Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Antimicrobial Potential: A Review

Written By

Amanda Mara Teles, Bianca Araújo dos Santos, Cleidiane Gomes Ferreira, Adenilde Nascimento Mouchreck, Kátia da Silva Calabrese, Ana Lucia Abreu-Silva and Fernando Almeida-Souza

Submitted: 16 August 2019 Reviewed: 17 September 2019 Published: 06 December 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89780

From the Edited Volume

Ginger Cultivation and Its Antimicrobial and Pharmacological Potentials

Edited by Haiping Wang

Chapter metrics overview

1,538 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Zingiber officinale Roscoe, commonly known as gengibre, ajengibre, jengibre dulce (Brazil, Argentina, and Spain), ginger (United States and England), and gingembre (France), is a perennial herbaceous plant that produces a fleshy and articulated rhizome, with rough brownish epidermis. As a medicinal plant, ginger is one of the oldest and most popular in the world. Several properties of the ginger have been verified in scientific experiments, with emphasis to the antimicrobial activity. Ginger essence oil has been investigated by several in vitro microbiological techniques, in which most of its essential oils presented antimicrobial activity against all selected bacteria. The antimicrobial effect is attributed mainly to several phytochemicals, such as camphene, phellandrene, zingiberene, and zingerone. This review provides an overview of the experimental evidence for the antimicrobial potential of Z. officinale.

Keywords

  • essential oil
  • chemical composition
  • ginger
  • gengibre

1. Introduction

Vegetable kingdom organisms are the major contributors to the significant number of organic substances in nature. Plants have enormous potential to biosynthesize the most varied types of molecular structures that perform various functions in your body. The substances responsible for ensuring the cells development and maintenance are called primary metabolites. From these compounds, through very complex biosynthetic routes, plants produce secondary metabolites, which help in the defense and adaptation of plants to the environment.

Composed of several secondary metabolites synthesized by plants, we highlight the essential oils that are characterized by being a complex mixture of low molecular weight liposoluble constituents with strong aroma. Essential oils stand out for their great therapeutic and economic importance, occupying a preponderant place in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and agri-food industries due to their high biological activity [1].

Although plants have been used since ancient times for spice and medicinal purposes, only in recent decades research has been intensifying for application of these compounds in food preservation and control of diseases of microbial origin.

Nowadays, there is a serious problem of bacterial resistance to commercially available antibiotics that occurs due to the wide distribution of antimicrobials and easy access to consumption by the population, which leads to indiscriminate use and self-medication. The uncertain diagnosis, the absence of a rational program for antimicrobial use, and subdoses of antimicrobial are also factors that contribute to the increased prevalence of drug-resistant microorganisms, rendering antibiotics ineffective [2].

Assuming the resistance of microorganisms to available drugs, the toxicity of synthetic antimicrobials, and the growing consumer awareness of the use of environmentally safe and health-friendly products, natural products emerge as a potential alternative for the replacement of synthetic antimicrobial agents.

One of the largest sources of research in this area is the evaluation of antimicrobial activity of plants popularly used for medicinal purposes. Zingiber officinale Roscoe, popularly known as ginger, is used in cooking, the pharmaceutical industry, and folk medicine to treat numerous conditions [3].

Thus, this review chapter aims to discuss the antimicrobial activity of ginger essential oil evaluated by various in vitro microbiological techniques against pathogenic microorganisms. This book chapter reviews the real contribution of ginger as a naturally occurring antimicrobial.

Advertisement

2. Methods

The bibliographic search was performed from May 2019 by a single researcher, searching for keywords such as antimicrobial, ginger, antibacterial, antifungal, Zingiber officinale, and their combinations, in PubMed and ScienceDirect. The productions were selected by reading and analyzing the titles and abstracts of all identified articles. After the initial screening, the selected studies were read, which allowed other texts that did not meet the review proposal to be excluded. The main information from the selected articles was synthesized in spreadsheets that guided the descriptive and critical analysis of the studies.

Advertisement

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Ginger plant

Ginger, scientifically named Zingiber officinale Roscoe, was first described in 1807 by the English botanist Willian Roscoe. It is a species in the Zingiberaceae family, from southwestern Asia and the Malay Archipelago, including over 1200 species and 53 genera [4].

