Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Male Reproduction

Written By

Sabiha Fatima

Submitted: 04 July 2017 Reviewed: 01 February 2018 Published: 09 March 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74763

From the Edited Volume

Novel Prospects in Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress

Edited by Pinar Atukeren

Chapter metrics overview

1,746 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a normal physiological event in the male germ line. ROS are a double-edged sword, despite its role as key signaling molecules in physiological processes such as capacitation and hyperactivation, its overproduction which overwhelms the body’s antioxidant defenses is thought to affect male fertility and normal embryonic development. The excess generation of ROS in semen by exogenous and endogenous factors has been recognized as detrimental etiologies for male infertilities. Spermatozoa are vulnerable to ROS attack because they are rich in mitochondria, have abundance of substrates for free radical attack and their capacity to protect themselves from oxidative stress is limited. The cytotoxic aldehydes generated as a result of lipid peroxidation are known to form adduct with the mitochondrial protein involved in electron transport chain and stimulate generation of ROS in mitochondria. ROS and their metabolites can lead to oxidative DNA damage in mitochondria and nucleus that eventually culminates in DNA fragmentation. The presence for large amount of damaged DNA is a major characteristic of defective human spermatozoa, which affect the fertility and pregnancy outcome. Thus, as a comprehensive approach, treatment of oxidative stress should involve strategies to reduce stress-provoking conditions to help reverse sperm dysfunction.


  • ROS
  • oxidative stress
  • male infertility
  • DNA damage

1. Introduction

Infertility is a disorder affecting 10–15% couples of reproductive age worldwide [1, 2]. It is defined as the inability of a couple to achieve spontaneous pregnancy after 1 year of regular, unprotected sexual intercourse [3]. The inability to have children affects the infertile couples psychologically and it may lead to depression, suicidal tendencies and other pathological and psychological conditions [4, 5]. Although, fertility may decrease with increase in age, but often occurs as a result of anatomic defects, endocrinopathies, immunologic problems, gene mutation, ejaculatory failures or radiation, chemotherapy and environmental exposures [6, 7, 8, 9]. In approximately half of all the cases of infertility, male factor is the sole or major contributing factor with no identifiable cause found in over 25% of infertile males [10, 11]. In approximately 40–50% of the male infertility cases, oxidative stress-related mechanisms are found to be responsible for the impairment of the sperm function and fertilization [12]. Oxidative stress is a disturbance in the balance between the systemic manifestation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the ability of the body to counteract their harmful effects through neutralization by antioxidant defense mechanism [13]. ROS such as superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (HO) are highly reactive oxidizing agents produced continuously during metabolic processes [14]. Oxidative processes related to spermatozoa are particularly of interest as they exhibit a double-edged sword role in these cells (Figure 1). The physiological level of ROS is necessary to regulate a critical redox-sensitive processes such as capacitation and hyperactivation without which fertilization is impossible [15]. While its supraphysiological level affects normal spermatogenesis and sperm functions such as motility, capacitation, acrosome reaction, egg penetration and decondensation of sperm head, which is essential to achieve fertilization. Spermatogenesis is a metabolically active biological process during which haploid spermatozoa are produced in the seminiferous tubules. During this process O2 are generated as a natural by-product of cellular respiration. The germ cells undergoing differentiation to spermatids in testes are protected from oxidative stress by its nurse cells called sertoli cells which possess high level of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) as well as the reductase, transferase, and peroxidase activities of the glutathione cycle [16]. Once the spermatozoa are released from the germinal epithelium, they become vulnerable to oxidative attack as they are no longer protected by defense mechanism of sertoli cells [13, 17]. Excess ROS can lead to cellular injury by damaging DNA, lipids, and proteins in the cells [18]. Thus, the ROS must be maintained at physiological levels for optimal sperm function, the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, and redox-sensitive signal transduction mechanisms affecting fertility.


2. ROS and sperm physiology

During their transit through the epididymis, spermatozoa progressively acquire the ability to move but lack fertilizing capacity [19]. They acquire the ability to fertilize in the female tract through a series of physiological changes called ‘capacitation’ which involves hyperactivation, acrosomal reaction, and sperm-oocyte fusion. Mammalian sperm capacitation is a redox regulated process which requires the production of different types of ROS to promote the fertilization of spermatozoa to the mature oocytes [20, 21]. The primary ROS generated in human spermatozoa is the O2 which appears to play a role in this process [22]. This one-electron reduction product of oxygen generated reacts with itself via dismutation reaction, which is greatly accelerated by SOD, to generate H2O2. It has been reported that the capacitating populations of mammalian spermatozoa generate ROS mainly by two mechanisms: the membrane nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, an enzyme complex that is contained in the plasma membrane; and the mitochondrial nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)-dependent oxido-reductase [23, 24]. The NADPH required by NADPH oxidase can be supplied by dehydrogenases located both in the plasma membrane and the cytosol. Studies have suggested the activation of sperm plasma membrane oxidase during capacitation and acrosome reaction [25, 26]. In mammalian spermatozoa, NADPH oxidase 5 (NOX5) are actively involved in generating O2 [27]. The mitochondria located in the mid-piece region of the sperm generates a low level of ROS during steady-state respiration but have the potential to accelerate this activity when these gametes enter the intrinsic apoptotic pathway [28, 29]. In addition to H2O2 and O2, a variety of secondary cytotoxic radicals which are reported to stimulate sperm capitation includes nitric oxide (NO) and peroxynitrite (ONOO) [30, 31]. The O2 generated from these two sources is thought to combine with NO produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and result in the formation of powerful oxidant ONOO−, which mediates the oxidation of cholesterol to oxysterols. The oxysterols then exit the plasma membrane dramatically to enhance membrane fluidity [31, 32]. Further, the combined action of ONOO− and H2O2 concomitantly lead to the inhibition of tyrosine phosphatase activity while the combination of O2, bicarbonate (HCO3), and calcium ions (Ca2+) activates soluble adenylyl cyclase, thereby stimulating cAMP production and the activation of protein kinase A (PKA) [33, 34, 35]. Activated PKA phosphorylates and inhibits protein phosphatase and activates tyrosine kinase that leads to an increase in actin polymerization, an essential process required for the development of hyperactivated motility [36, 37]. Only hyperactivated spermatozoa have increased motility to undergo acrosome reaction and acquire the characteristics required for successful fertilization. The role of low concentrations of OH in the initiation of hyperactivation in vitro has been well documented [38]. The hyperactivated spermatozoon traverse the cumulus oophorus surrounding ovulated eggs, it then binds and penetrate to the zonapellucida (ZP) of the oocyte and initiates an exocytotic release of proteolytic enzymes, creating a pore in ZP’s extracellular matrix. For successful fertilization, the spermatozoa then penetrate this physical zona barrier and fuse with the oocyte [39, 40]. Thus, ROS during the capacitation and acrosome reaction has been shown to increase the membrane fluidity and rates of sperm-oocyte fusion (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Physiological and pathological role of ROS in male reproduction.


