Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Plant Metabolomics: An Emerging Technology for Crop Improvement

Written By

Kapil Sharma, Supriya Sarma, Abhishek Bohra, Abhijit Mitra, Naveen K. Sharma and Anirudh Kumar

Submitted: November 29th, 2017Reviewed: March 24th, 2018Published: September 19th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76759

Chapter metrics overview

1,244 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The astounding ability of plants to make smart decisions in response to environment is evident. As they have evolved a long list of complex and unique processes that involve photosynthesis, totipotency, long-distance signaling, and ability to restore structural and metabolic memory, recognition, and communication via emission of the selected class of volatiles. In recent years, use of metabolite profiling techniques in detection, unambiguous identification, quantification, and rapid analysis of the minute quantity of cellular micromolecules has increased considerably. Metabolomics is key to understand the chemical footprints during different phases of growth and development of plants. To feed the ever-increasing population with limited inputs and in a rapidly changing environment is the biggest challenges that the world agriculture faces today. To achieve the project genetic gains, the breeding strategies employing marker-assisted selection for high-yielding varieties and identifying germplasm resistant to abiotic and biotic stresses are already in vogue. Henceforth, new approaches are needed to discover and deploy agronomically important gene/s that can help crops better withstand weather extremes and growing pest prevalence worldwide. In this context, metabolic engineering technology looks viable option, with immense potential to deliver the future crops.

Keywords

  • metabolomics
  • mass spectroscopy
  • metabolic engineering
  • crops
  • breeding

1. Introduction

Metabolomics is one of the fascinating disciplines in ‘– omics’ field involving plants, animals, and microorganisms. Since its adoption in the mid-1990s in the field of plant biology, this approach has been successfully used in identifying important gene(s) in plants [1, 2]. The model plant Arabidopsis thaliana(henceforth referred to as Arabidopsis) has been extensively researched using a plethora of genomic tools and technologies, facilitating functional genomics analyses. In recent years, metabolomics approach has been extended in crop plants to ascertain gene functions [3, 4]. The ability of metabolome to serve as an ultimate phenotype of a cell renders it immensely promising for advancing crop-breeding gains [5]. For instance, delineating metabolite quantitative loci (mQTL) in crop plants offers information about the genomic target regions or genes that hold great relevance to breeding [6, 7]. Also, food and agronomical traits of crops improved through genetic modification (GM) could be better evaluated in terms of the metabolites present [8, 9].

During the last decades, techniques used to analyze metabolites have shown unprecedented refinements such as improvements in mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), in conjunction with the growing ability of bioinformatics. In this chapter, we present the application of metabolomics for functional genomics in crops as well as its possible integration with crop breeding to deliver future crops.

Advertisement

2. Different platforms to gather metabolomic data

Let us take an example of tomato as a model system that contains different categories of chemical compounds contributing to the fruit quality. These include sugars, organic acids, amino acids, fatty acids, isoprenoids, and polyphenolic compounds. Variety of separation approaches have been used to investigate the tomato metabolome, using both targeted and nontargeted metabolomics, leading to a wide range of quality biomarkers. Targeted metabolomics is by far the most common way, as most research programs focused on understanding or improving a single target trait. A great deal of information exists that explain the phenotypic variation; however, this information may not be easily accessible.

Small molecules can have large effects. For example, the variation in the ratio between sweetness and acidity causes tomatoes to taste sharp, sweet, insipid, or lovely [10]. Accelerating improvements through breeding programs demands large-scale and low-cost assays that allow analysis of thousands of samples within a short period of time [11]. Phenotypic surveys of diverse germplasm have a very broad scope and help defining the range of acceptable phenotypic variation, albeit limited in their depth. These kinds of data on organic acid and sugar can be leveraged with gene expression analysis for discovering the genetic causes underlying fruit quality [12]. The information on carbohydrates and organic acids can also be obtained using more sophisticated tools such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, which detects more compounds per assay than enzymatic or colorimetric methods but at far lower throughput [13]. NMR spectroscopy is used for structural determination of a novel metabolite of particular interest. Alternatively, gas chromatography (GC) paired with mass spectrometry (MS) (GC–MS) permits broad-scope metabolomic profiling, with increased throughput compared to the NMR [14]. On the flip side, the need of GC–MS for chemical derivatization may cause exclusion of some metabolites from the analysis, and also may not produce sufficient information for the clear identification of a particular metabolite. However, combining multiple datasets emanating from complementary analytical platforms offers a powerful strategy to analyze metabolomes.

