Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Weed Seedbank in Rice Fields

Written By

Mário Luiz Ribeiro Mesquita

Submitted: May 4th, 2016 Reviewed: November 2nd, 2016 Published: March 15th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/66676

Chapter metrics overview

1,611 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The weed seedbank in the soil is the major source of weeds in rice fields. Therefore, information on ecological aspects of weeds occurring in rice, including their potential seed production, is crucial for weed management. The size of the weed seedbank in rice fields is highly variable depending on the climate, relief position, soil moisture content, depth of sampling, history of the areas and management practices used by farmers. As a survival strategy, colonization and persistence in the communities, most common weeds in rice fields produce huge number of seeds and vegetative propagules with physical and physiological dormancy mechanisms, insuring seed viability in the soil for long periods. A large proportion of weed seedbank remains generally on or close to the soil surface after seed rain. Sampling protocols involve the use soil cores at variable soil depths. Determination of the size of the weed seedbank can be made by seed direct extraction and germination methods. The latter is more precise with respect to enumeration of viable seeds in the soil. Weed management in rice fields should focus on methods suitable to decrease the weed population in the soil seedbank.


  • competition
  • biological invasion
  • germination
  • weed management
  • allelopathy

1. Introduction

Many weeds grow in association with the rice crop and their distribution and occurrence intensity are determined by a complex of climate, soils and relief and management practices. Weeds interfere with rice growth and yield by means of competition for nutrients, water, light and space. Moreover, many weed species possess allelopathy mechanisms that hinder or even prevent the growth of other species associated with them, including rice, resulting in decreased yield by up to 96% [1].

Weeds are a major biological constraint for rice farmers. Many weed species that occur in rice fields can produce a huge number of small seeds and vegetative propagules as a strategy to survive stresses imposed by control methods [24]. After dispersal, seeds may remain on the soil surface or be buried by means of biotic and abiotic agents thus forming a seedbank which becomes the main source of weeds in rice cropping fields.

As a survival strategy, colonization and persistence in the communities, the weeds have developed a number of features, for example, seed dormancy, which enables the occurrence of discontinuous germination during the rice crop growing season in addition to ensuring the viability of the seeds in the soil for long periods.

The weed seedbank in the soil is a dynamic system with inputs and outputs. The inputs occur via seed rain as a result of efficient dispersion mechanisms and the outputs by means of germination, predation [57] and decay or seed death [8].

Various factors affect weed seed germination including variations in soil temperature and moisture [913] and physiological aspects of the seeds particularly seed dormancy [14]. When favorable environmental conditions occur and physiological constraints are overcome, seeds germinate; weeds grow and produce new propagules enriching the soil seedbank.

Research on identification and quantification of weed species germinated in the soil seedbank from rice fields were carried out by numerous authors [9, 1520]. However, due to its ecological and economic importance, the status of the weed seedbank in rice cropping fields needs to be further investigated. Studies on weed seedbank ecology are crucial for improving weed control practices in rice fields.

Field and greenhouse studies are needed in order to understand the soil weed seedbank germination dynamics and its relationship with the weed flora on rice fields. These studies can contribute to predict infestations and could lead to improved management practices to decrease the negative effects of weed interference with rice crop growth and yield.

The goal of this chapter is to discuss general aspects of weed seedbank ecology including weeds associated with rice agroecosystems, types, sizes and major characteristics of the weed seedbank in rice fields, including seed dormancy, research methodology, factors affecting germination dynamics and some aspects of weed seedbank management in rice fields.


2. Major weeds in rice fields

2.1. South and Southeast Asia

Many weeds are associated with rice agroecosystems in different parts of the world. In South and Southeast Asia, 64 weeds were reported as the most important in upland rice [21]. These occur in 18 families; 37 are broadleaves, 20 are grasses and 7 are sedges. Twenty-seven of the cited weeds are primarily annuals, 20 are perennials and 17 are classified as annual or perennial [21]. Ninety weed species were reported competing with rice under aerobic systems [22]. In contrast [23] reported 47 weed species in the rice crop and [24] cited more than 1800 weed species reported in 15 South and Southeast Asian countries. Cyperus iriaL., Cyperus difformisL.,Echinochloa colona(L.) Link, Ischaemum rugosumSalisb. Leptochloa chinensisNees,Ludwigia hyssopifolia(G. Don) Excel, Oryza sativaL., Schoenoplectus juncoides(Roxb.) Palla,Sphenochlea zeylanicaGaertn. are the 12 most troublesome weeds of rice in Asia [25].

