Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Define the Process of Human Resource Integration in Cross-Border Acquisitions: Evidence from Chinese Oversea Acquisitions

Written By

Wenjia Chang-Howe

Submitted: November 23rd, 2020 Reviewed: March 9th, 2021 Published: April 8th, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97132

Chapter metrics overview

188 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This research focuses on integration during and after mergers and acquisitions where one firm (Chinese) has a dominant position in comparison with another (Western firm). Using the critical incident approach, 30 interviews were conducted with representatives of 13 firms that have undergone Chinese-Western mergers and acquisitions (M&As) during the period from 2005 to 2019. This study aims to analyse the HR integration process in pre-and post-acquisition to determine the critical success factors, and present a framework that determines the success or failure factors and the actions required. The findings have important implications for an organisation post-acquisition phenomenon from a human resource point of view. As a result, it presents an overview of this critical post-HR integration phenomenon and posits that using an integrated approach from the human resources perspective is essential to ultimately enhance the acquisition integration success rate.

Keywords

  • Post-M&As
  • Human resource integration process
  • Critical incident approach
  • HR Integration

1. Introduction

Although 80% of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) results are reported as failures based on the desired profitability [1, 2], M&A is still one of the most essential methods for an organisation to quickly attain corporate growth in order to gain market share or achieve synergies and innovation [3]. As M&A activities continue to rise, ‘human factors’ are often blamed for disappointing M&A outcomes. A substantial body of literature has examined various facts of the integration models and HR issues [4, 5]. In particular, HR is recognised as one of the critical factors after the M&A period (post-M&As) for success or failure outcomes [6, 7, 8, 9]. However, research in this area is more focused on emotive moments in the initiation of M&As [10], little research literature has looked at post-integration from a human resource (HR) process perspective [11].

Chinese overseas mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have a relatively short history [12], beginning with the Go Global policy in 1999 [13]. The golden age for Chinese-Western M&A deals was made between 2005 and 2017 [14], after which the Chinese government changed its policies on overseas investments, and M&A activity dropped dramatically. There was significant interest among Chinese companies to acquire the advanced technology used by Western companies [15], along with their more modern management systems [16, 17], market resources, and innovation capacity [13]. High-income countries, particularly those of North America and Europe, attracted 65.6% of Chinese foreign direct investment outflows during this period [18]. However, only a small amount of these outward-bound investments by Chinese firms has shown successful performance after the M&As. [19, 20, 21, 22].

Very few studies have examined integration during and following Chinese overseas M&As [23], and they lack a clearly defined process or an overview of content involved in this important phenomenon [24]. Further, a consistent perspective regarding the human resource integration process (HRIP) is absent as are the interaction steps. While most studies on M&As consider the human factor critical for integration [24], few scholars have considered HRIP as a dual process that is undertaken simultaneously with integration as a whole. This study focused on the Chinese -Western overseas M&As, posits that complete integration is necessary for practitioners to realise more successful merger outcomes [25]. It propose to answer the critical question: What is the HRIP and what factors should be incorporated into the HRIP after cross-border M&As?

In order to perform the investigation over post-M&A integrations, where one firm has a dominant position over the other, and simplify the interactions and process [26]. Thirty interviews were conducted using the critical incident (CI) approach [27], with representatives of 13 Western firms acquired by Chinese companies during the period from 2010 to 2016 (including the Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia), to understand the process. Secondary data from newspaper articles, internal HR policies, and managerial documentation were also reviewed.

This study makes two main contributions to the field of interests. The first is to analyse with preliminary information from selected companies the HR integration process through integration leadership, change and restructuring, personnel resistance, and valuable personnel retention factors. This process influences the success or failure of the M&A integration stage. The second contribution is to present a framework that can determine the success or failure factors, the actions, and some examples of HR management and behaviour during the M&A process. This study focuses entirely on Chinese overseas M&As, where a business from an Eastern culture enters a Western culture environment. Therefore, the scope is limited to predefined national characters, and does not exhaust all possible types. A discussion of the validity of the proposed framework in other contexts is also presented in this paper.

Advertisement

2. Literature review and selection

Following Pablo’s [28] definition of integration, HR integration can be defined as the post-M&A change in an organisation’s technical, administrative, and cultural configuration [11]. Many studies have addressed the causes and outcomes of HRIP, and some studies have also focussed on the integration of HR management practices [11, 25]. For instance, the failure to find consistent relationships may stem from an over-emphasis on either the pre-M&A stage (characteristic of early research in strategic management) [29], the post-M&A stage (a focus of early cultural studies) [30], and strategic management research at the expense of the interconnection between the pre- and post-M&A stages [31, 32].

The integration of organisations is the process by which two companies are combined after an M&A is announced. Often, the degree of interaction and strategy between the two companies is defined before the integration begins [33]. Therefore, the decision-making process for HR factors in the pre-M&A stage is critical in understanding the integration process [34]. Following the literary traditions on human factors in post-M&As, four central themes have been studied: leadership [33] and the integration team [35]; change [36] and the restructuring process [37]; personnel resistance [3]; and valuable personnel retention [38].

There are few systemic or structured methodological frameworks available for the study of integration itself [25]. Although several researchers have focused on a process approach [39, 40, 41, 42], this perspective has not been widely taken up as anticipated. For example, Caiazza and Volpe [43] proposed a three-staged integration process: a multi-level due diligence negotiation, an organisational culture integration, and atmospheric competences [43]. Steigenberger [38] presented an integrative framework of the general process of business integration in an M&A, which underlines the interactions between the conditions and interventions that are critical for understanding M&A outcomes. Advocates of a process approach have focused on post-acquisition management rather than examining linkages throughout the entire M&A process [39, 44]. A multidisciplinary review is needed to examine all of the critical variables that appear throughout the M&A process. While some resources are considered prerequisites for the development of a firm, such as absorptive capability [45] and integration capability [35], two critical dimensions identified by Haspeslagh and Jemison [39] are essential: the need for strategic interdependence and the need for structural autonomy [46]. Gomes and Angwin [47] summarised the critical success factors for the pre- and post-M&A phases and their inter-relationships. Furthermore, no clear linkage between the steps of the post-M&A processes and human factors has been established [48].

Most studies have investigated the human side of M&As by focusing on influential human factors within organisations [45]. These include cultural fit, the relationship between management styles, cultural tolerance, and stress-related emotions experienced by employees during and after an M&A [49, 50, 51, 52]). Other works have investigated the importance of managerial practices, such as cultural learning interventions and communication initiatives [53, 54]; openness and willingness in leadership [55]; and transparency to trust between the acquirer and the employee [56]. Although integration of human resources is important, there is a dearth of studies on HRIP practices during M&As [32, 57, 58]. Further, the current understanding of when and how human resource integration leads to cross-border acquisition success is limited and extant literature does not investigate remedies for conflicts in cross-border acquisitions.

In this study, the link between the structural, processual, and strategic dimensions of integration is also expressed through the use in the strategy literature [59, 60, 61, 62]. Integration’s strategic dimension influences its structural dimension and specifies the direction for its processual dimension. Granlund [63] also suggests that structure and action are inseparable in post-merger integration (PMI). Table 1 presents an overview of leading theories related to post-M&A HR integration taken into consideration during this study.

