Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Traceability of Intra- and Interpersonal Skills: From Education to Labor Market

Written By

Alberto Cerezo-Narváez, María José Bastante Ceca and José Luis Yagüe Blanco

Submitted: May 11th, 2017 Reviewed: September 26th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71275

Chapter metrics overview

1,646 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Both educators and employers agree there is a growing gap between competences that labor market expects from its new employees and skills they own. Literature review holds that a set of nontechnical, professional abilities and intra- and interpersonal attitudes are required to close this gap and indicates that more training of soft skills is needed to access employment and success in work life. Although these skills are theoretically included in educational stages, project management approach can be incorporated to improve students and new employees’ practical curricula. The methodology consists of the critical review of the competency frameworks established by the DeSeCo and Tuning projects, confronting them against the requirements currently demanded by labor market, based on the reports of Deloitte, PwC, EY, and KPMG, to detect inconsistencies between educational and professional stages and check if project management standards, by PMI and IPMA, cover them. Compiling these weaknesses, actions can be established aimed at solving them, based on project management proposals. The incorporation of project management concepts into educational stages, especially the vision by competences, contributes to improve the employability by highlighting those transverse but essential skills that lead to versatile and successful professionals. To achieve this, it is necessary to care for human competences.


  • intrapersonal competences
  • interpersonal competences
  • soft skills
  • twenty-first century skills
  • DeSeCo project
  • Tuning project

1. Introduction

In the knowledge society, as van Laar et al. expose [1], organizations operate in a global economy characterized by an intense competition, interdependence, and collaboration.

For Sliter [2], economic, demographic, and technological changes have ushered in a revolution of globalization and rapid innovation, needing a method of describing requirements to accommodate this unpredictability.

Besides, as Neubert et al. hold [3], in modern organizational work environments, the classic career approach has broadly been replaced by new paradigms that minimize organizational factors and stress the importance of an individual set of skills, including transversal ones.

In this environment, as Rodriguez et al. argue [4], competency modeling’s inherent adaptability allows it to easily adapt complex, changeable positions, and the nonroutine and interactive tasks required therein. For Bonilla [5], the competence-based education (CBE) has multiple applications for the development of people, organizations, and society, as a whole, highlighting the link between education and labor.

Education programs aim to prepare students for the workplace, as Rainsbury et al. conclude [6], by developing generic and specific competencies useful to students and employers.


2. Scope

This chapter studies the traceability of intra- and interpersonal skills demanded by labor market from educational stages, investigating how project management by competencies approach can help to correct the gaps detected through continuous formation programs, ready to success into the labor market in a dynamic and changing context.

The research is focused on the Latin America countries, Portugal, and Spain, from their regulatory frameworks to practical research studies.

2.1. Objectives

The main objective is to establish a traceable sequence of every intra- and interpersonal skill demanded by the workplace, checking if it is legally collected during learning phases, developed in training and properly applied to working life, like Figure 1 shows. Likewise, other goals are:

  • To contrast that focusing on competency project management approaches is an effective method to implement transversal skills in students and new employees, improving their satisfaction, productivity, and efficiency

  • To establish a theoretical framework of intra- and interpersonal skills, which should be taken into account in order to currently succeed into the labor market, ready to be collated, by statistical study and/or case study in future research.

Figure 1.

Research framework.

2.2. Methodology

The methodology consists of the critical review of the competency frameworks established by scientific literature, from three points of view: education, project management, and workplace.

In educational stages, Definition and Selection of Competencies (DeSeCo) Project of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), during the preuniversity period, and the Tuning project for the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and América Latina Formación Académica (ALFA), at the university stage, offer and develop the legal framework in which stakeholders have to act. These approaches will be compared and contrasted to topic researches.

Project management by competencies, in this investigation, has a double meaning. On the one hand, it is an emerging profession and, on the other, thanks to its intrinsic transverse and humanistic condition, it covers management requirements in any sector. From the analysis of standards, baselines, knowledge bodies, and frameworks of the two oldest organizations in project management, both the International Project Management Association (IPMA) and the Project Management Institute (PMI), intra- and interpersonal skills and competences are collected and prioritized according to topic researches.

Based on the reports of the most prestigious consulting firms, Deloitte, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), Ernst & Young (EY), and KPMG, the intra- and interpersonal skills most demanded by labor market are filtered and endorsed by topic researches.

With this method, inconsistencies between educational and professional stages are detected, so that improvement actions can be proposed from project management.


3. State of the art

Cleary et al. define employability skills as generic capabilities, key skills which play a significant role in contributing an individual’s effective and successful participation in the workplace [7]. In this context, for Gibb [8], generic skills are essential for employment and personal development, fulfillment, community life, and active citizenship. These skills must own, in order to be useful, these characteristics:

  • Preparing for employment

  • Emerging at entry levels within industry, thanks to be generic

  • Equipping individuals to participate effectively in workplaces and adult life

  • Being able to be learned

  • Being amenable to credible assessment

3.1. Concept of intra- and interpersonal skills

Hard skills can be defined as the specific knowledge and abilities required for a job. However, soft skills are much more difficult to define and measure. They are the interpersonal (people, social) skills that help oneself to successfully interact with others in the workplace, and interpersonal (human, individual) skills that allow oneself to know, understand, and manage own cognition and emotions. In Table 1, some definitions from literature are presented:

For the Collins English Dictionary,
Desirable qualities for certain forms of employment that do not depend on acquired knowledge, among are included the common sense, the ability to deal with people, and a positive flexible attitude.
For the Oxford Dictionary,
Personal attributes that enable someone to interact effectively and harmoniously with other people.
For Rainsbury et al.
Behavioral skills required for the application of hard skills and knowledge in organizations.
For Perreault,
Personal qualities, attributes, or the level of commitment that allow an individual to distinguish from others who may have similar skills and experience.
For James and James,
Set of abilities or talents that an individual can bring to the workplace.
For Bonilla,
Application of practical knowledge through physical and intellectual skills and abilities, with respect to criteria or standards of expected performance.
For Su, Golubovich, and Robbins,
Group of constructs that are used to refer to important predictors of readiness and success in the workplace across multiple domains of individual differences and beyond the knowledge acquired in formal education.

