Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Colorimetric Detection of Copper Ion Based on Click Chemistry

Written By

Lingwen Zeng, Zhiyuan Fang and Yunbo Wang

Submitted: 18 October 2017 Reviewed: 27 February 2018 Published: 04 July 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76024

From the Edited Volume

Noble and Precious Metals - Properties, Nanoscale Effects and Applications

Edited by Mohindar Singh Seehra and Alan D. Bristow

Chapter metrics overview

1,317 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Two colorimetric assays, lateral flow biosensor (LFB) and hemin/G-Quadruplex DNAzyme-based colorimetric assay, were developed for the detection of copper ion based on click chemistry. Two single-strand DNA (ssDNA) with azide- and alkyne-modified at 3′ and 5′ separately can be linked by the Cu+-catalyzed click chemistry. For hemin/G-Quadruplex DNAzyme-based assay, the two ssDNA fragments linked by Cu+-catalyzed click chemistry could form a complete G-rich sequence that severed as a horse-radish peroxidase. In the presence of hemin and K+, the colorless substrate tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) is catalyzed into a colored product by the G-rich sequence. The concentration of Cu2+ can then be quantitatively analyzed by measuring the color density. For the LFB assay, the two ligated ssDNA fragments could form a sandwich complex between an ssDNA fragment immobilized on gold nanoparticles and another ssDNA fragment on test zone of a biosensor, respectively. The biosensor enables visual detection of copper ion with excellent specificity. In comparison with conventional methods, the present assays are simpler to operate and more cost-effective to use, and so have great potential in point-of-care diagnosis and environmental monitoring.

Keywords

  • colorimetric detection
  • lateral flow biosensor
  • click chemistry
  • copper ion detection

1. Introduction

Cu2+ is one of the important cofactors or structural components for numerous enzymes needed in metabolic processes, and therefore, an essential micronutrient for human life. However, high intracellular concentration of Cu2+ can cause adverse health effects, such as liver damage, gastrointestinal disturbance, and neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer, Menkes, and Wilson diseases [1, 2]. The maximum contamination concentration for Cu2+ in drinking water set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is 20 mM [3]. Therefore, sensitive and specific analytical methods for the monitoring and detection of Cu2+ pollution in environment and food are imperative.

The standard methods for Cu2+ determination include graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) [4, 5] and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICPAES) [6]. These methods have advantages of high sensitivity and repeatability, which enable the analysis of a variety of samples. However, the shortcomings of these techniques are that they require expensive instruments and experienced operators. Recently, a variety of methods based on Cu2+-specific DNAzyme have been developed for Cu2+ detection [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Although these methods are effective, the reaction of Cu2+-dependent DNA-cleaving DNAzyme needs strict conditions, these methods are not suitable for real sample analysis. Furthermore, the use of fluorophore-labeled oligonucleotides is not only expensive but also increases the complexity of the operation.

Cu+-catalyzed click chemistry refers to the [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between an azide group and an alkyne group at room temperature in aqueous solution, which finally results in the formation of a five-membered triazole ring [12]. The reactivity of in situ-generated copper(I) acetylides renders this reaction with high efficiency and selectivity. The applications of click chemistry allow the modification of a wide range of biomolecules. Since click reaction acts in a quick, irreversible, and water uninterruptible manner, it has widely been used in biomedical fields, such as drug discovery [13, 14], bioconjugations [15], and imaging [16]. Due to the ability of adding probes into target molecules, extensive research was carried out for the detection of biomolecules and disease diagnosis based on click chemistry, including viral infection [17], carbohydrate detection [18], enzyme [19], single nucleotide polymorphism [20] and ions [21].

In this chapter, two simple methods for Cu2+ detection based on Cu+-catalyzed click chemistry by the reduction of Cu2+ in the presence of sodium ascorbate were proposed. Figure 1 shows a lateral flow biosensor based on Cu+-catalyzed click chemistry [22, 23]. The two biosensors have the following features: (1) easy to use and operate; (2) no requirement for bulky and costly apparatus; (3) high sensitivity; and (4) excellent selectivity to other metal ions. Details of the methods, procedures, and results are presented below. A section on Summary and Future Directions is given at the end of the chapter.

Figure 1.

Principle of the biosensor for Cu2+ detection. (A) The formation of the ligation product of azide-DNA and alkyne/biotin-DNA based on Cu+-promoted click chemistry. (B) The product is analyzed by a lateral flow biosensor. (C) Hemin/G-quadruplex HRP-mimicking DNAzyme formed by the catalyzation of click chemistry. The self-assembly of hemin/G-quadruplex catalyzed its colorless substrate TMB into a colored product (adapted from [22, 23]).

