Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Dual Response of Materials under Electric and Magnetic Fields

Written By

Mehmet Cabuk

Submitted: 22 November 2018 Reviewed: 23 April 2019 Published: 07 August 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86455

From the Edited Volume

Smart and Functional Soft Materials

Edited by Xufeng Dong

Chapter metrics overview

1,057 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The electrorheological (ER) effect is known as the change in the rheological behaviors of ER fluids under applied electric field E. When an E is imposed, ER fluids show phase transition from a liquid to a solid-like state due to the interactions of polarized particles. This solid-like behavior of particles is due to the increasing viscosity of suspensions. ER materials belong to a family of controllable fluids. ER fluids are dispersions of solid particles in a hydrophobic insulating dispersion medium. These solid particles play a very important role in the ER activity of dispersions. As the dispersed phase, diverse materials such as polymer blends, gels, biodegradable materials, clays, graphene oxide, hybrid nanocomposites, copolymers, ionic liquids, and conducting polymers have been proposed. In the magnetorheological fluids, this control is provided with magnetic field. Various magnetic particles such as carbonyl iron and iron oxides have been suggested as MR material. The combined effect of magnetic and electric field produces intensified rheological changes in the suspensions. This synergic effect is termed as electromagnetorheological effect (EMR). The EMR effect provides a new strategy to control the rheological properties of dispersions.


  • electrorheology
  • magnetorheology
  • nanocomposites
  • smart fluids
  • dual response

1. Introduction

The electrorheological (ER) effect is known as the change in the rheological behaviors of ER fluids under applied electric field E. When an E is imposed, ER fluids show phase transition from a liquid to a solid-like state due to the interactions of polarized particles. This solid-like behavior of particles is due to the increasing viscosity of suspensions. There are two main driving forces behind the viscosity increase in ER fluids. Fibrillar structure of polarized molecules with applied electric field and ion aggregation near the electrode surfaces are responsible for the viscosity increase. Essentially the ER effect in a liquid is related to the motions of ions or polar molecules [1, 2] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of particles into an ER fluid at absence and presence of electric or magnetic field.

In the nineteenth century, the apparent viscosity of pure nonconducting liquids was believed to increase with the applied E. This effect was called as electroviscous effect rather than the ER effect [3]. Many other solution systems showed that the electrolyte solutions have very much stronger electroviscous effect than the pure liquid. After this time, Winslow studied the E-induced viscosity increase of solid semiconducting particles dispersed in a low viscosity and high insulating oil medium [4]. The E-induced effect was much stronger than the electroviscous effect. Therefore, the ER effect was termed as “Winslow effect.” Winslow effect is regarded as the formation of fibrillated chain structures by the dispersed particles between the electrodes of a measuring system. Efforts have been carried out to elucidate the ER mechanism and to improve ER performance of dispersions that meets the industrial requirements.

ER fluids exhibit large reversible changes in their rheological properties when they are subjected to external E. Many studies have been carried out on the mechanism and application of ER fluid. One important property of the ER fluids is that it shows quick response to electric field. This inherent behavior has pioneered many researches to various engineering applications [5]. Some of these are machine mounts, shock absorbers, and smart structures. The rheological properties of ER fluids can be electrically controlled, and this control is beneficial to a wide range of application technologies such as active vibration, damping, and resistive force generation. Several commercial applications have been developed until today, and many potential applications especially in the automotive industry such as ER fluid-based engine mount, shock absorber, clutches, and seat dampers are still undiscovered [6].

Many materials have been used for the preparation of ER fluids. They can be classified as inorganic materials [7, 8] (such as TiO2, BaTiO2), organic materials [9] (such as chitosan, alginate, and its derivatives), and conducting polymers (such as polyaniline, polypyrrole). Among them conducting polymers have been widely studied, because of their ease of synthesis, less corrosive properties and high stability, and compatibility with the carrier liquid.

