Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Felty’s Syndrome

Written By

Vadim Gorodetskiy

Submitted: December 4th, 2020 Reviewed: March 7th, 2021 Published: March 22nd, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97080

Chapter metrics overview

352 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Felty’s syndrome (FS) is an uncommon subset of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) complicated by neutropenia with or without splenomegaly. The pathogenesis of neutropenia in FS is still not fully understood, but it is believed that the principal cause is neutrophil survival defect. Autoantibodies against peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 deiminated histones, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, and eukaryotic elongation factor 1A-1 antigen may contribute to neutropenia development in FS patients. Splenic histology in FS shows non-specific findings and spleen size do not correlate with neutropenia. Cases of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia with low tumor burden in blood and concomitant RA are clinically indistinguishable from FS and present a diagnostic challenge. Examination of T-cell clonality, mutations in signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 gene, and the number of large granular lymphocytes in the blood can establish a correct diagnosis. Optimal approaches to therapy for FS have not been developed, but the use of rituximab seems promising. In this chapter, the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, differential diagnosis, and treatment options for FS are discussed.


  • Felty’s syndrome
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • neutropenia
  • splenomegaly
  • large granular lymphocyte leukemia

1. Introduction

In 1924, at Johns Hopkins Hospital, American physician Augustus Felty described five unusual cases with features of chronic arthritis, splenomegaly, and striking leukopenia [1]. In 1932, the eponym “Felty’s syndrome (FS)” was first used by Hanrahan and Miller to describe these cases [2]. Currently, FS is considered an uncommon subset of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) complicated by neutropenia and splenomegaly [3]. Although splenomegaly represents one characteristic of the triad that defines FS, it is not an absolute requirement of FS diagnosis [4, 5]. T-cell large granular lymphocyte (T-LGL) leukemia in the setting of RA is the condition most likely to be confused with FS. Studies on FS should be considered with the caveat that almost all were performed without a study of T-cell clonality and, therefore, could include cases of RA-associated T-LGL leukemia (see “Diagnosis and differential diagnosis”).


2. Epidemiology

About 1% to 3% of patients with RA develop FS [6]. However, with the evolution of RA pharmacotherapy, the frequency of FS has decreased substantially [7]. The mean age of the patients is 60 years, with a 1.5:1 female to male ratio [8].


3. Pathogenesis

There is firm evidence that the HLA-DRB1*04 genotype is a risk factor for FS development [9]. The exact pathophysiological mechanisms leading to development of neutropenia and splenomegaly in FS are unknown. It is believed, though, that neutrophil survival defect is the main cause of neutropenia [8, 10]. Several autoantibodies have been found in the serum of FS patients with higher frequency or at higher titers in comparison with seropositive RA patients without FS, which may contribute to neutropenia development, including:

  • autoantibodies to H3, H4, and H2A histones deiminated by peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 [11];

  • autoantibodies against glucose-6-phosphate isomerase [12];

  • autoantibodies against eukaryotic elongation factor 1A-1 antigen [13];

  • circulating immune complexes [14].

Autoantibodies against granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were found in 73% patients with FS [15]. However, given that, in most cases, bone marrow in FS reveals normal myeloid cellularity or myeloid hyperplasia with increased granulopoiesis, relative excess of immature forms, and apparent lack of mature myeloid elements [8], the pathogenetic significance of anti-G-CSF antibodies in neutropenia development in patients with FS is unclear.

Some researchers question the significance of spleen sequestration/destruction in neutropenia pathogenesis [8]. However, neutrophils are found in periarteriolar lymphoid sheaths of the spleen even in patients with severe neutropenia [16]. In addition, removal of the spleen leads to restoration of normal neutrophil counts in most patients with FS.


4. Clinical manifestations

Clinical manifestations of FS and the frequency of signs/symptoms based on literature data [5, 14, 17, 18, 19] are presented in Table 1.

Signs/symptomsFrequency (%)
Rheumatoid arthritis100
Rheumatoid nodules53–82
Leg ulcers16–41
Skin pigmentation5–29
Hepatomegaly/portal hypertension5–68

Table 1.

Clinical manifestations of Felty’s syndrome and the frequency of signs/symptoms.

FS usually develops 10–15 years after RA presentation [14, 20], but in rare instances, neutropenia and splenomegaly may precede an arthritis history (non-articular Felty’s syndrome) [21, 22, 23, 24].

