Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Brazilian Coast: A Significant Gap in the Knowledge of Cyanobacteria and Their Applications

Written By

Taiara A. Caires and Helen Michelle de J. Affe

Submitted: 28 December 2020 Reviewed: 10 March 2021 Published: 28 March 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97151

From the Edited Volume

Cyanobacteria - Recent Advances in Taxonomy and Applications

Edited by Wael N. Hozzein

Chapter metrics overview

349 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Brazil has 10.959 km of coastline which includes three ecoregions based on the biogeographic system, exhibiting a wide range of environments that favor the occurrence of numerous cyanobacterial morpho- and ecotypes. These organisms have a great adaptive capacity, which explains their occupancy in numerous environments and the high diversification of the group. Historically, the cyanobacteria have been classified only based on morphology, which makes their taxonomy quite challenging. There is usually little morphological variation between taxa, which makes it difficult to identify diacritical characteristics between some genera and species, making intergeneric and intraspecific delimitation tough. Thereby, the polyphasic approach based on different tools allows the identification of new taxa and the reassessment of those already established with more reliability, contributing to a better systematic resolution of the world ‘cyanoflora’, a term that we propose herein to describe the diversity of Cyanobacteria into Phycoflora area. However, the use of these tools is still not widely applied to most genera and species, especially those from tropical and subtropical environments, which has limited the real recognition of their biodiversity, as well as the knowledge about the cyanobacteria’s evolutionary history and biogeography. In Brazil, even with the great development of phycological studies, the knowledge about Cyanobacteria from marine benthic environments has not evolved to the same degree. This phylum has been neglected in floristic surveys, presenting only 46 benthic species reported to the long Brazilian coastline, evidencing the still incipient knowledge about the diversity and distribution of this microorganism’s group. Furthermore, biotechnological properties of Brazilian marine cyanobacteria are still almost completely unknown, with only three studies carried out to date, underestimating one of the most diverse groups and with promising potential for the possibility of isolating new biochemically active compounds. The ten new taxa related to the Brazilian coast in the last decade emphasizes the challenge of conducting further floristic surveys in the underexplored marine environments in order to fill an important lacune in the cyanoflora knowledge, as well as their biogeographic distribution and biotechnological potential. Besides, the recognition of the Brazilian cyanoflora makes an important contribution to the understanding of the functioning and monitoring of marine ecosystems and provide data for the construction of future public policies, which is a goal of the United Nations Decade for Ocean Science for Sustainable Development.

Keywords

  • biodiversity
  • biotechnological prospection
  • Brazilian coast
  • cyanoflora
  • cyanobacteria
  • polyphasic approach
  • taxonomy

1. Introduction

The phylum Cyanobacteria is a well-defined group of gram-negative oxygenic photosynthetic bacteria, responsible for the initial change of the Earth’s atmosphere from the reducing to the oxidizing condition [1, 2, 3, 4]. The origin of this group is estimated between 2.7 to 3.5 billion years, based on fossil records and organic biomarkers. Cyanobacteria are highly adaptable and have colonized the most varied biotopes as terrestrial, freshwater, brackish, and marine environments, including those considered extreme, such as the poles, hot springs, and deserts, being considered excellent environmental colonizers [5, 6, 7].

The adaptive capacity and diversification of cyanobacteria, as well as the occupation of the environments by these microorganisms can be explained by their great flexibility to acclimatize to a wide range of environmental conditions [1, 4, 8]. This extraordinary adaptability is favored by a wide variety of morphological and physiological characteristics exhibited by different eco- and morphotypes into Cyanobacteria [7]. Besides their significant ecological importance as primary producers, these organisms also are recognized as great fixers of atmospheric nitrogen, playing an important role in the bioavailability of the nitrogen compounds in the trophic chains of the most diverse environments, whether aquatic or terrestrial [9].

Cyanobacteria usually present phenotypic plasticity among the individuals of the same species. On the other hand, individuals from different species can represent cryptic taxa [10]. For marine environments, these morphological variations may be due to local environmental features, such as hydrodynamics, water temperature, shading, and substrate types [11]. According to Dvořák et al. [12], the difficulty of cyanobacteria identification stems from their cryptic diversity, as well as the poor knowledge about morphological variability of these organisms and the common convergent evolutionary events. Thus, the polymorphism presented by cyanobacteria makes it difficult to identify diacritical characteristics for species identification [11, 13].

Historically, the cyanobacteria have been classified only based on morphology, which makes their taxonomy quite challenging, especially on intergeneric and intraspecific delimitation. In that respect, the polyphasic approach has been widely used in taxonomic studies of cyanobacteria as an efficient method to identify new taxa and reassessing of those already established [4, 14]. This approach mainly integrates molecular data (e.g. 16S rRNA), morphology, ultrastructure, biochemistry and ecological aspects. The recent inclusion of new molecular biology tools has been particularly useful, as the secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) located between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes [15, 16, 17, 18].

The integration of these tools has helped in the resolution of countless cryptogenera, which present distinct phylogenetically well-defined clades, but practically impossible to be separated only by morphology [4], clearly showing that genotypic diversity exceeds phenotypic diversity. Thereby, the polyphasic approach allows greater knowledge about polyphyletic genera [10, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26], contributing to a better systematic resolution of the world ‘cyanoflora’, a term that we propose herein to describe the diversity of Cyanobacteria into Phycoflora area.

However, the use of these tools is still not widely applied to most genera and species, especially those from tropical and subtropical environments, which has limited the real recognition of their biodiversity, as well as the knowledge about the cyanobacteria’s evolutionary history and biogeography. This group has been neglected in the Brazilian marine floristic surveys, mainly for benthic environments, which are still poorly understood. Besides the difficulties in carrying out taxonomic studies due to the great problem in the definition of diacritic characteristics that assist in rapid and practical identification of taxa [27], it is important to highlight the small number of taxonomists working in this specific group in Brazil, which amplifies the significant knowledge gap about the cyanoflora.

