Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Advances in Distilled Beverages Authenticity and Quality Testing

Written By

Teodora Emilia Coldea, Elena Mudura and Carmen Socaciu

Submitted: August 23rd, 2017 Reviewed: October 27th, 2017 Published: December 13th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72041

Chapter metrics overview

1,731 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Given the advent of the consumers and producers demands, researches are focusing lately to develop innovative, cost-effective, progressively complex alcoholic beverages. As alcohol consumption has a heavy impact on social environment and health, fast and safe solutions for industrial application are needed. In this chapter, the recent advances in the field of alcoholic beverages authenticity and quality testing are summarised. Solutions for the online monitoring of the process of distilled beverages are offered and the recent methods for identification of raw material and process formed biomarkers of distilled beverages are presented.


  • distilled beverages
  • authenticity
  • biomarkers

1. Introduction

Distilled beverages are important for consumers, producers and agricultural sector. Last decades presented us continuously changed requirements and descriptive practices for high level of consumer’s protection with impact on the market transparency and fair competition. Both traditional methods and innovative technologies applied in distilled beverages production are focusing on their quality improvement.

The principal requirement set for an alcoholic beverage can be summarised as: are intended for human consumption, have specific sensory properties, with a minimum ethyl alcohol content of 15% v/v produced either by distillation with addition of flavourings, of naturally fermented products, or by addition of plant ethanol macerates, or by blending of flavourings, sugars, other sweetening products, or other agricultural origin products. Spirit drinks can also be produced by blending of different spirit drinks with ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin and other alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverages.

Generally, spirit drinks can be classified as with or without extract content. The presence of flavourings, sugars or other sweetening ingredients are forbidden in rum, whisky, vodka, grain spirit, wine spirit, grape or other fruit marc spirit, fruit, cider and perry spirits. No addition of other sources of ethanol of agricultural origin and no colour improvements by the addition of caramel are allowed in fruit spirits. In the category of distilled alcoholic beverages containing extract, we can specify plant macerates based spirit drinks, gin, aquavit, aniseed-flavoured spirit drinks, bitter, liqueur and mead nectar.

The European Commission prepared a list with the specific parameters and geographical indications of alcoholic beverages in countries across Europe. For example, only for fruit spirits are recognised 70 denominations, such as Schwarzwälder Kirschwasser, sliwovitz, eau-de-vie, pálinka and țuica.

The European countries have an old tradition in fruit growing and valorising in traditional distilled beverages. The traditional methods used to obtain distilled beverages involve the distillation of fermented plant material (fruits or cereals) in copper stills with open fire, maturing and conditioning in oak barrels, for at least 3 months. Usually distillation is repeated twice, such as in Romania or Hungary, frequently the ethyl alcohol content ranging over 50% v/v. No matter the production process applied, the flavour and taste of these distilled beverages should indicate the origin of the raw material used. Several stages, quality testing of the raw material, its preparation and fermentation are key factors determining the distilled beverages quality, with respect to their specific bouquet. Additionally, some of the major volatiles found especially in fruit distillates, such as methanol, furfural, isobutylic alcohol and acetaldehyde have toxic potential. Of main interest for consumer’s health is the amount of methanol, which is the second compound found in fruit distillates after ethanol. It is usually ingested by consumers in low doses, but can create serious problems especially in countries with high unrecorded alcohol consumption [1].

Fruit spirits, very popular worldwide, are recognised in Eastern and Central Europe as a part of tradition heritage. Are considered as therapeutic agents since Middle Ages. The most famous fruit used is plum. In Europe, the most important countries producing fruit distillates are Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania and Czech Republic. Are used two categories of fruits—the one with stones (genus Prunus—plums, cherries, sour cherries, apricots, peaches etc.) and without stones (pears, apples and other berries). Each type of fruit give specific minor volatile compounds responsible for the aroma of the distillate—alcohols, aldehydes, esters, acids and volatile phenols [2]. The quality of a spirit is strongly related to the primary flavour given by the natural aroma of the fruit, which is influenced by the geographical origin of the fruit, method of cultivation, storage or harvest period. In this chapter, we describe recent advances in the field of alcoholic beverages authenticity and quality testing and indicate solutions for risk compounds decreasing during processing, that can be applied through beverages online monitoring.


2. Distilled beverages: health-related aspects

The beneficial effects of moderate alcohol consumption on dysfunctions of the cardiovascular system, such as coronary heart disease, associated myocardial infarction [3, 4], are diminished by the effects of alcohol to human health causing pancreatitis, diabetes, liver cirrhosis or pancreatic cancer [510].

It is well known the excessive alcohol consumption impact on social environment and health, recent studies showing the consequences of alcohol even to younger consumers [1113]. European countries are confronted with a high level of alcohol consumption. With a range of 7.4% alcohol exposure of young people at the age of 15–29 represents the third major risk factor for human health causing premature death in the EU countries [14]. Actually, recent statistics place Romania as the first country in Europe for illicit alcohol consumption. Still, an exact amount of alcohol consumed cannot be given because, especially East European countries have their own tradition for homemade producing and consumption of distilled beverages [1520].

According to epidemiological findings, the long-term consumption of alcoholic beverages is related to the occurrence of malignant tumours of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, oesophagus, liver, colorectal and female breast. Recent literature proved that ethanol carcinogenic mechanism is strongly linked with its transformations to acetaldehyde, already known for the carcinogenic activity.

Additionally, numerous outbreaks of alcohol poisoning, sometimes leading to fatal risk, were encountered especially with methanol, from illicit sources of alcoholic beverages. Some of the common symptoms of acute methanol poisoning are those related to hangover—headache, vertigo and vomiting, but can also cause severe abdominal pain, blurred vision or back pain. Still, its metabolites, formaldehyde and formic acid, are more harmful [21].

Furfural, a volatile compound derived from fruit carbohydrates, presents also toxicity to human organism consisting of inducing pain, sore throat, diarrhoea, vomiting and headache [16, 21]. It is formed during the improper conducted distillation, where commonly in homemade production of distilled beverages is used direct heating [2], creating harmful effects, caramel colour, with irreversible burnt-bitter taste. Acetaldehyde is formed during fermentation, by the ethanol dehydrogenation, and presents toxic effects associated with hangover-like symptoms such as nausea, sweating, rapid pulse, and headache and vomiting. It is also known as a carcinogenic compound [22, 23]. Distilled beverages, especially the homemade ones, may contain some amounts of heavy metals—such as lead or copper. Lead occurrence in distilled beverages comes from the pesticides used in agriculture and remained in ground water. When the alcohol content of traditional beverages is adjusted, usually no water analyses are made, and, as a consequence, water can become a harmful source of chemical pollution. Copper provenience in distilled beverages, namely in traditional ones, is from distilling installation or, as in the case of lead, from the pesticides used in agriculture [24]. As a positive effect, copper is key determinant in the improvement of sensory characteristics of many alcoholic beverages [25].

