Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Avian Coccidiosis, New Strategies of Treatment

Written By

Rosa Estela Quiroz-Castañeda

Submitted: May 18th, 2017 Reviewed: January 15th, 2018 Published: March 21st, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74008

Chapter metrics overview

3,690 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The control of avian coccidiosis since the 1940s has been associated with the use of ionophores and chemical drugs. Recently, a significant interest in natural sources has developed due to the pressure to poultry industry to produce drug-free birds. Consequently, the search of products derived from plants and other natural sources has increased in the last years. Today, many commercial products containing essential oils, extracts, and other compounds are available. The use of these compounds of natural origin is related to an increased immune response, a body weight gain, destruction of oocyst, among other benefits. The main inconvenience of these products is the act on some species of Eimeria, but not all. This genetic variability found in the parasite makes the use of products difficult to control and treat coccidiosis. In this chapter, several proposals of treatment are presented based on the use of natural products, considering the new strategies of treatment with minimal consequences to birds.

Keywords

  • Eimeria
  • coccidiosis
  • natural treatments
  • vaccines
  • herbal extracts

1. Introduction

Chickens’ production is positioned as an important source of meat around the world. About 60 billion chickens are produced worldwide every year. However, Eimeriaprotozoan parasites of Phylum Apicomplexa are considered the main risk to avian production since they are the causative agent of avian coccidiosis [1]. For Avian coccidiosis is caused by seven species of Eimeria, which parasite chickens intestine resulting in economic losses around $2.4 billion per year worldwide [2].

The life cycle of the Eimeriais complex. They have developmental cycles with an exogenous phase in the environment and an endogenous phase in the intestine of chickens [3]. The efforts to prevent this disease have been focused on developing vaccines and drugs with coccidiostatic and coccidicidal activity [4]. So far, genomic studies have revealed the wide antigenic variability of species such as Eimeria tenella, one of the most pathogenic parasites to chickens, which leads to develop a vaccine resistance rapidly [1].

The main problem of coccidiosis treatment is that the resistance to anticoccidial drugs can evolve rapidly leading to a continuing need to develop novel and effective therapies [5].

In this chapter, avian coccidiosis is briefly reviewed and a special focus on novel strategies of treatment is presented. The strategies include the use of herbal compounds to genomic analysis of Eimeriaspecies.

Advertisement

2. Avian coccidiosis

Poultry industry raises approximately 40 billion chickens annually and more than 100 tonnes of chicken meat. Today, there exist a growing demand of this meat not only because it is cheaper than other types of meat, but also due to the increasing number of inhabitants around the world [6]. In spite of the high production of poultry industry which still exists, some factors are affecting the productivity such as handling, housing, and rearing of birds in addition to disease control (nutritional, metabolic, and parasitic diseases) [7].

2.1. Causative agents of coccidiosis

Avian coccidiosis is a parasitic disease caused by protozoa belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa, genus Eimeria. It affects virtually all domestic and wild species, causing signs such as paleness, diarrhea with or without blood, high feed conversion, weight loss, and in severe cases even death. It is the most important parasitic disease of the poultry industry worldwide, causing serious economic losses both for the prevention and the control of subclinical or clinical disease [8]. The disease transmission is fecal-oral by consuming oocysts eliminated by infected birds. Those oocysts present in bed sporulate when conditions are favorable. Currently, the problem tends to worsen because conditions of intensive poultry production as the amount of oocysts per m2 in bed are higher and therefore, the challenge for the birds [9].

More than 1200 species of Eimeriaare described, most of them parasitizing the intestinal epithelium of vertebrates, and as a consequence, infected birds reduce feed intake, have bloody diarrhea, and have hampered weight gains [10].

In domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus), seven species of Eimeriaare reported. Those causing hemorrhagic disease are E. brunetti, E. necatrix,and E. tenella. Considered as mildly pathogenic and causing malabsorptive disease E. acervulina, E. mitis, E, maxima,and E. praecox[5]. Each species has a specific site of development in the small intestine (upper, middle, lower, rectum, and caeca) Table 1.

