Open access peer-reviewed chapter

An Example Usage of Graph Theory in Other Scientific Fields: On Graph Labeling, Possibilities and Role of Mind/Consciousness

Written By

Auparajita Krishnaa

Submitted: October 19th, 2016 Reviewed: March 21st, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68690

Chapter metrics overview

1,814 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


This paper provides insights into some aspects of the possibilities and role of mind, consciousness, and their relation to mathematical logic with the application of problem solving in the fields of psychology and graph theory. This work aims to dispel certain long-held notions of a severe psychological disorder and a well-known graph labeling conjecture. The applications of graph labelings of various types for various kinds of graphs are being discussed. Certain results in graph labelings using computer software are presented with a direction to discover more applications.


  • mathematical logic
  • graph labeling
  • magic
  • antimagic
  • inner magic
  • inner antimagic
  • graceful
  • harmonious
  • felicitous
  • sequential
  • NP-Complete

1. Introduction

In this paper, we begin with looking at the problems and problem solving elements of mathematical logicof the field of Discrete Mathematics (of which graph theory is a subject) and its application in the realms of mind and consciousness. Section 2 focuses on dispelling certain notions about a severe psychological disorder namely paranoid schizophrenia. It is a much debated and often misunderstood illness affecting many people. Many remain untreated and undiagnosed not even able to adequately articulate their thoughts and feelings causing them a severe debility and an untold suffering.

Generally, the mind and consciousness aspects have been nearly left out from Mathematics for various reasons but mostly studied in other fields. Perhaps, the first instance (as per the available literature) in solving a major problem in Mathematics providing an answer using mathematical argumentsfactoring in the role of mind/consciousness is given in Ref. [1] resolving the graceful tree conjecture. In Section 3, we look at some preset notions in assuming this conjecture to be true and some new insights into the work in Ref. [1]. This conjecture was widely believed to be true for about five decades that all trees are graceful. This conjecture was believed to be true by many researchers in the field of Graph Theory particularly in graph labelings even without proof. A graceful labelingin a graphwith pvertices(points) and qedges(lines) is assigning the numbers (labels) to the vertices 0,1,2,…,(q−1) such that the induced edge labels found by taking the absolute values (the positive value) are from 1,2,…,q(Figure 1). This is an interesting area of Graph Theory as well as Psychology to be studied that why this conjecture was believed to be true even without proof for such a long time and that too in the field of Mathematics which is often considered by many to be so cut and dry in terms of proofs and truth of ideas.

Figure 1.

Graceful bipartite tree where edges do not cross.

In Section 4, certain new aspects of applications of antimagic, inner magic, and inner antimagiclabelings and other kinds of labelings given in Refs. [2, 3] are presented. The inner magicand inner antimagicare new kinds of labelings given in Ref. [4]. In Section 5, some results using computer software in the field of graph labelings are discussed. In Section 6, a discussion of the lexicographic orderin graph labelings is presented with a direction to future study. At last, conclusion is given in Section 7.


2. Resolving aspects of paranoid schizophrenia

During the course of one’s life, one comes across various psychological problems, sometimes of a severe nature of psychological disorder like schizophrenia. Schizophreniahas perplexed researchers, thinkers, doctors, philosophers for centuries, though the systematic study of schizophreniais approximately 100 years old and has been called “arguably the worst disease affecting mankind, even AIDS not excepted (Nature 1988)” in Ref. [5]. In this section, we would focus on understanding schizophreniaparticularly paranoid schizophrenia. The clinical symptoms are characterized by the following major symptoms as in [5, 6, 7].

  1. Delusions of persecution like the person believing others conspiring against him/her or grandiosity.

  2. Delusion of exalted birth like the belief that one is born with a messianic role.

  3. Delusions of reference like believing that television, newspapers are referring to the patient in particular.

  4. Delusions of jealousy/infidelity: hearing voices of threatening nature which give commands to patient.

  5. In Ref. [7], “People with schizophrenia often have delusions, firmly held, unshakable beliefs with no basis in reality.”

  6. Hallucinations (“experience of perceiving things that do not actually exist” in [7]) of nonverbal auditory nature like laughing, humming, etc.

  7. Hallucinations through other somatic sensations like smell, sight, taste, etc.

  8. Withdrawal or hesitation from interacting with other people and feeling isolated.

  9. In Ref. [5], “The delusions are usually well-systematized (i.e., thematically well connected with each other).”

  10. In Ref. [5], under the first rank symptoms (SFRs) of schizophrenia.

    1. Voices heard arguing: two or more hallucinatory voices discussing the subject with third person.

    2. ‘Made’ volition of acts: In made effect, impulses and volitions, the person experiences feelings, impulses, or acts which are imposed by some external force. In “made” volition, for example, one’s own acts are experienced as being under control of some external forces.

    3. Somatic passivity: Bodily sensations, especially sensory symptoms are experienced as imposed on body by some external force.

    4. Delusional perception: Normal perception has a private and illogical meaning.

  11. Ref. [6] gives three types of thought alienationunder Schneiderian first rank symptoms of schizophreniaas follows:

    1. Patient believes that his/her thoughts are under control of some external agency and others participate in this thinking.

    2. External thoughts are being put in his/her mind by some external force.

    3. Thought broadcasting: patient feels that his/her thoughts are read by others and broadcast.

  12. In Ref. [7], “schizophrenia is a form of regression to earlier experiences and stages of life.”

  13. Patient can become homeless, suicidal, unemployed and behavioral problems could be bizarre.

Paranoid schizophreniais the most common type of schizophrenia, and the patient may not appear psychiatrically ill unless the symptoms of paranoia come to light.

