Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Acrylic Polymers as Additives for Engine Oil: A Historical Perspective

Written By

Rabab M. Nasser

Submitted: 03 June 2021 Reviewed: 12 June 2021 Published: 28 June 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.98867

From the Edited Volume

Crude Oil - New Technologies and Recent Approaches

Edited by Manar Elsayed Abdel-Raouf and Mohamed Hasan El-Keshawy

Chapter metrics overview

274 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Oil undergoes temporary viscosity changes under operating conditions in engines. Therefore, engine oils usually contain polymeric additives called viscosity modifiers. These additives are oil soluble polymers; enable the oil to provide adequate hydrodynamic lubrication at high temperatures and good starting/pumping performance at low temperatures. Pour point depressants are additives which add to engine oil to lower/decrease the probability of wax argument formation under lower temperature conditions. The aim of this chapter is to present the historical synthesis of different types of acrylic polymers, there effect as lubricating oil additives (viscosity index improvers and pour point depressants). In addition, the mechanisms by which viscosity modifiers and pour point depressants work, and method of evaluation.

Keywords

  • Acrylic polymers
  • Free radical polymerization
  • Engine oil additives
  • Viscosity index improvers
  • Pour point depressants

1. Introduction

Almost all commercial manufacturing and general-use equipment have mating surfaces that rub against each other, creating a lot of wear and tear. There is always resistance between the mating surfaces as a result of frictional reactions. As a result of wear and tear, material is removed from the top surface. Lubricants create a protective layer between mating surfaces, minimizing friction and, hence, wear and tear. Lubrication is a technique that is commonly used to maintain a protective layer between moving surfaces in order to reduce frictional effects and material degradation due to wear and tear [1, 2, 3, 4].

1.1 Lubricant uses

The main functions of the lubricant may be dominated as follow:

  1. To reduce mating layer wear and tear by limiting direct surface-to-surface contact, particularly in metallic surfaces, by introducing a lubricating layer between mating layers [4, 5, 6].

  2. To decrease frictional heat-induced material surface loss and metallic surface expansion.

  3. To transport heat by acting as a heat dissipater or coolant [7, 8, 9, 10].

  4. It adds to relative motion smoothness.

  5. It lowers total maintenance expenditures.

  6. It minimizes power losses in internal combustion engines [11, 12, 13], etc.

1.2 Lubrication methods

The concepts of lubrication can be elucidated using the mechanisms described below.

1.2.1 Use of thick films for lubrication

The moving/sliding faces are isolated with a thick layer of liquid, with the purpose of allowing for occasional top layer to layer contact. The lubricant layer fills the space at the irregularities of mating layers and creates a not-so-thin layer between them, preventing immediate mating among the top layers of the material in use. As a result, wear and tear is greatly reduced. The lubrication oil must be consistent during typical operation in machine parts, and it must also remain viscous enough to isolate the layers [14, 15, 16, 17].

1.2.2 Lubrication through the use of thin films

Maintaining a continuous layer of lubricant between the mating surfaces can be problematic in some instances. Then a process is used in which the region between layers sliding over one another is lubricated by an adsorbing substance that, according to its adsorption qualities, remains on the higher layers. This reduces friction between moving peak regions of mated surfaces. Adsorption can occur as a result of physical or chemical attributes [18, 19, 20, 21, 22].

1.2.3 Extreme pressure lubrication

When the moving/sliding surfaces are subjected to strong loading, a high temperature is reached. Under such conditions, liquid lubricating oils fail to adhere and may crumble or even evaporate. To solve these ridiculous circumstances, unique additives are added to mineral oils. These are referred to as exceptional weight included compounds. On metal surfaces, these extra chemicals form more intense films (capable of withstanding high loads and temperatures). The most fundamental contained compounds are regular mixtures containing dynamic radicals [23, 24, 25, 26].

1.3 Type of lubricants

Lube oils are generally classified depending on their condition, which is as follows;

1.3.1 Lubricants in liquid form or lubricating oils

There are three types of oils:

1.3.1.1 Animal and vegetable oils

They are derived from unrefined fatty oils and vegetable extracts. They are also called bio-lubricants [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. They have a high degree of smoothness and, as a result, may stick to metallic surfaces for extended periods of time and under harsh conditions.

1.3.1.2 Mineral or petroleum oils

These are readily available and reasonably priced lubricants. They are relatively stable in regular operating settings and so commonly used. In general, bulkier chemicals are added to them to increase their oiliness. For example, oleic acid and stearic acid are added to improve oiliness [36, 37, 38, 39].

1.3.1.3 Blended oils

Because no individual oil provides all of the desired qualities, these are the most regularly utilized oils. These oils perform better and are often manufactured to order with the addition of larger molecular components [40, 41].

1.3.2 Semi-solid lubricants or grease

These are typically created by combining thickening additives with base oil. Grease can withstand heavy loads at low speeds but is a poor heat dissipater and is hence utilized in low temperature bearings [42, 43, 44, 45].

1.3.3 Lubricants in solid form

These are to be used when even grease cannot tolerate the temperature and pressure, when contamination must be avoided, when combustible lubricants are undesirable. They keep the lubricating film persistent even in conditions that grease cannot. To improve their adhesion to metallic layers, these are manufactured in powder form, dry form, and as coalescent [46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54].

1.4 The role and importance of engine oil

In addition to decreasing friction and wear, the engine lubricant is required to aid in sealing, cooling, protecting components against corrosion, cleaning surfaces of deposits, and transporting particles in suspension to the oil filter. All of this must be accomplished while fulfilling customer expectations for low costs and, in some circumstances, considerable intervals between oil changes.