Advertisement

2. Brazil: an extensive and environmentally diverse coastline

Brazil has 10.959 km of coastline (4°N to 33°S) which is bathed in its entire length by the Atlantic Ocean. Additionally, its coast has an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) that includes up to 200 miles from the coast, encompassing the entire Continental Shelf and the oceanic islands [28]. The Brazilian coast is subdivided into three ecoregions based on the biogeographic system to classify the oceans: (1) Warm Temperate Southwestern Atlantic (South and Southeast regions); (2) Tropical Southwestern Atlantic (East and Northeast regions); and (3) North Brazil Shelf (Amazonia region) [29]. Included into the Tropical Southwestern Atlantic ecoregion are São Pedro & São Paulo Islands, Fernando de Noronha, Atoll das Rocas, Trindade and Martin Vaz Islands, and the Abrolhos Archipelago (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Ecoregions (colored lines) based on Spalding et al. [29], and regions (gray scale bars) based on Horta et al. [30]. Green - North Brazil shelf; red - tropical southwestern Atlantic; blue - warm temperate southwestern Atlantic. AR – Atoll das Rocas; SS – São Pedro & São Paulo Islands; FN - Fernando de Noronha; TR - Trindade Island; MV - Martin Vaz Islands; AA - Abrolhos archipelago.

Horta et al. [30], based on the latitudinal temperature gradient occurring along the Brazilian coast, divided it into two large areas: (1) Tropical Region (covering the Northeast area); and (2) Warm Temperate Region (including the Southeast and South areas, with exception of Espírito Santo state, which is considered a transition zone) (Figure 1). The Tropical Region is characterized by the oligotrophic waters and its benthic phycoflora is found predominantly on sandy substrates. In the Warm Temperate Region, the benthic algae occur on rocky shores [30, 31, 32].

For macroalgae, the species richness presents a reduction in the north–south direction along the Brazilian coast [30]. The obtained data so far show this same pattern of species richness distribution for cyanobacteria. However, there are many knowledge gaps about this group in the Brazilian coastline, which can modify this pattern observed up to now. Golubic et al. [33] and Hoffmann [34] highlighted that large areas with different climates can present a high cyanobacteria biodiversity, notably in the tropical zone, in which the great part of the Brazilian coast is found.

The Brazilian coastal region varies considerably in shape and width, including 3.000 km of coral reefs (0°50’S to 18°00’S) among which some are attached to the coast, and others are several kilometers offshore [35, 36, 37]. Charpy et al. [38] relate that benthic cyanobacteria constitute a major component of epiphytic, epilithic, and endolithic communities in reef ecosystems, performing an important role in these areas. Besides the coral reefs, the Brazilian coast presents several types of substrates, including beach rocky, sandstone formation, precambrian basement, and carbonate crusts, which can favor the occurrence of a great diversity of cyanobacteria (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

General aspect of beaches on the Brazilian coast. A. Praia do Francês (TSA); B. Paripueira (TSA); C. Pirambúzios (TSA); D. Pipa (TSA); E. Porto de Galinhas (TSA); F. Gaibú (TSA); G. Caponga (TSA); H. Itaqui (TSA); I. Araçagi (NBS); J. Pontal de Guaibura (WTSA); K. Praia das Focas (WTSA); L. Praia de Tassimirim (TSA); M. Ponta do Mutá (TSA); N. Praia do Francês (TSA); O. Imbassaí (TSA); P. Praia dos Castelhanos (WTSA); Q. Ponta das Canas (WTSA); R. Ponta da Nhá Pina (WTSA); S. Praia Grande (WTSA); T. Búzios (WTSA). (WTSA) Warm Temperate Southwestern Atlantic ecoregion (south and southeast regions); (TSA) Tropical Southwestern Atlantic ecoregion (east and northeast regions); (NBS) North Brazil Shelf ecoregion (subregion Amazonia region).

In the marine benthic environments, the cyanobacteria can occupy the supralittoral, mediolitoral (intertidal zone) and infralittoral, which may grow in epilithic, epiphytic, and epizoic life forms [11, 39, 40, 41]. Cyanobacteria do not have specific morphological adaptations for fixation. Thus, these organisms typically occur associated with rough substrates, as beach rock which favors their adhesion, and microhabitats which present low hydrodynamics [41]. According to Taton and Hoffmann [42], these microorganisms can occur as endoliths in the locals with high water movement.

Regarding the vertical zonation in these environments, the morphophysiological characteristics of cyanobacteria play an important role in their distribution. Taton and Hoffmann [42] describe that these microorganisms can display zonation from supralittoral areas toward the intertidal zone, which is directly influenced by hydrodynamics, duration and frequency of subaerial exposure, and the type and amount of sediments. In that respect, the presence of heterocytes can favor the survival of these microorganisms in microhabitats with limited nutrient availability, as the supralittoral. Tomitani et al. [43] and Sohm et al. [44] related the predominance of Nostocales taxa in this abovementioned microhabitat, which has limiting abiotic variables.

On the other hand, homocyted taxa present high success in several microhabitats in the mediolitoral region, which remain in contact with water for a period of the day [41]. Besides the aforementioned zones, the infralittoral region is also understudied in the Brazilian marine environments, with only one species described for this zone, Symploca infralitoralis, Caires et al. [40], highlighting the need for greater sampling and analysis efforts in this environment.