Stage of integrationCriteriaHuman resource factorsCitation
Pre-integrationDefine HR integration strategiesCompetitive advantage resource analysis[64, 65, 66]
Knowledge-based resource;
Resource-based view
Gap analysis[67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78]
Culture fit
Organisational culture assessment
Cultural distance
Cultural clash
Work alienation
Integration capabilities
Internal capabilities resources (if key personnel are available)
Organisational constraints (union, policies, pension, contract, and change management)
Legislation in the acquired country[79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84]
Institutional theory and institutional constraints (internal and external legitimacy, liability of foreignness, and institutional dualism)
Employment system, economic organisation and control, corporate governance regimes
Choose the type of methodologyAcculturation modes (interaction, assimilation, separation, and deculturation)[85, 86]
Acculturation modes (infusion type, interactive amalgamation type, and independent type)[87]
Define the level of HR integrationOverall integration (procedural integration, physical integration, managerial integration, and sociocultural integration)[88]
Continuum from autonomy to absorption[89]
Integration (execution)System integration[11, 25, 46]
HR management philosophy and system (acquire directly or recruit new employees; agent-type integration)Integration of HR management practice (deletion, adoption, and maintenance of HR practices)
Knowledge transfer and the learning process;
Personnel integration[11, 25, 46, 54, 87, 90]
Personnel changes
(Personnel assimilation mode, manager accreditation system, and changes in managerial positions)
Change management[91]
Perception of decision-maker[92]
Cultural rejection[93]
Post-integration (evaluation)Employee retentionKey personnel retention;[92, 94, 95, 96]
Top management turnover and career patterns
Performance evaluationOpportunistic behaviour (hold-up, shrinking, and free-riding), goal setting, and cultural retrenchment[97, 98]

Table 1.

Overview of main theories related to post-M&A HR integration.

Despite the diverse methodologies used by the studies reviewed, elements related to integration were identified in relation to the three stages of the M&A: the pre-integration stage, the integration stage, and the evaluation stage [39]. A conceptual framework for post-M&A HR integration was proposed by Chang-Howe [99], which categorises the HRIP from pre-integration (HR due diligence and determining the factors of an integration strategy) to HR integration (system integration, personnel integration, and change management) and integration outcome (success and failure indicators). It offers a clear overview of all tasks and discusses HR functions in an M&A, however, the interactional relationship between the stages remains unclear.

This study posits that a more integrative approach is required. Therefore, introducing a design management control system [97] to design a human resource intergration process (HRIP). The post-M&A HRIP can be understood as a performance management control system for the combination of two existing HR systems and two organisational cultures. This management control system incorporates a combination of competitive advantages [30] to maximise outcomes. The methodology used provides a logical workflow for organising and guiding the development of an HRIP [100]. The most important considerations for an HR management system in M&As are the level and speed of integration [41], and HRIP should be assessed with the post-merger concepts of integration strategies [50], integration planning [18], resource-based theory, and institutional theory [71, 72]. These key elements provide the content for the framework that will be used to develop the HRIP in the sections below. Previous studies on M&A integration do not differentiate between post-merger and post-acquisition integration, therefore, we employ the neutral term post-M&A integration [48].

Advertisement

3. Methodology

3.1 Research design and qualitative method

Three primary interviews were conducted at random with specialists from Chinese M&A consulting firms and investment banking firms. Using the data from these interviews, the potential M&A cases were selected and designed in the interview questions. The samples chose from commercially oriented companies since their segmentation toward business activities would have considerable similarities. These organisations feature a diverse collection of occupations and functions that show differences in the nature of work and the social context in which it is done [101]. To keep the sample concentrated and absolute, mergers and joint ventures were excluded from the study.

Companies were selected from five Western countries, the Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. The Critical Incident (CI) approach [102] was used to collect primary data on the levels and patterns of post-M&A HRIPs. The interviewee’s experience during the M&A was used to identify critical events and the processes and challenges met within the course of the M&As [103].

Contact was made with managers through professional and personal networks, and the sample was populated using a snowball approach. The sample was limited to those to whom the best access was possible and 30 interviews were conducted with representatives of 13 privately owned companies during the period from 2017 to 2020. The companies represented sectors such as manufacturing, entertainment, energy, finance, mining, and insurance. Interviews were concentrated on individuals in top management roles or who were critical to the M&A integration.

3.2 Data collection and analysis

3.2.1 Sample and context

HR integration is usually quite time-consuming, ranging from three months to two years. To collect relevant information and follow the development of cases, multiple interviews were conducted with the interviewees over the period 2017–2020. Six interviewees were transferred back to China after the integration, and four of them transferred to another location. The interviews were conducted in China, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, France, and Germany. In ten cases, interviews were conducted over the telephone, and the others were through face-to-face meetings in the country where the interviewees were located.

The interview questions were drawn from the literature on PMI, using the definitions of HRIP and patterns of HRIP from Yan [11]. The interview questions were developed in greater depth to identify and illustrate processes and critical factors in PMI. The questions covered the following topics:

  • The general process of HRIP in the company and the parties involved.

  • Exceptional events that occurred during the HRIP, as recalled by the interviewee.

  • Emotions and personal experiences related to these events, in particular, the reasons for the emotions.

  • Comparison of those experiences with other aspects of the interviewee’s professional life and knowledge.

The participants were approached with carefully designed, open-ended questions. The interviews began by asking them to describe their work, responsibilities, and duties within the organisation, to examine their self-awareness in relation to their work and to confirm their rank. We then enquired about their knowledge of post-M&A management. Further, we explored the interviewees’ emotions regarding post-M&A integration and their experience in the HRIP by using backtrack questions that explored sections of time. This sample and context provided an excellent opportunity to examine key events and integration challenges in acquired Western organisations.

3.2.2 Data

This study followed the grounded theory approach [104] to collect the data in stages. The primary data were gathered using semi-structured interviews. Then, by adopting content analysis, we structurally analysed the interview records to discover the specific HRIP used during the post-M&A activities. Three additional interviews were held with management consultants specialising in M&As, in the early and later stages of the research to determine whether management behaviour patterns were unique or common.

Table 2 presents the characteristics of the positions held by the participants, industry sector, interview years, and other information. The final 30 candidates were selected using the criteria of position and management experience. Interviews were performed within and outside the company and lasted approximately 1 hour on average [105]. Personal information was kept confidential, and the data were stored anonymously [106]. Although we modified the interview protocols during each interview to take advantage of emerging themes [107], each set of protocols included questions on each member’s perception of his responsibility, management experience, leadership style, the experience of the HRIP, and experience in managing conflicts and difficult emotions in the M&A process. This set of questions allowed the similarities and differences among members’ perspectives to be observed.

