Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Red Microalga Galdieria as a Promising Organism for Applications in Biotechnology

Written By

Mária Čížková, Milada Vítová and Vilém Zachleder

Submitted: 04 April 2019 Reviewed: 19 September 2019 Published: 10 October 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89810

From the Edited Volume

Microalgae - From Physiology to Application

Edited by Milada Vítová

Chapter metrics overview

1,438 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The genus Galdieria refers to red algae and includes microscopic inhabitants of highly acidic (pH 1–2), often volcanic habitats. They are thermophilic or thermo-tolerant organisms, some of them surviving temperatures up to 56°C. As other extremophilic microorganisms, they exhibit unique features derived from their modified metabolisms. In this chapter, we will review the special abilities of Galdieria species such as metabolic flexibility to grow photoautotrophically, heterotrophically or mixotrophically, ability to utilize a whole range of unusual carbon sources, capability of surviving extreme environments or their extremely high resistance to metals. We will discuss the potential of Galdieria for applications in biotechnology, for example, phycocyanin production, nutrient removal from urban wastewaters, bio-mining, treatment of acidic mine drainage, selective metal precipitation, bioremediation of acidic metal-contaminated areas or recovery of critical and scarce metals from secondary sources.


  • Galdieria
  • red algae
  • extremophiles
  • metals
  • biotechnology
  • recovery

1. Introduction

The alga Galdieria belongs to the class Cyanidiophyceae, which are unicellular red algae classified into three genera Cyanidium, Cyanidioschyzon, and Galdieria. They have a relatively simple morphology consisting of spherical thick-walled cells containing one chloroplast, 1–3 mitochondria, a nucleus, a vacuole, and storage products. They inhabit diverse environments including hot sulfur springs, streams, mud, rock walls, endolithic habitats, etc. Galdieria is an extremophilic organism surviving in acidic geothermal environments with very low pH and high temperatures. It exhibits a unique metabolism enabling auto-, mixo-, and heterotrophic growth. Versatility in the utilization of carbon sources for heterotrophic growth is enormous including a large range of sugars and alcohols. Besides low pH and high temperature, the Galdieria have several unique mechanisms for metal tolerance, enabling them to grow in environments rich in toxic metals [1, 2], where other organisms cannot grow at all or with difficulties.

For its unique extremophilic properties, the alga Galdieria is an unrivaled organism for biotechnological applications in surroundings with high temperatures, low pH, and high concentrations of heavy metals and organic compounds, particularly sugars. It can be cultivated under conditions where other microalgae often become contaminated with microorganisms, which is a major problem for their application in biotechnology [3]. The autotrophic cultivation of Galdieria follows predominant research trends in microalgal pigments, ß carotene, astaxanthin, and phycocyanin used in feed, in foods, in health applications or biofuels production. The composition of storage glycogen and lipids for biofuels can be largely changed depending on the growth conditions. Galdieria biomass has potential for use as food ingredients, both for protein-rich or insoluble dietary fiber-rich diets and for its low concentration of lipids.


2. Taxonomy and biodiversity

The order Cyanidiales from the class Cyanidiophyceae are a group of asexual, unicellular organisms that diverged from ancestral red algae around 1.3 billion years ago [4, 5]. These unicellular red algae were classified into three genera, Cyanidium, Cyanidioschyzon, and Galdieria. Cyanidioschyzon merolae is clearly recognizable thanks to its characteristic size and shape, but the other two algae are morphologically very similar. Until 1981 Cyanidium caldarium was used as a synonym for Galdieria sulphuraria, however, this species can grow only autotrophically while G. sulphuraria is also able to grow heterotrophically [6, 7]. Based on morphological, ultrastructural and ecophysiological studies the class Cyanidiophyceae was therefore instituted, containing the family Cyanidiaceae, including Cyanidium caldarium and the family Galdieriaceae, including Galdieria sulphuraria [8].

Different Cyanidiophycean species, including Galdieria, are found all over the world; however, their distribution is discontinuous as they are restricted to hot springs and geothermal habitats. This is related to the discontinuity of geothermal environments. Two decades ago, little was known about their biodiversity, their population structures, and the phylogenetic relationships of Cyanidiales.

Research based on environmental PCR studies revealed an unexpected level of genetic diversity among Cyanidiales. It was demonstrated that the Cyanidiales comprise a species-rich branch of red algae [9]. The high divergence rates in the Cyanidiales could be possibly explained by an elevated mutation rate in these taxa, resulting potentially from DNA damage in their extreme environments. The analyses also reject the putative mesophilic origin of Cyanidiales and suggest ancestral thermo-acidotolerancy of this lineage [9].

Sequencing of the rbcL gene with high sequence divergence within the genus has contributed to the taxonomy of Galdieria [10, 11, 12]. A cladogram defining molecular relationships among these algae shows that Cyanidium caldarium and Cyanidioschyzon merolae form a sister group relationship with Galdieria [11]. The genus Galdieria is divided into two clades, one of which includes G. sulphuraria accessions from Naples (Italy), California, and Yellowstone and the other one includes G. sulphuraria accessions from Java (Indonesia) and Russian species [11].

Based on molecular phylogenetics, three well supported Galdieria species exist: G. maxima Sentsova, G. sulphuraria (Galdieri) Merola (including two Russian species G. partita Sentsova and G. daedala Sentsova, described based on morphological differences) and G. phlegrea Pinto, Ciniglia, Cascone et Pollio [9, 13, 14].

Consequently, the main lineages were identified: G. phlegrea [14] comprising strains thriving in acidic non-thermophilic Italian sites; G. sulphuraria, a group that is geographically dispersed worldwide, including G. sulphuraria strains as well as G. partita and G. daedala, isolated from acid-thermal springs in Russia [15]. A final lineage contains the cosmopolitan species G. maxima [15], which is clustered independently from the Galdieria clade (G. sulphuraria + G. phlegrea) and shows an unexplained sister group relationship with the morphologically distinct Cyanidioschyzon merolae [5, 9, 10, 12, 16].

Generally, Galdieria (Cyanidiales) is well known from Italy [5, 9, 14, 17] Yellowstone National Park, USA [18, 19], New Zealand [20], Iceland [10], and recently from the Czech Republic [21, 22].