Recently, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) focused on ethyl carbamate content (a derivative from hydrogen cyanide (HCN) during fruit distillates processing). Even though European Regulation (110/2008) established limits for contaminants in alcoholic beverages, sometimes the imposed limits are still exceeded. The literature presents data on advanced techniques applied for determination of HCN, formed during fermentation process, from fresh fruit, fruit juice and kernel by [26].


3. Quality parameters of distilled beverages

The most important quality parameters, which are related to the safety of distilled beverage are ethanol content, esters, aldehydes, higher alcohols, methanol, furfural and HCN. These are also specified in the EU regulation for each type of product.

Depending on the product’s type, different values for ethanol content are imposed by EU regulation (min. 96% v/v in ethanol of agricultural origin; min. 37.5% v/v in vodka, fruit spirits, rum and wine spirit; min. 40% v/v in whisky).

Maximum level of methanol in ethanol of agricultural origin is 30 mg/100 mL p.a. High concentration of methanol in fruit distillates is directly related to the quantity of pectins present in fruits, which are methoxylated during fruit riping. Methanol forms when pectic substances hydrolyse under the influence of some pectolytic enzymes. As a result of pectases action, demethylation can occur releasing methanol together with pectic acid and pectol. One of the objectives of the second distillation is the concentration of methanol in overhead fraction, as to be removed and reduce its content in final distillate to a concentration in accordance with the maximum admissible levels (1200 mg/100 mL pure alc. in fruit distillates, 200 mg/100 mL p.a. in wine spirit, 1000 mg/100 mL p/a/ in cider spirit and 30 mg/100 mL p.a in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin).

Furfural is a chemical compound that, in small amounts, contributes to the aroma and bouquet of fruit distillates, and is not allowed in ethanol of agricultural origin due to its possible toxic effect. Its health harmful effects are skin, eyes and respiratory tract irritation, headache, taste loss, skin allergies, respiratory difficulties, vomiting, thirst sensation and long exposure can affect the central nervous system, liver or blood.

The mean intake of ethyl carbamate from food is approximately 15 ng/kg bw per day, excluding the levels that come from alcoholic beverages. High levels of ethyl carbamate (ranging between 0.01 and 12 mg/L) can be found in distilled spirits, mainly in stone fruit spirits [20], depending on their origin [27]. As more than 80% of ethyl carbamate is formed, the next 4 h after distillation ends, it is important to avoid its accumulation by applying few measures: chemical elimination of cyanide in fermented juices and after distillation and the replacing of copper condensers with stainless steel ones or proper separation of heads, as HCN has a low boiling point—25.7°C [28].

Total volatile substances are a quality indicator for alcoholic beverages. The more amounts of volatile substances in fruit distillate (min. 200 mg/100 mL p.a.) or rum (min. 225 mg/100 mL p.a.) increases their quality.

Along with common analytical methods, it is imposed the necessity of some rapid, eco-friendly and cost-effective simplified alternative for alcoholic beverages assessment with applicability for both research and authorities.


4. Extraction methods applied in distilled beverages analysis

With the advent of the modern scientific revolution and the development of chemistry, alcoholic beverage sector becomes progressively complex, new ideas passing very fast from a research theme to a final market product. Many researches were conducted in this field and provide solutions with fast industrial applicability.

Given the large number of existed and daily worldwide innovated beverages, considerable progress in terms of extraction methods and analytical techniques have been made especially in the last decade. Different extraction methods such as liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), gas-chromatography and ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) have been tested and discussed. Table 1 summarises some of the techniques generally used for the compound extractions and the analytical methods applied for the characterisation of distilled beverages.

Type of distilled beverageInvestigated compoundSample preparationAnalytical techniquesReferences
Non-aged fruit spiritVolatile compoundsHS-SPMEGC-MS[15, 29]
Volatile compoundsGC-MS[30, 31]
Volatile compoundsLLEGC-MS[2]
Volatile compoundsLLEGC-O[32]
Volatile compoundsGC-FID[16, 30, 31]
Sensory parametersSensory analysis[33]
Volatile compoundsEthanol, methanol (FTIR)[2]
PhenolsSolvent extractionTotal phenolics (UV-VIS)
Antioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAP)
Phenolics (HPLC)
Metal contentHeavy metals (Atomic absorbtion spectrophometry)[31, 35]
VodkaPhenolsSolvent extractionTotal phenolics (UV-VIS)
Antioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAP)
Phenolics (HPLC)
RumPhenolsSolvent extractionTotal phenolics (UV-VIS)
Antioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAP)
Phenolics (HPLC)
BitterPhenolsSolvent extractionTotal phenolics (UV-VIS)
Antioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAP)
Phenolics (HPLC)
Bitter liqueurPhenolsSolvent extractionTotal phenolics (UV-VIS)
Antioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAP)
Phenolics (HPLC)
Fruit liqueurVolatile compoundsHS-SPMEGC-MS[31]
PhenolsSolvent extractionTotal phenolics (UV-VIS)
Antioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAP)
Phenolics (HPLC)
Aged distillatePhenolsSolvent extractionTotal phenolics (UV-VIS)[34, 3639]
PhenolsSolvent extractionPhenolics (HPLC)[33, 34, 36, 37, 4044]
PhenolsSolvent extractionPhenolics (UPLC)[45]
PhenolsSolvent extractionAntioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAP)[33, 34]
Antioxidant activity (ABTS)[39]
Colour parametersColour intensity and hue (UV-VIS)[36]
Sensory parametersSensory analysis[36, 37, 46]
Volatile compoundsLLEGC-MS
[46, 47]
Volatile compoundsStir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE)GC-MS[49, 50]

Table 1.

Some techniques used for the extraction of distilled beverages interest compounds and the analytical methods applied for their quality, safety and authenticity assessment.


5. Authenticity biomarkers

5.1. Raw material biomarkers

The quality of final beverage is strongly dependent of the quality of raw material used, variety, harvesting methods applied and storage conditions. In this context, several studies focused the chemical characteristics, volatile and microbiological aspects of vegetal matrices used in production of distilled beverages [20, 5154]. The applied techniques in volatile compounds assessment are infrared spectroscopy [55], gas-chromatography coupled with mass-spectrometry [51, 52, 56, 57] and gas-chromatography with flame ionisation detector [53, 58].