Advertisement

3. How much is Brazilian marine benthic cyanoflora known?

In Brazil, even with the great development of phycological studies, the knowledge about the phylum Cyanobacteria has not evolved to the same degree, especially regarding the marine benthic environments [41, 45]. According to Komárek [46], only 5 to 10% of the diversity of cyanobacteria is known in the world. Menezes et al. [47] carried out a data compilation and registered the following species richness for the Brazilian marine environments: North - one taxon; Northeast - 45 taxa; Southeast - 91 taxa; and South - 16 taxa. However, these numbers include the diversity of planktonic cyanobacteria, which are more widely known than benthic ones.

Regarding the benthic taxa for the Brazilian coastal region, only 46 species are reported by ‘Flora do Brasil 2020 Database’, which are distributed as follows: 25 species for Oscillatoriales (homocyted taxa); six species for Nostocales (heterocystous taxa); two for Spirulinales (homocyted taxa); seven for Synechococcales (five homocyted taxa; and two single-celled taxa); four species for Chroococcales (single-celled taxa); and two species for Pleurocapsales (single-celled taxa) [48].

Cyanobacteria is a group of great ecological, health, economic and biotechnological interest nevertheless studies approaching benthic marine cyanobacteria in Brazil are scarce (Figure 3). Among the realized studies, most of them were developed in the southeastern region, mainly in the coastal environments of the São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro states, both included in Warm Temperate Region [49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65].

Figure 3.

Number of papers about benthic cyanobacteria developed in each coastal region Brazilian coastline: Green - North Brazil shelf (one study); red - tropical southwestern Atlantic (eight studies); blue - warm temperate southwestern Atlantic (seventeen studies). Brazilian states: MA – Maranhão; PE – Pernambuco; BA – Bahia; RJ – Rio de Janeiro; SP – São Paulo; PR - Paraná; SC – Santa Catarina; RS – Rio Grande do Sul.

For the other Brazil’s regions, the following studies are reported: South – Coutinho et al. [66] for Santa Catarina state, and Garcia-Baptista & Baptista [67] for Rio Grande do Sul state; and Northeast – Nogueira and Ferreira-Correia [68] for Maranhão, Branco et al. [69] for Pernambuco, and Caires et al. [10, 40, 41] for Bahia. Additionally, Caires et al. [70] described one new genus, Neolyngbya T.A. Caires, C.L. Sant’Anna et J.M.C. Nunes, which includes six species widespread for the Brazilian coast. Among them, N. granulosa T.A. Caires, C.L. Sant’Anna et J.M.C. Nunes was recently reevaluated based on genetic data by Lefler et al. [26], who proposed a new combination Affixifilum granulosum (Caires, Sant’Anna et Nunes) Lefler, D.E.Berthold et Laughinghouse.

Besides Neolyngbya, other two new genera were described for Brazilian coast in the last decade: Capilliphycus T.A. Caires, C.L. Sant’Anna et J.M.C. Nunes [10], including two species (C. salinus T.A. Caires, C.L. Sant’Anna et J.M.C. Nunes, and C. tropicalis T.A. Caires, C.L. Sant’Anna et J.M.C. Nunes); and Halotia D.B. Genuário et al., with one species for marine benthic environment (H. branconii D.B. Genuário et al.). The distribution of the ten new species, including Symploca infralitoralis described for the Brazilian infralittoral, is showed in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Spatial distribution along the Brazilian coast of the new described genera and species in the last decade. Data based on Caires et al. [10, 40, 70] and Genuário et al. [64]. Green - North Brazil shelf (no taxon); red - tropical southwestern Atlantic (six taxa); blue - warm temperate southwestern Atlantic (four taxa). Brazilian states: BA – Bahia; RJ – Rio de Janeiro; SP – São Paulo; PR - Paraná.

Since the first published research about Brazilian marine benthic cyanobacteria which was carried out almost four decades ago, a limited number of studies was realized in this country (Figure 5). The number of studies and the interval among them demonstrate that the knowledge about the diversity and distribution of cyanobacteria are still incipient, especially when considering the coastal extension of Brazil and the great diversity of favorable habitats for the development of these organisms [41].

Figure 5.

Distribution of all studies carried out about marine benthic cyanobacteria in the Brazilian environments over time.

Furthermore, Brazil has some islands, as São Pedro & São Paulo, Fernando de Noronha, Atoll das Rocas, and Trindade and Martin Vaz, which are completely unknown about their cyanoflora, underestimating the biodiversity of this group. For Abrolhos Archipelago, only the studies carried out by Walter et al. [71] and Walter et al. [72] describe a new genus, Adonisia Walter et al., and a new species Adonisia turfae Walter et al., respectively. However, the descriptions of new taxa are not valid according to the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes - ICNP [73] and the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi and Plants - Shenzhen Code [74]. Therefore, these taxa were not included in our analyses about benthic cyanobacteria diversity.

Regarding the relevance of ecological aspects related to benthic cyanobacteria, it is important to highlight that these microorganisms also are responsible for the “Black Band Disease” in the reef-forming corals, causing a direct impact on the functioning of these systems, and affecting their entire associated biota [75]. Some filamentous species have formed recurrent blooms, as observed in Abrolhos Archipelago by Ribeiro et al. [76]. According to Taylor et al. [77], the frequency of these blooms tends to increase globally as marine ecosystems undergo a process of eutrophication and thermal anomalies, which can be associated with global climate changes. These factors make evident the importance of studies that contribute to the knowledge of cyanobacteria, as well as about the interactions between this group and other organisms that occurred in the Brazilian marine habitats, supporting initiatives for the conservation of the reef environments.

Advertisement

4. Underestimated biotechnological potential of the Brazilian cyanoflora

Cyanobacteria presents a great physiological ability to survive under several abiotic conditions. This capacity is possibly related to a large number of secondary metabolites biosynthesized by different biochemical routes in these individuals [78]. These compounds are distributed into 260 cyanobacterial metabolite families and in ten different chemical classes, like lipopeptides, peptides, lipids, terpenes, polysaccharides, alkaloids, polyketides, macrolides/lactones, and indole compounds, [79, 80]. Among marine cyanobacteria, the filamentous forms usually have a greater quantity of natural bioactive products, with approximately 800 compounds [81].