The erosive process in FS is typically severe, but this is related to the duration of RA before the onset of neutropenia and splenomegaly [6]. RA with FS is associated with more frequent and severe extra-articular manifestations than RA without FS [14, 20]. Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies are associated with severe extra-articular manifestations in patients with RA [25]. This is consistent with the finding that the vast majority of patients with FS have high titers of RF [14]. In our cohort of 25 patients with FS with a median duration of RA prior to FS diagnosis of 7 years, erosive arthritis at the time of FS diagnosis was detected in 77% of the patients. RF was within the normal range in only two cases, but the anti-CCP titers in these patients were highly positive [26].

Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count of less than 1.500–2.000/μL) without a clearly identified cause is required, by definition, for the FS diagnosis. Neutropenia can manifest as increased frequency and severity of bacterial infections. However, despite reduced absolute neutrophil counts, patients with FS can remain free of infectious complications for extended periods of time.

Splenomegaly is present in over 90% of patients with FS, but the spleen size does not correlate with neutropenia [14, 17, 19]. Splenic histology in FS shows non-specific findings (Figure 1). The red pulp shows expanded sinuses as well as the pulp cords, and an increased number of macrophages and plasma cells. The white pulp follicles are usually hyperplastic [18, 27, 28]. It is possible that portal hypertension secondary to nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver contributes to spleen enlargement in some patients with FS [29].

Figure 1.

Spleen histological examination in a patient with Felty’s syndrome. (A) The spleen shows preservation of the white pulp with prominent germinal centers and lymphocytic infiltration of the red pulp (H&E, ×100). (B) Lymphocytes infiltrate both cords and sinusoids. The infiltration is more prominent within the splenic cords (H&E, ×400).


5. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis

FS should be suspected in a patient with RA, unexplained neutropenia, and splenomegaly. There is a wide range of pathologies in patients with RA that can manifest with neutropenia with or without splenomegaly. FS is a clinical diagnosis, and there is no specific single diagnostic test to confirm or exclude it; therefore, FS is essentially a diagnosis of exclusion.

Neutropenia caused by drug therapy (drug-induced neutropenia) should be ruled out first. The most important treatment of drug-induced neutropenia is to withdraw the causative drug. The average time for full recovery of the neutrophil count is 9 days (range, 9–24 days) [30]. Methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, tocilizumab, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists, antimalarial medications, analgesics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most common causes of drug-induced neutropenia in patients with RA [28]. It is important to keep in mind that unlike with other drugs, rituximab-induced neutropenia occurs after a median period of 4.5 months (range, 3–6.5 months) after the last rituximab infusion [31].

T-LGL leukemia is a rare type of mature T-cell neoplasm characterized by the clonal expansion of large granular lymphocytes (LGLs) and, in most cases, has indolent clinical course. Typical features of T-LGL leukemia include the increase in the number of peripheral blood LGLs, cytopenia (most commonly neutropenia), and variable splenomegaly. A peculiar feature of T-LGL leukemia is its association with RA, which occurs in 17–28% of patients with T-LGL leukemia [32, 33]. Historically, a definitive diagnosis of T-LGL leukemia required the increase in the number of LGLs in peripheral blood greater than 2 × 109/L, but it is now recognized that a lower count (range, 0.4–2 × 109/L) may be compatible with the diagnosis [34, 35, 36].

Cases of T-LGL leukemia in the setting of RA (RA-associated T-LGL leukemia) with low LGL count in peripheral blood and concomitant neutropenia are clinically indistinguishable from FS and diagnostically challenging. RA-associated T-LGL leukemia and FS are distinguished in clinical practice by evaluation of rearrangements of the T cell receptor (TCR) gamma and TCR beta genes in the blood and/or in the bone marrow. The monoclonal rearrangements of the TCR genes (T-cell clonality) are present in T-LGL leukemia but not in FS (Figure 2) [3, 8, 37]. However, there is considerable discussion regarding the significance of dominant T-cell clones as a hallmark of T-cell malignancy because clonal populations of T-cells are observed both in healthy individuals and in exuberant reactive responses [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. Activating somatic mutations in the signal transducer and activator of the transcription 3 (STAT3) gene and an increase in the number of LGLs above 2 × 109/L were detected in RA-associated T-LGL leukemia but not in FS (39% vs. 0% and 21% vs. 0%, respectively) [26]. In addition, the expression of the CD57 antigen and the aberrant (diminished or absent) expression of CD5 on cytotoxic CD3 + CD8+ T-lymphocytes are more typical for T-LGL leukemia than in the polyclonal expansion of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes in FS [26]. In contrast, it seems that the current criteria for bone marrow involvement in T-LGL leukemia do not seem to be sufficiently specific to distinguish it from FS [8, 26].

