Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Rare Earth Extraction from NdFeB Magnets

Written By

Jiro Kitagawa and Masami Tsubota

Submitted: 07 May 2017 Reviewed: 08 September 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70881

From the Edited Volume

Noble and Precious Metals - Properties, Nanoscale Effects and Applications

Edited by Mohindar Singh Seehra and Alan D. Bristow

Chapter metrics overview

1,244 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


There is a considerable interest in the extraction of rare earths (RE) from NdFeB magnets in order to recycle rare earth elements. Although the wet process using acid is in practical use in the in-plant recycle of sludge, higher selectivity between rare earths and Fe at room temperature is desired. We have recently proposed a pretreatment of corrosion before the hydrochloric acid (HCl) leaching and the oxalic acid precipitation. Almost full recovery of rare earths can be achieved even at room temperature process. In practical extraction methods, employing wet processes, the discharge of waste acid solution is a problem that needs to be solved to reduce the environmental impact. We further present an encouraging demonstration of rare earth extraction from NdFeB magnet using a closed-loop HCl-based process. Triple extraction has been conducted, and the recovery ratio of rare earths is approximately 50% in each extraction, which is reduced from almost 100% recovery in a one-shot extraction. Despite the reduced extraction efficiency, our method with a rather small number of procedures at almost room temperature is still highly advantageous in terms of cost and environmental friendliness. This study represents the initial step toward the realization of a closed-loop acid process in the recycling of rare earth elements.


  • recycle
  • corrosion
  • closed-loop acid process

1. Introduction

Rare earths (RE) are widely consumed in polish, catalysts, rare earth magnets, and so on [1]. Due to the skewed distribution of production countries for RE, many countries depend on the imports from other countries. For example, in Japan, the amount of import of RE metals reached 6479 tons in 2014. The import price, severely depending on international markets, fluctuates widely. Japan is promoting the provisions such as development of alternative materials and the recycle of rare earths. Because the demand of NdFeB magnets has been growing rapidly in recent years because of their use in motors of electric vehicles, wind turbines, etc., the recycling of RE elements extracted from used magnets has become an important research area [2, 3, 4, 5].

There are two main classes of recycling of RE: dry and wet processes. As for the dry process, the recovery of Nd metal has been demonstrated [6] by employing Mg acting as an extraction medium, which forms a low-viscosity liquid alloy with Nd. It has been reported that RE can be separated by a selective reduction and a distillation [7]. The large difference of vapor pressure between RECl2 and RECl3 is skillfully utilized, and the selection efficiency is highly improved. Recently, the difference of oxygen affinity between RE and transition metals has also received attention in that this difference is used as a RE separation. For example, the mixture with flux FeO·B2O3 is a promising method for high purity and high extraction ratio of RE oxide [8]. Thermal isolation of RE oxides from NdFeB magnets using carbon as a reducing agent has been reported [9]. However, many attempts based on the dry process proposed so far are still at the initial laboratory stage.

Development of ore dressing technologies has promoted wet process methods [10, 11], which have already been applied to recycling the sludge of in-plant scrap. After the acid leaching of scrap using HCl, HNO3, and H2SO4, and the filtration of insoluble material mainly containing Fe, acid solution is reacted with oxalic or carbonic acid to form a precipitate containing RE elements. The calcined precipitate becomes RE oxides, which can be returned to the initial manufacturing process of NdFeB magnet. The roasting of NdFeB magnet [12, 13, 14] as a pretreatment improves the selectivity between rare earths and Fe, but the recovery ratio of RE is usually rather low with acid (especially HCl) leaching at room temperature. Nearly 100% recovery is achieved [12, 13] when HCl solution is heated to 80–180°C. In the acid leaching method for sludge [15], it is also necessary to heat the acid solution up to 80°C. We have recently proposed a pretreatment of corrosion [16] before the HCl leaching and the oxalic acid precipitation. In this method, the recovery ratio of Nd reaches 97% even when a room temperature process is used.

