Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Physiological Limitations and Solutions to Various Applications of Microalgae

Written By

Manoj Kamalanathan and Antonietta Quigg

Submitted: 14 October 2019 Reviewed: 18 October 2019 Published: 25 November 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90206

From the Edited Volume

Microalgae - From Physiology to Application

Edited by Milada Vítová

Chapter metrics overview

880 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Despite over a century of research, the various applications of microalgae have only been realized only since the 1940s. With a repertoire of valuable products like biodiesel, astaxanthin, canthaxanthin, lutein, β-carotene, phycocyanin, chlorophyll a, polyunsaturated fatty acids, exopolymeric substance (EPS), and biohydrogen, the commercial importance of microalgae and demand for its product is gaining increasing attention. However, successful transition of the synthesis of microalgal products from laboratory to industries has yet to be realized, even after over 70 years of extensive research. This failure of commercial success of microalgal products can be attributed to the lack of understanding of the physiological role of the products and biological constraint placed by the bioenergetics and physiology, which has been largely ignored. This chapter focuses on the physiological limitations behind synthesis of microalgal products, highlights the crucial unknowns behind the role and synthesis of these products, and hints strategies to overcome the limitations to realize the commercial dream of microalgal products.


  • microalgae
  • biofuels
  • PUFA
  • EPS
  • hydrogen

1. Introduction

The biological reaction of photosynthesis has played a significant role in shaping the course of evolution through the great oxygenation event converting atmospheric CO2 into organic form that is being currently extracted as modern day fossil fuels and finally balancing the elemental cycles (C, N, P, and Si) on Earth. The magnitude of the impact photosynthesis reaction has on humans has encouraged scientists, engineers, and others to wonder about exploiting the potential of this reaction in different ways. Factors such as simplicity, metabolic elasticity, diversity, shorter life cycles, and the range of commercially important products synthesized make microalgae the most attractive and practical option of all the other photosynthesizing life forms. Some of the commercially important products produced by microalgae include biofuels (i.e., biodiesel, biohydrogen), high value products (i.e., astaxanthin, canthaxanthin, β-carotene), polyunsaturated fatty acids (i.e., omega-3-fatty acids), farming products (i.e., animal and fish feeds), fertilizer, single-cell proteins, and miscellaneous products such as exopolymeric substances (EPS) that have various applications. Despite the potential of microalgae in producing such a variety of commercially important products, the idea of microalgae mega factories has yet to become a reality. Several factors impede the commercial success of microalgal products. This includes existing sources (fossil fuels), technological development, and physiological limitation. In this chapter, we will describe the various known physiological limitations associated with productions of various microalgal products in a commercial scale and list possible solutions.


2. Biodiesel from microalgae

Spoehr and Milner in 1949 demonstrated that the lipid content increased in the green microalga Chlorella under nitrogen starvation [1]. However, it was not until the early 1970s, with the oil embargo and the increase in energy prices, that the concept of lipids from microalgae for biofuel production gained attention [2]. Despite decades of research, biodiesel from microalgae has yet to be introduced to the gas station near you. It has been reported that microalgae can produce around 20–50% of their dry weight as lipids [3, 4], with only one research article suggesting as high as 80% [5]. The amount of lipid produced by a variety of species under optimum growth conditions is summarized in Table 1. The ability to synthesize a higher percentage of their dry weight as lipids makes microalgae the highest producer of lipid per unit mass and arguably the most practical choice for the production of biodiesel. Theoretical estimates of maximum biomass production vary from 24 to 65 g m−2 ∙ day−1 [7]. Benedetti et al. have reported a theoretical maximum up to 280 tons ha−1 year−1 of biomass but also noted that the actual cultivation record never exceeded 100 tons ha−1 year−1 [11]. Even assuming the theoretical maximum estimates of biomass and 80% of the biomass composition as lipid, the maximum amount of 224 tons ha−1 year−1 of lipids is what can theoretically be produced. However, the lipid produced has to be transesterified to fatty acid methyl esters, which then can be used as biodiesel, which can result in some loss. However, earlier studies have reported up to 96% recovery of lipids through direct transesterification [12]. With 4% loss by transesterification, a maximum of 215 tons ha−1 year−1 of biodiesel can be produced. It is important to note that a recent study on Scenedesmus accuminatus using open and polyhouse raceway ponds estimated around 2.1 tons ha−1 year−1, which is 100 times lower than the theoretical maximum [13]. Another study with Chlorella sp. L1 and Monoraphidium dybowskii Y2 using batch and semicontinuous mode in a raceway pond resulted in lipid productivities of 13.91 and 14.45 ton ha−1 year−1 in semicontinuous mode [14], tenfold lower than the theoretical estimates. This discrepancy between theoretical estimates and laboratory and field tests are primarily due to physiological limitations, especially carbon fixation and light absorption [15, 16].

Microalga Taxa %Lipid %Protein %CHO Growth rate d−1 Source
Amphora sp. Bacillariophyceae 13.6 17.3 74.9 5.1 [6]
Amphiprora hyaline (ENTOM3) Bacillariophyceae 22–37 2.3 [6]
Anabaena cylindrical Cyanophyceae 4–7 43–56 25–30 [7]
Ankistrodesmus falcatus Chlorophyceae 40.3 14.3 18.3 2.89 [6]
Boekelovia sp. Chrysophyceae 20.7 3.43 [6]
Botryococcus braunii Chlorophyceae 54.2 20.6 14.3 1.8 [6]
Chaetoceros sp. Bacillariophyceae 22.2 31.9 43 4.3 [6]
Chaetoceros calcitrans Bacillariophyceae 16 34 6 [8]
Chaetoceros gracilis Bacillariophyceae 7 12 5 [8]
Chaetoceros muelleri Bacillariophyceae 31 59 10 [9]
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Chlorophyceae 21 48 17 [7]
Chlorella sp. Chlorophyceae 34–48 19–31 1.33 [6]
Chlorella ellipsoidea Chlorophyceae 8.9 26.1 26.3 5.3 [6]
Chlorella protothecoides Chlorophyceae 15–56 [6]
Chlorella pyrenoidosa Chlorophyceae 2 57 26 [7]
Chlorella vulgaris Chlorophyceae 14–22 51–58 12–17 [7]
Cyclotella sp. Bacillariophyceae 42.1 16.4 10.2 5.1 [6]
Dunaliella bioculata Chlorophyceae 8 49 4 [7]
Dunaliella salina Chlorophyceae 6 57 32 [7]
Dunaliella tertiolecta Chlorophyceae 15–43 2.58 [6]
Euglena gracilis Chlorophyceae 14–20 39–61 14–18 [7]
Isochrysis aff. Galbana Prymnesiophyceae 26 23.3 20.5 2.83 [6]
Monoraphidium sp. Chlorophyceae 17.9–24.4 25.5 3.1 [6]
Nannochloris Chlorophyceae 31–63 3.19 [6]
Nannochloropsis Chlorophyceae 46–68 1.05 [6]
Nannochloropsis granulata Chlorophyceae 24–28 18–34 27–36 [10]
Nannochloropsis oculata Chlorophyceae 17.8–39.9 [6]
Nannochloropsis salina Chlorophyceae 59.8 24.3 15.9 1.05 [6]
Nannochloropsis sp. Chlorophyceae 64 1.04 [6]
Navicula acceptala Bacillariophyceae 32–48 3.8 [6]
Nitzschia sp. Bacillariophyceae 27 36 16 [6]
Nitzschia dissipata Bacillariophyceae 66 12.6 9.3 1.32 [6]
Nitzschia closterium Bacillariophyceae 13 26 10 [8]
Oocystis pusilla Chlorophyceae 10.5 39 37 [6]
Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bacillariophyceae 16–50 31–35 11–17 1.96 [6, 8, 10]
Porphyridium cruentum Rhodophyceae 9–14 28–39 40–57 [7]
Prymnesium parvum Prymnesiophyceae 22–38 28–45 25–33 [7]
Scenedesmus obliquus Chlorophyceae 12–14 50–56 10–17 [7]
Scenedesmus quadricauda Chlorophyceae 1.9 47 [7]
Scenedesmus dimorphus Chlorophyceae 16–40 8–18 21–52 [7]
Skeletonema costatum Bacillariophyceae 10 25 5 [8]
Spirogyra sp. Chlorophyceae 11–21 6–20 33–64 [7]
Spirulina maxima Cyanophyceae 6–7 60–71 13–16 [7]
Spirulina platensis Cyanophyceae 4–9 46–63 8–14 [7]
Synechococcus sp. Cyanophyceae 11 63 15 [7]
Tetraselmis sp. Chlorophyceae 18 46 36 2.1 [6]
Tetraselmis chuii Chlorophyceae 20 2.1 [6]
Tetraselmis maculate Chlorophyceae 3 52 15 [7]
Tetraselmis succia Chlorophyceae 15–33 2.1 [6]
Thalassiosira pseudonana Bacillariophyceae 19 34 9 [8]

