## Abstract

Nonlinear equations describing dynamics of 2D vortices are very important in the physics of the ocean and the atmosphere and in plasma physics and Astrophysics. Here linear and nonlinear 2D vortex perturbations of gravitating and light gaseous disks are examined in the geostrophic and post-geostrophic approximations. In the frame of geostrophic approximation, it is shown that the vortex with positive velocity circulation is characterized by low pressure with negative excess mass density of substance. Vortex with negative circulation has higher pressure and is a relatively tight formation with the positive excess mass density. In the post-geostrophic approximation, structures of the isolated monopole and dipole vortex (modons) solutions of these equations are studied. Two types of mass distributions in dipole vortices are found. The first type of modon is characterized by an asymmetrically positioned single circular densification and one rarefaction. The second type is characterized by two asymmetrically positioned densifications and two rarefactions, where the second densification-rarefaction pair is crescent shaped. The constant density contours of a dipole vortex in a light gas disk coincide with the streamlines of the vortex; in a self-gravitating disk, the constant density contours in the vortex do not coincide with streamlines. Possible manifestations of monopole and dipole vortices in astrophysical objects are discussed. Vortices play decisive role in the process of planet formation. Gas in a protoplanetary disk practically moves on sub-Keplerian speeds. Rigid particles, under the action of a head wind drags, lose the angular momentum and energy. As a result, the ~10 cm to meter-sized particles drift to the central star for hundreds of years. Long-lived vortical structures in gas disk are a possible way to concentrate the ~10 cm to meter sized particles and to grow up them in planetesimal. Here the effect of anticyclonic Burgers vortex on formation of planetesimals in a protoplanetary dusty disc in local approach is also considered. It is shown that the Burgers vortex with homogeneously rotating kernel and a converging radial stream of substance can effectively accumulate in its nuclear area the meter-sized rigid particles of total mass ∼1028 g for characteristic time ∼106 year.

### Keywords

- anticyclone
- Burgers vortex
- dipole
- gravitating disk
- monopole
- planetesimals
- protoplanetary disk
- vortex

## 1. Introduction

Nonlinear equations describing dynamics of 2D vortices are important in the physics of the ocean and the atmosphere, in plasma physics, and in astrophysics. The same type of nonlinear equations describes these vortical structures. In fluid dynamics, Hasegawa-Mima equation is well-known [1].

which describes the nonlinear Rossby waves in the atmosphere [2] and drift nonlinear waves in plasma [3]. Here

The exact solution of the equation, describing a stationary solitary dipole vortex (modon) drifting along the y-axis on rotating shallow water, was obtained in [4]. The same type of solutions later received a large number of similar equations [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].

Nonlinear vortex disturbances of uniformly rotating gravitating gaseous disk were considered in [9]. For short-scale (much smaller than the Jeans wavelength:

IR, submillimeter, and centimeter radiation of protoplanetary disk analyses shows that vortices serve as incubators for the growth of dust particles and formation of planetesimals [11, 12, 13, 14]. The initial stage of growth probably proceeds through the nucleation of submicron-sized dust grains from the primordial nebula, which then forms the monomers of fractal dust aggregates up to ∼1 mm to ∼10 cm for characteristic time of an order of 10^{3} years [15, 16]. The best astrophysical evidence for grain growth to specified sizes is the detection of 3.5 cm dust emission from the face-on disk of radius 225 AU round classical T Tauri star TW Hya [17]. When the planetesimals reached a size of about 1 km, they began to attract other smaller bodies due to their gravity.

In models of protoplanetary disks, gas practically moves on sub-Keplerian speeds. Rigid particles, under the action of a head wind drag, lose the angular momentum and energy. As a result, the ∼10 cm to meter-sized particles drift to the central star for hundreds of years, that is, much less than the lifetime of a disk which makes several millions of years [18, 19].

Long-lived vortical structures in gas disk are a possible way to concentrate the ∼10 cm to meter-sized particles and to grow up them in planetesimal. Similar effect of vortices on the Earth was observed in special laboratories and also in the ocean [20].

In some areas of the stratified protoplanetary disks, the current has a 2D turbulent character. An attractive feature of such hydrodynamic current consists in the fact that in it, through a background of small whirlpools, long-living vortices will spontaneously be formed without requirement of special initial conditions [21, 22, 23]. In laboratory experiments [24, 25], formation of Burgers vortex, which will be considered here, is often observed in 2D turbulent flows. Anticyclonic vortices in a protoplanetary disk merge with each other and amplify, while cyclonic ones are destroyed by a shear flow [26].

