Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Advanced Optical Diagnostics of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma

Written By

Qing Xiong

Submitted: April 12th, 2018Reviewed: February 25th, 2019Published: April 11th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.85419

Chapter metrics overview

1,127 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Atmospheric-pressure plasma has been employed in various applications including bio-medicine, environmental pollution control, material processing. Diagnostic characterization of plasma sources is critical and indispensable for plasma control and achieving optimized treatment efficiency. In this chapter we will introduce several advanced optical techniques to visualize the detailed physical-and-chemical properties of atmospheric-pressure discharges. Non-invasive approaches of optical emission spectroscopy (OES), schlieren or shadowgraph, invasive methods of active laser spectroscopy including laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), laser or broadband absorption, cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS), and laser scattering are illustrated. Basic plasma parameters of gas temperature, electron density and temperature, electric field strength, and reactive chemical gaseous species (O, H, N, OH, NO, O3, etc.) are able to be monitored. Comparisons and comments of these approaches are provided depending on diagnostic purposes.

Keywords

  • advanced optical techniques
  • plasma parameters
  • active laser spectroscopy
  • LIF
  • absorption spectroscopy

1. Introduction

Atmospheric pressure plasmas attract intensely interests because of non-need of costly vacuum requirement and enabling in-line processing. Prospective novel applications have emerged over recent years, e.g., plasma bio-medicine, material synthesis, pollutant degradation, chemical conversion. However, with increase of gas pressure, plasmas tend to become constricted, unstable, and non-uniform. Miniaturization of discharge volume with non-equilibrium kinetic property are typically characterized by atmospheric pressure plasmas. And in many cases they are of strong gradients in space and in time as well, e.g., the so-called microplasmas. Much higher diagnostic requirements are put forward to atmospheric pressure plasmas with high time-and-space resolution. Not only the traditional optical emission spectroscopy (OES) accessing emitting species, but also advanced active diagnostics particularly the laser-aided techniques probing plasma parameters (Tg, ne, Te) and reactive plasma species, are the topics discussed in this chapter.

Advertisement

2. Diagnostics of basic plasma parameters

Plasma parameters mainly are the gas temperature Tg, electron density neand temperature Te. The three are important physical factors directly influencing the plasma generation and physical-and-chemical properties. Diagnostics of the three parameters are necessary in plasma field from points of both fundamental research and applications.

2.1 Gas temperature

From points of both fundamental investigation and applications, gas temperature (Tg) is one of the important basic plasma parameters strongly affecting the discharge property, especially the plasma chemistry as most chemical reactions are temperature dependent, and thus influences the final outcomes of plasma applications. Standard direct approach by thermocouples is difficult due to induced strong effects on plasma properties. Although thermometric probes based on fiber-optics are developed and applied to plasma diagnostics [1], the use of this technique is still rare and limited to, e.g., microplasmas.

Rotational distributions of molecules, typically from excited molecules are often used to estimate the plasma gas temperature, if the former achieves an equilibrium Boltzmann distribution [2, 3]. In this case the distribution of interested rotational manifold can be estimated from corresponding emissions in UV to visible range and easy to be detected by a spectrometer. Excited species OHA2Σ+and N2C3Πuare often used for the purpose of Tgestimation, by using programs of Lifbase or SpecAir [4, 5]. However, it needs to keep in mind that, on one hand this method is strongly affected by the production process of excited molecular state. Its rotational population distribution may highly deviate from thermal equilibrium state. This is typically characterized by atmospheric pressure plasmas, in which fast collisions significantly reduce the lifetime of rotational states and if the rotational energy transfer (RET) process is not fast enough to thermalized all rotational levels, a non-thermalized distribution is resulted. In this case Tgestimation will be not precise and overestimated due to over-populated high rotational states. This situation is often existent in water-contacting discharges if OHA2Σ+, or argon discharges if N2C3Πu, are applied for Tgdetermination [6, 7, 8, 9]. In this case, method of Boltzmann plotting may help by using the part of rotational states with small rotational number, as these levels with low rotational energy potential are easily thermalized by RET process [2].

On the other hand, it should mention that the emitting region usually characterizes only a part but not the whole discharge space. Commonly, it corresponds to the hot core of the discharge [10]. Other advanced approaches are desired if the full-space distribution of Tgis needed, for instance to estimate the heat flux of discharge to treated object. Laser scattering techniques such as Rayleigh scattering and Raman scattering, and calibrated schlieren photography are proposed and will be illustrated in this chapter. All these methods depend on the neutral density which directly relates to Tgif the ideal gas principle is valid.

Rayleigh scattering is elastic scattering on heavy species and its signal has the same wavelength as the laser. Its intensity depends proportionally on the scattering cross section, laser intensity, and amount of neutral particles probed in the scatter volume [11, 12, 13, 14]. By comparing the scattering signals of plasma off IoffRand plasma on IonR, the gas temperature is obtained if the gas composition does not vary significantly in the probed volume:

Tg=TrefIoffRIonRE1

where Trefis the known room temperature when plasma is off. An example of a Rayleigh scattering measurement in a pin-to-pin micro-glow air discharge is shown in Figure 1. This technique is favored for capturing the Tgspatial distribution of atmospheric pressure plasmas directly, but still following issues needs to be considered if it is applied:

  • Laser-induced breakdown needs to be avoided by using appropriate laser energy. UV laser wavelength is suggested for this purpose, even laser energy is low it still able to produce intense scattering signal as the cross section has a strong wavelength dependence (σλ4) [12].

