Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Actinobacteria: Potential Candidate as Plant Growth Promoters

Written By

Sumreen Hayat, Asma Ashraf, Bilal Aslam, Rizwan Asif, Saima Muzammil, Muhammad Asif Zahoor, Muhammad Waseem, Imran Riaz Malik, Mohsin Khurshid, Muhammad Afzal, Muhammad Saqalein, Muhammad Hussnain Siddique, Aqsa Muzammil and Sumera Sabir

Submitted: October 30th, 2019 Reviewed: June 26th, 2020 Published: September 1st, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93272

Chapter metrics overview

677 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Plant growth enhancement using plant beneficial bacteria has been viewed in the sustainable agriculture as an alternative to chemical fertilizers. Actinobacteria, among the group of important plant-associated bacteria, have been widely studied for its plant growth promotion activities. Actinobacteria are considered as a limelight among agriculturists for their beneficial aspects toward plants. They are naturally occurring spore-forming bacteria inhabiting the soil and known for their plant growth-promoting and biocontrol properties. The mechanisms behind these activities include nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and other attributes such as antifungal production of metabolites, phytohormones, and volatile organic compound. All these activities not only enhance the plant growth but also provide resistance in plants to withstand unfavorable conditions of the environment. Hence, this chapter emphasizes on the plant growth traits of actinobacteria and how far it was studied for enhanced growth and bio-fortification.

Keywords

  • actinobacteria
  • rhizosphere
  • PGPR
  • growth promotion

1. Introduction

Plant growth-promoting (PGP) microbes (epiphytic, endophytic, and rhizospheric) are likely to enhance the growth and productivity of crop by increasing the nutrient content. These plant microbiomes have been sorted out from diverse sources belonging to all three domains: archaea, bacteria, and fungi. The microbes associated with the plant rhizosphere are termed as rhizospheric microbes, and among them, actinobacteria are most dominant in nature [1]. As many researches stated actinobacteria as major microbial population present in the soil. The actinobacteria are known to have high G-C (57–75%) contents and comprise a broad group of filamentous, spore-forming, gram-positive, and aerobic bacteria that form branching filaments or hyphae and play a fundamental function in ecology along with soil nutrient cycle. Actinobacteria resemble to unicellular bacteria, they are different by not having distinct cell wall; instead they produce mycelium, a nonseptate and more slender [2]. Actinobacteria are widely dispersed in both terrestrial ecosystem, as present in soil, and aquatic ecosystems as in fresh and marine water. The terrestrial actinobacteria contribute in recycling process and are essential to the decomposition of many complex mixtures of polymers and organic material, located in dead plants, animals, and fungal materials. The phylum actinobacteria is currently recognized as the largest taxonomic units within the bacterial domain and recognized for its economic importance because it produces various biological active substances like vitamins, antibiotics, and enzymes. It is estimated that almost 23,000 bioactive secondary metabolites are produced by many microorganisms and almost 45% (10,000 out of 23,000) of these bioactive microbial metabolites are produced by actinomycetes. Among these actinomycetes, Streptomycesare classified as most abundantly occurring Actinomycetein the soil, while Nocardia, Micromonospora, and Streptosporangiumare the less abundant [3]. Streptomyces has established its importance in numerous sectors like health and agriculture, and it is also considered as most dominant actinobacteria, for root colonization and close association with plant roots. Actinomycetes are diversified organisms having various applications on many fields. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) actinobacteria promote the plant growth through a variety of mechanisms including production of phytohormones, antibiotics, siderophore, volatile organic compound, and different hydrolytic enzymes. These also promote nutrient fixation for easy uptake by the plant and develop abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Actinobacteria are also considered to have the potential to be used as promising biocontrol agents because they produce spore which can resist environmental stress. The actinobacteria help plants by suppressing disease-causing microbes and enhancing nutrient availability and assimilation which subsequently have beneficial impact on the agricultural sector by accelerating plant growth [4]. Although actinomycetes have many applications in different sectors including health and agriculture, this chapter will only focus on actinomycetes’ role as PGPR. Some commonly isolated actinobacteria, its host plant, and targets are mentioned in Table 1.

ActinobacteriaHost plantTarget pathogenReferences
Streptomycessp. S30, Streptomycessp. R18Lycopersicon esculentumRhizoctonia solani[5]
ActinoplanesCucumissp.Pythium aphanidermatum[6]
Streptomyces diastaticus, Streptomyces fradiae, S. collinusMedicinal plantsFusarium oxysporum, Alternaria solani, Sclerotium rolfsii[7]
Streptomycessp. DBT204Solanum lycopersicumFusarium proliferatum[8]
Leifsonia xyli, BPSAC24, Streptomycessp. BPSAC34Curcuma longa, Eupatorium odoratum, Mirabilis jalapaFusarium oxysporumciceri, F. oxysporum, F. graminearum, Rhizoctonia solani[9]
Microbisporaspp.Solanum tuberosumL.Streptomyces scabies[10]
Streptomycesspp. R-5Rhododendronsp.Phytophthora cinnamomi[11]
Streptomycessp. MBPu-75Cucumissp. and Cucurbitasp.Colletotrichum orbiculare[12]
Streptomycessp. RM 365Leguminous plantsXanthomonas campestris[13]
Streptomycessp. PRY-2RB2Pseudowintera colorataNocardia parvumMM562[14]
Nocardiopsissp. ac 9, Streptomycessp. ac19Elaeis guineensisJacq.Ganoderma boninense[15]
Streptomycessp. AzR-051, Streptomycessp. AzR-010Azadirachta indicaAlternaria alternate[16]
MutabilisCA-2Cleome arabica, Aristida pungensRhizoctonia solani[17]

Table 1.

