Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Hybrid Heterostructures for SPR Biosensor

Written By

Md. Shamim Anower, Md. Mahabubur Rahman and M. Saifur Rahman

Submitted: July 30th, 2020 Reviewed: November 6th, 2020 Published: December 16th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94932

Chapter metrics overview

435 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based biosensors have been enormously studied in the last decade for their better sensitivity. In recent years hybrid heterostructures are getting popularity to implement these SPR biosensors for their superior sensing capability. This chapter demonstrates the details of SPR technology with two recently studied prism-based hybrid heterostructures. These heterostructures are made up of conventional SPR biosensors with two additional layers of recently invented transition metal dichalcogenides, platinum di-selenide (PtSe2), and highly sensitive 2D material, tungsten di-sulfide (WS2). Angular interrogation method is discussed to investigate the sensing capabilities of the sensors which prove the superiority of the Ag-PtSe2-WS2 structure. The sensing capability of this structure has been found at least 1.67 times higher than that of the conventional non-hybrid structures, respectively, with comparable FOM and QF. A comparison table has been provided at the end of this chapter which also shows the impressive performance of the hybrid heterostructures for SPR biosensors. Proper demonstration with a suitable example of this chapter will emphasize the potential use of hybrid heterostructure based SPR biosensors in prospective medical diagnostics and biomedical detection applications.

Keywords

  • biosensor
  • hybrid heterostructure
  • sensitivity
  • surface plasmon resonance

1. Introduction

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors have become one of the most promising, standard, and affordable technology due to prompt research and expansion of SPR phenomenon in the last two decades. Nowadays, SPR sensors are broadly implemented for numerous biological and biochemical analytes identification and characterization due to its high sensitivity, real-time monitoring, level free detection assay, small sample size, and reusable sensor chip [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. To be detailed, the SPR biosensors are adopted to agriculture and food quality monitoring [6], security and safely analysis [7], in need of medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, bio-imaging [8, 9, 10], cancer detection [11, 12], DNA hybridization [13, 14], enzyme detection [15], protein-protein, protein-DNA, and protein-virus hybridization [16, 17], microorganisms identifying [18], industrial appliance’s condition monitoring, temperature monitoring [19], gas sensing [20, 21], chemical and biochemical analysis [22, 23], pharmaceutical and biological molecule analysis [24, 25], oil condition monitoring [26], and so on. In the year 1902, Wood [27] first observed unexpected optical power attenuation characteristic at the time of measuring the reflection of light from metallic gratings. This phenomenon occurs due to absorbance and conversion of photon energy to surface plasma wave (SPW) which is the result of combined oscillation of excited electrons called surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs). This oscillating electron consumes maximum energy at a certain wavelength for a specific angle of incidence of light which is called resonance condition. That is why this phenomenon is named surface plasmon resonance (SPR). In 1968, Otto [28] and Kretschmann [29] introduced attenuated total internal reflection (ATR), which encouraged scientists and researchers to concentrate on the implementation of SPR sensing technology practically. In 1982, the SPR sensing technique was first demonstrated by Nylander and Liedberg [4, 30] for the practical application of gas sensing. After that, SPR sensing technology has been getting ceaselessly developing consideration from the scientific and academic network. In 1990, the SPR sensing instrument was first commercially produced and introduced to the market by Biacore AB. Since then a considerable number of manufacturers e.g. IBIS Technologies B.V., Graffinity pharmaceuticals, GWC Technologies, Bio-Red, AutoLab, Farfield Sensors, Genoptics Bio Interactions, Microvaccum, Biosensing Instrument, and SPR Navi have launched their SPR instruments to the market [17, 31].

Different optical techniques are currently proposed for sensing purposes, including Ramman scattering based sensors [32, 33], grating coupled sensors [3435], prism coupled sensors [36, 37], optical fiber-based sensors [38, 39], planner waveguide-based sensors [40, 41] etc. The optical biosensors basically work with the measurement of change in input incident light and detected light at the output terminal. To be specific, the change in phase, amplitude, wavelength, frequency, or polarization of light is measured at the output terminal of the sensors and the changes in these parameters are observed. Among them, the commonly used technique is observing the reflected light angle where maximum light is attenuated. This method is called angular interrogation approach with attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) that is applied usually in prism coupled devices. The performance of an optical sensor is basically measured in terms of its sensitivity, detection accuracy or detection limit, the figure of merits (FOM) and quality factor (QF), etc. The researchers and scientists are continuously working for the improvement of the performances of the SPR sensors [31, 42, 43, 44].

