Network parameter values.
The heterogeneous cellular network (HCN) is most significant as a key technology for future fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks. The heterogeneous network consists of randomly macrocell base stations (MBSs) overlaid with femtocell base stations (FBSs). Stochastic geometry has been shown to be a very powerful tool to model, analyze, and design networks with random topologies such as wireless ad hoc, sensor networks, and multi-tier cellular networks. HCNs can be energy-efficiently designed by deploying various BSs belonging to different networks, which has drawn significant attention to one of the technologies for future 5G wireless networks. In this chapter, we propose switching off/on systems enabling the BSs in the cellular networks to efficiently consume the power by introducing active/sleep modes, which is able to reduce the interference and power consumption in the MBSs and FBSs on an individual basis as well as improve the energy efficiency of the cellular networks. We formulate the minimization of the power consumption for the MBSs and FBSs as well as an optimization problem to maximize the energy efficiency subject to throughput outage constraints, which can be solved by the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions according to the femto tier BS density. We also formulate and compare the coverage probability and the energy efficiency in HCN scenarios with and without coordinated multi-point (CoMP) to avoid coverage holes.
- heterogeneous cellular networks
- stochastic geometry
- poisson point process (PPP)
- different sleeping policy
- energy efficiency
- power consumption
Looking ahead to the year 2020 and beyond, there will be explosive growth in mobile data traffic. The existing cellular networks are experiencing some basic challenges such as higher data rates, excellent end-to-end performance, user coverage in hot-spots and crowded areas with lower latency energy consumption and amount of expenditure per information transfer. The fifth-generation (5G) cellular networks are envisioned to overcome these challenges. It is expected that 5G systems will have the ability to adopt a multi-tier architecture consisting of macrocells, different types of licensed small cells, relays, and device-to-device (D2D) networks to serve users with different quality-to-service (QoS) requirements in an energy efficient manner . It is expected that 5G wireless communication technologies will attain 1000 times higher mobile data volume per unit area, 10–100 times number of connecting devices and longevity of battery 10 times, user data rate, and 5 times reduced latency . A key attribute of 5G networks is that the expected cell data rate will be of the order of 10 Gb/s, whereas average data rate for single 4G networks is 1 Gb/s. Therefore, such a heterogeneous cellular network (HCN) architecture has drawn significant research attention and been recognized as a key technology for future 5G wireless networks. An HCN consisting of
Thus, we provide a stochastic geometry-based model for studying the BSs cooperation in downlink HCNs, which consists of two tiers of located BSs where each tier is characterized by different density and power and develops the performance of coverage probability. We investigate the energy saving problem through switching off/on for MBS and FBS in HCNs. We also derive two-tier HCNs under different sleeping policies and formulate the power consumption minimization for MBS and FBS. An optimization problem is formulated to maximize the energy efficiency subject to throughput outage constraints and solved by the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions in terms of femto tier BS density. BSs in sleeping mode might cause coverage holes, which have a negative impact on the connectivity of the network, combined coordinated multi-point (CoMP) and BS sleeping scheme in HCNs for energy efficiency. We introduce the energy efficiency performance based on two-state Markovian wireless channel model.
2. System model
We consider a HCN composed by
We focus on a typical user located and assume that a subset of the total ensemble of BSs cooperates by jointly transmitting a message to this tagged receiver, if we consider a nearest BS connectivity model, where a mobile tried to connect with its closest BS. This results in a Voronoi tessellation of the plane corresponding to the BS locations. In this case, the service area of a BS is the Voronoi cell associated with it (in Figure 2). When femtocells operate in closed access mode, only registered femtocells user can be allowed to contact to FBSs. On other hand, in open access mode, both macrocell user and unregistered femtocells user can be allowed to contact to FBSs, and then, the coverage region of FBS includes femtocells user and macrocell user connecting to femtocell as shown in Figure 3. We can see that and are the distances of MBS and FBS from user. From our proposed scheme, when the FBS is in sleeping mode, the user communicates with the active MBS. On the contrary, the user communicates with the active FBS as shown in Figure 3.
2.1. Signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio
We denote a BS by its location, while the user is at the origin 0. For downlink transmission of a MBS to the typical user 0, the SINR experienced by a macrocell user is given by:
2.2. Power consumption
Without employing any sleeping mode at each base station in the
In a two-tier cellular network, the total power consumption comes from macrocell tier and femtocell tier, which are expressed as:
where and are the static power expenditure of the MBS and FBS, and , and are the slope of the load-dependent power consumption in MBS and FBS, respectively. is the power control coefficient of MBS and FBS. and are the transmit powers of MBSs and femto BSs, respectively.
