Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Enhancement of Heat Transfer Using Taylor Vortices in Thermal Processing for Food Process Intensification

Written By

Hayato Masuda

Submitted: 05 July 2021 Reviewed: 14 July 2021 Published: 10 August 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99443

From the Edited Volume

A Glance at Food Processing Applications

Edited by Işıl Var and Sinan Uzunlu

Chapter metrics overview

304 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


We are witnessing a transition from the traditional to novel processing technologies in the food industry to address the issues regarding energy, environment, food, and water resources. This chapter first introduces the concept of food process intensification based on vortex technologies to all food engineers/researchers. Thereafter, the novel processing methods for starch gelatinization/hydrolysis and heat sterilization based on Taylor–Couette flow are reviewed. In fluid mechanics communities, the Taylor–Couette flow is well-known as a flow between coaxial cylinders with the inner cylinder rotating. Recently, this unique flow has been applied in food processing. In starch processing, enhanced heat transfer through Taylor vortex flow significantly improves gelatinization. In addition, effective and moderate mixing leads to an increase in the reducing sugar yield. In sterilization processing, the enhanced heat transfer also intensifies the thermal destruction of Clostridium botulinum. However, a moderate heat transfer should be ensured because excessive heat transfer also induces thermal destruction of the nutritional components. The Taylor–Couette flow is only an example considered here. There are various flows that intensify the heat/mass transfer and mixing in food processing. It is expected that this chapter will stimulate the development of food processing based on fluid technologies, toward food process intensification.


  • food process intensification
  • thermal processing
  • Taylor–Couette flow
  • starch hydrolysis
  • heat sterilization

1. Introduction

In manufacturing processes, including those specific to the food industry, sustainable development is necessary because there is a limit on the energy and other resources. To achieve this goal, chemical industries have considered process intensification (PI) that might result in a paradigm shift. Although the definition of PI is still under discussion, a dramatic reduction in the process size is one of the common goals. One of the methods to achieve size reduction is the enhancement of transport rates, such as momentum, heat, and mass. For example, Harvey [1] successfully showed that, in the ester saponification process, the apparatus size was reduced by one-tenth compared with a traditional batch reactor, using an oscillatory baffled reactor exhibiting an excellent mixing performance. Therefore, PI technologies would bring about innovation in all the manufacturing processes. In fact, the introduction of PI technologies has promoted various processes, for example, bio-pharmaceutical processes [2, 3]. The concept of PI should also be applied to food processing to establish energy/resource-saving processing. However, PI has not gained significant attention in the food industry. Boom et al. [4] analyzed three reasons for this: 1) food processing is largely based on traditional methods; 2) processing costs represent a small fraction of the total cost of food production, with the raw material representing the major portion of the total cost in most cases; and 3) the requirement of absolute food safety is a necessary obstacle to processing innovation. However, we should consider the transition from traditional food processing to novel processing by leveraging PI technologies, considering the environment, energy, and increasing population.

Few researchers have attempted to accomplish food process intensification by controlling fluid (liquid food) motion to enhance the mixing and heat/mass transfer. For example, Müller et al. [5] proposed a novel UV-C treatment device for juices based on the Dean vortex technology. Dean vortex flow occurs in a coiled tube owing to centrifugal instability [6]. They successfully showed that the Dean vortex flow promoted the inactivation of microorganisms because the fluid element is more frequently transported to the irradiation region through convective motion. Zhang et al. [7] successfully demonstrated the efficient manufacturing method of Fuzhu (also known as Yuba) through Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Rayleigh–Bénard convection is the flow between horizontal planes whose temperature at the lower plane is higher than that at the upper plane [8]. The driving cause underlying the Rayleigh–Bénard convection is the local distribution of the fluid density. Therefore, the novel concept based on fluid engineering has the potential for innovation in food processing.

In this chapter, aiming toward food process intensification, the application of a unique vortex flow between rotating cylinders (Taylor–Couette flow) to thermal processing is introduced.


