Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Polymeric Micro- and Nanosystems for Wood Artifacts Preservation

Written By

Rodica-Mariana Ion, Ramona-Marina Grigorescu, Lorena Iancu, Paul Ghioca and Nicoleta Radu

Submitted: 14 February 2018 Reviewed: 26 May 2018 Published: 05 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.79135

From the Edited Volume

New Uses of Micro and Nanomaterials

Edited by Marcelo Rubén Pagnola, Jairo Useche Vivero and Andres Guillermo Marrugo

Chapter metrics overview

1,297 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The complex methods of diagnosis investigation of the wood artifacts state and proper materials for their protection against decay are very important goals in cultural heritage. This chapter focuses on the recent trends in micro- and nanostructured polymer systems for application in cultural heritage and on wood preservation, especially. The synthesis, properties, and applications, as well as the relevant analysis techniques to reveal the structures and properties of polymer systems, are discussed, too. To overcome the specific problems that exist for wood artifacts, some aspects should be treated: effects of the environmental factors, as moisture and pollutant absorption into the wood fibers, over-exposure effect of sun or artificial light sources, biological attack of different microorganisms, and the effects of the protective and decorative coatings.


  • polymers
  • nanoparticles
  • PEG
  • SEBS
  • ZnO

1. Introduction

The conservation of cultural heritage is essential for humanity in order to preserve the cultural background of a people. Under this context, since most often old wooden objects present serious biological or chemical degradation which affects more or less the structural integrity, the mechanical resistance of the wooden material and their level of the authenticity are reduced [1, 2]. As a natural polymer, wood is composed of cellulose, hemicellulose (rich in free hydroxyl groups, being able to contribute to the hygroscopicity of wood), and lignin (hydrophobic heteropolymer). The delignification will weaken the water resistance capacity of wood. By heating, the hygroscopicity, moisture uptake rate, and sorption hysteresis will be reduced, due to hemicellulose degradation [3].

Also, wood is an environmentally friendly material, a structural organic tissue, which consists of cellulose fibers embedded in a lignin matrix together with some minor components: terpenoids, resin and fatty acids, pectin, proteins, and inorganics [4].

Wood is hydrophilic; the physico-mechanical properties decrease with increasing the relative humidity below the saturation point, and the surface degradation is accelerated in weathering conditions. Wood quality is mainly influenced by the following external factors: high humidity and oxygen presence, (micro)biological organisms such as fungi, molds, insects, temperature, and electromagnetic radiation (UV, IR, high-energy β or γ, and so forth) [5].

Taking into account these principles, the traditional conservation-restoration methods that in some cases can produce irreversible effects on wooden objects over time have been replaced with modern procedures due to the intensive development of nanotechnologies [6]. The wood protection with micro- and nanopolymeric systems exceeds the disadvantage of multilayer coatings that could affect the optical properties and the surface quality and also reduce the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) [7].

The degradation induced by UV light represents the main drawback and induces the organic compound decomposition due to the increase in photon’s energy that breaks the chemical bonds. An inefficient polymer coating can lead to loss in mechanical properties and integrity of the matrix and wood discoloration due to lignin degradation. New composite materials were developed, as aromatic impregnating agents (insecticides or fungicides) such as creosote, halogenated carbamates, benzothiazoles, pentachlorophenol, (alkyl) imidazoles, bis (tributyltin) oxide, or salt-based impregnates such as borates, quinolinolates, naphthenates of copper, zinc or chromated copper arsenate-based preservatives (CCA) in several commercial variants and so forth [8, 9, 10], fluoroalkyl functional oligomeric silane system [11], short-chain amino silicones [12], alkoxysilanes with different organic groups [R’Si(OR″)] [13], zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles dispersed in maleic anhydride-modified polypropylene (MAPP) [14], and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles [15, 16, 17, 18, 19].

During the last decades, an intensification of historical wood artifacts preservation researches has intensified, and the new materials should present reversibility, must be compatible with all the materials encapsulated by the object, must not leech from wood, must be ecologic and biodegradable, and the “artistic” materials are to be treated as a whole [20]. Nanotechnology may provide interesting alternatives to develop new and efficient wood treatments to overcome technologies less feasibly used in the past decades to improve wood properties like heat treatment, chemical modification and impregnation, methods that can expand the dimensional stability, and resistance against microorganism [16]. Due to their very small dimensions (less than 100 nm), the nanomaterials have new properties, especially improved chemical reactivity and high mechanical properties. The nanostructures confer hardness and high wear resistance to the protected wood artifacts in some measure due to the increased density of the material [21, 22].


2. Conservation of the recovered marine shipwrecks

The unanimously used method of conserving the marine shipwrecks consisted of water replacing from the wooden material with polyethylene glycol (PEG), obviating the uncontrolled dehydration that would cause drastic damage of artifacts by fracturing the fragile wood cells [21, 23, 24, 25]. In such preserved shipwrecks, an accumulation of sulfur and iron compounds was observed, leading to the acidity increase which facilitates the cellulose depolymerization by the destruction of cellular wood walls and residual lignin degradation [23, 26, 27]. The increase of the system acidity can also produce PEG degradation into acidic byproducts that can act as ionic transporters [28, 29, 30]. For the preservation of these shipwrecks, the wood deacidification by using neutralizing alkaline compounds was required. The studies established that the maximal effect of acidity neutralization of archeological wood is achieved with nanodispersed alkaline hydroxides (20–150 nm) in alcoholic or PEG solutions, the most used being Na and Mg hydroxide. The alkaline nanoparticles dispersed into the polymer solution (low-molecular weight PEG: 200–2000 g/mol) deeply penetrate the degraded cellulosic cells, completely neutralizing the acids resulted from the wood degradation and further inhibiting the cellulose hydrolysis [21, 31, 32]. The deposition of calcium and magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles in the wood wall cells inhibits the oxidation of wood, thus increasing the conservation degree of the shipwrecks [22].


