Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults

Written By

Martha Alvarado-Ibarra, José Antonio De la Peña Celaya, Luara Luz Arana-Luna, Eleazar Hernández-Ruiz, José Luis Alvarez Vera, María Eugenia Espitia Ríos and Juan Manuel Pérez Zúñiga

Submitted: June 1st, 2020 Reviewed: November 2nd, 2020 Published: November 27th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94886

Chapter metrics overview

438 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

When diagnosed with ALL the age group between 18 and 45 years old (AYA, adolescents and young adults) do not have the good prognosis factors generally observed in children with this diagnosis. For a long time, it was undetermined whether they should be treated with continuous and sustained chemotherapy as children or whether receive sustained chemotherapy, but with longer rest periods like old adults. The medical care of adolescents and young adults with neoplastic diseases, grouped between 15 and 45 years of age, became an emerging research field of treatment in hematological diseases. Outcomes have asses complete response disease-free survival, and overall survival as markers of response, with very poor results reported. Relevant challenges have been identified in the AYA group with ALL that have drawn attention to the need to increase research in this area, particularly in the care of the population under 45 years of age with hematological malignancies.

Keywords

  • acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • remission
  • relapse
  • treatment
  • adult young and adolescents
  • bone marrow transplant

1. Introduction

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an oncohematological disease caused by genetic changes that alter the differentiation and proliferation of lymphocytes, distinguished by the infiltration of bone marrow, blood, and other tissues by neoplastic cells of hematopoietic origin [1]. The pathophysiology of these disease include causes for which, certain genes result affected in their function. Patients could present the following symptomatology: fever, lymphadenopathy, coagulation disorders, anemia, hepato-splenomegaly, weight loss, among others.

Another definition of ALL could be a disease caused by an acquired or congenital injury to the hematopoietic cell DNA (the genetic material) developing in the bone marrow, once these cells transform into a leukemic clone multiplies uncontrollably and rapidly in billions of malignant cells called lymphoblasts that prevents the normal cellular production of leukocytes, platelets and red blood cells. As a result, when a patient is diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the number of healthy blood cells (red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets) could be less than normal, although it is not uncommon to see an exaggerated elevation of white blood cells but all of them lymphoblasts.

It is more frequent in childhood than in adulthood, being the most common type of leukemia in children, with a peak of incidence between the 2 and 4 years old. When it appears in adulthood, it implies a worse prognosis.

Advertisement

2. Diagnosis by flow cytometry

There are a group of important cellular markers to make the diagnosis of B cell lineage, those are: CD19, CD20, CD22, CD24, and CD79a. The principal and earlier markers for lineage B cells are CD19, CD22 (membrane and cytoplasm respective) and CD79a [1, 2]. The presence of either of these two markers, without further differentiation markers, identifies the neoplastic cell as pro-B ALL (EGIL BI subtype). Positivity of the CD10 antigen (CALLA) defines the neoplastic cell as “common ALL” (EGIL B-II subtype). Cases with additional identification of the cytoplasmic heavy Mu chain are classified as the pre-B group (EGIL B-III subtype), while the presence of surface immunoglobulin light chains as mature B-ALL (EGIL B-IV subtype) [3].

In recent years, the direct correlation between ontogenetic classification with immunophenotypic expression by flow cytometry and cytogenetic or molecular alterations in type B acute lymphoblastic leukemia has been described (Table 1) [3, 4, 5, 6].

PRECURSORSONTOGENICSINMUNOPHENOTYPEMOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC
Pro BCD 10(-), CD 34 (++), CD 20(-), TdT(++)t(v;11q23.3), rearrangement MLL (KMT2A), t(4;11)
CD 19 (+), CD 22 (+), CD79a(+),
HLA-DR(+)
CommonCD10 (+++), CD 34(+), CD20 (-/+), Cadena μ (-), TdT (++)t(9;22) (q34.1;q11.2)(BCR-ABL1), t(12;21)( p13.2;q22.1) (TEL-AML1/ETV6-RUNX1); t(5;14)(q31.1;q32.3) (IL3-IGH); hiperdyploid, hipodyploid
Pre BCD 10(+), CD34(-), CD20(+), Cadena μ (+), TdT ++t(5;14)(q31.1;q32.3) (IL3-IGH); hiperdyploid, hipodyploid
MatureCD20(+), TdT(-), CD10(+), CD34(-), k(+) o λ(+)rearregment of MYC, t(8;14), t(2;8), t(8;22)

Table 1.

Immunogenetic classification of B ALL.

T-cell ALL constitutes 25% of adult ALL cases. Characteristic T cell markers are CD1a, CD2, CD3 (membrane and cytoplasm), CD4, CD5, CD7, and CD8. CD2, CD5 and CD7 antigens are markers of immature T cells, but none of them is absolutely lineage-specific, so the unequivocal diagnosis of T-ALL is based on the demonstration of superficial / cytoplasmic CD3. In T-ALL CD10 expression is quite common (25%) but non-specific, CD34 andCD13 and / or CD33 myeloid antigens can also be expressed by these cells. The recognized T-ALL subgroups: pro-T EGIL TI (cCD3 +, CD7 +), pre-T EGIL T-II (cCD3 +, CD7 + and CD5 / CD2 +), cortical T EGIL T-III (cCD3 +, Cd1a +, sCD3 + / -) and mature-T EGIL T-IV (cCD3 +, sCD3 +, CD1a−) [3, 4, 5, 6, 7].

The ontogenetic and immunocytogenetic correlation have particular importance due to prognostic relevance in both B-cell and T-cell lymphoid leukemia. Table 2 shows the correlation between the different T cell-type leukemia.

PRECURSORONTOGENICSINMUNOPHENOTYPEMOLECULAR/CYTOGENETIC
Pro T (T I)CD2(-), CD5(-), CD8(-), CD4(-), TdT(++), CD34(+/-)NOTCH 1 t (10;14) HIX 11-TCR
t (11;14) LMO/TCR
NUP213
ABL1
HOX11
CD7(++), (CD3c(+), CD3m(-/+) débilEarly TCD5(+) d,CD8(-), CD1a(-), CD2(-), TdT(+)
Pre T (T II)CD2(+) y/o CD5(+) y/o CD8(+), CD1a(-), mCD3(-)
Intermedia or cortical T (T III)CD1a(+),CD34(-), CD4(+), CD8(+), CD3m(+)
CD7(++), CD3c(+),
CD3m(+)
Mature TCD3m(+), CD1a(-), TCRαβ(+) o TCRγδ(+)--------------

Table 2.

Immunogenetic classification of T cell.

Advertisement

3. Cytogenetic diagnosis

The karyotype alterations that could be found in ALL are numerical and structural changes as well, that have profound prognostic significance. Cytogenetics analysis represents an important step in ALL classification. The conventional karyotype can be useful in identifying recurring translocations, as well as in the identification of gain or loss of chromosomal material; However, the biggest limitation of this technique is the requirement of the cell to enter in metaphase, what is necessary for the obtaining of the material for the analysis of chromosomes. In such cases the technique of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can allow direct detection and visualization of virtually all investigated chromosomal abnormalities in ALL, with a sensitivity near of 99%, finally, comparative genomic hybridization of matrices (matrix-CGH, ​​a-CGH) and matrices of single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs) can allow the identification of cryptic and/or submicroscopic changes in the genome [8, 9].

3.1 Cytogenetic/genetic risk groups

The aberrations with a good prognosis are: del(12p), t(12p) / t(12; 21) (p13; q22) t(10; 14) (q24; q11) in ALL of lineage B. These abnormalities are relatively rare in adults compared to childhood with ALL.