Figure 2.

Evaluation of T-cell clonality based on rearrangements of the T-cell receptor (TCR) genes. (A) TCR genes show monoclonal rearrangement in T-LGL leukemia. (B) TCR genes show polyclonal rearrangement in Felty’s syndrome.

Aplastic anemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, or acute leukemia can sometimes present with isolated neutropenia. To rule out these pathologies, a bone marrow examination should be considered. In rare cases, cirrhosis, amyloidosis, lymphomas involving spleen, sarcoidosis, or infections can lead to splenomegaly in patients with RA.


6. Management

In two earlier analyzes of survival in FS, 5-year mortality ranged from 25% to 36% [5, 44]; however, recent data regarding the prognosis of FS are not available. The treatment goal in FS is a reversal of the neutropenia to prevent recurrent bacterial infections and sepsis, which is the leading cause of death in patients with FS. The treatment strategy for FS is not evidence-based because of the lack of controlled trials.

Methotrexate (MTX) is considered the first-line therapy for treatment of FS based on case reports and case series data. Low doses of MTX (up to 25 mg once a week) can improve both joint diseases and neutropenia, usually within 1–2 months.

One recent literature review supported the use of rituximab (RTX) as a second-line therapy. A sustained increase in the absolute number of neutrophils was observed in 62.5% of FS patients during the 3 months following one cycle of RTX treatment [45]. The appropriate dosing schedule of RTX for treatment of FS remains uncertain, but most often patients receive two 1000 mg doses separated by 15 days [46]. Some patients had a recurrence of neutropenia after RTX treatment, indicating that in some cases a sustained response may require maintenance therapy with RTX.

There is very limited evidence regarding the leflunomide efficacy in FS [47]. TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, ethanercept, and infliximab) are ineffective in FS [45].

Splenectomy maintained normal neutrophil counts in 80% of patients with FS [10]. However, the indications for splenectomy are now limited because of effective medications and the risk of post-splenectomy sepsis.

The results of treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with FS are variable. GCs can provide a rapid improvement in neutrophil count by stimulating the release of mature cells from the bone marrow and mobilizing them from the marginal pool, thus, creating the effect of increasing their absolute number. However, to achieve a real clinical effect, high doses and prolonged use of GCs may be required, which increases the risk of infection in patients with FS.

G-CSF can be used for treatment of FS patients with life-threatening infections.


7. Conclusion

Although nearly 100 years have passed since the first description of FS, this pathology remains a mystery in many aspects. The pathogenetic mechanisms underlying neutropenia and spleen enlargement in these patients are poorly understood. Optimal approaches to therapy for this rare disorder have not been developed, but the use of rituximab seems promising.



I would like to thank Editage ( for English language editing.


Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Felty AR. Chronic arthritis in the adult associated with splenomegaly and leukopenia. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1924; 35:16-20
  2. 2. Hanrahan EM, Miller SR. Effect of splenectomy in Felty’s syndrome. JAMA. 1932; 99:1247-1252
  3. 3. Balint GP, Balint PV. Felty's syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2004;18,631-645. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2004.05.002
  4. 4. Spivak JL. Felty’s syndrome: an analytical review. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1977;141:156-162
  5. 5. Campion G, Maddison PJ, Goulding N, James I, Ahern MJ, Watt I, Sansom D. The Felty syndrome: a case-matched study of clinical manifestations and outcome, serologic features, and immunogenetic associations. Medicine (Baltimore). 1990;69:69-80
  6. 6. Sibley JT, Haga M, Visram DA, Mitchell DM. The clinical course of Felty's syndrome compared to matched controls. J. Rheumatol. 1991;18:1163-1167
  7. 7. Bartels CM, Bell CL, Shinki K, Rosenthal A, Bridges AJ. Changing trends in serious extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis among United State veterans over 20 years. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49:1670-1675. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq135
  8. 8. Burks EJ, Loughran TP Jr. Pathogenesis of neutropenia in large granular lymphocyte leukemia and Felty syndrome. Blood Rev. 2006;20:245-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2006.01.003
  9. 9. Turesson C, Schaid DJ, Weyand CM, Jacobsson LT, Goronzy JJ, Petersson IF, Sturfelt G, Nyhäll-Wåhlin BM, Truedsson L, Dechant SA, Matteson EL. The impact of HLA-DRB1 genes on extra-articular disease manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:R1386–R1393. DOI: 10.1186/ar1837
  10. 10. Rashba EJ, Rowe JM, Packman CH. Treatment of the neutropenia of Felty syndrome. Blood Rev. 1996;10:177-184. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-960x(96)90024-7
  11. 11. Dwivedi N, Upadhyay J, Neeli I, Khan S, Pattanaik D, Myers L, Kirou KA, Hellmich B, Knuckley B, Thompson PR, Crow MK, Mikuls TR, Csernok E, Radic M. Felty’s syndrome autoantibodies bind to deiminated histones and neutrophil extracellular chromatin traps. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:982-992. DOI: 10.1002/art.33432
  12. 12. van Gaalen FA, Toes RE, Ditzel HJ, Schaller M, Breedveld FC, Verweij CL, Huizinga TW. Association of autoantibodies to glucose-6-phosphate isomerase with extraarticular complications in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:395-399. DOI: 10.1002/art.20028
  13. 13. Ditzel HJ, Masaki Y, Nielsen H, Farnaes L, Burton DR. Cloning and expression of a novel human antibody-antigen pair associated with Felty’s syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9234-9239. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9234
  14. 14. Goldberg J, Pinals RS. Felty syndrome. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1980;10:52-65. DOI: 10.1016/0049-0172(80)90014-1
  15. 15. Hellmich B, Csernok E, Schatz H, Gross WL, Schnabel A. Autoantibodies against granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in Felty's syndrome and neutropenic systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:2384-2391. DOI: 10.1002/art.10497
  16. 16. O'Malley DP, George TI, Orazi A, Abbondanzo SL. Benign and Reactive Conditions of Lymph Node and Spleen (Atlas of Nontumor Pathology). 1st ed. American Registry of Pathology Washington, DC in collaboration with the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Washington, DC; 2009. p.390-391.
  17. 17. Ruderman M, Miller LM, Pinals RS. Clinical and serologic observations on 27 patients with Felty’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1968;11:377-384. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780110302
  18. 18. Barnes CG, Turnbull AL, Vernon-Roberts B. Felty’s syndrome. A clinical and pathological survey of 21 patients and their response to treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 1971;30:359-374. DOI: 10.1136/ard.30.4.359
  19. 19. Sienknecht CW, Urowitz MB, Pruzanski W, Stein HB. Felty’s syndrome. Clinical and serological analysis of 34 cases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1977;36:500-507. DOI: 10.1136/ard.36.6.500
  20. 20. Rosenstein ED, Kramer N. Felty’s and pseudo-Felty’s syndromes. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1991;2:129-142. DOI: 10.1016/0049-0172(91)90002-h
  21. 21. Bradley JD, Pinals RS. Felty’s syndrome presenting without arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1983;1:257-259
  22. 22. Rozin A, Hoffman R, Hayek T, Balbir-Gurman A. Felty’s syndrome without rheumatoid arthritis? Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:701-704. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-012-2157-3
  23. 23. Jain T, Mittal C, Sengupta R, Rubin B. Non-articular Felty’s syndrome: An uncommon diagnosis. Neth J Med. 2015;73:435-436
  24. 24. Aslam F, Cheema RS, Feinstein M, Chang-Miller A. Neutropaenia and splenomegaly without arthritis: think rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:bcr2018225359. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-225359
  25. 25. Turesson C, Jacobsson LT, Sturfelt G, Matteson EL, Mathsson L, Rönnelid J. Rheumatoid factor and antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides are associated with severe extra-articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:59-64. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2006.054445