Yield shear stress is one of the most important parameters for ER fluids and can be varied by the applied E. Despite these properties, ER fluids have limited their application due to low yield stress, which yields poor mechanical performance that limits their application [1, 10]. The developing of the giant ER effect has revived interest in this area. When compared with traditional ER fluids, giant ER fluids show higher magnitude yield stresses. The polarization force of molecular dipoles between dispersed particles is responsible for the giant ER effect [11]. Many organic−/inorganic-structured giant ER materials have been synthesized. Wen et al. [12] reported the synthesis and ER properties of a new type of giant ER fluid consisting of polar group-modified nano-sized barium titanyl oxalate particles. Also, the problem associated with sedimentation of colloidal particles, as well as the lack of high-performance materials, has inhibited broad engineering applications [1314]. Giant ER fluids like other traditional ER fluids exhibit sedimentation drawback due to the density mismatch of the fluid and solid phases as well as the aggregation of the dispersed particles [15, 16]. To improve the sedimentation stability of the ER fluids, several methods have been developed. They can be listed as follows by adding surfactant to the dispersion, making the particle phase less dense that decrease the density mismatch and modify the surface or particle morphology [17]. Li et al. [18] reported the fabrication of multiwall carbon nanotubes, urea-coated barium titanyl oxylate composite particles, that exhibit the giant ER effect (yield stress was 194 kPa at 5 kV/mm). The antisedimentation property enhanced dramatically in silicone oil due to multiwall carbon nanotubes. Cabuk et al. [16] reported ER response and temperature effect on antisedimentation stability of expanded perlite particles in silicone oil. The expanded perlite particles as porous ultra-lightweight materials showed typical ER properties under applied E, exhibiting a shear thinning non-Newtonian viscoelastic behavior (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Antisedimentation stabilities of expanded perlite/silicone oil colloidal dispersions at various temperatures (φ = 10%) [16].

When the mechanism of the ER fluids is examined, Most ER fluids fit the Bingham fluid model. At this model, an ER fluid has its own yield stress, and the flow motion of the fluid impedes when an applied external shear stress is lower than the yield stress [19]. The Bingham model has been extensively used as a viscoelastic equation:

τ = τ y + η γ ̇ , τ τ y E1
γ ̇ = 0 , τ < τ y E2

In Eqs. (1) and (2), τ and τy are shear and yield stresses, γ ̇ is a shear rate, and η is a shear viscosity.

Klass and Martinek [20] introduced a dielectric principle and a water-associated electrical double-layer model, to explain that the critical factor of the ER effect was the molecule in the wet-base ER fluids. The dispersed particles were polarized and distorted when the extra E was applied, and then the water molecules into the dispersion made an attractive bridge between dispersed particles, thereby producing a higher surface tension.

Cho-Choi-Jhon (CCJ) model is an empirical formula with six parameters to explain the ER characteristics in a whole shear rate range [21]. The CCJ equation is given as follows:

τ = τy 1 + t 1 γ ̇ α + η 1 + 1 t 2 γ ̇ β γ ̇ E3

The first term expresses the decrease in the shear stress at the low shear rate area, and the next term shows a shear-thinning behavior at the high shear rate region. The t1 and t2 are time constants, and η is a shear viscosity at the infinite shear rate. The exponent α corresponds the shear stress decrease, and b is located between 0 and 1. The CCJ model is observed to be a good indication of the overall behavior of many ER fluids, including the reduced shear stress behavior.

Magnetorheological (MR) fluids consist of dispersed magnetic particles and nonmagnetic fluids such as an hydrocarbon, aqueous carrier fluid, or silicone oil [22, 23]. MR fluids have a Newtonian-like flow behavior with applied magnetic field. However, without an external magnetic field, they show a phase change from a liquid-like to a solid-like due to the formation of a fibrillar structure along the direction parallel to the direction of the applied magnetic field. This behavior is due to the magnetic polarization between the dispersed magnetic particles into the MR dispersion. A hybrid of conducting and magnetic particle-based materials can display an improved dual stimuliresponse under electric and magnetic fields [24]. These kinds of fluids also show typical ER and MR behaviors.


2. ER effect and types

On the basis of changes in ER properties of the dispersions, such as viscosity, shear stress, elastic and viscous moduli, and creep recovery, they can be classified as positive or negative ER material depending on their response to the external electric field imposed. In addition to ER effect, depending on the type of applied external stimuli photo, MR and electromagnetorheological effects are also investigated and used in various industrial applications.

2.1 Positive ER effect

An increase in rheological property with applied E is known as the positive ER effect. The fibrillar structure of ER particles is observed in positive ER fluids under E. This dramatic increase in viscosity is due to the change from liquid to solid-like state which is caused by the aggregation of polarized particles into fibrous structures under electric filed. These fibrous structures restrict the motion of the dispersed particles inside the base fluid under the shear flow conditions and result in enhanced viscosity (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Change of viscosity and shear stress with shear rate under various E for polyaniline/bentonite composite [25].