2. Taylor–Couette flow

Taylor [9] first discovered and analyzed the unique vortex flow generated between cylinders with the inner cylinder rotating. This flow experiences several transitions with an increase in the rotational speed of the inner cylinder. The flow dynamics are characterized by the Reynolds number [Re = ρRiωd/η] in the circumferential direction, where ρ, Ri, ω, d, and η are the fluid density, inner cylinder radius, rotational speed of the inner cylinder, gap width, and fluid viscosity, respectively. At a relatively low Re, a Couette flow is observed with no pressure gradient in the flow direction. When Re exceeds a critical Re (Recr), toroidal vortices appear to be counter-rotating, spaced regularly along the axis, as shown in Figure 1. These vortices are called Taylor vortex flows. In addition, each vortex cell is called a Taylor cell. The value of Recr that depends on the radius ratio Ri/Ro, was theoretically derived by Taylor [9]. After the initial transition, as Re increases, the Taylor vortex flow cascadingly transitions to a singly periodic wavy vortex flow, quasi-periodic wavy vortex flow, and weakly turbulent wavy vortex flow [10, 11]. Finally, the flow develops into a fully turbulent vortex flow. The dynamics of the Taylor–Couette flow are interesting from the viewpoint of not only fluid mechanics, but also process engineering because this flow system has few advantageous characteristics as a reactor. First, mixing and heat/mass transfer are enhanced by the toroidal motion within the Taylor cells. Second, each Taylor cell is extruded through a single file without breakdown when a small axial flow is added. In addition, mass transfer between the Taylor cells is prevented by an inward boundary where an inward secondary flow is formed. This implies that the axial dispersion that is a negative factor for uniform processing, is suppressed, while local mixing and heat/mass transfer are enhanced. Therefore, the continuous and uniform production is possible using this flow system as a reactor. Since Kataoka et al. [12] reported the excellent performance of Taylor–Couette flow in a chemical reactor, Taylor–Couette flow has been applied to various chemical processes, such as emulsion polymerization [13], photocatalytic reaction [14], particle synthesis [15], reverse osmosis [16], particle classification [17], and gas absorption [18]. According to these studies, the Taylor–Couette flow reactor has the potential to effectively intensify the processes compared with a traditional reactor, such as stirred tank reactor. In fact, among the chemical engineering communities, it is well-known that the Taylor–Couette reactor enables PI. Furthermore, few researchers have suggested that the Taylor–Couette flow apparatus is suitable for processes with shear-sensitive materials, such as food and bio-processes because the local strong shear force is absent. Haut et al. [19] applied the Taylor–Couette flow to the cultivation of CHO cells and reported the possibility of the Taylor–Couette flow-based bioreactor. To the best of our knowledge, the research conducted by Giordano et al. [20] is the first attempt of applying the Taylor–Couette flow in food processes. They showed that fructose–glucose isomerization could be efficiently conducted using a Taylor–Couette flow reactor. Subsequently, few researchers reported the excellent performance of Taylor–Couette flow in the non-thermal inactivation of bacteria in juice [21, 22, 23]. Although the application of Taylor–Couette flow to food processes is rather limited to non-thermal processing, efficient heat transfer by Taylor vortices should be utilized in thermal processing. Few research groups including the author have been trying to intensify thermal food processing based on Taylor–Couette flow. The intensification of starch processing and heat sterilization is introduced in this chapter.

Figure 1.

Taylor–Couette flow: (a) schematic picture and (b) flow visualization. The left and right figures show the laminar Taylor vortex flow and wavy vortex flow, respectively. The black band corresponds to inflow boundaries.


3. Food process intensification using Taylor–Couette flow

3.1 Intensification of starch processing

Starch is typically a biopolymer that consists of 25% amylose (linear structure) and 75% amylopectin (branched structure). Detailed information on starch from the viewpoint of chemistry is reviewed in other articles [24]. Starch processing is frequently encountered in the manufacturing process of various types of food, such as beer, beverages, bread, and sauce. From a practical viewpoint, one of the most important types of starch processing is starch hydrolysis that comprises gelatinization, liquefaction, and saccharification. Enzymatic hydrolysis is described in this chapter because it is more prevalent than the other starch modifications, such as thermal and chemical treatment [25, 26]. In the starch hydrolysis process, the fluid viscosity intricately changes, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Viscosity change at various shear rates during starch gelatinization/liquefaction/saccharification [27].

A significant increase in the viscosity was observed during gelatinization. Further, when enzyme (α-amylase) is added, the viscosity decreases as starch chains are broken down into glucose, maltose, maltotriose, and few higher oligomers. This intricate viscosity change is not favorable to the food engineers because the key operation is different between gelatinization and enzymatic liquefaction/saccharification processes. During gelatinization, heat transfer from the heated surface due to starch suspension and mass transfer between starch grains and water are required. In liquefaction/saccharification, highly efficient mixing of gelatinized starch and a small amount of enzyme is the most important operation. Therefore, individual apparatuses must be used. Consequently, the total size of starch hydrolysis process becomes large, as Baruque et al. indicated [28].

To make the total size compact, Baks et al. proposed the simultaneous and continuous processing of gelatinization and liquefaction/saccharification using an extruder [29, 30]. As shown in their studies, even at a high concentration of starch (600 g/L), gelatinization was completely conducted using the extruder. However, a high shear force was applied to the starch suspension in the extruder. This high shear force induces inactivation of the enzyme (α-amylase) [31, 32]. Therefore, other apparatuses such as stirred vessels are necessary for liquefaction/saccharification after gelatinization [30]. Paolucci-Jeanjean et al. [33] proposed a unique membrane reactor to conduct enzymatic hydrolysis using only one apparatus. However, the starch concentration was limited to 150 g/L because of the absence of mechanical agitation.