Liquid chromatography was applied for identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in apple [53, 59, 60], nectarin, peaches and plums [61].

Free fatty acids from fruits are considered main responsible for the beverages aroma studies found [51, 6264]. Fatty acid esters are contributors of fruit distillates flavour giving the fruity and flowery notes [2].

5.2. Biomarkers formed during fermentation process

Fermentation represents one of the most important factors for the quality and complexity of distilled beverages. Despite common laboratory methods used to test de-fermented marc quality, recent studies applied advanced methods. The quality of raw material subjected to fermentation, yeast specie and the inoculum amount, type and hygiene of the vessels [65], temperature and duration of the process are parameters intensively tested in the past years [20, 26, 28, 66, 67]. Yeast species used in fermentation have an important role in defining the final bouquet of the beverage, a gas-chromatography analysis proved [68]. Molecular techniques were used for distinguishing different types of microorganisms involved in the fermentation of cachaça [69] with impact on their volatile profile [70].

Ethanol, the first fermentation metabolite, along with high alcohols, aldehydes and fatty acids with their esters, are responsible for the flavour formation. In the case of traditional fruit, distillates are not involved in selected yeast cultures. The fermentation is carried out spontaneously, in the presence of Kloeckera apiculata yeast species present on fruit peels surface. Yeast microbiota species responsible for alcoholic fermentation of fruits depends especially by the region of raw material, the fermentation process applied, type of the final beverage, initial cellular concentration, temperature, pH, sulphur dioxide content and ethanol concentration. Fermentation microbiota is formed of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other spontaneous species, which should not exceed 106–109 CFU/mL, in order not to inhibit the S. cerevisiae biological activity. During the fermentation, S. cerevisiae will dominate the must microbiota due to their resistance to formed ethanol. Along with S. cerevisiae, which represents the majority of must yeast when must ethanol concentration exceeds 5% v/v, fermentation mibrobiota is formed by K. apiculata (representing 98% of the viable microbiota before must exceeded 5% v/v ethanol concentration), Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, R. graminis and Aureobasidium sp. [66]. These spontaneous yeast species can demonstrate the authenticity of a specific fermented beverage. Contrarily, must fermentation in the presence of selected strains of S. cerevisiae, provide more complex volatile profile of the final distillate [71]. Even more, were found ethyl decanoate and ethyl-2-trans-4-cis-decadienoate as authenticity biomarkers for pear distillates [72]. The higher number of viable fermentation yeast contributes to more esters formation. During fermentation, are formed also eugenol (that comes from phenol or ferulic acid), acetic acid and other ethyl esters [73].

Acetaldehyde, along with ethyl hexanoate, octanoate, decanoate and dodecanoate esters, which after distillation and ageing increase, are also compounds formed during fermentation [74]. Acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate and amyl alcohols, are the main responsible of distilled beverages aroma, formed during fermentation, their amounts influencing the quality of distillates [75].

5.3. Biomarkers formed during distillation process

The influence of distillation on the distillate bouquet is decisive. Distillation influences both the products quality and safety. Unwanted fractions, considered as toxic for human organism, are separated in this step. Separation depends on the distillation procedure (simple, double with or without rectification), temperature, duration, compounds separation grade and the fermented marc quality. The right moment for distillation is very important, because influences also the distillation yield, and should be performed immediately after the fermentation ends. The way distillation is conducted strongly influences the distillate quality. Marc heating should be made gradually and uniform, in order to avoid the burning taste and smell.

By distillation, components of a homogenous liquid are separated based on their constituents boiling temperatures and vapour pressures. The most volatile components have higher vapour pressures, so it will concentrate in the vapour phase, and will form the condensate. The low volatile compounds will remain in the residual liquid. The volatile compounds formed in fermentation are extracted by distillation. Usually, are used stainless steel installation, but the traditional method includes copper alembic. Copper has an important role as reaction catalyser and formation of aromatic substances. Firstly, marc is introduced in boiling kettle, from where will be obtained the first distillate, which is subjected to a new distillation. Redistillation aims the separation of heads and tails fractions. After the second distillation, ethanol content will be range 50% v/v.

The principal compounds resulted from distillation are water, ethanol and hundreds of volatile compounds, contributors to distillate flavour. During distillation three main fractions are collected: heads, middle fraction and tails (fusel oils).

Acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, methanol and some esters (ethyl acetate, methyl acetate and acetal) form heads fraction. They are highly toxic compounds, present unpleasant smell and taste and are separated after the first distillation. Middle fraction (ethanol content interval between 20 and 72% v/v) represents 30–45% of the entire distillate, and it contains ethanol, higher alcohols, acetals, which gives distillate specific aroma. Tails represent a high amount of volatile compounds, with high boiling point and water solubility. This fraction (10–15% of the entire amount of distillate) includes furfural, acetic acid, ethyl lactate, fatty acids with high molecular mass, fatty acids esters, volatile acids (propionic, butyric, isovalerianic and capronic) and higher alcohols (amylic, isoamylic and hexylic), and is also a strongly toxic fraction, with unpleasant sensorial properties, which is the reason for need of their separation. Heads are subjected to a new distillation, while tails are added to the marc, in order to perform the second distillation.

Many studies were performed for the identification of the different types of distilled beverages composition. A study performed in Thailand on rice distillate found volatiles identified by GC-MS have the strong odorant capacity: ethyl acetate, ethyl butyrate, ethyl decanoate, acetaldehyde, ethyl laureate, ethyl caprilate, 2-phenethyl acetate, 1-hexanol, isoamylic alcohol and 2-furaldehyde [76]. The volatile phenols identified were 4-ethylguaiacol, eugenol and 4-ethylphenol, responsible of strong floral and spicy notes, and they should be only in moderate amounts when compared to the other compounds. Grape marc distillate contains higher alcohols (1-hexanol, trans-3-hexen-1-ol, cis-3-hexen-1-ol and trans-2-hexen-1-ol), fusel alcohols (1-propanol, 2-butanol, isobutanol, 1-butanol, isoamyl alcohol, 1-pentanol, 1-octen-3-ol, 1-heptanol, 1-octen-4-ol, 1-octanol, 1-nonanol, 1-decanol, benzyl alcohol and 2-phenylethanol), fatty acids (isobutyric, butyric, pentanoic, hexanoic, heptanoic, octanoic, decanoic, dodecanoic, tetradecanoic and hexadecanoic acids), fatty acids esters (ethyl propanoate, ethyl isobutyrate, ethyl butyrate, ethyl 2-methyl butyrate, ethyl 3-methyl butyrate, ethyl pentanoate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl heptanoate, ethyl octanoate, ethyl nonanoate, ethyl decanoate, ethyl dodecanoate, ethyl tridecanoate, ethyl tetradecanoate, ethyl hexadecanoate, ethyl octadecanoate, ethyl linoleate and ethyl linolenate), acetic esters (ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, isoamyl acetate and hexyl acetate), hydroxi and dicarboxy acids esters (ethyl lactate and isoamylic lactate) and other esters [77].