3. Historical wood artifacts conservation

The historical wood artifacts show different degrees of chemical and biological degradation that weakens the material resistance, and their physical and structural consolidation is essential in preserving these objects. The use of polymeric resins, which must have a good compatibility with the wood material and a high stability to environmental degradation, has an important contribution in the old wood objects consolidation [33, 34, 35, 36]. The consolidation effect of the polymer resins is significantly improved by the nanodispersion in these solutions of mineral materials with reinforcing effect (especially metal oxides) [37]. The nanoinsertions of these nanocomposites into the wood support, besides the role of physical consolidation, also provide an important increase in resistance to oxidative and biological degradation (fungus mildew) and increased flame retardancy [38, 39, 40, 41]. The most suitable polymers for wood preservation are aliphatic and aliphatic epoxy acrylic resins due to their stability to oxidative degradation, their adhesion, and processability. The most intensely used polymers for the preservation of modern and archaic wood articles are the polyacrylates, the low-molecular weight ethyl acrylate (Paraloid B 72) a metallic copolymer, recently used as composites with nanometric materials, being representative [42, 43]. The most used nanocomposites of polymeric resins are obtained with metal oxide nanoinsertions mainly ZnO, MgO, TiO2 and metals Cu, Au and Ag [44, 45, 46, 47].


4. Study case

Under such context, poly(styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene) has the advantage of being able to be used as the base material for polymer films on the one hand and the advantage of high stability, good mechanical properties, and resistance to biological attack. Also, its composite with ZnO increases the efficacy of this polymer. ZnO has been reported as a substance that provides an increased wood stability against degradation due to UV radiation because ZnO has the ability to block UV rays, both UVA and UVB, acting as physical filters that reflect or disperse UV radiation.

For the polymeric composition, poly(styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene) block copolymer (SEBS) grafted with maleic anhydride (MA), mixed with ZnO, has been used for the preservation of wood surfaces by spraying the pretreated wood surfaces. A slight color change could be observed at the fir wood treated with SEBS-MA sample, because the consolidant retention, the penetration depth, and the uniformity of the consolidant distribution into the material are parameters that influence the consolidation effectiveness.

The protective behavior of these polymers on these samples was put into evidence by specific analytical techniques: Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), chromatic analysis, and gloss index analysis [48, 49, 50, 51].

The first change that indicates the wood degradation is identified by lignin degradation, through quinone compounds formed responsible for a yellowed surface. These compounds increase the surface roughness, the chemical bonds are weaker, and macroscopic cracks are formed [52]. The treatment of wood with different consolidants causes the alteration of the spectra aspect by the appearance or intensification of some characteristic absorption bands.

The temperature aging is characteristic to a reduction in hydroxyl groups, an increase of the unconjugated carbonyl groups, and an apparent slight increase of lignin. The different behavior of the studied wood species may be explained by their different chemical composition, especially hemicelluloses, lignin, and extractives content.

The color parameters that can indicate the wood change are L* (degree of color lightness), a* (green-red chromatic coordinate), b* (blue-yellow chromatic coordinate), and ΔE (color varia-tion and stability) that can be calculated using Eq. (1)


where ΔE*, Δa*, and Δb* are the differences between the sample specimens and the reference specimen; ΔL* is the change of the light in the point, on different time intervals, compared with the initial value: ΔL* = L1*Linitial*; Δa* is the chromatic deviation of the a* coordinates (red and green colors) of the same point, on different time intervals, compared to the initial value: Δa* = ΔL* = a1* − ainitial*; Δb* is the chromatic deviation of the b* coordinates (yellow and blue colors), respecting the same mathematic formula: Δb* = b1* − binitial* [53].

ΔE* value is an evaluation criterion of the overall change color. If the value is smaller than 0.2, the difference is not visible. A small difference in color is given by a value between 0.2 and 2. Between 2 and 3, respectively, between 3 and 6 highlight a color change visible with high-quality, respectively, a medium-quality filter. At a value over 6 of ΔE*, the color is highly changed or even different [54].

The positive values of Δa* after 120 h of irradiation indicate a tendency of both wood surfaces to become reddish. But when the exposure time increases, the values of Δa* become negative, which is associated with a tendency of both wood surfaces to become greenish. Lignin degradation leads to chromophoric groups formation, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups, which affect the color change mechanism [55]. The process of lignin degradation is accentuated by oxygen and moisture presence, decreasing the coating adhesion due to low-molecular degradation products. In these conditions, an efficient coating must respect more requirements, namely enough filter efficiency until 440 nm, oxygen barrier, water vapor permeation, and abrasion, scratch and impact resistance [56].

The color changes in time can be highlighted by the chromatic variations, namely ΔL*—variation of lightness and Δb*—variation of the blue-yellow chromatic coordinates. In [56], the authors presented these variations of acrylic-ZnO coating for wood. ΔL* increase from −20.09 for the wood sample to −5.66 for the sample of impregnated wood with 4% ZnO, Δb*, the coordinate that marks the wood yellowness after UV exposure, a decrease from 15.27 until 0.99 after impregnation with the UV absorber (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Chromatic parameters of fir wood samples after irradiation (60 min).

Main absorption bands, cm1Peak assignment [58]
3300Stretching of ▬OH groups
2895C▬H aliphatic
1730–1740Stretching of carbonyl group
1638Bending of water (the moisture content)
1596 and 1512Lignin aromatic ring
1423Asymmetric C▬H deformation
1364–1375Symmetric bending of methyl groups in lignin and hemicellulose, bending of hydroxyl groups of polysaccharides
1157Symmetric stretching of bridging oxygen
1025–1029C▬O in cellulose pyranose ring
809 and 670Aromatic C▬H from lignin

Table 1.

Main FTIR absorption bands of wood.

Under such context, the gloss parameters could reflect the polymer quality, by irradiation, a small decrease is observed, most probably due to the polymer degradation, faster for SEBS-MA than SEBS-MA + ZnO (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Gloss parameter of fir wood samples under different conditions.

Auclair et al. concluded during their study [57] that ZnO is a more efficient photo-protector for wood than CuO. As polymer matrix, urethane-acrylate systems were used. In case of polymer-ZnO nanocomposites, the discoloration of clear-coated wood exposed outdoors was reduced and the higher increase in gloss was obtained.

The photo-yellowing and UV degradation of wood surfaces were overcome by coating with ZnO-maleic anhydride-modified polypropylene (MAPP)-polyurethane transparent nanosystems [14]. The acid anhydride groups of MAPP ensure the compatibility with OH groups from wood.