The lubricant base stock, which accounts for 75 to 85 percent of the oil by volume, is a combination of hydrocarbons chosen to offer a starting point for viscosity and lubrication performance. The molecules that make up this base stock might be refined straight from crude oil or generated through chemical processing (synthetic lubricants).

In either scenario, the hydrocarbon compositions may be very similar, with the chemical makeup being more tightly controlled in synthetic oils. Depending on the hydrocarbon sources utilized to make the synthetic oil, it may also be free of the undesired sulfur and ash found in crude oils and which are costly to remove. The remaining lubricating oil is an additive package made up of a variety of chemical compounds chosen to give the anticipated lubrication performance [55].

1.5 Additives to engine oil

Engine oils are composed primarily of base oil, with the majority consisting of friction modifier additives used to increase performance. Typically, additives reduce wear, prevent oxidation, aid in dispersion, and add detergents to the base, which helps to keep the engine clean and improves viscosity index. Furthermore, the engine oil must maintain proper viscosity across a wide operating temperature range [56, 57, 58, 59, 60].

These features are carried by the additives added to base oil, which are necessary for the engine to run smoothly and efficiently. Oil is now produced with the stringent demands of today’s engines in mind. The amount of additives ranges from 5 to 30% from total engine oil, Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Main components of engine oil.

This, without a doubt, makes them tough and costly to create, but they can now be tailored to meet the application they are required to serve for engine safety and economical fuel efficiency. They can also be engineered to be exceedingly stable at both low and high temperatures. We will discuss viscosity index improvers and pour point depressants for lube oil.

1.5.1 Viscosity index improvers

The viscosity of hydrocarbon lubricants varies dramatically with temperature — roughly. Two orders of magnitude between cold ambient and full-load oil operating temperature for an unaltered mixture. Because of this reliance, ensuring adequate oil flow under all operating conditions and effectively balancing supply and leakage rates for acceptable lubrication of important surfaces is particularly difficult. Long-chain polymers called viscosity index improvers coil up at low temperatures and uncoil as the temperature rises [61, 62, 63].

As temperatures drop, the viscosity of ordinary petroleum oil increases, making it flow more slowly; conversely, as temperatures rise, the oil thins out and flows more freely, Figure 2. When there are large fluctuations in ambient temperature, it is often advantageous to use an oil whose viscosity remains as close to the ideal value as feasible despite the temperature fluctuation.

Figure 2.

Mechanism of viscosity index improvers.

The “viscosity index” (V.I) is the rate at which viscosity changes with temperature. A liquid’s viscosity is more consistent the greater its V.I. Depending on the source of the crude [paraffinic crude oils have the greatest natural viscosity index], lubricants extracted from crude oil by simple distillation can have a wide range of viscosity indexes. Viscosity index can be calculated according to ASTM D -2270-10 [64].

However, by adding a viscosity improver or viscosity modifier to an oil, the V.I can be increased. Long chain polymers with a very high molecular weight, such as polyisobutylene, polyacrylates or polymethacrylates, are commonly used as viscosity index improvers.

1.5.1.1 Mechanism of viscosity index improvement

Viscosity index improvers work by enhancing viscosity at high temperatures proportionally more than at low temperatures. Their behavior in oil shows that at higher temperatures, they distend or stretch, limiting flow and giving the oil more viscous qualities [62]. In doing so, they compensate to a significant extent for the oil’s tendency to thin out when heated. Increasing the molecular weight of a polymer increases its volume in an oil solution. Viscosity improvers respond to temperature in the same way that springs do. When cold, the molecules in the V.I improver contract and expand or thicken when heated. These changes in the physical properties of the V.I improver serve to adjust for variations in the basic oil stock. As a result, the oil’s temperature stability is improved throughout a wide temperature range [65].

1.5.2 Pour point depressants

All oils contain dissolved wax; however, the percentage of dissolved wax varies depending on the source of the oil. As the temperature dropped, the wax particles began to interlock like a sponge, attracting oil molecules into its microscopic pockets and so impeding oil transport [66, 67, 68].

Many approaches were employed to reduce the amount of wax in the generated oil, ranging from mechanical agitation to the inclusion of chemicals known as pour point depressants. The interaction mechanism of action of pour point depressants in oils is explained theoretically. Examples of these theories include adsorption, co-crystallization, nucleation, and improved wax solubility [69].

A good pour point depressant additive must have the following structural characteristics:

  • It must have a polymeric structure,

  • It must have both waxy and non-waxy components,

  • It must have a comb structure

  • It must have a balanced molecular weight distribution.

1.5.2.1 What is the mechanism of action of a pour point depressant?

Pour point depressants work by modifying the wax – crystal bond. The main question is how they work based on crystal size? This can happen through one of two ways:

1) adsorption onto the surface of newly formed crystals, or 2) co-crystallization with the precipitating wax [70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75]. Pour point can be evaluated using ASTM D 97–17 [76].

1.5.3 Rheological characteristics

Polymer molecules are mostly hydrocarbon compounds. When dissolved in oil, they form a random coil. Under significant shear stress, the polymer molecules will separate into two or more polymeric particles. Polymers with higher molecular weights are more resistant to distortion and mechanical degradation, whereas polymers with sufficiently low molecular weight may not even undergo permanent shearing. Because the sheared polymer molecules have a sufficiently low molecular weight to be resistant to further breakdown, the degradation process is self-limiting [77, 78, 79].