Phylogenetic analyses of the rbcL gene also showed that Galdieria from the coal mining site at Ostrava, Czech Republic, belongs to the cosmopolitan species G. sulphuraria, for now the only eukaryotic organism forming visible biomass on a burning coal-waste heap [10]. This was the first evidence of this species growing in central Europe, and isolates were closely related to the Italian strains, together forming the continental European lineage of G. sulphuraria [21]. Another, non-thermophilic strain of Galdieria, also found in the Czech Republic [22], referred to as CCALA 965 (Culture Collection of Autotrophic Organisms, Institute of Botany, CAS, Třeboň, Czech Republic) was found to belong to the species G. phlegrea, so far known only from Italy [13, 14].


3. Morphology and extremophile properties

Morphology of the unicellular taxa Cyanidiales is relatively simple. Thick-walled cells are of a spherical shape and usually contain one chloroplast, 1–3 mitochondria, a nucleus, a vacuole, and energy reserve products [8, 12, 15, 23, 24].

Representatives of the order Cyanidiales are unparalleled among phototrophic microorganisms (eukaryotes) in their ability to thrive in acidic (pH 0.5–3.5) and high temperature (38–56°C) geothermal environments. Soils, sediments, and endolithic habitats around hot springs, boiling mud pools, and steaming fumaroles are typical for these extremophiles, which are dominant in local microbial communities [5, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. They are the principal photosynthetic organisms found in hot acidic waters [31], where even photosynthetic prokaryotes, such as the cyanobacteria, are completely absent [32, 33, 34].

G. sulphuraria is a unicellular, spherical, spore-forming red alga. In addition to acidophilic and thermophilic properties, it has the ability to grow phototrophically, mixotrophically and moreover heterotrophically while utilizing sugars, alcohols or amino acids [7, 35, 36]. G. sulphuraria cells are morphologically indiscernible from cells of Cyanidium caldarium, however, are well recognizable thanks to their ready ability to grow heterotrophically in the dark [16, 18]. In its natural environment, G. sulphuraria has a yellow to green color; however, when heterotrophically grown in liquid medium, it looks like yellow-green to dark blue-green. The cell size of G. sulphuraria is larger than that of C. caldarium. It reproduces by endospore formation ranging from four to thirty-two. As originally described, G. sulphuraria has a single, cup-shaped, parietally localized chloroplast [8] and includes a vacuole and mitochondria [11].

Morphological similarities between G. sulphuraria and G. phlegrea are so high that methods for recognition of these species, their habitats, and growth requirements, together with molecular analyses, are used.

G. phlegrea (Figure 1) prefers a relatively low temperature (25–38°C) for growth and inhabits rather dry endolithic sites with high acidity (pH 0.5–1.5) [9, 14, 22]. The Latin word phlegreus means volcanic, what is consistent with the specific locality, (Campi Flegrei, Naples, Italy), where the alga was found [14]. The locality provides diverse environmental conditions in the form of hot springs, streams, mud, rock walls, with different pHs and temperature ranges, producing the different microhabitats occurring in that site. [14].

Figure 1.

Microphotographs of Galdieria phlegrea in bright field (A) and fluorescence (B). Nuclei in the panel B are in blue (stained by DAPI) and chloroplasts are in red (autofluorescence). The chloroplasts of large mother dividing cells are not visible. The bar is 10 μm.

Strain DB01 of G. phlegrea from the Tinto River (Spain) has typical coccoid cells with thick smooth cell walls. Mature cells reach the average size of 6.4 μm. The cell possesses a blue-green chloroplast without pyrenoids. Typical for the alga is asexual reproduction by autospores originating in the parental cell and resulting in autosporangia with 2–8 daughter cells. Testing the culture conditions of the isolate DB01 showed that the algae were not strictly thermophilic [13].

G. maxima is characterized by facultative heterotrophy; however, G. maxima strains grow very poorly when cultivated under dark conditions. Spherical cells are significantly larger (10–16 μm diameter) compared with other thermoacidophilic algal species [18, 23]. Cell size is thus used as the main character to distinguish one from the other. Inside the cell are at least two parietal plastids, lobe or oval shaped [37].


4. Genomes

Genetic information for the red algae Galdieria (G. maxima, G. partita, and G. sulphuraria) is located in the nucleus, in two small chromosomes, which differ in length. The smaller chromosome ranges from 0.8 to 1.8 μm and the larger one from 1.2 to 2.3 μm. The genome is characterized by an unusually high gene density, small or absent introns, and very few repetitive sequences. A genome size of 10.8 Mbp was estimated for G. sulphuraria [38]. In other strains of G. sulphuraria, genome sizes were found between 9.8 and 14.2 Mbp [39]. These genome characteristics refer to the smallest known genomes of all free living eukaryotes [38, 40].

The mitochondrial genome is extremely small in size with a very low genetic content. It is characterized by the highest guanine-cytosine content among all red algae.

The plastid genome contains a large number of intergenic stem-loop structures but is otherwise rather typical in size, structure, and content in comparison with other red algae. It is assumed that the unique genomic characteristic resulted from both the harsh conditions in which Galdieria lives and its unusual ability to grow mixotrophically, heterotrophically, and endolithically. The authors [41] suggested that “these conditions place additional mutational pressures on the mitogenome due to the increased reliance on the mitochondrion for energy production, whereas the decreased reliance on photosynthesis and the presence of numerous stem-loop structures may shield the plastome from similar genomic stress.”


5. Biotechnological applications

Galdieria with its extensive extremophilic properties, which are unique not only among all eukaryotic organisms but even in extremophilic prokaryotes, has a broad utilization in biotechnology. It is the only algae that can grow photo-, mixo-, and heterotrophically to biomass concentrations above 100 g/L dry weight [42]. For heterotrophic growth, it can use over 27 different kinds of sugars and polyols to produce a huge biomass and beneficial compounds [7, 43, 44]. It tolerates concentrations of glucose and fructose up to 166 g/L, salt concentrations up to 1–2 M, and pH values below pH 1 [42, 45] and can attain 80–110 g L−1 biomass in continuous flow cultures [43]. The ability of Galdieria to grow under conditions intolerable for other organisms, even prokaryotic ones, predetermines its biotechnical applications in such surroundings as different, often toxic, wastewaters, treatment of acid mine drainage, selective metal precipitation, bioremediation of acidic metal-contaminated areas, or recovery of critical and scarce metals from secondary sources.