  • Mie scattering on dust particles and stray scattering light from electrodes needs to be avoided. Therefore, this technique is quite difficult for probing discharge regions close to electrodes.

  • The scattering signal will be weak for helium discharge due to the low Rayleigh cross section of helium atoms.

  • Deviation will increase for temperature level above 2000 K as intensity of IonRwill be very low in above equation.

Figure 1.

Radial profiles of Rayleigh scattering intensities when the discharge was off and on, and the estimated gas temperature profile in the middle of discharge column with current of 8 mA [10].

Schlieren photography also is applied to measure the gas density gradients and correspondingly, to estimate the gas temperature [15, 16]. The advantage of this approach is achievable of the whole Tgdistribution by only one schlieren image, if after calibration. A schlieren image visualizes the deflection of light rays along the optical path. The signal intensity of each pixel on the schlieren image is an integration result of bent light ray which strongly depends on the density distribution of gas species. If the gas composition is known and its spatial gradient is induced by thermal motion, then Tgmap is able to be calculated through Abel inverse integral transformation. Symmetric assumption is usually made for the Tgmap in non-uniform discharges such as pin-to-pin microplasma. For asymmetric discharges, it is difficult but still possible by a computed tomographic reconstruction technique and multi-directional calibrated Schlieren imaging [16, 17].

Figure 2 shows an example of full Tgmap estimated by calibrated schlieren photography [10]. It needs to point out that this technique suffers the optical diffraction effect on the object boundary, which usually induces an overestimation of temperature. However, compared to laser scattering approach, calibrated schlieren is a low-cost way for full-mapping gas temperature in discharges. Its drawback is the calibrated calculation process and need extra calibration by a long-focus lens.

Figure 2.

(From left to right) A pin-to-pin air micro-glow discharge under 16 mA current, its Schlieren image, and two-dimensional Tg map.

Other methods including Raman scattering also allows one to measure the gas temperature [13]. It is the inelastic scattering of light on molecules such as N2 or O2 and its signal depends on neutral density, similar to the Rayleigh scattering. However, this technique requires expensive laser equipment and filter system for removing strong interference of Rayleigh scattering. Doppler broadening and Van der Waals broadening are analyzed for line profiles to estimate Tgas well if the Stark broadening is not dominant [18, 19]. However, the broadening routines require high spectral resolution to reduce the effect from instrumental broadening. Compared to emission lines, fine structure of atomic absorption line is achievable by tunable diode laser absorption measurement [8]. Compared to Doppler broadening, Van der Waals broadening is preferred for atmospheric-pressure plasmas with low gas temperature as the latter depends strongly on the neutral density. It should mention that the both broadening routines are line-integrated measurements and Abel inversion is required if radial profile of Tgis desired. Table 1 concludes and compares all these methods for Tgdiagnostics described above. Two or more techniques are suggested if diagnosing non-uniform high-pressure plasmas.

MethodsAdvantagesDisadvantagesRef.
Rotational temperature of molecules
  • Spatial resolution can be high;

  • Flexible and achievable by a fiber-optics spectrometer

  • Line-averaged

  • Non-equilibrium distribution if quenching is strong

  • Characterize only radiative region

[2, 3]
Broadenings of line profile
  • Spatial resolution can be high;

  • Non-dependent on quenching process

  • Require high-spectral resolution;

  • Line-averaged

[18, 19]
Rayleigh scattering
  • Spatial resolution can be high;

  • 2D measurement;

  • Accuracy is high for Tg< 2000 K

  • Require expensive laser system;

  • Stray light effect;

  • Deviation increase for Tg > 2000 K

[12, 13, 14]
Raman scattering
  • Spatial resolution can be high;

  • 2D measurement

  • Require expensive laser system and notch filter

[13, 14]
Schlieren imaging
  • Spatial resolution can be high;

  • Full spatial-field detection

  • Need calibration and complex calculation

[10, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21]

Table 1.

Summary comparison of various diagnostic techniques for gas temperature determination in atmospheric-pressure discharges.

2.2 Electric-field strength

Electric-field strength Edetermination is always a tough issue for high-pressure plasmas. Compared to emission spectroscopic methods based on Stark effect of atomic lines, coherent Raman scattering (CRS) technique is favored for both static and fast transient discharges at elevated pressures [22, 23]. Its basic principle is vibrational excitation of Raman-active molecular which produces an infrared (IR) coherent beam under the effects of two extra nanosecond pulsed laser beams and an electric field. The IR light can be considered as an anti-Stokes wave produced by the electric fields of two laser beams and a third field at zero frequency, i.e., the probed dc electric field [22, 24, 25]. At the same time the laser beams also produce conventional coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) regardless of the presence of the dc electric field. And Eis able to be determined from the detected intensities of the two coherent Raman scattering beam, according to:

IIR=C1NgNex2I1I2E2E2
ICARS=C2NgNex2I12I2E3
E2=C2C1I1IIRICARS=C0IIRICARSE4

Ngand Nexare the number densities of scattering molecules at the ground and excited levels involved in the vibrational transition. Since the incident laser intensity I1is known and can be treated as a constant with two other constants C1and C2. The value of parameter C0is almost independent of the gas density or temperature which significantly simplifies the analysis of this technique for Emeasurement in discharges.