Figure 3.

FTIR spectra of fir wood samples.

FTIR analysis can be used for solid wood samples being a fast-spectroscopic method and requiring an easy sample preparation. Information regarding the wood degradation can be obtained based on composition, functional groups, and molecular structure [52, 58, 59]. The degradation mechanism depending on the wood chemical composition (hemicellulose, lignin, and extractives content) is reflected in the chemical changes regarding the reduction of OH groups, increasing of unconjugated carbonyl groups, and formation of aromatic carbonyl conjugated groups as quinoid structures [60] (Table 1) (Figure 3).

Using polymeric micro- or nanosystems, the moisture content decreases. Humidity along with density is the physical factor that influences the physical, mechanical, and dimensional properties of wood and also influences the wood structure degradation. According to ISO 13061-1 [61] and Eq. (2), the moisture content is calculated for both native and treated wood:


where w is the moisture content [%], mw is the sample weight measured at a certain moisture [kg], and m0 is the weight of the sample oven-dried [kg].

As the humidity increases in the wood cell membranes, most of the mechanical properties of wood decrease, except for elasticity which increases. In the saturated air, the steady-state humidity will reach a maximum, which is precisely the same saturation humidity (the saturation point of the fiber). At this point, the sorption stops as a phenomenon of wood hygroscopicity, and the desorption begins if the external environment conditions change. Because relative air humidity is a function of temperature and humidity pressure, it results that the equilibrium humidity is directly dependent on relative humidity and temperature and, depending on them, there is a whole range of equilibrium humidities. Curves describing the evolution of sorption and desorption processes of water are not overlap, leading to the hysteresis area. Hysteresis indicates less water retention of dried capillaries as compared to those of the membrane in the wet state, due to the fact that the cell membranes suffer some deformations remaining during sorption. Hysteresis has a special role in drying and steaming wood as well as explaining the internal tensions. Water repellency can be improved by coating with natural wax [62], paraffin wax [63], palm oil [64], and esterified organosolv lignin [65].

ZnO is a suitable component for UV protection in coatings. Dispersion in acrylic polymers leads to a reduced yellowing and improved optical properties after artificially weathering for up to 1500 h [56]. Shellac nanosystems were studied in [66] as wood coating and different property modifications were observed using various nanofillers. For shellac-ZnO systems, the inhibition or the slowing down of the UV degradation was obtained. ZrO2 ensures an increased coating hardness. In both cases, the color, film-forming ability, water repellence, and adhesion were preserved.

UV-waterborne polyurethane containing different nanoparticles in order to increase the wood coating was studied. Thus, alumina, silica, ZnO, and CuO were used [7, 67]. The PU coating glass transition temperature is enhanced using alumina and silica that decrease the chains mobility at nanoparticles interface. The water and UV barrier properties are also increased. ZnO ensures a good photo-protection and clear-coated wood.

The coatings without nanoparticles in their composition present photo-yellowing and wood surface degradation when exposed to UV light. Dispersion of ZnO nanoparticles in MAPP and PU coatings restricted the color changes and photodegradation of wood polymers [14].

TiO2 nanoparticles can impart hydrophobic or hydrophilic properties to the material, fungicidal, and bactericidal protection and present photo-catalytic activity. Using TiO2 as coating for wood items ensures anisotropy, wettability, and UV protection [46, 68, 69, 70, 71].

Zanatta et al. obtained the nanoparticles by a hydrothermal method using microwaves, and then the wood pretreated with chromated copper borate was coated with TiO2. The wood maintained the natural color and the fungi resistance was improved [15].

The improvement of UV resistance using anatase TiO2 was demonstrated in [17] when micro- and nanoparticles were impregnated on acacia hybrid wood. The exposure of the treated wood at UV radiation 960 h did not lead to color changes.

Obtaining stable and uniform dispersed coating is an effectiveness indicator. Polypropylene glycol can be considered a good solvent for metal oxides (ZnO, CeO2 and TiO2) nanoparticles films. An increased UV resistance and thus a decrease in lignin degradation were observed [72] (Figures 46).

TiO2 coatings are a good moisture barrier for wood. If the treated wood is exposed to a 20–60% relative humidity (RH), the weight maintained constant, and at an RH between 60 and 90%, the mass increased with only 6%. TiO2 coatings drastically decreased the change in anisotropic swelling of wood [19]. Obtaining films with controlled physico-chemical characteristics broadens their field of application. TiO2 films may have different morphologies and wettability depending on the precursor pH (1–14). This characteristic may be a great advantage in using the nanoparticles coatings in various humidity environments [16].

Figure 4.

The fracture of the polymeric film from fir wood.

Figure 5.

The fracture of the polymeric film from fir wood + SEBS-MA.

Figure 6.

The fracture of the polymeric film from fir wood + SEBS-MA + ZnO.

Impregnation with micronized copper quaternary (MCQ) and UV absorbing acrylic resin (UVA-acrylic) was found to be a good method to increase the wood resistance to weathering conditions, and good visual, physical, and chemical properties were obtained [73].

Nkeuwa et al. [7] studied the behavior of UV-cured multilayer coatings where only the top coat consists of a nanoparticle—nanoclay with the RH variation. The color and gloss of initial, during, and after accelerated aging coatings were investigated. The color of coated samples does not present visual changes during and after aging. The studied color parameters (ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*, and ΔE*) increase with increasing RH while the gloss retention is lowered. At high RH, significant changes are observed.

Other additives used for wood protection are the fire retardants (FR). A good flame retardancy can be obtained using phosphorous, boron, and silicone. Phosphorous FR can exhibit both condensed and/or gas phase action and can generate less toxic gases and smoke during combustion [74]. Systems containing both phosphorous and nitrogen components are good substitutes for halogenated FR due to their synergistic effect [38, 39]. In [40], nitrogen-phosphorous FR dispersed in poly(sodium silicate-aluminum dihydrogen phosphate) (PSADP) was used to reduce poplar wood hygroscopicity and to improve its fire resistance. These two components present a synergic effect on the two properties being distributed over the inner surface and penetrate the cell cavities of wood.


