Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Towards an Integrative Taxonomy of the Genus Alstroemeria (Alstroemeriaceae) in Chile: A Comprehensive Review

Written By

Victor L. Finot, Carlos M. Baeza, Eduardo Ruiz, Oscar Toro and Pedro Carrasco

Submitted: July 31st, 2017 Reviewed: October 20th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71823

Chapter metrics overview

1,293 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The genus Alstroemeria encompasses approximately 80 species endemic to South America, with 2 centers of diversity (Chile and Brazil). In Chile, Alstroemeria represents one of the most diverse genera of vascular monocotyledons, comprising more than 50 recognized or accepted taxa (36 species, 11 subspecies and 10 varieties) from which ca. 82% are endemic to the Mediterranean zone of central Chile, one of the world’s diversity hotspots. The taxonomy of the genus is very difficult due to the great variability of the vegetative and floral traits. Moreover, a number of taxa have been recently described and several nomenclatural changes have been proposed. In order to elucidate the taxonomy of some Chilean complexes of Alstroemeria, an integrative approach including morphology, colorimetry, cytogenetic, multivariate statistical analyses of morphological variation and DNA-molecular studies have been conducted. In this chapter, we review the literature concerning these approaches; a checklist of the species growing in Chile is provided including all published names, references to the original protologues, accepted names, synonyms and the biogeographic status (endemic or native) of the accepted taxa; maps illustrating the diversity of the genus in South America and its distribution in Chile were constructed.


  • checklist
  • Chilean hotspot
  • cytogenetic
  • endemism
  • geographical distribution
  • South America
  • taxonomy

1. Introduction

The family Alstroemeriaceae Dumort. nom. Cons., belongs to the monocotyledon angiosperm clade (Subclass: Liliopsida, Order: Liliales) [1, 2]. It is distributed in Central and South America [3], and comprises about 200 species distributed in the genera Alstroemeria L., Bomarea Mirb., Leontochir Phil. and Schickendantzia Pax [4]. Some authors recognized Taltalia Ehr. Bayer as an independent genus [5, 6] while others included Taltalia and Schickendantzia in Alstroemeria [7]. Genera have been classified in two subfamilies: (a) Subfamily: Luzuriagoideae with Drymophila R. Br. and Luzuriaga Ruiz & Pav. and (b) Subfamily: Alstroemerioideae with Alstroemeria and Bomarea (incl. Leontochir) [3, 8] or treated Luzuriagoideae as a separate family Luzuriagaceae [3]. Alstroemeria comprises about 80 species endemic to South America (southern South America and Eastern Brazil); Bomarea includes 120 species in Central and South America; Luzuriaga comprises 4 species (3 species in Chile, 1 in New Zealand) and Drymophila 1 species from Australia and Tasmania [8]. Phylogenetic studies using morphology and DNA sequences (rps16, rbcL) recognized Alstroemeria as monophyletic and certainly different from Leontochir and Bomarea; moreover, three subclades of Alstroemeria have been recognized that correspond to northern Chile, central Chile and Brazil [9]. Alstroemeria was established by Linnaeus in 1762 in honor to the Swedish botanist Claus von Alströmer [10]. It has its boreal distribution in Venezuela (3°N) and its austral limit in the Patagonia of Chile and Argentina, with two main distribution centers in the continent: Brazil (and adjacent areas of Paraguay and Argentina) and Chile (and the adjacent countries Peru, Bolivia and Argentina) [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. In Chile, Alstroemeria represents 1 of the most diverse genera of vascular monocotyledons, comprising more than 50 recognized or accepted taxa (36 species, 11 subspecies and 10 varieties) from which about ca. 82% are endemic to the Mediterranean zone of central Chile [14]. Due to the beauty of their flowers, Chilean species of Alstroemeria, locally known as “astromelias or lirios del campo” are appreciated all over the world as ornamental plants [16, 17, 18]. Many hybrids and cultivars have been developed in several countries, such as, The Netherlands, England, United States and Japan [14]. The taxonomy of the genus is very complex due to the great variability both in vegetative and floral characters [19]. Moreover, several taxa have been recently described (e.g., A. werdermannii var. flavicans [20], A. philippi var. albicans [14], A. philippi subsp. adrianae [21], A. hookeri subsp. sansebastiana [22], A. marticorenae [19], A. traudliae [23]) or nomenclatural changes have been made, affecting the rank status of many taxa. Due to its geographical isolation, Chile contains a unique flora which includes an extraordinary number of endemic plants. Furthermore, the area between the Regions of Atacama and Biobío comprises about 60% of the vascular species of the Chilean flora, with nearly 50% endemic to Chile [24]. In this area, identified as a hotspot of biodiversity [25], lives most of the Chilean species of Alstroemeria. This area harbors most of the Chilean population, and is characterized by a strong disturbance triggered mainly by agriculture, industry and forestry. In this chapter, we reviewed the taxonomic literature to make an updated checklist of the species growing in Chile and their synonyms. In addition, we construct distribution maps based on the literature as well as on the database of the Herbarium of the University of Concepción (CONC). Recent studies integrating different source of evidence, such as morphometry, cytogenetic, colorimetry and molecular data for better taxonomic species delimitation are discussed.


2. Methods

The database of the Herbarium of the University of Concepción (CONC) was used to construct preliminary lists of species and the geographic distribution of each taxon. This database contains the following fields: (1) Taxon name; (2) Collector’s name; (3) Collector’s number; (4) Latitude; (5) Longitude; (6) Elevation; (7) Administrative region; (8) Locality; (9) Collection date (month); (10) Collection date (Year); (11) Herbarium and (12) Herbarium number. A total of 714 specimens were included in the CONC-DB. In addition to historical specimens, plants were collected and photographed in the field and kept in CONC. A checklist is provided including all published combinations, references to original publication, accepted names and biogeographic status (endemic or native). Maps illustrating the diversity of the genus in South America and distribution in Chile were constructed based on data taken from the CONC-DB and literature [14, 15, 23], using the software DIVA-GIS 7.5.0.


3. Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Alstroemeria in Chile

3.1. General morphology

Alstroemeria comprises mostly perennial species. In 1998, Bayer [5] established the monotypic genus Taltalia to separate the annual A. graminea Phil., endemic to northern Chile, from Alstroemeria. Perennial species have cylindrical rhizomes, from which two kinds of roots born: thin roots and thick roots which contain starch (Figure 1A); A. ligtu (locally known as “liuto”) was used by indigenous people (Mapuches or Araucanos) to produce starch from the thick roots. According to Molina [26], the farmers made from the roots of this plant “a white, light, nutritious and so healthy flour that they usually gave it to the sick persons…” [26]. Aerial stems are erect or decumbent. The leaves are often resupinated, that is, twisted from the petiole or the leaf blade so the lower surface becomes functionally the upper surface; sometimes the leaves form basal rosettes; leaf blades thin or thick, sometimes with papillae; the blade varies in shape from linear to elliptic or ovate; fertile stems usually have reduced leaves but sterile stems have well developed leaves (Figure 1B). The flowers are slightly zygomorphic (Figure 1C-D), with six free tepals in two verticils; the three outer tepals are similar in shape and color; the inner three tepals are differentiated in two upper inner tepals and one lower inner tepal. Upper inner tepals with colored lines (nectar guides) on a lighter background (Figure 1D). Stamens 3: the ovary is inferior, 3-carpellate, 3-loculate. The fruit is a six-ribbed loculicidal capsule (Figure 1C) with explosive dehiscence, with numerous globose seeds (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Morphology of the roots, rhizomes, leaves, flowers and fruits of Alstroemeria. (A) Roots and rhizomes of A. x chrysantha; (B) sterile leaves in fertile stems and basal rosettes of A. magenta; (C) fruits (capsules) of A. hookeri subsp. recumbens; (D) flower of A. x chrysantha. Photos A and D by V.L. Finot; photos B and C by C.M. Baeza.

Figure 2.

Seeds of Alstroemeria as seen with scanning electron microscope (SEM). (A) Alstroemeria presliana subsp. australis. (B) Alstroemeria magenta. (C) Alstroemeria ligtu subsp. simsii. (D). Alstroemeria magenta, surface details. (E) and (F) Alstroemeria x chrysantha.