To intensify starch hydrolysis using a single apparatus, Masuda et al., Hubacz et al., and Matsumoto et al. applied a Taylor–Couette flow reactor for continuous starch hydrolysis [27, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39]. The features of the Taylor–Couette flow are described in the previous section. Taylor–Couette flow enhances not only mixing, but also heat/mass transfer. Therefore, it is expected that both gelatinization, where heat/mass transfer is necessary and liquefaction/saccharification, where mixing is necessary, are intensified using a single Taylor–Couette flow reactor.

As an example, a Taylor–Couette flow reactor utilized by Masuda et al. [35] is shown in Figure 3. The reactor consisted of a rotating inner cylinder, a stationary outer cylinder, and two divided water jackets. A starch suspension was introduced into the inlet. The enzyme was continuously fed using a syringe pump from the port set in the middle of the reactor. Therefore, the first and second half parts of the reactor were regarded as corresponding to the gelatinization and liquefaction/saccharification processes, respectively. High-temperature water was pumped in the first water jacket to promote gelatinization. Furthermore, moderate temperature water was pumped into the second water jacket to avoid the thermal deactivation of α-amylase.

Figure 3.

Taylor–Couette flow reactor used for starch processing [35]: (1) stationary outer cylinder, (2) rotational inner cylinder, (3) starch suspension, (4) hot water for gelatinization, (5) variable temperature water for enzymatic reaction, (6) enzyme injection port, (7) insulator.

The effects of Taylor vortices on starch gelatinization and hydrolysis were experimentally and numerically investigated in detail. Figure 4 shows the impact of Taylor vortex flow on the degree of starch gelatinization (DSG). A high value of DSG was obtained when Taylor vortices were formed because the Taylor vortex flow enhanced the heat transfer from the heating surface. It should be noted that microscopic mass transfer around the starch granules was not considered in their simulation [36].

Figure 4.

Dependence of DSG (degree of starch gelatinization), obtained via two-dimensional simulation, on the rotational speed of inner cylinder (ω) [36]. The water jacket temperature, Thj, was assumed to be 65°C.

However, ascertaining whether Taylor vortices are formed within the reactor is not straightforward because the reactor is enwrapped in water jackets made of stainless steel. Therefore, to simulate the fluid flow in the reactor during starch gelatinization, Hubacz et al. [36] empirically established a mathematical model to describe the change in the rheological properties in response to gelatinization, as follows:


where n [−] and γ̇ [1/s] are the rheological model parameter and shear rate, respectively. Figure 5 shows the axial velocity distribution near the inlet when the initial concentration of starch, C0, is 50 g/L at the following values of ω: (a) 10 and (b) 22 rad/s. As clearly shown in Figure 5, at ω = 10 rad/s, it is confirmed that there are no Taylor vortices, except near the inlet because of the lower centrifugal force. Therefore, the rheological model is reasonably advantageous for the practical design of the starch gelatinization process based on Taylor–Couette flow. In addition, as Van Den Einde et al. [40] indicated, starch granule degradation by thermomechanical treatment should also be considered. Hubacz et al. [36] confirmed that, as shown in Figure 6, there was no mechanical destruction of starch granules, and thermal degradation was not visible. Therefore, Taylor–Couette flow is suitable for the intensification of starch gelatinization owing to the efficient heat transfer without violent shear force.

Figure 5.

Velocity distribution near the inlet during gelatinization at C0 = 50 g/L, ω = (a) 10 rad/s and (b) 22 rad/s. The circles in the figures denote vortex motion.

Figure 6.

Structure of starch observed using a light microscope: (a) native starch, gelatinized starch after treatment at (b) u = 0.099 cm/s, ω = 11.56 rad/s, Thj = 60°C, (c) u = 0.099 cm/s, ω = 19.56 rad/s, Thj = 65°C and (d) u = 0.099 cm/s, ω = 19.56 rad/s, Thj = 85°C [36].