From the standpoint of sustainability and ecology, the main issue of the wet process is the discharge of waste acid solution. The recyclability of waste acid crucially depends on the efficient extraction of the constituent elements of the magnet from the used acid. One of the promising methods for Fe extraction involves a reaction with an ionic liquid [12, 17, 18, 19, 20], which often possesses a high selectivity between rare earths and Fe. Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium chloride (Cyphos® IL101) is a well-characterized ionic liquid that can extract Fe3+ ions in HCl solution with no extraction of trivalent rare earth ions [12, 18]. A possible closed-loop acid process for roasted NdFeB magnet has also been proposed, and the elemental technologies are well investigated [12]. However, an actual demonstration with reuse of waste acid solution has not been performed.

In this study, we introduce the full recovery of rare earth from NdFeB magnet using a wet process with the pretreatment of corrosion but without a closed-loop acid process. After that we describe the detailed experimental results of multiple rare earth extraction in a closed-loop acid process [21].


2. Materials and methods

We used two kinds of commercial NdFeB magnets (Niroku seisakusyo). The elemental component of one magnet (denoted as magnet (1)) according to the manufacturer is Nd:Fe:B:the other elements (Dy et al.) = 28:66:1:5 in wt%. The composition of the other magnet (denoted as magnet (2)) was checked by an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer equipped in a field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL, JSM-7100F) and determined to be Nd1.6Pr0.6Fe14B. Figure 1(a) shows the process flow without a closed-loop acid process. A demagnetized and pulverized NdFeB magnet (1), weighing approximately 0.5 g, was immersed in 3% NaCl solution (300 mL) for 1 week. An air pump provided constant air flow to the solution to accelerate the corrosion. The corroded sample was leached into HCl solution (100 mL) ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 mol/L, at room temperature. The insoluble material was calcined at 800°C for 5 h to obtain α-Fe2O3. The solution after removal of the insoluble was reacted with 0.26 g oxalic acid. The precipitate after the reaction was also calcined at 800°C for 5 h to obtain cubic Mn2O3-type Nd2O3 (c-Nd2O3).

Figure 1.

(a) Procedures for rare earth recovery from NdFeB magnet (1) without closed-loop acid process. (b) Procedures for rare earth recovery from NdFeB magnet (2) with closed-loop acid process. S, L, and IL denote the solid, liquid, and ionic liquid, respectively. In procedure (b), elements expected to be present in the solid or solution are denoted.

To examine the feasibility of closed-loop acid process, the process flow was modified as shown in Figure 1(b). In this case, the corroded sample was leached in HCl solution (100 mL) with 0.2 mol/L or 0.5 mol/L for 1–2 h. After removal of the insoluble material, the solution was reacted with ionic liquid Cyphos® IL101 (HCl:ionic liquid = 4:1 in volume ratio), purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The salting-out agent 10 mol/L NH4Cl was added to the solution. The mixture underwent magnetic stirring at 750 rpm and 60°C for 10 min. Then, it was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min and split into each component. The HCl solution was reacted with oxalic acid.

Several samples, calcined at 800°C for 5 h in the air, were evaluated using a powder X-ray diffractometer (Shimadzu, XRD-7000 L) with Cu-Kα radiation. We employed an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (Shimadzu, ICPE-9000) to analyze the concentrations of Nd, Pr, Fe, and B dissolved in HCl or NaCl solution. The concentrations were determined by the working curves of standard Nd, Pr, Fe, and B liquids.


3. Results and discussion

The XRD pattern of corroded magnet (1) is shown in Figure 2, in which the XRD pattern of magnet (1) itself is also displayed. The main phase of magnet (1) is Nd2Fe14B with additional minor phase of NdFe4B4. The XRD pattern of Nd2Fe14B completely disappears in the corroded magnet, partially containing the XRD pattern of γ-FeOOH denoted by the filled triangles. In order to investigate the origin of the rest of the diffraction peaks (open circles) in the corroded sample, we have corroded NdFeB magnet (1) by hydrogenating it at 600°C for 12 h under a high pressure of hydrogen. The hydrogenated sample [22], as shown in the bottom pattern of Figure 2, shows the decomposition into Nd hydride (NdH2 + x) and α-Fe. Therefore, in each compound, the corrosion process would independently occur. The XRD pattern of corroded sample after the hydrogenation almost coincides with that of directly corroded magnet (1). Considering that α-Fe corroded into the Fe hydroxide (γ-FeOOH), a Nd hydroxide is probably responsible for the rest of the diffraction peaks (open circles) in the corroded sample. We note here that the NaCl concentration is not optimized. We simply suppose the sea water which is an abundant resource. The preliminary result using more concentrated NaCl solution (10%) also leads to the same results.