The positive ER effect is the most common ER phenomenon encountered in the literatures. Conducting polymers (polyaniline, polypyrrole, etc.) [26, 27, 28], liquid crystalline polymer/poly(dimethylsiloxane) blends [29], smart polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites [30], PPy-tin oxide nanocomposite [31], PAni-coated mesoporous silica [32], core−/shell-structured SiO2/PPy nanoparticles [33], graphene oxide/PAni composites [34], and biodegradable chitosan/bentonite composites [35] were reported to show positive ER effect.

2.2 Negative ER effect

On the contrary to positive ER effect, for the negative ER effect, the ER properties (i.e., electric field-induced viscosity) are decreased with applied E. the first negative ER effect was reported by Boissy and his co-workers for the poly(methyl methacrylate) PMMA powder/SO ER fluid [36]. Also, magnesium hydroxide, poly(tetrafluoroethylene) [37], hematite [38], and fumed silica [39] were reported to show the negative ER effect. Urethane-modified polyether liquids exhibit either positive or negative ER effect. Negative ER effect is increased by introducing a branched structure in the polyether main chain or a hard segment at the center of the linear polyether [40]. In a study, colemanite/SO ER fluid showed positive ER effect until E = 1.5 kV/mm and exhibited negative ER effect above E = 1.5 kV/mm. On the other hand, polyindene/colemanite composites dispersed in silicone oil were reported to show negative ER effect with all applied E. This negative ER activity of both the materials was attributed to the electromigration of the particles to one of the electrodes which resulted in phase separation of the dispersion. The presence of Triton X-100 nonionic surfactant converted a negative ER effect to a positive one with improving ER activity. The water/surfactant-bridge formation model was attributed [41]. In another study, the ER properties of urethane-modified polypropylene glycol (UPPG)/PDMS were reported. When the viscosity of UPPG is higher than viscosity of PDMS, ER effect of the suspension is positive. When the viscosity of UPPG is lower than viscosity of PDMS, the ER effect of the suspension is negative [42].

Negative ER effect is explained with two reasons:

  • Electrophoresis of particles which migrate to one of the electrodes under the applied electric field leading to phase separation.

  • Quincke rotation—Accumulation of charges on the particle surface after the polarization under applied E: the charges on the top and bottom of the surface of particles have the same sign as that of the upper and lower electrodes, and this makes the dispersion unstable and causes the particles to rotate under E.

ER fluids have been used in various industrial areas such as mechanical sensors, damping systems, e-ink, brakes, haptic services, human muscle simulators, and polishing media. Their main advantage is ability to control of mechanical properties with E. These fluids can also exhibit Newtonian fluid characteristics which is the advantage of negative ER fluids [43].

2.3 Photo effect

Light can induce polarization of dispersed particles similar to that of an applied E. Not only positive ER effect but also negative ER effect can be improved by ultraviolet illumination in some ER dispersions. This behavior is called photo-ER effect [44]. Photo-generated carriers are responsible for changing the conductivity of the ER materials and improving their ER response. Photo ER materials show an important relationship between charge mobility and ER activity. Komoda and co-workers studied the photo-ER of TiO2 nanoparticle dispersions [45]. These dispersions showed positive photo-induced ER effect at low water content, while negative photo-induced ER effect was observed at high water content. Besides, some dye particles (Monastral Green B and copper phthalocyanine), titania nanoparticles, and phenothiazine were reported to show photo ER effect [46, 47].


3. ER and MR materials and their properties

ER materials belong to a family of controllable fluids. They are typically dispersions of solid particles in an insulating liquid. Since the discovery of ER fluids, various types of ER material composition have been proposed [48, 49].

Optical microscopy (OM) studies provide observation of fibrillation of dispersed solid particles under an externally applied E which is a characteristic property of ER phenomenon (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

OM images of fibrillation of dispersed solid nanocube-TiO2/P3OT particles [50].

The dispersed particles have an importance in the ER activity. As the dispersed phase, diverse materials such as polymer blends, gels, biodegradable materials, clays, boron-containing polymers, hybrid nanocomposites, copolymers, ionic liquids, and conducting polymers have been proposed. In recent years, the synthesized ER materials are polystyrene/laponite composites [51], polypyrrole-g-chitosan copolymer [52], polythiophene/polyisoprene composite [53], graphene oxide/titania nanocomposite [54], chitosan/bentonite composite [9], and poly(vinyl chloride)/polyindole composite [55].