In tomato, color and aroma are other targets for improvement. A majority of pigments in tomato are isoprenoids, such as carotenoids, while others are polyphenolics (e.g., flavonoids) [15]. Traditionally, liquid chromatography (LC) with commercial standards is used for carotenoid profiling [16]. However, LC–MS is to be used for more complete estimate of metabolomes especially for isoprenoids. The MS analysis is done either inline with the LC or in an offline mode [17, 18]. Inline MS simplifies work flow, while offline MS may enhance sensitivity due to the greater reduction of sample complexity [18]. NMR spectroscopy could also be for isoprenoid profiling, which is effective in distinguishing Eand Zisomers; not possible from MS analysis [19]. This is important as different carotenoid isomers may have different biological activities, hence, nutritive qualities [20]. Carotenoid composition may change during food preparation and processing, both in quality (i.e., isomerization) and identity (i.e., degradation by heat). Therefore, analysis of both raw and cooked samples is necessary for complete description of the isoprenoids [21, 22]. In addition to color, carotenoids also contribute to fruit aroma, as do fatty acid and amino acid derivatives [23]. All three represent volatile compounds, GC and GC–MS are used for their separation and identification [23, 24]. A metabolite survey of approximately 100 Dutch tomato cultivars was conducted using LC–MS and MS/MS [25].

Need for a highly curated database is one of the challenges routinely faced while analyzing MS or NMR data in order to better understand the spectra produced during an experiment. Fortunately, recent developments in tomato metabolomics have led to creation of such community-oriented resources.

In recent past, several software and analyzing tools has been developed for processing and analyze the metabolite data but till now none of the platform is self-sufficient to fulfill the user expectations. In this context, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, has initiated a project to develop a platform (Computational Core for Plant Metabolomics, CCPM) that is a web-based collaborative platform for researchers in the field of metabolomics to store, analyze, and share their data [26].

Advertisement

3. Gene identification

Metabolomics study helps identifying particular mQTL which corresponds to gene(s) related to that particular trait. The method is increasingly gaining recognition because once mQTL is identified then it became easier to pin-point gene(s) responsible for that particular metabolite [27].

Advertisement

4. Breeding program

Researchers/breeders are interested in selecting desirable genotypes from a large plant population. Initial selection procedures relied solely on the phenotypic appearance of the plants but information on the entire breeding cycle is required (a time of nearly 10 years) to release an improved variety. To reduce this time duration, marker-based technologies such as enzyme-based markers, marker-assisted selection (MAS), and so on have been employed, that shortened the entire process up to 6 years. By using mQTL-based selection, we may further reduce time up to 4 years, given the fact that most of the metabolites are directly related to particular phenotype; and selection of mQTL remains easier and faster than that of MAS [28].

Advertisement

5. Metabolomic approaches to improve rice quality

Rice is an important staple crop worldwide. The crop has been benefitted considerably from the developments in the field of genomics. For example, rice genome has been sequenced and is found to encode approximately 32,000 genes [29]. However, the biological functions of more than half of these genes are yet to be determined [30]. Novel genes in rice have been identified using gain and loss-of-function approaches. Genetic linkage and association analyses with genetic core collections and segregating populations have been employed to investigate the direct relationships between metabolic composition, genotypes, and phenotypes as representatives for agronomical traits. These strategies can also be applied for other crops and vegetables (Figure 1). In the following section, we shall describe some of these approaches.

Figure 1.

An overview of gene discovery and markers for crop improvement based on genetic and genomic strategies [31].

5.1. Approaches to collate metabolite, phenotypic, and genotypic data: some examples in rice are as follows

5.1.1. Gain-of-function approach

Construction of the rice full-length (FL) cDNA collection (Oryza sativaL. ssp. japonica“Nipponbare”) was possible due to the development of the FOX hunting system (FL-cDNA overexpressor gene hunting system) [32]. The FOX hunting system is unique, as it permits ectopic expression of any plant FL-cDNA library even in heterologous plant systems, therefore, allowing the functional analysis of genes. More than 30,000 transgenic Arabidopsislines overexpressing rice FL-cDNAs, called “rice FOX Arabidopsislines,” have been generated [33]. Metabolic fingerprinting [34] and metabolic profiling [35] have been used with these FOX lines to identify functional genes in rice.

To screen a large number of rice FOX Arabidopsislines, a nondestructive analytical method was developed using Fourier transform-near-infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy [34]. Unlike MS techniques, FT-NIR analysis circumvents destructive preparation, and allows data acquisition within a very short span of time (<1 min). The authors analyzed approximately 3000 FOX seeds with FT-NIR to obtain their metabolite fingerprints. Assessment of the changes in the metabolite fingerprints of the re-transformants led the discovery of seven lines with altered metabolite fingerprints in seeds. Five of these seven lines have annotations for inserted FL-cDNAs. The association of the genes with biological processes highlighted the role of complex networks underlying metabolomic responses in plants.