5. Microbial degradation of wood

The degradation of wood materials depends on physico-chemical and biological factors such as temperature, humidity, nutrients, and the type of wood (hardwood or softwood), specific to the environment in which they are exposed. Among the biological factors, insects, macro- and micromycetes, and bacteria, the microbial load of the environment, corroborated with humidity and temperature, plays an important role in the biodegradation processes of this material. Of the microbiological agents, the most common types of biodegradation are those caused by fungi and bacteria, which manage to degrade the wood through enzymatic mechanisms with the enzymes they are secreting. The fungi types that attack wood materials are divided into three classes:

  1. White-root fungi can degrade all cellular components by using nonspecific enzymes that they secrete, but in a first stage, they degrade the lignin using hemicellulose as a carbon source. Following the degradation with these types of fungi, the attacked surfaces get a whitish appearance [75]. This class includes macromycetes such as Phanerochaete chrysosporium (Sporotrichum pulverulentum), Phanerochaete sordida, Phlebia radiata, and Phlebia tremellosa [76] which is able to degrade wood lignin to CO2 and water.

  2. Brown-root fungi generally degrade cellulose and hemicellulose from wood, but they also degrade lignin. The mechanisms used by brown rot fungi in the biodegradation of wood are both enzymatic and non-enzymatic. These micromycetes do not produce lignin degradation enzymes but have a mechanism that results in lignin modification and slow reduction of lignin content in the attacked wood. This class includes macromycete species as Serpula lacrymans, Postia placenta, Gloeophyllum trabeum, and Tyromyces palustris. Surfaces attacked by fungi of this class get a brownish look [77]. Studies on wood sample of Pinus sylvestris and Populus euramericana showed that after vacuum treatment with inorganic or organic preservatives, which contain Cr6+, Cu2+, As5+, organic salts of ammonia and N-alkylbenzyldimethylammonium chloride, inoculated with macromycetes from the species S. lacrymans 1, S. lacrymans 2, P. placenta, G. trabeum, and T. palustris, reveal a substantial reduction in wood loss due to the inhibition of the biological activity of the macromycetes tested [77].

  3. Soft root fungi, or micromycetes, from which the most popular are Penicillium chrysogenum and Aspergillus niger, perform deterioration from edge to center of wood. In a study of wood artifacts from Islamic Art Museum, the Grand Egyptian Museum and Saqqara necropolis [78], two species of of the genus Alternaria, 15 species of Aspergillus, three species of the genus Cladosporium, six species of Penicillium, two species of Trichophyton, along with species of the genus Cladosporium, Chaetomium, Phoma, Stemphylium, Ulocladium, and Syncephalastrum, were found most of them with cellulolytic enzymatic activity, able to degrade the wood [78]. Their frequency on the analyzed artifacts was between 7.1 and 35.7%; the most common fungal species being (Figure 7) Aspergillus. brasiliensis, Aspergillus flavus var. columnaris, Penicillium sp.2, Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus versicolor, Cladosporium sp.1, and Penicillium sp.3, the rest being encountered at a frequency of 7.1% [78].

Figure 7.

Fungal species frequency (%) (micromycetes) identified on biodeteriorated wood artifacts, from Islamic Art Museum, Saqqara necropolis, Grand Egyptian Museum, Cheops Solar Boat [78].

In vitro tests performed in order to establish the biological action of three types of inorganic nanomaterials with Ag, Ti, and Cu (AgNPs, CuNPs, TiNPs) on fungi and bacteria (Bacillus alvei, Short Bacilli, Bacilli Spore Former, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus) isolated from funerary masks of degraded wood from Saqqara showed that the most effective of the tested materials is AgNPs, followed by CuNPs and TiNPs [79], both for fungi and bacteria (Figures 8 and 9). The action mechanism of AgNP includes processes such as adherence to microbial cells, penetration into cells, free radical generation, DNA and RNA damage [79, 80].

Figure 8.

Effect of inorganic nanomaterial with AgNPs, CuNPs, TiNPs, on some fungal and bacterial strain isolated from wood artifacts from Saqqara necropole. Concentration of nanoproduct applied: = 10 μg/mL [79].

Figure 9.

Effect of inorganic nanomaterial with AgNPs, CuNPs, TiNPs, on some fungal and bacterial strain isolated from wood artifacts from Saqqara necropole. Concentration of nanoproduct applied: = 15 μg/mL [79].

Another study performed on China’s degraded wood objects [81] found in the Dingtao King Mausoleum during the Dynasty West Dynasty (206 BC-25 AC) revealed a massive degradation of the wooden objects. Determinations have shown that the degradation is caused by fungi. DNA sequencing of isolated fungi showed that there are 114 genres of fungi. However, in all samples, the most abundant genus was Hypochnicium sp., which represent 98.61–99.45% of the total of the fungal community.

Wood objects exhibited in museums are subject to deterioration of biological agents. The wood Jesuit sculptures from South America exposed at the Museum of Natural Sciences of La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina, are subject to the biodegradation [82]. Determinations made on a strip of degraded wood of the Cedrela fissilis species led to the identification of two fungi species: Nigrospora sphaerica and Chaetomium globosum. Chaetomium is a recognized macromycete for its ability to destroy wood, but for Nigrospora sphaerica, very few things are known regarding its effects on wood [82]. Bacteria are another class of biological agents that can affect the structure of the wood. Thus, in studies conducted to find an optimal method of disinfection and protection of wood surfaces in the historical area of Auschwitz-Birkenau II, bacterial species such as Pseudomonas fluorescens, Staphylococcus equorum, and Bacillus cereus have been isolated from this site. In terms of fungi, the following species have been identified on the wood surfaces: Alternaria alternata, Chaetomium globosum, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Engyodontium album, and Penicillium citreonigrum.