2.2. Africa

One hundred and thirty weed species are reported to occur in rice-based cropping systems in Africa [26]. Major weed species of upland rice areas are Rottboellia cochinchinensis(Lour.) W. Clayton, Digitaria horizontalisWilld., Ageratum conyzoidesL. and Tridax procumbensL., while A. conyzoidesand Panicum laxumSw. which were more cited in the hydromorphic areas and Cyperus difformisL., Sphenoclea zeylanicaGaertn., Fimbristylis littoralisGaudich, Oryza longistaminataA. Chev. & Roehr., Echinochloa colona(L.) Link and Echinochloa crus-pavonis(Kunth) Schult. dominates the lowland rice fields. Poaceae (43%) and Cyperaceae (37%) are the most prevalent families in lowland rice while, in the uplands, weed species composition tends to be more diverse with Poaceae (36%) and Asteraceae (16%) most prevalent [26].

2.3. Latin America

In Latin America [27] reported 13,892 individuals belonging to 20 families, 40 genera and 60 species in the soil weed seedbank germination studies in situand ex situin which there were 11,530 individuals and 50 species ex situand 2362 individuals and 34 species in situ. Total density was 3859 plants m−2 [27].

The families with the highest species richness were Cyperaceae with sixteen, Poaceae with ten and Fabaceae-Faboideae with six species each. These families contributed with 53.3% of total species. In contrast, ten families: Amaranthaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, Loganiaceae, Marantaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Plantaginaceae, Portulacaceae, Solanaceae, Thelypteridaceae and Turneraceae had only one species each. These correspond to 50% of the total of all recorded families [27]. Similar results were observed by [15] who reported that that 86% of species present in seedbank from 22 rice fields in Camboja were Cyperaceae family. In Nepal, Ref. [28] also reported that 37% of the species present in the weed seedbank belonged to this family.

In the tropics, about 80% of seeds germinate until the 60th day of the study in the greenhouse. Germination peak is generally observed at 25 days after the beginning of the study which coincides with the period of the start of the rainy season in the region leading to an increase in weed germination and emergence in weed soil seedbank. Germination stabilization generally occurs at 115 days after start of study [16] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Germination curve of weed of the weed seedbank from a rice field, in Maranhão State, Northeast Brazil, Latin America.

Floristic diversity, based on Shannon Diversity Index, generally is greater ex situstudy with H’= 2.66 nats ind−1, against H’= 2.53 nats ind−1 in situ. The highest number of individuals and species found ex situcontribute for the greatest floristic diversity ex situ[16].

The most important species in the weed seedbank in Latin America based on the importance value were Ludwigia octovalvis(Jacq.) P. H. Raven, Schoenoplectus juncoides(Roxb.) Palla, Lindernia crustacea(L.) F. Muell, Cyperus sphacelatusRoth, Cyperus iriaL., Fimbristylis dichotoma(L.) Vahl, Boerhavia erectaL., Rhynchospora nervosa(Vahl) Boeck, Scleria lithosperma(L.) Sw. and Sida rhombifoliaL. [16]. In Latin America, species of the family Cyperaceae largely dominates the weed seedbank in the soil of rice fields [16]. Forrmation of a seedbank represents an important regeneration component for many species of this family [2].

The species dominance in weed seedbank in rice fields might be related not only to cultural practices and crop history but also to the reproductive capacity of the weed species. All species cited here are propagated exclusively by seeds, except for F. dichotomaand S. lithosperma(Cyperaceae), which also propagate asexually, by rhizomes [29].

The ability to produce a very high number of seeds is one of the main features developed by weeds that occur in rice fields. This is a strategy to escape the stress imposed by the control methods and ensure the species survival.

In the Philippines, for example, see [25], among the weed species occurring in paddy fields, one of the species Ludwigia octovalvis(L.) F. Muell (Onagraceae) is capable of producing 250,000 seeds, while Echinochloa colona(L.) Link and Echinochloa crus-galli(L.) P. Beauv both from the Poacae family can produce 3100 and 2900 seeds per plant, respectively [5].