Interview taken year
Deal CountryCompany No.Integration strategyIntegration resultAcquired firm industryDeal YearParticipant No.Job Title Acquires sideJob Title Acquired side2017201820192020
1HR Manager of the acquired company1st
AFully integrateFailureHeavy vehicle Manufacture20122Chairman of the Acquired company1st2nd
3COO of the Acquired company1st
BFully integrateFailureEntertainment20154Head of Youth Academy1st
Partly integrateSuccessGeneral manager of the Acquired company
CEnergy201351st
6HR Director of Acquirer company1st2nd
7Director of Business Development1st
8Director of Technical Department1st
9Board member of the Acquirer company1st
The NetherlandDFully integrateSuccessElectric product wholesale200510Director of Business development1st
11General manager of the Acquired company1st
12Head of Business development1st
EFully integrateFailureElectric product wholesale201113Operational manager1st
14HRD of the Acquired Company1st2nd3rd
FFully integrateSuccess with re-intergrationInsurance201515CEO of the Acquired Company1st
16Secretary of the Board1st2nd
Chemical Manufacturer201617CFO of the Acquired Company1st2nd3rd
GFully integratedOn going18Sales director1st
Energy200919GM of the Acquired Company1st
HFully integrateSuccess20Office manager1st
IEntertainment201621HRD of the Acquired Company1st2nd
GermanyFully integrateSuccess with re-intergration22Director1st
23M&A manager1st
JFully integrateFailureElectric product201724Project manager1st
KOn goingPayment201925HRD of the Acquirer Company1st2nd
UKFully integrate26Project manager1st
CanadaLPartly integrateSuccess with re-intergrationEnergy201227M&A1st
28HRD of the Acquire Company1st
AustraliaMSuccess with re-intergrationMining201629HRD of the Acquire Company1st
Fully integrate30HR manager of the Acquire company1st

Table 2.

Participant sample.

3.2.3 Data analysis

Iterative analysis was performed on the qualitative data, by moving back and forth between the raw data and an emerging theoretical structure [108, 109, 110]. Three significant steps are followed in this iteration: creating provisional categories and first-order codes, integrating first-order codes and creating theoretical categories, and delimiting theory by aggregating theoretical dimensions [101].

The date employed in the qualitative research software ATLAS.ti, which facilitated the analysis of qualitative data. Interview transcripts were entered as text files into ATLAS.ti and coded. These included phrases, terms, or descriptions offered by the participants, in response to the semi-structured interviews. Open coding (initial coding) [111] was used in the first set of the coding process. Each coder began by reading the transcripts to identify the answers to the given questions, then joint statements were drawn on to form provisional categories. First-order codes and exit interviews were broken into sets of themes, using a strategy called focused coding [111] (e.g. post-M&A HRIP). This stage of analysis allowed a comparison to be made to establish differences between answers on the same topic. Measurements and extensions of critical incidents toward the change from the old to the new employer and the difference in organisational cultures and personal leadership representations were also deciphered. Once these theoretical categories were generated, we looked for the underlying dimensions to understand how different categories fit together into a coherent picture [112]. We formed different conceptual frameworks or models that described the relationship between the themes and available organisational theories. Once we identified a possible framework, we re-examined the fit or misfit of the data with a tentative theoretical understanding (e.g. [104, 108]).

Figure 1 summarises the process, using Corley and Gioia’s [10, 113] data structure, which presents first-order categories, theoretical categories, and aggregate theoretical dimensions. The aggregate theoretical dimensions shown are the ones that best explain the critical indicators that influence successful outcomes and employee emotions in HRIPs.

Figure 1.

Overview of data structure.

The rest of the manuscript discusses the findings, followed by a discussion on the process and constraints identified in the HRIP. We also propose a general theoretical model of HRIP as well as culturally specified values and attitudes that influence successful outcomes during post-M&A integrations. This research concludes with the discussion of the implications of the model, both in theory, related to HRIP and critical factors [114].

Advertisement

4. Findings

Following the fundamental argument of Jemison and Sitkin [40], M&A should be seen as a process with distinctive characteristics, which can affect important organisational activities and outcomes [100]. The results in the qualitative phase were divided into three significant steps: pre-integration (i.e. HR due diligence, choice of HRIP, and integration strategy), integration (i.e. systems integration, personnel integration, and change management), and evaluation (i.e. designed outcome and inconsistencies). As expressed by one interviewee ‘Each company has its own story, but overall, the problems are the same. First, you need to analyse what is there and what the priority is, and then what can be done’ (Participant 13). The combination of results of the current research with existing literature led to the development of the post-acquisition HRIP framework (Figure 2), which incorporates the HR integration strategy, HR system integration, personnel integration, and change management (Table 3).

Figure 2.

HR integration process (HRIP).

4.1 Pre-integration (HR due diligence, choice of HRIP, integration strategy)

Chinese firms tend to invest overseas, in countries with higher incomes, better technology, and advanced management methods [18]. In particular, Chinese companies that pursue M&As with Western companies seek to acquire knowledge, skills, and capabilities to enhance their competitive advantage, to enter Western markets. Therefore, the level of integration can be determined, depending on the absorptive capability of the acquiring company.

The pre-integration phase, took place in three steps, based on the findings: due diligence, HR analysis derived from broader business analysis, and HRIP strategy and planning.

“For mergers, there are two important issues. First, due diligence, and second, how to deal with current employees. Normally, business negotiations around the merger include personnel issues. Therefore, before integration starts, HR should already be involved. The moment of involvement should be before the merger. Involvement after the merger is dependent on the strategy before the merger.” (Participant 6)

According to Jansen and Groot [97], the management control cycle begins as soon as a control problem occurs and continues where there is a mismatch between performance and results. This identifies the nature of the poor fit between the acquired and acquiring companies. This may be caused by several factors, such as organisational constraints, cultural distance, and institutional constraints. Factors of this type should be identified during the due diligence process, in the pre-M&A phase, for later use as terminators for the integration strategy (level of integration, integration cost, and integration phase).

During due diligence, risks that may occur in the M&A should also be identified. Once a risk is identified, methods of control should be chosen. Such methods should answer two questions: Should human resource management be integrated? and to what level should it be integrated? If integration is not necessary, an autonomy-based style of integration strategy should be chosen (i.e. preservation or holding).

“HR planning [for this] is quite simple, requiring only an organisational chart and a match between headcount and positions. Organisational chart depends on business needs. Another important matter is what kind of business strategy should be adopted and what HR arrangement should be used. ”(Participant 6)

The business strategy determines the HR strategy, which leads to an integration strategy. Therefore, the question of whether the company will merge or continue to operate as a separate company is determined by the overall business strategy. HR planning covers the previously identified risks from due diligence.

Once the integration strategy is determined, preparation begins. Often, the preparation will run in parallel with business negotiations and signed deals. ‘If you wait until the deal is signed off and then begin to prepare the integration, it will be too late’ (Participant 27). ‘We need to prepare the plan for the key personnel, who will stay and who need to leave, which will influence the organisational structures and later authorisations’ (Participant 14).

Communication plans will only be drawn up after the integration strategy and all other preparatory plans are fixed. ‘The preparatory plan is often aided by external consultants, but once the deal is closed, they will leave. You are, after all, left on your own to carry out the integration’ (Participant 27).

