Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Vernalization in Brassicaceae

Written By

Ayasha Akter, Namiko Nishida, Satoko Takada, Etsuko Itabashi, Kenji Osabe, Daniel J. Shea and Ryo Fujimoto

Submitted: November 11th, 2017 Reviewed: January 29th, 2018 Published: March 1st, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74573

Chapter metrics overview

1,575 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


A wide variation of morphological traits exists in Brassica rapa L. and Brassica oleracea L., and cultivated vegetable varieties of these species are consumed worldwide. Flowering time is an important agronomic trait in these species and varies among varieties or cultivars. Especially, leafy vegetable species need a high bolting resistance. Isolation of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), one of the key genes involved in vernalization, has now provided an insight into the molecular mechanism involved in the regulation of flowering time, including the role of histone modification. In the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, FLC plays an important role in modulating flowering time. The response to vernalization causes an increase in histone H3 lysine 27 tri-methylation (H3K27me3) that leads to reduced expression of the FLC gene. B. rapa and B. oleracea both contain several paralogs of FLC at syntenic regions identified as major flowering time and vernalization response quantitative trait loci (QTL). We introduce the recent research, not only in A. thaliana, but also in the genus Brassica from a genetic and epigenetic view point.


  • vernalization
  • flowering time
  • histone modification
  • high bolting resistance

1. Introduction

During the life cycle of plants, the change from vegetative to reproductive growth is a major developmental transition in angiosperms. Flowering is the process where a transformation of the vegetative stem primordia into floral primordia occurs due to biochemical changes. In most plants, once the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth begins, it cannot be reversed. Thus, the proper timing of this transition is advantageous to ensure the successful propagation of offspring. Internal (endogenous cues) and external (environmental stimuli) factors both play important roles in flowering time. As plants are sessile organisms, plants are greatly affected by environmental conditions such as day length (photoperiodism) and temperature. Photoperiodism is controlled via the photoreceptor proteins phytochrome and/or cryptochrome, responsible for sensing red/far-red and blue light, respectively [1]. We typically refer to photoperiod requirements as either long day (LD) or short day (SD) with respect to the length of time that a plant receives daylight. As this photoperiod signal is also tied to the annual cyclical seasonal changes, LD, coinciding with the spring and summer seasons, and SD, associated with the autumn and winter seasons, both play roles in the floral development of several plant species [2]. The regulation of flowering to changes in temperature is known as vernalization. Vernalization is the process that accelerates flowering in response to the prolonged cold winter. Many plants have a vernalization requirement and will actively repress flowering until after an exposure to prolonged cold. This acts to synchronize seed production with the favorable environmental conditions of spring. The presence of certain photoperiods and ambient temperatures after vernalization are also important [3, 4].

Brassica is a genus in the family of Brassicaceae and includes 37 species of flowering plants. Many of these are important both economically and as agricultural crops, with members such as broccoli, brown mustard, brussels sprouts, cabbage, cauliflower, Chinese cabbage, kale, kohlrabi, rape, rutabaga, and turnip. The crops from this genus are sometimes known as cole crops. Three members of the genus Brassica: Brassica rapa, Brassica nigra, and Brassica oleracea are denoted as the A, B, and C genomes, respectively. These three species share a unique genomic relationship known as the “Triangle of U” [5]. Allotetraploids between these three species contain two complete diploid genomes derived from the two different parental species, one diploid genome from each parent. The agriculturally important allotetraploid Brassica napus (canola or rapeseed) is derived from the interspecific hybridization of the A and C genomes of B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively. With the advent of genomic sequencing, the genetic relationship between three diploid species such as B. rapa, B. nigra, and B. oleracea, in the Brassica genus has been elucidated further, revealing that they are descended from a common hexaploid ancestor that underwent a whole genome triplication event roughly 15.9 million years ago (MYA), with speciation divergence occurring approximately 4.6 MYA [6].

Different cultivated varieties of the diploid species of B. rapa exhibit extreme developmental and morphological diversity, and from the organs consumed they are generally divided into leafy, turnip, and oil types. B. rapa crops are normally grown in two seasons, autumn and spring, and their flowering habits are generally controlled by day length and/or temperature. B. rapa is a facultative LD plant. Although LD photoperiod conditions accelerate its flowering, it can also flower under SD photoperiod conditions [7]. B. rapa is a leafy vegetable, and flowering time is an important developmental trait because bolting can occur before plants reach the harvest stage. Examples include Chinese cabbage and pak choi, where early bolting markedly impairs the product value. Early bolting mostly occurs due to low temperatures at the beginning of cultivation and the longer day lengths during the growing period of the spring season. Thus, the genetic dissection of flowering time control is central to the breeding of late bolting leafy B. rapa cultivars. B. oleracea (cabbage), a plant-vernalization-responsive species, has become established as one of the most valuable vegetable crops in the Brassicaceae family and is widely consumed by both humans and livestock [8, 9]. Vernalization can be classified into two types: seed-vernalization-responsive and plant-vernalization-responsive, according to the age at which the plant vernalizes in response to low temperature [9]. In the plant-vernalization-responsive type, biennial plants grow vegetatively in the first year and flower in the following year after winter. The vernalization of cabbage normally requires low temperatures of approximately 6–8 weeks in duration that is initiated at the stage of seven to nine leaves, or when the stem diameter reaches 6 mm for the initiation of flowering [8, 9]. The differences in the mechanisms involved in vernalization and flowering between seed- and plant-vernalization-responsive types is of agronomic and scientific interest to understand. As such, attempts have been made to transfer the seed-vernalization character from Chinese cabbage (B. rapa) into cabbage (B. oleracea) [10], and the plant-vernalization character from cabbage into Chinese cabbage [11]. B. napus is an important oilseed crop in the temperate regions of the world. The production of seed in canola depends upon flowering time, thus the adaptation of flowering time is important for breeding. In B. napus, the natural variation in flowering time in response to vernalization was characterized into three groups: spring type, winter type, and semi-winter type [12].

Understanding the molecular mechanism(s) responsible for vernalization in the control of flowering is important for the breeding of high bolting resistance in B. rapa and B. oleracea leafy vegetables. Recent studies on vernalization using Arabidopsis thaliana, one of the model organisms used for studying plant biology and the first plant to have its entire genome sequenced, provided key insight into the molecular mechanism of vernalization. The knowledge derived from A. thaliana research has been useful for understanding the molecular mechanism of vernalization in the genus Brassica. In this chapter, we describe the latest research findings on vernalization in A. thaliana and the Brassica genus, especially leafy vegetables such as Chinese cabbage (B. rapa) and cabbage (B. oleracea) with a high bolting resistance.