Molecules including N2 and H2 have been used as the probe species, particularly the latter due to its large Raman cross section [22, 25]. However, compared to H2 nitrogen gas has significant potentials for diagnosing atmospheric-pressure discharges especially discharges mixing with nitrogen gas. Based on the four-wave mixing principle of CRS technique by two laser beams, recently a novel and simpler CRS scheme was developed by I. Adamovich’ group in Ohio State University by using only one laser beam [26, 27, 28, 29]. A high-pressure gas cell filled with N2 and He with 1:1 mixture ratio was used and pumped by the same laser beam to produce the 607 nm first order Stokes signal of N2. The 607 nm Stokes beam was generated to replace the need of another nanosecond laser system used in traditional CRS technique. Then the pump and Stokes beams are focused in the discharge region to produce the IR anti-Stokes beam under the presence of probed dc electric field [28]. They applied a picosecond laser at 532 nm especially for probing the transient electric field in nanosecond discharges.

A further simpler approach based on the second harmonic generation (SHG) was developed by the same group for diagnosing the time-resolved evolution of the electric field vector in a nanosecond atmospheric-pressure surface plasma [29]. A single picosecond laser was used without Stokes gas cell. The pump laser wavelength is 1064 nm and focused to the discharge region and under the presence of an external electric field, SHG at 532 nm is generated with intensity proportional to the probed Eof discharge [29]. Compared to CRS measurements, this SHG technique involves only one nonlinear optical process which enables better shot-to-shot signal reproducibility and signal/noise level. By using a polarizer in front of the SHG detector the vertical and horizontal components of Ein discharge are able to be measured separately. Absolute calibration is required for above all approaches by measuring a known Laplacian electric field between two parallel metal plate electrodes. It should be mentioned that low-frequency nanosecond lasers, such as 10 Hz Nd:YAG pumping laser, is also suitable for Emeasurement in atmospheric-pressure discharges if ns time-resolution is not required.

2.3 Electron density and temperature

Electron density neand temperature Teare two important fundamental plasma parameters since plasma property is mostly drove by electrons. Stark broadening of atomic line profile is often applied for estimating electron density if netypically exceeds 1014 cm−3 in atmospheric-pressure plasmas. The Hβ line is most frequently used for the diagnostic purpose of nedue to its strong Stark broadening but less self-absorption and weak effect from ion dynamics in discharges [30, 31]. Other hydrogen Balmer lines including Hα and Hγ are also studied and used for nedetermination. The Hα line is more intense of emission but easily suffered self-absorption effects. The Stark broadening of hydrogen Balmer lines has been studied extensively in [32] by group of M. Gigosos. They calculated the line widths of Hβ Stark broadening for wide ranges of electron density, temperature and emitter-perturber reduced mass. An equation is derived for nebased on the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of Hβ Stark broadening profile [32].

ws=4.8nmne1017cm30.68116E5

The Stark broadening of Hβ line facilitates the nedetermination in atmospheric-pressure plasmas. High-spectrum resolution (e.g., 10 pm) is recommended for capturing a clear shape of the Hβ line profile since other broadenings including Doppler, van der Waals, and instrumental broadenings contribute also to the detected line profile. The effects of these broadenings need to be separated to obtain the Stark part and accurate deconvolution procedures normally are required for this purpose [33]. Other atomic lines are also possible for nemeasurement based on their Stark broadening if hydrogen gas is absent, for example, He (447.1 nm) or Ar (415.9 nm) lines [34, 35].

Microwave interferometry and CO2-laser heterodyne interferometry have been applied as well to nemeasurement in plasmas based on the principle of change in refractive index of electromagnetic radiation passing through the discharge region [36, 37]. The main advantage of this technique is that it is able to measure electron densities at order of 1013 cm−3 lower than that by the Hβ Stark line broadening. However, since it is a line-integrated method and thermal effect may contribute also to the detected phase shift of probed electromagnetic radiation. This issue can be solved by using two laser sources with different wavelength [36]. Abel inversion is necessary to obtain spatially resolved electron density.

Compared to above two line-integrated techniques, Thomson scattering is a more advanced optical approach allows one probe directly information of both neand Te[13]. This technique is based on the elastic scattering of light on free electrons, and its signal is Doppler broadened due to the velocity of electrons if the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) is a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. Therefore, neis able to be determined from the measured scattered power per unit of wavelength Sλ[38]:

Sλ=CneGλλE6

where C=flIlΔΩis a constant factor depending on the optics efficiency f, length of detection volume l, laser power Il, and detection solid angle ΔΩ. Absolute calibration needs to be done to determine the Cvalue normally by means of Raman scattering on ambient air at atmospheric-pressure and room temperature [13]. /is the differential cross section and Gλλis the function of spectral distribution and normalized normally that Gλλ=1. Tecan be obtained by the measured Gaussian profile of Thomson scattering signal according to [13, 39]:

Te=mec24kBΔλλl2E7

Δλis the 1/ewidth of the Gaussian profile. Although these advantages of this advanced diagnostic technique, its implementation is not straightforward in general due to the weak scattered signal typically orders of magnitude lower than that of Rayleigh scattering in addition to stray light. A notch filter or a triple grating spectrometer, or an atomic absorption cell, are necessary to capture the weak scattered light [40, 41, 42]. And, laser-induced optical effects such as photo-detachment, photon-ionization, or electron heating may occur if high laser power is used in measurements, and need to be checked by measuring the signal as a function of laser power. More details about the Thomson scattering approach can be found in [13, 39, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48].