3.2. Colorimetric studies in Chilean Alstroemeria

In Alstroemeria, the flowers varies in color from white to yellow, pink, red, purple and violet according to the species [11, 14]; color is regulated by several pigments including anthocyanin-like 6-hydroxydelphinidine 3-rutinoside, 6-hydroxycyanidin 3-rutinoside, delphinidin 3-malonylglucoside among others, carotenoids and flavonoids [27]. In some groups of plants, as occurs in Alstroemeria, it is possible that the taxonomic characters traditionally used do not have sufficient discriminant power to differentiate very close species or varieties within a species complex. In such cases, it may be useful to have characteristics that pose a new perspective on the problem. It has been shown that the color of the corolla, objectively measured, had high taxonomic value when the traditional characters were less informative to distinguish cryptic taxa [28]. In Alstroemeria, the color of the flower has often been used in keys and descriptions [11, 14, 15, 22, 23], however, most of the time, the described color corresponds to a subjective perception of the same by the human eye. The color of the flowers is taxonomically significant in Alstroemeria [14, 29, 30]; the outer tepals and the lower inner tepals are similar in shape and color but the upper internal tepals are different, showing unique patterns of maculae (actually nectar guides) that are species specific; however, some species showed variability in the background color [30], because it depends on several ecological factors such as temperature and pH [31]. In order to describe objectively the color (mainly the background color) of the different tepals (external, upper internal and lower internal), the CIElab system [32] has been used in some species complexes of Chilean Alstroemeria [29, 30] (Figure 3). The CIE (Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage) color system uses three coordinates to locate a given color in the color space. The spectrophotometer registers the reflected wavelengths as numerical values (spectral curve) from which the coordinates that place a given color in the color space are calculated. The color expressed in the CIELab scale uses the Cartesian coordinates L*, a* and b*. L* expresses the luminosity, a* denotes the green/red value and b* the blue/yellow value. The degree of luminosity of L* determines that a color appears lighter or darker and is expressed in a scale from 0 (black or total absorption) to 100 (white). The axis a* moves from negative values (green) to positive values (red) while axis b* moves from blue (negative values) to yellow (positive values). The color expressed in the CIELCh scale uses polar coordinates (L*, C*, h°), derived from the CIELab scale. C* denotes chroma (saturation, intensity) and h° denotes hue, expressed as angular measures. Chroma is the distance of the color from the axes a* and b* of L*, calculated as (a*2 + b*2)1/2 and represents the color saturation; the hue, h° is calculated as arctg (b*/a*). In A. magnifica complex, the colorimetric study of the flower helped to elucidate the taxonomic position of A. pulchra var. maxima. This taxon, originally described by Philippi in 1864 [33], was transferred by Bayer in 1987 to A. magnifica with the subspecific rank (A. magnifica subsp. maxima) [11].

Figure 3.

Flowers of some species of Chilean Alstroemeria. (A) Alstroemeria pulchra, Maule region, Talca, Río Claro (Baeza 4393). (B) Alstroemeria ligtu subsp. simsii, Maule region, Talca, Río Claro (Baeza 4395). (C) Alstroemeria magnifica var. sierrae, Coquimbo region, Caleta Hornos (Baeza 4375). (D) Alstroemeria x chrysantha, Coquimbo region, Huanaqueros (Baeza 4376). Photos A and B by C. Baeza; C and D by V. Finot.

The colorimetric differences between A. magnifica and A. pulchra as shown in the reflectance spectra were due mainly to the parameters a* and b* indicating that A. magnifica have tepals comparatively more intense violet than those of A. pulchra var. maxima. Our results suggest that the color of the flowers can be used as a new taxonomic character in Alstroemeria and that var. maxima probably belongs to A. pulchra as originally proposed and not to A. magnifica [29]. Colorimetric studies were carried out also in A. presliana [30]. This species comprises two subspecies: subsp. presliana and subsp. australis. Alstroemeria presliana subsp. presliana grows in Chile (Regions of Maule and Biobío) and Argentina (Neuqén) [34]; subsp. australis in endemic to Chile (Regions of Biobío and Araucanía) [11, 14].

Although the color of the flowers is one of the most important characters to distinguish the subspecies [11], there is a huge variability in color in the flowers of both subspecies. Differences in the spectral reflectance curves were detected between 440 and 540 nm and between 660 and 700 nm in the outer and lower inner tepals. Upper internal tepals differ mainly between 640 and 700 nm. The color measured in the CIELab space is related to the content of anthocyanins so that the flowers containing delphinidin-3-glucosides take on a more blue hue than those containing exclusively cyanidin-3-glucosides [35]. The presence of delphinidin-3-glucosides detected in subsp. presliana but not in subsp. australis [27] could explain the bluer hue observed in subsp. presliana in comparison with subsp. australis and the difference observed in the parameter b*, which takes negative values in subsp. presliana and positive values in subsp. australis both in outer and lower inner tepals. On the other hand, in the upper inner tepals, b* was positive (yellow), reaching higher values in subsp. australis and therefore denoting a more intense yellow color in subsp. australis than in subsp. presliana [30].

3.3. Geographical distribution

In Chile, there are 38 species of Alstroemeria and 16 infraspecific taxa (8 subspecies and 8 varieties) and 1 nothospecies (A. x chrysantha) [23]. Nevertheless, more than 116 species have been described, most of which are considered synonyms or are names of uncertain application because there is no original material (types) in herbaria (see Checklist below). The description of such high number of taxa can be explained by the extent of morphological variation, especially of the flowers, which harbors most of the characters useful to taxonomy, and because microevolutionary processes are still active so that species are not yet completely separated. Chile shares only few taxa with its neighboring countries (Argentina, Bolivia and Peru). In Peru, five species have been mentioned [14, 36, 37], one of which is also present in Chile: A. violacea. In Bolivia, three species are found, one of which growth in Chile: A. aurea ([38], under A. aurantiaca). In Argentina, there are 10 species [34], 5 shared with Chile: A. andina var. venustula, A. aurea, A. patagonica, A. presliana subsp. presliana, A. pseudospathulata. Thus, more than 88% of the genus is represented by taxa endemic to Chile (Figure 4). In Chile, Alstroemeria spreads from 20°S (Tarapacá Region) to 53°S (Magallanes Region) [14, 23]. Most taxa have a very restricted distribution in Chile (Table 1). The vast majority of the species are distributed in north (Tarapacá-Coquimbo) and central (Valparaíso-Biobío) Chile (Figure 5); only six species growth in southern Chile (Araucanía-Magallanes). The most boreal taxa are A. lutea and A. violacea that reach the Region of Tarapacá (20°S) in northern Chile. Alstroemeria lutea is restricted to the coast of the Tarapacá Region (Iquique) whereas A. violacea extends southern to 28°S in the Atacama Region; this species if known also from Peru (Arequipa) [14, 23, 37]. The regions with the largest number of taxa are Atacama (14 taxa), Coquimbo (26), Valparaíso (19) and Metropolitan (14) (Figure 6). The number of taxa decreases abruptly southern the Maule Region where 12 taxa are found; in Los Ríos and Los Lagos, only one species has been collected (A. aurea) and A. patagonica is found in Aysén and Magallanes being the most austral species of the genus Alstroemeria in the world. The latter species grow from 46°30′S to 52°45′S [14] and also in Argentina (Neuquén to Tierra del Fuego) [14, 34]. Alstroemeria aurea is the species with the widest distribution in Chile (this species spreads over 10 regions, from the O’Higgins Region, 34°12′S to Torres del Paine National Park, Magallanes Region, 51°21′S). Alstroemeria revoluta, the second widely distributed species, spreads from Valparaíso (La Campana National Park, 32°57′S) to Araucanía Region (Traiguén-Galvarino, 38°16′S) and A. versicolor ranges from the Metropolitan Region (Rio Clarillo National Reserve, 33°40′S) to Araucanía (Malleco, Renaico, 37°48′S). With these exceptions, most species show very narrow distribution, some of them being confined to a single region, such as A. lutea (Tarapacá Region), A. kingii, A. philippi var. albicans and A. polyphylla (Atacama Region), A. andina var. venustula, A. hookeri subsp. maculata, A. magnifica, A. schizanthoides var. alba and A. mollensis, A. traudliae (Coquimbo Region), A. marticorenae (Valparaíso Region), A. achirae (Maule Region), A. hookeri subsp. sansebastiana (Biobío Region), A. presliana subsp. australis (Araucanía Region, Nahuelbuta National Park). For the latitudinal distribution of each species, see reference ([14], Figure 5). Altitudinally, the genus Alstroemeria spreads from the sea level to nearly 4000 m.a.s.l. although most species are found below 2000 m.a.s.l. Alstroemeria andina, A. crispata, A. exerens, A. pallida, A. parvula, A. spathulata and A. umbellata can be found above 3000 m of elevation.

Figure 4.

Species diversity of Alstroemeria in South America.

1A. achiraex
2aA. andina var. andinaxx
2bA. andina var. venustulax
3aA. angustifolia var. angustifoliaxx
3bA. angustifolia var. velutinaxx
4A. aureaxxxxxxxxx
5A. citrinaxx
6A. crispataxx
7A. cummingianaxx
8A. dilutaxxxx
9A. exerensxxx
10A. garaventaexx
11A. gramineaxx
12aA. hookeri subsp. hookerixxx
12bA. hookeri subsp. maculatax
12cA. hookeri subsp. recumbensxx
12dA. hookeri subsp. sansebastianax
13A. kingiix
14A. leporinaxx
15aA. ligtu subsp. ligtuxxx
15bA. ligtu subsp. simsiixxxx
15cA. ligtu subsp. splendensxx
16A. luteax
17A. magentaxx
18aA. magnifica var. magnificax
18bA. magnifica var. sierraex
18cA. magnifica var. tofoensisx
19A. marticorenaex
20A. mollensisx
21A. pallidaxx
22A. parvulaxx
23A. patagonicaxx
24A. pelegrinaxx
25aA. philippi subsp. adrianaexx
25bA. philippii var. albicansx
25cA. philippii var. philippiixx
26A. polyphyllax
27aA. presliana subsp. australisx
27bA. presliana subsp. preslianaxxx
28A. pseudospathulatax
29aA. pulchra subsp. lavandulaceaxx
29bA. pulchra subsp. pulchraxxxxx
29cA. pulchra var. maximaxxx
30A. revolutaxxxxxxx
31aA. schizanthoides var. albax
31bA. schizanthoides var. schizanthoidesxx
32A. spathulataxxx
33A. traudliaex
34A. umbellataxx
35A. versicolorxxxxxx
36A. violaceaxxx
37aA. werdermannii subsp. flavicansxx
37bA. werdermannii subsp. werdermanniixx
38A. x chrysanthaxxx
39A. zoellnerixx

Table 1.