2. Vernalization research in model plant Arabidopsis thaliana

A. thaliana is a small dicotyledonous species used as a model organism for studying plant biology belonging to the family Brassicaceae. In A. thaliana, over 180 genes are implicated in flowering time control and these genes are categorized into six major pathways that control flowering time, including the photoperiod/circadian clock pathway, vernalization pathway, ambient temperature pathway, age pathway, autonomous pathway, and gibberellin pathway [13, 14]. It is a much-studied model for vernalization and the transition to the reproductive phase of A. thaliana occurs by two related events, the floral transition (initiation of the first flower) and the bolting transition (elongation of the first internode) [15]. Brassicaceae includes many perennial species such as Arabis alpina and Arabidopsis halleri, and the respective A. thaliana orthologous gene is key regulator of flowering transition with seasonal gene expression [16, 17]. In this section, we introduce research on vernalization in A. thaliana.

2.1. Genes involved in vernalization

Two key genes, FRIGIDA (FRI) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), have been identified by map-based cloning of naturally occurring early flowering accessions of A. thaliana. Rapid cycling accessions have mutations in FRI, and loss-of-function mutations have originated independently [3, 18]. The functional FRI gene acts upstream of the FLC expression within the vernalization pathway. FRI acts as a scaffold protein interacting with FRIGIDA LIKE 1 (FRL1), FRIGIDA ESSENTIAL 1 (FES1), SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA 4 (SUF4), and FLC EXPRESSOR (FLX). These proteins assemble to form a large protein complex, FRIGIDA-containing complex (FRI-C), with SUF4 directly binding to the FLC promoter and FRI-C activating FLC expression [19].

The FLC gene is a floral repressor that contains a MADS box transcriptional regulator protein domain, and maintains a plant’s vegetative growth until exposure to prolonged cold is experienced. Within the vegetative apical meristem, FLC interacts with several important genes during vegetative growth by inhibiting the activation of a set of genes required for the transition of the apical meristem to inflorescence, ultimately determining the plant’s reproductive fate [20, 21, 22]. At the molecular level, FLC blocks flowering by binding to genes that promote flowering and repressing their transcription. Initially, three flowering time genes, FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSSON OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1), and FLOWERING LOCUS D (FD) were reported to be targeted by FLC, with FLC binding to the promoters of SOC1 and FD and to the first intron of FT [23, 24]. Later, using antiserum raised against the FLC protein without the conserved MADS domain, more putative FLC targeted genes were identified at the whole genome level by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq). About 500 FLC binding sites, mostly located in the promoter region of genes containing one CArG box (the known target of MADS-box proteins) were identified [25]. Two genes (FT and SOC1) that function downstream of the flowering activator CONSTANS (CO) in the photoperiod pathway were identified as being negatively regulated by FLC [4, 14].

In addition to the previously mentioned FRI-dependent pathway, the autonomous pathway is also known to repress FLC expression. In the autonomous pathway, key genes such as FCA, FLD, FLOWERING LATE KH DOMAIN (FLK), FPA, FVE, FY, and LUMINIDEPENDENS (LD) were identified [4, 22, 26], and mutation in these genes results in the activation of FLC and a late flowering phenotype. Thus, FRI and the autonomous pathway are internal regulators of basal FLC expression via constitutive activation and repression, respectively.

Examination of the regulation of FLC by the vernalization pathway in various vernalization-responsive accessions and flowering time mutants of A. thaliana showed that the levels of FLC mRNA and protein correlated well with flowering time in response to cold treatment [3, 4, 22]. To identify the genes involved in the vernalization pathway, mutants that do not respond to vernalization were characterized. Two mutants termed vernalization 1 (vrn1) and vrn2 were identified [3, 27, 28]. Cold treatment reduced the FLC expression levels in vrn1 fca-1 or vrn2 fca-1 double mutants. However, when plants are returned to a warm environment, the suppression of FLC expression was not maintained. This suggests that VRN1 and VRN2 are involved in the maintenance of FLC repression by vernalization, but not in the initial repression [27, 28]. VRN1 encodes a nuclear protein with B3 domains, a highly conserved plant-specific transcription factor that binds to DNA [28]. VRN2 encodes a nuclear-localized zinc-finger protein showing a similarity to Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins of plants and animals [27]. The expression levels of VRN1 and VRN2 are not changed by vernalization. However, a third gene involved in the repression of FLC by vernalization, VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3 (VIN3), is activated by vernalization, and VIN3 encodes a plant homeodomain (PHD) finger containing protein [29].

2.2. Epigenetic regulation of FLC gene

Epigenetic regulation is defined as changes in gene activities that are inherited through cell divisions without alteration in the DNA sequence. Epigenetic regulation is crucial for the development and adaptation of plants to the changing environment [30, 31]. DNA methylation and histone modification are the best examples of epigenetic modifications. The fundamental subunit of chromatin is the nucleosome, and the nucleosome consists of 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped around an octamer of histone proteins comprised of two tetramers. Each of the two tetramers contains one of each of the core histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. The alteration of chromatin structure, which causes changes in transcription, is regulated by various post-translational modifications such as methylation or acetylation of the N-terminal regions of the histone proteins [32]. Histone lysine residues can be mono-, di-, or tri-methylated, and each methylation state is associated with different functions [32]. In plants, histone deacetylation, H3K9me2, and H3K27me3 are associated with gene repression, and histone acetylation, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3 are associated with gene activation [22, 31, 33, 34].

The vernalization response is one example of epigenetic regulation, and FLC expression is regulated by chromatin modification [34, 35]. FLC is expressed before prolonged cold exposure, and H3K4me3 or H3K36me3 is associated with activation of FLC expression [36]. FRI-C facilitates recruitment of chromatin-modifying factors to FLC, such as the chromatin remodeling SWR1 complex (delivering H2A.Z variant) or the histone methyltransferases EARLY FLOWERING IN SHORT DAYS (EFS) (a homolog of SET2 that catalyzes H3K36me3) [19], ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX LIKE 1 (ATX1) (which catalyzes H3K4me3) [37], and ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX-RELATED 7 (ATXR7) [38]. H3K4me3 activity is also mediated by the yeast RNA polymerase II (Pol II) Associated Factor 1 (PAF1) complex, histone H3K4 methyltransferases such as ATX1, ATX2, and ATXR7, and the complex protein associated with Set 1 (COMPASS)-like complex that contains WDR5 HOMOLOG A (WDR5a), EFS, and ARABIDOPSIS Ash2 RELATIVE (ASH2R) [22, 39].