The Taylor–Couette flow reactor intensifies starch gelatinization and liquefaction/saccharification. Figure 7 shows that the relationship between the concentration of reducing sugar and effective Reynolds number at C0 = 50, 150, and 300 g/L for the axial velocity u of 0.024 cm/s. It is noted that the flow condition was evaluated by the effective Reynolds number Reeff because the apparent viscosity spatially changes due to the shear-thinning property of starch suspension. The detailed procedure for defining and calculating Reeff is described in a paper by Masuda et al. [41]. As clearly shown in Figure 7, a higher yield of reducing sugar is obtained through the operation above Recr (dashed line in the figure) in all cases of C0. Remarkably, starch is continuously and efficiently hydrolyzed even at relatively high concentrations of the starch suspension. The maximum yield is comparable to that obtained using a stirred batch reactor. Therefore, the conversion from batch to continuous is possible for food process intensification. However, a slight decrease in the yield was observed at higher Reeff values. This decrease is explained by the axial dispersion and destabilization of the vortex structure during the enzymatic reaction [27]. At higher Re, a wavy motion is observed (called the wavy Taylor vortex flow). The wavy vortex flow significantly enhances mixing and heat/mass transfer within Taylor cells; furthermore, this also leads to axial dispersion through by-pass flow [42]. According to Richter et al. [43, 44], Taylor vortices can be stabilized and immobilized by a ribbed inner cylinder, as shown in Figure 8.

Figure 7.

Relation between the yield of reducing sugar (Crs/C0) and effective Reynolds number (Reeff) at C0 = 50, 150, 300 g/L, u = 0.024 cm/s, Thj = 45°C [39]. The dashed line denotes the critical Re (Recr) where Taylor vortices are fully formed.

Figure 8.

Ribbed inner cylinder system [27]: (a) picture and (b) cross-sectional view of a pair of Taylor vortices between ribs.

Consequently, the axial dispersion was suppressed even at a higher Re. Masuda et al. [27] successfully showed that the decrease in the yield at a higher Reeff is suppressed by the equipment of ribs in the inner cylinder, as shown in Figure 9. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 10, the yield of small saccharides (glucose, maltose, and maltotriose) was significantly enhanced by utilizing the ribbed inner cylinder. This is because the ribbed inner cylinder enables the enhancement of mixing, while the axial dispersion is suppressed at a higher Re. Finally, the effect of the axial velocity on the reducing sugar yield at C0 = 150 g/L is shown in Figure 11.

Figure 9.

Effect of Reeff on Crs/C0 with three types of cylinders (Lrib = 0, 50, 100 mm) at u = 0.024 cm/s in starch hydrolysis experiments [27]. Lrib refers to the length of the ribbed section from the outlet.

Figure 10.

Effect of Css/C0 on Reeff with three types of cylinders (Lrib = 0, 50, 100 mm) at u = 0.024 cm/s [27]. Css refers to small saccharide concentration.

Figure 11.

Effect of axial velocity on Crs/C0 at C0 = 150 g/L [39].

At a higher axial velocity (u = 0.048 cm/s), the yield monotonically increases with Reeff without a decrease at a higher Reeff. Masuda et al. [39] explained that the transition from laminar Taylor vortex flow to wavy Taylor vortex flow occurs at a higher Reeff than at a lower u because the axial flow enhances the stability of the Taylor vortex flow [45]. This should be investigated from the viewpoint of fluid mechanics. Nevertheless, the Taylor–Couette flow reactor promotes innovation in starch processing, for example, dramatic size reduction, high efficiency, and energy saving.

3.2 Intensification of heat sterilization processing

Heat sterilization is important for human health. Although novel technologies such as ultraviolet, ultrasonic, high-pressure, and cold plasma have been utilized [46], thermal sterilization plays a major role in the food industry. Recently, ohmic heating has recently been applied to heat sterilization processes [47]. However, the principle of scale-up for industries is under consideration. A traditional heat sterilizer, including a double-pipe, plate, and scrapped surface heat exchanger, faces problems such as clogging and high-pressure loss in the case of highly viscous liquid food. Therefore, heat sterilizers should be utilized for food process intensification. We consider the functions of an ideal sterilizer as follows:

  1. High heat transfer performance in rapid heating;

  2. Low shear force to avoid mechanical degradation of nutritional component;

  3. Low pressure loss for saving energy.

These three functions are satisfied by adequately controlling the motion of liquid food. For example, chaotic advection and Dean vortex flow enable efficient and continuous heat sterilization [48, 49]. Taylor–Couette flow also offers a novel heat sterilization process. As described in the previous section, the Taylor–Couette flow offers efficient and moderate heat transfer. In addition, the shear-thinning properties of many liquid foods should be considered. Another advantage is that a lower power is required for pumping because the apparent viscosity decreases owing to the rotation of the inner cylinder. The Taylor–Couette flow sterilizer has the potential for food process intensification. Masuda et al. [50, 51, 52] numerically investigated the performance of a Taylor–Couette flow sterilizer. They assumed the sterilization process of highly viscous liquid food such as mayonnaise or ketchup, including the thermal destruction of the spores of Clostridium botulinum and the retention of thiamine.