Presence (x) of the accepted species of Alstroemeria in the administrative political regions of Chile.

AYP = Arica-Parinacota Region; TAR = Tarapacá Region; ANT = Antofagasta Region; ATA = Atacama Region; COQ = Coquimbo Region; VAL = Valparaíso Region; RME = Metropolitan Region; LBO = O’Higgins Region; MAU = Maule Region; NUB = Ñuble Region; BIO = Biobío Region; ARA = Araucanía Region; LRI = Los Ríos Region; LLA = Los Lagos Region; AYS = Aysén Region; MAG = Magallanes and Antártica Chilena Region.

Figure 5.

Distribution of the genus Alstroemeria in Chile. Each point represents at least one collection housed in the herbarium of the University of Concepción, Chile (CONC).

Figure 6.

Number of taxa in the 16 administrative regions of Chile. For regions names see Table 1.


4. Cytogenetic studies in Chilean Alstroemeria

Cytogenetic studies in Alstroemeria have proved to be useful in delimiting species, since each studied taxon has a unique karyotype. These studies have contributed to the delimitation of the different taxa, as well as to the understanding of the chromosomal processes that determine the divergence among them [39]. Recent studies at the infraspecific level, in taxonomic complexes of the genus, have also been shown to be useful in the recognition of these taxa, either due to differences in the chromosomal architecture or in the asymmetry indexes of the chromosomes [40, 41]. Strasburger [42] was the first researcher to perform chromosome studies in Alstroemeria and until 1989 the number of cytological published papers involved no more than 10 different species [43]. In the last 25 years, a wide variety of cytogenetic studies have been carried out in the genus, including physical location of repetitive DNA sequences in A. aurea [16, 44, 45], meiosis and mitosis [46], karyology [47, 48, 49], variation and size of the genome [50], fluorescent in situ hybridization [39, 51, 52] and cytotaxonomy [40, 41, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58]. In 15 geographically isolated populations of five species of Alstroemeria (A. aurea, A. hookeri, A. ligtu, A. pelegrina and A. presliana) collected in Chile, karyotypes and variation of RAPD markers have been investigated. Tandemly repeated DNA sequences—5S and 18/25S rDNA genes and the sequence A001-1 were used to characterize karyotypes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Ten somatic metaphases per population were used for measurement of chromosome length. Differences in RAPD marker bands were used for characterization of populations, creating a similarity index. FISH with all three DNA probes shows a high degree of polymorphism among and sometimes also within accessions of A. aurea, A. hookeri and A. ligtu. The number of chromosome pairs showing 5S rDNA signals is more different for the investigated species A. aurea, A. hookeri, A. ligtu, A. pelegrina and A. presliana with 5, 7, 5, 3 and 7, respectively, than the number of 18/25S rDNA signals in this succession with 7, 7, 6, 5 and 7 chromosome pairs, showing a high evolutionary dynamics within the genus. Furthermore, among the four populations of A. hookeri, accession 4181 was different in arm length of chromosome 3. RAPD markers (index of similarity) also showed a greater genetic distance of accession 4181 from the other three accessions of A. hookeri [39].

The study of the chromosomes in Alstroemeria has already helped to clarify a number of taxonomic issues within the genus. For example, study of karyotypes in the A. hookeri complex permitted change a subspecies to the species rank (A. cummingiana), the recognition of a new subspecies (A. hookeri subsp. sansebastiana) and description of a new species (A. marticorenae) [19, 22, 40, 41]. Similar situation occurred in the A. presliana complex, where after completing a comparative karyotypic study in 11 populations, it was suggested that A. presliana subsp. australis, endemic to the cordillera of Nahuelbuta, should be raised to species rank [18].

A number of cytological studies have been completed in the Alstroemeria ligtu complex. Buitendijik and Ramanna [16] and Buitendjik et al. [50] found variation in the DNA content and polymorphism of C bands in the chromosomes of subsp. ligtu, subsp. simsii and subsp. splendens. Zhou et al. [51], utilizing FISH, completed the characterization of the genomic DNA of eight highly repetitive sequences in subsp. ligtu and simsii, showing detailed karyotypes with localization of specific DNA sequences. DAPI staining and acetic orcein, completed a comparative karyotype study of five populations of subsp. ligtu from the Region of Biobío and one population of subsp. simsii from the Region of Valparaiso [39]. The six populations studied revealed an asymmetric karyotype with 2n = 2x = 16 chromosomes. The populations of subsp. ligtu have a haploid formula of four metacentric chromosomes (chromosomes 1 and 2 with microsatellites), one submetacentric with a microsatellite and three telocentric with microsatellites. The population of subsp. simsii is characterized by having five metacentric chromosomes (chromosome 2 with a microsatellite and 6 with a secondary constriction) and three telocentric chromosomes with satellites. Baeza et al. [39] analyzed four populations of subsp. ligtu, defining localization on the chromosomes of the ribosomal genes 5S and 18-45S. Low polymorphic hybridization sites were detected in the populations, and only chromosome 1 presented a polymorphic site of 5S and 18/25S rDNA in the proximal and distal positions, respectively. Three subspecies are recognized within A. ligtu complex: subsp. ligtu, subsp. splendens and subsp. simsii. Fourteen populations were collected throughout its distributional range. Chromosome number, karyotype formulae, karyotypes, ideograms, intrachromosomal asymmetry index MCA, and interchromosomal asymmetry index CVCL were calculated [57, 58]. All studied populations showed 2n = 2x = 16 chromosomes. Subspecies ligtu and simsii are clearly differentiated from each other in MCA and together from subsp. splendens with CVCL. Intrachromosomal asymmetry index revealed two population groups within subsp. splendens. These populations also differ in karyotype formulae, habitat, soil type and distribution. We concluded that a fourth subspecies should be described from populations located in the lower part of the cordillera de los Andes in the Region of Maule. Populations of higher elevations correspond to those already described as subsp. splendens [57]. A comparative karyotype study was carried out among four populations of A. diluta subsp. diluta and three populations of A. diluta subsp. chrysantha. The seven populations presented an asymmetric karyotype, with 2n = 2x = 16 chromosomes, and with same karyotype formulae: 3 m + 1sm + 1st + 3 t. The architecture of the karyotype between the subspecies is the same. The scatter plot among MCA versus CVCL shows different groupings between populations of the two subspecies, and the total chromosomes length (TCL) is highest in the populations of subsp. chrysantha. According to the results obtained, the populations growing in Valparaíso Region should be considered belong to subsp. diluta [58]. We analyzed the karyotypes of 10 populations of A. magnifica complex along its natural distribution. All the populations showed an asymmetric karyotype, with 2n = 16 chromosomes but with 3 different karyotype formulae. Alstroemeria magnifica var. magnifica and A. magnifica var. sierrae presented the same karyotype formula, and A. magnifica var. magenta and A. magnifica var. tofoensis each had a different formula. The scatter plot among CVCL versus MCA shows different groupings between populations of the four varieties. Based on these results it is possible to consider raising Alstroemeria magnifica var. magenta to species rank and A. magnifica var. tofoensis to subspecies; A. magnifica var. magnifica and A. magnifica var. sierrae should each remain as varieties. Nevertheless, these taxonomic changes should be considered tentative, as additional sources of evidence become available.


5. Molecular studies in Alstroemeria

During recent years, an increasing accessibility to molecular data and the development of a vast range of bioinformatics analysis has favored the successful implementation of genetic tools in the identification and conservation of biological diversity [59]. Dominant molecular markers based on random fragment alleles e.g. Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR), Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) have been used for characterizing genetic diversity in Alstroemeria [60, 61, 62], becoming the marker of choice for the identification of cultivar varieties with ornamental value [63, 64, 65] and conducting population genetic analyses [66, 67]. The use of DNA sequences has been more related to the construction of phylogenetic hypotheses and establishment of biogeographic patterns [8, 9]. Interestingly, near 30% of the Chilean species of Alstroemeria form species complexes, comprising from two to four infraspecific taxa each. This pattern is likely explained by adaptation to a wide range of environmental heterogeneity present in Chile [68], which is possibly driving processes of microevolutionary divergence [14]. Given the complexity of interpreting the integrity within and among these species complexes, we started several initiatives for applied genetic studies with the purpose of disentangling the discernibility of intraspecific patterns of divergence, especially in groups highly regarded for their ornamental and conservation value.

5.1. Molecular markers in assessing genetic diversity for conservation in Alstroemeria

A priority goal in conservation is to evaluate levels of apportionment of genetic diversity in targeted species, given the association between population genetic diversity and their potential for local adaptation and evolutionary resilience. Genetic variability is the result of the dynamics of gene flow, for which a homogeneous distribution of allelic frequencies is expected under high levels of gene flow among populations [69]. Interestingly, this situation is rarely found in nature, since the strong effect that geographic isolation and selection represents for local populations of plants. As a result, it is not surprising that peripheral populations tend to increase gene differentiation and population structure levels; hence, contributing to the local isolation that eventually could result in different isolated species (Figure 7) [69].