SpeciesSite of developmentPathogenicityDisease type
E. necatrixJejunum, ileum, caeca+++++Hemorrhagic
E. brunettiCaeca and rectum++++Hemorrhagic
E. tenellaCaeca++++Hemorrhagic
E. maximaJejunum, ileum+++Malabsorptive
E. mitisIleum++Malabsorptive
E. acervulinaDuodenum, ileum++Malabsorptive
E. praecoxDuodenum, jejunum+Malabsorptive

Table 1.

Location and pathogenicity of Eimeriaspecies [5, 7].

2.2. Life cycle

Eimerialife cycle is complex and comprises of three stages, one occurs on litter under the conditions of humidity, temperature, and oxygen supply (sporogony), and two stages occurs in the cells of intestinal epithelium [merogony or schizogony (asexual reproduction) and gametogony (sexual reproduction)].

During the sporogony, which is considered a noninfective stage, the oocyst is excreted in chicken feces and undergoes sporulation in the presence of humidity, warmth, and oxygen and thus becoming a sporulated oocyst, now infective. Merogony or schizogony occurs in the intestine and comprises of several rounds of asexual multiple division (from two to four times), followed by gametogony that involves the formation of male and female gametes, fertilization and formation of a zygote (oocyst) that will be excreted in feces [11]. Infection starts when the host ingest sporulated oocysts (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Infection process ofEimeriaspp. in chickens. First,Eimeriaoocysts are ingested by chickens, once inside,Eimeriasporozoites colonize and infect different regions of intestine epithelium. Oocysts are formed again and released to litter to begin another cycle.

Due to the chemical and mechanical proventriculus and gizzard action, and the presence of CO2 in the lumen, the oocyst releases the sporozoites, which gets the intestinal lumen and attached to enterocytes using this anchoring and penetration proteins present in the apical complex (rhoptries and micronemes) entering the cell in order to continue the second phase: esquizogony or merogony, producing a schizont with thousands of merozoites inside to be released back into the lumen to infect new intestinal cells. Thus, after several stages of merogonies, some of the merozoites inside the intestinal cell forms macrogamonts with a macrogametocyte (inmobile cell considered the female gamete) and some forms microgamonts with several microgametocytes inside (mobile cells considered male gametes). These microgametocytes come out of the cells that originated to locate and fertilize to macrogametocyte producing a zygote to be excreted in the feces again (not sporulated oocyst) to begin another cycle [12] Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Life cycle ofEimeria. (A) Sexual and asexual stages reproduction occurs in epithelium cells and oocyst formation occurs outside the birds under specific environmental conditions. (B) Structure ofEimeriaspp. sporozoite. Figure taken fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.trivac.2016.02.001.

Once the oocyst is formed, it is considered the most persistent structure of Eimerialife cycle. It has a significant resistance to mechanical, chemical, and proteolytic damage, due to the composition of the two walls that confer the oocyst and outstanding resistance [13, 14] Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Eimeriaoocyst cell wall micrograph. Double layer of oocyst is observed. (A) Bright-field ofEimeriaoocyst and (B) Oocyst staining with FM™ 4-64FX fluorophore. M. A. Castelló-Leyva. Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, UNAM.

The unsporulated oocyst is considered as the noninfective stage while the sporulated oocyst is the infective stage, in Eimeria,the oocyst has four sporocysts, each with two sporozoites Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Eimeriaoocyst bright-field micrograph. (A) Unsporulated oocyst. (B) Sporulated oocyst, the infective stage, containing four sporocysts. Notice the double layer of cell wall. M. A. Castelló-Leyva. Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, UNAM.

Environmental factors such as humidity (40–80%), temperature (24–28°C), and oxygen supply (aeration) makes the sporulation occurs, at least in E. acervulinathe most important environmental factor to onset sporulation is temperature [15, 16]. Nevertheless, the temperature is an environmental factor that is hard to control due to the ideal temperatures that are easily reached in the poultry litter.