Aberrations associated with intermediate risk include the normal diploid subset plus cases of hyperdiploidy and various other recurrent or random chromosomal abnormalities.

Other aberrations such as isolated trisomy 21, trisomy 8, and perhaps del(6q) and t(1; 19) (q23;p13) / E2A-PBX1 may constitute an intermediate-high risk group; Recent evidence suggests that the previously poor prognosis reported for t (1, 19) (q23; p13) / E2A-PBX1 could be outweighed by some current therapeutic approaches [10, 11]. Other newly identified aberrations in the intermediate-high risk group are iAMP21 12 and IGH rearrangements, including CRLF2 [12, 13].

Finally, patients with t(9; 22) (q34; q11) or BCR-ABL1 rearrangement with positive FISH test (Philadelphia + ALL), t (4; 11) (q21; q23) or MLL rearrangements at 11q23, monosomy 7, hypodiploidy (and the closely related near triploid group) fell into the high-risk cytogenetic category, with a disease-free survival (DFS) rate of approximately 25%, or 10% in the specific case of Phi + ALL prior to introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) [14, 15]. The presence of the Phi + chromosome in ALL can constitute 25–50% of CD10 + or pre-B cases and represent the most frequent alteration in adult and elderly patients, found in more than 50% of cases in the 6th decade of life [16]. Secondary chromosomal abnormalities in addition to t(9; 22) (q34; q11) may worsen the prognosis [17] however this has not yet been proven in the TKI era [18]. Currently the most group with the most unfavorable prognosis among cases with known genetic / molecular aberration is represented by t(4; 11) (q21; q23) with MLL1 rearrangement unless an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is performed [19].

Some other karyotypes alterations are exclusive to specific ALL syndromes. Translocations involving chromosome 8 (MYC gene), as well as t (8; 14) (q24; q32) (90% of cases), t (8; 22) (q24; q11) (10% of cases) and t (2;8) (rarely observed) are practically present in 100% of cases of mature B-ALL with L3 / Burkitt morphology and immunoglobulins in the clonal surface. Typical cytogenetic aberrations are also found in the T lineage, the most frequent involve resection points of 14q11, for example, t (10; 14) (q24; q11), t (11; 14) (p13; q11) and others, the presence of t (8; 14) with resection points at q24; q11 (q24; q32 in line B ALL) in T cell ALL is associated with aggressive lymphomatous presentation [20, 21, 22].

An interruption in IKZF1 encoding the Ikaros transcription factor has been frequently observed in ALL with BCR / ABL rearrangement (80% of cases). The IKZF1 mutation predicts poor outcome in the treatment of ALL, Phi+ or not [13, 23, 24, 25].

By integrating genome-wide technologies the “BCR / ABL-like” subgroup has been suggested and identified in adult and child populations [26, 27] and represents approximately 15% of ALL ontogeny B cases. This subgroup It is characterized by a gene expression that is similar to that of BCR/ABL + patients, with frequent detection of the IKZF1 mutation and CRLF2 rearrangements but with where abysmal differences in the outcomes. Other mutations and / or rearrangements that activate tyrosine kinases has also been revealed as poor prognosis factor such as rearrangement of IGH-CRLF2, NUP214-ABL1, EBD1-PDGRB, BCR-JAK2 fusions and STRN3 JAK2, which have been associated with a very poor prognosis [28].

Hypodiploid ALL, considered a high risk factor has been extensively evaluated in pediatric ALL [29] Alterations involving tyrosine kinase receptors and RAS gene signaling (i.e., NRAS, KRAS, FLT3, and NF1) can be detected in up to 70% of haploid cases, while hypodiploid cases are characterized by lesions involving members of the Ikaros family, particularly IKZF2 and by TP53 interruptions which can be identified in 91.2% of these. In adult ALL, these cases are characterized by non-random chromosome loss and CDKN2A / B with locus deletion as the only recurrent abnormality; As previously reported, in children these cases often harbor TP53 mutations [30].

The TP53 mutation is detected in 6.4% of all ALL cases and a correlation with a worse result has been demonstrated. In adults, TP53 mutations are identified at diagnosis in 8.2% of cases (11.1% of T-ALL and 6.4% of B-ALL), and are preferably identified without molecular aberrations and are associated with refractoriness to chemotherapy [31, 32].

In T cell-ALL, well-recognized aberrations are: Rearrangement of the T-cell receptor (TCR) gene, chromosomal deletions and focal gene deletions, in addition, chromosomal rearrangements can also lead to fusion genes in the framework of Chimeric proteins with oncogenic properties such as thePICALM-MLLT10, NUP214-ABL1 fusion for medin episomes, EML-ABL1, theSET-NUP214 fusion and MLL-type genetic rearrangements have uncertain significance [33, 34].

A large set of mutations in T cell-line ALL has been identified by sequencing techniques including NOTCH1, FBW7, BCL11B, JAK1, PTPN2, IL7R and PHF6, some of them have recognized prognostic importance, while others require further investigation. In fact, NOTCH1 and / or FBW7 mutations that occur in more than 60% and around 20% of cases, respectively, are generally associated with a favorable outcome. A new prognostic model has been recently proposed defining as low risk those with NOTCH1 and FBW7 mutations and those with lesions involving RAS/PTEN as high-risk. JAK1 mutations, which increase JAK activity and impair proliferation and survival, have been associated with refractoriness of chemotherapy and should be considered as poor prognosis markers [35, 36].

Recurrent chromosomal and molecular abnormalities characterize ALL subtypes in adults and children (Table 3) and often provide prognostic information that can influence risk stratification and treatment decisions (Table 4). The frequency of certain subtypes differs between adult and child ALL, what partially explains the difference in clinical outcomes between patient populations [6, 30, 34, 36].

Cytogenetic alterationsGeneFrequency in adultsFrequency in children
Hypodiploidy (>50 chromosomes)--7%25%
Hypodiploidy (<44 chromosomes)--2%15
t(9;22) (q34;q11):Philadelphia chromosome(Ph+)BCR-ABL125%2-4%
t(12,21) (p13;q22)ETV6-RUNX1
(TEL-AML1)
2%22%
t(v;11q23), t(4;11), t(11;19)KMT2A10%8%
t(1;19) (q23;p13)TCF3-PBX1
(E2A-PBX1)
3%6%
t(5;14) (q31;q32)IL3-IGH< 15<1%
t(8;14), t(2;8), t(8;22)c-MYC4%2%
t(1;14)TAL-112%7%
t(10;14) (q24;q11)HOX11
(TLX1)
8%15
t(5;14) (q35;q32)HOX11L21%35
t(11;14) (q11)(p13;q11) (p15;q11)TCR y
TCR
20-25%10-20%
BCR-abl1-like/Ph-likeMultiple10-30%15%
LLA-B con iAMP21RUNX11--2%
ETPMultiple2%25%
IkarosIKZF125-35%12-17%

Table 3.

Frequency of Chromosomic and molecular alterations by age group.

RiskCytogenetic alterations
Good• Hypodiploidy (51-65 chromosomes)
• Cases with trisomy 4,10 y 17 more favorable results
• t(12;21) (p13;q22):ETV6-EUNX1a
Poor• Hypodiploidy
• KMT2A, t(4;11)
• t(v;14q32)/IgH
• t(8;22)(q34;q11.2):BCR-ABL1
• Complex karyotype (5 o more abnormalities)
• Ph-like ALL intrachromosomal amplification 21(iAMP21)

Table 4.

