Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Black Hole Binary Gravitons and Related Problems

Written By

Miroslav Pardy

Submitted: 27 August 2018 Reviewed: 22 November 2018 Published: 30 January 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.82659

From the Edited Volume

New Ideas Concerning Black Holes and the Universe

Edited by Eugene Tatum

Chapter metrics overview

858 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The energy spectrum of graviton emitted by the black hole binary is calculated in the first part of the chapter. Then, the total quantum loss of energy is calculated in the Schwinger theory of gravity. In the next part, we determine the electromagnetic shift of energy levels of H-atom electrons by calculating an electron coupling to the black hole thermal bath. The energy shift of electrons in H-atom is determined in the framework of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. In the last section, we determine the velocity of sound in the black hole atmosphere, which is here considered as the black hole photon sea. Derivation is based on the thermodynamic theory of the black hole photon gas.

Keywords

  • graviton
  • Schwinger source theory
  • spectrum of H-atom
  • Coulomb potential
  • black hole spectrum
  • energy shift
  • sound

1. The graviton spectrum of the black hole binary

In 1916, Schwarzschild published the solution of the Einstein field equations [1] that were later understood to describe a black hole [2, 3], and in 1963, Kerr generalized the solution to rotating black holes [4]. The year 1970 was the starting point of the theoretical work leading to the understanding of black hole quasinormal modes [5, 6, 7], and in the 1990s, higher-order post-Newtonian calculations [8] were performed and later the extensive analytical studies of relativistic two-body dynamics were realized [9, 10]. These advances, together with numerical relativity breaks through in the past decade [11, 12, 13]. Numerous black hole candidates have now been identified through electromagnetic observations [14, 15, 16]. The black hole binary and their rotation and mergers are open problem of the astrophysics, and it is the integral part of the binary black hole physics.

The binary pulsar system PSR B1913+16 (also known as PSR J1915+1606) discovered by Hulse and Taylor [17] and subsequent observations of its energy loss by Taylor and Weisberg [18] demonstrated the existence of gravitational waves [19].

By the early 2000s, a set of initial detectors was completed, including TAMA 300 in Japan, GEO600 in Germany, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) in the United States, and Virgo in Italy. In 2015, Advanced LIGO became the first of a significantly more sensitive network of advanced detectors (a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector) to begin observations [20].

Taylor and Hulse, working at the Arecibo Radiotelescope, discovered the radio pulsar PSR B1913+16 in a binary, in 1974, and this is now considered as the best general relativistic laboratory [21].

Pulsar PSR B1913+16 is the massive body of the binary system where each of the rotating pairs is 1.4 times the mass of the Sun. These neutron stars rotate around each other in an orbit not much larger than the Sun’s diameter, with a period of 7.8 h. Every 59 ms, the pulsar emits a short signal that is so clear that the arrival time of a 5 min string of a set of such signals can be resolved within 15 μ s.

A pulsar model based on strongly magnetized, rapidly spinning neutron stars was soon established as consistent with most of the known facts [22]; its electrodynamical properties were studied theoretically [23] and shown to be plausibly capable of generating broadband radio noise detectable over interstellar distances. The binary pulsar PSR B1913+16 is now recognized as the harbinger of a new class of unusually short-period pulsars, with numerous important applications.

Because the velocities and gravitational energies in a high-mass binary pulsar system can be significantly relativistic, strong-field and radiative effects come into play. The binary pulsar PSR B1913+16 provides significant tests of gravitation beyond the weak-field, slow-motion limit [24, 25].

We do not repeat here the derivation of the Einstein quadrupole formula in the Schwinger gravity theory [26]. We show that just in the framework of the Schwinger gravity theory, it is easy to determine the spectral formula for emitted gravitons and the quantum energy loss formula of the binary system. The energy loss formula is general, including black hole binary, and it involves arbitrarily strong gravity.

Since the measurement of the motion of the black hole binaries goes on, we hope that sooner or later the confirmation of our formula will be established.

1.1 The Schwinger approach for the problem

Source methods by Schwinger are adequate for the solution of the calculation of the spectral formula of gravitons and energy loss of binary. Source theory [27, 28] was initially constructed to describe the particle physics situations occurring in high-energy physics experiments. However, it was found that the original formulation simplifies the calculations in the electrodynamics and gravity, where the interactions are mediated by photon and graviton, respectively. The source theory of gravity forms the analogue of quantum electrodynamics because, while in QED the interaction is mediated by the photon, the gravitational interaction is mediated by the graviton [29]. The basic formula in the source theory is the vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude [30]:

0 + 0 = e i W S , E1

where the minus and plus symbols refer to any time before and after the region of space–time with action of sources. The exponential form is postulated to express the physically independent experimental arrangements, with result that the associated probability amplitudes multiply and the corresponding W expressions add [27, 28].