Prolonged cold exposure induces VIN3, a PHD-finger protein, which acts to establish the initial repression of FLC [29]. PHD-finger proteins VIN3, VRN5, VIN3/VRN5-like 1 (VEL1) interact with VRN2 protein and form POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX2 (PHD-PRC2) complex [29, 40, 41]. FLC repression by vernalization is associated with the enrichment of H3K27me3, which is mediated by the PHD-PRC2 mechanism [41]. During prolonged cold exposure, H3K27me3 is enriched in chromatin at the FLC transcription/translation start sites [42]. After cold exposure, during growth at higher temperatures, the H3K27me3 modification extends across the FLC gene [42]. The initial transcriptional repression of FLC is PRC2-independent, but the stable maintenance of repression requires PRC2 [27]. The maintenance of FLC silencing under warm conditions after cold exposure is therefore mediated by PHD-PRC2 spreading H3K27me3 over the FLC locus. In addition, LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 (LHP1), which is associated with H3K27me3, and VRN1 are required for the maintenance of stable FLC repression [28, 43, 44].

FLC is epigenetically silenced by vernalization, but FLC needs to be reactivated to restore the requirement for vernalization in each subsequent generation. FLC expression is repressed in gametogenesis, regardless of the parental state of vernalization, and its expression increases as the embryo develops [45, 46]. Some autonomous pathway genes, which upregulate FLC in vegetative tissues, are required for FLC expression in the early embryo [46]. In contrast, FRI and SUF4 are not required to reset the expression of FLC, however, they are required to maintain it after reactivation of FLC [46]. EARLY FLOWERING 6 (ELF6) is a jumonji domain H3K27me3 demethylase protein and is expressed at high levels in both flowers and embryos, but at low levels in seedlings [47]. Resetting of the vernalized state at the FLC locus in the next generation requires H3K27 demethylation by ELF6 [47]. However, FLC expression in some non-vernalized elf6 mutants was found to be lower than in non-vernalized wild type, but the expression level was fully restored in the next generation [48]. Thus, there may be another factor associated with the resetting of FLC expression. LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) encodes a seed-specific NF-YB transcription factor that is a subunit of NF-Y that binds to NF-C and NF-A, and regulates embryogenesis. LEC1 NF-Y engages EFS, which is associated with H3K36me3, and the SWR1 complex, remodeling the chromatin state at the FLC locus to a transcriptionally active euchromatic state during embryogenesis [46, 48]. This activity suggests that LEC1 NF-Y binds to the FLC promoter, displacing Polycomb proteins and recruiting EFS, and that the maintenance of a euchromatic state at the FLC locus by LEC1 inhibits the transmission of repressive chromatin marks [48].

2.3. Long noncoding RNA induced by cold treatments in the FLC locus

Advanced technologies such as tiling arrays or RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), use high-throughput sequencing to enable the discovery of long noncoding transcripts. It has been shown that some long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involved in the regulation of gene expression through interactions with associated proteins. Several PRC2-associated lncRNAs have been identified in mammals, for example, XIST targets PRC2 to the X chromosome or HOTAIR targets PRC2 to the HOX gene, resulting in silencing of target genes [22]. Using a custom array covering the 50 kb region around FLC, with single-nucleotide resolution of both strands, lncRNAs termed cold-induced long antisense intragenic RNAs (COOLAIR) have been identified. COOLAIR encompasses most of the FLC locus, from the 5′ start to the 3′ polyadenylation sites, and COOLAIR is alternatively polyadenylated and spliced. The induction of COOLAIR occurs after 14 days of cold treatment in wild type and vin3–4 mutants, which is earlier than VIN3 induction (20 days after transfer to cold), and the suppression of unspliced sense FLC transcription was observed before the maximum induction of VIN3 [29, 49]. COOLAIR promoter-driven antisense transcription of a reporter gene could lead to transient cold-induced repression, suggesting that COOLAIR contributes to the early repression of sense FLC transcription transiently before the stable repression that is mediated by the PHD-PRC2 complex [49]. However, plants having T-DNA insertions in the region covering COOLAIR where COOLAIR expression or upregulation of COOLAIR is not observed during cold treatment, showed normal repression of sense FLC by vernalization. This suggests that the production of COOLAIR transcripts is not an essential component of vernalization-induced repression of FLC [50]. Because of this, while COOLAIR is considered to be involved in the autonomous pathway and the PRC2-mediated epigenetic silencing of FLC, its function in the cold-induced silencing of FLC is still controversial [50, 51, 52]. After the degradation of FLC mRNA via COOLAIR, COOLAIR transcription is then reduced by the formation of an RNA-DNA hybrid within its promoter, R-loop [53].

Another lncRNA, COLD ASSISTED INTRONIC NONCODING RNA (COLDAIR), has been identified in the first intron of FLC in the sense direction. COLDAIR contains a 5′ cap structure but is not polyadenylated. COLDAIR is induced during cold exposure and reaches its maximum level of expression at around 20 days of cold exposure. The expression level then returns to the pre-vernalized level after more than 30 days of cold. The induction of COLDAIR occurs earlier than VIN3 induction, but later than the induction of COOLAIR. The transcription start site of COLDAIR is located within the VERNALIZATION RESPONSE ELEMENT (VRE), a region important for the stable repression of FLC by vernalization [44]. COLDAIR interacts with FLC chromatin and one of the components of the PRC2 complex, CURLY LEAF (CLF), specifically during cold exposure. Reduced COLDAIR by RNA interference showed that FLC repression was not maintained when plants were returned to a warm growth condition after vernalization. COLDAIR mutants decrease the association of PRC2 and H3K27me3 accumulation [54]. In addition, the repression of FLC expression by cold treatment was not maintained in the COLDAIR mutants once the plants were moved to normal growth conditions [55]. Increased expression of CLF and enrichment of H3K27me3 by vernalization were not observed in knockdown lines of COLDAIR, indicating that COLDAIR plays a role in the establishment of the stable maintenance of FLC repression during vernalization by recruitment of the PHD-PRC2 complex to FLC chromatin [54].

RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) using the antibody against CLF followed by a tiled RT-PCR identified COLDWRAP (cold of winter-induced noncoding RNA from the promoter) overlapping the promoter region of FLC. COLDWRAP associated with PRC2 throughout cold exposure. COLDWRAP transcripts increased during cold exposure, and were maintained even after cold exposure. COLDWRAP has a 5′ cap structure but is not polyadenylated. COLDWRAP is 316 bp in length, and its transcription start site is 225 bp upstream from the FLC mRNA transcription start site. COLDWRAP mutants showed an absence of stable repression of FLC expression by cold exposure, with a low level of recruitment of PRC2 and H3K27me3 accumulation, suggesting that COLDWRAP is involved in PRC2-mediated FLC silencing by vernalization [56].