Cytogenetic risk groups.

The most recent classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia ins shown in Table 5.

B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, NOS
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with recurrent genetic abnormalities
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2);BCR-ABL1
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with t(v;11q23.3);KMT2A rearranged
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1);ETV6-RUNX1
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with hyperdiploidy
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with hypodiploidy
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with t(5;14)(q31.1;q32.3) IL3-IGH
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with t(1;19)(q23;p13.3);TCF3-PBX1
Provisional entity: B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, BCR-ABL1–like
Provisional entity: B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with iAMP21
T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma
Provisional entity: Early T-cell precursor lymphoblastic leukemia
Provisional entity: Natural killer (NK) cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma

Table 5.

WHO classification of lymphoblastic leukemia.

Modified of D´Angelo, 2006 [37].

Advertisement

4. Treatment

The evolution in treatment of patients with ALL has progressed over time, this in order to achieve better survival, relapse-free rates and the quest to achieve cure. We will divide this issue into two large groups: AYA group (adolescents and young adults) and the group of people over 40 years old; and subdivided focusing on status of Philadelphia chromosome (positive and negative).

Chemotherapy treatment is divided into treatment phases with different goals: [38, 39].

Induction: it is the phase that seeks to achieve remission normalizing the parameters of the blood count (Hb >10 gr/dl, Neutrophils >1000 /mm3, platelets >100,000/mm3) as well normalization of the organs affected by diagnosis (liver, kidney, lung).

Consolidation: in this phase, the aim is to keep the patient in remission and achieve a negative minimal residual disease (MRD) that will impact the prognosis.

Maintenance: this phase seeks to avoid relapse of the disease and prepare for an elective suspension [38, 39, 40].

Advertisement

5. Treatment of the AYA group

This group is considered as a “superimposed” population since pediatric schemes have improved their degrees of response compared to adult designed schemes. Initially, the treatment regimens in this group of patients were based on regimens for adults, showing complete remissions in a low percentage, a couple of examples are the UKALLXII/ECOG [41] case study that reported complete remission (CR) nearly 51% after 1 chemotherapy cycle with increase to 91% after 2 induction cycles and the CALGB8811 [42] study that reported RC of 62–86% after 1 and 2 cycles of induction to remission respectively; On the other hand, the LALA-94 [43] study reported CR rate of 72% after one treatment cycle up to 84% after 2 treatment cycles, thus we have to mention the Hyper-CVAD scheme with a CR rate in the first cycle reported in 81% with increase after 2 cycles to 92% [44]; the DFCI45 pilot study showed an RC of 82% in the first induction cycle. Due to the above, it’s clear that treatment schemes based on adults’ schemes are ineffective to achieve CR, for these reasons the AYA Group was separated looking for different treatment schemes which includes two large groups, those based on pediatric schemes with expansion in the group of age and modified pediatric inspiration schemes (Tables 6 and 7).

StudiesNumber of casesAge (rank)% CRDFS (years/%)OS (years/%)Ref.
CCG 196126216-21955/725/78[38]
DFCI9101/95015115-18945/785/81[40]
UKALL 200322916-24975/725/76[39]
TOTAL TERAPY XV4515-81985/865/88[45]
PETHEMA ALL 968115-30986/616/69[46]
HOVON (FRALLE 93)5417-40912/662/72[47]
NOPHO 200822118-45NR5/745/78[48]
FRALL 200018615-19965/745/80[49]
INTERGROUPC1040329617-39NR2/662/79[50]
FRALLE937715-20945/67NR[51]
DCOG4715-18985/695/79[52]
ALL976115-17985/65NR[53]
AIEOP15014-18945/675/67[54]

Table 6.

No comparative studies of pediatric regimens.

CR: Complete Remission, Ref. Reference, DFS: Disease Free Survival, OS: Overall Survival, NR: Not Reported.

StudiesNumber of casesAge (rank)% CRDFS (years/%)OS (years/%)Ref.
DFCI 01-1757418-50864/584/67[55]
MODIFIED DFCI 91-014218-35983/773/83[56]
GRAALL2003/200550215-35955/595/65[57]
GMALL 07/0388715-35915/615/65[58]
MODIFIED TPOG3515-39892/472/50[59]
LALIN2015-25905/70NR[60]
NOPHO-9214410-14995/65NR[61]

Table 7.

Pediatric inspired schemes.

CR: Complete Remission, Ref. Reference, DFS: Disease Free Survival, OS: Overall Survival, NR: Not Reported.

By reviewing the pediatric regimens with extension to the age group of treatment was possible to increase the degree of response in this group classified as AYA; in adult regimens, complete remissions ranging from 51% to a maximum of 82% were reported after 1 cycle of treatment, however, in Table 1 we observe that pediatric regimens in general achieved a higher percentage of complete response or remission after applying 1 cycle of induction, showing with the highest degree of complete response in 98% of the cases for the studies: TOTAL TERAPY IV, 46 PETHEMA ALL 96.47 DCOG, 58 ALL97.59, however, it should be noted that the study with greater robustness in this group that showed the highest CR is the PETHEMA ALL 96.47 study, which shows a reported follow-up at 5 years with evidence of DFS of 61% OS of 69% at 6 years. On the other hand, it is important to mention that the Intergroup C1040351 study observed a 2-year DFS of 66% and an OS of 79%. In all the groups referred to in Table 8, the degree of CR registered was greater than 90%, but with different DFS and OS times, the longest DFS time for the DCOG study, which was 69% at 5 years and OS of 79% at 5 years.

StudiesNumber of casesAge (rank)% CRDFS (years/%)OS (years/%)Ref.
Hyper-CVAD185>60915/39%5/10[62]
SMOG 84198550-84415/325/<10[63]
GIMEMA 028877812-59822/509/27[64]
CALGB280
350
129
<30
30-59
>60
90
81
57
3/47
3/38
3/18
3/58
3/38
3/18
[65]
PETHEMA ALL963356-67582/392/46[66]
MRC UKALLXII/ECOG299310055-64705/195/21[67]
GMALL26855-8576NR5/23[68]
HOSPITAL EDOUARD HERRIOT, LYON195
118
66
<35
35-60
>60
84
85
58
3/35
3/31
3/11
3/39
3/34
3/11
[69]
MD ANDERSON, HOUSTON65
64
31
44
<30
30-49
50-59
>60
98
89
93
79
3/53
3/55
3/34
3/36
5/54
5/42
5/29
5/17
[70]
ALL-07FRAIL7257-89546.9 month7.6 month[71]

Table 8.

Treatment schemes for ALL in adults.

CR: Complete Remission, Ref. Reference, DFS: Disease Free Survival, OS: Overall Survival, NR: Not Reported.

Of the pediatric inspiration schemes, we refer to those registered in Table 9, all of them report CR greater than 90%, with the exception of studies DFCI01–17552 and MODIFIED TPOG 56 where the lowest degree of CR of 86 and 89%, respectively, is recorded. Likewise, the DFS reported in the MODIFIED TPOG group is lower, being 47% of the cases at 2 years. In this same table we observe the two studies with the largest number of patients, the GRAALL2003 / 200,554 study with a number of subjects analyzed of 502 cases and for the GAMALL55 study 887 cases, with a similarity in the DFS reported for the GRAALL2003 / 2005 of 59% at 5 years and for GMALL07 / 03 from 61% at 5 years and similar OS in both groups from 65% at 5 years; the aforementioned has generated improvement in responses and survival in the AYA groups, so the current recommendations are aimed at treating pediatric schemes or modified schemes of pediatric-inspired protocols.