Advertisement

3. Diagnostics of plasma chemistry (reactive species)

Plasma chemistry covers broad ranges of chemical properties of discharge plasmas, and rapidly grows to an important research area of scientific endeavor holding great promise for many novel plasma applications. Reactive species, including neutrals, metastable or excited species, ions consist the dominant active agents of discharges and play critical roles in plasma treatments, e.g., in fields of medicine, material, energy, etc. Various diagnostic techniques have been developed and applied for probing different reactive species quantitatively. And in this chapter three important techniques based on principles of laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) and absorption spectroscopy, are included.

3.1 Laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy

Laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) is an in situsensitive technique monitoring transient species with high temporal and spatial resolution [49]. This approach is based on a two-step process, where atoms or molecules in the initial electronic state iare firstly pumped to an upper electronic state jby absorbing laser photons with energy ∆E=hvijsame to the transition gap between states iand j. Secondly, the excited state jundergoes spontaneous transition to a lower state kand emits photons with energy hvjkcalled the fluorescence signal. As an example, a conceptual LIF scheme of OH radicals, one typical reactive molecular species studied frequently by this technique, is depicted in Figure 3. For molecules fast vibrational energy transfer (VET) and rotational energy transfer (RET) processes are occurring after laser excitation, as well as the pre-dissociation process.

Figure 3.

LIF scheme of OH radicals.

For atomic species these ro-vibrational processes are not existent. Although LIF is a direct technique allows us detect the spatial distributions of interested species, absolute calibration and analysis model are required for quantitative measurements [50, 51, 52, 53, 54]. For the case of single-photon excitation the fluorescence calibration is relative simple with the aid of Rayleigh scattering. It is based on a comparison under identical conditions of laser irradiation in Rayleigh scattering and fluorescence detection in LIF. A reference gas with known density is usually used for Rayleigh calibration, for instance air gas under room temperature. Typical laser excitations and fluorescence transitions of various species are listed in Table 2 together with suggested calibration.

SpeciesExcitation transitionFluorescence transitionCalibrationRef.
OHX2Π,v=0A2Σ+,v=1
283 nm
A2Σ+,v=0X2Π,v=0
308 nm
Rayleigh of air[50, 51, 52, 53, 54]
NOX2Π,v=0A2Σ+,v=0
226 nm
A2Σ+,v=2X2Π,v=0
247 nm
NO gas[55, 56, 57, 58, 59]
N2A3Σu+A3Σu+,v=0B3Πg,v=4
618 nm
B3Πg,v=4A3Σu+,v=1
678 nm
Rayleigh[60, 61, 62]
NHX3Σ,v=0A3Πi,v=0
334 nm
A3Πi,v=0X3Σ,v=0
336 nm
Rayleigh[63, 64]
CHX2Π,v=0A2Δ,v=1
364 nm
A2Δ,v=0X2Π,v=0
405 nm
Rayleigh[65, 66]

Table 2.

The plasma species have been measured by single-photon LIF.

Analysis of fluorescence signal for absolutely determining probed species density can be very complicated under high gas pressure due to the fast collisional processes [67]. In this case the excited state after laser pumping may redistribute because of fast collisions at same timescale or even faster and these processes have to be considered in the analysis model. This could be more complicated for molecular species, for instance OH, NO, etc. in addition to the fast processes of VET and RET [49]. Assumptions are often made for simplifying the LIF model, e.g., RET is fast enough to redistribute the rotational manifold of excited vibrational state and in this case the lifetime of the vibrational band can be considered only depending on quenching and emission coefficients. Effective lifetime of excited vibrational band instead of single rotational level, is used in the LIF model. And this is normally correct if RET process is fast, but still need to check if concentrations of quenching species such as H2O to OH is very high [54, 68, 69, 70]. Furthermore, the laser power needs to be kept low and linear LIF is achieved to avoid stimulated emission and large depletion of initial pumped state density.

In many cases the excitation radiations locate range of deep UV (e.g., <100 nm) and are strongly absorbed by ambient gaseous medium (e.g., air or water molecules), then two-photon excitation in the UV spectral range (>200 nm) can be applied for the same diagnostic purpose, namely the so-called two-photon absorption LIF (TA-LIF) [49]. Compared to single-photon LIF, TA-LIF is considerably less efficient and the excitation rate scales with the square of laser power. Normally higher laser power is required to produce detectable fluorescence intensity, but laser stimulated effects including photon-ionization, induced breakdown, stimulated emission, etc. needs to be avoided [71, 72]. Table 3 lists excitation schemes of TA-LIF for various active atomic species in plasmas. An example of two-dimensional distribution of atomic oxygen in an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet-source by TA-LIF is presented in Figure 4.

SpeciesExcitation wavelength (nm)Fluorescence wavelength (nm)CalibrationRef.
O225845Xe gas[49, 73]
H205656Kr gas[74]
N206742–747Kr gas[75]
F170420Ar gas[49]
C246477Rayleigh[49]

Table 3.

Excitation schemes of various atomic species by TA-LIF technique.

Figure 4.

Two-dimensional spatial distributions of ground-state O density in the x-z plane of the RF argon plasma jet under different O2 admixtures [76].

3.2 Absorption spectroscopy

Another important diagnostic technique for atmospheric-pressure plasmas is absorption spectroscopy (AS) [77]. Compared to LIF or OES approaches, AS is an in situand non-invasive technique probing absolute densities of interested species without need of extra calibration and independent on collisional quenching process. It relies on the Beer-Lambertlaw:

Aλ=lnIsI0=λLE8

where Isis the light intensity passing through sample, I0is the incident radiation, Nis species density, σλis the wavelength dependent absorption cross-section, and Lis the absorption path-length. If probed species density is low, the absorption length is normally increased by using a multi-pass spectroscopic absorption cell where light reflects between two mirrors, e.g., the Herriottcell [78]. However, if for micro-plasmas this technique maybe not sensitive enough if species density is not high to obtain a distinct absorbance signal.

