Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Molecular Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis

Written By

María del Rocío Reyes-Montes, Esperanza Duarte-Escalante, María Guadalupe Frías-De-León, Erick Obed Martínez-Herrera and Gustavo Acosta-Altamirano

Submitted: March 2nd, 2018 Reviewed: May 14th, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.78694

From the Edited Volume

Molecular Medicine

Edited by Sinem Nalbantoglu and Hakima Amri

Chapter metrics overview

1,257 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a disease that is difficult to manage and is associated with a significantly high morbidity and mortality, caused by different species of the genus Aspergillus, and closely related to immunocompromised patients; thus, it is important to understand the distribution and molecular epidemiology of the species causing this disease. Even though Aspergillus fumigatus sensu stricto is the most common species that cause IA, in recent years, there has been an increase in the number of species in the different sections which makes the diagnosis of this invasive fungal disease a great challenge. Conventional tests for the diagnosis of IA present limitations in sensitivity and specificity, while molecular tests have the potential to improve diagnosis by offering a more sensitive and rapid identification, but they are not yet standardized for reliable use in clinic. Nevertheless, there are some tests for the presumptive diagnosis of aspergillosis which, although are not specific for the identification of species, have been decisive in the case of IA. Among these are the Galactomannan test (GM), the Beta-D-glucan assay and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) testing. In this chapter, the recent advances and challenges in the molecular diagnosis of IA are revised.


  • molecular diagnosis
  • invasive aspergillosis
  • PCR
  • epidemiology
  • molecular markers

1. Introduction

Aspergillosis is defined as tissue damage caused by fungi of the genus Aspergillus [1], which belongs to the class Ascomycetes. This genus consists of 8000 opportunistic and saprobic fungal species that have been reclassified as 250 species in nine primary sections: Flavi, Fumigati, Nigri, Udagawae, Cricumdati, Versicolor, Usti, Terrei and Emericella [2, 3]. Members of the genus Aspergillus are filamentous fungi that are ubiquitous in the environment [4, 5] and primarily develop close to decomposing plants, organic waste and soil, where they produce large numbers of conidia that are disseminated through the air [6].

Aspergillus is a cosmopolitan fungus that primarily infects immunocompromised hosts and individuals with the underlying lung disease. Some Aspergillus species are capable of causing a wide variety of diseases in humans and animals, collectively known as aspergillosis, which have increased significantly in recent years [7]. Approximately, 45 species have been reported to cause disease in humans [2, 8].

Aspergillosis can cause several clinical symptoms in humans, especially in immunocompromised individuals [8]. A. fumigatus sensu stricto is the most important opportunistic human pathogen, producing thousands of airborne conidia, which, due to their small size (2.5–3.5 μm in diameter), can be disseminated great distances by atmospheric disturbances such as wind convection currents and can survive under a wide range of environmental conditions. These airborne conidia can eventually be inhaled into the lungs of humans and animals, where an efficient innate immune response is required to prevent infection [8]. The primary diseases associated with this pathogen are allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, and IA, the latter of which is difficult to manage, leading to a significantly high morbidity and mortality. IA is the most serious disease caused by this fungus since it involves the invasion of fungal hyphae into tissue, and in some cases, haematogenously spread to other organs, particularly the brain [8]. The primary site of IA infection is the lungs. Infections of the skin and cornea may also occur, but fungal colonization of these sites is much less frequent. IA is rare in healthy individuals and almost exclusively affects patients with compromised immune systems [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. The prognosis for these patients is often poor due to the scarcity of effective treatments combined with the already compromised state of health of these individuals, with mortality rates ranging between 30 and ≥90% depending on the immune status of the patient [14]. To reduce mortality in patients with IA, von Eiff et al. [15] administered empirical antifungal therapies to patients with severe neutropaenia (absolute granulocytosis of ≤500/μl) and observed a 90–41% reduction in mortality. However, this non-specific strategy has caused an increase in resistance to antifungals in patients undergoing long-term treatment [16]. In addition, some species belonging to the complex A. fumigatus sensu latu (Fumigati section) have been recognized as occasional causes of IA [17, 18, 19, 20], and other IA-causing species belong to different Aspergillus sections or complexes (Table 1).

Country *Total Rate/100,000 Reference
Algeria 2865 7.1 [21]
Bangladesh 5166 3.2 [22]
Belgium 675 6.08 [23]
Brazil 8664 4.47 [24]
Burkina Faso 54a 0.3 [25]
Cameroon 1175 5.3 [26]
Canada 566 1.59 [27]
Chile 296 1.7 [28]
Colombia 2820 5.7 [29]
Czech Republic 297 2.8 [30]
Ecuador 594 1.3 [31]
Egypt 9001 10.7 [32]
France 1185 1.8 [33]
Greece 1125 10.4 [34]
Guatemala 671 4.4 [35]
Hungary 319b 3.2 [36]
Jordan 84 1.34 [37]
Kazakhstan 511 2.8 [38]
Korea 2150 4.48 [39]
Malaysia 1018 3.3 [40]
Mexico 20c 0.017 [41]
4d 0.0036
Nepal 1119 4 [42]
Norway 278 5.3 [43]
Pakistan 10949 5.9 [44]
Peru 1621 5 [45]
Portugal 240 2.3 [46]
Philippines 3085 3 [47]
Qatar 11 0.6 [48]
Romania 1524 7.7 [49]
Russia 3238 2.27 [50]
Spain 4318 9.19 [51]
Thailand 941 1.4 [52]
Tanzania 20 0.05 [53]
Trinidad and Tobago 8 0.6 [54]
Ukraine 1233 2.7 [55]
Uruguay 773 22.4 [56]
United Kingdom 2001-2912e 4.59-4.6 [57]
Vietnam 14523 15.9 [58]

Table 1.

Estimated burden of invasive aspergillosis.

Haematological malignancies

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Renal, heart and liver transplant recipients.

Allogenic- hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

All risk groups except critical care patients.

Total expected number of cases.


2. Taxonomy of the genus Aspergillus

The genus Aspergillus belongs to the order Eurotiales and includes over 344 species, more than 40 of which are aetiological agents of opportunistic human infections, although some of them do so only occasionally [59].

Aspergillus is traditionally classified based on morphological characteristics, such as the size and arrangement of the aspergillary heads, the color of the conidia, the growth rate in different media and physiological characteristics. According to these morphological characteristics, Raper and Fennell [60] divided the genus Aspergillus into 18 groups. However, because this classification did not have any status in the nomenclature, Gams et al. [61] introduced the use of Aspergillus subgenera and sections. These studies showed that the groups organized by Raper and Fennell [60], which were based on phenotypic characteristics, largely coincide with the current classifications. However, because morphological variations in several sections resulted in controversial taxonomic groups, polyphasic identification was used, which involves the morphological, physiological, molecular and ecological characterization of a species [3]. Peterson [62] established the acceptance of five subgenera (Aspergillus, Circumdati, Fumigati, Nidulantes and Ornati) with 16 sections from a phylogenetic analysis rDNA region sequences. By contrast, Samson and Varga [63], based on phylogenetic analysis using multilocus sequence typing (using calmodulin, RNA polymerase 2 and the rRNA gene), subdivided Aspergillus into eight subgenres: the subgenus Aspergillus, with the sections Aspergillus and Restricti; the subgenus Fumigati, with the sections Fumigati, Clavati and Cervini; the subgenus Circumdati, with the sections Circumdati, Nigri, Flavi and Cremei; the subgenus Candidi, with the section Candidi; the subgenus Terrei, with the sections Terrei and Flavipedes; the subgenus Nidulantes, with the sections Nidulantes, Usti and Sparsi; the subgenus Warcupi, with the sections Warcupi and Zonati; and the subgenus Ornati, with the section Ornati. Later, Varga et al. [64], based on multilocus sequence typing (using β-tubulin, calmodulin and the intergenic spacing regions [ITS] region), added the subgenus Nidulantes to the Aenei section.