StudiesNumber of casesAge (rank)% CRDFS (years/%)OS (years/%)Ref.
GMALL (Imatinib)2854-79962/192/42[72]
PETHEMA ALL0PH07 (Imatinib)5356-888738months37.3 months[73]
HyperCVAD + Imatinib5417-84935/435/35[74]
GIMEMA LAL0201-B (Imatinib)2961-831001/481/74[75]
EWAL-PH-01 (Dasatinib)7159-83965/275/36[76]
GIMEMA LAL1205 (Dasatinib)5318-771002/512/69[77]
HyperCVAD plus Dasatinib.7221-80965/425/52[78]
EWALL-PH-02 Nilotinib6555-8587NRNR[79]
Korean study Nilotinib9017-77912/722/72[80]
HyperCVAD + Ponatinib3727-551002/812/80[81]
GIMEMA + Ponatinib4227-85913/693/83[82]

Table 9.

ALL Phi positive treatment.

CR: Complete Remission, Ref. Reference, DFS: Disease Free Survival, OS: Overall Survival, NR: Not Reported.

Those patients over 40 years old are considered as “adults” an represent totally different group when comparing with the pediatric and AYA groups when talking about prognosis and treatment. The age by itself is a conditioning factor for a lower response rate, lower DFS, and poorer OS compared to the AYA group, this data is summarized in Table 8. This group have hematological remission variable and those with lesser degree of Response rate are adults over 65 years, with a percentage of CR ranging from 41 to 60% according to the ALL-07FRAIL72 studies and the SMOG 841964 study. As illustrated in Table 3, in the Edouard Herriot Lyon Hospital, the population of 35–60 years old reached a CR of 85% but this was lower in the group over 60 years with CR reported in 58% [69]; as well as the study of the MD Anderson with the HyperCVAD [62] scheme where the age groups of 30 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years and over 60 years reached a CR of 98%, 83%, 79% respectively [70]. In the same way, the DFS and OS for the Hyper CVAD group of the GIMEMA study 028865 was lower in the older groups, 39% at 5 years and an OS with a longer duration of 27% at 9, in general we conclude that the older age could be related to lower rate of CR, DFS and OS.

All those previously described have been mainly in the groups cataloged as Phi negative ALL, as they are not carriers of the BCR / ABL oncogene, however, in the group that is a carrier of these genetic alteration treatment will be describe in Table 9, where the different percentages of response between these and those Phi negatives are observed.

In the GMALL73 study the benefit of adding a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to non-intensive regimens in elderly patients was initially observed. In this study a group was randomized to receive chemotherapy (CT) + TKI vs. CT, and was observed that adding an TKI achieved a CR of 96%, the double from the RC of 50% seeing in patients who were not treated with imatinib. In this patient group it is striking that adding TKI to a conventional chemotherapy scheme offers the benefit of even higher CR than those presented in populations older than 40 years, as reported in the studies of the Italian group (GIMEMA, LAL0201-B and GIMEMA LAL1205) [75, 77]with CR of 100% with 1st and 2nd generation inhibitor of TKI, however, the DFS and OS were brief in both groups, being higher in the group that received dasatinib (2nd generation TKI) as induction therapy and with a younger population that predicts the higher degree of response. It is worth mentioning that the second-generation TKI dasatinib has Central Nervous System (CNS) penetration showing improved response and survival of cases with CNS infiltration compared to imatinib that fails to cross the blood–brain barrier. Table 4 records the treatment given by the MD Anderson group, which showed that adding a 3rd generation TKI as ponatinib to the HyperCVAD scheme achieved 100% CR in the group aged 27 to 55 with DFS and OS at 2 years of 81 and 80% respectively [81]. It should be mentioned that ponatinib has good CNS penetration as does dasatinib, however ponatinib is indicated in patients with the T315I resistance mutation.

A meta-analysis of 15 studies with a total of 11,040 patients with ALL Phi positive shown that the highest prevalence of Phi positive is seeing in those between 11 and 40 years old (25.8% to 26.2%.) By age subgroup the reported prevalence was: 1–10 years 15.6%, 10–20 years 25.6%, 21–40 years of age 26.2% and in the group over 40 years of age 16.9%. In this meta-analysis, the overall 5-year survival rate was 42.8% (CI 95% CI, 23.9–64.1, I2 93) [83].

Advertisement

6. Prophylaxis to CNS

Intrathecal chemotherapy is pivotal in the treatment of ALL since the CNS is a site of relevance in this pathology. In adult ALL involvement of the CNS at diagnosis is reported in 5–7% of cases, mainly with meningeal involvement. The risk factors related to initial infiltration are elevated Lactic Dehydrogenase (LDH), hyperleukocytosis and ALL B subtype at diagnosis, the latter showing CNS involvement in up to 18% of cases. Other factors that contribute to the initial infiltration are increased blast replication rate, mediastinal mass, and positive Phi [84]. These same factors contribute to the early relapse of the disease, systemically or in isolation to the CNS. For the diagnosis of infiltration, the microscopic examination of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained from a lumbar puncture continues to be the standard and classified the cases into risk groups according to the number of leukocytes, and the presence of blasts (Table 10) and the nature of the lumbar puncture, as well as determination by flow cytometry.

ClassificationLymphoblasts in CSFLeucocytes in CSF
SNC 1None
SNC 2Present<5
SNC 3Present≥5
TLPPresentVariable

Table 10.

Classification of the CNS infiltration according to the CSF characteristics.

CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CNS, central nervous system; traumatic lumbar puncture (TLP).

Traumatic Lumbar puncture (TLP) is defined as a result of CSF with erythrocyte count>10 /uL. The Stevenherz/Bleyer algorithm evaluates traumatic puncture if the patient has leukemic cells in peripheral blood and the lumbar puncture is traumatic and contains >5 leukocytes/uL and blasts, the following algorithm should be followed to distinguish between CNS2 disease and CNS3: CSF leukocytes/erythrocytes >2 x leukocytes in blood/red blood cells [84, 85].

Effective prophylaxis to prevent CNS relapse is an essential part of ALL regimens, the most used modalities are based on CNS irradiation, intrathecal chemotherapy with a single drug or with steroid-based triplet plus cytarabine and methotrexate at same time as systemic CT is being administrated. With these measures the relapse rate can be reduced from 10 to 5%. Irradiation as a single dose of 24 Gy is recommended as unique therapy to the skull without involving the neuroaxis to avoid cytopenia associated with concurrent CT [86]. In cases of ALL Phi +, although dasatinib and ponatinib are not part of prophylaxis therapy these have been shown to cross the blood–brain barrier and secondarily reduced the risk of isolated relapse to the CNS [87, 88].

Advertisement

7. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia is a therapeutic option in those with high risk disease that have reached complete response (CR) and those who are candidates by the Predictive Models of Risk (Disease Risk Index (DRI), EBMT Risk Score, HCT-Comorbidity Index). the patients could be classified in 3 different risk groups (0 points = low risk, 1–2 points = intermediate risk, ≥ 3 = high risk) and this correlated with two years NRM (non relapse mortality (Table 11) [90, 91, 92, 93].