Every person is conditioned by one’s culture, educational training, ethics, environment, life events, etc. Often this illness is treated by the psychiatrist based on his/her medical training, experience, and often colored by the above mentioned conditioning with perhaps their own perception that the present knowledge about this illness is all there or just plain puzzled compounded by the fact that every patient is similar and different as well in many ways. There is much more to these hallucinations, delusions, and symptoms from the mathematical and scientific viewpoints and also there are certain bases and reasons of these symptoms which are often not understood adequately.

Often Nature’s mysteries present themselves in form of problems to be resolved with deeper hidden truths contained in them. We discuss the above mentioned aspects of hallucinations and delusions using principles of mathematical logicfollowed by explanation and insights into these symptoms and this illness.

Theorem 1: Delusions and hallucinations exist from an objective point of view in paranoid schizophrenia. This is proven as follows:

Prove the validity of the argument:

If Neela is a patient of paranoid schizophrenia, then she has delusions and hallucinations. If delusions and hallucinations are experienced by Neela, then these are either considered “unreal” (imaginary) by Neela’s doctors or delusions, hallucinations are considered “real” (existent) by Neela. Either delusions or hallucinations are not considered “unreal” by her doctors (i.e., cause is found or insight into certain traumatic event(s) causing them and issue resolved) or no debility, behavioral problems caused by hallucinations and delusions remain (i.e., way of solution found to understand delusions and hallucinations of the particular patient) or delusions and hallucinations exist from an objective point of view in paranoid schizophrenia. Therefore, delusions and hallucinations exist from an objective point of view in paranoid schizophrenia.

Proof: First, we convert the given argument in symbolic form using the propositional variables a,b,c,d,e,fand logical connectives such as and(^), or(v), not(¬), implication if-then():

  1. Neela is a patient of paranoid schizophrenia.

  2. She has delusions and hallucinations.

  3. Delusions and hallucinations are considered “unreal” by Neela’s doctors.

  4. Delusions and hallucinations are considered “real” by Neela.

  5. Debility and behavioral problems are caused by delusions and hallucinations.

  6. Delusions and hallucinations exist from an objective point of view in paranoid schizophrenia.

The given argument now becomes in symbolic form as follows:

  1. a → b (IfNeela is a patient of paranoid schizophrenia then she has hallucinations, delusions)

  2. b → (c ^ d) [Ifshe has delusions, hallucinations then{(these are considered “unreal” by her doctors) and(these are considered “real” by Neela)}]

  3. ¬ c v (¬ e v f) [delusions, hallucinations are notconsidered “unreal” by her doctors or

  4. {(nodebility, behavioral problems caused by delusions, hallucinations remain) or(delusions, hallucinations exist from an objective point of view in paranoid schizophrenia)}]

  5. a ^ e (Neela is a patient of paranoid schizophrenia anddebility, behavioral problems are caused by delusions, hallucinations)

Therefore, f (Delusions and hallucinations exist from an objective point of view in paranoid schizophrenia).

1. a → bPremise
2. b → (c ^ d)Premise
3. a → (c ^ d)Steps 1 and 2 and the law of syllogism
4. a ^ ePremise
5. aStep 4 and rule of conjunctive simplification
6. c ^ dSteps 5 and 3 and rule of detachment
7. cStep 6 and rule of conjunctive simplification
8. ¬ c v (¬ e v f)Premise
9. ¬ (c ^ e) v fStep 8, the associative law of ‘v’ and De’Morgan’s law
10. eStep 4 and rule of conjunctive simplification
11. c ^ eSteps 7 and 10 and rule of conjunction
12. Therefore, fSteps 9 and 11 and rule of disjunctive syllogism

Thus, we see that the delusions and hallucinations exist from an objective point of view in paranoid schizophrenia. The rules of mathematical logicare in Ref.[8].

Often the hallucinations and delusions not being believed to be “real” by the doctors and the patient unable to verbalize the dreadful feelings contained in the delusions and hallucinations lead to the patient feeling helpless and hopeless. Everything which exists in nature has an element of truth in it and is very much “real” which can appear as something quite negative until not understood. Nature presents problems to uncover the hidden truth underlying the causesin a problem. We would look at the causes of development of hallucinations and delusions which are the major symptoms of schizophrenia.

