Scheme of the implementation of the software code.
Abstract
In this report a Finite Element Method (FEM) model, within the continuum mechanics of solids, for mechanical long term response of timber structures is presented. The proposed model can analyze threedimensional solids, within the theory for nonlinear material orthotropic elasticviscousplastic. It can account ductile behaviour in compression and brittle behaviour in tension, under the kinematics hypothesis of large displacements and large strains. The work has been carried out with a general purpose FEM software code in which a specific stressstrain law for wood, by a proper subroutine, has been built in. The constitutive equations have been formulated by a multisurface yield approach of viscoplasticity, each yield surface acts separately each other. This approach is specifically almost necessary for some problems, such as glued composite parts or steel bolt connections. Specialized solution algorithms, which adopt timestepping and automating relaxation techniques, have been used to handle the behaviour of the loading path response for elasticviscousplastic or elasticbrittle behaviours. The model has been applied to examples to test the effectiveness of the suggested approach. The results obtained have shown the potentiality of the proposed model to effectively simulate the overall mechanical behaviour of timber.
Keywords
 finite element method
 timber model
 elastoviscoplastic model
 multisurface yield viscoplasticity
1. Introduction
Wood is one of the ancient materials employed in construction. It is commonly used as parts in buildings, such as bridges, roofs, sports halls, and floors. Today timber, especially in the gluelaminated technology, is frequently used in new constructions. Wood, as a material in the construction industry, has encountered a returned interest, mainly for its renewable nature, environmental compatibility and for its low energetic cost of production in comparison with concrete and steel.
Timber is advantageous, compared to other common construction materials, in wide spanning structures for its high ratio between loadcarrying capacity and selfweight, along the longitudinal direction of grain. Timber structures have a good performance under dynamic loads for their elevated damping capacity. Although timber exhibits a consistent strength in the longitudinal direction for bending elements, in contrast it demonstrates a low value of tensile strength along the radial and tangential directions. This feature is unfavourable for connections, subjected to stress concentrations of tension, which can lead to crack development. However, timber is subjected to natural decay and its mechanical properties are sensitive to temperature and moisture.
An adequate mechanical description of timber material is an important task in scientific research on structural analysis of timber building. Also, an accurate stress analysis is particularly necessary for a composite system such as reinforced timber or prestressed timber, for the coupling and interaction of adhesive, lamination and reinforcements [1], and also for components used in connection joint [2].
In the scientific literature, many studies on modelling mechanics of wood can be retrieved [3]. However, continuum mechanics is the most common approach, being the basis of the finite element method (FEM) implementation. Within the theory of continuum mechanics, wood is assumed as an ideal homogeneous continuum [3], avoiding its complex nature. Wood is generally schematized as orthotropic elastic with three orthogonal material directions, corresponding to its longitudinal, radial and tangential growth fibre directions [3, 4]. However, experimental evidence [5] demonstrated that the extension of the Hooke’s law to orthotropy can be acceptable only when the load intensity is low and not for high strain and for loading direction inclined with respect to the fibre orientation of the material [6].
Many theories on the wood material have been proposed in the literature. Among these, the earliest was that for wood in compression at an inclined angle of fibre, of Hankinson [7], which was extended by Goodman and Bodig [8] to a three dimension. Another model of wood was that of Tsai and Wu [9], which formulated a failure surface expressed as a scalar function of a polynomial tensor. PattonMallory et al. [2] used a threedimensional model of wood, trilinear elasticplastic under compression stress and linear elastic, with a tension and shear cutoff, under tension stress.
Tabiei and Wu [10] proposed a continuum FEM model for timber which updated, in an incremental analysis, each component of the elastic moduli of the material stiffness matrix, on the basis of power functions, fitted to test data. This approach did not use any yield function of stress. Schmidt and Kaliske [11] proposed a threedimensional model which adopted a multisurface yield approach for elasticplastic behaviour of wood. Recently, the adoption of FEM numerical codes to analyse the strength of a timber structural member has gained an increasing importance. Often the numerical codes are sophisticated and are specifically capable of representing the nonlinear behaviour of the material [12–15] and some particular effects such as creep [16, 17].