ComorbidityPointsComorbidityPoints
Liver disease
Liver cirrhosis, bilirubin >1.5xULN, or AST/ALT >2.5xULN
3Obesity
BMI of > 35 for adults
1
Severe pulmonary
DLco and/or FEV1 ≤ 65%, dyspnea at rest oroxygen at home
3Hepatic Mild
Chronic hepatitis, bilirubin>ULN to 1.5x ULN, or AST/ALT >ULN to 2.5x ULN
1
Previoussolid malignancy
Treated at any time point in thepatient’shistory, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer
3Psychiatric disturbance
Depression/anxiety requiring psychiatric consult and/or treatment at the time of HCT
1
Heart valve disease
Diagnosed (except mitral prolapse)
3Cerebrovascular Disease
Transient ischemic attacks or cerebrovascular accident
1
Moderate pulmonary
DLco and/or FEV1 66–80% or minimal stress dyspnea
2Diabetes
Requiring treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemic
1
Renal
Creatinine >2mg/dl, dialysis, or previous kidney transplant
2Inflammatory bowel disease
Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis
1
Rheumatologic
SLE, RA, polymyositis, mixed CTD, and polymyalgia rheumatica
2Coronary artery disease
congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or EF of ≤ 50%
1
Peptic ulcer
Requiring treatment
2Arrhytmia
Atrial fibrillation or flutter, sick sinus syndrome, or ventricular arrhythmias
1
Previous infection
Documented infection or fever of unknown etiology requiring antimicrobial treatment before, during and after the start of conditioning regimen
1Age ≥ 401

Table 11.

HCT-Comorbidity Index [89].

EF = ejection fraction; ULN= upper limit of normal, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, BMI=body mass index, SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus, RA= rheumatoid arthritis, CTD = connective tissue disease, Dlco = diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide, FEV1= forced expiratory volume in one second.

The modality of transplant recommended is allogenic after the first complete response (CR1) in high-risk patients (Table 12) and in patients with second complete response (CR2) [90].

High Risk
CytogeneticsHypodiploidy (< 44 chromosomes)
t(9:22) (q34;q11.2):BCR-ABL1
Complex karyotype (5 or more chromosomal abnormalities)
t(4;11) (q21;q23)
t(8;14) (q24.1q32)
Age>40 years
High WBC count at diagnosis>30 x 109 in B-ALL
>100 x 109 in T-ALL
ALL subtypesT-cell precursor ALL
High-risk geneticsIKZF1 deletion in B precursor ALL, unmutated NOTCH1, Ph-like.
MRD>1X10−4 after two courses of therapy, some groups post-induction.
CNS diseaseCentral Nervous System involvement
ImmunophenotypePro-B/early and mature-T
Time to CR>1 cycle

Table 12.

High Risk Patients [91, 92, 94, 95].

Autologous HSCT is not recommended for an adult with ALL. It could be possible in high-risk patients with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) that are not considered for allo-HSCT, but there is insufficient data to support this option, including Phi + ALL [91].

7.1 Indication for the different modalities of allo-HSCT

It is preferred a matched sibling donor or an unrelated donor very well matched, these options are considered equivalent in terms of results [91, 92].

Haploidentical transplant is always an option in patients without a matched donor, this type of transplant is nowadays frequently used because it allows almost all patients in need for an allo-SCT to undergo allo-SCT without a matched-donor [96].

7.2 Conditioning

The choice of conditioning is based on the patient’s physical status, for those fit without relevant comorbidity the recommended regimens are the combination of fractionated TBI (Total Body Irradiation) 12Gy in 6 fractions, plus Cyclophosphamide (Cy) 120 mg/kg or Etoposide (VP) 60 mg/kg. The regimens with TBI seem to have better anti-leukemic activity than busulfan-based regimens [97].

For elderly patients should be considered reduced conditioning regimens as for patients with contraindications for myeloablative regimens [92].

For patients with an haploidentical donor the used scheme is: Cy 14.5 mg/kg/day IV on days −6 and − 5, fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day IV on days −6 to −2, and 200 cGy of TBI on day −1, on days +3 and + 4, 50 mg/kg Cy with Mesna [98, 99].

Other regimens for transplant with haploidentical donor recommended by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EMBT are: 1) Myeloablative regimen TBF (thiotepa 10 mg/kg, fludarabine 150 mg/m2, busulfan 9.6 mg/kg IV. 2) RIC (reduced-intensity chemotherapy) Thiotepa 5 mg/kg and busulfan 6.4 mg/kg. ATG and Cyclophosphamide are used as prophylaxis for Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) at doses of ATG 10 mg/Kg (total dose), or Cy 50 mg/kg +3 and + 4 [96].

7.3 Maintenance post allo-HSCT

It is recommended for patients with Ph +, maintenance with TKI after allo-HSCT. The optimal treatment duration has not been defined. The described options are continuing the treatment until MRD negativity is confirmed by three consecutive tests or sustained for at least three months, or TKI administration for at least one year of continuous PCR negativity, and if a single positive result, then reset the treatment period [100].

7.4 Status of minimal residual disease before HSCT

It is demonstrated that the presence of MRD positivity at the time of HSCT is a significant risk for relapse after the procedure; this asseveration applies for both B-ALL and T-ALL and suggests that novel therapies are a new option to improve the outcome [101, 102, 103].

Advertisement

8. Novel Therapies

8.1 Blinatumomab

It is a bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct that binds simultaneously to CD3-positive cytotoxic T cells and CD19-positive B cells, this reaction allows the patient’s endogenous T cells to recognize and eliminate CD19-positive ALL blasts.

It is indicated for the treatment of B- ALL in the first or second complete remission with MRD >/= 0.1% and in B-ALL relapse or refractory in adults and children.

In the TOWER study, eligible patients with pretreated B-ALL were randomly assigned to receive Blinatumomab or Standard Chemotherapy. The overall survival was significantly better in patients treated with Blinatumomab compared with those of the standard group. The median OS was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6 to 9.6) in the blinatumomab group versus 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 5.3) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.93; p = 0.01 [104].

8.2 Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO)

It is a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antibiotic compound that induces double-strand DNA breaks. It is utilized in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-ALL [105].

Katarjian H. and cols published a phase 3 trial (INO-VATE ALL) where randomly assigned adults with R/R ALL to receive either inotuzumab ozogamicin or standard intensive chemotherapy. The rate of complete remission was 80.7% in the inotuzumab ozogamicin group than in the standard therapy group, 29.4% p < 0.001. In the survival analysis OS of 5.0 months vs. 1.8 months (HR0.45 [97.5% CI, 0.34 to 0.6)]; p < 0.001. The veno-occlusive disease occurred more frequently in the InO group [106].

8.3 Tisagenlecleucel

It is a CD19-directed, genetically modified, autologous T-cell immunotherapy. It is prepared from an apheresis collection of the patient’s peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The autologous T cells are transduced using a lentiviral vector to express an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) [107]. Tisagenlecleucel was the first gene-modified cell therapy approved by the FDA for children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL.

These have proven highly efficient at inducing MRD-negative remissions. A CAR induced remission could offer a window to proceed to allo- HSCT [107, 108].

Maude and cols published this trial of tisagenlecleucel in children with R/R B-ALL, the overall remission rate was 81%. All patients with complete remission were negative for MRD. The rate of relapse-free survival in patients with a response to treatment was 80% at 6 months and 59% at 12 months. Neurologic events occurred in 40% [108].

Advertisement

9. Minimal residual disease (MRD)

In the last decade, the measurement of minimal residual disease has become a necessary tool in the follow-up of patients since its impact on progression-free survival and overall survival has been demonstrated in multiple studies, that leads it to be currently an indicator of treatment for patients with acute leukemia.