There is often the basis of traumatic abusive events from distant past behind hearing the voices and delusions. Some abusive traumatic events by an older person in position of power and trust can get buried in the memory of the patient and get internalized as “just punishment” or even “love” thus making it seems like “normal.” This “normal” can create later on conflict in the personality between “right” and “wrong” accompanied by tremendous guilt, fear, anger, self-doubt, and paranoia. Oftentimes, the acts of abuse including rapes are carried out in childhood or during adulthood in a vulnerable situation of the victim by cajoling suggestionsby the abuser with cajolingseeming like “love” to the victim or in a threatening manner causing terror in the victim. In either case such events create a lot of guilt, fear, and paranoia in the psyche of the victim. The power of a loving suggestion is not lost on anyone but these very suggestions to carry out a crime can be internalized very deeply by the victim and could be heard as “voices”later in life and being under “control” or “persecuted” by some external agent. Such cunning suggestions can also have the effect of hypnosison the victim with the victim not realizing that he/she has fallen prey to a heinous crime. The whole incident(s) can lie buried in the consciousness of the victim for a long time like a volcano which can erupt anytime triggered by some sensory input from the outer environment, especially sound. For example, in distant past, some violent incidents were followed by the banging of utensils and food served to the patient in those utensils. In the present moment, the patient’s dormant memory can get horribly triggered by sound of some utensils or similar sound causing auditory hallucinations. Moreover, the victim can pick up the opinions and feelings of the abuser at the time of crime. For instance, picking up of mocking attitudeof the abuser can result in hearing voices or hallucinations of “nonverbal auditory nature likelaughingat a later date by the patient. The patient can feel that the abuser (the personality) has “entered”his/her mind-body system. This can cause confusion over time and an apparent incoherent jumbled up speech of the patient and having hallucinations. The patient can feel “possessed”by the person who committed the crime on him/her or in case of not remembering accurately, the patient can feel the same by projecting his/her experience to another person not responsible for the crime. In this way, the patient can feel that “external thoughts are being put in his/her mind by someexternal force.”Being termed the hallucinations as “unreal” or “which actually do not exist”by the doctor does not help the patient except increasing the terror felt by the patient and losing heart even further. Usually crimes of this nature have certain intimacy creating emotional dependence between the abuser and the victim. When such incidents are not discussed immediately or soon after the incidents, the thoughts and feelings tend to fester inside the mind-body of the patient and not forgotten in the real sensebut deeply suppressed and internalized as part of the personality of the patient. The added guilt also comes from the victim being blamed for crimes of this nature for various socio-cultural reasons. The stigma and taboo associated with such crimes and mental disorders complicate the situation even further.

The abusive events and their memories keep on getting buried deeper and deeper in the consciousness of the victim with time, building up of avoidance issuesand sucking up the psychic energy of the mind-body system causing debility. The victim tends to develop thought patternsof escaping the trauma and tends to get attracted to similar abusers inviting trouble for him/her and over long period of time, the thought patterns, feelings, events getting all mixed up developing hallucinations and delusions. Ifthe hallucinations and delusions did not actually exist and were “imaginary,”thenthere would be no debility. The patient has an “unshakable belief”that the delusions and hallucinations are true through subconscious memory and knowledge but cannot articulate them due to the memories being overwhelming. Thus, the building up of trauma and thought patterns can go on till death and beyond. During intense emotional pain, the patient may realize that the psyche has very much a life of its own and certain past life event may resonatewith similar event in the present lifetime. As in Ref. [7] “schizophrenia is a form of regression to earlier experiences and stages of life.”Whether one believes in past lives or not depends upon how convincingly one can recall certain events. Going back in one’s life may be understood in this way that if one is an adult then he/she has been a child also and some traumatic event(s) must have caused the delusions and hallucinations. A particular patient may have the ability to regress to childhood trauma or could regress further to pre-birth times as well. The occurrence of past lives has got a lot to do with the patient’s ability to recall correctly and can be understood from the broader viewpoint of nature’s perspective. Nature creates, destroys, and maintains the creation through dualitieslike right-wrong, pleasure-pain, day-night, birth-death, etc. The body has a shelf-life of a few decades and, in general, has limitations of movement but the psyche is not limited like the body—its life is indefinite. Psyche is more powerful than the body and more subtle. It has more potential for evolution in terms of self-knowledge, though more complex and difficult than the physical. When the body is done with the death, the invisible psyche remains because mind/consciousness is a form of invisible but palpable energy. The psyche has a subconscious longing to resolve the pending issues of the trauma and is often full of regret. This psyche assumes next body with mixed emotions with the already developed thought patterns and unresolved trauma. In the present lifetime of the patient, some memory may be triggered off by some stimuli or coming across the abuser in a different body and the patient may feel that the “sensory symptoms are imposed on body by some external force.”When looked at from a broader time-span, it can be understood that the psyche is a form of energy, only with various kinds of thoughts, feelings, and with some unfinished business. One can have restlessness due to some unfinished businessfor a few days in the same body then why not for a longer time-span? Thought acts as chronological timein the mind. It can be understood in this way that taking urgent action immediately which someone was thinking of taking after 2 years takes away those 2 years, and one feels unburdened thus bringing the “future” into the “present.” Some past memories can get triggered nowwhich bring the “past” into the “present.” Therefore, the thoughts and feelings dictate to a great extent the interpretations of past, present, and future. So, the psychological timeis different from the chronological time. Some gifted patients can recall the past lives in a “timeless” way i.e., by looking at his/her life events as events of one stretched out lifespan with events well connected and with insights into the thought patterns (as in no. 9 of symptoms: “the delusions are usually well-systematized i.e., thematically well connected with each other”). This is entirely possible if the patient, who has authentic paranormal abilities, is a conscientious, courageous warrior, and a lover of truth.

The intelligence of the mind-body complex records everything like a movie or even better. The dialogues between the abuser and the victim may appear as “voices” later on in life or if the person is sensitive may be constantly reminded of it. Based on some similar stimuli in the outside environment, this/these traumatic event(s) stored in the mind-body can get triggered off. Usually, the victim is blamed directly or indirectly thus causing a severe guilt and fear which when accumulated over time can result in “delusion of reference, persecution”or simply projecting his/her guilt and fear to everyone outside thus resulting in “thought broadcasting.”Guilt and low self-esteem can only intensify the feeling of “others will read my thoughts and harm me.”An abusive incident can breed the feelings of betrayal, infidelity, jealousy, insecurity, feelings of no sense of belonging to anyone or anywhere and broken-hearted leading to a solidified mental state of feeling orphaned, and “homeless.”This could translate to the patient actually running away from home, hospital, or refusing treatment. The patient may also “learn” infidelity attracting similar abusive people and “expecting” to be betrayed which may appear as “natural” in relationships and could cause major relationship troubles. Memories recorded in the consciousness of such abusive incidents are experienced as hallucinations of a threatening nature giving commands to the patients; these are very real to the patient but fear of not being believed and unable to talk about them only makes things worse because of guilt associated with infidelity and anger with jealousy.