2.3. Network energy efficiency
The throughput outage probability defined as the probability that a user in the macro (femto) tier is unable to achieve a certain minimum target throughput as follows:
Network energy efficiency can be defined as the ratio of the total amount of throughput and total power consumption in the network. The energy efficiency (EE) function can be written as:
3. Coverage probability
In this section, we use stochastic geometry theory to analyze the coverage performance of MBS and FBS system under different allocation strategies. Under orthogonal deployment, the spectrum allocation for MBS and FBS is orthogonal, which avoids the cross-tier interference . The received SINR of macro-mobile station (MS) located at the cell boundary is given by:
To guarantee the coverage performance of macrocell, the received SINR of the MS at the macrocell edge should satisfy the following equation:
There is no interference coordination in femtocell. So, inter-tier interference will provide in femtocell. The received SINR of MS at femtocell edge is written as:
Similar way, the received SINR of the MS at the femtocell edge should satisfy the following equation:
Conditioning on the nearest BS being at a distance
Using the fact that , the coverage probability can be expressed as:
where and are the Laplace transform of random variable evaluated at the distance to the closest BS from the origin. This gives a coverage expression:
The definition of Laplace transform yields 
Now, we have
Let and .
Again, , then we get
Putting (16) into (12) with gives the desired result.
4. Propose base stations sleep mode strategies
We know that the coverage probability is independent of the sleeping mode. However, we need to maintain the coverage of the cellular networks when we implement sleeping mode in MBSs through power control small cells as shown in Figures 1b and 3. In Ref. , authors introduced active/sleep (on/off) modes in MBSs and improved the energy efficiency in cellular networks. In this chapter, we consider the HCNs comprised of macrocell and femtocell tiers. We propose switching off/on systems for the efficient power consumption at the BSs in the cellular networks, which introduce active/sleep modes in the MBSs and FBSs. The active/sleep modes reduce the interference and power consumption as well as improve the energy efficiency of the cellular networks. We derive the two-tier HCNs under different sleeping policies as well as formulate power consumption minimization for the MBSs and FBSs. An optimization problem is formulated to maximize the energy efficiency subject to throughput outage constraints as well as solved by the KKT conditions in terms of the femto tier BS density. Thus, the total power consumed by each BS in the macro and femto tiers is modeled as follows:
From Eq. (17), we can see that the MBS and FBS are active modes, and the maximum power is consumed by BSs. Otherwise, power consumption is zero when it is in sleeping mode.
4.1. Random sleeping
In random sleeping strategy, we take it as a Bernoulli trial, that is, each BS actives with probability
The power is consumed in the macro tier and femto tier BS when operating in the active and sleep mode, and then the total average power is given by:
Thus, the energy efficiency of the network for random sleeping is given by:
The network energy efficiency is expressed in the units of nats/Joule. The numerator in Eq. (21) is the total average throughput achieved by all the users in the two-tier network, and the denominator is the total power consumption use of Eqs. (18), (19) and (20).
4.2. Strategic sleeping
The sleep mode strategy can be considered as a load-aware policy and can incorporate traffic profile in the optimization problem. By applying strategic sleeping, the average power consumption can be expressed as:
In case of random sleeping mode, a network is developed that is adaptive to the fluctuating activity levels during the day. The strategic sleeping mode can go one step further. It can model a network that is adaptive to fluctuating activity levels within the location . In addition, the strategic sleeping model can measure the impact of cooperation among MBSs. The energy efficiency of the network for strategic sleeping is given by:
Similar way, the network energy efficiency is expressed as the numerator in Eq. (24) of the total average throughput achieved by all the users in the two-tier network and the denominator of the total power consumption use of Eqs. (22) and (23).
4.3. Optimization problem
To solve the following multi-objective optimization problem :
where and denote the outage objectives guaranteeing a minimum target throughput for each user in the macro and femto tier, respectively. The optimal femto tier BS density that maximizes the energy efficiency of network subject to the downlink outage constraints is given by
where and are the Lagrange multipliers and is power ratio of BSs. The optimization problem in Eq. (25) is determined by satisfying the KKT conditions as follows:
The KKT conditions are then listed as follows:
Based on the listed KKT conditions, evaluating each possible scenario for which and are either active or inactive gives the optimal femto tier BS density .