Figure 2.

XRD patterns of corroded magnet, corroded sample after hydrogenation, and hydrogenated magnet. The employed magnet is magnet (1). The origin of each pattern is shifted by an integer value for clarity. Based partly on Ref. [16].

We checked the XRD pattern of insoluble material after HCl leaching of the corroded sample as shown in Figure 3(a). The diffraction peaks match well with those of the XRD pattern of γ-FeOOH, which transforms into α-Fe2O3 through the calcination (see Figure 3(b)). Figure 3(a) supports that the Nd hydroxide would be selectively dissolved into HCl solution, in which Nd ions are generated. The oxalic acid precipitation was performed to recover Nd. The precipitate has been calcined and evaluated by XRD pattern, which is displayed in Figure 3(b) with the simulated pattern of c-Nd2O3. The XRD patterns are well matched between the calcined precipitate and c-Nd2O3, suggesting the successful recovery of Nd in the form of Nd oxide.

Figure 3.

(a) XRD patterns of corroded magnet (1) and insoluble material after HCl (0.1 mol/L, 30 min) leaching and γ-FeOOH. (b) XRD patterns of insoluble material and oxalic acid precipitate in HCl solution. They were calcined in the air. The simulation patterns of α-Fe2O3 and c-Nd2O3 are also shown. The HCl concentration is 0.2 mol/L, and the leaching time is 2 h. The origin of each pattern in (a) and (b) is shifted by an integer value for clarity. Based partly on Ref. [16].

Figure 4 shows the leaching time dependences of effective recovery ratio R of Nd through 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mol/L HCl leaching. R was obtained by the equation.

R=Mass ofNdinNd2O3/Mass ofNdin magnet×100E1

Figure 4.

Leaching time dependences of effective recovery ratio of Nd. The examined HCl solutions are 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mol/L. Based partly on Ref. [16].

For each HCl concentration, R increases with increasing leaching time, and approximately saturates, however exceeds 100% at some conditions. The excess above 100% would be due to the existence of impurity phases in c-Nd2O3 and/or incomplete filtration technique.

Next, we show the experimental results of rare earth extraction using the closed-loop acid process. The starting magnet is magnet (2) with the mass of approximately 0.5 g. The distribution of constituent elements in our method mentioned above is partially unknown. Thus, a one-shot extraction with 0.2 mol/L HCl and 0.26 g oxalic acid but with no use of ionic liquid was performed. Table 1 shows the distribution of each ion in the NaCl solution after removal of the corroded sample and in the HCl solution after removal of precipitates produced by the reaction with oxalic acid. In the NaCl solution, only B is detected. A sufficient amount of oxalic acid can efficiently separate rare earths. A large amount of Fe stays in the HCl solution. The expected ion concentrations of the completely dissolved 0.5 g magnet are 1041 mg/L for Nd, 381 mg/L for Pr, 3527 mg/L for Fe, and 49 mg/L for B, respectively. The summation of the B concentrations in the two states listed in Table 1 is not far from 49 mg/L. Then, approximately 30% of B can be separated by the NaCl solution, and the remaining B stays in the HCl solution. Approximately 60% of the Fe ions are contained in the insoluble material obtained after HCl leaching. The recovery ratio of Nd (Pr) is 99% (97%).

SolutionNd (mg/L)Pr (mg/L)Fe (mg/L)B (mg/L)
NaCl after removal of corroded magnetNDNDND12.3
HCl after removal of oxalic acid precipitates10.613.0148028.6

Table 1.