1.6 Acrylic polymers

Acrylic polymers are “polymers based on acrylic acid, its homologues, and derivatives.” Acrylic acid, methacrylic acid are the most common commercial polymers in this class, as are acrylic acid esters, methacrylic acid esters, acrylonitrile, acrylamide, cyanoacrylates, and copolymers of these compounds. Styrene–acrylonitrile, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene terpolymers, as well as acrylonitrile-butadiene-butadiene terpolymers [80, 81, 82].

Acrylate polymers are easily polymerized (Homo-polymers, co-polymers and terpolymers) using free radical polymerization, where polymerization occur according to free radical polymerization; using initiator such as benzoyl peroxide, H2O2 … etc. the general mechanism of acrylate polymerization is illustrated at Figure 3.

Figure 3.

General mechanism of acrylate polymerization.

The incorporation of acrylic polymers with other green ingredients such as (jojoba oil [83, 84, 85, 86, 87], sunflower oil [88, 89, 90], castor oil [91] … etc.) has been reported. Acrylic polymers have been evaluated as motor oil additives (viscosity index improvers, pour point depressants, anti-wear, and anti-friction … .etc.) as tabulated at Table 1.

#ComponentsratioInitiatorSolventFunction with Lube OilRefs.
Monomer1Monomer2Monomer3
1Octylacrylate, dodecylacrylate, tetradecylacrylate, hexadecylacrylatevinyl acetate1:1BPOTolueneVIIs
PPDs
[92, 93]
2Octylacrylate, Dodecylacrylate, Tetradecylacrylate, Hexadecylacrylatemaleic anhydride1:1BPOTolueneVIIs
PPDs
[92, 93]
3Octyl acrylate, dodecyl acrylate, tetradecylacrylate, hexadecylacrylate1-octene, 1-dodecene, 1-tetradecene1:1BPOTolueneVIIs
PPDs
[93, 94]
4Octylacrylate, decylacrylate, dodecylacrylate, tetradecylacrylate, hexadecylacrylatestyrenevinyl pyrrolidoneDifferent ratiosBPOTolueneVIIs
PPDs
[95]
52-ethyl-hexyl methacrylatevinyl acetate1:1BPOTolueneVIIs[96]
6octene, dodecene, tetradecene, and octadeceneButyl acrylate1:1BPOTolueneVIIs
PPDs
[97]
7dodecylacrylate, tetradecylacrylate, and hexadecylacrylatejojoba oil2:1BPOnonVIIs
PPDs
[83]
8dodecylacrylate, tetradecylacrylate and hexadecylacrylateJojobavinyl acetate1:1:1BPOnonVIIs
PPDs
[84]
9dodecylacrylate, tetradecylacrylate, hexadecylacrylateJojobavinyl pyrrolidone1:1:1BPOnonVIIs
PPDs
[85]
10decylacrylateJojobadodecylacrylate1:1:1BPOnonVIIs
PPDs
[86]
decylacrylateJojobatetradecylacrylate
decylacrylateJojobahexadecylacrylate
dodecylacrylateJojobaTetradecylacrylate
dodecylacrylateJojobaHexadecylacrylate
tetradecylacrylateJojobahexadecylacrylate
11dodecylacrylate, tetradecylacrylate, hexadecylacrylateJojoba1-dodecene, 1-tetradecene, 1-hexadecene1:1:1BPOnonVIIs
PPDs
[87]
12dodecyl acrylate, and isodecyl acrylateα- pineneDifferent molar ratiosBPOtolueneVIIs
PPDs
[98]
13Alkyl acrylateN,N-Dimethylacrylamide1:1, 1:2 and 2:1AIBNtolueneVIIs
AW
AF
AC.
[99]
14Sunflower oiloctylacrylate/decylacrylate/ dodecyl acrylatestyrene1:1:1, 2:1:1, 3:1:1AIBNtolueneVIIs
PPDs
AW
[88]
15Sunflower oilMethylmethacrylate
/decylacrylate
styrenedifferent mole fractionBPOtoluenePPDs
VIIs
[89]
16Maleic AnhydrideC10-C18 alkylacylate1:1BPODry benzenePPDs[100]
15Maleic Anhydride-n-alkylacrylatesN-butylmaleimide1:1:1H2O2benzenePPDs
VIIs
AW
EP
[101]
16Myristyl acrylateBPOThermal: Toluene
Microwave: non
VIIs
PPDs
[102]
17Isodecylacrylate and Isooctylacrylatestyrenedifferent mole fractionBPOtolueneVIIs
PPDs
[103]
18different esters of acrylic acidstyrenedifferent mole fractionBPOxylenePPDs[104]
19DodecylacrylateHexadecylacrylate,styrenedifferent mole fractionBPOacetoneVIIs
PPDs
[105]
20n-decyl methacrylate, alkylacrylates C16-C20, alkylacrylates C18-C26,N- (n-octyl) acrylamide, N- tert-nonyl acrylamide, N(tert-dodecyl) acrylamidedifferent mole fractionAIBNtolueneVIIs
PPDs
[106]
21castor oildodecyl acrylatedifferent mole fractionAIBNNonVIIs
PPDs
AW
[91]
22Methyl Methacrylatedifferent mole fractionBPOtolueneVIIs
PPDs
[107]
Methyl MethacrylateStyrene
23Dodecyl methacrylateDifferent molar ratiosAIBNtoluenePPDs
VIIs
[108]
Dodecyl methacrylateVinyl acetate
24n-alkyl acrylatesmaleic anhydrideDifferent molar ratiosH2O2PPD[109]
25methyl methacrylate and decyl acrylatesunflower oilDifferent molar ratiosBPOnonVIIs[90]

Table 1.

Application of acrylate polymers in petroleum sector as engine oil additives.