Figure 12 shows the computational domain used in [51]. To eliminate the effect of back flows through Taylor vortex flow at the outlet, an extended section is imposed where the inner cylinder is stationary. This attempt does not affect the simulation results. They have solved the conservation equations of mass, momentum, heat, and chemical species, as follows [51]:

Figure 12.

Computational domain: (a) three-dimensional view without an extended section, (b) cross-sectional view with an extended section [51].


where u is the velocity, p is the pressure, ρ is the density, η is the viscosity depending on the shear rate, D (= (∇u + ∇uT) /2) is the rate of deformation tensor, g is the gravitational acceleration, α is the coefficient of volume expansion, T is the temperature, Tref is the reference temperature, λ is the thermal conductivity, Cp is the specific heat capacity, C is the concentration, Dc is the diffusion coefficient, and S is the scalar source term. Because this simulation was assumed to be in a steady state, the time derivative term is omitted in Eqs. (2)(5). It was assumed that the model fluid had a moderate shear-thinning property. According to Horak and Kessler [53], the thermal destruction of thiamine is followed by a second-order reaction model. The decrease in thiamine concentration due to destruction was included in the sink term, S, as shown in Eq. (5). Detailed information on the numerical procedure is described in [51]. The simulation code was validated.

Figure 13 shows the temperature distribution with the velocity vectors near the inlet at various values of Reeff. In the case of Reeff = 101.1 and 172.6 (Figure 13(c) and (d)), Taylor vortices were fully developed near the inlet, and consequently, heat transfer from the surface of the outer cylinder was significantly enhanced. This enhancement of the heat transfer is clearly confirmed from the bulk temperature distribution along the axis, as shown in Figure 14.

Figure 13.

Normalized bulk temperature distribution with velocity vectors in r-z plane near the inlet at (a) Reeff = 0 (ω = 0 rad/s), (b) Reeff = 43.7 (ω = 20 rad/s), (c) Reeff = 101.1 (ω = 35 rad/s), (d) Reeff = 172.6 (ω = 50 rad/s) [51].

Figure 14.

Normalized bulk temperature distribution along the axis [51].

To investigate the performance of heat sterilization, the equivalent lethality, F0, was calculated from the temperature distribution. The value of F0 is calculated as follows:


where Ea is the activation energy for the destruction of Clostridium botulinum, and R is the gas constant. Finally, the local value of F0 at an arbitrary axial position z is calculated as follows:


Figure 15 shows the axial distribution of F0 along the axis. The significant increase in F0 (higher than F0 = 500 s) is observed under the condition at which Taylor vortices are developed (Reeff = 101.1 and 172.6), as shown in Figure 15. This result indicates that Taylor–Couette flow has the potential to intensify the heat sterilization process. Figure 16 shows the retention performance of thiamine during the sterilization process. Comparing the result at Reeff = 101.1 with that at Reeff = 172.6, it is confirmed from Figure 15 that there is no clear difference in F0. In addition, a clear difference in the thermal destruction of thiamine is not observed in Figure 16. Nevertheless, Ilo and Berghofer [54] indicated the mechanical destruction of thiamine by shear force. Therefore, the operation at Reeff = 101.1, is preferable because of the lower shear force. It is valuable to investigate the effect of shear force on thiamine destruction in the future.

Figure 15.

Equivalent lethality distribution along the axis [51].

Figure 16.

Normalized thiamine concentration distribution along the axis [51].

Finally, the characteristics of energy consumption that are important for practical applications, are shown in Figure 17. In Figure 17, the energy consumption was calculated from the shear stress at the surface of the inner cylinder, as follows:

Figure 17.

Effect of power consumption on rheological properties in Taylor–Couette flow sterilizer.


where τ is the component of the shear stress tensor at the surface of the inner cylinder, and dA is the differential surface of the inner cylinder. It is noted that the value of n indicates the strength of the shear-thinning property. For Newtonian fluids, n corresponds to 1. Remarkably, Figure 17 shows that the power consumption significantly decreases with an increase in the shear-thinning property because the apparent viscosity decreases owing to the shear force generated by the rotation of the inner cylinder. Therefore, the Taylor–Couette flow sterilizer enables energy-saving sterilization processing of liquid foods with shear-thinning properties.


4. Conclusions

In this chapter, novel food processing utilizing Taylor–Couette flow was introduced for food process intensification. As examples, starch processing and heat sterilization processes were specifically selected. With respect to starch processing, continuous and efficient gelatinization/liquefaction/saccharification were successfully conducted even in the case of high-concentration starch suspension. In addition, no clear thermal degradation of the starch granules was observed. Therefore, in the future, Taylor–Couette flow could be practically utilized in industries. In heat sterilization processing, enhancement of heat transfer by Taylor–Couette flow significantly improved the thermal destruction of Clostridium botulinum. Actually, the sufficient value of F0 (higher than F0 = 500 s) was obtained due to Taylor vortices. Based on the lethality, thermal destruction of nutritional components such as thiamine and mechanical destruction by shear force, the optimum operational conditions were proposed.