  26. 26. Gorodetskiy VR, Sidorova YV, Kupryshina NA, Vasilyev VI, Probatova NA, Ryzhikova NV, Sudarikov AB. Analysis of a single-institution cohort of patients with Felty’s syndrome and T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41:147-156. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04757-4
  27. 27. van Krieken JH, Breedveld FC, te Velde J. The spleen in Felty’s syndrome: a histological, morphometrical, and immunohistochemical study. Eur J Haematol. 1988;40:58-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1988.tb00797.x
  28. 28. Lazaro E, Morel J. Management of neutropenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2015;82:235-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.01.005
  29. 29. Stock H, Kadry Z, Smith JP. Surgical management of portal hypertension in Felty’s syndrome: A case report and literature review. J Hepatol. 2009;50:831-835. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.035
  30. 30. Pick AM, Nystrom KK. Nonchemotherapy Drug-Induced Neutropenia and Agranulocytosis: Could Medications be the Culprit? Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2014;27:447-452. DOI: 10.1177/0897190014546115
  31. 31. Salmon JH, Cacoub P, Combe B, Sibilia J, Pallot-Prades B, Fain O, Cantagrel A, Dougados M, Andres E, Meyer O, Carli P, Pertuiset E, Pane I, Maurier F, Ravaud P, Mariette X, Gottenberg JE. Late-onset neutropenia after treatment with rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases: data from the AutoImmunity and Rituximab registry. RMD Open. 2015;1:e000034. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000034
  32. 32. Loughran TP Jr. Clonal diseases of large granular lymphocytes. Blood. 1993;82:1-14
  33. 33. Bareau B, Rey J, Hamidou M, Donadieu J, Morcet J, Reman O, Schleinitz N, Tournilhac O, Roussel M, Fest T, Lamy T. Analysis of a French cohort of patients with large granular lymphocyte leukemia: a report on 229 cases. Haematologica. 2010;95:1534-1541. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.018481
  34. 34. Semenzato G, Zambello R, Starkebaum G, Oshimi K, Loughran TP Jr. The lymphoproliferative disease of granular lymphocytes: updated criteria for diagnosis. Blood. 1997;89:256-260
  35. 35. Moignet A, Lamy T. Latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;38:616-625. DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_200689
  36. 36. Cheon H, Dziewulska KH, Moosic KB, Olson KC, Gru AA, Feith DJ, Loughran TP Jr. Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia. Curr Hematol Malig Rep.2020; 15:103-112. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-020-00565-6
  37. 37. Shah A, Diehl LF, St Clair EW. T cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia associated with rheumatoid arthritis and neutropenia. Clin Immunol. 2009;132:145-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.03.515
  38. 38. Posnett DN, Sinha R, Kabak S, Russo C. Clonal populations of T cells in normal elderly humans: the T cell equivalent to “benign monoclonal gammapathy”. J Exp Med. 1994;179:609-618. DOI: 10.1084/jem.179.2.609
  39. 39. Delfau-Larue MH, Laroche L, Wechsler J, Lepage E, Lahet C, Asso-Bonnet M, Bagot M, Farcet JP. Diagnostic value of dominant T-cell clones in peripheral blood in 363 patients presenting consecutively with a clinical suspicion of cutaneous lymphoma. Blood. 2000;96:2987-2992
  40. 40. Dippel E, Klemke D, Hummel M, Stein H, Goerdt S. T-cell clonality of undetermined significance. Blood. 2001;98:247-248. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v98.1.247
  41. 41. Bigouret V, Hoffmann T, Arlettaz L, Villard J, Colonna M, Ticheli A, Gratwohl A, Samii K, Chapuis B, Rufer N, Roosnek E. Monoclonal T-cell expansions in asymptomatic individuals and in patients with large granular leukemia consist of cytotoxic effector T cells expressing the activating CD94:NKG2C/E and NKD2D killer cell receptors. Blood. 2003;101:3198-3204. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2408
  42. 42. Shi M, Olteanu H, Jevremovic D, He R, Viswanatha D, Corley H, Horna P. T-cell clones of uncertain significance are highly prevalent and show close resemblance to T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Implications for laboratory diagnostics. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:2046-2057. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0568-2
  43. 43. Sidorova YV, Sychevskaya KA, Chernova NG, Julhakyan HL, Smirnova SJ, Ryzhikova NV, Gorodetskiy VR, Naumova EV, Sudarikov AB. High Incidence of Clonal CD8+ T-cell Proliferation in Non-malignant Conditions May Reduce the Significance of T-cell Clonality Assay for Differential Diagnosis in Oncohematology. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20:203-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.12.021
  44. 44. Thorne C, Urowitz MB. Long-term outcome in Felty’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 1982;41:486-489. DOI: 10.1136/ard.41.5.486
  45. 45. Narváez J, Domingo-Domenech E, Gómez-Vaquero C, López-Vives L, Estrada P, Aparicio M, Martín-Esteve I, Nolla JM. Biological agents in the management of Felty’s syndrome: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41:658-668. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.08.008
  46. 46. Wang CR, Chiu YC, Chen YC. Successful treatment of refractory neutropenia in Felty’s syndrome with rituximab. Scand J Rheumatol. 2018;47:340-341. DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2017.1334816
  47. 47. Yazıcı A, Uçar A, Mehtap Ö, Gönüllü EÖ, Tamer A. Presentation of three cases followed up with a diagnosis of Felty syndrome. Eur J Rheumatol. 2014;1:120-122. DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheumatol.2014.026

Written By

Vadim Gorodetskiy

Submitted: December 4th, 2020 Reviewed: March 7th, 2021 Published: March 22nd, 2021