Advertisement

2. Materials

The materials used in this project and their suppliers are listed below:

  • Sodium ascorbate: Shanghai Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

  • Ammonium peroxodisulfate (AP), urea, copper(II) chloride dihydrate, potassium chloride, and other metal ions: Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory (Guangzhou, China).

  • SYBR Green II, hemin, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and human serum: Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA).

  • 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethyl benzidine hydrochloride dihydrate (TMB-2HCl): Cellway-Lab (Luoyang, China).

  • Phosphate buffer solution (PBS): Genetimes Technology, Inc. (Shanghai, China).

  • Tris-base, boric acid, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), Triton X-100, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2): Guangzhou WhiGa Technology Ltd. (Guangzhou, China).

  • Oligonucleotides purified by HPLC: Shanghai Sangon Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

  • Rinsing buffer: 1% BSA and 8% sucrose containing 0.05% NaN3. Rinsing buffer was stored at 4°C until use.

  • Sample pad buffer: 0.01 M PBS pH 7.8 containing 0.5% BSA, 5% Triton X-100, and 0.05% NaN3. Sample pad buffer was stored at 4°C.

  • Loading buffer: 4× SSC containing 0.1% Triton X-100.

  • Adhesive plate: PVC plate, obtained from Vinostech, Shanghai, China.

  • Nitrocellulose membrane: AE99, 25 mm × 30 cm, capillary rate: 140 ± 40 s, thickness: 145 ± 20 μm, obtained from GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China.

  • Fiberglass, absorbent paper: Shanghai Jie Ning Biotechnology, Shanghai, China.

  • Dispenser: XYZ dispenser HM3030, obtained from Shanghai Kinbio, Shanghai, China.

  • Cutter: Automatic Strip Cutter ZQ2000, obtained from Shanghai Kinbio, Shanghai, China.

  • Strip reader: Test Strip Reader DT2032, obtained from Shanghai Kinbio, Shanghai, China.

All buffer solutions used in this study were prepared in our lab. Other chemicals were purchased from standard commercial sources and the sequences of the oligonucleotides are listed in Table 1.

Probe nameSequence (5′ → 3′)
Azide-DNAATACTCCCCCAGGTGCCG
Alkyne/biotin-DNAAGCTTCTTTCTAATACG
Control zone-DNACGTATTAGAAAGAAGCTCGTATTAGAAAGAAGCT
Test zone-DNACGGCACCTGGGGGAGTATCGGCACCTGGGGGAGTAT

Table 1.

DNA probes used in this assay.

Advertisement

3. Lateral flow biosensor detection of Cu2+

3.1. Preparation of streptavidin-modified gold nanoparticle (AuNP-SA) conjugates

AuNPs with 15 nm were prepared as follows: heat 100 mL of 0.01% HAuCl4 to boil and add 4 mL of 1% trisodium citrate immediately in a 500-mL round-bottom flask with rapid stirring. The solution was boiled for additional 10 min after its color turned red. After then, it was cooled to room temperature with gentle stirring.

AuNP–SA conjugates were prepared as follows: pH of 1 mL AuNP solution was adjusted by adding 4 μL of 0.1 M K2CO3, followed by adding 10 mg (46 μL) SA. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 1 h with gentle shaking. AuNP was blocked with 1% BSA. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for another 1 h with gentle shaking. After blocking, AuNP was collected and rinsed three times with rinsing buffer (12,103 rpm, 20 min). The red pellet was resuspended in 50 mL of rinsing buffer and then stored at 4°C until use.

3.2. Construction of lateral flow biosensor

The biosensor was constructed as follows:

  • The sample pad (17 mm × 30 cm) was prepared by soaking a glass fiber pad in sample pad buffer. The pad was then dried and stored in a low-humidity chamber at room temperature;

  • The conjugate pad (8 mm × 30 cm) was prepared by dispensing AuNP-SA solution (10 μL cm−1) onto the fiberglass using a dispenser. The pad was dried at room temperature for 12 h and stored at room temperature in low humidity until use;

  • Test zone and control zone were prepared by dispensing 30 μL control zone DNA (100 μM) and 30 μL of test zone DNA (100 μM) onto the nitrocellulose membrane simultaneously by a lateral flow dispenser. There should be 5 mm distance between the test zone and the control zone. The nitrocellulose membrane was exposed to ultraviolet light for 15 min to immobilize DNA. The membrane was then dried in low humidity at room temperature. It was stored in ziplock bag with desiccant at room temperature.

  • Lateral flow biosensor was assembled by adhesion of the four components onto a plastic adhesive backing (60 mm × 30 cm). Each component had a part of 2 mm overlapped. The backing along with four components was then cut into 0.4-cm wide strips using a paper cutter.