Schoenoplectusspp. (Cyperaceae) are able to produce on average 82,098 seeds.m−2 [2]. Other species of the same family, among which, Fimbristylis miliaceae(L.) Vahl, Fimbristylis dichotoma(L.) Vahl, can produce 10,000 and 6500 seeds per plant, respectively [29], while Cyperus iria(L.) can produce 5000 seeds per plant [30].

After dispersal, weed seeds are deposited on the soil forming the seedbank that becomes the main source of weeds in rice fields.


3. Weed seedbank types

Soil seedbanks vary according to the duration their seeds remain viable in the soil [30]. Weed scientists distinguished between transient seedbanks for species that have viable seeds present for less than 1 year, such as seeds from grasses, for example, and short-term persistent seedbanks for species with viable seeds that remain for at least 1 but less than 5 years and long-term persistent, when seeds persist in the soil for at least 5 years [30]. Seeds of many weed species of the Malvaceae and Fabaceae families have long persistence in the soil because of their tegument impermeability to water and gases [14].

Seed persistence in the soil has been attributed to variation in fungal activity, soil fertility, particularly the presence of nitrates, oxygen supply, vegetation cover, burial depth via biotic and abiotic agents, seed density and predator pressure [31].


4. Characteristics of the weed seedbanks

4.1. Seed dormancy

Dormancy is the failure of the weed seeds to germinate under favorable environmental conditions. There are two types of seed dormancy. The first is known as primary or innate dormancy which occurs when seeds are dormant at the time of maturity and the second, as secondary dormancy which is when weed seeds can cycle in and out of a dormancy state due to variation on environmental conditions [14]. Seed dormancy in the soil is important because it maintains the weed seedbank over time and thus helps to ensure that for most weed species only a small proportion of buried weed seeds is recruited as seedlings from the soil seedbank in any given year [14].

The main dormancy mechanisms are physiological, by means of hormones, phytochromes and inhibitors; physical, due to impermeable seed coat to water and gases; and morphological, due to immature embryo [14].

In temperate climate regions, the weed seedbank declines 32% a year [32]. In contrast, in tropical regions, the weed seedbank is generally smaller and the decline tends to be faster because (a) there is a high seedling recruitment rate due to favorable climate conditions for seed germination, which persist for longer periods than in temperate regions; (b) high seed mortality due to attack of predators; (c) high relative humidity and higher temperatures, which favor biotic agents; (d) seedling mortality due to seed germination in short, hot dry periods that can occur during the rainy season; (e) a shorter duration or even the absence of seed dormancy in many weed species; and (f) low seed viability [33].

In post-dispersal weed seedbank studies carried out in rice fields in the Philippines, it was noted that in a period of only 14 days, the fire ants (Solenopsis geminata) were the main predators and responsible for the removal of 98%, 88% and 75% of Digitaria ciliaris(Retz.) Koeler, Eleusine indica(L.) and Echinochloa colona(L.) Link seeds, respectively, previously placed on soil surface [5].

Generally higher germination rates observed in the soil weed seedbank in rice fields in the first 60 days [27] is probably due to dormancy breaking because of greater sunlight exposition and temperature variation as observed by many authors [3435]. This is corroborated by studies carried out in the Philippines where 50% of weed soil seedbank in rice fields germinated in first six weeks [36] and in rice field in Malaysia where it was noted that the highest germination peak occurred at 30 days [9].

4.2. Weed seedbank size in rice fields

The magnitude of weed seedbanks in rice fields is highly variable. Using the direct seed extraction method Ref. [17] found 260,000 seeds m−2 in Vietnã, Ref. [19] reported that the number of weed seeds in the soil ranged from 17,300 to 646,000 m−2 in New South Wales, Australia, Ref. [15] reported that in the top 5 cm of soil ranged from 52.1 to 167,000 seeds m−2 with overall mean of 8,500 seeds m−2 in Cambodian rice fields, Ref. [37] found from 116,812 to 294,761 seeds m−2 in China. In contrast, using the germination method Ref. [38] found from 1700 to 4000 seedlings m−2 in Northern Laos, Ref. [39] counted 878 seedlings m−2 and Ref. [18] found 4953 seedlings m−2 in weed seedbank in rice fields in Latin America.

