Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Electrochemical Response of Cells Using Bioactive Plant Isolates

Written By

Elvis K. Tiburu, Richard Asiamah, Bernard O. Asimeng, Samuel Kojo Kwofie, Emmanuel Nyankson and William N. Gblerkpor

Submitted: 04 September 2020 Reviewed: 04 December 2020 Published: 05 May 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.95360

From the Edited Volume

Biosensors - Current and Novel Strategies for Biosensing

Edited by Luis Jesús Villarreal-Gómez and Ana Leticia Iglesias

Chapter metrics overview

469 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Traditional herbal medical practices continue to be part of the healthcare needs of the world especially residents of sub-Sahara Africa (sSA). However, the mechanism of action of the plant metabolites to elicit their potency continue to be a mystery due to the lack of standardized methods. The mechanism of plant bioactive compounds to cause cell death is gradually being linked to membrane polarization and depolarization behaviour. The current work seeks to probe the electrochemical response of model cells using bioactive compounds captured in bio-zeolites or membrane mimetics. The voltage and current fluctuations emanating from such studies will establish a correlation between cell death and membrane depolarization. It will be a useful biological interface sensing material with the potential to identify plant metabolites that can selectively detect and destroy diseased cells. Several model membranes have already been developed for biomedical applications and this new paradigm will elevate the usefulness of these model systems. The concept was investigated using extracts from Dioclea reflexa (DR) hook which belongs to the leguminous family. There are certain class of compounds in Dioclea reflexa (DR) that have clinical usefulness in both temperate and tropical regions, however the identity of the bioactive compounds responsible for inducing cell death continue to be a major challenge.


  • model membrane
  • electrochemical
  • bioactive
  • polarization
  • depolarization
  • bio-zeolites

1. Introduction

Living organisms use small molecules including membrane targeted drugs to enhance membrane fluidity and permeability to elicit their potency in signal transduction as well as in the treatment of various diseases including cancer, fungal and microbial pathogens. Electrochemical signaling from reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a major mechanism used to regulate different cancer-related processes including cell proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis and vascularization. The key players in the redox microenvironment of the cancer and neighboring cells are superoxide (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), nitric oxide (NO) and ions which are produced or regulated by membrane bound nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), oxidases known as NOX and by the dual oxidases (DUOX), or nitric oxide synthases. For example studies using scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) and fluorescence microscopy confirmed the release of ROS from prostate cancer (PC3) cells [1, 2].

Among the ion channels that are membrane bound include voltage-gated Na+ channels that selectively allow the passage of Na+ ions into cells resulting in membrane depolarization leading to generation of action potential in excitable cells including neurons, heart and skeletal tissues. It is known that strongly metastatic prostate cancer cell lines such as PC3 cells demonstrate significantly higher expression of voltage-gated Na+ channels (Nav1.9 alpha subunit). Studies have shown that inhibiting specific voltage-gated Na+ channels activity have helped to reduce cell proliferation and therefore such channels including K+, Ca2+, and Cl may emerge as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for certain cancer treatments. The concept is to develop small molecular probes or nanoparticles that are either delivery vehicles or the nanoparticle itself having the potential to specifically block a particular ion channel to prevent the movement of ions across the membrane which is key critical step for tumor cell survival.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) cells are single-celled eukaryotes and model organisms for studying cellular mechanisms including DNA damage and repair as well as systematic fungal infections. Additionally, S. cerevisiae shares the complex internal cell structure of animals without the high percentage of non-coding DNA that can confound research in higher eukaryotes. Three of the most extensively used antibiotic drugs for studying SC is amphotericin B (Amp B), rifampicin and fluconazole [3, 4]. The antibiotics target different cellular organs to elicit their antimicrobial and antifungal effects. For example, Amp B is membrane mediated thereby increasing the permeability of ions and small molecules by binding more strongly to ergosterol, the principal fungi sterol found in SC [5]. Rifampicin and fluconazole on the other hand have broad antibacterial and antifungal influence with rifampicin targeting different forms of mycobacteria by inhibiting DNA-dependent RNA polymerase activities, whereas fluconazole is used for a number of fungal infections including candidiasis as well as other fungal diseases. Since Amp B and rifampicin are redox mediators that can interact with eukaryotic cell membrane thereby increasing redox activity by creating pores or inhibiting the synthesis of ergosterol respectively, it will be interesting to compare their redox activity with fluconazole. These antifungal drugs were used as model drugs because they have been extensively used for various in vitro and in vivo studies of model cells.

Based on the background outlined, it is obvious that there are essentially two pathways (lipid-mediated and diffusion porins) through which both hydrophobic and hydrophilic plant metabolites or drugs elicit their potency at the cellular level. It is obvious that the degree of permeation of the cell membrane has a major impact on the redox activity. In addition, the presence of a hydrophobic drug within the complex architecture of the membrane, enhances easy access of small ions through pores which can be detected electrochemically. Non-membrane-mediated drugs diffuse freely through the membrane and may not necessarily destabilize the membrane architecture; thereby limiting ionic flow that can be captured by electrochemical detection techniques. In the current work, an entrapment strategy was developed using aluminosilicate minerals to selectively pool plant metabolites using different pH conditions and evaluating the polarization and depolarization of model cells using electrochemical sensing techniques. For membrane targeted bioactive compounds, the fluctuation in the redox signals will reveal important lead bioactive compounds for further investigation.