5.1 Wastewaters

Recycling of valuable components and nutrients from wastewaters using algae has recently been studied extensively. But only limited types of wastewaters can be treated because wastewaters are generally acidic and most algal species grow with difficulty at low pH, and absorption rates that can be achieved by bioaccumulation decrease substantially [46, 47, 48, 49]. The acidophilic alga G. sulphuraria is the only alga that has commercial potential for remediation of these wastewaters [50, 51]. Nutrient removal from municipal wastewater by the alga G. sulphurea was found to be very efficient for ammoniacal-nitrogen (88.3%) and phosphate (95.5%) in large scale outdoor bioreactors [51]. Additionally, many crucial elements, including phosphate and rare earth elements from wastewater were successfully bio-sorbed [51, 52]. It can be concluded that G. sulphuraria can be applied as a preferred strain for energy-efficient nutrient removal from urban wastewaters [51], achieving higher nutrient removal efficiencies and removal rates than other strains. This alga can also be used for bio-sorption of precious metals from metal-containing wastewaters. The great advantage is that precious metals can be efficiently bio-sorbed by Galdieria cells even if they are present in very low concentrations. Over 90% of gold and palladium were recovered from aqua-regia-based metallic wastewater where metal concentrations were so low that they could not be recycled chemically or pyro-metallurgically. Because the entire process could be completed within 1 h, the use of G. sulphuraria has promising applications in metal recovery [53], particularly where Pt and Au could be selectively re-eluted from cells into a solution containing 0.2 M ammonium salts without other contaminating metals [54].

5.2 Rare earth elements

Lanthanides [Rare Earth Elements (REEs)] have unique magnetic and catalytic properties and are, up to now, irreplaceable materials in numerous technologies, for example, wind turbines, solar panels, batteries, fluorescent lamps, computer and mobile monitors, TV screens etc. They are also used as fertilizers in agriculture, in aquaculture, or as animal growth enhancers.

Methods for extraction of lanthanides from ores, including pyro-metallurgy and hydro-metallurgy, have severe negative environmental impacts, as well as being expensive. Currently, industrial extraction of lanthanides from monazite involves either a basic process that uses concentrated sodium hydroxide or an acidic process that uses concentrated sulfuric acid. These processes generate large amounts of hazardous waste containing thorium and uranium [55]. Moreover, requirements for REEs are continually increasing, becoming critical due to risks of reduced availability of resources and their possible exhaustion.

One way to solve the problem would be efficient, sustainable, and cheap recycling of REE-containing wastewaters and others industrial wastes.

Considerable research efforts have been directed toward the development of efficient biological methods for recovering small amounts of these materials from wastewater systems [48, 49]. Research has recently focused on environmentally friendly technologies of metal recovery, including REEs, from secondary resources [56, 57] including bio-sorption by algae or cyanobacteria [52, 58]; for review, see [59, 60].

However, if REEs were present in an aquatic environment, together with other metals, most algae could not accumulate high concentrations of REEs [61, 62] due to metal-inhibited growth. The extraction of REEs or other metals have now been simplified by the use of Galdieria cells, which were effective in the recovery of many crucial elements, including phosphates and REEs [51, 52].

Similar to its relative Cyanidium caldarium, G. sulphuraria is resistant to high concentrations of metals in solution, including Al3+. Moreover, it could be used to selectively recover lanthanides and Cu2+ ions from water containing various kinds of metals at a pH of 2.5. The concentration of soluble metals in solution remained unchanged at pH values within the range 0.5–5.0 [52]. In contrast, this process is usually difficult to achieve by bacterial bio-sorption. Lowering of pH to 1.0–1.5 enabled the recovery of lanthanides from cells whereas Cu2+ ions remained dissolved in aqueous acid. The use of G. sulphuraria also allowed recovery of over 90% of low levels of metals (0.5 ppm) from solution by cell fractionation at pH values in the range of 1.5–2.5. This system did not require any genetic manipulation or treatment of the cells for the efficient recovery of lanthanides [52].

Recycling from different mineral ores and electronic wastes (luminophores) often meets difficulties in that REEs are not suitable for bio-sorption because they are present in solid forms and are almost insoluble in nutrient solutions for algal cultivation. The material can be readily dissolved in aqueous acid, but the efficiency of metal bio-sorption for most algae is usually decreased under acidic conditions or the algae cannot grow at a low pH. Application of extremophilic red alga Galdieria would therefore be an advantageous solution to this problem and seems to be the aim of future research. The species Galdieria phlegrea has already been used to test the bio-accumulation of REEs from luminophores added into the medium in the form of a powder. Algal cells were cultured mixotrophically in a liquid medium with the addition of glycerol as a source of carbon. Luminophores from two different sources (fluorescence lamps and energy saving light bulbs) were tested. In spite of the low solubility of luminophores, G. phlegrea could grow in the presence of luminophores and accumulate REEs [63, 64].

Another rich source of lanthanides is bauxite residue, called red mud, which is a by-product of the production of alumina (aluminum oxide) from bauxite. However, less than 2% of the residue produced annually is currently being reused [65], due to difficulties related to high pH, salinity, low solid content, size of fine particles, and the leaching of metals [66]. The ability to grow in the presence of red mud and accumulate REEs was successfully tested with G. phlegrea (Figure 2) [67].

Figure 2.

Electron microphotograph of the dense freeze-dried culture of Galdieria phlegrea used for REEs recovery. The bar is 10 μm. (provided by Dr. Jens Hartmann).

To conclude, the alga G. sulphuraria offers great potential for the direct recovery of REEs from metal-containing wastewaters (even if present at very low concentrations) or from solid waste material (luminophores) as well as for bio-mining from bauxite ore residue (red mud).