Advertisement

2. Conclusions

In this chapter we summarize the important uses of acrylate polymers, copolymers, and terpolymers and their uses as viscosity index improvers, pour point depressant, anti-wear, corrosion inhibitors, and rheology modifiers for engine oil. We can conclude the important of this category of polymers in the petroleum sector.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge this work to my Mother, and my Sons (Abd El-Rahman, Mostafa, and Faty).

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

I have no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

ASTMAmerican Society for Testing and Materials
VIIsViscosity index improvers
PPDsPour Point Depressants
AWAnti - wear
ACAnti- Corrosion

References

  1. 1. M. Hatami, M. Hasanpour and D. Jing, “Recent developments of nanoparticles additives to the consumables liquids in internal combustion engines: Part II: Nano-lubricants,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 319, pp. 114156, Dec 01, 2020.
  2. 2. A. Rosenkranz, H.L. Costa, M.Z. Baykara and A. Martini, “Synergetic effects of surface texturing and solid lubricants to tailor friction and wear – A review,” Tribology International, vol. 155, Mar. 2021.
  3. 3. N.A. Ismail, N.W.M. Zulkifli, Z.Z. Chowdhury and M.R. Johan, “Functionalization of graphene-based materials: Effective approach for enhancement of tribological performance as lubricant additives,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 115, pp. 108357, May. 2021.
  4. 4. S. Mazumder, H.S.C. Metselaar, N.L. Sukiman and N.W.M. Zulkifli, “An overview of fluoride-based solid lubricants in sliding contacts,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 40, pp. 4974-4996, Dec. 2020.
  5. 5. N. Elzayady and R. Elsoeudy, “Microstructure and wear mechanisms investigation on the brake pad,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 11, pp. 2314-2335, Mar. 2021.
  6. 6. P. Lu, H.E. Powrie, R.J.K. Wood, T.J. Harvey and N.R. Harris, “Early wear detection and its significance for condition monitoring,” Tribology International, vol. 159, pp. 106946, Jul. 2021.
  7. 7. T. Tawakoli, M.J. Hadad and M.H. Sadeghi, “Investigation on minimum quantity lubricant-MQL grinding of 100Cr6 hardened steel using different abrasive and coolant–lubricant types,” International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 50, pp. 698-708, 2010.
  8. 8. T. Tawakoli, M. Hadad, M.H. Sadeghi, A. Daneshi and B. Sadeghi, “Minimum quantity lubrication in grinding: effects of abrasive and coolant–lubricant types,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 19, pp. 2088-2099, 2011.
  9. 9. J.Y. Ho, K.F. Rabbi, S. Sett, T.N. Wong and N. Miljkovic, “Dropwise condensation of low surface tension fluids on lubricant-infused surfaces: Droplet size distribution and heat transfer,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 172, pp. 121149, Jun. 2021.
  10. 10. S. Ravi and P. Gurusamy, “Review of nanofluids as coolant in metal cutting operations,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 37, pp. 2387-2390, 2021.
  11. 11. X. Gou and Z. Guo, “Reed leaf-inspired anisotropic slippery lubricant-infused surface for water collection and bubble transportation,” Chemical Engineering Journal (Lausanne, Switzerland: 1996), vol. 411, pp. 128495, May 01,. 2021.
  12. 12. J. Yang and A. Palazzolo, “Power loss reduction for tilt pad journal bearings utilizing pad pockets and steps,” Tribology International, vol. 159, pp. 106993, Jul. 2021.
  13. 13. K.T. AW and K.T. OOI, “Leakage study of a lubricant-free revolving vane compressor,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 124, pp. 122-133, Apr. 2021.
  14. 14. K. Yang, L. Wang and J. Atkinson, “An investigation of factors influencing the response of screen printed thick film electrochemical sensors in the monitoring of lubrication oil ageing,” Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, vol. 23, pp. 100273, Apr. 2019.
  15. 15. H. Zhang, Y. Takeuchi, W.W.F. Chong, Y. Mitsuya, K. Fukuzawa and S. Itoh, “Simultaneous in situ measurements of contact behavior and friction to understand the mechanism of lubrication with nanometer-thick liquid lubricant films,” Tribology International, vol. 127, pp. 138-146, Nov. 2018.
  16. 16. K. Fukuzawa, Y. Sasao, K. Namba, C. Yamashita, S. Itoh and H. Zhang, “Measurement of nanometer-thick lubricating films using ellipsometric microscopy,” Tribology International, vol. 122, pp. 8-14, Jun. 2018.
  17. 17. P. Montmitonnet and F. Delamare, “A model of thick film lubrication by soaps in wire drawing using a pseudo-plastic rheological law, Tribology International, pp. 133-137, Jun. 1982.
  18. 18. A. Chouhan, T.K. Sarkar, S. Kumari, K.L.N. Sivakumar, H. Sugimura and O.P. Khatri, “Mechano-adaptive thin film of graphene-based polymeric nanocomposite for enhancement of lubrication properties,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 538, Feb 01,. 2021.
  19. 19. W. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Li, R. Huang, J. Xu and L. Yang, “Effects of molecular structures of poly α-olefin mixture on nano-scale thin film lubrication,” Materials Today Communications, vol. 25, pp. 101500, Dec. 2020.
