Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Antiparasitic Mechanisms of the Human Placenta

Written By

Castillo Christian, Ana Liempi, Lisvaneth Medina, Ileana Carrillo and Ulrike Kemmerling

Submitted: April 25th, 2017 Reviewed: January 8th, 2018 Published: September 12th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73569

Chapter metrics overview

771 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Trypanosoma cruzi, during vertical transmission, crosses the placental barrier. The trophoblast, a continuous renewing epithelium, is the first tissue of this anatomical barrier to have contact with the parasite. The epithelial turnover, including the trophoblast, is part of the innate immune response due to the fact that pathogens attach to the surface of cells prior invasion. Cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and apoptotic cell death are part of the trophoblast turnover. Interestingly, T. cruzi induces all of them. In addition, the placenta expresses TLRs, whose activation leads to the secretion of pro-inflammatory and immunomodulating cytokines. T. cruzi is recognized by TLR-2, TLR-4, TLR-7, and TLR-9. In the present review, we analyze the current evidence about the trophoblast epithelial turnover, the induction of a specific cytokine profile as a local placental innate immune response, as well as other possible defense mechanisms against the parasite.


  • Trypanosoma cruzi
  • placenta
  • epithelial turnover
  • TLRs
  • cytokine profile

1. Introduction

Congenital Chagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi(T. cruzi), is associated with premature labor, low birth weight, and stillbirths [1, 2]. The congenital transmission of pathogens is the consequence of complex interactions among the parasite, maternal and fetal/newborn immune responses, and placental factors. The placenta is the least-studied component of this “trilogy” [3, 4] but is essential in determining the probability of transmission since it forms the primary barrier between the maternal and fetal compartments throughout pregnancy [5].

Mother and developing fetus are protected against environmental challenges by the immune system; the placenta is able to modulate fetal as well as maternal immune responses. Maternal immune system presents an enhanced capacity of cellular and molecular recognition and communication between each other. Therefore, during normal pregnancy, the maternal immune defenses assure the health of the mother and developing child. Moreover, the fetus during its development also acquires immune defenses that are able to modulate the maternal immune system. Considering this facts, the immune system responses are unique and particularly effective [6].

The maternal and the fetal developing innate and adaptative immune systems determine the probability of fetal/neonatal infection. Fetal infection is related to diverse pregnancy disorders such as abortion, preterm labor, intrauterine growth retardation, and preeclampsia [7]. Particularly, congenital T. cruziinfection can cause abortion, stillbirth, and intrauterine growth restriction [1, 2, 8].

The innate immune system presents a main role in protecting the developing child against T. cruziinfection. Thus, increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines is present in the sera of uninfected babies born to infected mothers [9]. However, in newborns who suffer from congenital infection, the levels of inflammation markers as well as active NK cells are low [10]. Therefore, the innate immune response is effective in uninfected newborn from chagasic mothers. The adaptive immune system is also relevant; for instance, maternal anti-T. cruziantibodies are transferred through the placenta to the fetus and where they reduce the parasitemia [9].

Importantly, congenital transmission rates for Trypanosoma cruzi(T. cruzi) are relatively low (3.9–5.6%) [11, 12]. Moreover, the typical amastigote nests (intracellular parasites) cannot be observed in placentas from mothers with chronic Chagas disease [13] nor in human placental chorionic villi explants (HPCVE) infected in vitro with the parasite [14]. In the latter, only a few parasite antigens and DNA can be identified [14, 15]. In addition, other infections of the placenta are not commonly observed [11]. All these evidences suggest the presence of systemic and local defense mechanisms against pathogen and that the placenta is a key factor against T. cruziinfection.


2. Antiparasitic mechanisms of the placenta

Importantly, during congenital transmission, the parasites must cross the placental barrier [8, 16].