Differences in the number of seeds or weed seedling density in the seedbank can be explained by several factors, including climate, relief position, soil moisture content, depth of sampling, history of the areas and management practices used by rice farmer [40].

4.3. Seed distribution in the soil profile

In cropping systems where there is no soil disturbance and no tillage, as is the case for subsistence farming, weed seeds tend to remain on the soil surface, where they are easier to control [42].

The seed location is an important feature because only those situated on or near the soil surface are able to germinate, which can lead to greater short-term germination flows accelerating the reduction of the seedbank. Moreover, the permanence of seeds at the soil surface favors predation [43].

Studies on the movement of weed seeds in a no-till soil have shown that after 1 year, the seeds reached deeper in sandy soils (10% > 6 mm) than in clayey soils (2% > 6 mm). It was also noted that the vertical movement is very small and is conditioned by soil texture, the cumulative rainfall and the seed size, weight and shape [43].

The smaller and lighter seed concentrate at the soil surface. With respect to the seed shape, those flattened are more difficult to penetrate the soil than spherical, discoidal or pyramidal [43].


5. Weed seedbank research methodology

5.1. Sampling

Weed scientists advocate the use of 5 cm diameter cores to sample weed seedbanks in the soil. They state that this size core is large enough to detect seeds, but small enough not to burden the researcher with too much soil [44]. The number of cores to be sampled and the depth to which soil cores should be taken depends upon the research objectives. If the research is to determine the seedbank size and composition or to relate seedbanks to aboveground weed flora, then seedbanks should be sampled at times that follow seed shed but precede seed germination [44].

5.2. Determination of the size and floristic composition of the weed seedbank

There are two methods to enumerate the number of seeds in the soil: Direct seed extraction and germination method

5.2.1. Direct seed extraction

In the direct seed extraction technique, seeds are separated from soil by washing or flotation. Initially the soil sample is placed on a screen with a mesh size smaller than the smallest expected seed. A mesh size of about 0.2 mm is enough to catch most small seeds [44].

The flotation method is often used after the soil sample has been washed. The objective is to separate seed from soil particles so that they will float in a solution made with water and potassium carbonate. After the seeds are separated using the direct seed extraction method, they must be identified. Identification is made under magnification using proper literature [44].

5.2.2. Germination method

The second technique for enumerating seeds in the soil seedbank is the germination method [44]. This technique is used to enumerate the density of nondormant seeds in the seedbank. Twenty cores are recommended from an experimental treatment [44]. The cores are mixed, composed, inserted in trays and placed in greenhouse. The most suitable soil depth in the trays should be within 2–3 cm with a maximum of 5 cm so that all seeds can germinate. Trays should be perforated in order to facilitate drainage. In case of sandy soils, water retention can be improved by lining the trays with vermiculite (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Germination method.

In recent years, research on seedbanks has focused more on the germination method instead of the direct seed extraction. The main reason for this is that the germination method is more accurate because it enables to estimate the actual weed seedbank size considering that all viable seeds will germinate even if it takes several months of work. Furthermore, the seedlings are easier to identify than the seeds.


6. Weed seedbank management in rice fields

The weed seedbank in rice fields is an indicator of weed community resulting from the present and past weed control practices and can provide valuable information for the development of ecologically friendly practices such as, for example, the reduction of herbicide application.

In the past few years, several authors have recommended that the weed management should integrate the different control methods in order to decrease weed population in the soil seedbank [4548].

A reduction in the weed seedbank germination means minor problem with weeds and hence savings for rice farmers. Moreover, it can provide a healthier environment with less use of chemicals, creating the necessary conditions for the development of more efficient and environmentally acceptable weed management.

Therefore, it is important to limit the current contribution to the weed seedbank to reduce the population size and facilitate the use of future weed control practices.

