Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Introductory Chapter: The Versatile Escherichia coli

Written By

Marjanca Starčič Erjavec

Reviewed: July 29th, 2019 Published: September 18th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88882

Chapter metrics overview

1,063 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

There are not so many organisms that are so well studied and researched as the bacterium Escherichia coli(E. coli). Since its discovery in 1885, it was used in research, and by end of 2018, there are now already 368,071 publications in PubMed about E. coli[1]. Figure 1, presenting data about number of publications found in PubMed for the search term “Escherichia coli” in the time frame from 1932 to 2018, clearly demonstrates the high and still growing research interest in this microbe.

Figure 1.

Number of publications in PubMed for the search term “Escherichia coli” in the time frame from January 01, 1932 to December 31, 2018 [1].


2. The discovery of Escherichia coli

The bacterium E. coliwas discovered by the German-Austrian pediatrician Dr. Theodor Escherich (1857–1911) in 1885 [2]. He conducted examinations of neonate’s meconium and feces of breast-fed infants with the aim to gain insight into the development of intestinal “flora.” In preparations of meconium and stool samples under the microscope, he observed “slender short rods” of the size of 1–5 μm in length and 0.3–0.4 μm in width, which he named Bacterium coli commune(Figure 2). Further, he cultured these bacteria on agar and blood serum plates, where these bacteria grew as white, non-liquefying colonies. He also showed that these bacteria slowly cause milk to be clotted, as a result of acid formation, and demonstrated that these bacteria have fermentative ability. He also performed the Gram method of staining and revealed that these bacteria rapidly take color with all aniline dyes but lose the color after treatment with potassium iodide and alcohol [2]. Later, in 1919, the bacterium was renamed after its discoverer by Castellani and Chalmers and became Escherichia coli[3].

Figure 2.

Escherich’s drawing of the stool bacteria, as seen under light microscope [4]. Panel 1: Preparation of a meconium of a 27-hour-old infant. TheE. coliasBacterium coli communeis represented underd. Panel 2: Preparation of a stool of a 2-month-old healthy breast-fed child. TheE. coliasBacterium coli communeis represented underaanda′.


3. Characteristics of Escherichia coli

3.1 Basic characteristics

The bacterium E. coli(Figure 3) belongs into the family of Enterobacteriaceae. It is a Gram-negative rod-shaped bacterium, non-sporulating, nonmotile or motile by peritrichous flagella, chemoorganotrophic, facultative anaerobic, producing acid from glucose, catalase positive, oxidase negative, and mesophilic [5].

Figure 3.

Scanning electron microscopy of a single bacterialE. colicell adhering to 19-day-old Caco-2 cells [6].

E. coliis a well-known commensal bacterium that is among the first colonizing bacteria of the gut after birth. It is a highly successful competitor in the human gut and is comprising the most abundant facultative anaerobe of the human intestinal microbiota [7]. As it is a facultative anaerobe, it survives when released to the environment and can be spread to new hosts. E. coliis thus an important component of the biosphere [8].

Even though E. coliis a well-known commensal bacterium, many pathogenic strains of E. colido exist. Several highly adapted E. coliclones have acquired specific virulence factors, which confer an increased ability to adapt to new niches and allow them to cause a broad spectrum of disease, and intestinal and also extraintestinal infections [7].

3.2 The E. coligenome

The first complete E. coligenome sequence was the sequence of the K-12 MG1655 strain of E. coli, published in 1997. The sequenced strain has been maintained as a laboratory strain with minimal genetic manipulation, having only been cured of the temperate bacteriophage lambda and F plasmid. The published genome has 4,639,221 base pairs. Protein-coding genes account for 87.8% of the genome, 0.8% encodes stable RNAs, and 0.7% consists of noncoding repeats. Eleven percent of the genome are involved in regulation of gene expression and also other functions [9]. A circular map of the E. coligenome is represented in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Circular map of theE. coliK-12 MG1655 strain.

The map is based on the K-12 MG1655 sequence data as deposited in GenBank (Accession number NC_000913) [10]. The multiplier for the ticks is 1e-6 (1.0 represents 1,000,000). In blue, the forward genes are shown, in purple the reverse genes, tRNA genes in orange, and rRNA genes in red. The map was drawn with the online tool ClicO FS, available at the Internet site [11, 12].

Genomes of pathogenic E. colistrains are general bigger, as the pathogenic strains need several special properties, so-called virulence factors. These are encoded in the virulence-associated genes (VAGs), which are frequently clustered in DNA regions called pathogenicity islands (PAIs) [13]. Often the pathogenic strains possess also extrachromosomal DNA elements, i.e., plasmids, that can also carry additional VAGs [7]. Some examples of genomes of pathogenic strains in comparison with the K-12 MG1655 strain are given in Table 1.

E. colistrainAssociated with infectionChromosome size (Mbp)Number of genes in the chromosomePlasmidsPlasmid size (bp)Number of genes on the plasmid
K-12 MG1655/4.644.566///
O157:H7 SakaiHemorrhagic diarrhea5.55.329pO15792.72185
O7:K1 IAI39Urinary tract infection5.135.092///
O83:H1 NRG 857CCrohn’s disease4.754.532pO83_CORR147.060154
O104:H4 2011C-3493 ASM29945v1Hemolytic-uremic syndrome5.275.081pG-EA1115491
UMN026Urinary tract infection5.25.096p1ESCUM122.301156

Table 1.