Therefore, these microorganisms are evaluated as a rich source of biologically active secondary metabolites with potential biotechnological application [82, 83], especially in the pharmacological area, presenting substances with antitumor, antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticholinesterase activities [84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102].

According to Demay et al. [80], there are more than 90 genera of cyanobacteria that produce compounds with potential beneficial activities, most of them belonging to the orders Oscillatoriales, Nostocales, Chroococcales, and Synechococcales. However, the orders Pleurocapsales, Chroococcidiopsales, and Gloeobacterales remain poorly explored about their bioactivity potential. In that respect, the marine species, specifically the complex Lyngbya-Moorena genera stand out for the large production of bioactive metabolites.

Although Brazil has a long coastline, showing itself as a potential source of natural products, the biotechnological properties of Brazilian marine cyanobacteria are still almost completely unknown, underestimating one of the most diverse groups with promising potential for the possibility of isolating new biochemically active compounds. In Brazil, only the studies conducted by Caires et al. [103], Vaz [62], Silva et al. [65], and Armstrong et al. [104] deal with this theme, which demonstrated the great biotechnological potential of the Brazilian marine benthic cyanobacteria, highlighting the capacity of this group.

Approaches including biofertilization and nutraceutical applications have not yet been carried out with these Brazilian marine microorganisms. For biofuel production, only the study realized by Da Rós et al. [105] with a unicellular marine strain Chlorogloea sp. is registered. This research evaluated the chemical and physico-chemical properties of lipids obtained from distinct cyanobacterial strains for biodiesel production.

Therefore, the extensive Brazilian coastline is almost entirely unidentified regarding the biotechnological potential of the marine cyanobacteria occurring in this environment, underestimating the biochemiodiversity of one of the most promising groups concerning the possibility of isolating new biochemically active compounds with unprecedented molecular skeletons. Thus, the use of natural compounds, as those obtained from marine cyanobacteria, has become a viable alternative for the discovery of substances for the treatment of infections caused by resistant microorganisms [106], as well as the cyanobacterial biomass can become an important source to nutraceutical, biofertilization, and biofuel applications.

Advertisement

5. Future perspectives about Brazilian cyanoflora

The knowledge about the biodiversity of marine benthic cyanobacteria from the Brazilian coast is notoriously underestimated. The recognition of their cyanoflora makes an important contribution to the understanding of the functioning of marine ecosystems, as well as the ecological relationships in which cyanobacteria are present, such as coral reefs. Besides, the generation of scientific knowledge about marine biodiversity is one of the goals of the United Nations Decade for Ocean Science for Sustainable Development, providing data for monitoring and conservation of these environments, in addition to the construction of future public policies [107].

The number of new taxa related to the Brazilian coast in the last decade emphasizes the challenge of conducting further floristic surveys in the underexplored marine environments in order to fill an important lacune in the cyanoflora knowledge, as well as their biogeographic distribution. The future data set based on a polyphasic approach about this group can contribute to the definition of morphological markers for better delimitation of marine species, providing the basis for understanding evolutionary relationships and sustaining systematic decisions into Cyanobacteria. Furthermore, the recognition of this diversity supports studies that can reveal new bioactive compounds through the biotechnological prospection, aggregating value to these microorganisms.