3. Human spermatozoa are vulnerable to oxidative stress

During spermatogenesis, germ cells produce high levels of reactive oxygen species, but fortunately a complex of antioxidant defense system and DNA repair system exists in the testis that protects genome integrity in differentiating sperm [16]. In normal spermatogenesis, the developing spermatozoa extrude most of the cytoplasm by the action of sertoli cells to change to a condensed, elongated form [41]. The lack of cytoplasm results in decreased intrinsic antioxidant defense due to the loss of most of antioxidant enzymes, rendering the cells less protected against ROS by the time they are discharged into the epididymis [42, 43]. Further, they also lack the necessary cytoplasmic-enzyme repair systems, thus they have very limited capacity for detection and repair of DNA damage [44]. Therefore, during their transit and storage into the epididymis or post-ejaculation they have no DNA repair mechanism, and thus cannot synthesize DNA, RNA, or translate proteins (such as repair enzymes) [45, 46]. The mammalian spermatozoa are vulnerable to oxidative stress not only because of their inherent free radical generating activity and lack of endogenous antioxidant protection, but also due to the abundant substrates that these cells possess for free radical attack. In mature spermatozoa, the small cytoplasm with limited defense remains confined to the mid-piece region in the vicinity of the mitochondria. As a result, the plasma membrane richly endowed with high concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), particularly docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (22:6) and arachidonic acids (20:4) containing six and four carbon-carbon double bonds per molecule, surrounding the acrosome and the tail are not protected by the intracellular antioxidants [47, 48, 49]. In human spermatozoa, approximately 50% of the fatty acids are composed of DHA which is thought to play a major role in regulating spermatogenesis and membrane fluidity [18]. The presence of double bond in PUFAs adjacent to a methylene group weakens the methyl carbon-hydrogen bonds and makes hydrogen more susceptible to abstraction and thus vulnerable to oxidation [44, 50].

Sperm mitochondrial DNA has long been postulated as a sources and often likely target of ROS oxidation as they are not protected by histones and has a very limited capacity for DNA repair with complete lack of nucleotide-excision repair pathways [51]. It is estimated that the mitochondrial DNA exhibits the mutation rate two orders of magnitude higher than that of nuclear DNA. Thus any quantitative or qualitative aberrations in mitochondrial DNA will result in the increased ROS generation which will affect the cellular functioning of the cell [52].

Despite its vulnerability to oxidative stress, maturing sperms spontaneously generate ROS during their progress through the epididymis, as its normal metabolite that aids it to acquire full fertility competence [53]. The lack of intrinsic antioxidant protection forces these cells to dependent on defense provided by seminal and epididymal enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant mechanisms. These mechanisms compensate for the deficiency in cytoplasmic enzymes in sperm [54, 55]. Thus the sperms which spend long period as an isolated cells both in male and female genital tracts (approximately 3 weeks), these limited defenses can be easily overwhelmed with an increased generation of ROS [56].


4. ROS scavenging capacity of semen

Spermatozoa like other aerobic cells are dependent on cellular respiration process which supports its life. But excessive generation of its metabolites, such as ROS, can modify cell functions. Hence, under normal condition male reproductive system must continuously inactivate ROS to maintain a balance between ROS production and its scavenging mechanism in order to keep only the small amount necessary to maintain normal cell function. Thus, in order to maintain the redox homeostasis, the mature spermatozoa with limited antioxidant defense capacity are mainly dependent on seminal plasma which is well endowed with an array of effective enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanisms [57, 58].

The main enzymatic antioxidants in the semen include superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione peroxidase/glutathione reductase (GPX/GRD) system [59]. SOD is metalloenzymes which is present in both intracellular and extracellular forms [60]. SOD spontaneously dismutase O2 to form H2O2 and catalase catalyzes the decomposition of H2O2 to O2 and water (H2O) thus preventing the lipid peroxidation of the sperm plasma membrane. Another enzyme of the antioxidant system in the semen is glutathione peroxidase (GPX), which catalyzes the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and organic peroxides, including the peroxides of phospholipids [61]. Spermatozoa have limited supply of catalase and GPX, while SOD is the main enzymatic antioxidant which protects it from oxidative stress [62]. Beside the enzymes antioxidant protective mechanism, seminal plasma is also employed by the low molecular weight, non-enzymatic antioxidants that assist enzyme activity. These include ascorbic acid (vitamin C), tocopherol (vitamin E), vitamin A, pantothenic acid, coenzyme Q10, carnitine, amino acids (taurine, hypotaurine) zinc, selenium albumin, and urate. These agents principally act by directly neutralizing free radical activity chemically and some of these antioxidants are reported to enhance sperm viability/motility as well as normal sperm morphology and required for spermatogenesis, development of spermatozoa [63, 64]. The seminal plasma antioxidants concentrations have been shown to be significantly higher in fertile men than those in infertile men [65, 66].


5. Sources of ROS in seminal plasma

Oxidants in seminal plasma originate from numerous extrinsic and intrinsic sources. The human ejaculate is composed of various types of cells, which include mature and immature cells, round cells from extraordinary degrees of spermatogenesis, leukocytes, and epithelial cells [67, 68]. Of those, leukocytes, specially neutrophils and macrophages and immature spermatozoa are taken into consideration as the primary endogenous assets of ROS [69], while numerous life style elements including immoderate smoking and alcohol intake, and environmental elements inclusive of radiation and pollution can contribute as exogenous sources of ROS (Figure 2) [70, 71]. Exposure to radiation and toxins induces ROS production which impairs spermatogenesis and leads to DNA damage in human spermatozoa, which further decreases the motility and vitality of sperm cells as well as their concentration depending on the duration of exposure [72]. Cigarette smoking is found to be correlated with leukocytospermia. It has been reported that smoking can elevate the leukocyte concentration by 48% and ROS by 107% in seminal plasma [73].

Figure 2.

Extrinsic and intrinsic factors of ROS generation in seminal plasma.