There are several ways of measurement of MRD and each one presents different sensitivity as describe: New Generation Sequencing (NGS) present a sensitivity of 106; Flow cytometry with a 104 sensitivity for cytometers of 6 colors and 106 for cytometers of 8 colors or more; PCR for specific genes 105 of sensitivity. However, to achieve these sensitivity results, it is necessary to perform them on bone marrow samples considered in morphological remission [89, 109].

We have already discussed the prognostic value of having a negative MRD. The GRAALL group demonstrated that the presence of negative MRD at the end of induction was a better prognostic marker than the conventional ones, like the achievement of CR at first line therapy a transplantation in patients with pediatric schemes [109, 110].

In a meta-analysis published in 2017, including 13,637 patients in total, the progression-free survival for the pediatric group was 77% at 10 years in patients with negative MRD, and 64% for adults, while progression free survival for patients with positive MRD were 32% and 21% respectively [111].

References

  1. 1. Coustan-Smith E, Behm FG, Sánchez J, Boyett J, Hancock M, Raimondi S. Immunological detection of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Lancet.1998;351:550–554
  2. 2. Janossy G, Coustan-Smith E, Campana D. The reliability of citoplasmic CD3+ and CD22+ antigen expression in the immunodiagnosis of acute leukemia: a study of 500 cases. Leukemia. 1989; 3:170–181
  3. 3. Mirji G, Bhat J, Kode J, Benavalli S, Sangar M.” Genetic and clinical characterization of KMT2A fusion partner genes in 13 cases of pediatric leukemia with complexo r cryptic karyotypes.” Leu Res.2016;45:33–39
  4. 4. Moorman, Anthony V. “New and emerging prognostic and predictive genetic biomerkers in B-cell presursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leu Res. 2016; 45:407–416
  5. 5. Aber D, Orazi A, Hasserjian R et al.The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016;127: 2391–2405
  6. 6. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Version 1.20 NCCN.org
  7. 7. Weinberg, O. K., and Arber, D. B. “Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia: Historical overview and a new definition.” Leukemia 24.11 (2010): 1844–1851
  8. 8. Pui CH, Crist WM, A T Look. Biology and clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood.1990;76:1449–1463
  9. 9. Kolomietz E, Al-Maghrabi J, Brennan S, et al. Primary chromosomal rearrangements of leukemia are frequently accompanied by extensive submicroscopic deletions and may lead to altered prognosis. Blood. 2001; 97: 3581–3588. doi: 10.1182 / Blood.V97.11.3581
  10. 10. Felice MS, Gallego MS, Alonso CN, et al.Prognostic impact of t(1;19)/ TCF3-PBX1 in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the context of Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster-based protocols. Leukemia Lymphoma. 2011;52:1215–1221
  11. 11. Burmeister T, Gökbuget N, Schwartz S, Fischer L, Hubert D, Sindram A, Hoelzer D, Thiel E. Clinical features and prognostic implications of TCF3-PBX1 and ETV6-RUNX1 in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2010;95:241–246
  12. 12. Harrison CJ, Moorman AV, Schwab C, y col. An international study of intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21): cytogenetic characterization and outcome. Leukemia. 2014;28 :1015–1021
  13. 13. Moorman AV, Schwab C, Ensor HM, et al. IGH@ translocations, CRLF2 deregulation, and microdeletions in adolescents and adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3100–3108
  14. 14. Schardt C, Ottmann OG, Hoelzer D, Ganser A. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the (4;11) translocation:combined cytogenetic, immunological and molecular genetic analyses . Leukemia. 1992;6:370–374
  15. 15. Gleissner B, Gökbuget N, Bartram CR, et al. Leading prognostic relevance of the BCR-ABL translocation in adult acute B- lineage lymphoblastic leukemia: a prospective study of the German Multicenter Trial Group and confirmed polymerase chain reaction analysis. Blood. 2002;99:1536–1543
  16. 16. Chiaretti S, Vitale A, Cazzaniga G, et al.Clinico-biological features of 5202 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia enrolled in the Italian AIEOP and GIMEMA protocols and stratified in age cohorts. Haematologica. 2013; 98:1702–1710
  17. 17. Rieder H, Ludwig WD, Gassmann W, et al. Prognostic significance of additional chromosome abnormalities in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. BrJ Haematol. 1996;95: 678–691
  18. 18. Ravandi F, Jorgensen JL, Thomas DA, et al. Detection of MRD may predict the outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Blood. 2013; 122 :1214–1221
  19. 19. Marks DI, Moorman AV, Chilton L, et al.The clinical characteristics, therapy and outcome of 85 adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and t(4;11)(q21;q23)/MLL-AFF1 prospectively treated in the UKALLXII/ECOG2993 trial. Hematologica. 2013; 98: 945–952
  20. 20. Schneider NR, Carroll AJ, Shuster JJ, y col. New recurring cytogenetic abnormalities and association of blast cell karyotypes with prognosis in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a pediatric oncology group report of 343 cases. Blood. 2000; 96: 2543–2549
  21. 21. Lange BJ, Raimondi SC, Heerema N, et al. Pediatric leukemia/lymphoma with t(8;14)(q24;q11). Leukemia. 1992;6:613–618
  22. 22. Parolini M, Mecucci C, Matteucci C, y col. Highly aggressive T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with t(8;14)(q24;q11):extensive genetic characterization and achievement of early molecular remission and long-term survival in an adult patient. Blood Cancer J. 2014;4: e176
  23. 23. Martinelli G, Iacobucci I, Storlazzi CT, et al. IKZF1 (Ikaros) deletions in BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia are associated with short disease-free survival and high rate of cumulative incidence of relapse:a GIMEMA AL WP report. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5202–5207
  24. 24. Van der Veer A, Zaliova M, Mottadelli F, et al. IKZF1 status as a prognostic feature in BCR-ABL1-positive childhood ALL. Blood.2014;123:1691–8
  25. 25. Kuiper RP, Waanders E, van der Velden VH, y col.IKZF1 deletions predict relapse in uniformly treated pediatric precursor B- ALL. Leukemia. 2010; 24:1258–1264
  26. 26. Haferlach T, Kohlmann A, Schnittger S, et al. Global approach to the diagnosis of leukemia using gene expression profiling. Blood. 2005;106: 1189–1198
  27. 27. Chiaretti S, Li X, Gentleman R, et al. Gene expression profiles of B-lineage adult acute lymphocytic leukemia reveal genetic patterns that identify lineage derivation and distinct mechanisms of transformation. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7209–7219
  28. 28. Roberts KG, Morin RD, Zhang J, et al. Genetic alterations activating kinase and cytokine receptor signaling in high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell.2012;22:153–166
  29. 29. Holmfeldt L, Wei L, Díaz-Flores E, et al. The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013; 45:242–252
  30. 30. Muhlbacher V, Zenger M, Schnittger S, et al. Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia with low hypodiploid/near triploid karyitipe is a specific clinical entity and exhibits a very high TP53 mutation frequency of 93%. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 2014; 53: 524–536
  31. 31. Hof J, Krentz S, Van Schewick, et al. Mutations and deletions of the TP53 gene predict non response to trearment and poor aoutcome in first relapse of clidhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.J Clin oncol.2011;29: 3185–23
  32. 32. Stencil A, Schnittger S, Weissmann S, et al. TP 53 mutations occur in 15.7% of ALL and are associated with MYC- rearrangement, low hypodiploidy, and a poor prognosis Blood. 2014;124: 251–258
  33. 33. Barber KE, Marttineau M, harewood L et al. Amplification ofthe ABL gene in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia Leukemia. 2004;18:1153–1156
  34. 34. Asnafi v, Buzyn A, Le Noir s, et al. NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutation identifies a large subgroup with favorable outcome in adult T- cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T ALL): a Group for Research on Adult acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ( GRAALL) study. Blood. 2009;113:3918–3924
  35. 35. Flex E, Petrangeli V, Stella L, et al.Somatically acquired JAK1 mutations in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Exp Med. 2008;205 : 751–758
  36. 36. Asnafi V, Le Noir S, Lhermitte L, et al. JAK1 mutations are not frequent events in adult T-ALL: a GRAALL study. Fr. J Haematol. 2010;148 :178–179