A detailed metabolite composition can be obtained in non-targeted manner by using metabolite profiling based on gas chromatography-time-of-flight-MS (GC-TOF-MS), particularly for primary metabolites and intermediates of secondary metabolites [36]. A set of 26 candidate lines for gene characterization were identified through surveying 350 rice FOX Arabidopsislines with GC-TOF-MS. These candidate lines included a rice FOX Arabidopsisline that overexpressed the FL-cDNA of the rice Lateral Organ Boundaries (LOB) Domain (LBD)/Asymmetric Leaves2-like(ASL)LBD37/ASL39 (Os-LBD37/ASL39)gene, which showed significant changes in nitrogen metabolism in the mutants [35]. The aerial parts of the rice FOX Arabidopsisplants exhibited hyponastic leaves and early flowering. The ArabidopsisAt-LBD37/ASL39-overexpressor plants showed similar morphological leaf changes (i.e., hyponastic leaves), and had increased levels of amino acids and metabolites related to nitrogen metabolism. Subsequent profiling of metabolites and transcriptomes of the rice Os-LBD37/ASL39-overexpressing lines ascertained the same function of Os-LBD37/ASL39in rice and Arabidopsis. The analysis revealed notable features in rice overexpressor plants including early heading, metabolite alterations (related to nitrogen metabolism), and advanced leaf senescence. These findings established a close association between Os-LBD37/ASL39and nitrogen metabolism in rice.

Above studies suggest that the FOX hunting system can quickly and efficiently identify and characterize the genes from available cDNA libraries; the alterations that exert influence on metabolite profiles in crops and vegetables.

5.1.2. Loss-of-function approach

The Tos17retrotransposon- and Ds-transposon-inserted mutant lines have served as loss-of-function resources for characterization of the novel genes in rice [37, 38]. Tos17-knockout lines characterized glutamine synthetase (GS), catalyzes the key step of ammonium assimilation. Tabuchi et al. (2005) used the Tos17-retrotransposon inserted lines to show that the three genes (OsGS1;1, OsGS1;2, and OsGS1;3) encoding cytosolic GS (GS1) in rice. The OsGS1;1gene was critical for normal growth and grain filling [39]. They further investigated the metabolomic changes and metabolite-to-metabolite correlations of the mutants by a GC-TOF-MS-based assay [40]. In comparison to the wild-type rice, the mutants showed dramatic increase in the levels of sugars and sugar phosphates and reduced levels of amino acids and rice leaf TCA cycle intermediates. Changes in the metabolite profiles differed in root and leaf parts in the presence of ammonium. Interestingly, an overabundance was noted for nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites. The study uncovered new correlations between the over-accumulated metabolites and some primary metabolites in the mutant roots. These findings demonstrated OsGS1;1 playing crucial role in regulating the global metabolic network in rice plants grown using ammonium as the nitrogen source.

5.2. Association analysis between trait and metabolites

Modern crop-breeding practices have been highly successful in improving some important traits, for example, field performance and yield. However, genetic bottlenecks develop due to slow selection processes and narrow genetic base. Strategies to determine relationships between metabolic composition and genotypes and phenotypes in rice are discussed later.

5.2.1. Untargeted high-coverage metabolomic characterization of the rice diversity research set (RDRS)

The vast reservoir of rice seed banks provides a rich opportunity to identify genotypes possessing useful agronomical traits. However, large-scale characterization of this vast germplasm demands considerable time and resources. As a result, genetic core collections have been developed as a manageable representation of the genetic diversity. Examples include, the rice diversity research set (RDRS) comprising 67 varieties, created with the analysis of 332 varieties of O. sativausing restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) marker [41]. To investigate the direct relationship between metabolite [5] and phenotype in RDRS, untargeted high-coverage metabolomic characterization and constructed was performed, leading to the development of predictive metabolome-trait models using multivariate regression analysis [42]. Combined datasets of rice kernels were obtained from four types of MS platforms: GC-TOF-MS for small compounds, including primary metabolites; ultra-pressure liquid chromatography-quadruple-TOF-MS (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS) for hydrophilic compounds; capillary electrophoresis-TOF-MS (CE-TOF-MS) for ionic compounds; and liquid chromatography-ion trap-TOF-MS (LC-IT-TOF-MS) for polar lipids. The study precisely defined a correlation between genetic diversity and metabolite abundance [43]. After the removal of covariance between the trait data and the population membership, a multi-block-orthogonal projection was conducted for latent structures (MB-OPLS) regression analysis. Traits such as amylose/total starch ratio and ear emergence day can be predicted from the metabolic composition by using the MB-OPLS model. The model for the amylose/total starch ratio showed a tight and negative correlation with fatty acids and lysophosphatidylcholines (Figure 2). Evaluation of the model using an external set of RDRS samples, other rice varieties, and the two mutants, showed high-, middle-, and low-amylose/total starch ratios, respectively. The amylose/total starch ratio was found to be associated with metabolites in rice kernels of the cultivars. However, this association was not observed in the mutants. The two loss-of-function mutants-e1, a starch synthase IIIa(SSIIIa)-deficient mutant and the SSIIIa/starch branching enzyme(BE) double-knockout mutant 4019—showed a high amylose/total starch ratio [42, 44]. Examination of starch granules with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the starch granules of the mutants were loosely packed in rice kernels [45]. Thus, fatty acids and lysophosphatidylcholines most likely play a role in packing normal starch granules into rice kernels.