5.1. Immature/abnormal spermatozoa

One of the major cellular sources of ROS in the semen is sperm cells [74]. When spermatogenesis is impaired, the cytoplasmic extrusion mechanisms are defective, and spermatozoa are released from the germinal epithelium carrying surplus cytoplasmic residues in the mid-piece [75]. These residues are rich in the cytoplasmic enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, lactic acid dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), and creatine kinase [69, 76]. However among these enzymes, the key enzyme was thought to be G6PDH, which would be expected to enhance the intracellular availability of NADPH via the hexose monophosphate shunt. NADPH is used to fuel the generation of ROS via NADPH oxidase activity [27, 77]

5.2. Leukocytes

The main source of ROS inside semen is leukocytes. Infection or chronic inflammation may activate the leukocytes to release 1000-times more ROS than spermatozoa [78]. This high production of ROS by leukocytes plays an important role in the cellular defense system against infections as well as inflammation [78]. However, the high concentrations of ROS may overwhelm seminal antioxidant defenses and damage the sperm cell [79]. Essentially, the cellular mechanisms for the generation of ROS within leukocytes and spermatozoa are same, in leukocytes, the release of the large amounts of superoxide into phagocytic vesicles for killing the pathogens [80, 81].


6. Impact of oxidative stress on spermatozoa

The exact mechanism of oxidative stress-induced decline in sperm function remains unknown but is mainly attributed to peroxidative damage to axoneme and depletion of intracellular ATP levels, followed by generation of 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and malondialdehyde (MDA) owing to the oxidation of lipid membrane components and oxidation of DNA followed by fragmentation of both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA [82].

6.1. Lipid peroxidation

In PUFAs, the hydroxyl radicals attack lipids containing carbon-carbon double bond and promote the hydrogen abstraction from carbon to generate a carbon-centered lipid radical (2CH−•) that then combines with oxygen to generate lipid peroxyl radicals (ROO•) [83]. The ROO• radicals subsequently attacks another lipid molecule, abstract a hydrogen atom in order to stabilize itself as the lipid hydroperoxide but in the process generates another carbon-centered lipid radical that perpetuates the cascade of chemical reactions called lipid peroxidation. The process results in the generation of small molecular mass electrophilic lipid aldehydes such as 4-hydroxynonenal (4HNE), acrolein, and malondialdehyde [84]. Lipid peroxidation (LPO) is extremely harmful to spermatozoa, having a dramatic effect on both sperm movement and the competence of these cells for fertilization (Figure 3). Immature human sperm cells contain high levels of DHA in the cytoplasmatic droplet and showed more susceptibility to LPO than normal matured sperm with lower DHA levels [85].

Figure 3.

(A) ROS-induced initiation and propagation of lipid peroxidation (LPO) generates lipid hydroperoxides plus a new carbon-centered radical that continues the chain reaction. (B) Mitochondrial ROS generation. The electrophilic aldehydes generated as a by-product of LPO process bind to protein of electron transport chain and further promote mitochondrial ROS generation. This process results in loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, low ATP generation, loss of sperm motility, oxidative DNA damage followed by DNA fragmentation.

Added to this vulnerability, it has been shown that cytotoxic aldehydes generated as the result of oxidative stress has the ability to of triggering ROS generation by the sperm mitochondria in a self-perpetuating cycle; the greater the level of unsaturation, the greater the level of the stimulatory effect. The defective human spermatozoa contain abnormally high cellular contents of free polyunsaturated fatty acids, the levels of which are positively correlated with mitochondrial superoxide generation. The lipid aldehydes, 4HNE or acrolein bind covalently to the nucleophilic centers of vulnerable proteins, such as succinic acid dehydrogenase and form a protein adducts in the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) that results in the leakage of electrons which disturbs the normal flow of electrons and reduction of oxygen to water [86, 87]. The leakage of electrons from the ETC results in the reduction of oxygen to generate O2, which then by mitochondrial superoxide dismutase rapidly dismutates to H2O2 [88]. The excess of cytoplasm in the immature or defective spermatozoa contain superabundance of cytoplasmic enzymes. The retention of excess of SOD can only be an asset for any cell seeking to protect itself from oxidative stress if it is accompanied by a corresponding increase in the presence of enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase or catalase that can scavenge H2O2. But excess of SOD and limited supply of glutathione peroxidase or catalase in human spermatozoa simply turns a short-lived, membrane-impermeant, relatively inert free radical O2 into a long-lived, membrane-permeate reactive oxidant, H2O2 [89, 90]. The damage of protein and membrane lipids due to elevated levels of ROS in mitochondria might affect the process of oxidative phosphorylation causing depletion of intracellular ATP levels leading to axonemal damage, decreased sperm viability, and increased mid-piece sperm morphological defects with deleterious effects on sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction and decline of motility and fertility [91]. The mitochondrial function as a measure of inner mitochondrial membrane potential is found to be decreased in the spermatozoa of infertile men with elevated levels of ROS production and is positively correlated with the sperm concentration [92].

6.2. DNA damage in spermatozoa

Mitochondrial DNA is particularly vulnerable to free radical attack because it is essentially unprotected and has a very limited capacity for DNA repair [93]. Sperm nuclear DNA, on the other hand, is much resistant to damage because it is tightly compacted by replacing histones with small, positively charged molecules known as protamine [94, 95]. Sperm DNA maturation and appropriate packaging are vital steps in the proper development of spermatozoa.

During the late spermatogenesis in the mammalian germinal epithelium, the differentiating spertamids are highly susceptible to DNA damage due to important changes in the cytoarchitecture and dramatic remodeling of the chromatin during which most of the histones are removed from the DNA and are first replaced by transition proteins TP1 and TP2, and then by protamines P1 and P2 which are approximately half the size of histones. P1 and P2 are normally expressed in a 1:1 ratio in human sperm, and provide a tight packaging of the sperm DNA. The chromatin remodeling is facilitated by the coordinated loosening of the chromatin by histone hyperacetylation and by the DNA topoisomerase II (topo II), which produce temporary stand breaks in the sperm DNA to relieve torsional stress that results from supercoiling [96, 97]. This forms the basic packaging unit of sperm chromatin, a toroid, which is further compacted by the intramolecular and intermolecular disulfide cross-links between cysteine residues present in protamines. The tight packaging of the sperm DNA enables the entire haploid genome to be condensed and packed in a sperm head measuring 5 × 2.5 μm. This level of protect and ensures that the paternal genome is delivered in a form that allows developing embryo to accurately express genetic information Normally, these temporary strand breaks are repaired by nuclear poly (ADP-ribose) polymersases (PARP) and topoisomerase II prior to completion of spermiogenesis and ejaculation [98]. However in pathological cases, the error in chromatin remodeling and repair mechanism leads to the generation of high level of nicked and poorly protaminated nuclear DNA with relatively high nucleohistone content or abnormally high and low P1/P2 ratios [99, 100, 101]. Thus, defect in the chromatin remodeling process causes DNA damage in spermatids during spermiogenesis, this creates a state of vulnerability whereby spermatozoa become increasingly susceptible to oxidative damage.