The yield stress of MR fluids is generally higher than that of ER fluids. Therefore, MR fluids have a potential for active development. MR fluids show reversible specific properties. They can magnetize under magnetic field and demagnetize in the absence of magnetic field. Magnetite and carbonyl iron (CI) as magnetic particles have been used in the industrial applications of MR fluids [56]. Among the magnetic particles, soft magnetic micron-sized CI particles have an attention for superior MR fluids due to its high saturation magnetization value, suitable size, spherical shape, and low cost [57].

The liquid phase should have high electrical resistivity and hydrophobicity. Liquids such as mineral oil, kerosene, toluene, petroleum fractions, and silicone oil (dimethyl siloxane), dibutyl sebacate, dioctyl phthalate, trioctyl trimellitate, and chlorinated paraffin have been used as dispersing phase [58].

ER fluids are divided into two categories as dry-base ER system and wet-base ER system. The dry-base ER system is anhydrous dispersion and shows ER activity without adding any polar promoter. The wet-base ER system is hydrous dispersion and needs a polar promoter to show ER activity. When these systems compare, dry-base ER system has more attention than wet-base ER system due to its physicochemical characteristics. Many materials such as conducting polymers, biopolymers, and polymer/clay nanocomposites exhibit dry-base ER properties [59, 60].

To enhance the ER effect and to increase the colloidal stability of the dispersions, various types of additives (water, ethyl alcohol, diethylene glycol, surfactants, etc.), called activators, have been added into the dispersions. They most certainly affect the particulate surface and the dispersing liquid.

Surfactants can be added to ER dispersions to improve ER activity and used to tailor dispersion properties. They effect the colloidal stability of dispersions and keep the particles from irreversibly flocculating. Also, they promote the rheological properties of dispersions in the absence an E. While some dispersions show little or no ER effect with adding of water or surfactant, some dispersions display improved ER response with water or surfactant [61, 62]. The adding of water as promoter has several problems such as the low of operation temperature, corrosion, and dispersion conductivity. Some surfactants used in ER dispersions are SDS, CTAB, Triton X, sodium oleate, glycerol, borax, and fatty amines [63, 64, 65].

Other additives into the ER dispersions effect the liquid phase by chancing the conductivity. The additives are generally used to increase the rheological characteristics of the dispersions. Some additives used in ER dispersions are water, NaCl, NaOH, acetic acid, amines, oxalic acid, diethylene glycol, glycerine [62]. In a study, the effect of water and surfactant was tested and both in rheological and electrical properties of the dispersions changed by adding small amounts of additives. The yield stress of the ER fluid increased with increasing water content. After the optimal water amount, a reduction in ER activity was observed. This tendency was explained by the water bridge model. On the other hand, the current density of ER fluid increased by adding water and Brij 30. ER activity of Brij 30-activated dispersions decreased under high E conditions. It can be attributed to the formation of surfactant droplets enclosing the particles [66] (Table 1).

Properties Magnitude
Zero-field viscosity (E = 0 kV/mm) Low (<1 Pas)
High yield strength τ = 5 kPa at E = 2 kV/mm
Short response time <5 ms
Wide working temperature (−30)–(+125°C)
Low density d < 1–2 g/cm3
Chemical resistance High
Electric field resistance High
ER materials Inert, hydrophobic, and cheap
Particle size <10 μm
Current density <10 μA/cm2 at E = 4 kV/mm

Table 1.

Preferred properties of an ideal ER fluid.

Antisedimentation stability (or colloidal stability) is one of the important characteristics for the usability of ER dispersions at different environmental conditions. When charged particles in an ER fluid are dispersed, the particle interaction between dispersed particles increases, and rheological properties of ER fluid change. Surface charge of dispersed particles is determined by ζ-potential measurements. Therefore, ζ-potential can be used to determine the colloidal stability of ER fluids.

The density mismatch between the solid and fluid phases in an ER dispersion causes the sedimentation. It can be due to the particle aggregation through van der Walls interaction between the particles and the non-favorable particle-solvent interactions. As a result, the dispersed particles settle down according to Stokes’ law [67]. To overcome this traditional problem in ER fluids, several solutions have been suggested.

Surfactants can be used to improve the colloidal stability of the ER fluids. They reduce the sedimentation and aggregation of dispersed particles in an ER fluid via adsorption on the particle surface. This method is still necessary for the long-term stability of ER dispersions. In a reported study, for the synthesis of graft copolymerization with aniline, tailor-made stabilizer was used, and polyaniline particle dispersions with improved stability were obtained [68]. In addition, porosity [69], particle size [70], and apparent density [52] of dispersed particles play an important role on colloidal stability of the ER fluids.