Subsequently, based on different studies [62, 64, 65, 66], a new classification was proposed for the genus Aspergillus that included four subgenres and 19 sections in which the subgenera Ornati and Warcupi were transferred to other genera, since they did not belong to the genus Aspergillus. Similarly, the Cremei section, which had been classified into the subgenus Aspergillus [62], was reclassified into the subgenus Circumdati by Houbraken and Samson [66], resulting in the following classification: the subgenus Aspergillus, with the sections Aspergillus (teleomorph Eurotium) and Restricti (teleomorph Eurotium); the subgenus Circumdati, with the sections Candidi, Circumdati (teleomorph Neopetromyces), Flavi (Petromyces), Flavipedes (Fennellia), Nigri and Terrei; the subgenus Fumigati, with the sections Cervini, Clavati (teleomorph Neocarpenteles, Dichotomomyces) and Fumigati (Neosartorya); and the subgenus Nidulantes, with sections Aeni (teleomorph Emericella), Bispori, Cremei (teleomorph Chaetosartorya), Nidulantes (teleomorph Emericella), Ochraceorosei, Silvati, Sparsi and Usti (teleomorph Emericella). Finally, the current classification consists of four subgenera (Aspergillus, Circumdati, Fumigati and Nidulantes) and 20 sections [67, 68], with 339 correctly identified species [59]. There are currently 45 species of Aspergillus described as human pathogens [2], although the number of clinically relevant fungal species has been steadily increasing in recent years and is likely to increase further in the future (Table 1).

Colonies of the genus Aspergillus are typically fast growing and can exhibit a range of colors, including white, yellow, yellow-brown, brown and black or exhibit shades of greenish-gray or blue-green. Aspergillus species are characterized by the production of specialized structure, called conidiophores, which in some cases can be dramatically different [59]. Although it is a unicellular structure, the conidiophore has three distinct parts: the vesicle (swollen apical end), the stipe (cylindrical section located below the vesicle) and the foot cell (final section, sometimes separated by a septum that joins the conidiophore with the mycelium). The vesicle is partially or entirely covered by an enclosure of phialides (uniseriate). In many species, other cells called metulae are located between the vesicle and the phialides that support a small number of compact phialides (biseriate). The set forms what is called the aspergilar head, which can be strictly uniseriate, biseriate or mixed. The conidia are unicellular, round, oval, elliptical, smooth or rough, hyaline or pigmented, with thick or thin walls, produced in long chains that can be divergent (radiated) or aggregated in compact (columnar) or lax columns (that tend to open). Few species produce other types of conidia besides the phialides and metulae on the vesicle, and most develop directly on the vegetative hyphae as round or ovoid forms called aleuroconidia. Some species can produce Hülle cells, which can be solitary or envelop the cleistothecia form of one of the associated teleomorphs. The types of known ascomata present great morphological variation, ranging from those surrounded by loose hyphae with a smooth pseudoparenchymatous appearance to those exhibiting compact sclerotium structures, with variations in size, ornamentation and type of ascospore surfaces also observed [69].

The classification of the genus Aspergillus into subgenres and sections is made based on four fundamental characteristics: the presence of a teleomorph, the presence or absence of metulae, the disposition of the metulae or phialides on the vesicle and the colouration of the colonies [69].


3. Epidemiology

The number of IA cases has increased in recent years. Recent data provided by Bongomin et al. [70] estimate approximately 250,000 cases that occur worldwide each year, with an associated increase in morbidity and mortality rates. This increase is of great importance for health-care systems, since the epidemiological surveillance systems in several countries are inefficient. When combined with the difficulties in diagnosing IA, the resulting delay in the application of timely treatment can lead to the death of patients (Table 2). Given the importance of this disease, several research groups have developed ‘The Aspergillus guide’, which includes diagnostic and therapeutic guidance, focusing on life-threatening diseases caused by Aspergillus spp., primarily in Europe [71].

Species Identification method Reference
A. ustus (100) Culture and molecular typing (RAPD) [72]
Emericella quadrilineata (4) Sequence-based analysis
[ITS region, β-tubulin (benA) and calmodulin (caM)]
A. viridinutans Sequence-based analysis
(β -tubulin and rodlet A gene)
A. udagawae Sequence-based analysis
[β-tubulin (benA)]
A. fumigatus (32)
A. lentulus (4)
A. calidoustus (2)
A. tubingensis (1)
A. sydowii (1)
A. flavus (1)
A. terreus (1)
E. rugulosa (1)
Sequence-based analysis
[ITS region, β-tubulin (benA) and calmodulin (caM)]
Section Usti:
A. calidoustus
Section Fumigati:
A. novofumigatus
A. viridinutans
Sequence-based analysis
[β-tubulin (benA)]
E. nidulans
var. echinulata
Sequence-based analysis
[ITS region, β-tubulin (benA) and calmodulin (caM)]
A. lentulus Sequence-based analysis
[ITS region, β-tubulin (benA) and calmodulin (caM)]
A. lentulus Culture
Sequence-based analysis
[ITS region, β-tubulin (benA)
A. fumigatus (72.7)
A.flavus (27.3)
Nested PCR:
A. fumigatus (30)
A.flavus (20)
Real-time PCR:
A. fumigatus (6.25)
A. flavus (12.5)
Culture (standard morphological procedures)
Nested PCR
Real-time PCR
Section Circumdati:
A. pallidofulvus (6.66)
A. ochraceus (2.22)
Section Flavi:
A. tamari (8.88)
Section Terrei:
A. niveus (6.66)
Section Versicolor:
A. sydowii (8.88)
Section Aspergillus:
A. montevidensis (6.66)
Section Nigri:
A. brunneoviolaceus (4.44)
Culture (standard morphological procedures)
Sequence-based analysis
[β-tubulin (benA) and calmodulin (caM)]
A. fumigatus (28.8)
A. flavus (7.2)
Sequence-based analysis:
[ITS region, β-tubulin (benA)]
A. flavus complex (15)
A. tubingensis (3)
A. fumigatus (2)
Sequence-based analysis:
(region, β-tubulin (benA)
Section Nidulantes:
A. sublatus (1)
Scanning electron microscopy of ascospores
Sequencing of calmodulin gene

Table 2.

Species associated with invasive aspergillosis (IA).

The major risk factors for developing IA are neutropaenia, allogeneic transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells or solid organ transplantation (particularly lung), haematologic malignancy and chemotherapy with cytotoxic cancer. Patients with chronic granulomatous disease and advanced AIDS also have a high risk of developing IA, as do patients receiving treatment with chronic steroid therapies and tumor necrosis factor as well as those with long-term chronic diseases and other conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, rheumatological conditions, liver disease and chronic obstructive disease [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 86, 87, 88]. It is also important to know the distribution and molecular epidemiology of Aspergillus species obtained from clinical and environmental sources in different geographical regions of the world, since different Aspergillus species can cause IA. In addition, although the Fumigati section (complex A. fumigatus) has been reported as the most frequent cause of IA, data suggest that IA can be caused by other species in immunocompromised hosts (Table 2), especially A. niger, A. terreus and species of the complex A. flavus. Therefore, the precise identification of Aspergillus species isolated from patients is of great importance for the selection of an effective antifungal therapy [84].

Because Aspergillus species are widely distributed fungi in the environment, and their conidia are dispersed primarily through air currents, their relationship with hosts in hospital environments is of great relevance. Standards have been established for hospital environments for adults and immunosuppressed children who require special attention. Ullmann et al. [71] recommend that patients should be separated from areas under construction or renovation and from potted plants and flowers in patient rooms and living quarters. In addition, they recommend placing patients in special rooms with positive air pressure and HEPA filters or laminar air flow and rooms with filters for water supplies, especially in showers.


4. Molecular diagnosis

Accurate and early diagnosis of an active Aspergillus infection is necessary to initiate effective antifungal therapy, particularly in critically ill patients [89]. The IA diagnosis is made based on the criteria defined for proven, probable or possible infection, implemented by the European Organization for Cancer Research and Treatment/Study Group on Mycoses (EORTC/MSG). These criteria depend on the clinical manifestations, host and fungal factors as well as the results of traditional laboratory methods (histopathology and culture) [90, 91]. However, the diagnosis of IA continues to be a challenge, since histopathology and cultures have limitations in their sensitivity and specificity as well as in the time required to obtain the results, which leads to significant delays in the initiation of treatment [89]. To achieve an accurate diagnosis and timely and effective treatment, molecular tests have been developed that overcome the limitations of conventional methods and can reduce the mortality rate associated with IA [92]. Thus, Samson et al. [59] suggested using a polyphasic approach (morphological characterization, physiological tests, ecological data, extrolite analysis and DNA sequencing) as a gold standard for the identification of Aspergillus species. However, because these methodologies are time and labour intensive, they are not practical in most clinical laboratories. Therefore, different PCR modalities have been developed through the use of specific molecular markers for the detection of Aspergillus species of medical importance to quickly identify the aetiological agent of aspergillosis [93, 94].