Table 1.

Definition of soft skills.

Extract of [5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].

In summary, soft skills are social abilities and individual attributes, which can also be called as twenty-first century skills by many authors, such as Kraiger [14], Gibb [8], Nealy [15], Gewertz [16], Ziegenfuss [17], Hodge and Lear [18], Suto [19], Soland et al. [20], Hayes [21], Davis [22], Neubert et al. [3], Su et al. [13], Schooner et al. [23], or Ali et al. [24].

3.2. Soft skills in educational stages

In the educational context, Cullen defines competence as complex integrated capacities, in different degrees, in which education must train individuals so that they can operate as responsible subjects in different situations and contexts of their social and personal life, knowing how to see, do, act, and enjoy properly, assessing alternatives, choosing appropriate strategies, and taking responsibility for the decisions taken [25].

Besides, as Ali et al. highlight [24], education requires the integration of relevant content, skills, and instructional support to enhance knowledge processes in line with twenty-first century employability requirements. However, authors, such as Gewertz [16], Bronson [26], Klaus [27], Mitchell et al. [28], or Tan et al. [29], among others, conclude that current students (future employees) do not have the set of soft skills they need to be successful in workplace.

In fact, the lack of soft skills may truncate promising careers with technical abilities and professional expertise but with no human qualities like Klaus affirms [27]. Likewise, as Nabi and Bagley expose [30], recent graduates tend to rate the importance of generic transferable skills more highly than their own ability in those ones.

Even the International Youth Foundation (IYF) publishes the gap among students’ characteristics and employers’ demands is increasing, due to the lack of soft skills, which is avoiding the achievement and success of the majority of entry-level candidates [31].

Soft-skills education has been overshadowed by the quantitative focus in most educative programs, despite the weak relationship found between curricula and career success, as Laud and Johnson asseverate [32]. Likewise, as Hassan et al. conclude [33], soft skills have been very difficult to embed in teaching and learning courses.

However, as Low et al., Vázquez and Liesa discuss [34, 35], through a review of academic programs, it is possible to improve the acquisition of these transversal skills students are going to need in their professional and personal lives. In this regard, Tito and Serrano remark the importance that universities prepare students in soft skills and graduate with tools that add a differentiating advantage that allows them to compete in the labor market and generally maintain a high sense of well-being with themselves [36].

3.2.1. DeSeCo project for preuniversity stage

The DeSeCo project of the OECD defines competencies as the abilities to successfully meet complex demands in a particular context, implying the mobilization of knowledge, cognitive, and practical skills, as well as social and behavior components such as attitudes, emotions, and values and motivations [37].

In a holistic notion, according to the conceptual framework of DeSeCo, if competency is not reduced to its cognitive dimension, it has a broader meaning than a skill.

Key competencies shown in Table 2, as OECD remarks [37], are not determined by arbitrary decisions about what personal qualities and cognitive skills are desirable, but by a careful consideration of the factors required for a successful life and a well-functioning society.

Use tools interactively Interact in heterogeneous groups Act autonomously
Use communication skills effectively Be empathetic Understand patterns
Access adequate information sources Manage emotions Have an idea of the system
Evaluate the value of information Present ideas and listen to others Identify action consequences
Organize knowledge and information Understand debate Choose among available options
Use technology Construct tactical alliances Define projects and set goals
Negotiate Evaluate necessary resources
Make decisions Balance resources to meet goals
Analyze issues and interests Learn from past actions
Identify areas of agreement Monitor progress
Reframe the problem Understand own interests
Prioritize needs and goals Know rules and principles
Construct arguments
Suggest alternative solutions

Table 2.

Key competencies of DeSeCo project.

Extract of [37].

DeSeCo also sets a conceptual context for assessment by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), considering their criticity according to three criteria:

  • Contribution to highly valued outcomes at an individual and societal level

  • Instrumentation for meeting important, complex demands and challenges

  • Importance for all individuals, not just for specialists

In the Latin America, Portugal, and Spain contexts, only Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Spain, and Portugal are members of the OECD, being Brazil a partner and Costa Rica a guest. However, an OECD regional initiative covers the whole Latin American region.

In Table 3, OECD PISA 2015 results are shown [38]. It´s observed a level of performance and resilience below the average, which contradicts with the levels of motivation, interest, and enjoyment.

