Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Circulating Cell-Free DNA

By Yingli Sun, Ke An and Caiyun Yang

Submitted: February 8th 2018Reviewed: August 6th 2018Published: July 10th 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80730

Downloaded: 902


Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to extracellular DNA present in body fluid that may be derived from both normal and diseased cells. The concentration, integrity, genetic, and epigenetic alternations in the cfDNA may suggest pathological conditions of the body, such as inflammation, autoimmune diseases, stress, or even malignancies. cfDNA from patients with malignancies contains variants as those in the tumor tissue cells, thus allowing noninvasive assessment of tumor in real time. The clinical detection of cfDNA is one major application of liquid biopsy and has great application value in the early diagnosis of clinical tumors, real-time progression monitoring, curative effect observation and evaluation, prognosis assessment, and metastasis risk analysis. This chapter summarizes the origin of cell-free DNA and its important clinical applications as a noninvasive biomarker.


  • liquid biopsy
  • circulating cell-free DNA
  • cancer
  • biomarker

1. Introduction

Liquid biopsy, a term relative to tissue biopsy, is a technical way to analyze the nonsolid biological tissue by detection of cells and free DNA that enter body fluids. Liquid biopsy refers to the real-time monitoring of the dynamic alterations of disease by detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes and so on. This technique has great application value as a tool for disease early diagnosis, real-time progression monitoring, curative effect observation and evaluation, prognosis assessment, and metastasis risk analysis, with the added benefit of being noninvasive and flexible for repeat tumor sampling [1, 2, 3].

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is released as single-stranded DNA and double-stranded DNA into body fluids, including the blood [4], sputum [5], urine [6], cerebrospinal fluid [7], or ascites [8] from apoptotic and necrotic cells [9]. cfDNA was first identified by Mandel and Metais in the human blood in 1948 [10]. In 1977, Leon discovered that circulating cell-free DNA was also existed in cancer patients [11]. In 1997, Lo et al. found the presence of a small percentage of cfDNA originating from the fetus in the maternal plasma and serum. Then cfDNA was first used for noninvasive prenatal testing, including fetal sex assessment which can identify sex for fetus [12], RhD blood group genotyping, detection of chromosomal aneuploidy, and fetal-related diseases. These diseases include systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disease involving multiple systems, multiple organs, and multiple autoantibodies [13], and monogenic diseases, such as β-globingene and HBBgene [14]. At present, as an important aspect of liquid biopsy, the detection of circulating cell-free DNA displays its irreplaceable advantages in clinic, including simpleness and accessibility. Compared with the solid biopsy, the liquid biopsy by detection of cfDNA is noninvasive and easily repeated. The detection of cfDNA as a clinic marker has amounts of advantages. The intra-abnormalities can be detected in cfDNA at an earlier time, thus enabling early diagnosis of disease. And the detection of cfDNA makes repeated sampling possible for the monitoring of disease progression, drug response, and prognostic tracking.


2. Clinical applications of circulating cell-free DNA

The concentration, integrity, genetic, and epigenetic alternations in the cfDNA may suggest pathological conditions of the body, such as inflammation, autoimmune diseases, stress, or even malignancies. Different disease-associated molecular characteristics can be detected as the indicators of pathological conditions in the plasma of patients, including the total level and fragment, copy-number aberrations [15, 16, 17, 18], methylation changes [19, 20, 21], single-nucleotide mutations [16, 22, 23, 24, 25], cancer-derived viral sequences [26, 27], and chromosomal rearrangements [28, 29]. cfDNA from patients with malignancies (cell-free tumor DNA, ctDNA) contains variants as those in the tumor tissue cells, thus allowing noninvasive assessment of tumor in real time. ctDNA is a very promising tumor biomarker for cancer diagnosis and monitoring, prognosis assessment, and personalized medication guidance compared with conventional serum markers.