For MR fluids, sedimentation is an important problem due to the limit of their technological applications. Several approaches to improving the colloidal stability of the dispersed magnetic particles have been suggested. They can be the dispersion stabilizers or additives, viscoplastic carrier medium, and the modification of magnetic particles with either polymers or inorganic coatings [71, 72]. Because of much lower density and relatively good magnetic properties than CI particles, Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 have been used as MR materials [73].


3.1 Dual response of materials under electric and magnetic fields

Basically the particles used to make MR suspensions cannot be used for ER systems because magnetic particles are more conductive; however, the magnetic particles can be coated with an insulating agent, which renders the suspension applicable in both MR and ER systems. The combined effect of magnetic and electric field produces intensified rheological changes in the suspensions. This synergic effect is termed as electromagnetorheological effect (EMR) [34]. Figure 5 shows the flow curves of a reported study [74]. As shown, suspension behaves like a Newtonian fluid in the absence of an E or magnetic field, where the shear stress increases linearly with increasing shear rate. On the other hand, it acted as a Bingham fluid under an external E or magnetic field with a yield stress due to the formed particle cluster or chains by polarization forces.

Figure 5.

Flow curves of CI@PANI/SO ER fluid under (a) electric and (b) magnetic fields [75].

The EMR technique is a new strategy to control the rheological properties of fluid materials. The rheological properties of some fluids can be enhanced with the combination of an electric field and a magnetic field [75]. At this technique, superimposed electric and magnetic fields are applied to a fluid, and the strength/direction of each field can be independently changed during the measurements. Also, the change of magnetic field direction is easier rather than that of the electric field. In a study, a comparison of EMR effects was carried out with the parallel-field and cross-field systems [76]. It was observed that a marked EMR effect was obtained with applied parallel field for the spherical iron dispersion. These EMR effect has been attributed to the different reorientations of the dispersed particles according to field directions. In a reported study, simultaneous impact of electric and magnetic fields on fluids containing a two-component dispersed phase (SiO2 and CI) was investigated. The fluids showed the strong synergistic effect in the entire investigated range of intensities of electric and magnetic fields. Also, the ferromagnetic particles (γ-Fe2O3) sensitive to the impact of an E was added to the fluids, and an increasing synergistic effect was observed until reaching saturation magnetization [77].


4. Conclusions

Various industrial applications such as the automotive, production sector, and robotic controls are full-potential ER and MR fluid applications. EMR fluids can change the particle interaction and the mechanical properties of dispersed materials. It means that they can allow an increase in the shear stress under two fields. Therefore, EMR fluids can expand the application areas of both ER and MR fluids due to their synergic effects.