In the flat space-time, the field of gravitons is described by the amplitude (1) with the action ( c = 1 in the following text) [31]

W T = 4 πG dx d x T μν x D + x x T μν x 1 2 T x D + x x T x , E2

where the dimensionality of W T has the dimension of the Planck constant and T μν is the momentum and energy tensor that, for a particle trajectory x = x t , is defined by the equation [32]

T μν x = p μ p ν E δ x x t , E3

where p μ is the relativistic four-momentum of a particle with a rest mass m and

p μ = E p E4
p μ p μ = m 2 , E5

and the relativistic energy is defined by the known relation

E = m 1 v 2 , E6

where v is the three-velocity of the moving particle.

Symbol T x in Eq. (2) is defined as T = g μν T μν , and D + x x is the graviton propagator whose explicit form will be determined later.

1.2 The power spectral formula in general

It may be easy to show that the probability of the persistence of vacuum is given by the following formula [27]:

0 + 0 2 = exp 2 Im W = d exp dtd ω 1 ω P ω t , E7

where the so-called power spectral function P ω t has been introduced [27]. For the extraction of the spectral function from Im W , it is necessary to know the explicit form of the graviton propagator D + x x . This propagator involves the graviton property of spreading with velocity c . It means that its mathematical form is identical with the photon propagator form. With regard to Schwinger et al. [33], the x -representation of D k in Eq. (2) is as follows:

D + x x = dk 2 π 4 e ik x x D k , E8

where

D k = 1 k 2 k 0 2 i ϵ , E9

which gives

D + x x = i 4 π 2 0 sin ω x x ' x x ' e t t . E10

Now, using Eqs. (2), (7), and (10), we get the power spectral formula in the following form:

P ω t = 4 πGω d x d x d t sin ω x x x x ' cos ω t t × T μν x t T μν ( x t ) 1 2 g μν T μν ( x t ) g αβ T αβ ( x t ) . E11

1.3 The power spectral formula for the binary system

In the case of the binary system with masses m 1 and m 2 , we suppose that they move in a uniform circular motion around their centre of gravity in the xy plane, with corresponding kinematical coordinates:

x 1 t = r 1 i cos ω 0 t + j sin ω 0 t E12
x 2 t = r 2 i cos ω 0 t + π + j sin ω 0 t + π E13

with

v i t = d x i / dt , ω 0 = v i / r i , v i = v i i = 1 2 . E14

For the tensor of energy and momentum of the binary, we have

T μν x = p 1 μ p 1 ν E 1 δ x x 1 t + p 2 μ p 2 ν E 2 δ x x 2 t , E15

where we have omitted the tensor t μν G , which is associated with the massless, gravitational field distributed all over space and proportional to the gravitational constant G [32].

After the insertion of Eq. (15) into Eq. (11), we get [33]

P total ω t = P 1 ω t + P 12 ω t + P 2 ω t , E16

where ( t t = τ )

P 1 ω t = r 1 π sin 2 ω r 1 sin ω 0 τ / 2 sin ω 0 τ / 2 cos ωτ × E 1 2 ω 0 2 r 1 2 cos ω 0 τ 1 2 m 1 4 2 E 1 2 , E17
P 2 ω t = r 2 π sin 2 ω r 2 sin ω 0 τ / 2 sin ω 0 τ / 2 cos ωτ × E 2 2 ω 0 2 r 2 2 cos ω 0 τ 1 2 m 2 4 2 E 2 2 , E18
P 12 ω t = 4 π sin ω r 1 2 + r 2 2 + 2 r 1 r 2 cos ω 0 τ 1 / 2 r 1 2 + r 2 2 + 2 r 1 r 2 cos ω 0 τ 1 / 2 cos ωτ × E 1 E 2 ω 0 2 r 1 r 2 cos ω 0 τ + 1 2 m 1 2 m 2 2 2 E 1 E 2 . E19

1.4 The quantum energy loss of the binary

Using the following relations

ω 0 τ = φ + 2 πl , φ π π , l = 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 , E20
l = l = cos 2 πl ω ω 0 = l = ω 0 δ ω ω 0 l , E21

we get for P i ω t , with ω being restricted to positive:

P i ω t = l = 1 δ ω ω 0 l P il ω t . E22

Using the definition of the Bessel function J 2 l z

J 2 l z = 1 2 π π π cos z sin φ 2 cos , E23

from which the derivatives and their integrals follow, we get for P 1 l and P 2 l the following formulae:

P il = 2 r i ( E i 2 v i 2 1 m i 4 2 E i 2 0 2 v i l dx J 2 l x +   4 E i 2 v i 2 1 v i 2 J 2 l 2 v i l + 4 E i 2 v i 4 J 2 l 2 v i l ) , i = 1 , 2 . E24

Using r 2 = r 1 + ϵ , where ϵ is supposed to be small in comparison with radii r 1 and r 2 , we obtain

r 1 2 + r 2 2 + 2 r 1 r 2 cos φ 1 / 2 2 a cos φ 2 , E25

with

a = r 1 1 + ϵ 2 r 1 . E26

So, instead of Eq. (19), we get

P 12 ω t = 2 sin 2 ωa cos ω 0 τ / 2 cos ω 0 τ / 2 ] cos ωτ × E 1 E 2 ω 0 2 r 1 r 2 cos ω 0 τ + 1 2 m 1 2 m 2 2 2 E 1 E 2 . E27

Now, we can approach the evaluation of the energy loss formula for the binary from the power spectral of Eqs. (24) and (27). The energy loss is defined by the relation

dU dt = P ω = i , l δ ω ω 0 l P il + P 12 ω = d dt U 1 + U 2 + U 12 . E28

From [34] we have Kapteyn’s formula:

l = 1 J 2 l 2 lv l 2 = v 2 2 . E29

After differentiating the last relation with respect to v , we have

l = 1 l J 2 l 2 lv = 0 . E30

From [34] we learn other Kapteyn’s formulae:

l = 1 2 l J 2 l 2 lv = v 1 v 2 2 , E31

and

l = 1 l 0 2 lv J 2 l x dx = v 3 3 1 v 2 3 . E32

So, after the application of Eqs. (30), (31) and (32) to Eqs. (24) and (28), we get

dU i dt = Gm i 2 v i 3 ω 0 3 r i 1 v i 2 3 13 v i 2 15 . E33

Instead of using Kapteyn’s formulae for the interference term, we will perform a direct evaluation of the energy loss of the interference term by the ω -integration in (27) [35]. So, after some elementary modification in the ω -integral, we get

dU 12 dt = 0 P ω = A dωω e iωτ sin 2 ωa cos ω 0 τ B C cos ω 0 τ + 1 2 D cos ω 0 τ / 2 , E34

with

A = G , B = E 1 E 2 , C = v 1 v 2 , D = m 1 2 m 2 2 2 E 1 E 2 . E35

Using the definition of the δ -function and its derivative, we have, instead of Eq. (34), with v = a ω 0

dU 12 dt = A ω 0 π dx B C cos x + 1 2 D cos x / 2 × δ x 2 v cos x / 2 δ x + 2 v cos x / 2 . E36

According to the Schwinger article [36], we express the delta function as follows:

δ x ± 2 v cos x / 2 = n = 0 ± 2 v cos x / 2 n n ! d dx n δ x . E37

Then

δ x ± 2 v cos x / 2 = n = 0 ± 2 v cos x / 2 n n ! d dx n + 1 δ x = E38

and it means that

δ x + 2 v cos x / 2 δ x 2 v cos x / 2 cos x / 2 = 2 n = 1 2 v 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 n 1 2 n 1 ! d dx 2 n δ x E39

Now, we can write Eq. (36) in the following form after some elementary operations:

dU 12 dt = A ω 0 π dx B C cos x + 1 2 D × 2 n = 1 2 v 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 n 1 2 n 1 ! d dx 2 n δ x , E40

where B C cos x + 1 2 D can be written as follows:

B C cos x + 1 2 D = 4 BC 2 ( cos 4 x / 2 + 4 CB 4 BC 2 ( cos 2 x / 2 + BC 2 2 CB + B D . E41

After the application of the per partes method, we get from Eq. (40) the following mathematical object:

dU 12 dt = 2 A 4 BC 2 ω 0 π dx δ x n = 1 d dx 2 n 2 v 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 n + 2 2 n 1 !   2 A 4 CB 4 BC 2 ω 0 π dx δ x n = 1 d dx 2 n 2 v 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 n 2 n 1 !   2 A BC 2 2 CB + B D ω 0 π dx δ x n = 1 d dx 2 n 2 v 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 n 1 2 n 1 ! . E42

We get after some elementary operations δf x = f 0

J 1 = n = 1 d dx 2 n 2 v 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 n + 2 2 n 1 ! x = 0 = n = 0 f n v 2 n = F v 2 , E43
J 2 = n = 1 d dx 2 n 2 v 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 n 2 n 1 ! x = 0 = n = 0 g n v 2 n = G v 2 E44

and

J 3 = n = 1 d dx 2 n 2 v 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 n 1 2 n 1 ! x = 0 = n = 0 h n v 2 n = H v 2 E45

where f , g , h , F , G , H are functions which must be determined.

