Open access

Introductory Chapter: Characterization and Breeding of Brassica Germplasm

Written By

Mohamed A. El-Esawi

Submitted: 09 July 2018 Published: 24 October 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80457

From the Edited Volume

Brassica Germplasm - Characterization, Breeding and Utilization

Edited by Mohamed Ahmed El-Esawi

Chapter metrics overview

1,003 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The genus Brassica L. belonging to the family Brassicaceae has a vital role in agriculture and populations health [1]. It comprises several species, including major oilseed and vegetable crops of promising agronomic traits [2, 3, 4, 5]. Brassica species are vital resources of vegetable oil, vegetables, and condiments [6]. Brassica napus, B. rapa, B. juncea, and B. carinata provide approximately 12% of the vegetable oil supply worldwide [3, 7]. The oil is utilized for human consumption or as a biofuel or renewable resource in the petrochemical industry. B. oleracea comprises a large storage capacity for nutrients and provides a large range of unique cole and cabbage crops used for human consumption [1, 3]. The seed of Brassica nigra is used as a condiment mustard. Furthermore, Brassica species are vital sources of potassium; dietary fiber; vitamins A, C, and E; phenolics; and other health-enhancing factors [3, 6, 8]. Brassicaceae contains glucosinolates which are broken down to isothiocyanates known to mitigate tumor development and resist a range of heart diseases and human cancers [2, 3, 9]. The plants comprising high amount of glucosinolate may be further utilized as a potential genetic source for breeding [10]. Brassica vegetables inhibit major diseases such as Alzheimer’s, and some of the functional declines associated with aging [3, 9].

Brassica secondary products have antibacterial, antioxidant, and antiviral effects as well as inducing the immune system and regulating steroid metabolism [2, 3, 9]. Various fungal, bacterial, viral, and insect and pest pathogens, including Plasmodiophora brassicae (clubroot), Peronospora parasitica (downy mildew), Ophiosphaerella korrae (ring spot), Leptosphaeria maculans (blackleg), Fusarium oxysporum (yellows or fusarium wilt), Xanthomonas campestris (black rot), Brevicoryne brassicae (aphids), Prodenia spp. (cut worms), Pieris rapae (cabbage worms), and Delia radicum (cabbage root fly) infect Brassica and crucifers causing harmful diseases and damage [3, 11]. The utilization of pesticides to control these devastated diseases is harmful for human and environment. The issue has led to searching for alternative resources to control these diseases. To close this gap, disease-resistant Brassica varieties would be developed in future breeding programs in order to improve their conservation and agricultural production [3]. Hence, attention has been paid to wild Brassica genetic resources (repositories of resistance genes) to identify the genes conferring resistance and good agronomic traits including oil content [2, 3, 12, 13, 14]. Due to the strong self-incompatibility system, most Brassica crops are outbreeders with a high degree of heterozygosity in natural populations and open-pollinated crops [3, 9]. Better methods for characterizing those germplasm collections have also been developed to improve strategies for their biodiversity conservation and utilization in varietal improvement.


2. Genetic characterization of Brassica germplasm

Genetic diversity is defined as the variation of individual genotypes within and among species and is the raw material permitting species to adjust to a changing world [2, 3]. Knowledge of the amount and distribution of genetic variability within a species is important for establishing efficient conservation and breeding practices [3], whereas it provides plant breeders with options to develop, through selection and breeding, new and more productive crops that are resistant to diseases and pests and adapted to changing environments. It also provides information for domestication and designing sampling protocols [3]. Therefore, assessing genetic diversity is also essential for providing information for domestication, propagation, and breeding programs as well as conservation of plant genetic resources. Different techniques and markers have been successfully used for characterizing Brassica genetic resources [3]. These techniques include morphological, cytological, biochemical, and molecular markers. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular genetic techniques have also successfully applied in different plant species [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. This work highlights the current knowledge of the application of physiological and genetic markers in the genus Brassica L. in order to understand its biology, diversity, conservation, and breeding as a basis for further research to develop disease-resistant and more productive crops. Breeding technologies and resistance to abiotic stresses in Brassica species are also discussed.