Rank Performance Efficacy Enjoyment Interest Motivation Resilience
OECD average 49% 24% 60% 53% 65% 29%
23 Portugal 50% 31% 73% 66% 72% 38%
30 Spain 49% 23% 61% 58% 68% 39%
38 Argentina 47% 31% 52% 66% 15%
44 Chile 44% 19% 67% 54% 68% 15%
47 Uruguay 43% 23% 64% 54% 72% 14%
53 Trinidad and Tobago 42% 37% 71% 78% 13%
55 Costa Rica 42% 24% 78% 60% 77% 9%
57 Colombia 41% 24% 79% 67% 78% 11%
58 Mexico 42% 27% 76% 70% 80% 13%
63 Brazil 40% 27% 77% 62% 81% 9%
64 Peru 39% 29% 79% 71% 85% 3%
70 Dominican Republic 34% 36% 84% 80% 82% 1%

Table 3.

OECD PISA 2015 results.

Extract of [38].

3.2.2. Tuning project for university stage

Tuning project defines a competence, into an integrated approach, as the capability to execute the degree of preparation, sufficiency, and/or responsibility for certain tasks [39]. Also defines it as a dynamic combination of knowledge, understanding, skills, abilities and values [40] and as the capacities that all humans need to resolve the situations that arise in their lives effectively and autonomously [41]. To understand this concept of competence properly, it is necessary to include knowing how to:

  • Understand: theoretical knowledge of an academic field

  • Act: practical and operational application of knowledge to certain situations

  • Be: values as an integral element of the way of living in a social context

EHEA and ALFA Tuning projects propose a methodology [40, 41], whose framework is designed to understand and compare the curricula, based on these five approaches:

  1. Generic competences

  2. Specific competences

  3. Learning, teaching, assessment, and performance

  4. Role of European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) as an accumulation system

  5. Role of quality enhancement in the educational process

Within this context, Tuning classifies generic competences, as Table 4 shows into three groups:

  • Instrumental (cognitive abilities, methodological capacities, linguistic skills, and technological capabilities)

  • Interpersonal (individual abilities and social skills)

  • Systemic (abilities and skills concerning whole systems)

Instrumental Interpersonal Systemic
Analysis and synthesis Criticism and self-criticism Applying knowledge in practice
Organization and planning Teamwork Research
Basic general knowledge Interaction with technical experts Learning
Communication Working in heterogeneous teams Adaptation to new situations
Elementary computing Appreciation of diversity Creativity
Information management Working in international context Leadership
Problem solving Ethical commitment Judgment of cultures and customs
Decision making Motivation Working autonomously
Cooperation Project design and management
Initiative and entrepreneurial spirit
Concern for quality
Will to succeed

Table 4.

EHEA and ALFA tuning project competences.

Extract of [39].

Tuning EHEA includes Portugal and Spain and Tuning ALFA counts with the participation of Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

3.3. Soft skills in project management

Projects, as Jensen et al. affirm [42], have become omnipresent not only in economy but also in society. In fact, both DeSeCo in the preuniversity stage (defining projects and setting goals) and Tuning in the university stage (designing and managing projects) include projects in all students’ curricula.

The importance of both hard skills (relating to processes) and soft skills (dealing with people) is widely recognized in project management (PM), as Azim et al. and Ahern et al. explain [43, 44], being managers, individually, responsible for balancing and optimizing their application. Chipulu et al., in the context of PM, extract six dimensions for them [45]:

  1. Industry-specific and generic skills over project management knowledge/expertise

  2. PM knowledge/expertise over industry-specific and generic skills

  3. Managerial (senior) skills

  4. Personal (positive) traits

  5. Project management methodology experience and professional qualifications

  6. Risk management over a project life cycle

For Ojiako et al. [46, 47], to learn properly about social and behavioral skills is critical in order to complete the role transformation from technicians to managers. Azim et al. advice that project managers and senior executives have to realize the significance of managing people [43]. In this context, soft skills are increasing their influence, being not only required but also important to manage teams. Pant and Baroudi identify soft skills as the missing link critical for achieving project success and advice the lack of emphasis placed on this within the context of university education [48]. Strang concludes that managing projects requires a series of skills, including interpersonal abilities, technical competencies, cognitive aptitudes, the capability to understand both context and people, and the integration of leadership behaviors [49]. Posner argues that rather than technical skills, intrapersonal and interpersonal competences are the most critical to solve problems in project management [50]. Likewise, for Chipulu et al., both managerial skills and personal traits are critical to manage complex environments characterized by rapid changes and uncertainty [45].

In summary, in the context of project management, there are a lot of studies that highlight the impact of soft skills on project success, as Strang [49], Pant and Baroudi [48], Awan et al. [51], López et al. [52], Kandelousi et al. [53], Cousillas et al. [54], Koutsikouri et al. [55], Camilleri [56], Davis [22], or Carmona-Chaves [57], among others, expose.

3.3.1. IPMA approach

IPMA is the World’s first project management association (in particular, a federation of 68 national PM associations), founded in 1965, that offers unique, role-specific competence development guidelines, for improved project success.

IPMA competence baseline (ICB) is a global standard that defines the competences required by individuals working in the field of PM, to train (and certify) future professionals, who will probably work in distributed environments with overlapping and conflicting stakeholder interests, shaped by real-time data and performance management tools, challenged with too much information and not enough communication, and judged by their ability to deliver outcomes that align with short- and long-term strategies [58]. IPMA organizes the profession into three competence areas:

  • People: Personal and interpersonal competences required to succeed in projects

  • Practice: Technical aspects of managing projects

  • Perspective: Contextual competences that must be navigated within environment

Table 5 shows people competences, as well as skills related to them.