Figure 2.

Correlation network of trait-associated metabolites. The node color indicates the associated trait. Red lines (edges) represent positive correlations, while purple edges show negative correlations. The thickness of the edges indicates the strength of the correlation [31].

5.2.2. mQTL analysis using back-cross inbred (BIL) lines

Matsuda et al. (2012) investigated 85 BILs generated by backcrossing O. sativaL. ssp. japonica“Sasanishiki” and O. sativaL. ssp. indica“Habataki” to find an association between genotype and metabolic composition [6]. The genotypic data recorded on such mapping populations are useful for QTL mapping of various agronomical traits. The genotypic data of the BIL lines cover 12 rice chromosomes, and the genotype of each BIL line was analyzed with 236 RFLPs [46]. A metabolite profiling using multi-MS-based pipelines yielded a metabolite profile dataset comprising 759 metabolite signals. Of these, 131 metabolites were identified or annotated. The lower heritability of the mQTL in yeast, mice, humans, and Arabidopsisthan that of the expression QTL (eQTL) [47, 48] could be attributable to greater susceptibility of metabolite accumulation to environmental factors [4]. Therefore, they evaluated the effects of heritable factors on the 759 metabolic traits. Although more than half of the metabolic traits showed relatively low broad-sense heritability (H2), high H2values were observed for some of the secondary metabolites, such as lysophosphatidylcholines, oryzanols, and flavone glycosides. Notably, heritability profiles obtained in rice were not similar to those of tomato fruits and Arabidopsisleaves [49, 50]. The QTL mapping results identified 802 mQTL from 759 metabolic traits and suggested for a coordinated control of some metabolites, such as amino acids and triacylglycerols, through a mQTL hotspot on chromosome three. The extent of genetic control was determined for the annotated flavone glycoside level. The authors determined the structure of the flavone glycoside by using multi-step chromatography, MS, and NMR. The mQTL analysis provides faster and efficient breeding technique to dissect useful metabolic traits of both primary and secondary metabolites in rice.

Advertisement

6. Metabolomic approach to improve legume crops

Forage and grain legumes contribute 27% of the world gross primary crop. The grain legumes alone cater 33% of required human dietary protein, thus contributing to the global food security and environmental sustainability [51, 52]. Barring a few extensively investigated model legumes, metabolomics studies in other legumes remain limited. The studies in model legumes demonstrate a decrease in oxylipins as effect of rhizobial node factor (Nod) in Medicago[53] and metabolic adjustments of shoot constituent in salt tolerant Lotusspecies for its survival [54].

Stress conditions such as salinity and anoxia cause an accumulation of alanine, and its biosynthesis co-substrates such as glutamate and GABA, and succinate in soybean [55]. Differential expression was also obtained for genes involved in nitrogen fixation and fermentation in root. Interestingly, a negative correlation was observed for amino acid derived from glycolysis and the TCA cycle during water logging; several TCA cycle enzymes were induced upon exposure to water logging [56]. Likewise, a study on metabolic changes associated with flooding stress in soybean revealed a set of 81 mitochondria-associated metabolites, suggesting a boost in concentrations of metabolites involved in respiration and glycolysis such as, amino acids, NAD, and NADH coupled with the depletion of free adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [57]. Under drought and salinity conditions, metabolite phenotyping of four different Mediterranean accessions of lentil suggested a decrease in intermediates of the TCA cycle and glycolytic pathway [58]. Importantly, the study yielded metabolite markers for specific stress; such as threonate, asparagine/ornithine, and alanine/homoserine for NaCl, drought, and salinity, respectively. Another study aimed to assess the impact of water deficiency on Lupinus albusdemonstrated that the plant stem served as a storage organ for sugars and amino acids [59]. Importantly, tolerant plant accumulated high level of metabolites such as asparagine, proline, sucrose, and glucose in the stem stelar region [59]. This suggests for reorganization of nitrogen and carbon metabolism pathways in plants in order to tolerate salinity stress. In soybean, consistent increase in pinitol (sugar alcohol, osmoprotectant) was reported in the tolerant plant at both normal and drought-stressed conditions [60]. Similarly, accumulation of sucrose, free amino acids, and soluble proteins was observed in tolerant soybean in response to water stress [61].