Moderate presence of ethyl acetate is considerate as a positive aspect due to its aroma flavour. Though, acetals in large amounts indicate a possible microbial contamination. Acetaldehyde brings hazel, cherry and overripe apple flavours.

Furfural is formed during distillation by acid hydrolysis, by fermented pentoses heating or by Maillard reactions, especially by direct heating in copper alembic. The distillation method applied influences especially the amount of esters in the final distillate, mainly considering the increasing of ethyl decanoate and ethyl palmitate [78]. When distillation columns are used, a significant increase of esters is observed, 20% more higher alcohols, less aldehyde (a decrease with 40%) and 10% less methanol, when compared to alembic distillation. Higher concentrations of methyl and ethyl acetates indicate the incorrect fractions separation (heads) during the distillation process [65]. Lactate ethyl (found in tails fraction), with unpleasant aroma, is considered a marker of the long fermented marc storage before distillation, when unwanted malolactic fermentation takes place. Fatty acids esters (caproic, caprilic, capric and lauric), with a fruity floral flavour, are formed during fermentation. Ethyl caproate presents a banana flavour, ethyl caprylate is less perfumed, and giving a grape oil flavour, ethyl caprate is less intense, while ethyl laurate gives a candle wax smell. Another source for fatty acids esters formation can be explained by the yeasts thermal degradation and autolysis during distillation.

Methanol is separated in heads and tails. Still, a small amount of methanol is separated also in middle fraction [79], depending on the fruits processing method (crushing or pressing), storage duration, fruits initial composition, pH, fermentation and distillation temperatures [65].

Higher alcohols, isoamyl alcohol and 1-propanol in the greatest amount, are known as fusel oils, having a higher boiling point than ethanol. They present a strong flavour and are retrieved in large amounts in distillate beverages, depending on the raw material and yeasts species used during fermentation, as these compounds are derived from the sugars and amino acids metabolised by yeasts [79].

Aldehydes, the most volatile compounds in distilled beverages, are formed during fermentation and are considered the main compounds resulted from the biochemical reaction when yeasts use amino acids and sugars. Acetaldehyde is the most abundant (90% of total aldehydes) and it is accumulated in heads fraction [79]. Acrolein is another important aldehyde present in heads fraction of the distillate, has a strong spicy aroma and is produced by bacteria from glycerol.

5.4. Aged distillates biomarkers

All distilled beverages need a maturation period before consumption. During maturation, a physical structuring of the ethanol and water molecules is produced and as a result, distillate becomes smoother and less pungent [80].

Biochemical process during distilled beverages ageing depends on the temperature, oxygen and the chemical composition of the ageing or maturation materials. The storage materials are very important for the distillate safety. When plastic material is used, unwanted high extraction yield of phthalate compounds was observed especially in illegally produced strong alcoholic beverages [81].

Distillates ageing can be performed in different wooden barrels or by the addition of different wood powders and other wood fragments.

Ever since OIV approved the use of wood alternatives for barrels, different methods are applied to shorten the ageing period of alcoholic beverages and enhance their phenolic and flavour profile [82]. Recently, more attention is given to the use of wooden fragments and powders for the rapid inducing ageing character of brandies [37, 46, 8385], with reducing the lasting period between days to some weeks. The cost and difficulty of wooden barrels handling, guided actors in beverage industry to these less expensive alternatives.

Free phenolic compounds from oak wood, in contact with oxygen produce quinones. Surface wood phenols, partially transformed by quinones, dissolved in distillate and, along with quinones oxidise distillate compounds with the formation of other phenolic compounds. Furfural can be formed also during ageing process of distillate. It results by pentose oxidation by wood extraction and by wood sugar residues.

Distillate storage in wooden barrels is producing a high ethanolic extraction of wood components in distillate, especially referring to gallic acid and quercetin. The action of tanase on gallic acid produces an oxidation reaction, resulting a gold-yellow colour of the distillate. Simultaneous are produced reactions of oxidation of ethanol, higher alcohols and aldehydes with formation of acids, which react with alcohols forming esters with specific flavour.

During ageing, as interaction between wood compounds (hemicelluloses, lignin, phenolic compounds, cellulose) and distillate, are produced physical (volume decreasing, alcohol content loss, colour intensity increasing, specific mass and extract increasing) and chemical transformations (oxido-reduction processes, pH modifications, new ester, acetals and aldehydes formations). Some of the substances absorbed from wood in distillate are colour, pectic and mineral compounds, amino acids and sugars. The most important are phenolic compounds with impact on both sensory properties of the distillate and on its antioxidant activities. Depending on wood species used in cooperage, different wood-related phenols are extracted in distilled beverages (Table 2). Despite oak (Quercus robur L.), the most frequently researched woods in cooperage are chestnut (Castanea sativa Miller), cherry tree (Prunus avium L.), walnut (Juglans regia L.), acacia (Robinia pseudacacia L.), mulberry (Morus alba and Morus nigra), ash (Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus Americana L.), beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), alder (Alnus glutinosa L.) and lime (Tilia cordata Miller) [33, 8689], although only oak and chestnut are approved by OIV for (wine) ageing [89].