Genomes of different E. colistrains.

Data in the table are based on data available in the genome database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Internet site: [14].

The most famous E. coliplasmid is the plasmid F (Figure 5). It is the paradigm plasmid for plasmid-specified transfer systems, as bacterial conjugation was first identified as a function of the F plasmid. Further, this plasmid was used to develop many of the genetic techniques commonly used to dissect prokaryotic systems, and F product analysis has been central in elucidating the basic mechanisms of plasmid replication and transmission [15].

Figure 5.

Map of theE. coliF plasmid. The map was drawn based on the complete nucleotide sequence of the F plasmid as deposited in GenBank [18].

F plasmid has two functional replication regions, RepFIA and RepFIB. The RepFIA region is believed to be primarily responsible for the typical replication properties of F [16]. The secondary replication region, RepFIB, is independently functional and can perform replication in the absence of RepFIA. F plasmid has also remnants of a third replication region, RepFIC, whose function was abolished by transposition of Tn1000into this replication region [17]. Apart from Tn1000also insertion sequences IS2 and IS3 are carried on F plasmid [16]. The plasmid-specified transfer system is encoded in the traregion, starting with the origin of transfer (oriT) [15].

3.3 The phylogenetic groups of E. coli

The E. colispecies has an extensive genetic substructure and the methods to assess the phylogenetic relationship among E. colistrains evolved during the time. In the pre-molecular era, the E. colidiversity was studied by serotyping. Serotyping studies showed that the somatic (O) antigen, the flagellar (H) antigen, and to a lesser extent the capsular (K) antigen are useful in distinguishing E. colistrains [19]. The E. coliserotyping is complex—173 O antigens, 80 K antigens, and 56 H antigens are known—and the O, K, and H antigens can be found in nature in many of the possible combinations. The final number of E. coliserotypes is therefore very high, 50,000–100,000 or more [20].

The molecular studies of E. colidiversity began with the measurement of variations in electrophoretic mobility of enzymes derived from different E. colistrains [21]. In 1980s the multi-locus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) became the common technique for the study of bacterial diversity. It was found that E. colipopulations evolve in a clonal manner, with recombination playing a limited role, and it also became clear that genetically distant strains can have the same serotype and that closely related strains may have different serotypes [19]. Based on the MLEE studies of 38 enzyme loci, four major phylogenetic groups among E. coliwere found: A, B1, B2, and D [22]. Clermont et al. [23] established a method of rapid and simple determination of the E. coliphylogenetic groups by a triplex PCR. This genotyping method is based on the amplification of a 279 bp fragment of the chuAgene; a 211 bp fragment of the yjaAgene; and a 152 bp fragment of TSPE4.C2, a noncoding region of the genome. The presence or absence of combinations of these three amplicons is used to assign the E. colito the phylogenetic groups: A, B1, B2, or D (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Dichotomous decision tree to determine the phylogenetic group by the Clermont triplex PCR method [23].

However, subsequently, on the basis of multi-locus sequence typing and complete genome data, additional E. coliphylogenetic groups were recognized [24, 25]. The number of defined phylogenetic groups thus rose to eight (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, F that belongs to E. colisensu stricto, and the eighth—the Escherichiacryptic clade I). Clermont et al. [26] thus revised their method to encompass the newly described phylogenetic groups. To enable identification of the F phylogenetic group, the new extended PCR phylotyping method employs an additional gene target, arpA, which serves also as an internal control for DNA quality. Thus, the revised PCR method is based on a quadruplex PCR, and if required, additional single PCR reactions are employed to distinguish between E and clade I, A or C, and D or E phylo-group [26] (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Dichotomous decision tree to determine the phylogenetic group by the Clermont quadruplex PCR method [26].

Two collections of human fecal isolates were screened using the quadruplex phylo-group assignment method demonstrating that 12.8% of E. coliisolates belonged to the newly described phylo-groups C, E, F, and clade I and that strains assigned to phylo-groups A and D by the triplex method are worth to be retested by the quadruplex method, as it is likely that they are going to be reclassified [26]. Logue et al. [27] performed a comparative analysis of phylogenetic assignment of human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic (ExPEC) and fecal commensal E. coli(FEC) strains and showed that a total 13.05% of studied human E. colistrains and 40.49% of avian E. colistrains had to be reclassified. Another study using human E. colistrains isolated from skin and soft-tissue infections and fecal E. colistrains from healthy humans and also avian and brown bear fecal strains revealed that 27.60% of human, 23.33% of avian, and 70.93% of brown bear strains had to be reclassified. Moreover, a high number (12.22%) of reclassifications from the previous phylo-groups to the non-typeable (NT) group were observed among the avian fecal strains of this study. Further, a survey performed on other published data by Starčič Erjavec et al. [28] showed that also a number of other studies report occurrence of NT strains by the quadruplex method, for example, a study including 140 uropathogenic E. colistrains from Iran reported 27.14% of NT strains [29]. These data emphasizes that there is a need to search for more E. colistrains from novel environments (new hosts in not yet explored geographic regions) and to revise the PCR phylotyping method again in order to type these NT strains.