Biological activities of some isolated actinobacteria.

Advertisement

2. Actinobacteria’s role in PGPR activity

Plant growth and development of important organs in plant are facilitated by plant hormones called plant growth regulators (PGR). These PGR can influence plant growth even at very low concentration. Actinobacteria act as PGPR, and its impact is determined by considering the effectiveness and ability to influence PGR in root system. Different mechanisms used for promoting PGR by actinobacteria are classified into direct and indirect method (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Mode of action of actinobacteria.

The direct method exhibits various activities including solubilization of phosphorus, nitrogen fixation, iron acquisition, and production of different phytohormones, for instance, indole acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins, and gibberellins. In indirect method, actinobacteria promote plant growth in many ways such as synthesizing extracellular enzymes for fungal cell wall degradation producing antibiotics, volatile compounds (VOCs), inducting systemic resistance, as well as competition for nutrients [18].

2.1 Direct method for plant growth promoter by actinobacteria

Actinobacteria promote the growth of plants by involving in various direct activities as shown in Table 2.

ActinobacteriaPGP traitsHost plantReference
Streptomycessp. GMKU 3100Siderophore productionRice (Oryza sativa L.)[19]
Streptomycessp.IAA production
Phosphate solubilization
Wheat[20]
Streptomyces griseoflavusP4Nitrogen fixationSoybean (Glycine max)[21]
Microbisporaspp.
Micromonosporaspp. Nocardiaspp.
IAA productionMandarin (Citrus reticulata L.)[22]
Streptomycesspp.IAA productionSorghum
Rice
[23]
Arthrobactersp. strain EZB4ACC deaminase activityPepper (Capsicum annuumL.)[24]
Micromonospora endolithicaPhosphate solubilizationCarrot (Daucus carota)[25]
Streptomycessp.Nutrient uptakeClover[26]
Streptomycessp.Gibberellic acid, IAA,Marine environments[27]
Streptomyces olivaceoviridis, S. rocheiAuxin, gibberellin, and cytokinin synthesisWheat[28]
Brevibacterium epidermidisRS15,
Micrococcus yunnanensisRS222
Nitrogen fixation
IAA production ACC deaminase activity
Canola[29]
Streptomycesspp.Phosphate solubilization[30]
ActinobacteriaPhosphate solubilization, Nitrogen fixationSoya bean[31]

Table 2.

Direct plant growth-promoting (PGP) properties of actinobacteria.

2.1.1 Nitrogen fixation

Nitrogen is a well-known and key element of nucleic acids and proteins, and it is also an indispensable nutrient for plant growth. Nitrogen gas is abundantly found in the air, constituting 78% of the atmosphere, but it is not directly available to plants for uptake unless it is converted into its soluble form [32]. Biological nitrogen fixer (BNF) used nitrogenase enzyme system which converts the atmospheric nitrogen required by plants into ammonium and nitrates [33]. Additionally, synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are also supplied to balance the limited availability of nitrogen provided by biological nitrogen fixer. But these fertilizers might be harmful to health and agricultural sustainability. Therefore, actinobacteria are good choice to be utilized as BNF to improve the plant growth for sustainable agriculture. Frankiais a versatile actinobacterium which enters in the root cell through different ways, such as intracellular using root-hair or intercellular by means of root invasion, and fixes nitrogen under both free-living and symbiotic conditions in nonlegume plants [34]. In addition to Frankia, many other endophytes like Agromyces, Arthrobacter, Micromonospora, Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium, Mycobacterium, and Streptomycesalso demonstrated N-fixing ability [35].

2.1.2 Phosphorus solubilization

After nitrogen, the second major element, for plant growth, is phosphorus [36]. Phosphorus exists in soil as both inorganic and organic forms [37], but 0.1% phosphorus is available as soluble form to be absorbed by plants. An immediate need of phosphorus is fulfilled by chemical fertilizers, like nitrogen, but the majority of these applied chemical fertilizers are not only expensive but also wasted because it retains in soil as an insoluble form just after the application [37]. In the past decades, many microbes have been described which can solubilize the insoluble phosphorus, and since then, numerous studies by many researchers have been carried out to investigate the phosphate-solubilizing potential of different microbes such as bacteria, fungi, and actinobacteria [38]. Different in vitro and in vivo studies have been executed, which highlight capability to solubilize soil phosphorus by PGP actinobacteria, for instance, Streptomyces, Rhodococcus, Arthrobacter, Gordonia, and Micromonospora[39]. Micromonospora endolithicaa non-streptomycete enhances the phosphate-solubilizing ability in bean plants which subsequently increase the growth of bean plants [40]. Micromonospora aurantiaca, Streptomycessp., and Streptomyces griseusalso showed similar results on wheat plants when grown under phosphorus-deficient soil. Many actinobacterial strains also aid in phosphorus solubilization by producing several organic acids such as citric acid, gluconic acid, oxalic acid, lactic acid, malic acid, succinic acid, and propionic acid. Therefore, it is more viable to utilize microorganisms like actinobacteria as biofertilizers economically. Some plant growth-promoting characteristic of actinobacteria is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Plant disease suppressing trait adopted by actinobacteria.