Taylor–Couette flow has the potential to intensify other processes as well. For example, an appropriate mixing performance of Taylor vortices would facilitate the manufacturing of sophisticated emulsions, such as multiple emulsions. Furthermore, other fluid techniques, such as chaotic advection, could incorporate novel processing. This chapter provides all food engineers with new insights into food process intensification.



Researches, introduced in this chapter, by the author was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers JP18H03853, JP19KK0127, 20 K21110 and JP21K14450) and the Food Science Institute Foundation.


Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.



Cthiamine concentration [mg/L]
Cpspecific heat capacity [kJ/kg⋅K]
Crsreducing sugar concentration [g/L]
Csssmall saccharide concentration [g/L]
C0initial concentration of starch [g/L]
Drate of deformation tensor [1/s]
dgap width [−]
Dcdiffusion coefficient [m2/s]
Eactivation energy [kJ/mol]
Eaactivation energy for destruction of spores [kJ/mol]
F0lethality [s]
ggravity acceleration [m/s2]
Llength of cylinders [m]
Lelength of extended section of cylinders [m]
Lriblength of ribbed section from outlet [mm]
npower index [−]
Rgas constant [J/mol⋅K]
rradial position [m]
ReReynolds number [−]
Riouter diameter of inner cylinder [m]
Roinner radius of outer cylinder [m]
Sscalar source term [mg/L⋅s]
Ttemperature [K]
Thjheat jacket temperature [K]
uvelocity [m/s]
uaxial velocity [m/s]
ppressure [Pa]
zaxial position [m]
Greek letters
αcoefficient of volume expansion [1/K]
βcharacteristic time [s]
γ̇shear-rate [1/s]
ηfluid viscosity [Pa⋅s]
η0zero shear rate viscosity [Pa⋅s]
λThermal conductivity [W/m⋅K]
ρfluid density [kg/m3]
τresidence time [s]
ωangular velocity of inner cylinder [rad/s]