Ginger has been known and used practically worldwide and in all medicines. It has been cultivated for thousands of years in China and India, reaching the West for at least 2000 years. The name of this genus, Zingiber, derives from a Sanskrit word meaning “horn-shaped" in reference to the protrusions on the surface of the rhizome. Ginger has several names, including gengibre, ajengibre, and jengibre dulce (Brazil, Argentina, and Spain), ginger (United States and England), and gingembre (France) [5, 6].

In Brazil, its cultivation was introduced shortly after the beginning of European colonization. However, only in the 1980s, with the introduction of giant rhizome varieties by Japanese farmers, ginger cultivation became effectively commercial in Brazil, especially in the coasts of Santa Catarina, Sao Paulo, and Paraná [7].

Ginger has a herbaceous habit, is perennial, produces articulated rhizome, and has adventitious roots and distal leaves, with the basilars reduced and floral bracts obliterated, each involving a single flower [8]. The ginger rhizome has an elongated, slightly flattened body, with a color ranging from yellow to bright brown leather, striated longitudinally, with endings known as “fingers” that arise obliquely from the rhizomes. Internally yellowish brown, it has a yellow endoderm, with numerous fibrovascular bundles and abundant oil cells. It presents pleasant and aromatic odor and strongly pungent taste [7].

As a medicinal plant, ginger is one of the oldest and most popular in the world. It is used to relieve symptoms of inflammation, rheumatic diseases, and gastrointestinal discomfort [9]. Its root has carminative, digestive, sweat, anti-influenza, and stimulating properties [8]. In gastronomy, ginger is used as a seasoning and flavoring, giving spicy and refreshing characteristics. It is a raw material for the manufacture of beverages and bakery products such as breads, cakes, cookies, and jams. In the cosmetics industry, its use is due to its fragrance [10].

Ginger has shown a variety of biological activities such as antifungal [11, 12], anti-inflammatory [13], antiviral [14], antimicrobial [3, 15], antioxidant [16], and antitumor [17, 18, 19]. Due to these properties, the use of rhizomes to obtain ginger essential oils, extracts, and concentrates has attracted interest from the pharmaceutical and food industries.

3.2 Chemical profile of ginger essential oils

Chemical analysis of ginger shows that it contains over 400 different compounds where the main components of ginger rhizomes are carbohydrates (50–70%), lipids (3–8%), terpenes, and phenolic compounds. Terpenes include zingiberene, β-bisabolene, α-farnesene, β-sesquifelenolene, and α-curcumene, while phenolic compounds include gingerol, paradols, and shogaol [20], as shown in Table 1.

Reference Major compounds %
[12] α-Zingiber 24.0
Geraniale 15.0
β-Phellandrene 8.0
[21] Comphene 12.0
β-Phellandrene 11.0
1,8-cineal 10.0
α-Zingiberene 7.0
[22] α-Zingiberene 25.0
β-Sesquiphellan 18.0
β-Bisobeolene 12.5
[16] Geraniale 26.0
α-Zingiberene 9.5
α-Farnesene 7.6
Neral 7.4
[23] Geraniale 16.0
z-Citral 9.2
β-Cedrene 8.6
Geranyl acetate 8.4
[24] Geraniale 26.0
α-Zingibere 9.5
Farnesene 7.6
Neral 7.4
[25] β-Sesquiphellandrene 27.0
Caryophyllene 15.3
Zingiberene 14.0
α-Farnesense 10.5
[26] ar-Curcumene 11.3
Geraniale 11.0
Camphene 5.0
Eucalypto 3.0
[27] α-Zingiberene 20.0
ar-Curcumene 15.0
β-Bisabalene 11.0
β-Sesquiphellandrene 13.0
[28] ar-Curamene 59.0
1,8-Cinerol 8.0
Citral 7.5
α-Zingiberene 7.5

Table 1.

Chemical composition of different Zingiber officinale essential oil described in literature.

In studies from 2006 to 2018 with Z. officinale, geranial and α-zingiberene were the major compounds in their chemical composition [12, 22, 27]. Significant quantities of the terpene family chemical constituents have also been reported [12, 22]. The least common constituent found in ginger essential oil is ar-curcumene [25, 27]. Compounds such as 1,8-cineole, eucalyptol, and 1,8-cinerol that are not very common in the chemical composition of Zingiber officinale have also been noted [21, 26, 28].