2.1. Placenta

The placenta is a temporary organ that provides nutrition and gas exchange for the developing fetus, ensuring normal embryo-fetal growth and development and supporting pregnancy-related changes in maternal physiological systems [17]. The human placenta is classified as discoidal, villous, and hemochorial and consists of a fetal portion, which originates from the Chorion frondosum, and a maternal portion, or basal decidua, which originates from the endometrium. The functional units are the floating chorionic villi, formed by the trophoblast, and the villous stroma. The trophoblast comes into contact with maternal blood in the intervillous space (IVS) and is delimited by a basal lamina from the villous stroma, which is the fetal connective tissue containing the fetal capillaries. The placental barrier is formed by the trophoblast, basal laminae, villous stroma, and fetal capillary endothelium (Figure 1) [4, 8].

Figure 1.

The placental barrier: the placental barrier is formed by the trophoblast composed by the superficial syncytiotrophoblast (ST) that contacts the maternal blood in the intervillous space (IVS) and the cytotrophoblast (CT) which corresponds to the germinative layer of the epithelium. The trophoblast is supported by the fetal connective tissue of the villous stroma (VS) that contains the fetal capillaries (FC). The placental barrier presents also two basal membranes (BM): (1) between villous stroma and trophoblast and (2) around fetal endothelium. The cells of the CT proliferate and afterward differentiate into the ST. The continuous incorporation of CT cells into the ST is counterbalanced by the formation of apoptotic ST knots, which are released into the IVS.

The placenta may contain as much as 500 mL of maternal blood, in the IVS, exposing the trophoblast to pathogens that might be present in it [5]. Therefore, the trophoblast is a key factor against congenital infection since it is the first fetal tissue that comes into contact with pathogens circulating in the maternal blood [11]. On the other hand, the placenta, as an immune regulatory organ, acts as a modulator of fetal as well as maternal immune responses [6]. The placenta, in particular the trophoblast, is also part of a local innate immune response. Three types of defense mechanisms in innate immunity have been described: (i) anatomical barriers, such as the placental barrier (Figure 1), (ii) cellular innate immune responses, and (iii) humoral innate immune responses. During tissue invasion, pathogen breaks the anatomical barriers, and innate immune cells are activated and secrete cytokines and chemokines to control pathogen replication [18, 19].

2.2. The trophoblast

The trophoblast is a bistratified epithelium composed of the superficial syncytiotrophoblast (ST) and the basal cytotrophoblast (CT). There is strong evidence that the ST layer is resistant to numerous pathogens, including T. cruzi[20, 21]. However, damage of the syncytium might allow the parasite access to the villous core, increasing parasite infection [5, 22].

2.3. The trophoblast epithelial turnover

The basal CT cells are the only ones of the trophoblast with proliferative capacity. The superficial multinucleated ST layer is highly differentiated and is unable to proliferate. Importantly, the ST contacts directly with the maternal blood [23, 24, 25], where in case of T. cruziinfection, the parasite circulates [11, 26]. The ST is a typical syncytium that is continuous and normally uninterrupted and covers all villous trees of the human placenta. The ST is formed and maintained by the continuous incorporation of CT cells through syncytial fusion, meaning that the CT cells suffer cellular differentiation. The continuous incorporation of CT cells into the ST is counterbalanced by the formation of apoptotic knots that are released into the maternal blood present in the IVS [24, 25]. The normal epithelial turnover assures the integrity of diverse anatomical barriers, including the placental one. The maintenance of the integrity of anatomical barriers is part of the innate immune system due to the fact that pathogens, prior to cell invasion, must attach to the surface of cells. As these cells are continuously eliminated, the attached pathogens are removed with them [3]. Thus, the trophoblast turnover should be considered as a defense mechanism against pathogens, including T. cruzi.