Advertisement

7. Metabolomic approaches to evaluate GM crops

GM crops are now widely used worldwide [62]. The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) reported that in 2011, 160 million hectares of arable land was used to grow biotech crops, including GM crops (http://www.isaaa.org/).

Metabolism refers to the processes involved in maintaining life, such as the synthesis and breakdown of proteins, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates. Metabolomics offers a snapshot of the current biochemical status, including important nutritional and toxicological characteristics. Furthermore, the metabolite composition is reported to have close association with the organism’s phenotype. Hence, metabolomics is a useful tool for investigating the metabolic composition of GM crops. The application of metabolomic technology could generate a database of metabolites in both GM crops and traditional varieties. For instance, metabolomics approach was employed to assess the chemical composition of GM tomatoes in order to compare the modified crops with the traditional varieties [63]. The authors used GM tomatoes overexpressing a foreign gene encoding miraculin, a glycoprotein found in tropical plants but normally absent in tomatoes [64]. The MS-based multiple platforms detected 86% of the total chemical diversity in the tomato cultivars used in the study. Subsequently, statistical approach for “proof-of-safety” rather than “proof-of hazard” approach was used to evaluate “similarities” and “differences” between GM tomatoes and six traditional cultivars, including the control line Moneymaker. Results suggested that the GM tomatoes had a reproducible metabolic signature; moreover, more than 92% of the compounds showed an acceptable variation in both green and red stages of the tomato, highlighting striking similarity of the GM tomatoes with that of the control line Moneymaker in terms of their metabolite profiles.

Furthermore, a comparison was drawn for the metabolite profiles obtained from two independent experiments. The study determined the levels of the most commonly altered metabolites in the GM tomatoes, such as proline, 4-hydroxy-proline, spermidine, asparagine, arginine, serine, and inositol-1-phosphate, across all growth conditions. The expression of these metabolites was unaltered by genetic modification, not associated with the expression of foreign genes. This approach could be useful for evaluating GM crops for assessing their metabolomic equivalence with traditional crops.

Advertisement

8. Conclusions and future perspective

The growing attention that metabolomics is receiving in the field of plant research could be ascribed to plant’s ability to produce a vast array of metabolites, far greater than that produced by animals and microorganisms. Achieving a comprehensive coverage of metabolome analysis calls for multiparallel complementary technologies instead of relying on a single analytical technology. Increasing the annotation rate of unknown signals still poses a big challenge. The cooccurrence principle of transcripts and metabolites, particularly transcriptome co-expression network analysis, is powerful for decoding functions of genes not only in a model plants but also in crops and medicinal plants. The mQTL analysis along with scoring of gene expression and agronomical traits emerges as a promising technique to support crop breeding [65]. In addition to expedite the development of improved cultivars, metabolomics plays a key role in the evaluation of GM crops.

Combining de novo transcriptome assembly [66] and metabolomic techniques enables us to adopt a systems biology approach to investigate genetic populations as both techniques do not require a reference genome sequence. These post-genomics tools and techniques can considerably shorten the time required for selection in plant breeding and accelerate the discovery of novel genes in crops, vegetables, and medicinal plants [67, 68]. In summary, systems biology, metabolomics, and other omics will play a key role in understanding plant systems and developing novel biotechnology applications for crop improvement.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to DBT, India for funding to Computational Core for Plant Metabolomics (CCPM) project jointly at IIIT-Hyderabad and JNU-Delhi, (No. BT/PR14715/PBD/16/903/2010). Authors are grateful to thank Prof. Indira Ghosh for her consistent guidance and support. K.S and S.S are grateful to DBT for the fellowship support.