Table 1.

Summary of macromolecular composition and growth rate of microalgae belonging to various taxa.

The current demand of fossil fuel is approximately 100 million barrels per day (~11,563 million liters per day), which is only expected to increase with time (105 million barrels per day by 2021) [17]. To meet this magnitude of global demand, assuming 15 ton ha−1 year−1 lipid productivity from microalgae, around 276 million hectares of land would be required for microalgal cultivation every day. This huge demand can be reduced by increasing the lipid productivity of microalgae by minimizing energy and carbon wasting physiological processes in the cell and redirecting it towards lipid synthesis. RUBISCO, the enzyme catalyzing the dark reaction of photosynthesis, wherein the atmospheric or dissolved CO2 is converted into organic triose phosphate, has a lower affinity to CO2. In addition, oxygen is a competitive substrate for RUBISCO, catalyzing the reaction of photorespiration wherein energy and NADPH are utilized and fixed CO2 is released. Therefore, during CO2 limitation, some species of microalgae utilize a carbon concentration mechanism (CCM) that increases the concentration of CO2 at the site of RUBISCO, leading to the catalysis of the dark reaction of photosynthesis. Although the CCM is an ingenious mechanism evolved to address the lower CO2 affinity of RUBISCO and the competition by oxygen, the process consumes one to two molecules of ATP [18]. This energy can instead be redirected towards lipid synthesis by simply bubbling CO2 into the cultures [19] or by selection CCM lacking microalgae species.

Finkel et al. found that the median macromolecular composition of nutrient-sufficient exponentially growing microalgae is 17.3% lipid, 32.2% protein, and 15% carbohydrates [20]. For biofuels, lipids are the most important cellular fraction. Botryococcus braunii has the highest lipid as percent dry weight, 43%, while Tetraselmis suecica and Dunaliella tertiolecta have the least (<10%). Also in species-specific differences (Table 1), Finkel et al. showed that there are some phylogenetic differences [20]. Cyanobacteria have the lowest lipid content (11.7%; dry wt), while the Bacillariophyta (diatoms) had the highest (18.6–21.3%; dry wt). In fact, in most cases, these median values are all significantly lower than those values reported in Table 1, which are up to 60% (w/w) for lipid, protein, and carbohydrate. The values at the higher end of the spectrum are typically induced after some kind of stress (e.g., light, nutrient) is placed on the microalgae. Nutrient stress is most often used to induce lipid production, particularly nitrogen [5, 21, 22]. These large lipid stores are thought to provide a growth advantage under variable resource supplies [23].

Light harvesting systems of microalgae are usually capable of absorbing between 350 and 700 nm; however much of the radiation extending out to 1100 nm remains unused. In addition, Raven et al. calculated a 22% loss of energy even within the spectrum of 350–700 nm [24]. However, anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria possess bacteriochlorophylls capable of absorbing light up to 1050 nm and perform photochemistry [19]. These bacteriochlorophyll-based photosystem can be engineered into microalgae. By replacing photosystem I, it would extend the range of absorbed photons that can be used for photochemistry [25], therefore the energy available for lipid synthesis. It has been proposed that smaller cells can photosynthetically perform better larger cells [26, 27], primarily attributing to the “package effect.” Package effect refers to the inverse relationship between light harvesting ability of the cells and the cell volume. However, studies have shown that larger cells tend to decrease the antennae size, thereby counteracting the negative impacts of package effect [28, 29]. Moreover, several studies have shown that decreasing the antennae size significantly increased the photosynthetic efficiencies [30, 31]. This could be due to decreased photoinhibition and decreased allocation of resources towards light harvesting systems [19]. However, the hypothesis that larger cells would be less photosynthetically efficient than smaller cells due to package effect was recently disproved by a recent study by Malerba et al. [32], which showed that larger cells developed compensatory mechanisms by reducing the antenna size, increasing the connectivity between the photosynthetic units, and decreasing the levels of photo-protective pigment β-carotene. This in turn minimized the negative significances of larger cell volume-induced package effects. Exposure to extreme conditions such as photoinhibitory light levels, UVA and UVB radiation, and nutrient and temperature stress could result in oxidative damage to cellular components especially proteins. These kinds of damage result in breakdown of the damage component and re-synthesis of these components or adaptive changes to the cellular components. These changes however have a cost in terms of energy (i.e., ATP, NADPH) and resources which could have been directed towards biomass and lipid synthesis. Protein turnover during scotophase has been shown to consume about one-third of the total respiratory ATP production [33]. Exposure to nitrogen-limiting conditions could result in upregulation of nitrogenase in diazotrophic cyanobacteria, which in turn could result in 10% decrease in growth rates [34, 35]. These are avoidable energy and resource expenditure, which can be easily prevented by providing optimal light, nutrient, and temperature during mass cultivation.