In cylindrical system of coordinates (

This is a vortex with a converging stream of substance to its center with gradient

## 2. Magnitude of some parameters of circumstellar disks

A typical circumstellar disk is a few hundred AU (astronomical unit, 1 AU = 1.5 10^{13} cm) in size. It is mainly composed of hydrogen and helium gas. We consider a vortex in such axially symmetrical viscous accretion disk with effective temperature T and gas density

The sound speed in gas is estimated by

where

In a vertical direction, the gas is in hydrostatic balance with a characteristic scale height:

The thickness-to-radius ratio (aspect ratio) is usually ∼ 1/10 and increases slowly with radius, R. The superficial density of the gas in a disk can be estimated as

In “_{s} H.

The dynamic time scale of a disk is

For Keplerian disk, radial momentum equation solution yields to a difference between the speeds of rigid particles and surrounding gas [30]. In a thin gas disk (

At

For a characteristic time

Viscous dissipation and orbital shear limit the sizes of a vortex. Viscous dissipation destroys vortices of sizes less than the viscous scale [32]:

where

The Keplerian shear flow forbids the formation of circular structures with the sizes larger than the shear length scale:

The vortices, whose sizes surpass _{s}, can be circular and have the size of an order of ∼1 AU.

In a gas disk, drag force on rigid particles from gas is exposed, which, depending on size of a particle, is expressed either by Stokes or Epstein’s formula (see, e.g., [25]).

Here our main results obtained by investigations of the linear and nonlinear perturbation equations of differentially rotating gravitating gaseous disk in geostrophic and post-geostrophic approximations are presented [35], as well as the results on formation of planetesimals by Burgers vortex in a protoplanetary disk [26].

## 3. Model and basic equations for linear perturbations

Consider at first a gravitating pure gas disk of mass density

We will consider isentropic perturbations (S = constant) and therefore enthalpy H(S, P) = H(P),

where

where

Perturbations of the disk in a rotating with angular velocity ^{1}:

where the velocity was presented in the form of

and the Poisson equation is

In Eq. (10) we have used the radial equilibrium condition for the disk:

Taking into account Eq. (9), the continuity Eq. (11) can be written as

Taking operator ** curl** on Eq. (10) and then by combining the equation of continuity, after simple transformation, we obtain

The expression in the curly brackets in this equation is a generalized vortencity. The equation shows that for 2D isentropic perturbations, generalized vortencity is conserved along the current lines. So for stationary perturbations, generalized vortencity is an arbitrary function of

In a uniformly rotating (

## 4. Vortices in the geostrophic approximation

This approach assumes that Coriolis forces and gravity balance the pressure gradient in the disk.

Then from the equation of motion (17), we get the perturbed geostrophic velocity:

Using the last, Eq. (18) takes the form

In further analysis of this topic, we will introduce the local Cartesian coordinate system (X,Y) such that (Figure 2)

and will explore the vortical perturbations around a point O in a linear approximation.

The stream function

Imagine around a point O function

In this case

Perturbations of density and enthalpy (9) in linear approach are connected by the following formula:

Then Eq. (13) with an accuracy to a constant term will be in the form of

where

If to take the relationship of density perturbations with perturbations of gravitational potential using Poisson equation

instead of Eq. (25), we obtain the equation

where

The order of magnitude of |H/U| can be estimated using the definition

where k is wavenumber of perturbations

where

Limit

By selection of function B, we can explore the stationary vortex solutions of Eqs. (29) and (30).

Let’s take a look at the simplest case of uniformly rotating disk of homogeneous density,

which gives a circularly symmetric solution for relative perturbed density of mass

where

Note that the vortices with positive and negative velocity circulation

To illustrate these results, we will take into account the fact that the Rossby wavenumber usually is of the order of the inverse thickness of the disk. Considering that the size of the vortex * a* as the disk thickness order, we will get for the Bessel function argument

For long-scale perturbations (33), the Rankin vortex velocity profile is given [27, 28]:

where

## 5. Vortices in the post-geostrophic approximation

In this section, we will get nonlinear perturbation equation, taking into account the inertia term in the equation of motion (10) for homogeneously rotating disk. The cross product of Eq. (10) with e_{z}: e_{z} × Eq. (10), gives

where the first term is geostrophic speed (19) and the second is

Substituting Eq. (35) to Eq. (36) and taking approximation

With the use of Eqs. (19) and (34), we find

where

The continuity equation now takes the form

or, using Eqs. (14), (20), and (21)

Here we have served the terms that are of second order in perturbed amplitude and neglected terms of highest order.