Several biopolymers and aluminosilicate minerals derived composite drug delivery carriers have been reported from several laboratories. For example halloysites natural tubules (HNTs) are aluminosilicate minerals composed of different proportions of aluminum, silicon, hydrogen and oxygen often with the chemical formula Al2Si2O5(OH)4.nH2O [6, 7]. They are empty cylinders with widths of about 100 nanometers and consist of two structures; the anhydrous structure with an interlayer dispersing of approximately 7 Å and the hydrated structure with an augmented interlayer dividing of 10 Å, due to the presence of water in the lamellar spaces [8, 9, 10]. In each layer of the halloysite nanotube, the SiOH groups are found on the outer surface whiles the AlOH groups are situated on the inner surfaces making the outer and inner surfaces to have different charges [11, 12, 13]. The positive charge of the internal lumen is a consequence of protonation of the AlOH group at low pH whereas the SiOH groups have overall negative charge due to the coordination of the atoms. When the halloysites nanotubes are modified with biopolymer such as chitosan new functional materials with improved physicochemical properties are generated. The composite materials can serve as effective drug carriers.

The charge disparity of halloysites has also drawn interest from the research community whereby overall negatively charged proteins taken above their isoelectric points are mostly loaded into the positively charged nanotube lumen [14]. Therefore, in a pool of organic compounds, halloysites nanotubes can facilitate the formation of a transient bond between selected bioactive compounds and the AlOH or SiOH as a function of pH conditions and can be very effective as a nano drug carrier for different applications [15, 16, 17, 18, 19].

Traditional herbal medical practices continue to be part of the healthcare needs of the world especially residents of sub-Sahara Africa (sSA) [20, 21, 22, 23]. However, the mechanism of action of the plant metabolites to illicit their potency continues to be a mystery due to the lack of standardized methods. Electrochemical detection of drugs interacting with most biological systems is an important strategy to understand cellular stresses that causes cell death [24, 25, 26]. Evidence emanating from previous findings, indicate that there are several membrane redox centers in most eukaryotic cells that can be targeted to monitor redox activities in the presence of certain drugs including plant metabolites [27, 28, 29].

The concept is investigated using extracts from Dioclea reflexa (DR) hook which belongs to the leguminous family. There are certain class of compounds in Dioclea reflexa (DR) that have clinical usefulness in both temperate and tropical regions [30, 31, 32, 33]. Extract of DR seed has been shown to boost hematological parameters and antioxidant activities which protect the kidney and blood from oxidative and related injuries under acute and chronic toxicological challenges [30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. Also, the aqueous extract of the seeds produces 100% mortality in third stage mosquito larvae of Aedes aegypti. The seed is a potential food source which contains around 14% protein, 8% fats and 58% carbohydrates [32]. Though these metabolites continue to show promise in disease treatment, there is very limited data in the literature of the properties of single isolates and their medicinal relevance, albeit due to the difficulties in pursuing systematic separation of the complex mixtures in a single separation method. Thus, the current work describes the use of a simplified method to systematically pool bioactive compound mixtures from DR and test their inhibitory effects on breast (MCF-7) cancer cells and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) cells. The rationale is that the larger surface area coupled with the differential polarity of the lumen and the surface of the halloysites nanotubes will be sufficient to bind selectively with the plant metabolites in the crude extracts of DR. The evidence of the entrapped species on the halloysites nanotubes was monitored using X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to determine the degree of aluminol (AlOH) and the siloxane (SiOH) groups modification since these two functional groups will be key sites for bioactive compounds interaction. pH-dependent eluted samples were then tested on breast (MCF-7) cancer cell lines to investigate their inhibitory effects and the mechanism of inhibition were determined using cyclic voltammetry and flow cytometry analyses [38, 39, 40, 41]. The results are reported here and show evidence of differential inhibitory effects of the bioactive compounds from the various pH conditions.


2. Methods

2.1 Extraction of bioactive compounds

Dioclea reflexa seeds were obtained from the District of Jaman North in the Brong Ahafo region of Ghana (7°57′1.8” North and 2°41′52.08” West). The content of the seeds was dried in the sun, and the cotyledon ground into powder using a laboratory mortar and pestle. The drugs used for the study were obtained from a Company (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). 5 gram of Dioclea reflexa Seed powder was dissolved in 30 mL of 70% ethanol. 5 mL of the supernatant was used for immobilization using 10, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 mg of HNTs. 200 mg gave the best entrapment. The loaded HNTs were released with a buffer with pH ranging from 4 to 9 and the contents vacuum dried followed by dissolution in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to give a final concentration of 3.2 mg/mL.

2.2 Cell viability and electrochemical detection

The methods used for preparing stock solution of the drug are previously described [23]. Cells were treated with the drugs or the extracts to study the effects at prescribe time interval followed by estimating cell death. A correlation of cell death to electrochemical behavior was conducted using cyclic voltammetry under steady-state conditions as previously described [17].