Lipids are not secreted/excreted actively by all microalgae, with exception of Botryococcus sp. [36]. This constrains the maximum amount of lipid that is synthesized and stored in a microalgal cells, as the largest reported cell volume for a microalgae is for species Noctiluca scintillans belonging to the class Dinophyceae (83,700,000 μm3) [37]. The most commonly used microalgal species in biotechnology belong to the class Chlorophyceae such as Chlorella sp., Haematococcus sp., and Scenedesmus sp., which have cell volumes of 34.5, 48, and 26,200 μm3, respectively [38], and the species belonging to class Bacillariophyceae such as Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana which have cell volumes of ~60–100 μm3 and 28–200 μm3 [37, 39]. On the other hand, the maximum cellular density has an inverse relationship with the volume of a cell, by a factor of 3/4 [38]. This further constrains the maximum amount of lipids that can be synthesized in a microalgal mass culture. However, if the lipids were secreted in a manner similar to EPS, physiological limitations such as cell volume or maximum density would not play a constraining role on the maximum amount of lipid that can be synthesized in an algal mass culture. Microalgal species like Botryococcus sp. has already been shown to actively secrete lipids that can be converted into fuel-grade biodiesel. However, their slower growth rates limit the maximum lipids that can be synthesized. Microalgal species like Scenedesmus has been shown to grow as fast as 1.53 per day [40]. Therefore, genetic engineering techniques to integrate the lipid-secreting trait into the fast-growing Scenedesmus sp. could be a possible solution.

Phototrophic modes of cultivation depend on two critical factors, namely, light and carbon dioxide [16]. Therefore, microalgae grown phototrophically can either be limited in light or carbon dioxide or both, limiting the maximum cellular density one can achieve using this mode of cultivation. In addition, various inefficiencies described above with light-harvesting abilities of microalgae, lower affinity for CO2 of RUBISCO, cost associated with protein turnover, and photoinhibition can be simply avoided by growing microalgae heterotrophically and mixotrophically. Extensive amount of research suggests enhanced biomass production under heterotrophic and mixotrophic modes of cultivation, increasing the cellular density to as much as 4 to 5 times [41, 42]. Further modification in these modes of cultivation such as using fed-batch mode has resulted in further increase in biomass as much as two- to fivefold [43, 44]. Therefore, by growing a hybrid strain of lipid-secreting Botryococcus sp. and fast-growing Scenedesmus sp., in a fed-batch heterotrophic or mixotrophic cultivation system, one can possibly overcome the physiological limitations of the maximum amount of lipids that can be synthesized in a microalgal system.


3. High valued products

Apart from lipids for biodiesel, microalgae synthesize other products of value such as astaxanthin, canthaxanthin, lutein, β-carotene, phycocyanin, chlorophyll a, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) such as γ-linolenic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, and eicosapentaenoic acid. A subset of these, astaxanthin, canthaxanthin, lutein, and β-carotene, have antioxidant properties and are commercially high valuable pharmaceutical products. Phycocyanin is a high value natural food dye, and products such as γ-linolenic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid are considered animal-free based sources of essential fatty acids. Some of these products are also considered to boost the immune system. Table 2 summarizes the common high value products, their use, the species of microalgae most commonly grown to harvest the products, and the global market values.

Product Use Species (dominant) Global market value*
Carotenoids Total US$1.2 billion in 2010
β-carotene Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory Dunaliella salina,
Dunaliella bardawil
US$ 300–1500 kg−1
Astaxanthin Feed additive for farmed fish; pigmenter of the fish flesh Haematococcus pluvialis US$ 2500–7000 kg−1
Phycobilins Food coloring,
cosmetics coloring
US$ 60 million
C-Phycocyanin Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory Spirulina, Porphyridium,
US$ 500 to 100,000 kg−1
Fatty acids
Health food supplements Nannochloropsis, Tetraselmis, Isochrysis, Thalassiosira, and Chaetoceros
Docosahexaenoic acid Crypthecodinium cohnii US$140 kg−1
Omega-3 oils US$1.5 billion
US$80–160 kg−1
Sterols Pharmaceutical applications or in functional foods US$ 300 million
Polyhydroxyalkanoates Production of biodegradable plastics Spirulina,

Table 2.

Summary of the main high value products derived from microalgae.

*(from Borowitzka - 2013, Chew et al. 2017) [45, 46].

The major fraction of studies on microalgal PUFA have primarily focused on screening for microalgal species and optimization of conditions that lead to enhanced PUFA products. However, we have no clear understanding on the physiological role of PUFAs in microalgae. It is hypothesized that PUFAs might play a role in homeoviscous adaptation [47], i.e., the enhanced fluidity provided by increased unsaturation membrane fatty acids. Additionally, the fatty acid composition and therefore the PUFA concentrations appear to have some level species specificity, suggesting varying roles [48]. However, the physiological roles of PUFAs are not yet confirmed in microalgae, and therefore strategic optimization of their synthesis in microalgae has not been realized. Nevertheless, PUFAs make a significant portion of the neutral lipid content synthesized in microalgae; therefore optimization strategies discussed above to enhance biomass and lipid synthesis should also increase the PUFA content in microalgae.

Astaxanthin is another promising product synthesized by microalgae that has already achieved a profit of $200 million per year [49]. Astaxanthin is a red keto-carotenoid pigment ubiquitous in nature and has antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic properties. It is also proposed as a potential therapeutic agent for cardiovascular and neurological diseases [50]. Apart from its pharmaceutical use, this product is also used as a pigment source in aquaculture of salmon and trout [51]. Despite the relatively vast amount of research into its properties and applications, the mass production of astaxanthin is still unable to meet its huge market demand [49]. This problem can be primarily attributed to the lack of knowledge on the underlying mechanisms of why these algae accumulate astaxanthin similar to PUFAs and hence the lack of better strategies to optimally produce the pigment. The most prominent hypothesis regarding its production includes a multifunctional photoprotective response to stress induced by exposure to unfavorable conditions (excess light, UV-B radiation, nutrient deprivation) leading to ROS formation [52, 53, 54]. However, this hypothesis does not explain the synthesis of astaxanthin under heterotrophic conditions [55, 56]. Therefore, more studies are needed to have a better understanding of the physiological roles of astaxanthin.

Nutrient limitation such as nitrogen, phosphorus or sulfur are widely used strategies for inducing astaxanthin accumulation in Haematococcus pluvialis [57, 58]. However, nutrient limitation reduces the maximum amount of biomass one can achieve, thereby reducing the total amount of astaxanthin that can be produced. Additional strategies for inducing astaxanthin production include high salt stress and high light exposure, but these external stressors also lower the biomass yield and therefore the associated pigment production. Using stress as a mechanism to induce astaxanthin synthesis has the fundamental problem of stopping cell cycle and therefore reducing biomass and astaxanthin production. Hence, new strategies to boost astaxanthin and biomass production with the use of stressors need to be discovered.