2.1.3 Siderophore production by actinobacteria

Iron is an essential nutrient element for all organisms, which acts as a necessary co-factor for several enzymatic reactions. Many beneficial actinobacteria including Streptomyces, Micrococcus, Microbacterium, Kocuria, Corynebacterium, and Arthrobacterimprove the plant growth through production of Fe-chelating compounds. Normally, soil iron resides in insoluble hydroxides and oxy-hydroxides forms that are not available for microbes and plants. For iron availability siderophore, a compound of high iron affinity and low molecular weight is needed to be synthesized [41]. Two major classes of siderophore are catechols and hydroxamate, produced by microbes and various actinobacterial strains that have been nominated as producers of siderophore [42]. Some well-known siderophores that are produced by the genus Streptomycesare hydroxamate, desferrioxamines, and coelichelin [43], and other members of actinobacteria like Rhodococcusand Nocardiaproduced heterobactin siderophore [44]. Siderophore also plays a role in plant protection from phytopathogens besides its role in plant nutrition. Both siderophore and pathogenic microbe require iron so a competitive environment creates between them in the root vicinity [45]. As actinobacteria produce high-affinity siderophore and fungal pathogen produces low-affinity siderophores, therefore actinobacteria can eliminate the fungal pathogen. Streptomycesproduce siderophore that is also found to be effective against wilt disease on chickpea caused by F. oxysporumf. sp. ciceri[46].

2.1.4 Production of hormone

Several rhizospheric and endophytic actinobacteria have been noticed to yield several phytohormones, namely, indole acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins, and gibberellins. These phytohormones show a significant role in the plant growth [47]. The most important phytohormone is indole-3-acetic acid, a principal form of auxin that shows the useful impact on plants by various cellular processes like cell division, elongation, and differentiation. Recently, endophytic actinobacteria are getting more attention because of their role in the production of phytohormones. It has been reported that Nocardiopsis, an endophytic actinobacterium, produces the highest percentage of IAA [22]. Many researchers studied that Streptomycesendophytes like S. olivaceoviridis, S. rimosus, S. atrovirens, S. rochei, and S. viridisalso produce IAA that is responsible for improved seed germination, root elongation, and growth in different plants [48]. Hence, actinobacteria have the ability to boost the production and growth of plants by producing the phytohormone as shown in Table 2.

2.2 Indirect plant growth mechanism of actinobacteria

In indirect plant growth mechanism, actinobacteria also enhance the growth of plants like direct mechanism which is mentioned in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Alleviation of abiotic stress in actinobacteria.

2.2.1 Cell wall-degrading enzymes

Actinobacteria synthesize many different extracellular enzymes that help to decompose material in soil. Some of these enzymes include xylanases, chitinases, hemicellulose, nucleases, amylases, lipases, glucanases, pectinase, proteinases, cellulases, ligninases, and keratinase. Mainly soil-living actinobacteria are saprophytic and play a central role in decomposition. Actinobacteria use this mixture of enzymes for decomposition against a variety of phytopathogens and majorly contribute to biocontrol potential by damaging cell wall of these pathogens. Cell wall of many bacteria and fungi is made up of polymers like glycan, cellulose, chitin, protein, and lipids [49]. Actinobacteria are regarded as the dominant organisms that decompose chitin in soil and also considered as promising antagonistic agents for biocontrol because of the hydrolytic reaction on mycelium of the fungi. Acctinobacteria are also observed to produced chitinase enzyme that inhibit fungal growth by cell wall chitin hydrolysis. Many species of Streptomycesgenus have the potential to degrade the chitin polymer and are, therefore, known as a principal chitinolytic microbial group in soil [50, 51]. A list of some important enzyme secreted by actinobacteria is shown in Table 3.

EnzymesActinobacteriaReferences
ChitinaseStreptomyces viridificans, S. coelicolor, S. griseus, S. albovinaceus, S. caviscabies, S. setonii, S. virginiae[52]
Chitinase, glucanaseS. cavourensisSY224[53]
CelluloseThermomonosporaspp. Actinoplanes philippinensis, A. missouriensis, Streptomyces clavuligerus[54]
LigaseNocardia autotrophica[25]
Amylases, lipases, β-1-3-glucanaseThermomonospora curvata, Streptomycesspp.[55]
Chitinase, glucanase and proteaseStreptomycesspp. 80[56]

Table 3.

Production of hydrolytic enzymes by actinobacteria.