Distribution of Nd, Pr, Fe, and B in the one-shot recovery process.

ND means not detected. Based on Ref. [21].

Following the results of Ref. [12] which reported that salting-out agent NH4Cl plays an essential role in full extraction of Fe by an ionic liquid, the dependence of extraction efficiency on NH4Cl concentration was determined. Without NH4Cl, the extraction efficiency of Fe is only 40%, increasing to 75% with 5 mol/L NH4Cl and 95% for 10 mol/L NH4Cl. In this experiment, we also found that B is fully extracted by the ionic liquid. We speculate that Cyphos® IL101 represented by C38H68ClP transforms into C38H68FeCl4, after the incorporation of Fe3+ ions. Thus, the extraction efficiency of Fe severely depends on the Cl concentration, and the salting-out agent NH4Cl is necessary to provide enough Cl ions.

The preliminary experiment for a closed-loop process of HCl solution was performed using 0.5 mol/L HCl to reduce the experimental time. The oxalic acid mass was maintained at 0.26 g. Hereafter, the HCl solutions after removal of insoluble material in the acid leaching, after Fe extraction by the ionic liquid, and after removal of rare earths by oxalic acid precipitation are denoted state [I], [II], and [III], respectively (see also Figure 1(b)). Table 2 shows the Nd, Pr, and Fe concentrations of these states during each cycle. In the first cycle, approximately 24% of rare earths are extracted together with Fe by the ionic liquid. Only Nd and Pr are separated by the reaction with the oxalic acid. In state [I] during the second cycle, the concentrations of Nd and Pr are approximately one-quarter of those during the first cycle, which means an immediate precipitation due to excess oxalic acid in the previous cycle.

CycleState of solutionNd (mg/L)Pr (mg/L)Fe (mg/L)

Table 2.

Distribution of Nd, Pr, and Fe in the preliminary experiment of a closed loop for HCl solution.

The notations of solutions are defined in Figure 1(b). ND means not detected. Based partly on Ref. [21].

The preliminary experiment suggested that the weight of oxalic acid needs to be adjusted. The weight of oxalic acid for a 0.5 g magnet, reproducing the initial concentrations of Nd and Pr in state [I] in the second cycle, has been searched as shown in Figure 5. The vertical axis shows the difference in Nd (Pr) ion concentration in state [I] between the first and second cycles, which is denoted as ▵c. A positive value for ▵c indicates a poor precipitation efficiency, and a negative value indicates an excess oxalic acid. For each element, ▵c linearly decreases with increasing weight of oxalic acid. A weight of 0.1675 g oxalic acid can reproduce the initial Nd (Pr) ion concentration of state [I] in the second cycle. The chemical equation for oxalic acid precipitation is.


Figure 5.

A plot of Δc vs. the weight of oxalic acid. Δc represents the difference in Nd (Pr) ion concentration after HCl leaching of corroded magnet between the first and second cycles. Based partly on Ref. [21].

If the starting magnet weight is 0.5 g, the ideal amount of oxalic acid is 0.1335 g. However, as shown in Figure 5, Nd and Pr would not fully precipitate for 0.1335 g of oxalic acid. To achieve sufficient precipitation, the amount of oxalic acid that is consumed must be 1.3 times larger.

From the preliminary experiments for the closed-loop process of HCl solution, we have obtained the conditions of 10 mol/L NH4Cl and 0.1675 g oxalic acid for the recycling of 0.5 g magnet. Table 3 shows the results of a demonstration of triple rare earth extraction from 0.5 g magnet with the closed loop of HCl solution. The HCl concentration was 0.5 mol/L to expedite the experiment. The concentrations of Nd and Pr ions are measured in states [I], [II], and [III]. In each cycle, 10–15% of Nd and Pr ions are extracted together with Fe ions by the ionic liquid, as in the preliminary experiment (see Table 2). Contrary to our expectation, 30–35% of Nd and Pr ions remain in solution after the oxalic acid precipitation. However, these ions apparently do not contribute to the rare earth concentrations of state [I] in the next cycle; the concentrations of Nd and Pr ions in state [I] are the same as those during the previous cycle. The recovery ratio of each element, calculated by eliminating the amount of element extracted by the ionic liquid, is approximately 50% in all cycles. Figure 6 shows the XRD pattern of calcined insoluble material after HCl leaching in the second cycle. The simulated patterns of Nd0.73Pr0.27FeO3 and α-Fe2O3 are also exhibited. Elemental Nd (Pr) is partially recovered together with Fe. The XRD pattern in Figure 6 supports the idea that the Nd and Pr elements, which are present in the same concentration as the ions in state [III], would enter insoluble material in state [I] in the next cycle.