The sensitivity of absorption measurements is strongly dependent on the stability of used light source. Various types of light sources, narrow-band or broadband with wavelength range from VUV to mid-infrared, are applied together with high spectral resolution detection system such as spectrometer or FTIR. AS by laser light sources, particularly tunable diode-lasers or quantum cascade lasers are attractive light sources have been applied to measure species densities in micro-plasmas [8, 79, 80]. These laser sources output specific wavelengths of large absorption cross-sections and enable fine scan of wavelength to obtain a clear absorption line profile, and from which species density and even gas temperature are able to be derived.

Wavelength selectivity is important in the implementation of AS technique as absorption may overlap by multi-species. And, it should be mentioned that absorption measurements yield line-integrated densities and spatial distribution is achievable by Abel inversion. Special efforts are required for non-uniform micro-plasmas by AS approach, since gas temperature and species density are spatially dependent. In this case broadband absorption can provide more details for deriving both the gas temperature and species density [81, 82]. An example of OH density determination by broadband UV absorption in an atmospheric-pressure pin-to-water discharge is depicted in Figure 5 [83].

Figure 5.

(a) Measured spectra in the range 305–315 nm from the lamp source Il, lamp and plasma on Il + p, plasma on Ip, and the background Ib. (b) Radial profiles of OH density and gas temperature, and n(A-X) emission with or without filter from the cathode region of water-cathode discharge [83].

Another quite sensitive approach by using a cavity of two highly reflective mirrors is the cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) [84]. The laser pulse goes-and-back in the cavity and that effectively enhances the absorption path length in the probed gas sample by several orders of magnitude. The time-decay of light intensity leaking from the cavity depends on the reflectivity of mirrors and species density in the cavity. Based on that the species density is able to be obtained with the known mirror reflectivity. In addition to the high sensitivity, compared to absorption spectroscopy, CRDS is independent on fluctuations of light intensity since a time constant rather than an absolute absorbance is measured. More details of CRDS technique are included in Refs. [84-90].

Advertisement

4. Summary

High-end diagnostic techniques have been applied to atmospheric-pressure plasmas. Even for highly transient non-uniform micro-plasmas, reliable insights of discharge properties are able to be achieved. This chapter includes several important advanced diagnostic approaches specifically for plasma parameters and reactive plasma species. Two approaches are suggested for a same diagnostic purpose, for example, the determination of gas temperature or electron density, and compared to ensure and increase the measurement accuracy, particularly for atmospheric-pressure plasmas. Other important plasma properties, such as densities of ion species and ion flux, surface charges, have been investigated as well and related diagnostic techniques can be found in above (review) references.

