Abstract
Phaseolus vulgaris L. of the family Fabaceae is widely grown for essential nutrients in its edible leaves, immature pods, and mature seeds. Landraces are local crops with wide morphological and genetic diversity. Morpho-agronomically, P. vulgaris landraces vary exceptionally in their vegetative and reproductive traits. These landraces vary in their germination rate and final percentage. Their growth form varies from bushy to vining type. Flowers range in their time to flowering, color, and size. Pods also vary widely in their time to pod formation; pod size, color, and shape; number of pods per plant; and time to pod maturity. Seeds also vary in their size, shape, color, and mass, as well as their number per pod and per plant. These landraces also vary in their resistance to pests and diseases from seed germination, plant growth and yield, and seed storage duration. A review on variation among P. vulgaris landraces forms basis for their future breeding as they are a good source of genetic diversity. This enables a possible selection for leaf, pod, and seed consumption, as well as resistance toward pests and diseases during the entire growth.
Keywords
- Phaseolus vulgaris
- traits
- variability
- landraces
- morpho-agronomic
1. Introduction
A landrace is defined as a crop with wide genetic diversity, which is usually identifiable, is known locally, has a local name, and has not undergone the proper crop improvement [4]. Landraces of
2. Taxonomy, uses, and variation among Phaseolus vulgaris landraces
2.1. Taxonomy, origin, and distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris
Common beans are mostly annual, while others are short-lived perennial. They are cultivated in the warm climatic regions especially in tropical, semitropical, and temperate regions [18].
2.2. Uses of P. vulgaris
The consumption of common bean has health benefits by decreasing and preventing the glucose and cholesterol level [21, 22]. It also prevents stress and cancer and decreases heart diseases and obesity [8, 21]. It consists of enzyme inhibitors as well as compounds such as phenolic, phytates, and lectins, which help in metabolic functions in animal and human body systems [6].
However,
2.3. Landraces and their uses
Landraces are crops with wide genetic diversity, which are usually identifiable, are known locally, and have not undergone the proper crop improvement [4]. Landraces are categorized into primary and secondary landraces [24]. Primary landraces contain their original and uncontaminated traits, whereas secondary (improved) landraces consist of foreign material that was incorporated into them through partial breeding [24]. Secondary landrace may change back to primary landrace after sometime [24]. An autochthonous landrace is a variety which is native and grown for a long period of time in a certain environment within a particular agricultural system [25]. It has specialized traits that allow biotic and abiotic stress conditions to increase and stabilize their yield [25]. Allochthonous landraces are varieties which are taken from other regions and introduced (grown) in another region and then allowed to adapt to that new region [24]. Landraces are naturally selected and are also characterized by the lack of formal genetic improvement [26].
Landraces play a significant role in agricultural production ensuring quality and well-managed crops [26]. They are varieties that have genotypes with wide specific traits [27]. These traits are adaptive to a specific environment and produces well-improved genotype, reduces the vulnerability, resistance to pests and diseases [27]. Landraces serve as a source of genetic diversity, and plant breeders often use specific traits to create new variation and maximize genetic diversity [12]. It also plays important role in ensuring food security [26]. Landraces result in high to intermediated yield, which is also stable under a low-input agricultural system in small-scale farmers [24, 27, 28]. They are a unique source of special traits which have marginal environment tolerance and nutritional quality [26]. The basis of diversity in landraces is genetic heterogeneity [29].
Common bean landraces have advantages of adaptation to cultural practices and local climatic conditions, resistance or tolerance to diseases, and early or late seed maturation, resulting high to intermediate yields under low inputs [10]. In eastern and southern Africa, farmers grow
2.4. Germination percentage
The higher germination percentage of seed depends on the availability of environmental factors, like adequate temperature, light, salinity, moisture, and water [30]. The germination stage is the most important stage in the crop survival, which is to determine the amount of water and nutrient resources that need to be applied [31]. In Mexico the germination percentage ranges from 58.27 to 73.51% among the
2.5. Growth form, plant height, and number of branches and leaves
The plant height of Brazilian
2.6. Days to first flower formation and flower color
Days to flowering also vary among
2.7. Color, shape, number, and size of pods
The color of immature pods in Uganda
2.8. Color, shape, number, and size of seeds as well as seed maturity
Genetic variability in

Figure 1.
Variation in shape, size, and color of some Italian
The number of seeds per pod among the
Seed size varies widely among
2.9. Plant resistance to diseases and pests
In Tanzania, the screening of different
3. Conclusion
A wide variation in growth and yield of
References
- 1.
Nwadike C, Terkimbi V. Effects of planting date on performance of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L) landraces of the Jos plateau: A preliminary studies. International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review. 2015;3 :309-324 - 2.