The variation in the composition of the essential oils obtained from this species may be due to genetic and/or environmental factors, plant age, and different extraction methods. The composition of essential oils directly influences their antimicrobial activity, as each secondary metabolite has a specific ability to break or penetrate the structure of the microorganism [24].

3.3 Antimicrobial assays with ginger

The most used methods for the determination of antimicrobial activity of Z. officinale vary among researches as can be seen in Table 2. The main methods are disk and well agar diffusion and agar and broth microdilution technique that determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC).

Method Dilution Reference
Disk and well diffusion agar DMSO [16]
Broth microdilution MIC and MBC DMSO 5% [21]
MIC—diffusion agar Ethanol [29]
Agar disk diffusion Acetone [30]
MIC—broth microdilution Ginger essential oil [31]
Agar disk diffusion Essential oil [32]
MIC—broth microdilution Tween 80 [33]
Agar disk diffusion Ginger essential oil [34]
MIC-broth microdilution Tween 126 [35]
Agar-agar diffusion DMSO [36]
Broth microdilution MIC and MBC DMSO [37]

Table 2.

Methods used to establish antimicrobial activity of Zingiber officinale essential oil.

DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC, minimum bactericidal concentration.

It was verified [16] that the Z. officinale essential oil tested by two methods showed strong inhibitory effects by well diffusion, demonstrating that the technique used can influence the result, while the agar diffusion test had less effect. As can be seen in Table 2, there is no standardization of ginger oil dilution, which can lead to uncertain results as it is an oil, and, because it is a less dense material than water, the oil cannot be diluted directly in the broth, which limits their miscibility in the test media. Therefore, a surfactant should be added, and we found that the most commonly used was DMSO [16, 21, 36, 37], tween [33, 35], some solvents like ethanol [29] and acetone [30], and even ginger oil [31, 32, 34].

The disk diffusion and well diffusion tests have been used to evidence antimicrobial activities, assuming that all components of the oil have the same solubility, but as verified in Tables 3 and 4, the diffusion of oil in the agar, during the test, may not diffuse into the agar, limiting the use of this method. However, the use of several methods to determine antimicrobial activity, as verified in [16], can directly interfere with the result. Although interference of chemical composition is possible, the MIC values found in several studies do not demonstrate a reproducibility using broth dilutions [21, 31, 33, 35, 37].

Reference Country Bacteria MIC MBC Halo (mm)
[16] India P. vulgaris 18.4
K. pneumoniae 20.5
[21] Tunisia V. alginolyticus >25
[23] Brazil S. mutans 250 μg/mL 500 μg/mL
[29] Saudi Arabia S. aureus 15.8
B. cereus 8.3
E. coli 0.0
S. typhi 0.0
P. aeruginosa 11.2
[30] Brazil S. enteritidis 8.8
L. plantarum 7.0
[32] Saudi Arabia E. faecalis 61.94%
P. aeruginosa 21.65%
E. coli 106.02%
Shigella 119.79%
[37] Canada S. pyogenes >1000 μg/mL >1000 μg/mL
[33] Brazil L. monoctogenes 4.7 μL/mL 9.4 μL/mL
S. aureus 2.3 μL/mL 4.7 μL/mL
E. coli O157:H7 9.4 μL/mL 18.7 μL/mL
S. typhimurium 9.4 μL/mL 18.7 μL/mL
P. aeruginosa 2.3 μL/mL 4.7 μL/mL
[38] India B. cereus 9.11
L. monocytogenes 9.00
M. l nkluteus 6.86
S. aureus 8.90
E. coli 8.00
S. typhimurium 6.61
[39] Negeri Sembilan B. licheniformis 0.16 mg/mL
B. spizizenii 0.24 mg/mL
E. coli 0.31 mg/mL
K. pneumoniae 0.47 mg/mL
P. stutzeri 0.63 mg/mL
[40] Mexico S. aureus 0.25 mg/mL
S. epidemidis 0.5 mg/mL
E. faecalis 1.0 mg/mL

Table 3.

Antibacterial activity of Zingiber officinale essential oil.