People competences Skills related
Communication Facilitation, empathy, moderation, promotion
Conflict and crisis Creativity, moderation, persuasiveness, prevention
Integrity and reliability Confidence, consistency, equity, ethics, professionalism, responsibility, trustworthiness
Leadership Awareness, coaching, commitment, decision making, empowerment, flexibility, influence, learning, managing, mentoring, proactivity, team building
Negotiation Assertiveness, empathy, patience, persuasion, attitude
Relations and engagement Commitment, confidence, diversity, empathy, encouragement, engagement, facilitation, intuition, motivation, networking, resistance, team building
Resourcefulness Critical thinking, decision making, creativity, facilitation, innovation, problem solving, resilience
Results orientation Balance, delegation, effectiveness, efficiency, entrepreneurship, organization, productivity, sensitivity
Self-reflection &
Awareness, confidence, delegation, effectiveness, focusing on goals, motivation, organization, prioritization, relaxation, responsibility
Teamwork Cooperation, delegation, empowerment, facilitation, networking, organization, recruitment, time management, team building

Table 5.

IPMA ICB People competences and skills related.

Extract of [58].

3.3.2. PMI approach

PMI is the world’s leading professional membership association for PM, founded in 1969, with over half a million members and certification holders in 185 countries. The guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK) provides guidelines for managing individual projects and defines PM-related concepts, as methods, processes, and practices [59].

However, understanding and applying tools and techniques recognized as good practice are not enough to be effective. In addition to specific skills and general management proficiencies required for a project, it is necessary to domain the three competency dimensions, as PMI proposes in the project manager competency development framework (PMCDF) [60]:

  • Knowledge: Knowing about PM

  • Performance: Accomplishing while applying PM knowledge

  • Personal: Behaving when performing the project or related activities

Table 6 Shows interpersonal skills (from PMBOK) and personal competences (from PMCDF).

Interpersonal skills Personal competences
Cognitive ability
Communication Communicating
Conflict management
Decision making
Leadership Leading
Team building
Trust building

Table 6.

PMI PMBOK and PMCDF interpersonal skills and personal competences.

Extract of [59, 60].

3.4. Soft skills in workplace

Employability includes an array of technical and nontechnical skills, as well as knowledge, management, and experience, in order to ensure that a student is able to put them into practice, reason why they should be included into the educational stages, as Sangwan and Garg hold [61]. In the same way, Robles states that executives consider soft skills a very important attribute in job applicants [62]. According to Sutton, soft skills are extremely important for job hires in many occupations [63]. Besides, Truong et al. reveal that major employers value the potential role that soft skills can play in maximizing business success [64].

For Mitchell et al. [28], in the twenty-first century, organizations seek versatile individuals, even for entry-level jobs. The integration of soft skills into students’ curriculum also promotes their hiring in today’s workforce, and their proficiency is important to potential employers. Lindsey and Rice recapitulate that successful graduates should possess a high ratio of emotional-social intelligence against book smarts [65]. In fact, as many authors as Saravanan [66], Ramlall and Ramlall [67] or Alismail and McGuire [68], among others, resume, employers are increasingly demanding a greater range of soft skills. In fact, as Robles holds [62], candidates, who add value with their soft skills, have the ability to make the difference in obtaining and retaining the jobs for which they have been prepared.

Pittenger et al. or Nealy consider soft skills a factor of equal importance to hard skills in career success [69, 15]. Other authors, as Wats and Wats or Klaus, claim that soft skills account for individual success more than hard skills [70, 27]. It is incontestable that soft skills play an integral role in success, as Bennett [71], Gibb [8], Schultz [72], Weber et al. [73], Sheikhy and Shafiee [74], Truong et al. [64], Tito Maya and Serrano Orellana [36], Holtzman and Kraft [75], or Nusrat [76], among others, remark.

From the studies published by Deloitte, EY, KPMG, and PwC, also known as the Big Four because they are the largest professional networks that offer their services in management consulting to majority of public and private companies all around the world, a compilation of the most demanded soft skills in the labor market is made.

Once the assemblage is collected, then only those that are repeated are transferred to Table 7, discarding other soft skills for employability, such as assertiveness, balance, coaching, commitment, compliance, confidence, conflict resolution, empowerment, encouragement, endurance, engagement, esteem, facilitation, honesty, illusionment, inclusiveness, judgment, monitoring, participation, perceptiveness, positive attitude, reasoning, recruitment, responsiveness, sociability, technology, and training.

Skills Labor market demands
Deloitte EY KPMG PwC
Adaptability X X X
Appreciation X X
Awareness X X
Collaboration X X
Communication X X X X
Control X X
Cooperation X X
Coordination X X
Creativity X X
Critical thinking X X X
Customer service X X X
Decision making X X X
Diversity X X
Ethics X X X
Flexibility X X X
Influence X X
Initiative X X
Innovation X X
Integrity X X
Leadership X X X X
Learning X X
Management X X X
Mentoring X X
Motivation X X
Negotiation X X X X
Networking X X X
Organization X X
Persuasion X X X
Planning X X
Problem solving X X X X
Professionalism X X
Sensitivity X X
Teamwork X X X
Time management X X
Trustworthiness X X

Table 7.

Essential skills for labor market demands by Big Four.

Extract of [77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82].


4. Comparative analysis

Table 8 Summarizes the whole collection of soft skills from the literature review, but those skills that have only appeared on a single occasion have been eliminated, such as agility, appearance, authority, balance, citizenship, coaching, cooperation, coordination, directiveness, independence, investigation, loyalty, marketing, opportunity, patience, persistence, persuasion, proactivity, reliability, sensibility, and training.