2.3.1. Cell proliferation

We have previously shown that the parasite induces, in the trophoblast, cellular proliferation. These experiments were performed in HPCVE and in the trophoblastic cell line BeWo; both models are commonly used in trophoblast studies [27]. In HPCVE T. cruziincreases DNA synthesis as well as the PCNA proliferation marker [11]. On the other hand, in BeWo cells the parasite also induces significant DNA synthesis (as determined by BrdU incorporation), increase of the percentage of cells in the ST and G2/M cell cycle phases, and the expression of the widely used proliferation markers AgNORs, PCNA, and Ki67 [28]. Importantly, it should be taken into account that PCNA acts also as a molecular coordinator in multiple other cellular functions such as DNA damage repair, cell cycle control, cell survival, and gene expression [29]. Therefore, the increase of PCNA expression could also be a response to T. cruzi-induced cell and tissue damage. We have previously demonstrated that T. cruziinduces during ex vivo infection tissue disorganization of HPCVE [14] as well as apoptosis [30]. However, Ki67, a more specific proliferation marker that can be observed only during the active phases of the cycle [24], was significantly increased together with the other proliferation markers.

2.3.2. Cell differentiation

As described above, CT cells differentiate continuously and fuse with the ST [24, 25]. T. cruziinduces cell differentiation in the trophoblast in HPCVE and BeWo cells. Thus, the parasite increases the protein expression of the major biochemical markers of trophoblast differentiation [31]: β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) and syncytin [3]. Moreover, T. cruziinduces cell fusion in BeWo cells as demonstrated by a two-color fusion assay and by the analysis of the redistribution of the intercellular adhesion protein desmoplakin [3]. Previously, we have shown that T. cruziactivates the ERK1/ERK2 MAPK pathway [32]. Interestingly, the induction of trophoblast differentiation is mediated by the activation of the ERK1/ERK2 MAPK and other MAPK signal transduction pathways [33].

2.3.3. Apoptotic cell death

T. cruzialso induces apoptotic cell death in the trophoblast. The ST releases continuously apoptotic knots into the IVS [24]. In HPCVE, the induction of apoptosis has been demonstrated by the determination of the presence of pyknotic nuclei, induction of DNA fragmentation, caspase-3 like activity, and presence of caspase-3 and cleaved cytokeratin 18 [30]. Cellular processes related to apoptosis are also regulating cell differentiation (fusion) in the trophoblast. For instance, CT cell differentiation is regulated by caspases [34, 35]. Particularly, caspase-8, an apoptosis initiator caspase, regulates trophoblast differentiation and fusion. Caspase-8 is activated in highly differentiated CT cells just prior to fusion and escorts the fusing cell content including the nucleus into the ST, and it has not been found in proliferating CT cells [23, 36]. Moreover, the fusion of the trophoblast has been visualized by localizing caspase-8 [34]. T. cruziinduces in BeWo cells as well as HPCVE the expression and activation of caspase-8 [11, 37]. Moreover, the inhibition of caspase-8 increases the amount of parasite DNA and the number of intracellular parasites in BeWo cells [37]. The inhibition of caspase-8 decreases parasite-induced cellular differentiation and apoptotic cell death, but not cellular proliferation [11, 37].

2.4. The trophoblast and the innate immune cellular response against T. cruzi

The innate immune response against pathogens is initiated by pathogen pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which include Toll-like receptors (TLRs) that recognize and bind highly conserved sequences known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). The human trophoblast expresses all ten of the known functional TLRs [7], and T. cruziis recognized by TLR-2, TLR-4, TLR-7, and TLR-9. Surface TLRs (TLR-2 and TLR-4) recognize glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored mucin-like glycoproteins from T. cruzisurface [16, 38, 39]. We have shown that T. cruziinfection is related to TLR-2, but not to TLR-4 and TLR-9, expression, and activation [16]. The binding of TLR-2 to its ligands leads to activation of signaling pathways and upregulation of genes involved in the innate immune response including cytokines and chemokines [7, 16]. T. cruziinduces the secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α in HPCVE [16]. Interestingly, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α secretions are also associated with cellular proliferation and differentiation in the trophoblast [40, 41], and inhibition of TLR-2 impairs trophoblast turnover (manuscript under review in “Placenta”). However, up to now, we do not know whether the activation of TLRs occurs mainly in the trophoblast or if other placental cells are also involved in this matter that should be addressed in the future. Importantly, as a consequence of our results, the TLR-2-initiated cytokine profile should also be considered as a local placental defense mechanism.