A gifted individual can be subjected to actual events of ostracizing, persecution, and condemned for his/her free ideas not fitting in with the majority of people, so the delusions of persecutioncan be quite pronounced in this case with the patient feeling like a criminal burdened with fear, guilt, and a seething insane rage underneath. If he/she has certain fame due to excellence in work, then the delusion of referencecan bother him/her like anything.

A patient can pick up certain disturbing opinionscommon to large number of people (collective consciousness) either through hearing, reading about them, watching a movie, etc. which caused much pain to the patient and he/she can feel “attacked”by several people triggering off hallucinations and delusions. In terms of picking up others’ thoughts and feelings the illness of schizophreniacan get as “infectious”or more than a communicable illness of the body.

In the case of an average patient or a gifted patient, abuse at a vulnerable situation can happen, and the insight into the truth of such events can involve strong emotions like betrayal, anger, and helplessness. The prospect of a daunting war to be fought within and with the abusers who could be far away coupled with the paralyzing stored up guilt, terror, anger, sorrow, debility, etc. may depress the patient like anything. This is the trial by fire and the test of inner strength of character which the patient may face. Moreover, an intelligent action of the medicine could try to release the suppressed traumatic memories (this may be understood as being akin to an operation on the body to take out a tumor, only in the psychological realm, it is much more complex and difficult). This can seem like worsening the situation thus the patient losing faith in the medicine, stopping it, and relapses taking place. An ardent wistful desire to avenge and revenge could be behind the delusion of grandiosityand feelings of one’s messianic role in life. Even when not triggered, the person may hear voices subconsciously of those stored events in the memory which are so old that the memory appears to be lost and cannot be recalled. If it could be recalled or some insight into the thoughts and feelings happen, then it could lead to recognizing and changing the thought patternsby the patient with suitable help. But the essential initiative must come from the patient and could lead to decrease in delusions and hallucinations and hence improvement in behavioral problems. As in Ref. [5], “The delusions are usually well-systematized, i.e., thematically well connected with each other”also points to the fact that delusions stem from some eventsand the need to start by believing the patient could be the first step instead of right away starting with the notion that voices or delusions are imaginary or “unreal.”

Even in the case of delusions and hallucinations being “unreal,” we have to see that in nature or creation everything appears asdualities or pairs of opposites, and there istruthin both the extremes. Change or evolution which is continuous is brought about by these pairs of opposites by nature in creation. For instance, like pleasure-pain, day-night, birth-death, true-false, for-against, etc., the “real”-“unreal” in this case is also another pair of opposites with truth in both, depending on whose viewpoint one is looking from, the puzzled doctor, or the troubled patient. In shaping of the consciousness of a person, the elements affecting the psychology like personal background, the kind of education one has had, culture, ethics, events in one’s life, etc. all play a role in shaping and conditioning the mind, thus the doctor is also conditioned by these factors as well as the patient. Moreover, these factors are uniquefor each person hence for each patient as well; therefore, the patient in order to get well has to take the initiative himself/herself to understand this conditioning with suitable help.

One more thing to be noted is the overemphasis in human society on the logical part and not emphasizing enough in the matters of heart. In climbing the social ladder, the calculative logical part plays a greater role disregarding the heart/conscience which speaks our truth to us, and this voice is ignored often creating transgressions against the conscience leading to dishonesty, obscuring of the truth, and further complicating the disorders of the psyche. Another outcome of overemphasis on logic in terms of social conditioning is that when due to some input from the senses, some trauma is caused or triggered; the person is unable to feel and analyze the overwhelming emotions as emotions are far more powerful than thoughts and could lead to bizarre behavior. This conditioning is equivalent to total disregard of the heart leading to ignoring the heart’s voice further leading to an unbalanced personality.

There is often deep depression, exhaustion, anxiety, panic, post traumatic stress leading to psychosis, obsession, and one, more, or all of these are experienced by the patient at some time or other in schizophreniawhich makes it difficult to diagnose and understand this illness.

The problems in the psychological realm get complicated by the fact that the world is flooded with the advice of many experts on “positive thinking” which is an antithesis to the approach of problem solving. This positive thinkingoften translates into an avoidance, even denial, looking the other way and away from the problem. The apparently negative approach to problem solving requireshard work, paying attention to the problem and taking adequate actions in response to various psychological states, thoughts and feelings and is anything but escapist. Not working on problem solvingonly aggravates the problem.

About the correlating of thoughts and ideas, Ref. [5] says “Autistic thinking is one of the most classical features of schizophrenia. Here, thinking is governed by private and illogical rules. The patient may consider two things identical because they have identical predicates or properties (von Domarus Law).” For example, Jesus Christ was persecuted, I am persecuted; So I am Jesus Christ.

It is a matter of interest to see the similarity between the above law and the Law of Detachment inmathematical logicof Discrete Mathematics. Let us consider the same argument in light of the law of detachment as follows:

I feel persecuted. If I feel persecuted then I am Jesus Christ. Therefore, I am Jesus Christ.