Reference Fungi MIC Disk diffusion
Halo Concentration
[16] A.flavus 20.6 mm 6 μg/mL
A. solani 66.3 mm
A. oryzae 51.3 mm
A. Níger 66.7 mm
F. moniliforme 100 mm
[35] C. albicans 25 mm 100 μg/mL
G. candidum 21 mm
F. oxysporum 22 mm
A. flavus 20 mm
[36] F. verticillioides 2500 μg/mL
[41] A. terrus 50% 10 μL
A. Niger 31.3%
A. flavus 87.5%
F. oxysporum 87.5%
C. palliscens 87.5%
T. roseum 100%
F. graminearum 62.5%
F. monoliforme 75%
[42] Penicillium spp 869.2 mg/mL

Table 4.

Zingiber officinale antifungal activity.

3.4 Antimicrobial activity of ginger

3.4.1 Antibacterial activity of ginger

Essential oils have a chemical composition rich in volatile and odorous secondary metabolites, mainly monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. Several studies reported the antimicrobial properties of Z. officinale essential oil against various bacteria, as can be seen in Table 3.

A research showed that Z. officinale essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation verified that L. monocytogenes showed the highest sensitivity to oil when compared to other bacteria and presented the largest zone of inhibition (37 mm). Ginger essential oil has been shown to be active against the V. alginolyticus strain, despite the high MIC value range of 0.05–0.2 mg/mL reported [29].

The description of a moderate activity, with MIC values of 0.16–0.63 mg/mL, against Gram-positive bacteria indicates that Gram-negative bacteria are more resistant to Z. officinale essential oils compared to Gram-positive bacteria [21].

However, the essential oil showed activity against Shigella and E. coli, probably due to the presence of active constituents such as zingiberene, endoborneol, and gingerol [39]. The MIC value found for K. pneumonia (ATCC 13383) and S. enterica (ATCC 7251) strains was 1 mg/mL. These results are expected due to the constitution of the Gram-negative cell wall [16], although the effect of high sensitivity on Gram-negative strains such as K. pneumonia has been observed [39]. A survey of 15 strains of bacteria reported results that validate the use of Z. officinale as a medicine to treat diseases of possible infectious origin [9].

A research conducted in Brazil with a substance (zerumbone) isolated from ginger essential oil showed its efficacy against S. mutans, resulting in 250 μg/mL MIC and 500 μg/mL MBC. Another investigation of the effect of oil against growth activity and biofilm formation of S. pyogenes showed MIC and MBC of 1 mg/mL [37].

We found that the studies reported in this review show that the antibacterial effect of essential oil has significant differences according to the collection site, its genetic and environmental composition of the plant, and extraction methods, as well as significant differences in the inhibition of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Gram-positive strains are more sensitive, suggesting that the cell wall composed of a thick layer of peptidoglycan surrounding the cytoplasmic membrane would be the microbial target of essential oil [43].

However, the possibility of another target is not ruled out, as we found that, depending on the location, the oil tested demonstrates a better effect on Gram-negative, suggesting other microbial targets, such as the plasma membrane, since the constituents of essential oils have lipophilic properties that interact with membranes by changing their fluidity and permeability [44].

3.4.2 Antifungal activity of ginger

In the evaluation of antifungal activity, we found that antifungal tests with Z. officinale oil showed inhibitory effects against all fungal tested. Ginger oil was found to completely inhibit F. moniliforme growth at the highest concentration tested, and Aspergillus inhibition was also reported.

A study with oils obtained by different drying methods against six fungi (Candida albicans, Geotrichum candidum, Trichophyton rubrum, Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium oxysporum, and Scopulariopsis brevicaulis) revealed that hot-drying ginger exhibited potent antifungal activity except against T. rubrum and S. brevicaulis when the oil was obtained by drying indoors. In open-air drying, the oil showed antifungal activity only against C. albicans [35].

The activity against Fusarium verticillioides determined by broth dilution exhibited MIC of 2500 μg/mL, suggesting that ginger oil is capable of controlling F. verticillioides growth and subsequent fumonisin production [36]. Both essential oil and ginger resin totally inhibited (100%) Fusarium moniliforme [41]. Activity against other fungi showed moderated to good effect (Table 4).