7. Causes of DNA damage in spermatozoa

When the protection of DNA in spermatozoa, which is dependent on its close association with cysteine rich protaminesis is lost, the cells become very susceptible to oxidative DNA damage induced by several extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Deoxygenated guanine (dG) is more susceptible to oxidation than other nucleosides in DNA due to its low oxidation potential [102]. The enzyme 8-oxoguanine glycosylase 1 (OGG1) immediately clips the 8OHdG residues out of the DNA generating an abasic site, But due to the absence of base excision repair enzyme, the spermatozoa are ejaculated carrying a abasic sites in their DNA [103]. Studies have reported that the spermatozoa of subfertile patients contain particularly high levels of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8OHdG), the major oxidized base adduct formed when DNA is subjected to attack by ROS [104].

DNA repair does occur during spermiogenesis but stops post-spermiogenesis because spermatozoa are transcriptionally and translationally silent. They cannot undergo programmed cell death called apoptosis, due to their inherent physical architecture, the endonucleases released from the mitochondria have no access to the DNA. Thus, abortive apoptosis initiated post-meiotically, when the ability to drive the spermiogenesis process to completion is declined and the stand breaks are not repaired due to impairment in the repair process results in high levels of DNA fragmented sperm in the ejaculate [105]. Sperm with DNA fragmentation still has thepotential to fertilize and some types of stand DNA breaks in sperm can be repaired by oocytes, before the initiation of the first cleavage division, and generate normal offspring, but that depends on the type and level of chromatin damage and the capacity of the oocyte to repair it [106]. DNA-strand breaks are extremely harmful lesions if not repaired and can lead to genomic instability and cell death. In natural conception, percentage of DNA damage has been negatively correlated to the rate of fertilization. If post fertilization oocyte make mistake in the repair process, deletions or sequence errors may be introduced, then it fabricates the possibility for de novo mutations, which could have a profound impact on the health and well-being of the offspring [107]. Sperm DNA damage in context to assisted reproductive technique (ART) has important clinical implications. Sperm selected for ART mostly originates from environment experiencing oxidative stress and high percentage of these sperms may have damaged DNA. If such sperms are used clinically in the form of therapy then can lead to substantial risk in pregnancy outcome. In case of intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in vitro fertilization (IVF), the use of these spermatozoa may not be cause of concern. But in case of intracellular sperm injection (ICSI), this natural selection barrier is bypassed and the spermatozoa with damaged DNA are directly injected into oocytes. Studies have reported that DNA damaged spermatozoa used in ICSI have some capacity for fertilization, but percentage of DNA damage has been negatively correlated to the rate of fertilization [108]. ROS-mediated DNA damage may be linked to an increase in early embryo death, infertility in the offspring, and high incidence of childhood cancer [109, 110]. We propose that extrinsic and intrinsic sources of ROS could make a significant contribution to the induction of OS and DNA damage in spermatozoa which can decrease pregnancy rate and affect the fertility outcome, further additional studies are clearly needed to validate this concept.


8. Management of infertility caused by oxidative stress

Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathophysiology of male infertility, which is caused due to pathological level of ROS and the loss of antioxidant protection for the spermatozoa. There are many factors which can induce oxidative stress and can alter seminal parameters and rate of fertilization. Thorough examination and management of some of these factors may protect the ROS-induced DNA damage and improve a couple’s chances of conception either naturally or via assisted reproduction.

8.1. Behavior and life style modification

Various behaviors and lifestyles factors such as alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, obesity, excess exposure to environmental toxicants, and psychological stress are negatively correlated with spermatogenesis and may cause oxidative stress and reduction in sperm quality [111]. The increased consumption of simple sugars and high-fat food and physical inactivity are leading causes of the growing obesity. It is suggested that abnormal hormonal regulation, dysregulation of adipocytokine, and ROS generation lead to suboptimal semen quality these patients [112]. Several systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, infection, and cancer are known to cause oxidative stress-induced male infertility [113, 114]. There are studies which have shown positive correlation of exercise with improvements in semen parameters, sperm DNA integrity, and pregnancy rate [115]. Nevertheless, modification in behavior and unhealthy living, regular exercise, stress free jobs, and treatment of a patient’s underlying pathology should be the first steps to reduce or eliminate stress-provoking conditions to reverse sperm dysfunction.

8.2. Dietary antioxidants

As many studies suggested that oxidative stress is a major cause of unexplained male infertility, antioxidant therapy would be expected to have a therapeutic effect in such cases. There are evidences which have suggested that oral antioxidants and herbal products can also boost male reproductive functions [116, 117]. But, despite of known effect of antioxidant on oxidative stress, very few studies conducted have any validity due to small sample size, difference in dosage and duration of therapy, and lack controls [118]. In order to make the study valid, patient’s selection criteria for the trial should be based on the evidence indication oxidative stress as a key element in their pathology, a thorough diagnosis is required to determine patients that need to be supplemented. However, if this strategy is pursued, great care must be taken in selecting the most appropriate antioxidants for clinical use. Since ROS plays an important role in regulating the signal transduction cascades that drive sperm capacitation, we should ensure that any antioxidants employed in vitro do not compromise the fertilizing potential of these cells [119].

The study of in vitro antioxidants is highly relevant in the era of assisted reproduction because sperm preparation techniques in ART are potential generators of exogenous stresses that make human spermatozoa vulnerable to oxidative stress and DNA damage.


9. Conclusion

Oxidative stress has been recognized as a major contributory factor to male infertility. Spermatozoa are professional generator of ROS as physiological level of ROS is necessary to regulate critical redox-sensitive processes such as capacitation, hyperactivation, acrosome reactions, and signaling processes to ensure appropriate fertilization. On the other hand, many endogenous and exogenous factors can elevate ROS production which can overwhelm their antioxidant mechanism. This results in male infertility via mechanisms involving the induction of peroxidative damage to the sperm plasma membrane, DNA damage, which significantly impairs sperm function. Lack of repair mechanism and abortive apoptosis in mature spermatozoa results in high levels of DNA fragmented sperm in the ejaculate. In natural conception, oocytes can repair some of stand DNA breaks, but that depends on the type and level of chromatin damage and the capacity of the oocyte to repair it. If post fertilization oocyte make mistake in the repair process it may lead to failure in fertilization. But if fertilization occurs, then it creates the possibility for de novo mutations, which could have a profound impact on the health and well-being of the offspring. When the natural balance between ROS and antioxidants is disturbed, the first restorative measure to be taken should be changes in lifestyle, maintaining a healthy and balanced diet, and antioxidant supplementation may then be taken together to improve the patient’s health outcomes.