The present work here discusses the following parts: the basic mathematical formulation of the continuum mechanics of solids according to the finite strain theory; the material model for timber: orthotropic, elasticviscousplastic, brittle in tension, ductile in compression, based on a multisurface yield approach; the FEM formulation for large strains and large displacements with 3D solid hexahedral elements, numerical examples, results and discussion.
2. Materials and methods
The FEM is inherently developed according to the theory of the continuum mechanics of solids. In this work a general purpose FEM framework, with threedimensional hexahedral elements and with a specific material model of wood, has been devised and software coded for the analysis of structural timber, which aims to reproduce the main mechanic performance of a timber element. In this code, the material model has been built in. In compression state, an elasticviscousplastic behaviour has been adopted, and in tension an elastic with brittle failure has been adopted. The stress tensor is accounted, at the integration points of an element, to compute the corresponding elasticviscousplastic material tangent modulus and the corresponding strain tensor. Failure is computed at a limit value of each component, in compression of both the stress tensor, representing yield, and strain tensor and in tension of the strain tensor only.
2.1. Introduction to the problem of continuum mechanics
According to the classical theory of the continuum mechanics of solids [18–20], the formulation of the FEM for finite strains is based on the description of the deformation state of a generic solid, subjected to a loading condition. The kinematic transformation of a body, from the state at the initial time 0, in the reference configuration
The solution to that problem consists to determinate the displacement of a point
where
A basic tensor, which has an important role in the present theory, is the deformation gradient which can be calculated as:
The quantities that govern the problem are distinguished if they are referred to the reference configuration, which is known, or to the current configuration, which is instead unknown.
The strains to which the body is subjected can be computed in the reference configuration by the GreenLagrange strain tensor
where
The stress tensor is computed through the constitutive law that expresses the stress tensor in terms of the strain tensor, by warranting that the stress and strain measures must be energetically conjugate. Accordingly to this, the Second PiolaKirchhoff stress tensor,
The true stress tensor or Cauchy stress tensor
The measures of engineering stresses are expressed by the First PiolaKirchhoff stress tensor, which is computed as
The above problem is ruled out by the equation of spatial momentum equilibrium in the reference configuration:
where
and in the current configuration:
where Γ is the inverse Jacobian of surface and
is the spatial velocity gradient,
By considering
2.2. Finite element method framework
According to the FEM, the variables in the above equation can be discretized by interpolation forms,
where the nodal force vector is:
the nodal stiffness matrix is:
the nodal residual vector is:
and the tangent stiffness matrix is:
Also, to account that the orthotropic principal axes of the material can rotate with respect to the reference system, the material tensor, constitutive law, must be computed using a rotation tensor
where
The tangent stiffness matrix in general is nonsymmetric and is dependent on the material tangent modulus. Its computation requires an adequate numerical approach which has to be generally relied to the constitutive relationships of the specific material.
The above nonlinear system of Eqs. (12) and (13), at a global level, by applying the NewtonRaphson Method, is iteratively solved with the trial solution
2.3. The constitutive material model
The nonlinear behaviour of a material can be analysed by constitutive equations which relate stress to strain and other internal variables in a rate form. Within the finite strain hypothesis, constitutive equations must be formulated by warranting the principle of objectivity, that is, they must remain indifferent to the change of reference frame. This can be guaranteed by utilizing the objective tensor in constitutive equations.
In recent scientific literature some authors have proposed numerical solutions to the problem of continuum and consistent elasticviscousplasticity. Many scientific papers have been developed within the hypothesis of small strains [21–26], and others have focused their attention on finite strains hypothesis [27–31]. Many theoretical and numerical methods have been proposed in the literature to perform the procedure of stress update, in an incremental objectivity. The formulation of an incremental objective algorithm is based on constitutive equations, expressed as objective spatial rate, which are mapped to an intermediate configuration (in the present paper the relative variables are denoted with ‘^’). This configuration is a fictitious configuration which remains indifferent to rigid rotation. Also, the principle of objectivity is guaranteed by appropriate tensorial transformation of the body between spatial and material configuration.