5. Combined coordinated multi-point (CoMP) transmission and BS sleeping scheme
In this section, we also evaluate the performance of the combined CoMP and BS sleeping scheme in a two-tier HCNs. The first tier is deployed as MBSs with a density of , and the second tier is deployed as FBSs with a density of .
5.1. BS cooperation
BS sleeping has been proved to be an effective technique for saving energy consumption in cellular networks. However, BSs in sleeping mode might cause coverage holes, which have a negative impact on the connectivity of the network. We conduct a stochastic geometry analysis to evaluate the performance of the proposed combined CoMP and BS sleeping scheme in HCNs for energy efficiency . We apply CoMP to avoid coverage holes when the target SINR cannot be reached. Applying stochastic geometry tools, we formulate and compare the coverage probability and the energy efficiency in HCN scenarios with and without CoMP.
The cooperative set is composed of the closest BSs in each network tier to the user. The density of CoMP is the same as the tier contains BSs with the lowest density. The probability of CoMP happens is equal to the probability of awake MBSs
where for and .
The energy efficiency of the networks for BS cooperation
From Eq. (31), we can see that the energy efficiency is related to the coverage probability and the power consumption of whole networks.
5.2. BS non-cooperation
The typical user only connects to the nearest BS, which belongs to first tier in a non-CoMP scenario . Then, the coverage probability in the case of BS non-cooperation is given by:
Thus, the energy efficiency of the networks for BS non-cooperation is given by:
From Eqs. (30) and (32), we can see that the coverage probability depends on both the sleep strategy and BSs density ratio.
6. Markovian wireless networks
The BS can be in either of the two operational states: ON or OFF. If BS is ON, the energy increases with the energy harvesting rate and decreases according to the number of users served by that BS. However, if the BS is OFF, it does not serve any users.
In this class of strategies, the decision to toggle the operational state, that is, turn a BS ON or OFF, is taken by the BS independently of the operational states of the other BSs.
In this class of strategies, the decision to toggle the state of a particular BS is dependent upon the states of the other BSs.
6.3. Energy efficiency of two-cell cellular networks
To investigate the basic energy efficiency performance of two-cell cellular network, in this case, a user’s channel of two-cell cellular network is modeled into good and bad states due to channel conditions . Moreover, a transition from one state to the next state only depends on the current state with the state space , where ‘0’ corresponds to a good state and ‘1’ corresponds to a bad state in Figure 4. Based on properties of Markovian processes, a channel transition probability matrix is given by:
The energy efficiency for multicell cellular networks is given by:
The wireless channels of multicell cellular network are assumed as two-state Markovian wireless channels, due to the memory-less property of two-state Markovian wireless channel model . Furthermore, after an
To analyse the impact of cell number on the energy efficiency of multicell cellular networks; for a good state channel, and ; for a bad state channel, and ;
7. Numerical results
In this section, we present numerical evaluations of the integral expressions for the coverage probability and energy efficiency performance. We focus on the two network tiers consisting of a macro tier overlaid with a femto tier. The assumed parameter values for two-tier HCNs are based on the values used in Table 1. We assume that and that the first tier has spatial intensity and available power , while the second tier has spatial intensity and available power .
|Path loss exponent||4|
|SINR threshold for macro||8 dB|
|SINR threshold for femto||5 dB|
|Macro BS transmit power||20 W|
|Femto BS transmit power||2 W|
|Macro range||300 m|
|Femto range||15 m|
|Static power MBS||130 W|
|Static power FBS||4.8 W|
|Slope of MBS||4.7|
|Slope of FBS||8|
|Sleeping power MBS||75 W|
|Sleeping power FBS||5 W|
|Density of MBS|
|Density of FBS|
Figure 5 illustrates the effect of the SINR threshold
Figure 6 plots the coverage probability versus noise for different sleeping strategies. The sleeping strategy is modeled as 0 and 1, respectively. As shown in Figure 6, in strategic sleeping mode, the coverage probability is marginally better than no sleeping mode. It can also be said that strategic sleeping has a bigger margin of improvement over no sleeping when . Finally, it can be seen that strategic sleeping is always better than random sleeping for the same fraction of sleeping MBSs and FBSs.
Figure 7 shows the maximum two-tier achieved energy efficiency versus density. The assumed parameter values for the two-tier HCNs are based on the values used in Table 1. In general, the maximum two-tier energy efficiency decreases with increasing density. Note that, we show the energy efficiency curves close to the points for and . The observations made from Figure 7 underscore the impact of the femto-to-macro BS power consumption factor on the ability to maximize the two-tier energy efficiency while satisfying the outage objectives.