4.2 Integration (system integration, personnel integration, and change management)

4.2.1 System integration

The acquisition process is so complex that managers often spend most of their time solving issues that were overlooked during the pre-M&A stage. Hence, the integration strategy and day-to-day management could be neglected. ‘HR integration begins the day after the deal is signed, and it sometimes lasts two to three years’ (Participant 27). Therefore, it is essential to offer a clear assessment of overall integration contents and steps. In this study, data were gathered on three aspects of the redefining processes utilised by acquired companies. Birkinshaw et al. [115] divided the post-acquisition process into task integration and human integration. During the integration phase, HR integration is implemented through three categories: HR system integration, personnel integration, and change management.

Systems integration concentrates on providing updated definitions for performance control and appraisal. When two existing management control systems need to be combined, or one needs to be replaced, system integration is a necessary step. System integration refers to task integration, which includes redefining organisational structures to fit the new business strategy; compliance checks of the acquirer’s internal and external requirements; and integration of two information technology (IT) systems. The findings revealed that for each M&A, the language barrier created a significant challenge between the Chinese acquirer and the acquired company. This includes language clashes in the vital areas of the IT system, internal control systems, and spoken language in the workplace. These language barriers aggravated the challenge of communication, both internally and externally. Participant 3 elaborated on this topic as:

“Because the Chinese manager’s English skills are poor, I have to hire local assistants to support the work. Additionally, all reports to the HQ are written in Chinese, and communication with external parties has to be translated. Therefore, I have two Dutch financial assistants and two Chinese assistants, and I report every month, where normally I do it only twice a year”(Participant 3).

4.2.2 Personnel integration

Personnel integration includes changes to personnel in a post-M&A organisation that relates to key personnel allocation; the international transfer of key Chinese staff overseas, trilingual talent recruitment, and redundancy and reorganisation (layoffs). Control problems differ on two axes: the source of the problems may be on the individual or the organisational level, and it might manifest itself in behaviours or ideas [97]. Therefore, to promote integration, the focus should be on behaviours that are related to functional factors, namely, human resource systems and personnel allocation, as well as on ideas related to personal factors, such as emotions and cultures. ‘There is still a relationship between a boss and an employee. In fact, the transactional relationship in Western society is the same; only the Chinese understanding hides it more deeply’ (Participant 9).

The issues that most often arise from system and personnel integration revolve around the following two considerations: the organisational chart, the design of the organisation’s reporting line and the human resource needs based on the chart. ‘This analysis includes HR planning, including budgets, headcounts, layoff plans, and so on. If a layoff plan is included, a payoff plan should also be made’ (Participant 6). ‘The reorganisation of all manager positions merges between departments. If it is a complete company merge, the switch of the employment agreement should be taken into consideration’ (Participant 14).

Previous studies have devoted significant attention to the allocation of top management and the shift in organisational culture linked to the CEO’s identity, during post-M&A integration [116]. Further, studies have also focused on the impact of succession on organisational outcomes (Miller, 1993; Shen & Cannella, 2002; Zhang and Rajagopalan, 2004). This study found that the stability of new management is essential for the HRIP. Top management, including the CEO, CFO, and board of directors in acquired companies, are often replaced after the acquisition, by expatriates sent from the China-based headquarters, or recruited locally. Sometimes, due to multiple reasons (including change in organisational strategy, relocation delay, personal reasons, cultural misfit, and expectations mismatch), new management do not remain longer than one or two years. Frequent changes in top management (CEO, CFO, or critical positions within the company) creates management divisions within an organisation. Departments and stakeholders become disengaged because they lose interest in management decisions, and daily operations can progress without consulting them. Divisions between top management and operations limit the rollout of strategic decisions or new policies from the management level to the operational level. Hence, changes in strategy or new management policies are not implemented throughout the organisation. ‘Three CEOs remained within two years. Many policies were changed or were not implemented before they were changed again’ (Participant 21).

4.2.3 Change management

Management control produces a never-ending loop. Any unexpected incident can, and will, alter the process chosen to achieve the desired outcome. Therefore, change management is the greatest challenge in the post-M&A environment, and requires experienced and qualified human capital to manage the risk and process [117]. ‘The challenge for Chinese overseas M&A is how to develop the acquired company in the long term. The sustainability of the company is the most challenging for the Chinese owner’ (Chinese corporate owner and roundtable participant in response to the question, ‘What is the biggest challenge to managing a Chinese-owned Western company’?)

This research suggests that change management include the following elements: emotional influence, language barrier, cultural conflict, financial change, strategic change, unexpected legal constraint, and unexpected delays in the international transfer of key personnel [118].

“In people management, there was not that much influence due to the change. The structure was changed, the structure was implemented in one way, and then I changed it to another way, then I quickly changed back to the first structure because it worked better”(Participant 1).

Critical events, even if challenging, do not necessarily entail negative outcomes, as such events are recalled as disagreements over practices. Surprisingly, criticism is not usually perceived as having negative effects, but rather, as a motivating factor. The role of HR is to facilitate change and influence its direction, hence, attention should be paid to the linkages and interrelations among the three integration processes running in parallel, and their influence on each other. For instance, process redefinition in the category of systems integration, linked with international personnel transfer and reorganisation (personnel integration), will be influenced by legal constraints and the availability of expert talents in the market. This uncertainty is usually unforeseen before the integration process and, therefore, change management is both a challenge and a major part of HRIP tasks.

4.3 Evaluation (designed outcome and/or dysfunction)

An important part of managing a control system is the feedback loop, controlling the designed outcome (i.e. integrated HR systems, cost efficiency, successful transfer of knowledge, combined advantage for both companies, and effective control and feedback) and influencing the failures (high cost, ineffective systems, negative emotions, loss of key personnel, lack of resources, and prolonged integration).

All control functions are linked to cost, therefore, the method of control directly influences outcomes and costs. The tighter the control, the higher the likelihood of designed outcome; however, the related cost is high. A typical profit-oriented organisation maintains a balance between functional behaviours and cost, however, maintaining control of other dysfunctional outcomes is challenging.

To achieve long-term success and ensure the continued development of the company, a few important HR management characteristics may be excluded, such as employee training, rewards, and compensation. The findings of this study have important implications for managers seeking to better manage post-M&A integration. Generally, in Chinese companies, less effort is made in training related to creativity, management skills, and culture. Moreover, mid- to long-term incentive plans are seen as weak areas for Chinese overseas human resource management. Findings from interviews and category coding show that the perceptions of critical events during integration among employees are primarily related to their emotional states. These events, even where they are challenging, do not entail negative outcomes. Conflict or difficulties due to changes caused by the acquisition should not be seen as challenges but as positive occurrences.

The challenges of integration are perceived as drivers of motivation and success. The high-performance orientation of a work team is the key driver of a successful integration outcome. Employees in the acquired company are more concerned with the opportunities for multi-cultural experiences. In particular, when action taken to solve the dilemma is justified, these employees’ discourses feature a performance orientation (even if the integration is not ultimately ideal).