Coherently to the above assertions, in the present work a convective or material representation [32, 33] has been employed. The problem is analysed by adopting the wellknown multiplicative elastoplasticity theory [32, 34] which postulates the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient in an elastic part
From the above discussion, the intermediate configuration can be described by the plastic part of the deformation gradient,
In order to formulate the elasticviscousplastic kinematics, a consistent transformation to the intermediate configuration is introduced for the spatial velocity gradient:
where
The material velocity gradient is:
By mapping
and
of the velocity gradient
The stress power per unit reference volume is:
where the stress measure, workconjugate to
The constitutive relationships must conform to some restrictions [35], which derive from the second law of thermodynamics, expressed as the ClausiusPlanck inequality. By considering an isothermal process and a purely mechanical case, the above inequality is expressed as plastic dissipation per unit reference volume:
where
The material time derivative of the free energy is
and the inequality results as:
The inequality (25) being valid for any admissible process of the material and from Eqs. (26) and (27) the constitutive equations are obtained as:
and
where
Hence the reduced dissipation inequality in a local form is:
The hardening or softening law is expressed as follows:
where
In the case of elastic response of stress, the response can be formulated in a nonrate form with a hyperelastic potential in the intermediate configuration
and [36]
is the Second PiolaKirchhoff stress tensor in the intermediate configuration. From the differential of Eq. (32), the fourthorder elastic modulus tensor in the intermediate configuration can be obtained as:
In the case of rateindependent elasticplasticity, without the viscous effect, the point representative of stress cannot come outside the yield surfaces, identified by the yield functions
Note that in the following expression the stresses
and the consistency conditions:
In the case of ratedependent viscoplasticity, the actual stress can overcome out the yield surface, and consequently the above condition is no longer appropriate, but an overstress function
The viscousplastic flow is evaluated by the following relaxation equation
whose discretized form is:
where
In order to determine the plastic stress response in Eq. (30), the plastic dissipation requires to compute the plastic part of the deformation gradient. From the principle of maximum plastic dissipation, the evolution equations of the inelastic strain tensors can be determined as normality rules:
The introduction of the consistency multipliers allows to distinguish the different material response upon each yield surface as follows:
2.4. Objective integration algorithm
The constitutive equations can be approximately solved at a local level, with a general return mapping procedure. The time integration has been executed with a backward Euler scheme fully implicit in time, and an exponential map has been adopted for the plastic deformation gradient. According to this scheme of time integration, from a given state at the previous time step
The multiplicative decomposition, Eq. (19) is discretized
From the Eqs. (23) and (40)
where
is the viscousplastic flow direction where the plastic potential coincide with the yield function, in an associative viscoplasticity.
The hardening or softening law has been discretized as follows:
From the above Eq. (43), it is possible to obtain:
the same relation can be integrated in time by an implicit backward Euler procedure, from
where
Then the continuum elasticviscousplastic tangent stiffness matrix, which expresses the derivative of stress to respect to strain, it can be determined:
where the creep term is expressed as follows:
where the power law for creep is evaluated [16] as:
where
The trial stress predictor is computed as
and in discretized form
where
Substituting the Eqs. (42) and (47) into the elastic Green Lagrange strain tensor, we have:
For all the multisurface yields, by using the proper yield criterion, the trial overstress function
Then, the increment of each plastic multiplier
For all the multisurfaces, at the end of each local iteration, the intermediate configuration, described by
The updated stress tensor is evaluated as follows:
In the following expressions
the increments are evaluated as follows:
by introducing the residual vectors:
which are solved for the variables:
By linearizing [37] the residual vectors, a system of linear equations is obtained:
Dropping the superscript
and
the solution can be obtained as
where the consistent Jacobian,
the vector of unknowns is:
and the vector of residual is:
The system of equations is solved by the NewtonRaphson following iteration scheme:
where
At the start of the iteration loop the following positions are made:
At each iteration
hence the internal variables are updated as follows:
The next step begins by computing the stress tensor and the internal stress tensor. The iterations progress until the norm of the residual vectors stays behind a prefixed tolerance.