3. Results

The stepwise procedure in this work probes the mechanism of action of standard drugs for treating microbial infections and the results compared to plant bioactive metabolites and chitosan nanocomposites. Two classes of standard drugs were used for comparison; anti-microbial drugs that include amphotericin B, rifampicin and fluconazole as well as cancer drugs which included curcumin and gossypol. Whereas the plant metabolites were derived from Dioclea reflexa (DR). The therapeutic effect of nanocomposites were also tested. Chitosan nanocomposites were synthesized using chitosan as the base material and Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as well as acetic acid as modifiers. Our hypothesis stipulated that drug candidate target membrane environment of cells leading to polarization or depolarization. The outcome in this case would enhance ionic mobility across membranes which could be captured through electrochemical detection as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of the mechanism of drug interaction with biological membranes and how its electrochemical response (using a miniature electrode) correlates to cell viability as captured by the a cell counting device (Cellometer) [33].

The various standardized drugs, plant metabolites as well as the synthesized nanocomposites used to investigate the electrochemical behaviour of the cells are displayed in Table 1. The cell lines and their sources are also indicated in Table 2. First, the electrochemical behaviour of S. cerevisiae cells was investigated using the standard antimicrobial drugs, amphotericin B, fluconazole and rifampicin. As shown in Figure 2, fluconazole and rifampicin exhibited very limited changes in the anodic peak potential (Figure 2A and B) compared to the amphotericin B doped S. cerevisiae cell lines (Figure 2C). The results obtained confirmed membrane polarization/depolarization behaviour of the S. cerevisiae due to the presence of amphotericin B leading to increase ionic mobility. Fluconazole and rifampicin which are not directly linked to membrane destabilization as the former are mainly responsible for RNA synthesis inhibition and rifampicin being responsible for inhibition of ergosterol synthesis.

FluconazoleHuman milkTriazole
AmphotericinStreptomyces nodosusPolyene with seven adjoining trans double bonds
GossypolCotton plantNatural phenol
CurcuminCurcuma longa plantsBeta-diketone
Chitosan nanocomposite*,1Syntheisized from chitosan and Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS)Chitosan modified with TEOS in different sequence (no known structures)
Dioclea reflexa Extract*,2SeedpH dependent elution of plant metabolites from halloysites nanotubes (no known structures)

Table 1.

List of compounds used for the study.

Extracted or synthesized and unpurified.

The following composites were tested: CT; chitosan modified by TEOS followed by acetic acid, CC; chitosan modified with TEOS/acetic acid mixture, CA; chitosan modified with acetic acid, and CT, chitosan modified with TEOS.

Plant metabolites obtained from pH ~4.1–9.6.

Cell linesSourceRedox behaviorCell viability
Prostate cancer (PC3)ATCC (Manassas, VA)Cyclic VoltammetryTrypan blue and MTT assays
Breast (MCF-7) cancerATCC (Manassas, VA)Cyclic VoltammetryTrypan blue and MTT assays
S. cerevisiae(ATCC/LGC Standards, Teddington, UK)Cyclic VoltammetryMTT assay

Table 2.

Cell lines and Detection methods used for Investigating membrane mediated effects.

Figure 2.

Cyclic voltammetry response of S. Cerevisiae in the presence of (A) rifampicin, (B) fluconazole, and (C) amphotericin B on IDE electrode (Colour code: black, antibiotic; red, cells and blue, cell + antibiotic).

A correlation between cell death and electrochemical response was established using S. cerevisiae cell lines and MTT assay detection. Although the result indicated cell death in the presence of the antimicrobial drugs, Amphotericin B exhibited enhanced cell death probably due to the high degree of membrane permeability of ions as indicated in the voltammograms in Figure 2C.

To test the electrochemical behaviour and redox activity of the Dioclea reflexa extracts, cyclic voltammetry analysis was conducted using interdigitated gold electrodes (IDEs), (Metrohm, DropSens). The current from the quasi-reversible oxidation curve was plotted against concentration of the plant metabolites. Figure 3A (control, black) indicated insignificant redox mechanism, however, the extracts showed quasi-reversible oxidation values ranging from 0.25 to 0.70 mA at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. The water extract (SWE) had higher redox potential compared to those of the ethanol extract (SEE). The water extract (SWE) (red) demonstrated the most cell death followed by methanol extract (SME) (purple) and ethanol extract (SEE) (blue) respectively with the control cells (black) exhibiting the least cell death at higher concentrations and extended incubation time periods. SWE (red) revealed cell death of about 57%, whereas SME (purple), SEE (blue) recorded about 31 and 22% respectively at the same concentration. It was concluded that the extracts caused membrane porosity to initiate reactive oxygen species release leading to cell death.

Figure 3.

(A) A graph of current versus concentration of plant extracts revealed the water extract generated highest current, followed by the methanol extract, ethanol extract and the control cells in that order. (B) Investigating cell death as a function time. The water extract revealed significant cell death (red) after 2 days of incubation, followed by the methanol extract, ethanol extract and control in that order.