5.3 Phycocyanin

Phycocyanin is an important compound that can be obtained from microalgal and cyanobacterial cultures. It is used as a fluorescent marker in diagnostic histochemistry [68, 69] and as a dye in foods and cosmetics [70] or as a therapeutic agent [71, 72]. Production of phycocyanin as a photosynthetic pigment in most microalgae grown heterotrophically is low and not suitable for biotechnological applications [73]. In contrast, phycocyanin as a major pigment of G. sulphuraria can be produced even under heterotrophic conditions in darkness [7, 74]. Due to superior biomass productivity, the productivity of phycocyanin in cultures of G. sulphuraria was 1–2 orders of magnitude greater than in Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis, which was used recently for commercial production of phycocyanin [43] and was dependent on sunlight and climatic conditions. Besides light independence, G. sulphuraria tolerates a concentrated medium and can metabolize many different compounds as a source of carbon and energy [7, 75].

For example, G. sulphuraria could grow in restaurant and bakery waste hydrolysates in which sugars and free amino acids were utilized as substrates. Ammonium and inorganic nutrients were, however, needed in order to maximize phycocyanin synthesis [76].

The feasibility of utilizing crude glycerol (a major waste by-product of biofuel production from oilseed rape) as a carbon source for heterotrophic growth of green microalgae [54] was confirmed for Chlorella and also for G. sulphuraria.

G. sulphuraria has also been grown on sugar beet molasses [42]. Under heterotrophic conditions, phycocyanin synthesis depends mostly on available ammonium ions [77]. Ammonium sulphate was tolerated in higher molar concentrations than glucose, fructose, or sodium chloride [22, 23].

G. sulphuraria is well suited for heterotrophic growth to an extremely high cell density, which is among the highest biomass concentrations ever reported for microalgal cultures. Nearly 5% of sugar is employed for biomass yield, which is comparable to the biomass yields in industrially important heterotrophic microorganisms [78].

The high tolerance of Galdieria species to concentrated substances is probably an adaptation to the high concentrations of sulfuric acid and other salts present in acidic springs. G. sulphuraria tolerated and grew well concentrations of glucose and fructose of up to 166 g/L (0.9 M) and an ammonium sulphate concentration of 22 g/L (0.17 M) without negative effects on specific growth rate. In carbon-limited fed-batch cultures, biomass dry weight concentrations of 80–120 g/L were obtained while phycocyanin accumulated to concentrations between 250 and 400 mg/L [42].

The ability of G. sulphuraria to accumulate high levels of phycocyanin in heterotrophic or mixotrophic cultures compete with or at least represents an alternative to the cyanobacterium, Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis that is currently used for synthesis of phycocyanin [77].

Since a number of positive health effects have been associated with phycocyanin [79], and phycocyanin from A. platensis has been approved for food use in the USA and EU in 2013 and 2014, respectively, interests in applications of phycocyanin have increased substantially over recent years [80].

In addition to phycocyanin, G. sulphuraria could also provide floridosides suggested as a commercial products [81, 82, 83]. Its biomass was also tested and found to be a suitable and safe component in foods, as well as a dietary supplement [84].

5.4 Biofuels

The world-wide and continuous increase in fossil fuel consumption, leading probably in the relatively near future to an exhaustion of resources, has led to increased research for alternative energy sources. Production of biofuels by algae might provide a viable alternative to fossil fuels; however, this technology must overcome a number of serious obstacles before it could compete in the fuel market and be broadly deployed. Application of remarkably extremophilic G. sulphuraria could overcome at least some of these.

Microalgae often become contaminated with other microorganisms in large-scale outdoor cultivations, which is a major problem that inhibits algal growth and decreases the quality of biofuel and high-value products. A lack of resistance to these factors could be catastrophic for future algae farmers. The red alga G. sulphuraria and other species of the same genus have great potential to produce large quantities of biofuel [53] and other beneficial compounds without becoming contaminated with other microorganisms, under both mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. Furthermore, the algae are tolerant of pH and temperature extremes that offer a reliable means of controlling the composition of large-scale cultures.

5.5 Glycogen

The extremophilic red algae, similarly to other Rhodophyta, produce glycogen as energy and carbon reserves, instead of starch, which is characteristic of other microalgae and higher plants [81]. Glycogen, in contrast to starch, is readily soluble in cold water and more accessible by enzymes. In red algae, glycogen accumulates in a lower molecular weight form than glycogen from other microalgae and is a highly branched (higher than any other glycogen) glucose polymer [81]. Amylopectin, as a highly branched glucose polymer in starch, is used in various products such as peritoneal dialysis solutions and sports drinks. However, it is costly to prepare because of its insoluble, granular nature. The application of glycogen offers a cheaper alternative.

The alga G. sulphuraria can grow to a very high biomass concentration [42], accumulating glycogen up to 50% of the dry cell weight. Another advantage of this alga is that it can grow heterotrophically using many organic sources and also very cheap waste glycerol [84].

Apart from G. sulphuraria, the production of glycogen by most other microorganisms is too low for biotechnological applications because it is produced only under growth limiting conditions [85]. Thus, G. sulphuraria can be used as a cheap and efficient producer of glycogen, which could be applied as an alternative to starch in several fields [83].

Large amounts of glycogen were obtained in mixotrophic cultures, [53] where the maximum glycogen content per mL of culture was almost 10- and 2-fold greater than those of autotrophic and heterotrophic cultures, respectively. The accumulation of glycogen was enhanced by the addition of glucose, and the amount and composition of glycogen were determined by growth conditions. It is assumed that in addition to glycogen, other forms of carbon may be stored, although pathways are, as yet, unknown [75, 86].

5.6 Nutritional applications

Because of their high content of protein, algal biomass, in general, and green algae particularly, have been used in many foods, mostly in the form of dried biomass.