At this point each overstress function can be defined as follows:
where:
To enhance the convergence in the equilibrium iteration, with the NewtonRaphson Method, the consistent elasticviscousplastic tangent stiffness matrix can be used instead of the continuum elasticviscousplastic tangent stiffness matrix (48). This is the consequence of the discretization of the consistency condition in correspondence of the rateindependent elastic limit. It can be obtained by substituting the matrix
2.5. The finite element method implementation
The previous nonlinear constitutive material model has been implemented in a threedimensional finite element code, based on the displacement approach. The geometry was schematized by adopting linear hexahedral solid isoparametric elements with eight node. The spatial integration was carried out for each element with an 8point Gauss quadrature rule.
Within the framework of the NewtonRaphson iteration method, the solution of the nonlinear equilibrium equation system was found for the displacements as unknown variables.
The procedure implemented in the software code is listed in Table 1.

The FEM code was employed to simulate the loaddisplacement behaviour of white spruce timber up to and beyond failure. Simple tests in tension and in compression have been run to check the ability of the computational code.
2.6. Comparison with experimental data and numerical example
As a check to the suggested implementation, application examples by using the present model have been simulated with the software code. The hexahedron 3D solid elements have been used to mesh timber. Note that the purpose of these tests is to make a preliminary check of the proposed model. Subsequently, the improvement of this model and of its parameters, and further checks against experimental data, is a future task.
To verify the present model preliminarily, a comparison between numerical results and experimental data has been reported here. The experimental data concern a test on a specimen of white spruce under compressive loading, with the loading axes set along the longitudinal fibre of wood. The specimen has been dimensioned with size 20 mm × 20 mm
Tensile strength (numerical)  4.0  6.0  6.0  6.0  4.0  6.0  6.0  6.0  40.0 
Compressive strength [6]  4.0  6.0  6.0  6.0  4.0  6.0  6.0  6.0  40.0 
Compressive maximum strain (numerical)  0.005  0.005  0.005  0.005  0.005  0.005  0.005  0.005  0.005 
1.0627E7  4.7290  0.1458 
Another simulation has been reported as an example. It consists of the reproduction of the nonlinear behaviour of a wood specimen under tension loading. The wood specimen has been dimensioned with a size of 20 mm × 10 mm × 240 mm, assuming that the orientation of the longitudinal fibre of wood is set along the loading axes. The simulation has been executed by using a finite element mesh of eight node hexahedral elements with 700 elements and 1188 nodes. In the test, the specimen has been restrained at its bottom surface edge and it has been subjected to an imposed displacement course at its top surface edge. The loading simulation has been carried out in control of displacement.
3. Results and discussion
The stressstrain data of both the experimental and numerical results for the specimen under compression loading have been plotted in Figure 1. One can view that the mechanical behaviour is properly predicted both for the elastic tract and for the yielding zone, although the last part of the elastic path, numerically predicted, stays slightly behind that measured.
Also the numerical results concerning the compression test are reported as a plot of coloured isomap. These isomaps show the intensity distribution of displacement, stress, strain and equivalent plastic (inelastic) strain along the longitudinal fibre, at some prefixed time steps (Figures 2–5).
In the plotted isomap of the displacement field, along the longitudinal axes of the specimen (Figure 2), it is quite clear to observe the different levels of displacement along the specimen height, it varies from the maximum level at the top edge of the specimen to the minimum at the bottom edge, close to the restrains.
Figure 3 shows the distribution of normal stress along the longitudinal axes of the specimen. The distribution is reasonably uniform with the exception around the edge restrain, where the marked colour variation points out the expected stress concentrations.
Figure 4 displays the colour isomap of the strain field along the longitudinal axes of the specimen. In this figure, the different levels of strain along the height of the specimen are quite evident, from a minimum at the bottom edge, which is cinematically restrained, to a maximum at the top, where the deformation increases from the inner side towards the outer side of the specimen.
Figure 5 shows the equivalent plastic strain distribution on the specimen shape, which is however comprehensive of other inelastic strains, such as creep. At the loading step illustrated in this figure, the plastic strain is quite extended on the whole of the specimen shape.
The numerical results for the specimen under tension loading are also reported as a plot of coloured isomap. The isomaps show the intensity distribution of displacement, stress and strain along the longitudinal fibre, at some prefixed loading stepping (Figures 6–8).