References

  1. 1.Wertheimer MR, Ahlawat M, Saoudi B, Kashyap R. Accurate in-situ gas temperature measurements in dielectric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure. Applied Physics Letters. 2012;100(20):201112
  2. 2.Bruggeman P, Sadeghi N, Schram D, Linss V. Gas temperature determination from rotational lines in non-equilibrium plasmas: A review. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2014;23(2):023001
  3. 3.Bruggeman P, Verreycken T, Gonzalez MA, Walsh JL, Kong MG, Leys C, et al. Optical emission spectroscopy as a diagnostic for plasmas in liquids: Opportunities and pitfalls. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2010;43(12):124005
  4. 4.Luque J, Crosley D. LIFBASE: Database and spectral simulation (version 1.9). SRI International Report MP. 1999. 99-009
  5. 5.http://www.specair-radiation.net[database on the Internet]
  6. 6.Bruggeman PJ, Kushner MJ, Locke BR, Gardeniers JGE, Graham WG, Graves DB, et al. Plasma–liquid interactions: A review and roadmap. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2016;25(5):053002
  7. 7.Xiong Q, Nikiforov AY, Lu XP, Leys C. High-speed dispersed photographing of an open-air argon plasma plume by a grating–ICCD camera system. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2010;43(41):415201
  8. 8.Bol'shakov AA, Cruden BA, Sharma SP. Determination of gas temperature and thermometric species in inductively coupled plasmas by emission and diode laser absorption. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2004;13(4):691-700
  9. 9.Jackson GP, King FL. Probing excitation/ionization processes in millisecond-pulsed glow discharges in argon through the addition of nitrogen. Spectrochimica Acta B. 2003;58(2):185-209
  10. 10.Xiong Q, Xu L, Wang X, Xiong L, Huang Q, Chen Q, et al. Full spatial-field visualization of gas temperature in an air micro-glow discharge by calibrated Schlieren photography. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2018;51(9):095207
  11. 11.Miles RB, Lempert WR, Forkey JN. Laser Rayleigh scattering. Measurement Science and Technology. 2001;12(5):R33-R51
  12. 12.Adams SF, Caplinger JE, Sommers BS. Spatial temperature mapping of an atmospheric microdischarge using ultraviolet Rayleigh scatter imaging. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2015;24(2):025031
  13. 13.van Gessel AH, Carbone ED, Bruggeman P, van der Mullen JM. Laser scattering on an atmospheric pressure plasma jet: Disentangling Rayleigh. Raman and Thomson scattering. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2012;21(1):015003
  14. 14.Verreycken T, van Gessel A, Pageau A, Bruggeman P. Validation of gas temperature measurements by OES in an atmospheric air glow discharge with water electrode using Rayleigh scattering. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2011;20(2):024002
  15. 15.Hargather MJ, Settles GS. A comparison of three quantitative Schlieren techniques. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2012;50(1):8-17
  16. 16.Settles GS, Hargather MJ. A review of recent developments in Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques. Measurement Science and Technology. 2017;28(4):042001
  17. 17.Ishino Y, Hayashi N, Bt Abd Razak IF, Kato T, Kurimoto Y, Saiki Y. 3D-CT (computer tomography) measurement of an instantaneous density distribution of turbulent flames with a multi-directional quantitative Schlieren camera (reconstructions of high-speed premixed burner flames with different flow velocities). Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2016;96(3):819-835
  18. 18.Ionascut-Nedelcescu A, Carlone C, Kogelschatz U, Gravelle DV, Boulos MI. Calculation of the gas temperature in a throughflow atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge torch by spectral line shape analysis. Journal of Applied Physics. 2008;103(6):063305
  19. 19.Yubero C, Dimitrijević MS, García MC, Calzada MD. Using the van der Waals broadening of the spectral atomic lines to measure the gas temperature of an argon microwave plasma at atmospheric pressure. Spectrochimica Acta B. 2007;62(2):169-176
  20. 20.Qing X, Le X, Lin X, Qinghua H, Qiang C, Yi C, et al. Heat deposition in the thermal field of a micro-glow discharge: Effect of humidity. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2018;27(9):095010
  21. 21.Tobin JD, Hargather MJ. Quantitative Schlieren measurement of explosively-driven shock wave density, temperature, and pressure profiles. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics. 2016;41(6):1050-1059
  22. 22.Ito T, Kobayashi K, Mueller S, Luggenhölscher D, Czarnetzki U, Hamaguchi S. Electric field measurement in an atmospheric or higher pressure gas by coherent Raman scattering of nitrogen. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2009;42(9):092003
  23. 23.Ochkin VN, Savinov SY, Tskhai SN, Czarnetzki U, Gathen VS, Dobele HF. Nonlinear optical techniques for plasma diagnostics. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 1998;26(5):1502-1513
  24. 24.Ito T, Kanazawa T, Hamaguchi S. Rapid breakdown mechanisms of open air nanosecond dielectric barrier discharges. Physical Review Letters. 2011;107(6):065002
  25. 25.Ito T, Kobayashi K, Czarnetzki U, Hamaguchi S. Rapid formation of electric field profiles in repetitively pulsed high-voltage high-pressure nanosecond discharges. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2010;43(6):062001
  26. 26.Simeni MS, Baratte E, Zhang C, Frederickson K, Adamovich IV. Electric field measurements in nanosecond pulse discharges in air over liquid water surface. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2018;27(1):015011
  27. 27.Simeni MS, Goldberg B, Gulko I, Frederickson K, Adamovich IV. Sub-nanosecond resolution electric field measurements during ns pulse breakdown in ambient air. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2017;51(1):01LT01
  28. 28.Simeni Simeni M, Goldberg BM, Zhang C, Frederickson K, Lempert WR, Adamovich IV. Electric field measurements in a nanosecond pulse discharge in atmospheric air. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2017;50(18):184002
  29. 29.Simeni Simeni M, Tang Y, Frederickson K, Adamovich IV. Electric field distribution in a surface plasma flow actuator powered by ns discharge pulse trains. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2018;27(10):104001
  30. 30.Gigosos MA, Cardenoso V. Study of the effects of ion dynamics on Stark profiles of Balmer-α and -β lines using simulation techniques. The Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. 1987;20(22):6005-6019