Phycocyanin is a phycobiliprotein exclusively produced by cyanobacteria and commercially important as a high value natural blue coloring agent for food. Being a part of light-harvesting pigment-protein complex in cyanobacteria, phycocyanin is very critical in light capture and therefore is an indispensable element in the growth and survival of cyanobacteria. Phycocyanin has been shown to constitute up to 60% of the total cellular protein content [59]. As it is involved in light capture, its synthesis is tightly regulated by the wavelength of light the cells are exposed to. Green light has been shown to stimulate the synthesis of phycocyanin, whereas red light has the opposite effect [60]. In addition, low light levels have been also shown to induce accumulation of phycocyanin [61, 62]. Other factors such as glucose and salt have also been shown to enhance the synthesis of phycocyanin [61]. Despite knowing their physiological roles, the commercial success of phycocyanin from microalgae is limited as their production is strictly dependent on the maximum amount of biomass that can be generated. A suggested final concentration of higher than 10% of cell dry weight of phycocyanin is required to make a profit over the cost of pigment downstream separation [63]. With factors such as blue light and low light levels required to induce maximum cellular synthesis of phycocyanin, the growth is significantly attenuated under these low energy light conditions, thereby limiting the maximum biomass and hence the maximum quantity of phycocyanin that can be synthesized. Therefore, a dual phase production approach to maximize the biomass production under mixotrophic conditions with cheaper organic carbon source such as molasses [41] followed by the second phase of low levels of blue light to stimulate the synthesis phycocyanin can significantly maximize the total amount of phycocyanin that be produced.


4. Exopolymeric substances from microalgae

Studies show that microalgae actively release from 3 to 40% of the fixed carbon into the surrounding environment as exopolymeric substances, mostly polysaccharides and proteins but also nucleic acids, DNA, RNA, and other macromolecules [64]. Although initially presumed as experimental artifact or a product of dead and decaying phytoplankton [65], EPS is now universally accepted as a product that is actively secreted by microalgae. The relatively higher percentage of fixed carbon released extracellularly has led the physiologist to question the reasons behind this phenomena. Several hypotheses have been put forward, including carbon overflow, photoprotection of the over-reduced photosystems, motility, self-defense mechanisms, active selection of phycosphere residents, and passive excretion due to osmosis and permeability. The hypothesis of carbon overflow and photoprotection has been discredited due to the presence of proteins, amino acids, and vitamins in the released substances and due to the secretion of EPS during the night [66]. The hypothesis of EPS secretion as a self-defense mechanism, motility, active selection of phycosphere residents, and passive excretion due to osmosis and permeability needs to be experimentally tested.

Experimental studies have shown contrasting results in the secretion of EPS in response to environmental factors such as temperature, nutrient (N, P, and S) limitation, salinity, and heterotrophy/mixotrophy [67]. The results vary depending on the species of microalgae being tested. In addition, EPS secretion during various phases of growth was species dependent, with some showing an increased secretion during stationary phase and others in exponential phase. Overall, with no universal explanation behind the mechanisms of EPS secretion by phytoplankton, and multiple hypotheses explaining the phenomena, strategic means to regulate the production and composition of EPS release by microalgae is clearly lacking. Although more research is needed, EPS are usually composed of carbohydrates, nitrogenous compounds, lipids, and organic acids [68]. Polysaccharides usually could account for 80–90% of the EPS composition even under healthy conditions [69]. Nitrogenous compounds, such as amino acids and proteins, on the other hand, only make up to 4–7% of the total EPS secreted [70, 71]. These protein fractions can include exoenzymes like phosphatase, β-glucosidase [72], and siderophores such as ISIP2a [73]. Characterization of EPS involves quantification of organic matter released as polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, neutral sugars, and/or uronic acids. EPS characterization of these macromolecules is often performed under the assumption these are the dominant molecules, however, possibilities of the same molecules possessing both sugar chain and a protein moiety are quite certain. Moreover, rarely are the monomers that make up these polymers investigated (e.g., sugars that make up these polysaccharides), and therefore the polymeric composition and the structure and physical properties remain unknown. Therefore, more in-depth characterization of EPS from microalgal species of potential and under different growth conditions and growth phase are needed to integrate EPS from microalgae into the algal biotechnology market. Needless to say, these characterization studies of EPS have to be performed with appropriate controls within the context of its application, whether as a surfactant, lubricant, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antivirus, antibacterial, antifungal, or anticoagulant.

Xiao et al. [74] in their review compared the emulsifying activity of EPS from Dunaliella salina (88% retention) reported by Mishra et al. [75] to commercially available surfactants Tween 20 (65% retention), Tween 80 (60% retention), and Triton X-100 (65% retention). Furthermore, being extracellularly secreted, EPS is not constrained by physiological feedback inhibition mechanisms, or retention capacity dictated by the maximum cell volume, or the need of expensive procedures to lyse the cell to release the products from the cell, unlike other microalgal products (such as lipid for biodiesel, PUFAs, and high valued pigments). Therefore, with better-focused research, EPS has a relatively greater potential of becoming a commercial reality as a microalgal product.


5. Hydrogen from microalgae

With the raising awareness of cleaner and sustainable fuel, development of hydrogen fuel cell-powered cars, and the high cost and greenhouse gas emission associated with thermochemical hydrogen production, microalgae is increasingly becoming an attractive source for the fuel. First observed by Hans Gaffron in 1939 [76], this phenomenon of hydrogen production has been extensively studied since then. The production of hydrogen by microalgae only occurs during anaerobic conditions, due to the sensitivity of hydrogenase (the enzyme catalyzing the reversible reaction of hydrogen production) to oxygen. Three major enzymes that lead to the production of hydrogen in microalgae include (1) reversible/classical hydrogenases, (2) membrane-bound uptake hydrogenases, and (3) nitrogenase enzyme [77, 78]. Of all three, the reversible/classical hydrogenase is the most studied enzyme. Located in the chloroplast, the primary electron donor for this enzyme is photosystem I (PS I). However, the generation of molecular oxygen through photolysis by photosystem II (PS II) inhibits the activity of hydrogenase. Therefore, this enzyme only functions when the rate of photosynthesis is below the compensation point (rate of photosynthesis = rate of respiration). Past studies have achieved this condition by either flushing the system with argon or nitrogen [79] or using PS II lacking mutants [80], or selective excitation of PS I through far red light (>710 nm) [81], or more commonly through sulfur deprivation [82]. During a combination of anaerobiosis and below compensation point conditions, supply of electron from PSI to hydrogenase has been shown to either come from the excitation of PS I, and/or through the photolysis of water, and/or through non-photochemical reduction of the plastoquinone pool through type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenase that mediates the transfer of electron derived from anaerobic catabolism of cellular carbon reserve, primarily thought to be proteins at this point [83, 84].