Phenolic compoundOakChestnutCherryMulberryWalnutReferences
Gallic acid****[82, 86, 88, 90, 91]
Vanillic acid***[82, 86, 88, 91, 92]
Syringic acid***[82, 86, 88, 91]
Vanillin****[38, 82, 83, 86, 88, 90, 92]
Ellagic acid****[82, 86, 88, 91]
Trans caffeic acid*[91]
Trans cafftaric acid*[91]
5-OH-methyl-furfural*[82, 83]
Furfural**[38, 82, 92]
Syringaldehyde***[38, 82, 86, 88, 92]
Coniferaldehyde***[38, 82, 86, 88]
Sinapaldehyde***[82, 86, 88]
Eugenol****[38, 83, 90, 92]
Bnezene derivatives*[90]
Benzaldehyde derivatives*[90]
Protocatechuic acid***[86, 88, 91]
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid**[88, 91]
Ferulic acid***[86, 88]
Protocatechuic aldehyde****[86, 88]
Vanillic aldehyde*[86]
Scopoletin**[86, 88]
Vescalagin***[86, 88]
Castalagin***[86, 88]
Glucopyranose derivatives*[86]
Ellagic acid deoxyhexose*[86]
Ellagic acid dimer dehydrated*[86]
Valoneic acid dilactone*[86]
p-Coumaric acid***[86, 88]
cis p-Coumaric*[91]
trans p-Coumaric*[91]
cis Coutaric*[91]
trans Coutaric*[91]
cis p-Coumaric derivative*[91]
trans p-Coumaric derivative*[91]
Methyl vanillate*[86]
Methyl syringate*[86]
Benzoic acid*[86]
B-type procyanidin dimer*[86]
B-type procyanidin trimer*[86]
Ethyl guaiacol**[38, 83]
Myricetin 3-O-glucoside*[91]
Quercetin 3-O-glucuronide*[91]
Quercetin 3-O-galactoside*[91]
Resveratrol trans 3-O-glucoside*[91]
Resveratrol cis 3-O-glucoside*[91]
Resveratrol trans*[91]
Resveratrol cis*[91]
Methyl gallate*[91]
Ethyl gallate*[91]
Sinapic acid***[88]
Caffeic acid***[88]
Roburin A**[88]
Roburin B**[88]
Roburin C**[88]
Roburin D**[88]
Roburin E**[88]

Table 2.

Phenolic compounds identified in wood extracts as mentioned in different references.

5.5. Rapid authenticity testing of distilled beverages

Ethyl alcohol used for the production of spirit drinks should be of exclusively agricultural origin (EUR Lex 110/2008). A key quality parameter is the maturation and ageing periods, respectively.

The addition of flavourings, sugars or other sweetening products is forbidden for distilled beverages such as rum, whisky, fruit distillates or wine brandy. The addition of caramel in fruit distillates is not allowed, and in whiskey is allowed only the plain caramel (for colouring) [93], being considered as counterfeit.

Advanced techniques for laboratory analysis of the alcoholic beverages are the chromatographic ones. The expensive reference methods tend to be replaced by simpler ones, non-destructive and easy to handle. The Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) technique, in combination with chemometrics is a fast and reproducible way to identify the authenticity and adulteration of beverages [19, 94]. As for wine, vinegar or olive oil, distilled beverages have also geographical indication denominations. Recent studies focused the discrimination of distilled beverages based on their raw material and geographical region [2, 9597]. Due to the degradation of methoxylated pectins found in pulp, fruit distillates will content higher amounts of methanol in comparison with other matrices (cereal ethyl alcohol). Indirectly, methanol can be considered an authenticity marker of a natural fruit brandy, indicating the origin of raw material used [16].