2.1. The size of cfDNA

The length of cfDNA from patients differs from that of healthy groups, which may suggest some kinds of physiological or pathological conditions, including pregnancy, cancer, liver/bone marrow transplantation, SLE, and many other clinical scenarios such as stroke, autoimmune disorders, and myocardial infarction [30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. The length of cfDNA was previously identified by gel electrophoresis and electron microscopy (EM) in 1998. Giacona et al. found that most abundant cfDNA fragments from pancreatic cancer patients displayed stronger ladder patterns compared with that from healthy controls, which was equivalent to whole-number multiples (1–5×) of nucleosomal DNA (185–200 bp). The average strand length distributions of DNA (DNA-SL) in pancreatic cancer patients were also obviously shorter (231 nm; median, 185 nm) than average plasma DNA-SL in controls (311 nm; median, 273 nm). There were more excess of short DNA at approximately 63, approximately 126, approximately 189, approximately 252, and approximately 315 nm, corresponding to small multiples of lengths associated with nucleosomes, in the pancreatic cancer patient plasma than in the plasma of healthy control [38]. The molecular size-distribution profiles of plasma DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients exhibited a significantly increased proportion of short DNA fragments [22]. Jiang et al. found that the plasma DNA molecules from hepatocellular carcinoma patients were aberrantly short or long through massively parallel sequencing and the aberrantly short ones preferentially carried tumor-associated copy-number aberrations [23]. The study now confirms that the overall size of cfDNA was approximately 166 or 143 bp or even shorter with a periodicity of 10 bp [37]. The size distributions of cfDNA prominent peak were focused in 166 bp for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers [39]. The size of cfDNA fragment was different from the systemic lupus erythematosus patients that the height of the 166 bp peak was reduced and has smaller peaks and healthy individuals [40]. These abundant cfDNA molecules were most likely generated from apoptosis cells accompanied with certain enzymatic cleavage processes shaped by nucleosome-associated DNA packing [34, 40, 41, 42, 43]. With the technology development and refinement for the determination of cfDNA fragment size, cfDNA fragment size and its distribution provide important information associated with pathological conditions and display to be a promising indicator for clinical diagnosis.

2.2. cfDNA concentration

The concentration or level of cfDNA could change with different physiological conditions. The study described the concentration of cfDNA in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was higher than healthy controls, and the average level was 95.67 and 59.60 ng/μl, respectively [44]. The concentrations of overall cfDNA in cancer patients have a significant increase with a wide range (hundreds to thousands ng/ml in the blood) compared with in the healthy controls (a relative level of 30 ng/ml) [45, 46, 47, 48]. The level of cfDNA in cancer patients, such as in ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer, is significantly associated with the cancer-specific survival and can be used as an independent predictor for death [22, 46, 47]. The study found preoperative cell-free DNA levels are significantly elevated in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), and the cell-free DNA level is a potential predictor for clinical outcome in patients with ovarian cancer. For colorectal cancer patients, the cfDNA level is correlated with a shorter survival and may be a biomarker for survival when it is above 1000 ng/ml [47]. The level of cfDNA is the highest in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma compared with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and chronic pancreatitis using Alu repeat amplicon [1]. The cfDNA level also can be used as a marker of cellular trauma and inflammation from anesthesia and surgery in clinic. The concentration of cfDNA displayed significant differences and fluctuation pattern during serial perioperative process in donors and recipients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The cfDNA concentration is higher in recipients than in donor undergoing living donor liver transplantation and is an indicative marker for liver injury. The cfDNA level fluctuated from a baseline 37.62 ng/ml to a relative high level of 94.72 ng/ml in recipient who developed postoperative sepsis [49]. In the study of lung cancer, the patients with high baseline cfDNA concentration had a significantly worse disease-free and overall survival than those with lower concentrations [50].

2.3. cfDNA genetic variations

Cell-free DNA generates from apoptosis or necrosis cells and contains the same genetic variations with intra-tissues. cfDNA is widely used as a genetic biomarker for disease diagnosis and monitoring by detection of the copy-number variations, SNPs, and mutation occurred in cfDNA.

2.3.1. Copy-number variations of cfDNA

Copy-number variations (CNV) are always associated with the occurrence of complex disorders. The CNV of urine cfDNA in advanced prostate cancer patients is significantly associated with tumor burden, and the CNV change after stage-specific therapies reflected disease progression status and overall survival [51]. Copy-number variations of HLA-DRB5 in 135 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients were higher than that in 219 healthy controls and were associated with the risk of SLE. The copy-number at 6p21.32 is aberrant in the majority of SLE patients [52]. In the plasma of neuroblastoma patients, the copy-number alterations of cfDNA displayed concordant high patterns and can be used as a cost-effective, noninvasive, rapid, robust, and sensitive biomarker for neuroblastoma prognosis [53].