In SPR biosensors, the most crucial parameters determining the characteristics of the sensors are plasmonic materials. Materials with adequate free electrons at their valance bands can be used as plasmonic materials. To be specific, metals e.g. gold (Au), aluminum (Al), silver (Ag), copper (Cu), etc. are a good candidate to be used as a plasmonic material [45, 46]. Al and Cu have not gained much interest to be used because of their high damping nature, prone to oxidation, corrosion, and interband transition characteristics. But Silver (Ag) can be nominated as a potential candidate for SPR sensors as it attributes outstanding optical properties, such as no interband transfer at the visible light frequency, small optical damping, and sharper resonance peak [46, 47, 48], etc. Using Ag in SPR sensors, better sensitivity can be captured, but it shows poor chemical stability as it creates brittle oxide layers with liquid analyte [49]. Some researchers have reported that applying bimetallic layer on the Ag surface can resolve this problem [50, 51]. On the other hand, Au is more chemically stable compared to Ag and free of corrosion and oxidation problems. But, gold offers a slightly higher damping loss and widen SPR curve that restricts the detection accuracy and figure of merits (FOM) of the sensors [52]. The sensitivity of Au-based sensors is also slightly lower because of the low biomolecular adsorption characteristics of the gold surface. In order to improve the sensitivity of the sensors, researchers recommended various approaches in which the application of hybrid structures (multilayer structures) are widely used [53, 54, 55, 56]. Various 2D materials are used in the hybrid configuration of SPR based sensors. A single atom thick carbon nanostructure (graphene) is often applied on the top of the plasmonic materials to avoid oxidation problems and increase the performance of the sensors because of its chemical inertness and high adsorption characteristics [57, 58]. There are also some other nanomaterials e.g. graphene oxides, graphene carbon nitrite (g-C3N4), transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs: MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, WSe2, PtSe2, SnSe2, etc.), transition metal chalcogenides (NbSe3, TaSe3), transition metal oxides (TMOs: LaVO3, LaMnO3), Black phosphorene (BP), hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), group IV elements [59, 60] and so on which are summarized in the Figure 1.

Figure 1.

2D materials library where blue shaded materials are stable at ambient condition, green-shaded are probably stable, pink shaded are unstable at ambient condition but stable at inert condition. The gray shaded mistrials are 3D but can be exfoliated down to monolayers [60,61].

This chapter mainly focuses on the recent trends applied for enhancing the performance of the Kretschmann configuration based prism coupled SPR sensors and their potential applications. The fundamental theory of SPR phenomena is presented first. Then, the method of angular interrogation utilizing attenuated total internal reflection and the performance measuring parameters of the SPR sensors are narrated. Finally, with their compressive architectures, recent developments of the prism coupled SPR sensors are discussed.

Advertisement

2. Principle of SPR phenomena

Metals are composed of positively charged nuclei with a lot of free electrons in their conduction band (surface of the metal). If an external electric field is applied close to the metal surface, free electrons are dislocated, resulting in an electric dipole [61]. A longitudinal oscillation has resulted from such electron transportation in a metal surface known as surface plasmons (SPs) [49]. To support the generated SPs a metal and dielectric interface is needed [46] whereas excitation of these SPs leads to an enhanced electromagnetic field resulting in a collective oscillation of free electrons or electron plasma [46, 61, 62]. The basic principle of the construction of SPR based sensors lies in the generation and propagation of electromagnetic waves called surface plasmon wave (SPW) due to the interaction of irradiating electric fields and the generated fields for dislocation of the electrons between the metal-dielectric interface [4]. The SPWs can only be produced by the incidence of a transverse magnetic (TM-) or plane (p-) polarized field as Maxwell’s equations supports no solution for transverse electric (TE-) polarized case [46]. Furthermore, the fact that electron oscillation means resistive losses. Thus, when an optical field appears at the metal-dielectric boundary, the SPW produces due to optical absorption of exponentially decaying evanescent waves. Mathematically, when the wave vector of the SPW is equal to the propagation constant of the irradiating lightwave, maximum absorption of evanescent field is observed leading to a strong SPW generation [63, 64]. This condition is called resonance condition. The propagating evanescent wave can be characterized by propagation constant βevas follows [10, 65]:

βev=2πλn×sinθE1

Where λ, n, θindicate the incident light wavelength, refractive index of the medium, and angle of incident of light at the metal surface, respectively. The equation as follows characterizes the SPW [66]:

βSPW=βfεmεdεm+εdE2

Where βf=2πλ, is the wave vector of light at free space. Also, εmand εdindicate the dielectric constants of plasmonic material and dielectric medium, respectively. Eq. (2) can also be rewritten in terms of the refractive index as follows [31]:

βSPW=2πλnm2nd2nm2+nd2E3

Where the RI of plasmonic material (nm) and sensing medium (nd) are related to the dielectric constants as nm2=mand nd2=d, respectively. The resonance condition is located in SPR based sensor, where the propagation constant of incident light (βev) is matched with the SPW’s wave vector βSPW[67]. From Eqs. (1) and (3), it can be related that by controlling the incident angle for a particular frequency of light, the resonance condition can be achieved. This method is called the angular interrogation method. Similarly, the light wavelength can be modified to achieve the SPR condition for a particular angle of incident light for the wavelength interrogation method [68]. At this condition, the electrons start to resonate triggering the generation of SPW on the metal-dielectric interface where a sharp loss peak called the SPR point appears. The SPR point is extremely responsive to the refractive index (RI) of the surrounding medium where a minor change in RI of the dielectric (sensing) medium shifts the SPR point to a new state [69].

