Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Alternative Splicing and Alzheimer’s Disease

Written By

Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Sonia Lilia Mestizo Gutiérrez, María Elena Hernández Aguilar and Fausto Rojas Durán

Reviewed: June 6th, 2016 Published: September 28th, 2016

DOI: 10.5772/64513

Chapter metrics overview

1,922 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease is a neurodegenerative process whose origin is unknown. It has been associated with this process at least two important proteins: the first is the β-amyloid forming amyloid plaques and the second protein is Tau, which has been determined to precipitates inside the neuron because hyperphosphorylation, causing instability in the axon. Tau microtubule-associated protein (MAP) is essential for the development of neuronal cell polarity. Tau protein is preferentially localized in the axons, whereas MAP2, another neuronal specific microtubule-associated protein, is localized in the somatodendritic domain. Previous studies have demonstrated that the localization of these proteins depends, at least in part, on messenger RNA (mRNA) subcellular localization, that is, Tau mRNA into the axon and MAP2 mRNA into the dendrite. Tau protein has an essential role in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease, and hyperphosphorylated Tau promotes destabilization of microtubules. Tau alternative splicing generates six isoforms in the adult human brain due to the inclusion or exclusion of exons 2, 3, and 10. The failure in the splicing process of exon 10 generates a tauopathy, which can be carried out by the amyloid peptide; however, the splicing of other exons is less studied. The impact of amyloid peptide on the alternative splicing of exons 2, 3, and 6 caused formed cell processes to retract in differentiated cells and altered the expression of exons 2/3 in cell culture. Expression of exon 6 was repressed under β-amyloid treatment. The molecular mechanism for this amyloid-Tau interaction remains to be determined, but may have potential implications for the understanding of the underlying neuropathological processes in Alzheimer’s disease.

Keywords

  • Alzheimer
  • Tau
  • APP
  • PSEN1
  • PSEN2
  • alternative splicing

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by progressive loss of memory, orientation, sanity, and language. AD is a slow evolving disorder of multigenic nature with an average duration between 8 and 12 years. During the disease onset, symptoms are overlooked generally for the first 2 or 3 years. There are few hereditary cases (genetic or familial AD) resulting from autosomal dominant inheritance of chromosomal alterations. This condition is the most common type of dementia, and it is globally recognized as one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among the advanced age population. In 2004, approximately 44 million cases of dementia were diagnosed worldwide and the number of cases in 2050 is estimated to be 135 million [1].

In AD, there is neuron loss and two typical alterations appear: the neuritic plaque produced by the β-amyloid (Aβ) and the neurofibrillary tangle that contains the hyperphosphorylated Tau protein as the main component.

Neuritic plaques are sphere-like structures in which the major component is the β-amyloid (Aβ) protein. The latter is generated by proteolytic cleavage of a larger protein, βAPP (Aβ precursor protein), and the neurofibrillar tangle, an intracellular damage affecting pyramidal neurons [2].

When the disease is diagnosed, its pathology has progressed several years [3]. Cerebral changes underlying AD probably develop 20–30 years before the first symptoms appear.

AD diagnosis combines psychological and imaging tests as well as the exclusion of neurologic disorders [4].

The pathological processes frequently linked to AD are as follows: aging, amyloid deposition, neurofibrillar degeneration, synaptic loss, inflammation, loss of vascular integrity, and neuron loss [5].

The development of tangles and plaques leads to neuron death. Tangles are mainly located at the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, and frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital cortices and some subcortical nuclei projected toward these regions [6].

Tangles are composed by paired helical filaments (PHF), in which the latter are gathered in helixes. Neuritic plaques are microscopic foci of extracellular amyloid depositions associated with axon and neurite damage. They are found in large amounts at the limbic and association cortex [7].

At the neuritic plaques, it is observed an abnormal extracellular accumulation of the Aβ peptide, comprised by 40 or 42 amino acids (Aβ40 and Aβ42) [8]. Dystrophic neurites are located both within and surrounding the amyloid depositions, and they are distinguished by structural abnormalities including lysosomes, mitochondria, and PHF.

These plaques are associated with microglia either contiguous or within the amyloid nucleus. The period of time for neuritic plaque development is unknown. Most of the fibrillar Aβ located at the neuritic plaques is the species ending in the amino acid 42 (Aβ42), which is the slightly larger and hydrophobic form, prone to aggregation [9].

In AD, there is neurotransmitter deficiency at brain level. Dementia symptoms develop because the severe degeneration suffered by neurons that synthesize and liberate acetylcholine. The level and activities of the synthesizing and degrading enzymes, choline acetyltransferase and acetylcholinesterase, decrease at the limbic and cerebral cortex showing an associated loss of cholinergic cell bodies at the septal nucleus and the anterior forebrain cholinergic system [6].

Glutamatergic system is also deteriorated in AD. There are interactions between β-amyloid and glutamate at the synaptic function: the former has influence on the generation of the latter and glutamate levels may be modified by the peptide. Concentration changes of these two molecules may impact AD progression. Because hippocampus and cortex are fundamental for learning and memory, it is possible that glutamatergic neuron degeneration appears at early stages of AD [10].

The cerebral regions severely affected by AD are as follows: hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, amygdala, cerebral cortex, and some subcortical areas such as cholinergic neurons at the anterior forebrain, serotoninergic neurons at the dorsal raphe, and noradrenergic neurons at the locus coeruleus [11].

Four main genes have been associated to Alzheimer’s disease; all of them are processed by ribonucleic acid (RNA) alternative splicing.