Using the Poisson equation, we get from Eq. (42) the basic nonlinear equation

where

In view of the assessment (28), for short-scale perturbations (

On the limit

Eqs. (45) and (46) have the same structure differing only by their coefficients, and are Hasegawa-Mima type (see Eq. (1)).

## 6. A solitary dipole vortex

In a Cartesian coordinate system (X,Y) (Figure 2), we will look for stationary solutions of Eq. (45) (and (46)) in a small neighborhood of the guiding center O with a radius of

Eq. (46) can be rewritten in the form

or in the form of the Jacobean

where

On basis of Eq. (49)

where F is an arbitrary function. As we are interested in the restricted solutions, then in the limit of large values η, solution U should vanish for arbitrary values x; therefore

We will assume that the function F (51) in the equation is linear not only for large

where k and p are real constants. Soon the sense of splitting the (

Eqs. (53) and (54) have the following stationary solution [9]:

where

For long-scale perturbations

while for small-scale disturbances

From Eqs. (56) and (19), we get the velocity field of a vortex in the form

Moreover, the condition (57) is derived from the requirements of continuity (61) on the circle

The current lines are determined by

Figure 4 shows the current lines of drifting solitary dipole vortex, the appropriate formula (62).

## 7. The contours of constant density

As shown in Section 3,

In the long-scale limit,

Since equipotentials U = constant, generally speaking, do not coincide with the contours of constant density, it follows that the stream lines ψ = constant do not coincide with the contours of constant density.

Define the contours of constant density of modon. Relative density perturbations in the short-scale range are expressed by the following formula:

The relative perturbed density in long-scale range turns out to be in the form

where

To illustrate, consider a logarithmic model of the disk, describing in equilibrium by the following functions of potential, mass density, and angular velocity:

where * )* can be considered as uniform, and

where we used the relation

For illustrations of a perturbed density distribution in dipole vortex (65), we used the following solutions of “dispersion equation” (57): (g,s) = (4.0, 1.52); (4.2, 2.90); (4.5, 6.0); (4.7, 10.0).

The curves in Figure 5 show perturbed density as a function of dimensionless distance * R/a* from the guiding center O in the short-scale (curves increasing towards the center) and in the long-scale (curves descending towards the center) limit.

The density distribution is antisymmetrical to the guiding center. Depending on the choice of the dispersion curve (57) range, there are two types of mass distribution in dipole vortex. One is antisymmetrically located almost round condensation, and one rarefaction (Figure 6) characterizes the first type. The second type is characterized by the two antisymmetrically located condensations and two rarefactions, and second condensation-rarefaction pair has sickle-form (Figure 7). For small values g and s, the short-scale modon is of the second type, with distinctive two condensations (see Figure 8). In the middle part of the dispersion curve, the short-scale and long-scale modons have roughly the same structure. They have one antisymmetrical located prominent pair of condensation-rarefaction and another weak pair of sickle forms. For large values of g and s, the short-scale modon is the first type and has the character of a cyclone-anticyclone couple; the long-scale one is the second type and is characterized by a nearly round and sickle-shaped condensations. In laboratory experiments, the solitary dipole vortices on shallow water, obviously, are the short-scale modons of the first type with the asymmetry between high- and low-pressure centers.

Let’s estimate the masses of condensations in long-scale modon:

where

Numerical estimations show that the ratio of the masses of condensations in the long-scale modon, depending on values of parameters g and s, varies in the range

Now we will focus our attention on a role of vortices for the formation of planetesimals in a protoplanetary light dusty disk.

## 8. The Burgers vortex in local frame of reference

Let’s use the local approach, choosing frame of reference, rotating with a disk with angular speed

In case when only the gravitation of the central star operates, rotation will be Keplerian with q = 3/2, and for homogeneously rotating disk,

The substance stream in chosen frame of reference, has X component of speed -

In the local approach, the equation stationary isentropic shear flow of dusk viscous substance is described by Navier–Stokes and continuity equations:

where h is specific enthalpy ** i**,

**, and**j

**are Cartesian unit vectors. The first term in the right-hand side of Eq. (72) is tidal acceleration, the second term is vertical gravitation, the third is acceleration of Coriolis, and the last is a viscous stress.**k

In the Cartesian coordinate system, the Burgers vortex (2) will be presented in the form

where

## 9. Motion of rigid particles in Burgers vortex

Let us study the two-dimensional dynamics of dust rigid particles in a Burgers vortex. We will neglect the influence of rigid particles on dynamics of gas and the interaction of rigid particles among themselves.