Figure 8 shows the energy efficiency of the CoMP and non-CoMP schemes versus density. It is observed that the energy efficiency improves according to the density. The proposed scheme of combined CoMP and BSs sleeping mode is increased by 2% of energy efficiency from non-CoMP schemes. Numerical results confirm that the combined CoMP and BS sleeping can improve the energy efficiency as well as increase the coverage probability compared with implementing BS sleeping only. Moreover, the performance of non-CoMP is almost same as the macro BS sleeping only .
In this chapter, we provide energy efficiency of two-tier network through deploying sleeping strategy in MBSs and FBSs. The MBS and FBS are switching off/on systems, that is, it reduces power consumption and interference and improves the energy efficiency of HCNs. Power consumption is formed into optimization problems, which is determined by the optimal density of femto tier BS. BSs in sleeping mode might cause coverage holes, which have a negative impact on the connectivity of the network. Thus, we proposed combined CoMP and BS sleeping scheme in HCNs for energy efficiency to avoid coverage holes. Numerical results show that the proposed sleeping strategy can effectively increase energy efficiency. We also analyze the energy efficiency performance of cellular network based on two-state Markovian wireless channels.
This work was supported by the MEST 2015R1A2A1A05000977, NRF, Korea.
Hossain E., Rasti M., Tabassum H., Abdelnasser A. Evolution toward 5G multi-tier cellular wireless networks: An interference management perspective. IEEE Wireless Communications. 2014; 21(3): pp. 118–127. doi: 10.1109/MWC.2014.6845056
Metis. Scenarios, Requirements and KPIs for 5G Mobile and Wireless System. ICT-317669, Metis Project. May 2013.
Dhillon D. S., Ganti R. K., Andrews J. G. Modelling and analysis of K-tier downlink heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications. 2012; 30(3): pp. 550–560. doi:10.1109/JSAC.2012.120405
Zhang X., Su Z., Yan Z., Wang W. Energy efficiency study for two-tier heterogeneous networks under coverage performance constraints. Mobile Networks and Applications. 2013; 18(4): pp. 567–577. doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0435-1
Liu C., Natarajan B., Xia H. Small cell base station sleep strategies for energy efficiency. IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology. 2016; 65(3): pp. 1652–1661. doi:10.1109/TVT.2015.2413382
Ashraf I., Boccardi F., Ho L. Sleep mode techniques for small cell deployments. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2011; 49(8): pp. 72–79.
Ashraf I., Boccardi F., Ho L. Power savings in small cell deployments via sleep mode techniques. Proc. IEEE 21st Int. Symp. PIMRC Workshops. 2010; pp. 307–311.
Li Y., Celebi H., Daneshmand M., Wang C., Zhao W. Energy efficient femtocell networks: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Wireless Communication. 2013; 20(6): pp. 99–105.
Soh Y. S., Quek T. Q. S., Kountouris M., Shin H. Energy efficient heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 2013; 31(5): pp. 840–850. doi:10.1109/JSAC.2013.130503
He A., Liu D., Chen Y., Zhang T. Stochastic geometry analysis of energy efficiency in HetNets with combined CoMP and BS sleeping. In: IEEE 25th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC); 2–5 Sept. 2014; Washington DC. IEEE; pp. 1798–1802. doi:10.1109/PIMRC.2014.7136461
Chenlong J. Energy Efficient Design of Heterogeneous Cellular Networks Using Stochastic Geometry. PhD thesis. National University of Singapore, 2015.
Li C., Zhang J., Letaief K. B. Throughput and energy efficiency analysis of small cell networks with multi-antenna base stations. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communications. 2014; 13(5): pp. 2505–2517. doi:10.1109/TWC.2014.031714.131020
Andrews J. G., Baccelli F., Ganti R. K. A tractable approach to coverage and rate in cellular networks. IEEE Transaction on Communications. 2011; 59(11): pp. 3122–3134.
Rao J. B., Fapojuwo A. O. An analytical framework for evaluating spectrum/energy efficiency of heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2016; 65(5): pp. 3568–3584. doi:10.1109/TVT.2015.2448593
Ge X., Cao C., Jo M., Chen M., Hu J., Humar I. Energy efficiency modelling and analysing based on multicell and multi-antenna cellular networks. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems. 2010; 4(4): pp. 560–574. doi:10.3837/tiis.2010.08.007