3.3. Detection of Cu2+ using the lateral flow biosensor

  • Azide-DNA and alkyne/biotin-DNA were mixed at the same mole ratio (10 μM, 2 μL) in 14 μL of PBS buffer, followed by adding 2 μL of Cu2+ solution.

  • Test without Cu2+ was used as control.

  • Sodium ascorbate (2 μL) was added to a final concentration of 600 mM to accelerate the reaction between azide and alkyne group.

  • Shake gently at room temperature for 45 min.

  • After the reaction, 4 μL of loading buffer was added and mixed with the above mixture. It was then loaded onto the sample pad. Results could be observed visually in 15 min, and the optical intensities of test zone and control zone were recorded using the strip reader.

3.4. Results of biosensor for Cu2+ detection

As shown in Figure 2, visible test zone could be observed in the presence of 100 nM Cu2+, which was determined as the limit of detection (LOD) for visual detection. The linear range between optical intensities and logarithm of Cu2+ concentration was 50 nM to 200 mM with a linear equation of optical intensity = 265.82x − 177.3 (R2 = 0.9735).

Figure 2.

Sensitivity of the assay. (A) Typical photo images of the strip. (B) Recorded corresponding optical intensities of the strip. (C) Plots of the optical intensities of red bands on the test zone vs. different concentrations of Cu2+. Inset: calibration curve of the optical intensities of red bands on the test zone vs. the log value of Cu2+ concentration. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent measurements (reproduced with permission from [22]).

Advertisement

4. Colorimetric detection of Cu2+

The detection was based on the hemin/G-quadruplex HRP-mimicking DNAzyme produced by Cu(+)-catalyzed click chemistry between azide- and alkyne-modified short G-rich sequences. The intact G-quadruplex can catalyze its colorless substrate TMB into a colored product, indicating the content of copper ion.

4.1. Preparation of chemicals

  • Azide-modified G1 and alkyne-modified G2 were mixed at a mole ratio of 1:1 in reaction buffer at a final concentration of 1 μM.

  • Cu2+ with various concentrations was added. Control experiment (in the absence of Cu2+) was conducted under the same condition.

  • Sodium ascorbate (2 μL) was added to a final concentration of 100 μM to accelerate the reaction between azide and alkyne group.

  • Shake the mixture gently for 2 h at RT.

  • After the reaction, add 1 μM hemin and 100 mM KCl, continued to shake for 20 min in order to form the hemin/G-quadruplex HRP-mimicking DNAzyme in aqueous solution.

  • Equal volume (30 μL) of 0.5% (w/v) H2O2 and 0.05% (w/v) TMB were added to DNA-hemin mixture.

  • 40 μL of 2 M H2SO4 was added to stop the reaction in 15 min, transferred solution into a 96-well microtiter plate. Record the OD values at 450 nm in each well using the microplate reader.

4.2. Results of colorimetric Cu2+ detection

The color intensity of the solution in each well increased with increasing Cu2+ concentration from 100 nM to 200 μM. In the absence of Cu2+, the color of the solution had almost no change and was still colorless. Calibration curve shows that the OD value is proportional to the logarithm of Cu2+ concentration in the range of 0.05–50 μM with a linear equation of OD value = 0.2578 (logCu2+) − 0.3214 (R2 = 0.9733). Using this equation, the limit of detection (LOD) of 5.9 nM was calculated based on triple standard deviation plus the mean of blanks [23] (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

The sensitivity for Cu2+ detection based on click chemistry and hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. (A) Photo images of the color intensity with different concentrations of Cu2+ (0, 100 nM, 200 nM, 500 nM, 1 μM, 10 μM, 100 μM, and 200 μM). (B) Plots of the OD value at 450 nm vs. Cu2+ concentration. Insert: calibration curve of OD value at 450 nm vs. the logarithm of Cu2+ concentration. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent measurements (reproduced with permission from [23]).

Advertisement

5. Summary and future directions

In summary, we have successfully constructed two sensors for rapid detection of copper ion based on click chemistry. Separated elements of probes were constructed at the presence of copper ion, which mediated the following color detection. The present methods are independent of complex operations and costly apparatus, while high sensitivity is achieved. The LOD of visual and colorimetric assay are 100 nM and 5.9 nM, respectively, which are much lower than 20 mM defined by EPA limit of Cu2+ in drinking water. In the future, the development of one-step process of microfluidic devices that integrate click chemistry and color development would provide even more convenient and more sensitive assays.