  31. 31.Ivković M, Jovićević S, Konjević N. Low electron density diagnostics: Development of optical emission spectroscopic techniques and some applications to microwave induced plasmas. Spectrochimica Acta B. 2004;59(5):591-605
  32. 32.Gigosos MA, González MÁ, Cardeñoso V. Computer simulated Balmer-alpha, -beta and -gamma Stark line profiles for non-equilibrium plasmas diagnostics. Spectrochimica Acta B. 2003;58(8):1489-1504
  33. 33.Bruggeman P, Schram D, González MÁ, Rego R, Kong MG, Leys C. Characterization of a direct dc-excited discharge in water by optical emission spectroscopy. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2009;18(2):025017
  34. 34.Du B, Sadeghi N, Tsankov TV, Luggenhölscher D, Czarnetzki U. Temporally resolved optical emission spectroscopic investigations on a nanosecond self-pulsing micro-thin-cathode discharge. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2012;21(4):045015
  35. 35.Xiong Q, Nikiforov AY, González MÁ, Leys C, Lu XP. Characterization of an atmospheric helium plasma jet by relative and absolute optical emission spectroscopy. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2012;22(1):015011
  36. 36.Choi J-Y, Takano N, Urabe K, Tachibana K. Measurement of electron density in atmospheric pressure small-scale plasmas using CO2-laser heterodyne interferometry. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2009;18(3):035013
  37. 37.Leipold F, Stark RH, El-Habachi A, Schoenbach KH. Electron density measurements in an atmospheric pressure air plasma by means of infrared heterodyne interferometry. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2000;33(18):2268-2273
  38. 38.Kempkens H, Uhlenbusch J. Scattering diagnostics of low-temperature plasmas (Rayleigh scattering, Thomson scattering, CARS). Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2000;9(4):492-506
  39. 39.Muraoka K, Uchino K, Bowden MD. Diagnostics of low-density glow discharge plasmas using Thomson scattering. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 1998;40(7):1221-1239
  40. 40.Jia F, Sumi N, Ishikawa K, Kano H, Inui H, Kularatne J, et al. Laser scattering diagnosis of a 60-Hz non-equilibrium atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Applied Physics Express. 2011;4(2):026101
  41. 41.Muraoka K, Kono A. Laser Thomson scattering for low-temperature plasmas. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2011;44(4):043001
  42. 42.Sande MJ, Deckers RHM, Lepkojus F, Buscher W, Mullen JJAM. Time resolved electron density and temperature measurements on a capacitively coupled helium RF discharge. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2002;11(4):466-475
  43. 43.Nedanovska E, Nersisyan G, Morgan TJ, Hüwel L, Lewis CLS, Riley D, et al. Comparison of the electron density measurements using Thomson scattering and emission spectroscopy for laser induced breakdown in one atmosphere of helium. Applied Physics Letters. 2011;99(26):261504
  44. 44.Hassaballa S, Yakushiji M, Young-Kee K, Tomita K, Uchino K, Muraoka K. Two-dimensional structure of PDP micro-discharge plasmas obtained using laser Thomson scattering. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 2004;32(1):127-134
  45. 45.Noguchi Y, Matsuoka A, Bowden MD, Uchino K, Muraoka K. Measurements of electron temperature and density of a micro-discharge plasma using laser Thomson scattering. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2001;40(1(1)):326-329
  46. 46.Kono A, Iwamoto K. High-spatial-resolution multichannel Thomson scattering measurements for atmospheric pressure microdischarge. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2004;43(8A):L1010-L10L3
  47. 47.Palomares JM, Iordanova E, Hübner S, Carbone EAD, JJAMvd M. Towards poly-diagnostics on cool atmospheric plasmas. Journal of Instrumentation. 2012;7(02):C02027-C
  48. 48.Kempkens H, Uhlenbusch J. Scattering diagnostics of low-temperature plasmas (Rayleigh scattering, Thomson scattering, CARS). Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2000;9:492
  49. 49.Döbele H, Mosbach T, Niemi K, Gathen V. Laser-induced fluorescence measurements of absolute atomic densities: Concepts and limitations. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2005;14(2):S31-S41
  50. 50.Dilecce G, Ambrico PF, Benedictis SD. An ambient air RF low-pressure pulsed discharge as an OH source for LIF calibration. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2004;13(2):237-244
  51. 51.Dilecce G, Ambrico PF, Simek M, De Benedictis S. LIF diagnostics of hydroxyl radical in atmospheric pressure He-H2O dielectric barrier discharges. Chemical Physics. 2012;398:142-147
  52. 52.Riès D, Dilecce G, Robert E, Ambrico P, Dozias S, Pouvesle J. LIF and fast imaging plasma jet characterization relevant for NTP biomedical applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2014;47(27):275401
  53. 53.Verreycken T, van der Horst R, Baede A, Veldhuizen V, Bruggeman P. Time and spatially resolved LIF of OH in a plasma filament in atmospheric pressure He–H2O. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2012;45(4):045205
  54. 54.Yagi I, Ono R, Oda T, Takaki K. Two-dimensional LIF measurements of humidity and OH density resulting from evaporated water from a wet surface in plasma for medical use. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2015;24(1):015002
  55. 55.Iseni S, Zhang S, van Gessel AFH, Hofmann S, van Ham BTJ, Reuter S, et al. Nitric oxide density distributions in the effluent of an RF argon APPJ: Effect of gas flow rate and substrate. New Journal of Physics. 2014;16(12):123011
  56. 56.Burnette D, Shkurenkov I, Adamovich IV, Lempert WR. Kinetics of NO formation and decay in nanosecond pulse discharges in air, H2-air, and C2H4-air mixtures. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2016;25(2):025012
  57. 57.Dilecce G, Ambrico PF, Šimek M, De Benedictis S. New laser-induced fluorescence scheme for simultaneous OH and NO detection by a single laser set-up. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics. 2002;75(1):131-135
  58. 58.van Gessel AFH, Hrycak B, Jasiński M, Mizeraczyk J, van der Mullen JJAM, Bruggeman PJ. Temperature and NO density measurements by LIF and OES on an atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2013;46(9):095201
  59. 59.van Gessel AFH, Bruggeman PJ. Thermalization of rotational states of NO A(2)Σ+(v = 0) in an atmospheric pressure plasma. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2013;138(20):204306
  60. 60.Simek M, Ambrico P, Prukner V. LIF study of N2(A3Σu+, v = 0–10) vibrational kinetics under nitrogen streamer conditions. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2015;48(26):265202