Difficulties in introducing microalgal-based ingredients into foods are technological and include sensorial obstacles such as its unattractive green-brownish color and unpleasant fishy smell increasing after longer storing [87]. Another problem is bacterial contamination, which decreases the commercial quality of algal biomass. Such disadvantages of green algae are not encountered using Galdieria species. G. sulphuraria can grow heterotrophically even in large-scale bioreactors under so extreme conditions that contamination by other organisms is not likely. Biomass is colorless, has a low lipid content, mainly of monounsaturated fatty acids, and oxidation during shelf life is negligible. Heterotrophic growth enables high cell densities to be achieved using cheap glycerol as a source of carbon. Consequently, in addition to other specific applications, red algal biomass can be used as a source of protein and other macronutrients. G. sulphuraria is rich in proteins (26–32%) and polysaccharides (63–69%), and poor in lipids. Under heterotrophic cultivation conditions, the lipid moiety mainly contained monounsaturated fatty acids. Nutritional applications of red algae were firstly suggested by Bailey and Staehelin [87], who found very high levels of protein in their cell walls.

G. sulphuraria proteins are strictly associated with polysaccharide components and therefore not digestible. However, a commercial enzyme preparation containing a mixture of polysaccharidases was developed, and G. sulphuraria proteins were good substrates for human gastrointestinal enzymes. G. sulphuraria biomass therefore has the potential to be used either for protein-rich or for insoluble dietary fiber-rich applications. Among micronutrients, some B group vitamins and pigments are present. Carotenoids are minor pigments in G. sulphuraria, detected only in the autotrophic algae, the main ones being astaxanthin and lutein. The absence of carotenoids under heterotrophic growth conditions is due to the lack of photosynthesis. Phycobiliproteins are present under heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultivation conditions. The cells grown on organic source of carbon frequently lose their photosynthetic antenna undermining the accumulation of the phycobilins. In G. sulphuraria, allophycocyanin is the dominant form in the autotrophic algae, while phycoerithrin was the main phycobiliprotein in the heterotrophic algae.

G. sulphuraria can therefore be used to develop new food ingredients, including preparations that are rich in bioavailable proteins and dietary fiber [84].


6. Conclusions

The unicellular red alga Galdieria is an amazing organism, not only because of its ability to live in extreme habitats, but also because of its metabolic flexibility to grow photo-autotrophically, heterotrophically or mixotrophically on diverse carbon sources. These properties make it a suitable candidate for biotechnological applications, including those inappropriate for other organisms. The biotechnological potential of Galdieria lies in the tremendous variability of cultivation conditions under which it is able to grow, including the ability to accumulate toxic heavy metals as well as rare ones such as Au, Pt or lanthanides. This alga can also produce biotechnologically attractive products such as phycocyanin, glycogen, protein-rich or insoluble dietary fiber-rich additives for nutritional applications. This opens up fields for its use in a wide range of industries such as the food industry, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, waste management, the metal recycling industry, bioremediation, wastewater management, etc. Galdieria is certainly worth the effort to research it for future uses.



We thank prof. J. D. Brooker for critical reading and language corrections of the manuscript. We are grateful to Dr. Jens Hartmann, Donau University, Krems, Austria, for the electron-microscopy photograph.

This work was supported by the National Program of Sustainability I, ID: LO1416 and by the Program Interreg V-A Austria-Czech Republic, project ATCZ172 REEgain.