Advertisement

3. Strategies of treatment

During the last years, research has focused on development of anticoccidial drugs, with interest focused on the sexual and asexual stages of the parasites (stages occurring within the host). However, exists a tendency to ban the use of drugs in animals for human consumption, so the development of new drugs to control avian coccidiosis demands another way to control the disease.

The control of avian coccidiosis is a challenge of veterinary parasitology. So far, any treatment, including, anticoccidial drugs, vaccines, or natural alternatives control avian coccidiosis by itself. It proposed the use of combination of different strategies to achieve an effective control (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

The proposal of use of chemotherapy and vaccines in a yearly chicken production. Figure taken from [17]. In the clean out period litter is removed. Chemotherapy comprises use of anticoccidial drugs.

3.1. Chemotherapy

This treatment comprises of ionophorous compounds (ionophores) and synthetic drugs (chemicals). Ionophores usually cause the death of parasite and are produced by the fermentation and chemicals inhibit several biochemical pathways of the parasite and are produced by chemical synthesis [17, 18]. In Table 2, the most important ionophores and chemicals are shown.

TreatmentExamplesFunction
IonophoresLasalocid, Monensin, Narasinm Salinomycin, and SemduramicinDisruption of ion gradient across the parasite cell membrane
ChemicalsQuinolone drugs (Decoquinate and nequinatem buquinolate).
Pyridones (Meticlorpindol)
Inhibition of parasite mitochondrial respiration
SulphonamidesInhibition of the folic acid pathway
AmproliumCompetitive inhibition of thiamine uptake
Diclazuril, Halofuginone, and RobenidineMode of action unknown
NicarbazinInhibition of the development of the first and second generations of the schizont stage of the parasites

Table 2.

Most commonly used ionophores and chemical in coccidiosis treatment.

However, after prolonged uses of a drug treatment, several drug-resistant strains may emerge, which represents a severe problem [19]. To combat resistance, shuttle, mix, and rotation systems of drugs are employed.

3.2. Vaccines

Passive or active immune responses induce immunity in animals. This immunity can reduce the pathogenic effects of coccidiosis such as less macroscopically visible lesions, decreasing of oocyst production, and increasing performance of birds [16].

The first commercial live coccidiosis vaccine was CocciVac® registered in the USA in 1952 [20]. Currently, two types of vaccines are used with the aim of controlling coccidiosis in a chemical-free way: nonattenuated and attenuated vaccines.

The main risk of using live nonattenuated vaccines (Coccivac, Advent, Immucox, and Inovocox) is the live parasites that can develop a severe reaction in birds. Many times their use is accompanied by chemical treatments to control the inherent pathogenicity of the parasites [21].

On the contrary, the success of live attenuated vaccines (Paracox and HatchPak CocciIII) relies on the low risk of disease occurring because of the reduction in the proliferation of parasites and consequently a less damage in birds’ tissue [22].

Nonattenuated and attenuated vaccines may have different routes of administration (oral, eyes drops, in ovo) in birds and several Eimeriaspecies as target [23].

Subunit vaccines consist of purified antigenic determinants obtained from Eimeriaparasite. These vaccines are obtained from DNA recombinant technology and may consist of native antigens or recombinant proteins of various stages (sporozoites, merozoites, and gametes) of Eimeria[16]. Distinct protective antigens used are micronemes, rhoptries, refractile bodies, merozoites, or gametocytes of Eimeriaparasite [24].

These kinds of vaccines involve native or recombinant subunit second generation extract or DNA vaccines. The only commercial subunit vaccine was CoxAbic®, based on purified native protein isolated from gametocytes of Eimeriaand inhibits the development of oocysts but with only 53% of protection against challenge with Eimeriainfections, resulting in a very limiting vaccine [22, 25].

Proteomic analysis of E. tenellalife cycle stages (unsporulated oocyst, sporulated oocyst, sporozoite, and second generation merozoite) revealed specific proteins in each stage and many other proteins are shared in all stages. During parasite invasion, proteins RON2 and RON5 are expressed, these proteins have been previously identified in Toxoplasma gondii,and also were found in E. tenella, where may have a role in host adhesion during process of invasion [11].