References

  1. 1. Wilmotte A. Molecular Evolution and Taxonomy of the Cyanobacteria. In: Bryant, D. A. (ed). The Molecular Biology of Cyanobacteria. Kluwer Academi Pub. 1994; 1-25
  2. 2. Golubic S, Seong-Joo L. Early Cyanobacterial fossil record: preservation palaeoenvironments and identification. European Journal Phycology 1999; 34:339-348
  3. 3. Jill AS, Webb EA, Capone DG. Emerging patterns of marine nitrogen fixation. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2011; 9:499-508
  4. 4. Komárek J. A polyphasic approach for the taxonomy of cyanobacteria: principles and applications. European Journal of Phycology. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/09670262.2016.1163738
  5. 5. Schopf JW, Packer BM. Early Archean (3.3-Billion to 3.5-Billion-Year-Old) Microfossils from Warrawoona Group, Australia. Science. 1987; 3:237:70-3
  6. 6. Brocks JJ, Logan GA, Buick R, Summons RE. Archean Molecular Fossils and the Early Rise of Eukaryotes. Science. 1999; 285:1033-1036
  7. 7. Komárek J. Cyanobacterial taxonomy: current problems and prospects for the integration of traditional and molecular approaches. Algae. 2006; 21:349-375
  8. 8. Komárek J, Anagnostidis K. Cyanoprokaryota-2. Teil/2nd part: Oscillatoriales, in: Büdel, B., Krienitz, L., Gärtner, G., Schagerl, M. (Eds.), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 19/778 2. Elsevier/Spektrum, Heidelberg. 2005. 759p.
  9. 9. Chen M, Schliep M, Willows RD, Cai Z, Neilan BA, Scheer H. A Red-Shifted Chlorophyll. Science. 2010; 329:1318-1319
  10. 10. Caires TA, Lyra GM, Hentschke GS, Pedrini AG, Sant’Anna CL, Nunes JMC. Neolyngbya gen. nov. (Cyanobacteria, Oscillatoriaceae): A new filamentous benthic marine taxon widely distributed along the Brazilian coast. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2018a; 120:196-211. ISNN 10557903
  11. 11. Sant’Anna CL. Cyanophyceae marinhas bentônicas do Parque Estadual da Ilha do Cardoso, São Paulo, Brasil. Hoehnea. 1995; 22 (1/2):197-216
  12. 12. Dvořák P, Jahodářová E, Hašler P, Gusev E, Pulíčková A. A new tropical cyanobacterium Pinocchia polymorpha gen. et sp. nov. derived from genus Pseudanabaena. Fottea. 2015; 15:113-120.
  13. 13. Sant’Anna CL, Azevedo MTP, Agujaro LF. Manual Ilustrado e Contagem de Cianobactérias Planctônicas de Águas Continentais Brasileiras. 1ª ed. Rio de Janeiro. Interciência. 2006; 58p.
  14. 14. Hoffmann L, Komárek J, Kaštovský J. System of cyanoprokaryotes (Cyanobacteria) – state in 2004. Algological Studies. 2005; 117: 95-115.
  15. 15. Iteman I, Rippka R, De Marsac NT, Herdman M. rDNA analyses of planktonic heterocystous cyanobacteria, including members of the genera Anabaenopsis and Cyanospira. Microbiology. 2002; 148:481-496.
  16. 16. Boyer SL, Flechtner VR, Johansen JR. Is the 16S–23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region a good tool for use in molecular systematics and population genetics? A case study in cyanobacteria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001; 18:1057-69.
  17. 17. Boyer SL, Johansen JR, Flechtner VR. Phylogeny and genetic variance in terrestrial Microcoleus(Cyanophyceae) species based on sequence analysis of the 16s rRNA gene and associated 16S–23S ITS region. J. Phycol. 2002; 38:1222-1235.
  18. 18. Johansen JR, Kovacik L, Casamatta DA, Fučiková K, Kaštovský J. Utility of 16S–23S ITSsequence and secondary structure for recognition of intrageneric and intergeneric limits within cyanobacterial taxa: Leptolyngbya corticola sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenaceae, Cyanobacteria). Nova Hedwigia. 2011; 92:283-302.
  19. 19. Sharp K, Arthur KE, Gu L, Ross C, Harrison G, Gunasekera SP, Meickle T, Matthew S, Luesch H. et al. Phylogenetic and chemical diversity of three chemotypes of bloom-forming Lyngbya species (Cyanobacteria: Oscillatoriales) from reefs of southeastern Florida. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009; 75:2879-2888.
  20. 20. Engene N, Rottacker EC, Kastovsky J, Byrum T, Choi H, Ellisman MH, Komárek J, Gerwick WH. Moorea producta gen. nov., sp. nov. and Moorea bouillonii comb. nov., tropical marine cyanobacteria rich in bioactive secondary metabolites. Int. Journ. of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2012; 62:202-214.
  21. 21. Engene N, Gunasekera SP, Gerwick WH, Paul VJ. Phylogenetic Inferences Reveal a Large Extent of Novel Biodiversity in Chemically Rich Tropical Marine Cyanobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2013; 79 (6):1882-1888.
  22. 22. Engene N, Tronholm A, Paul VJ. Uncovering cryptic diversity of Lyngbya: the new tropical marine cyanobacterial genus Dapis (Oscillatoriales). J Phycol. 2018; 54(4):435-446.
  23. 23. Komárek J, Zapomělová E, Šmarda J, Kopecký J, Rejmánková E, Woodhouse J, Neilan BA, Komárková J. Polyphasic evaluation of Limnoraphis robusta, a water-bloom forming cyanobacterium from Lake Atitlán, Guatemala, with a description of Limnoraphis gen. nov. Fottea. 2013; 13(1):39-52.
  24. 24. Mcgregor GB, Sendall BC. Phylogeny and toxicology of Lyngbya wollei (Cyanobacteria, Oscillatoriales) from north-eastern Australia, with a description of Microseira gen. nov. J. Phycol. 2014; 51(1):109-119.
  25. 25. Stoyanov P, Moten D, Mladenov R, Dzhambazov B, Teneva I. Phylogenetic Relationships of Some Filamentous Cyanoprokaryotic Species. Evolutionary Bioinformatics. 2014; 10: 39-49.
  26. 26. Lefler F, Berthold DE, Laughinghouse IV HD. The occurrence of Affixifilum gen. nov. and Neolyngbya (Oscillatoriaceae) in South Florida (USA), with the description of A. floridanum sp. nov. and N. biscaynensis sp. nov. Journal of Phycology. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13065