2.5. Other placental defense mechanisms against T. cruzi

The placenta, and particularly the trophoblast, expresses many noncoding RNAs including microRNAs (miRNAs) that regulate placental development function. Moreover, different miRNAs exhibit specialized functions during normal and pathological pregnancies. Placental miRNAs, packaged within exosomes and other vesicles or bound in protein complexes, are capable of communicating distinctive signals to maternal and fetal tissues [5]. Placenta-specific and trophoblast-derived miRNAs, encoded in the chromosome 19 miRNA cluster (C19MC), are released within exosomes and confer resistance to viral infection in other mammalian cells [42]. Preliminary results from our laboratory show that T. cruziinduces in HPCVE a specific C19MC-encoded miRNA profile. Some of those miRNAs are involved in the regulation of immune functions, particularly those of TLR-mediated pathways [43]. Studies on T. cruzi-induced miRNAs and exosomes are currently ongoing, being of particular interest since miRNA pathways are potential diagnostic tools and targets for therapeutic control of parasitic diseases [44] and other pathologies, including placenta-derived ones [5]. Targeting miRNAs constitute a promising possibility for the treatment of different diseases due to the facts that (i) miRNAs are regulators of gene expression, (ii) are relatively easy to manipulate, (iii) can be administrated in vivo, and (iv) present an apparent lack of adverse effects when administered intravenously. Moreover, miRNAs are detectable in biological fluids, thus offering real potential as noninvasive biomarkers, providing new diagnostic and therapeutic options during pregnancy and for several diseases as well [45, 46].

In summary, the studies about the placental defense mechanism that determines the probability of infection, together with parasite, maternal, and fetal/newborn factors, are of outstanding interest since they are potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools.