A collection of epitope mapping of T-cell mediated antigenic determinants was applied in an in silicoanalysis to investigate promising epitopes from the sporozoite and merozoite stages. Several epitopes showed a significant predicted efficacy [26].

So far, the use of recombinant vaccines is limited mainly due to the low protection of antigens with the potential to induce potent protective immune response against Eimeria. Certainly, genomic and proteomic analyses of E. tenellagenome will allow the design and development of potential immunogens that could be used as vaccine in future [5, 27, 28].

3.3. Natural compounds, alternative treatments

The search of alternatives to anticoccidial drugs and vaccines against avian coccidiosis has led to discover in fungal extracts, plant extracts, and probiotics a source of new compounds with anticoccidial activity. Many of them with the oocyst as target being that if the dispersion of oocysts is controlled then the possibilities of infection reduce.

The role of fats, essential oils and herbal and medicinal plants has been explored to control avian coccidiosis.

3.3.1. Fats

Fatty acids from fish or flax seeds reduce the severity of E. tenellainfections in young broiler chicks. Diets supplemented with docosahexaenoic acid, linoleic acid, and eicosapentaenoic acid allowed a maintained weight gain in birds, which strongly suggests their use as part or birds nutrition. Cecal lesions were reduced as well as the parasite invasion rate and development of parasite. Unfortunately, this benefits only were observed in birds infected with E. tenellaand not with other species, thus, limiting the use of fatty acids to control coccidiosis [29, 30].

3.3.2. Essential oils

The use of essential oils as a therapy to control Eimeriaoocysts is widely reported. Although the mechanism of oils is still unclear, they destroy the most resistant structure of Eimeria, the oocyst, thus reducing dispersion and the risk of infection [7].

Functional oils comprise those oils that have an action beyond nutritional value [31]. Recently, a variety of essential have been used at different stages of life cycle of Eimeriawith good results Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Plant compounds target different stages of life cycle ofEimeriaspecies. Different phytocompounds inhibit the sporogony and merogony stages. Figure reproduced with permission from [32].

In vitro assays are used to test potential oocysticidal activity of essential oils. The use of oils from Artemisia, thyme, tea tree, and clove showed a clear destruction of oocyst after 3 hours of treatment and a LC50 < 1 mg/ml of oocyst [33]. Commercial oils carvacol, carvone, isopulegol, thymol, and eugenol were used to destroy a mixture of Eimeriaspecies oocysts, a release of oocyst internal substances was observed after treatment suggesting the potential of these oils to control oocysts of E. tenella, E. maxima, E. acervulina, E. necatrix,and E. mitis[34].

A commercial essential oils product called Essential (Oligo Basics Agroind. Ltda, www.oligobasics.com.br) containing ricinoleic acid and alkylphenolic oil of the shell of the cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale) showed an improvement in the energy utilization and the livability and decreased lesion caused by coccidiosis (E. acervulina, E.maxima,and E. tenella) in birds treated with Essential [31].

3.3.3. Herbal derivatives

A total of 68 plants and phytocompounds with proven suppression of Eimeriaspecies have been reported. Some plants species and their extracted compounds with anticoccidial effects are: Fabacea: Sophora flavescens, Gleditsia japonica;Menispermaceae: Sinomenium acutum;Combretaceae: Quisqualis indica;Ranunculaceae, Pulsatilla koreana;Ulmaceae: Ulmus macrocarpa;Asteraceae: Artemisia asiatica, Artemisia sieberi, Artemisia afra;Meliaceae: Melia azedarach;Piperaceae: Piper nigrumUrticaceae: Urtica dioica;Brassicaceae: Lepidium sativum,Apiaceae: Foeniculum vulgare;Rubiaceae: Morinda lucida;Burseraceae: Commiphora swynnertonii,Moringaceae: Moringa oleifera, Moringa indica, Moringa stenopetala;Lamiaceae: Origanumspp., Lavandula stoechas; Mentha arvensis;Lauraceae: Laurus nobilis;Musaceae: Musa paradisiaca;Solanaceae: Solanum nigrum;Meliaceae: Melia azadirachta;Amaryllidaceae: Tulbaghia violacea,Vitaceae: Vitis vinifera;Fagaceae: Quercus infectoria;Anacardiaceae: Rhus chinensisand Combretaceae: Terminalia chebula[32].