  1. 1. Yoshimura E, Nagasaka S, Sato Y, Satake K, Mori S. Extraordinary high aluminium tolerance of the acidic thermophilic alga, Cyanidium caldarium. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition. 1999;45:721-724. DOI: 10.1080/00380768.1999.10415835
  2. 2. Nagasaka S, Nishizawa NK, Watanabe T, Mori S, Yoshimura E. Evidence that electron-dense bodies in Cyanidium caldarium have an iron-storage role. Biometals. 2003;16:465-470. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022563600525
  3. 3. Varshney P, Mikulic P, Vonshak A, Beardall J, Wangikar PP. Extremophilic micro-algae and their potential contribution in biotechnology. Bioresource Technolology. 2015;184:363-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.040
  4. 4. Yoon HS, Hackett JD, Ciniglia C, Pinto G, Bhattacharya D. A molecular timeline for the origin of photosynthetic eukaryotes. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2004;21(5):809-818. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh075
  5. 5. Yoon HS, Ciniglia C, Wu M, Comeron JM, Pinto G, Pollio A, et al. Establishment of endolithic populations of extremophilic Cyanidiales (Rhodophyta). BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2006;6:78. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-78
  6. 6. De Luca P, Taddei R, Varano L. Cyanidioschyzon merolae: A new alga of thermal acidic environments. Webbia. 1978;33:37-44. DOI: 10.1080/00837792.1978.10670110
  7. 7. Gross W, Schnarrenberger C. Heterotrophic growth of two strains of the acido-thermophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. Plant and Cell Physiology. 1995;36:633-638. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078803
  8. 8. Merola A, Castaldo R, De Luca P, Gambardella R, Musacchio A, Taddei R. Revision of Cyanidium caldarium. Three species of acidophilic algae. Giornale Botanica Italiana. 1981;115:189-195. DOI: 10.1080/11263508109428026
  9. 9. Ciniglia C, Yoon HS, Pollio A, Pinto G, Bhattacharya D. Hidden biodiversity of the extremophilic Cyanidiales red algae. Molecular Ecology. 2004;13(7):1827-1838. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078803
  10. 10. Ciniglia C, Yang EC, Pollio A, Pinto G, Iovinella M, Vitale L, et al. Cyanidiophyceae in Iceland: Plastid rbcL gene elucidates origin and dispersal of extremophilic Galdieria sulphuraria and G. maxima (Galdieriaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycologia. 2014;53(6):542-551. DOI: 10.2216/14-032.1
  11. 11. Cozzolino A, Caputo P, De Castro O, Moretti S, Pinto G. Molecular variation in Galdieria sulphuraria (Galdieri) Merola and its bearing on taxonomy. Hydrobiologia. 2000;433:145-151. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004035224715
  12. 12. Pinto G, Albertano P, Ciniglia C, Cozzolino S, Pollio A, Yoon HS, et al. Comparative approaches to the taxonomy of the genus Galdieria merola (Cyanidiales, Rhodophyta). Cryptogamie Algologie. 2003;24:12-32
  13. 13. Barcytė D, Elster J, Nedbalová L. Plastid-encoded rbcL phylogeny suggests widespread distribution of Galdieria phlegrea (Cyanidiophyceae, Rhodophyta). Nordic Journal of Botany. 2018;36:e01794. DOI: 10.1111/njb.01794.1-6.
  14. 14. Pinto G, Ciniglia C, Cascone C, Pollio P. Species composition of cyanidiales assemblages in Pisciarelli (Campi Flegrei, Italy) and description of Galdieria phlegrea sp. nov. In: Seckbach J, editor. Algae and Cyanobacteria in Extreme Environments. Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology. 11. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. pp. 489-502. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6112-7_26
  15. 15. Sentsova OJ. The study of Cyanidiophyceae in Russia. In: Seckbach J, editor. Evolutionary Pathways and Enigmatic Algae: Cyanidium caldarium (Rhodophyta) and Related Cells Developments in Hydrobiology. 91. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. pp. 167-174. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0882-9_12
  16. 16. Gross W, Heilmann I, Lenze D, Schnarrenberger C. Biogeography of the Cyanidiaceae (Rhodophyta) based on 18S ribosomal RNA sequence data. European Journal of Phycology. 2001;36(3):275-280. DOI: 10.1080/09670260110001735428
  17. 17. Gross W, Küver J, Tischendorf G, Bouchaala N, Büsch W. Cryptoendolithic growth of the red alga Galdieria sulphuraria in volcanic areas. European Journal of Phycology. 1998;33(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1080/09670269810001736503
  18. 18. Ferris MJ, Sheehan KB, Kuhl M, Cooksey K, Wigglesworth-Cooksey B, Harvey R, et al. Algal species and light microenvironment in a low-pH, geothermal microbial mat community. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71(11):7164-7171. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7164-7171.2005
  19. 19. Skorupa DJ, Reeb V, Castenholz RW, Bhattacharya D, McDermott TR. Cyanidiales diversity in Yellowstone national park. Letters of Applied Microbiology. 2013;57(5):459-466. DOI: 10.1111/lam.12135
  20. 20. Toplin JA, Norris TB, Lehr CR, McDermott TR, Castenholz RW. Biogeographic and phylogenetic diversity of thermoacidophilic cyanidiales in Yellowstone National Park, Japan, and New Zealand. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008;74(9):2822-2833. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02741-07
  21. 21. Barcyte D, Nedbalová L, Culka A, Košek F, Jehlička J. Burning coal spoil heaps as a new habitat for the extremophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. Fottea. 2018;18:19-29. DOI: 10.5507/fot.2017.015
  22. 22. Gross W, Oesterhelt C, Tischendorf G, Lederer F. Characterization of a non-thermophilic strain of the red algal genus Galdieria isolated from Soos (Czech Republic). European Journal of Phycology. 2002;37(3):477-482. DOI: 10.1017/S0967026202003773
  23. 23. Albertano P, Ciniglia C, Pinto G, Pollio A. The taxonomic position of Cyanidium, Cyanidioschyzon and Galdieria: An update. Hydrobiologia. 2000;433(1993):137-143. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004031123806
  24. 24. Ott FD, Seckbach J. New classification of the genus Cyanidium Geitler 1933. In evolutionary pathways and enigmatic algae: Cyanidium caldarium (Rhodophyta) and related cells. In: Seckbach J, editor. Evolutionary Pathways and Enigmatic Algae: Cyanidium caldarium (Rhodophyta) and Related Cells Developments in Hydrobiology. 91. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands; 1994. pp. 113-132. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0882-9_9
  25. 25. Seckbach J. In: Seckbach J, editor. Evolutionary Pathways and Enigmatic Algae: Cyanidium caldarium (Rhodophyta) and Related Cells. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 1994. p. 349. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0882-9
  26. 26. Reeb V, Bhattacharya D. The thermo-acidophilic Cyanidiophyceae (Cyanidiales). In: Seckbach J, Chapman DJ, editors. Red Algae In the Genomic Age. 13. Netherlands: Springer; 2010. pp. 409-426. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3795-4_22
  27. 27. Hsieh CJ, Zhan SH, Lin Y, Tang SL, Liu SL. Analysis of rbcL sequences reveals the global biodiversity, community structure, and biogeographical pattern of thermoacidophilic red algae (Cyanidiales). Journal of Phycology. 2015;51:682-694. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12310
  28. 28. Castenholz RW, McDermott TR. The Cyanidiales: Ecology, biodiversity, and biogeography. In: Seckbach J, Chapman DJ, editors. Red Algae in the Genomic Age. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. pp. 357-271. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3795-4_19