  37. 37. Daniel D’Angelo, M.D. Personal Communication May 2006
  38. 38. Nachman JB, La MK, Hunger SP, Heerema NA, Gaynon PS, Hast- ings C, et al. Young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have an excellent outcome with chemotherapy alone and benefit from intensive postinduction treatment: a report from the chil-dren’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(31):5189–94
  39. 39. Hough R, Rowntree C, Goulden N, Mitchell C, Moorman A, Wade R, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of a paediatric protocol in teenagers and young adults with Philadelphia chromosome negative acute 2018 lymphoblastic leukaemia : results from UKALL 2003 . Br J Hae-matol. 2016;172(3):439–51
  40. 40. Barry E, DeAngelo DJ, Neuberg D, Stevenson K, Loh ML, Asse- lin BL, et al. Favorable outcome for adolescents with acute lymph- oblastic leukemia treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Consortium Protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(7):813–9
  41. 41. Rowe JM, Buck G, Burnett AK, et al. Induction therapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of more than 1500 patients from the international ALL trial: MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E 2993. Blood. 2005;106:3760–3767
  42. 42. Larson RA, Dodge RK, Burns CP, et al. A five-drug remis- sion induction regimen with intensive consolidation for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 8811. Blood. 1995;85:2025–2037
  43. 43. Thomas X, Boiron J-M, Huguet F, et al. Outcome of treatment in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: analysis of the LALA-94 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4075–4086
  44. 44. Kantarjian H, Thomas D, O’Brien S, et al. Long-term follow- up results of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (Hyper- CVAD), a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 2004;101:2788–2801
  45. 45. Pui CH, Pei D, Campana D, Bowman WP, Sandlund JT, Kaste SC, et al. Improved prognosis for older adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(4):386–91
  46. 46. Ribera JM, Oriol A, Sanz MA, Tormo M, Fernandez-Abellan P, del Potro E, et al. Comparison of the results of the treatment of adolescents and young adults with standard-risk acute lympho- blastic leukemia with the Programa Espanol de Tratamiento en Hematologia pediatric-based protocol ALL-96. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(11):1843–9
  47. 47. Rijneveld AW, van der Holt B, Daenen SM, Biemond BJ, de Weerdt O, Muus P, et al. Intensified chemotherapy inspired by a pediatric regimen combined with allogeneic transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia up to the age of 40. Leukemia. 2011;25(11):1697–703
  48. 48. Toft N, Birgens H, Abrahamsson J, Griskevicius L, Hallbook H, Heyman M, et al. Results of NOPHO ALL2008 treatment for patients aged 1–45 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leu- kemia. 2018;32(3):606–15
  49. 49. Stock W, Luger SM, Advani AS, Geyer S, Harvey RC, Mul- lighan CG, et al. Favorable outcomes for older adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): early results of US intergroup trial C10403 [abstract]. Blood. 2014;124(21):Abstract 796
  50. 50. Gökbuget N, Beck J, Brandt K, Brüggemann M, Burmeister T, Diedrich H, et al. Significant improvement of outcome in ado- lescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 15–35 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with a pediatric derived adult ALL protocol: results of 1529 AYAs in 2 consecutive trials of the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL) [abstract]. Blood. 2013;122(21):Abstract 839
  51. 51. Boissel N, Auclerc M-F, Lheritier V, et al. Should adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia be treated as old children or young adults? Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:774–780
  52. 52. deBont JM, van der Holt B, Dekker AW, van der Does-van den Berg A, Sonneveld P, Pieters R. Significant difference in outcome for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on pediatric vs adult protocols in the Netherlands. Leukemia. 2004;18:2032–2035
  53. 53. Ramanujachar R, Richards S, Hann I, Webb D. Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia:emerging from the shadow of paediatric and adult treatment protocols. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47(6):748–756
  54. 54. Testi AM, Valsecchi MG, Conter V, et al. Difference in outcome of adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) enrolled in pediatric (AIEOP) and adult (GIMEMA) protocols. Blood. 2004;104:1954
  55. 55. DeAngelo DJ, Stevenson KE, Dahlberg SE, Silverman LB, Cou- ban S, Supko JG, et al. Long-term outcome of a pediatric-inspired regimen used for adults aged 18–50 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2015;29(3):526–34
  56. 56. Storring JM, Minden MD, Kao S, Gupta V, Schuh AC, Schim- mer AD, et al. Treatment of adults with BCR-ABL negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with a modified paediatric regimen. Br J Haematol. 2009;146(1):76–85
  57. 57. Dombret H, Cluzeau T, Huguet F, Boissel N. Pediatric-like therapy for adults with ALL. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2014;9(2):158–64
  58. 58. Cluzeau T, Dhedin N, Huguet F, Raffoux E, Maury S, Mannone L, et al. Dose- intensity impacts on survival of adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in adult departments by a pediatric protocol (FRALLE 2000BT) [abstract]. Blood. 2012;120(21):Abstract 3561
  59. 59. Ting-Chi Yeh, Der-Cherng Liang, et al Treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with delayed first intrathecal therapy and omission of prophylactic cranial irradiation: Results of the TPOG-ALL-2002 study. Cancer. 2018;124(23):4538–4547
  60. 60. López-Hernández MA, Alvarado-Ibarra M, Jiménez-Alvarado RM, et al. Adolescentes con leucemia aguda linfoblástica de novo: eficacia y seguridad de un protocolo pediátrico versus uno de adultos. Gac Med Mex. 2008;144(6):485–490
  61. 61. Schmiegelow K, Forestier E, Hellebostad M, et al. Long-term results of NOPHO ALL-92 and ALL-2000 studies of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia [published correction appears in Leukemia. 2010 Mar;24(3):670]. Leukemia. 2010;24(2):345–354
  62. 62. Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, Smith TL et al. Results of treatment with hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 18(3), 547–561 (2000)
  63. 63. Petersdorf SH, Kopecky KJ, Head DR et al. Comparison of the L10M consolidation regimen to an alternative regimen including escalating methotrexate/L-asparaginase for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Leukemia 15(2), 208–216 (2001)
  64. 64. Annino L, Vegna ML, Camera A et al. Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): long-term follow-up of the GIMEMA ALL 0288 randomized study. Blood 99(3), 863–871 (2002)
  65. 65. Richard A. Larson, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Older Patients and Newer Drugs Hematology 2005
  66. 66. Sancho JM, Ribera JM, Xicoy B et al. Results of the PETHEMA ALL-96 trial in elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Eur. J. Haematol. 78(2), 102–110 (2007)
  67. 67. Sive JI, Buck G, Fielding A et al. Outcomes in older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): results from the international MRC UKALL XII/ECOG2993 trial. Br. J. Haematol. 157(4), 463–471 (2012)
  68. 68. Goekbuget N, Beck J, Brueggemann M et al. Moderate intensive chemotherapy including CNS-prophylaxis with liposomal cytarabine is feasible and effective in older patients with Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): results of a prospective trial from the German multicenter study group for adult ALL (GMALL). Blood 120(21), 1493 (2012)
  69. 69. Thomas X, Olteanu N, Charrin C, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly: the Edouard Herriot Hospital experience. Am J Hematol. 2001;67:73–83
  70. 70. Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, Smith TL, et al. Results of treatment with hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:547–561
  71. 71. Ribera, Josep-Maria et al. Treatment of Frail Older Adults and Elderly Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of a Prospective Trial With Minimal Chemotherapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2020 Apr 05
  72. 72. Ottmann OG, Wassmann B, Pfeifer H, et al: Imatinib compared with chemotherapy as front-line treatment of elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome- positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph1ALL). Cancer. 2007;109(10):2068–2076