  20. 20. H. Ahmed and L. Biancofiore, “A new approach for modeling viscoelastic thin film lubrication,” Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, vol. 292, pp. 104524, Jun. 2021.
  21. 21. K. Ono, “Modified Reynolds equations for thin film lubrication analysis with high viscosity surface layers on both solid surfaces and analysis of micro-tapered bearing,” Tribology International, vol. 151, pp. 106515, Nov. 2020.
  22. 22. Z.-. Wu and X.C. Zeng, “Multiscale simulation on shearing transitions of thin-film lubrication with multi-layer molecules,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 679, pp. 6-14, Jul 01, 2017.
  23. 23. L. Wang, A.K. Tieu, J. Wang, P.T. Sang, C. Xia, H. Zhu and G. Deng, “High load capability, sticking scale inhabitation and promising lubrication of sodium carbonate coating for steel/steel contact at high temperature,” Tribology International, vol. 153, pp. 106594, Jan. 2021.
  24. 24. P.D. Srivyas and M.S. Charoo, “Nano lubrication behaviour of Graphite, h-BN and Graphene Nano Platelets for reducing friction and wear,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 44, pp. 7-11, 2021.
  25. 25. G.W. Stachowiak, A.W. Batchelor, Boundary and Extreme Pressure Lubrication, Tribology Series, Elsevier, Volume 24, 1993, Pages 425-484, ISSN 0167-8922,https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8922(08)70582-0.
  26. 26. L. Ma, Z. Li, K. Hou, W. Jia, J. Wang and S. Yang, “Sonication-assisted solvothermal synthesis of noncovalent fluorographene/ceria nanocomposite with excellent extreme-pressure and anti-wear properties,” Tribology International, vol. 159,
  27. 27. M.L. Shreeshail, A.C. Desai, I.G. Siddhalingeshwar and K.G. Kodancha, “A study on influence of vegetable oils in milling operation and it’s role as lubricant,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Mar. 2021.
  28. 28. S. Almasi, B. Ghobadian, G. Najafi and M.D. Soufi, “A review on bio-lubricant production from non-edible oil-bearing biomass resources in Iran: Recent progress and perspectives,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 290, pp. 125830, Mar 25,. 2021.
  29. 29. S. Almasi, B. Ghobadian, G. Najafi and M. Dehghani Soufi, “A novel approach for bio-lubricant production from rapeseed oil-based biodiesel using ultrasound irradiation: Multi-objective optimization,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 43, pp. 100960, Feb. 2021.
  30. 30. J. Xu, L. Kong, L. Deng, G. Mazza, F. Wang, J. Baeyens and K. Nie, “The conversion of linoleic acid into hydroxytetrahydrofuran-structured bio-lubricant,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 291, pp. 112692, Aug 01,. 2021.
  31. 31. S. Bhaumik, B.R. Mathew and S. Datta, “Computational intelligence-based design of lubricant with vegetable oil blend and various nano friction modifiers,” Fuel (Guildford), vol. 241, pp. 733-743, Apr 01,. 2019.
  32. 32. M. Samuel Gemsprim, N. Babu and S. Udhayakumar, “Tribological evaluation of vegetable oil-based lubricant blends,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 37, pp. 2660-2665, 2021.
  33. 33. A. Yadav, Y. Singh and P. Negi, “A review on the characterization of bio based lubricants from vegetable oils and role of nanoparticles as additives,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Feb. 2021.
  34. 34. P. Negi, Y. Singh and K. Tiwari, “A review on the production and characterization methods of bio-based lubricants,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Feb. 2021.
  35. 35. F.J. Owuna, “Stability of vegetable based oils used in the formulation of ecofriendly lubricants – a review,” Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, vol. 29, pp. 251-256, Sep. 2020.
  36. 36. R. Wang, Q. Wu and Y. Wu, “Use of nanoparticles to make mineral oil lubricants feasible for use in a residential air conditioner employing hydro-fluorocarbons refrigerants,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 42, pp. 2111-2117, 2010.
  37. 37. T.S. Ravikumar and D. Mohan Lal, “On-road performance analysis of R134a/R600a/R290 refrigerant mixture in an automobile air-conditioning system with mineral oil as lubricant,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 50, pp. 1891-1901, 2009.
  38. 38. S. Perabathula, N. Bhanu Teja, P. Hari Chandra Prasad, M. Sarat Chandra Prasad and S. Thomas, “Performance analysis of mineral oil based nano-lubricants with sulphur impregnated reduced graphene oxide nanosheets,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Feb. 2021.
  39. 39. J.E. Martín-Alfonso, C. Valencia and J.M. Franco, “Composition-property relationship of gel-like dispersions based on organo-bentonite, recycled polypropylene and mineral oil for lubricant purposes,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 87, pp. 265-271, Jan. 2014.
  40. 40. A.D. Thampi, M.A. Prasanth, A.P. Anandu, E. Sneha, B. Sasidharan and S. Rani, “The effect of nanoparticle additives on the tribological properties of various lubricating oils – Review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, -04. 2021.
