Effect of extracts of
Abstract
Calendula arvensis (CA) had been reported in traditional Moroccan medicine to exhibit its extensive use to treat pain and inflammation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the anti‐inflammatory activity of CA flowers. The methanol, aqueous, and hexane extracts (ME, AE, and HE) were investigated for inflammatory effects by using two methods, namely, carrageenan and experimental trauma‐induced hind paw edema in rats and using indomethacin (20 mg/kg body weight) as a standard drug. The results demonstrated that Calendula Arvensis CA extracts had significant anti‐inflammatory activity where the HE at the doses of 300 and 500 mg/kg p.o. (p < 0.001) had the best significant reduction and inhibition of edema with 51.08, 71.33 and 63.38, 67.33% induced by carrageenan and on experimental trauma induced rat paw edema at third hour, respectively, and similar as compared with standard drug indomethacin 20 mg/kg body weight p.o. (p < 0.001). These results indicate that it could be suggested as contributory effects to the use of CA flowers in the management of inflammation and pain conditions.
Keywords
- Calendula arvensis
- anti‐inflammatory activity
- indomethacin
- wistar male rats
1. Introduction
Morocco is known as the “emporium of medicinal plants” due to availability of several thousands of medicinal plants in the different bioclimatic zones, and it has favored the proliferation of more than 42,000 species of plants, divided into 150 families and 940 genuses [1–4].
Inflammation was described 2000 years ago by the four Latin words: rubor, calor, tumor, and dolor [8]. It is a healthy process resulting from some disturbances or disease and it is usually associated with pain as a secondary process resulting from the release of analgesic mediators: nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), steroidal drugs, and immunosuppressant drugs, which have been used usually in the relief of inflammatory diseases by people around the world for a long time [9].
Most anti‐inflammatory drugs and antiarthritic drugs have wide applications in clinical conditions [10], and they are associated with several side effects such as gastrointestinal tract complications, ulcers, and cardiovascular problems [11, 12]. Therefore, alternative therapies from natural resources are ventured throughout the world.
In the recent years, inflammation is one of the major target research areas among biomedical researchers, which includes various cellular processes (e.g., phagocytosis, chemotaxis, mitosis, and cell differentiation).
Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the anti‐inflammatory effect of the extracts of the flowers of
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sample collection and authentication
Flowers of
2.2. Sample preparation and extraction
The aqueous extract (AE), 200 g of
The hexanolic and methanolic extracts (HE and ME) were, respectively, obtained by the method of soxhlet extraction of 200 g of
The filtrated extracts were evaporated using a rotator evaporator. After that, the extracts were concentrated to dryness and the residue was kept at 4°C [14].
2.3. Drugs and chemicals
The following drugs and chemicals were used in the studies: carrageenan (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), PGE2 (Fluka Chemie AG), p‐benzoquinone (Merck), indomethacin 20 mg/kg; all the plant extracts were dissolved in a mixture of arabic gum 5%, and then they were given to the test animals by oral mouth, and also the control group received the same treatment.
Indomethacin 20 mg/kg in 5% of gum arabic was used as the reference drug.
2.4. Animals
The study was performed on adult male rats (180–220 g), bred at the Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat. All animals were kept in a room maintained under environmentally controlled conditions of 23 ′ 1°C and 12 h light–12 h dark cycle. The food was withdrawn on the day before the experiment; however, they were allowed free access to water and standard diet throughout the experiments, the animals were handled according to the prescribed ethical guidelines for laboratory animals.
2.5. Anti‐inflammatory tests
In both methods, all animals were fasted 18 h before testing and received 5 mL of distilled water by gavages to minimize individual variations in response to the swelling of the paws. The left hind paw (LP) is not treated, and it is taken as control.
2.5.1. Carrageenan model
The carrageenan‐induced hind paw edema model was used for the determination of anti‐inflammatory activity [13–15]. Six animals were used for each extract dose, as well as the control and reference groups.
Note that 300 and 500 mg/kg doses were administered of extracts into the subplantar tissue of right hind paw of each rat that was injected with 35 μL of 30 mg/mL of freshly prepared carrageenan in physiological saline (0.9% NaCl). Note that 30 μL of saline was injected into subplantar tissue of left hind paw of control groups. Then, after the injection, the paw edema was measured at 1.5, 3, and 6 h.
Mean differences of treated groups were compared with the mean differences of the control group. The percentages of inhibition of inflammation were calculated according to the following formula:
where Vleft is the mean volume of edema on the left hind paw and Vright is the mean volume of edema on the right hind paw.
2.5.2. Experimental trauma model
This assay was determined as described by Riesterer and Jacques test [16].