In symbolic notation, the argument using the propositional variablesis as follows:


I feel persecuted.


I am Jesus Christ.

Let us write the argument as per the Law of Detachment in symbolic notation as follows:

  1. p (I feel persecuted)

  2. p→q (IfI feel persecuted thenI am Jesus Christ)

Therefore, q (Therefore, I am Jesus Christ).

The Law of Detachment is a valid rule of inferencein mathematical logic. This similarity points to the common originof logic/argumentsin Psychology and Mathematics. Thus, we observe that what appears as “illogical”to the doctor is a perfect valid argument mathematically and psychologically for the patient further establishing our findings in this section depending upon whose viewpoint one is looking from. In fact, the whole of the discussion in this section is of mathematical logic(reasoning) applicable in psychological realm as well. The patient is obviously not Jesus Christ from the doctor’s point of view but the patient unable to feel or understand the trauma identifieswith the trauma he/she knows as what Jesus Christ faced and expresses in this manner.

Schizophrenia is an illness of facing the hard truths in one’s life or lifetimes as the case may be depending on the patient’s abilities, initiative, and sense of responsibility toward oneself preferably with suitable help.


3. Role of mind and consciousness in resolving the graceful tree conjecture

Sometimes holding on strongly to the binary logic of true/false in Graph Theory (a branch of Discrete Mathematics) fails to produce results and can even make mathematics look too rigid. This has been seen in the case of the well-known about five decades old graceful tree conjecture(all trees are graceful) being assumed to be true by a large number of researchers even without proof.

Treeis a kind of graph. A graph labelingis assigning numbers (labels) to vertices and edges such that the induced labels form a certain pattern. A graceful labelingin a graph with pvertices and qedges is assigning the numbers to the vertices 0,1,2,…,(q−1) such that the induced edge labels found by taking the absolute value (the positive value) are from 1,2,…,q(see Figure 1). Ref. [9] was an attempt to solve the graceful tree conjecture. Ref. [9] was a direct attemptto solve the graceful tree conjecture as pointed out in Ref. [10].

Assuming this conjecture to be true led to no doubt a lot of work getting done and published but generally of specialized variety and not able to pinpoint why and how this conjecture was even formed in the first place. Zeroing in on answering this conjecture in Ref. [1] after attempting to solve it in Ref. [9] took years of delving into the nature of the mathematical problem as well as the nature of mind to discover that it seemed that the definition of tree being connected and acyclicwas taken to be the controlling factor in determining that all treeswould be graceful.

A bipartite graphis one whose set of vertices can be split into two subsets X and Y such that each edge of the graph joins a vertex in X and a vertex in Y. The following algorithm Gin Ref. [9] gives graceful labelingfor bipartite treesin which the edges do not cross(Figure 1).

  1. Draw the tree as a bipartite graph in two partite sets denoted as Left(L) and Right(R). Let the number of vertices in L be x.

  2. Number the vertices in L starting from top going to bottom consecutively as 0,1,…,(x-1).

  3. Number the vertices in R starting from bottom going to top consecutively as x,(x+1),(x+2),…,q(qis the no. of edges). Note that these numbers are the vertex labels.

  4. Compute the edge labels by taking the absolute value of the difference of the incident vertex labels.

  5. The resulting labeling is graceful.

The treeswhich cannot be drawn as bipartite treeswhere the edges do not cross may not give graceful labelingwith this algorithm. Other algorithms in [9] for labelings of such bipartite trees namely harmonious(vertex labels are added mod q; one vertex label allowed to be repeated in trees: Figure 2), sequential(vertex labels are added with ordinary addition: Figures 2 and 3), felicitous(vertex labels are added mod q: Figure 3), andantimagic labelings(sum of all the incident edge labels at each vertex is distinct: Figures 4 and 5) are also based on this construction of trees.

Figure 2.

Sequential and harmonious bipartite tree where edges do not cross. Sequential and harmonious edge labels written on left and right, respectively, separated by a comma.

Figure 3.

Sequential and felicitous bipartite tree where edges do not cross: Sequential and felicitous edge labels written on left and right, respectively, separated by a comma.

Figure  4.

Antimagic bipartite tree where edges do not cross.

Figure 5.

Antimagic bipartite tree where edges do not cross: the edge labels in parentheses show the interchanged edge labels as in step 4 of algorithm AM.

In a result like this, the mind and its set perceptions play a role because the mind being conditioned by a long history of the traditional branches of mathematics where the mathematical structures are rigid, well defined and are controlled or predicted by the definitions, tends to assume or project the samein Graph Theory as well. In geometry also there are diagrams but these diagrams are defined by their formulas. For instance, ellipse, hyperbola, etc. are defined by their formulas or how many geometrical units will comprise a given diagram is specified as in a triangle (three line segments and angles), square, etc. But treesare just defined as connected and acyclicand can be drawn in any way with no restrictions and nothing which can be measured or quantified resulting in infinite shapesrendering them suitable only for specialized results of particular kinds of treesand not generalized results. So far, the research in Mathematics has discounted how the mind influences the perceptions of looking at mathematical problems, formulating them, and going about solving them. How mind and its perceptions influence viewing a mathematical problem, its formulation and solution could be an area of research which can be quite subjective but could yield interesting results when done more consciously. Ref. [1] which answers the graceful tree conjectureand Ref. [11] which finds that the definition of tree alone can not be the controlling factor in similar conjectures, both factor in the psychological conditioning in looking at a mathematical problem.