  1. 1. Sedlacik M, Mrlik M, Pavlinek V, Saha P, Quadrat O. Electrorheological properties of suspensions of hollow globular titanium oxide/polypyrrole particles. Colloid and Polymer Science. 2012;290:41-48
  2. 2. Hao T. Electrorheological Fluids: The Non-Aqueous Suspensions. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2005. pp. 83-113
  3. 3. Duff AW. The viscosity of polarised dielectrics. Physics Review. 1896;4:23
  4. 4. Winslow WM. Induced fibration of suspensions. Journal of Applied Physics. 1949;20:1137
  5. 5. Gawade SS, Jadhav AA. A review on electrorheological (ER) fluids and its applications. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT). 2012;1(10):1-8
  6. 6. Ramkumar K, Ganesan N. Vibration and damping of composite sandwich box column with visco elastic/electro rheological fluid core and performance comparison. Materials and Design. 2009;30:2981-2994
  7. 7. Oh SY, Kang TJ. Electrorheological response of inorganic-coated multi-wall carbon nanotubes with core-shell nanostructure. Soft Matter. 2014;10:3726-3737
  8. 8. Cheng YC, Guo JJ, Xu GJ, Cui P, Liu XH, Liu FH, et al. Electrorheological property and microstructure of acetamide-modified TiO2 nanoparticles. Colloid and Polymer Science. 2008;286:1493
  9. 9. Cabuk M, Yavuz M, Unal HI, Erol O. Synthesis, characterization and investigation of electrorheological properties of biodegradable chitosan/bentonite nanocomposites. Clay Minerals. 2013;48:129-141
  10. 10. Zhang WL, Liu YD, Choi HJ. Graphene oxide coated core–shell structured polystyrene microspheres and their electrorheological characteristics under applied electric field. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011;21:6916-6921
  11. 11. Shen R, Wang X, Lu Y, Wang D, Sun G, Cao Z, et al. Polar-molecule-dominated electrorheological fluids featuring high yield stresses. Advanced Materials. 2009;21:4631-4635
  12. 12. Wen W, Huang X, Yang S, Lu K, Sheng P. The giant electrorheological effect in suspensions of nanoparticles. Nature Materials. 2003;2:727-730
  13. 13. Shen C, Wen W, Yang S, Sheng P. Wetting-induced electrorheological effect. Journal of Applied Physics. 2006;99:106104
  14. 14. Choi HJ, Jhon MS. Electrorheology of polymers and nanocomposites. Soft Materials. 2009;5:1562
  15. 15. Wang BX, Zhou M, Rozynek Z, Fossum JO. Electrorheological properties of organically modified nanolayered laponite: Influence of intercalation, adsorption and wettability. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2009;19:1816
  16. 16. Cabuk M. Electrorheological response of mesoporous expanded perlite particles. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2017;247:60-65
  17. 17. Slobodian P, Pavlinek V, Lengalova A, Saha P. Polystyrene/Multi-Wall carbon nanotube composites prepared by suspension polymerization and their electrorheological behavior. Current Applied Physics. 2009;9:184
  18. 18. Li J, Gong X, Chen S, Wen W, Sheng P. Giant electrorheological fluid comprising nanoparticles: Carbon nanotube composite. Journal of Applied Physics. 2010;107:93507-93512
  19. 19. Engelmann B, Hiptmair R, Hoppe RHW, Mazurkevitch G. Numerical simulation of electrorheological fluids based on an extended Bingham model. Computing and Visualization in Science. 2000;2:211-219
  20. 20. Klass DL, Martinek TW. EIectroviscous fluids. I. Rheological properties. Journal of Applied Physics. 1967;38:67-74
  21. 21. Cho MS, Choi HJ, Jhon MS. Shear stress analysis of a semiconducting polymer based electrorheological fluid system. Polymer. 2005;46:11484-11488
  22. 22. Park BJ, Fang FF, Choi HJ. Magnetorheology: Materials and application. Soft Matter. 2010;6:5246-5253
  23. 23. Kim MW, Han WJ, Hyun Kim Y, Choi HJ. Effect of a hard magnetic particle additive on rheological characteristics of microspherical carbonyl iron-based magnetorheological fluid. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2016;506:812-820
  24. 24. Noh J, Hong S, Yoon CM, Lee S, Jang J. Dual external field-responsive polyaniline-coated magnetite/silica nanoparticles for smart fluid applications. Chemical Communications. 2017;53:6645-6648
  25. 25. Çabuk M, Yesil T, Yavuz M, Hi Ü. Colloidal and electrorheological properties of conducting polyaniline bentonite composite in silicone oil medium. Current Smart Materials. 2017;2:1-8
  26. 26. Hiamtup P, Sirivat A, Jamieson AM. Strain-hardening in the oscillatory shear deformation of a dedoped polyaniline electrorheological fluid. Journal of Materials Science. 2010;45:1972-1976
  27. 27. Lin DD, Zhang ZJ, Zhao BY, Chen LS, Hu K. Rapid synthesis of porous polyaniline and its application in electrorheological fluid. Smart Materials and Structures. 2006;15:1641-1645