References

  1. 1.Bino RJ, Hall RD, Fiehn O, Kopka J, Saito K, Draper J, Nikolau BJ, et al. Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool. Trends in Plant Science. 2004;9:418-425
  2. 2.Saito K, Matsuda F. Metabolomics for functional genomics, systems biology, and biotechnology. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2010;61:463-489
  3. 3.Oikawa A, Matsuda F, Kusano M, Okazaki Y, Saito K. Rice. Rice metabolomics. 2008;1:63-71
  4. 4.Fernie AR, Schauer N. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: A viable option for crop improvement? Trends in Genetics. 2009;25:39-48
  5. 5.Hall RD. Plant metabolomics: From holistic hope, to hype, to hot topic. The New Phytologist. 2006;169:453-468
  6. 6.Matsuda F, Okazaki Y, Oikawa A, Kusano M, Nakabayashi R, et al. Dissection of genotype-phenotype associations in rice grains using metabolome quantitative trait loci analysis. The Plant Journal. 2012;70:624-636
  7. 7.Okazaki Y, Saito K. Recent advances of metabolomics in plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 2012;6:1-15
  8. 8.Catchpole GS, Beckmann M, Enot DP, Mondhe M, Zywicki B, Taylor J, et al. Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial com-positional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:14458-14462
  9. 9.Baker JM, Hawkins ND, Ward JL, Lovegrove A, Napier JA, Shewry PR, Beale MH. A metabolomic study of substantial equivalence of field grown genetically modified wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2006;4:381-392
  10. 10.Baldwin EA, Scott JW, Shewmaker CK, Schuch W. Flavor trivia and tomato aroma: Biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components. Hort Science. 2000;35:1013-1022
  11. 11.Velterop JS, Vos F. A rapid and inexpensive microplate assay for the enzymatic determination of glucose, fructose, sucrose, L-malate and citrate in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) extracts and in orange juice. Phytochemical Analysis. 2001;12(5):299-304
  12. 12.Baxter CJ, Carrari F, Bauke A, et al. Fruit carbohydrate metabolism in an introgression line of tomato with increased fruit soluble solids. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2005;46(3):425-437
  13. 13.Sobolev AP, Segre A, Lamanna R. Proton high-field NMR study of tomato juice. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry. 2003;41:237-245
  14. 14.Fraser PD, Enfissi EM, Halket JM, et al. Manipulation of phytoene levels in tomato fruit: Effects on isoprenoids, plastids, and intermediary metabolism. The Plant Cell. 2007;19(10):3194-3211
  15. 15.Grotewold E. The genetics and biochemistry of floral pigments. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2006;57:761-780
  16. 16.Enfissi EM, Fraser PD, Lois LM, Boronat A, Schuch W, Bram-ley PM. Metabolic engineering of the mevalonate and non-mevalonate isopentenyl diphosphate-forming pathways for the production of health-promoting isoprenoids in tomato. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2005;3(1):17-27
  17. 17.Capanoglu E, Beekwilder J, Boyacioglu D, Hall R, de Vos CH. Changes in antioxidant and metabolite profiles during production of tomato paste. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;56(3):964-973
  18. 18.Fraser PD, Enfissi EM, Goodfellow M, Eguchi T, Bramley PM. Metabolite profiling of plant carotenoids using the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The Plant Journal. 2007;49(3):552-564
  19. 19.Tiziani S, Schwartz SJ, Vodovotz Y. Profiling of carotenoids in tomato juice by one- and two-dimensional NMR. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006;54(16):6094-6100
  20. 20.Yeum KJ, Russell RM. Carotenoid bioavailability and bioconversion. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2002;22:483-504
  21. 21.Dewanto V, Wu X, Adom KK, Liu RH. Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50(10):3010-3014
  22. 22.Re R, Bramley PM, Rice-Evans C. Effects of food processing on flavonoids and lycopene status in a Mediterranean tomato variety. Free Radical Research. 2002;36(7):803-810
  23. 23.Tieman DM, Zeigler M, Schmelz EA, et al. Identification of loci affecting flavour volatile emissions in tomato fruits. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2006;57(4):887-896
  24. 24.Tikunov Y, Lommen A, de Vos CH, et al. A novel approach for nontargeted data analysis for metabolomics. Large-scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiology. 2005;139(3):1125-1137
  25. 25.Moco S, Bino RJ, Vorst O, et al. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolome database for tomato. Plant Physiology. 2006;141(4):1205-1218