2.2.2 Actinobacteria’s role as nutrient promoter

As PGP, actinobacteria also act to raise the soil fertility by exhibiting various activities; hence, it is acknowledged as a main natural nutrient enhancer. Besides siderophore producer and phosphate solubilizer, actinobacteria also produce many kinds of enzymes like lipase, amylase, peroxidase, xylanase, chitinase, keratinase, pectinase, cellulase, and protease. This cocktail of enzymes helps to convert nutrients into simple mineral forms, and due to this nutrient cycling ability of actinobacteria, it is considered as an optimal candidate for natural fertilizers [38]. These actinobacteria also promote the soil metal-mobilizing ability like Fe, Zn, and Se, which ultimately increase the germination of seeds and plant growth. Current research has exposed that the root colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases growth of crop and zinc and iron content of chickpea grains [57]. Under greenhouse and field conditions, two PGPR, namely, Mesorhizobiumsp. and Pseudomonassp., also enhance the production and acquisition of Fe in chickpea [58]. Some previous studies elaborated that actinobacteria enhance plant growth in various crops like cereals, oilseeds, and leguminous by mobilizing the minerals. PGP Streptomyceswere also observed to increase Fe and Zn quantity by 38% and 30%, respectively, in grains of chickpea [59].

2.2.3 Actinobacteria in bioremediation of metals

Anthropogenic activities are the main cause of metal pollution of agricultural lands which led to a decrease in the fruitful agricultural cropland. As reported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), nearly more than 40,000 contaminated sites are present in the United States. Furthermore, due to heavy metal contamination, 50,000 hectare of forest, 55,000 hectare of pasture, and 100,000 hectare of cropland have vanished, and these need retrieval process [60]. PGP like actinobacteria stay in metal-contaminated soil and increase the bioremediation process by extracting and solubilizing mineral. Different reactions like oxidation, metal reduction, and biosorption as well as several substances like organic acids, siderophores, polymeric substances, glycoprotein, and bio-surfactants are released by the microbes which aid in the metal-mobilizing property of these microbes. Many studies have been performed by researchers which demonstrated the metal-mobilizing mechanism [61].

2.2.4 Reduction of plant-pathogen stress by actinobacteria

Primarily, plants use beneficial microorganisms and plant integrated defense mechanism to protect themselves from phytopathogens [62]. Beneficial microorganisms (pathogen antagonistic) alleviate the pathogen stress in plants through different mechanisms like secretion of anti-pathogenic metabolites, competition for space, and nutrients [8]. Actinobacteria also play vital role in plant protection against plant pathogens utilizing nutrients, required by pathogens for growth. Meanwhile, actinobacteria produce different volatile compounds, antibiotics and cell wall degrading enzymes against phytopathogens [63]. Actinobacteria have been reported to produce various antifungal volatile organic compounds against fungal disease [64]. Streptomycesactinobacteria also produce many kinds of volatile compounds which have antifungal activities against Rhizoctonia solaniand Botrytis cinerea[65]. Actinobacteria have the ability to produce different hydrolytic enzymes that degrade fungal and bacteria pathogens cell wall, so protect the plants against phytopathogens [66]. A nonspecific (indirect) mechanism has also been developed by plants which provide the long-term protection against a wide range of phytopathogens. PGP actinobacteria have played an important role in developing disease resistance in plants by inducing gene expression related to defense pathway [67]. Plants display two types of indirect or nonspecific defensive mechanism: the one involves salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathway and pathogenesis-related (PR) protein genes, called systemic acquired resistance (SAR), and the other is induced systemic resistance (ISR) that involves two pathways, ethylene (ET) and jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathways [68]. A study described that Streptomyces bikiniensisHD-087 produces metabolites which cause systemic resistance and suppress the Fusariumwilt in cucumber raised by F. oxysporumf. sp. cucumerinum[69]. Some important metabolites which are synthesized by actinobacteria against phytopathogens are shown in Table 4.

Endophytic actinobacteriaHost plantMetaboliteTarget pathogen(s)Reference
Streptomycessp. NRRL 3052Kennedia nigriscansMunumbicins A, B, C and DPythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani, Phytophthora cinnamomi[70]
S. melanosporofaciensEF-76 and FP-54PotatoGeldanamycinStreptomyces scabiei[71]
Micromonosporasp. M39Rice2,3-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, phenylacetic acid, cervinomycin A1 and A2P. oryzae[72]
S. malaysiensisWheatMalayamycinStagonospora nodorum[73]
S. cavourensissubsp. cavourensisSY224Pepper2-FurancarboxaldehydeColletotrichum gloeosporioides[74]
Streptomyces chryseusPotentilla discolorSaadamycin/5,7-Dimethoxy-4-pmethoxylphenyl coumarinBotrytis cinerea[75]
Streptomycessp. MSU-2110Monsterasp.CoronamycinPythium ultimum, Fusarium solani, Rhizoctonia solani[76]
Microbacteriumsp. S4S17Ferula sinkiangensisCoumarinAlternaria alternate[77]
Streptomyces olivaceus, Streptomycessp. BPSA 121Rhynchotechum ellipticumKetoconazole, fluconazole, miconazoleFusarium oxysporum, Fusarium proliferatum[78]
S. miharaensis
100%
TomatoFilipin III (purified antibiotic)F. oxysporumf. sp. lycopersici[79]
Streptomycessp. G10BananaF. oxysporumf. sp. cubense[80]
Streptomycessp. AMA49RiceBonactinPyricularia oryzae[81]
Streptomyces angustmyceticusNR8–2Brassica rapaBenzaldehyde, butanoic acidColletotrichumsp. Curvularia lunata[53]

Table 4.

