Open access

Introductory Chapter: A Brief Overview on Fermentation and Challenges for the Next Future

Written By

Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa

Submitted: 23 January 2019 Published: 05 February 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89418

From the Edited Volume

New Advances on Fermentation Processes

Edited by Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa

Chapter metrics overview

1,494 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Several authors stated that the word ‘fermentation’ comes from the Latin word fermentare, which means ‘to leaven’, while others confirm that it comes from the Latin verb fervere, which means ‘to boil’. From these Latin terms, several definitions have been used so far to explain not only the concept of fermentation but also its applications. Thus, the earliest use of the word ‘fermentation’ mostly referred to natural metabolic processes driven by wild and unidentified microbes. Other more recent definitions state that fermentation is a process in which a substance breaks down into a simpler substance usually due to the metabolic activity of microorganisms like yeast or bacteria. In the context of physiology and biochemistry, fermentation processes are usually metabolic pathways producing modifications in organic molecules thanks to the action of microorganisms and/or enzymes [1].

In the strict biochemical sense of the term, fermentation involves the action of anaerobic organisms on organic substrates. However, modern usage extends definition to the microbiological formation of smaller organic molecules, whether aerobic or anaerobic [2]. In applied fields like food or beverage production, fermentation involves any process conducted by microbial activities which brings about a desirable change to a foodstuff or beverage. The component products of fermentation may be isolated from the feedstock and purveyed as pure substances, unlike fermentation of antiquity (e.g. ethanol vs. wine).

From the very beginning, microorganisms were described as the main organisms able to carry out fermentation, but, in general, fermentation is widely distributed in nature. From a biological point of view, fermentation is a way of extracting energy from molecules, and it is one of the common metabolic processes to all living beings: bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes. Thus, fermentation provides ATP thanks to the degradation of organic nutrients (usually under anoxic conditions). In animals for instance, fermentation occurs within the gastrointestinal tracts thanks to microbial flora [1, 3].

Fermentation-based processes have been of great interest for humans since the antiquity due to their potential applications. The origins of fermentation are difficult to track down, and it is assumed that the first fermentation process was discovered accidentally when salt was incorporated with food. Few historians have traced signs of fermentation dating as far back as 7000 BC. At that time, human beings made fermented foods like beer, wine, leavened bread (made primarily by yeasts) and cheeses (made by bacteria and moulds) since Neolithic times in West regions. These societies were soon followed by East Asian regions (6000–1500 BC), where fermented foods, yoghurt and other fermented milk products, pickles, sauerkraut, vinegar (soured wine), butter and a host of traditional alcoholic beverages were made following local procedures [4, 5, 6].

The aims of using fermentation-based processes have been evolving along time, due to cultural and social issues or due to technology and engineering facilities. Consequently, fermentation has been extensively used in all cultures worldwide to improve food storage for short midterms or to make beverages or local dishes in which fermented sauces, vegetable meat or fish increase the culinary offer. This kind of fermentation is commonly known as ‘indigenous fermentation’/‘classical fermentation’ (it is used to produce foods and beverages using natural microbes following traditional procedures based on cultural practices) (Figure 1). Through indigenous fermentation, many products have been standardised and commercialised (ales, natural yeast; cheeses, natural fungi; wines, natural yeast), whilst many other products are made and commercialised at limited quantities for specialised markers or even remain uncommercialised (products of indigenous/local cultures). This is the case of products like kefir, kimchi, sauerkraut, etc. [7, 8].

Figure 1.

Simple classification of fermentation based on the nature of the process (criteria: processes based on traditional procedures vs. processes based on technological facilities).

The results of the evolution of fermentation-based process are made possible through ‘technological fermentations’ (Figure 1), which offers several advantages in order to upscale processes.


2. Microorganism and enzymes as key tools for fermentation

The nineteenth century was probably one of the periods in which the concept of fermentation as well as its applications focused the attention of professionals from all fields of knowledge. This was mainly due to the French chemist Louis Pasteur (mid-nineteenth century) who connected, for the first time, yeast metabolic activity to fermentation. Since that time and up to the beginning of the twentieth century, significant number of studies summarised basic descriptions of fermentation processes mainly driven by microorganisms [9, 10, 11]. Thus, eukaryotic and prokaryotic microbes able to carry out anaerobic metabolic pathways have been considered good targets for fermentation-based processes so far. During the last four decades, most of the studies focused on fermentation were related to food or beverage production, descriptions of natural fermentations, production of marketed compounds at large scale or technologies to carry out industrial fermentations. Between the descriptions of these natural processes, it is worthy to highlight the following with potential implications in medicine or industries:

  1. The role of microflora in mammals (including human beings and ruminants) [3, 12, 13]

  2. The production of highly demanded secondary metabolites through fermentation (antibiotics, pigments, prebiotics, etc.) [14, 15, 16, 17]

  3. The production of biomolecules like proteins, amino acids, fatty acids [18], enzymes, vitamins or surface-active compounds [19]

The interest of the use of microbes at industrial scale in fermentation processes was higher at the end of the last century, when some studies reinforced the exploitation at mid or large scale of ‘conventional’ microbes. Shortly after this period, several works increased the interest of scientific community on looking for extremophilic microbes showing ‘rare’ or ‘specific’ metabolic capabilities (even under anoxia) susceptible of being used in industries (Food, Green Biotechnology, Biomedicine, etc.). This was the case of the use of hyperthermophilic microorganisms first [20, 21], members of Archaea domain [22] or nonconventional yeast like Yarrowia lipolytica from which production of oils and fats has been recently reported [23].

More recently, other fields of knowledge have evolved thanks to the knowledge of microbial fermentation. Thus, two new areas of research have emerged:

  1. The production of biogas, biodiesel, biofuel and their derivatives [24]

  2. The design and development of biosorption and bioremediation processes (involving microbes or their isolated enzymes) for soils and wastewater treatments [25]

Not only microorganisms but also their enzymes have contributed significantly to the development of fermentation-based processes. Several processes aim for the fermentative production of microbial enzymes which are further used at large scale mainly in biotechnology [26]. As an example, the use of lignocellulose as a rich and sustainable globally available carbon source to produce bioproducts has only been possible thanks to the use of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes produced by different microorganisms including filamentous fungi, yeasts and bacteria [27, 28]. Enzymes from extremophilic microorganisms reveal as promising candidates for industrial processes. The reason beyond this potential use is that most of these enzymes show high catalytic efficiency under some of the extreme conditions used in several processes like high temperature, high ionic strength, extreme pHs or low water availability [29].


3. Optimising fermentation processes: impact of technology on fermentation

Technology was coupled to fermentation making possible large-scale production for commercial purposes. Thus, the development of modern engineering, biotechnology and related advanced techniques has connected traditional food fermentations with large-scale production approaches, in which product quality and safety are guaranteed.

To obtain better integrated functions of microbial cells and enzymes, evolutionary engineering combined with other biotechnologies has attracted more attention in recent years. Classical laboratory evolution has not only been proven effective to letting more beneficial mutations occur affecting different genes but also has some inherent limitations such as a long evolutionary period and uncontrolled mutation frequencies [30].

With the arrival of ‘genomics era’ (genomics, transcriptomics, metagenomics, metabolomics, proteomics, etc.) and ‘synthetic biology’ approaches, new ways of exploring fermentation are possible due to the possibility of selecting markers and improving cellular transformation strategies [31]. Thanks to these molecular biology approaches, the production of biomolecules through fermentation at large scale is more efficient, low time-consuming and low cost [32].

The development of fermentation technology is still being carried out in all aspects. This is intended to improve the yield and quality of products, reducing the costs of production and looking for processes environmentally friendly. Increasing fermentation products can be done by optimising the factors that influence the process from the aspect of the microbe itself, the environment and the technological facilities. Among these factors, the following have promoted optimization [33]:

  1. Type of feeding of the bioreactor: batch, fed-batch and continuous mode of operation

  2. Nature of fermentation: one or more than one step; solid vs. liquid

  3. Type of microbial cells: single strain or mixed culture processes

  4. Oxygen availability: aerobic, microaerobic and anaerobic processes

  5. Characteristics of inoculation and incubation: ratio of inoculation, agitation rate (to optimise mixing), and continuous control of pH

Other approaches combine microbes and technology at micro-/nanoscale. This is the case of strategies based on electrochemistry, which have been reported as successful approaches, mainly in wastewater and sludge treatments [34].


4. Challenges related to fermentation for the next future

As mentioned before, fermentation sustains many processes in food and beverage production at global scale as well as other processes like the production of marketed biocompounds: antibiotics, hormones, pigments, bioplastics, etc. Despite the intensive research efforts on fermentation-based processes, which involve various scientific areas such as plant/microorganism genetics, biochemistry, biomass chemistry and process engineering, the progress of the global use of fermentation has interesting challenges to address in the next future. This is particularly significant in the case of bioethanol production as a fuel alternative (it is still rather slow compared to the fast-growing demand on such biofuels worldwide).