The usage of these plants varies from organic extracts (ethanol, petroleum ether and acetone extracts), ground powder, essential oils, and decoction. The parameters measured to evaluate efficiency of the anticoccidial compounds are body weight gain, oocyst count, feed consumption, lesion scores, bloody diarrhea, and mortality [7, 32]. Recently, plant Bidens pilosawas used in diet of birds, which significantly elevated body weight gain and lowered feed conversion ratio. Also, B. pilosareduced cecal damage, villus destruction and decreased villus-to-crypt ratio in chicken ceca [35, 36].

Table 3 shows some compounds related to different action to control avian coccidiosis. Information based on [7, 32, 37].

ActionCompound (Plant/fungi)Function
Inhibition of Eimerialife cycleArtemisin (Artemisia annua)Induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) that inhibit oocyst wall formation and sporulation
Tannins, Pine (Pinus radiata)Inhibition of life cycle and decreased sporulation of the oocyst
Allicin and sulfur compounds, Garlic (Allium sativum)Antimicrobial activity and inhibition of sporulation of E. tenella.
Selenium, Phenolics and Green tea (Camellia sinensis)Inhibition of sporulation of coccidian oocysts.
Papain (Carica papaya)Inhibition of coccidiosis probably by proteolytic degradation of Eimeria
Saponins (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)Suppression of coccidiosis
Essential oils from thyme, tea tree and cloveDestruction of Eimeriaoocysts
Ethyl acetate extract (Meyerozyma guilliermondii)Destruction of Eimeriaspp. oocysts
Immune response modulatorsProbiotics (Pediococcus acidilacticiand Saccharomyces boulardii)Enhanced humoral immunity, changes in body weight gain and fecal oocyst shedding rates.
Arabinoxylans (Triticum aestivum)Immunostimulatory and protective effects against coccidiosis in broiler chickens
Sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum)
Polysaccharides (Astragalus membranaceus Radix, Carthamus tinctorius, Lentinula edodes, Tremella fuciformis)Enhancement of anticoccidial antibodies and antigen-specific cell proliferation in splenocytes via cellular and humoral immunity to E. tenella
Phytonutrients mixtures: VAC (carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, Capsicumoleoresin).
MC (Capsicumoleoresin and turmeric oleoresin)
Protection against E. tenellainfection. Increase in NK cells, macrophages, CD4+ T cells, CD8 + T cells and cytokines IFN γ and IL6.
Lectins (Fomitella fraxinea)Enhancement of both cellular and humoral immune response

Table 3.

Natural compounds identified with potential to inhibit Eimerialife cycle and acting as immune system modulators.

The use of these compounds is not limited to laboratory conditions, many products that contain natural compounds are commercially available for prevention and treatment of coccidiosis. This highlights their potential use in poultry industry. In Table 4, commercial natural products are show.

Commercial nameIngredientsProducer
EssentialRicinoleic acid and alkylphenolic oil of the shell of the cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale)Oligo Basics Agroind. Ltda,
AvihicoxClove and Bocconia cordataextractCentaur
NutriminApple cider vinegarChicken Lickin
Kochi freeOlive leaf, mustard seed, black seed, cloves, grapefruit seed extractAmber Technology
CoccinonBlend of plant extracts and natural compoundsNatural farm health
Oil of oregano80% CarvacrolNatural factors
Garlic granulesGarlicFlyte so fancy
Poultry ProvitaProbiotics and prebiotic inulinVets plus
EimericoxBlend of essential oilsPhytosynthese/Trouw nutrition
EnteroguardGarlic and cinnamonOrffa
CoxynilAllium sativumLinn 15%, Cinnamomum camphoraNees & Eberum 15%, Elephantopus scaberLinn 15%, Valeriana wallichiiDC 15%, Sulfur dioxide 25% and NaCl 15%Growell India

Table 4.