It is proposed that under ideal conditions, one should expect a generation of 2:1 H2/O2 per 8 photons [85]. However, only around 20% of this efficiency is practically achieved [86]. The discrepancy between theory and practical estimations could be due to several physiological reasons unaccounted for in the theoretical estimation. (1) The physiological role of hydrogenase was although a mystery for the most part [86], discuss it’s to act as an electron sink and hence oxidation of reducing equivalents derived through anaerobic catabolism of cellular carbon reserve. Therefore, all the physiological and thermodynamic limitations that apply to anaerobic catabolism of cellular would in turn limit the supply of electrons and protons to hydrogenase. (2) Hydrogenase catalyzes a reversible reaction, and Kessler [84] has shown a “photoreduction” process of uptake of hydrogen gas to reduce molecular oxygen or CO2 similar to the photosynthate derived under aerobic conditions. Whether the reduction of CO2 through uptake of hydrogen gas by hydrogenase under anaerobic conditions involves the Calvin cycle remains to be demonstrated. Regardless, the uptake of hydrogen by hydrogenase should contribute to the reduced efficiency of the hydrogenase. (3) Direct oxidation of photosysnthetically derived reducing equivalents would mean a net production of 3.1:0 ATP/NADPH per 8 photons (4 molecules of H2O) and generation of 2 H2. This would provide no anabolic advantage to the cells producing hydrogen, as this would lead to a big imbalance in the ATP/NADPH levels in the cells. (4) Often the yields of hydrogen derived under sulfur deprivation are compared to the theoretical yield of 2:1 H2/O2 per 8 photons; however, during sulfur deprivation, the anaerobiosis is created by the failure to regenerate the high sulfur photo-damaged D1 protein; therefore the hydrogen gas derived is not directly through photolysis of water but instead through catabolism of carbon reserves [84, 87]. These carbon reserve can be starch or proteins [82], and every molecule of glucose derived from the breakdown of starch, is then catabolized to pyruvate through glycolysis yielding 2 NADH and ATP, based on the observation by Melis et al. [82] of increase in acetate levels beyond 120 hour incubation in sulfur deprived anaerobic condition in the presence of light and no ethanol of formate secretion, hints towards catabolism of pyruvate to acetate possibly via phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase, which would generate an additional molecule of NADH and ATP. Atteia et al. [88] have detected phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase in the species Chlamydomonas reinhardtii that was used in Melis et al. (2000) study [82]. Overall, this process of sulfur deprivation-induced anaerobiosis leads to a total of 3 NADH and 3 ATP, and 2 molecules of acetate from 1 molecule of glucose; therefore a net loss of 8 protons and hence 4H2 in the form of 2 acetate molecules and formation of 6H2 occurs in this biochemical pathway. This, when expressed per photon cost, would result in 6H2 per 32 photons (the ideal required amount to make a molecule of glucose), which would result in 75% efficiency compared to the ideal generation of 2H2 per 8 photons directly through photolysis of water via photosynthesis. The discrepancy of the observed 20% efficiency vs. calculated 75% via fermentation can be due to the existence of other pathways competing for the same NADH. Oxidative pentose phosphate pathway has been shown to be upregulated under sulfur deprivation-induced anaerobiosis [89, 90]; however, whether reductive pentose phosphate pathway is upregulated remains unknown. This is probably due to the cellular demand for ribulose 5-phosphate to synthesize nucleic acids and NADP and NAD to maintain the integrity/protect the DNA and cellular metabolism. Nevertheless, if the glucose was catabolized only via oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, only 2 NADPH would be synthesized, which would yield just two molecules of H2, which would match the observed 20% efficiency of H2 generation. However, despite nucleic acid synthesis, further catabolism of ribulose 5-phosphate is inevitable and should lead to generation of more NADH. Furthermore, catabolism via oxidative pentose phosphate pathway solely would not explain the increase in acetate levels observed by Melis et al. [82]. On the other hand, if proteins served as carbon source during sulfur-deprived anaerobiosis, we hypothesize only amino acid with three or more carbon chains would be utilized, based on the absence of acetate consumption during sulfur-deprived anaerobiosis observed by Melis et al. [82] and the absence of H2 production and methyl viologen reduction when supplied with α-ketoglutarate during anaerobiosis as observed by Noth et al. [91]. Both these studies indicate that TCA cycle was not active during anaerobiosis, which explains the absence of acetate and α-ketoglutarate uptake under such conditions, therefore making catabolism of amino acid smaller than the three-carbon chain (glycine) and serving as a source for reducing equivalents for impractical H2 production. However, Noth et al. [91] did observe H2 production and methyl viologen reduction when Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was grown on oxaloacetate, which suggest glyoxylate pathway might be still active under anaerobiosis. It is important to note the absence of acetate uptake in sulfur deprivation-induced anaerobiosis as seen in Melis et al. [82] study and the opposite phenomena observed by Gibbs et al. [87] where acetate was readily uptaken when anaerobiosis was established via flushing with N2. This suggests that glyoxylate pathway is inhibited under sulfur deprivation-induced anaerobiosis, probably due to the iron–sulfur (Fe▬S) cluster of aconitase [92], thereby limiting the ability of cells to use external acetate as a carbon source. Therefore, sulfur deprivation-induced anaerobiosis would lead to relatively lower H2 production than N2 flushing-induced anaerobiosis, which is due to the extra one NADH and FADH produced via glyoxylate pathway that could potentially yield an additional two molecules of H2 per molecule of glucose and the two molecules of H2 per molecule of external acetate metabolized. Nevertheless, calculation of H2 per photon derived through protein catabolism is complicated by the presence of three to five carbon substrates and the various pathways through which they can be broken down to acetate. Isotope labelling studies will definitely help shed light into which amino acids are preferentially degraded during anaerobiosis and allow for a more accurate determination of H2 per photon. Studies have suggested that using genetic engineering to develop mutants lacking the ability to carry out state transitioning, cyclic electron transport, and mutants that have a smaller antennae size produced more hydrogen [93, 94].

Hydrogen is also produced in the dark and therefore in the absence of excitation and transfer of electrons by PS I. Noth et al. [91] under anaerobic conditions generated by N2 flushing observed around 0.422 H2 μg Chl−1 in the dark compared to 3.128 H2 μg Chl−1 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Along with the H2, fermentative metabolism in the dark also leads to the production of formate, acetate, and ethanol [87]. Atteia et al. [88] revealed the presence of pyruvate-formate lyase in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, suggesting mixed fermentative metabolism via pyruvate-formate lyase, aldehyde-alcohol dehydrogenase, phosphotransacetylase, and acetate kinase, leading to the formation of formate, ethanol, and acetate [91]. Furthermore, Noth et al. [91] suggested pyruvate ferrodoxin oxidoreductase and not hydrogenase being responsible for H2 production in the dark. The combination of mixed acid fermentation and pyruvate ferrodoxin oxidoreductase suggests the operation of a different set of pathways in dark anaerobic conditions compared to light. More studies are needed to study to confirm this hypothesis and also to test whether these pathways are mutually exclusive. Even though the hydrogen produced were around 87% lower than that observed in the light, the absence of photosystem involvement eliminates the complication of oxygen-induced inhibition of hydrogenases and competition for NADPH by photorespiration. In addition, the complete heterotrophic nature of this production and the valuable co-products such as ethanol and acetate allows for further optimization and scaling up the fermentative reactions, leading up to hydrogen production. Overall, the process of hydrogen production from microalgae via anaerobiosis whether in the light and/or dark clearly has a strong potential, especially with the development of hydrogen fuel cell-powered cars. Given the advantage of being a cleaner source of hydrogen than thermochemical production, hydrogen production from microalgae can definitely benefit more from more research.