In vivo tests, made on new pieces of white poplar wood, previously sterilized and treated with a mixture of cultures of bacteria and/or fungi, were aimed at the evaluation of the number of living microorganisms on the surfaces (bacteria) and the estimation of the percentage from the wood surface altered by fungal activity, as well as the changes in color and luminance of the treated samples. The study reveals that the best commercially available biocidal products are B, ABM-1, and R 101 (Figure 10) (product B containing 24% benzyl alkyl (C12–16) dimethylammonium chlorides, 5% boric acid ABM-1 contains N-3-aminopropyl-1,3-propanediamine, N,N-dialkyl (C10–C16)-N-methyl N-polyoxyethylene ammonium propionate, N,N-dialkyl (C10–C14) [3-dodecanoylamino)] propyl dimethyl ammonium acetate; product R101 contains 40–60% N,N-dodecyl-N,N-dimethylammonium chloride and 20–25% isopropanol). The best results were obtained for product R101, followed by AM-1, applied by spray or fogging exposure. The color (ΔE) and luminance (ΔL) tests showed that for the treatments chosen, no remarkable differences compared to the untreated control were observed (Figure 11). In another study, the effects of some aqueous dispersions of silver or zinc nanoparticles (AgNPs, ZnNPs) to air and liquid permeability of Paulownia wood samples exposed to Trametes versicolor were assessed [83]. The wood samples were heat treated at 100 and 150°C, after which they were exposed to T. versicolor. Permeability values were measured before and after exposure to fungal activity. The results obtained showed significant decreases in permeability in all treatments after exposure to fungi (Figure 12). The permeability difference was related to the growth and accumulation of fungal hyphae along the lumen vessels, which block the fluid transfer. The best results were obtained by heat treatment at 150°C, followed by impregnation with ZnNps or AgNps which significantly inhibited the growth of the microorganism, reducing the mass loss of impregnated wood samples subjected to fungal attack [83].

Figure 10.

Biocidal effect of some commercial products on the wood samples inoculated with fungal strains, by spraying or fogging [84].

Figure 11.

The color and luminance difference of wood samples after biocidic product applications. ΔE = difference of color; ΔL = difference of luminance [84].

Figure 12.

Specific air permeability in wood samples treated with ZnNps and/or AgNps nanomaterials after exposure to action of rot-white fungus Trametes versicolor [83].

Regarding methods of treatment against wood degradation, there are currently several methods of protection against decomposition caused by biological agents. From these, organic compounds based on quaternary ammonium salts were the most used. Studies conducted to determine the antimicrobial activity of three biocides against Pseudomonas fluorescens, Staphylococcus equorum, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus muralis, Sporosarcina aquimarina, Rhodococcus fascians, and some fungi species such as Chaetomium globosum, Penicillium citreonigrum, Cladosporium cladosporioides 1, Acremonium strictum, Aspergillus fumigatus and Cladosporium cladosporioides 2, all isolated from wood or brick surfaces, showed that species such as Staphylococcus equorum, Bacillus cereus, Sporosarcina aquimarina, Rhodococcus fascieni, Cladosporium cladosporioides, and Acremonium strictum have a high susceptibility to quaternary ammonium biocides [85]. Thus, the wood objects with a historical value can be efficiently disinfected by three times application of a biocide (30% v/v) which contains dodecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, citric acid, propiconazole, and propanol [85]. The mechanism of action of ammonium quaternary salts is based on the dissolution of certain sites from cell walls, which results in the loss of microbial cell integrity, followed by exposure of cell content and release of the material out of the cell, followed by degradation of proteins, of nucleic acids, and cell lysis, the latter caused by autolytic enzymes [85].

Protecting degradation of wood by biological agents can also be done without biocides based on quaternary ammonium salts. A wood protection variant is based on the application of a titanium isopropoxide gel and ammonium cerium nitrate as a stabilizer for wood treatment [86]. As a mechanism of action, it is assumed that the hydrolysis of titanium isopropoxide is initiated by the wood-based OH groups as well as by the moisture in the cellular wood wall resulting in a layer of cerium-doped TiO2 which seals the wood surface and thus limiting the direct exposure of micro- or nanopores of wood to fungal hydrolytic enzymes. Studies conducted on Norway spruce have shown that this method can be protected against degradation by biological agents such as Gloeophyllum trabeum, Rhodonia placenta, and Coniophora puteana.


6. Conclusions

The maintaining of wood quality in time is usually achieved with the help of preservatives. These are individual chemical compounds or mixtures that make wood less susceptible to attack from a large variety of degradative factors or organisms. These organisms include insects, marine borers, and various types of fungi such as stain and decay. Some of these chemicals are effective against a wide range of organisms, while others are very specific and protect wood from only one type of organism.



This chapter received financial support from MCI-UEFISCDI by the project: 51PCCDI/2018.


Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest.