Commercially available compounds of natural origin: plants and herbal extracts, fatty acids, probiotics and others).

Advertisement

4. Future vision of avian coccidiosis

The development of new treatments against avian coccidiosis is a challenge to many researchers. However, information of parasites still can be revealed using new strategies such as omics approaches. Recently, a transcriptional profile analysis of virulent and precocious strains of E. tenellarevealed that some genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, proteases, transporters, cell attachment proteins, and mitochondrial proteins express are upregulated in the virulent strain [38].

The vaccine development against Eimeriaspp. also requires new approaches. Marugan-Hernández et al., [39] reported the expression of viral proteins in parasite E. tenella. They found that the chicken immune system recognizes the expressed viral proteins, which is a significant precedent to develop a vaccine in future, due to the chance to express antigens that allow recognition of the parasite. A study about the population structure or E. tenellaas well as their genotype distribution and the presence of the Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (AMA1) showed that this antigen outweighs immune evasion [1].

The recent studies of Eimeriaspp. focus on genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analysis, besides genetic diversity and molecular phylogenetics, which strengthens the need to explore other fields of interest [5, 40, 41, 42].

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

The development of drugs to control and treat avian coccidiosis since the 1940s until now has increased significantly leading to a wide variety of products. The use of these drugs interferes with cofactor synthesis, mitochondrial functions, and cell membrane function of Eimeriaspp. Although their use was the first alternative, today, most governments and health policies preferred meal free of antibiotics and drugs, as in most European countries.

This view guided research efforts to search for new compounds with a natural origin. Thus, plants, fungi, and bacteria were considered sources of metabolites and molecules with potential anticoccidial activity. In this chapter, we present recent information related to compounds that can be used to prevent, control, and treat avian coccidiosis. Many of them were with good results when an immune response is involved.

This disease may not be controlled or treated with the use of only one compound, on the contrary, it requires the combination of immunostimulators that induce a good response in bird and herbal extracts, essential oils and other natural compounds that can destroy Eimeriaspp. oocysts or interfere with life cycle. In summary, avian coccidiosis control demands many shared efforts that with the advancement of omics technologies will certainly open new lines of investigation.