Metabolites produced by actinobacteria used to suppress disease.

2.2.5 Actinobacteria’s role against stress

Several abiotic stress factors including flooding, extreme temperatures, salinity, nutrient stress, drought, and metal stress impose a harmful impact on yields of the crop, as well as it also severally damaged the soil. As described by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), if precautionary steps are not implemented, in the next 25 years 30% land degradation will happen due to abiotic stress factors, and this will rise to 50% in 2050 [16]. Strains of actinobacteria have better tolerance against abiotic stress factors like temperature, salinity, and metal stress, and inoculation of tolerant actinobacteria strain was noticed to encourage the plant growth. Useful effects of PGP Streptomycessp. were observed on maize and wheat under saline conditions [82]. In another in vitro study, Streptomycessp. PGPA39 inoculation showed similar results under saline conditions and ultimately increase the biomass and secondary growth of Arabidopsisseedlings (Palaniyandi et al. 2014). Actinobacteria stress tolerance potential was also studied in chickpea [49]. Treatment with Streptomyces rocheiSM3 in chickpea under stress salt condition decreases mortality (48%) toward Sclerotinia sclerotioruminfection and increases biomass (20%). Physiological studies of SM3-treated plants showed increased accumulation of phenolics and proline along with increased catalase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities. Further genetic level investigation showed that ET-responsive ERF transcription factor (CaTF2) is triggered by strain SM3 under challenging conditions. Moreover, Streptomyces padanustolerate drought situations by induction of increased osmotic pressure of plant cells and cell wall lignification. Co-inoculation of drought-tolerant Streptomyces olivaceusDE10 and Streptomyces geysiriensisDE27 endophytic actinobacteria verified the highest yield in wheat [83]. In response to stress, plants produce stress ethylene also known as ET which leads to premature plant death [84]. Microbes synthesize an enzyme known as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase that prevents the effect of ethylene due to ethylene precursor ACC conversion to ammonia and a-ketobutyrate which is shown in Figure 3. Currently effects of this enzyme on stress management are considered as a central phenomenon of PGP traits and are studied for the past two decades [85]. Some famous actinobacteria that are known to produce ACC deaminase include Amycolatopsis, Streptomyces, Nocardia, Rhodococcus, and Mycobacterium[86]. Many halo-tolerant actinobacteria having ACC deaminase are isolated from rhizosphere of naturally growing halophytic plants and soil of barren land [29].

Advertisement

3. Conclusion

Production of food to fulfill the need of an increasing population and mimic the reliance on nonrenewable resources and also environmental effect is the greatest challenge of this century. To complete this challenge, the use of plant growth microbes such as actinobacteria is a good choice as an alternative tool for sustainable agriculture. Various studies highlight the abilities of actinobacteria as a plant growth promoter and their additive impact on plant growth and protection. Actinobacteria isolates have shown the multidimensional way to be effective on plant growth. They promote plant growth by involving various activities like production of phytohormones, siderophore production, solubilization of phosphate, fixation of nitrogen, complementing mycorrhizal fungi, and also balancing the ecology of the soil system. Additionally, many studies also have proven the potential of actinobacteria as a biocontrol agent. These characteristics of the actinobacteria group have proved them as inevitable tools for increasing productivity and quality in agriculture. Keeping in mind all these aspects, it is a need of time that we focus on the use of actinobacteria as an alternative tool and reduce the use of harmful chemicals. The studies referred in this chapter also support the belief that the use of eco-friendly microorganisms and designing new formulations with cooperative microbe might contribute to plant growth improvement.