  1. 1. Reinprecht L. Wood Deterioration, Protection and Maintenance. Wiley Online Library; Chichester, West Sussx, UK. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/9781119106500
  2. 2. Wörlea M, Hubert V, Hildbrand E, Hunger K, Lehmann E, Mayer I, Petrak G, Pracher M, von Arx U, Wülfert S. Evaluation of decontamination methods of pesticide contaminated wooden objects in museum collections: Efficiency of the treatments and influence on the wooden structure. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2012;13:S209-S215. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.006
  3. 3. Salminen E, Valo R, Korhonen M, Jernlas R. Wood preservation with chemicals. Copenhagen, Denmark: Best Available Techniques (BAT) Nordic Council of Ministers; 2014
  4. 4. Ghetiu MM, Toporet V. Chimia Lemnului. Chisinau: Ed. Tehnica-Info; 2010. ISBN: 978-99-75-63-310-9
  5. 5. Clausen CA. Biodeterioration of Wood. Madison, Wisconsin: Forest Products Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service; 2010
  6. 6. Ion R-M, Doncea S-M, Ţurcanu-Caruțiu D. Nanotechnologies in Cultural Heritage—Materials and Instruments for Diagnosis and Treatment. In: Kyzas G, editor. Novel Nanomaterials. IntechOpen; 2018. pp. 173-190. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71950
  7. 7. Nkeuwa WN, Riedl B, Landry V. Transparent UV-cured clay/UV-based nanocomposite coatings on wood substrates: Surface roughness and effect of relative humidity on optical properties. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research. 2017;14(3):555-569. DOI: 10.1007/s11998-016-9873-6
  8. 8. Nami Kartal S, Tenzi E, Yilmaz H, Goodell B. Bioremediation and decay of wood treated with ACQ, microionized ACQ, nano-CuO and CCA wood preservatives. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2015;99:95-101. DOI: 10.1016.j.ibiod.2015.01.004
  9. 9. Lin LD, Chen YF, Wang SY, Tsai MJ. Leachability, metal corrosion, and termite resistance of wood treated with copper-based preservative. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2099;63(4):533-538. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.07.012
  10. 10. Cicardi C, Schwarze FWMR, Wick P. Microionized copper wood preservatives: An efficiency and potential health risk assessment for copper-based nanoparticles. Environ-mental Pollution. 2015;200:126-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.018
  11. 11. Hochmanska P, Krystofiak T, Mazela B. Hydrophobicity and weathering resistance of wood treated with silane-modified protective systems. Drewno. 2014;57(191):99-111. DOI: 10.12841/wood.1644-3985.060.07
  12. 12. Ghosh SC, Militz H, Mai C. Modification of Pinus sylvestris L. wood with quat- and amino-silicones of different chain lengths. Holzforschung. 2013;67(4):421-427. DOI: 10.1515/hf-2012-0103
  13. 13. Cappelletto E, Maggini S, Girardi F, Bochicchio G, Tessadri B, Di Maggio R. Wood surface protection with different alkoxysilanes: A hydrophobic barrier. Cellulose. 2013;20(6):3131-3141. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0038-9
  14. 14. Salla J, Pandey KK, Srinivas K. Improvement of UV resistance of wood surfaces by using ZnO nanoparticles. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2012;97(4):592-596. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab. 2012.01.013
  15. 15. Zanatta P, Lazarotto M, de Cademartori PHG, Cava SD, Moreira ML, Gatto DA. The effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles obtained by microwave-assisted hydrothermal method on the color and decay resistance of pinewood. Maderas-Ciencia Y Tecnologia. 2017;19(4):495-506. DOI: 10.4067/s0718-221x2017005000901
  16. 16. Gao LK, Zhan XX, Lu Y, Li J, Sun QF. pH-dependent structure and wettability of TiO2-based wood surface. Materials Letters. 2015;142:217-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.12.035
  17. 17. Tuong VM, Chu TV. Improvement of color stability of acacia hybrid wood by TiO2 nano sol impregnation. Bioresources. 2015;10(3):5417-5425
  18. 18. Wang BL, Feng M, Zhan HB. Improvement of wood properties by impregnation with TiO2 via ultrasonic-assisted sol-gel process. RSC Advances. 2014;4(99):56355-56360. DOI: 10.1039/c4ra04852k
  19. 19. Sun Q, Yu H, Liu Y, Li J, Lu Y. Improvement of water resistance and dimensional stability of wood through titanium dioxide coating. Holzforschung. 2010;64:757-761. DOI: 10.1515/hf.2010.114
  20. 20. Christensen M, Kutzke H, Hausen FK. New materials used for the consolidation of archaeological wood. Past, attemps, present struggles and future requirements. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2012;135:S183-S190. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.02.013
  21. 21. Baglioni P, Giorgi R, Dei L. Soft condensed matter for the conservation of cultural heritage. Comptes Rendus Chimie. 2009;12(1-2):61-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2008.05.017
  22. 22. Hamed SAM. Possibilities application on nanoscience and nanotechnology in conservation of archaeological wood. A review. Journal of American Science. 2013;6(10):1186-1194
  23. 23. Almkvist G, Persson I. Degradation of polyethylene glycol and hemicellulose in the vasa. Holtzforschung. 2008;62:64-70. DOI: 10.1515/hf.2008.009
  24. 24. Almkvist G, Persson I. Fenton-induced degradation of polyethylene glycol and oak hemicellulose. A model experiment in comparison to change observed in conserved waterlogged wood. Holtzforschung. 2008;62:704-708. DOI: 10.1515/hf.2008.129
  25. 25. Giauchi G, Capretti C, Macchioni N, Pizzo B, Donato ID. A methodological approach in the evaluation of the efficacy of treatments for the dimensional stabilization of waterlogged archaeological wood. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2010;1:91-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2009.04.003
  26. 26. Almkvist G, Persson I. Analysis of acids and degradation products related to iron and sulfur in the swedish warship vasa. Holtzforschung. 2008;62:694-703. DOI: 10.1515/HF.2008.130
  27. 27. Zoia L, Orlandi M, Tamburini D, Colombini MP. Chemical characterization of the whole plant cell wall in archaeological wood: An integrated approach. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2017;409(17):4233-4245. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0378-7
  28. 28. Lars E. Vasa—Recent preservation research. 11th ICOM-WOAM Conf.; Greeville, NC, USA. 2010
  29. 29. Hocker E, Almkvist G, Sahlstedt M. The Vasa experience with polyethylene glycol: A conservator’s perspective. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2012;13(1):S175-S 182. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.017
  30. 30. Gregory D, Jensen P, Strætkvern K. Conservation and in situ preservation of wooden shipwrecks from marine environments. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2012;13:139-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.03.005