  28. 28. Xia X, Yin J, Qiang P, Zhao X. Electrorheological properties of thermo-oxidative polypyrrole nanofibers. Polymer. 2011;52:786-792
  29. 29. Kimura H, Koichiro A, Yuichi M, Jun-İchi T, Kiyohito KK. Phase structure change and ER effect in liquid crystalline polymer/dimethylsiloxane blends. Rheologica Acta. 1998;37:54-60
  30. 30. Zhang WL, Liu J, Choi HJ. Graphene and graphene oxide composites and their electrorheological applications. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2015;16:8
  31. 31. Wei C, Zhu Y, Jin Y, Yang X, Li C. Fabrication and characterization of mesoporous TiO2/polypyrrole-based nanocomposite for electrorheological fluid. Materials Research Bulletin. 2008;43:3263-3269
  32. 32. Noh J, Yoon CM, Jang J. Enhanced electrorheological activity of polyaniline coated mesoporous silica with high aspect ratio. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2016;470:237-244
  33. 33. Kim MW, Moon IJ, Choi HJ, Seo Y. Facile fabrication of core/shell structured SiO2/polypyrrole nanoparticles with surface modification and their electrorheology. RSC Advances. 2016;6:56495-56502
  34. 34. Wen W, Sheng P. Two-and three-dimensional ordered structures formed by electro-magnetorheological colloids. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2003;338:343-346
  35. 35. Boissy C, Atten P, Foulc JN. On a negative electrorheological effect. Journal of Electrostatics. 1995;35(1):13-20
  36. 36. Young GK, Choi US. Negative electrorheological fluids. Journal of Rheology. 2013;57(6):1655-1667
  37. 37. Wu CW. Negative electrorheological effect and electrical properties of a teflon/silicone oil suspension. Journal of Rheology. 1997;41:267-275
  38. 38. Erol O, Ramos-Tejada MM, Unal HI, Delgado AV. Effect of surface properties on the electrorheological response of hematite/silicone oil dispersions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 3013(392):75-82
  39. 39. Minagawa K, Okamura H, Masuda S, Tanaka M, Gohko N, Masubuchi Y, et al. Preparation and property of model homogeneous ER fluids having urethane groups. International Journal of Modern Physics B. 1999;13(14n16):1998-2004
  40. 40. Cetin B, Unal H I and Erol O. The negative and positive electrorheological behavior and vibration damping characteristics of colemanite and polyindene/colemanite conducting composite. Smart Materials and Structures. 2012;21(12):125011
  41. 41. Kimura H, Aikawa K, Masubuchi Y, Takimoto J, Koyama K, Uemura T. Positive and negative electro-rheological effect of liquid blends. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 1998;76:199-211
  42. 42. Cho MY, Kim JS, Choi HJ, Choi SB, Kim GW. Ultraviolet light-responsive photorheological fluids: As a new class of smart fluids. Smart Materials and Structures. 2017;26:054007
  43. 43. Hao T. Electrorheological fluids. Advanced Materials. 2001;13(24):1847-1857
  44. 44. Komoda Y, Sakaı N, Rao TN, Tryk DA, Fujıshıma A. Photoelectrorheological phenomena involving Tio2 particle suspensions. Langmuir. 1998;7463(16):1081-1091
  45. 45. Komoda Y, Tata NR, Fujishima A. Photoelectrorheology of TiO2 Nanoparticle Suspensions. Langmuir. 1997;13:1371-1373
  46. 46. Carreira L, Mihajlov V. U.S. Patent 3553708, U.S.A.; 1971
  47. 47. Smith YR, Heermance D, Smith RN. Photo-effects on the viscosity of titania nanoparticle suspensions in conducting and insulating medium. Korea-Australia Rheology Journal. 2016;28(1):51-54
  48. 48. Cho MS, Choi HJ, Chin IJ, Ahn WS. Electrorheological characterization of zeolite suspensions. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 1999;32:233-239
  49. 49. Jang WH, Cho YH, Kim JW, Choi HJ, Sohn JI, Jhon MS. Electrorheological fluids based on chitosan particles. Journal of Materials Science Letters. 2001;20:1029-1031
  50. 50. Sever E, Unal HI. Electrorheological, viscoelastic, and creep-recovery behaviors of covalently bonded nanocube-TiO2/poly(3-octylthiophene) colloidal dispersions. Polymer Composites. 2018;39:351-359
  51. 51. Kim YD, Klingenberg DJ. Surfactant-activated electrorheological suspensions. In: Havelka KO, Filisko FE, editors. Progress in Electrorheology. Plenum, New York; 1994. pp. 115-130
  52. 52. Cabuk M, Yavuz M, Unal HI. Colloidal, electrorheological, and viscoelastic properties of polypyrrole-graft-chitosan biodegradable copolymer. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 2015;26(14):1799-1810
  53. 53. Puvanatvattana T, Chotpattananont D, Hiamtup P, Niamlang S, Kunanuruksapong R, Sirivat A, et al. Electric field induced stress moduli of polythiophene/polyisoprene suspensions: Effects of particle conductivity and concentration. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2008;28:119-128
  54. 54. Zhang WL, Choi HJ. Fast and facile fabrication of a graphene oxide/titania nanocomposite and its electro-responsive characteristics. Chemical Communications. 2011;47:12286-12288