The antimicrobial activity of ginger oil can be attributed to its constituent monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, as they are capable of altering the permeability and fluidity of the plasma membrane of microorganisms. The lipophilic character of its hydrocarbon skeleton and the hydrophilic character of some of its functional groups confer this property [40].

Z. officinale essential oil contains considerable amounts of phenolic compounds (eugenol, shogaols, zingerone, gingerdiols, gingerols, etc.), which may be responsible for the observed effects, and has different chemotypes in which the efficiency can be attributed to the major compounds, although the possibility of a synergistic action of all constituents is not ruled out either [41].

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

The studies reported in this literature review made the determination of the species, the indication of the place of collection, and the extraction method, since these data are fundamental for adequate comparison of the results, as well as a secondary metabolite identification technique where we found that the most used techniques were gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (HPLC) to indicate the present compounds. Geographical location, oil extraction method, techniques, media types, dilution used in antimicrobial activity at different concentrations, and microorganisms can certainly lead to different results. Ginger essential oil has compounds that are present in varying proportions as verified in this review; therefore, there is no parameter for their composition as they have several chemotypes. The lack of oil standardization makes it difficult to compare the work done and to obtain an adequate result of the antimicrobial activity of the oil. However, numerous reports of antimicrobial activity, even with the various variables described above, lead us to believe that ginger essential oil has a potential antimicrobial activity to be explored, and further studies are needed to ensure this activity.