Theoretical categoriesCodes and interviewee numbers
Pre - IntegrationHR due diligence
Internal capabilities and resources
Organisational constraints
Institutional constraints
Cultural distance
synergy potential
The golden parachute of critical executives
To define the internal capabilities of the acquired company well and understand what available resources you have within your own company. (Nos. 15, 19, 27)
The key points for HR due diligence are to determine what structures and risks the acquired company has and whether there are any compliance issues. (Nos. 27, 28, 29, 23, 17, 14)
We overlooked the legal and government policies that impacted our deals. (No. 4)
For Chinese companies, especially state-owned ones, government policies have a great impact on decision making. (Nos. 2, 27, 28, 15)
We assess the acquired company to seek synergy potential. (Nos. 28, 24, 23, 21, 19, 15, 9)
Cultural assessment and determination of cultural distance is critical during the HRDD process. (Nos. 14, 27, 21, 25, 23, 27, 29)
The directors in the target company have already signed off on highly paid and well-protected exit clauses before the sale, or golden parachutes. (Nos. 27, 23)
Integration strategy
Level of integration
Integration cost
Speed of integration
Integration can last from three months to two years. (Nos. 27, 23, 29)
Determine how much effort you would like to put in and how much time you have. (Nos. 14, 21, 23, 27)
How deep do you need to go and how many people need to be integrated? (Nos. 28, 29, 21, 14)
Preparation
Run in parallel Executive replacement plan
Design of the organisational structure
Authorisation table design
Communication plan
For HR, the work begins before the deal is made, and we run in parallel with the acquired company to prepare the transition. (Nos. 28, 25)
Many plans have to be made in a limited time frame, including those for the organisational structure, the talent map, the authorisation table, and the communication plan. (Nos. 6, 14, 21, 23, 25, 27, 28)
IntegrationSystems integration
Organisational structure
Language barrier and communication channels
Compliance/non-compliance
Usability of IT systems
The organisational structure was redefined. (Nos. 21, 19, 25, 28, 29)
Language (English or Chinese) often caused difficulties. (No. 7)
There was no English version available in the internal system of the acquired company. No one expected that. (No. 15)
The two ERP systems were just not comparable. (No. 3)
I did not think compliance would be such a big issue. (No. 17)
Performance control, resetting target and goals. (Nos. 21, 28)
Personnel integration
Key personnel allocation
International transfer (work permits)
Reorganisation (layoff and recruitment)
People from the HQ were sent to the acquired company for key positions, for example: CFO, CEO, HR, and technical positions. (Nos. 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 16)
Work permits are often difficult to arrange for overseas Chinese managers. (Nos. 20, 30, 16, 6).
Layoffs were the number one task after the M&A, we had to let people go. (No. 28)
Key positions need hiring, and we need fresh minds and talent for the new organisation. (Nos. 14,15, 21)
Change management
Cultural conflict
Strategy change
Unexpected legal & external
constraints
Unexpected delay of international transfer of key personnel
If one phrase is used to describe HR integration, it would be change management. (No. 28)
The English of some Chinese colleagues is really not good. I cannot understand them. (No. 4)
If all internal communication between Chinese colleagues is written in Chinese, we may feel left out. (Nos. 7, 12, 18, 22, 26)
The decision-making process is quite one-way, and there are often significant cultural conflicts between Chinese and Western workers in relation to decision making and trust building. (Nos. 3, 1, 7, 12, 18, 22, 24, 26)
The strategy of the company has changed over time. (No. 28)
To survive, you will need for the company to become accustomed to the Chinese way of doing things. (No. 30)
No one expected that the union would say no. (No. 4)
We waited four months for the new CEO to arrive, but his visa was delayed. (No. 30)
The HQ must decide whom to send over, and the key contact person changed a few times over three years. (No. 21)
The person who was needed is pregnant. (No. 25)
EvaluationDesigned outcome
Integrated HR systems
Cost efficiency
Successfully transfer of knowledge.
Combined both companies advantage
Effective control and feedback
It took us two years to integrate the two HR systems into one, it but functions pretty well now. (No. 14)
The cost is much lower, and overhead costs are much more efficient. (No. 21)
We set up a sharing platform and internal transfer systems for people to transfer between the China HQ and overseas locations. (Nos. 17, 11, 2, 21)
Resources and talents are shared with HQ and worldwide, and we integrate the acquired company into our global scope. (Nos. 25)
The internal system is linked, and the dates and results, as well as performance, can now be easily seen. (Nos. 18)
We set up a clear communication and control channel to allow the employees to talk to us and get feedback, and the engagement is much higher than before. (No. 21)
Dysfunction
High cost
Ineffective systems
Negative emotions
Loss of key personnel
Lack of resources
Prolonged integration
Money was an issue; we needed have to wait until the Chinese manager made a decision. This is difficult sometimes for a Dutch company. (No. 4)
Do we have qualified people or not? The financial manager they sent should be able to take responsibility. (No. 3)
Chinese HR managers think trust issues during the HR integration process are not much of a problem. (Nos. 2, 6, 22, 29)
We had three CEOs in two years. (No. 21)
Almost all directors have left the company. (No. 28)
Due to the current situation, we need to let the company run on its own for the time being. (No. 25)

Table 3.

Coding results: Contents and processes of HR integration.

Advertisement

5. Discussion and conclusion

There has been a growing body of research on the variables and processes that affect the success of cross-border acquisitions. However, the critical success factors and the reasons why acquisitions integration often fail are inadequately understood [119]. According to Gunkel et al. [51], mechanisms involved during the PMI process are still unclear to scholars, and practitioners may prevent exploitation of the potential synergy that can arise from sharing or transferring resources and skills. Secondly, cross-cultural conflicts and differences between the two companies may cause problems such as stress and negative attitudes toward the acquiring company and its management, including high turnover of the acquired top executives [120].

This research responds to these calls by providing insights into the process of integrating operating synergies. It empirically investigated the human resource integration processes (HRIP) to understand the dynamics of the post-M&A phase in a cross-cultural context. The HRIP presented in this research provide a clear overview of the primary human resources that are relevant to the post-phase of a cross-border M&A. However, the interactions among the constituents of the system and the interaction between the system and its environment are complex. Thus, focusing on the critical success factors facilitating the integration of tasks and the dissemination of skills of the acquired firms, is important. This study’s intent was to develop a better understanding of the parameters that make the post M&A HR integration process successful, in the context of cross-border acquisitions, thus contributing to a better understanding of the value-added creation process and synergy realisation in international M&As.

This study contributes to international management research and provides managerial implications regarding cross-border M&As in several ways. First, a framework for HRIP is proposed. This framework will assist both managers and policymakers to understand the integration approach dominantly used in Chinese cross-border M&As and benefit from the potential synergy in the wake of Chinese cross-border M&As [121].

The proposed framework (Figure 2) incorporates three theoretical perspectives, into an integrative model and addresses post-acquisition factors and issues. It is offered as a descriptive and analytical device rather than a prescriptive model, to highlight the management of the post-acquisition integration process illuminated in this study. Secondly, the framework presented can assist consultants and executives in conducting better assessments at all stages of the M&A, including screening, planning, and negotiation. Thus, it enhance the effectiveness of interventions carried out during a post-M&A HRIP. As such, this study emphasises the role of corporate HR integration analysis as an essential and influential milestone for the exploration of the international business environment [24]. Most importantly, an approach that centres on human resource integration could drive the development of organisational integration in a positive direction. Therefore, the framework proposed in this research has implications that extend beyond the limitations of the field of HR management.