3.4 The commensal E. coli

As E. coliis a facultative anaerobe, and among the first gut colonizers, these bacteria help to establish the anaerobic environment of the gut that enables the further colonization of the gut by anaerobic bacteria [30]. After the E. colicolonization, usually the host and E. colicoexist in mutual benefit for decades [7]. E. coligets “food and shelter,” and the host benefits due to the E. colivitamin K production and the so-called colonization resistance. Colonization resistance is the phenomenon of protection against colonization by pathogenic bacteria, including pathogenic E. coli[31]. The niche of the commensal E. coliis the mucous layer of the colon [7]. On average five different commensal E. colistrains colonize a human host at any given time [32]. As host and the E. coliprofits from their association, these E. colicould be also designated as mutualistic E. coli.

3.5 The pathogenic E. coli

E. coliis also a medically important species, as it is involved in many different types of infections. Two major groups of pathogenic E. coliexists: the intestinal pathogenic E. coli(IPEC), associated with infections of the gastrointestinal tract, and the extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli(ExPEC), associated with infections of extraintestinal anatomic sites [7]. The medical diversity of this species is nicely exhibited by its classification of pathogenic E. coli(Figure 8), the so-called E. colipathotypes.

Figure 8.

Classification of pathogenicE. coli, based on Roy et al. [33]. The IPEC are also designated as diarrheagenicE. coli(DEC)—Although not all of the subtypes in this group necessarily cause diarrhea. STEC that cause hemorrhagic colitis and/or the hemolytic uremic syndrome are called EHEC—For enterohemorrhagicE. coli. Among ExPEC also strains associated with pneumonia, skin and soft-tissues, and infections of many other extraintestinal anatomic sites are present, though they are not yet established as separate pathotypes.

The versatility of pathogenic E. colistrains depends on their genetic makeup, on the presence of so-called virulence genes, and possession of such genes distinguishes pathogenic from nonpathogenic bacteria [34]. Virulence factors help bacteria to (1) invade the host, (2) cause disease, and (3) evade host defenses [35].

3.5.1 Adhesins and invasins

Once a bacterium reaches the host surface, in order to colonize, it must adhere to host cells. For this purpose bacteria have different fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins. Fimbrial adhesins are rod-shaped protein structures, which consists primarily of an ordered array of single protein subunits, which build a long cylindrical structure. At the top, there are proteins, adhesins, which mediate the adherence to the host’s molecules. A fimbrial adhesin is thus a structure that extends outward from the bacterial surface and establishes the contact between the bacterial surface and the surface of the host cells. Afimbrial adhesins are surface proteins important for tighter binding of bacteria to host cells. Some bacteria have evolved mechanisms for entering nonphagocytic host cells. Bacterial surface proteins that provoke actin rearrangements and thereby incite the phagocytic ingestion of the bacterium by host cells are called invasins [36]. The most known E. coliadhesins and invasins are presented in Table 2.

Adhesin/invasinMost commonly tested virulence (associated) genes
Type 1 fimbriae (Fim)fimH
P fimbriae (Pap/Prf)papC, papG
S/F1C fimbriae (Sfa/Foc)sfa/focDE
N-Acetyl-d-glucosamine-specific fimbriae (Gaf)gafD
M-Agglutinin (Bma)bmaE
Bifunctional enterobactin receptor/adhesin (Iha)iha
Afimbrial adhesin (Afa)afa/draBC
Invasion of brain endothelium (IbeA)ibeA
Colonization factor antigen I (CFA/I)cfaB
Bundle-forming pili (BFP)bfpA
Aggregative adherence fimbriae (AAF/I)aaf/I

Table 2.

Typical adhesins and invasins of pathogenic E. colistrains.

3.5.2 Iron acquisition mechanisms

Iron is essential for bacterial growth, but iron concentrations in nature are generally quite low, particularly low in host organism. To survive in the host organism, bacteria must have some mechanisms for acquiring iron. The best studied type of bacterial iron acquisition is the siderophores. These are low-molecular-weight compounds that chelate iron with very high affinity [36]. The most known E. coliiron uptake systems are presented in Table 3.

Iron uptake systemMost commonly tested virulence (associated) genes
Aerobactin (Iuc)iucD, iutA
Yersiniabactin (Ybt)fyuA, irp2
Salmochelin (Iro)iroCD, iroN
Siderophore receptor IreAireA
Temperature sensitive hemagglutinin (Tsh)—in birds, Hemoglobin protease (Hbp)—in humanstsh, hbp
Periplasmic iron binding protein (SitA)sitA
Ferrichrome-iron receptor (Fhu)fhuA

Table 3.

Typical iron uptake systems of pathogenic E. colistrains.

3.5.3 Systems to evade host immune response

The healthy host usually has multilayered defenses that prevent the establishment of bacterial infection. Among the most effective of these defenses is the immune response. However, bacteria have evolved systems to avoid, subvert, or circumvent innate host defenses and to evade acquired specific immune responses of the host [34]. A capsule is a loose, relatively unstructured network of polymers that covers the surface of a bacterium. The role of capsules in bacterial virulence is to protect bacteria from the host’s inflammatory response [36]. Further, increased serum resistance is often found among pathogenic bacteria, especially those associated with systemic infections [36]. Serum resistance is the ability to prevent complement activation on the bacterial cell surface and to inhibit insertion of the membrane attack complex into the bacterial membrane [34]. The feature is often based on the modifications in lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which can be of two types: either attachment of sialic acid to LPS O antigen or changes in the LPS O antigen side chain [36]. However, other proteins can also be implicated in increased serum resistance; for example, the TraT protein of the surface exclusion complex involved in conjugation [37]. Another important protein of pathogenic E. coliis the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing protein (Tcp) that interferes with the TLR signaling system of the innate immunity [38]. The most known E. colisystems to evade host immune response are presented in Table 4.