From the rules of mathematical logicsome of above mentioned ideas can be proved as follows:

Theorem 2: Definition of treealone is not the controlling factor in assuming the graceful tree conjectureto be true.

Proof: Let us write the argument using propositional variablesand logical connectivesas follows:

p:definition of treealone is the controlling factor in assuming the graceful tree conjectureto be true.

q: graceful tree conjectureis assumed to be true By the Law of Modus tollens the argument is as follows:

pq(ifdefinition of treealone is the controlling factor then thegraceful tree conjectureis assumed to be true).

¬ q (graceful tree conjecture isnotassumed to be true).

Therefore ¬ p (definition of treealone is notthe controlling factor in assuming the graceful tree conjectureto be true).

Thus, it should be noted that pictorial representation of graphs gives rise to infinite number of shapes which makes impossible to classify them all and makes the definitions in Graph Theory particularly in trees, distinct from definitions in older, traditional branches of Mathematics, and may not be the basis of forming generalized conjectures like the graceful tree conjecture.


4. Graph labelings and applications

As from the antimagic, inner magic, and inner antimagicgraphs, applications have emerged and been presented in Ref. [2], and some new and modified interpretations are being given in this work. Inner magicand inner antimagicare new kinds of labelings given in Ref. [4]. In these labelings, the pvertices, qedges, and the finternal faces of a planar graph are labeled such that labels of the faces form an arithmetic progressionwith common difference d. If d= 0, then the graph is said to have an inner magiclabeling, and if d≠ 0, then the graph is said to have inner antimagiclabeling. Figure 6 shows the inner magicand inner antimagicwheel.

Figure 6.

Inner magic and inner antimagic wheel. Inner magic internal face labels:f1 = 6,f2 = 5,f3 = 4,f4 =3,f5 = 2,f6 = 1. Inner magic weight number = 34. Inner antimagic internal face labels:f1 = 1,f2 = 2,f3 = 3,f4 = 4,f5 = 5,f6 = 6. Inner antimagic internal face weights: 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39.

An antimagiclabeling of a graph with pvertices and qedges is one in which the qedges are labeled with numbers 1,2,…,qsuch that the sum of the incident edge labels on each vertex is distinct. In the antimagicgraphs shown in Figures 711, the vertices could represent offices in a building and the antimagiclabeled edges could represent codes/passwords to reach those offices. The antimagiclabel of the particular vertex representing office could be a password or code given to the personnel in a security setup requiring confidentiality. Thus, these antimagicgraphs could serve as a security model for various kinds of buildings in a scenario of urban planning

Figure 7.

Antimagic double wheel D6.

Figure 8.

Antimagic centerless wheel-2 CW26.

Figure 9.

Antimagic centerless wheel-3 CW36.

Figure 10.

Antimagic helm.

Figure 11.

Antimagic regular actinia.

In double wheeland helm(Figures 7 and 10) of Refs. [12, 13], the central antimagicvertex could serve as the central headquarters for all the offices or the vertices and their passwords/codes or edges being the antimagiclabeled edges. The antimagic centerless wheels CW2n, CW3n, and regular actiniaof Refs. [12, 13] in Figures 8, 9, and 11 could serve as model for a security system without centralized control. The concepts of cut-set Sin graph G (removal of all the edges in S disconnects G; removal of some but not all of the edges in S, does not disconnect G) and vertex cut-set S1(analogous for vertices) could be used to disallow certain security personnel’s legitimate access. The ideas of vertex connectivity(minimum number of vertices deleted to disconnect the graph) and edge connectivity(analogous for edges) could also be combined with these applications to check for the violation of codes/passwords.

The graphs studied in Ref. [4] are wheels, flower-1, and flower-2(Figures 6, 12, and 13). The planar graph flower-1has one central vertex and rest being outer vertices, and all the internal faces are bound by four edges. Flower-2is a planar graph with one central vertex and rest being outer vertices and all internal vertices are bound by five edges. Wheelsare found to have inner magicas well as inner antimagiclabelings and flower-1and flower-2have inner antimagiclabelings.

Figure 12.

Inner antimagic flower-1. Inner antimagic inner antimagic labels and internal face labels are as follows: (1) 39, 45, 51, 57, 63.f1 = 1,f2 = 2,f3 = 3,f4 = 4,f5 = 5. (2) 43, 47, 51, 55, 59.f1 = 5,f2 = 4,f3 = 3,f4 = 2,f5 = 1.

Figure 13.

Inner Antimagic Flower-2. Inner antimagic inner antimagic labels and infernal face labels are as follows :(1) 59, 65, 71, 77;f1 =1,f2 =2,f3 =3,f4 =4. (2) 62, 66, 70, 74;f1 =4,f2 =3,f3 =2,f4 =1.

The larger of these graphs may have to be checked for existence of these labels. These graphs could also serve as models for surveillance or security systems, in designing building in an urban planning setup, network addressing, communication studies, etc.

Inner magicwheel could be used in a security system where matching of all the labels to the inner magiclabel could lead to decode or unlock the security system.

Above mentioned antimagic, inner magic, and inner antimagicgraphs could have applications in cryptography also.

Ref. [14] mentions the need for efficient methods of graph labelings. Such algorithms are found in Ref. [9] for graceful, harmonious, sequential, felicitous, and antimagic labelingsfor bipartite trees where edges do not crossuseful in communication networks and circuit design where the wires are such that there are no crossing points. The various algorithms developed for bipartite trees, where edges do not cross with pvertices and qedges for graceful, harmonious, sequential, felicitous, and antimagic labelings, could be explored further for applications where such bipartite treesserve as models.