  41. 41. R. Kumar, S. Maheshwari, R.K. Voolapalli and S. Upadhyayula, “Investigation of physical parameters of crude oils and their impact on kinematic viscosity of vacuum residue and heavy product blends for crude oil selection,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 120, pp. 33-42, Mar. 2021.
  42. 42. C. Xu, Y. Peng, Z. Zhu, W. Tang and K. Huang, “Influence of different mineral particles in lubricating grease on the fretting behavior between steel wires under different contact forms,” Wear, vol. 472-473, pp. 203700, May 15,. 2021.
  43. 43. C. Xu, Y. Peng, Z. Zhu, W. Tang and K. Huang, “Fretting behavior evolution of steel wires with helical structure after adding ore particles in lubricating grease,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 124, pp. 105332, Jun. 2021.
  44. 44. H. Cen and P.M. Lugt, “Effect of start-stop motion on contact replenishment in a grease lubricated deep groove ball bearing,” Tribology International, vol. 157, pp. 106882, May. 2021.
  45. 45. H. Cen and P.M. Lugt, “Film thickness in a grease lubricated ball bearing,” Tribology International, vol. 134, pp. 26-35, Jun. 2019.
  46. 46. J. Green, M. Priest, A. Morina and A. Neville, “Approaches to sensitising engine valve train friction models to lubricant formulation characteristics,” in Tribology Series, 2003, pp. 35-45.
  47. 47. J.A. Heredia-Cancino, M. Ramezani and M.E. Álvarez-Ramos, “Effect of degradation on tribological performance of engine lubricants at elevated temperatures,” Tribology International, vol. 124, pp. 230-237, Aug. 2018.
  48. 48. S.H. Hamdan, W.W.F. Chong, J.-. Ng, C.T. Chong and S. Rajoo, “A study of the tribological impact of biodiesel dilution on engine lubricant properties,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 112, pp. 288-297, Nov. 2017.
  49. 49. W. Mbogning Feudjio, G.Y. Mbesse Kongbonga, S.B.C. Kogniwali-Gredibert, H. Ghalila, P. Wang-Yang, Y. Majdi, C. Kenfack Assongo and M. Nsangou, “Characterization of engine lubricants by fluorescence spectroscopy and chemometrics,” Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 252, pp. 119539, May 05,. 2021.
  50. 50. P. Fasihi, O. Kendall, R. Abrahams, P. Mutton, Q. Lai, C. Qiu and W. Yan, “Effect of graphite and MoS.sub.2 based solid lubricants for application at wheel-rail interface on the wear mechanism and surface morphology of hypereutectoid rails,” Tribology International, vol. 157, May 01,. 2021.
  51. 51. A. Rosenkranz, H.L. Costa, M.Z. Baykara and A. Martini, “Synergetic effects of surface texturing and solid lubricants to tailor friction and wear – A review,” Tribology International, vol. 155, Mar. 2021.
  52. 52. A. Tiwari, M.A. Makhesana, K.M. Patel and B.K. Mawandiya, “Experimental investigations on the applicability of solid lubricants in processing of AISI 4140 steel,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 26, pp. 2921-2925, 2020.
  53. 53. R. Kumar, H. Kumar Banga, H. Singh and S. Kundal, “An outline on modern day applications of solid lubricants,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 28, pp. 1962-1967, 2020.
  54. 54. R. Singh, “Progress of environment friendly cutting fluids/solid lubricants in turning-A review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 37, pp. 3577-3580, 2021.
  55. 55. Engine lubrication. In: Vehicular Engine Design, 2006. Der Fahrzeugantrieb/Powertrain. Springer, Vienna. https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/3-211-37762-X_12
  56. 56. L. Wu, L. Gu and R. Jian, “Lubrication mechanism of graphene nanoplates as oil additives for ceramics/steel sliding components,” Ceramics International, vol. 47, pp. 16935-16942, Jun 15,. 2021.
  57. 57. M.A. Mujtaba, M.A. Kalam, H.H. Masjuki, M.E.M. Soudagar, H.M. Khan, H. Fayaz, M. Farooq, M. Gul, W. Ahmed, M. Ahmad, M. Munir, H. Yaqoob, O.D. Samuel and L. Razzaq, “Effect of palm-sesame biodiesel fuels with alcoholic and nanoparticle additives on tribological characteristics of lubricating oil by four ball tribo-tester,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 60, pp. 4537-4546, Oct. 2021.
  58. 58. N. Thachnatharen, M. Khalid, A. Arulraj and N. Sridewi, “Tribological performance of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) as nano-additives in military grade diesel engine oil,” Materials Today: Proceedings, May. 2021.
  59. 59. S.I. Shara, E.A. Eissa and J.S. Basta, “Polymers additive for improving the flow properties of lubricating oil,” Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, vol. 27, pp. 795-799, Dec. 2018.
  60. 60. U. Abdulfatai, A. Uzairu, S. Uba and G.A. Shallangwa, “Molecular design of antioxidant lubricating oil additives via QSPR and analysis dynamic simulation method,” Heliyon, vol. 5, pp. e02880, Nov. 2019.
  61. 61. S. Rathika, PS Raghavan, Influence of polyvinyl palmitate copolymer as viscosity index improvers for lube, Materials Today: Proceeding, Vol. 16, pp. 978-986, 2019
  62. 62. J. Lomège, V. Mohring, V. Lapinte, C. Negrell, J. Robin and S. Caillol, “Synthesis of plant oil-based amide copolymethacrylates and their use as viscosity index improvers,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 109, pp. 435-446, Dec. 2018.