  1. 1. Altemani AM, Bittencourt AL, Lana AM. Immunohistochemical characterization of the inflammatory infiltrate in placental Chagas’ disease: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2000;62(2):319-324
  2. 2. Shippey 3rd SH, Zahn CM, Cisar MM, Wu TJ, Satin AJ. Use of the placental perfusion model to evaluate transplacental passage ofTrypanosoma cruzi. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;192(2):586-591
  3. 3. Liempi A, Castillo C, Duaso J, Droguett D, Sandoval A, Barahona K, et al.Trypanosoma cruziinduces trophoblast differentiation: A potential local antiparasitic mechanism of the human placenta? Placenta. 2014 Dec;35(12):1035-1042
  4. 4. Liempi A, Castillo C, Carrillo I, Munoz L, Droguett D, Galanti N, et al. A local innate immune response againstTrypanosoma cruziin the human placenta: The epithelial turnover of the trophoblast. Microb Pathog. 2016 Oct;99:123-129
  5. 5. Arora N, Sadovsky Y, Dermody TS, Coyne CB. Microbial vertical transmission during human pregnancy. Cell Host & Microbe. 2017;21(5):561-567
  6. 6. Mor G, Cardenas I. The immune system in pregnancy: A unique complexity. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2010;63(6):425-433
  7. 7. Koga K, Aldo PB, Mor G. Toll-like receptors and pregnancy: Trophoblast as modulators of the immune response. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2009;35(2):191-202
  8. 8. Kemmerling U, Bosco C, Infection GN. Invasion mechanisms ofTrypanosoma cruziin the congenital transmission of Chagas' disease: A proposal. Biological Research. 2010;43(3):307-316
  9. 9. Carlier Y, Truyens C. Congenital Chagas disease as an ecological model of interactions betweenTrypanosoma cruziparasites, pregnant women, placenta and fetuses. Acta Tropica. 2015;151:103-115
  10. 10. Hermann E, Berthe A, Truyens C, Alonso-Vega C, Parrado R, Torrico F, et al. Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor expression induction on neonatal CD8(+) T cells in vitro and following congenital infection withTrypanosoma cruzi. Immunology. 2010;129(3):418-426
  11. 11. Liempi A, Castillo C, Carrillo I, Munoz L, Droguett D, Galanti N, et al. A local innate immune response againstTrypanosoma cruziin the human placenta: The epithelial turnover of the trophoblast. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2016;99:123-129
  12. 12. Pérez-Molina JA, Molina I. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):82-94
  13. 13. Duaso J, Yanez E, Castillo C, Galanti N, Cabrera G, Corral G, et al. Reorganization of extracellular matrix in placentas from women with asymptomatic chagas disease: Mechanism of parasite invasion or local placental defense? J Trop Med. 2012;2012:758357
  14. 14. Duaso J, Rojo G, Cabrera G, Galanti N, Bosco C, Maya J, et al.Trypanosoma cruziinduces tissue disorganization and destruction of chorionic villi in anex vivoinfection model of human placenta. Placenta. 2010;31(8):705-711
  15. 15. Lujan CD, Triquell MF, Sembaj A, Guerrero CE, Fretes RE.Trypanosoma cruzi: Productive infection is not allowed by chorionic villous explant from normal human placentain vitro. Experimental Parasitology. 2004;108(3-4):176-181
  16. 16. Castillo C, Munoz L, Carrillo I, Liempi A, Gallardo C, Galanti N, et al.Ex vivoinfection of human placental chorionic villi explants withTrypanosoma cruziandToxoplasma gondiiinduces different Toll-like receptor expression and cytokine/chemokine profiles. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2017 Jul;78(1-8)
  17. 17. Furukawa S, Kuroda Y, Sugiyama A. A comparison of the histological structure of the placenta in experimental animals. Journal of Toxicologic Pathology. 2014;27(1):11-18
  18. 18. Janeway Jr CA, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annual Review of Immunology. 2002;20:197-216
  19. 19. Hazlett L, Wu M. Defensins in innate immunity. Cell and Tissue Research. 2011;343(1):175-188
  20. 20. Diaz-Lujan C, Triquell MF, Castillo C, Hardisson D, Kemmerling U, Fretes RE. Role of placental barrier integrity in infection byTrypanosoma cruzi. Acta Tropica. 2016;164:360-368
  21. 21. Diaz-Lujan C, Triquell MF, Schijman A, Paglini P, Fretes RE. Differential susceptibility of isolated human trophoblasts to infection byTrypanosoma cruzi. Placenta. 2012;33(4):264-270
  22. 22. Robbins JR, Zeldovich VB, Poukchanski A, Boothroyd JC, Bakardjiev AI. Tissue barriers of the human placenta to infection withToxoplasma gondii. Infection and Immunity. 2012;80(1):418-428