Figure 7.

Cytogenetic studies in Chilean Alstroemeria. (A) Mitotic metaphase of Alstroemeria hookeri Ssp. hookeri. (B) Mitotic metaphase of Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. hookeri using 5S genes. (C) Mitotic metaphase of Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. hookeri using 18-25S genes. (D) Mitotic metaphase of Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. hookeri using A001 genes. (E) Ideogramm of Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. hookeri showing genes 5S, 18-25S, and A001 (FISH). (F) Karyotypes of Alstroemeria presliana: above, A. presliana ssp. presliana; below, A. presliana ssp. australis.

Such patterns of isolation and divergence are no exception in Alstroemeria, for which high levels of structuration are documented. For example, Alstroemeria hookeri represents a species complex that comprises four subspecies, two of them (subspecies recumbens and maculata) distributed in North-Central of Chile and two (subspecies hookeri and sansebastiana) in southern Chile. Based on ISSR (Inter Simple Sequence Repeat) markers, high levels of population structure were found among southern subspecies (Figure 8, Table 2); also concomitant with previous findings found with allozymes markers [67]. Similarly, high levels of within population diversity was found in A. presliana complex using AFLP markers (Table 2), exhibiting significant levels of among population variability and moderate levels of genetic population structure (Table 2). This complex comprises of two varieties (var. presliana and var. australis), both separately distributed across Coastal and Andean mountain ranges in Chile (Figure 9). The results from both complexes showed the existence of two heterogeneous genetic groups with no evident spatial congruence suggesting genetic differentiation among varieties or subspecies. Interestingly, several populations are individually differentiated in their genetic profiles, despite of occurring closely enough with other neighbored populations to sustain substantial levels of gene flow (Figure 9).

Figure 8.

Population structure inferred with ISSR in the A. hookeri complex. Bar plots colors represent levels of genetic membership (k = 2) in each individual per sampled population, as inferred under Bayesian admixture inference criterion with the program STRUCTURE [70].

SpeciesSubspeciesHeFstAMOVA (%)Marker/source
Within pop.Among pop.
A. hookerihookeri0.0520.58241.7158.28Allozymes/Ruiz et al. [67]
A. preslianapresliana0.2000.17182.9117.0AFLP/unpublished

Table 2.

Genetic diversity values obtained with allozymes and DNA markers (fragments analyses), for A. hookeri and A. presliana complexes.

Figure 9.

Population structure inferred with AFLP in the A. presliana Complex. Bar plots colors represent levels of genetic membership (k = 2) in each individual per sampled population, as inferred under Bayesian admixture inference criterion with the program STRUCTURE [70].

Among explanations of the observed patterns of genetic diversity found in Alstroemeria, strategies of reproduction and dispersal become plausible enough to be considered. Alstroemeria species have a restricted capacity of seed and pollen dispersal [66], which in combination with their vegetative reproduction by rhizomes [14, 67], could contribute to maintaining restricted levels of gene flow and sustaining high levels of genetic structure among populations [67]. The sum of these factors implies that local populations could be subject to strong geographic and ecological isolation, which would explain the diversity of infraspecific taxa found in this and other species complexes [67]. In general, moderate to high levels of among population genetic diversity were detected in the studied Alstroemeria species complexes. From a conservation perspective, this pattern suggests that protection initiatives should consider as many populations as possible, in order to preserve the largest proportion of total species genetic diversity.

5.2. Molecular phylogenetic studies in Alstroemeria

Phylogenetic studies provide a theoretical framework to understand the relationships among populations and species. It is desirable that taxa must represent monophyletic lineages, thus reflecting the genetic, evolutionary and biogeographical integrity of lineages and species. Under such premise, several phylogenetic studies in Alstroemeria have been conducted integrating a diverse array of molecular, morphological and cytological data [8, 9]. Chacón et al. [8] conducted the most recent and comprehensive phylogenetic studies in genus Alstroemeria, based on DNA sequences and cytological data. From taxonomic and evolutionary perspective, three are the most relevant results: (1) Samples belonging to the same species were retrieved as monophyletic; (2) a biogeographic break exists between Brazilian and Chilean species groups and (3) a relatively recent divergence has occurred with the most species of the genus, being diverged during the last 8 millions of years. Interestingly, some of these results have been confirmed from previous initiatives, especially those reflecting the monophyly of the Brazilian species group with alternative molecular markers (i.e., AFLP) [61].

Despite the promising of these results, species from the Chilean group were mostly underrepresented, making difficult to obtain relevant evidence of local patterns of diversification, particularly to those depicting evolutionary trends or taxonomic integrity in species complexes. Nonetheless, while some progress has been achieved scrutinizing chloroplast sequences (rpl32-trnl), discordant results challenge the hypothesis integrity previously stated in several of these groups. While Alstroemeria hookeri and A. presliana complexes are retrieved as monophyletic clades, other groups like A. magnifica and A. ligtu are retrieved as paraphyletic (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Maximum clade credibility tree (MCCT) inferred with the combination of chloroplast regions (trnL-S, rpl32-trnL, petA) for five species complexes of Alstroemeria, calculated with Bayesian inference criterion inferred with Mr. Bayes 3.2 [71]. Each tip represents an individual sampled per population and labels on branches depict posterior probabilities for each clade.

5.3. Molecular markers in eliciting taxonomic status in Alstroemeria species complex

The delimitation of species is a fundamental step for conducting natural and applied sciences, as they represent the main study unit for most areas of research (global evaluations of biodiversity, assessment and initiatives for biological conservation, etc.) [72]. In this sense, molecular approaches in taxonomy have been used under the assumption that observed divergent patterns of genetic variation are the direct result of breaks in gene flow, leading to phenotypic and genotypic differences that sustain isolated and differentiated species and populations [69]. The simultaneous use of multiple molecular markers and criteria of delimitation has improved the taxonomic work, particularly helping to contextualize the role of microevolutionary processes in the species generation. As previously stated, species of Alstroemeria share attributes that could heavily influence patterns of micro evolutionary isolation and divergence, such as restricted seed and pollen dispersal and vegetative reproduction by rhizomes. Therefore, the wide distribution of taxonomic complexes in areas with contrasting topography and climatic conditions implies the existence of restrictions for gene flow, where substantial effects of ecogeographic isolation and divergence are expected in local diversification patterns [67]. Hence, micro evolutionary processes are currently underway and active [14], probably producing decoupled or unnoticeable patterns of divergence. Traditional taxonomic treatment in Alstroemeria has heavily relied on the interpretation of floral diversity and vegetative attributes, which has resulted in an important number of recognized taxa and species complexes described [14]. Nonetheless, because active of micro-evolutionary divergence may not ensure congruence among the diverse phenotypic and genotypic characters, it is likely that an under or overrepresentation of taxa is currently occurring in Alstroemeria. Therefore, given that molecular data could reflect patterns of divergence more accordingly to the dynamic of local gene flow, an interesting approach is to evaluate taxonomic boundaries integrating both molecular and phenotypic data as potential taxonomic characters. Recent molecular and phenotypic integrated studies conducted in Alstroemeria complexes resulted beneficial when multiple sources of evidence are placed to solve questions about the integrity or the validity of previous taxonomic treatments. For example, when morphometric, cytogenetic and molecular data were employed in A. hookeri complex taxa [41, 67], all analyzed characters were partially consistent with the recognition of the new subspecies Alstroemeria hookeri subsp. sansebastiana [22], and supported the hypothesis of Muñoz & Moreira [14] of elevating Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. cummingiana to species level. Subsequent investigations were also conducted in other three complexes (A. ligtu, A. magnifica and A. presliana), eliciting similar evidence with significant taxonomic impact. In the A. magnifica complex, evidence from morphology, colorimetry and cytology support the change of the taxonomic status of A. magnifica var. magenta. Preliminary analyses based on chloroplast sequences (rpl32-trnL) also supported this observation, validating the separation of var. magenta from the other A. magnifica varieties (Figure 11). In the A. ligtu complex, a new entity was discovered based on cytogenetic data, and its taxonomic status was redefined [57, 58]. The molecular data, based on chloroplast DNA (rpl32-trnL region) support the separation of Coastal populations of A. ligtu subsp. ligtu from populations of the inland distribution range (Figure 12). Finally, in A. presliana, same chloroplast markers also confirm the lack of structure observed with AFLP data; nonetheless, both of them seem not concordant with previous studies conducted with phenotypic data [18, 30]. It is likely that different sources of divergence are shaping idiosyncratic processes of differentiation among species complexes of Alstroemeria, suggesting that a case by case evaluation might be required before reaching a consensus for a more genus-wide taxonomic perspective.

Figure 11.

Haplotype network inferred with trnL-F chloroplast spacer for individuals sampled from population of A. magnifica species complex. Network was constructed under parsimony criteria with TCS [73], as implemented in PopART [74].

Figure 12.

Haplotype network inferred with trnL-F chloroplast spacer for individuals sampled from population of A. ligtu species complex. Network was constructed under parsimony criteria with TCS [73], as implemented in PopART.