Advertisement

3. Angular interrogation approach and performance parameters of the sensor

Due to its outstanding performance characteristics, commercial standardization, and ease of manufacturing technology, the angular interrogation method using ATR has become more popular today among various SPR based sensors. When light is directly coupled to the metal-dielectric interface, due to a mismatch of momentum, the SPs are not sufficiently excited to generate SPWs [70]. Researchers have suggested several special arrangements called Otto configuration [71], Kretschmann configuration [72, 73] as visualized in Figure 2 to alter the momentum of the photon to couple with the SPPs leading to propagation of SPW. In prism based Otto configuration, there is a distance where a dielectric layer with a smaller RI is used between the prism and metal sheet on which the light is employed. On contrary, Kretschmann configuration the metallic layer is in direct contact with the prism. Among them, the Kretschmann configuration is the most popular solution to ensure the coupling of the strongest evanescent wave passing through the metal and generate SPW [53, 74, 75, 76]. In the Kretschmann configuration, the light is incident at the metal-dielectric interface through a high index prism [77].

Figure 2.

Special Arrangements [74] e.g. (a) Kretschmann configuration, and (b) Otto configuration to match the momentum of incident photon and SPW.

Usually, the incident light bounces back from the interface while the evanescent field is induced by a portion of light penetrating through the metal. For a particular sensor configuration and light frequency, the momentum of the evanescent field is aligned with the wave vector of SPW at a specific angle called resonance angle [76]. Maximum light is coupled to the oscillating electrons at this resonance condition, leading to minimum reflection. If the reflected light is plotted concerning the incident angle, then a resonance dip of reflection spectrum is observed called SPR point which is highly responsive to the RI of the sensing medium. By interrogating this SPR point the analyte can be detected easily. The performance measuring parameters e.g. sensitivity, detection accuracy, FOM, and QF should be as high as possible to eliminate false positive detection. The sensitivity of the sensor operating on the angular interrogation approach depends on the change in the SPR point or resonance angle with a change in RI of the sensing medium. Figure 3 illustrates the SPR curve variation due to change in sensing medium RI where the resonance point is found at θresaand θresa+θresafor sensing medium RI of naand na+na. Due to change in RI of nathe shift in SPR is observed as θresa. Thus, the sensitivity (Sa) of the sensor with the angular interrogation approach can be measured as [78]:

Figure 3.

Illustration of the SPR curve variation due to change in sensing medium RI.

Sa=θresanaE4

A sensor’s detection accuracy, which depends on the width of the SPR curve, determines how quickly and accurately the SPR point can be measured by the sensor. It is inversely proportional to the width of SPR. If θ0.5is the width of the SPR curve corresponding to 50% reflection then the detection accuracy (D.A.), FOM, and QF can be defined as [15, 79, 80]:

D.A.=1θ0.5E5
FOM=θresa/naθ0.5=Sa×D.A.E6
QF=θresaθ0.5×SaE7
Advertisement

4. Recent trends to enhance the performance of the SPR sensors

Nowadays, the prime concern of scientists, researchers, and academicians are to enhance the performance of the SPR based sensor. To date, several attempts have been reported to attain highly sensitive sensors where the use of bimetallic coating and hybridization of numerous 2D materials along with plasmonic materials are the most popular approach to accommodate the angular interrogation approach. Benaziez S. et al. [81] reported a sensor where Ag is considered as an SPR active material. They showed that the addition of mostly used 2D material graphene on Ag surface enables to reduce the oxidation problem as well as increase the sensitivity up to 9.3%. Yet, the detection accuracy of the sensor is slightly reduced. Also, Rouf H. K. and Haque A. [82] proposed a hybrid structure using InP and Ti with the Ag-Au bimetallic configuration. Their sensor shows maximum sensitivity of 70.90 deg/RIU. Similarly, Mishra S. K. and their team [83] have demonstrated a configuration with excellent sensor sensitivity of 229 deg/RIU. They used a rarely used material Rhodium (Rh) with Ag to realize bimetallic configuration. Also, they used a silicon layer on the bimetallic layer to lessen the limitations of Ag. Likewise, N. Mudgal et al. [3] proposed a four-layer hybrid structure that consists of Au, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), h-BN (hexagonal boron nitride), and graphene to detect urine glucose. The structure can enhance the sensor sensitivity up to 194.12 deg/RIU with the detection accuracy of 16.04/RIU. In the same way, Hailin Xu et al. [84] proposed an optical sensor with the graphene-Al-graphene sandwich structure where graphene prevents the oxidation issue of Al as well as enhances the sensor sensitivity 3.4 times more than only Al-based sensor. Besides, Wang M. et al. [85] suggested a sensor consisting of graphene, Tungsten disulfide (WS2), and Au-Ag bimetallic film. They observed that hybridization of single layer graphene and WS2 with Au-Ag bimetallic nanostructure leads to sensitivity up to 182.5 deg/RIU which is superior to Au-only based sensor. Incorporating the advantages of hybrid structure and bimetallic configuration, very recently Rahman M. et al. [86] also proposed a new configuration of SPR biosensors utilizing the newly emerged TMDC (PtSe2) embedded 2D materials as illustrated in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Schematic Illustration of SPR biosensor employing hybridization of 2D materials with Ag/Au [86].