References

  1. 1. Si W, Liu J, Cai L, Jiang H, Zheng C, He X, Wang J, Zhang X. Health risks of metals in contaminated farmland soils and spring wheat irrigated with Yellow River water in Baotou, China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2015;94(2):214
  2. 2. Pal A. Copper toxicity induced hepatocerebral and neurodegenerative diseases: An urgent need for prognostic biomarkers. Neurotoxicology. 2014;40:97
  3. 3. Nath B, Chaudhuri P, Birch G. Assessment of biotic response to heavy metal contamination in Avicennia marina mangrove ecosystems in Sydney Estuary, Australia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2014;107:284
  4. 4. Sacmaci S, Sahan S, Sahin U, Kartal S, Ulgen A. On-line solid-phase separation/preconcentration for the determination of copper in urine by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2014;44:240
  5. 5. Stecka H, Jedryczko D, Welna M, Pohl P. Determination of traces of copper and zinc in honeys by the solid phase extraction pre-concentration followed by the flame atomic absorption spectrometry detection. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2014;186(10):6145
  6. 6. Li W, Simmons P, Shrader D, Herrman TJ, Dai SY. Microwave plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy as a tool for the determination of copper, iron, manganese and zinc in animal feed and fertilizer. Talanta. 2013;112:43
  7. 7. Li H, Huang XX, Cai Y, Xiao HJ, Zhang QF, Kong DM. Label-free detection of Cu(2+) and Hg(2+) ions using reconstructed Cu(2+)-specific DNAzyme and G-quadruplex DNAzyme. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73012
  8. 8. He JL, Zhu SL, Wu P, Li PP, Li T, Cao Z. Enzymatic cascade based fluorescent DNAzyme machines for the ultrasensitive detection of Cu(II) ions. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2014;60:112
  9. 9. Yin H, Kuang H, Liu L, Xu L, Ma W, Wang L, Xu C. A ligation DNAzyme-induced magnetic nanoparticles assembly for ultrasensitive detection of copper ions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2014;6(7):4752
  10. 10. He Y, Tian J, Zhang J, Chen S, Jiang Y, Hu K, Zhao Y, Zhao S. DNAzyme self-assembled gold nanorods-based FRET or polarization assay for ultrasensitive and selective detection of copper(II) ion. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2014;55:285
  11. 11. Wang F, Orbach R, Willner I. Detection of metal ions (Cu2+, Hg2+) and cocaine by using ligation DNAzyme machinery. Chemistry. 2012;18(50):16030
  12. 12. Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. A stepwise Huisgen cycloaddition process: Copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English). 2002;41(14):2596
  13. 13. Kolb HC, Sharpless KB. The growing impact of click chemistry on drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 2003;8(24):1128
  14. 14. Whiting M, Muldoon J, Lin YC, Silverman SM, Lindstrom W, Olson AJ, Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB, Elder JH, et al. Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease by using in situ click chemistry. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English). 2006;45(9):1435
  15. 15. Wang Q, Chan TR, Hilgraf R, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB, Finn MG. Bioconjugation by copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3 + 2] cycloaddition. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003;125(11):3192
  16. 16. Cai Z, Li BT, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ. Cu(I)-assisted click chemistry strategy for conjugation of non-protected cross-bridged macrocyclic chelators to tumour-targeting peptides. Dalton Transactions. 2015;44(9):3945
  17. 17. Kalveram B, Lihoradova O, Indran SV, Head JA, Ikegami T. Using click chemistry to measure the effect of viral infection on host-cell RNA synthesis. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2013;78:e50809
  18. 18. Wu ZL, Huang X, Burton AJ, Swift KA. Glycoprotein labeling with click chemistry (GLCC) and carbohydrate detection. Carbohydrate Research. 2015;412:1
  19. 19. van Geel R, Debets MF, Lowik DW, Pruijn GJ, Boelens WC. Detection of transglutaminase activity using click chemistry. Amino Acids. 2012;43(3):1251
  20. 20. Sun H, Peng X. Template-directed fluorogenic oligonucleotide ligation using “click” chemistry: Detection of single nucleotide polymorphism in the human p53 tumor suppressor gene. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2013;24(7):1226
  21. 21. Hua C, Zhang WH, De Almeida SR, Ciampi S, Gloria D, Liu G, Harper JB, Gooding JJ. A novel route to copper(II) detection using ‘click’ chemistry-induced aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Analyst. 2012;137(1):82
  22. 22. Wang D, Ge C, Wang L, Xing X, Zeng L. A simple lateral flow biosensor for the rapid detection of copper(ii) ions based on click chemistry. RSC Advances. 2015;5(92):75722
  23. 23. Ge C, Luo Q, Wang D, Zhao S, Liang X, Yu L, Xing X, Zeng L. Colorimetric detection of copper(II) ion using click chemistry and hemin/G-quadruplex horseradish peroxidase-mimicking DNAzyme. Analytical Chemistry. 2014;86(13):6387

Written By

Lingwen Zeng, Zhiyuan Fang and Yunbo Wang

Submitted: 18 October 2017 Reviewed: 27 February 2018 Published: 04 July 2018