  23. 23. Huppertz B, Borges M. Placenta trophoblast fusion. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2008;475:135-147
  24. 24. Mayhew TM. Turnover of human villous trophoblast in normal pregnancy: What do we know and what do we need to know? Placenta. 2014;35(4):229-240
  25. 25. Huppertz B, Gauster M. Trophoblast fusion. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2011;713:81-95
  26. 26. Carlier Y, Sosa-Estani S, Luquetti AO, Buekens P. Congenital Chagas disease: An update. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110(3):363-368
  27. 27. Drewlo S, Baczyk D, Dunk C, Kingdom J. Fusion assays and models for the trophoblast. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2008;475:363-382
  28. 28. Droguett D, Carrillo I, Castillo C, Gomez F, Negrete M, Liempi A, et al.Trypanosoma cruziinduces cellular proliferation in the trophoblastic cell line BeWo. Experimental Parasitology. 2017;173:9-17
  29. 29. Wang SC. PCNA: A silent housekeeper or a potential therapeutic target? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2014;35(4):178-186
  30. 30. Duaso J, Rojo G, Jana F, Galanti N, Cabrera G, Bosco C, et al.Trypanosoma cruziinduces apoptosis in ex vivo infected human chorionic villi. Placenta. 2011;32(5):356-361
  31. 31. Baergen KBPKR. Pathology of the Human Placenta. 5th ed. Springer Science-Business Media, Inc.; 2006. p. 1065
  32. 32. Castillo C, Villarroel A, Duaso J, Galanti N, Cabrera G, Maya JD, et al. Phospholipase C gamma and ERK1/2 mitogen activated kinase pathways are differentially modulated byTrypanosoma cruziduring tissue invasion in human placenta. Experimental Parasitology. 2013;133(1):12-17
  33. 33. Forbes K, Westwood M. Maternal growth factor regulation of human placental development and fetal growth. The Journal of endocrinology. 2010;207(1):1-16
  34. 34. Gauster M, Siwetz M, Huppertz B. Fusion of villous trophoblast can be visualized by localizing active caspase 8. Placenta. 2009;30(6):547-550
  35. 35. Gauster M, Moser G, Orendi K, Huppertz B. Factors involved in regulating trophoblast fusion: Potential role in the development of preeclampsia. Placenta. 2009;30(Suppl A):S49-S54
  36. 36. Pidoux G, Gerbaud P, Cocquebert M, Segond N, Badet J, Fournier T, et al. Review: Human trophoblast fusion and differentiation: Lessons from trisomy 21 placenta. Placenta. 2012;33(Suppl):S81-S86
  37. 37. Carrillo I, Droguett D, Castillo C, Liempi A, Munoz L, Maya JD, et al. Caspase-8 activity is part of the BeWo trophoblast cell defense mechanisms againstTrypanosoma cruziinfection. Experimental Parasitology. 2016;168:9-15
  38. 38. Tarleton RL. Immune system recognition ofTrypanosoma cruzi. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2007;19(4):430-434
  39. 39. Gravina HD, Antonelli L, Gazzinelli RT, Ropert C. Differential use of TLR2 and TLR9 in the regulation of immune responses during the infection withTrypanosoma cruzi. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63100
  40. 40. Haider S, Knofler M. Human tumour necrosis factor: Physiological and pathological roles in placenta and endometrium. Placenta. 2009;30(2):111-123
  41. 41. Hamilton ST, Scott G, Naing Z, Iwasenko J, Hall B, Graf N, et al. Human cytomegalovirus-induces cytokine changes in the placenta with implications for adverse pregnancy outcomes. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52899
  42. 42. Bayer A, Delorme-Axford E, Sleigher C, Frey TK, Trobaugh DW, Klimstra WB, et al. Human trophoblasts confer resistance to viruses implicated in perinatal infection. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;212(1):71e1-71e8
  43. 43. Zhou A, Li S, Wu J, Khan FA, Zhang S. Interplay between microRNAs and host pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) signaling pathways in response to viral infection. Virus Research. 2014;184:1-6
  44. 44. Zheng Y, Cai X, Bradley JE. MicroRNAs in parasites and parasite infection. RNA Biology. 2013;10(3):371-379
  45. 45. Donker RB, Mouillet JF, Chu T, Hubel CA, Stolz DB, Morelli AE, et al. The expression profile of C19MC microRNAs in primary human trophoblast cells and exosomes. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2012;18(8):417-424
  46. 46. Sadovsky Y, Mouillet JF, Ouyang Y, Bayer A, Coyne CB. The function of TrophomiRs and other microRNAs in the human placenta. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2015;5(8):a023036

Written By

Castillo Christian, Ana Liempi, Lisvaneth Medina, Ileana Carrillo and Ulrike Kemmerling

Submitted: April 25th, 2017 Reviewed: January 8th, 2018 Published: September 12th, 2018