  63. 63. B. Elarbe, I. Elganidi, N. Ridzuan, N. Abdullah and K. Yusoh, “Influence of poly (stearyl acrylate co-behenyl acrylate) as flow improvers on the viscosity reduction of Malaysian crude oil,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 42, pp. 201-210, 2021.
  64. 64. ASTM-D2270 Standard Practice for Calculating Viscosity Index from Kinematic Viscosity at 40 °C and 100 °C,” Jan 01,. 2016.
  65. 65. H.G. Müller, “Mechanism of action of viscosity index improvers,” Tribology International, vol. 11, pp. 189-192, 1978.
  66. 66. F.J. Owuna, “Stability of vegetable based oils used in the formulation of ecofriendly lubricants – a review,” Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, vol. 29, pp. 251-256, Sep. 2020.
  67. 67. S. Wu, T. Sun, Z. Cai, J. Shen, W. Yang, Z. Zhao and D. Yang, “Biolubricant base stock with improved low temperature performance: Ester complex production using housefly (Musca domestica L.) larval lipid,” Renewable Energy, vol. 162, pp. 1940-1951, Dec. 2020.
  68. 68. W. Li, H. Li, H. Da, K. Hu, Y. Zhang and L. Teng, “Influence of pour point depressants (PPDs) on wax deposition: A study on wax deposit characteristics and pipeline pigging,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 217, pp. 106817, Jun 15,. 2021.
  69. 69. A. Prasad, K. Kulkarni, A.D. Kulkarni, P.L. Chaudhari, S.C. Bandpatte, “Pour Point Depressant of Crude Oil” International Journal of Chemical Engineering Research, Vol. 11, (2), pp. 81-90, 2019.
  70. 70. B. Deka, R. Sharma and V. Mahto, “Synthesis and performance evaluation of poly (fatty esters-co-succinic anhydride) as pour point depressants for waxy crude oils,” Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, vol. 191, pp. 107153, Aug. 2020.
  71. 71. T. Liu, L. Fang, X. Liu and X. Zhang, “Preparation of a kind of reactive pour point depressant and its action mechanism,” Fuel (Guildford), vol. 143, pp. 448-454, Mar 01,. 2015.
  72. 72. M.A. Betiha, T. Mahmoud and A.M. Al-Sabagh, “Effects of 4-vinylbenzyl trioctylphosphonium- bentonite containing poly(octadecylacrylate-co-1-vinyldodecanoate) pour point depressants on the cold flow characteristics of waxy crude oil,” Fuel (Guildford), vol. 282, pp. 118817, Dec 15,. 2020.
  73. 73. H. Huang, W. Wang, Z. Peng, Y. Ding, K. Li, Q. Li and J. Gong, “The influence of nanocomposite pour point depressant on the crystallization of waxy oil,” Fuel (Guildford), vol. 221, pp. 257-268, Jun 01,. 2018.
  74. 74. I. Elganidi, B. Elarbe, N. Abdullah and N. Ridzuan, “Synthesis of a novel terpolymer of (BA-co-SMA-co-MA) as pour point depressants to improve the flowability of the Malaysian crude oil,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 42, pp. 28-32, 2021.
  75. 75. J. Zhang, C. Wu, W. Li, Y. Wang and Z. Han, “Study on performance mechanism of pour point depressants with differential scanning calorimeter and X-ray diffraction methods,” Fuel, vol. 82, pp. 1419, -03-10. 2003.
  76. 76. ASTM D - 97 Standard Test Method for Pour Point of Petroleum Products,” Dec 15, 2017.
  77. 77. A. Brito, N. Guzmán, L. Rojas-Solórzano and T. Zambrano, “Rheological study of two- and three-phase highly viscous fluid flow in pipelines,” Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, vol. 170, pp. 772-784, Nov. 2018.
  78. 78. M.T. Ghannam, M.Y.E. Selim, M.A.M. Khedr, N.A.G. Bin Taleb and N.R. Kaalan, “Investigation of the rheological properties of waste and pure lube oils,” Fuel (Guildford), vol. 298, pp. 120774, Aug 15,. 2021.
  79. 79. N.K. Attia, S.A. El-Mekkawi, O.A. Elardy and E.A. Abdelkader, “Chemical and rheological assessment of produced biolubricants from different vegetable oils,” Fuel (Guildford), vol. 271, pp. 117578, Jul 01,. 2020.
  80. 80. M.T. Ghannam and M.Y.E. Selim, “The flow behavior of raw Jojoba oil in comparison with some traditional lube oils,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 161, pp. 113164, Mar. 2021.
  81. 81. K.J. Saunders, Organic polymer chemistry, 2nd Edition, Chapman and Hall, 1988.
  82. 82. S.A. Mohamad, N.S. Ahmed, S.M. Hassanein and A.M. Rashad, “Investigation of polyacrylates copolymers as lube oil viscosity index improvers,” Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, vol. 100, pp. 173-177, Dec. 2012.
  83. 83. A.M. Nassar and N.S. Ahmed, “The Behavior of α-Olefins Butyl Acrylate Copolymers as Viscosity Index Improvers and Pour Point Depressants for Lube Oil,” International Journal of Polymeric Materials, vol. 55, pp. 947-955, Nov 01,. 2006.
  84. 84. A.M. Nassar, Ahmed NS, Nasser RM. Jojoba Polymers as Lubricating Oil Additives; Petroleum & Coal; 57 (2) 120-129, 2015.
  85. 85. N.S. Ahmed, A.M. Nassar and R.M. Nasser, “Jojoba modified polymers as performance modifiers additives for engine oil,” Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, vol. 67, pp. 425-433, Aug 10, 2015.
  86. 86. A.M. Nassar, Ahmed N.S., Nasser R.M., Green Lubricating Oil Additives, Der Chemica Sinica, 6(3), 100-107, 2015.
  87. 87. R. Nasser, N. Ahmed and A. Nassar, “Terpolymers for modifying the performance properties of engine oil,” Appl Petrochem Res, vol. 5, pp. 61-69, Mar. 2015.