In this configuration, a heterostructure of PtSe2/2D material (e.g., graphene, MoS2, WS2) has been employed to realize the hybrid configuration whereas BK7 prism is used as a coupler that increases the momentum of the evanescent wave to match with the wave vector of the SPW. The sensor comprises a thin layer (50 nm) of Au or Ag as an SPR active material between the prism coupler and PtSe2/2D material heterostructure. A monochromatic He-Ne laser source having a wavelength of 633 nm have been incorporated to excite the SPPs. The sensor parameters are altered and optimized varying the thickness of PtSe2 and number 2D material’s layer to get better performance where the results are revealed in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Sensitivity variation due to change in the thickness of PtSe2, and number of (a) Graphene layer (b) MoS2 layer, (c) WS2 layer for BK7/Ag (50 nm)/PtSe2/2D materials (Graphene/MoS2/WS2) hybrid structure; and number of (d) Graphene layer, (e) MoS2 layer, and (f) WS2 layer for BK7/Au (50 nm)/PtSe2/2D materials (Graphene/MoS2/WS2) hybrid structure [86].

The effects of alteration of different parameters of PtSe2, and 2D materials have been analyzed comprehensively and two new sensors have been introduced with excellent performance characteristics. The details of optimized design parameters and performances are listed in Table 1. As well, Table 2 shows the performance comparison of different SPR biosensors based on Kretschmann configuration with a hybrid structure.

Sl. no.Proposed SPR sensors with optimized structural parametersOperating range of sensing medium RIFOM [RIU–1]QF [deg/RIU]Sensitivity [deg/RIU]
01.Ag/PtSe2/WS2Thickness of Ag (nm)501.33-1.3817.6434.22194
Thickness of PtSe2 (nm)02
Number of WS2 Layers04
02.Au/PtSe2/WS2Thickness of Au (nm)501.33-1.3815.7229.39187
Thickness of PtSe2 (nm)02
Number of WS2 Layers02

Table 1.

Details of optimized design parameters and results of the proposed SPR biosensors [86].

Ref.Configuration of the sensorsSensitivity (deg/RIU)
[83]Prism/Air/Titanium (Ti)/Ag/Au/InP70.90
[84]Prism/Rh/Ag/Si229
[3]Prism/MoS2/h-BN/graphene194.12
[85]Prism/Ag/Au/WS2/graphene182.5
[86]Prism/Ag/PtSe2/WS2194
[86]Prism/Au/PtSe2/WS2187
[87]Prism/Au/Black Phosphorous (BP)180
[2]Prism/Au/Graphene/MoS289.29
[1]Prism/Au/MoS275.34
[88]Prism/ZnO/Ag/Au/graphene66
[89]Prism/Au/MoS2/WS2/WSe2142
[90]Prism/Au/MoS2/Au film/graphene182
[55]Prism/MoS2/aluminum (Al) film/MoS2/graphene190.83
[91]Prism/Ag/PtSe2162
[91]Prism/Au/PtSe2165

Table 2.

Sensitivity comparison of Kretschmann configuration based SPR biosensors comprising hybrid structures.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

This chapter provides a detailed description of the surface plasmon resonance phenomenon with the recent trends that are being applied in the advancement of SPR based sensors where the application of hybrid structures as well as bimetallic configurations are found to be potential techniques to enhance the sensor performances. Besides, it demonstrates different 2D materials applied for sensing capability enhancement of the hybrid SPR biosensors. Also, two 5 layer prism based hybrid heterostructures (Prism-Au-PtSe2-WS2 and Prism-Ag-PtSe2-WS2) have been comprehensively discussed here to show the effectiveness of hybrid technology.