6. Conclusions

Overall, the successful transition of microalgal products from laboratory to industry largely depends on addressing various physiological limitations of microalgae. Biodiesel production from microalgae, although requires further research, can achieve commercial success by simple modifications such as heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultivation of microalgae in combination with genetic engineering to gain properties such as fast-growing and high lipid-secreting ability in microalgae. High valued products from microalgae can also benefit from similar modification such as heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultivation; however, the lack of knowledge on the physiological role and the biochemical pathway regulating the synthesis of these products demands further research to strategically optimize the production to its maximal potential. EPS production by microalgae, on the other hand, has a benefit of the product being naturally secreted by microalgae; however, its commercial success is hindered by the lack of knowledge of its physiological role and the nebulous nature of its applications. Hydrogen production from microalgae is a promising candidate for being a cleaner source of energy over other alternatives; however, its failure to gain commercial attention is primarily due to the limited research invested.



The Open Access publishing fees for this article have been covered by the Texas A&M University Open Access to Knowledge Fund (OAKFund), supported by the University Libraries and the Office of the Vice President for Research.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


Acronyms and abbreviations


Carbon dioxide






















exopolymeric substances


ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oxidase


nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide


(reduced) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide


nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate


(reduced) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate


flavin adenine dinucleotide


(reduced) flavin adenine dinucleotide


carbon concentration mechanism


adenosine triphosphate


adenosine diphosphate


ultraviolet rays A


ultraviolet rays B


polyunsaturated fatty acids


deoxyribonucleic acid


ribonucleic acid


photosystem I


photosystem II


  1. 1. Spoehr HA, Milner HW. The chemical composition of chlorella; effect of environmental conditions. Plant Physiology. 1949;24(1):120
  2. 2. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap. 2010. Available from:
  3. 3. Araujo GS, Matos LJ, Gonçalves LR, Fernandes FA, Farias WR. Bioprospecting for oil producing microalgal strains: Evaluation of oil and biomass production for ten microalgal strains. Bioresource Technology. 2011;102(8):5248-5250
  4. 4. Sun XM, Ren LJ, Zhao QY, Ji XJ, Huang H. Microalgae for the production of lipid and carotenoids: A review with focus on stress regulation and adaptation. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2018;11(1):272
  5. 5. Chisti Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnology Advances. 2007;25(3):294-306
  6. 6. Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P. A look back at the US Department of Energy’s aquatic species program: Biodiesel from algae. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 1998;328:1-294
  7. 7. Becker EW. Microalgae: Biotechnology and Microbiology. Vol. 10. Cambridge University Press; 1994
  8. 8. Brown MR. The amino-acid and sugar composition of 16 species of microalgae used in mariculture. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1991;145(1):79-99
  9. 9. Velasco LA, Carrera S, Barros J. Isolation, culture and evaluation of Chaetoceros muelleri from the Caribbean as food for the native scallops, Argopecten nucleus and Nodipecten nodosus. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research. 2016;44(3):557-568
  10. 10. Tibbetts SM, Milley JE, Lall SP. Chemical composition and nutritional properties of freshwater and marine microalgal biomass cultured in photobioreactors. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2015;27(3):1109-1119
  11. 11. Benedetti M, Vecchi V, Barera S, Dall’Osto L. Biomass from microalgae: The potential of domestication towards sustainable biofactories. Microbial Cell Factories. 2018;17(1):173
  12. 12. Lepage G, Roy CC. Improved recovery of fatty acid through direct transesterification without prior extraction or purification. Journal of Lipid Research. 1984;25(12):1391-1396
  13. 13. Koley S, Mathimani T, Bagchi SK, Sonkar S, Mallick N. Microalgal biodiesel production at outdoor open and polyhouse raceway pond cultivations: A case study with Scenedesmus accuminatus using low-cost farm fertilizer medium. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2019;120:156-165
  14. 14. He Q , Yang H, Hu C. Culture modes and financial evaluation of two oleaginous microalgae for biodiesel production in desert area with open raceway pond. Bioresource Technology. 2016;218:571-579
  15. 15. Kenny P, Flynn KJ. Physiology limits commercially viable photoautotrophic production of microalgal biofuels. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2017;29(6):2713-2727
  16. 16. Beardall J, Raven JA. Limits to phototrophic growth in dense culture: CO2 supply and light. In: Algae for Biofuels and Energy. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. pp. 91-97
  17. 17. Available from:
  18. 18. Raven JA, Beardall J, Giordano M. Energy costs of carbon dioxide concentrating mechanisms in aquatic organisms. Photosynthesis Research. 2014;121(2-3):111-124
  19. 19. Raven JA, Ralph PJ. Enhanced biofuel production using optimality, pathway modification and waste minimization. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2015;27(1):1-31
  20. 20. Finkel ZV, Follows MJ, Liefer JD, Brown CM, Benner I, Irwin AJ. Phylogenetic diversity in the macromolecular composition of microalgae. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155977. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0155977
  21. 21. Myklestad S. Production of carbohydrates by marine planktonic diatoms. 1. Comparison of nine different species in culture. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1974;15:261-274
  22. 22. Hu Q , Sommerfeld M, Jarvis E, Ghirardi M, Posewitz M, Seibert M, et al. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. The Plant Journal. 2008;54:621-639. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03492.x
  23. 23. Talmy D, Blackford J, Hardman-Mountford N, Polimene L, Follows M, Geider RJ, et al. N ratio enhances metabolism of large phytoplankton when resource supply is intermittent. Biogeosciences. 2014;11:4881-4895
  24. 24. Raven JA, Donnelly S. Brown dwarfs and black smokers: The potential for photosynthesis using radiation from low-temperature black bodies. In: Habitability of Other Planets and Satellites. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. pp. 267-284