Skills Educational stages Project management Workplace
[30] [6] [72] [17] [32] [34] [21] [64] [50] [83] [43] [19] [46] [51] [75] [1] [7] [73] [28] [18] [31] [67] [62] [76]
Adaptability X X X
Awareness X X X X X X X X
Collaboration X X X X
Commitment X X X X
Communication X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Confidence X X X X
Courtesy X X X X X
Creativity X X X X X X X X X
Critical thinking X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Customer service X X X X
Decision making X X X X
Delegation X X X
Development X X
Diversity X X X X X X X
Empathy X X X
Entrepreneurship X X
Enthusiasm X X X X
Ethics X X X X X X X X X X
Flexibility X X X X X X X X X
Honesty X X X X
Influence X X
Initiative X X X X
Innovation X X X X X
Integrity X X X X X X
Leadership X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Learning X X X X X X X X
Motivation X X X X X X X X
Negotiation X X
Networking X X X
Planning X X X X X X X
Positive attitude X X X X
Problem solving X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Professionalism X X X X X X X
Responsibility X X X X X X X X X X
Result orientation X X X X
Self-organization X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Socialization X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Teamwork X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Technology X X X X X X X

Table 8.

Twenty-first century skills from literature review in education, PM, and workplace.


5. Discussion

Comparative analysis from literature review made in Table 8 has to be contrasted against Big Four’s compilation. Then, once the most demanding skills have been selected, it is necessary to check if PM frameworks chosen incorporate them, in order to establish a model of practical implementation during the formative stages, especially the university.

Firstly, there are soft skills that are highlighted almost unanimously: communication, teamwork, problem solving and/or conflict resolution, critical thinking, self-reflexion and self-management, and leadership.

Secondly, other soft skills are emphasized by the majority of authors, educators, trainers, practitioners, consultants, and employers: ethics and/or integrity, creativity, active learning, motivation, attention to diversity, and professionalism and/or reliability.

Thirdly, it is convenient to accentuate other soft skills that are very present among consultants, PM frameworks, and educational projects, which have hardly been studied, in general, by authors and researchers: decision making, result orientation, influence and/or persuasion, coaching and mentoring, negotiation, and coordination and/or cooperation.

Later, it is opportune to rescue other soft skills whose interest grows over time, finding more and more references in recent literature: competitiveness, customer service, initiative and/or entrepreneurship, marketing and publicity, and sustainability.

To conclude, from the compilation of the soft skills developed, it is opportune to discuss how these skills can be grouped, for which how the authors have organized them is analyzed.

Cheng, Dainty and Moore, and Le Deist and Winterton, in the context of human resources management, classify competences into three groups [84, 85]:

  • Functional (job-specific skills)

  • Cognitive (knowledge and understanding)

  • Social (behavioral and attitudinal)

In the same vein, Binkley et al. organize twenty-first century skills into three groups [83]:

  • Ways of thinking

  • Ways and tools for working

  • Living in the world

Similarly, Onisk classifies generic soft skills into three broad categories [86]:

  • Behavioral development: improving (or enhancing) the underlying social behaviors and influencing capabilities

  • Professional development: obtaining (or maintaining) a professional certification or accreditation

  • Compliance: helping employers become legally compliant with legislated standards

According to classifications studied, selected skills are organized in Table 9.

Intrapersonal Interpersonal
Cognitive Individual Social
Active learning Competitiveness Attention to diversity
Communication Empathy and/or sensitiveness Coordination and/or cooperation
Creativity Ethics and/or integrity Customer service
Critical thinking Initiative and/or entrepreneurship Influence and/or persuasiveness
Decision making Leadership Marketing and publicity
Problem solving and/or conflict resolution Motivation Mentoring and/or training
Results orientation Professionalism and/or reliability Negotiation
Self-reflection and self-management Sustainability Teamwork

Table 9.

Traceability of intra- and interpersonal skills from education to labor market.


6. Conclusions

Despite there are different definitions for intra- and interpersonal skills’ set, a general consensus about its main characteristics can be made: they are social abilities, individual attributes, and cognitive attitudes. They are also called as twenty-first century skills, essential skills, human skills, professional skills, and/or soft skills.

Intra- and interpersonal skills are currently essential for both individual careers and organizational success, being identified by many employers as the number one differentiator, regardless of the type of organization. Importance of intra- and interpersonal skills has increased more and more over last years among new employees.

The gap between skill levels that employers need from recent graduates and new employees versus skill development grade they own is growing. To decrease the contrast between supply and demand, the implementation of training programs throughout all educational stages is required, from high school to university.

Into a knowledge-based economy, with abundant unskilled human resources, it is time to train recent graduates with properly employable skills. It is necessary to emphasize that education should focus not only on core academic subject mastery, but also on intra- and interpersonal skills development.

Labor market demands that employees acquire and/or improve their intra- and interpersonal skills around three dimensions:

  • Cognitive skills: being creative, communicating, focusing on results, learning actively, making decisions, resolving conflicts, solving problems, self-managing and self–reflecting, and thinking critically

  • Individual skills: being competitive, entrepreneurial, ethic, integrous, professional, reliable and sensitive, empathizing, leading, motivating, promoting sustainability, and taking the initiative

  • Social skills: attending to diversity, being persuasive, coordinating, cooperating, influencing, marketing, mentoring, negotiating serving customers, training, and working as a team

PM competencies approach can be used to develop and perfect intra- and interpersonal skills of employees, through formation programs that train how to be aware culturally and politically, be effective, integrous, professional, related, reliable and resourceful, build trust, coach, communicate, engage, influence, lead, make decisions, manage, motivate, negotiate, orientate to results, resolve conflicts, and work as a team.