6.1. Land preparation

Soil disturbance with tillage can promote weed seed germination by several mechanisms including exposition of weed seeds to light which releases seeds of some species from dormancy but can also bury some seeds that are on the soil surface [41]. Tillage prior to rice crop establishment may result in nitrogen mineralization which can promote some seed germination. On the other hand, off-season dry soil tillage at sufficient depth may help breaking and drying vegetative propagules including stolons, bulbs and subsoil rhizomes of perennial weeds. However, tillage may cause soil erosion and increase costs for the rice farmer [36]. Patterns of weed emergence as affected by tillage in upland and lowland rice soils have shown that 40–50% occurred within 6 weeks after tillage in both sites. A significant weed emergence was observed within 3 weeks in both soils but very little emergence occurred in lowland soil [36].

6.2. Mulching

Soil mulching reduces weed seed germination by 90% [49]. The reduction in seed germination in the weed seedbank occur because the mulch prevents the penetration of light or blocks certain spectrum of light wavelengths which are necessary for most of the weed seeds to germinate [5052]. This is the case for the weed species that produce seeds that are photoblastic positive, that is, need light to germinate, such as Amaranthus retroflexus[53], Eclipta alba[54], Hyptis suaveolens[55], Digitariaspp. [56], Urtica dioica[57], Ageratum conyzoides[23, 58], Fimbristylis autumnalis[23] and Cyperus aggregatus[59].

Moreover, the physical barrier formed by straw must contributes to the death of germinated seedlings from seeds located on the soil surface, whose reserves were not enough to overcome the mulch [60, 61] and provides cover for predators that feed on weed seeds. In addition, residues have a moderating effect on temperature fluctuations in the soil, which in turn can impact seed dormancy of many weed species.

In India, for example, see Ref. [62], the use wheat straw as mulch resulted in 54% reduction in weed density at 30 days after rice seeding. In Vietnam, the herbaceous legume Tephrosia candida(Roxb.) D.C. used as mulch caused a reduction in the weed growth and a significant increase in rice yield [63].

6.3. Herbicides

Herbicides are widely used in rice cropping systems all over the world and may be economically attractive in some cases as it requires less overall weeding times. In Africa, 26 herbicides as single application or mixtures are being used in upland and lowland rice [26]. They are effective in reducing weed populations and hence the number of seeds added to the soil seedbank. However, their use is sharply decreasing due to social and environmental concerns and major negative impacts on soil biology aside from promoting the appearance of herbicide resistance in 51 weeds in rice fields [64].

6.4. Interaction between weeds and ducks

In China, a form of organic rice farming called rice-duck farming (RDF) has proven to be very successful in controlling weeds and decreasing the weed bank size in rice fields [65]. Interaction between weeds and ducks after 9 years under RDF, resulted in a decline from 38 to 21 in the number of weed species and the density of both the weed seedbank and aboveground weed flora decreased by more than 90%. After 9 years of interaction between weeds and ducks, RDF resulted in a more uniform vertical distribution of the weed seedbank both quantitatively and qualitatively. The ecological indices point to a gradual change towards fewer species, lower density and lower diversity following continued RDF. The dominant species in the weed seedbank shifted [65].


7. Conclusions

In recent years, there is growing interest in the adoption of conservation practices in rice agricultural production. This involves reducing soil disturbance along with maintaining crop residues on the surface, reducing weed seed inputs and promoting seed depletion in the weed seedbank in the soil. The technology of no-till or minimum tillage and also the growing interest in the practice of organic agriculture and agroecology to develop more balanced rice production systems are current trends that converge to a healthy environmentally and economically sustainable agricultural model.



The author is funded by FAPEMA (Foundation for Research and Scientific and Technological Development of Maranhão) State, Brazil. We thank our main donor, for their past and present financial support.