Figure 6 shows the displacement field along the longitudinal axes of the specimen. The distribution is quite coherent with a mechanical behaviour, it varies along the height of the specimen with a high level towards the centre of the specimen.
In Figure 7, the stress distribution along the longitudinal axes of the specimen is displayed. The distribution is correctly rather uniform. It also presents stress concentrations near the bottom edge where the specimen is held back.
Figure 8 displays the strain isomap along the longitudinal axes of the specimen. This distribution is quite uniform except near the bottom edge of the specimen.
4. Conclusions
Most common models, used to analyse the mechanical behaviour of timber or wood composite structures, mainly adopt a single equivalent yield surface to describe the nonlinearity of the material. In the present approach a multisurface yielding description of the nonlinear behaviour of wood is proposed. It performs a general orthotropic elasticviscousplastic constitutive formulation, according to the finite strain theory. Within a continuum mechanics approach, the proposed threedimensional FEM model is capable to represent elasticviscousplastic in compression and elasticbrittle in tension behaviour of wood.
On the basis of a preliminary comparison of the numerical results with experimental data, the model has demonstrated to be valuable to represent the main mechanical behaviour of a test specimen. The examples presented here illustrate that the FEM model can be adequate to examine the mechanical behaviour of wood under displacement loading both in linear and nonlinear situations. The model has been built within a general purpose FEM code, its formulation being quite general it is almost powerful to describe complex states in wood materials such as anisotropy, elasticity and viscoplasticity, brittle crack occurring in the timber structure. However, the validation of the model with the comparison between numerical and experimental results can be carried out in a future work
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the University of Basilicata under the research Project ‘RIL 2015’. This support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
 1.
De Luca V., Marano C. Prestressed glulam timbers reinforced with steel bars. Construction and Buildings Materials. 2012; 30 :206–217. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.016.  2.
PattonMallory M., Cramer S. M., Smith F. W., Pellicane P. J. Nonlinear material models for analysis of bolted wood connections. Journal of Structural Engineering. 1997; 123(8): 1063–1070.  3.
Perkins R. W. Concerning the mechanics of wood deformation. Forest Production Journal. 1967; 17 (3):55–67.  4.
Bodig J., Jayne B. A. Mechanics of wood and wood composites. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company; 1982.  5.
Dinwoodie J. M. Timber—its nature and behaviour. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company; 1981.  6.
De Luca V., Sabia D. Mechanical compression tests to model timber structures behaviour. In: A. A. Mammoli and C. A. Brebbia, editor. Computational Methods and Experiments in Materials Characterization III. WIT Transaction on Engineering Sciences; 13 June 2007 through 15 June 2007; Bologna (Italy). Southampton: WIT Press. Southampton; 2007. Volume 57 pp. 273–278. DOI: 10.2495/MC070271.  7.
Hankinson R. L. Investigation of Crushing Strength of Spruce at Varying Angles of Grain. Air Service Information Circular No. 259, U. S. Air Service; 1921.  8.
Goodman J. R., Bodig J. Orthotropic strength of wood in compression. Wood Science. 1971; 4 (2):83–94.  9.
Tsai S. W., Wu E. M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. Journal of Composite Materials. 1971; 5 :58–80.  10.
Tabiei A., Wu J. Threedimensional nonlinear orthotropic finite element material model for wood. Composite Structures. 2000; 50 :143–149.  11.
Schmidt J., Kaliske M. Models for numerical failure analysis of wooden structures. Engineering Structures. 2009; 31 :571–579. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.06.004.  12.
Oudjene M., Khelifa M. Finite element modelling of wooden structures at large deformations and brittle failure prediction. Materials and Design. 2009; 30 :4081–4087.  13.
Dahl K. B., Malo K. A. Nonlinear shear properties of spruce softwood: numerical analyses of experimental results. Composites Science and Technology. 2009; 69 :2144–2151.  14.
Oudjene M., Khelifa M. Elastoplastic constitutive law for wood behaviour under compressive loadings. Construction and Building Materials. 2009; 23 :3359–3366.  15.