As we consider centimeter- to meter-sized particles, then D considerably surpass the mean free path of gas molecules; therefore, the friction of rigid particles with gas will be described by Stokes drag force:

** u** = (dX/dt, dY/dt) is velocity of a particle, and X and Y are particle coordinates.

In a dimensionless form, the equation of motion of particles in the accepted approach looks like

where

In Eqs. (76) and (77) a characteristic length is accepted: the size of a trunk of a vortex

In the vortex trunk area (

where

With the use of Eqs. (76)–(81), we receive the equations of motion of rigid particles in the field of a vortex trunk:

where

From Eq. (82) it follows that the equilibrium position of rigid particles in a vortex trunk is its center

For establishing the stability of this position of balance, it is necessary to require real parts of eigenvalues of a matrix in Eq. (82) to be zero or negative.

Eigenvalues are complex:

which gives stability condition

Taking into account Eq. (83), Eq. (84) leads to stability criterion

Hence, the unique position of balance for rigid particles in a Burgers vortex is its center where all particles captured by a vortex will gather during the characteristic time:

The mass of the rigid particles captured by a vortex during this time is in the order

which forms a planetesimal.

## 10. The thickness of disk in nuclear area of Burgers vortex

So far we have considered the behavior of a whirlwind in a disk plane. However the whirlwind of Burgers is in 3D formation. We will discuss now a question on a thickness of a disk in the area where the Burgers vortex is located. For this purpose we will address a z-projection of the Navier–Stokes Eq. (72). Integrating this equation taking into account the formula for speed

where _{0} is an angular speed of rotation of local frame of reference. Whence we obtain half thickness of a disk at the kernel area of a whirlwind:

The question arises whether the disk thickness in area of vortex localization changed. On radius of

is positive if

## 11. Discussion and conclusion

First let’s pay attention to the nontrivial structure of monopoly and dipole vortices in a rotating and gravitating pure gas disk. Monopole vortices (33) with mass distribution (32) are localized formations and can have positive and negative velocity circulation, and

More interesting are properties of solitary dipole vortex - modon (60), (61) with mass distribution (65) in short-scale and long-scale limits. There exist two types of mass distribution in dipole vortex. Anti-symmetrically located one almost round condensation and one rarefaction (Figure 6) characterizes the first type. The second type is characterized by the anti-symmetrical located two condensations and two rarefactions, and second condensation-rarefaction pair has sickle-form (Figure 7). Circulation of substance in different parts of modon occurs in opposite direction (Figure 4)!

Now it is difficult to judge about a way of evolution of these structures, for example, whether monopole vortices lead to the formation of planets in circumstellar disks, or the formation of stars or clouds in the galactic gas disk? Or, if it could transformed the dipole vortices to well-known double objects, such as double stars, double nuclei in galaxies (as Mrk 266 [36], Figure 10), as well as in giant molecular clouds, or a planet with a companion in circumstellar disk, or not?

As for dusty protoplanetary disks, long-lived anticyclonic vortical structures can capture the ∼10 cm to meter-sized particles and grow up them into planetesimals. Let’s estimate an order of magnitudes of time (86), and mass (87) for planetesimal formation by Burgers vortex for a model of a disk of radius 30 AU and mass

Let the maximum rotation speed of a vortex be ∼10 m/s at distance

The condition (85) is carried out with a large supply for protoplanetary disks. The molecular viscosity of gas, estimated by the formula * c* is the speed of a sound, does not play an appreciable role in processes of a protoplanetary disk. For this reason, the “α-disk” model [29] is used, in which turbulent viscosity is represented by the expression

_{s}

Taking

Therefore, during an order of ∼10^{6} year, for meter-sized rigid particles, in the vortex trunk the mass amount comparable with mass of Venus accumulates.

Finally, note that the disk in the Burgers vortex localization area is thicker.