References

  1. 1. Lata RK, Divjot K, Nath YA. Endophytic microbiomes: Biodiversity, ecological significance and biotechnological applications. Research Journal of Biotechnology. 2019;14:10
  2. 2. Chander J. Textbook of Medical Mycology. Chandigarh, India: JP Medical Ltd; 2017
  3. 3. Binda E et al. Specificity of induction of glycopeptide antibiotic resistance in the producing actinomycetes. Antibiotics. 2018;7(2):36
  4. 4. Stamenov D et al. The use ofStreptomycesisolate with plant growth promoting traits in the production of English ryegrass. Romanian Agricultural Research. 2016;33:299-306
  5. 5. Cao L et al. Isolation and characterization of endophyticStreptomycesstrains from surface-sterilized tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum)roots. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2004;39(5):425-430
  6. 6. El-Tarabily KA, Hardy GESJ, Sivasithamparam K. Performance of three endophytic actinomycetes in relation to plant growth promotion and biological control ofPythium aphanidermatum, a pathogen of cucumber under commercial field production conditions in the United Arab Emirates. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2010;128(4):527-539
  7. 7. Singh S, Gaur R. Evaluation of antagonistic and plant growth promoting activities of chitinolytic endophytic actinomycetes associated with medicinal plants againstSclerotium rolfsiiin chickpea. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2016;121(2):506-518
  8. 8. Passari AK et al. Detection of biosynthetic gene and phytohormone production by endophytic actinobacteria associated withSolanum lycopersicumand their plant-growth-promoting effect. Research in Microbiology. 2016;167(8):692-705
  9. 9. Passari AK et al. In vitro and in vivo plant growth promoting activities and DNA fingerprinting of antagonistic endophytic actinomycetes associates with medicinal plants. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0139468
  10. 10. Goodman AA. Endophytic Actinomycetes as Potential Agents to Control Common Scab of Potatoes. Nothern Michigan University: NMU Master’s Theses; 2014
  11. 11. Shimizu M et al. Identification of endophyticStreptomycessp. R-5 and analysis of its antimicrobial metabolites. Journal of General Plant Pathology. 2004;70(1):66-68
  12. 12. Shimizu M, Yazawa S, Ushijima Y. A promising strain of endophyticStreptomycessp. for biological control of cucumber anthracnose. Journal of General Plant Pathology. 2009;75(1):27-36
  13. 13. Shivlata L, Satyanarayana T. Actinobacteria in agricultural and environmental sustainability. In: Agro-Environmental Sustainability. New Delhi, India: Springer; 2017. pp. 173-218
  14. 14. Purushotham N et al. Community structure of endophytic actinobacteria in a New Zealand native medicinal plantPseudowintera colorata(Horopito) and their influence on plant growth. Microbial Ecology. 2018;76(3):729-740
  15. 15. Ting ASY, Hermanto A, Peh KL. Indigenous actinomycetes from empty fruit bunch compost of oil palm: Evaluation on enzymatic and antagonistic properties. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2014;3(4):310-315
  16. 16. Verma V, Singh S, Prakash S. Bio-control and plant growth promotion potential of siderophore producing endophyticStreptomycesfromAzadirachta indica A. Juss. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2011;51(5):550-556
  17. 17. Goudjal Y et al. Biocontrol ofRhizoctonia solanidamping-off and promotion of tomato plant growth by endophytic actinomycetes isolated from native plants ofAlgerian Sahara. Microbiological Research. 2014;169(1):59-65
  18. 18. Majeed A et al. Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from wheat rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:198
  19. 19. Rungin S et al. Plant growth enhancing effects by a siderophore-producing endophytic streptomycete isolated from a Thai jasmine rice plant (Oryza sativaL. cv. KDML105). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102(3):463-472
  20. 20. Aly MM, El Sayed H, Jastaniah SD. Synergistic effect betweenAzotobacter vinelandiiandStreptomycessp. isolated from saline soil on seed germination and growth of wheat plant. Journal of American Science. 2012;8(5):667-676
  21. 21. Soe KM, Yamakawa T. Low-density co-inoculation ofMyanmar Bradyrhizobium yuanmingenseMAS34 andStreptomyces griseoflavusP4 to enhance symbiosis and seed yield in soybean varieties. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2013;4(09):1879
  22. 22. Shutsrirung A et al. Diversity of endophytic actinomycetes in mandarin grown in northern Thailand, their phytohormone production potential and plant growth promoting activity. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2013;59(3):322-330
  23. 23. Gopalakrishnan S et al. Plant growth-promoting activities ofStreptomycesspp. in sorghum and rice. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):574
  24. 24. Sziderics A et al. Bacterial endophytes contribute to abiotic stress adaptation in pepper plants (Capsicum annuumL.). Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2007;53(11):1195-1202
  25. 25. El-Tarabily KA, Nassar AH, Sivasithamparam K. Promotion of growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) in a calcareous soil by a phosphate-solubilizing, rhizosphere-competent isolate ofMicromonospora endolithica. Applied Soil Ecology. 2008;39(2):161-171
  26. 26. Franco-Correa M et al. Evaluation of actinomycete strains for key traits related with plant growth promotion and mycorrhiza helping activities. Applied Soil Ecology. 2010;45(3):209-217
  27. 27. Rashad FM et al. Isolation and characterization of multifunctionalStreptomycesspecies with antimicrobial, nematicidal and phytohormone activities from marine environments in Egypt. Microbiological Research. 2015;175:34-47
  28. 28. Aldesuquy H, Mansour F, Abo-Hamed S. Effect of the culture filtrates ofStreptomyceson growth and productivity of wheat plants. Folia Microbiologica. 1998;43(5):465-470