  27. 27. Kling HJ, Watson SA. New planktic species of Pseudanabaena (Cyanoprokaryota, Oscillatoriales) from North American large lakes. Hydrobiologia. 2003; 502: 383-388
  28. 28. Castro BM, Brandini FP, Fortes JF. A Amazônia Azul: recursos e preservação. Revista USP. 2017; 113:7-26. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i113p7-26
  29. 29. Spalding MD, Fox HE, Allen GR, Davidson N, Ferdaña ZA, Finlayson M, Halpern BS, Jorge MA, Lombana A, Lourie AS, Martin KD, Mcmanus E, Molnar J, Recchia CA, Robertson J. Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas. 2007; 57(7):573-583
  30. 30. Horta PA, Amancio E, Coimbra CS, Oliveira EC. Considerações sobre a distribuição e origem da flora de macroalgas marinhas brasileiras. Hoehnea. 2001; 28(3):243-265
  31. 31. Oliveira Filho EC. Algas marinhas bentônicas do Brasil. Tese de Livre-Docência, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. 1977; 407p.
  32. 32. Castro BM, Miranda LB. Physical oceanography of the western atlantic continental shelf located between 4°N and 34°S: Coastal segment (4,W). In: The Sea. 1998; 11:1
  33. 33. Golubic S, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Campbell SE. Diversity of Marine Cyanobacteria. In: Marine Cyanobacteria. Charpy, L., Larkum, A., W., D., Eds. Monaco Musee Océanographique, Monaco, 1999; 19, pp. 53-76
  34. 34. Hoffmann L. Marine cyanobacteria in tropical regions: diversity and ecology. Eur J Phycol. 1999; 34:371-379
  35. 35. Leão ZMAN, Kikuchi RKP, Testa V. Corals and coral reefs of Brazil. In Cortes J. (ed.). Latin American Coral Reefs. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publisher. 2003. p. 9-52
  36. 36. Ferreira BP, Costa MBSF, Coxey MS, Gaspar ALB, Veleda D, Araujo M. The effects of sea surface temperatures anomalies on oceanic coral reef systems in the southwestern tropical Atlantic. Coral Reefs. 2013; 32(2): 441-454
  37. 37. Leão ZMAN, Kikuchi RKP, Ferreira BP, Neves EG, Sovierzoski HH, Oliveira MDM, Maida M, Correia MD, Johnsson R. Brazilian coral reefs in a period of global change: A synthesis. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography. 2016; 64(spe2), 97-116
  38. 38. Charpy L, Casaerto BE, Langlade MJ, Suzuki Y. Cyanobacteria in coral reef ecosystems: a review. J Mar Biol. 2012; 2012:1-9
  39. 39. Graham LE, Wilcox LW. Algae. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 2000; pp. 97-131
  40. 40. Caires TA, Sant’Anna CL, Nunes JMC. A new species of marine benthic cyanobacteria from the infralittoral of Brazil: Symploca infralitoralis sp. nov. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 2013; 36:159-163
  41. 41. Caires TA, Sant’Anna CL, Nunes JMC. Biodiversity of benthic filamentous Cyanobacteria in tropical marine environments of Bahia State, Northeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 2019; 42:149-170
  42. 42. Taton A, Hofmann L. Marine cyanophyceae of Papua New Guinea. VII Endoliths. Algol. Stud. 2003; 109: 537-554.
  43. 43. Tomitani A, Knoll AH, Cavanaugh CM, Ohno T. The evolutionary diversification of cyanobacteria: molecular–phylogenetic and paleontological perspectives. PNAS. 2006; 103:5442-5447
  44. 44. Sohm JA, Webb EA, Capone DG. Emerging patterns of marine nitrogen fixation. Microbiol. 2011; 9:499-508
  45. 45. Crispino LMB. Cianobactérias Marinhas Bentônicas do Estado de São Paulo. Tese de Doutorado em Biodiversidade Vegetal e Meio Ambiente - Instituto de Botânica de São Paulo. São Paulo. 2007; 154p.
  46. 46. Komárek J. Planktic oscillatorialean cyanoprokaryotes (short review according to combined phenotype and molecular aspects). Hydrobiologia. 2003; 502:367-382
  47. 47. Menezes M. et al. Update of the Brazilian floristic list of Algae and Cyanobacteria. Rodriguésia. 2015; 66 (4): 1047-1062
  48. 48. Flora do Brasil 2020 Database - available at: http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/listaBrasil
  49. 49. Tórgo FMS. Observações sobre Ralfsia expansa (Phaeophyceae) e Hyella caespitosa (Cyanophyceae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, Nova Série, Botânica, Rio de Janeiro. 1963; n° 30.
  50. 50. Baeta Neves MHC. Étude dês Cyanophycées marines de la région de Cabo Frio (Rio de Janeiro – Brésil): taxonomie et essai d’interpretation écologique. Tese de Doutorado, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris. 1988; 155p.
  51. 51. Baeta Neves MHC. Estudo das Cianofíceas Marinhas Bentônicas da Região de Cabo Frio (Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil). I – Chroococcales. Hoehnea. 1991; 18(1): 191-204
  52. 52. Baeta Neves MHC. Estudo das Cianofíceas Marinhas Bentônicas da Região de Cabo Frio (Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil). II – Hormogonae. Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 1992; 52(4): 641-659.
  53. 53. Baeta Neves MHC, Casarin AJ. As cianofíceas das salinas de Cabo Frio – Brasil. Acta Biologica Leopoldensia. 1990; 12(1):99-123
  54. 54. Baeta Neves MHC. Tribuzi D. Les Cyanophycées de la mangrove de la “Ponta do Pai Vitório” de la região de Cabo Frio (RJ, Brésil). Acta Biológica Leopoldensia. 1992; 14:29-52
  55. 55. Sant’Anna CL, Simonetti C. Cianobactérias marinhas bentônicas das Praias de Peruíbe edos Sonhos, Município de Itanhaém, São Paulo, II: espécies epilíticas e epizoicas. Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 1991; 52(3):515-523
  56. 56. Sant’Anna CL. Cyanophyceae marinhas bentônicas da região de Ubatuba, SP, Brasil. Hoehnea. 1997; 24: 57-74
  57. 57. Branco LHZ, Sant’Anna CL, Azevedo MTP, Sormus L. Cyanophyte flora from Cardoso Island, São Paulo State, Brazil, 2: Oscillatoriales. Algological Studies. 1997; 84:39-52