## References

- 1.
Hasegawa A, Mima K. Pseudo‐three‐dimensional turbulence in magnetized non-uniform plasma. Physics of Fluids. 1978; 21 :87 - 2.
Hasegawa A, Maclennan CG, Kodama Y. Nonlinear behavior and turbulence spectra of drift waves and Rossby waves. Physics of Fluids. 1979; 22 :212 - 3.
Meiss JD, Horton W. Solitary drift waves in the presence of magnetic shear. Physics of Fluids. 1983; 26 :990 - 4.
Larichev E, Reznik GM. On the 2D solitary Rossby waves. USSR AS Reports. 1976; 231 :1077 - 5.
Pavlenko V, Petviashvili V. Solitary waves in a plasma and in atmosphere. Plasma Physics. 1983; 9 :603 - 6.
Mikhailovskii AB, Aburdzhaniya GD, Onishchenko OG, Churikov AP. Alfven vortex solution in homogeneous magnetized plasma. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 1984; 59 :1198 - 7.
Horton W, Liu J, Meiss JD, Sedlak JE. Physics of Fluids. 1986; 29 :1004 - 8.
Nycander J, Pavlenko VP, Stenflo I. Physics of Fluids. 1987; 30 :1367 - 9.
Dolotin V, Fridman AM. Generation of an observable turbulence spectrum and solitary dipole vortices in rotating gravitating systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 1991; 72 (1):1 - 10.
Adams FC, Watkins R. Vortices in circumstellar disks. The Astrophysical Journal. 1995; 451 :314 - 11.
Heng K, Kenyon SJ. arXiv:1005.1660v3 [astro-ph. EP]; 2010 - 12.
Youdin AN. From grains to planetesimals. European Astronomical Society (EAS) Publication Series. 2010; 41 :187 - 13.
Armitage PJ. Lecture notes on the formation and early evolution of planetary systems. arXiv: astro-ph/0701485v2; 2007 - 14.
Armitage PJ. Astrophysics of Planet Formation. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010 - 15.
Blum J, Wurm G. The growth mechanisms of macroscopic bodies in protoplanetary disks. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2008; 46 :21 - 16.
Zsom A, Ormel CW, Guttler C, Blum J, Dullemond CP. arXiv: 1001.0488v1; 2010 - 17.
Wilner DJ, D’Alessio P, Calvet N, Claussen MJ, Hartmann L. Toward planetesimals in the disk around TW Hydrae: 3.5 centimeter dust emission. The Astrophysical Journal. 2005; 626 :L109 - 18.
Adachi I, Hayashi C, Nakazawa K. The gas drag effect on the elliptical motion of a solid body in the primordial solar nebula. Progress in Theoretical Physics. 1976; 56 :1756 - 19.
Weidenschilling SJ. Formation and evolution of exoplanets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 1977; 180 :57 - 20.
Paterson HL, Feng M, Waite AM, Gomis D, Beckley LE, Holliday D, et al. Physical and chemical signatures of a developing anticyclonic vortexes. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2008; 113 (C7):C07049 - 21.
Carnevale GF, McWilliams JC, Pomeau Y, Weiss JB. Evolution of vortex statistics in two-dimensional turbulence. Physical Review Letters. 1991; 66 :2735 - 22.
Weiss JB, McWilliams JC. Temporal scaling behavior of decaying two-dimensional turbulence. Physics of Fluids A. 1993; 5 :3 - 23.
Tabeling P. Two-dimensional turbulence: A physicist approach. Physics Reports. 2002; 362 :1 - 24.
Inaba S, Barge P, Daniel E, Guillard H. A two-phase code for protoplanetary disks. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2005; 431 :365 - 25.
Inaba S, Barge P. Dusty vortices in protoplanetary disks. The Astrophysical Journal. 2006; 649 :415 - 26.
Abrahamyan MG. The vortex of Burgers in protoplanetary disk. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 2017; 511 :254-264 - 27.
Rankine WJM. On the thermal energy of molecular vortices. Philosophical Magazine. 1870; 39 :211 - 28.
Abrahamyan MG, Matveenko LI. Initial phase of protostar formation. Astrophysics. 2012; 55 :443 - 29.
Shakura NI, Sunyaev RA. Black holes in binary systems. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 1973; 24 :337 - 30.
Pringle JE. Astrophysics of planet formation. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1981; 19 :137 - 31.
Chiang EI, Goldreich P. Formation and evolution of exoplanets. The Astrophysical Journal. 1997; 490 :368 - 32.
Godon P, Livio M. The formation and role of vortices in protoplanetary disks. The Astrophysical Journal. 2000; 537 :396 - 33.
Abrahamyan MG. Anticyclonic vortex in a protoplanetary disk. Astrophysics. 2016; 59 :309 - 34.
Chandrasekhar S. Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibria. New Haven and London: Yale University Press; 1969 - 35.
Abrahamyan MG. Vortices in rotating gravitating gas disks. Astrophysics. 2015; 58 :105 - 36.
Petrosyan AP, Sahakyan KA, Khachikyan EY. Spectroscopic investigation of double nucleus galaxy Markarian 266. Astrophysics. 1980; 16 :621

## Notes

- Here and below the bar indicates the differentiation of equilibrium parameters of the disk on the radial coordinate r.