2.3.2. Mutation of cfDNA

Mutation is a widespread phenomenon in biology, the effect of which is permanent alteration of nucleotide sequence. Mutations play a vital role in both normal and abnormal biological processes, such as evolution and cancer. Many studies display that the mutation detection in cfDNA will enable noninvasive tumor diagnosis and monitoring with higher sensitivity and specificity in advance [54, 55]. Many patients with advanced lung cancers that are resistant to AZD9291 therapy carried EGFR C797Smutation in cfDNA [56]. EGFR mutations in cfDNA were significantly associated with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy in the EURTAC trial. The EGFR L858R mutations in cfDNA proved to be a novel prognostic marker [57]. In melanoma, BRAF mutation in cfDNA can be detected earlier than primary lesion [58]. KRAS mutation in cfDNA for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) provided a new diagnostic marker and could optimize therapeutic strategies for patients [59].

2.3.3. SNP of cfDNA

Single-nucleotide polymorphism is a variation in a single nucleotide occurring in the genome at a specific position. Detection of SNP in circulating cell-free DNA has been widely used in prenatal screening. The detection of SNP located in SRY gene or TSPY gene in Y chromosome proved to be a highly accurate and clinically applicable noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) marker for fetal gender determination [60, 61, 62]. The study reported first trimester contingent screening used nuchal translucency and cell-free DNA, the latter has higher detection rate that is up to 98% for trisomy 21, but noninvasive prenatal testing will not be cost-effective associated with traditional [63, 64].

2.4. cfDNA methylation as epigenetic biomarker

Epigenetic modifications are heritable molecular events that affect gene expression without changing DNA sequences, including DNA methylation, histone modification, and so on. They are stable through cell division. DNA methylation refers to the addition of methyl group to cytosine residues in DNA sequence, and it is the best-studied epigenetic event [65, 66]. The quantitative DNA methylation analysis of tumor-derived cell lines was conducted in 1999 for the first time, and the possibility of using them as noninvasive biomarkers for cancer was examined [21, 67, 68]. Various studies were performed to detect cfDNA to assess the performance of cfDNA methylation as a biomarker [64].

The level of cfDNA methylation for GSTP1 and APC in the castration-resistant prostate cancer patients could be used as a marker reflecting treatment response and prognosis [69]. The BRMS1 promotor in cfDNA could provide prognostic information from the plasma of NSCLC and highly methylated from advanced NSCLC patients [70]. cfDNA epigenetic pattern can be used as an early diagnostic marker for breast cancer [71].


3. Conclusion

At present, cfDNA has been used as an independent marker for prenatal screening and also has great applicable value in the disease prognosis and monitoring, particularly in cancer. When the concentration of cfDNA is above a baseline 30 ng/ml and is closed to hundreds or even thousands ng/ml, or/and when the size of cfDNA is obviously short and displays ladder pattern, or/and when vital genetic and epigenetic mutations are reported in cfDNA, patients should be recommended for further examination. The appearance of cfDNA conforms to the current trend of precision medicine in the disease and achieves accurate diagnosis and precise treatment. However, there are many challenges in the real clinic applications. Firstly, the detected method is not uniform and the standardization process is lacking [72]. Secondly, the level of cfDNA can be too low, so the detection technology needs to be improved to increase the sensitivity and specificity [73, 74].

The study of cfDNA is still in its infancy, and a lot of in-depth research is needed to further confirm its clinical application value.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Yingli Sun, Ke An and Caiyun Yang (July 10th 2019). Circulating Cell-Free DNA, Liquid Biopsy, Ilze Strumfa and Janis Gardovskis, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80730. Available from:

chapter statistics

902total chapter downloads

2Crossref citations

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

A Review on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Liquid Biopsy

By Arets Paeglis, Boriss Strumfs, Dzeina Mezale and Ilze Fridrihsone

Related Book

First chapter

Introductory Chapter: Non-Invasive Diagnostic Methods in Medicine

By Mariusz Marzec

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us