Another important strategy in plant phytochemical studies is to develop local immobilization materials that can capture bioactive plant metabolites and release the cargo steadily onto diseased cells. Optimization parameters were developed to capture plant metabolites from Dioclea Reflexa (DR) seed extracts on halloysites nanotubes (HNTs). An encapsulating capacity of 13% was obtained when approximately 5 g of DR extracts was immobilized onto about 1 g of HNTs. Evidence of plant metabolites entrapment was monitored with FTIR and X-ray diffraction methods. As shown in Figure 4A, changes in the FTIR signatures peak intensities of the halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) revealed all the functional groups present in the empty halloysites nanotubes (black). The inner Al-OH and outer Si-OH groups have characteristic stretching peaks at 3624 and 3691 cm−1, respectively. Bending vibrations of Al-OH and Si-O revealed absorption peaks at 907 cm−1. In addition, the uneven stretching vibrations of the Si-O bond gives a strong absorption peak at 1005 cm−1. There was a significant reduction of the transmission peak after immobilization of the DR extracts on the halloysites nanotubes (blue) and this indicated a modification of the nanotubes with the plant metabolites. Following the release of the bioactive compounds from the nanotubes, the transmission peaks reverted to the original peaks of the empty nanotubes (red). Similarly, Figure 4B, showed the characteristics 2θ° peak positions of the nanotubes which occurs at 11.7, 20.5, 24.8, 37.5, 43.3 and 64.4° (red). After immobilization of the DR extract on the nanotubes, there was dramatic reduction of peak intensities at the same 2θ° positions and that indicated chemical modifications of the nanotubes by the bioactive constituents in DR extract (black). The bioactive constituents were eluted with 70% ethanol and resulted in the reversal of the nanotubes peaks as shown in Figure 4B (blue). The characteristic peak intensities reverted to those observed in the control.

Figure 4.

(A) Characterization of HNTs and loaded HNTs with plant metabolites using FTIR techniques. Reduction in IR transmittance indicates OH on the HNTs are functionalized by at least one bioactive. (B) XRD spectra of the entrapped metabolites showing the signature peaks at two theta position of HNTs and loaded HNTs with plant metabolites. Intensity has inverse relationship to surface area. Larger area due to immobilization will cause a decrease peak intensity.

The antiproliferative activity of the crude extracts did not reveal significant inhibitory effects on breast (MCF-7) cancer cells, however, the pH-dependent eluted metabolites revealed that the acidic pH samples exhibited profound antiproliferative effects on the cancer cells compared to the basic pH metabolites using both trypan blue dye exclusion assay and MTT viability test as shown in Table 3. pH ~ 5.2 demonstrated IC50 of 0.8 mg and a cyclic voltammetry oxidation peak potential and current of 234 mV and 0.45 μA respectively indicating membrane polarization/depolarization of the cancer cells as shown in Figure 5. It was confirmed through fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) studies that the plant metabolites influenced breast cancer apoptotic signaling pathways of cell death as shown in Figure 6. The studies proved that plant metabolites could be captured using simplified screening procedures for rapid drug discovery purposes. Such procedures, however, would require the integration of affordable analytical tools to isolate individual metabolites for testing. Our approach could be an important strategy to create plant metabolite database based on pH values.

Sample/Dry extractIC50 (mg)R squared value

Table 3.

Experimental IC50 values of the extracts eluted at different pH conditions all measured in milligram quantities of the seed extract.

Figure 5.

(A) Effects of the bioactive compounds from the pH ~5.2 on the depolarization potential of the MCF-7 cells. (B) The influence of the voltage on current of the MCF-7 cells as a function of pH. The cyclic voltammogram measurements conditions were: Scanning from 690 mV to 970 mV at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1. MCF-7 cancer cell viability studies of the bioactive compounds extracted at pH ~ 5.2 at cell concentration of 1 x106 cells/well [submitted results for publication, Scientific Reports].

Figure 6.

Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of the inhibitory effects of breast (MCF-7) cancer cells using bioactive extracts at pH ~ 5.2 (best IC50 concentration). The results were compared to the inhibitory effects of a Commercially available cancer drug, cucurmin. (A) untreated cells, (B) cells treated with extract and (C) cells treated with curcumin all at cell concentration of 1 x106 cells/well.

Biopolymers such as chitosan, gelatin and cellulose have been used with different additives in order to modify their surfaces for biomedical application. In the next paragraph, a description of the synthesis of chitosan nanocomposites using tetraorthosilicate (TEOS) and acetic acid (AA) to study their influence on prostate cancer (PC3) cell lines would be described. The particles synthesized for the study include SC; chitosan modified by TEOS followed by acetic acid, CC; chitosan modified with TEOS/acetic acid mixture, CA; chitosan modified with acetic acid, and CT, chitosan modified with TEOS. As shown in Figure 7A and B, The electrochemical response of normal cells and prostate cancer cells (PC3) when treated with the particles revealed the latter showed modest response whereas the PC3 cells anodic peak currents changed dramatically with the treatment with the nanocomposites especially the SC nanoparticles. The cell viability studies revealed a corresponding decrease in cell viability as measured by a cell counting device. The normal cells again showed no significant difference in cell viability after 24–48 hours of cell growth as shown in Figure 7C and D. The results were compared with a standard drug used to treat cancers, gossypol (GP).

Figure 7.

Correlation electrochemical response of the (A) normal cells and (B) prostate cancer cells (PC3) as a function of chitosan composite treatment. SC; chitosan modified by TEOS followed by acetic acid, CC; chitosan modified with TEOS/acetic acid mixture, CA; chitosan modified with acetic acid, and CT, chitosan modified with TEOS The corresponding cell viability as measured by the cell counting device. (C) normal cells and (D) cancer cells.