Molecular tests for the diagnosis of IA have been developed for both home and commercial use to directly detect and identify Aspergillus spp. in different clinical specimens, including the following: whole blood, serum, plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), sputum, bronchial aspirate, tissue, pleural effusion and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), allowing for the PCR amplification of fungal DNA via nested, multiplex and real-time PCR [89, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105] and with minor frequency via isothermal amplification (loop-mediated isothermal amplification, LAMP) [106]. The efficiency of these tests is variable and depends on many factors, including the DNA extraction method, clinical sample type, type of PCR, amplification target and detection method. The lack of standardization of these technical problems represents the most important barrier for the widespread application of PCR as a diagnostic modality for the diagnosis of IA [107].

4.1 DNA extraction methods

The quality and quantity of DNA available for amplification depends on the extraction method used. Home, commercial and automated methods for DNA extraction are available. In the home, enzymatic, chemical or physical agents are used to break the cell wall, while sodium dodecyl sulphate, beta-mercaptoethanol and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid are used to lyse the membrane. The elimination of proteins and purification of the DNA is performed by an extraction with phenol-chloroform, after which the purified DNA is precipitated with alcohol [91]. DNA can also be extracted using commercial methods or kits, such as the Qiagen QIAmp Tissue Kit (Hilden, Germany), but they are disadvantageous in that the efficiency of fungal DNA extraction can vary considerably between different commercial brands. Furthermore, for both the home-based and commercial methods, contamination of the extraction systems and reagents has been reported, which contributes to variations in the sensitivity and specificity of the tests. The use of automated methods, such as MagNA Pure LC (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), is a viable and high-performance option for DNA extraction but may be cost-prohibitive in many in-hospital laboratories with limited resources [91, 108].

4.2 Types of clinical samples

The direct detection of Aspergillus DNA has primarily been performed in whole blood, serum, plasma, and BAL, and occasionally in other specimens, such as sputum, bronchial aspirate, tissue, pleural effusion, peritoneal fluid and cerebrospinal fluid. It has been observed that the interpretation of results is easier when sterile samples are used than when non-sterile samples are used, such as BAL, since the ubiquity of the fungus can promote its presence in the upper respiratory tract, making colonization, invasion or contamination difficult to determine. To date, the most appropriate clinical sample for the diagnosis of IA has not been defined. However, the use of total blood and its fractions (serum or plasma) are the most widely used, the ease at which both blood can be obtained and the interpretation of results. The optimal blood fraction for the detection of Aspergillus DNA is unknown. Studies have been conducted to identify the ideal hematological sample to detect Aspergillus DNA, taking into account that the processing of whole blood and plasma requires the use of an anticoagulant, such as EDTA, which could inhibit PCR. It has been observed that the greatest inhibition occurs when using heparin or sodium citrate as an anticoagulant [109]. Some authors consider that from a practical point of view, serum is the best hematological sample for the detection of Aspergillus DNA, since it is easier to process and allows for antigens to be detected at the same time [98]. Other authors have shown that the sensitivity of PCR in serum and blood is similar, since the levels of circulating A. fumigatus DNA are between 100 fg/ml and 1 ng/ml, both in serum and in whole blood. They also report that the sensitivity may increase when a combination of serum and blood is used, which can perhaps be explained by the fact that the performance of DNA detection improves when large volumes of samples are used, rather than by the combination of the two per se [95, 98, 109, 110]. Meanwhile, Springer et al. [111] reported that PCR performed using plasma showed a higher sensitivity (91%) than for serum (80%) and whole blood (55%). These observations contrast with previous reports, possibly due to differences in sample processing [107].

BAL has also been used to detect Aspergillus by PCR, showing promising and contradictory results. In clinical studies, the general ranges of sensitivity and specificity varied widely, from 73 to 100% and 80 to 100%, respectively, depending on the characteristics of the trial and the type of patients evaluated. The majority of PCR studies using BAL have been performed using patients with haemato-oncological disorders. While some studies demonstrated a high specificity [100], others have shown greater sensitivity [112] or high sensitivity and specificity [99].

Other types of samples that have been used are lung or other deep-tissue biopsies, CSF and pleural effusion, which provided acceptable values of sensitivity and specificity [102, 103, 113]. However, its applicability in routine laboratory diagnostics is limited by the difficulty in obtaining this type of specimen.

4.3 Types of PCR

Nested PCR has been successfully used to detect Aspergillus spp. [102]. However, this technique is not the most suitable format, since although the process allows for great sensitivity, there is also the possibility of contamination and the generation of false-positive results. Multiplex PCR has also been used to detect Aspergillus spp., particularly in BAL samples. However, despite its adequate specificity and sensitivity (0.01 ng of DNA) [93], the detection method required (electrophoresis in an agarose gel) limits its application as a diagnostic tool, since results in this setting are expected to be obtained as quickly as possible. The primary limitation of these end-point PCR formats is the inability to differentiate between colonization or active infection. In 2006, the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative (EAPCRI) sought proposals for a technical consensus. This consensus was possible thanks to the generalization of real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). This technique drastically reduces the risk of contamination, allows quantitative management of the amplification reaction (quantification of the fungal load), differentiates between several pathogenic species when multiple probes are used in a single assay and allows for the result to be known; at the same time, the amplification is carried out, which helps establish an effective treatment in a timely manner [114]. Therefore, most of the PCR assays that have been developed for the diagnosis of IA are in a real-time format, primarily using hydrolysis probes (TaqMan) directed at the 18S, 28S and ITS regions [91].

Another alternative to detect Aspergillus is LAMP. This technique offers several potential advantages over PCR, among which is a more efficient amplification, the possibility of evaluating cell viability, a reduction in the contamination of the genetic material to be amplified and the possibility of using RNA as a target instead of DNA. The latter advantage allows for a greater sensitivity since highly expressed genes produce thousands of transcripts within a cell [106, 107].

4.4 Molecular marker or amplification targets

The selection of a molecular marker or a target region for PCR amplification to diagnose IA is of great importance, since it must favor a sensitive and specific amplification. The most commonly used markers to achieve high sensitivity in detecting Aspergillus spp., both in home and in commercial PCR assays, are multicopy genes, such as the ribosomal 18S and 28S genes, for which hundreds of copies are present in the genomes of Aspergillus spp. [89, 95, 97, 99, 102, 103, 104, 105]. The disadvantage of using multicopy genes is that they involve highly conserved sequences in fungi, leading to a limited specificity (panfungal PCR). This type of amplification target does not always allow the differentiation of phylogenetically related species, such as species that are within the same section, which can often be important. For example, in the Fumigati section, although A. fumigatus, A. lentulus and N. udagawe are closely related, the latter two species are more resistant to antifungals than A. fumigatus. This PCR method may not even be able to distinguish between phylogenetically related genera (Aspergillus, Penicillium and Paecilomyces spp.), representing a problem in the selection of antifungal treatments [99]. Strategies have been designed to overcome the lack of specificity of multicopy genes, such as hybridization with species-specific probes [112]. Similarly, the variable regions of the rRNA gene, the ITS regions and D1/D2 are used [98, 100, 115]. ITS sequences may lack sufficient variation for the resolution of some Aspergillus species, and a bar code or a secondary identification marker is typically needed to identify an isolate at the species level. Based on these observations, the use of sequencing gene fragments, such as α-tubulin (benA) or calmodulin (caM), has been recommended for the identification of individual species within sections [107]. Single-copy genes have also been used as molecular markers in the diagnosis of IA, which provide a greater specificity to the assay but a lower sensitivity. The single-copy genes that have been used include aspHS, SCW4 and anxC4, which have shown promising results for detecting A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, A. nidulans, A. terreus and A. versicolour in BAL samples [93, 101, 106]. Because the aspHS gene encodes a haemolysin that is overexpressed in vivo during infection, its detection provides specificity to differentiate an active infection (germinated conidia) from a non-active one (non-germinated conidia) [101].

4.5 Resistance markers

PCR has also been used to detect resistance to antifungals, since an increasing number of environmental and clinical A. fumigatus isolates with a lower susceptibility to azoles have been observed. Infections caused by azole-resistant fungi are associated with a very high mortality rate. The available evidence suggests that resistance may be emerging as a result of the widespread use of these compounds in agricultural and clinical settings. The predominant resistance mechanism involves mutations in the cyp51A gene (L98H, Y121F, T289A and TR34), which encodes sterol demethylase, the target of azoles, and it has been shown that a variety of these mutations confer resistance to azoles. Molecular resistance tests have been used to assess fungal isolates as part of epidemiological surveillance studies of drug resistance and have been used to assess clinical isolates as a complement to phenotypic susceptibility testing. Real-time multiplex PCR has also been used to directly detect azole-resistant Aspergillus in BAL samples from patients at IA risk. However, more studies are needed to determine its potential utility in clinical care [107, 112].