  1. 1. Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Row spacing and weed control timing affect yield of aerobic rice. Field Crops Research. 2011;121:226–231.
  2. 2. Leck MA, Schütz W. Regeneration of Cyperaceae, with particular reference to seed ecology and seedbanks. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2005;7:95–133. ppees.2005.05.001
  3. 3. Libertino GV. Biology ofBoerhavia erectaL. [thesis] Kabacan North Cotabato: University of Southern Mindanao Philippines; 1984.
  4. 4. Munhoz CBR, Felfli JM. Phytosociology of the herbaceous and sub-shrub layer of a savannah in Federal District, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 2006;20:671–685. http://dx.
  5. 5. Chauhan BS, Migo T, Westerman PR, Johnson DE. Post dispersal of weed seeds in rice fields. Weed Research. 2010;50:553–560.
  6. 6. Hesse E, Rees M, Müller-Schärer H. Seedbank persistence of clonal weeds in contrasting habitats: implications for control. Plant Ecology. 2007;190:233–243.
  7. 7. Rodriguez C. Garcia MA. Seed-bank dynamics of the tropical weedSida rhombifolia(Malvaceae): incidence of seedling emergence, predators and pathogens. Seed Science Research. 2009;9:241–248.
  8. 8. Mohler CL, Dykeman C, Nelson EB, Ditommaso A. Reduction in weed seedling emergence by pathogens following the incorporation of green crop residue. Weed Research. 2012;52:467–477.
  9. 9. Begum M, Juraimi AS, Rastan SOBS, Amartalingam R, Man AB. Seedbank and seedling emergence characteristics of weeds in rice field soils of the muda granary area in north-west peninsular Malaysia. Biotropia. 2006;13:11–21.
  10. 10. Hérault B, Hiernaux P. Soil seedbank vegetation dynamics in Sahelian fallows; the impact of past cropping and current grazing treatments. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 2004;20:683–69.
  11. 11. Maia FC, Medeiros RB, Pillar VP, Focht T. Soil seedbank variation patterns according to environmental factors in a natural grassland. Revista Brasileira de Sementes. 2004;26:126–137.
  12. 12. Vivian R, Gomes Junior FG, Chamma HMCP, Silva AA, Fagan EB, Ruiz ST. The effect of light and temperature on germination ofAlternathera tenella, Conyza bonariensisandDigitaria ciliaris. Planta Daninha. 2008;26:507–513. 14 2008000300005
  13. 13. Batlla D, Benech-Arnold RL, Weed seed germination and the light environment: implications for weed management. Weed Biology and Management. 2014;14:77–87.
  14. 14. Baskin CC, Baskin JM, The natural history of soil seedbanks of arable land. Weed Science. 2006;4:549–557.
  15. 15. Kamoshita A, Ikeda H, Yamagishi J, Ouk M. Ecophysiological study on weed seedbank and weeds in Cambodian paddy fields with contrasting water availability. Weed Biology and Management. 2010;10:261–272.
  16. 16. Mesquita MLR, Andrade LA, Pereira WE. Soil weed seedbankin situandex situat a smallholder field in Maranhão State, northeastern Brazil. Ciência Agronomica. 2015;11:14–20.
  17. 17. Hach CV, Chin DV, Nhiem NT, Mortimer M, Heonq KL, Nam NTH. Effect of tillage practices on weed infestation and soil seed naks in wet-seeded rice. In: Proceedings of the International Weed Science Congress; (WSSA 2000) 6–11 June 2000. Foz do Iguassu, Brazil: IWSS; 2000. pp. 51–52.
  18. 18. Silva MRM, Costa EA, Marques LJP, Corrêa MJP. Weed seedbank in upland rice fields in the Pré-Amazônia Maranhense Region, Brazil, Revista de Ciências Agrárias. 2014;57:351–357.
  19. 19. McIntyre S. Seed reserves in temperate Australian rice fields following pasture rotation and continuous cropping. Journal of Appiled Ecology.1985;22: 875–884. DOI: 10.2307/2403236 Stable URL:
  20. 20. de Rouw A, Casagrande M, Phaynaxay K, Soulileuth B, Saito K. Soil seedbanks in slash-and-burn rice fields of northern Laos. Weed Research. 2014;54:26–37. DOI: 10.1111/wre.12053
  21. 21. Galinato MI, Moody K, Piggin CM. Upland rice weeds of South and Southeast Asia, Makati City: International Rice Research Institute; 1999. 156 p.
  22. 22. Jabran K, Chauhan BS. Weed management in aerobic rice systems. Crop Protection. 2015;78:151–163
  23. 23. Caton BP, Mortimer M, Hill JE, Johnson DE. 2010. A practical field guide to weeds of rice in Asia. 2nd ed. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute; 2010. 118 p.