Host immunity evading systemMost commonly tested virulence (associated) genes
Group II capsule including K1 and K5 capsuleskpsMT II
Conjugal transfer surface exclusion protein (TraT)traT
Outer membrane protease T (OmpT)ompT, APEC-ompT
Increased serum survival (Iss)iss
Suppression of innate immunity (Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing protein Tcp)tcpC

Table 4.

Typical host immunity evading systems of pathogenic E. colistrains.

3.5.4 Toxins

Toxins are the virulence factors that damage the host. Exotoxins are toxic bacterial proteins that are excreted into the medium by growing bacteria or localized in the bacterial cytoplasm or periplasm and released during bacterial lysis. Exotoxins vary considerably in their activities and the target host cell types [36]. The most known E. colitoxins (exotoxins) are presented in Table 5.

ToxinsMost commonly tested virulence (associated) genes
alpha-Hemolysin (HlyA)hlyA
Cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF-1)cnf1
Cytolethal distending toxin IV (CDT 1)cdtB
Uropathogenic specific protein (Usp)usp
Colibactin (Clb)clbAQ
Serine protease autotransporters Sat, Picsat, picU
Heat-stable toxins (STa, STb)stIa/stIb
Heat-labile toxin I (LTI), heat-labile toxin II (LTII)eltI, eltIIa
Shiga toxin 1 (Stx1), Shiga toxin 2 (Stx2)stxI, stxII
EHEC hemolysin (Ehx)ehxA
Low-MW heat-stable toxin (EAST1)astA

Table 5.

Typical toxins (exotoxins) of pathogenic E. colistrains.

However, E. colipossess also an endotoxin, namely, the lipopolysaccharide, which is an integral component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. The lipid portion (lipid A) is embedded in the outer membrane, with the core and O antigen portions extending outward from the bacterial surface. Lipid A is the toxic portion of the molecule, and it exerts its effects only when bacteria are lysed. The toxicity of lipid A resides primarily in its ability to activate, complement, and stimulate the release of bioactive host proteins, such as cytokines [36].

3.6 The antibiotic-resistant E. coli

Antibiotics are low-molecular-weight compounds that kill or inhibit growth of bacteria [36]. Antibiotic treatment is one of the main approaches of modern medicine to combat bacterial infections, including also E. coliinfections [39]. However, bacteria evolved different mechanisms that confer resistances to antibiotics. Resistant bacteria are able to either (i) modify/degrade the antibiotic, (ii) actively transport the antibiotic out of the cell or prevent its intake, (iii) sequester the antibiotic by special proteins, or (iv) modify, bypass, or protect the target [40]. The emergence, spread, and persistence of resistant and even multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria or “superbugs”, also among E. coli, are now posing a serious global health threat of growing concern [39]. The antimicrobial resistance surveillance data of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) also showed the increase in antibiotic resistance among invasive E. coliisolates (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Prevalence of invasiveE. coliisolates with antimicrobial resistance to aminopenicillins, fluoroquinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems—the population weighted mean EU/EEA is shown. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance to carbapenems in 2009 and 2011 was 0%, in 2012 <0.1%, in 2013 and 2015 0.2%, and in 2014, 2016, and 2017 0.1% [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49].

The mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics are encoded in resistance genes. A list of typical E. coliresistance genes is given in Table 6.

Resistance gene(s)Antibiotic classResistance to
strA[aph(3′)-Ib], strB[aph(6′)-Id]AminoglycosidesSTR
aadA1, aadA2, aadA5, aadA7, aadA24AminoglycosidesSTR
aac(3′)-VI, aac(3′)-IIdAminoglycosidesGEN
blaCMY-2β-LactamsAMC, AMP, CRO, FOX, TIO
ampCβ-LactamsAMC, AMP, FOX
sul1, sul2, sul3Folate synthesis inhibitorsFIS
dfrA1, dfrA5, dfrA12, dfrA17Folate synthesis inhibitorsSXT
catA1, catB3PhenicolsCHL
qnrB2, qnrB6, qnrS2QuinolonesNAL, CIP
tet(A), tet(B), tet(C), tet(D), tet(M)TetracyclinesTET

Table 6.

Typical E. coliresistance genes.

STR, streptomycin; KAN, kanamycin; GEN, gentamicin; AMP, ampicillin; AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CRO, ceftriaxone; FOX, cefoxitin; TIO, ceftiofur; FIS, sulfisoxazole; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; AZM, azithromycin; CHL, chloramphenicol; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; TET, tetracycline [50].

As many of the resistance genes are encoded on conjugative plasmids or conjugative transposons, they are easily transferred between different bacteria and hence spread in the population [36].