5. Other diagnostic methods

Nowadays, there are some tests for the presumptive diagnosis of aspergillosis which, although are not specific for the identification of species, have been decisive in the case of IA. Among these are the Galactomannan test (GM), the Beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) testing.

5.1 Galactomannans

The GM is a polysaccharide, the main component of the Aspergillus cell wall, which binds to and is released from the hyphae during growth [116, 117]. The galactomannan is not only found in the walls of Aspergillus but also in the cell walls of other fungi such as Fusarium spp., Histoplasma capsulatum, Penicillium spp., Paecilomyces spp. and to a lesser extent in other fungi [109, 118, 119, 120, 121].

One of the most widely used tests for its determination is Platelia™ Aspergillus EIA (immunoenzymatic sandwich microplate assay), which uses monoclonal antibodies that are directed against the GM of Aspergillus [117, 122, 123, 124]. The real interest of this test in the diagnosis of aspergillosis lies in the fact that the galactomannan represents a good indirect indicator of the fungus [119] once it is released into the bloodstream; furthermore, it can be detected in body fluids such as serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), cerebrospinal fluid or pleural fluid [118].

Currently, it is considered as a serological method that facilitates the diagnosis of IA [125], even though it presents a highly variable sensitivity which ranges from 40 to 100% and depends on the population to be evaluated. Hachem et al. [118] showed in a study with patients suffering from haematologic malignancies associated to IA produced by Aspergillus non-fumigatus a sensitivity of 49%, whereas patients that presented IA by A. fumigatus sensu stricto showed a sensitivity of 13%, and the specificity was of 99% in both groups. Another study conducted by Maschmeyer et al. [126] reported that in patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer or patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the sensitivity of the GM was of 67–100% and the specificity was of 86–99%. The meta-analysis conducted by Leeflang et al. [117] in patients with neutropaenia showed a sensitivity and a specificity of 78 and 81%, respectively. Pfeiffer et al. [116] found a sensitivity and a specificity of 95% in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplant and solid organ transplants, respectively. It is important to highlight that the detection of GM in patients on antibacterial treatment results in the reduction of the test’s specificity, while in patients on antifungal treatment, the sensitivity decreases in most cases. However, this does not occur when using caspofungin which increases the sensitivity [109, 127]. It is necessary to consider that when using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to determine galactomannans, the test increases its sensitivity and turns out to be a more useful mortality prediction test [128].

5.2 ΒDG

The ß-glucans are glucose polymers (polysaccharides) of high-molecular weight that are found naturally in the cell wall of various organisms, such as bacteria, yeasts, fungi and plants. The BDG is produced by most fungi of medical importance such as Candida spp., Aspergillus spp. and Pneumocystis jirovecii. Among the fungi that release little BDG in serum, there can be found Mucorales fungi and Cryptococcus [129]. This antigen is important in fungal infections as it is released during the infection and has a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of IA compared to GM and can be detected in the plasma of patients with mycosis. Therefore, this antigen can be used as a marker of fungal infection although it does not allow the identification of species [130] and is included as a diagnostic criterion in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) [90, 131].

For the detection of BDG, the Fungitell assay (Cape Cod Associates, Inc.) is used, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2003 for the presumptive diagnosis of IFI [132]. For this test, the results are variable in different studies, with sensitivity values ranging from 80 to 90% and specificity values from 36 to 92%, according to the cut-off value used [133, 134]. In studies with patients suffering from haematologic malignancies who develop IA, the sensibility of the test varies from 55 to 95%, and the specificity from 77 to 96% [133, 135]. It is important to mention that data from existing clinical studies for the Fungitell assay, which is the most widely used test today, suggest that the use of a detection limit of 80 pg/ml is associated with a greater precision than those with a result of 60–80 pg/ml, which are considered as indefinite. The above indicates that higher cut-off values dramatically decrease the sensitivity of the test, whilst increasing its specificity [135, 136].

The β-D-glucan assay is often useful in combination with culture, as it improves conditions for success [135]. Several factors that may increase the levels of BDG on IFI have been identified, such as thrombocyte infusions with leukocyte depletion filters, hemodialysis with cellulose membranes [137], the use of antibiotics such as amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or piperacillin-tazobactam [138], the use of surgical gauzes containing glucan, the administration of human blood products (immunoglobulins or albumin), severe mucositis and the presence of serious bacterial infections [129]. On the other hand, Pickering et al. [139] reported that high concentrations of bilirubin and triglycerides inhibit the levels of BDG and cause false-negative results, while hemolysis causes false-positive results.

5.3 Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

The air exhaled by patients with invasive diseases contains a large number of VOCs, produced by different metabolic pathways, which can be used as biomarkers of pulmonary disease [109, 140]. Several techniques have been used to determine VOCs, like the gas chromatography and mass spectrometry which is impractical for use in the clinic [141, 142, 143]. One alternative seems to be the use of electronic noses and artificial olfactory systems that use a series of sensors that help discriminate each smell that represents a unique blend of VOCs, which function through pattern recognition algorithms called ‘breathprints’ [144, 145]. Several volatile organic compounds characteristic of Aspergillus spp. have been identified such as 3-octanone, isoamyl alcohol, ethanol, cyclohexanone, 2-methyl-2-propanol, 2-methylfuran, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol and 2-pentylfuran, among others [141, 142, 143, 146].

Among the advantages of these devices are their low cost, most of them are manual, easy to operate and provide results in few minutes. With regard to the benefits for the patient, they are non-invasive tests, safe, fast and easy to perform. The sensitivity and specificity of this test is of 100 and 83.3%, respectively, which makes it one of the best options for the diagnosis of IA [140].

It is necessary to consider that in order to validate all these tests, more studies that provide additional advantages for their use must be conducted.


6. Discussion and conclusions

Currently, IA has become very important among fungal infections around the world since the number of cases has increased coupled with a high rate of morbidity and mortality, detected mainly in immunocompromised patients. The A. fumigatus complex has been reported as the most frequent cause of IA in immunocompromised hosts. During the last few years, new species have been described that belong to other complexes that also cause this disease, which represents a challenge to understand the epidemiology of this nosological entity. On the other hand, the appearance of new species causing IA generates problems to establish its diagnosis since conventional methods continue to be used, which fail to discriminate between closely related species, such as imaging, histopathology, microscopy and culture procedures. These last ones are still considered the gold standards even though they have a low sensitivity and are time-consuming [109]. Other methods that have been considered important are immunological methods to detect GM and BDG antigens in serum and other biological fluids. They also have limitations, such as cross reactions with other fungal species and interference with antibiotics such as b-lactams or with plasma infusion solutions [147]. In addition, these methods only identify the fungus at the complex level. It is important to identify the species, since recently, the presence of ‘cryptic’ Aspergillus species has been revealed in clinical samples of IA, which present differences in the susceptibility to antifungals, as is the case of voriconazole considered as the therapy of choice for invasive aspergillosis. The effectiveness of this drug is uncertain in the cryptic Aspergillus species, since it has been shown that resistance to multiple antifungal drugs is frequent, particularly in A. lentulus, A. alliaceus, A. sydowii, A. calidoustus, A. keveii, A. insuetus and A. fumigatiaffinis [19]. Currently, there is more awareness of the need to identify Aspergillus at the species level. This can be achieved through a polyphasic strategy [3]. In addition to the phenotypic characteristics, it includes the analysis of multilocus sequences, as well as PCR with specific probes for each species, such as multiplex qPCR, to identify clinically relevant Aspergillus species from the complex A. fumigatus, A. terreus, A. flavus, A. niger and A. nidulans [112]. However, molecular methods have not yet been recognized as diagnostic criteria for the identification of invasive fungal infection (IFI) by EORTC/MSG, due to the lack of standardization protocols, and the significant rates of false positives and false negatives. In addition, it should be considered that before its implementation in routine clinical practice, each diagnostic test must follow a long validation process, which involves various aspects such as limit of sensitivity, reproducibility and precision, so that the task is nothing simple; however, its use is paramount, so several recent studies have evaluated its application [108, 109, 148].

Therefore, it is clear that despite the efforts made so far to implement effective diagnostic methods, there is still no consensus about which is the ideal method. Therefore, as long as these methods are not standardized and their reliability is not guaranteed to improve the detection of Aspergillus spp. in an effective and timely manner, the diagnosis of IA will continue to represent a challenge.



This project was supported by PAPIIT-DGAPA (IT201318).