References

  1. 1. Q . Ouyang, S. Zeng, X.-Q . Dinh, P. Coquet, and K.-T. Yong, “Sensitivity enhancement of MoS2 nanosheet based surface plasmon resonance biosensor,”Procedia engineering,vol. 140, pp. 134-139, 2016
  2. 2. M. S. Rahman, M. S. Anower, M. R. Hasan, M. B. Hossain, and M. I. Haque, “Design and numerical analysis of highly sensitive Au-MoS2-graphene based hybrid surface plasmon resonance biosensor,”Optics Communications,vol. 396, pp. 36-43, 2017
  3. 3. N. Mudgal, A. Saharia, A. Agarwal, J. Ali, P. Yupapin, and G. Singh, “Modeling of highly sensitive surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor for urine glucose detection,”Optical and Quantum Electronics,vol. 52, p. 307, 2020
  4. 4. C. Basak, M. K. Hosain, and A. A. Sazzad, “Design and Simulation of a High Sensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor for Detection of Biomolecules,”Sensing and Imaging,vol. 21, no. 1, p. 2, 2020
  5. 5. B. A. Prabowo, A. Purwidyantri, and K.-C. Liu, “Surface plasmon resonance optical sensor: A review on light source technology,”Biosensors,vol. 8, no. 3, p. 80, 2018
  6. 6. M. Hossain and M. Rana, “Graphene coated high sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensor for sensing DNA hybridization,”Sensor Letters,vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 145-152, 2016
  7. 7. M. B. Hossain, M. M. Rana, L. F. Abdulrazak, S. Mitra, and M. Rahman, “Graphene-MoS2 with TiO2/SiO2 layers based surface plasmon resonance biosensor: Numerical development for formalin detection,”Biochemistry and biophysics reports,vol. 18, p. 100639, 2019
  8. 8. K. Narsaiah, S. N. Jha, R. Bhardwaj, R. Sharma, and R. Kumar, “Optical biosensors for food quality and safety assurance—a review,”Journal of food science and technology,vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 383-406, 2012
  9. 9. M. Piliarik, L. Párová, and J. Homola, “High-throughput SPR sensor for food safety,”Biosensors and Bioelectronics,vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1399-1404, 2009
  10. 10. H. Šípová and J. Homola, “Surface plasmon resonance sensing of nucleic acids: a review,”Analytica chimica acta,vol. 773, pp. 9-23, 2013
  11. 11. J. Homola, “Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species,”Chemical reviews,vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 462-493, 2008
  12. 12. M. B. Hossain, T. B. A. Akib, L. F. Abdulrazak, and M. M. Rana, “Numerical modeling of graphene-coated fiber optic surface plasmon resonance biosensor for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic breast cancer detection,”Optical Engineering,vol. 58, no. 3, p. 037104, 2019
  13. 13. M. B. Hossain, M. M. Islam, L. F. Abdulrazak, M. M. Rana, T. B. A. Akib, and M. Hassan, “Graphene-coated optical fiber SPR biosensor for BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer biomarker detection: a numerical design-based analysis,”Photonic Sensors,vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 67-79, 2020
  14. 14. M. S. Rahman, M. Anower, M. K. Rahman, M. R. Hasan, M. B. Hossain, and M. I. Haque, “Modeling of a highly sensitive MoS2-Graphene hybrid based fiber optic SPR biosensor for sensing DNA hybridization,”Optik,vol. 140, pp. 989-997, 2017
  15. 15. B. Meshginqalam and J. Barvestani, “Performance enhancement of SPR biosensor based on phosphorene and transition metal dichalcogenides for sensing DNA hybridization,”IEEE Sensors Journal,vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 7537-7543, 2018
  16. 16. Y. Iwasaki, T. Horiuchi, and O. Niwa, “Detection of electrochemical enzymatic reactions by surface plasmon resonance measurement,”Analytical chemistry,vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 1595-1598, 2001
  17. 17. J. Polletet al., “Fiber optic SPR biosensing of DNA hybridization and DNA–protein interactions,”Biosensors and Bioelectronics,vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 864-869, 2009
  18. 18. J. Leeet al., “Top publications by reads,”Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases,vol. 27, no. 12, 2018
  19. 19. N. Mudgal, P. Yupapin, J. Ali, and G. Singh, “BaTiO3-Graphene-Affinity Layer–Based Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Biosensor for Pseudomonas Bacterial Detection,”Plasmonics,pp. 1-9, 2020
  20. 20. J. S. Velázquez-González, D. Monzón-Hernández, D. Moreno-Hernández, F. Martínez-Piñón, and I. Hernández-Romano, “Simultaneous measurement of refractive index and temperature using a SPR-based fiber optic sensor,”Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical,vol. 242, pp. 912-920, 2017
  21. 21. E. Della Gasperaet al., “Au nanoparticles in nanocrystalline TiO2− NiO films for SPR-based, selective H2S gas sensing,”Chemistry of Materials,vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 3407-3417, 2010
  22. 22. M. G. Maneraet al., “Enhanced gas sensing performance of TiO2 functionalized magneto-optical SPR sensors,”Journal of Materials Chemistry,vol. 21, no. 40, pp. 16049-16056, 2011