Training practices of PM by competencies can be introduced in education. In fact, PM proposals are included on theoretical educational frameworks exposed (defining, designing and managing projects and setting goals, besides balancing, executing, evaluating, interacting, monitoring, organizing, planning, prioritizing, among other actions intrinsically related to leading projects).

In the context of Portugal, Spain, and Latin America countries, the theoretical frameworks that cover the different educational stages include most of the soft skills selected:

  • During the preuniversity stage, DeSeCo Project by OECD tries to instill that students assert rights and duties, communicate, conduct plans and projects, construct alliances, cooperate, empathize, make decisions, negotiate, recognize merits, resolve conflicts, be self-aware, suggest alternatives, support others, and take responsibility, among other skills

  • At the university stage, EHEA and ALFA Tuning Projects ensure that future graduates analyze, appreciate diversity, are competitive, be creative and critical, commit, communicate, lead, learn, make decisions, motivate, solve problems, synthesize, take initiative, and work as a team, among other skills


7. Future research

Once it has been proven that, from a theoretical point of view, most of the soft skills demanded by the labor market are present in education (including to direct and manage projects), it is mandatory to ask right now what is wrong. There are two nonexclusive possibilities:

  • Learning and training of soft skills is not done or done weakly

    (subordinating them to hard skills)

  • Assessment of soft skills’ performance is not done or done incorrectly

    (avoiding their application’s improvement)

To answers these questions, further research is needed:

  • Launching a questionnaire in Portugal, Spain, and Latin American countries, directed to recent graduates and new employees, to check the importance given by the system to soft skills they have perceived during their education and contrast the importance they think soft skills are going to reach, in order to measure the gap between educational criticity and workplace impact

  • Analyzing assessment methods and checking if they are adequate and effective, proposing improvements