  29. 29. Siddikee MA et al. Isolation, characterization, and use for plant growth promotion under salt stress, of ACC deaminase-producing halotolerant bacteria derived from coastal soil. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010;20(11):1577-1584
  30. 30. Nafis A et al. Actinobacteria from extreme niches in Morocco and their plant growth-promoting potentials. Diversity. 2019;11(8):139
  31. 31. Amule F et al. Effect of actinobacterial, rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria consortium inoculation on rhizosphere soil properties in soybean in Jabalpur district of Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2018;6(1):583-586
  32. 32. Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C. Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Annals of Botany. 2013;111(5):743-767
  33. 33. Kim J, Rees DC. Nitrogenase and biological nitrogen fixation. Biochemistry. 1994;33(2):389-397
  34. 34. Benson DR, Silvester W. Biology ofFrankiastrains, actinomycete symbionts of actinorhizal plants. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1993;57(2):293-319
  35. 35. Sellstedt A, Richau KH. Aspects of nitrogen-fixingActinobacteria, in particular free-living and symbioticFrankia. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2013;342(2):179-186
  36. 36. Razaq M, Zhang P, Shen H-L. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous on the growth and root morphology of Acer mono. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171321
  37. 37. Bouain N et al. Phosphate and zinc transport and signalling in plants: Toward a better understanding of their homeostasis interaction. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014;65(20):5725-5741
  38. 38. Jog R, Nareshkumar G, Rajkumar S. Enhancing soil health and plant growth promotion by actinomycetes. In: Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 33-45
  39. 39. Hamdali H et al. Rock phosphate-solubilizing Actinomycetes: Screening for plant growth-promoting activities. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008;24(11):2565-2575
  40. 40. El-Tarabily KA. Promotion of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plant growth by rhizosphere competent 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase-producing streptomycete actinomycetes. Plant and Soil. 2008;308(1-2):161-174
  41. 41. Crowley DE. Microbial siderophores in the plant rhizosphere. In: Iron Nutrition in Plants and Rhizospheric Microorganisms. Riverside, CA, USA: Springer, University of California; 2006. pp. 169-198
  42. 42. Wang W et al. Siderophore production by actinobacteria. Biometals. 2014;27(4):623-631
  43. 43. Challis GL, Ravel J. Coelichelin, a new peptide siderophore encoded by the Streptomyces coelicolor genome: Structure prediction from the sequence of its non-ribosomal peptide synthetase. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2000;187(2):111-114
  44. 44. Lee J et al. Siderophore production by actinomycetes isolates from two soil sites in Western Australia. Biometals. 2012;25(2):285-296
  45. 45. Rashid S, Charles TC, Glick BR. Isolation and characterization of new plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Applied Soil Ecology. 2012;61:217-224
  46. 46. Gopalakrishnan S et al. Biocontrol of charcoal-rot of sorghum by actinomycetes isolated from herbal vermicompost. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(79):18142-18152
  47. 47. Gopalakrishnan S, Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R. A Book Entitled “Plant Growth-Promoting Actinobacteria: A New Avenue for Enhancing the Productivity & Soil Fertility of Grain Legumes”. Singapore: Springer; 2016
  48. 48. Abd-Alla MH, El-Sayed E-SA, Rasmey A-HM. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production by Streptomyces atrovirens isolated from rhizospheric soil in Egypt. Journal of Biology and Earth Sciences. 2013;3(2):182-193
  49. 49. Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R, Gopalakrishnan S. Plant growth-promoting actinobacteria: A new strategy for enhancing sustainable production and protection of grain legumes. Biotech. 2017;7(2):102
  50. 50. Karthik N, Binod P, Pandey A. Purification and characterisation of an acidic and antifungal chitinase produced by aStreptomycessp. Bioresource Technology. 2015;188:195-201
  51. 51. Yandigeri MS et al. ChitinolyticStreptomycesvinaceusdrappus S5MW2 isolated from Chilika lake, India enhances plant growth and biocontrol efficacy through chitin supplementation againstRhizoctonia solani. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;31(8):1217-1225
  52. 52. Liotti RG, da Silva Figueiredo MI, Soares MA.Streptomyces griseocarneusR132 controls phytopathogens and promotes growth of pepper(Capsicum annuum). Biological Control. 2019;138:104065
  53. 53. Wonglom P et al. Streptomyces angustmyceticus NR8-2 as a potential microorganism for the biological control of leaf spots of Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis caused byColletotrichumsp. andCurvularia lunata. Biological Control. 2019;138:104046
  54. 54. Saito A, Fujii T, Miyashita K. Distribution and evolution of chitinase genes inStreptomycesspecies: Involvement of gene-duplication and domain-deletion. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2003;84(1):7
  55. 55. Khamna S, Yokota A, Peberdy JF, Lumyong S. Indole-3-acetic acid production byStreptomycessp. isolated from some Thai medicinal plant rhizosphere soils. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences. 2010;4(1):23-32
  56. 56. Marsh P, Wellington EMH. Molecular ecology of filamentous actinomycetes in soil. Molecular Ecology of Rhizosphere Microorganisms. Wellington, New Zealand: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 2007. pp. 133-149
  57. 57. Pellegrino E, Bedini S. Enhancing ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture: Biofertilization and biofortification of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2014;68:429-439