9.1. Suggestion

The conventional seminological parameter in infertile cases reflects the functional competence of the spermatozoa and the fertilizing potential of the ejaculate, but the underlying mechanisms of male fertility is not known. Thus in order to enrich the diagnostic value of this fundamental form of investigation, the detailed examination of sperm DNA damage may be incorporated as a potentially valuable tool to investigate the functional integrity of the spermatozoa at the molecular level.


  1. 1. Louis JF, Thoma ME, Sorensen DN, McLain AC, King RB, Sundaram R, Keiding N, Buck Louis GM. The prevalence of couple infertility in the United States from a male perspective: Evidence from a nationally representative sample. Andrology. 2013;1:741-748. DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00110.x
  2. 2. Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility service use in the United States: Data from the National Survey of family growth, 1982-2010. National Health Statistics Reports. 2014;73:1-21
  3. 3. Catanzariti F, Cantoro U, Lacetera V, Muzzonigro G, Polito M. Comparison between WHO (World Health Organization) 2010 and WHO 1999 parameters for semen analysis-interpretation of 529 consecutive samples. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia. 2013;85:125-129. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2013.3.125
  4. 4. Fassino S, Piero A, Boggio S, Piccioni V, Garzaro L. Anxiety, depression and anger suppression in infertile couples: A controlled study. Human Reproduction. 2002;17:2986-2994. DOI: 10.1093/17.11.2986
  5. 5. Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck MP, Knauth D, Passos EP. Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;31:101-110. DOI: 10.3109/0167482X.2010.4813
  6. 6. Campbell AJ, Irvine DS. Male infertility and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). British Medical Bulletin. 2000;5:616-629. DOI: 10.1258/0007142001903427
  7. 7. Jurasović J, Cvitković P, Pizent A, Colak B, Telisman S. Semen quality and reproductive endocrine function with regard to blood cadmium in Croatian male subjects. Biometals. 2004;17:735-743. DOI: 10.1007/s10534-004-1689-7
  8. 8. Lavranos G, Balla M, Tzortzopoulou A, Syriou V, Angelopoulou R. Investigating ROS sources in male infertility: A common end for numerous pathways. Reproductive Toxicology. 2012;34:298-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.06.007
  9. 9. Shiraishi K, Matsuyama H, Takihara H. Pathophysiology of varicocele in male infertility in the era of assisted reproductive technology. International Journal of Urology. 2012 Jun;19:538-550. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02982.x
  10. 10. Agarwal A, Virk G, Ong C, du Plessis SS. Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. World Jornal of Mens Health. 2014;32:1-17. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.2014.32.1.1
  11. 11. Borges Jr, E. Total motile sperm count: A better way to rate the severity of male factor infertility? JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2016;20:47-48. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20160012
  12. 12. Agarwal A, Sekhon LH. Oxidative stress and antioxidants for idiopathic Oligoastheno-teratospermia: Is it justified? Indian Journal of Urology. 2011;27:74-85. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.78437
  13. 13. Bauché F, Fouchard MH, Jégou B. Antioxidant system in rat testicular cells. FEBS Letters. 1994;349:392-396. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00709-8
  14. 14. Birben E, Sahiner UM, Sackesen C, Erzurum S, Kalayci O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organization Journal. 2012;5:9-19. DOI: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e3182439613
  15. 15. Lee D, Moawad AR, Morielli T, Fernandez MC, O'Flaherty C. Peroxiredoxins prevent oxidative stress during human sperm capacitation. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2017;23:106-115. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaw081
  16. 16. Baarends WM, van der Laan R, Grootegoed JA. DNA repair mechanisms and gametogenesis. Reproduction. 2001;121:31-39. DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1210031
  17. 17. Aitken RJ. Gpx5 protects the family jewels. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2009;119:1849-1851. DOI: 10.1172/JCI39688
  18. 18. Aitken RJ, Baker MA, De Iuliis GN, Nixon B. New insights into sperm physiology and pathology. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. 2010;198:99-115. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02062-9_7
  19. 19. Baker MA, Hetherington L, Weinberg A, Velkov T. Phosphopeptide analysis of rodent epididymal spermatozoa. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2014;94:51546. DOI: 10.3791/51546
  20. 20. Baker MA, Aitken RJ. Reactive oxygen species in spermatozoa: Methods for monitoring and significance for the origins of genetic disease and infertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2005;3:67. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-3-67
  21. 21. O'Flaherty C. Redox regulation of mammalian sperm capacitation. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2015;17:583-590. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.153303
  22. 22. Zhang H, Zheng RL. Promotion of human sperm capacitation by superoxide anion. Free Radical Research. 1996;24:261-268. DOI: 10.3109/10715769609088023
  23. 23. Gavella M, Lipovac V. NADH-dependent oxidoreductase (diaphorase) activity and isozyme pattern of sperm in infertile men. Archives of Andrology. 1992;28:135-141. DOI: 10.3109/ 01485019208987691
  24. 24. Aprioku JS. Pharmacology of free radicals and the impact of reactive oxygen species on the testis. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. 2013;14:158-172
  25. 25. deLamirande E, Gagnon C. Human sperm hyperactivation and capacitation as parts of an oxidative process. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 1993;14:157-166. DOI: 10.1016/0891-5849(93)90006-G
  26. 26. deLamirande E, Gagnon C. Capacitation-associated production of superoxide anion by human spermatozoa. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 1995;18:487-195. DOI: 10.1016/0891-5849(94)00169-K
  27. 27. Musset B, Clark RA, DeCoursey TE, Petheo GL, Geiszt M, Chen Y, Cornell JE, Eddy CA, Brzyski RG, El Jamali A. NOX5 in human spermatozoa: Expression, function, and regulation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:9376-9388. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111. 314955
  28. 28. Andreyev AY, Kushnareva YE, Starkov AA. Mitochondrial metabolism of reactive oxygen species. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2005;70:200-214. DOI: 10.1007/s10541-005-0102-7
  29. 29. Amaral A, Lourenço B, Marques M, Ramalho-Santos J. Mitochondria functionality and sperm quality. Reproduction. 2013;146:R163-R174. DOI: 10.1530/REP-13-0178
  30. 30. deLamirande E, Lamothe G, Villemure M. Control of superoxide and nitric oxide formation during human sperm capacitation. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2009;46:1420-1427. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.02.022
  31. 31. Aitken RJ. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of sperm capacitation and pathological damage. Molecular reproduction and development. 2017;84:1039-1052. DOI: 10.1002/mrd. 22871
  32. 32. Baker MA, Hetherington L, Curry B, Aitken RJ. Phosphorylation and consequent stimulation of the tyrosine kinase cAbl by PKA in mouse spermatozoa; its implications during capacitation. Developments in Biologicals. 2009;33:57-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.022