So we get instead of Eq. (41) the following final form:

dU 12 dt = 2 A 4 BC 2 ω 0 πG v 2 2 A 4 CB 4 BC 2 ω 0 πF v 2   2 A 2 CB + BC 2 + B D ω 0 πH v 2 E46

Let us remark that we can use simple approximation in Eq. (41) as follows: cos x / 2 2 n + 2 cos x / 2 2 , cos x / 2 2 n cos x / 2 2 , cos x / 2 2 n 1 cos x / 2 2 . Then, after using the well-known formula

d dx 2 n cos 2 x / 2 = 1 2 cos x + πn E47

and

1 2 cos x + πn x = 0 = 1 2 1 n . E48

So, instead of Eq. (46), we have

dU 12 dt = A ω 0 π 2 BC + BC 2 + B D n = 1 2 v 2 n 1 1 n 2 n 1 ! . E49
Advertisement

2. Energy shift of H-atom electrons due to the black hole thermal bath

We here determine the electromagnetic shift of energy levels of H-atom electrons by calculating an electron coupling to the black hole thermal bath. The energy shift of electrons in H-atom is determined in the framework of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.

The Gibbons-Hawking effect is the statement that a temperature can be associated to each solution of the Einstein field equations that contain a causal horizon.

Schwarzschild space-time involves an event horizon associated with temperature T of a black hole of mass M . We consider here the influence of the heat bath of the Gibbons-Hawking photons on the energy shift of H-atom electrons.

The analogical problems are solved in the scientific respected journals. There is a general conviction of an analogy between the black hole and the hydrogen atom. Corda [37] used the model where Hawking radiation is a tunneling process. In his article the emission is expressed in terms of the black hole quantum levels. So, the Hawking radiation and black hole quasinormal modes by Corda [38] are analogical to hydrogen atom by Bohr.

In this model [39] the corresponding wave function is written in terms of a unitary evolution matrix. So, the final state is a pure quantum state with no information loss. Black hole is defined as the quantum systems, with discrete quantum spectra, with Hooft’s assumption that Schrödinger equations are universal for all universe dynamics.

Thermal photons by Gibbons and Hawking are blackbody photons, with the Planck photon distribution law [40, 41, 42], derived from the statistics of the oscillators inside of the blackbody. Later Einstein [43] derived the Planck formula from the Bohr model of atom where photons and electrons have the discrete energies related with the Bohr formula ω = E i E f , E i , E f being the initial and final energies of electrons.

Now, we determine the modification of the Coulomb potential due to blackbody photons. At the start, the energy shift in the H-atom is the potential V 0 x , generated by nucleus of the H-atom. The potential at point V 0 x + δ x is [44, 45]

V 0 x + δ x = 1 + δ x + 1 2 δ x 2 + V 0 x . E50

The average of the last equation in space enables the elimination of the so-called the effective potential:

V x = 1 + 1 6 δ x T 2 Δ + V 0 x , E51

where δ x T 2 is the average value of the square coordinate shift caused by the thermal photons. The potential shift follows from Eq. (51):

δV x = 1 6 δ x T 2 Δ V 0 x . E52

The shift of the energy levels is given by the standard quantum formula [44]:

δ E n = 1 6 δ x T 2 ψ n Δ V 0 ψ n . E53

In case of the Coulomb potential, which is the case of the H-atom, we have

V 0 = e 2 4 π x . E54

Then for the H-atom we can write

δ E n = 2 π 3 δ x T 2 e 2 4 π ψ n 0 2 , E55

where we used the following equation for the Coulomb potential

Δ 1 x = 4 πδ x . E56

The motion of electron in the electric field is evidently described by elementary equation:

δ x ¨ = e m E T , E57

which can be transformed by the Fourier transformation into the following equation

δ x 2 = 1 2 e 2 m 2 ω 4 E 2 , E58

where the index ω concerns the Fourier component of the above functions.