3. Vernalization research in the genus Brassica

Flowering time is very important for the harvest of valuable agricultural products because the flowering that is induced by exposure to cold temperatures, known as bolting, can occur. This is especially the case in vernalization-sensitive leafy vegetables of the genus Brassica (B. rapa and B. oleracea). Because bolting causes the devaluation of agricultural products, a high bolting resistance is of economic significance for cultivar breeding. Additionally, the control of flowering time is also critical for the yield of seeds in canola (B. napus) because the appropriate timing of flowering maximizes both seed production and quality. The FLC gene maintains a plant’s vegetative growth phase until exposure to prolonged cold, and is highly conserved among members of the Brassicaceae family [57], suggesting that the FLC gene is an important factor for the breeding of highly bolting resistant cultivars in leafy vegetables. Indeed, previous studies have already supported this possibility. This section introduces the research of flowering in the genus Brassica, mainly focusing on the FLC gene.

3.1. Species in the genus Brassica has the paralogs of FLC genes

Recently, the whole genome sequences of the diploid species, B. rapa, B. nigra, and B. oleracea, and the allotetraploid species, B. napus and B. juncea have been determined. From these genome sequences, it is already known that there are multiple FLC paralogs in the genus Brassica. Four FLC paralogs, Bra009055 (BrFLC1), Bra028599 (BrFLC2), Bra006051 (BrFLC3), and Bra022771 (BrFLC5) were found in the reference genome of B. rapa, Chiifu-401-42, but Bra022771 is possibly a pseudogene because of the two deleted exons. Two BoFLC (Bol008758, Bol043693) paralogs are found in the B. oleracea var. capitata homozygous line 02–12, while four BoFLC paralogs are found in TO1000DH3, a doubled haploid derived from a rapid cycling B. oleracea. In the reference genome of allotetraploid species of B. napus (AC genome), nine FLC paralogs were found in the European winter oilseed cultivar Darmor-bzh with four FLCs in the An subgenome and five within the Cn subgenome [58].

3.2. QTL controlling flowering time

In the genus Brassica, several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting flowering time have been identified. To identify the genes involved in flowering time QTLs, populations derived from parents that show differences for flowering time were used.

In B. rapa, several QTLs for flowering time (VFR1, 2, and 3 in non-vernalized condition and FR1, 2, and 3 in vernalized condition) were identified using an F2 population derived from a cross between an annual and a biennial oil seed cultivars [59, 60]. Later, VFR2 and FR1 were located in the regions covering BrFLC1 and BrFLC2, respectively [61, 62]. Using a multi-population derived from several parental lines (rapid cycling, Chinese cabbage, yellow sarson, pak-choi, and a Japanese vegetable turnip variety) eight QTLs for flowering were detected, and one major QTL co-localized with BrFLC2 [63]. BrFLC1 and BrFLC2 were linked to QTLs that control bolting, budding, and flowering time using an F2 population derived from an early flowering oilseed rape line, yellow sarson, and a late flowering line of the Japanese commercial komatsuna variety, osome [64]. In yellow sarson, a decrease in BrFLC2 transcripts was observed and was considered to be due to a nucleotide substitution occurring upstream of the start codon [64]. QTL analyses using other parental combinations between pak-choi and yellow sarson also showed the co-localization of a major QTL with BrFLC2 [65, 66]. QTL analysis using a recombinant inbred line population produced from a cross between a caixin line (L58, ssp. parachinensis) and a yellow sarson line (R-o-18, ssp. tricolaris) detected two QTLs in both the spring and autumn seasons, and the BrFT2 gene is co-localized with a QTL. Later flowering is caused by a transposon insertion in the second intron of BrFT2. In another QTL, BrFLC2 was located, and the earlier flowering line has a 57-bp deletion covering the fourth exon and fifth intron [67]. QTL analyses by different groups over many years have shown that a major QTL of flowering time co-localized with BrFLC2. Because of the early flowering line, yellow sarson was used as a parent for making the populations for QTL analysis in all groups, it seems likely that all the groups detected the defects of BrFLC2 function in yellow sarson as a flowering time QTL. QTL analysis using an F2 population derived from a cross between an extremely late bolting line (Nou 6 gou, PL6) and early bolting line (A9709) of Chinese cabbage was performed in two different conditions, greenhouse and open field. Five QTLs were detected, but the QTLs did not map to the same position between the two conditions. Three of five QTLs were co-localized with BrFTa (greenhouse), BrFLC1 (open field), and BrFLC5 (open field) [68]. In another parental combination in Chinese cabbage, an F2 population was developed from the cross of an early bolting parent of commercial F1 varieties, Early, and an extremely late bolting breeding line, Tsukena No. 2. In this analysis, the QTLs for bolting time after vernalization co-localized with the late bolting alleles of BrFLC2 and BrFLC3. These two genes carry large insertions in the first intron, suggesting that a weak repression of BrFLC2 and BrFLC3 transcripts by vernalization causes the extremely late bolting of Tsukena No. 2 [69]. Furthermore, this group succeeded in developing new F1 hybrids of Chinese cabbage by introducing these two FLC alleles from Tsukena No. 2 [70].

In B. oleracea, QTL analysis using a population derived from a DH line of broccoli, Green Comet (var. italica), and a DH line of cabbage, Reiho (var. capitata), identified a major QTL covering BoFLC2, while BoFLC1, BoFLC3, and BoFLC5 were not linked to the QTLs [71]. In addition, Green Comet (non-vernalization type) has a single base deletion in exon 4 leading to the frame-shift, suggesting that BoFLC2 contributes to the control of flowering time [71]. Another group performed QTL analysis using the population derived from a rapid cycling line of B. oleracea var. alboglabra (A12DHd) and the broccoli variety, Green Duke. Because these two lines contain non-functional copies of BoFLC2 (named BoFLC4 in this paper), there is a deletion in the A12DHs, and a single base deletion in exon 4 in Green Duke, it was concluded that BoFLC2 is not responsible for the flowering time difference between the two lines [72]. Later, the association between flowering time (under both glasshouse and field conditions) and a QTL at BoFLC2 has been shown using the population derived from two purple sprouting broccoli lines, E5 and E9; E9 requires longer cold periods than E5 to head [73].