  58. 58. Crispino LMB, Sant’Anna CL. Cianobactérias marinhas bentônicas de ilhas costeiras do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasil. Bot. 2006; 29(4):639-655
  59. 59. Sant’Anna CL, Bicudo RMT, Pereira HASL. Nostocophyceae (Cyanophyceae) do Parque Estadual da Ilha do Cardoso, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Rickia, 1983; 10: 1-27
  60. 60. Sant’Anna CL, Cordeiro-Marino M, Braga MRA, Guimarães SMPB. Cianofíceas marinhas bentônicas das Praias de Peruíbe e dos Sonhos, Município de Itanhaém, São Paulo, Brasil. Rickia. 1985; 12:89-112
  61. 61. Sant’Anna CL, Azevedo MTP, Branco LHZ, Braga MRA, Cordeiro-Marino M, Guimarães SMPB. Cianofíceas marinhas bentônicas das praias de Peruíbe e dos Sonhos, Município de Itanhaém, SP, Brasil, III. Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 1994; 55:389-407
  62. 62. Vaz MGMV, Genuário DB, Andreote APD, Malone CFS, Sant’Anna CL, Barbiero L, Fiore MF. Pantanalinema gen. nov. and Alkalinema gen. nov.: novel pseudanabaenacean genera (Cyanobacteria) isolated from saline–alkaline lakes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014; 65: 298-308
  63. 63. Silva CSP, Genuário DB, Vaz MGMV, Fiore MF. Phylogeny of culturable cyanobacteria from Brazilian mangroves. Syst Appl Microbiol, 2014; 37: 100-112
  64. 64. Genuário DB, Vaz MGMV, Hentschke GS, Sant’Anna CL, Fiore MF. Halotia gen. nov., a phylogenetically and physiologically coherent cyanobacterial genus isolated from marine coastal environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015; 65:663-675
  65. 65. Silva EM, Vaz MGMV, Genuário DB, Armstrong L, Fiore MF, Debonsi HM. Novel marine cyanobacteria from the Atlantic coast of Brazil, Applied Phycology. 2020; 1:1, 58-72.DOI: 10.1080/26388081.2020.1753571
  66. 66. Coutinho R. Taxonomia, distribuição, crescimento sazonal, reprodução e biomassa das algas bentônicas do estuário da Lagoa dos Patos (RS). Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade do Rio Grande, Rio Grande. 1982; 232p.
  67. 67. Garcia-Baptista M, Baptista LRM. Algas psâmicas de Jardim Beira Mar, Capão da Canoa, Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 1991; 52(2):325-342
  68. 68. Nogueira NMC, Ferreira-Correia MM. Cyanophyceae/ Cyanobacteria in red mangrove Forest at Mosquitos and Coqueiros estuaries, São Luiz, State of Maranhão, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 2001; 61: 347-356
  69. 69. Branco LHZ, Moura NA, Silva AC, Bittencourt-Oliveira MC. Biodiversidade e considerações biogeográficas das Cyanobacteria de uma área de manguezal do estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Acta Bot. Bras. 2003; 17: 585-596
  70. 70. Caires TA, Lyra GM, Hentschke GS, Silva AMS, Araújo VL, Sant’ Anna CL, Nunes JMC. Polyphasic delimitation of a filamentous marine genus, Capillus gen. Nov. (Cyanobacteria, Oscillatoriaceae) with the description of two Brazilian species. Algae. 2018b; 33(4):291-304
  71. 71. Walter JM, Coutinho FH, Dutilh BE, Swings J, Thompson FL, Thompson CC. Ecogenomics and Taxonomy of Cyanobacteria Phylum. Front. Microbiol. 2017; 8:2132. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02132
  72. 72. Walter JM, Coutinho FH, Leomil L, Hargreaves PI, Campeão ME, Vieira VV, Silva BS, Fistaro GO, Salomon PS, Sawabe T, Mino S, Hosokawa M, Miyashita H, Maruyama F, van Verk MC, Dutilh BE, Thompson CC, Thompson FL. Ecogenomics of the Marine Benthic Filamentous Cyanobacterium Adonisia Microbial Ecology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-019-01480-x
  73. 73. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM (Editors). International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes Prokaryotic Code (2008 Revision) 2019, volume 69, issue 1A, pages S1–S111. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:S1
  74. 74. Turland, NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber WH, Li DZ, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) Regnum Vegetabile 159. Glashütten: Koeltz Botanical Books. 2018.
  75. 75. Sato Y, Ling ES, Turaev D, Laffy P, Weynberg K, Rattei T, Willis B, Bourne D. Unraveling the microbial processes of black band disease in corals through integrated genomics. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7:1-14
  76. 76. Ribeiro F. V., Padula, V., Moura, R. L., Moraes, F. C., Salomon, P. S., Gibran, F. Z., Motta, F. S., Pereira, R. C., Amado-Filho, G. M. & Pereira-Filho, G. H. 2017. Massive opisthobranch aggregation in the largest coralline reefs in the South Atlantic Ocean: are mesoherbivores underestimated top-down players? Bulletin of Marine Sciences 93 (3): 915-916.
  77. 77. Taylor M, Stahl-Timmins W, Redshaw C, Osborne N. Toxic alkaloids in Lyngbya majuscula and related tropical marine cyanobacteria. Harmful Algae. 2014; 31:1-8
  78. 78. Singh RK, Tiwari SP, Rai AK, Mohapatra TM. Cyanobacteria: an emerging source for drug discovery. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2011; 64:401-412
  79. 79. Burja AM, Banaigs B, Abou-Mansour E, Burgess JG, Wright PC. Marine cyanobacteria – a profilic source of natural products. Tetrahedron. 2011; 57: 9347-9377
  80. 80. Demay J, Bernard C, Reinhardt A, Benjamin M. Natural Products from Cyanobacteria: Focus on Beneficial Activities. Mar. Drugs. 2019; 17(6):320. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17060320
  81. 81. Jones AC, Monroe EA, Eisman EB, Gerwick L, Sherman DH, Gerwick WH. The unique mechanistic transformations involved in the biosynthesis of modular natural products from marine cyanobacteria. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010; 27:1048-1065