  26. 26.Pudi V, Rani P, Mitra A, Ghosh I. Computational core for plant metabolomics: A case for interdisciplinary research. In: Reddy P, Sureka A, Chakravarthy S, Bhalla S, editors. Big Data Analytics. BDA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10721. Cham: Springer
  27. 27.Lisec J, Meyer RC, Steinfath M, Redestig H, Becher M, et al. Identification of metabolic and biomass QTL inArabidopsis thalianainaparallel analysis of RIL and IL populations. The Plant Journal. 2008;53:960-967
  28. 28.Alisdair R. Fernie and Nicolas Schauer. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: A viable option for crop improvement? Trends in Genetics. 2008;25:39-48
  29. 29.Sato Y, Antonio BA, Namiki N, Takehisa H, Minami H, Kamatsuki K, et al. RiceXPro: A platform for monitoring gene expression in japonica rice grown under natural field conditions. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39:D1141-D1148
  30. 30.Itoh T, Tanaka T, Barrero RA, Yamasaki C, Fujii Y, Hilton PB, et al. Curated genome annotation of Oryza sativa ssp. Japonica and comparative genome analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Research. 2007;17:175-183
  31. 31.Kusano M, Saito KJ. Role of metabolomics in crop improvement. Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2012;21:S24–S31
  32. 32.Ichikawa T, Nakazawa M, Kawashima M, Iizumi H, Kuroda H, et al. The FOX hunting system: An alternative gain-of-function gene hunting technique. The Plant Journal. 2006;48:974-985
  33. 33.Kondou Y, Higuchi M, Takahashi S, Sakurai T, Ichikawa T, et al. Systematic approaches to using the FOX hunting system to identify useful rice genes. The Plant Journal. 2009;57:883-894
  34. 34.Suzuki M, Kusano M, Takahashi H, Nakamura Y, Hayashi N, et al. Rice-ArabidopsisFOX line screening with FT-NIR-based fingerprinting for GC-TOF/MS-based metabolite profiling. Metabolomics. 2010;6:137-145
  35. 35.Albinsky D, Kusano M, Higuchi M, Hayashi N, Kobayashi M, et al. Metabolomic screening applied to rice FOXArabidopsislines leads to the identification of a gene-changing nitrogen metabolism. Molecular Plant. 2010a;3:125-142
  36. 36.Kusano M, Fukushima A, Redestig H, Saito K. Metabolomic approaches toward understanding nitrogen metabolism in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011a;62:1439-1453
  37. 37.Hirochika H, Guiderdoni E, An G, Hsing YI, Eun MY, Han CD, et al. Rice mutant resources for gene discovery. Plant Molecular Biology. 2004;54:325-334
  38. 38.Kolesnik T, Szeverenyi I, Bachmann D, Kumar CS, Jiang S, Ramamoorthy R, et al. Establishing an efficient Ac/Ds tagging system in rice: Large-scale analysis of Ds flanking sequences. The Plant Journal. 2004;37:301-314
  39. 39.Tabuchi M, Sugiyama K, Ishiyama K, Inoue E, Sato T, Takahashi H, Yamaya T. Severe reduction in growth rate and grain filling of rice mutants lacking OsGS1;1, a cytosolic glutamine synthetase 1;1. The Plant Journal. 2005;42:641-651
  40. 40.Kusano M, Tabuchi M, Fukushima A, Funayama K, Diaz C, et al. Metabolomics data reveal a crucial role of cytosolic glutamine synthetase 1;1 in coordinating metabolic balance in rice. The Plant Journal. 2011c;66:456-466
  41. 41.Kojima Y, Ebana K, Fukuoka S, Nagamine T, Kawase M. Development of an RFLP-based rice diversity research set of germplasm. Breeding Science. 2005;55:431-440
  42. 42.Redestig H, Kusano M, Ebana K, Kobayashi M, Oikawa A, et al. Exploring molecular backgrounds of quality traits in rice by predictive models based on high-coverage metabolomics. BMC Systems Biology. 2011;5:176
  43. 43.Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research. 1967;27:209-220
  44. 44.Fujita N, Yoshida M, Kondo T, Saito K, Utsumi Y, Tokunaga T, et al. Characterization of SSIIIa-deficient mutants of rice: The function of SSIIIa and pleiotropic effects by SSIIIa deficiency in the rice endosperm. Plant Physiology. 2007;144:2009-2023
  45. 45.Kusano M, Fukushima A, Fujita N, Okazaki Y, Kobayashi M, Oitome NF, Ebana K, Saito K. Deciphering starch quality of rice kernels using metabolite profiling and pedigree network analysis. Molecular Plant. 2012;5:442-451
  46. 46.Nagata K, Fukuta Y, Shimizu H, Yagi T, Terao T. Quantitative trait loci for sink size and ripening traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breeding Science. 2002;52:259-273
  47. 47.Schadt EE, Monks SA, Drake TA, Lusis AJ, Che N, et al. Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature. 2003;422:297-302
  48. 48.Meyer RC, Steinfath M, Lisec J, Becher M, Witucka-Wall H, et al. The metabolic signature related to high plant growth rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:4759-4764