  23. 23. F. Baldini, M. Brenci, F. Chiavaioli, A. Giannetti, and C. Trono, “Optical fibre gratings as tools for chemical and biochemical sensing,”Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry,vol. 402, no. 1, pp. 109-116, 2012
  24. 24. R. Gordont and D. Sinton, “KL kavanagh and AG Brolo,”Accounts of Chemical Research,vol. 41, pp. 1049-1057, 2008
  25. 25. J. M. McDonnell, “Surface plasmon resonance: towards an understanding of the mechanisms of biological molecular recognition,”Current opinion in chemical biology,vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 572-577, 2001
  26. 26. A. Olaru, C. Bala, N. Jaffrezic-Renault, and H. Y. Aboul-Enein, “Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors in pharmaceutical analysis,”Critical reviews in analytical chemistry,vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 97-105, 2015
  27. 27. A. K. Paul, “Design and analysis of photonic crystal fiber plasmonic refractive Index sensor for condition monitoring of transformer oil,”OSA Continuum,vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 2253-2263, 2020
  28. 28. R. W. Wood, “XLII. On a remarkable case of uneven distribution of light in a diffraction grating spectrum,”The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science,vol. 4, no. 21, pp. 396-402, 1902
  29. 29. A. Otto, “Excitation of nonradiative surface plasma waves in silver by the method of frustrated total reflection,”Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and nuclei,vol. 216, no. 4, pp. 398-410, 1968
  30. 30. E. Kretschmann and H. Raether, “Radiative decay of non-radiative surface plasmons excited by light,”Z. Naturforsch. a,vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2135-2136, 1968
  31. 31. B. Liedberg, C. Nylander, and I. Lunström, “Surface plasmon resonance for gas detection and biosensing,”Sensors and actuators,vol. 4, pp. 299-304, 1983
  32. 32. A. H.-P. Ho, S.-Y. Wu, S.-K. Kong, S. Zeng, and K.-T. Yong, “SPR Biosensors 5,”channels,vol. 15, p. 37, 2017
  33. 33. K. L. Lee, C. Y. Hung, M. Y. Pan, T. Y. Wu, S. Y. Yang, and P. K. Wei, “Dual Sensing Arrays for Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) and Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Based on Nanowire/Nanorod Hybrid Nanostructures,”Advanced Materials Interfaces,vol. 5, no. 21, p. 1801064, 2018
  34. 34. F. Wang, S. Cao, R. Yan, Z. Wang, D. Wang, and H. Yang, “Selectivity/specificity improvement strategies in surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy analysis,”Sensors,vol. 17, no. 11, p. 2689, 2017
  35. 35. K. M. Byun, S. J. Kim, and D. Kim, “Grating-coupled transmission-type surface plasmon resonance sensors based on dielectric and metallic gratings,”Applied optics,vol. 46, no. 23, pp. 5703-5708, 2007
  36. 36. K. Lin, Y. Lu, J. Chen, R. Zheng, P. Wang, and H. Ming, “Surface plasmon resonance hydrogen sensor based on metallic grating with high sensitivity,”Optics express,vol. 16, no. 23, pp. 18599-18604, 2008
  37. 37. Y. Dai, H. Xu, H. Wang, Y. Lu, and P. Wang, “Experimental demonstration of high sensitivity for silver rectangular grating-coupled surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensing,”Optics Communications,vol. 416, pp. 66-70, 2018
  38. 38. H. R. Gwon and S. H. Lee, “Spectral and angular responses of surface plasmon resonance based on the Kretschmann prism configuration,”Materials transactions,vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1150-1155, 2010
  39. 39. M. M. Rahman, M. M. Rana, M. Anower, M. S. Rahman, and A. K. Paul, “Design and analysis of photonic crystal fiber-based plasmonic microbiosensor: an external sensing scheme,”SN Applied Sciences,vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 1-11, 2020
  40. 40. M. M. Rahman, M. A. Molla, A. K. Paul, M. A. Based, M. M. Rana, and M. Anower, “Numerical investigation of a highly sensitive plasmonic refractive index sensor utilizing hexagonal lattice of photonic crystal fiber,”Results in Physics,vol. 18, p. 103313, 2020
  41. 41. R. Kashyap and G. Nemova, “Surface plasmon resonance-based fiber and planar waveguide sensors,”Journal of Sensors,vol. 2009, 2009
  42. 42. J. Dostaleket al., “Surface plasmon resonance biosensor based on integrated optical waveguide,”Sensors and actuators B: Chemical,vol. 76, no. 1-3, pp. 8-12, 2001
  43. 43. W.-C. Kuo, C. Chou, and H.-T. Wu, “Optical heterodyne surface-plasmon resonance biosensor,”Optics letters,vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 1329-1331, 2003
  44. 44. C. Chou, H.-T. Wu, Y.-C. Huang, Y.-L. Chen, and W.-C. Kuo, “Characteristics of a paired surface plasma waves biosensor,”Optics Express,vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 4307-4315, 2006
  45. 45. J.-Y. Lee, L.-W. Mai, C.-C. Hsu, and Y.-Y. Sung, “Enhanced sensitivity to surface plasmon resonance phase in wavelength-modulated heterodyne interferometry,”Optics Communications,vol. 289, pp. 28-32, 2013