5.1 Limitations and directions for future research

Perhaps the most straightforward implications are those derived from a logical interpretation of a researcher’s findings. ([122], p. 257) This study develops insights into the HRIP in the post-M&A period of a Chinese-acquired Western company [123]. There are both theoretical and managerial implications to the finding.

The knowledge produced should not be taken to be general, but instead specific to two sets of societies in a certain context. This knowledge is local, in that, it may be true and useful for Chinese managers who seek to work in Western environments. It is difficult to evaluate the consequences that flow from the choice of the HRIP in the relatively short history of Chinese cross-border M&As [20], Company D was more willing to cooperate during the research process than the others and we took advantage of this by interviewing more candidates within the company compared with the other companie, it may created a bias to the findings and study. However, it is valuable to monitor the further developments of these M&As and measure organisational performance over time. ‘I think our top management underestimated the challenge of HR integration and overestimated the value of human capital when the deal was made’ (Participant 21). Hence, further studies on these companies in the course of time, will be beneficial.

The evidence collected in this research supports the conclusions of recent studies, which have shown that connecting the pre- and post-M&A stages may yield improved M&A performance in general [124]. These studies report that if both strategic fit (synergy potential) and organisational fit (cultural differences and the national culture of the acquiring company) factors are known, pre-mergers can be taken into account in the choice of the post-acquisition integration approach. M&A performance is superior in deals that did not take pre-acquisition factors into account in post-acquisition decisions.

This study identifies theoretical aspects that may provide direction for future research in the field of post-M&A integration:

  • On the macro-level, from a strategic perspective, a focus on the interactions and interrelations between the steps during the human resource integration process (HRIP) could be fruitful.

  • At the micro-level, the individual process that often are barriers to synergistic integration, has been overlooked, (e.g. management divisions) and is worth further study.

It should be noted that the conceptual framework was developed through qualitative research and would require further validation with quantitative research to test the theory on a broader scale. As more cases from other industries and countries become available, it suggests using quantitative methods to test the framework.

It is the hope that the theoretical integration and review in this paper can provide a clear organising framework for future work, and that the conceptual framework proposed in this research will benefit the creation of a future focus in this field.