  33. 33. Herrero MB, Gagnon C. Nitric oxide: A novel mediator of sperm function. Journal of Andrology. 2001;22:349-356. DOI: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb02188.x
  34. 34. Ecroyd HW, Jones RC, Aitken RJ. Endogenous redox activity in mouse spermatozoa and its role in regulating the tyrosine phosphorylation events associated with sperm capacitation. Biology of Reproduction. 2003;69:347-354. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.012716
  35. 35. Visconti PE. Understanding the molecular basis of sperm capacitation through kinase design. The molecular basis of sperm capacitation through kinase design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:667-668. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811895106
  36. 36. Krapf D, Arcelay E, Wertheimer EV, Sanjay A, Pilder SH, Salicioni AM, Visconti PE. Inhibition of Ser/Thr phosphatases induces capacitation-associated signaling in the presence of Src kinase inhibitors. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2010;285:7977-7985. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.085845
  37. 37. Battistone MA, Da Ros VG, Salicioni AM, Navarrete FA, Krapf D, Visconti PE, Cuasnicú PS. Functional human sperm capacitation requires both bicarbonate-dependent PKA activation and down-regulation of Ser/Thr phosphatases by Src family kinases. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2013;19:570-580. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gat033
  38. 38. Desai N, Sharma R, Makker K, Sabanegh E, Agarwal A. Physiologic and pathologic levels of reactive oxygen species in neat semen of infertile men. Fertility and Sterility. 2009;92:1626-1631. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.109
  39. 39. Avella MA, Dean J. Fertilization with acrosome-reacted mouse sperm: Implications for the site of exocytosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:19843-19844. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118234109
  40. 40. Saldívar-Hernández A, González-González ME, Sánchez-Tusié A, Maldonado-Rosas I, López P, Treviño CL, Larrea F, Chirinos M. Human sperm degradation of zona pellucida proteins contributes to fertilization. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2015;13:99. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-015-0094-0
  41. 41. O'Donnell L. Mechanisms of spermiogenesis and spermiation and how they are disturbed. Spermatogenesis. 2015;4:e979623. DOI: 10.4161/21565562.2014.979623
  42. 42. Iwasaki A, Gagnon C. Formation of reactive oxygen species in spermatozoa of infertile patients. Fertility and Sterility. 1992;57:409-416. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54855-9
  43. 43. Zini A, de Lamirande E, Gagnon C. Reactive oxygen species in the semen of infertile patients: Levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase-like activities in seminal plasma. International Journal of Andrology. 1993;16:183-188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1993. tb01177.x
  44. 44. Saleh RA, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and male infertility: From research bench to clinical practice. Journal of Andrology. 2002;23:737-752. DOI: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02324.x
  45. 45. Sotomayor RE, Sega GA. Unscheduled DNA synthesis assay in mammalian spermatogenic cells: An update. Environmental and molecular mutagenesis. 2000;36:255-265. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2280(2000)36:4<255::AID-EM1>3.0.CO;2-O
  46. 46. Gunes S, Al-Sadaan M, Agarwal A. Spermatogenesis, DNA damage and DNA repair mechanisms in male infertility. Reproductive Biomedicine online. 2015;31:309-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.010
  47. 47. Ollero M, Powers RD, Alvarez JG. Variation of docosahexaenoic acid content in subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation: Implications for sperm lipoperoxidative damage. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2000;55:326-334. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(200003)55:3<326::AID-MRD11>3.3.CO;2-1
  48. 48. Ollero M, Gil-Guzman E, Lopez MC, Sharma RK, Agarwal A, Larson K, Evenson D, Thomas Jr AJ, Alvarez JG. Characterization of subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation: implications in the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. Human Reproduction. 2001;16:1912-1921. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1912
  49. 49. Aitken RJ, Curry BJ. Redox regulation of human sperm function: From the physiological control of sperm capacitation to the etiology of infertility and DNA damage in the germ line. Antioxidants and Redox signaling. 2011;14:367-381. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2010.3186
  50. 50. Saalu LC. The incriminating role of reactive oxygen species in idiopathic male infertility: An evidence based evaluation. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2010;13:413-422. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2010.413.422
  51. 51. Güney AI, Javadova D, Kırac D, Ulucan K, Koc G, Ergec D, Tavukcu H, Tarcan T. Detection of Y chromosome microdeletions and mitochondrial DNA mutations in male infertility patients. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2012;11:1039-1048. DOI: 10.4238/2012
  52. 52. Shamsi MB, Kumar R, Bhatt A, Bamezai RN, Kumar R, Gupta NP, Das TK, Dada R. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in etiopathogenesis of male infertility. Indian Journal of Urology. 2008;24:150-154. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.40606
  53. 53. Gil-Guzman E, Ollero M, Lopez MC, Sharma RK, Alvarez JG, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A. Differential production of reactive oxygen species by subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation. Human Reproduction. 2001;16:1922-1930. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1922
  54. 54. Rhemrev JP, van Overveld FW, Haenen GR, Teerlink T, Bast A, and Vermeiden JP. Quantification of the nonenzymatic fast and slow TRAP in a postaddition assay in human seminal plasma and the antioxidant contributions of various seminal compounds. Journal of Andrology. 2000;21:913-920. DOI: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03422.x
  55. 55. Vernet P, Aitken RJ, Drevet JR. Antioxidant strategies in the epididymis. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2004;216:31-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2003.10.069
  56. 56. Marchetti F, Wyrobek AJ. Mechanisms and consequences of paternally-transmitted chromosomal abnormalities. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today. 2005;75:112-129. DOI: 10.1002/bdrc.20040
  57. 57. Fujii J, Iuchi Y, Matsuki S, Ishii T. Cooperative function of antioxidant and redox systems against oxidative stress in male reproductive tissues. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2003;5:231-242. DOI:
  58. 58. Doshi SB, Khullar K, Sharma RK, Agarwal A. Role of reactive nitrogen species in male infertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2012;10:109. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-109
  59. 59. Potts RJ, Notarianni LJ, Jefferies TM. Seminal plasma reduces exogenous oxidative damage to human sperm, determined by the measurement of DNA strand breaks and lipid peroxidation. Mutation Research. 2000;447:249-256. DOI: 10.1016/S0027-5107(99) 00215-8
  60. 60. Mruk DD, Cheng CY. In vitro regulation of extracellular superoxide dismutase in sertoli cells. Life Sciences. 2000;67(2):133-145. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3205(00)00609-3