The test groups of rats were given orally 300 and 500 mg/kg of each extract dose, the control group received 5 mL/kg of distilled water, and the standard group received the reference drug indomethacin 20 mg/kg.
One hour after oral administration of different substances dropping weight of 50 g onto the dorsum of the left hind paw of all animals. The right hind paw is not treated; it is taken as a witness. The difference volume of two paws was measured and taken as the edema value by using digital plethysmometer LE750 at 1 h 30 min, 3, and 6 h after induction of inflammation [17].
The percentages of inhibition of inflammation were calculated according to the following formula 2 where the mean differences of treated groups were compared with the mean differences of the control groups.
where Vleft is the mean volume of edema on the left hind paw and Vright is the mean volume of edema on the right hind paw.
2.5.3. Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as mean ′ SEM and analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by student’s t‐test. A value of
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Carrageenan‐induced rat paw edema
The results of the effect of the flowers

Figure 1.
Percentage of inhibition of inflammation of extracts of
Treatment groups | Dose mg/kg p.o. | 1 h 30 min | 3 h 00min | 6 h 00min |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 0.458 ± 0.003 | 0.71 ± 0.009 | 0.55 ± 0.002 | |
IND | 20 | 0.06 ± 0.001* | 0.113 ± 0.007* | 0.135 ± 0.001* |
EM | 300 | 0.375 ± 0.001* | 0.473 ± 0.002* | 0.426 ± 0.005* |
EM | 500 | 0.318 ± 0.005* | 0.363 ± 0.003* | 0.325 ± 0.004* |
EA | 300 | 0.273 ± 0.003* | 0.34 ± 0.005* | 0.291 ± 0.001* |
EA | 500 | 0.2 ± 0.007* | 0.251 ± 0.001* | 0.235 ± 0.003* |
EH | 300 | 0.22 ± 0.005* | 0.26 ± 0.007* | 0.24 ± 0.001* |
EH | 500 | 0.123 ± 0.003* | 0.158 ± 0.001* | 0.136 ± 0.002* |
Table 1.
Notes: Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (
The hexanolic extract showed maximum reduction and inhibition of edema by 51.08 and 71.43% at 300 and 500 mg/kg, respectively, compared to the aqeuose and methanolic extracts 48.26, 65.14, and 35.96, 52.63% respectively, and similar to standard drug indomethacin (20 mg/kg) by 72.36% during the same time (Figure 1).
3.2. Experimental trauma‐induced rat paw edema
The effect of two doses 300 and 500 mg/kg p.o.of the

Figure 2.
Percentage of inhibition of inflammation of extracts of
Treatment groups | Dose mg/kg p.o. | 1 h 30 min | 3 h 00 min | 6 h 00 min |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 0.458 ± 0.003 | 0.71 ± 0.009 | 0.55 ± 0.002 | |
IND | 20 | 0.06 ± 0.001* | 0.113 ± 0.007* | 0.135 ± 0.001* |
EM | 300 | 0.375 ± 0.001* | 0.473 ± 0.002* | 0.426 ± 0.005* |
EM | 500 | 0.318 ± 0.005* | 0.363 ± 0.003* | 0.325 ± 0.004* |
EA | 300 | 0.273 ± 0.003* | 0.34 ± 0.005* | 0.291 ± 0.001* |
EA | 500 | 0.2 ± 0.007* | 0.251 ± 0.001* | 0.235 ± 0.003* |
EH | 300 | 0.22 ± 0.005* | 0.26 ± 0.007* | 0.24 ± 0.001* |
EH | 500 | 0.123 ± 0.003* | 0.158 ± 0.001* | 0.136 ± 0.002* |
Table 2.
Effect of extracts of
Notes: Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (
The hexanolic extract showed maximum reduction and inhibition of edema by 63.38 and 76.33% at 300 and 500 mg/kg, respectively, compared to the aqeuose and methanolic extracts 52.11, 64.64 and 33.38, and 48.87%, respectively, and similar to standard drug indomethacin 20 mg/kg by 86.89% during the same time (Figure 1).
4. Discussion
Medicinal plant extracts have been used for thousands of years in the world by numerous civilizations.
Carrageenan‐induced rat paw edema in rats is known to be sensitive to cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitors and has been used to evaluate the effect of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory agents, which primarily inhibit the cyclo‐oxygenase involved in prostaglandin synthesis [18]. It plays a major role in the development of second phase of inflammatory reaction, which is measured at the third hour [19].