  24. 24. Moody K.Weeds reported in rice in South and Southeast Asia. Manila: Philippines International Rice Research Institute; 1989. 442 p.
  25. 25. International Rice Research Institute. Rice knowledge bank. Makati: IRRI; 2010.
  26. 26. Rodenburg J, Johnson DE. Weed management in rice-based cropping system in Africa. In: Sparks, D, editor: Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 103, Burlington: Academic Press; 2009, pp. 149–218.
  27. 27. Mesquita MLR, Andrdae, LA, Pereira, WE. Floristic diversity in the soil weed seedbank in a rice growing area of Brazil: in situ and ex situ evaluation. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 2013;27:463–471.
  28. 28. Bhatt MD, Singh SP. Soil seedbanks dynamics of weed flora in upland and lowland rice paddy cultivation areas of far western Nepal. Scientific World. 2007;5:54–59.
  29. 29. Lorenzi H. Invasive plants of Brazil: aquatic terrestrial, parasite and toxic. 4th ed. Nova Odessa ? São Paulo: Instituto Plantarum, 2008. 640 p.
  30. 30. Thompson K, Ceriani RM, Bakker JP, Bekker RM. Are seed dormancy and persistence in soil related? Seed Science Research. 2003;13:97–100 DOI: 10.1079/SSR2003128
  31. 31. Saatkamp A, Poschlod P, Venable DL. The functional role of soil seedbanks in natural communities. In: Gallagher, RS editor. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 3rd ed. CAB International; Wallingford, UK, 2014. pp. 263–295.
  32. 32. Roberts HA, Feast PM. Changes in the number of viable seeds in the soil under different regimes. Weed Research. 1973;13:298–303. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1973.tb01278.x
  33. 33. Garcia MA. Relationship between weed community and soil seedbank in a tropical agro-ecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment. 1995;55:139–146.
  34. 34. Baskin, CC, Baskin JM. 1998. Seeds, ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. 666 p.−plfTbCXph&sig=_-2EJx6RgCQfGUEV_eWQlL_SPOI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  35. 35. Benech-Arnold RL, Sanchez RA, Forcela F, Kruk BC, Ghersa CM. Environmental control of dormancy in weed seedbanks in soil. Field Crops Research. 2000;67:105–122.
  36. 36. Zimdhal RL, Moody K, Lubigan RT. Castin EM. Patterns of weed emergence on tropical soils. Weed Science. 1988;36:603–608.
  37. 37. Feng W, Pan G, Qiang S, Li R, Wei J. Influence of long-term different fertilization on soil weed seedbank diversity of a paddy soil under rice/rape rotation. Frontiers in Biology China. 2008;3:320–327. DOI: 10.1007/s11515-008-0056-4
  38. 38. de Rowl A, Casagrande M, Phaynaxay K, Soulileuth B, Saito K. Soil seedbanks in slash-and-burn rice fields of northern Laos. Weed Research. 2014;54:26–37. DOI: 10.1111/wre.12053
  39. 39. Mesquita MLR, Andrade LA, Pereira WE. Germination, floristic composition and phytosociology of the weed seedbank in rice intercropped with corn fields. Agraria Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias.2016;11:14–20. DOI:10.5039/agraria.v11i1a5359
  40. 40. Maia FC, Medeiros RB, Pillar VP. Focht T. Soil seedbank variation patterns according to environmental factors in a natural grassland. Revista Brasileira de Sementes2004;26:126–137.
  41. 41. Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Influence of tillage systems on weed seedling emergence pattern in rainfed rice. Soil & Tillage Research. 2009;106:15–21.
  42. 42. Grundy AC, Mead A, Burston S. Modelling the emergence response of weed seeds to burial depth: interactions with seed density, weight and shape. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2003;40:757–770. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.200300836.x
  43. 43. Benvenuti S. Natural weed seed burial: effect of soil texture, rain and seed characteristics. Soil Science Research. 2007;17:211–219. DOI: 10.1017/S0960258507782752
  44. 44. Forcella FT, Webster T, Cardina J. Protocols for weed seedbanks determination in agro-ecosystems. In: Adeendum 1 Labrada IR editor, Weed Management for Developing Countries, FAO – Rome, Plant Production and Protection Paper. 2003;120:3–18.