5.4. Perspectives and future work

Previous studies have demonstrated that a consensus about the integrity of the taxa of Alstroemeria is far from being reached, as different patterns of differentiation may difficult to be elicited separately. In this sense, molecular markers have provided a natural framework to contextualize their evolutionary process, reconciling discordance observed from different character sources. Nonetheless, despite of their utility, molecular markers are not exempt of limitations that should be addressed in subsequent studies. One of the main limitations to reach a robust taxonomic hypothesis is the recurrent difficulty to obtain consistent molecular markers adaptable enough for interspecific and intraspecific analyses. These difficulties arise from the extraordinary large and complex genomic architecture of Alstroemeria, which is likely comprised of a large proportion of repetitive DNA (18–34 pg.) [17]. Our experience suggests that most nuclear markers tend to recurrently fail to retrieve single and readable copies through recurrent Sanger sequencing techniques, especially for the Internal Transcribed Spacer or ITS. Similarly, fragment analyses also exhibit levels of difficulties for consistent scoring, since the effect that repetitive DNA has in the proportion of cut sites with restriction enzymes [17]. Since a more widespread consensus exist about the necessity of integrating different sources of molecular evidence and methodologies in species delimitation analyses [75], further work is required in the design of reliable and stable molecular markers for the study of natural species of Alstroemeria.

With the onset of new and more accessible technologies for genome sequencing (Next Generation Sequencing or NGS), new possibilities have opened for the generation of more representative analyses of genetic diversity [76, 77]. Unfortunately, such techniques have been not widely implemented in Alstroemeria, except important breakthroughs like the sequencing and the annotation of the chloroplast genome in A. aurea [78]. The generation of single nuclear polymorphisms (SNP) in non-model organisms has been the approach of choice for high-throughput genome sequencing, adding improved genome representation and resolution for inter and intraspecific levels relationships [79]. The implementation of SNPs might result in a significant improvement in the estimation of genetic diversity and species limits in Alstroemeria, as SNPs represent codominant markers capable of providing a higher statistical power and an easier species comparability considering the available genomic resources compared to AFLP [80]. For taxonomic purposes, SNP could greatly improve the use of DNA barcodes to identify species through the use of specific DNA regions, especially when traditional approaches of taxonomy fail [81]. Obviously, the use of NGS and SNP techniques in Alstroemeria requires adjustments to overcome the limitations imposed by genome size and complexity, for which recent alternatives have been shown from the study of other equally complex organisms [82]. As such, the perspective of solving the taxonomic problems with molecular techniques in Alstroemeria remains promising, yet keeping in perspective its own limitations and challenges to reach the require tools to finally approach the inherent dynamics of macro and micro evolutionary patterns in this group.


6. Concluding remarks

Genetic divergence and population structure estimated with AFLPs and ISSR, have demonstrated the importance of molecular markers for conservation purposes in Alstroemeria. Integrative use of molecular data with other source of evidence (morphology, cytology and morphometry) give a best interpretation of lineage divergence with better argumentation for taxonomic delimitation in species complexes of Alstroemeria. Due to the high proportion of species complex in genus Alstroemeria in Chile, is necessary to carry out phylogenetic studies including the most infraspecifc taxa and more representative sampling, in addition with a major representation of the genome in the analyses. More efforts are needed in producing more stable molecular markers, in order to further implement integrative analyses. In this sense, it is likely that NGS will play a pivotal role helping to overcome present limitations of molecular work in Alstroemeria.



We gratefully acknowledge the Curators and Director of the Herbarium CONC for providing access to the studied specimens. This work was supported by the projects Fondecyt 1130349 “Morphological, molecular and cytogenetic overview of some species complexes of the genus Alstroemeria in Chile” and VRID-ENLACE 217.111.063-1.0 “Integrative taxonomy in the genus Alstroemeria L. (Alstroemeriaceae): The use of morphological, colorimetric, cytological and molecular approaches on several Chilean complexes”. We acknowledge Nicolás Villalobos for technical support.



Checklist of the Chilean species of Alstroemeria

Accepted names were written in bold, synonyms in italics. Names written in normal fonts corresponds to those whose acceptance or status has not yet been clarified. (E) = Endemic to Chile. (N) = Native.

  1. Alstroemeria achirae Muñoz-Schick & Brink, Gayana, Bot. 57(1): 56. 2000 (E)

  2. Alstroemeria albiflora C. Presl, Reliq. Haenk. 1(2): 121. 1827 = Alstroemeria pallida Graham

  3. Alstroemeria amoena Salisb., Prodr. Stirp. Chap. Allerton 248. 1796 = Alstroemeria pelegrina L.

  4. Alstroemeria andina Phil., Linnaea 29: 69. 1858.

    1. subsp. venustula (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 74. 1987 = Alstroemeria andina Phil. var. venustula (Phil.) Muñoz-Schick, Not. Mens. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. 352: 22. 2003.

    2. var. andina (E)

    3. var. venustula (Phil.) Muñoz-Schick, Not. Mens. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. 352: 22. 2003. (N)

  5. Alstroemeria angustifolia Herb., Amaryllidaceae 96. 1837.

    1. subsp. velutina Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 165. 1987.

    2. var. acuminata Herb., Amaryllidaceae 97. 1837 = Alstroemeria angustifolia var. angustifolia

    3. var. angustifolia (E)

    4. var. conferta Herb., Amaryllidaceae 97. 1837 = Alstroemeria angustifolia var. angustifolia

    5. var. intermedia Herb., Amaryllidaceae 97. 1837 = Alstroemeria angustifolia var. angustifolia

    6. var. solliana Herb., Amaryllidaceae 97. 1837 = Alstroemeria angustifolia var. angustifolia

    7. var. velutina (Ehr. Bayer) Muñoz-Schick, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 165. 1987. (E)

  6. Alstroemeria aulica Ravenna, Onira 4(10): 41. 2000.

  7. Alstroemeria aurantiaca D. Don, Brit. Fl. Gard., ser. 2, t. 205. 1835 Alstroemeria aurea Graham

  8. Alstroemeria araucana Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 43: 547. 1873 Alstroemeria aurea Graham

  9. Alstroemeria aurea Graham, Edinburgh Philos. J. 181. 1833. (N)

    1. var. valparadisiaca Herb., Amaryllidaceae 98. 1837 = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  10. Alstroemeri aurea Meyen, Reise Erde 1: 311. 1834, hom. Illeg. = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  11. Alstroemeria bicolor Hook., Exot. Fl. 2(9): t. 95. 1824 = Alstroemeria pulchra Sims subsp. pulchra

  12. Alstroemeria bilabiata Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 282. 1988.

  13. Alstroemeria cantillanica Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 285. 1988.

  14. Alstroemeria chilensis Lem., Fl. Serres 1(5): 98. 1845 = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. ligtu

  15. Alstroemeria chillanensis Grau & Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 18: 220. 1982 = Alstroemeria presliana Herb. subsp. presliana

  16. Alstroemeria chiloensis Phil., Linnaea 29: 71. 1858 = Alstroemeria aurea Graham

  17. Alstroemeria ciliata Poepp., Fragm. Syn. Pl. 6. 1833 = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  18. Alstroemeria citrina Phil., Linnaea 22: 264. 1864 (E)

  19. Alstroemeria concolor Steud., Berberid. Amer. Austr. 53. 1857

  20. Alstroemeria x chrysantha (Ehr. Bayer) J.M. Watson & A.R. Flores, Fl. Silvtr. Chile 1: 90. 2015.(E)

  21. Alstroemeria crispata Phil., Linnaea 29: 70. 1858 (E)

  22. Alstroemeria crocea Phil., Linnaea 33: 262. 1864, non Ruiz & Pav. 1802 = Alstroemeria pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer

  23. Alstroemeria cummingiana Herb., Amaryllidaceae 96. 183 (E)

  24. Alstroemeria decora Ravenna, Onira 4(10): 42. 2000.

  25. Alstroemeria dentata Klotzsch ex Kunth, Enum. Pl. 5: 780. 1850, nom. Nud. = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  26. Alstroemeria diazii Phil., Linnaea 33: 261. 1864 = Alstroemeria exerens Meyen

  27. Alstroemeria diazii auct. Non Phil., Fl. Patagonica 2: 162. 1969 = Alstroemeria presliana Herb. subsp. presliana

  28. Alstroemeria diluta Ehr. Bayer, Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 178. 1987

    1. subsp. chrysantha Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 178. 1987 (E= Alstroemeria x chrysantha (Ehr. Bayer) J.M. Watson & A.R. Flores

    2. subsp. diluta (E)

  29. Alstroemeria discolor Ravenna, Onira 4(10): 44. 2000.

  30. Alstroemeria epulauquensis Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 283. 1988 = Alstroemeria presliana Herb. subsp. presliana

  31. Alstroemeria exerens Meyen, Reise Erde 1: 34. 1834 (E)

  32. Alstroemeria exserens Meyen, Reise Erde 1: 34. 1834 = Alstroemeria exerens Meyen

  33. Alstroemeria flava Phil., Linnaea 33: 263. 1864 = Alstroemeria ligtu subsp. ligtu

  34. Alstroemeria flos-martini Ker Gawl., Bot. Reg. 9: t. 731. 1823 = Alstroemeria pulchra Sims subsp. pulchra

  35. Alstroemeria garaventae Ehr. Bayer, Gattung Alstroemeria in Chile 60. 1987 (E)

  36. Alstroemeria gayana Phil., Linnaea 29: 71. 1857 = Alstroemeria magnifica Herb. var. magnifica

  37. Alstroemeria graminea Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 93: 161. 1896 (E)

  38. Alstroemeria haemantha Ruiz & Pav., Fl. Peruv. 3: 60. 1802 = Alstroemeria ligtu L.

    1. var. haemantha = Alstroemeria ligtu L.subsp. ligtu

    2. var. pilosa Herb., Amaryllidaceae 100. 1837 = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

    3. var. simsiana Herb., Amaryllidaceae 99. 1837 = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  39. Alstroemeria haemantha auct. Non Ruiz & Pav. = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  40. Alstroemeria herbertiana M. Roem., Fam. Nat. Syn. Monogr. 250. 1847 = Alstroemeria revoluta Ruiz & Pav.