  1. 1. van Laar E, van Deursen AJAM, van Dijk JAGM, et al. The relation between 21st century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;72:577-588. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
  2. 2. Sliter KA. Assessing 21st century skills: Competency Modeling to the rescue. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice. 2015;8:284-290. DOI: 10.1017/iop.2015.35
  3. 3. Neubert JC, Mainert J, Kretzschmar A, et al. The assessment of 21st century skills in industrial and organizational psychology: Complex and collaborative problem solving. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice. 2015;8:238-268. DOI: 10.1017/iop.2015.14
  4. 4. Rodriguez D, Patel R, Bright A, et al. Developing competency models to promote integrated human resource practices. Human Resource Management. 2002;41:309-324. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.10043
  5. 5. Bonilla Climent JB. La Educación Basada en Competencias como Instrumento de Política Educativa y Laboral. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios. 2008;XII(22):490-502
  6. 6. Rainsbury E, Hodges D, Burchell N, et al. Ranking workplace competencies: Student and graduate perceptions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education. 2002;3(2):8-18
  7. 7. Cleary M, Flynn R. Thomasson S. Employability Skills From Framework to Practice. Melbourne: Commonwealth of Australia; 2006
  8. 8. Gibb J. Generic Skills and Training. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research; 2004
  9. 9. Dictionaries C. Collins English Dictionary. 11th ed. Glasgow: HarperCollins; 2011
  10. 10. Dictionaries O. Oxford Dictionary of English. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010
  11. 11. Perreault HR. Business educators can take a leadership role in character education. Business Education Forum. 2004;59:23-25
  12. 12. James RF, James ML. Teaching career and technical skills in a ‘mini’ business world. Business Education Forum. 2004;59(2):39-41
  13. 13. Su R, Golubovich J, Robbins SB. Bridging science and practice: Toward a standard, evidence-based framework of 21st century skills. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice. 2015;8:289-295. DOI: 10.1017/iop.2015.36
  14. 14. Kraiger K. Perspectives on Training and Development. In: Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, et al., editors. Handbook of psychology. Vol 12: Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2003. p. 171-192. DOI: 10.1002/ 0471264385.wei1208
  15. 15. Nealy C. Integrating soft skills through active learning in the management classroom. Journal of College Teaching & Learning. 2005;2:1-6. DOI: 10.19030/tlc.v2i4.1805
  16. 16. Gewertz C. ‘Soft Skills’ in Big Demand. Education Week. 2007;26:25-27
  17. 17. Ziegenfuss RM. Education in the 21st Century: Toward an Expanded Epistemic Frame of Leadership [thesis]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania; 2010
  18. 18. Hodge KA, Lear JL. Employment skills for 21st century workplace: The gap between faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Career and Technical Education. 2011;26:28-41
  19. 19. Suto I. 21st Century skills: Ancient, ubiquitous, enigmatic?. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication. 2013;15:2-8
  20. 20. Soland J, Hamilton LS, Stecher BM. Measuring 21st Century Competencies. Santa Mónica: Guidance for Educators; 2013
  21. 21. Hayes JH. Skill Builders: Perceived Skills Enhanced by Students through Participation in High School Extracurricular Activities [thesis]. Boiling Springs: Gardner-Webb University; 2014
  22. 22. Davis K. Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32:189-201. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ijproman.2013.02.006
  23. 23. Schooner P, Nordlöf C, Klasander C, et al. Developing 21st century skills in Swedish compulsory school technology education: Three teacher perspectives. In: 32 PATT Conference: Technology Education for 21st Century Skills. Utrecht: Delft University of Technology and HU University of Applied Sciences; 2016. p. 411-418
  24. 24. Ali SM, Harun H, Massari N, et al. The 21st century skills in online multiliteracies project approach (eMULPA): Learners’ reflections on their knowledge processes. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2017;8:252-258. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n1p252
  25. 25. Cullen C. El debate epistemológico de fin de siglo y su incidencia en la determinación de las competencias científico tecnológicas en los diferentes niveles de la educación formal. Parte II. Novedades Educativas. 1996;62:1-20
  26. 26. Bronson E. Helping CTE students learn to their potential. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers. 2007;82:30-31
  27. 27. Klaus P. Communication Breakdown. California Job Journal. 2010;28:1-9
  28. 28. Mitchell GW, Skinner LB, White BJ. Essential soft skills for success in the twenty first century workforce as perceived by business educators. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. 2010;51:43-53
  29. 29. Tan AYT, Chew E, Kalavally V. The expectations gap for engineering field in Malaysia in the 21st century. On the Horizon. 2017;25:131-138. DOI: 10.1108/OTH-12-2015-0071
  30. 30. Nabi GR, Bagley D. Graduates’ perceptions of transferable personal skills and future career preparation in the UK. Career Development International. 1998;3:31-39. DOI: 10.1108/13620439810368619
  31. 31. International Youth Foundation. Getting Youth in the Door: Defining Soft Skills Requirements for Entry-level Service Sector Jobs. Baltimore: International Youth Foundation; 2013
  32. 32. Laud R, Johnson M. The future of the MBA curriculum : Improving relevancy through evidenced- based soft skills. In: Academy of Educational Leadership. New Orleans: Allied Academies International Conference; 2012. p. 63-67
  33. 33. Hassan A, Maharoff M, Abiddin NZ. The Readiness of Lecturers in Embedding Soft Skills in the Bachelor’s Degree Program in Malaysian Institutes of Teacher Education. 2014;2:138-143. DOI: 10.11114/jets.v2i3.455
  34. 34. Low M, Samkin G, Liu C. Accounting Education and the Provision of Soft Skills: Implications of the recent NZICA CA Academic requirement changes. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching. 2013;7(1):1-33
  35. 35. Larraz N, Vázquez S, Liesa M. Transversal skills development through cooperative learning. Training teachers for the future. On the Horizon. 2017;25:85-95. DOI: 10.1108/ OTH-02-2016-0004
  36. 36. Tito Maya MD, Serrano OB. Desarrollo de soft skills: una alternativa a la escasez de talento humano. INNOVA Research Journal. 2016;1:59-76
  37. 37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The definition and selection of key competencies - Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2005. DOI: 10.1080/ 2159676X.2012.712997
  38. 38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. PISA. Results. Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. p. 2015
  39. 39. González J, Wagenaar R. Tuning educational structures in Europe. In: Pilot Project - Phase. Vol. 1. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Deusto: Bilbao; 2003
  40. 40. González J, Wagenaar R. Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Universities’ Contribution to the Bologna Process. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Deusto: Bilbao; 2005
  41. 41. Beneitone P, Esquetini C, González J, et al. Latin America Project. Tuning Reflections on and Outlook for Higher Education in Latin America. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Deusto: Bilbao; 2007
  42. 42. Jensen AF, Thuesen C, Geraldi J. The projectification of everything: Projects as a human condition. Project Management Journal. 2016;47:21-34
  43. 43. Azim S, Gale A, Lawlor-Wright T, et al. The importance of soft skills in complex projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2010;3:387-401. DOI: 10.1108/ 17538371011056048