3.7 The bacteriocinogenic E. coli

Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized, proteinaceous substances that inhibit the growth of closely related species through numerous mechanisms [51]. They are a heterogeneous group of particles with different morphological and biochemical entities. They range from a simple protein to a high molecular weight complex [52]. The bacteriocins with molecular masses below 10 kDa are designated as microcins [53]. Bacteriocins are potent toxins that are usually produced during stressful conditions and result in the rapid elimination of neighboring bacterial cells that are not immune or resistant to their effect. The killing is exhibited after adsorption to specific receptors located on the external surface of sensitive bacteria, by one of the three primary mechanisms: forming channels in the cytoplasmic membrane, degrading cellular DNA/RNA, or inhibiting protein synthesis. Because of their narrow range of activity, it has been proposed that the primary role of bacteriocins is to mediate intraspecific, or population level, interactions [54]. The genetic determinants of most of the bacteriocins are located on the plasmids, apart from few, which are chromosomally encoded [52]. Bacteriocins of E. coliare usually called colicins. A relatively high frequency of colicin-encoding plasmids is found in isolates of pathogenic E. coli[55], for example, ~80% of O157:H7 enterohemorrhagic E. colistrains studied by Bradley and Howard were colicinogenic [56]. Especially microcins have been associated with pathogenic strains [54]. In a collection of E. colistrains isolated from skin and soft-tissue infections, 55% of strains possessed microcin M, and 43% possessed microcin H47 [57]. Further, colicin insensitivity among these strains correlated with a higher prevalence of extraintestinal virulence factors [58]. Typical E. colibacteriocins, their receptors, translocation systems, and mode of action are given in Table 7.

BacteriocinReceptorTranslocation systemMode of action
ColABtuBTolIon channel
ColBFepATonIon channel
ColDFepATonStops translation
ColE1BtuBTolIon channel
ColE5BtuBTolStops translation
ColIaCirTonIon channel
ColIbCirTonIon channel
ColKTsxTolIon channel
ColMFhuATonInhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis
ColNOmpFTolIon channel
ColS4OmpWTolIon channel

Table 7.

Typical E. colibacteriocins, their receptor, translocation system, and mode of action [59, 60].

3.8 The probiotic E. coli

Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. Probiotic bacteria act via a variety of means, including modulation of immune function, production of organic acids and antimicrobial compounds, interaction with resident microbiota, interfacing with the host, improving the gut barrier integrity, and enzyme formation [61]. Several E. colistrains were recognized as good and effective probiotics and are now used in drugs (see Table 8). The probiotic E. coliare applied to a variety of human conditions, including intestinal bowel diseases and diarrhea. Further it was shown that colonization of newborns led to reduced disease rates, lower incidence of allergies, and reduced mortality [62].

Drug nameMutaflorSymbioflor 2Colinfant newborn
E. colistrainE. coliNissle 1917 strainSix different E. colistrains (G1/2, G3/10, G4/9, G5, G6/7, and G8)E. coliA0 34/86 strain
ProductCapsulesSuspensionPowder for preparation of per oral solution
Produced byArdeypharm GmbH, Herdecke, GermanySymbioPharm GmbH, Herborn, GermanyDyntec, Terezín, Czech Republic
Contents2.5–25 × 109 CFU/capsule1.5–4.5 × 107 CFU/ml0.8–1.6 × 108 CFU/dosis
Recommended daily dose1–2 capsules/day (2.5–50 × 109 CFU)2–4 ml (3.0–18 × 107 CFU)0.8–1.6 × 108 CFU three times/week
Isolation date of the used strain(s)19151954Data not available
Serotype06:K5:H1Variable including 035,129, 0:169, rough, all H–083:K24:H31
Plasmid content2 cryptic plasmids12 plasmidsNo plasmids
Microcin productionMicrocin M, H47Microcin SData not available
MotilityMotile (flagella present)Nonmotile (flagella absent)Data not available
Closest relativesCFT073, ABU83972 (UPEC)K12, ATCC8739 (commensals)CFT073, 536 (UPEC)
Year of first publication describing the use in humans198919981967

Table 8.

Probiotic E. colidrugs [62, 63].

E. coliNissle 1917 is nowadays often used as a reference strain or model microorganism in experimental biomedical studies, including recombinant manipulations of the strain in order to construct derivatives with novel properties [64]. One such example is the strain ŽP, which is a genetically modified Nissle 1917 possessing a bacterial conjugation-based “kill”-“anti-kill” antimicrobial system—a conjugative plasmid carrying the “kill” gene (colicin ColE7 activity gene) and a chromosomally encoded “anti-kill” gene (ColE7 immunity gene). Hence, in the process of conjugation, the conjugative plasmid transfers the “kill” gene into a recipient cell, where it is expressed and the recipient killed [65, 66].

3.9 The “workhorse” E. coli

E. coliis known for its fast growing rate in chemically defined media and extensive molecular tools available for different purposes. All these make it an important model organism, which is also called the “workhorse” of molecular biology. Even though E. colilacks many interesting features appreciated in biotechnology, such as growing at extreme temperatures or pH and the capacity to degrade toxic compounds, pollutants, or difficult to degrade polymers, it is much used in biotechnology also [67]. In Table 9 contributions of E. colito biology, medicine, and industry are listed.

