Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Common Regional Development Strategies on Iberian Territories - A Framework for Comprehensive Border Corridors Governance: Establishing Integrated Territorial Development

Written By

Ana Vulevic, Rui Alexandre Castanho, José Manuel Naranjo Gómez, José Cabezas, Luis Fernández-Pozo, Jacinto Garrido Velarde, José Martín Gallardo, Sérgio Lousada and Luís Loures

Submitted: September 21st, 2020 Reviewed: December 22nd, 2020 Published: February 23rd, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.95617

Chapter metrics overview

208 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Although the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) has made a considerable contribution to increasing transport infrastructure and improving transport services, it still often seems that border regions have reduced accessibility compared to central regions. The Iberian border regions of Alto-Alentejo (Portugal) and Badajoz (Spain) were analyzed. Studies conducted in the Iberian territories confirm some of these regions’ unsustainability and the non-impact on the inhabitants’ quality of life. Also, a few questions arise: Can we verify the change in methods and measures used by development strategies? Is it necessary to acquire a more comprehensive view of corridor flows and interactions through common regional development strategies for managing development corridors? Will we influence the change of the methodological approach to be strategic and that it does not imply a corridor only in terms of the flow and mobility of people and goods, but also the search for the causes of movements in growth corridors? So, infrastructure and connectivity planning, regional economic development, and land use planning are critical contexts in developing territorial policies in the planning of development of corridors and their integration into development processes. This study proposes a framework for strategic corridor governance to increase accessibility and regional equity.

Keywords

  • regional development
  • corridor
  • accessibility
  • governance
  • sustainable planning

1. Introduction

Nowadays, Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) strategies and territorial governance arrangements are essential to use territories to use external funding opportunities to finance their vision of their community or territory’s future. However, it is not so simple to apply in practice. Although the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) has made a considerable contribution to increasing transport infrastructure and improving transport services, it still often seems that border regions have reduced accessibility compared to central regions. The Iberian border area along the border regions of Alto Alentejo (Portugal) and Badajoz (Spain) was analyzed, where border regions still appear to be less accessible compared to the central regions despite the considerable contributions of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) in terms of equipped with transport infrastructure.

In order to activate all the potentials of border areas in recent decades, EU policies are aimed at increasing cross-border cooperation [1, 2, 3, 4].

Common regional development strategies on Iberian territory can be a new framework for comprehensive border corridors governance and situating integrated territorial development. The present research will be presented some hypotheses and new ways “to generate policy-relevant insights into the interactions and flows occurring within growth corridors” for a well-planned long-term sustainable territory.

In their discussions on cross-border planning, Peironi and Denert in [5] emphasize the importance of EU regions having their institutional policy towards border regions.

These areas are very often internal peripheries, and their activation can be facilitated by various cross-border interactions that can be planned within common strategies [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8].

Furthermore, building a strategy should identify the issues associated with an area’s inner peripheralization and understand the triggers and drivers [9]. Here we made a summary of the data corridor and policy and recommendations measure that can be useful for corridor collaboration, territorial development, and comprehensive corridor governance.

Advertisement

2. Common regional development strategies and governance across borderlands

A policy to enhance or modify the process of peripheralization needs a centered intervention philosophy and relevant combined implementation structures formed within the local, territorial and national governance methods, and demands to be practical, using current policy frameworks and convenient “levers” to perform influence. Besides, a particular focus should then be set on those means thriven by ineffectual connectedness of some form because this differentiates an inner periferies (IP) from other typologies of the bordering region. The difficulty then is to obtain drivers that can cause a development at an advanced stage and turn around the “spiraling-down” methods of interior boundaries. Although each of the three IP thoughts has distinguishing features, they have, in general, a focus on the requirement to improve various kinds of connectedness [9].

Diverse investigations have analyzed the different kinds of multi-level governance in terms of European integration [10, 11, 12]. Multi-level governance formats are necessary for vertical and horizontal coordination between decision-making bodies at different levels and sector policies to manage links between different governance processes, develop multisectoral coordination on local, regional, national, and European actors [6].