  31. 31. Poggi G, Toccafondi N, Chelazzi D, Canton P, Giorgi R, Baglioni P. Calcium hydroxide nanoparticles from solvothermal reaction for the deacidification of degraded waterlogged wood. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2016;473:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.03.038
  32. 32. Giorgi R, Chelazzi D, Fratini E, Eanger S, Niklasson A, Rademar M, Svensson JE, Baglioni P. Nanoparticles of calcium hydroxide for wood deacidification. Decreasing the emission of organic acid vapor in church organ environments. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2009;10:206-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2008.06.012
  33. 33. Sassoni E. Hydroxyapatite and other calcium phosphates for the conservation of cultural heritage: A review. Materials. 2018;11(4):1-48. DOI: 10.3390/ma11040557
  34. 34. Sakuno T, Schniewind AP. Adhesive qualities of consolidants for deteriorated wood. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation. 2013;29:33-44. DOI: 10.1179/019713-690806046127
  35. 35. deSilva M, Henderson J. Sustainability in conservation practice. Journal of the Institute of Conservation. 2011;34:5-15. DOI: 10.1080/19455224.2011.566013
  36. 36. Rogerio-Candelera MA, Lazzari M, Cano E. Science and Technology for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage. New York, USA: CRC Press; 2013
  37. 37. Stankovic A, Dimitrevic S, Uskokovic D. Influence of size and morphology on bacterial properties of ZnO powder hydrothermally synthesized using different surface stabilizing agents. Colloid and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2013;102:21-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.07.033
  38. 38. Chambhare SU, Yagtap R, Lockhande G. Design and UV-curable behaviour of boron based reactive diluent for epoxy acrylate oligomer used for flame retardant wood coating. Designed Monomers & Polymers. 2016;20(1):125-135. DOI: 10.1080/15685551.2016.123102
  39. 39. Dasari A, Cai G, Yu Y-Y, Mai Y-W. Recent developments in the fire retardancy of polymeric materials. Progress in Polymer Science. 2013;38(9):1357-1387. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.006
  40. 40. Zhang XT, Mu J, Chu DM, Zhao Y. Synthesis of fire retardants based on N and P and poly(sodium silicate-aluminum dihydrogen phosphate) (PSADP) and testing the flame-retardant properties of PSADP impregnated poplar wood. Holzforschung. 2016;70(4):341-350. DOI: 10.1515/hf-2014-0362
  41. 41. Sow C, Riedl B, Blanchet P. UV-waterborne polyurethane-acrylate nanocomposite coatings containing alumina and silica nanoparticles for wood: Mechanical, optical, and thermal properties assessment. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research. 2011;8(2):211-221. DOI: 10.1007/s11998-010-9298-6
  42. 42. Crisci GM, Malagodi M, La Russa MF, Ruffolo SA. Consolidating properties of Regalrez 1126 and Polaroid B72 applied to wood. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2010;11:304-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2009.12.001
  43. 43. Crisci GM, La Russa MF, Malagodi M, Ruffolo SA. The Effect of acrylic polymer Paraloid B72 used in conservation. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2010;11:304-308
  44. 44. Nami Kartal S, Clausen CA, Green F. Do the unique properties of nanometals affect leachability or efficacy against fungi and termites? International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2009;63(4):490-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.01.007
  45. 45. Dumitrescu I, Manciulea I. Nanocomposites materials based on polymers and alumina nanoparticles. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2009;8(4):953-956
  46. 46. Lu Y, Li J, Sun Q, Cui Y, Liu Y. Growth of TiO2 coating on wood surface using controlled hydrothermal method at low temperatures. Applied Surface Science. 2010;256:5046-5050. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.053
  47. 47. Pasquet J, Chevalier Y, Couval E, Bouvier D, Bolzinger M-A. Zinc oxide as a new antimicrobial preservative of topical products: Interactions with common formulation ingredients. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2015;479:88-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.031
  48. 48. Tolvaj L, Varga D, Papp G. Colour Measurement for Determining the Steaming Properties of Wood. Óbuda Univ. e-Bull. 2012:99-104
  49. 49. JIS Z 8729. Colour Specification-CIELAB and CIELUV Colour Spaces. 4th ed. Japan: Japanese Standards Association (JSA); 2008
  50. 50. Matsuo M, Yokoyama M, Umemura K, Gril J, Yano K, Kawai S. Color changes in wood during heating: Kinetic analysis by applying a time-temperature superposition method. Applied Physics A. 2010;99(1):47-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-010-5542-2
  51. 51. Giuriani E, Cominelli S, Marini A, Gubana A. The penetration test to evaluate wood decay after 20 years timber structure assessment experience. Advanced Materials Research. 2013;778:201-208. DOI: 10.4028/
  52. 52. Timar MC, Varodi A, Hacibektasoglu M, Campean M. Color and FTIR analysis of chemical changes in beech wood (Fagus sylvatica L.) after light steaming and heat treatment in two different environments. BioResources. 2016;11(4):8325-8343. DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.4.8325-8343
  53. 53. Schanda J. Colorimetry. Understanding the CIE System. Hoboken: New Jersey, Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2007
  54. 54. Barcik S, Gasparik M, Razumov EY. Effect of temperature on the color changes of wood during thermal modification. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology. 2015;49(9-10):789-798
  55. 55. Yeniocak M, Goktas O, Colak M, Ozen E, Ugurlu M. Natural coloration of wood material by red beetroot (Beta vulgaris) and determination color stability under UV exposure. Maderas. Ciencia y Tecnología. 2015;17(4):711-722. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-221X201500-5000062
  56. 56. Weichelt F, Beyer M, Emmler R, Flyunt R, Beuer E, Buchmeiser M. Zinc oxide based coatings for the UV-protection of wood for outdoor applications. In: Camino G, Frache A, Tabuani D, editors. Eurofillers. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag Gmbh; 2011. pp. 23-30. DOI: 10.1002/masy.201150304
  57. 57. Auclair N, Riedl B, Blanchard V, Blanchet P. Improvement of photoprotection of wood coatings by using inorganic nanoparticles as ultraviolet absorbers. Forest Products Journal. 2011;61(1):20-27. DOI: 10.13073/0015-7473-61.1.20
  58. 58. Timar MC. An investigation of consolidants penetration in wood. Part 2: FTIR spectroscopy. Pro Ligno. 2011;7(1):22-38
  59. 59. Dobrica I, Bugheanu P, Stanculescu I, Ponta CFTIR. spectral data of wood used in Romanian traditional village constructions. Analele Universitătii din Bucureşti–Chimie. Anul XVII (serie nouă). 2008;17(I):33-37
  60. 60. Xin YL, Timar MC, Varodi AM, Sawyer G. An investigation of accelerated temperature-induced ageing of four wood species: Colour and FTIR. Wood Science and Technology. 2016;51:357-378. DOI: 10.1007/s00226-016-0867-4