CycleState of solutionNd (mg/L)Pr (mg/L)Recovery ratio of Nd (%)Recovery ratio of Pr (%)

Table 3.

The distribution of Nd and Pr and the recovery ratio of each element in a triple rare earth extraction.

The notations of the solutions are defined in Figure 1(b). Based partly on Ref. [21].

Figure 6.

XRD pattern of calcined insoluble material after HCl leaching in the second extraction. The simulated Nd0.73Pr0.27FeO3 and α-Fe2O3 patterns are also shown. The origin of each pattern is shifted by an integer value for clarity. Based partly on Ref. [21].

In our method, Cyphos® IL101 is rather expensive, and the regeneration of the ionic liquid by stripping Fe3+ is required to reduce the cost. We examined two stripping methods. The first one is the stripping using NaOH solution. After the reaction of the ionic liquid containing Fe3+ ions with NaOH solution, Fe(OH)3 is expected to be precipitated, and Fe2O3 would be obtained after the calcination. The ionic liquid was reacted with NaOH solution (1 mol/L) with a volume ratio of Cyphos® IL101:NaOH solution = 1:2.The calcined precipitate was checked by the XRD pattern, and it is shown in Figure 7(a). The obtained pattern is in good agreement with the XRD pattern of NaFeO2. The recovery ratio of Fe is estimated to be 17%. The second method is the employment of ammonia solution, for which 100% stripping of Fe3+ has been already reported [23]. We roughly followed the reported recipe [23]. The yellow-colored ionic liquid containing Fe3+, which was obtained in the actual process flow, was reacted with the ammonia solution (approximately 3 wt.%) with a volume ratio of Cyphos® IL101:ammonia solution = 1:10. The precipitate at the interface between the liquids was collected using a cellulose filter and calcined together with the filter in the air. Figure 7(b) shows the XRD pattern of the calcined sample recovered from used Cyphos® IL101. The figure also displays the simulated patterns of α-Fe2O3, Fe3PO7, and C. The experimental XRD pattern closely matches the superposition of simulated patterns. The sources of P and C atom contamination would be Cyphos® IL101 containing P and the cellulose filter, respectively. Despite the contamination due to our insufficient filtration technique, Fe can be stripped. Furthermore, the yellow-colored ionic liquid once again became transparent after Fe3+ stripping, which means the ionic liquid is regenerated.

Figure 7.

(a) XRD pattern of the calcined sample recovered from used Cyphos® IL101 reacted with NaOH solution. The simulated NaFeO2 pattern is also presented. The origin of each pattern is shifted by an integer value for clarity. (b) XRD pattern of calcined sample recovered from used Cyphos® IL101 reacted with ammonia solution. The simulated α-Fe2O3, Fe3PO7, and C patterns are also presented. The origin of each pattern is shifted by an integer value for clarity. (Based partly on Ref. [21]).

Focusing on the one-shot recovery processes, a comparison between our method and other methods [12, 13, 14, 15] based on the acid leaching mentioned in Introduction is shown in Table 4. The number of steps in the recovery processes and the rare earth recovery ratio of each method are similar. The roasting used in Refs. [12, 13, 14] would have a cost disadvantage. Although Ref. [15] does not employ roasting, HNO3 has a disadvantage because waste discharge containing nitrate salt is severely controlled by law for environmental reasons. The acid leaching process in our method and in Ref. [14] is performed at room temperature, which means that these are safe processes. Since B is harmful, its separation is highly desired. Our method has achieved 30% B separation, whereas the other methods do not report a clear B separation. If a closed-loop acid process with a high recovery ratio of rare earths is realized, our method is promising because each step except Fe extraction by ionic liquid is performed at room temperature. This condition and the rather simple procedures lead to a safe and low-cost recovery process. In addition, the peculiar feature of B separation in our method is environmentally friendly.