Using Bethe idea [46] of the influence of vacuum fluctuations on the energy shift of electron, the following elementary relations were applied by Welton [45], Akhiezer et al. [44] and Berestetzkii et al. [47]:

1 2 E ω 2 = ω 2 , E59

and in case of the thermal bath of the blackbody, the last equation is of the following form [48]:

E 2 = ϱ ω = ω 3 π 2 c 3 1 e ω kT 1 , E60

because the Planck law in (60) was written as

ϱ ω = G ω < E ω > = ω 2 π 2 c 3 ω e ω kT 1 , E61

where the term

< E ω > = ω e ω kT 1 E62

is the average energy of photons in the blackbody and

G ω = ω 2 π 2 c 3 E63

is the number of electromagnetic modes in the interval ω , ω + .

Then,

δ x 2 = 1 2 e 2 m 2 ω 4 ω 3 π 2 c 3 1 e ω kT 1 , E64

where δ x 2 involves the number of frequencies in the interval ω ω + .

So, after some integration, we get

δ x T 2 = ω 1 ω 2 1 2 e 2 m 2 ω 4 ω 3 π 2 c 3 e ω kT 1 = 1 2 e 2 m 2 π 2 c 3 F ω 2 ω 1 , E65

where F ω is the primitive function of the omega-integral with

1 ω 1 e ω kT 1 , E66

which is not elementary, and it is not in the tables of integrals.

Frequencies ω 1 and ω 2 can be determined from the field of thermal photons. It was performed for the Lamb shift [44, 47] caused by the interaction of the Coulombic atom with the field fluctuations. The Bethe-Welton method is valid here too and so we take Bethe-Welton frequencies. It means an electron does not respond to the fluctuating field if the frequency is much less than the atom binding energy given by the Rydberg constant [49] E Rydberg = α 2 mc 2 / 2 . So, the lower frequency limit is

ω 1 = E Rydberg / = α 2 mc 2 2 , E67

where α 1 / 137 is so-called the fine structure constant.

The second frequency follows from the cutoff, determined by the neglection of the relativistic effect in our theory. So, we write

ω 2 = mc 2 . E68

If we express the thermal function in the form of the geometric series

1 e ω kT 1 = q 1 + q 2 + q 3 + . . ; q = e ω kT , E69
ω 1 ω 2 q 1 + q 2 + q 3 + . . 1 ω = ln ω + k = 1 ω kT k k ! k + . ; q = e ω kT E70

and the first thermal contribution is

Thermal contribution = ln ω 2 ω 1 kT ω 2 ω 1 , E71

then, with Eq. (55)

δ E n 2 π 3 e 2 m 2 π 2 c 3 ln ω 2 ω 1 kT ω 2 ω 1 ψ n 0 2 , E72

where according to Sokolov et al. [50]

ψ n 0 2 = 1 π n 2 a 0 2 E73

with

a 0 = 2 me 2 . E74

Let us only remark that the numerical form of Eq. (72) has deep experimental astrophysical meaning.

Haroche [51] and his group performed experiments with the Rydberg atoms in a cavity. We used here Gibbons-Hawking black hole for the determination of the energy shift of H-atom electrons in the black hole gas.

Advertisement

3. Velocity of sound in the black hole photon gas

We have seen that the black hole can be modeled by the blackbody, and it means that there is the velocity of sound in the Gibbons-Hawking black hole thermal bath. So, let us derive the sound velocity from the thermodynamics of photon gas and energy mass relation.

In order to be pedagogically clear, we start with the derivation of the speed of sound in the real elastic rod.

Let A be the cross-section of the element Adx of a rod on the axis x . Let φ x t be the deflection of Adx at point x at time t . The shift of the Adx at point x + dx is evidently

φ + φ x dx . E75

Now, we suppose that the force tension F x t acting on the Adx of the rod is given by Hooke’s law:

F x t = EA φ x , E76

where E is Young’s modulus of elasticity. We easily derive that

F x + dx F x EA 2 φ x 2 dx . E77

The mass of Adx is ϱ Adx , where ϱ is the mass density of the rod and the dynamical equilibrium is expressed by Newton’s law of force:

ϱ Adx φ tt = EA φ xx dx E78

or

φ tt v 2 φ xx = 0 , E79

where

v = E ϱ 1 / 2 E80

is the velocity of sound in the rod.