  61. 61. Imai H, Nakagawa Y. Biological significance of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx, GPx4) in mammalian cells. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2003;34:145-169. DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01197-8
  62. 62. O'Flaherty C. Peroxiredoxins: Hidden players in the antioxidant defence of human spermatozoa. Basic and Clinical Andrology. 2014;24:4. DOI: 10.1186/2051-4190-24-4
  63. 63. Tremellen K. Oxidative stress and male infertility – A clinical perspective. Human Reproduction Update. 2008;14:243-258. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmn004
  64. 64. Walczak–Jedrzejowska R, Wolski JK, Slowikowska–Hilczer J. The role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male fertility. Central European Journal of Urology. 2013;66:60-67. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2013.01.art19
  65. 65. Atig F, Raffa M, Habib BA, Kerkeni A, Saad A, Ajina M. Impact of seminal trace element and glutathione levels on semen quality of Tunisian infertile men. BMC Urology. 2012;12:6. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-6
  66. 66. Micheli L, Cerretani D, Collodel G, Menchiari A, Moltoni L, Fiaschi AI, Moretti E. Evaluation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in seminal plasma of men with genitourinary infections, varicocele and idiopathic infertility. Andrology. 2016;4:456-464. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12181
  67. 67. Arata de Bellabarba G, Tortolero I, Villarroel V, Molina CZ, Bellabarba C, Velazquez E. Nonsperm cells in human semen and their relationship with semen parameters. Archives of Andrology. 2000;45:131-136. DOI: 10.1080/01485010050193896
  68. 68. Patil PS, Humbarwadi RS, Patil AD, Gune AR. Immature germ cells in semen – Correlation with total sperm count and sperm motility. Journal of Cytology. 2013;30:185-189. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.117682
  69. 69. Rengan AK, Agarwal A, van der Linde M, du Plessis SS. An investigation of excess residual cytoplasm in human spermatozoa and its distinction from the cytoplasmic droplet. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2012;10:92. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-92
  70. 70. Gharagozloo P, Aitken RJ. The role of sperm oxidative stress in male infertility and the significance of oral antioxidant therapy. Human Reproduction. 2011;26:1628-1640. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der132
  71. 71. Harlev A, Agarwal A, Gunes SO, Shetty A, du Plessis SS. Smoking and male infertility: An evidence-based review. World Journal of Mens Health. 2015;33:143-160. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh. 2015.33.3.143
  72. 72. Avendaño C, Mata A, Sanchez Sarmiento CA, Doncel GF. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;97:39.e2-45.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.012
  73. 73. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ Jr. Effect of cigarette smoking on levels of seminal oxidative stress in infertile men: A prospective study. Fertility and Sterility. 2002;78:491-499. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03294-6
  74. 74. Koppers AJ, De Iuliis GN, Finnie JM, McLaughlin EA, Aitken RJ. Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008;93:3199-3207. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-2616
  75. 75. Aitken RJ, Fisher HM, Fulton N, Gomez E, Knox W, Lewis B, Irvine S. Reactive oxygen species generation by human spermatozoa is induced by exogenous NADPH and inhibited by the flavoprotein inhibitors diphenyleneiodonium and quinacrine. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 1997;47:468-482. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199708)47:4<468::AID-MRD14>3.0.CO;2-S
  76. 76. Fisher HM, Aitken RJ. Comparative analysis of the ability of precursor germ cells and epididymal spermatozoa to generate reactive oxygen metabolites. The Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1997;277:390-400. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19970401)277:5<390::AID-JEZ53.0.CO;2-K>
  77. 77. Shukla S, Jha RK, Laloraya M, Kumar PG. Identification of non-mitochondrial NADPH oxidase and the spatio-temporal organization of its components in mouse spermatozoa. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005;331:476-483. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.198
  78. 78. Plante M, de Lamirande E, Gagnon C. Reactive oxygen species released by activated neutrophils, but not by deficient spermatozoa, are sufficient to affect normal sperm motility. Fertility and Sterility. 1994;62:387-393. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56895-2
  79. 79. Ramya T, Misro MM, Sinha D, Nandan D. Sperm function and seminal oxidative stress as tools to identify sperm pathologies in infertile men. Fertility and Sterility. 2010;93:297-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.074
  80. 80. Wolff H. The biologic significance of white blood cells in semen. Fertility and Sterility. 1995;63:1143-1157. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57588-8
  81. 81. Henkel RR. Leukocytes and oxidative stress: Dilemma for sperm function and male fertility. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2011;13:43-52. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.76
  82. 82. Gavriliouk D, Aitken RJ. Damage to sperm DNA mediated by reactive oxygen species: Its impact on human reproduction and the health trajectory of offspring. Advances in Experimental Medicine nad Biology. 2015;868:23-47. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18881-2_2
  83. 83. Sikka SC. Relative impact of oxidative stress on male reproductive function. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2001;8:851-862. DOI: 10.2174/0929867013373039
  84. 84. Moazamian R, Polhemus A, Connaughton H, Fraser B, Whiting S, Gharagozloo P, Aitken RJ. Oxidative stress and human spermatozoa: Diagnostic and functional significance of aldehydes generated as a result of lipid peroxidation. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2015;2:502-515. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gav014
  85. 85. Khosrowbeygi A, Zarghami N. Fatty acid composition of human spermatozoa and seminal plasma levels of oxidative stress biomarkers in subfertile males. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes, and Essential Fatty Acids. 2007;77:117-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.plefa.2007.08.003
  86. 86. Aitken RJ, Whiting S, De Iuliis GN, McClymont S, Mitchell LA, Baker MA. Electrophilic aldehydes generated by sperm metabolism activate mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation and apoptosis by targeting succinate dehydrogenase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:33048-33060. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.366690
  87. 87. Zhong H, Yin H. Role of lipid peroxidation derived 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) in cancer: Focusing on mitochondria. Redox Biology. 2015;4:193-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox. 2014.12.011
  88. 88. Aitken RJ, Jones KT, Robertson SA. Reactive oxygen species and sperm function--in sickness and in health. Journal of Andrology. 2012;33:1096-1106. DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.112. 016535
  89. 89. Gomez E, Buckingham DW, Brindle J, Lanzafame F, Irvine DS, Aitken RJ. Development of an image analysis system to monitor the retention of residual cytoplasm by human spermatozoa, correlation with biochemical markers of the cytoplasmic space, oxidative stress and sperm function. Journal of Andrology. 1996;17:276-287. DOI: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1996.tb01783.x