  82. 82. Carmichael WW. The cyanotoxins - bioactive metabolites of cyanobacteria: occurrence, ecological role, taxonomic concerns and effects on humans. Journal of Phycology, 2001; 37(3):9-10
  83. 83. Costa M, Costa-Rodrigues J, Fernandes ML, Barros P, Vasconcelos V, Martins R. Marine Cyanobacteria Compounds with Anticancer Properties: A Review on the Implication of Apoptosis. Marine Drugs. 2012; 10(10):2181-2207
  84. 84. Mynderse JS, Moore RE, Kashiwagi M, Norton TR. Antileukemia Activity in the Osciliatoriaceae: Isolation of Debromoaplysiatoxin from Lyngbya. Science, 1977; 196: 538-540
  85. 85. Harrigan GG, Goetzl G. Symbiotic and dietary marine microalgae as a source of bioactive molecules–experience from natural products research. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2002; 14(2):103-108
  86. 86. Mian P, Heilmann J, Bürgi HR, Sticher O. Biological Screening of Terrestrial and Freshwater Cyanobacteria for Antimicrobial Activity, Brine Shrimp Lethality, and Cytotoxicity. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2003; 41(4): 243-247
  87. 87. Surakka A, Sihvonen LM, Lehtimaki JM, Wahlsten M, Vuorela P, Sivonen K. Benthic Cyanobacteria from the Baltic Sea Contain Cytotoxic Anabaena, Nodularia, and Nostoc Strains and an Apoptosis-Inducing Phormidium Strain. Wiley Periodicals. 2005. DOI: 10.1002/tox.20119
  88. 88. Gademann K, Portmann C. Secundary metabolites from Cyanobacteria: Complex Structures and Powerful Bioactivities. Current Organic Chemistry. 2008; 12: 326-341
  89. 89. Martins RF, Ramos MF, Herfindal L, Sousa JA, Skærven K, Vasconcelos VM. Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Assessment of Marine Cyanobacteria – Synechocystis and Synechococcus. Marine Drugs. 2008; 6(1):1-11
  90. 90. Simmons TL, Niclas EN, Ureña LD. et al. Viridamides A and B, Lipodepsipeptides with Anti-Protozoal Activity from the Marine Cyanobacterium Oscillatoria nigro-viridis. J Nat Prod. 2008; 71(9):1544-1550
  91. 91. Becher PG, Baumann HI, Gademann K, Jütner F. The cyanobacterial alkaloid nostocarboline: an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase and trypsin. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2009; 21: 103-110
  92. 92. Chlipala G, Shunyan M, Esperanza J, Carcache B, Ito A, Bazarek S, Orjala J. Investigation of antimicrobial and protease-inhibitory activity from cultured cyanobacteria. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2009; 47 (1):53-60
  93. 93. Liu L, Rein KS. New Peptides Isolated from Lyngbya Species: A Review. Mar. Drugs. 2010; 8:1817-1837
  94. 94. Nunnery JK, Mevers E, Gerwick WH. Biologically active secondary metabolites from marine cyanobacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010; 21:787-793
  95. 95. Sanchez LM, Lopez D, Vesely BA et al. Almiramides A–C: Discovery and Development of a New Class of Leishmaniasis Lead Compounds. J Med Chem. 2010; 53(10):4187-4197
  96. 96. Khalid MN, Shameel MM. Studies on the Bioactivity and Phycochemistry of Lyngbya Agardh (Cyanophycota). International Journal on Algae. 2011; 13 (3): 234-249
  97. 97. Oftedal L, Skjærven KH, Coyne RT, Edvardsen B, Rohrlack T, Skulberg OM, Døskeland SO, Herfindal L. The apoptosis-inducing activity towards leukemia and lymphoma cells in a cyanobacterial culture collection is not associated with mouse bioassay toxicity. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 38: 489-501
  98. 98. Balunas MJ, Grosso MF, Villa FA, et al. Coibacins A-D, Anti-leishmanial Marine Cyanobacterial Polyketides with Intriguing Biosynthetic Origins. Org Lett. 2012; 14(15):3878-3881
  99. 99. Hau AM, Greenwood JA, Lo CV, Serrill JD, Proteau PJ, Ganley IG, Mcphail KL, Ishmael JE. Coibamide A Induces mTOR-Independent Autophagy and Cell Death in Human Glioblastoma Cells. Plos One. 2013; 8(6):1-16
  100. 100. Felczykowska A, Pawlik A, Mazur-Marzec H, Toruńska-Sitarz A, Narajczyk M, Richert M, Węgrzyn G, Herman-Antosiewicz A. Selective inhibition of cancer cells' proliferation by compounds included in extracts from Baltic Sea cyanobacteria. Toxicon. 2015; 108:1-10
  101. 101. Soares AR, Engene N, Gunasekera SP, Sneed JM, Paul VJ. Carriebowlinol, an Antimicrobial Tetrahydroquinolinol from an Assemblage of Marine Cyanobacteria Containing a Novel Taxon. J. Nat. Prod. 2015; 78(3):534-538
  102. 102. Gheda SF, Ismail GA. Natural products from some soil cyanobacterial extracts with potent antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2020; 92(2):e20190934
  103. 103. Caires TA, Silva AMS, Vasconcelos VM, Affe HMJ, Souza-Neta LC, Boness HVM, Sant’Anna CL, Nunes JMC. Biotechnological potential of Neolyngbya (Cyanobacteria), a new marine benthic filamentous genus from Brazil. Algal Research. 2018c; 36:1-9
  104. 104. Armstrong L, Vaz MGMV, Genuário DB, Fiore MF, Debonsi HM. Volatile compounds produced by cyanobacteria isolated from mangrove environment. Current Microbiology. 2019; 76:575-582
  105. 105. Da Rós PCM, Silva CSP, Silva-Estenico ME, Fiore MF, De Castro HF Assessment of Chemical and Physico-Chemical Properties of Cyanobacterial Lipids for Biodiesel Production. Marine Drugs. 2013; 11:2365-2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11072365
  106. 106. Pandey VD. Cyanobacterial natural products as antimicrobial agents, Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015; 4(1):310-317
  107. 107. UNESCO. 2020. UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030) - available at: accessible at https://oceandecade.org/.

Written By

Taiara A. Caires and Helen Michelle de J. Affe

Submitted: 28 December 2020 Reviewed: 10 March 2021 Published: 28 March 2021