Adesoye AI, Ojobo OA. Phaseolus spp.: Valuable but underutilized genetic resource in Nigeria. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2015;9 (1):1-9 - 3.
Kouam EB, Ndomou M, Gouado I, Pasquet RS. Assessment of the genetic diversity of cultivated common beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L .) from Cameroon and Kenya using allozymes markers. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 2017;5 :088-097 - 4.
Njoki NB. Breeding for durable resistance to angular leaf spot ( Pseudocercospora griseola ) in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ) in Kenya [thesis]. South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2013 - 5.
Freitas G, Gananca JFT, Nobrega H, Nunes E, Costa G, Slaski JJ. Morphological evaluation of common bean diversity on the island of Madeira. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2011; 58 :861-874 - 6.
Piergiovanni AR, Lioi L. Italian common bean landraces: History, genetic diversity, and seed quality. Diversity. 2010; 2 :837-862 - 7.
Doria E, Campion B, Sparvoli F, Tava A, Nielsen E. Anti-nutrient components and metabolites with health implications in seeds of 10 common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. andPhaseolus lunatus L.) landraces cultivated in southern Italy. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2012;26 :72-80 - 8.
Camara CRS, Carlos A, Urrea CA, Schlegel V. Pinto beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as a functional food: Implications on human health. Agriculture. 2013;3 :90-111 - 9.
Lima ER, Santaigo AS, Araujo AP, Texeira MG. Effect of the size sown seed on the growth and yield of common bean cultivars of different seed sizes. Brazilian Journal Plant Physiology. 2005; 17 :273-281 - 10.
Stoilova T, Pereira G, De Sousa MMT, Carnide V. Diversity in common bean landraces ( Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) from Bulgaria and Portugal. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2005;6 :443-448 - 11.
Okii D, Tukamuhabwa P, Odong T, Namayanja A, Mukabaranga J, Paparu P, Gepts P. Morphological diversity of tropical common bean germplasm. African Crop Science Journal. 2014; 22 :59-67 - 12.
Casquera PA, Lema M, Santalla M, De Ron AM. Performance of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from Spain in the Atlantic and Mediterranean environments. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2006;53 :1021-1032 - 13.
Scarano D, Rubio F, Ruiz JJ, Rao R, Corrado G. Morphological and genetic diversity among and within common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the Campania region (southern Italy). Scientia Horticulturae. 2014;180 :72-78 - 14.
Marzooghian A, Valizade M, Moghaddam M, Kooshki MH. Evaluation of seed storage protein in common bean by same biplot analysis. International Journal of Bioscience. 2013; 3 :101-107 - 15.
Panda A, Paul A, Mohapatra P. A study on variability, character association and path analysis for pod yield in French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 2016;7 :033-039 - 16.
Coelho RC, Faria MA, Rocha J, Reis A, Oliveria MBPP, Nunes E. Assessing genetic variability in germplasm of Phaseolus vulgaris L. collected I northern Portugal. Scientia Horticulturae. 2009;122 :333-338 - 17.
Gomez O. Evaluation of Nicaraguan common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces [thesis]. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 2004 - 18.
Ince AG, Karaca M. Genetic variation in common bean landraces efficiently revealed by td-DAMD-PCR markers. Plant Omics Journal. 2011; 4 :220-227 - 19.
Lanna AC, Mitsuzono ST, Terra ST, Vianello TGR, Pereira VR, Carvalho MAF. Physiological characterization of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes, water stress induced with contrasting response towards drought. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2016;10 :1-6 - 20.
Fivawo NC, Msolla NS. The diversity of common bean landraces in Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. 2011; 2 :337-351 - 21.
Adesoye AI, Ojobo OA. Genetic diversity assessment of ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces in Nigeria’s mid-altitude agro ecological zone. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation. 2012;4 :453-460 - 22.
Hernández-Delgado S, Muruaga-Martínez JS, Vargas-Vázquez MLP, Martínez-Mondragón J, Chávez-Servia JL, Gill-Langarica HR, Mayek-Pérez N. Advances in genetic diversity analysis of Phaseolus in Mexico. Molecular Approaches to Genetic Diversity. 2015:49-73 - 23.
Argaw A, Mekonnen E, Muleta D. Agronomic efficiency of N of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in some representative soils of eastern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2015;1 :1074790 - 24.
Zeven AC. Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica. 1998; 104 :127-139 - 25.
Hammer K, Diederichsen A. Evolution, Status and Perspectives for Landraces in Europe. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin No. 15. Italy: Biodiversity International, Rome; 2009 - 26.
Villa TCC, Maxted N, Scholten M, Lloyd BF. Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources. 2006; 3 :373-384 - 27.