  1. 1. Vanden Bossche H, Dromer F, Improvisi I, Lozano-Chiu M, Rex JH, Sanglard D. Antifungal drug resistance in pathogenic fungi. Medical Mycology. 1998;36(Suppl 1):119-128
  2. 2. De Hoog GS, Guarro J, Gené J, Figueras MJ. Atlas of Clinical Fungi. 3rd ed. Utrecht: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Center; 2011
  3. 3. Samson RA, Varga J, Witiak SM, Geiser DM. The species concept in Aspergillus: Recommendations of an international panel. Studies in Mycology. 2007;59:71-73
  4. 4. Loo VG, Bertrand C, Dixon C, Vityé D, DeSalis B, McLean AP, Brox A, Robson HG. Control of constructionassociated nosocomial Aspergillosis in an antiquated hematology unit. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 1996;17(6):360-364
  5. 5. Wiederhold NP, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23(12):1592-1610
  6. 6. Opal SM, Asp AA, Cannady PB Jr, Morse PL, Burton LJ, Hammer PG 2nd. Efficacy of infection control measures during a nosocomial outbreak of disseminated aspergillosis associated with hospital construction. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1986;153(3):634-637
  7. 7. Denning DW. Aspergillosis. Schering-Plough Corporation. 2006. Website of Aspergillus:
  8. 8. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive mycoses in North America. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2010;36(1):1-53
  9. 9. Kousha M, Tadi R, Soubani AO. Pulmonary aspergillosis: A clinical review. European Respiratory Review. 2011;20(121):156-174
  10. 10. Fortún J, Meije Y, Fresco G, Moreno S. Aspergillosis. Clinical forms and treatment. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. 2012;30(4):201-208
  11. 11. Steinbach WJ, Marr KA, Anaissie EJ, Azie N, Quan SP, Meier-Kriesche HU, Apewokin S, Horn DL. Clinical epidemiology of 960 patients with invasive aspergillosis from the PATH Alliance Registry. The Journal of Infection. 2012;65(5):453-464
  12. 12. Tunnicliffe G, Schomberg L, Walsh S, Tinwell B, Harrison T, Chua F. Airway and parenchymal manifestations of pulmonary aspergillosis. Respiratory Medicine. 2013;107(8):1113-1123
  13. 13. Geltner C, Lass-Flӧrl C. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in organ transplants—Focus on lung transplants. Respiratory Investigation. 2016;54(2):76-84
  14. 14. Taccone FS, Van den Abeele AM, Bulpa P, Misset B, Meersseman W, Cardoso T, Paiva JA, Blasco-Navalpotro M, De Laere E, Dimopoulos G, Rello J, Vogelaers D, Blot SI, Study Investigators AICU. Epidemiology of invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients: Clinical presentation, underlying conditions, and out comes. Critical Care. 2015;19:7
  15. 15. von Eiff M, Roos N, Schulten R, Hesse M, Zühlsdorf M, van de Loo J. Pulmonary aspergillosis: Early diagnosis improves survival. Respiration. 1995;62(6):341-347
  16. 16. Maertens JA, Nucci M, Donnelly JP. The role of antifungal treatment in hematology. Haematologica. 2012;97(3):325-327
  17. 17. Balajee SA, Kano R, Baddley JW, Moser SA, Marr KA, Alexander BD, Andes D, Kontoyiannis DP, Perrone G, Peterson S, Brandt ME, Pappas PG, Chiller T. Molecular identification of Aspergillus species collected for the transplant-associated infection surveillance network. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2009;47(10):3138-3141
  18. 18. Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Mellado E, Peláez T, Pemán J, Zapico S, Alvarez M, Rodríguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M, FILPOP StudyGroup. Population-based survey of filamentous fungi and antifungal resistance in Spain (FILPOP Study). Anti-microbial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57(7):3380-3387
  19. 19. Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Cuenca-Estrella M. Antifungal susceptibility profile of cryptic species of Aspergillus. Mycopathologia. 2014;178(5-6):427-433
  20. 20. Escribano P, Peláez T, Muñoz P, Bouza E, Guinea J. Is azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus a problem in Spain? Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57(6):2815-2820
  21. 21. Chekiri-Talbi M, Denning DW. Estimation des infections fongiques en Algérie. Journal de Mycologie Médicale. 2017;27:139-145
  22. 22. Gugnani HC, Denning WD, Rahim R, Sadat A, Belal M, Mahbub MS. Burden of serious fungal infections in Bangladesh. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:993-997
  23. 23. Lagrou K, Maertens J, Van Even E, Denning DW. Burden of serious fungal infections in Belgium. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):1-5
  24. 24. Giacomazzi J, Baethgen L, Carneiro LC, Millington MA, Denning DW, Colombo AL, Pasqualotto AC, in association with the LIFE Program. The burden of serious human fungal infections in Brazil. Mycoses. 2016;59:145-150
  25. 25. Bamba S, Zida A, Sangaré I, Cissé M, Denning DW, Hennequin C. Burden of severe fungal infections in Burkina Faso. Journal of Fungi (Basel). 2018;4(1):35
  26. 26. Mandengue CE, Denning DW. The burden of serious fungal infections in Cameroon. Journal of Fungi. 2018;4:44. DOI: 10.3390/jof4020044
  27. 27. Dufresne SF, Cole DC, Denning DW, Sheppard DC. Serious fungal infections in Canada. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:987-992
  28. 28. Alvarez-Duarte E, Denning DW. Serious fungal infections in Chile. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:983-986
  29. 29. Alvarez-Moreno CA, Cortes JA, Denning DW. Burden of fungal infections in Colombia. Journal of Fungi (Basel). 2018;4(2):41
  30. 30. Chrdle A, Mallátová N, Vaŝáková M, Haber J, Denning DW. Burden of serious fungal infections in the Czech Republic. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):6-14
  31. 31. Zurita J, Denning DW, Paz-Y-Miño A, Solís MB, Arias LM. Serious fungal infections in Ecuador. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:975-981
  32. 32. Zaki SM, Denning DW. Serious fungal infections in Egypt. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:971-974
  33. 33. Gangneux JP, Bougnoux ME, Hennequin C, Godet C, Chandenier J, Denning DW, Dupont B, LIFE program, the Société française de mycologie médicale SFMM-study group. An estimation of burden of serious fungal infections in France. Journal de Mycologie Médicale. 2016;26:385-390
  34. 34. Gamaletsou MN, Drogari-Apiranthitou M, Denning DW, Sipsas V. An estimate of the burden of serious fungal diseases in Greece. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2016;35:1115-1120
  35. 35. Medina N, Samayoa B, Lau-Bonilla D, Denning DW, Herrera R, Mercado D, Guzmán B, Pérez JC, Arathoon E. Burden of serious fungal infections in Guatemala. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:965-969
  36. 36. Sinkó J, Sulyok M, Denning DW. Burden of serious fungal diseases in Hungary. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):29-33
  37. 37. Wadi J, Denning DW. Burden of serious fungal infections in Jordan. Journal of Fungi. 2018;4(1):15
  38. 38. Kemaykin VM, Tabinbaev NB, Khudaibergenova MS, Olifirovich AA, Layzzat MA, Denning DW, Klimko N. An estimate of severe and chronic fungal diseases in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Fungi (Basel). 2018;4(1):34
  39. 39. Huh K, Ha YE, Denning DW, Peck KR. Serious fungal infections in Korea. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:957-963
  40. 40. Velayuthan RD, Samudi C, Singh HKL, Ng KP, Shankar EM, Denning DW. Estimation of the burden of serious human fungal infections in Malaysia. Journal of Fungi. 2018;4(1):38
  41. 41. Corzo-León DE, Armstrong-James D, Denning DW. Burden of serious fungal infections in Mexico. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):34-44
  42. 42. Khwakhali US, Denning DW. Burden of serious fungal infections in Nepal. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):45-50
  43. 43. Nordoy I, Hesstvedt L, Andersen CT, Mylvaganam H, Kols NI, Falch BM, Tofteland S, Müller F, Denning DW. An estimate of the burden of fungal disease in Norway. Journal of Fungi (Basel). 2018;4(1):29
  44. 44. Jabeen K, Farooqi J, Mirza S, Denning DW, Zafar A. Serious fungal infections in Pakistan. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:949-956
  45. 45. Bustamante B, Denning DW, Campos PE. Serious fungal infections in Peru. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:943-948
  46. 46. Sabino R, Verissímo C, Brandão J, Martins C, Alves D, Pais C, Denning DW. Serious fungal infections in Portugal. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:1345-1352
  47. 47. Batac MCR, Denning DCW. Serious fungal infections in the Philippines. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:937-941
  48. 48. Taj-Aldeen SJ, Chandra P, Denning DW. Burden of fungal infections in Qatar. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):51-57