References

  1. 1. Andrade MA. Óleos essenciais de Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Cymbopogon nardus e Zingiber officinale: Caracterização química, atividade antioxidante e antibacteriana [Dissertação (Mestrado em Agroquímica)]. Minas Gerais: Universidade Federal de Lavras; 2010. 101 p
  2. 2. Mota LM, Vilar FC, Dias LBA, Nunes TF, Moriguti JC. Uso racional de antimicrobianos. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto). 2010;43(2):164-172
  3. 3. Diemer AW. Ação antimicrobiana de Rosmarinusofficinalis e Zingiber officinale frente a Escherichia coli e Staphylococcus aureus em carne mecanicamente separada de frango [Dissertação (Mestrado em Biotecnologia)]. Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul: Centro Universitário Univates; 2016. 67 p
  4. 4. Lorenzi H, Matos FJA. Plantas medicinais no Brasil: Nativas e exóticas. Plantarum: Nova Odessa; 2002. 512 p
  5. 5. Corrêa Junior C, Ming LC, Scheffer MC. Cultivo de plantas medicinais, condimentares e aromáticas. 2ª. ed. Jaboticabal: FUNEP; 1994. 151 p
  6. 6. Morgan R. Enciclopédia das Ervas e Plantas Medicinais. Hemus: São Paulo; 1994
  7. 7. Martins AGLA. Atividade antibacteriana dos óleos essenciais do manjericão (Ocimum basilicum Linnaeus) e do gengibre (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) frente a linhagens de Escherichia coli enteropatogênicas isoladas de hortaliças [Tese (Doutorada em Ciências dos Alimentos)]. João Pessoa: Universidade Federal do Paraíba; 2010. 110 p
  8. 8. Soares RP. Atividade biológica dos óleos essenciais de gengibre, açafrão e louro sobre o fungo Aspergillus carbonarius [Dissertção (Mestrado em Agroquímica)]. Lavras, Minas Gerais: Universidade Federal de Lavras; 2009. 79 p
  9. 9. Pfeiffer E, Heuschmid FF, Kranz S, Metzler M. Microsomal hydroxylation and glucuronidation of [6]-gingerol. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Easton. 2006;54(23):8769-8774
  10. 10. Mukkavilli R, Yang C, Singh Tanwar R, Ghareeb A, Luthra L, Aneja R. Absorption, metabolic stability, and pharmacokinetics of ginger phytochemicals. Molecules. 2017;22:553
  11. 11. Freire JCP, Júnior JK d O, Silva D d F, de Sousa JP, Guerra FQS, de Oliveira Lima E. Antifungal activity of essential oils against Candida albicans strains isolated from users of dental prostheses. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2017;2017:1-9
  12. 12. Ferreira FMD, Hirooka EY, Ferreira FD, Silva MV, Mossini SAG, Machinski M Jr. Effect of Zingiber officinale Roscoe essential oil in fungus control and deoxynivalenol production of Fusarium graminearum Schwabe in vitro. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A. 2018;35(11):2168-2174
  13. 13. Camargo LCS. Efeito antiinflamatorio do extrato de Zingiber officinale aplicado por fonoforese sobre o edema de pata de ratos [Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Biológicas)]. São José dos Campos: Instituto de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba; 2006. 89 p
  14. 14. Camero M, Lanave G, Catella C, Capozza P, Gentile A, Fracchiolla G, et al. Virucidal activity of ginger essentialoilagainstcaprinealphaherpes virus-1. Veterinary Microbiology. 2019;230:150-155
  15. 15. Cutrim ESM, Teles AM, Mouchrek AN, Mouchrek Filho VE, Everton GO. Avaliação da Atividade Antimicrobiana e Antioxidante dos Óleos Essenciais e Extratos Hidroalcoólicos de Zingiber officinale (Gengibre) e Rosmarinus officinalis (Alecrim). Revista Virtual de Química. 2019;11(1):60-81
  16. 16. Singh G, Kapoor IPS, Singh P, Heluani CS, Lampasona MP, Catalan CAN. Chemistry, antioxidant and antimicrobial investigations on essential oil and oleoresins of Zingiber officinale. Food and Chemical Toxicology, Oxford. 2008;46(10):3295-3302
  17. 17. Dorai T, Aggarwal BB. Role of chemopreventive agents in cancer therapy. Cancer Letters. 2004;215:129-140
  18. 18. Manju V, Nalini N. Chemopreventive efficacy of ginger, a naturally occurring anticarcinogen during the initiation, post-initiation stages of 1,2dimethylhydrazine-inducedcoloncancer. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2005;358:60-67
  19. 19. Shukla Y, Singh M. Cancer preventive properties of ginger: A brief review. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2007;45:683-690
  20. 20. Grzanna R, Lindmark L, Frondoza CG. Ginger—An herbal medicinal product with broad anti-inflammatory actions. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2005;8(2):125-132
  21. 21. Snuossi M, Trabelsi N, Taleb S, Dehmeni A, Flamini G, Feo V. Laurus nobilis, Zingiber officinale and Anethum graveolens essential oils: Composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities against bacteria isolated from fish and shellfish. Molecules. 2016;21:1414. DOI: 10.3390/molecules21101414
  22. 22. Varoni EM, Lo Faro AF, Sharifi-Rad J, Iriti M. Anticancer molecular mechanisms of resveratrol. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2016;3:8. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2016.00008
  23. 23. Silva M, Pinheiro C, Orlandi P, Pinheiro C, Pontesa J. Zerumbone from Zingiber zerumbet (L.) smith: A potential prophylactic and therapeutic agent against the cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018;18:301. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2360-3010
  24. 24. Chmit M, Kanaan H, Habib J, Abbass M, Mcheik A, Chokr A. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of polysaccharides, essential oil, and fatty oil extracted from Laurus nobilis growing in Lebanon. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2014:546-552. DOI: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60288-1
  25. 25. Borah A, Sethi L, Sarkar S, Hazarika K. Effect of drying on texture and color characteristics of ginger and turmeric in a solar biomass integrated dryer. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2017;40:e12264. DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12310