References

  1. 1. Charman, A. (1999) Global mergers and acquisitions: the human resource challenge.International Focus(Society for Human Resource Management)
  2. 2. Haspeslagh, P. & (1991). Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal.New York:The Free Press.
  3. 3. Lupina-Wegener, Anna. (2013). Human resource integration in subsidiary mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 26. 10.1108/09534811311328353
  4. 4. Katou, A. A., Budhwar, P. S., & Patel, C. (2014). Content vs. process in the HRM-performance relationship: An empirical examination. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 527–544
  5. 5. Zhou, A. J., Fey, C., & Yildiz, H. E. (2018). Fostering integration through HRM practices: An empirical examination of absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&As. Journal of World Business
  6. 6. Angwin, D.N., Mellahi, K., Gomes, E., Peter, E. (2016). How communication ap- proaches impact mergers and acquisitions outcomes. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 2370–2397
  7. 7. Bagdadli, S., Hayton, J.C., Perfido, O. (2014). Reconsidering the role of HR in M&As: What can be learned from practice. Human Resource Management, 53, 1005–1025
  8. 8. Cartwright, S., Schoenberg, R. (2006). Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities. British Journal of Management, 17, S1-S5
  9. 9. Cogman, D., Tan, J. (2010). A lighter touch for postmerger integration. McKinsey on Finance, 34, 8–12
  10. 10. Corley, K.G., Gioia, D.A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173–208
  11. 11. Yan, S., Wang, Z. (2008). Research on the levels and patterns of human resource integration in M&A intrapreneurshipFrontiers of Business Research in China Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag, 2, 15–32
  12. 12. Zhang, J., Zhou, C., Ebbers, H. (2011). Completion of Chinese overseas acquisitions: Institutional perspectives and evidence International Business Review, 20, 226–238
  13. 13. Gu, L., Reed, W. (2013). Chinese overseas M&A performance and the go global policy. Economics of Transition, 157–192
  14. 14. Alon, I.e. (2009). China rules: Globalisation and political transformation
  15. 15. Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., Tripathy, A. (2012). Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liber- alization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 368–395
  16. 16. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498
  17. 17. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2018). A general theory of springboard MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2), 129–152
  18. 18. Deng, P. (2007). Investing for strategic resources and its rationale: The case of outward FDI from Chinese companies. Business Horizons. ScienceDirect, 50, 71–81
  19. 19. Chen, W., Ding, Y., Meyer, K.E., Wang, G., Xin, K. (2018). Global expansion: The Chinese way. London, UK: LID Publishing
  20. 20. Liu, Y., Woywode, M. (2013). Light-touch integration of Chinese cross-border M&A: The influences of culture and absorptive capacity. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55, 469–483
  21. 21. Wang, S.L., Luo, Y., Lu, X., Sun, J., and Maksimov, V. 2014. Autonomy delegation to foreign subsidiaries: An enabling mechanism for emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 111–130
  22. 22. Zhu, H., Zhu, Q. (2016). Mergers and acquisitions by Chinese firms: A review and comparison with other mergers and acquisitions research in leading journals.Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33, 1107–1149. doi:10.1007/s10490.016.9465.0, especially its part “Post.acquisition integration”
  23. 23. Yijun, Y., Yipeng, L. (2015). Linking leaders’ identity work and human resource management involvement: The case of sociocultural integration in Chinese mergers and acquisitions. International Journal of Human Resource Management
  24. 24. Weber, Y., Tarba, S., 2012. Mergers and acquisitions process: The use of corporate culture analysis. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19, 288–303
  25. 25. Trompenaars, F., Nijhoff Asser, M. (2011). The global M&A tango: How to reconcile cultural differences in mergers, acquisitions, and strategic partnerships?The USA: McGraw-Hill Companies
  26. 26. Weber, Y., Pliskin, N. (1996). “The effects of information systems integration and organisational culture on a firm’s effectiveness”. Information and Management, 30, 81–90
  27. 27. Barker, J.R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408–437
  28. 28. Pablo, L. (1994). Determinant s of acquisition integration level: A decision making perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 803–836
  29. 29. Gomes, E., Brown, W.Y., Tarba, C., S. (2011). Mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances: Understanding the process.Palgrave MacMillan.
  30. 30. Bower, J.L. (2001). Not all M&A are alike - And that matters. Harvard Business Review, 79, 92–101, 164
  31. 31. Weber, Y. (2011). Managing mergers and acquisitions: Implementation and integration. International Studies of Management and Organiza- tion, 41(3), 3–8
  32. 32. Weber, Y., & Fried, Y. (2011a). The role of HR practices in manag- ing culture clash during the post merger integration process. Human Resource Management, 50(5), 565–570
  33. 33. Schuler, R., & Jackson, S. (2001). HR issues and activities in mergers and acquisitions. European Journal of Management, 19(3), 239–253
  34. 34. Jemison, Sitkin (1986). Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective. Academy of Management Review, 11, 145.163. P. 148
  35. 35. Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2010). Human resource practices and per- formance of M&A in Israel. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 203–211
  36. 36. Lin, B.W., Hung, S.C. and Li, P.C. (2006), “Mergers and acquisitions as a human resource strategy: evidence from US banking firms”, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 126-142
  37. 37. Ashkenas, R.N., DeMonaco, L.J. and Francis, S. (1998), “Making the deal real: how GE capital integrates acquisitions”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76 No. 1, pp. 165-178
  38. 38. Steigenberger, N. (2017). The challenge of integration: A review of the M&A integration literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, , 408–431
  39. 39. Haspeslagh, P., Jemison, D. & (1991). Managing acquisitions.Free Press
  40. 40. Jemison, D.B., Sitkin, S.B. (1986). Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective. Academy of Management Review, 11, 145–163
  41. 41. Meglio, O., Risberg, A. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions: Time for a methodological rejuvenation of the field? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 87–95
  42. 42. Risberg, A. (2001). Employee experience in acquisition processes. Journal of World Business, 36, 58–84
  43. 43. Caiazza, R., and Volpe, T. 2015. M&A process: A literature review and research agenda Business Process Management Journal, 21, 205–220
  44. 44. Hayward, M.L.A. (2002). When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 21–39
  45. 45. Zahra, S.A., George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185–203
  46. 46. Aguilera, R.V., Dencker, J.C. (2004). The role of human resource management in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 1355–1370
  47. 47. Gomes Angwin Weber &Tarba. (2013). Critical success factors through the mergers and acquisitions process: Revealing pre- and post- M&A connections for improved performance. Thunderbird International Business Review
  48. 48. Schweiger, D.M., Goulet, P.K. (2000). Integrating mergers and acquisitions: An international research review. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions (Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions,1, 61–91
  49. 49. Ager, D.L. (2011). The emotional impact and behavioral consequences of post-M&A integration: An ethnographic case study in the software industry. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40, 199–230
  50. 50. Ashton-James, C.E., Ashkanasy, N.M. (2008). Chapter 1 Affective events theory: A strategic perspective. Research on Emotion in Organizations, 4, 1–34
  51. 51. Gunkel, M.S., Schlaegel, C., Rossteutscher, T., Wolff, B. (2015). The human aspect of cross-border acquisition outcomes: The role of management practices, employee emotions, and national Culture. International Business Review, 24, 394–408
  52. 52. Sinkovics, R.R., Zagelmeyer, S., Kusstatscher, V. (2011). Between merger and syndrome: The intermediary role of emotions in four cross-border M&As. International Business Review, 20, 27–47
  53. 53. Schweiger, D.M., Goulet, P.K. (2005). Facilitating acquisition integration through deep-level cultural learning interventions: A longitudinal field experiment. Organization Studies, 26, 1477–1499
  54. 54. Schweiger, David M., and Angelo S. DeNisi. “Communication with Employees Following a Merger: A Longitudinal Field Experiment.” The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, 1991, pp. 110–135. JSTOR,www.jstor.org/stable/256304. Accessed 5 Apr. 2021
  55. 55. Rao-Nicholson, R., Khan, Z., and Stokes, P. 2016. Making great minds think alike: Emerging market multinational firms’ leadership effects on targets’ employee psychological safety after cross-border mergers and acquisitions. International Business Review, 25, 103–113
  56. 56. Rottig, D. (2013). Marriage metaphor model for sociocultural integration in international mergers and acquisitions. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55, 439–451
  57. 57. Gomes, E., Angwin, D.N., Melahi, K. (2012a). HRM practices throughout the mergers and acquisition (M&A) Process: A study of domestic deals in the Nigerian banking industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management
  58. 58. Gomes, E., Angwin, D.N., Weber, Y., Tarba, S.Y. (2012b). Critical success factors through the mergers and acquisitions process: Revealing pre- and post- M&A connections for improved performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 13–35
  59. 59. Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, J.B. and Ghoshal, S. (2003), The Strategy Process − Concepts, Contexts, Cases, International Global, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
  60. 60. Pettigrew, A. (1987), “Context and action in the transformation of the firm”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 657-670
  61. 61. Pettigrew, A. (2003), “Strategy as process, power and change”, in Cummings, S. and Wilson, D. (Eds), Images of Strategy, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 301-330
  62. 62. Porter, M.E. (1991), “Towards a dynamic theory of strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 2, Special Issue, pp. 95-117
  63. 63. Gadiesh, O., Ormiston, C. and Rovit, S. (2003), “Achieving an M&A’s strategic goals at maximum speed for maximum value”, Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 35-41