4. Discussion

In the current work, a systematic approach was undertaken to carefully investigate standard drugs, plant metabolites and chitosan nanoparticles on the electrochemical behaviour of selected cell lines and also to correlate their electrochemistry to cell viability.

It is becoming evident that taking advantage of the numerous redox mediators, scientists could develop biosensors from many biological systems. For example, S. Cerevisiae has several Redox centers which could be exploited using hydrophilic/hydrophobic molecules as extensively discussed previously by Rawson et al. [1, 2]. The fact that Electrochemical behavior could be monitored using membrane targeted drugs [42, 43, 44, 45], opens avenue for future development of a biosensor for identifying potential drug candidate from plant sources. For example, the famous antifungal drug, Amp B has been used to treat fungal infection effectively and its mechanism of action has been well characterized [46, 47]. It is established that the antifungal drug binds to ergosterol in the cell membrane to enhance leakage of ions leading to depolarization of the membrane [48]. Increase in ions leakage across membrane could ultimately increase the oxidation potential across membranes. Such source of ions can be detected through electrochemical techniques as already observed in our studies as well as studies from other groups [2].

The fact that Amp B and the plant extracts behave similarly on S. cerevisiae cell viability supported a general claim that Amp B and the plant extracts exhibited a common mechanism leading to cell death. Hence, due to the quasi-reversible oxidation process observed in the anodic response, it was concluded that membrane polarization/depolarization leading to ionic leakage might have been the mechanism through which one or more of the organic bioactive molecules illicit their action. This correlation had highlighted an important opportunity that could be further exploited for identifying bioactive plant metabolites in the natural product field.

We used pH dependent elution of the DR bioactive compounds from the halloysites nanotubes to further validate the activity of the captured metabolites on electrochemical behaviour and cell death. Halloysite nanotubes have SiOH and AlOH groups which are found on the outer surface and the inner surface making the outer and inner surfaces to have different charges respectively [10, 49, 50]. Thus, depending on the pH conditions, aluminol (AlOH) and the siloxane (SiOH) groups could either be protonated or deprotonated leading to different affinities towards certain macromolecules and organic compounds. Our hypothesis was that partially positive metabolites will be weakly attracted to SiOH groups whereas negatively charged metabolites would prefer the latter. The pH dependent release of the metabolites from the HNT were not statistically different after determining the amount in milligram quantities and expressing the entrapment efficiency as a percentage value. However, when tested against the breast (MCF-7) cancer cell lines, the acidic pH elution demonstrated significant anti-proliferative activity against the cancer cell lines compared to the basic pH metabolites. The most profound activity was found in the pH ~ 5.2 which was supported by IC50 calculated values.

Depolarization is an indicator of mitochondrial dysfunction in most cancer cells and therefore investigating polarization and depolarization could inform the mechanism of cell death [51]. In this work, Cyclic voltammetry measurements were used to probe the extent of polarization and depolarization by relating the voltage to current surge using electrochemical methods. The results revealed that the metabolites exhibited quasi-reversible redox behavior and concentration dependent reduction in the applied voltage [52]. The currents also showed a triangular modulation with a rise in oxidation current at lower pH, followed by another rise beyond acidic pH and further reduction to the strongly basic pH. Metabolites from the pH ~ 5.2 extract required a higher voltage application to generate the minimum amount of current in the cells indicating cell membrane polarization in the presence of the metabolite was achieved. The extracts from pH ~ 7.4 and pH ~ 8.1, even though gave higher IC50 values, the voltage required to initiate cell depolarization in the cells was at a minimum as indicated in the maximum current generation. The results highlighted that the metabolites could cause cell death through a polarization/depolarization mechanism as documented by other researchers in the literature [53]. Flow cytometer-based analysis showed that the metabolites showed dose-dependent apoptosis of MCF-7 cells. It was noted that exposure of 2 mgmL−1 concentrations of the metabolites led to greater than two-fold increase in apoptosis in comparison to the untreated cells. Curcumin is a well-known polyphenol and widely used for its anti-oxidative and anti-cancerous application. Curcumin effects on the breast cancer cells were also investigated and compared with the result from the metabolites. It was observed that curcumin improved cell death significantly without going through the apoptotic phase indicating synergistic effect could be developed when both metabolites and curcumin are used to treat cancer. Finally, the chitosan nanoparticles also demonstrated that membrane polarization and depolarization could also be used to monitor particle permeation into cell membrane to induce varied cell behaviour.


5. Conclusion

In conclusion, electrochemical behaviour of cells in the presence of plant metabolites if carefully pursued could help establish a database with fundamental information on herbal medicine isolation and characterization to serve the scientific community in future studies of herbal medicine. It is also simple, robust and required a specific protocol that could be adopted for understanding the medicinal plants behaviour for easy characterization. It has to be emphasized that further work needs to be pursued to understand the mechanism of these membrane targeted behaviours.



We will like to thank the West African Center for Cell Biology of Infectious Pathogens (WACCBIP) for support in providing the facilities and technical assistants for the work. We also thank Mr. Solomon Katu for assisting the team conducting the experiments in the Department of Biomedical engineering. Mr. Ayirebaje Azuponga and Mr. Kwasi Obeng for processing the images for this book.