We are now entering the post-genomic age at a time when many genomes from plants, fungi and microorganisms used in industrial fermentation or microorganisms isolated from food fermentations have already been sequenced. This offers a new knowledge-based approach to the exploitation of these organisms for fermentation related to different industrial activities, from metabolic engineering of microorganisms to produce antimicrobials or nutritionals, to the molecular mining of activities yet unknown, but which could benefit food production as well as the production of market biocompounds. Besides, the availability of the genomes of many pathogenic and spoilage bacteria may open new possibilities for the design of novel antibiotics which target essential functions of these problematic bacteria. The real challenge of the genomics and proteomic era, as it applies to food systems, is the harnessing of this wealth of information for improved culture performance and activities, thereby improving the safety and quality and composition of global food supply.

Another important challenge involves technology. Some microorganisms of interest recently described for industrial fermentations require ‘extreme conditions’ for growth like high salt concentration or highly acidic pHs. This is the case of halophilic or acid thermophilic microbes, respectively. Operating under these conditions causes corrosion (which affects the half-life of most of the bioreactor currently available), thus negatively affecting the implementation of these microorganisms at large scale.

Finally, the design of fermentation processes based on circular economy is still a challenge. Some recent approaches tend to use food wastes as raw materials to design sustainable processes based on acidogenesis, fermentation, methanogenesis, solventogenesis, photosynthesis, oleaginous process, bioelectrogenesis, etc., in order to obtain various products like biofuels, platform chemicals, bioelectricity, biomaterial, biofertilizers, animal feed, etc. which can be utilised for FW valorisation [35].



The author is thankful to MINECO Spain (RTI2018-099860-B-I00) and University of Alicante (VIGROB-309) for the funding.


Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Fruton J, Fermentation: Vital or chemical process?. In: History of Science and Medicine Library, Volume: 1. Leiden-Boston: Brill; 2006. 141 p. ISBN: 978-90-04-15268-7
  2. 2. Hui YH, Ghazala S, Graham DM, Murrell KD, Nip W-K. Handbook of Vegetable Preservation and Processing. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2003. DOI: 10.1201/9780203912911. 752 p
  3. 3. Savage DC. Gastrointestinal microflora in mammalian nutrition. Annual Review of Nutrition. 1986;6:155-178
  4. 4. McGovern PE, Zhang J, Tang J, Zhang Z, Hall GR, Moreau RA, et al. Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101(51):17593-17598. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407921102
  5. 5. Vouillamoz JF, McGovern PE, Ergul A, Söylemezoğlu GK, Tevzadze G, Meredith CP, et al. Genetic characterization and relationships of traditional grape cultivars from Transcaucasia and Anatolia. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization. 2006;4(2):144. CiteSeerX: DOI: 10.1079/PGR2006114
  6. 6. Cavalieri D, McGovern PE, Hartl DL, Mortimer R, Polsinelli M. Evidence for S. cerevisiae fermentation in ancient wine. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 2003;57(Suppl 1):S226-S232. CiteSeerX: DOI: 10.1007/s00239-003-0031-2
  7. 7. Hesseltine CW, Wang HL. The importance of traditional fermented foods. BioScience. Vol. 30, No. 6, Food from Microbes. 1980, pp. 402-404
  8. 8. Zhu Y, Tramper J. Koji—Where east meets west in fermentation. Biotechnology Advances. 2013;31(8):1448-1457. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.07.001
  9. 9. Krebs HA. The Pasteur effect and the relations between respiration and fermentation. Essays in Biochemistry. 1972;8:1-34
  10. 10. Berche P. Louis Pasteur, from crystals of life to vaccination. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2012;18(Suppl 5):1-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03945.x
  11. 11. Kohl F. A milestone of biochemistry and enzyme research. 100 years ago the German physiologist and chemist Eduard Buchner demonstrated “cell-free fermentation” in yeast extracts. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1998;123(25-26):814-817
  12. 12. Hespell RB. Microbial digestion of hemicelluloses in the rumen. Microbiological Sciences. 1988;5(12):362-365
  13. 13. Mackie RI, White BA. Recent advances in rumen microbial ecology and metabolism: Potential impact on nutrient output. Journal of Dairy Science. 1990;73(10):2971-2995
  14. 14. Franco CM, Coutinho LE. Detection of novel secondary metabolites. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 1991;11(3):193-276
  15. 15. H H, GM K, TF S. Production of antimicrobial compounds by fermentation. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2017;1520:49-61. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6634-9_3
  16. 16. Sadh PK, Kumar S, Chawla P, Duhan JS. Fermentation: A boon for production of bioactive compounds by processing of food industries wastes (by-products). Molecules. 2018;23(10). pii: E2560). DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102560
  17. 17. Calegari-Santos R, Diogo RA, Fontana JD, Bonfim TM. Carotenoid production by halophilic archaea under different culture conditions. Current Microbiology. 2016;72(5):641-651. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-015-0974-8
  18. 18. Kim SK, Park YC. Biosynthesis of ω-hydroxy fatty acids and related chemicals from natural fatty acids by recombinant Escherichia coli. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;103(1):191-199. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-9503-6
  19. 19. Georgiou G, Lin SC, Sharma MM. Surface-active compounds from microorganisms. Biotechnology (N. Y). 1992 Jan;10(1):60-65
  20. 20. Adams MW. Enzymes and proteins from organisms that grow near and above 100 degrees C. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1993;47:627-658
  21. 21. Kelly RM, Adams MW. Metabolism in hyperthermophilic microorganisms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1994;66(1-3):247-270
  22. 22. Torregrosa-Crespo J, Pire Galiana C, Martínez-Espinosa RM. Biocompounds from Haloarchaea and their uses in biotechnology. In: Sghaier H, Najjari A, Ghedira K, editors. Archaea: New Biocatalysts, Novel Pharmaceuticals and Various Biotechnological Applications. Intech Open; 2017. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69944
  23. 23. Carsanba E, Papanikolaou S, Erten H. Production of oils and fats by oleaginous microorganisms with an emphasis given to the potential of the nonconventional yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2018;38(8):1230-1243. DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2018.1472065
  24. 24. Dos Santos Vieira CF, Maugeri Filho F, Maciel Filho R, Pinto Mariano A. Acetone-free biobutanol production: Past and recent advances in the isopropanol-butanol-ethanol (IBE) fermentation. Bioresource Technology. 2019;287:121425. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121425
  25. 25. Aracil-Gisbert S, Torregrosa-Crespo J, Martínez-Espinosa RM. Recent trend on bioremediation of polluted salty soils and waters using Haloarchaea. In: Shiomi N, editor. Advances in Bioremediation and Phytoremediation. 1st ed. IntechOpen; 2017. pp. 63-77. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70802
  26. 26. Vittaladevaram V. Fermentative production of microbial enzymes and their applications: Present status and future prospects. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology;5(04):090-094
  27. 27. de Paula RG, Antoniêto ACC, Ribeiro LFC, Srivastava N, O’Donovan A, Mishra PK, et al. Engineered microbial host selection for value-added bioproducts from lignocellulose. Biotechnology Advances. 2019: pii: S0734-9750(19)30014-X. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.02.003
  28. 28. Hosseini Koupaie E, Dahadha S, Bazyar Lakeh AA, Azizi A, Elbeshbishy E. Enzymatic pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biomethane production—A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;233:774-784. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.106
  29. 29. Esclapez Espliego JM, Bautista Saiz V, Torregrosa-Crespo J, Vegara Luque A, Camacho Carrasco ML, Pire C, et al. Extremophile enzymes and biotechnology. In: Durvasula RV, Subba Rao DV, editors. Extremophiles. 1st ed. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press; 2018. pp. 227-248
  30. 30. Zhu Z, Zhang J, Ji X, Fang Z, Wu Z, Chen J, et al. Evolutionary engineering of industrial microorganisms—Strategies and applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;102(11):4615-4627. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-8937-1
  31. 31. He B, Tu Y, Jiang C, Zhang Z, Li Y, Zeng B. Functional genomics of Aspergillus oryzae: Strategies and progress. Microorganisms. 2019;7(4). pii: E103. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7040103
  32. 32. Wang Y, Ling C, Chen Y, Jiang X, Chen GQ. Microbial engineering for easy downstream processing. Biotechnology Advances. 2019. pii: S0734-9750(19)30040-0. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.03.004
  33. 33. Jiang Y, May HD, Lu L, Liang P, Huang X, Ren ZJ. Carbon dioxide and organic waste valorization by microbial electrosynthesis and electro-fermentation. Water Research. 2019;149:42-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.092
  34. 34. Paulová L, Patáková P, Brányik T. Advanced fermentation processes. In: Teixeira JA, Vicente AA, editors. Engineering Aspects of Food Biotechnology. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2013. p. 89-105. ISBN: 9781138199767
  35. 35. Puyol D, Batstone DJ, Hülsen T, Astals S, Peces M, Krömer JO. Resource recovery from wastewater by biological technologies: Opportunities, challenges, and prospects. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;7:2106. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02106

Written By

Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa

Submitted: 23 January 2019 Published: 05 February 2020