5. Results in graph labelings using computer software

The software developed in Refs. [15, 16] to check the existence of major graph labeling methods namely harmonious, sequential, graceful, felicitous, antimagic, magicfor an arbitrary graph has been used in certain studies. It was used in the studies done in Refs. [3, 17]. Statistical analysis of the antimagic graph labelings of paths, cycles, wheels, and stargraphs in Ref. [3] shows that there is a relation between degree(degreeis the number of edges incident on a vertex) of vertices and number of antimagiclabelings obtained for these graphs. Presence of higher degreevertices increases the number of antimagiclabelings obtained by the computer software. Moreover, various kinds of graphs were tested, and nearly all the graphs had antimagiclabelings.

In the application of antimagiclabelings to complete graphs(see Figure 14; in a complete graph, every vertex is connected to every other vertex), higher degreevertices imply more number of legitimate routes for persons who are allowed access to a particular office (where vertices represent offices of the graph and antimagiclabel for a vertex can represent the code/password). Star(see Figure 15) is a graph with a central vertex and the rest are pendant vertices(vertices of degreeone). Antimagic Starscould represent one centralized control room with scattered single offices as the pendant vertices. Antimagic Pathscould represent linear offices; for example, along a street.

Figure 14.

Complete graph.

Figure 15.


Ref. [18] studies the effect of repeated vertex labels and shows that the labelings produced are faster and several in number on the computer when a vertex label is repeated. This also yields labeling where there is no labeling with the conventional definition. The repetition of a vertex label can have significance in applications where the repeated vertex label could represent some quantity which is repeated. This opens up possibilities for studies to obtain more labelings and can be explored further.

In Ref. [19], certain patterns in graph labelings have been discovered. It has been discovered that lower degree vertex can be manipulated more easily to yield labeling faster with the help of the software developed in Refs. [15, 16]. This approach could be followed while working manually also.


6. Lexicographic order in graph labelings

Applications so far undiscovered could be explored in the graph labelings in the following works which could be of further interest in research: lexicographic orderof permutations and combinations is mentioned in Ref. [20] and made use of it to develop a generalized software to check existence of major graph labeling schemes namely graceful, harmonious, felicitous, sequential, magic, and antimagicfor an arbitrary graph in Refs. [15, 16]. This software has been used to prove that harmonious graph is NP-Complete as given in Ref. [21]. Existence of lexicographic orderin graph labelings has been studied in Refs. [22, 23].

In a lexicographic order, the word ‘card’ comes before ‘cart’ as in a dictionary or lexicon.

Permutations in lexicographic orderof 4! = 24 permutations which are as follows: 1234, 1243, 1324, 1342, 1423, 1432, 2134, 2143, 2314, 2341, 2413, 2431, 3124, 3142, 3214, 3241, 3412, 3421, 4123, 4132, 4213, 4231, 4312, 4321.

Combinations in lexicographic orderof 6C4 are: 1234, 1235, 1236, 1245, 1246, 1345, 1346, 1356, 1456, 2345, 2356, 3456.

In paths, permutation 1 and permutation 2 give the antimagiclabeling for evenand odd edges, respectively, in [23] and is shown in Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Antimagic paths.

Let us look at the computer generated results for the cycleswhere the edges e1, e2, e3…,and so on are labeled in the order of the permutations in Refs. [17] and is shown in Figure 17.

Figure 17.


  1. C4: Permutation 2: 1 2 4 3

  2. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 4 6 7

  3. C6: Permutation 2: 1 2 3 4 6 5

  4. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 6 7 10 11

  5. C8: Permutation 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7

  6. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 7 8 9 11 14 15

  7. C10: Permutation 2: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 9

  8. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 7 9 10 11 13 15 18 19

  9. Now, let us look at the odd Cycles:

  10. C5: Permutation 1: 1 2 3 4 5

  11. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 6 7 9

  12. C7: Permutation 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  13. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 7 8 9 11 13

  14. Permutation 3: 1 2 3 4 6 5 7

  15. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 7 8 10 11 12

  16. C9: Permutation 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  17. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 7 9 10 11 13 15 17

  18. Permutation 3: 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 9

  19. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 7 9 10 11 14 15 16

  20. C11: Permutation 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

  21. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 7 9 11 12 13 15 17 19 21

  22. Permutation 3: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 9 11

  23. Vertex labels (in ascending order): 3 5 7 9 11 12 13 15 18 19 20

In cycles, permutation 1 gives antimagiclabeling for odd cycles(odd number of edges), whereas permutation 2 gives antimagiclabeling for even cycle(even number of edges). Permutation 3 also gives antimagiclabeling for odd cyclesexcept C5. Permutation 1 results in induced vertex labels showing almost an arithmetic progressionwith difference 2.

Lexicographic orderfound in graph labelings could be studied for further applications.


7. Conclusion

Thus, we have seen that the various kinds of delusions and hallucinations often considered “unreal” of the severe psychological disorder of paranoid schizophrenia, a kind of schizophreniahave much truth and underlying inherent causes in them with insights provided in these factors in this work. Hallucinations and delusions exist in real terms have been proved by mathematical logicalso.