  1. 1. Rawson FJ, Cole MT, Hicks JM, Aylott JW, Milne WI, Collins CM, Jackson SK, Silman NJ, Mendes PM: Electrochemical communication with the inside of cells using micro-patterned vertical carbon nanofibre electrodes. Sci Rep 2016, 6: 37672. doi: 10.1038/srep05216
  2. 2. Rawson FJ, Downard AJ, Baronian KH: Electrochemical detection of intracellular and cell membrane redox systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep 2014, 4:5216. doi: 10.1038/srep05216
  3. 3. Robbins N, Spitzer M, Yu T, Cerone RP, Averette AK, Bahn YS, Heitman J, Sheppard DC, Tyers M, Wright GD: An Antifungal Combination Matrix Identifies a Rich Pool of Adjuvant Molecules that Enhance Drug Activity against Diverse Fungal Pathogens. Cell Rep 2015, 13(7):1481-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 5
  4. 4. Hartland CL, Pu J, Krysan D, Didone L, Moquist PN, Dandapani S, Munoz B, Palmer M, Schreiber S: Discovery and Evaluation of Fungicidal Anti-Cryptococcal Molecules. In: Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program. Bethesda (MD); 2010
  5. 5. Ibragimova V, Alieva I, Kasumov K, Khutorsky V: Transient permeability induced by alkyl derivatives of amphotericin B in lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006, 1758(1):29-37. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.12.011 doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.12.011
  6. 6. Gianni E, Avgoustakis K, Papoulis D: Kaolinite group minerals: applications in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.07.030
  7. 7. Saif MJ, Asif HM, Naveed AM: Properties and modification methods of Halloysite nanotubes: a state-of-the- art review. J Chil Chem Soc 2018, 63. doi: 10.4067/s0717-97072018000304109
  8. 8. Park K, Lee J, Chang JH, Hwang KH, Lee Y: Characterization of Surface-Modified Halloysite Nanotubes by Thermal Treatment Under Reducing Atmosphere. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2020, 20(7):4221-4226.doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.186
  9. 9. Tas CE, Sevinis Ozbulut EB, Ceven OF, Tas BA, Unal S, Unal H: Purification and Sorting of Halloysite Nanotubes into Homogeneous, Agglomeration-Free Fractions by Polydopamine Functionalization. ACS Omega 2020, 5(29):17962-17972.doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01057
  10. 10. Jang SH, Jang SR, Lee GM, Ryu JH, Park SI, Park NH: Halloysite Nanocapsules Containing Thyme Essential Oil: Preparation, Characterization, and Application in Packaging Materials. J Food Sci 2017, 82(9):2113-2120.doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13835
  11. 11. Lisuzzo L, Cavallaro G, Milioto S, Lazzara G: Halloysite Nanotubes Coated by Chitosan for the Controlled Release of Khellin. Polymers (Basel) 2020, 12(8). doi:10.3390/polym12081766
  12. 12. Fizir M, Dramou P, Dahiru NS, Ruya W, Huang T, He H: Halloysite nanotubes in analytical sciences and in drug delivery: A review. Mikrochim Acta 2018, 185(8):389. doi:10.1007/s00604-018-2908-1
  13. 13. Jana S, Kondakova AV, Shevchenko SN, Sheval EV, Gonchar KA, Timoshenko VY, Vasiliev AN: Halloysite nanotubes with immobilized silver nanoparticles for anti-bacterial application. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2017, 151:249-254. doi. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.12.017
  14. 14. Tully J, Yendluri R, Lvov Y: Halloysite Clay Nanotubes for Enzyme Immobilization. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17(2):615-621. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01542
  15. 15. Barman M, Mahmood S, Augustine R, Hasan A, Thomas S, Ghosal K: Natural halloysite nanotubes/chitosan based bio-nanocomposite for delivering norfloxacin, an anti-microbial agent in sustained release manner. Int J Biol Macromol 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.060
  16. 16. Bonifacio MA, Gentile P, Ferreira AM, Cometa S, De Giglio E: Insight into halloysite nanotubes-loaded gellan gum hydrogels for soft tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr Polym 2017, 163:280-291. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.064
  17. 17. Bottino MC, Yassen GH, Platt JA, Labban N, Windsor LJ, Spolnik KJ, Bressiani AH: A novel three-dimensional scaffold for regenerative endodontics: materials and biological characterizations. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2015, 9(11):E116-123. doi: 10.1002/term.1712
  18. 18. De Oliveira T, Guegan R, Thiebault T, Milbeau CL, Muller F, Teixeira V, Giovanela M, Boussafir M: Adsorption of diclofenac onto organoclays: Effects of surfactant and environmental (pH and temperature) conditions. J Hazard Mater 2017, 323(Pt A):558-566. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.001
  19. 19. Li W, Liu D, Zhang H, Correia A, Makila E, Salonen J, Hirvonen J, Santos HA: Microfluidic assembly of a nano-in-micro dual drug delivery platform composed of halloysite nanotubes and a pH-responsive polymer for colon cancer therapy. Acta Biomater 2017, 48:238-246. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.042