Molecular biology, physiology, and genetics
Elucidation of the genetic codeCrick FH, Barnett L, Brenner S, and Watts-Tobin RJ1961
DNA replicationLehman IR, Bessman MJ, Simms ES, and Kornberg A1958
TranscriptionStevens A1960
Life cycle of lytic bacteriophagesEllis EL and Delbrück M1939
Gene regulation of the lacoperonJacob F and Monod J1961
Gene regulation of the araoperonEnglesberg E, Irr J, Power J, and Lee N1965
Discovery of restriction enzymesLinn S and Arber W1968
Identification of genes controlling antimicrobial drug tolerance in stationary phaseHu Y and Coates AR2005
Role of global regulators and nucleotide metabolism in antibiotic toleranceHansen S, Lewis K, and Vulić M2008
Metabolic control of persister formationAmato SM, Orman MA, and Brynildsen MP2013
Swarming motility behaviorHarshey RM and Matsuyama T.1994
Elucidation of the structure and function of ATP synthaseCapaldi RA, Schulenberg B, Murray J, and Aggeler R2000
Conjugal DNA transferTatum EL and Lederberg J1947
Random nature of mutationLuria SE and Delbrück M1943
Relationship between genomic evolution and adaptationBarrick JE, Yu DS, Yoon SH, Oh TK, Schneider D, Lenski RE, and Kim JF2009
Role of adaption, chance, and history in evolutionTravisano M, Mongold JA, Bennet AF, and Lenski RE1995
Adaptive mutationCairns J, Overbaugh J, and Miller S1988
Role of historical contingency in evolutionBlount ZD, Borland CZ, and Lenski RE2008
Origin of novel traitsBlount ZD, Barrick JE, Davidson CJ, and Lenski RE2012
Long-term fitness trajectoriesWiser MJ, Ribeck N, and Lenski RE2013
Effect of sexual recombination on adaptationCooper TF2007
Predator-prey interactions (bacteriophage)Chao L and Levin BR1977
Genetic engineering and biotechnology
Molecular cloning and recombinant DNACohen S, Chang A, Boyer H, and Helling R1973
Generating precise deletions and insertionsLink AJ, Phillips D, and Church GM1997
Gene replacementHerring CD, Glasner JD, and Blattner FR2003

Table 9.

Contributions of E. colito biology, medicine, and industry [68, 69, 70].

The following recombinant pharmaceuticals were set up to be in vivo synthesized in E. coli: insulin, interleukin-2, human interferon-β, erythropoietin, human growth hormone, human blood clotting factors, pegloticase, taxol, and certolizumab. Further, E. coliis also used to produce biofuels and industrial chemicals such as phenol, ethanol, mannitol, and a variety of others [68].


4. Conclusion

To conclude, E. coliis a truly versatile microorganism possessing many facets—it is a well-known commensal bacterium, but some strains can be also pathogenic, even causing mortality, especially if the pathogenic strain acquired multiple resistance genes. However used as a probiotic it can improve health and in it can be employed as a good working “workhorse” in the laboratory as well as in biotechnological settings. The differentiation between commensal and pathogenic strains is not easy, as among the healthy gut microbiota pathogenic strains are hidden, and also commensal strains can become pathogenic due to horizontal gene transfer of mobile genetic elements possessing virulence genes [71]. Even though E. colihas been the object of research now for already more than 100 years, its versatility warrants new possibilities for investigation also in the future.



The author is thankful to the Slovenian Research Agency (P1-0198) for its funding.


Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. PubMed-Search Item:Escherichia coli, Publication Dates: From 1885/01/01 to 2018/12/31 [Internet]. Available from:[Accessed: February 07, 2019]
  2. 2. Escherich T. The intestinal bacteria of the neonate and breast-fed infant. 1885. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 1988;10:1220-1225
  3. 3. List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN). GenusEscherichia[Internet]. Available from:[Accessed: February 07, 2019]
  4. 4. Escherich T. Die darmbakterien des neugeborenen und säuglinge. Fortschritte der Medizin. 1885;3:515-528;547-554
  5. 5. Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Bender KS, Buckley DH, Stahl DA. Brock Biology of Microorganisms. 14th ed. London: Pearson Education, Inc; 2015
  6. 6. Starčič M, Johnson JR, Stell AL, van der Goot J, Hendriks HG, van Vorstenbosch C, et al. HaemolyticEscherichia coliisolated from dogs with diarrhea have characteristics of both uropathogenic and necrotoxigenic strains. Veterinary Microbiology. 2002;85:361-377
  7. 7. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. PathogenicEscherichia coli. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2004;2:123-140
  8. 8. van Elsas JD, Semenov AV, Costa R, Trevors JT. Survival ofEscherichia coliin the environment: Fundamental and public health aspects. ISME Journal. 2011;5:173-183. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2010.80
  9. 9. Blattner FR, Plunkett G 3rd, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, et al. The complete genome sequence ofEscherichia coliK-12. Science. 1997;277:1453-1462
  10. 10. GenBank NC_000913.3 [Internet]. 2018. Available from:[Accessed: August 03, 2019]
  11. 11. Cheong WH, Tan YC, Yap S, Ng KP. ClicO FS: An interactive web-based service of Circos. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3685-3687. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv433
  12. 12. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, et al. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Research. 2009;19:1639-1645. DOI: 10.1101/gr.092759.109
  13. 13. Schmidt H, Hensel M. Pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenesis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2004;17(1):14-56
  14. 14. Genome-Search ItemEscherichia coli. [Internet]. Available from:[Accessed: April 04, 2019]
  15. 15. Frost L, Ippen-Ihler K, Skurray RA. Analysis of the sequence and gene products of the transfer region of the F sex factor. Microbiological Reviews. 1994;58:162-210
  16. 16. Firth N, Ippen-Ihler K, Skurray RA. Structure and function of the F factor and mechanism of conjugation. In: Neidhardt FC, editor in chief. Curtiss R III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, et al., editors.Escherichia coliandSalmonella. 2nd ed. Washington: ASM Press; 1996. p. 2377-2401
  17. 17. Saadi S, Maas WK, Bergquist PL. RepFIC, a basic replicon of IncFI plasmids that has homology with a basic replicon of IncFII plasmids. Plasmid. 1984;12:61-64
  18. 18. GenBank AP001918.1 [Internet]. 2018. Available from:[Accessed: April 04, 2019]
  19. 19. Chaudhuri RR, Henderson IR. The evolution of theEscherichia coliphylogeny. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2012;12:214-226
  20. 20. Ørskov F, Ørskov I.Escherichia coliserotyping and disease in man and animals. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 1992;38:699-704
  21. 21. Milkman R. Electrophoretic variation inEscherichia colifrom natural sources. Science. 1973;182:1024-1026
  22. 22. Herzer PJ, Inouye S, Inouye M, Whittam TS. Phylogenetic distribution of branched RNA-linked multicopy single-stranded DNA among natural isolates ofEscherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 1990;172:6175-6181
  23. 23. Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Rapid and simple determination of theEscherichia coliphylogenetic group. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66:4555-4558
  24. 24. Walk ST, Alm EW, Gordon DM, Ram JL, Toranzos GA, Tiedje JM, et al. Cryptic lineages of the genusEscherichia. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75:6534-6544. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01262-09
  25. 25. Luo C, Walk ST, Gordon DM, Feldgarden M, Tiedje JM, Konstantinidis KT. Genome sequencing of environmentalEscherichia coliexpands understanding of the ecology and speciation of the model bacterial species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:7200-7205. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015622108
  26. 26. Clermont O, Christenson JK, Denamur E, Gordon DM. The ClermontEscherichia coliphylo-typing method revisited: Improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo-groups. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2013;5:58-65. DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.12019
  27. 27. Logue CM, Wannemuehler Y, Nicholson BA, Doetkott C, Barbieri NL, Nolan LK. Comparative analysis of phylogenetic assignment of human and avian ExPEC and fecal commensalEscherichia coliusing the (previous and revised) Clermont phylogenetic typing methods and its impact on avian pathogenicEscherichia coli(APEC) classification. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:283. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00283
  28. 28. Starčič Erjavec M, Predojević L, Žgur-Bertok D. Commentary: Comparative analysis of phylogenetic assignment of human and avian ExPEC and fecal commensalEscherichia coliusing the (previous and revised) Clermont phylogenetic typing methods and its impact on avian pathogenicEscherichia coli(APEC) classification. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:1904. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01904
  29. 29. Iranpour D, Hassanpour M, Ansari H, Tajbakhsh S, Khamisipour G, Najafi A. Phylogenetic groups ofEscherichia colistrains from patients with urinary tract infection in Iran based on the new Clermont phylotyping method. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:846219. DOI: 10.1155/2015/846219
  30. 30. Houghteling PD, Walker WA. Why is initial bacterial colonization of the intestine important to infants' and children's health? Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2015;60:294-307. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000597
  31. 31. Stecher B, Hardt WD. Mechanisms controlling pathogen colonization of the gut. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2011;14:82-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.10.003
  32. 32. Apperloo-Renkema HZ, van der Waaij BD, van der Waaij D. Determination of colonization resistance of the digestive tract by biotyping ofEnterobacteriaceae. Epidemiology and Infection. 1990;105:355-361
  33. 33. Robins-Browne RM, Holt KE, Ingle DJ, Hocking DM, Yang J, Tauschek M. AreEscherichia colipathotypes still relevant in the era of whole-genome sequencing? Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2016;6:141. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00141
  34. 34. Webb SA, Kahler CM. Bench-to-bedside review: Bacterial virulence and subversion of host defences. Critical Care. 2008;12(6):234. DOI: 10.1186/cc7091
  35. 35. Peterson JW. Bacterial pathogenesis. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. 4th ed. Galveston: University of Texas Medical Branch at Galevston; 1996. pp. 121-135. Available from:
  36. 36. Salyers AA, Whitt DD. Bacterial Pathogenesis. A Molecular Approach. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1994
  37. 37. Moll A, Manning PA, Timmis KN. Plasmid-determined resistance to serum bactericidal activity: A major outer membrane protein, thetraTgene product, is responsible for plasmid-specified serum resistance inEscherichia coli. Infection and Immunity. 1980;28(2):359-367
  38. 38. Cirl C, Wieser A, Yadav M, Duerr S, Schubert S, Fischer H, et al. Subversion of toll-like receptor signaling by a unique family of bacterial toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain-containing proteins. Nature Medicine. 2008;14(4):399-406. DOI: 10.1038/nm1734
  39. 39. Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad MI, Khurshid M, Muzammil S, Rasool MH, et al. Antibiotic resistance: A rundown of a global crisis. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2018;11:1645-1658. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S173867
  40. 40. Peterson E, Kaur P. Antibiotic resistance mechanisms in bacteria: Relationships between resistance determinants of antibiotic producers, environmental bacteria, and clinical pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:2928. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02928
  41. 41. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2009. 2010. Available from:
  42. 42. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2010. 2011. Available from:
  43. 43. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2011. 2012. Available from:
  44. 44. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2012. 2013. Available from:
  45. 45. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2013. 2014. Available from:
  46. 46. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2014. 2015. Available from:
  47. 47. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2015. 2017. Available from:
  48. 48. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2016. 2017. Available from:
  49. 49. ECDC. Surveillance Report: Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Europe 2017. 2018. Available from:
  50. 50. Tyson GH, McDermott PF, Li C, Chen Y, Tadesse DA, Mukherjee S, et al. WGS accurately predicts antimicrobial resistance inEscherichia coli. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2015;70(10):2763-2769. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv186
  51. 51. Cavera VL, Arthur TD, Kashtanov D, Chikindas ML. Bacteriocins and their position in the next wave of conventional antibiotics. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2015;46(5):494-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.07.011
  52. 52. Daw MA, Falkiner FR. Bacteriocins: Nature, function and structure. Micron: The International Research and Review Journal for Microscopy. 1996;27(6):467-479
  53. 53. Duquesne S, Destoumieux-Garzón D, Peduzzi J, Rebuffat S. Microcins, gene-encoded antibacterial peptides from enterobacteria. Natural Product Reports. 2007;24(4):708-734
  54. 54. Riley MA, Gordon DM. The ecological role of bacteriocins in the bacterial competition. Trends in Microbiology. 1999;7:129-133
  55. 55. van der Wal FJ, Luirink J, Oudega B. Bacteriocin release proteins: Mode of action, structure, and biotechnological application. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 1995;17:318-399
  56. 56. Bradley DE, Howard SP. Colicinogeny of O157:H7 enterohemorrhagicEscherichia coliand the shielding of colicin and phage receptors by their O-antigenic side chains. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 1991;37:97-104
  57. 57. Starčič Erjavec M, Petkovšek Ž, Predojević L, Žgur-Bertok D. Iron uptake and bacteriocin genes amongEscherichia colistrains from skin and soft-tissue infections. APMIS (Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica). 2017;125(3):264-267. DOI: 10.1111/apm.12663
  58. 58. Petkovšek Ž, Žgur-Bertok D, Starčič Erjavec M. Colicin insensitivity correlates with a higher prevalence of extraintestinal virulence factors amongEscherichia coliisolates from skin and soft-tissue infections. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2012;61(Pt 6):762-765. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.037234-0
  59. 59. Arnold T, Zeth K, Linke D. Structure and function of colicin S4, a colicin with a duplicated receptor-binding domain. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(10):6403-6413. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M808504200
  60. 60. Cascales E, Buchanan SK, Duché D, Kleanthous C, Lloubès R, Postle K, et al. Colicin biology. Microbiology and Molecular Miology Reviews: MMBR. 2007;71(1):158-229
  61. 61. Sanders ME, Merenstein DJ, Reid G, Gibson GR, Rastall RA. Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: From biology to the clinic. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41575-019-0173-3
  62. 62. Wassenaar TM. Insights from 100 years of research with probioticE. coli. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology. 2016;6(3):147-161. DOI: 10.1556/1886.2016.00029
  63. 63. Wassenaar TM, Zschüttig A, Beimfohr C, Geske T, Auerbach C, Cook H, et al. Virulence genes in a probioticE. coliproduct with a recorded long history of safe use. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology. 2015;5:81-93. DOI: 10.1556/EuJMI-D-14-00039
  64. 64. Sonnenborn U.Escherichia colistrain Nissle 1917-from bench to bedside and back: History of a specialEscherichia colistrain with probiotic properties. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2016;363(19):pii: fnw212. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw212
  65. 65. Starčič Erjavec M, Petkovšek Ž, Kuznetsova MV, Maslennikova IL, Žgur-Bertok D. Strain ŽP: The first bacterial conjugation-based “kill”-“anti-kill” antimicrobial system. Plasmid. 2015;82:28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2015.10.001
  66. 66. Maslennikova IL, Kuznetsova MV, Toplak N, Nekrasova IV, Žgur Bertok D, Starčič Erjavec M. Estimation of the bacteriocin ColE7 conjugation-based “kill”- “anti-kill” antimicrobial system by real-time PCR, fluorescence staining and bioluminescence assays. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2018;67(1):47-53. DOI: 10.1111/lam.12884
  67. 67. Vargas-Maya NI, Franco B.Escherichia colias a model organism and its application in biotechnology. In: Samie A, editor.Escherichia coli: Recent Advances on Physiology, Pathogenesis and Biotechnological Applications. Rijeka: InTechOpen; 2017. pp. 253-274. DOI: 10.5772/67306
  68. 68. Blount ZD. The unexhausted potential ofE. coli. eLife. 2015;4:e05826. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05826
  69. 69. Foster PL. Adaptive mutation: Implications for evolution. BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology. 2000;22(12):1067-1074
  70. 70. Tatum EL, Lederberg J. Gene recombination in the bacteriumEscherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 1947;53(6):673-684
  71. 71. Starčič Erjavec M, Žgur-Bertok D. Virulence potential for extraintestinal infections among commensalEscherichia coliisolated from healthy humans: The Trojan horse within our gut. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2015;362(5):pii. fnu061. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnu061

Written By

Marjanca Starčič Erjavec

Reviewed: July 29th, 2019 Published: September 18th, 2019