  49. 49.Lisec J, Meyer RC, Steinfath M, Redestig H, Becher M, Witucka-Wall H, et al. Identification of metabolic and biomass QTL inArabidopsis thalianain a parallel analysis of RIL and IL populations. The Plant Journal. 2008;53:960-972
  50. 50.Schauer N, Semel Y, Balbo I, Steinfath M, Repsilber D, Selbig J, Pleban T, Zamir D, Fernie AR. Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. The Plant Cell. 2008;20:509-523
  51. 51.Graham PH, Vance CP. Legumes: Importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiology. 2003;131:872-877
  52. 52.Ramalingam A, Kudapa H, Pazhamala LT, Weckwerth W, Varshney RK. Proteomics and metabolomics: Two emerging areas for legume improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:1116
  53. 53.Zhang N, Venkateshwaran M, Boersma M, Harms A, Howes-Podoll M, Den Os D, et al. Metabolomic profiling reveals suppression of oxylipin biosynthesis during the early stages of legume-rhizobia symbiosis. FEBS Letters. 2012;586:3150-3158
  54. 54.Sanchez DH, Pieckenstain FL, Escaray F, Erban A, Kraemer U, Udvardi MK, et al. Comparative ionomics and metabolomics in extremophile and glycophytic Lotus species under salt stress challenge the metabolic pre-adaptation hypothesis. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2011;34:605-617
  55. 55.Rocha M, Sodek L, Licausi F, Hameed MW, Dornelas MC, van Dongen JT. Analysis of alanine aminotransferase in various organs of soybean (Glycine max) and in dependence of different nitrogen fertilisers during hypoxic stress. Amino Acids. 2010b;39:1043-1053
  56. 56.Rocha M, Licausi F, Araujo WL, Nunes-Nesi A, Sodek L, Fernie AR, et al. Glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle are linked by alanine aminotransferase during hypoxia induced by waterlogging of Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiology. 2010a;152:1501-1513
  57. 57.Komatsu S, Yamamoto A, Nakamura T, Nouri MZ, Nanjo Y, Nishizawa K, et al. Comprehensive analysis of mitochondria in roots and hypocotyls of soybean under flooding stress using proteomics and metabolomics techniques. Journal of Proteome Research. 2011;10:3993-4004
  58. 58.Muscolo A, Junker A, Klukas C, Weigelt-Fischer K, Riewe D, Altmann T. Phenotypic and metabolic responses to drought and salinity of four contrasting lentil accessions. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66:5467-5480
  59. 59.Pinheiro C, Passarinho JA, Ricardo CP. Effect of drought and rewatering on the metabolism of Lupinus albus organs. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2004;161:1203-1210
  60. 60.Silvente S, Sobolev AP, Lara M. Metabolite adjustments in drought tolerant and sensitive soybean genotypes in response to water stress. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38554
  61. 61.Tripathi P, Rabara RC, Shulaev V, Shen QJ, Rushton PJ. Understanding water-stress responses in soybean using hydroponics system-a systems biology perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:1145
  62. 62.Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Saito K. Review: Genetically modified plants for the promotion of human health. Biotechnology Letters. 2006;28:1983-1991
  63. 63.Kusano M, Redestig H, Hirai T, Oikawa A, Matsuda F, Fukushima A, et al. Covering chemical diversity of genetically-modified tomatoes using metabolomics for objective substantial equivalence assessment. PLoS One. 2011b;6:e16989
  64. 64.Sun HJ, Kataoka H, Yano M, Ezura H. Genetically stable expression of functional miraculin, a new type of alternative sweetener, in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2007;5:768-777
  65. 65.Wentzell AM, Rowe HC, Hansen BG, Ticconi C, Halkier BA, Kliebenstein DJ. Linking metabolic QTLs with network and cis-eQTLs controlling biosynthetic pathways. PLoS Genetics. 2007;3:1687-1701
  66. 66.Martin JA, Wang Z. Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2011;12:671-682
  67. 67.Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Saito K. Functional genomics for plant natural product biosynthesis. Natural Product Reports. 2009;26:1466-1487
  68. 68.Bunsupa S, Katayama K, Ikeura E, Oikawa A, Toyooka K, Saito K, Yamazaki M. Lysine decarboxylase catalyzes the first step of quinolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis and coevolved with alkaloid production in leguminosae. The Plant Cell. 2012;24:1202-1216

Written By

Kapil Sharma, Supriya Sarma, Abhishek Bohra, Abhijit Mitra, Naveen K. Sharma and Anirudh Kumar

Submitted: November 29th, 2017Reviewed: March 24th, 2018Published: September 19th, 2018