QTL analysis was also performed in B. napus, and QTLs for flowering time were co-localized with the genes involved in flowering time in A. thaliana. Using a population derived from a biennial rapeseed cultivar, Major, and the annual canola cultivar, Stellar, four QTLs (VFN1, 2, 3 in non-vernalized condition and FN1 in vernalized condition) were detected. One major QTL, VFN1, co-localized with the region collinear with the top of chromosome 4 in A. thaliana covering the FRI gene [60, 74]. Six FT paralogs have been mapped in the B. napus genome and three (BnA2.FT, BnC6.FT.a, and BnC6.FT.b) genes were co-localized with two major QTL clusters for flowering time using populations from the European winter cultivar, Tapidor, and the Chinese semi-winter cultivar, Ningyou 7 [75]. Using the same population, BnaA.FRI.a was co-localized to a major flowering time QTL in multiple environments [76]. QTL analyses were performed under field and greenhouse conditions using a population from two Australian B. napus cultivars, Skipton and Ag-Spectrum, and the number of QTL detected differed between the two growth conditions. Flowering time genes such as FLC were localized within marker intervals associated with flowering time [77, 78]. A total of 158 European winter type B. napus inbred lines were genotyped to investigate the association with flowering time, plant height, and seed yield by a genome-wide association study (GWAS). This study revealed that the flowering time regulators, Bna.FLC and Bna.CO, were absent from the candidate regions associated with flowering time [79]. Another GWAS study examined the flowering times and genome architectures of 188 accessions of B. napus collected from different geographic locations around the world, showing associations between flowering time and regions within 20 kb of FT, FLC, and FRI [12].

3.3. Regulation of FLCs by vernalization in the genus Brassica

From QTL analyses, it has been demonstrated that multiple FRI or FLC paralogs are involved in the flowering times of B. rapa, B. oleracea, and B. napus. The transformation of BoFRIa complemented the loss of FRI function in A. thaliana, indicating that BoFRI has the same function as AtFRI [80]. In the case of FLC paralogs, the early flowering line yellow sarson has a non-functional BrFLC2 [64, 67], and a naturally occurring splicing mutation in the BrFLC1 gene is associated with flowering time variation [81]. In B. oleracea, an early flowering line of broccoli has a frame-shift mutation in exon 4 of BoFLC2 [71]. In addition, 40% of flowering time variation in cauliflower (var. botrytis) was explained by the same mutation in BoFLC2 [82]. Furthermore, transgenic plants overexpressing BnFLC paralogs in A. thaliana showed a late flowering phenotype, indicating that all five BnFLCs have similar function to AtFLC [83], and three FLCs (BrFLC1, BrFLC 2, and BrFLC3) have been confirmed to be a floral repressor in B. rapa [84]. These results indicate that FLC paralogs function as a floral repressor, and play an important role in the vernalization requirement.

In B. rapa, it has been shown that there is a difference in the expression levels of the FLC paralogs [85]. The coding sequences for the FLC paralogs are relatively conserved between Brassica species, but the alignment of the upstream sequences or introns are more divergent [57]. This suggests that these differences may account for the different steady state expression levels among BrFLC paralogs, or variation of the vernalization requirement.

In B. rapa grown under normal conditions, all four BrFLC paralogs were expressed in the leaves. The expression of BrFLC genes was reduced after vernalization, and the repression was stably maintained after returning to ambient temperatures. Before cold treatment, only BrFLC1 showed accumulation of both H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 modifications, while three of the BrFLC paralogs (BrFLC2, BrFLC3, and BrFLC5) had only H3K4me3. After 4 weeks of cold treatment, the accumulation of H3K27me3 was observed in BrFLC1, BrFLC2, and BrFLC3, and H3K27me3 was maintained after returning to a warm temperature [85]. These results indicate that, like A. thaliana, the repression of BrFLC expression by prolonged cold treatment was associated with the states of histone modification. The first intron, the promoter region, and exon 1 are important for FLC repression in A. thaliana [86], and lncRNA COLDAIR is expressed from the mid-region of the first intron in A. thaliana [54, 87]. Although insertions in the first intron cause a weak repression of BrFLC2 and BrFLC3 transcripts by vernalization in B. rapa, sequence similarity to the VRE in the first intron or to the COLDAIR of A. thaliana were not detected in the first intron of any of the B. rapa paralogs [69]. At least, COLDAIR-like transcripts in B. rapa were not detected. By contrast, COOLAIR-like transcripts were detected only from BrFLC2, and these transcripts were induced by cold treatment. The plant growth cycle was shortened by the over-expression of FLC natural antisense transcripts (NATs) (COOLAIR-like) resulting in decreased flowering time and FLC expression, suggesting that the activity of the BrFLC2 gene was suppressed by BrFLC NATs during cold condition [88]. BoFLC2 was shown to be a major determinant of heading date variation and vernalization response through allelic variation, and sequence polymorphisms in BoFLC2 alter the sensitivity and silencing dynamics of its expression [73].

3.4. Perspective of vernalization research in the genus Brassica

In leafy vegetables such as Chinese cabbage or cabbage, a high bolting resistance is an important trait for cultivation, indicating that understanding the molecular mechanisms of the vernalization requirement is important for breeding. While research into vernalization and flowering time has provided a wealth of information, a complete understanding of the molecular mechanism controlling the vernalization requirement has not yet been elucidated. In contrast to A. thaliana, where histone modifications such as active marks, H3K4me3 and H3K36me3, or repressive marks, H3K9me2 and H3K27me3, have been characterized at the whole genome level by ChIP-seq, such analysis has yet to be conducted in the genus Brassica. Comparison of the histone modification states, especially H3K27me3, at the whole genome level between vernalized and non-vernalized plants will identify the genes other than FLCs involved in the regulation of vernalization. In addition, combining histone modification data with transcriptome data may facilitate the identification of genes involved in the regulation of vernalization. In A. thaliana, it has been revealed that lncRNAs such as COOLAIR, COLDAIR, and COLDWRAP are involved in vernalization [49, 54, 56]. Currently, COOLAIR-like transcripts were detected only from BrFLC2, and these transcripts were involved in the suppression of BrFLC2 and maybe other BrFLCs [88]. However, in B. rapa, there is no report about the transcripts of COLDAIR or COLDWRAP, and regions sharing sequence similarity to the COLDAIR found in A. thaliana were not detected in the first intron of any of the B. rapa paralogs [69]. Therefore, there is a possibility that lncRNAs that do not show sequence similarity to COLDAIR or COLDWRAP may be involved in the regulation of repression of FLC in the genus Brassica. To examine this possibility, lncRNAs whose expression changes in response to vernalization will need to be assessed by RNA-seq. Thus, there exists a need to identify the sequences important for vernalization, termed VREs, within the genus Brassica; and to examine any sequence polymorphisms that may exist with respect to the vernalization response. This will help to identify important regions and explicate their relationship to sensitivity of vernalization. If there are any correlations, they will be useful for marker-assisted selection, and serve as important tools for breeding in the genus Brassica.