  45. 45. Ghersa, CM, Benech-Arnold, RL, Satorre EH, Martinez-Ghersa MA. Advances in weed management strategies. Field Crops Research. 2000;67:95–104.
  46. 46. Labrada, R. The need for improved weed management in rice. In: Proceedings of the 20th Session of the International Rice Comission (Bangkok, Thailand), 23–26 July 2002; Bangkpk, Thailand: FAO; 2002.
  47. 47. Bastiaans L, Paolini R, Baumann DT, Focus on ecological weed management: what is the hindering adoption? Weed Research. 2008;48:481–491.
  48. 48. Saito K, Azoma K, Oikeh SO. Combined effects ofStylosanthes guianensisfallow and tillage management in upland rice. Soil and Tillage Research. 2010;107:57–63.
  49. 49. Teasdale JR. Principles and practices of using cover crops in weed management systems. In: Adeendum 1 Labrada IR editor, Weed Management for Developing Countries, FAO – Rome, Plant Production and Protection Paper.2003;120:Chapter 3.
  50. 50. Battla D, Benech-Arnold RL. Weed seed germination and the light environment: implications for weed management. Weed Biology and Management. 2014;14:77–87.
  51. 51. Steinmaus S, Elmore CL, Smith RJ, Donaldson D, Weber EA, Roncoroni JA, Miller PRM. Mulched cover crops as an alternative to conventional weed management systems in vineyards. Weed Research. 2008;48:273–281.
  52. 52. Yamashita OM, Guimarães SC, Silva JL, Carvalho MAC, Camargo MF. Fatores ambientais sobre a germinação deEmilia sonchifolia. Planta Daninha. 2009;27:673–681.
  53. 53. Teasdale JR, Mohler CL. The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Science. 2000;48:385–392.
  54. 54. Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Seed germination ecology of purple-leaf button weed (Borreria ocymoides) and indian heliotrope (Heliotropium indicum): two common weeds of rain-fed rice. Weed Science. 2008;56:670–675.
  55. 55. Wulff R, Medina E. Germination of seeds ofHyptis suaveolensPoit. Plant Cell Physiology. 1971;12:567–579.
  56. 56. Kobayashi H, Oyanagi A.Digitaria ciliarisseedbanks in tilled and untilled soybean fields. Weed Biology and Management. 2005;5:53–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2005.00156.x
  57. 57. Jankowska-Blaszczuk M, Daws MI. Impact of red : far red ratios on germination of temperate forest herbs in relation to shade tolerance, seed mass and persistence in the soil. Functional Ecology. 2007;2:1055–1062. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01328.x
  58. 58. Sun P, Mantri N, Möller M, Jinbo Shen J. Shen Z, Jiang B. Chen C, Miao Q, Lu H. Influence of light and salt on the growth of alien invasive tropical weedAgeratum conyzoides. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2012;6:739–748.
  59. 59. McIvor, JG, Reid DJ. Germination characteristics of tropical and subtropical rangeland species. The Rangeland Journal. 2011;33:195–208.
  60. 60. Gardarin A, Dürr C, Colbach N. Effects of seed depth and soil aggregates on the emergence of weeds with contrasting seed traits. Weed Research. 2010;50:91–101. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00757.x
  61. 61. Gomes Junior FG, Christoffoleti PJ. Biologia e manejo de plantas daninhas em áreas de plantio direto. Planta Daninha. 2008;26:789–798.
  62. 62. Singh S, Ladha JK, Gupta RK, Bhusan L, Rao AN, Sivaprasad B, Singh PP. Evaluation of mulching, intercropping with Sesbania and herbicide use for weed management in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativaL.) Crop Protection. 2007;26:518–524. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.04.024
  63. 63. Hoang Fagerstrom, MH, Niilsson SI, van Nordwijk M, Phien T, Olssom M, Hansson A, Svensson C. DoesTephrosia candidaas fallow species, hedgerow or mulch improve nutrient cycling and prevent nutrient losses by erosion on slopes in northern Vietnam? Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2002;90:291–304.
  64. 64. Heap, I. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds [Internet]. 2016 Available from [Accessed 2016-08-02].
  65. 65. Li SS, Wei SH, Zuo RL, Wei JQ, Qiang S. Changes in the weed seedbank over 9 consecutive years of rice-duck farming. Crop Protection. 2012;37:42–50.

Written By

Mário Luiz Ribeiro Mesquita

Submitted: May 4th, 2016 Reviewed: November 2nd, 2016 Published: March 15th, 2017