  61. 61. ISO 13061-1: 2014 Physical and mechanical properties of wood—Test methods for small clear wood specimens—Part 1: Determination of moisture content for physical and mechanical tests
  62. 62. Humar M, Kržišnik D, Lesar B, Thaler N, Ugovšek A, Zupančič K, Žlahtič M. Thermal modification of wax-impregnated wood to enhance its physical, mechanical and biological properties. Holzforschung. 2017;71(1):57-64. DOI:
  63. 63. Wang W, Huang Y, Cao J, Zhu Y. Penetration and distribution of paraffin wax in wood of loblolly pine and Scots pine studied by time domain NMR spectroscopy. Holzforschung. 2018;72(2):125-131. DOI: 10.1515/hf-2017-0030
  64. 64. Lee SH, Ashaari Z, Chen Lum W, Fei Ang A, Abdul Halip J, Halis R. Chemical, physico-mechanical properties and biological durability of rubberwood particle boards after post heat-treatment in palm oil. Holzforschung. 2018;72(2):159-167. DOI:
  65. 65. Gordobil O, Herrera R, Llano-Ponte R, Labidi J. Esterified organosolv lignin as hydrophobic agent for use on wood products. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2017;103:143-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.030
  66. 66. Weththimuni ML, Capsoni D, Malagodi M, Milanese C, Licchelli M. Shellac/nanoparticles dispersions as protective materials for wood. Applied Physics A. 2016;122(12):1058. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-016-0577-7
  67. 67. Sow C, Riedl B, Blanchet P. UV-waterborne polyurethane-acrylate nanocomposite coatings containing alumina and silica nanoparticles for wood: Mechanical, optical, and thermal properties assessment. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research. 2011;8(2):211-221. DOI: 10.1007/s11998-010-9298-6
  68. 68. Godnjavec J, Znoj B, Venturini P, Žnidaršič A. The application of rutile nano-crystalline titanium dioxide as UV absorber. Informacije MIDEM. 2010;40(1):6-9
  69. 69. Veronovski N, Verhovšek D, Godnjavec J. The influence of surface-treated nano-TiO2 (rutile) incorporation in water-based acrylic coatings on wood protection. Wood Science and Technology. 2013;47(2):317-328. DOI: 10.1007/s00226-012-0498-3
  70. 70. Srinivas K. Pandey KK. Enhancing photostability of wood coatings using titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Wood is Good: Current Trends and Future Prospects in Wood Utiliza-tion. 2017:251-259. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3115-1_23
  71. 71. Auer G, Woditsch P, Westerhaus A, Kischkewitz J, Griebler W-D, Rohe M, Liedekerke M. Pigments, Inorganic, 2. White Pigments. In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industria Chemistry, Chichester, West Sussx, UK. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/143-56007.n20_n01.pub2
  72. 72. Nair S, Pandey KK, Gridhar NN. UV stabilization of wood by nano metal oxides dispersed in propylene glycol. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. B, Biology. 2018;183. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.04.007
  73. 73. Ozgenc O, Yildiz UC. Weathering resistance of oriental spruce wood treated with different protection processes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2016;28(8). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001493
  74. 74. Lokhande G, Chambhare S, Jagtap R. Synthesis and properties of phosphate-based diacrylate reactive diluent applied to UV-curable flame-retardant wood coating. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research. 2017;14(1):255-266. DOI: 10.1007/s11998-016-9849-6
  75. 75. Ohm RA, Riley R, Salamov A, et al. Genomics of wood-degrading fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2014;72:82-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.05.001
  76. 76. Abdel-Hamid AM, Solbiati JO, Cann IK. Insights into lignin degradation and its potential industrial applications. Advances in Applied Microbiology. 2013;82:1-28. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407679-2.00001-6
  77. 77. Kose C, Kartal SN. Tolerance of brown-rot and dry-rot fungi to CCA and ACQ wood preservatives. Turk Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2010;34:181-190. DOI: 10.3906/tar-0902-43
  78. 78. Osman ME-S, EL-Shaphy AAE-N, Meligy DA, Ayid MM. Survey for fungal decaying archaeological wood and their enzymatic activity. International Journal of Conservation Science. 2014;5(3):295-308
  79. 79. Helmi FM, Ali NM, Ismael SM. Nanomaterials for the inhibition of microbial growth on ancient Egyptian funeral masks. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry. 2015;15(3):87-95. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18360
  80. 80. Dakal TC, Kumar A, Majumdar RS, Yadav V. Mechanistic basis of antimicrobial actions of silver nanoparticles. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:1-17. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01831
  81. 81. Liu Z, Wang Y, Pan X, Ge Q, Ma Q, Li Q, Fu T, Hu C, Zhu X, Pan J. Identification of fungal communities associated with the biodeterioration of waterlogged archaeological wood in a Han Dynasty Tomb in China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:1-9. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01633
  82. 82. Fazio AT, Papinutti L, Gómez BA, Parera SD, Rodríguez Romero A, Siracusano G. Fungal deterioration of a Jesuit South American polychrome wood sculpture. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2010;64:694-701. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.04.012
  83. 83. Taghiyari HR, Kalantari A, Ghorbani M, Bavaneghi F, Akhtari M. Effects of fungal exposure on air and liquid permeability of nanosilver- and nanozincoxide-impregnated Paulownia wood. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2015;105:51-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.08.014
  84. 84. Koziróg A, Rajkowska K, Otlewska A, Piotrowska M, Kunicka-Styczynska A, Brycki B, Nowicka-Krawczyk P, Koscielniak M, Gutarowska B. Protection of historical wood against microbial degradation—Selection and application of microbiocides. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016;17(1364):1-15. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17081364
  85. 85. Rajkowska K, Koziróg A, Otlewska A, Piotrowska M, Nowicka-Krawczyk P, Brycki B, Kunicka-Styczyńska A, Gutarowska B. Quaternary ammonium biocides as antimicrobial agents protecting historical wood and brick. Acta Biochimica Polonica. 2016;63(1):153-159. DOI: 10.18388/abp.2015-1134
  86. 86. Guo H, Bachtiar EVRibera J, Heeb M, Schwarze FWMR, Burgert I. Non-biocidal preservation of wood against brown-rot fungi with a TiO2/Ce xerogel. Green Chemistry. 2018; 20:1375-1382. DOI: 10.1039/C7GC03751A

Written By

Rodica-Mariana Ion, Ramona-Marina Grigorescu, Lorena Iancu, Paul Ghioca and Nicoleta Radu

Submitted: 14 February 2018 Reviewed: 26 May 2018 Published: 05 November 2018