From the viewpoint of things appearing in creation as dualities of nature, we can see that every pair of opposites like pleasure-pain, right-wrong, day-night, birth-death, stress-relief, for-against, etc. have truth in both the opposites. Thus, the “real”-“unreal” of hallucinations and delusions also have truth in them depending upon the viewpoint of the subject: patient and doctor, respectively. The duality of brain(logical)-heart(feeling) also brings about an unbalanced personality in an individual when there is an overemphasis on calculative logic in human society and overriding the voice of the heart/conscience. Nature brings evolution by these dualities in creation leading to an increase in understanding and knowledge of some unresolved problem.

The graceful tree conjecturehas elements of psychological conditioning in it, being believed to be true even without a proof for about five decades. Conditioned by a long history of being used to the definitions in traditional Mathematics as the controlling factor in predicting behavior of allthe defined mathematical structures will lead to projecting the same in the definition of treealso. The big difference in the definitions of traditional branches of Mathematics and a newer subject like Graph Theory is that the definition of tree is unquantifiable and pictorialthus cannotpredict the behavior of alltrees. A treewith four vertices is defined as “connected and acyclic” and a treeof two million vertices is also defined in the same way with no restrictions and no measuregiving rise to infinite shapes for larger trees. In the case of a number being divisible by 2, 3, or 5, the definition is applicable to any number no matter how largethus allsuch numbers are predicted by this quantifiable definition unlike the unquantified, pictorial representationof a tree.

Applications of antimagic, inner magic, and inner antimagicgraphs in urban planning and security setup, etc. have been given for various kinds of graphs. More applications for bipartite trees where edges do not crossfor various kinds of labelings could be discovered where such trees with graceful, harmonious, felicitous, sequential, and antimagiclabeling could serve as models. Some results of graph labelings using computer software developed to check the existence of major graph labeling schemes for an arbitrary graph have been discussed. Role of repeated vertex labels and low degree vertex has been presented. Finally, for further studies, the lexicographic orderfound in antimagiclabelings of paths, cycles, etc. could be studied for discovering more applications.


  1. 1. Krishnaa A. A note on some thoughts on the graceful tree conjecture. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography. 2013;16(6):387-392. DOI: 10.1080/09720529.2013.858484
  2. 2. Krishnaa A. Some applications of labelled graphs. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology. 2016;37(3):19-23
  3. 3. Krishnaa A, Dulawat MS, Rathore GS. A study on statistical analysis of antimagic graph labeling. Journal of Rajasthan Academy of Physical Sciences. 2004;3(2):111-120
  4. 4. Krishnaa A, Dulawat MS. Algorithms for inner magic and inner antimagic labelings for some planar graphs. Informatica (Lithuania). 2006;17(3):393-406. DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(01)00175-3
  5. 5. Ahuja N. A Short Textbook of Psychiatry. 7th ed. Jaypee Brothers Publishers, New Delhi (India), St. Louis (USA), London (UK)
  6. 6. Puri BK, Treasadan IH. Textbook of Psychiatry. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, UK.
  7. 7. Feldman RS. Essentials of Understanding Psychology. 10th ed. McGraw Hill, New York, USA
  8. 8. Grimaldi RP. Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics: An Applied Introduction. 4th ed. Pearson Education, USA
  9. 9. Krishnaa A. A study of the major graph labelings of trees. Informatica. 2004;15(4):515-524.
  10. 10. Kraayenbrink N, de Frits N, Vavic M. Symmetries in Graceful
  11. 11. Krishnaa A. A note on perception of definitions in graph labelings of trees. Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences. 2011;2(2):254-259
  12. 12. Krishnaa A. On antimagic labellings of some cycle related graphs. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography. 2012;15(4&5)
  13. 13. Krishnaa A. Formulas and algorithms for antimagic labelings of some helm related graphs. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography. 2016;19(2):435-445. DOI: 10.1080/09720529.2015.1130935
  14. 14. Daykin JW, Iliopoulos CS, Miller M, Phanalasy O. Antimagicness of generalized corona and snowflake graphs. Mathematics in Computer Science. 2015;9(1):105-111
  15. 15. Krishnaa A. Computer modelling of graph labelings. In: Proceedings of National Conference on Mathematical and Computational Models; Coimbatore, India. Allied Publishers: India; 2001
  16. 16. Krishnaa A, Dulawat MS. Algorithms and programs for some problems in graph labellings, operations research and combinatorics. Journal of Mathematics and System Sciences. 2007;3(1):1-15
  17. 17. Krishnaa A. On the use of computers in graph labeling. International Journal of Computer Science and Communication. 2012;3(1):191-197
  18. 18. Krishnaa A, Dulawat MS. Study of the effect of repeated vertex labels. Ultra Scientist of Physical Sciences. 2011;23(1):176-180
  19. 19. Krishnaa A, Dulawat MS, Rathore GS. Some patterns in graph labelings. Pure and Applied Mathematika Sciences. 2005;LXI(1-2):61-65
  20. 20. Liu CL. Discrete Mathematics. Tata McGraw Hill. New Delhi, India; 1978
  21. 21. Krishnaa A. A note on a graph scheme and its computational complexity. Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences. 2011;2(3):521-524
  22. 22. Krishnaa A, Dulawat MS. Lexicographic ordering in graph labelings of cycles, paths and complete bipartite graphs. South East Asian Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences. 2009;7(2):87-93
  23. 23. Krishnaa A, Dulawat MS. Labeling of paths. Journal of Rajasthan Academy of Physical Sciences. 2006;5(1):99-104

Written By

Auparajita Krishnaa

Submitted: October 19th, 2016 Reviewed: March 21st, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017