  58. 58. Kaur N, Sharma P. Screening and characterization of nativePseudomonassp. as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) rhizosphere. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2013;7(16):1465-1474
  59. 59. Sathya A et al. Plant growth-promoting actinobacteria on chickpea seed mineral density: An upcoming complementary tool for sustainable biofortification strategy. Biotech. 2016;6(2):138
  60. 60. Mahmood T. Phytoextraction of heavy metals-the process and scope for remediation of contaminated soils. Soil and Environment. 2010;29(2):91-109
  61. 61. Sessitsch A et al. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2013;60:182-194
  62. 62. Dangl JL, Jones JD. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2001;411(6839):826
  63. 63. de Jesus Sousa JA, Olivares FL. Plant growth promotion by streptomycetes: Ecophysiology, mechanisms and applications. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2016;3(1):24
  64. 64. Wang Z et al. Fumigant activity of volatiles from Streptomyces alboflavus TD-1 againstFusarium moniliformeSheldon. Journal of Microbiology. 2013;51(4):477-483
  65. 65. Wan M et al. Effect of volatile substances of Streptomyces platensis F-1 on control of plant fungal diseases. Biological Control. 2008;46(3):552-559
  66. 66. Pal KK, Gardener BM. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. Gujarat, India: The Plant Health Instructor; 2006
  67. 67. Conn V, Walker A, Franco C. Endophytic actinobacteria induce defense pathways inArabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2008;21(2):208-218
  68. 68. Senthilraja G. Induction of systemic resistance in crop plants against plant pathogens by plant growth-promoting actinomycetes. In: Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 193-202
  69. 69. Zhao S, Du C-M, Tian C-Y. Suppression ofFusarium oxysporumand induced resistance of plants involved in the biocontrol ofCucumber FusariumWilt byStreptomyces bikiniensisHD-087. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;28(9):2919-2927
  70. 70. Castillo UF et al. Munumbicins E-4 and E-5: Novel broad-spectrum antibiotics fromStreptomycesNRRL 3052. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2006;255(2):296-300
  71. 71. Clermont N et al. Effect of biopolymers on geldanamycin production and biocontrol ability ofStreptomyces melanosporofaciensstrain EF-76. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2010;32(4):481-489
  72. 72. Ismet A et al. Production and chemical characterization of antifungal metabolites fromMicromonosporasp. M39 isolated from mangrove Rhizosphere soil. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2004;20(5):523-528
  73. 73. Li W et al. Malayamycin, a new streptomycete antifungal compound, specifically inhibits sporulation ofStagonospora nodorum(Berk) castell and Germano, the cause of wheat glume blotch disease. Pest Management Science. 2008;64(12):1294-1302
  74. 74. Park S et al. Determination of polyphenol levels variation inCapsicum annuumL. cv. Chelsea (yellow bell pepper) infected by anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry. 2012;130(4):981-985
  75. 75. Zhao K et al. The diversity and anti-microbial activity of endophytic actinomycetes isolated from medicinal plants inPanxi plateau, China. Current Microbiology. 2011;62(1):182-190
  76. 76. Ezra D et al. Coronamycins, peptide antibiotics produced by a verticillateStreptomycessp.(MSU-2110) endophytic onMonsterasp. Microbiology. 2004;150(4):785-793
  77. 77. Liu Y et al. Endophytic bacteria associated with endangered plantFerula sinkiangensisKM Shen in an arid land: Diversity and plant growth-promoting traits. Journal of Arid Land. 2017;9(3):432-445
  78. 78. Passari AK et al. Insights into the functionality of endophytic actinobacteria with a focus on their biosynthetic potential and secondary metabolites production. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):11809
  79. 79. Kim JD et al. Identification and biocontrol efficacy ofStreptomyces miharaensisproducing filipin III againstFusariumwilt. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2012;52(2):150-159
  80. 80. Getha K et al. Evaluation ofStreptomycessp. strain g10 for suppression ofFusariumwilt and rhizosphere colonization in pot-grown banana plantlets. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2005;32(1):24-32
  81. 81. Buatong J et al. Antifungal metabolites from marine-derivedStreptomycessp. AMA49 againstPyricularia oryzae. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 2019;13(2):653-665
  82. 82. Sadeghi A et al. Plant growth promoting activity of an auxin and siderophore producing isolate ofStreptomycesunder saline soil conditions. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;28(4):1503-1509
  83. 83. Yandigeri MS et al. Drought-tolerant endophytic actinobacteria promote growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under water stress conditions. Plant Growth Regulation. 2012;68(3):411-420
  84. 84. Saraf M, Jha CK, Patel D. The role of ACC deaminase producing PGPR in sustainable agriculture. In: Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. pp. 365-385
  85. 85. Etesami H et al. Bacterial biosynthesis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) as endophytic preferential selection traits by rice plant seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2014;33(3):654-670
  86. 86. Nascimento FX et al. New insights into 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase phylogeny, evolution and ecological significance. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99168

Written By

Sumreen Hayat, Asma Ashraf, Bilal Aslam, Rizwan Asif, Saima Muzammil, Muhammad Asif Zahoor, Muhammad Waseem, Imran Riaz Malik, Mohsin Khurshid, Muhammad Afzal, Muhammad Saqalein, Muhammad Hussnain Siddique, Aqsa Muzammil and Sumera Sabir

Submitted: October 30th, 2019 Reviewed: June 26th, 2020 Published: September 1st, 2020