This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (15H04433) (JSPS) and Hyogo Science and Technology Association.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Más P, Devlin PF, Panda S, Kay SA. Functional interaction of phytochrome B and cryptochrome 2. Nature. 2000;408:207-211. DOI: 10.1038/35041583
  2. 2. Corbesier L, Coupland G. Photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis: Integrating genetic and physiological approaches to characterization of the floral stimulus. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2005;28:54-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01283.x
  3. 3. Henderson IR, Dean C. Control of Arabidopsis flowering: The chill before the bloom. Development. 2004;131:3829-3838. DOI: 10.1242/dev.01294
  4. 4. Kim DH, Doyle MR, Sung S, Amasino RM. Vernalization: Winter and the timing of flowering in plants. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2009;25:277-299. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113411
  5. 5. UN: Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japanese Journal of Botany. 1935;7:389-452
  6. 6. Cheng F, Wu J, Wang X. Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants. Horticulture Research. 2014;1:14024. DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2014.24
  7. 7. Falik O, Hoffmann I, Novoplansky A. Say it with flowers: Flowering acceleration by root communication. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2014;9:e28258. DOI: 10.4161/psb.28258
  8. 8. Ito H, Saito T, Hatayama T. Time and temperature factors for the flower formation in cabbage II. The site of vernalization and the nature of vernalization sensitivity. Tohoku. Journal of Agricultural Research. 1966;17:1-15
  9. 9. Friend DJC. Brassica. Harlevy AH, editor. Handbook of Flowering. CRC Press; 1985. pp. 44-77
  10. 10. Hossain MM, Inden H, Asahira T. Seed vernalized interspecific hybrids through in vitro ovule culture in Brassica. Plant Science. 1990;68:95-102. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9452(90)90157-J
  11. 11. Shea DJ, Tomaru Y, Itabashi E, Nakamura Y, Miyazaki T, Kakizaki T, Naher TN, Shimizu M, Fujimoto R, Fukai E, Okazaki K. The production and characterization of a BoFLC2 introgressed Brassica rapa by repeated backcrossing to an F1. Breeding Science. 2018 in press
  12. 12. Raman H, Raman R, Coombes N, Song J, Prangnell R, Bandaranayake C, Tahira R, Sundaramoorthi V, Killian A, Meng J, Dennis ES, Balasubramanian S. Genome-wide association analyses reveal complex genetic architecture underlying natural variation for flowering time in canola. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2016;39:1228-1239. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12644
  13. 13. Srikanth A, Schmid M. Regulation of flowering time: All roads lead to Rome. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2011;68:2013-2037. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-011-0673-y
  14. 14. Andrés F, Coupland G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2012;13:627-639. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3291
  15. 15. Pouteau S, Albertini C. The significance of bolting and floral transitions as indicators of reproductive phase change in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60:3367-3377. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp173
  16. 16. Wang R, Farrona S, Vincent C, Joecker A, Schoof H, Turck F, Alonso-Blanco C, Coupland G, Albani MC. PEP1 regulates perennial flowering in Arabis alpina. Nature. 2009;459:423-427. DOI: 10.1038/nature07988
  17. 17. Aikawa S, Kobayashi MJ, Satake A, Shimizu KK, Kudoh H. Robust control of the seasonal expression of the Arabidopsis FLC gene in a fluctuating environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:11632-11637. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0914293107
  18. 18. Johanson U, West J, Lister C, Michaels S, Amasino R, Dean C. Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time. Science. 2000;290:344-347. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5490.344
  19. 19. Choi K, Kim J, Hwang HJ, Kim SY, Park C, Kim SY, Lee I. The FRIGIDA complex activates transcription of FLC, a strong flowering repressor in Arabidopsis, by recruiting chromatin modification factors. The Plant Cell. 2011;23:289-303. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.110.075911
  20. 20. Michaels SD, Amasino RM. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. The Plant Cell. 1999;11:949-956. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.11.5.949
  21. 21. Sheldon CC, Burn JE, Perez PP, Metzger J, Edwards JA, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. The FLF MADS box gene: A repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. The Plant Cell. 1999;11:445-458. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.11.3.445
  22. 22. Whittaker C, Dean C. The FLC locus: A platform for discoveries in epigenetics and adaptation. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2017;33:555-575. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060546
  23. 23. Helliwell CA, Wood CC, Robertson M, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. The Arabidopsis FLC protein interacts directly in vivo with SOC1 and FT chromatin and is part of a high-molecular-weight protein complex. The Plant Journal. 2006;46:183-192. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02686. x
  24. 24. Searle I, He Y, Turck F, Vincent C, Fornara F, Kröber S, Amasino RA, Coupland G. The transcription factor FLC confers a flowering response to vernalization by repressing meristem competence and systemic signaling in Arabidopsis. Genes & Development. 2006;20:898-912. DOI: 10.1101/gad.373506
  25. 25. Deng W, Ying H, Helliwell CA, Taylor JM, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) regulates development pathways throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:6680-6685. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103175108
  26. 26. Simpson GG. The autonomous pathway: Epigenetic and post-transcriptional gene regulation in the control of Arabidopsis flowering time. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2004;7:570-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.002
  27. 27. Gendall AR, Levy YY, Wilson A, Dean C. The VERNALIZATION 2 gene mediates the epigenetic regulation of vernalization in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2001;107:525-535. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00573-6
  28. 28. Levy YY, Mesnage S, Mylne JS, Gendall AR, Dean C. Multiple roles of Arabidopsis VRN1 in vernalization and flowering time control. Science. 2002;297:243-246. DOI: 10.1126/science.1072147
  29. 29. Sung S, Amasino RM. Vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by the PHD finger protein VIN3. Nature. 2004;427:159-164. DOI: 10.1038/nature02195
  30. 30. Richards EJ. Natural epigenetic variation in plant species: A view from the field. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2011;14:204-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.009
  31. 31. Fujimoto R, Sasaki T, Ishikawa R, Osabe K, Kawanabe T, Dennis ES. Molecular mechanisms of epigenetic variation in plants. International Journal of Molecular Science. 2012;13:9900-9922. DOI: 10.3390/ijms13089900
  32. 32. Fuchs J, Demidov D, Houben A, Schubert I. Chromosomal histone modification patterns–from conservation to diversity. Trends in Plant Science. 2006;11:199-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.008
  33. 33. Bastow R, Mylne JS, Lister C, Lippman Z, Martienssen RA, Dean C. Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature. 2004;427:164-167. DOI: 10.1038/nature02269