Bertoldo JG, Coimbra JLM, Guidolin AF, de Andrade LRB, Nodari RO. Agronomic potential of gene bank landrace elite accessions for common bean genetic breeding. Science in Agriculture 2014; 71 :120-125 - 28.
Lo Bianco M, Grillo O, Cremonini R, Sarigu M, Venora G. Characterization of Italian bean landraces ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using seed image analysis and texture descriptors. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2012;9 :1022-1034 - 29.
Veteläinen M, Negri V, Maxted N. European Landraces on-Farm Conservation, Management, and Use. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin No. 15. Rome, Italy: Biodiversity International; 2009 - 30.
Cokkizgin A. Salinity stress in common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed germination. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici. 2012;40 :177-118 - 31.
Aguilar-Benitez G, Pena-Valdivia CB, Vega JR, Castro-Rivera R, Ramirez-Tobias HM. Seed germination and early root growth in common bean and maize landraces and improved cultivars at different water stress levels. International Journal of Applied Science & Technology. 2014; 4 :118-127 - 32.
Stoilova T, Pereira G, Tavares- De- Sousa M. Morphological characterization of a small common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) collection under different environments. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2013;14 :1-11 - 33.
Sözen Ӧ, ӦzҫelǏk H, Bozoğlu H. The revealing of morphological variability and characterization of local bean populations in eastern Black Sea Region. Biyoloji Bilimleri Arastirma Dergisi. 2014; 7 :29-36 - 34.
Molosiwa OO, Kgokong SB, Makwala B, Gwafika C, Ramakopane MG. Genetic diversity in Tepary bean ( Phaseolus acutifolius ) landraces grown in Botswana. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science. 2014;6 :194-199 - 35.
Meza N, Rosas JC, JP M’n, Ortiz JM. Biodiversity of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Honduras, evidenced by morphological characterization. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2013;60 :1329-1336 - 36.
Mavromatis AG, Arvanitoyannis VA, Korkovelos E, Giakountis A, Chatzitheodorou VA, Goulas CK. Genetic diversity among common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Greek landraces and commercial cultivars: Nutritional components, RAPD and morphological markers. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010;8 :986-994 - 37.
Vakali C, Papathanasion F, Papadopoloulos I, Tamoutiside E. Preliminary results on a comparative study evaluating landrace of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) under organic agriculture in a protected areas in Greece. In: European Summer Academics on Organic Farming ,Lednice na Morava, June 24–27, 2009. Czech Republic - 38.
Hatice B, Omer S. A sample for biodiversity in Turkey: Common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. ) landraces from Artvin. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10 :13789-13796 - 39.
Barelli MAA, Goncalves-Vidigal MC, Filho PSV, Neves LG, da Silva HT. Genetic divergence in common bean landrace cultivars from Mato Grosso do Sul state. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina. 2009; 30 :1061–1072 - 40.
Venora G, Grillo O, Ravalli C, Cremonini R. Identification of Italian landraces of bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using an image analysis system. Scientia Horticulturae. 2009;121 :410-418 - 41.
Martins SR, Vences FJ, Miera S’e d, LE BMR, Carnide V. RAPD analysis of genetic diversity among and within Portuguese landraces of common white bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Scientia Horticulturae. 2006;108 :133-142 - 42.
Musango R, Kudzai K, Mhungu S, Tibugar H. Phenotypic characterization of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions conserved at the genetic resources and biotechnology institute. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences. 2016;8 :2222-3045 - 43.
Piergiovanni AR, Villecco D, Lioi L, Zaccardelli M. Comparison among recognized and non-recognized Phaseolus vulgaris L. landraces as traditional agro-food products of the Campania region (Italy). Genetic Resources Crop Evolution. 2015;62 :1009-1019 - 44.
Fetahu S, Aliu S, Rusinovci I, Kelmendi B, Caka H, Maliqi N. Diversity of seeds size and weight of common beans landraces ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Kosovo. International Symposium on Agriculture, Opatija, Croatia. 2012. pp. 270-274 - 45.
Mavromatis AG, Arvanitoyannis LS, Chatzitheodorou V, Kaitsa A, Patsiaoura I, Nakas CT. A comparative study among landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. andP. coccineus L. based on molecular, physicochemical and sensory analysis for authenticity purpose. Scientia Horticulturae. 2012;144 :10-18 - 46.
Rahman IU, Afzal A, Iqbal Z, Ijaz F, Manan S, Ali SA, Khan K, Karim S, Qadir G. Growth and yield of Phaseolus vulgaris as influenced by different nutrients treatment in Mansehra. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. 2014;4 :20-26 - 47.
Okwiri Ojwang PP, Melis R, Githiri MS, Songa JM. Genetic analysis for resistance to bean fly ( Ophiomyia phaseoli ) and seed yield among common bean genotypes in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Research. 2011;120 :223-229