  49. 49. Mares M, Moroti-Constantinescu VR, Denning DW. The burden of fungal diseases in Romania. Journal of Fungi (Basel). 2018;4(1):31
  50. 50. Klimko N, Kozlova Y, Khostelidi S, Shadrivova O, Borzova Y, Burygina E, Vasilieva N, Denning DW. The burden of serious fungal diseases in Russia. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):58-62
  51. 51. Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Gago S, Cuenca-Estrella M, León C, Miro JM, Nuñez Boluda A, Ruiz Camps I, Sole A, Denning DW, The University of Manchester in association with the LIFE program at Burden of serious fungal infections in Spain. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2015;21:183-189
  52. 52. Chayakulkeeree M, Denning DW. Serious fungal infections in Thailand. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:931-935
  53. 53. Faini D, Maokola W, Furrer H, Hatz C, Battegay M, Tanner M, Denning DW, Letang E. Burden of serious fungal infections in Tanzania. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):70-79
  54. 54. Denning DW, Gugnani HC. Burden of serious fungal infections in Trinidad and Tobago. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):80-84
  55. 55. Osmanov A, Denning DW. Burden of serious fungal infections in Ukraine. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):94-100
  56. 56. Macedo-Viñas M, Denning DW. Estimating the burden of serious fungal infections in Uruguay. Journal of Fungi (Basel). 2018;4(1):37
  57. 57. Pegorie M, Denning DW, Welfare W. Estimating the burden of invasive and serious fungal disease in the United Kingdom. The Journal of Infection. 2017;74(1):60-71
  58. 58. Beardsley J, Denning DW, Chau NV, Yen NTB, Crump JA, Day JN. Estimating the burden of fungal disease in Vietnam. Mycoses. 2015;58(Suppl. S5):101-106
  59. 59. Samson RA, Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Hong SB, Hubka V, Klaassen CHW, Perrone G, Seifert KA, Susca A, Tanney JB, Varga J, Kocsubé S, Szigeti G, Yaguchi T, Frisvad JC. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Studies in Mycology. 2014;78:141-173
  60. 60. Raper KB, Fennell DI. The Genus Aspergillus. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1965
  61. 61. Gams W, Christensen M, Onions AH, Pitt JI, Samson RA. Infrageneric taxa of Aspergillus. In: Samson RA, Pitt JI, editors. Advances in Penicillium and Aspergillus Systematics. New York: Plenum Press; 1985. pp. 55-62
  62. 62. Peterson SW. Phylogenetic analyses of Aspergillus species using DNA sequences from four loci. Mycologia. 2008;100(2):205-226
  63. 63. Samson RA, Varga J. Molecular systematics of Aspergillus and its teleomorphs. In: Machida M, Gomi K, editors. Aspergillus: Molecular Biology and Genomics. 2010. pp. 19-40
  64. 64. Varga J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA. Aspergillus sect. Aeni sect. nov., a new section of the genus for A. karnatakaensis sp. nov. and some allied fungi. IMA Fungus. 2010;1(12):197-205
  65. 65. Peterson SW, Varga J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA. Phylogeny and subgeneric taxonomy of Aspergillus. In: Varga J, Samson RA, editors. Aspergillus in the Genomic Era. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2008. pp. 33-56
  66. 66. Houbraken J, Samson RA. Phylogeny of Penicillium and the segregation of Trichocomaceae into three families. Studies in Mycology. 2011;70(1):1-51
  67. 67. Houbraken J, de Vries RP, Samson RA. Modern taxonomy of biotechnologically important Aspergillusand Penicillium species. Advances in Applied Microbiology. 2014;86:199-249
  68. 68. Hubka V, Nováková A, Kolařík M, Jurjević Ž, Peterson SW. Revision of Aspergillus section Flavipedes: Seven new species and proposal of section Jani sect. Nov. Mycologia. 2015;107(1):169-208
  69. 69. Piontelli EL. Agentes comunes en las aspergilosis humanas: Conceptos primarios en la diferenciación de sus complejos de especies. Boletín Micológico. 2014;29:63-100
  70. 70. Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. Journal of Fungi. 2017;3(4):57
  71. 71. Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan-Akdagli S, Denning DW, Groll AH, Lagrou K, Lass-Flörl C, Lewis RE, Munoz P, Verweij PE, Warris A, Ader F, Akova M, Arendrup MC, Barnes RA, Beigelman-Aubry C, Blot S, Bouza E, Brüggemann RJM, Buchheidt D, Cadranel J, Castagnola E, Chakrabarti A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Dimopoulos G, Fortun J, Gangneux JP, Garbino J, Heinz WJ, Herbrecht R, Heussel CP, Kibbler CC, Klimko N, Kullberg BJ, Lange C, Lehrnbecher T, Löffler J, Lortholary O, Maertens J, Marchetti O, Meis JF, Pagano L, Ribaud P, Richardson M, Roilides E, Ruhnke M, Sanguinetti M, Sheppard DC, Sinkó J, Skiada A, Vehreschild MJGT, Viscoli C, Cornely OA. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: Executive summary of the 2017 ESCMIDECMM-ERS guideline. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2017;24(S1):e1-e38
  72. 72. Panackal AA, Imhof A, Hanley EW, Marr KA. Aspergillus ustus infections among transplant recipients. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2006;12(3):403-408
  73. 73. Verweij PE, Varga J, Houbraken J, Rijs AJMM, Lunel FMV, Blijlevens NMA, Shea YR, Holland SM, Warris A, Melchers WJG, Samson RA. Emericella quadrilineata as cause of invasive aspergillosis. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2008;14(4):566-572
  74. 74. Coelho D, Silva S, Vale-Silva L, Gomes H, Pinto E, Sarmento A, Pinheiro MD. Aspergillus viridinutans: An agent of adult chronic invasive aspergillosis. Medical Mycology. 2011;49(7):755-759
  75. 75. Gyotoku H, Izumikawa K, Ikeda H, Takazono T, Morinaga Y, Nakamura S, Imamura Y, Nishino T, Miyazaki T, Kakeya H, Yamamoto Y, Yanagihara K, Yasuoka A, Yaguchi T, Ohno H, Miyzaki Y, Kamei K, Kanda T, Kohno S. A case of bronchial aspergillosis caused by Aspergillus udagawae and its mycological features. Medical Mycology. 2012;50(6):631-636
  76. 76. Hubka V, Kubatova A, Mallatova N, Sedlacek P, Melichar J, Skorepova M, Mencl K, Lyskova P, Sramkova B, Chudickova M, Kolarik PHM. Rare and new etiological agents revealed among 178 clinical Aspergillus strains obtained from Czech patients and characterized by molecular sequencing. Medical Mycology. 2012;50(6):601-610
  77. 77. Pelaéz T, Álvarez-Pérez S, Mellado E, Serrano D, Valerio M, Blanco JL, Garcia ME, Muñoz P, Cuenca-Estrella M, Bouza E. Invasive aspergillosis caused by cryptic Asper-gillus species: A report of two consecutive episodes in a patient with leukaemia. Journal of Medical Microbiology; 62(Pt 3):474-478
  78. 78. Yu J, Mu X, Li R. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis due to Emericella nidulans var. echinulata, successfully cured by voriconazole and micafungin. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013;51(4):1327-1329
  79. 79. Bastos VR, Santos DW, Padovan AC, Melo AS, Mazzolin Mde A, Camargo LF, Colombo AL. Early invasive pulmonary sspergillosis in a kidney transplant recipient caused by Aspergillus lentulus: First Brazilian report. Mycopathologia. 2015;179(3-4):299-305
  80. 80. Yoshida H, Seki M, Umeyama T, Urai M, Kinjo Y, Nishi I, Toyokawa M, Kaneko Y, Ohno H, Miyazaki Y, Tomono K. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus lentulus: Successful treatment of a liver transplant patient. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2015;21(6):479-481
  81. 81. Zarrinfar H, Mirhendi H, Fata A, Khodadadi H, Kordbacheh P. Detection of Aspergillus flavus and A. fumigatus in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of hematopoietic stem cell transplants and hematological malignancies patients by real-time polymerase chain reaction, nested PCR and mycological assays. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2015;8(1):e13744
  82. 82. Masih A, Singh PK, Kathuria S, Agarwal K, Meis JF, Chowdharya A. Identification by molecular methods and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry and antifungal susceptibility profiles of clinically significant rare Aspergillus species in a referral chest hospital in Delhi, India. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016;54(9):2354-2364
  83. 83. Taghizadeh-Armaki M, Hedayati MT, Moqarabzadeh V, Ansari S, Omran SM, Zarrin-far H, Saber S, Verweij PE, Denning DW, Seyedmousavi S. Effect of involved Asper-gillus species on galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with invasive aspergillosis. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017;66(7):898-904
  84. 84. Zanganeh E, Hossein Zarrinfar H, Rezaeetalab F, Fata AM, Tohidi M, Najafzadeh MJ, Alizadeh M, Seyedmousavi S. Predominance of non-fumigatus Aspergillus species among patients suspected to pulmonary aspergillosis in a tropical and subtropical region of the Middle East. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2018;116:296-300