  20. 20. Nguyen-Vo TH, Nguyen L, Do N, Nguyen TN, Trinh K, Cao H, Le L: Plant Metabolite Databases: From Herbal Medicines to Modern Drug Discovery. J Chem Inf Model 2020, 60(3):1101-1110. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00826
  21. 21. Tajadini H, Divsalar K, Mehrabani M, Haghdoost AA, Esmaili Z, Shadkam M, Moradi M: The frequency of using herbal medicines among patients with hypertension in Kerman, Iran, 2012-2013. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2015, 20(3):199-202. doi: 10.1177/2156587215573141
  22. 22. Zhang X, Schmitter S, Van de Moortele PF, Liu J, He B: From complex B(1) mapping to local SAR estimation for human brain MR imaging using multi-channel transceiver coil at 7T. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32(6):1058-1067. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2251653
  23. 23. Wang X, Han L, Li G, Peng W, Gao X, Klaassen CD, Fan G, Zhang Y: From the Cover: Identification of Natural Products as Inhibitors of Human Organic Anion Transporters (OAT1 and OAT3) and Their Protective Effect on Mercury-Induced Toxicity. Toxicol Sci 2018, 161(2):321-334. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfx216
  24. 24. Nikitin M, Deych K, Grevtseva I, Girsova N, Kuznetsova M, Pridannikov M, Dzhavakhiya V, Statsyuk N, Golikov A: Preserved Microarrays for Simultaneous Detection and Identification of Six Fungal Potato Pathogens with the Use of Real-Time PCR in Matrix Format. Biosensors (Basel) 2018, 8(4). doi: 10.3390/bios8040129
  25. 25. Antunes RS, Ferraz D, Garcia LF, Thomaz DV, Luque R, Lobon GS, Gil ES, Lopes FM: Development of a Polyphenol Oxidase Biosensor from Jenipapo Fruit Extract (Genipa americana L.) and Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Textile Industrial Effluents. Biosensors (Basel) 2018, 8(2). doi:10.3390/bios8020047
  26. 26. Anderson DE, Balapangu S, Fleischer HNA, Viade RA, Krampa FD, Kanyong P, Awandare GA, Tiburu EK: Investigating the Influence of Temperature on the Kaolinite-Base Synthesis of Zeolite and Urease Immobilization for the Potential Fabrication of Electrochemical Urea Biosensors. Sensors (Basel) 2017, 17(8).
  27. 27. Holzmann C, Kilch T, Kappel S, Dorr K, Jung V, Stockle M, Bogeski I, Peinelt C: Differential Redox Regulation of Ca(2)(+) Signaling and Viability in Normal and Malignant Prostate Cells. Biophys J 2015, 109(7):1410-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.006
  28. 28. Martino T, Kudrolli TA, Kumar B, Salviano I, Mencalha A, Coelho MGP, Justo G, Costa PRR, Sabino KCC, Lupold SE: The orally active pterocarpanquinone LQB-118 exhibits cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cell and tumor models through cellular redox stress. Prostate 2018, 78(2):140-151. doi: 10.1002/pros.23455
  29. 29. Sajjadi M, Karimi E, Oskoueian E, Iranshahi M, Neamati A: Galbanic acid: Induced antiproliferation in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells and enhanced cellular redox state in the human dermal fibroblasts. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2019, 33(11):e22402. doi:10.1002/jbt.22402
  30. 30. Pinto-Junior VR, Osterne VJ, Santiago MQ, Correia JL, Pereira-Junior FN, Leal RB, Pereira MG, Chicas LS, Nagano CS, Rocha BA et al: Structural studies of a vasorelaxant lectin from Dioclea reflexa Hook seeds: Crystal structure, molecular docking and dynamics. Int J Biol Macromol 2017, 98:12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.092
  31. 31. Pinto-Junior VR, Correia JL, Pereira RI, Pereira-Junior FN, Santiago MQ, Osterne VJ, Madeira JC, Cajazeiras JB, Nagano CS, Delatorre P et al: Purification and molecular characterization of a novel mannose-specific lectin from Dioclea reflexa hook seeds with inflammatory activity. J Mol Recognit 2016, 29(4):134-141. doi: 10.3390/molecules180910857
  32. 32. Ajatta MA, Akinola SA, Otolowo DT, Awolu OO, Omoba OS, Osundahunsi OF: Effect of Roasting on the Phytochemical Properties of Three Varieties of Marble Vine (Dioclea reflexa) Using Response Surface Methodology. Prev Nutr Food Sci 2019, 24(4):468-477. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2019.24.4.468
  33. 33. Arthur PK, Yeboah AB, Issah I, Balapangu S, Kwofie SK, Asimeng BO, Foster EJ, Tiburu EK: Electrochemical Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Corresponds to Cell Viability upon Exposure to Dioclea reflexa Seed Extracts and Antifungal Drugs. Biosensors (Basel) 2019, 9(1). doi: 10.3390/bios9010045
  34. 34. Kazenel MR, Debban CL, Ranelli L, Hendricks WQ, Chung YA, Pendergast THt, Charlton ND, Young CA, Rudgers JA: A mutualistic endophyte alters the niche dimensions of its host plant. AoB Plants 2015, 7. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv005