  1. 1. Levy P, Hexdall A, Gordon P, Boeriu C, Heller M, Nelson L. Methanol contamination of Romanian home-distilled alcohol. Journal of Toxicology. Clinical Toxicology. 2003;41:23-28. DOI: 10.1081/CLT-120018267
  2. 2. Coldea TE, Socaciu C, Moldovan Z, Mudura E. Minor volatile compounds in traditional homemade fruit brandies from Transylvania-Romania, as determined by GC-MS analysis. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2014;42:530-537 DOI: 10.15835/nbha4229607
  3. 3. Brien SE, Ronksley PE, Turner BJ, Mukamal KJ, Ghali WA. Effect of alcohol consumption on biological markers associated with risk of coronary heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies. BMJ Open. 2011;342:d636. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d636
  4. 4. Koppes LLJ, Dekker JM, Hendriks HFJ, Bouter LM, Heine RJ. Moderate alcohol consumption lowers the risk of type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:719-725. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.719
  5. 5. Witt H, Apte MV, Keim V, Wilson JS. Chronic pancreatitis: Challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1557-1573. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.001
  6. 6. Yadav D, Whitcomb DC. The role of alcohol and smoking in pancreatitis. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2010;7:131-145. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.6
  7. 7. Deng X, Wang L, Elm MS, Gabazadeh D, Diorio GJ, Eagon PK, Whitcomb DC. Chronic alcohol consumption accelerates fibrosis in response to cerulein-induced pancreatitis in rats. American Journal of Pathology. 2005;166:93-106. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62235-3
  8. 8. Go VLW, Gukovskaya A, Pandol SJ. Alcohol and pancreatic cancer. Alcohol. 2005;35:205-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2005.03.010
  9. 9. Hassan MM, Bondy ML, Wolff RA, Abbruzzese JL, Vauthey JN, Pisters PW, Evans DB,Khan R, Chou TH, Lenzi R, Jiao L, Li D. Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: Case-control study. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2007;102:2696-2707. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01510.x
  10. 10. Lachenmeier DW, Monakhova YB, Rehm J. Influence of unrecorded alcohol consumption on liver cirrhosis mortality. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;20:7217-7222
  11. 11. Salanţă LC, Tofană M, Pop C, Pop A, Coldea T, Mudura E. Beverage alcohol choice among university students: Perception, consumption and preferences. Bulletin UASVM Food Science and Technology. 2017;74:23-30. DOI: 10.15835/buasvmcn-fst:12633
  12. 12. McCambridge J, McAlaney J, Rowe R. Adult consequences of late adolescent alcohol consumption: A systematic review of cohort studies. PLoS Medicine. 2011;8:e1000413. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000413
  13. 13. Berkey CS, Willett WC, Frazier AL, Rosner B, Tamimi RM, Rockett HRH, Colditz GA. Prospective study of adolescent alcohol consumption and risk of benign breast disease in young women. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1081-e1087. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-2347.
  14. 14. Salanţă LC, Tofană M, Mudura E, Pop C, Pop A, Coldea T. The alcoholic beverage consumption preference of university students: A preliminary Romanian case study. Bulletin UASVM Food Science and Technology. 2016;73:33-39. DOI: 10.15835/buasvmcn-fst:11984
  15. 15. Bajer T, Bajerová P, Surmová S, Kremr D, Ventura K, Eisner A. Chemical profiling of volatile compounds of various home-made fruit spirits using headspace solid-phase microextraction. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2017;123:105-112. DOI: 10.1002/jib.386
  16. 16. Rusu Coldea TE, Socaciu C, Pârv M, Vodnar D. Gas-chromatographic analysis of major volatile compounds found in traditional fruit brandies from Transylvania, Romania. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2011;39:109-116. DOI: 10.15835/nbha3926053
  17. 17. Rusu Coldea TE, Socaciu C, Fetea F, Ranga F, Pârlog R. Phenolic derivatives as authenticity markers of traditional homemade brandies from different counties of Transylvania, using UV-VIS and HPLC analysis. Bulletin UASVM Agriculture. 2011;68:518-528. DOI: 10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:6610
  18. 18. Pecić S, Veljović M, Despotović S, Leskošek-Ćukalović I, Jadranin M, Tešević V, Nikšić M,Nikićević N. Effect of maturation conditions on sensory and antioxidant properties of old Serbian plum brandies. European Food Research and Technology. 2012;235:479-487. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-012-1775-y
  19. 19. Coldea TE, Socaciu C, Fetea F, Ranga F, Pop RM, Florea M. Rapid quantitative analysis of ethanol and prediction of methanol content in traditional fruit brandies from Romania, using FTIR spectroscopy and chemometrics. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2013;41:143-149. DOI: 10.15835/nbha4119000
  20. 20. Śliwińska M, Wiśniewska P, Dymerski T, Wardencki W, Namieśnik J. The flavour of fruit spirits and fruit liqueurs: A review. Flavour and Fragrance Journal. 2015;30:197-207. DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3237
  21. 21. Rohsenow DJ, Howland J. The role of beverage congeners in hangover and other residual effects of alcohol intoxication: A review. Current Drug Abuse Reviews. 2010;3:76-79. DOI: 10.2174/1874473711003020076
  22. 22. Pflaum T, Hausler T, Baumung C, Ackermann S, Kuballa T, Rehm J, Lachenmeier DW. Carcinogenic compounds in alcoholic beverages: An update. Archives of Toxicology. 2016;90:2349-2367. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1770-3
  23. 23. Lachenmeier DW, Monakhova YB. Short-term salivary acetaldehyde increase due to direct exposure to alcoholic beverages as an additional cancer risk factor beyond ethanol metabolism. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 2011;30:3-9. DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-3
  24. 24. Rusu Coldea TE, Socaciu C, Părău C, Mocan AA. Quality and safety analysis for some traditional homemade fruit distillates from Transylvania (North West Romania). Bulletin UASVM Agriculture. 2010;67:395-403. DOI: 10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:5155
  25. 25. Bonić M, Tešević V, Nikićević N, Cvejić J, Milosavljević S, Vajs V, Mandić B, Urošević I,Veličković M, Jovanić S. The contents of heavy metals in Serbian old plum brandies. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2013;78:933-945. DOI: 10.2298/JSC121106016B
  26. 26. Balcerek M, Szopa J. Ethanol biosynthesis and hydrocyanic acid liberation during fruit mashes fermentation. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2012;30(2):144-152
  27. 27. Weber JV, Sharypov VI. Ethyl carbamate in foods and beverages: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2009;7:233-247. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-008-0168-8
  28. 28. Spaho N. Distillation techniques in the fruit spirits production. In: Mendes M, editor. Distillation – Innovative Applications and Modeling. InTech; 2017. pp. 129-152. DOI: 10.5772/66774
  29. 29. Zhao Y, Xu Y, Li J, Fan W, Jiang W. Profile of volatile compounds in 11 brandies by headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Food Science. 2009;74:c90-c99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.01029.x
  30. 30. Versini G, Franco MA, Moser S, Barchetti P, Manca G. Characterisation of apple distillates from native varieties of Sardinia island and comparison with other Italian products. Food Chemistry. 2009;113:1176-1183. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.08.003
  31. 31. Galego LR, Da Silva JP, Almeida VR, Bronze MR, Boas LV. Preparation of novel distinct highly aromatic liquors using fruit distillates. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011;46:67-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02452.x
  32. 32. Malfondet N, Gourrat K, Brunerie P, Le Quéré JL. Aroma characterization of freshly-distilled French brandies; their specificity and variability within a limited geographic area. Flavour and Fragrance Journal. 2016;31:361-376. DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3325
  33. 33. Madrera RR, Suárez Valles B, Diñeiro García Y, Del Valle Argüelles P, Picinelli Lobo A.Alternative woods for aging distillates - an insight into their phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2010;19:1129-1134. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-010-0161-4
  34. 34. Mrvcic J, Posavec S, Kazazic S, Stanzer D, Peša A, Stehlik-Tomas V. Spirit drinks: A source of dietary polyphenols. Croatian Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2012;4:102-111