  29. 29. Gross W, Gross S. Hot Sulphur Springs at Sao Miguel Island (Azores): A new locality of the acidophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria (Galdieri) Merola. Algological Studies. 2002;107:109-116. DOI: 10.1127/algol_stud/107/2002/109
  30. 30. Brock TD. Thermophilic Microorganisms Abd Life at High Temperatures. New York, Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1978. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3760050112
  31. 31. Brock TD. Lower pH limit for the existence of bluegreen algae: Evolutionary and ecological implications. Science. 1973;179:480-483. DOI: 10.1126/science.179.4072.480
  32. 32. Doemel WN, Brock TD. The upper temperature limit of Cyanidium caldarium. Archives of Microbiology. 1970;72:326-332. DOI: 10.1007/BF00409031
  33. 33. Rothschild LJ, Mancinelli RL. Life in extreme environments. Nature. 2001;409:1092-1101. DOI: 10.1038/35059215
  34. 34. Donachie SP, Christenson BW, Kunkel DD, Malahoff A, Alam M. Microbial community in acidic hydrothermal waters of volcanically active White Island, New Zealand. Extremophiles. 2002;6:419-425. DOI: 10.1007/s00792-002-0274-7
  35. 35. Oesterhelt C, Gross W. Different sugar kinases are involved in the sugar sensing of Galdieria sulphuraria. Plant Physiology. 2002;128(1):291-299. DOI: 10.1104/pp.010553
  36. 36. Barbier G, Oesterhelt C, Larson MD, Halgren RG, Wilkerson C, Garavito RM, et al. Genome analysis. Plant Physiology. 2005;137:460-474. DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.051169.460
  37. 37. Sentsova OY. Diversity of acido thermophilic unicellular algae of the genus Galdieria (Rhodophyta, Cyanidiophyceae). Botanicheskii Zhurnal. 1991;76:69-79
  38. 38. Muravenko O, Selyakh I, Kononenko N, Stadnichuk I. Chromosome numbers and nuclear DNA contents in the red microalgae Cyanidium caldarium and three Galdieria species. European Journal of Phycology. 2001;36(3):227-232. DOI: 10.1080/09670260110001735378
  39. 39. Moreira D, Lopez-Archilla A-J, Amils R, Marin J. Characterization of two new thermoacidophilic microalgae: Genome organization and comparison with Galdieria sulphuraria. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1994;122:109-114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07152.x
  40. 40. Derelle E, Ferraz C, Lagoda P, Eychenie S, Cooke R, Regad F, et al. DNA libraries for sequencing the genome of Ostreococcus tauri (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae): The smallest free-living eukaryotic cell. Journal of Phycology. 2002;38(6):1150-1156. DOI: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.02021.x
  41. 41. Jain K, Krause K, Grewe F, Nelson GF, Weber AP, Christensen AC, et al. Extreme features of the Galdieria sulphuraria organellar genomes: A consequence of polyextremophily? Genome Biology and Evolution. 2015;7(1):367-380. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu290
  42. 42. Schmidt RA, Wiebe MG, Eriksen NT. Heterotrophic high cell-density fed-batch cultures of the phycocyanin-producing red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2005;90(1):77-84. DOI: 10.1002/bit.20417
  43. 43. Gravelholt OS, Erickson NT. Heterotrophic high-cell-density fed-batch and continuous-flow cultures of Galdieria sulphuraria and production of phycocyanin. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2007;77(1):69-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1150-2
  44. 44. Oesterhelt C, Schmalzlin E, Schmitt JM, Lokstein H. Regulation of photosynthesis in the unicellular acidophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. The Plant Journal. 2007;51(3):500-511. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03159.x
  45. 45. Vítová M, Goecke F, Sigler K, Řezanka T. Lipidomic analysis of the extremophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria in response to changes in pH. Algal Research. 2016;13:218-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2015.12.005
  46. 46. Boyanov MI, Kelly SD, Kemner KM, Bunker BA, Fein JB, Fowle DA. Adsorption of cadmium to Bacillus subtilis bacterial cell walls: a pH-dependent X-ray adsorption fine structure spectroscopy study. Geochimica et Cosmochima Acta 2003;67:3299-3311. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01343-1
  47. 47. Cordero B, Lodeiro P, Herrero R, Sastre de Vicente ME. Biosorption of cadmium by Fucus spiralis. Environment and Chemistry. 2004;1:180-187. DOI: 10.1071/EN04039
  48. 48. Jiang MY, Ohnuki T, Kozai N, Tanaka K, Suzuki Y, Sakamoto F, et al. Biological nano-mineralization of Ce phosphate by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chemical Geology. 2010;277(1-2):61-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.07.010
  49. 49. Hosomomi Y, Baba Y, Kubota F, Kamiya N, Goto M. Biosorption of rare earth elements by Escherichia coli. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 2013;46:450-454. DOI: 10.1252/jcej.13we031
  50. 50. Schönknecht G, Chen WH, Ternes CM, Barbier GG, Shrestha RP, Stanke M, et al. Gene transfer from bacteria and archaea facilitated evolution of an extremophilic eukaryote. Science. 2013;339:1207-1210. DOI: 10.1126/science.1231707
  51. 51. Selvaratnam T, Pegallapati AK, Montelya F, Rodriguez G, Nirmalakhandan N, Van Voorhies W, et al. Evaluation of a thermo-tolerant acidophilic alga, Galdieria sulphuraria, for nutrient removal from urban wastewaters. Bioresource Technology. 2014;156:395-399. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.075
  52. 52. Minoda A, Sawada H, Suzuki S, Miyashita S, Inagaki K, Yamamoto T, et al. Recovery of rare earth elements from the sulfothermophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria using aqueous acid. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;99(3):1513-1519. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-6070-3
  53. 53. Sakurai T, Aoki M, Ju X, Ueda T, Nakamura Y, Fujiwara S, et al. Profiling of lipid and glycogen accumulations under different growth conditions in the sulfothermophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. Bioresource Technology. 2016;200:861-866. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.014
  54. 54. Ju X, Igarashi K, Miyashita S, Mitsuhashi H, Inagaki K, Fujii S-I, et al. Effective and selective recovery of gold and palladium ions from metal wastewater using a sulfothermophilic red alga, Galdieria sulphuraria. Bioresource Technolology. 2016;211:759-764. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.061
  55. 55. Abreu RD, Morais CA. Purification of rare earth elements from monazite sulphuric acid leach liquor and the production of high-purity ceric oxide. Minerals Engineering. 2010;23:536-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.03.010
  56. 56. Sethurajan M, Lens PNL, Horn HA, Figueiredo LHA, van Hullebusch ED. Leaching and recovery of metals. In: Rene ER, Lewis A, Sahynkaya E, PNL L, editors. Sustainable Heavy Metal Remediation Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World. 2. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. pp. 161-206. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61146-4
  57. 57. Pollmann K, Kutschke S, Matys S, Raff J, Hlawacek G, Lederer FL. Bio-recycling of metals: Recycling of technical products using biological applications. Biotechnology Advances. 2018;36:1048-1062. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.006