  1. 1. Harvey AP, Mackley MR, Stonestreet P. Operation and optimization of an oscillatory flow continuous reactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2001;40:5371-5377. DOI: 10.1021/ie0011223
  2. 2. Shallan AI, Priest C. Microfluidic process intensification for synthesis and formulation in the pharmaceutical industry. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification. 2019;142:107559. DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2019.107559
  3. 3. Satyawali Y, Vanbroekhoven K, Dejonghe W. Process intensification: The future for enzymatic processes?. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2017;121:196-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2017.01.016
  4. 4. Boom RM, van der Goot AJ, Janssen AEM, Schroën KGPH. Food process intensification for better sustain-ability. In: Proceedings of 11th International Congress on Engineering and Food; 22-26 May 2011; Athnes; FMS1276
  5. 5. Müller A, R. Stahl M, Graef V, M.A.P. Franz C, Huch M. UV-C treatment of juices to inactivate microorganisms using Dean vortex technology. Journal of Food Engineering. 2011;107:268-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.05.026
  6. 6. Dean WR, Hurst JM. Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Mathematika. 1959;6:77-85. DOI: 10.1112/S0025579300001947
  7. 7. Zhang J, Peng X, Guo S. Protein-lipid film (fuzhu) prepared from soymilk: Effects of soymilk convection on its formation, composition, and quality. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 2021;141:110909. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110909
  8. 8. Bodenschatz E, Pesch W, Ahlers G. Recent developments in Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2000;32:709-778. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.709
  9. 9. Taylor GI. VIII. Stability of a viscous liquid contained between two rotating cylinders. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 1923;223:289-343. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1923.0008
  10. 10. Di Prima RC, Swinney HL. Instabilities and transition in flow between concentric rotating cylinder. In: Swinney HL, Gollub JP, editors. Hydrodynamic Instabilities and the Transition to Turbulence. Berlin: Springer; 1981. p. 139-180
  11. 11. Kataoka K. Taylor vortices and instabilities in circular Couette flows. In: Cheremisinoff, editor. Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics. Houston: Gulf Publications; 1986. p. 236-274
  12. 12. Kataoka K, Doi H, Hongo T, Futagawa M. Ideal plug-flow properties of Taylor vortex flow. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 1975;8:472-476. DOI:
  13. 13. Kataoka K, Ohmura N, Kouzu M, Simamura Y, Okubo M. Emulsion polymerization of styrene in a continuous Taylor vortex flow reactor. Chemical Engineering Science. 1995;50:1409-1416. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(94)00515-S
  14. 14. Sczechowski JG, Koval CA, Noble RD. A Taylor vortex reactor for heterogeneous photocatalysis. Chemical Engineering Science. 1995;50:3163-3173. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(95)00176-6
  15. 15. Ogihara T, Matsuda G, Yanagawa T, Ogata N, Fujita K, Nomura M. Continuous synthesis of monodispersed silica particles using Couette-Taylor vortex flow. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan. 1995; 103:151-154. DOI: 10.2109/jcersj.103.151 10.2109/jcersj.103.151
  16. 16. Lee S, Lueptow RM. Rotating reverse osmosis: a dynamic model for flux and rejection. Journal of Membrane Science. 2001;192:129-143. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00493-8
  17. 17. Saomoto K, Horie T, Kumagai N, Takigawa T, Noui-Mehidi MN, Ohmura N. Dispersion of floating particles in a Taylor vortex flow reactor. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 2010;43:319-325. DOI: 10.1252/jcej.09We07
  18. 18. Masuda H, Zheng W. Horie T, Ohmura N. Enhancement of gas hold-up with a Taylor vortex flow system equipped with ribs. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 2013;46:27-32. DOI: 10.1252/jcej.12we067
  19. 19. Haut B, Ben Amor H, Coulon L, Jacquet A, Halloin V. Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in a Couette–Taylor bioreactor for the culture of animal cells. Chemical Engineering Science. 2003;58:777-784. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00607-3
  20. 20. Giordano RLC, Giordano RC, Cooney CL. Performance of a continuous Taylor–Couette–Poiseuille vortex flow enzymic reactor with suspended particles. Process Biochemistry. 2000;35:1093-1101. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00143-6
  21. 21. Forney LJ, Pierson JA, Ye Z. Juice Irradiation with Taylor-Couette flow: UV inactivation of Escherichia coli. Journal of Food Protection. 2004;67:2410-2415. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-67.11.2410
  22. 22. Milly PJ, Toledo RT, Kerr WL, Armstead D. Hydrodynamic cavitation: characterization of a novel design with energy considerations for the inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in apple juice. Journal of Food Science. 2008;73:M298-M303. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00827.x
  23. 23. Orlowska M, Koutchma T, Kostrzynska M, Tang J, Defelice C. Evaluation of mixing flow conditions to inactivate Escherichia coli in opaque liquids using pilot-scale Taylor–Couette UV unit. Journal of Food Engineering. 2014;120:100-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.07.020
  24. 24. Ellis RP, Cochrane MP, Dale MFB, Duffus CM, Lynn A, Morrison IM, Prentice RDM, Swanston JS, Tiller SA. Starch production and industrial use. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1998;77:289-311. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199807)77:3<289::AID-JSFA38>3.0.CO;2-D
  25. 25. Tester RF, Debon SJJ. Annealing of starch — a review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2000;27:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-8130(99)00121-X
  26. 26. Tharanathan RN. Starch — Value addition by modification. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2005;45:371-384. DOI: 10.1080/10408390590967702
  27. 27. Matsumoto M, Masuda H, Hubacz R, Horie T, Iyota Y, Shimoyamada M, Ohmura N. Enzymatic starch hydrolysis performance of Taylor-Couette flow reactor with ribbed inner cylinder. Chemical Engineering Science. 2021;231:116270. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116270