  35. 35. Ivanova-Petropulos V, Balabanova B, Bogeva E, Frentiu T, Ponta M, Senila M, Gulaboski R, Irimie FD. Rapid determination of trace elements in Macedonian grape brandies for their characterization and safety evaluation. Food Analytical Methods. 2017;10:459-468. DOI: 10.1007/s12161-016-0604-5
  36. 36. Rodríguez-Solana R, Salgado JM, Domínguez JM, Cortés-Diéguez S. First approach to the analytical characterization of barrel-aged grape marc distillates using phenolic compounds and colour parameters. Food Technolology and Biotechnology. 2014;52:391-402. DOI: 10.17113/ftb.
  37. 37. Canas S, Caldeira I, Anjos O, Lino J, Soares A, Belchior AP. Physicochemical and sensory evaluation of wine brandies aged using oak and chestnut wood simultaneously in wooden barrels and in stainless steel tanks with staves. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2016;51:2537-2545. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.13235
  38. 38. De Rosso M, Cancian D, Panighel A, Dalla Vedova A, Flamini R. Chemical compounds released from five different woods used to make barrels for aging wines and spirits: Volatile compounds and polyphenols. Wood Science and Technology. 2009;43:375-385. DOI: 10.1007/s00226-008-0211-8
  39. 39. Schwarz M, Rodríguez MC, Martínez C, Bosquet V, Guillén D, Barroso CG. Antioxidant activity of Brandy de Jerez and other aged distillates, and correlation with their polyphenolic content. Food Chemistry. 2009;116:29-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.096
  40. 40. Rodríguez Dodero MC, Guillén Sánchez DA, Rodríguez MS, Barroso CGJ. Phenolic compounds and furanic derivatives in the characterization and quality control of Brandy de Jerez. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58:990-997. DOI: 10.1021/jf902965p
  41. 41. Canas S, Silva V, Belchior PA. Wood related chemical markers of aged wine brandies. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola. 2008;23:45-52
  42. 42. Madrera RR, Gomis BD, Alonso MJJ. Influence of distillation system, oak wood type, and aging time on composition of cider brandy in phenolic and furanic compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003;51:7969-7973. DOI: 10.1021/jf0347618
  43. 43. Delgado-González MJ, Sánchez-Guillén MM, García-Moreno MV, Rodríguez-Dodero MC,García-Barroso C, Guillén-Sánchez DA. Study of a laboratory-scaled new method for the accelerated continuous ageing of wine spirits by applying ultrasound energy. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2017;36:226-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.11.031
  44. 44. Bin Z, Zeng XA, Sun D-W, Shu Juan Y, Yang MF, Ma S. Effect of electric field treatments on brandy aging in oak barrels. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2013;6:1635-1643. DOI: 10.1007/s11947-012-0788-7
  45. 45. Schwarz M, Rodríguez MC, Sánchez M, Guillén DA, Barroso CG. Development of an accelerated aging method for brandy. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 2014;59:108-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.05.060
  46. 46. Caldeira I, Anjos O, Portal V, Belchior AP, Canas S. Sensory and chemical modifications of wine-brandy aged with chestnut and oak wood fragments in comparison to wooden barrels. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2010;660:43-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.059
  47. 47. Caldeira I, Pereira R, Clímaco MC, Belchior AP, De Sousa RB. Improved method for extraction of aroma compounds in aged brandies and aqueous alcoholic wood extracts using ultrasound. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;513:125-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.011
  48. 48. Caldeira I, De Sousa BR, Belchior PA, Clímaco CM. A sensory and chemical approach to the aroma of wooden aged Lourinhã wine brandy. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola. 2008;23:97-110
  49. 49. Delgado R, Durán E, Castro R, Natera R, Barroso CG. Development of a stir bar sorptive extraction method coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the analysis of volatile compounds in Sherry brandy. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2010;672:130-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.05.015
  50. 50. Guerrero ED, Cejudo Bastante MJ, Mejías RC, Marín RN, Barroso CG. Characterization and differentiation of sherry brandies using their aromatic profile. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2011;59:2410-2415. DOI: 10.1021/jf104409n
  51. 51. Madrera RR, Suarez Valles B. Determination of volatile compounds în apple pomace by stir bar sorptive extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SBSE-GC-MS). Journal of Food Science. 2011;76:C1326-C1334. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02406.x
  52. 52. Elss S, Preston C, Appel M, Heckel F, Schreier P. Influence of technological processing on apple aroma analysed by high resolution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and on-line gas chromatography-combustion/pyrolysis-isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry. 2006;98:269-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.011
  53. 53. Wu J, Gao H, Zhao L, Liao X, Chen F, Wang Z, Hu X. Chemical compositional characterization of some apple cultivars. Food Chemistry. 2007;103:88-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.030
  54. 54. Christoph N, Bauer-Christoph C. Flavour of spirit drinks: Raw materials, fermentation, distillation, and ageing. In: Berger RG, editor. Flavours and Fragrances. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. pp. 219-239. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49339-6_10
  55. 55. Schneider R, Charrier F, Moutounet M, Baumes R. Rapid analysis of grape aroma glycoconjugates using Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry and chemometric techniques. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;513:91-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2003.11.082
  56. 56. Tietel Z, Porat R, Weiss K, Ulrich D. Identification of aroma-active compounds în fresh and stored 'Mor' mandarins. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011;46:2225-2231. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02740.x
  57. 57. Villatoro C, Altisent R, Echeverria G, Graell J, Lopez ML, Lara I. Changes în biosynthesis of aroma volatile compounds during on-tree maturation of 'Pink lady (R)' apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2008;47:286-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.07.003
  58. 58. Hashimoto A, Kozima K, Sakamoto K. Validity of SPME cryofocusing în analysis of volatile components în orange juice. Food Science and Technology Research. 2006;12:295-298. DOI: 10.3136/fstr.12.295
  59. 59. Huber GM, Rupasinghe HPV. Phenolic profiles and antioxidant properties of apple skin extracts. Journal of Food Science. 2009;74:C693-C700. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01356.x
  60. 60. Kammerer DR, Saleh ZS, Carle R, Stanley RA. Adsorptive recovery of phenolic compounds from apple juice. European Food Research and Technology. 2007;224:605-613. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-006-0346-5
  61. 61. Gil MI, Tomas-Barberan F, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA. Antioxidant capacities, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and vitamin C contents of nectarine, peach, and plum cultivars from California. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50:4976-4982. DOI: 10.1021/jf020136b
  62. 62. Blanco-Gomis D, Alonso JJM, Cabrales IM, Abrodo PA. Characterization of cider apples on the basis of their fatty acid profiles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50:1097-1100. DOI: 10.1021/jf010998x
  63. 63. Fromm M, Bayha S, Carle R, Kammerer D. Comparison of fatty acid profiles and contents of seed oils recovered from dessert and cider apples and further Rosaceous plants. European Food Research and Technology. 2012;234:1033-1041. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-012-1709-8
  64. 64. Ozdemir F, Topuz A. Changes în dry matter, oil content and fatty acids composition of avocado during harvesting time and post-harvesting ripening period. Food Chemistry. 2004;86:79-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.08.012
  65. 65. Cortés S, Salgado JM, Rodríguez N, Domínguez JM. The storage of grape marc: Limiting factor în the quality of the distillate. Food Control. 2010;21:1545-1549. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.04.029
  66. 66. Satora P, Tuszynski T. Biodiversity of yeasts during plum Wegierka Zwykla spontaneous fermentation. Food Technology and Biotechnology. 2005;43:277-282