  41. Alstroemeria hirtella Phil., Linnaea 29: 70. 1858, hom. Illeg. = Alstroemeria leporina Ehr. Bayer & Grau

  42. Alstroemeria hookeri Lodd., Bot. Cab. 13: t. 1272. 1827

    1. subsp. cummingiana (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 157. 1987 = Alstroemeria cummingiana Herb.

    2. subsp. hookeri (E)

    3. subsp. maculata Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 153. 1987 (E)

    4. subsp. recumbens (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 149. 1987 (E)

    5. subsp. sansebastiana C.M. Baeza & E. Ruiz, Gayana, Bot. 68(2): 313. 2011 (E)

  43. Alstroemeria hookeriana Schult., Syst. Veg. 7(1): 733. 1829 = Alstroemeria hookeri Lodd. subsp. hookeri

  44. Alstroemeria huemulina Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 285. 1988

  45. Alstroemeria inconspicua Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 43: 546. 1783 = Alstroemeria revoluta Ruiz & Pav.

  46. Alstroemeria jocunda Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 284. 1988

  47. Alstroemeria kingii Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 43: 548. 1873 (E)

  48. Alstroemeria lacrima-solis Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 283. 1988 = Alstroemeria pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer

  49. Alstroemeria leporina Ehr. Bayer & Grau, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 18: 222. 1982 (E)

  50. Alstroemeria ligtu L., Pl. Alströmeria 10. 1762.

    1. Fma. pulchra (Sims) Voss, Bot. Mag. 50: t. 2421. 1823[1822] = Alstroemeria pulchra Sims subsp. pulchra

    2. subsp. incarnata Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 131. 1987, nom. Illeg. = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. splendens Muñoz-Schick

    3. subsp. ligtu (E)

    4. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 122. 1987 (E)

    5. subsp. splendens Muñoz-Schick, Notic. Mens. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. 352: 22. 2003 (E)

    6. var. andina Phil., Linnaea 33: 261. 1864 = Alstroemeria pallida Graham

    7. var. pulchra (Sims) Baker, Handb. Amaryllideae: 139. 1888 = Alstroemeria pulchra Sims subsp. pulchra

  51. Alstroemeria ligtu auct. Non L., Trab. Inst. Bot. Farmacol. 33: 26. 1915 Alstroemeria aurea Graham

  52. Alstroemeria lothiana Utinet. J. Jardins Jahrgang 1841: 348. = Alstroemeria ligtu subsp. ligtu

  53. Alstroemeria lutea Muñoz-Schick, Gayana, Bot. 57(1): 55. 2000 (E)

  54. Alstroemeria macreana Herb., Amaryllidaceae 90. 1837 = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  55. Alstroemeria magenta Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 191. 1987 = Alstroemeria magnifica Herb. var. magenta (Ehr. Bayer) Muñoz-Schick

  56. Alstroemeria magnifica Herb., Bot. Reg. 29: 64. 1843

    1. subsp. gayana (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer, Gatt. Alstroemeria Chile 252. 1987[1986] = Alstroemeria magnifica Herb. var. magnifica

    2. var. magnifica (E)

    3. var. magenta (Ehr. Bayer) Muñoz-Schick, Notic. Mens. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. 352: 22. 2003 = Alstroemeria magenta Ehr. Bayer

    4. var. sierrae (Muñoz) Muñoz-Schick, Notic. Mens. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. 352: 22. 2003 (E)

    5. var. tofoensis Muñoz-Schick, Notic. Mens. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. 352: 22. 2003 (E)

  57. Alstroemeria magenta Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 191. 1987 (E)

  58. Alstroemeria magna Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 284. 1988

  59. Alstroemeria marticorenae Negritto & C.M. Baeza, Syst. Bot. 40(1): 70. 2015 (E)

  60. Alstroemeria meyeniana Schauer, Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. Suppl. 1: 440. 1843 = Alstroemeria versicolor Ruiz & Pav.

  61. Alstroemeria mollensis Muñoz-Schick & Brinck, Gayana, Bot. 60(2): 102. 2003 (E)

  62. Alstroemeria monantha Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 286. 1988

  63. Alstroemeria mutabilis Kunze, Enum. Pl. 5: 777. 1850 Alstroemeria aurea Graham

  64. Alstroemeria nana Rendle, J. Bot. 42: 325. 1904 = Alstroemeria patagonica Phil.

  65. Alstroemeria nidularis Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 282. 1988

  66. Alstroemeria nivalis Phil., Linnaea 29: 69. 1858, hom. Illeg. = Alstroemeria pallida Graham

  67. Alstroemeria nubigena Phil., Linnaea 29: 69. 1858 = Alstroemeria pallida Graham

  68. Alstroemeria oxyphylla Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 286. 1988, nom. Superfl. = Alstroemeria pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer

  69. Alstroemeria pallens Phil., Linnaea 33: 265. 1864 = Alstroemeria exerens Meyen

  70. Alstroemeria pallida Graham, Edinburgh New Philos. J. 344. 1829 (E)

  71. Alstroemeria parvula Phil., Linnaea 33: 261. 1864 (E)

  72. Alstroemeria patagonica Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 84: 160. 1894 (N)

    1. fma. Biflora Ravenna, Sellowia 19: 34. 1967 = Alstroemeria patagonica Phil.

  73. Alstroemeria paupercula Phil., Fl. Atacam. 51. = Alstroemeria violacea Phil.

  74. Alstroemeria pelegrina L., Sp. Pl. (ed. 2) 1: 461. 1762 (E)

    1. var. albescens Herb. Amaryllidaceae 91. 1837. = Alstroemeria pelegrina L.

  75. Alstroemeria philippii Baker, Handb. Amaryllidae 140. 1888

    1. subsp. adrianae J.M. Watson & A.R. Flores, Herbertia 63: 102. 2009[2010] (E)

    2. subsp. philippii (E)

    3. var. albicans Muñoz-Schick, Alstroemerias Chile 41. 2003 (E)

    4. var. philippii (E)

  76. Alstroemeria poetica Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 285. 1988

  77. Alstroemeria polpaicana Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 283. 1988

  78. Alstroemeria polyphylla Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 93: 160. 1896 (E)

  79. Alstroemeria presliana Herb., Enum. Pl. 5: 773. 1850

    1. subsp. presliana (N)

    2. subsp. australis Ehr. Bayer, Gatt. Alstroemeria Chile 122. 1987 (E)

  80. Alstroemeria pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 49. 1987 (N)

  81. Alstroemeria pulchella auct. Non L.f. = Alstroemeria ligtu subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  82. Alstroemeria pulchella L.f. var. pilosa Lindl., Edwards’s Bot. Reg. 17: t. 1410. 1831 = Alstroemeria ligtu subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  83. Alstroemeria pulchra Sims, Bot. Mag. 50, t. 2421. 1823[1822]

    1. subsp. lavandulacea Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 187. 1987 (E)

    2. subsp. maxima (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 202 t.14, 18. 1987 (E)

    3. subsp. pulchra (E)

    4. var. maxima Phil., Linnaea 33: 266. 1864–65 (E)

  84. Alstroemeria pygmaea auct. Non Herb., Svenska Exped. Magell. 3(5): 205. 1901 = Alstroemeria patagonica Phil.

  85. Alstroemeria quillotensis Herb., Amaryllidaceae 97, t.2., f.2, 1837 = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  86. Alstroemeria recumbens Herb., Amaryllidaceae 97, t.3. 1837 = Alstroemeria hookeri Lodd. subsp. recumbens (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer

  87. Alstroemeria reflexa M. Roem., Fam. Nat. Syn. Monogr. 4: 252. 1847 = Alstroemeria revoluta Ruiz & Pav.

  88. Alstroemeria revoluta Ruiz & Pav., Fl. Peruv. 3: 59. 1802 (E)

  89. Alstroemeria rosea Hook., Exot. Fl. 3(27): t.181. 1825 = Alstroemeria hookeri Lodd. subsp. hookeri

  90. Alstroemeria rosea Phil., Sert. Mendoc. Alt. 43. 1871 = Alstroemeria pallida Graham

  91. Alstroemeria sabulosa Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 281. 1988

  92. Alstroemeria schizanthoides Grau, Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 18: 213. 1982

    1. var. alba Muñoz-Schick, Notic. Mens. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. 352: 22. 2003 (E)

    2. var. schizanthoides (E)

  93. Alstroemeria sericantha Schauer, Nov. Actorum Acad. Caes. Nat. Cut. 19(Suppl. 1): 441. 1843 = Alstroemeria umbellata Meyen

  94. Alstroemeria sierrae Muñoz, Fl. Silvestr. Chile: 64. 1966 = Alstroemeria magnifica Herb. var. sierrae (Muñoz) Muñoz-Schick

  95. Alstroemeria simsii Spreng., Syst. Veg. [Sprengel] 2: 80. 1825 = Alstroemeria ligtu L. subsp. simsii (Spreng.) Ehr. Bayer

  96. Alstroemeria sotoana Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 93: 159. 1896 = Alstroemeria versicolor Ruiz & Pav.