  25. 25. Blankenship RE, Tiede DM, Barber J, Brudvig GW, Fleming G, Ghirardi M, et al. Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement. Science. 2011;332(6031):805-809
  26. 26. Morel A, Bricaud A. Theoretical results concerning light absorption in a discrete medium, and application to specific absorption of phytoplankton. Deep Sea research part a. Oceanographic Research Papers. 1981;28(11):1375-1393
  27. 27. Geider RJ, Osborne BA. Light absorption by a marine diatom: Experimental observations and theoretical calculations of the package effect in a small Thalassiosira species. Marine Biology. 1987;96(2):299-308
  28. 28. Agusti S. Allometric scaling of light absorption and scattering by phytoplankton cells. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 1991;48(5):763-767
  29. 29. Berner T, Dubinsky Z, Wyman K, Falkowski PG. Photoadaptation and the “package” effect in Dunaliella tertiolecta (Chlorophyceae) 1. Journal of Phycology. 1989;25(1):70-78
  30. 30. Melis A, Neidhardt J, Benemann JR. Dunaliella salina (Chlorophyta) with small chlorophyll antenna sizes exhibit higher photosynthetic productivities and photon use efficiencies than normally pigmented cells. Journal of Applied Phycology. 1998;10(6):515-525
  31. 31. Neidhardt J, Benemann JR, Zhang L, Melis A. Photosystem-II repair and chloroplast recovery from irradiance stress: Relationship between chronic photoinhibition, light-harvesting chlorophyll antenna size and photosynthetic productivity in Dunaliella salina (green algae). Photosynthesis Research. 1998;56(2):175-184
  32. 32. Malerba ME, Palacios MM, Palacios Delgado YM, Beardall J, Marshall DJ. Cell size, photosynthesis and the package effect: An artificial selection approach. New Phytologist. 2018;219(1):449-461
  33. 33. Quigg A, Beardall J. Protein turnover in relation to maintenance metabolism at low photon flux in two marine microalgae. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2003;26(5):693-703
  34. 34. Raven JA. Protein turnover and plant RNA and phosphorus requirements in relation to nitrogen fixation. Plant Science. 2012;188:25-35
  35. 35. Raven JA. The cost of photoinhibition. Physiologia Plantarum. 2011;142(1):87-104
  36. 36. Jin J, Dupré C, Yoneda K, Watanabe MM, Legrand J, Grizeau D. Characteristics of extracellular hydrocarbon-rich microalga Botryococcus braunii for biofuels production: Recent advances and opportunities. Process Biochemistry. 2016;51(11):1866-1875
  37. 37. Harrison PJ, Zingone A, Mickelson MJ, Lehtinen S, Ramaiah N, Kraberg AC, et al. Cell volumes of marine phytoplankton from globally distributed coastal data sets. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2015;162:130-142
  38. 38. Agusti S, Kalff J. The influence of growth conditions on the size dependence of maximal algal density and biomass. Limnology and Oceanography. 1989;34(6):1104-1108
  39. 39. Allen AE, LaRoche J, Maheswari U, Lommer M, Schauer N, Lopez PJ, et al. Whole-cell response of the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum to iron starvation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(30):10438-10443
  40. 40. Gardner RD, Cooksey KE, Mus F, Macur R, Moll K, Eustance E, et al. Use of sodium bicarbonate to stimulate triacylglycerol accumulation in the chlorophyte Scenedesmus sp. and the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2012;24(5):1311-1320
  41. 41. Kamalanathan M, Chaisutyakorn P, Gleadow R, Beardall J. A comparison of photoautotrophic, heterotrophic, and mixotrophic growth for biomass production by the green alga Scenedesmus sp.(Chlorophyceae). Phycologia. 2018;57(3):309-317
  42. 42. Heredia-Arroyo T, Wei W, Hu B. Oil accumulation via heterotrophic/mixotrophic Chlorella protothecoides. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2010;162(7):1978-1995
  43. 43. Shi XM, Chen F. High-yield production of lutein by the green microalga chlorella protothecoidesin heterotrophic fed-batch culture. Biotechnology Progress. 2002;18(4):723-727
  44. 44. Chen F, Zhang Y. High cell density mixotrophic culture of Spirulina platensis on glucose for phycocyanin production using a fed-batch system. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 1997;20(3):221-224
  45. 45. Borowitzka MA. High-value products from microalgae—Their development and commercialisation. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2013;25(3):743-756
  46. 46. Chew KW, Yap JY, Show PL, Suan NH, Juan JC, Ling TC, et al. Microalgae biorefinery: High value products perspectives. Bioresource Technology. 2017;229:53-62
  47. 47. Sinensky M. Homeoviscous adaptation—A homeostatic process that regulates the viscosity of membrane lipids in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1974;71(2):522-525
  48. 48. Jónasdóttir SH. Fatty acid profiles and production in marine phytoplankton. Marine Drugs. 2019;17(3):151
  49. 49. Zhang C, Zhang L, Liu J. The role of photorespiration during astaxanthin accumulation in Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2016;107:75-81
  50. 50. Chen YT, Kao CJ, Huang HY, Huang SY, Chen CY, Lin YS, et al. Astaxanthin reduces MMP expressions, suppresses cancer cell migrations, and triggers apoptotic caspases of in vitro and in vivo models in melanoma. Journal of Functional Foods. 2017;31:20-31
  51. 51. Lorenz RT, Cysewski GR. Commercial potential for Haematococcus microalgae as a natural source of astaxanthin. Trends in Biotechnology. 2000;18(4):160-167
  52. 52. Lemoine Y, Schoefs B. Secondary ketocarotenoid astaxanthin biosynthesis in algae: A multifunctional response to stress. Photosynthesis Research. 2010;106(1-2):155-177
  53. 53. Fan L, Vonshak A, Zarka A, Boussiba S. Does astaxanthin protect Haematococcus against light damage? Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. Section C. 1998;53(1-2):93-100
  54. 54. Li Y, Sommerfeld M, Chen F, Hu Q. Consumption of oxygen by astaxanthin biosynthesis: A protective mechanism against oxidative stress in Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae). Journal of Plant Physiology. 2008;165(17):1783-1797
  55. 55. Kobayashi M, Kakizono T, Yamaguchi K, Nishio N, Nagai S. Growth and astaxanthin formation of Haematococcus pluvialis in heterotrophic and mixotrophic conditions. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering. 1992;74(1):17-20
  56. 56. Sun N, Wang Y, Li YT, Huang JC, Chen F. Sugar-based growth, astaxanthin accumulation and carotenogenic transcription of heterotrophic chlorella zofingiensis (Chlorophyta). Process Biochemistry. 2008;43(11):1288-1292
  57. 57. Grewe C, Griehl C. Time-and media-dependent secondary carotenoid accumulation in Haematococcus pluvialis. Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare Nutrition Technology. 2008;9-10:1232-1244
  58. 58. García-Malea MD, Brindley C, Del Río E, Acién FG, Fernández JM, Molina E. Modelling of growth and accumulation of carotenoids in Haematococcus pluvialis as a function of irradiance and nutrients supply. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2005:26(2-3):107-114