ItemsOur method [16][12][13][14][15]
PretreatmentCorrosion at RTRoast at 950°CRoast at 500–1000°CRoast at 750°CSludge
Acid leaching temperatureRT80°C180°CRT80°C
B separation30%Not separatedNot separatedNot separatedNot separated
Recovery ratio of rare earths (%)9710010010094

Table 4.

Comparison between our method and other methods based on acid leaching in a one-shot recovery process.

RT means room temperature. Based partly on Ref. [21].


4. Summary

Rare earth extraction methods based on acid leaching are entering the stage of practical use. To address the issue of rather low selectivity between rare earths and Fe at the room temperature acid-process, we have proposed the pretreatment of corrosion. Our method has improved the selectivity, and rare earth recovery ratio, in one-shot extraction, reaches to almost 100% even at room temperature. For sustainability and environmental considerations, the recyclability of waste acid solution is one of the central issues in rare earth recycling, and this has not been well investigated. In this work, we have experimentally determined the recovery ratio of rare earth elements in our method with the closed-loop acid process. This ratio is approximately 50%, reduced from almost full recovery in a one-shot extraction. Although the recovery ratio is rather low at the present stage, our encouraging result should lead to rapid advancement of the study of recycling using a closed-loop acid process.


5. Future directions

The demonstration of closed-loop process for HCl solution indicates that the precipitation by oxalic acid is not sufficient, although the amount of oxalic acid is larger than the ideal amount calculated using the chemical formula of precipitation. To increase the recovery ratios of rare earth elements, if the amount of oxalic acid is increased, it will result in a reduced recovery ratio in the second cycle, as deduced from Table 2. Thus, a trade-off between the number of rare earth extractions and the recovery ratio of rare earths might exist for the present precipitation condition. The main cause of the reduced recovery ratio is the insufficient ionization of oxalic acid. The degree of ionization of oxalic acid strongly depends on the pH of the solution. The ionization concentration generally increases with increasing pH, and the full ionization of oxalic acid with an ideal weight of 0.1335 g would be realized. Another issue to be considered is the partial rare earth extraction by the ionic liquid. If the oxalic acid precipitation process is performed before the process of Fe3+ extraction by the ionic liquid, only rare earth elements would be separated due to the high selectivity between rare earths and Fe under oxalic acid precipitation. Thus, the issue would be resolved by reversing the sequence of the two processes. As shown in Figure 6, unassigned peaks of material other than α-Fe2O3 and Nd0.73Pr0.27FeO3 are present in the XRD spectrum. In our study, complete separation of the ionic liquid from the HCl solution is difficult, which results in contamination of the calcined sample. Further improvement of the separation technique is needed to obtain a pure calcined sample.



This research was supported by the Matching Planner Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). J.K. is grateful for the support provided by the Comprehensive Research Organization of Fukuoka Institute of Technology.