  58. 58. Jacinto J, Henriques B, Duarte AC, Vale C, Pereira E. Removal and recovery of critical rare elements from contaminated waters by living Gracilaria gracilis. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2018;344:531-538. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.054
  59. 59. Isildar A, van Hullebusch ED, Lenz M, Du Laing G, Marra A, Cesaro A, et al. Biotechnological strategies for the recovery of valuable and critical raw materials from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2019;362:467-481. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.050
  60. 60. Das N, Das D. Recovery of rare earth metals through biosorption: An overview. Journal of Rare Earths. 2013;31(10):933-943. DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0721(13)60009-5
  61. 61. Mehta SK, Gaur JP. Use of algae for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: Progress and prospects. Critical Review of Biotechnology. 2005;25:113-152. DOI: 10.1080/07388550500248571
  62. 62. Wang JL, Chen C. Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnology Advances. 2009;27(2):195-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.002
  63. 63. Čížková M, Bišová K, Zachleder V, Mezricky D, Rucki M, Vítová M. Recovery of rare earth elements from luminophores using the red alga Galdieria. In: 16th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology; September 2019; Rhodes, Greece; 2019. pp. 1-3
  64. 64. Vítová M, Čížková M, Zachleder V. Lanthanides and algae. In: Awwad NS, Mubarak AT, editors. Lanthanides. London, United Kingdom: InTech Open; 2019. pp. 87-111. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80260
  65. 65. Ujaczki E, Feigl V, Molnar M, Cusack P, Curtin T, Courtney R, et al. Re-using bauxite residues: Benefits beyond (critical raw) material recovery. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2018;93:2498-2510. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5687
  66. 66. Cusack PB, Courtney R, Healy MG, O’Donoghue LMT, Ujaczki E. An evaluation of the general composition and critical raw material content of bauxite residue in a storage area over a twelve-year period. Journal of Clean Products. 2019;208:393-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.083
  67. 67. Čížková M, Mezricky D, Rucki M, Tóth TM, Náhlík V, Lanta V, et al. Bio-mining of lanthanides from red mud by green microalgae. Molecules. 2019;24:1-19. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24071356
  68. 68. Glazer AN. Phycobiliproteins—A family of valuable, widely used fluorophores. Journal of Applied Phycology. 1994;6:105-112. DOI: 10.1007/BF02186064
  69. 69. Glazer AN, Stryer L. Phycofluor probes. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 1984;9:423-427. DOI: 10.1016/0968-0004(84)90146-4
  70. 70. Benemann JR, Tillett DM, Weissman JC. Microalgae biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology. 1987;5(2):47-53. DOI: 10.1016/0167-7799(87)90037-0
  71. 71. Rimbau V, Camins A, Romay C, González R, Pallàs M. Protective effects of C-phycocyanin against kainic acid-induced neuronal damage in rat hippocampus. Neuroscience Letters. 1999;276:75-78. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00792-2
  72. 72. Romay C, Armesto J, Remirez D, González D, Ledon N, Garcìa I. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of C-phycocyanin from blue-green algae. Inflamation Research. 1998;47:36-41. DOI: 10.1007/s000110050256
  73. 73. Chen F. High cell density culture of microalgae in heterotrophic growth. Trends in Biotechnology. 1996;14:421-426. DOI: 10.1016/0167-7799(96)10060-3
  74. 74. Marquardt J. Effects of carotenoid-depletion on the photosynthetic apparatus of a Galdieria sulphuraria (Rhodophyta) strain that retains its photosynthetic apparatus in the dark. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1998;152(4-5):372-380. DOI: 10.1016/s0176-1617(98)80250-2
  75. 75. Oesterhelt C, Schnarrenberger C, Gross W. Characterization of a sugar/polyol uptake system in the red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. European Journal of Phycology. 1999;34(3):271-277. DOI: 10.1080/09670269910001736322
  76. 76. Sloth JK, Jensen HC, Pleissner D, Eriksen NT. Growth and phycocyanin synthesis in the heterotrophic microalga Galdieria sulphuraria on substrates made of food waste from restaurants and bakeries. Bioresource Technology. 2017;238:296-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.043
  77. 77. Sloth JK, Wiebe MG, Eriksen NT. Accumulation of phycocyanin in heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultures of the acidophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2006;38(1-2):168-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.05.010
  78. 78. Roels JA. Applications of macroscopic principles to microbial metabolism. Biotechnology Bioengeneering. 1980;22:2457-2514. DOI: 10.1002/bit.22325
  79. 79. Fernández-Rojas B, Medina-Campos ON, Hernández-Pando R, Negrette-Guzmán M, Huerta-Yepez S, Pedraza-Chaverri J. C-Phycocyanin prevents cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity through inhibition of oxidative stress. Food & Function. 2014;5:480-490. DOI: 10.1039/c3fo60501a
  80. 80. Eriksen NT. Research trends in the dominating microalgal pigments, ß carotene, astaxanthin, and phycocyanin used in feed, in foods, and in health applications. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences. 2016;6:1-6. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000507
  81. 81. Martinez-Garcia M, Kormpa A, van der Maarel MJEC. The glycogen of Galdieria sulphuraria as alternative to starch for the production of slowly digestible and resistant glucose polymers. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017;169:75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.004
  82. 82. Martinez-Garcia M, van der Maarel MJEC. Floridoside production by the red microalga Galdieria sulphuraria under different conditions of growth and osmotic stress. AMB Express. 2016;6:71. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-016-0244-6
  83. 83. Martinez-Garcia M, Stuart MCA, van der Maarel MJ. Characterization of the highly branched glycogen from the thermoacidophilic red microalga Galdieria sulphuraria and comparison with other glycogens. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2016;89:12-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.051
  84. 84. Graziani G, Schiavo S, Nicolai MA, Buono S, Fogliano V, Pinto G, et al. Microalgae as human food: Chemical and nutritional characteristics of the thermo-acidophilic microalga Galdieria sulphuraria. Food & Function. 2013;4(1):144-152. DOI: 10.1039/c2fo30198a
  85. 85. Preiss J. Bacterial glycogen synthesis and its regulation. Annual Reviews in Microbiology. 1984;38:419-458. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.38.100184.002223
  86. 86. Lammers PJ, Selvaratnam S, Nirmalakhandan N, Reddy H, Deng S. A route to algal biofuels via ecosystem services: the case for an extremophile, Galdieria sulphuraria. In: 2nd International Symposium on Energy Challenges and Mechanics; 19-21 August 2014; Aberdeen, Scotland, UK; 2014
  87. 87. Bailey RW, Staehelin LA. The chemical composition of isolated cell wall of Cyanidium caldarium. Journal of General Microbiology. 1968;54:269-276. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-54-2-269

Written By

Mária Čížková, Milada Vítová and Vilém Zachleder

Submitted: 04 April 2019 Reviewed: 19 September 2019 Published: 10 October 2019