The anti‐inflammatory activity of extracts of
5. Conclusion
Our study demonstrates significant anti‐inflammatory activity where the hexanolic extract showed maximum inhibition of edema similar to the standard drug indomethacin (20 mg/kg) on carrageenan‐induced paw edema and experimental trauma‐induced rat paw edema in a dose‐dependent fashion. Aqueous and methanolic extracts of
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Pr. M. Al‐Saghir [botanist from Institute Scientific (IS) in Rabat], for the botanical identification and collection of the plants used in this study. This work was carried out under intramural funding from the University of Mohammed the Vth of Rabat.
References
- 1.
Alnamer R, Alaoui K, Bouidida HE, Benjouad A, Cherrah Y. Toxicity and psychotropic activity of essential oils of Rosmarinus officinalis andLavandula officinalis from Morocco. Journal of Biologically Active Products from Nature. 2012;14 :262-272 - 2.
Alnamer R, Alaoui K, Bouidida HE, Benjouad A, Cherrah Y. Psychostimulant activity of Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils. Journal of Natural Products. 2012;5 :83-92 - 3.
Alnamer R, Alaoui K, Bouidida HE, Benjouad A, Cherrah Y. Psychostimulants activity of Rosmarinus officinalis L . methanolic and aqueous extracts. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2012;6 (10):1860-1865 - 4.
Alnamer R, Alaoui K, Bouidida EH, Benjouad A, Cherrah Y. Sedative and hypnotic activities of the methanolic and aqueous extracts of Lavandula officinalis from Morocco. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences. 2012;2012 :5 - 5.
Heyn CC, Joel A. Reproductive relationships between annual species of Calendula (Compositae). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 1983;143 :311-329 - 6.
Ruiz de Clavijo E. The reproductive strategies of the heterocarpic annual Calendula arvensis (Asteraceae). Acta Oecologica. 2005;28 :2119-2126 - 7.
Messina, Nino (2010). “Calendula arvensis”. Actaplantarum. Retrieved 21 January 2015 - 8.
Chatterjee A, Sen B, Das S, Chatterjee TK. Antiinflammatory and analgesic activity of methanolic extract of medicinal plant Rhodiola roseal rhizomes. International Journal of Pharma Research & Review. 2015;4 (2):1-8 - 9.
Alwashli A, Al‐sobarry M, Alnamer R, Cherrah Y, Alaoui K. Analgesic and anti inflammatory activities of Boswellia elongata balf methanolic extracts, as endemic plants in Yemen. Journal of Biologically Active Products from Nature. 2012;2 (2):90-98 - 10.
Gaffo A, Saag KG, Curtis JR. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. American Journal of Health‐System Pharmacy. 2006; 63 :2451-2465 - 11.
Singh G, Ramey DR, Morfeld D, Shi H, Hatoum HT, et al. Gastrointestinal tract complications of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective observational cohort study. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996; 156 :1530-1536 - 12.
Emmanuel, J.H. & Montgomery, R.D. Gastric ulcer and anti-arthritic drugs. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 1971; 47 :227-232. - 13.
J.B. Harborne: Phytochemical Methods. A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 2nd. Ed. Chapman and Hall ltd., London, New York 1984;288 - 14.
Rudzik AD, Hester JB, Tang AH, Staw RN, Friis W, editors. The Benzodiazepines. New York, USA: Raven Press; 1973 - 15.
Yamada K, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y. Effects of inhaling the vapor of Lavandula burnatii super‐derived essential oil and linalool on plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), catecholamine and gonadotropin levels in experimental menopausal female rats. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2005; 28 (2):378-379 - 16.
Bignotto L, Rocha J, Sepodes B, et al. Antiinflammatory effect of lycopene on carrageenan‐induced paw edema and hepatic ischaemia‐reperfusion in the rat. British Journal of Nutrition. 2009; 102 (1):126-133 - 17.
Sonavane GS, Sarveiya VP, Kasture VS, Kasture SB. Anxiogenic activity of Myristica fragrans seeds. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2002;71 (1-2):239-244 - 18.
Crunkhorn P, Meacock SC. Mediators of the inflammation induced in the rat paw by carrageenan. British Journal of Pharmacology. 1971; 42 :392-402 - 19.
Di Rosa M, Willoughby DA. Screens for antiinflammatory drugs. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1971; 23 :2978 - 20.
Abudunia AM, et al. Anticandidal, antibacterial, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of Calendula arvensis flowers. Journal De Mycologie Médicale. 2016 - 21.
Oyekunle AO, Idowu AO. Antiinflammatory activity of methanolic extract of Cnidoscolous aconitifolius leaves in laboratory rodents. Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences. 2012;2 (2):770-774
Notes
- The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.