References

  1. 1. Blake DP, Clark EL, Macdonald SE, Thenmozhi V, Kundu K, Garg R, et al. Population, genetic, and antigenic diversity of the apicomplexanEimeria tenellaand their relevance to vaccine development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America [Internet]. 2015;112(38):E5343-E5350. Available from:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4586875&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  2. 2. Shirley MW, Smith AL, Tomley FM. The biology of avian Eimeria with an emphasis on their control by vaccination. Advances in Parasitology. 2005;60:285-330
  3. 3. Lal K, Bromley E, Oakes R, Prieto JH, Sanya J, Kurian D, et al. Proteomic comparison of four Eimeria tenella life cycle stages. Proteomics. 2010;9(19):4566-4476
  4. 4. Tewari AK, Maharana BR. Control of poultry coccidiosis: Changing trends. Journal of Parasitic Diseases. 2011;35(1):10-17
  5. 5. Reid AJ, Blake DP, Ansari HR, Billington K, Browne HP, Bryant J, et al. Genomic analysis of the causative agents of coccidiosis in domestic chickens. Genome Research. 2014 Oct;24(10):1676-1685
  6. 6. Faostat. FAOSTAT [Internet]. Livestock Primary. 2014. Available from:http://www.fao.org
  7. 7. Quiroz-Castañeda RE, Dantán-González E. Control of avian coccidiosis: Future and present natural alternatives. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:11. Article ID: 430610.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/430610
  8. 8. Chapman HD, Barta JR, Blake D, Gruber A, Jenkins M, Smith NC, et al. A selective review of advances in coccidiosis research. Advances in Parasitology. 2013;83:93-171
  9. 9. Haug A, Gjevre AG, Thebo P, Mattsson JG, Kaldhusdal M. Coccidial infections in commercial broilers: epidemiological aspects and comparison of Eimeria species identification by morphometric and polymerase chain reaction techniques. Avian Pathology [Internet]. 2008;37:161-170. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079450801915130
  10. 10. Gilbert ER, Cox CM, Williams PM, McElroy AP, Dalloul RA, Ray WK, et al. Eimeria species and genetic background influence the serum protein profile of broilers with coccidiosis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2011;6(1):e14636. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014636
  11. 11. Lal K, Bromley E, Oakes R, Prieto JH, Sanderson SJ, Kurian D, et al. Proteomic comparison of four Eimeria tenella life cycle stages: unsporulated oocyst, sporulated oocyst, sporozoite and second generation merozoite. Proteomics [Internet]. 2009;9(19):4566-4576. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900305
  12. 12. The Poultry Site. Coccidiosis Management for Natural and Organic Poultry [Internet]. 2017. Available from:http://www.thepoultrysite.com/publications/2/CoccidiosisManage-ment/41/life-cycle-and-types-of-coccidia/
  13. 13. Belli SI, Smith NC, Ferguson DJ. The coccidian oocyst: A tough nut to crack! Trends in Parasitology [Internet]. 2006;22(9):4169-4423. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2006.07.004
  14. 14. Mai K, Sharman PA, Walker RA, Katrib M, Souza D, McConville MJ, et al. Oocyst wall formation and composition in coccidian parasites. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz [Internet]. 2009;104(2):281-289. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762009000200022
  15. 15. Graat EAM, Henken AM, Ploeger HW, Noordhuizen JPTM, Vertommen MH. Rate and course of sporulation of oocysts of Eimeria acervulina under different environmental conditions. Parasitology [Internet]. 2009/04/01. 1994;108(5):497-502. Available from:https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/rate-and-course-of-sporulation-of-oocysts-of-eimeria-acervulina-under-different-environmental-conditions/90410949EA40127F9CEDE211C4370C60
  16. 16. Peek HW, Landman WJM. Coccidiosis in poultry: Anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. The Veterinary Quarterly. 2011;31(3):143-161
  17. 17. Chapman HD, Jeffers TK. Vaccination of chickens against coccidiosis ameliorates drug resistance in commercial poultry production. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance [Internet]. 2014 Dec 25;4(3):214-217. Available from:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266793/
  18. 18. Chapman HD, Jeffers TK, Williams RB. Forty years of monensin for the control of coccidiosis in poultry. Poultry Science [Internet]. 2010;89(9):1788-1801. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00931
  19. 19. McDougald LR. Protozoal infections. In: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, McDougald LR, Swayne DE, editors. Diseases of Poultry. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press; 2003. pp. 973-1023
  20. 20. Edgar SA, King D. Breeding and immunizing chickens for resistance to coccidiosis 62nd and 63rd Annual Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. 1952;36-37
  21. 21. Williams S. Fifty years of anticoccidial vaccines for poultry (1952-2002). Avian Diseases. 2002;46(4):775-802
  22. 22. Sharman PS, Smith SC, Wallach MG, Chasing KM. The golden egg: Vaccination against poultry coccidiosis. Parasite Immunology. 2010;32(8):590-598