The complete solution of Eq. (79) includes the initial and boundary conditions. We suppose that Eq. (80) is of the universal validity also for gas in the cylinder tube. If Δ L / L is the relative prolongation of a rod, then an analogue for the tube of gas is Δ V / V , F Δ p , where V is the volume of a gas and p is gas pressure. Then, the modulus of elasticity as the analogue of Eq. (76) is

E = dp dV V . E81

The sound in ideal gas is the adiabatic thermodynamic process with no heat exchange. This is the model of the sound spreading in the gas of blackbody photons. Such process is described by the thermodynamic equation:

pV κ = const , E82

where κ is the Poisson constant defined as κ = c p / c v , with c p , c v being the specific heat under constant pressure and under constant volume.

After differentiation of Eq. (82), we get the following equation:

dpV κ + κ V κ 1 dV = 0 , E83

or

dp dV = κ p V . E84

After inserting Eq. (84) into Eq. (81), we get from Eq. (80) the so-called Newton-Laplace formula:

v = κ p ϱ , E85

with ϱ being the gas mass density.

The equilibrium radiation density has the Stefan-Boltzmann form:

u = aT 4 ; a = 7,5657.10 16 J K 4 m 3 . E86

Then, with regard to the thermodynamic definition of the specific heat,

c v = u T V = 4 aT 3 . E87

Similarly, with regard to the general thermodynamic theory,

c p = c v + u V T + p V T p = c v , E88

because V T T = 0 for photon gas, and in such a way, κ = 1 for photon gas. According to the theory of relativity, there is a relation for mass and energy, namely, m = E / c 2 . At the same time, the pressure and the internal energy of the blackbody gas are related as p = u / 3 . So, in our case

ϱ = u / c 2 = aT 4 c 2 ; p = u 3 . E89

So, after the insertion of formulae in Eq. (88) into Eq. (85), the final formula for the sound velocity in photon blackbody sea is the following:

v = c κ 3 = c 3 3 , E90

which was derived by Partovi [52] using the QED theory of the photon gas. We correctly derived v / c < 1 .

So, we have performed the derivation of the velocity of sound in the relic photon sea. It is not excluded that the relic sound can be detected by the special microphones of Bell Laboratories. If we use van der Waals equation of state or the Kamerlingh Onnes virial equation, the obtained results will be modified with regard to the basic results.

Our derivation of the light velocity in the blackbody photon gas was based on the classical thermodynamic model with the adiabatic process ( δQ = 0 ), controlling the spreading of sound in the gas. Partovi [52] derived additional radiation corrections to the Planck distribution formula and the additional correction to the speed of sound in the relic photon sea. His formula is of the form

v sound = 1 88 π 2 α 2 2025 T T e 4 c 3 , E91

where α is the fine structure constant and T e = 5.9 G Kelvin. We see that our formula is the first approximation in the Partovi expression.

There is the Boltzmann statistical theory of transport of sound energy in a gas [53]. After the application of this theory to the photon gas or relic photon gas, we can obtain results involving the cross-section of the photon-photon interaction [47]:

σ γγ = 4 , 7 α 4 c ω 2 ; ω mc 2 , E92

and

σ γγ = 973 10125 π α 2 r e 2 ω mc 2 6 ; ω mc 2 , E93

where r e = e 2 / mc 2 = 2,818 × 10 13 cm is the classical radius of electron and α = e 2 / c is the fine structure constant with numerical value 1 / α = 137,04 .

Advertisement

4. Discussion and summary

We have derived the spectral density of gravitons and the total quantum loss of energy of the black hole binary. The energy loss is caused by the emission of gravitons during the motion of the two black hole binaries around each other under their gravitational interaction. The energy loss formulae of the production of gravitons are derived here by the Schwinger method. Because the general relativity and theory of gravity do not necessarily contain the last valid words to be written about the nature of gravity and it is not, of course, a quantum theory [21], they cannot give the answer on the production of gravitons and the quantum energy loss, respectively. So, this article is the original text that discusses the quantum energy loss caused by the production of gravitons by the black hole binary system. It is evident that the production of gravitons by the binary system forms a specific physical situation, where a general relativity can be seriously confronted with the source theory of gravity.

This article is an extended version of an older article by the present author [33], in which only the spectral formulae were derived. Here we have derived the quantum energy loss formulae, with no specific assumption concerning the strength of the gravitational field. We hope that future astrophysical observations will confirm the quantum version of the energy loss of the binary black hole.

In the next part of the chapter, the electromagnetic shift of energy levels of H-atom electrons was determined by calculating an electron coupling to the Gibbons-Hawking electromagnetic field thermal bath of the black hole. The energy shift of electrons in H-atom is determined in the framework of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.