  44. 44. Ahern T, Leavy B, Byrne PJ. Knowledge formation and learning in the management of projects: A problem solving perspective. International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32:1423-1431. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.004
  45. 45. Chipulu M, Neoh JG, Ojiako U, et al. A multidimensional analysis of project manager competences. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2013;60:506-517. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2012.2215330
  46. 46. Ojiako U, Chipulu M, Ashleigh M, et al. Project management learning: Key dimensions and saliency from student experiences. International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32:1445-1458. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.002
  47. 47. Ojiako U, Chipulu M, Marshall A, et al. Project Management learning: A comparative study between engineering students’ experiences in South Africa and the United Kingdom. Project Management Journal. 2015;46:47-62. DOI: 10.1002/pmj.21510
  48. 48. Pant I, Baroudi B. Project management education: The human skills imperative. International Journal of Project Management. 2008;26:124-128. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ijproman.2007.05.010
  49. 49. Strang K. Achieving Organizational Learning across Projects. In: PMI® Global Congress 2003 - North America. Baltimore: PMI; 2003. p. 10
  50. 50. Posner BZ. What it takes to be a good project manager. Project Management Journal. 1987;18:51-54
  51. 51. Awan MH, Ahmed K, Zulqarnain W. Impact of project Manager’s soft leadership skills on project success. Journal of Poverty, Investment and. Development. 2015;8:27-47
  52. 52. López Paredes A, Pajares Gutierrez J, Iglesias Sanzo M. Certificación IPMA-4LC. Manual de Preparación. In: Valladolid: Business Project Management Solutions & Technologies. 2013
  53. 53. Kandelousi NS, Ooi J, Abdollahi A. Key success factors for managing projects. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation. 2011;5:1185-1189
  54. 54. Cousillas SM, Rodríguez-Montequín V, Villanueva-Balsera J, et al. Análisis de factores de éxito y causas de fracaso en proyectos: Herramientas de patrones de comportamiento mediante técnicas. In: XVII Congreso Internacional de Dirección e Ingeniería de Proyectos. Logroño: AEIPRO. 2013. p. 190-202
  55. 55. Koutsikouri D, Dainty A, Austin S. Critical success factors for multidisciplinary engineering projects. In: 22nd Annual ARCOM Conference. Birmingham: Association of Researchers in Construction Management; 2006. p. 219-228
  56. 56. Camilleri E. Project Sucess: Critical Factors and Behavoiurs. Burlington: Gower Publishing Company; 2011
  57. 57. Carmona-Chaves A-I. Las diez principales competencias de un lider de proyectos. In: San José. 2013
  58. 58. International Project Management Association. Individual Competence Baseline for Project, Programme & Portfolio Management. 4th ed. Zurich: IPMA; 2015
  59. 59. Project Management Institute. A Guide To. The Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMBOK Guide - Fifth Edition. 5th ed. Newtown Square: PMI; 2013
  60. 60. Project Management Institute. Project Manager Competency Development Framework. 3rd ed. Newtown Square: PMI; 2017
  61. 61. Sangwan S, Garg S. WIL and business graduate skill transfer to workplace. On the Horizon. 2017;25:109-114. DOI: 10.1108/OTH-06-2016-0031
  62. 62. Robles MM. Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in Today’s workplace. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. 2015;75:453-465. DOI: 10.1177/1080569912460400
  63. 63. Sutton N. Why can’t we all just get along?. Computing Canada. 2002;28(16):1-20
  64. 64. Truong HTT, Laura RS, Shaw K. New insights for soft skills development in Vietnamese business schools: Defining essential soft skills for maximizing graduates’ career success. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and. Industrial Engineering. 2016;10:1857-1863
  65. 65. Lindsey NS, Rice ML. Interpersonal skills and education in the traditional and online classroom environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. 2015;13:126-136
  66. 66. Saravanan V. Sustainable employability skills for engineering professionals. The Indian Review of World Literature in English. 2009;5:1-9
  67. 67. Ramlall S, Ramlall D. The value of soft-skills in the accounting profession: Perspectives of current accounting students. Advances in Research. 2014;2:645-654. DOI: 10.9734/ AIR/2014/11000
  68. 68. Alismail HA, Mcguire P. 21st century standards and curriculum: Current research and practice. Journal of Education and. Practice. 2015;6:150-155
  69. 69. Pittenger KKS, Miller MC, Mott J. Using real-world standards to enhance students’ presentation skills. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. 2004;67:327-336. DOI: 10.1177/1080569904268084
  70. 70. Wats M, Wats RK. Developing soft skills in students. International Journal of Learning. 2009;15:1-10. DOI: 10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v15i12/46032
  71. 71. Bennett R. Employers’ demands for personal transferable skills in graduates: A content analysis of 1000 job advertisements and an associated empirical study. Journal of Vocational Education & Training. 2002;54:457-476. DOI: 10.1080/13636820200200209
  72. 72. Schulz B. The importance of soft skills: Education beyond academic knowledge. Journal of. Language & Communication. 2008;2:19-29
  73. 73. Weber MR, Finley DA, Crawford A, et al. An exploratory study identifying soft skill competencies in entry-level managers. Tourism and Hospitality Research. 2009;9:353-361. DOI: 10.1057/thr.2009.22
  74. 74. Sheikhy A, Shafiee A. An investigation into the association between personal skills, organizational learning, and innovation, and organizational performance in the power distribution company, northern Kerman. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015;6:715-721. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p715
  75. 75. Holtzman DM, Kraft EM. Skills needed in the workplace: A comparison of the results of feedback from representatives of large and small businesses in New Jersey. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research. 2016;9:13-24
  76. 76. Nusrat M. Soft Skills for Sustainable Employment; Does it Really Matter? Dhaka; 2016
  77. 77. Knowles-Cutler A, Lewis H. Talent for survival. London: Essential skills for humans working in the machine age; 2016
  78. 78. Brooke B, Pyron DA, Matthews P, et al. Paradigm shift. Building a new talent management model to boost growth. London: Ernst & Young; 2012
  79. 79. KPMG’s Business Academy. Leadership and business skills. Amstelveen: KPMG International; 2016
  80. 80. KPMG’s Business Academy. Soft skills Courses & Workshops. Amstelveen: KPMG International; 2016
  81. 81. Bruce A. People: Growing Headcount and Access to Key Skills. London: Pricewater house Coopers; 2017
  82. 82. PwC´s Academy. The Talent Challenge: Harnessing the Power of Human Skills in the Machine Age. New York: Pricewater house Coopers; 2017
  83. 83. Binkley M, Erstad O, Herman J, et al. Defining 21st century skills. Draft white paper 1. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; 2010
  84. 84. Cheng MI, Dainty ARJ, Moore DR. What makes a good project manager? Human Resource Management Journal. 2005;15:25-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00138.x
  85. 85. Le Deist FD, Winterton J. What is competence? Human resource development international. 2005;8:27-46. DOI: 10.1080/1367886042000338227
  86. 86. Onisk M. Is Measuring Soft-Skills Training Really Possible? Sidney: Appcon; 2011

Written By

Alberto Cerezo-Narváez, María José Bastante Ceca and José Luis Yagüe Blanco

Submitted: May 11th, 2017 Reviewed: September 26th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017