  67. 67. Ribeiro LS, Duarte WF, Dias DR, Schwan RF. Fermented sugarcane and pineapple beverage produced using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeast. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2015;121:262-272. DOI: 10.1002/jib.218
  68. 68. Budić-Leto I, Humar I, Zdunić G, Hribar J, Zlatić E. Volatile compounds in Prošek dessert wines produced from white and red grapes. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2015;33:354-360. DOI: 10.17221/28/2015-CJFS
  69. 69. Gomes FCO, Silva LC, Vianna CR, Lacerda ICA, Borelli BM, Nunes AC, Franco GR, Mourao MM, Rosa CA. Identification of lactic acid bacteria associated with traditional cachaca fermentations. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2010;41:486-492. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000200031
  70. 70. Geroyiannaki M, Komaitis ME, Stavrakas DE, Polysiou M, Athanasopoulos PE, Spanos M.Evaluation of acetaldehyde and methanol în greek traditional alcoholic beverages from varietal fermented grape pomaces (Vitis vinifera L.). Food Control. 2007;18:988-995. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.06.005
  71. 71. García-Llobodanin L, Ferrando M, Güell C, López F. Pear distillates: Influence of the raw material used on final quality. European Food Research and Technology. 2008;228:75-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-008-0908-9
  72. 72. Diban N, Voinea OC, Urtiaga A, Ortiz I. Vacuum membrane distillation of the main pear aroma compound: Experimental study and mass transfer modeling. Journal of Membrane Science. 2009;326:64-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.024
  73. 73. Nunes C, Coimbra MA, Saraiva J, Rocha SM. Study of the volatile components of a candied plum and estimation of their contribution to the aroma. Food Chemistry. 2008;111:897-905. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.05.003
  74. 74. Tešević V, Nikićević N, Milosavljević S, Bajić D, Vajs V, Vučković I, Vujisić L, Đorđević I,Stanković M, Veličković M. Characterization of volatile compounds of “Drenja”, an alcoholic beverage obtained from the fruits of cornelian cherry. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2009;74:117-128. DOI: 10.2298/JSC0902117T
  75. 75. Apostolopoulou AA, Flouros AI, Demertzis PG, Akrida-Demertzi K. Differences în concentration of principal volatile constituents în traditional Greek distillates. Food Control. 2005;16:157-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.01.005
  76. 76. Wechgama K, Laopaiboon L, Laopaiboon P. Quantitative analysis of main volatile and other compounds în traditional distilled spirits from Thai rice. Biotechnology. 2008;7:718-724. DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2008.718.724
  77. 77. Lukić I, Tomas S, Miličević B, Radeka S, Peršurić Đ. Behaviour of volatile compounds during traditional alembic distillation of fermented Muscat Blanc and Muškat Ruža Porečki grape marcs. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2011;117:440-450. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00491.x
  78. 78. García-Llobodanin L, Roca J, López JR, Pérez-Correa JR, López F. The lack of reproducibility of different distillation techniques and its impact on pear spirit composition. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2011;46:1956-1963. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02707.x
  79. 79. Claus M, Berglund K. Fruit brandy production by batch column distillation with reflux. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2005;28:53-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4530.2005.00377.x
  80. 80. Mosedale JR, Puech JL. Wood maturation of distilled beverages. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 1998;9:95-101. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2244(98)00024-7
  81. 81. Savchuk SA, Nuzhnyi VP, Kolesov GM. Factors affecting the accuracy of the determination of diethyl phthalate in vodka, ethanol, and samples of illegal alcoholic products. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2006;61:1198-1203. DOI: 10.1134/S1061934806120136
  82. 82. Cabrita MJ, Barrocas Dias C, Costa Freitas AM. Phenolic acids, phenolic aldehydes and furanic derivatives în oak chips: American vs. French oaks. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2011;32:204-210. DOI: 10.21548/32-2-1380
  83. 83. Van Jaarsveld FP, Hattingh S, Minnaar P. Rapid induction of ageing character în brandy products – Part II. Influence of type of oak. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2009;30:24-37. DOI: 10.21548/30-1-1420
  84. 84. Van Jaarsveld FP, Hattingh S. Rapid induction of ageing character in brandy products. Ageing and general overview. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2012;33:225-252
  85. 85. Rodríguez-Solana R, Rodríguez-Freigedo S, Salgado JM, Domínguez JM, Cortés-Diéguez S.Optimisation of accelerated ageing of grape marc distillate on a micro-scale process using a box – Benhken design: Influence of oak origin, fragment size and toast level on the composition of the final product. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 2016;23:5-14. DOI: 10.1111/ajgw.12249
  86. 86. Sanz M, Cadahía E, Esteruelas E, Muñoz AM, Fernández De Simón B, Hernández T, Estrella I. Phenolic compounds in cherry (prunus avium) heartwood with a view to their use in cooperage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58:4907-4914
  87. 87. Gortzi O, Metaxa X, Mantanis G, Lalas S. Effect of artificial ageing using different wood chips on the antioxidant activity, resveratrol and catechin concentration, sensory properties and colour of two Greek red wines. Food Chemistry. 2013;141:2887-2895. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.051
  88. 88. Alañón ME, Castro-Vázquez L, Díaz-Maroto MC, Hermosín-Gutiérrez I, Gordon MH, Pérez-Coello MS. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of different woods used in cooperage. Food Chemistry. 2011;129:1584-1590. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.013
  89. 89. Fernández de Simón B, Sanz M, Cadahía E, Martínez J, Esteruelas E, Muñoz AM. Polyphenolic compounds as chemical markers of wine ageing in contact with cherry, chestnut, false acacia, ash and oak wood. Food Chemistry. 2014;143:66-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.096
  90. 90. Flamini R, Vedova AD, Cancian D, Panighel A, De Rosso M. GC/MS-positive ion chemical ionization and MS/MS study of volatile benzene compounds în five different woods used în barrel making. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2007;42:641-646. DOI: 10.1002/jms.1193
  91. 91. Hernández T, Estrella I, Dueñas M, Fernández de Simón B, Cadahía E. Influence of wood origin în the polyphenolic composition of a Spanish red wine aging în bottle, after storage în barrels of Spanish, French and American oak wood. European Food Research and Technology. 2007;224:695-705. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-006-0360-7
  92. 92. Zarzynski P. Identification and quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds naturally occuring în wood of selected European and exotic tree species. Forest Research Papers. 2009;70:27-39. DOI: 10.2478/v10111-009-0003-4
  93. 93. Wiśniewska P, Dymerski T, Wardencki W, Namieśnik J. Chemical composition analysis and authentication of whisky. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2015;95(11):2159-2166
  94. 94. Leopold LF, Leopold N, Diehl HA, Socaciu C. Prediction of Total antioxidant capacity of fruit juices using FTIR spectroscopy and PLS regression. Food Analytical Methods. 2012;5(3):405-407
  95. 95. Uríčková V, Sádecká J. Determination of geographical origin of alcoholic beverages using ultraviolet, visible and infrared spectroscopy: A review. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2015;148:131-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.03.111
  96. 96. Borràs E, Ferré J, Boqué R, Mestres M, Acena L, Busto O. Data fusion methodologies for food and beverage authentication and quality assessment: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2015;891:1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.04.042
  97. 97. Pontes MJC, Santos SRB, Araújo MCU, Almeida LF, Lima RAC, Gaião EN, Souto UTCP. Classification of distilled alcoholic beverages and verification of adulteration by near infrared spectrometry. Food Research International. 2006;39:182-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2005.07.005

Written By

Teodora Emilia Coldea, Elena Mudura and Carmen Socaciu

Submitted: August 23rd, 2017 Reviewed: October 27th, 2017 Published: December 13th, 2017