  55. 55. Koyuncu K, Unal HI, Gumus OY, Erol O, Sari B, Ergin T. Electrokinetic and electrorheological properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/polyindole conducting composites. Polymers for Advanced Technologies. 2011;23:1464-1472
  56. 56. Bombard AJF, Knobel M, Alcantara MR. Phosphate coating on the surface of carbonyl iron powder and its effect in magnetorheological suspensions. International Journal of Modern Physics B. 2007;21:4858-4867
  57. 57. Ashtiani M, Hashemabadi SH, Ghaffari A. A review on the magnetorheological fluid preparation and stabilization. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2015;374:716-730
  58. 58. Hong CH, Sung JH, Choi HJ. Effects of medium oil on electroresponsive characteristics of chitosan suspensions. Colloid and Polymer Science. 2009;287:583-589
  59. 59. Hao T, Xu Z, Xu YJ. Correlation of the dielectric properties of dispersed particles with the electrorheological effect. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1997;190:334-340
  60. 60. Kim JW, Choi HJ, Jhon MS. Synthesis and electrorheological characterization of emulsion polymerized SAN-clay nanocomposite suspensions. Macromolecular Symposia. 2000;155:229-237
  61. 61. Weiss KD, David CJ. Material aspects of electrorheological systems. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 1993;4:13-35
  62. 62. Makela KK. Characterization and performance of electrorheological fluids based on pine oils. VTT Publications 385, Technical Research Centre of Fınland, Espoo; 1999
  63. 63. Sudha JD, Sasikala TS. Studies on the formation of self-assembled nano/microstructured polyaniline clay nanocomposite (PANICN) using 3-pentadecyl phenyl phosphoric acid (PDPPA) as a novel intercalating agent cum dopant. Polymer. 2007;48:338-347
  64. 64. Unal HI, Sahan B, Erol O. Investigation of electrokinetic and electrorheological properties of polyindole prepared in the presence of a surfactant. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2012;134:382-391
  65. 65. Choi HJ, Jhon MS. Electrorheology of polymers and nanocomposites. Soft Matter. 2009;5:1562-1567
  66. 66. Espin MJ, Delgado AV, Plocharsky JZ. Effect of additives and measurement procedure on the electrorheology of hematite/silicone oil suspensions. Rheologica Acta. 2006;45:865-876
  67. 67. Uemura T, Minagava K, Takimato J, et al. Opposite electrorheological effects between urethane-based polymers having different terminal groups. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions. 1995;91:1051-1052
  68. 68. Armes SP, Aldissi M, Gottesfeld S, Agnew SF. Aqueous colloidal dispersions of polyaniline formed by using poly (vinylpyridine)-based steric stabilizers. Langmuir. 1990;6:1745
  69. 69. Yin JB, Zhao XP. Enhanced electrorheological activity of mesoporous Cr-doped TiO2 from activated pore wall and high surface area. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2006;110(26):12916-12925
  70. 70. Liu F, Xu G, Wu J, Cheng Y, Guo J, Cui P. Electrorheologıcal properties of amorphous titanium oxide particles wıth different sizes. In: Electro-Rheological Fluids and Magneto-Rheological Suspensions. USA; 2010
  71. 71. Lim ST, Cho MS, Jang IB, Choi HJ, Jhon MS. Magnetorheology of carbonyl-iron suspensions with submicron-sized filler. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2004;40:3033-3035
  72. 72. Fang FF, Choi HJ, Seo Y. Sequential coating of magnetic carbonyliron particles with polystyrene and multiwalled carbon nanotubes and its effect on their magnetorheology. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. 2010;2:54-60
  73. 73. Pu HT, Jiang FJ. Towards high sedimentation stability: Magnetorheological fluids based on CNT/Fe3O4 nanocomposites. Nanotechnology. 2005;16:1486-1489
  74. 74. Sim B, Chae HS, Choi HJ. Fabrication of polyaniline coated iron oxide hybrid particles and their dual stimuli-response under electric and magnetic fields. Express Polymer Letters. 2015;9(8):736-743
  75. 75. Fujita T, Mochizuki J, Lin IJ. Viscosity of electrorheological magneto-dielectric fluid under electric and magnetic fields. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 1993;122:29
  76. 76. Koyama K, Minagawa K, Watanabe T, Kumakura Y, Takimoto J-İ. Electro-magneto-rheological effects in parallel-field and crossed-field systems. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 1995;58:195-206
  77. 77. Korobko EV, Novikova ZA, Zhurauski MA, Borin D, Odenbach S. Synergistic effect in magnetoelectrorheological fluids with a complex dispersed phase. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 2011;23(9):963-967

Written By

Mehmet Cabuk

Submitted: 22 November 2018 Reviewed: 23 April 2019 Published: 07 August 2019