  61. 61.Simek M, Ambrico P, Prukner V. N2(A) vibrational kinetics in streamer discharges: Effect of oxygen on formation of low vibrational levels. APS Gaseous Electronics Conference 2016. Bochum 2016
  62. 62.Ono R, Tobaru C, Teramoto Y, Oda T. Laser-induced fluorescence of N2(A3Σu+) metastable in N2 pulsed positive corona discharge. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2009;18(2):025006
  63. 63.Brackmann C, Zhou B, Li ZS, Aldén M. Strategies for quantitative planar laser-induced fluorescence of NH radicals in flames. Combustion Science and Technology. 2016;188(4–5):529-541
  64. 64.Rensberger KJ, Dyer MJ, Wise ML, Copeland RA. Time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence in low-pressure flames. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1988;172(1):750-752
  65. 65.Luque J, Klein-Douwel RJH, Jeffries JB, Smith GP, Crosley DR. Quantitative laser-induced fluorescence of CH in atmospheric pressure flames. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics. 2002;75(6):779-790
  66. 66.Luque J, Crosley DR. Absolute CH concentrations in low-pressure flames measured with laser-induced fluorescence. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics. 1996;63(1):91-98
  67. 67.Bruggeman P, Brandenburg R. Atmospheric pressure discharge filaments and microplasmas: Physics, chemistry and diagnostics. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2013;46(46):464001
  68. 68.Yagi I, Shirakawa Y, Hirakata K, Akiyama T, Yonemori S, Mizuno K, et al. Measurement of OH, O, and NO densities and their correlations with mouse melanoma cell death rate treated by a nanosecond pulsed streamer discharge. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2015;48(42):424006
  69. 69.Yonemori S, Nakagawa Y, Ono R, Oda T. Measurement of OH density and air–helium mixture ratio in an atmospheric-pressure helium plasma jet. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2012;45(22):225202
  70. 70.Yonemori S, Ono R. Flux of OH and O radicals onto a surface by an atmospheric-pressure helium plasma jet measured by laser-induced fluorescence. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2014;47(12):125401
  71. 71.Amorim J, Baravian G. The two-photon absorption laser induced stimulated emission as a hydrogen atoms diagnostic tool: Modelling and experiment. Optics Communications. 2001;192(3):277-286
  72. 72.Amorim J, Baravian G, Touzeau M, Jolly J. Two‐photon laser induced fluorescence and amplified spontaneous emission atom concentration measurements in O2 and H2 discharges. Journal of Applied Physics. 1994;76(3):1487-1493
  73. 73.Niemi K, Gathen VS-v, Döbele HF. Absolute atomic oxygen density measurements by two-photon absorption laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy in an RF-excited atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2005;14(2):375-386
  74. 74.Yatom S, Luo Y, Xiong Q, Bruggeman PJ. Nanosecond pulsed humid Ar plasma jet in air: Shielding, discharge characteristics and atomic hydrogen production. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2017;50(41):415204
  75. 75.Wagenaars E, Gans T, O'Connell D, Niemi K. Two-photon absorption laser-induced fluorescence measurements of atomic nitrogen in a radio-frequency atmospheric-pressure plasma jet. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2012;21(4):042002
  76. 76.Xiong Q, Liu H, Britun N, Nikiforov AY, Li L, Chen Q, et al. Time-selective TALIF spectroscopy of atomic oxygen applied to an atmospheric pressure argon plasma jet. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 2016;44(11):2745-2753
  77. 77.Reuter S, Sousa JS, Stancu GD, Hubertus van Helden JP. Review on VUV to MIR absorption spectroscopy of atmospheric pressure plasma jets. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2015;24(5):054001
  78. 78.Reuter S, Winter J, Iseni S, Peters S, Schmidt-Bleker A, Dünnbier M, et al. Detection of ozone in a MHz argon plasma bullet jet. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2012;21(3):034015
  79. 79.Douat C, Hübner S, Engeln R, Benedikt J. Production of nitric/nitrous oxide by an atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2016;25(2):025027
  80. 80.Simeni Simeni M, Laux CO, Stancu GD. High-spatial resolution measurements of NO density and temperature by mid-IR QCLAS in open-air confined plasmas. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2017;50(27):274004
  81. 81.Bruggeman P, Cunge G, Sadeghi N. Absolute OH density measurements by broadband UV absorption in diffuse atmospheric-pressure He–H2O RF glow discharges. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2012;21(3):035019
  82. 82.Dilecce G, Ambrico PF, Simek M, Benedictis SD. OH density measurement by time-resolved broad band absorption spectroscopy in an Ar–H2O dielectric barrier discharge. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2012;45(12):125203
  83. 83.Xiong Q, Yang Z, Bruggeman P. Absolute OH density measurements in an atmospheric pressure dc glow discharge in air with water electrode by broadband UV absorption spectroscopy. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2015;48(42):424008
  84. 84.Berden G, Engeln R. Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy: Techniques and Applications. New York: Wiley; 2009
  85. 85.Zalicki P, Zare RN. Cavity ring‐down spectroscopy for quantitative absorption measurements. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1995;102(7):2708-2717
  86. 86.Stancu GD, Janda M, Kaddouri F, Lacoste DA, Laux CO. Time-resolved CRDS measurements of the N2(A3Σu+) density produced by nanosecond discharges in atmospheric pressure nitrogen and air. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114(1):201-208
  87. 87.Stancu GD, Kaddouri F, Lacoste DA, Laux CO. Atmospheric pressure plasma diagnostics by OES, CRDS and TALIF. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2010;43(12):124002
  88. 88.Liu Z-W, Xu Y, Yang X-F, Zhu A-M, Zhao G-L, Wang W-G. Determination of the HO2 radical in dielectric barrier discharge plasmas using near-infrared cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2008;41(4):045203
  89. 89.Gianella M, Reuter S, Press SA, Schmidt-Bleker A, Helden JH, Ritchie GAD. HO2 reaction kinetics in an atmospheric pressure plasma jet determined by cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2018;27(9):095013
  90. 90.Wang C, Wu W. Simultaneous measurements of OH(A) and OH(X) radicals in microwave plasma jet-assisted combustion of methane/air mixtures around the lean-burn limit using optical emission spectroscopy and cavity ringdown spectroscopy. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2013;46(46):464008

Written By

Qing Xiong

Submitted: April 12th, 2018Reviewed: February 25th, 2019Published: April 11th, 2019