  46. 46. K. M. McPeaket al., “Plasmonic films can easily be better: rules and recipes,”ACS photonics,vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 326-333, 2015
  47. 47. A. A. Rifat, M. R. Hasan, R. Ahmed, and A. E. Miroshnichenko, “Microstructured optical fiber-based plasmonic sensors,” inComputational Photonic Sensors: Springer, 2019, pp. 203-232
  48. 48. M. A. Ordal, R. J. Bell, R. W. Alexander, L. L. Long, and M. R. Querry, “Optical properties of fourteen metals in the infrared and far infrared: Al, Co, Cu, Au, Fe, Pb, Mo, Ni, Pd, Pt, Ag, Ti, V, and W,”Applied optics,vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 4493-4499, 1985
  49. 49. P. R. West, S. Ishii, G. V. Naik, N. K. Emani, V. M. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, “Searching for better plasmonic materials,”Laser & Photonics Reviews,vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 795-808, 2010
  50. 50. J. Homola, “Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors,”Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry,vol. 377, no. 3, pp. 528-539, 2003
  51. 51. S. Bharadwaj, P. K. Maharana, R. Das, and R. Jha, “Effect of chalcogenide glass and plasmonic metal on electric field enhancement in surface plasmon resonance sensor,” inInternational Conference on Fibre Optics and Photonics, 2012: Optical Society of America, p. TPo. 19
  52. 52. B. Gupta and A. K. Sharma, “Sensitivity evaluation of a multi-layered surface plasmon resonance-based fiber optic sensor: a theoretical study,”Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical,vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 40-46, 2005
  53. 53. H. R. Gwon and S. H. Lee, “Spectral and angular responses of surface plasmon resonance based on the Kretschmann prism configuration,”Materials transactions,vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1150-1155, 2010
  54. 54. J. Maurya, Y. Prajapati, V. Singh, and J. Saini, “Sensitivity enhancement of surface plasmon resonance sensor based on graphene–MoS 2 hybrid structure with TiO2–SiO2 composite layer,”Applied Physics A,vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 525-533, 2015
  55. 55. L. Wuet al., “Sensitivity improved SPR biosensor based on the MoS2/graphene–aluminum hybrid structure,”Journal of Lightwave Technology,vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 82-87, 2016
  56. 56. L. Wu, J. Guo, X. Dai, Y. Xiang, and D. Fan, “Sensitivity enhanced by MoS2–graphene hybrid structure in guided-wave surface plasmon resonance biosensor,”Plasmonics,vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 281-285, 2018
  57. 57. L. Han and C. Wu, “A Phase Sensitivity-Enhanced Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor Based on ITO-Graphene Hybrid Structure,”Plasmonics,vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 901-906, 2019
  58. 58. Y. Zhao and Y. Zhu, “Graphene-based hybrid films for plasmonic sensing,”Nanoscale,vol. 7, no. 35, pp. 14561-14576, 2015
  59. 59. P. O. Patilet al., “Graphene-based nanocomposites for sensitivity enhancement of surface plasmon resonance sensor for biological and chemical sensing: A review,”Biosensors and Bioelectronics,vol. 139, p. 111324, 2019
  60. 60. X. Gan, H. Zhao, and X. Quan, “Two-dimensional MoS2: A promising building block for biosensors,”Biosensors and Bioelectronics,vol. 89, pp. 56-71, 2017
  61. 61. K. Shavanovaet al., “Application of 2D non-graphene materials and 2D oxide nanostructures for biosensing technology,”Sensors,vol. 16, no. 2, p. 223, 2016
  62. 62. J. Krajczewski, K. Kołątaj, and A. Kudelski, “Plasmonic nanoparticles in chemical analysis,”RSC advances,vol. 7, no. 28, pp. 17559-17576, 2017
  63. 63. M. Pelton and G. W. Bryant,Introduction to metal-nanoparticle plasmonics. John Wiley & Sons, 2013
  64. 64. N. Mudgal, M. K. Falaswal, T. Ismail, I. Fahim, M. Tiwari, and G. Singh, “Study of Approaches to Implement the Prism-Based Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors,” inOptical and Wireless Technologies: Springer, 2020, pp. 353-362
  65. 65. C. T. Witteket al., “Prevalence and predictors of video game addiction: A study based on a national representative sample of gamers,”International journal of mental health and addiction,vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 672-686, 2016
  66. 66. M. B. Hossain and M. M. Rana, “Graphene coated high sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensor for sensing DNA hybridization,”Sens. Lett.,vol. 13, pp. 1-8, 2015
  67. 67. J. Homola, “Electromagnetic theory of surface plasmons,” inSurface plasmon resonance based sensors: Springer, 2006, pp. 3-44
  68. 68. L. E. Ronald, Jr., Multiwavelength Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Designs for Chemical and Biochemical Detection, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Chemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1998