Khennane A., Khelifa M., Bleron L., Viguier J. Numerical modelling of ductile damage evolution in tensile and bending tests of timber structures. Mechanics of Materials. 2014; 68 :228–236.  16.
De Luca V., Della Chiesa A. A creep nonlinear FEM analysis of glulam timber. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 2013; 20 :489–496. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2011.627643.  17.
Moayyed M. Y, Taheri F. Creep response of glulam reinforced by a novel prestressed FRPwood composite system. 11th World Conference on Timber Engineering 2010 (WCTE 2010), Trentino, Italy, 20–24 June, 2010.  18.
Bathe K. J. Finite element procedures. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1995.  19.
Zienkiewicz O., Taylor R. The finite element method. Volume 1: The basis. Oxford: ButterworthHeinemann; 2000.  20.
Zienkiewicz O., Taylor R. The finite element method. Volume 2: Solid mechanics. Oxford: ButterworthHeinemann; 2000.  21.
Carosio A., Willam K., Etse G. On the consistency of viscoplastic formulations. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2000; 37 :7349–7369.  22.
De Angelis F. On the structural response of elasto/viscoplastic materials subject to timedependent loadings. SDHM Structural Durability and Health Monitoring. 2012; 8 (4):341–358.  23.
De Angelis F. Numerical algorithms for j2 viscoplastic models. Advanced Materials Research. 2012; 567 :267–274. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.567.267  24.
De Angelis F. Computational aspects in the elasto/viscoplastic material behavior of solids. Advanced Materials Research. 2012; 567: 192–199. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.567.192  25.
De Angelis F. On constitutive relations in nonsmooth elasto/viscoplasticity. Advanced Materials Research. 2012; 566 :691–698. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.566.691  26.
De Angelis F. Computational issues in ratedependent plasticity models. Advanced Materials Research. 2012; 566 :70–77. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.566.70.  27.
Simo J. C., Ortiz M. A unified approach to finite deformation elastoplastic analysis based on the use of hyperelastic constitutive equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1985; 49 :221–245.  28.
Moran B., Ortiz M., Shih. C. F. Formulation of implicit finite element methods for multiplicative finite deformation plasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1990; 29 :483–514.  29.
Wang W. M., Pozivilova A., Sluys L. J. Implicit algorithms for finite deformation viscoplasticity. European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, ECCOMAS 2000, Barcelona 11–14 September, 2000.  30.
Wang W. M., Sluys L. J. Formulation of an implicit algorithm for finite deformation viscoplasticity. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2000; 37 : 7329–7348.  31.
García Garino C., Ribero Vairo M. S., Andía Fagés S., Mirasso A. E., Ponthot J.P. Numerical simulation of finite strain viscoplastic problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 2013; 246 :174–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.10.008.  32.
Cuitino A. M., Ortiz M. A. A materialindependent method for extending stress update algorithms from smallstrain plasticity to finite plasticity with multiplicative kinematics. Engineering Computations. 1992; 9 :437–451.  33.
RodríguezFerran A., Pegon P., Huerta A. Two stress update algorithms for large strains: accuracy analysis and numerical implementation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1997; 40( 23):4363—4404.  34.
Lubliner J Plasticity theory. First ed. New York, USA: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1990.  35.
Eidel B., Gruttmann F. Elastoplastic orthotropy at finite strains: multiplicative formulation and numerical implementation. Computational Materials Science. 2003; 28 :732–742.  36.
Holmes D. W., Loughran J. G. Numerical aspects associated with the implementation of a finite strain, elastoviscoelastic–viscoplastic constitutive theory in principal stretches. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 2010; 83 :366–402. DOI: 10.1002/nme.2850.  37.
Schröder J., Gruttmann F., Löblein J. A simple orthotropic finite elasto–plasticity model based on generalized stress–strain measures. Computational Mechanics. 2002; 30 :48–64. 10.1007/s0046600203663.  38.
Forest Product Laboratory (FPL). Wood handbookwood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPLGTR113. Madison (WI, USA): Department of Agriculture; 1999.  39.
Lekhnitskii S. G. In: Brandstatter J. J., editor. Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic elastic body. San Francisco, CA: Holden Day, Inc.; 1963.