  88. 88. P. Ghosh, M. Hoque and G. Karmakar, “Terpolymers based on sunflower oil/alkyl acrylate/styrene as sustainable lubricant additive,” Polymer Bulletin (Berlin, Germany), vol. 74, pp. 2685-2700, Jul. 2017.
  89. 89. P. Ghosh, T. Das, D. Nandi, G. Karmakar and A. Mandal, “Synthesis and Characterization of Biodegradable Polymer - Used as a Pour Point Depressant for Lubricating Oil,” International Journal of Polymeric Materials, vol. 59, pp. 1008-1017, Oct 27,. 2010.
  90. 90. P. Ghosh and T. Das, “Synthesis and Characterization of Homopolymer of Decyl Acrylate and its Copolymer with Styrene and Evaluation of their Performance as a Pour Point Depressant in Lubricating Oil,” Petroleum Science and Technology, vol. 32, pp. 1448-1457, Jun 18,. 2014.
  91. 91. P. Ghosh, M. Hoque and G. Karmakar, “Castor oil as potential multifunctional additive in the formulation of eco-friendly lubricant,” Polym. Bull, vol. 75, pp. 501-514, Feb. 2018.
  92. 92. P. Ghosh and M. Das, “Study of the influence of some polymeric additives as viscosity index improvers and pour point depressants – Synthesis and characterization,” Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, vol. 119, pp. 79-84, Jul. 2014.
  93. 93. N.S. Ahmed, A.M. Nassar, R.M. Nasser, A.F. Khattab and A.A. Abdel-Azim, “Synthesis and Evaluation of Some Polymers as Lubricating Oil Additives,” Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, vol. 33, pp. 668-675, May 01,. 2012.
  94. 94. Rabab M. Nasser, Synthesis and Evaluation of Some Lubricating Oil Viscosity Index Improvers and Pour Point Depressants, OmniScriptum GmbH &Co.KG, Germany, ISBN:978-3-330-33270-6, (2017).
  95. 95. N.S. Ahmed, A.M. Nassar, R.M. Nasser, A.F. Khattab and A.A. Abdel-Azim, “Synthesis and Evaluation of Some Polymers as Lubricating Oil Additives,” Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, vol. 33, pp. 668-675, May 01,. 2012.
  96. 96. N.S. Ahmed, A.M. Nassar, R.M. Nasser, M.E. Abdel Raouf and A.F. El-Kafrawy, “Novel Terpolymers as Pour Point Depressants and Viscosity Modifiers for Lube Oil,” Petroleum Science and Technology, vol. 32, pp. 680-687, Mar 19,. 2014.
  97. 97. A.M. Nassar, “The Behavior of Polymers as Viscosity Index Improvers,” Petroleum Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 514-522, Mar 27,. 2008.
  98. 98. P. Ghosh, M. Das, M. Upadhyay, T. Das and A. Mandal, “Synthesis and Evaluation of Acrylate Polymers in Lubricating Oil,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 56, pp. 3752-3758, Oct 13,. 2011.
  99. 99. R.K. Singh, A. Kukrety, A. Kumar, A. Chouhan, R.C. Saxena, S.S. Ray and S.L. Jain, “Synthesis, characterization, and performance evaluation of N,N-Dimethylacrylamide–alkyl acrylate copolymers as novel multifunctional additives for lube oil,” Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 37, pp. 1695-1702, Oct. 2018.
  100. 100. S. Deshmukh and D.P. Bharambe, “Synthesis of polymeric pour point depressants for Nada crude oil (Gujarat, India) and its impact on oil rheology,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 89, pp. 227-233, 2008.
  101. 101. S. Khalkar, D. Bhowmick and A. Pratap, “Synthesis of Polymers from Fatty Alcohol and Acrylic Acid and its Impact on Tribological Properties,” Journal of Oleo Science, vol. 62, pp. 167-173, 2013.
  102. 102. P. Ghosh and G. Karmakar, “Synthesis and Characterization of Polymyristyl Acrylate as a Potential Additive for Lubricating Oil,” American Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2, pp. 1-6, Aug 31,. 2012.
  103. 103. P. Ghosh, S. Talukder, M. Upadhyay and T. Das, “Multifunctional Additive Performance of Acrylate-Styrene Copolymers,” Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, vol. 75, pp. 420, -07. 2016.
  104. 104. A.A.A. Azim, A.M. Nassar, N.S. Ahmed and R.S. Kamal, “Preparation and Evaluation of Acrylate Polymers as Pour Point Depressants for Lube Oil,” Petroleum Science and Technology, vol. 24, pp. 887-894, Aug 01, 2006.
  105. 105. A.M. NASSER, N.S. AHMED and R.S. KAMAL, “Preparation and Evaluation of Some Terpolymers as Lube Oil Additives,” Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, vol. 32, pp. 616-621, 2011.
  106. 106. A.P. Sivokhin, O.A. Kazantsev, K.V. Shirshin, I.R. Arifullin, A.A. Moikin and V.P. Lukonin, “Additives for petroleum products, based on copolymers of higher alkyl (meth)acrylates and N-alkylacrylamide”, Plasticheskie Massy, 11-12, pp 13-16, 2015.
  107. 107. P. Ghosh, T. Das and D. Nandi, “Synthesis Characterization and Viscosity Studies of Homopolymer of Methyl Methacrylate and Copolymer of Methyl Methacrylate and Styrene,” J Solution Chem, vol. 40, pp. 67-78, Jan. 2011.
  108. 108. P. Ghosh, M. Hoque, G. Karmakar and M.K. Das, “Dodecyl methacrylate and vinyl acetate copolymers as viscosity modifier and pour point depressant for lubricating oil,” International Journal of Industrial Chemistry, vol. 8, pp. 197-205, Jun. 2017.
  109. 109. P. Ghosh, T. Das, G. Karmakar and M. Das, “Evaluation of acrylate-sunflower oil copolymer as viscosity index improvers for lube oils,” J. Chem. Pharm. Res, vol. 3, pp. 547, 2011.

Written By

Rabab M. Nasser

Submitted: 03 June 2021 Reviewed: 12 June 2021 Published: 28 June 2022