  1. 1. Goonan TG. Rare earth elements—End use and recyclability. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report. 2011;2011-5094:1-15
  2. 2. Tanaka M, Oki T, Koyama K, Narita H, Oishi T. Recycling of rare earths from scrap. Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths. 2013;43:159-211
  3. 3. Binnemans K, Jones PT, Blanpain B, Gerven TV, Yang Y, Walton A, Buchert M. Recycling of rare earths: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013;51:1-22
  4. 4. Darcy JW, Bandara D, Mishra B, Emmert MH. Challenges in recycling end-of-life rare earth magnets. JOM. 2013;65:1381-1382
  5. 5. Rademaker JH, Kleijn R, Yang Y. Recycling as a strategy against rare earth element criticality: A systemic evaluation of the potential yield of NdFeB magnet recycling. Environmental Science & Technology. 2013;47:10129-10136
  6. 6. Takeda O, Okabe TH, Umetsu Y. Recovery of neodymium from a mixture of magnet scrap and other scrap. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2006;408-412:387-390
  7. 7. Uda T, Jacob KT, Hirasawa M. Technique for enhanced rare earth separation. Science. 2000;289:2326-2329
  8. 8. Bian Y, Guo S, Jiang L, Tang K, Ding W. Extraction of rare earth elements from permanent magnet scraps by FeO-B2O3 flux treatment. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy. 2015;1:151-160
  9. 9. Maroufi S, Khayyam R, Sahajwalla V. Thermal isolation of rare earth oxides from Nd-Fe-B magnets using carbon from waste tyres. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2017;5:6201-6208
  10. 10. Xie F, Zhang TA, Dreisinger D, Doyle F. A critical review on solvent extraction of rare earths from aqueous solutions. Minerals Engineering. 2014;56:10-28
  11. 11. Yang Y, Walton A, Sheridan R, Güth K, Gauẞ R, Gutfleisch O, Buchert M, Steenari B-M, Gerven TV, Jones PT, Binnemans K. REE recovery from end-of-life NdFeB permanent magnet scrap: A critical review. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy. 2017;3:122-149
  12. 12. Hoogerstraete TV, Blanpain B, Gerven TV, Binnemans K. From NdFeB magnets towards the rare-earth oxides: A recycling process consuming only oxalic acid. RSC Advances. 2014;4:64099-64111
  13. 13. Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Co., National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tohoku Univ. Method of rare-earth extraction by acid leaching. Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication 2011; No. 2011-184735
  14. 14. Önal MAR, Borra CR, Guo M, Blanpain B, Gerven TV. Recycling of NdFeB magnets using sulfation, selective roasting, and water leaching. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy. 2015;1:199-215
  15. 15. Rabatho JP, Tongamp W, Takasaki Y, Haga K, Shibayama A. Recovery of Nd and Dy from rare earth magnetic waste sludge by hydrometallurgical process. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2013;15:171-178
  16. 16. Kataoka Y, Ono T, Tsubota M, Kitagawa J. Improved room-temperature-selectivity between Nd and Fe in Nd recovery from Nd-Fe-B magnet. AIP Advances. 2015;5:117212
  17. 17. Billard I. Ionic liquids: New hopes for efficient lanthanide/actinide extraction and separation? Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths. 2013;43:213-273
  18. 18. Hoogerstraete TV, Wellens S, Verachtert K, Binnemans K. Removal of transition metals from rare earths by solvent extraction with an undiluted phosphonium ionic liquid: Separations relevant to rare-earth magnet recycling. Green Chemistry. 2013;15:919-927
  19. 19. Dupont D, Binnemans K. Recycling of rare earths from NdFeB magnets using a combined leaching/extraction system based on the acidity and thermomorphism of the ionic liquid [Hbet][Tf2N]. Green Chemistry. 2015;17:2150-2163
  20. 20. Parmentier D, Hoogerstraete TV, Metz SJ, Binnemans K, Kroon MC. Selective extraction of metals from chloride solutions with the tetraoctylphosphonium oleate ionic liquid. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015;54:5149-5158
  21. 21. Kitagawa J, Uemura R. Rare earth extraction from NdFeB magnet using a closed-loop acid process. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:8039
  22. 22. Kataoka Y, Kawamoto Y, Ono T, Tsubota M, Kitagawa J. Hydrogenation of Nd-Fe-B magnet powder under a high pressure of hydrogen. Results in Physics. 2015;5:99-100
  23. 23. Wellens S, Hoogerstrete TV, Möller C, Thijs B, Luyten J, Binnemans K. Dissolution of metal oxides in an acid-saturated ionic liquid solution and investigation of the back-extraction behaviour to the aqueous phase. Hydrometallurgy. 2014;144-145:27-33

Written By

Jiro Kitagawa and Masami Tsubota

Submitted: 07 May 2017 Reviewed: 08 September 2017 Published: 20 December 2017