  85. 85. Chrenkova V, Hubka V, Cetkovsky P, Kouba M, Weinbergerova B, Hornofova PLL, Hubacek P. Proven invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in stem cell transplant recipient due to Aspergillus sublatus, a cryptic species of A. nidulans. Mycopathologia. 2018;183(2):423-429
  86. 86. Suleyman G, Alangaden GJ. Nosocomial fungal infections. Epidemiology, infection control, and prevention. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2016;30(4):1023-1052
  87. 87. Pana ZD, Roilides E, Warris A, Groll AH, Zaoutis T. Epidemiology of invasive fungal disease in children. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. 2017;6(S1):S3-S11
  88. 88. López-Medrano F, Fernández-Ruiz M, Silva JT, Carver PL, van Delden C, Merino E, Pérez-Saez MJ, Montero M, Coussement J, de Abreu Mazzolin M, Cervera C, Santos L, Sabé N, Scemla A, Cordero E, Cruzado-Vega L, Martín-Moreno PL, Len O, Rudas E, Ponce de León A, Arriola M, Lauzurica R, David MD, González-Rico C, Henríquez-Palop F, Fortún J, Nucci M, Manuel O, Paño-Pardo JR, Montejo M, Vena A, Sánchez-Sobrino B, Mazuecos A, Pascual J, Horcajada JP, Lecompte T, Moreno A, Carratalá J, Blanes M, Hernández D, Hernández-Méndez DA, Fariñas MC, Perelló-Carrascosa M, Muñoz P, Andrés A, Aguado JM, the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI), the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplant Recipients (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (SEIMC), the Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS). Multinational case-control study of risk factors for the development of late invasive pulmonary aspergillosis following kidney transplantation. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2018;24(2):192-198
  89. 89. Sönmez A, Eksi F, Mustafa P, Haydaroglu Sahin H. Investigating the presence of fungal agents in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies using different microbiological, serological, and molecular methods. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2015;15(3):40-47
  90. 90. DePauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Muñoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008;46(2):1813-1821
  91. 91. Ambasta A, Carson J, Church DL. The use of biomarkers and molecular methods for the earlier diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Medical Mycology. 2015;53(6):531-557
  92. 92. Shah AA, Hazen KC. Diagnostic accuracy of histopathologic and cytopathologic examination of Aspergillus species. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2013;139(1):55-56
  93. 93. Arancia S, Sandini S, De Carolis E, Vella A, Sanguinetti M, Norelli S, De Bernardis F. Use of SCW4 gene primers in PCR methods for the identification of six medically important Aspergillus species. The New Microbiologica. 2016;39(4):274-286
  94. 94. Fernandez-Molina JV, Abad-Diaz-de-Cerio A, Sueiro-Olivares M, Pellon A, Ramirez-Garcia A, Garaizar J, Pemán J, Hernando FL, Rementeria A. Rapid and specific detection of section Fumigati and Aspergillus fumigates in human samples using a new multiplex real-time PCR. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2014;80:111-118
  95. 95. Challier S, Boyer S, Abachin E, Berche P. Development of a serum-based Taqman real-time PCR Assay for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2004;42(2):844-846
  96. 96. Hummel M, Spiess B, Kentouche K, Niggemann S, Böhm C, Reuter S, Kiehl M, Mörz H, Hehlmann R, Buchheidt D. Detection of Aspergillus DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with cerebral aspergillosis by a nested PCR assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2006;44(11):3989-3993
  97. 97. Faber J, Moritz N, Henninger N, Zepp F, Knuf M. Rapid detection of common pathogenic Aspergillus species by a novel real-time PCR approach. Mycoses. 2008;52(3):228-233
  98. 98. Bernal-Martínez L, Gago S, Buitrago MJ, Gomez-Lopez A, Rodríguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M. Analysis of performance of a PCR-based assay to detect DNA of Aspergillus fumigatus in whole blood and serum: A comparative study with clinical samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2011;49(10):3596-3599
  99. 99. Torelli R, Sanguinetti M, Moody A, Pagano L, Caira M, De Carolis E, Fuso L, De Pascale G, Bello G, Antonelli M, Fadda G, Posteraro B. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis by a commercial real-time PCR assay for Aspergillus DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from high-risk patients compared to a galactomannan enzyme immunoassay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2011;49(12):4273-4278
  100. 100. Walsh TJ, Wissel MC, Grantham KJ, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Kasai M, Francesconi A, Cotton MP, Hughes JE, Greene L, Bacher JD, Manna P, Salomoni M, Kleiboeker SB, Reddy SK. Molecular detection and species-specific identification of medically important Aspergillus species by real-time PCR in experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2011;49(12):4150-4157
  101. 101. Abad-Diaz-De-Cerio A, Fernandez-Molina JV, Ramirez-Garcia A, Sendino J, Hernando FL, Pemán J, Garaizar J, Rementeria A. The aspHS gene as a new target for detecting Aspergillus fumigatus during infections by quantitative real-time PCR. Medical Myco-logy. 2013;51(5):545-554
  102. 102. Reinwald M, Spiess B, Heinz WJ, Heussel CP, Bertz H, Cornely OA, Hahn J, Lehrnbecher T, Kiehl M, Laws HJ, Wolf HH, Schwerdtfeger R, Schultheis B, Burchardt A, Klein M, Dürken M, Claus B, Schlegel F, Hummel M, Hofmann WK, Buchheidt D. Aspergillus PCR-based investigation of fresh tissue and effusion samples in patients with suspected invasive aspergillosis enhances diagnostic capabilities. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013;51(12):4178-4185
  103. 103. White PL, Barnes RA, Springer J, Klingspor L, Cuenca-Estrella M, Morton CO, Lagrou K, Bretagne S, Melchers WJG, Mengoli C, Donnelly JP, Heinz WJ, Loeffler J, the EAPCRI. Clinical performance of Aspergillus PCR for testing serum and plasma: A study by the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2015;53(9):2832-2837
  104. 104. White PL, Posso RB, Barnes RA. Analytical and clinical evaluation of the PathoNostics AsperGenius assay for detection of invasive aspergillosis and resistance to azole antifungal drugs directly from plasma samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2017;55(8):2356-2366
  105. 105. Grancini A, Orlandi A, Lunghi G, Consonni D, Pozzi C, Rossetti V, Palleschi A, Fracchiolla N, Melada E, Savioli M, Arghittu M, Maiavacca R, Prigitano A. Evaluation of real time PCR Aspergillus spp. in bronchoalveolar lavage samples. The New Microbiologica. 2018;41(1):67-70
  106. 106. Tang Q, Tian S, Yu N, Zhang X, Jia X, Zhai H, Sun Q, Han L. Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid detection of Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016;54(4):950-955
  107. 107. Powers-Fletcher MV, Hanson KE. Molecular diagnostic testing for Aspergillus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016;54(11):2655-2660
  108. 108. White PL, Bretagne S, Klingspor L, Melchers WJ, McCulloch E, Schulz B, Finnstrom N, Mengoli C, Barnes RA, Donnelly JP, Loeffler J, European Aspergillus PCR Initiative. Aspergillus PCR: One step closer to standardization. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2010;48(4):1231-1240
  109. 109. Arvanitis M, Anagnostou T, Burgwyn Fuchs B, Caliendo AM, Mylonakis E. Molecular and nonmolecular diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2014;27(3):490-526
  110. 110. Suarez F, Lortholary O, Buland S, Rubio MT, Ghez D, Mahé V, Quesne G, Poirée S, Buzyn A, Varet B, Berche P, Bougnoux ME. Detection of circulating Aspergillus fumigatus DNA by real-time PCR assay of large serum volumes improves early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in high-risk adult patients under hematologic surveillance. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2008;46(11):3772-3777
  111. 111. Springer J, White PL, Hamilton S, Michel D, Barnes RA, Einsele H, Loffler J. Comparison of performance characteristics of Aspergillus PCR in testing a range of blood-based samples in accordance with international methodological recommendations. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016;54(3):705-711
  112. 112. Chong GLM, van de Sande WWJ, Dingemans GJH, Gaajetaan GR, Vonk AG, Hayette MP, van Tegelen DWE, Simons GFM, Rijnders BJA. Validation of a new Aspergillus real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Aspergillus and azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2015;53(3):868-874