  34. 34. Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. Epigenetic regulation of flowering. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2007;10:520-527. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.06.009
  35. 35. Groszmann M, Greaves IK, Albert N, Fujimoto R, Helliwell CA, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. Epigenetics in plants-vernalisation and hybrid vigour. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2011;1809:427-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.03.006
  36. 36. Ko JH, Mitina I, Tamada Y, Hyun Y, Choi Y, Amasino RM, Noh B, Noh YS. Growth habit determination by the balance of histone methylation activities in Arabidopsis. The EMBO Journal. 2010;29:3208-3215. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2010.198
  37. 37. Pien S, Fleury D, Mylne JS, Crevillen P, Inzé D, Avramova Z, Dean C, Grossniklaus U. ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX1 dynamically regulates FLOWERING LOCUS C activation via histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation. The Plant Cell. 2008;20:580-588. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.108.058172
  38. 38. Berr A, Xu L, Gao J, Cognat V, Steinmetz A, Dong A, Shen WH. SET DOMAIN GROUP25 encodes a histone methyltransferase and is involved in FLOWERING LOCUS C activation and repression of flowering. Plant Physiology. 2009;151:1476-1485. DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.143941
  39. 39. He Y, Doyle MR, Amasino RM. PAF1-complex-mediated histone methylation of FLOWERING LOCUS C chromatin is required for the vernalization-responsive, winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis. Genes & Development. 2004;18:2774-2784. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1244504
  40. 40. Wood CC, Robertson M, Tanner G, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES, Helliwell CA. The Arabidopsis thaliana vernalization response requires a polycomb-like protein complex that also includes VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:14631-14636. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0606385103
  41. 41. De Lucia F, Crevillen P, Jones AM, Greb T, Dean C. A PHD-polycomb repressive complex 2 triggers the epigenetic silencing of FLC during vernalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:16831-16836. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808687105
  42. 42. Finnegan EJ, Dennis ES. Vernalization-induced trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 at FLC is not maintained in mitotically quiescent cells. Current Biology. 2007;17:1978-1983. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.026
  43. 43. Mylne JS, Barrett L, Tessadori F, Mesnage S, Johnson L, Bernatavichute YV, Jacobsen SE, Fransz P, Dean C. LHP1, the Arabidopsis homologue of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, is required for epigenetic silencing of FLC. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:5012-5017. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507427103
  44. 44. Sung S, He Y, Eshoo TW, Tamada Y, Johnson L, Nakahigashi K, Goto K, Jacobsen SE, Amasino RM. Epigenetic maintenance of the vernalized state in Arabidopsis thaliana requires LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1. Nature Genetics. 2006;38:706-710. DOI: 10.1038/ng1795
  45. 45. Sheldon CC, Hills MJ, Lister C, Dean C, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. Resetting of FLOWERING LOCUS C expression after epigenetic repression by vernalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:2214-2219. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0711453105
  46. 46. Choi J, Hyun Y, Kang MJ, In Yun H, Yun JY, Lister C, Dean C, Amasino RM, Noh B, Noh YS, Choi Y. Resetting and regulation of Flowering Locus C expression during Arabidopsis reproductive development. The Plant Journal. 2009;57:918-931. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03776.x
  47. 47. Crevillén P, Yang H, Cui X, Greeff C, Trick M, Qiu Q, Cao X, Dean C. Epigenetic reprogramming that prevents transgenerational inheritance of the vernalized state. Nature. 2014;515:587-590. DOI: 10.1038/nature13722
  48. 48. Tao Z, Shen L, Gu X, Wang Y, Yu H, He Y. Embryonic epigenetic reprogramming by a pioneer transcription factor in plants. Nature. 2017;551:124-128. DOI: 10.1038/nature24300
  49. 49. Swiezewski S, Liu F, Magusin A, Dean C. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature. 2009;462:799-802. DOI: 10.1038/nature08618
  50. 50. Helliwell CA, Robertson M, Finnegan EJ, Buzas DM, Dennis ES. Vernalization-repression of Arabidopsis FLC requires promoter sequences but not antisense transcripts. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21513. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021513
  51. 51. Angel A, Song J, Dean C, Howard M. A polycomb-based switch underlying quantitative epigenetic memory. Nature. 2011;476:105-108. DOI: 10.1038/nature10241
  52. 52. Liu F, Marquardt S, Lister C, Swiezewski S, Dean C. Targeted 3′ processing of antisense transcripts triggers Arabidopsis FLC chromatin silencing. Science. 2010;327:94-97. DOI: 10.1126/science.1180278
  53. 53. Sun Q, Csorba T, Skourti-Stathaki K, Proudfoot NJ, Dean C. R-loop stabilization represses antisense transcription at the Arabidopsis FLC locus. Science. 2013;340:619-621. DOI: 10.1126/science. 1234848
  54. 54. Heo JB, Sung S. Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science. 2011;331:76-79. DOI: 10.1126/science.1197349
  55. 55. Kim DH, Xi Y, Sung S. Modular function of long noncoding RNA, COLDAIR, in the vernalization response. PLoS Genetics. 2017;13:e1006939. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006939
  56. 56. Kim DH, Sung S. Vernalization-triggered intragenic chromatin loop formation by long noncoding RNAs. Developmental Cell. 2017;40:302-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.12.021
  57. 57. Zou X, Suppanz I, Raman H, Hou J, Wang J, Long Y, Jung C, Meng J. Comparative analysis of FLC homologues in Brassicaceae provides insight into their role in the evolution of oilseed rape. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45751. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045751
  58. 58. Shea DJ, Itabashi E, Takada S, Fukai E, Kakizaki T, Fujimoto R, Okazaki K. The role of FLOWERING LOCUS C in vernalisation of Brassica: the importance of vernalisation research in the face of climate change. Crop & Pasture Science. 2018;69:30-39. DOI: 10.1071/CP16468
  59. 59. Teutonico RA, Osborn TC. Mapping of RFLP and quantitative trait loci in Brassica rapa and comparison to linkage maps of B. napus, B. oleracea and Arabidopsis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1996;89:885-894. DOI: 10.1007/BF00224514
  60. 60. Osborn TC, Kole C, Parkin IAP, Sharpe AG, Kuiper M, Lydiate DJ, Trick M. Comparison of flowering time genes in Brassica rapa, B. napus and Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 1997;146:1123-1129
  61. 61. Kole C, Quijada P, Michaels SD, Amasino RM, Osborn TC. Evidence for homology of flowering-time genes VFR2 from Brassica rapa and FLC from Arabidopsis thaliana. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2001;102:425-430. DOI: 10.1007/s001220051663
  62. 62. Schranz ME, Quijada P, Sung SB, Lukens L, Amasino R, Osborn TC. Characterization and effects of the replicated flowering time gene FLC in Brassica rapa. Genetics. 2002;162:1457-1468
  63. 63. Lou P, Zhao J, Kim JS, Shen S, Del Carpio DP, Song X, Jin M, Vreugdenhil D, Wang X, Koornneef M, Bonnema G. Quantitative trait loci for flowering time and morphological traits in multiple populations of Brassica rapa. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2007;58:4005-4016. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm255