  1. 1. Rakow G. Species origin and economic importance of Brassica. In: Pua EC, Douglas CJ, editors. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 54. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2004. pp. 3-11
  2. 2. Christopher GL, Andrew JR, Geraldine ACL, Clare JH, Jacqueline B, Gary B, German CS, David E. Brassica ASTRA: An integrated database for Brassica genomic research. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005;1(33):D656-D659
  3. 3. El-Esawi MA. Taxonomic relationships and biochemical genetic characterization of Brassica resources: Towards a recent platform for germplasm improvement and utilization. Annual Research & Review in Biology. 2015;8(4):1-11
  4. 4. El-Esawi MA. Genetic diversity and evolution of Brassica genetic resources: From morphology to novel genomic technologies—A review. Plant Genetic Resources and Characterization. 2017;15:388-399
  5. 5. El-Esawi MA, Germaine K, Bourke P, Malone R. Genetic diversity and population structure of Brassica oleracea germplasm in Ireland using SSR markers. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2016;339:133-140
  6. 6. Zhao J. The genetics of phytate content and morphological traits in Brassica rapa [PhD thesis]. The Netherlands: Wageningen University; 2007
  7. 7. Labana KS, Gupta ML. Importance and origin. In: Labana KS, Banga SS, Banga SK, editors. Breeding Oilseed Brassicas. Berlin, Germany: Springer, Verlag Press; 1993. pp. 1-20
  8. 8. Fahey J, Talalay P. The role of crucifers in cancer chemoprotection. In: Gustine DL, Florens HE, editors. Phytochemicals and Health. Rockville, USA: American Society of Plant Physiologists; 1995. pp. 87-93
  9. 9. King GJ. A white paper for the multinational Brassica genome project. 2015. Available online at
  10. 10. Faltusová Z, Kučera L, Ovesná J. Genetic diversity of Brassica oleracea var. capitata Gene Bank accessions assessed by AFLP. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;14(3):1-10
  11. 11. Relf D, McDaniel A. Cole Crops or Brassicas. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Publication Number 426-403. Petersburg, USA: Virginia State University; 2009
  12. 12. Lázaro A, Auginagalde I. Genetic diversity in Brassica oleracea L. (Cruciferae) and wild relatives (2n = 18) using isozymes. Annals of Botany. 1998;82:821-828
  13. 13. Warwick SI, Francis A, La Fleche J. Guide to Wild Germplasm of Brassica and Allied Crops (Tribe Brassiceae, Brassicaceae). Ottawa, Canada: Agriculture and agri-food Canada, Eastern Cereal and Oilseeds Research Centre; 2000
  14. 14. Watson-Jones SJ, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV. Population baseline data for monitoring genetic diversity loss for 2010: A case study for Brassica species in the UK. Biological Conservation. 2006;132:490-499
  15. 15. Consentino L, Lambert S, Martino C, Jourdan N, Bouchet PE, Witczak J, Castello P, El-Esawi M, Corbineau F, d’Harlingue A, Ahmad M. Blue-light dependent reactive oxygen species formation by Arabidopsis cryptochrome may define a novel evolutionarily conserved signalling mechanism. New Phytologist. 2015;206:1450-1462
  16. 16. Elansary HO, Szopa A, Kubica P, Ekiert H, Ali HM, Elshikh MS, et al. Bioactivities of traditional medicinal plants in Alexandria. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018;2018:1463579
  17. 17. Elansary HO, Yessoufou K, Abdel-Hamid AME, El-Esawi MA, Ali HM, Elshikh MS. Seaweed extracts enhance Salam turfgrass performance during prolonged irrigation intervals and saline shock. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:830
  18. 18. El-Esawi MA. Micropropagation technology and its applications for crop improvement. In: Anis M, Ahmad N, editors. Plant Tissue Culture: Propagation, Conservation and Crop Improvement. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 523-545
  19. 19. El-Esawi MA. Nonzygotic embryogenesis for plant development. In: Anis M, Ahmad N, editors. Plant Tissue Culture: Propagation, Conservation and Crop Improvement. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 583-598
  20. 20. El-Esawi MA. Somatic hybridization and microspore culture in Brassica improvement. In: Anis M, Ahmad N, editors. Plant Tissue Culture: Propagation, Conservation and Crop Improvement. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 599-609
  21. 21. El-Esawi MA. SSR analysis of genetic diversity and structure of the germplasm of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2017;340:474-480
  22. 22. El-Esawi MA, Sammour R. Karyological and phylogenetic studies in the genus Lactuca L. (Asteraceae). Cytologia. 2014;79:269-275
  23. 23. El-Esawi M, Arthaut L, Jourdan N, d’Harlingue A, Martino C, Ahmad M. Blue-light induced biosynthesis of ROS contributes to the signaling mechanism of Arabidopsis cryptochrome. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:13875
  24. 24. El-Esawi MA, Elansary HO, El-Shanhorey NA, Abdel-Hamid AME, Ali HM, Elshikh MS. Salicylic acid-regulated antioxidant mechanisms and gene expression enhance rosemary performance under saline conditions. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017;8:716
  25. 25. El-Esawi MA, Elkelish A, Elansary HO, et al. Genetic transformation and hairy root induction enhance the antioxidant potential of Lactuca serriola L. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2017; Article ID 5604746, 8 pages
  26. 26. El-Esawi MA, Germaine K, Bourke P, Malone R. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Brassica oleracea in Ireland. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2016;133:163-170
  27. 27. El-Esawi M, Glascoe A, Engle D, Ritz T, Link J, Ahmad M. Cellular metabolites modulate in vivo signaling of Arabidopsis cryptochrome-1. Plant Signaling and Behaviour. 2015;10(9)
  28. 28. El-Esawi MA, Mustafa A, Badr S, Sammour R. Isozyme analysis of genetic variability and population structure of Lactuca L. germplasm. Biochemical Systematic and Ecology. 2017;70:73-79
  29. 29. El-Esawi MA, Witczak J, Abomohra A, Ali HM, Elshikh MS, Ahmad M. Analysis of the genetic diversity and population structure of Austrian and Belgian wheat germplasm within a regional context based on DArT markers. Genes. 2018;9(1):47
  30. 30. Jourdan N, Martino C, El-Esawi M, Witczak J, Bouchet PE, d'Harlingue A, Ahmad M. Bluelight dependent ROS formation by Arabidopsis cryptochrome-2 may contribute towards its signaling role. Plant Signaling and Behaviour. 2015, 2015;10(8):e1042647
  31. 31. Vwioko E, Adinkwu O, El-Esawi MA. Comparative physiological, biochemical and genetic responses to prolonged waterlogging stress in okra and maize given exogenous ethylene priming. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017;8:632

Written By

Mohamed A. El-Esawi

Submitted: 09 July 2018 Published: 24 October 2018