In the last section, we have determined the velocity of sound in the blackbody gas of photons inside of the black hole. Derivation was based on the thermodynamic theory of the photon gas and the Einstein relation between energy and mass. The spectral form for the n-dimensional blackbody was not here considered. The text is based mainly on the author articles published in the international journals of physics [33, 54, 55].

There is the fundamental problem concerning the maximal mass of the black hole. The theory of the space–time with maximal acceleration constant was derived by authors [56, 57]. In this theory the maximal acceleration constant is the analogue of the maximal velocity in special theory of relativity. Maximal acceleration determines the maximal black hole mass where the mass of the black hole is restricted by maximal acceleration of a body falling in the gravity field of the black hole.

Another question is what is the relation of our formulae to the results obtained by LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory)? LIGO is the largest and most sensitive interferometer facility ever built. It has been periodically upgraded to increase its sensitivity. The most recent upgrade, Advanced LIGO (2015), detected for the first time the gravitational wave, with sensitivity far above the background noise. The event with number GW150914 was identified with the result of a merger of two black holes at a distance of about 400 Mpc from Earth [58]. Two additional significant detections, GW151226 and GW170104, were reported later. We can say that at this time it is not clear if the LIGO results involve information on the spectrum of gravitons calculated in this chapter.

References

  1. 1. Schwarzschild K. Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie. Sitsungsberichte Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 1916;1:189. [English translation: On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory. General Relativity and Gravitation. 2003;35:951]
  2. 2. Finkelstein D. Past-future asymmetry of the gravitational field of a point particle. Physics Review. 1958;110:965
  3. 3. Kruskal MD. Maximal extension of Schwarzschild metric. Physics Review. 1960;119:1743
  4. 4. Kerr RP. Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics. Physical Review Letters. 1963;11:237
  5. 5. Vishveshwara CV. Scattering of gravitational radiation by a Schwarzschild black hole. Nature (London). 1970;227:936
  6. 6. Press WH. Long wave-trains of gravitational waves from a vibrating black hole. The Astrophysical Journal. 1971;170:L105
  7. 7. Chandrasekhar S, Detweiler SL. The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 1975;344:441
  8. 8. Blanchet L, Damour LT, Iyer BR, Will CM, Wiseman AG. Gravitational-radiation damping of compact binary systems to second-post-Newtonian order. Physical Review Letters. 1995;74:3515
  9. 9. Blanchet L. Gravitational radiation from post-Newtonian sources and inspiralling compact binaries. Living Reviews in Relativity. 2014;17:2
  10. 10. Buonanno A, Damour T. Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics. Physical Review D. 1999;59:084006
  11. 11. Pretorius F. Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes. Physical Review Letters. 2005;95:121101
  12. 12. Campanelli M, Lousto CO, Marronetti P, Zlochower Y. Accurate evolutions of orbiting black-hole binaries without excision. Physical Review Letters. 2006;96:111101
  13. 13. Baker JG, Centrella J, Choi DI, Koppitz M, van Meter J. Gravitational-wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merging black holes. Physical Review Letters. 2006;96:111102
  14. 14. Webster BL, Murdin P. Is Cygnus X-1-a spectroscopic binary with a heavy companion? Nature (London). 1972;235:37
  15. 15. Bolton CT. Is Cyg X-1 a neutron star? Nature (London). 1972;240:124
  16. 16. Casares J, Jonker PG. Mass measurements of stellar and intermediate-mass black holes. Space Science Reviews. 2014;183:223
  17. 17. Hulse RA, Taylor JH. Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system. The Astrophysical Journal. 1975;195:L51
  18. 18. Taylor JH, Weisberg JM. A new test of general relativity: Gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar PSR B1913+16. The Astrophysical Journal. 1982;253:908
  19. 19. Aasi J et al. Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 2015;32:074001
  20. 20. Acernese F et al. Advanced Virgo: A 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 2015;32:024001
  21. 21. Taylor JH Jr. Binary pulsars and relativistic gravity. Nobel Lecture. December 1993. www.nobelprise.org/uploads/2018/06/taylor-lecture-1.pdf
  22. 22. Gold T. Rotating neutron stars as the origin of the pulsating radio sources nature. Nature. 1968;218:731