  73. 73. Ribera JM, Garc ́ıa O, Oriol A, et al: Feasibility and results of subtype-oriented protocols in older adults and fit elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of three prospective parallel trials from the PETHEMA group. Leuk Res 41:12–20, 2016
  74. 74. Daver N, Thomas D, Ravandi F, et al: Final report of a phase II study of imatinib mesylate with hyper-CVAD for the front-line treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 100:653–661, 2015
  75. 75. Vignetti M, Fazi P, Cimino G, et al: Imatinib plus steroids induces complete remissions and prolonged survival in elderly Philadelphia chromosome-positive patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia without additional chemotherapy: Results of the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto (GIMEMA) LAL0201-B protocol. Blood 109:3676–3678, 2007
  76. 76. Rousselot P, Coude ́ MM, Gokbuget N, et al: Dasatinib and low-intensity chemotherapy in elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL. Blood 128:774–782, 2016
  77. 77. Foà R, Vitale A, Vignetti M, et al: Dasatinib as first-line treatment for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 118:6521–6528, 2011
  78. 78. Ravandi F, O’Brien SM, Cortes JE, et al: Long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study of chemotherapy plus dasatinib for the initial treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer 121:4158–4164, 2015
  79. 79. Ottmann OG, Pfeifer H, Cayuela J-M, et al: Nilotinib (Tasigna®) and chemotherapy for first-line treatment in elderly patients with de novo Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL1 positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A trial of the European Working Group for Adult ALL (EWALL-PH-02). Blood 124, 2014 (abstr 798)
  80. 80. Kim DY, Joo YD, Lim SN, et al: Nilotinib combined with multiagent chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 126:746–756, 2015
  81. 81. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, et al: Combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib as first-line therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: A single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 16:1547–1555, 2015
  82. 82. Martinelli G, Piciocchi A, Papayannidis C, et al: First report of the GIMEMA LAL1811 phase II prospective study of the combination of steroids with ponatinib as frontline therapy of elderly or unfit patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 130:99, 2017
  83. 83. Weerapat Owattnapanich, Pongrueth Rujirachun, et al: Prevalence and Clinical Outcome of Philadelphia- Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia January 20
  84. 84. Elias Jabbour, Debora Thomas, et al: Central Nervous System Prophylaxis in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer May 15, 2010
  85. 85. Liron Frishman-Levy, et al: Advances in understanding the pathogenesis of CNS acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and potential for therapy. British Journal of Haematology, 2017, 176, 157–167
  86. 86. Lazarus HM, Richards SM, Chopra R et al. Central nervous system involvement in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia at diagnosis: results from the international ALL trial MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993. Blood 2006; 108: 465–472
  87. 87. Kimmo Porka, Perttu Koskenvesa, et al: Dasatinib Crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier and Is an Efficient Therapy for Central Nervous System Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Leukemia. Blood-2008-02-140665
  88. 88. Jia-Bao He, Xin Zhang, t al: Ponatinib Therapy in Recurrent Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Central Nervous System Leukemia With T315I Mutation After Allo-HSCT. International Journal of Cancer 2020; 147: 911–1236
  89. 89. Sorror ML, Giralt S, Sandmaier BM, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index as an outcome predictor for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: combined FHCRC and MDACC experiences. Blood. 2007;110:4606–13
  90. 90. Majhail N., et al. Indications for Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2015.1863e1869
  91. 91. Hoelzer D., et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology 27 (Supplement 5): v69–v82, 2016
  92. 92. Terwilliger T., Abdul-Hay M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update. Blood Cancer Journal.2017; 7:e577
  93. 93. Marks D., Forman S., et al.A Comparison of Cyclophosphamide and Total Body Irradiation with Etoposide and Total Body Irradiation as Conditioning Regimens for Patients Undergoing Sibling Allografting for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First or Second Complete Remission . Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation .2006;12:438–453
  94. 94. NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2020 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
  95. 95. Carreras E., et al. The EBMT Handbook. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. Springer Open 2019. P 531–538
  96. 96. Giebel S., et al.Use of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Prevent Relapse After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia:A Position Statement of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Cancer 2016;122:2941–51
  97. 97. Fuchs E., et al. HLA-Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies Using Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and High-Dose, Post transplantation Cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(6): 641–650
  98. 98. Bolaños-Meade J., et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation with posttransplant Cyclophosphamide expands the donor pool for patients with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2012;120(22):4285–4291
  99. 99. Santoro N., et al., Unmanipulated haploidentical stem cell transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia:a study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Journal of Hematology & Oncology.2017;10:113
  100. 100. Brammer JE., et al. Multi-center analysis of the effect of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia subtype and minimal residual disease on allogeneic stem cell transplantation outcomes. Bone Marrow Transplantation.2017; 52, 20–27
  101. 101. Zhou Yi, et al. The Effect of Peritransplant Minimal Residual Disease in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia 2014;(14), ISSUE 4, P319–326
  102. 102. Bar M., et al. Impact of Minimal Residual Disease, Detected by Flow Cytometry, on Outcome of Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Leukemia Research and Treatment 2014; Article ID 421723
  103. 103. Kantarjian H., et al. Blinatumomab versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.N Engl J Med 2017;376:836–47
  104. 104. Jabbour E., et al., Monoclonal antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;125(26):4010–4016
  105. 105. Katarjian H., et al., Inotuzumab Ozogamicin versus Standard Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med 2016;375:740–53
  106. 106. O'Leary M. et al, FDA Approval Summary: Tisagenlecleucel for Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res; 2019;25(4):1141–1146
  107. 107. Pehlivan K. et al. CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Transforming the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Disease. Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-018-0470-x
  108. 108. Maude S.L., et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia.N Engl J Med 2018;378:439–48
  109. 109. Short N, Jabbour E. Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia:How to Recognize and Treat It. Curr Oncol Rep.2017;19:6–13
  110. 110. Nathalie Dhedin, Anne Huynh, Sebastien Maury, Reza Tabrizi, Kheira Beldjord, Vahid Asnafi, Xavier Thomas, Patrice Chevallier. Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015,125(16):2486–2496
  111. 111. Donald A.Berry, Shouhao Zhou, Howard Higley, Lata Mukundan, Shuangshuang Fu, Gregory H. Reaman, Brent L. Wood, Gary J. Kelloff, J.Milburn Jessup, Jerald P. Radich. Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Clinical Outcome in Pediatric and Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. A Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0580 Published online May 11, 2017

Written By

Martha Alvarado-Ibarra, José Antonio De la Peña Celaya, Luara Luz Arana-Luna, Eleazar Hernández-Ruiz, José Luis Alvarez Vera, María Eugenia Espitia Ríos and Juan Manuel Pérez Zúñiga

Submitted: June 1st, 2020 Reviewed: November 2nd, 2020 Published: November 27th, 2020