  113. 113. Mikulska M, Furfaro E, Viscoli C. Non-cultural methods for the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy. 2015;13(1):103-117
  114. 114. Alanio A, Menotti J, Gits-Muselli M, Hamane S, Denis B, Rafoux E, Peffault de la Tour R, Touratier S, Bergeron A, Guigue N, Bretagne S. Circulating Aspergillus fumigatus DNA is quantitatively correlated to galactomannan in serum. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:2040
  115. 115. Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, Chen W. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(16):6241-6246
  116. 116. Pfeiffer CD, Fine JP, Safdar N. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using a galactomannan assay: A meta-analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2006;42(10):1417-1427
  117. 117. Leeflang MM, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Visser CE, Scholten RJ, Hooft L, Bijlmer HA, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C. Galactomannan detection for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008;12:CD007394
  118. 118. Hachem RY, Kontoyiannis DP, Chemaly RF, Jiang Y, Reitzel R, Raad I. Utility of galactomannan enzyme immunoassay and (1,3) beta- D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: Low sensitivity for Aspergillus fumigatus infection in hematologic malignancy patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2009;47(1):129-133
  119. 119. Quindós G. New microbiological techniques for the diagnosis of invasive mycoses caused by filamentous fungi. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2006;12(Suppl 7):40-52
  120. 120. Tortorano AM, Esposto MC, Prigitano A, Grancini A, Ossi C, Cavanna C, Cascio G. Cross-reactivity of Fusarium spp. in the Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2012;50(3):1051-1053
  121. 121. Wheat LJ, Hackett E, Durkin M, Connolly P, Petraitiene R, Walsh TJ, Knox K, Hage C. Histoplasmosis-associated cross-reactivity in the BioRad Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2007;14(5):638-640
  122. 122. Latgé JP, Kobayashi H, Debeaupuis JP, Diaquin M, Sarfati J, Wieruszeski JM. Chemical and immunological characterization of the extracellular galactomannan of Aspergillus fumigatus. Infection and Immunity. 1994;62(12):5424-5433
  123. 123. Stynen D, Sarfati J, Goris A, Prévost MC, Lesourd M, Kamphuis H, Darras V, Latgé JP. Rat monoclonal antibodies against Aspergillus galactomannan. Infection and Im-munity. 1992;60(6):2237-2245
  124. 124. Stynen D, Goris A, Sarfati J, Latge JP. A new sensitive sandwich enzymelinked immunosorbent assay to detect galactofuran in patients with invasive aspergillosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1995;33(2):497-500
  125. 125. Mennink-Kersten MA, Donnelly JP, Verweij PE. Detection of circulating galactomannan for the diagnosis and management of invasive aspergillosis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2004;4(6):349-357
  126. 126. Maschmeyer G, Calandra T, Singh T, Wiley J, Perfect J. Invasive mould infections: A multi-disciplinary update. Medical Mycology. 2009;47(6):571-583
  127. 127. Klont RR, Mennink-Kersten MA, Ruegebrink D, Rijs AJ, Blijlevens NM, Donnelly JP, Verweij PE. Paradoxical increase in circulating Aspergillus antigen during treatment with caspofungin in a patient with pulmonary aspergillosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2006;43(3):e23-e25
  128. 128. Zou M, Tang L, Zhao S, Zhao Z, Chen L, Chen P, Huang Z, Li J, Chen L, Fan X. Systematic review and meta-analysis of detecting galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43347
  129. 129. Sulahian A, Porcher R, Bergeron A, Touratier S, Raffoux E, Menotti J, Derouin F, Ribaud P. Use and limits of (1-3)-β-D-glucan assay (Fungitell), compared to galactomannan determination (Platelia Aspergillus), for diagnosis of invasive sspergillosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2014;52(7):2328-2333
  130. 130. Pizarro S, Ronco AM, Gotteland M. β-glucanos: ¿qué tipos existen y cuáles son sus beneficios en la salud? Revista Chilena de Nutricion. 2014;41(3):439-446
  131. 131. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnally JP, Stenvens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008;46(12):1813-1821
  132. 132. Theel ES, Doern CD. β-D-Glucan testing is important for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013;51(11):3478-3483
  133. 133. Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Alexander BD, Kett DH, Vasquez J, Pappas PG, Saek F, Ketchum PA, Wingard J, Schiff R, Tamura H, Finkelman MA, Rex JH. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the (1→3)-ß-D-Glucan assay as an aid to diagnosis of fungal infections in humans. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;41(5):654-659
  134. 134. De Vlieger G, Lagrou K, Maertens J, Verbeken E, Meersseman W, Van Wijngaerden E. (1→3)-ß-D-Glucan detection as a diagnostic test for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised critically ill patients with symptoms of respiratory infection: An autopsy-based study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2011;49(11):3783-3787
  135. 135. Lamoth F, Cruciani M, Mengoli C, Castagnola E, Lortholary O, Richardson M, Marchetti O. Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-3). ß-Glucan antigenemia assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies from the Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-3). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2012;54(5):633-643
  136. 136. Obayashi T, Negishi K, Suzuki T, Funata N. Reappraisal of the serum (13)-beta-D-glucan assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections—A study based on autopsy cases from 6 years. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008;46(12):1864-1870
  137. 137. Kanda H, Kubo K, Hamasak K, Kanda Y, Nakao A, Kitamura T, Fujita T, Yamamoto K, Mimura T. Influence of various hemodialysis membranes on the plasma (1-3)-β-d-glucan level. Kidney International. 2001;60(1):319-323
  138. 138. Marty FM, Lowry CM, Lempitski SJ, Kubiak DW, Finkelman MA, Baden LR. Reacti-vity of (1-3)-β-D-glucan assay with commonly used intravenous antimicrobials. Anti-microbial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2006;50(10):3450-3453
  139. 139. Pickering JW, Sant HW, Bowles CAP, Roberts WL, Woods GL. Evaluation of a (1→3)-ß-D-Glucan assay for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005;43(12):5957-5962
  140. 140. de Heer K, van der Schee MP, Zwinderman K, van den Berk IA, Visser CE, van Oers R, Sterk PJ. Electronic nose technology for detection of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in prolonged chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: A proof-of-principle study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013;51(5):1490-1495
  141. 141. Chambers ST, Syhre M, Murdoch DR, McCartin F, Epton MJ. Detection of 2-pentylfuran in the breath of patients with Aspergillus fumigatus. Medical Mycology. 2009;47(5):468-476
  142. 142. Gerritsen MG, Brinkman P, Escobar N, Bos LD, de Heer K, Meijer MM. Profiling of volatile organic compounds produced by clinical Aspergillus isolates using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Medical Mycology. 2018;56(2):253-256
  143. 143. Syhre M, Scotter JM, Chambers ST. Investigation into the production of 2-pentylfuran by Aspergillus fumigatus and other respiratory pathogens in vitro and human breath samples. Medical Mycology. 2008;46(3):209-215
  144. 144. Lewis NS. Comparisons between mammalian and artificial olfaction based on arrays of carbon black-polymer composite vapor detectors. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2004;37(9):663-672
  145. 145. Wilson AD, Baietto M. Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications. Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(1):1105-1176
  146. 146. Perl T, Jünger M, Vautz W, Nolte J, Kuhns M, Zepelin MB, Quintel M. Detection of characteristic metabolites of Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida species using ion mobility spectrometry–metabolic profiling by volatile organic compounds. Mycoses. 2011;54(6):e828-e837
  147. 147. Barton RC. Laboratory diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: From diagnosis to prediction of outcome. Scientifica. 2013;2013:29
  148. 148. Ibáñez-Martínez E, Ruiz-Gaitán A, Pemán-García J. Update on the diagnosis of invasive fungal infection. Revista Española de Quimioterapia. 2017;30(Suppl 1):16-21

Written By

María del Rocío Reyes-Montes, Esperanza Duarte-Escalante, María Guadalupe Frías-De-León, Erick Obed Martínez-Herrera and Gustavo Acosta-Altamirano

Submitted: March 2nd, 2018 Reviewed: May 14th, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018