  26. 26. Mesomo MC, Corazza ML, Ndiaye PM, Dalla Santa OR, Cardozo L, de Paula Scheer A. Supercritical CO2 extracts and essential oil of ginger (Zingiber officinale R.): Chemical composition and antibacterial activity. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2013;80:44-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2013.03.031
  27. 27. Wang Z, Wang L, Li T, Zhou X, Ding L, Yu Y, et al. Rapid analysis of the essential oils from dried Illicium verum Hook. f. and Zingiber officinale Rosc. by improved solvent-free microwave extraction with three types of microwave-absorption medium. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2006;386(6):1863-1868. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-006-0778-6
  28. 28. Nogueira de Melo GA, Grespan R, Fonseca JP, Farinha TO, da Silva EL, Romero AL, et al. Inhibitory effects of ginger (Zingiber officinale roscoe) essential oil on leukocyte migration in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Natural Medicines. 2011;65:241-246. DOI: 10.1007/s11418-010-0479-5
  29. 29. Mostafa A, Abdulaziz A, Al-Askar A, Khalid S, Turki M, Essam N, et al. Antimicrobial activity of some plant extracts against bacterial strains causing food poisoning diseases. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2018;25(2):361-366. DOI: 10.1016/ j.sjbs.2017.02.004
  30. 30. Ambrosio MS, Severino M, Alencar LM, Sousa M, Gloria M. Antimicrobial activity of several essential oils on pathogenic and beneficial bacteria. Industrial Crops and Products. 2017;97(2017):128-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.0926-6690
  31. 31. Chakotiya A, Tanwar A, Narula A, Sharma R. Zingiber officinale: Its antibacterial activity on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and mode of action evaluated by flow cytometry. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017;107:254-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.03.02-9 0882-4010
  32. 32. Ashraf S, Al-Shammari E, Hussain T, Tajuddin S, Panda B. In-vitro antimicrobial activity and identification of bioactive components using GC–MS of commercially available essential oils in Saudi Arabia. Association of Food Scientists & Technologists. 2017;54(12):3948-3958. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-017-2859-2
  33. 33. Tavares F, Cunha K, Fonseca L, Antunes M, Mello S, Fiorentini A, et al. Action of ginger essential oil (Zingiber officinale) encapsulated in proteins ultrafine fibers on the antimicrobial control in situ. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018;118(2018):107-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.079
  34. 34. El-Shouny WA, Ali SS, Sun J, Samy SM, Ali A. Drug resistance profile and molecular characterization of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESβL)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wound infections. Essential oils and their potential for utilization. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2018;116:301-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.02.005
  35. 35. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar H, Baghdadi A, Tayebi-Meigooni A. Formation of 6-, 8- and 10-Shogaol in ginger through application of different drying methods: Altered antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. Molecules. 2018;23:1646. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071646
  36. 36. Yamamoto-Ribeiro MMG, Grespan R, Kohiyama CY, Ferreira FD, Mossini SAG, Silva EL, et al. Effect of Zingiber officinale essential oil on Fusarium verticillioides and fumonisin production. Food Chemistry. 2013;141(3):3147-3152. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.144
  37. 37. Wijesundara NM, Rupasinghe HPV. Essential oils from Origanum vulgare and Salvia officinalis exhibit antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities against streptococcus pyogenes. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2018;13(6):612-632. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.02.026
  38. 38. Bag A, Chattopadhyay RR. Evaluation of synergistic antibacterial and antioxidant efficacy of essential oils of spices and herbs in combination. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131321. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131321
  39. 39. Sivasothy Y, Chong WK, Hamid A, Eldeen IM, Sulaiman SF, Awang K. Essential oils of Zingiber officinale var. rubrum Theilade and their antibacterial activities. Food Chemistry. 2011;124:514-517. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.062
  40. 40. López EIC, Balcázar MFH, Mendoza JMR, Ortiz ADR, Melo MTO, Parrales RS, et al. Antimicrobial activity of essential oil of Zingiber officinale roscoe (Zingiberaceae). American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2017;8(07):1511
  41. 41. Singh G, Maurya S, Catalan C, De Lampasona MP. Studies on essential oils, part 42: Chemical, antifungal, antioxidant and sprout suppressant studies on ginger essential oil and its oleoresin. Flavour and Fragrance Journal. 2005;20(1):1-6
  42. 42. BELLIK Y. Total antioxidant activity and antimicrobial potency of the essential oil and oleoresin of Zingiber officinale roscoe. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2014;4(1):40-44
  43. 43. Burt S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2004;94:223-253. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022
  44. 44. Berger RG. Bioactivity of essential oils and their components. In: Flavors and Fragrances: Chemistry, Bioprocessing, and Sustainability. Berlin: Springer; 2007. pp. 88-90. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49339-6

Written By

Amanda Mara Teles, Bianca Araújo dos Santos, Cleidiane Gomes Ferreira, Adenilde Nascimento Mouchreck, Kátia da Silva Calabrese, Ana Lucia Abreu-Silva and Fernando Almeida-Souza

Submitted: 16 August 2019 Reviewed: 17 September 2019 Published: 06 December 2019