  28. 28. Baruque EA, Baruque MDA, Sant’Anna GL. Babassu coconut starch liquefaction: An industrial scale approach to improve conversion yield. Bioresource Technology. 2000;75:49-55. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00026-2
  29. 29. Baks T, Ngene IS, van Soest JJG, Janssen AEM, Boom RM. Comparison of methods to determine the degree of gelatinization for both high and low starch concentrations. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2007;67:481-490. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.016
  30. 30. Baks T, Kappen FHJ, Janssen AEM, Boom RM. Towards an optimal process for gelatinisation and hydrolysis of highly concentrated starch–water mixtures with alpha-amylase from B. licheniformis. Journal of Cereal Science. 2008; 47:214-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.03.011
  31. 31. Özbek B, Yüceer S. α-Amylase inactivation during wheat starch hydrolysis process. Process Biochemistry. 2001;37:87-95. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00175-3
  32. 32. van der Veen ME, Van Iersel DGV, van der Goot AJ. Shear-induced inactivation of α-amylase in a plain shear field. Biotechnology Progress. 2004;20:1140-1145. DOI: 10.1021/bp049976w
  33. 33. Paolucci-Jeanjean D, Belleville MP, Rios GM, Zakhia N. Kinetics of continuous starch hydrolysis in a membrane reactor. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2000;6:233-238. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00092-9
  34. 34. Hubacz R, Buczyńska M. Starch gelatinisation in Couette-Taylor flow apparatus. Chemical and Process Engineering. 2011;4:267-279. DOI: 10.2478/v10176-011-0021-7
  35. 35. Masuda H, Horie T, Hubacz R, Ohmura N. Process intensification of continuous starch hydrolysis with a Couette–Taylor flow reactor. Chemical Engineering Researh and Design. 2013;91:2259-2264. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.08.026
  36. 36. Hubacz R, Ohmura N, Dłuska E. Intensification of Starch Processing Using Apparatus with Couette–Taylor Flow. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2013;36:774-785. DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12046
  37. 37. Masuda H, Horie T, Hubacz R, Ohmura N. Numerical and experimental investigation of continuous starch hydrolysis with a Couette–Taylor flow reactor. In: Proceedings The 24th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena (ISTP 24) ; 1-5 November 2013; Yamaguchi. Japan; 2013. p. 402-407
  38. 38. Hubacz R, Masuda H, Horie T, Ohmura N. Thermal treatment of starch slurry in Couette-Taylor flow apparatus. Chemical and Process Engineering. 2017;38:345-361. DOI: 10.1515/cpe-2017-0027
  39. 39. Masuda H, Horie T, Hubacz R, Ohmura N, Shimoyamada M. Process development of starch hydrolysis using mixing characteristics of Taylor vortices. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 2017;81:1-7. DOI: 10.1080/09168451.2017.1282806
  40. 40. Van Den Einde RM, Van Der Goot AJ, Boom RM. Understanding molecular weight reduction of starch during heating-shearing processes. Journal of Food Science. 2008;68:2396-2404. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb07036.x
  41. 41. Masuda H, Horie T, Hubacz R, Ohta M, Ohmura N. Prediction of onset of Taylor-Couette instability for shear-thinning fluids. Rheologica Acta. 2017;56:73-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00397-016-0987-7
  42. 42. Lueptow RM, Docter A, Min K. Stability of axial flow in an annulus with a rotating inner cylinder. Physics of Fluids. 1992;4:2446-2455. DOI: 10.1063/1.858485
  43. 43. Richter O, Hoffmann H, Kraushaar-Czarnetzki B. Effect of the rotor shape on the mixing characteristics of a continuous flow Taylor-vortex reactor. Chemical Engineering Science. 2008;63:3504-3513. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.04.003
  44. 44. Richter O, Menges M, Kraushaar-Czarnetzki B. Investigation of mixing in a rotor shape modified Taylor-vortex reactor by the means of a chemical test reaction. Chemical Engineering Science. 2009;64:2384-2391. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.02.015
  45. 45. Wereley ST, Lueptow RM. Velocity field for Taylor–Couette flow with an axial flow. Physics of Fluids. 1999;11:3637-3649. DOI: 10.1063/1.870228
  46. 46. Li X, Farid M. A review on recent development in non-conventional food sterilization technologies. Journal of Food Engineering. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.02.026
  47. 47. Tiravibulsin C, Lorjaroenphon Y, Udompijitkul P, Kamonpatana P. Sterilization of coconut milk in flexible packages via ohmic-assisted thermal sterilizer. LWT. 2021;147:111552. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111552
  48. 48. Kelder JDH, Ptasinski KJ, Kerkhof PJAM. Power-law foods in continuous coiled sterilisers. Chemical Engineering Science. 2002;57:4605-4615. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00321-4
  49. 49. Tian S, Barigou M. Using chaotic advection to enhance the continuous heat-hold-cool sterilisation process. Innovatice Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2016;34:352-366. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.03.007
  50. 50. Masuda H, Horie T, Ohmura N, Shimoyamada M. Intensification of heat sterilization process for liquid foods using Taylor–Couette flow system. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2017;57:1753-1758. DOI: 10.3303/CET1757293
  51. 51. Masuda H, Hubacz R, Shimoyamada M, Ohmura N. Numerical simulation of sterilization process for shear-thinning food in Taylor–Couette flow system. Chemical Engineering & Technology. 2019; 42:859-866. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201800600
  52. 52. Masuda H, Hubacz R, Ohmura N, Shimoyamada M. Effect of rheological properties of liquid foods on heat sterilization process in Taylor–Couette flow apparatus. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2019;75:31-36. DOI: 10.3303/CET1975006
  53. 53. Horak F, Kessler H. Thermische Thiaminschädigung—Eine Reaktion 2. Ordnung. Zeitschrift Lebensmittal Untersuchung-und Forschung A. 1981;173:1-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF01042831
  54. 54. Ilo S, Berghofer E. Kinetics of thermomechanical destruction of thiamin during extrusion cooking. Journal of Food Science. 1998;63:312-316. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb15732.x

Written By

Hayato Masuda

Submitted: 05 July 2021 Reviewed: 14 July 2021 Published: 10 August 2021