  35. 35. Saqib Z, Mahmood A, Naseem Malik R, Mahmood A, Hussian Syed J, Ahmad T: Indigenous knowledge of medicinal plants in Kotli Sattian, Rawalpindi district, Pakistan. J Ethnopharmacol 2014, 151(2):820-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.05.035
  36. 36. Pal DK, Mandal M, Senthilkumar GP, Padhiari A: Antibacterial activity of Cuscuta reflexa stem and Corchorus olitorius seed. Fitoterapia 2006, 77(7-8):589-591. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2006.06.015
  37. 37. Mazumder UK, Gupta M, Pal D, Bhattacharya S: Chemical and toxicological evaluation of methanol extract of Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. stem and Corchorus olitorius Linn. seed on hematological parameters and hepatorenal functions in mice. Acta Pol Pharm 2003, 60(4):317-323. doi: 10.3742/OPEM.2009.9.1.049
  38. 38. Munge BS, Stracensky T, Gamez K, DiBiase D, Rusling JF: Multiplex Immunosensor Arrays for Electrochemical Detection of Cancer Biomarker Proteins. Electroanalysis 2016, 28(11):2644-2658. doi: 10.1002/elan.201600183
  39. 39. Nejadnik MR, Deepak FL, Garcia CD: Adsorption of Glucose Oxidase to 3-D Scaffolds of Carbon Nanotubes: Analytical Applications. Electroanalysis 2011, 23(6):1462-1469. doi:10.1002/elan.201000758
  40. 40. Szigeti Z, Vigassy T, Bakker E, Pretsch E: Approaches to Improving the Lower Detection Limit of Polymeric Membrane Ion-Selective Electrodes. Electroanalysis 2006, 18(13-14):1254-1265. doi:10.1002/elan.200603539
  41. 41. de Oliveira LA, Soares RO, Buzzi M, Mourao C, Kawase T, Kuckelhaus SAS: Cell and platelet composition assays by flow cytometry: basis for new platelet-rich fibrin methodologies. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2020, 34(4). doi: 10.23812/20-278-A
  42. 42. Hashkavayi AB, Raoof JB, Ojani R, Kavoosian S: Ultrasensitive electrochemical aptasensor based on sandwich architecture for selective label-free detection of colorectal cancer (CT26) cells. Biosens Bioelectron 2017, 92:630-637. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.042
  43. 43. Haupt A, Campetelli A, Bonazzi D, Piel M, Chang F, Minc N: Electrochemical regulation of budding yeast polarity. PLoS Biol 2014, 12(12):e1002029. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002029
  44. 44. Hudcova K, Trnkova L, Kejnovska I, Vorlickova M, Gumulec J, Kizek R, Masarik M: Novel biophysical determination of miRNAs related to prostate and head and neck cancers. Eur Biophys J 2015, 44(3):131-138. doi: 10.1007/s00249-015-1008-y
  45. 45. Nguyen HV, Richtera L, Moulick A, Xhaxhiu K, Kudr J, Cernei N, Polanska H, Heger Z, Masarik M, Kopel P et al: Electrochemical sensing of etoposide using carbon quantum dot modified glassy carbon electrode. Analyst 2016, 141(9):2665-2675. doi:10.1039/c5an02476e
  46. 46. Huang W, Zhang Z, Han X, Tang J, Wang J, Dong S, Wang E: Ion channel behavior of amphotericin B in sterol-free and cholesterol- or ergosterol-containing supported phosphatidylcholine bilayer model membranes investigated by electrochemistry and spectroscopy. Biophys J 2002, 83(6):3245-3255Uno B. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75326-5
  47. 47. Gray KC, Palacios DS, Dailey I, Endo MM, E, Wilcock BC, Burke MD: Amphotericin primarily kills yeast by simply binding ergosterol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109(7):2234-2239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117280109
  48. 48. Fang J, Palanisami A, Rajapakshe K, Widger WR, Miller JH: Nonlinear dielectric spectroscopy as an indirect probe of metabolic activity in thylakoid membrane. Biosensors (Basel) 2011, 1(1):13-22. doi: 10.3390/bios1010013
  49. 49. Santos AC, Ferreira C, Veiga F, Ribeiro AJ, Panchal A, Lvov Y, Agarwal A: Halloysite clay nanotubes for life sciences applications: From drug encapsulation to bioscaffold. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2018, 257:58-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2018.05.007
  50. 50. Vergaro V, Lvov YM, Leporatti S: Halloysite clay nanotubes for resveratrol delivery to cancer cells. Macromol Biosci 2012, 12(9):1265-1271. doi:10.1002/mabi.201200121
  51. 51. Wang B, Zhang X, Wang C, Chen L, Xiao Y, Pang Y: Bipolar and fixable probe targeting mitochondria to trace local depolarization via two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging. Analyst 2015, 140(16):5488-5494. doi:10.1039/c5an01063b
  52. 52. Kuralay F, Dukar N, Bayramli Y: Poly-L-lysine Coated Surfaces for Ultrasensitive Nucleic Acid Detection. Electroanalysis 2018, 30(7):1556-1565. doi:10.3390/jfb11040071
  53. 53. Verhoeven HA, van Griensven LJ: Flow cytometric evaluation of the effects of 3-bromopyruvate (3BP) and dichloracetate (DCA) on THP-1 cells: a multiparameter analysis. J Bioenerg Biomembr 2012, 44(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s10863-012-9414-7

Written By

Elvis K. Tiburu, Richard Asiamah, Bernard O. Asimeng, Samuel Kojo Kwofie, Emmanuel Nyankson and William N. Gblerkpor

Submitted: 04 September 2020 Reviewed: 04 December 2020 Published: 05 May 2021