Territorial management systems are consequently essential to maintain the development of regional administrations’ organizational and flexibility capabilities, both individually and collectively. So, in a period of enhanced mobilities, the above-mentioned organizations are required to produce a living space capable of handling the in-and outflows of persons - i.e., transitional economy; thus, it is possible to valorize human and financial capital of its citizens - i.e., residential economy; also, to mobilize extra-local networks to create new knowledge encouraging community growth. A relevant characteristic of territorial governance is the regions’ capacity to manage external funding possibilities to finance their perception of their society or territory’s future [13].

Territorial strategies set specific indicators to check if the regional development is on track. Firstly it should operate primarily through “soft” means, such as the provision of regional analysis and collaboration.

Almost all management levels influence the development of the corridor, so the planning of the growth corridor requires a comprehensive approach to data and their sources to better understand the mutual interactions. Consequently, targeted big data analysis and EGCs were designed to establish the evidence-based plan in European growth corridors joining the TEN-T transport infrastructure network [14].

For a broader perception of the synergies within the growth corridor, traditional data references are sufficient, yet more comprehensive, new sources for more comprehensive corridor management [14].

In this regard, the issue is seen from different perspectives for managing growth corridors, carrying into account three coinciding dimensions of development ( Figure 1 ) [14].

Figure 1.

Conceptual framework for broadening the perspective of corridor functionalities [14].

Contextually, we should consider three dimensions: (a) the physical dimension indicating transportation progress and urbanization; (b) the digital dimension recognizing digital flows and interplays as a significant part of corridor functions; and (c) the social dimension surveying the corridor as a framework for social synergy [14].

So, it is fundamental to progress from data management to data management based on perspicacity received from data and designing the basis for regional development management.

In this regard, Table 1 presents the categorization of critical flows and interactions, which are extremely important to corridor governance and decision-making, with models of the kinds of data sets that appeal to each type of flow and interaction.

DimensionInteractions/Flows
PhysicalCustomer Flows
Daily Commuting
Student Mobility
Tourism & Leisure Flows
Business Travel Flows
SocialResearch Cooperation
Trade Interaction
Inter-Firm Cooperation
Family/Social Interactions
Student Interactions
Planning Cooperation
Purchase flows
DigitalNetwork traffic flows
Monetary flows
Communication flows

Table 1.

Categorization of example data sources for corridor development (shortened version) [14].

The Data-Based Territorial Management Strategy and the action plans are the first proposed measures through corridor cooperation, governance, and territorial development. One of the proposed models is also to establish and foster collaboration and partnerships [14].

Advertisement

3. The Iberian border territory along the border regions of Alto Alentejo (Portugal) and Extremadura (Badajoz-Spain)

Most of the cross-border region, Sparsely Populated Area (SPA), as well as Alto Alentejo (Portugal) and Extremadura-Badajoz (Spanish side of the border), are located at the margins of the administrative boundaries, small villages poorly connected by road infrastructure, weak urban network, low-density settlement, continued population losses and poor access to public transportation what isolates these settlements from the other surrounding areas.

In fact, SPAs can be schematized as a disorder of inadequately related local economies and communities, physically - i.e., secondary transport infrastructure; institutionally - i.e., loss of inter-municipal cooperation; or functionally - i.e., reduction of commuting beyond municipal borders. For example, in the Spanish case, constant SPAs can be observed along the borders of NUTS2 regions. Also, SPAs could attempt to ‘reconnect’ these populations across geographical borders to properly create a decisive mass of economic and social bonds from within, developing their collective ability to solve joint difficulties and unlock shared possibilities [13].

Contextually, Table 2 represents of difficulty and obstacles in coordination and comprehensive border corridors governance based on modern studies (see: [10, 11, 12, 13]), where have been and highlighted the common regional development between Portugal and Spain.