  64. 64. Li F, Kitashiba H, Inaba K, Nishio T. A Brassica rapa linkage map of EST-based SNP markers for identification of candidate genes controlling flowering time and leaf morphological traits. DNA Research. 2009;16:311-323. DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsp020
  65. 65. Zhao J, Kulkarni V, Liu N, Del Carpio DP, Bucher J, Bonnema G. BrFLC2 (FLOWERING LOCUS C) as a candidate gene for a vernalization response QTL in Brassica rapa. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2010;61:1817-1825. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq048
  66. 66. Xiao D, Zhao JJ, Hou XL, Basnet RK, Carpio DP, Zhang NW, Bucher J, Lin K, Cheng F, Wang XW, Bonnema G. The Brassica rapa FLC homologue FLC2 is a key regulator of flowering time, identified through transcriptional co-expression networks. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2013;64:4503-4516. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert264
  67. 67. Zhang X, Meng L, Liu B, Hu Y, Cheng F, Liang J, MGM A, Wang X, Wu J. A transposon insertion in FLOWERING LOCUS T is associated with delayed flowering in Brassica rapa. Plant Science. 2016;241:211-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.10.007
  68. 68. Kakizaki T, Kato T, Fukino N, Ishida M, Hatakeyama K, Matsumoto S. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling late bolting in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.) parental line Nou 6 gou. Breeding Science. 2011;61:151-159. DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.61.151
  69. 69. Kitamoto N, Yui S, Nishikawa K, Takahata Y, Yokoi S. A naturally occurring long insertion in the first intron in the Brassica rapa FLC2 gene causes delayed bolting. Euphytica. 2014;196:213-223. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-013-1025-9
  70. 70. Kitamoto N, Nishikawa K, Tanimura Y, Urushibara S, Matsuura T, Yokoi S, Takahata Y, Yui S. Development of late-bolting F1 hybrids of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.) allowing early spring cultivation without heating. Euphytica. 2017;213:292. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-017-2079-x
  71. 71. Okazaki K, Sakamoto K, Kikuchi R, Saito A, Togashi E, Kuginuki Y, Matsumoto S, Hirai M. Mapping and characterization of FLC homologs and QTL analysis of flowering time in Brassica oleracea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2007;114:595-608. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-006-0460-6
  72. 72. Razi H, Howell EC, Newbury HJ, Kearsey MJ. Does sequence polymorphism of FLC paralogues underlie flowering time QTL in Brassica oleracea? Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2008;116:179-192. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-007-0657-3
  73. 73. Irwin JA, Soumpourou E, Lister C, Ligthart JD, Kennedy S, Dean C. Nucleotide polymorphism affecting FLC expression underpins heading date variation in horticultural brassicas. The Plant Journal. 2016;87:597-605. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13221
  74. 74. Ferreira ME, Satagopan J, Yandell BS, Williams PH, Osborn TC. Mapping loci controlling vernalization requirement and flowering time in Brassica napus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1995;90:727-732. DOI: 10.1007/BF00222140
  75. 75. Wang J, Long Y, Wu B, Liu J, Jiang C, Shi L, Zhao J, King GJ, Meng J. The evolution of Brassica napus FLOWERING LOCUS T paralogues in the context of inverted chromosomal duplication blocks. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2009;9:271. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-271
  76. 76. Wang N, Qian W, Suppanz I, Wei L, Mao B, Long Y, Meng J, Müller AE, Jung C. Flowering time variation in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) is associated with allelic variation in the FRIGIDA homologue BnaA.FRI. a. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011;62:5641-5658. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err249
  77. 77. Raman H, Raman R, Eckermann P, Coombes N, Manoli S, Zou X, Edwards D, Meng J, Prangnell R, Stiller J, Batley J, Luckett D, Wratten N, Dennis E. Genetic and physical mapping of flowering time loci in canola (Brassica napus L.). PLoS One. 2013;126:119-132. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1966-8
  78. 78. Raman H, Dalton-Morgan J, Diffey S, Raman R, Alamery S, Edwards D, Batley J. SNP markers-based map construction and genome-wide linkage analysis in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2014;12:851-860. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12186
  79. 79. Schiessl S, Iniguez-Luy F, Qian W, Snowdon RJ. Diverse regulatory factors associate with flowering time and yield responses in winter-type Brassica napus. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:737. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1950-1
  80. 80. Irwin JA, Lister C, Soumpourou E, Zhang Y, Howell EC, Teakle G, Dean C. Functional alleles of the flowering time regulator FRIGIDA in the Brassica oleracea genome. BMC Plant Biology. 2012;12:21. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-21
  81. 81. Yuan YX, Wu J, Sun RF, Zhang XW, Xu DH, Bonnema G, Wang XW. A naturally occurring splicing site mutation in the Brassica rapa FLC1 gene is associated with variation in flowering time. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60:1299-1308. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp010
  82. 82. Ridge S, Brown PH, Hecht V, Driessen RG, Weller JL. The role of BoFLC2 in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) reproductive development. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66:125-135. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru408
  83. 83. Tadege M, Sheldon CC, Helliwell CA, Stoutjesdijk P, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. Control of flowering time by FLC orthologues in Brassica napus. The Plant Journal. 2011;28:545-553. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01182. x
  84. 84. Kim SY, Park BS, Kwon SJ, Kim J, Lim MH, Park YD, Kim DY, Suh SC, Jin YM, Ahn JH, Lee YH. Delayed flowering time in Arabidopsis and Brassica rapa by the overexpression of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) homologs isolated from Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Plant Cell Reports. 2007;26:327-336. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-006-0243-1
  85. 85. Kawanabe T, Osabe K, Itabashi E, Okazaki K, Dennis ES, Fujimoto R. Development of primer sets that can verify the enrichment of histone modifications, and their application to examining vernalization-mediated chromatin changes in Brassica rapa L. Genes & Genetic Systems. 2016;91:1-10. DOI: 10.1266/ggs.15-00058
  86. 86. Sheldon CC, Conn AB, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. Different regulatory regions are required for the vernalization-induced repression of FLOWERING LOCUS C and for the epigenetic maintenance of repression. The Plant Cell. 2002;14:2527-2537. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.004564
  87. 87. Tsai MC, Manor O, Wan Y, Mosammaparast N, Wang JK, Lan F, Shi Y, Segal E, Chang HY. Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science. 2010;329:689-693. DOI: 10.1126/science.1192002.Long
  88. 88. Li X, Zhang S, Bai J, He Y. Tuning growth cycles of Brassica crops via natural antisense transcripts of BrFLC. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2016;14:905-914. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12443

Written By

Ayasha Akter, Namiko Nishida, Satoko Takada, Etsuko Itabashi, Kenji Osabe, Daniel J. Shea and Ryo Fujimoto

Submitted: November 11th, 2017 Reviewed: January 29th, 2018 Published: March 1st, 2018