  23. 23. Goldreich P, Julian WH. Pulsar electrodynamics. The Astrophysical Journal. 1969;157:869
  24. 24. Damour T, Taylor JH. Strong field tests of relativistic gravity and binary pulsars. Physical Review D. 1992;45(6):1840-1868
  25. 25. Taylor JH, Wolszczan A, Damour T, Weisberg JM. Experimental constrains on strong-field relativistic gravity. Nature. 1999;355:132-136
  26. 26. Manoukian EB. A quantum viewpoint of gravitational radiation. General Relativity and Gravitation. 1990;22:501
  27. 27. Schwinger J, Tsai WY, Erber T. Classical and quantum theory of synergic synchrotron—Cherenkov radiation. Annals of Physics (New York). 1976;96:303
  28. 28. Dittrich W. Source methods in quantum field theory. Fortschritte der Physik. 1978;26:289
  29. 29. Schwinger J. Gravitons and photons: The methodological unification of source theory. General Relativity and Gravitation. 1976;7:251
  30. 30. Schwinger J. Particles, Sources and Fields. Vol. 1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publ. Comp. 1970
  31. 31. Weinberg S. Gravitation and Cosmology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1972
  32. 32. Cho CF, Dass NDH. Gravitational two-body problems, a source theory viewpoint. Annals of Physics (New York). 1976;90:406
  33. 33. Pardy M. The Synchrotron production of gravitons by the binary system. General Relativity and Gravitation. 1983;15(11):1027
  34. 34. Prudnikov AP, Bryčkov JA, Maričev OI. Integrals and Series—Special Functions. Moscow: Nauka; 1983 (in Russian)
  35. 35. Sokolov AA, Ternov IM. The Relativistic Electron. Moscow: Nauka; 1983 (in Russian)
  36. 36. Schwinger J. On radiation by Electrons in a Betatron. LNBL-39088, CBP Note-179, UC-414; Berkeley, CA; January 13, 1998
  37. 37. Corda C. Precise model of Hawking radiation from the tunneling mechanism. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 2015;32:195007
  38. 38. Corda CH. Quasi-normal modes: The “electrons” of black holes as “gravitational atoms”? Implications for the black hole information puzzle. Advances in High Energy Physics. 2015. Artical ID: 867601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/867601
  39. 39. Corda C. Time dependent Schrödinger equation for black hole evaporation: No information loss. Annals of Physics. 2015;353:71
  40. 40. Planck M. Zur theorie des gesetzes der energieverteilung im normalspektrum. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft. 1900;2:237
  41. 41. Planck M. Ueber irreversible strahlungsvorgänge. Ann. Phys. 1901;4:553
  42. 42. Schöpf H-G. Theorie der Wärmestrahlung in Historisch—Kritischer Darstellung. Berlin: Alademie/Verlag; 1978
  43. 43. Einstein A. Zur quantentheorie der strahlung. Physikalische Zeitschrift. 1917;18:121
  44. 44. Akhiezer AI, Berestetzkii VB. Quantum Electrodynamics. Moscow: GITTL; 1953
  45. 45. Welton T. Some observable effects of the quantum-mechanical fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. Physics Review. 1948;74:1157
  46. 46. Bethe HA. The electromagnetic shift of energy levels. Physics Review. 1947;2:339
  47. 47. Berestetzkii VB, Lifshitz EM, Pitaevskii LP. Quantum Electrodynamics. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999
  48. 48. Isihara A. Statistical mechanics. New York/London: Academic Press; 1971
  49. 49. Rohlf JW. Modern physics from α to Z 0 . London/New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1994
  50. 50. Sokolov AA, Loskutov YM, Ternov IM. Quantum Mechanics (State Pedagogical Edition). Moscow: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson Unstated Edition; 1966 (in Russian)
  51. 51. Haroche S. The secrets of my prizewinning research. Nature. 2012;490:311
  52. 52. Partovi MH. QED corrections to Planck’s radiation law and photon thermodynamics. Physical Review D. 1994;50(2):1118-1124
  53. 53. Uhlenbeck GE, Ford GW. Lectures in Statistical Physics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society; 1963
  54. 54. Pardy M. Energy shift of H-atom electrons due to Gibbons-Hawking thermal bath. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology. 2016;2:472-477
  55. 55. Pardy M. Velocity of sound in the black-body. Results in Physics. 2013;3:7073
  56. 56. Pardy M. Thomas precession by uniform acceleration and gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology. 2018;2018(4):132-142
  57. 57. Pardy M. From Lobachevsky-Beltrami-Fok Space to Schwinger Gravity and Cosmology. Saarbrücken, Detschland/Germany: LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2017
  58. 58. LIGO. The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory. The LIGO Scientific Collaboration. 2015. Available from: http://www.ligo.org

Written By

Miroslav Pardy

Submitted: 27 August 2018 Reviewed: 22 November 2018 Published: 30 January 2019