Common regional strategyChallenge and obstacles in coordination and comprehensive border corridors governance: establishing integrated territorial development
Transnational coordinationIncreasing number of new initiatives
Setting up a territorial monitoring system
Better macro-regional institutional cooperation
Increasing number of regional stakeholders contributing to the implementation process
Lack of qualitative shifts of the political agendas
Marketing and advertisement strategies are not coordinated
The Euro-city is fertile to attract tourism and cultural activities
Political - Strategic Several infrastructures are duplicated in nearby areas/territories
Unemployment rates are still high in the territory
Political coordination and governancePlanning cooperation
Integration of Common regional strategy objectives in domestic and European documents/projects, in particular regarding sectoral policies
Number of strategic projects
Continued population losses and poor access to public transportation
Several infrastructures are duplicated in nearby areas/territories
Sharing resources should be considered to avoid duplication
Lack of political commitment towards crossborder areas goals and EU standard’s
Transparency and political commitment should be increased
Common Master-Plans and long-term objectives should be considered
Cross-sector coordinationGDP/ per capita values are considerable low
Increasing horizontal coordination activities
Unemployment rates are still high in the territory
Data-Based Territorial Management Strategy
Viewing the corridor as a framework for social interaction.
Common activities and projects increasing number of actors, networks, meetings, projects
Better tourism and Business Travel Flows
The issue of connectivity can be related to the upgrading of communication and transport systems (CTS) to support the development of both extra-regional and intra-regional relations.
Strengthen the evidence base for evidence-based planning in European growth corridors connecting to the TEN-T transport infrastructure network
Multi-level coordinationParticipation of all levels
Involvement of political stakeholders, e.g. the ministers meeting
Increasing citizen engagement
Increase transparency on multilevel governance structures and political governmental techniques.
Improve institutional capacity, economic efficiency, competitiveness, inclusion and sustainability principles

Table 2.

Challenge and obstacles in coordination and comprehensive border corridors governance: establishing integrated territorial development.

Advertisement

4. Discussion and conclusions

In general, CBC planning reveals a loss of engagement at the local, regional, and meso-level, which need to be more actively included in the EU and macro-regional level. This is an extra obstacle to borderlands’ successful regional development [9, 10, 11, 13]. Thus, it can also be assumed that at this level of CBC planning, there is a shortage of soft, resilient forms of governance which demands a tremendous political commitment as well as the use of already learned lessons regarding coordination and management at different levels that could be applied in this particular case study. The EU funds numerous projects and strategies on the Iberian Peninsula. However, in addition to all these projects and strategies along the Portuguese-Spanish border, several obstacles should be considered for further better territorial and sustainable development [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Some of them are presented in Table 2 .

The development of a common regional strategy needs all members’ involvement in the decision-making process to succeed all obstacles in coordination and comprehensive border corridors governance to establish integrated territorial development [1, 2, 3, 7, 8]. A case study of the CBC project in Iberian territory was presented to understand better the barriers to well-developed joint regional growth in Iberian territory. Several studies have already been conducted, which allowed us to analyze and evaluate outcomes. Border areas, which are also sparsely populated, should certainly support the EU in terms of flexible policies to enable their sustainable development.

Moreover, this study also aims to be useful for policymakers in moving from traditional data sources in the formation and planning of growth corridors to new, more comprehensive data sources that will give better results in preparing joint territorial development strategies in CBC areas [14].

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National FundsFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) by the project UIDB/05064/2020 (VALORIZA – Research Centre for Endogenous Resource Valorization). Also, the authors wish to acknowledge funding for this research work from the VI Regional Research Plan and the Regional Government of Extremadura and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), associated with financing the research group Sustainable Development and Territorial Planning (GR18052), the Environmental Resources Analysis Research Group (GR18054) and Functional Study of Mediterranean Ecosystems (GR18078).

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

“The authors declare no conflict of interest.”