  64. 64. Larsson, R., Lubatkin, M. (2001). Achieving acculturation in mergers and acquisitions: An international case survey. Human Relations, 54, 1573–1607
  65. 65. Larsson, R., Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organisational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realisation. Organization Science, 10, 1–26
  66. 66. Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3, 319-363.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003003
  67. 67. Chakrabarti, R.G., Gupta-Mukherjee, S., Jayaraman, N. (2009). Mars–Venus marriages: Culture and cross-border M&A. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 216–236
  68. 68. Glover, J., Friedman, H. (2014). Cultural dilemmas and sociocultural encounters: A transcultural approach for understanding, assessing, and changing culture.Organization Development Journal, 79–92
  69. 69. Graebner, M.E., Eisenhardt, K.M. (2004). The other side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 366–403
  70. 70. Puranam, P., Singh, H., Zollo, M. (2006). Organising for innovation: Managing the coordination- autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 263–280
  71. 71. Cording, M., Christmann, P., & King, D. (2008). Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integra- tion decisions and acquisition performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 744–767
  72. 72. Ellis, K. M., Reus, T. H., & Lamont, B. T. 2009. The effects of procedural and informational justice in the in- tegration of related acquisitions. Strategic Manage- ment Journal, 30: 137–161
  73. 73. Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Chaudhuri, S. 2009. Integrating acquired capabilities: When structural integration is (un) necessary. Organization Science, 20: 313–328
  74. 74. Puranam, P., & Srikanth, K. 2007. What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 805–825
  75. 75. Sarala, R.M. and Vaara, E. (2009), “Cultural differences, convergence, and crossvergence as explanations of knowledge transfer in international acquisitions”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 41 No. 8, pp. 1365-1390
  76. 76. Stahl, G.K. and Voigt, A. (2008), “Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model and examination”, Organization Science, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 160-176
  77. 77. Teerikangas, S., & Very, P. 2006. The culture-performance relationship in M&A: From yes/no to how. British Journal of Management, 17(S1): S31–S48
  78. 78. Brannen, Mary & Peterson, Mark. (2009). Merging Without Alienating: Interventions Promoting Cross-Cultural Organizational Integration and Their Limitations. Journal of International Business Studies. 40. 468-489. 10.1057/jibs.2008.80
  79. 79. Scott D. Culture In Political Theory. Political Theory. 2003;31(1):92-115. doi:10.1177/0090591702239440
  80. 80. Kostova, Tatiana, and Srilata Zaheer. “Organizational Legitimacy under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise.” The Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, no. 1, 1999, pp. 64–81. JSTOR,www.jstor.org/stable/259037. Accessed 5 Apr. 2021
  81. 81. S Zaheer - Academy of Management journal, 1995
  82. 82. Kostova, Tatiana & Roth, Kendall. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal. 45. 215-233. 10.2307/3069293
  83. 83. La Porta, Rafael and Lopez de Silanes, Florencio and Shleifer, Andrei, Corporate Ownership Around the World (August 1998). Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=103130orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.103130
  84. 84. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
  85. 85. Nahavandi, Afsaneh & Malekzadeh, Ali. (1988). Acculturation in Mergers and Acquisitions. The International Executive. 30. 10-12. 10.1002/tie.5060300103
  86. 86. Elsass, P. M., & Veiga, J. F. (1994). Acculturation in acquired organizations: A force-field perspective. Human Relations, 47(4), 431–453.https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700404
  87. 87. Cartwright, S. and Cooper, C.L. (1995), "Organizational marriage: “hard” versus “soft” issues?", Personnel Review, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 32-42.https://doi.org/10.1108/00483489510089632
  88. 88. Shrivastaya P(1986). Post-merger Integration. Journal of Business Strategy, 7(1): 65–76
  89. 89. Schweiger D M, Walsh J P(1990). Merger and acquisitions: An interdisciplinary view. Rowland K M, Ferris G R(ed): Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, (8): 41–107
  90. 90. Shanley, M.T., Correa, M.A. (1992). Agreement with top management teams and expectations for post acquisition performance. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 245–266
  91. 91. Chung, G.H., Jing, D., Jin, N.C. (2014). How do employees adapt to organisational change driven by cross-border M&As? A case in China.Journal of World Business, 78–86
  92. 92. Chatterjee, S., Lubatkin, M.H., Schweiger, D.M., Weber, Y. (1992). Cultural differences and shareholder value in related mergers: Linking equity and human capital. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 319–334
  93. 93. Dupuis, J.P. (2014). New approaches in cross-cultural management research: The importance of context and meaning in the perception of management styles. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 14, 67–84
  94. 94. Walsh, J. P. 'Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions', Strategic Management Journal, 9, 1988. pp. 173-183
  95. 95. Krug, Jeffrey & Hegarty, W.. (2001). Predicting Who Stays and Leaves After An Acquisition: A Study of Top Managers in Multinational Firms. Strategic Management Journal. 22. 185 - 196. 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<185::AID-SMJ149>3.0.CO;2-M
  96. 96. Rao-Nicholson, R., Khan, Z., Akhtar, P., & Tarba, S. Y. (2020). The contingent role of distributed leadership in the relationship between HR practices and organizational ambidexterity in the cross-border M&As of emerging market multinationals. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(2), 232-253.https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1216882
  97. 97. Jansen, P.G.W., Groot, T.L.M.C. (2015). Performance management and control.Administration.Amsterdam: VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics and Business
  98. 98. Altendorf, D. (1986). When Cultures Clash: A case study of the Texaco takeover of Getty oil and the impact of acculturation on the acquired firm. Unplublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California
  99. 99. Chang-Howe, W. (2019). The challenge of HR integration: A review of the M&A HR integration literature. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 10, 19–34. doi:10.1108/JCHRM-03-2019-0009
  100. 100. Friedman, Yair & Carmeli, Abraham & Tishler, Asher & Shimizu, Katsuhiko. (2015). Untangling micro-behavioral sources of failure in mergers and acquisitions: a theoretical integration and extension. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 27. 1-31. 10.1080/09585192.2015.1042003
  101. 101. Pratt, M.G., Rockmann, K.W., Kaufmann, J.B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity Amon medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 235–262
  102. 102. Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358
  103. 103. Durand, M. (2016). employing critical incident technique as one way to display the hidden aspects of post-merger integration. International Business Review, 87–102
  104. 104. Glaser, N.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.New York:Aldine de Gruyter.
  105. 105. Legard (2003). In-depth interviews
  106. 106. Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organisational research. Academy of Management Review, 28, 13–33
  107. 107. Johnson, B., Turner, L.A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications. 297–319
  108. 108. Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management re- search.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage
  109. 109. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  110. 110. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  111. 111. Saunders, M., Kale, P., Corsten, D. (2009). Research methods for business students.Pearson Education Limited.
  112. 112. Creswell (2007). Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. Sage Publications
  113. 113. Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31
  114. 114. Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases; challenges and opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32
  115. 115. Birkinshaw, J.M., Bresman, H., Håkanson, L. (2000). Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 395.426
  116. 116. Ma, L.K., Zihui, C. (2010). China’s outward foreign direct investment, China’s growing role in world trade.University of Chicago Press, 545–578
  117. 117. Widener S.K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of the control framework. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 32, 757–788
  118. 118. Clark, S.M., Gioia, D.A., Ketchen, D.J.T., Thomas, J.B. (2010). Transitional identity as a facilitator of organisational identity change during a merger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 397–438
  119. 119. Stahl, G.K., Angwin, D. N., Very, P., Gomes, E., Weber, Y., Tarba, S.Y., Noorderhaven, N., Benyamini, H., Bouckenooghe, D., Chreim, S., Durand, M., Hassett, M.E., Kokk, G., Mendenhall, M.E., Mirc, N., Miska, C., Park, K.M., Reynolds, N., Rouzies, A., Sarala, R.M., Seloti, S.L., Søndergaard, M., Yildiz, H.E. (2013). Sociocultural integration in mergers and acquisitions: Unresolved paradoxes and directions for future research. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55, 333–356
  120. 120. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J.L., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., Mora-Valentín, E.M. (2019). Thinking about people in mergers and acquisitions processes. International Journal of Manpower, 40, 643–657. doi:10.1108/IJM-05-2018-0143
  121. 121. Spigarelli, F., Alon, I., Mucelli, A., 2013. Chinese overseas M&A: Overcoming cultural and organisational divides. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 6, 190. doi:10.1504/IJTLID.2013.051703
  122. 122. Tepper, G., Tepper, B.J. & (2012). Publishing in AMJ – Part 6: Discuss the implications. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 256–260
  123. 123. Hanemann, T. Huotari, Mikko, A (2016). A new record year for Chinese outbound investment in Europe.MERICS,http://www.merics.org/en/merics-analysis/merics-reports/a-new-record-year-for-chinese-outbound-investment-in-europe/#c11166
  124. 124. Weber, Y., Tarba, S. Y., & Rozen-Bachar, Z. (2011). Mergers and acquisitions performance paradox: The mediating role of integration approach. European Journal of International Management, 5 (4), 373-393

Written By

Wenjia Chang-Howe

Submitted: November 23rd, 2020 Reviewed: March 9th, 2021 Published: April 8th, 2021