  69. 69. G. S. Mei, P. S. Menon, and G. Hegde, “ZnO for performance enhancement of surface plasmon resonance biosensor: a review,”Materials Research Express,vol. 7, no. 1, p. 012003, 2020
  70. 70. A. A. Rifatet al., “Photonic crystal fiber based plasmonic sensors,”Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical,vol. 243, pp. 311-325, 2017
  71. 71. D. Zhang, L. Men, and Q . Chen, “Microfabrication and applications of opto-microfluidic sensors,”Sensors,vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 5360-5382, 2011
  72. 72. E. K. Akowuah, T. Gorman, and S. Haxha, “Design and optimization of a novel surface plasmon resonance biosensor based on Otto configuration,”Optics express,vol. 17, no. 26, pp. 23511-23521, 2009
  73. 73. H.-S. Leong, J. Guo, R. G. Lindquist, and Q . H. Liu, “Surface plasmon resonance in nanostructured metal films under the Kretschmann configuration,”Journal of applied physics,vol. 106, no. 12, p. 124314, 2009
  74. 74. V. G. Achanta, “Surface waves at metal-dielectric interfaces: Material science perspective,” Reviews in Physics, p. 100041, 2020
  75. 75. S. Deng, P. Wang, and X. Yu, “Phase-sensitive surface plasmon resonance sensors: Recent progress and future prospects,”Sensors,vol. 17, no. 12, p. 2819, 2017
  76. 76. D. Barchiesi and A. Otto, “Excitations of surface plasmon polaritons by attenuated total reflection, revisited,”La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento,vol. 36, pp. 173-209, 2013
  77. 77. B. D. Gupta and R. K. Verma, “Surface plasmon resonance-based fiber optic sensors: principle, probe designs, and some applications,”Journal of sensors,vol. 2009, 2009
  78. 78. F. Liu, J. Zhang, Y. Deng, D. Wang, Y. Lu, and X. Yu, “Detection of EGFR on living human gastric cancer BGC823 cells using surface plasmon resonance phase sensing,”Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical,vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 398-403, 2011
  79. 79. A. K. Mishra, S. K. Mishra, and R. K. Verma, “Graphene and beyond graphene MoS2: a new window in surface-plasmon-resonance-based fiber optic sensing,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry C,vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 2893-2900, 2016
  80. 80. S. A. Zynio, A. V. Samoylov, E. R. Surovtseva, V. M. Mirsky, and Y. M. Shirshov, “Bimetallic layers increase sensitivity of affinity sensors based on surface plasmon resonance,”Sensors,vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 62-70, 2002
  81. 81. S. Benaziez, Z. Dibi, and N. Benaziez, “Reflectivity optimization of the SPR graphene sensor,”Nanopages,vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5-17, 2018
  82. 82. H. K. Rouf and T. Haque, “Performance enhancement of Ag-Au bimetallic surface plasmon resonance biosensor using InP,”Progress In Electromagnetics Research,vol. 76, pp. 31-42, 2018
  83. 83. S. K. Mishra, K. D. Malviya, and A. K. Mishra, “Highly sensitive bimetallic plasmonic sensing probe for aqueous samples.”
  84. 84. H. Xu, L. Wu, X. Dai, Y. Gao, and Y. Xiang, “An ultra-high sensitivity surface plasmon resonance sensor based on graphene-aluminum-graphene sandwich-like structure,”Journal of Applied Physics,vol. 120, no. 5, p. 053101, 2016
  85. 85. M. Wanget al., “Theoretical design of a surface plasmon resonance sensor with high sensitivity and high resolution based on graphene–WS2 hybrid nanostructures and Au–Ag bimetallic film,”RSC advances,vol. 7, no. 75, pp. 47177-47182, 2017
  86. 86. M. M. Rahman, M. M. Rana, M. S. Rahman, M. Anower, M. A. Mollah, and A. K. Paul, “Sensitivity enhancement of SPR biosensors employing heterostructure of PtSe2 and 2D materials,”Optical Materials,vol. 107, p. 110123, 2020
  87. 87. S. Pal, A. Verma, Y. Prajapati, and J. Saini, “Influence of black phosphorous on performance of surface plasmon resonance biosensor,”Optical and Quantum Electronics,vol. 49, no. 12, p. 403, 2017
  88. 88. R. Kumar, A. S. Kushwaha, M. Srivastava, H. Mishra, and S. Srivastava, “Enhancement in sensitivity of graphene-based zinc oxide assisted bimetallic surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor,”Applied Physics A,vol. 124, no. 3, p. 235, 2018
  89. 89. Z. Lin, S. Chen, and C. Lin, “Sensitivity Improvement of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Based on Two-Dimensional Materials Hybrid Structure in Visible Region: A Theoretical Study,”Sensors,vol. 20, no. 9, p. 2445, 2020
  90. 90. Z. Lin et al., “Tuning and sensitivity enhancement of surface plasmon resonance biosensor with graphene covered Au–MoS2–Au films,” IEEE Photonics Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1-8, 2016
  91. 91. Y. Jia, Z. Li, H. Wang, M. Saeed, and H. Cai, “Sensitivity Enhancement of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor with Platinum Diselenide,”Sensors,vol. 20, no. 1, p. 131, 2020

Written By

Md. Shamim Anower, Md. Mahabubur Rahman and M. Saifur Rahman

Submitted: July 30th, 2020 Reviewed: November 6th, 2020 Published: December 16th, 2020