  97. Alstroemeria spathulata C. Presl, Reliq. Haenk. 1(2): 122, t.22, f.2., 1827 (E)

  98. Alstroemeria spathulata auct. Non C. Presl, Fl. Patag. 2: 162. 1969 = Alstroemeria pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer

  99. Alstroemeria spectabilis Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 284. 1988

  100. Alstroemeria stenopetala Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 43: 547. 1873 Alstroemeria aurea Graham

  101. Alstroemeria timida Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 281. 1988

  102. Alstroemeria tigrina Phil., Linnaea 29: 68. 1857 = Alstroemeria versicolor Ruiz & Pav.

  103. Alstroemeria traudliae J.M. Watson & A.R. Flores, Fl. Sylvestr. Chil. 1: 118. 2015 (E)

  104. Alstroemeria tricolor Hook., Exot. Fl. 1(5): t. 65. 1823 = Alstroemeria pulchra Sims subsp. pulchra

  105. Alstroemeria umbellata Meyen, Reise Erde 1: 356. 1835 (E)

  106. Alstroemeria venusta Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 282. 1988

  107. Alstroemeria venustula Phil., Linnaea 33: 260. 1864 = Alstroemeria andina Phil. var. venustula (Phil.) Muñoz-Schick

  108. Alstroemeria versicolor Ruiz & Pav., Fl. Peruv. 3: 59. 1802 (E)

  109. Alstroemeria violacea Phil., Fl. Atacam. 51. 1860 (N)

  110. Alstroemeria violacea Knight & Perry, nom. Nud. = Alstroemeria violacea Phil.

  111. Alstroemeria werdermannii Ehr. Bayer, Gatt. Alstroemeria Chile 87. 1986[1987]

    1. var. werdermannii (E)

    2. var. flavicans Muñoz-Schick, Gayana, Bot. 57(1): 57, f.3. 2000 = A. werdermannii Ehr. Bayer subsp. flavicans (Muñoz-Schick) J.M. Watson & A.R. Flores (E)

    3. subsp. flavicans (Muñoz-Schick) J.M. Watson & A.R. Flores, Fl. Silvestr. Chile 1: 122. 2015.

  112. Alstroemeria xanthina Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 43: 546. 1873 = Alstroemeria versicolor Ruiz & Pav.

  113. Alstroemeria yaelae Ravenna, Phytologia 64(4): 282. 1988

  114. Alstroemeria zoellneri Ehr. Bayer, Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 24: 245, t. 143–144. 1987(E)

  115. Taltalia graminea (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer, Sendtnera 5: 7, f. 1–4. 1998 = Alstroemeria graminea Phil.