References

  1. 1. Van Houtum, H. An Overview of European geographical Research on Borders and border regions, J. Borderl. Stud. 2000, 15, 1
  2. 2. Decoville, A.; Durand, F.; Sohn, C.; Walther. O. Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: towards a functional typology. J. Borderl. Stud. 2013, 28, 2, 221-237
  3. 3. Reitel, B. Border temporality and space integration in the European transborder agglomeration of Basel. J. Borderl. Stud. 2013, 28, 2, 239-256
  4. 4. United Nations (UN). UN Study: Transport for Sustainable Development - The case of Inland Transport. UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2015
  5. 5. Peyrony, J.; Denert, O. Planning for Cross-Border Territories: The Role Played. Raumforsch Raumordn 2012, 70, 229-240. Springer-Verlag, doi 10.1007/s13147-012-0156-0
  6. 6. European Commission. DG Regio. Passenger rail accessibility in Europe's border areas. WP 11/2017, p. 3, 2017
  7. 7. Szary, A. L. 2012. Walls and Border Art: The Politics of Art Display. J. Borderl. Stud. 2012, 2, 213-228.2427.12071
  8. 8. Decoville, A.; Durand. D. Building a cross-border territorial strategy between four countries: wishful thinking? Eur. Plan. Stud. 2016, 24, 10
  9. 9. ESPON PROFECY (2018) Inner peripheries in Europe - Possible development strategies to overcome their marginalising effects. Policy Brief. Available at:https://www.espon.eu/inner-peripheries-brief
  10. 10. MEDEIROS, E. (2016). Territorial Impact Assessment and Public Policies: The case of Portugal and the EU. Public Policy. Port. J, 1, 51-61
  11. 11. CASTANHO, R., (2017). Sustainable Urban Planning in Transboundary Areas – Analysis of Critical Factors for Territorial Success. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Extremadura. Badajoz, Spain
  12. 12. Vulevic, A., Castanho, R., Gómez, N., Loures, L., Cabezas, J., Fernández-Pozo, L., Gallardo, M. Accessibility Dynamics and Regional Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) Perspectives in the Portuguese—Spanish Borderland, 2020 Sustainability 2020,12(5), 1978; doi:10.3390/su12051978
  13. 13. ESPON BRIDGES Territories with Geographical Specificities, Applied research, Draft final report, 2018
  14. 14. ESPON - Potentials of big data for integrated territorial policy development in the European growth corridors (Big Data & EGC), Targeted Analysis, Executive Summary, 28/06/2019
  15. 15. Gløersen E (2012) Renewing the Theory and Practice of European Applied Territorial Research on Mountains, Islands and Sparsely Populated Areas. Regional Studies 46(4): 443-457. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.665989
  16. 16. Giordano B and Dubois A (2018) Combining territory and competitiveness in EU Regional Policy? Analyzing ERDF investment profiles in regions with specific geographical features. Regional Studies 0(0): 1-10. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1495323
  17. 17. Castanho, R.A., Loures, L., Cabezas, J., and Garrido Velarde, J. (2020). The Socio-Cultural Factors in the Common Strategic Planning in European Territories: Principles for Sustainable Development Extracted from Borderlands. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT, DOI: DOI:10.37394/232015.2020.16.79
  18. 18. Castanho, R.A. (2020). The Relevance of Political Engagement and Transparency in Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) Environments. Analyzing Border cities in Europe. Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 487-502, July 2020https://doi.org/10.4335/18.3.487-502(2020)
  19. 19. Jurado Almonte, J., Pazos-Garcia, F. and Castanho, R.A. (2020). Eurocities of the Iberian Borderland: A Second Generation of Border Cooperation Structures. An Analysis of Their Development Strategies. Sustainability 2020, 12(16), 6438;https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166438
  20. 20. Castanho, R.A. (2019). Identifying Processes of Smart Planning, Governance and Management in European Border Cities. Learning from City-to-City Cooperation (C2C). Sustainability 2019, 11, 5476; doi:10.3390/su11195476
  21. 21. Castanho, R.A., (2019). Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) the Paths to Achieve Territorial Success for EU Territories: the Critical Factors. European Week of Regions and Cities University 7th Master Class on EU Cohesion Policy. BOOK OF PAPERS 6th – 10th October 2019 - Brussels, Belgium #EURegionsWeek. pp.156-159
  22. 22. Loures, L., Castanho, R.A., Naranjo Gómez, J., Lousada, S., Fernández-Pozo, L., Cabezas, J., and Loures, A. (2019). Impactos Socioculturais da Cooperação Transfronteiriça (CT) no Espaço Europeu. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Sciencehttp://periodicos.unievangelica.edu.br/fronteiras/v.8, n.3, set.-dez. 2019 p. 292-312

Written By

Ana Vulevic, Rui Alexandre Castanho, José Manuel Naranjo Gómez, José Cabezas, Luis Fernández-Pozo, Jacinto Garrido Velarde, José Martín Gallardo, Sérgio Lousada and Luís Loures

Submitted: September 21st, 2020 Reviewed: December 22nd, 2020 Published: February 23rd, 2021