  90. 90. Sanocka D, Miesel R, Jedrzejczak P, Chełmonska-Soyta AC, Kurpisz M. Effect of reactive oxygen species and the activity of antioxidant systems on human semen; association with male infertility. International Journal of Andrology. 1997;20:255-264. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1997.00050.x
  91. 91. Bansal AK, Bilaspuri GS. Impacts of oxidative stress and antioxidants on semen functions. Veterinary Medicine InternationalVeterinary Medicine International. Sep 7, 2010;2010. pii: 686137. doi: 10.4061/2011/686137
  92. 92. Wang X, Sharma R K, Gupta A, George V, Thomas A J, Falcone T, Agarwal A. Alterations in mitochondria membrane potential and oxidative stress in infertile men: A prospective observational study. Fertility and Sterility. 2003;80:844-850. DOI: 10.1016/ S0015-0282(03)00983-X
  93. 93. Sawyer DE, Roman SD, Aitken RJ. Relative susceptibilities of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA to damage induced by hydrogen peroxide in two mouse germ cell lines. Redox Report. 2001;6:182-184. DOI: 10.1179/135100001101536157
  94. 94. Sawyer DE, Mercer BG, Wiklendt AM, Aitken RJ. Quantitative analysis of gene-specific DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Mutation Research. 2003;529:21-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0027-5107(03)00101-5
  95. 95. Bennetts LE, Aitken RJ. A comparative study of oxidative DNA damage in mammalian spermatozoa. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2005;71:77-87. DOI: 10.1002/mrd. 20285
  96. 96. Marcon L, Boissonneault G. Transient DNA strand breaks during mouse and human spermiogenesis new insights in stage specificity and link to chromatin remodeling. Biology of Reproduction. 2004;70:910-918. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.022541
  97. 97. Laberge RM, Boissonneault G. On the nature and origin of DNA strand breaks in elongating spermatids. Biology of Reproduction. 2005;73:289-296. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.036939
  98. 98. Meyer-Ficca ML, Lonchar JD, Ihara M, Bader JJ, Meyer RG. Alteration of poly (ADP-ribose) metabolism affects murine sperm nuclear architecture by impairing pericentric heterochromatin condensation. Chromosoma. 2013;122:319-335. DOI: 10.1007/s00412-013-0416-y
  99. 99. Leduc F, Maquennehan V, Nkoma GB, Boissonneault G. DNA damage response during chromatin remodeling in elongating spermatids of mice. Biology of Reproduction. 2008;78:324-332. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064162
  100. 100. Aitken RJ, Bronson R, Smith TB, De Iuliis GN. The source and significance of DNA damage in human spermatozoa; acommentary on diagnostic strategies and straw man fallacie. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2013;19:475-485. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gat025
  101. 101. Simon L, Castillo J, Oliva R, Lewis SE. Relationships between human sperm protamines, DNA damage and assisted reproduction outcomes. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 201;23:724-734. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.010
  102. 102. Milligan JR, Aguilera JA, Nguyen JV, Ward JF. Redox reactivity of guanyl radicals in plasmid DNA. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 2001;77:281-293. DOI: 1080/095530000100.13436
  103. 103. Smith TB, Dun MD, Smith ND, Curry BJ, Connaughton HS, Aitken RJ. The presence of a truncated base excision repair pathway in human spermatozoa that is mediated by OGG1. Journal of Cell Science. 2013;126:1488-1497. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.121657
  104. 104. Kodama H, Yamaguchi R, Fukuda J, Kasai H, Tanaka T. Increased oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in the spermatozoa of in fertile male patients. Fertility and Sterility. 1997;68:519-524. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00236-7
  105. 105. Sakkas D, Seli E, Manicardi GC, Nijs M, Ombelet W, Bizzaro D. The presence of abnormal spermatozoa in the ejaculate: Did apoptosis fail? Human Fertility (Cambridge, England). 2004;7:99-103. DOI:10.1080/14647270410001720464
  106. 106. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1999;284:696-704. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19991101)284:6<696::AID-JEZ11>3.0.CO;2-E
  107. 107. González-Marín C, Gosálvez J, Roy R. Types, causes, detection and repair of DNA fragmentation in animal and human sperm cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012;13:14026-14052. DOI: 10.3390/ijms131114026
  108. 108. Merchant R, Gandhi G, Allahbadia GN. In vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility. Indian Journal of Urology. 2011;27:121-132. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.78430
  109. 109. Hazout A, Menezo Y, Madelenat P, Yazbeck C, Selva J, Cohen-Bacrie P. Causes and clinical implications of sperm DNA damages. Gynécologie, obstétrique and fertilité. 2008;36:1109-1117. DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.07.017
  110. 110. Chen SJ, Allam JP, Duan YG, Haidl G. Influence of reactive oxygen species on human sperm, functions and fertilizing capacity including therapeutical approaches. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013;288:191-199. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2801-4
  111. 111. Sharma R, Biedenharn KR, Fedor JM, Agarwal A. Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: taking control of your fertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2013;11:66. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-66
  112. 112. Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, Iwaki M, Yamada Y, Nakajima Y, Nakayama O, Makishima M, Matsuda M, Shimomura I. Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2004;114:1752-1761. DOI: 10.1172/JCI21625
  113. 113. La Vignera S, Condorelli R, Vicari E, D'Agata R, Calogero AE. Diabetes mellitus and sperm parameters. Journal of Andrology. 2012;33:145-153. DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.111.013193
  114. 114. Kumar K, Lewis S, Vinci S, Riera-Escamilla A, Fino MG, Tamburrino L, Muratori M, Larsen P, Krausz C. Evaluation of sperm DNA quality in men presenting with testicular cancer and lymphoma using alkaline and neutral comet assays. Andrology. 2018;6:230-235. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12429
  115. 115. Hajizadeh Maleki B, Tartibian B. Combined aerobic and resistance exercise training for improving reproductive function in infertile men: A randomized controlled trial. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2017;42:1293-1306. DOI: 10.1139/ apnm-2017-0249
  116. 116. Gvozdjáková A, Kucharská J, Dubravicky J, Mojto V, Singh RB. Coenzyme Q10, α-tocopherol, and oxidative stress could be important metabolic biomarkers of male infertility. Disease Markers. 2015;2015:827941. DOI: 10.1155/2015/827941
  117. 117. Adewoyin M, Ibrahim M, Roszaman R, Isa MLM, Alewi NAM, Rafa AAA, Anuar MNN Male infertility: The effect of natural antioxidants and phytocompounds on seminal oxidative stress. Diseases. 2017;5:pii: E9. DOI: 10.3390/diseases5010009
  118. 118. Zini A, Al-Hathal N. Antioxidant therapy in male infertility: Fact or fiction? Asian Journal of Andrology. 2011;13:374-381. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.182
  119. 119. Agarwal A, Nallella KP, Allamaneni SS, Said TM. Role of antioxidants in treatment of male infertility: An overview of the literature. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2004;8:616-627. DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61641-0

Written By

Sabiha Fatima

Submitted: 04 July 2017 Reviewed: 01 February 2018 Published: 09 March 2018