  1. 1. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2009;161:105-121
  2. 2. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2016;181:1-20
  3. 3. Stevens PF. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 12, July 2012. [Internet]. 2001. Available from [Accessed: Aug 9, 2017]
  4. 4. Watson L, Dallwitz MJ. The Families of Flowering Plants: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval. [Internet]. 1992. Available from: [Accessed: July 28, 2017]
  5. 5. Bayer E. Taltalia, eine neue Gattung in der Familie der Alstroemeriaceae. Sendtnera. 1998;5:5-14
  6. 6. Sanso AM, Xifreda C. Generic delimitation between Alstroemeria and Bomarea (Alstroemeriaceae). Annals of Botany. 2001;88:1057-1069
  7. 7. Camargo de Assis M. Neotropical Alstroemeriaceae. In: Milliken W, Klitgard W, Baracat A,editors. Neotropikey-Interactive Key and Information Resources for Flowering Plants of the Neotropics. [Internet]. 2009. Available from: [Accessed: July 28, 2017]
  8. 8. Chacón J, Camargo de Assis M, Meerow AW, Renner S. From East Gondwana to Central America: Historical biogeography of the Alstroemeriaceae. Journal of Biogeography. 2012a;39:1806-1818
  9. 9. Aagesen L, Sanso M. The phylogeny of the Alstroemeriaceae, based on morphology, rps16 Intron, and rbcL sequence data. Systematic Botany. 2003;28:47-69
  10. 10. Linnaeus C. Planta Alströmeria. Johannes Petrus Falck, Vestrogothus. Upsala. 1762:8
  11. 11. Bayer E. Die Gattung Alstroemeria in Chile. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung München. 1987;24:1-362
  12. 12. Aker S, Healy W. The phytogeography of the genus Alstroemeria. Herbertia. 1990;46:76-87
  13. 13. Meerow AW, Tombolato AFC, Meyer F. Two new species of Alstroemeria (Alstroemeriaceae) from Brazil. Brittonia. 1999;51:439-444
  14. 14. Muñoz-Schick M, Moreira A. Alstroemerias de Chile. Diversidad, Distribución y Conservación. Taller La Era: 2003. 140 p
  15. 15. Hofreiter A, Rodríguez EF. The Alstroemeriaceae of Peru and neighbouring areas. Revista Peruana de Biología. 2006;13:5-69
  16. 16. Buitendijk J, Ramanna M. Giemsa C-banded karyotypes of eight species of Alstroemeria L.and some of their hybrids. Annals of Botany. 1996;78:449-457
  17. 17. Buitendijk J, Boon E, Ramanna M. Nuclear DNA content in twelve species of Alstroemeria L.and some of their hybrids. Annals of Botany. 1997;79:343-353
  18. 18. Baeza CM, Finot VL, Ruiz E. Comparative karyotype analysis of populations in the Alstroemeria presliana Herbert (Alstroemeriaceae) complex in Chile. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2015;38:199-204
  19. 19. Negritto MA, Baeza CM, Ruiz E, Novoa P. Alstroemeria marticorenae (Alstroemeriaceae), a new species from Central Chile. Systematic Botany. 2015;40:69-74
  20. 20. Muñoz-Schick M. Novedades en la familia Alstroemeriaceae. Gayana Botanica. 2000;57:55-59
  21. 21. Watson JM, Flores AR. A rare new subspecies and change in rank in Alstroemeria L. (Alstroemeriaceae) for taxa narrowly endemic to Chile’s Atacama region. Herbertia. 2010;63:101-117
  22. 22. Baeza CM, Ruiz E. Alstroemeria hookeri Lodd. Subsp. sansebastiana C. Baeza & E. Ruiz, new for the Chilean flora. Gayana Botanica. 2011;68:313-315
  23. 23. Hoffmann A, Watson J, Flores A. Flores silvestres de Chile. Cuando el desierto florece. Vol. 1. Monocotiledóneas y otros taxones. Fundación Claudio Gay. 2015. 263 pp
  24. 24. Arroyo MTK, Marquet P, Marticorena C, Simonetti J, Cavieres L, Squeo F, Rozzi R, Massardo F. El hotspot chileno, prioridad mundial para la conservación. In: Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente, editors. Biodiversidad de Chile: Patrimonio y Desafíos. Ocho Libros Editores Ltd., Santiago de Chile. 2006. pp. 94-97
  25. 25. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, De Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853-858
  26. 26. Molina JA. Compendio de la Historia Geográfica Natural y Civil del Reyno de Chile, Primera Parte. Madrid: Imprenta de Sancha; 1788 418 pp
  27. 27. Norbaek R, Christensen LP, Bojesen G, Brandt K. Anthocyanins in Chilean species of Alstroemeria. Phytochemistry. 1996;42:97-100
  28. 28. Abdelaziz M, Lorite J, Muñoz-Pajares AJ, Herrador MB, Perfectti M, Gómez JM. Using complementary techniques to distinguish cryptic species: A new Erysimum (Brassicaceae) species from North Africa. American Journal of Botany. 2011;98:1049-1060
  29. 29. Finot VL, Baeza CM, Melín P, Novoa P, Campos J, Ruiz E, Fuentes G, Albornoz P, Carrasco P. ¿Es Alstroemeria pulchra Sims var. maxima Phil. (Alstroemeriaceae) un miembro del complejo A. magnifica Herbert?: Estudio colorimétrico de los tépalos externos e internos de la flor. Gayana Botanica. 2015;72:101-113
  30. 30. Finot VL, Baeza CM, Ruiz E, Carrasco P, Melín P. Análisis colorimétrico y morfométrico de la flor de Alstroemeria presliana (Alstroemeriaceae). Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 2016;10:89-108
  31. 31. He Q, Shen Y, Wang M, Yang R, Azhu S, Wang L, Xu Y, Wu R. Natural variation in petal color in Lycoris longituba revealed by anthicyanin components. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22098. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022098
  32. 32. CIE (Commision Internationale de L’éclairage). Recommendations on Uniform Color Spaces: Color-difference Equations, Psychometric Color Terms. Paris: CIE Publ. 15, supl. 2; 1978
  33. 33. Philippi RA. Plantarum novarum chilensium. Linnaea. 1864;33:260-261
  34. 34. Sanso AM. El género Alstroemeria (Alstroemeriaceae) en Argentina. Darwin. 1996;34:349-382
  35. 35. Norbaek R, Christensen LP, Brandt K. An HPLC investigation of flower color and breeding of anthocyanins in species and hybrids of Alstroemeria. Plant Breeding. 1998;117:63-67
  36. 36. Macbride JF. Flora of Peru. Publication: Field Museum of Natural History. 1936;13:631-690
  37. 37. Missouri Botanical Garden. [Internet]. Available from: [Accessed: Aug 3, 2017]
  38. 38. Jorgensen PM, Nee MH, Beck SG. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de Bolivia. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. 2014;127:1-1744 [Internet]. Available from: Accessed: Aug 3, 2017
  39. 39. Baeza C, Schrader O, Budahn H. Characterization of geographically isolated accessions in five Alstroemeria L. species (Chile) using FISH of tandemly repeated DNA sequences and RAPD analysis. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2007a;269:1-14
  40. 40. Cajas D, Baeza M, Ruiz E, Negritto M. Análisis citogenético en poblaciones de Alstroemeria hookeri Lodd. ssp. hookeri (Alstroemeriaceae) en la Región del Biobío, Chile. Gayana Botanica. 2009;66:117-126
  41. 41. Baeza C, Ruiz E, Negritto M. Comparative karyotypic analysis in the Alstroemeria hookeri Lodd. (Alstroemeriaceae) complex sensu Bayer (1987). Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2010a;33:119-124
  42. 42. Strasburger E. Über den Teilungsvorgang der Zellkerne und das Vehaltnis der Kernteilung zur Zellteilung. Archiv für Mikrobiologie und Anatomie. 1882;21:476-596
  43. 43. Tsuchiya T, Hang A. Cytogenetics in the genus Alstroemeria. Herbertia. 1989;45:163-170
  44. 44. De Jeu M, Lasschuit J, Kuipers A, Kamstra S, Visser R. Characterization and localization of repetitive DNA sequences in the ornamental Alstroemeria aurea Graham. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1997;94:982-990
  45. 45. Kamstra S, Kuipers A, De Jeu M, Ramanna M, Jacobsen E. Physical localization of repetitive DNA sequences in Alstroemeria: Karyotyping of two species with species-specific and ribosomal DNA. Genome. 1997;40:652-658
  46. 46. Stephens J, Tsuchiya T, Hughes H. Chromosome studies in Alstroemeria pelegrina L.International Journal of Plant Sciences. 1993;154:565-571
  47. 47. Sanso A, Hunziker J. Karyological studies in Alstroemeria and Bomarea (Alstroemeriaceae). Hereditas. 1998;129:67-74
  48. 48. Sanso A. Chromosome studies in Andean taxa of Alstroemeria (Alstroemeriaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2002;138:451-459
  49. 49. Jara-Seguel P, Palma-Rojas C, von Brand E. Karyotype and C-bands in the annual Inca lily Alstroemeria graminea. Belgian Journal of Botany 2004;137:199-204
  50. 50. Buitendijk J, Peters A, Jan-Quené R, Ramanna M. Genome size variation and C-band polymorphism in Alstroemeria aurea, A. ligtu and A. magnifica (Alstroemeriaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 1998;212:87-106
  51. 51. Zhou S, De Jeu M, Visser R, Kuipers A. Characterization of distant Alstroemeria hybrids: Applications of highly repetitive DNA sequences from A. ligtu ssp. ligtu. Annals of Applied Biology. 2003;142:277-283
  52. 52. Baeza CM, Schrader O, Ruiz E, Negritto M. Análisis comparativo del cariotipo en poblaciones de Alstroemeria aurea R. Graham (Alstroemeriaceae) de Chile. Gayana Botanica. 2007;64:31-37
  53. 53. Baeza CM, Schrader O, Ruiz E, Negritto M. Alstroemeria presliana herb. (Alstroemeriaceae) in Chile from a cytogenetic perspective. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008;68:328-333
  54. 54. Baeza CM, Ruiz E, Novoa P. The karyotype of Alstroemeria diluta Ehr. Bayer Subsp. chrysantha (Alstroemeriaceae). Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010b;70:667-669
  55. 55. Baeza CM, Espejo J, Ruiz E. El cariotipo de Alstroemeria versicolor Ruiz et Pav. (Alstroemeriacerae). Gayana Botanica. 2011a;68:327-329
  56. 56. Baeza CM, Rojas G, Ruiz E. El Cariotipo fundamental de Alstroemeria patagonica Phil. (Alstroemeriaceae). Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica. 2011;46:313-315
  57. 57. Baeza CM, Finot VL, Ruiz E, Carrasco P, Novoa P, Stuessy T, González A. Comparative karyotypic analysis and cytotaxonomy in the Alstroemeria ligtu L. (Alstroemeriaceae) complex of Chile. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 2016;39:305-313
  58. 58. Baeza CM, Finot VL, Ruiz E, Carrasco P, Novoa P, Rosas M. Análisis citotaxonómico del complejo Alstroemeria diluta E. Bayer (Alstroemeriaceae) de Chile. Gayana Botanica. 2016;73:221-227
  59. 59. Allendorf FW, Luikart GH. Conservation and the Genetic of Populations. 1st ed. Blackwell Publishing; Malden, USA. 2007 652 p
  60. 60. Han T-H, Van ECK, HJ DJMJ, Jacobsen E. Optimization of AFLP fingerprinting of organisms with a large genome size: A study on Alstroemeria spp. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1999;98:465-471
  61. 61. Han T-H, De Jeu M, Van Eck H, Jacobsen E. Genetic diversity of Chilean and Brazilian Alstroemeria species assessed by AFLP analysis. Heredity. 2000;84:564-569
  62. 62. Anastassopoulos E, Keil M. Assessment of natural and induced genetic variation in Alstroemeria using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Euphytica. 1996;90:235-244
  63. 63. De Jeu M, Lasschuit J, Chevalier F, Visser RGF. Hybrid detection in Alstroemeria by use of species specific repetitive probes. Acta Horticulturae. 1995;(420):62-64
  64. 64. Dubouzet JG, Murata N, Shinoda K. RAPD analysis of genetic relationships among Alstroemeria L. cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae. 1997;68:181-189
  65. 65. Han T-H, van Eck H, de Jeu M, Jacobsen E. The construction of a linkage map of Alstroemeria aurea by AFLP markers. Euphytica 2002;128:153-164
  66. 66. Souto CP, Premoli AC. Genetic divergence among natural populations of Alstroemeeria aurea D. Don: A dominant clonal herb of the understory in subalpine Nothofagus forests. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 2003;44:329-336
  67. 67. Ruiz E, Balboa K, Negritto MA, Baeza CM, Briceño V. Variabilidad genética y morfológica yestructuración poblacional en Alstroemeria hookeri subsp. hookeri (Alstroemeriaceae), endémica de Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 2010;83:605-616
  68. 68. Di Castri F. An ecological overview of the five regions of the world with mediterranean climate. In Groves, RH, F. Di Castri, editors. Biogeography of Mediterranean Invasions. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 3-15
  69. 69. Grant V. The Evolutionary Process. A Critical Study of Evolutionary Theory. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Columbia University Press; 1991 487 p
  70. 70. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945-959
  71. 71. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L,Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 2012;61:539-542
  72. 72. Sites Jr JW, Marshall JC. Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2004;35:199-227
  73. 73. Clements M, Snell Q, Walker P, Posada D, Crandall K. TCS: Estimating gene genealogies. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International Proceedings. Vol. 2. 2002. p. 184. [Internet]. Available from: Accessed: Nov 22, 2017
  74. 74. Leigh JW, Bryant D. PopART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015;6:1110-1116
  75. 75. Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM, Satler JD. How to fail at species delimitation. Molecular Ecology. 2013;22:4369-4383
  76. 76. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies-the next generation. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010;11:31-46
  77. 77. Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2011;12:499-510
  78. 78. Kim JS, Kim J-H. Comparative genome analysis and pylogenetic relationship of order Liliales insight from the complete plastid genome sequences of two lilies (Lilium longiflorum and Alstroemeria aurea). Plos One. 2013;8:e68180
  79. 79. Andrews KR, Good JM, Miller MR, Luikart G, Hohenhole PA. Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2016;17:81-92
  80. 80. Allendorf FW, Luikart G, Aitken SN. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. 2nd ed. Massachusets, USA: Wiley-Blackwell Publisher; 2013 642 p
  81. 81. Lahaye R, Van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, Gigot G, Maurin O, Duthoit S, Barraclough T, Savolainen V. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105:2923-2928
  82. 82. Pan J, Wang B, Pei Z-Y, et al. Optimization of the genotyping-by-sequencing strategy for population genomic analysis in confiers. Molecular Ecology Resouces. 2015;15:711-722

Written By

Victor L. Finot, Carlos M. Baeza, Eduardo Ruiz, Oscar Toro and Pedro Carrasco

Submitted: July 31st, 2017 Reviewed: October 20th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017