  23. 23. Williams RB. Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: Pathways to success. Avian Pathology [Internet]. 2002 Aug 1;31(4):317-353. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079450220148988
  24. 24. Jenkins MC. Advances and prospects for subunit vaccines against protozoa of veterinary importance. Veterinary Parasitology [Internet]. 2001 Nov 22;101(3-4):291-310. Available from:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030440170100557X
  25. 25. Wallach M, Smith NC, Petracca M, Miller CMD, Eckert J, Braun R. Eimeria maxima gametocyte antigens: Potential use in a subunit maternal vaccine against coccidiosis in chickens. Vaccine [Internet]. 1995;13(4):347-354. Available from:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0264410X95982559
  26. 26. Ahmad TA, Tawfik DM, Sheweita SA, Haroun M, El-Sayed LH. Development of immunization trials againstAcinetobacter baumannii. Trials in Vaccinology [Internet]. 2016;5:53-60. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trivac.2016.02.001
  27. 27. Viljoen GJ, Luckins AG. The role of nuclear technologies in the diagnosis and control of livestock diseases–A review. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2012;44(7):1341-1366
  28. 28. Ling K-H, Rajandream M-A, Rivailler P, Ivens A, Yap S-J, Madeira AMBN, et al. Sequencing and analysis of chromosome 1 ofEimeria tenellareveals a unique segmental organization. Genome Research. 2007 Mar;17(3):311-319
  29. 29. Allen PC, Danforth H, Levander OA. Interaction of dietary flaxseed with coccidia infections in chickens. Poultry Science. 1997 Jun;76(6):822-827
  30. 30. Allen PC, Danforth HD, Levander OA. Diets high in n-3 fatty acids reduce cecal lesion scores in chickens infected withEimeria tenella. Poultry Science. 1996 Feb;75(2):179-185
  31. 31. Murakami AE, Eyng C, Torrent J. Effects of functional oils on coccidiosis and apparent metabolizable energy in broiler chickens. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2014;27(7):981-989
  32. 32. Muthamilselvan T, Kuo TF, Wu YC, Yang WC. Herbal remedies for coccidiosis control: A review of plants, compounds, and anticoccidial actions. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2016;2016. Article ID: 2657981, 19 pages.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2657981
  33. 33. Remmal A, Achahbar S, Bouddine L, Chami N, Chami F. In vitro destruction of Eimeria oocysts by essential oils. Veterinary Parasitology [Internet]. 2011;182(2-4):121-126. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.06.002
  34. 34. Remmal A, Achahbar S, Bouddine L, Chami F, Chami N. Oocysticidal effect of essential oil components against chicken Eimeria oocysts. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Medicine. 2013;2013. Article ID: 599816, 8 pages. DOI: 10.5171/2013.599816
  35. 35. Chang CLT, Chung CY, Kuo CH, Kuo TF, Yang CW, Yang WC. Beneficial effect ofBidens pilosaon body weight gain, food conversion ratio, gut bacteria and coccidiosis in chickens. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146141.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146141
  36. 36. Yang WC, Tien YJ, Chung CY, Chen YC, Chiou WH, Hsu SY, et al. Effect ofBidens pilosaon infection and drug resistance of Eimeria in chickens. Research in Veterinary Science [Internet]. 2015;98:74-81. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.11.002
  37. 37. Dantán-González E, Quiroz-Castañeda RE, Cobaxin-Cárdenas M, Valle-Hernández J, Gama-Mart’inez Y, Tinoco-Valencia JR, et al. Impact ofMeyerozyma guilliermondiiisolated from chickens against Eimeria sp. protozoan, an in vitro analysis. BMC Veterinary Research [Internet]. 2015;11(1):1-11. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0589-0
  38. 38. Matsubayashi M, Kawahara F, Hatta T, Yamagishi J, Miyoshi T, Anisuzzaman, et al. Transcriptional profiles of virulent and precocious strains ofEimeria tenellaat sporozoite stage; novel biological insight into attenuated asexual development. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2016 Jun;40:54-62
  39. 39. Marugan-Hernandez V, Cockle C, Macdonald S, Pegg E, Crouch C, Blake DP, et al. Viral proteins expressed in the protozoan parasiteEimeria tenellaare detected by the chicken immune system. Parasites & Vectors. 2016 Aug;9:463
  40. 40. Blake DP. Eimeria Genomics: Where are we now and where are we going? Veterinary Parasitology. 2015 Aug;212(1-2):68-74
  41. 41. Zhang Z, Wang S, Huang J, Liu L, Lu M, Li M, et al. Proteomic analysis ofEimeria acervulinasporozoite proteins interaction with duodenal epithelial cells by shotgun LC-MS/MS. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2015 Aug;202(2):29-33
  42. 42. Kumar S, Garg R, Banerjee PS, Ram H, Kundu K, Kumar S, et al. Genetic diversity within ITS-1 region of Eimeria species infecting chickens of north India. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2015 Dec;36:262-267

Written By

Rosa Estela Quiroz-Castañeda

Submitted: May 18th, 2017 Reviewed: January 15th, 2018 Published: March 21st, 2018