  59. 59. Bogorad L. Phycobiliproteins and complementary chromatic adaptation. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 1975;26(1):369-401
  60. 60. Luzardo AD, Niell FX, López-Figueroa F. Photocontrol of the synthesis of chlorophyll a and phycocyanin in the cyanobacterium Calothrix crustacea Schousboe. Revista Española de Fisiología. 1991;47(3):109-114
  61. 61. Hsieh-Lo M, Castillo G, Ochoa-Becerra MA, Mojica L. Phycocyanin and phycoerythrin: Strategies to improve production yield and chemical stability. Algal Research. 2019;42:101600
  62. 62. Kuddus M, Singh P, Thomas G, Al-Hazimi A. Recent developments in production and biotechnological applications of C-phycocyanin. BioMed Research International. 2013:1-9
  63. 63. del Rio-Chanona EA, Zhang D. A Bilevel programming approach to optimize C-phycocyanin bio-production under uncertainty. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2018;51(18):209-214
  64. 64. Quigg A, Passow U, Chin WC, Xu C, Doyle S, Bretherton L, et al. The role of microbial exopolymers in determining the fate of oil and chemical dispersants in the ocean. Limnology and Oceanography Letters. 2016;1(1):3-26
  65. 65. Sharp JH. Excretion of organic matter by marine phytoplankton: Do healthy cells do it? 1. Limnology and Oceanography. 1977;22(3):381-399
  66. 66. Bjørrisen PK. Phytoplankton exudation of organic matter: Why do healthy cells do it? 1. Limnology and Oceanography. 1988;33(1):151-154
  67. 67. Delattre C, Pierre G, Laroche C, Michaud P. Production, extraction and characterization of microalgal and cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides. Biotechnology Advances. 2016;34(7):1159-1179
  68. 68. Biddanda B, Benner R. Carbon, nitrogen, and carbohydrate fluxes during the production of particulate and dissolved organic matter by marine phytoplankton. Limnology and Oceanography. 1997;42(3):506-518
  69. 69. Myklestad SM. Release of extracellular products by phytoplankton with special emphasis on polysaccharides. Science of the Total Environment. 1995;165(1-3):155-164
  70. 70. Mague TH, Friberg E, Hughes DJ, Morris I. Extracellular release of carbon by marine phytoplankton; a physiological approach 1. Limnology and Oceanography. 1980;25(2):262-279
  71. 71. Myklestad S, Holm-Hansen O, Vårum KM, Volcani BE. Rate of release of extracellular amino acids and carbohydrates from the marine diatom Chaetoceros affinis. Journal of Plankton Research. 1989;11(4):763-773
  72. 72. Aaronson S. Excretion of organic matter by phytoplankton in vitro. Limnology and Oceanography. 1978;23(4):838
  73. 73. Morrissey J, Sutak R, Paz-Yepes J, Tanaka A, Moustafa A, Veluchamy A, et al. A novel protein, ubiquitous in marine phytoplankton, concentrates iron at the cell surface and facilitates uptake. Current Biology. 2015;25(3):364-371
  74. 74. Xiao R, Zheng Y. Overview of microalgal extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and their applications. Biotechnology Advances. 2016;34(7):1225-1244
  75. 75. Mishra A, Jha B. Isolation and characterization of extracellular polymeric substances from micro-algae Dunaliella salina under salt stress. Bioresource Technology. 2009;100(13):3382-3386
  76. 76. Gaffron H. Reduction of carbon dioxide with molecular hydrogen in green algae. Nature. 1939;143(3614):204
  77. 77. Tamagnini P, Axelsson R, Lindberg P, Oxelfelt F, Wünschiers R, Lindblad P. Hydrogenases and hydrogen metabolism of cyanobacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2002;66(1):1-20
  78. 78. Benemann JR. Feasibility analysis of photobiological hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 1997;22(10-11):979-987
  79. 79. Gaffron H, Rubin J. Fermentative and photochemical production of hydrogen in algae. The Journal of General Physiology. 1942;26(2):219-240
  80. 80. Makarova VV, Kosourov S, Krendeleva TE, Semin BK, Kukarskikh GP, Rubin AB, et al. Photoproduction of hydrogen by sulfur-deprived C. reinhardtii mutants with impaired photosystem II photochemical activity. Photosynthesis Research. 2007;94(1):79-89
  81. 81. Stuart TS, Kaltwasser H. Photoproduction of hydrogen by photosystem I of Scenedesmus. Planta. 1970;91(4):302-313
  82. 82. Melis A, Zhang L, Forestier M, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M. Sustained photobiological hydrogen gas production upon reversible inactivation of oxygen evolution in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiology. 2000;122(1):127-136
  83. 83. Kessler E. Hydrogenase, photoreduction and anaerobic growth. Algal Physiology and Biochemistry. 1974;10:456-473
  84. 84. Kessler E. Effect of anaerobiosis on photosynthetic reactions and nitrogen metabolism of algae with and without hydrogenase. Archiv für Mikrobiologie. 1973;93(2):91-100
  85. 85. Benemann JR, Berenson JA, Kaplan NO, Kamen MD. Hydrogen evolution by a chloroplast-ferredoxin-hydrogenase system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1973;70(8):2317-2320
  86. 86. Melis A, Happe T. Hydrogen production. Green algae as a source of energy. Plant Physiology. 2001;127(3):740-748
  87. 87. Gibbs M, Gfeller RP, Chen C. Fermentative metabolism of Chlamydomonas reinhardii: III. Photoassimilation of acetate. Plant Physiology. 1986;82(1):160-166
  88. 88. Atteia A, Van Lis R, Gelius-Dietrich G, Adrait A, Garin J, Joyard J, et al. Pyruvate formate-lyase and a novel route of eukaryotic ATP synthesis in Chlamydomonas mitochondria. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(15):9909-9918
  89. 89. Nguyen AV, Thomas-Hall SR, Malnoë A, Timmins M, Mussgnug JH, Rupprecht J, et al. Transcriptome for photobiological hydrogen production induced by sulfur deprivation in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryotic Cell. 2008;7(11):1965-1979
  90. 90. Zhang Z, Shrager J, Jain M, Chang CW, Vallon O, Grossman AR. Insights into the survival of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii during sulfur starvation based on microarray analysis of gene expression. Eukaryotic Cell. 2004;3(5):1331-1348
  91. 91. Noth J, Krawietz D, Hemschemeier A, Happe T. Pyruvate: Ferredoxin oxidoreductase is coupled to light-independent hydrogen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288(6):4368-4377
  92. 92. Ruzicka FJ, Beinert HE. The soluble “high potential” type iron-sulfur protein from mitochondria is aconitase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1978;253(8):2514-2517
  93. 93. Bernát G, Waschewski N, Rögner M. Towards efficient hydrogen production: The impact of antenna size and external factors on electron transport dynamics in Synechocystis PCC 6803. Photosynthesis Research. 2009;99(3):205-216
  94. 94. Kruse O, Rupprecht J, Bader KP, Thomas-Hall S, Schenk PM, Finazzi G, et al. Improved photobiological H2 production in engineered green algal cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(40):34170-34177

Written By

Manoj Kamalanathan and Antonietta Quigg

Submitted: 14 October 2019 Reviewed: 18 October 2019 Published: 25 November 2019