Advertisement

2. RNA splicing

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) splicing is a mechanism used by eukaryotic cells in order to eliminate introns. These introns are non-coding RNA sequences, and therefore, they need to be removed by a ribonucleoprotein-rich structure termed the spliceosome complex. Thus, exon sequences are joined, producing a mature transcript that is available for migrating from the cell nucleus to the cytoplasm in order to be translated into a protein.

Splicing mechanism must be very accurate, as at least 50% of human genetic diseases are associated with mutations occurring in consensus sequences of splicing sites. These sequences consist on GU at the 5′ intron and an AG sequence at 3′. Toward the 5′ end of the intron, there is a pyrimidine-rich region (C U).

In order to carry out the splicing, the spliceosome complex needs to be assembled. The consensus sequences located at the exon–intron boundary are essential to bind the 5 ribonucleoproteins (snRNP) U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 in such sequences in order to form the spliceosome. Several protein complexes constitute the spliceosome: the complex E (U1 binds to the GU sequence at the 5′ site of an intron, SF1 binds to the intron branch point, U2AF1 binds to the 3′ splicing site, and U2F2 binds to the polypirimidine sequence), the complex A (U2 displaces SF1 and it binds to the branch point sequence), the complex B (U5, U4, and U6 form a trimer that bind to U2 along with U5). U1 is released, U5 shifts from exon to intron, and U6 binds to the 5′ splicing site). Complex C (U4 is released, and U6/U2 catalyze a transesterification to induce the binding of the 5′-end intron to the complex A, forming an intron lariat. U5 bind to the exon 3′ splicing site, which is cleaved). Afterward, U2, U5, and U6 remain bound to the lariat forms and the 3′ site is cleaved, whereas exons are ligated by means of ATP hydrolysis. Lariat forms are degraded, and the snRNP are recycled (Figure 1).

Alternative splicing generally is a mean by which a gene may generate a variety of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) with biological significance, that is coding for a protein. It has been estimated that at least 90% of all expressed genes are subjected to alternative splicing.

It has been identified at least six ways to generate alternative splicing: (a) exon exclusion or inclusion, (b) selecting one or more exons, (c) and (d) competition for the splicing site at a defined exon either in the 5′ or 3′ region, (e) retaining an intron, (f) multiple promoters, (g) multiple poly-A sites [12] (Figure 2). Exon and intron sequences may regulate the splicing site through enhancer or silencer sequences.

Figure 1.

RNA splicing. Exon 1 flanked on its 3′ end by the GU sequence and exon 2 on its 5′ end by AG, with both target sites for the ribonucleoproteins and the assembled spliceosome complex. The spliceosome will cut the intron in the consensus sequences and will enable the joining of the exons, generating a mature RNA. Scheme taken from [49].

Figure 2.

Forms of alternative splicing. (A) Exclusion or inclusion of exons, (B) selection of one or more exons, (C) intron retention, (D) competencies by the site of splicing in a particular exon in the region 5′ or 3′, (E) multiple promoters, (F) multiple poly-A sites.

Advertisement

3. The Tau gene and its alternative splicing

Tau is a cytoskeleton protein involved in neuron morphology and polarity. It posses the ability to bind to microtubules in order to provide stability, and it maintains the neuron phenotype at the axon level [13].

It has been determined that Tau is located at the axon hillock, the axon and the growth cone, as its mRNA is transported to its translation site by a protein complex involving kinesin-3 as transporter and the HuD protein as mRNA stabilizer [1416]. This is possible because Tau mRNA posses in its 3′-UTR region a uracil-rich axon localization sequence [14, 17].

Tau protein is mainly constituted by two domains: the N-terminal whose function is to interact with the plasma membrane [18] and the C-terminal domain, in which the microtubule-binding region is coded [19].

The human Tau gene is located at chromosome 17 [20], it is formed by 16 exons, and it has a promoter region that confers it with neuron specificity [21].

This gene is transcribed into three RNAs of 2, 6, and 9 kb, which are differentially expressed in the central nervous system, depending on their maturity state and the neuron type [18]. Six Tau mRNA isoforms have been identified as consequence of alternative splicing, five of them in the adult central nervous system and one fetal isoform. These messenger RNAs code six proteins ranging from 352 to 441 amino acids (aa). The fetal isoform (352 aa) does not contain the exons 2, 3, and 10. The adult form of 383 aa lacks exons 2 and 3; however, it includes exon 10. The 381 aa isoform include exon 2 but not 10. The 412 aa isoform includes both exons 2 and 10; the 410 aa isoform includes exons 2 and 3, but not 10. The 441 aa isoform includes exons 2, 3, and 10 [22] (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Tau isoforms, showing the different Tau proteins from the alternative splicing of exons 2, 3 and 10. Scheme taken from [49].

Tau alternative splicing occurs in exons 2, 3, and 10 and its form is of the (a) type that corresponds to exon exclusion or inclusion.

The studies conducted on Tau alternative splicing have been comprehensive, and most of them have been focused on exon 10.

Exon 10 displays a splicing pattern of inclusion and it is not present on fetal neurons. It is influenced by exon 9, which promotes its inclusion [18]. Exon 10 codes the second region of the (R) (KXGS) repeats in Tau. Alternative splicing generates Tau isoforms with 3 or 4 repeats that bind to microtubules. In mature brains, the level of 3R and 4R is similar. Exon 10 disruption is able and enough to cause neuron degeneration or taupathies [23].

Exon 10 is flanked by a long 13.6-kb intron and a short 3.8-kb intron, possessing a weak 5′ splicing site, which is similar to that in 3′. This would allow the inclusion or not of exon 10 in order to generate proteins with or without it [24, 25].

Exon 2 alternative splicing has been less studied. However, the studies conducted in our laboratory show that when PC12 cells (rat pheochromocytoma) cultures are exposed to the β1 → 42 amyloid peptide; alternative splicing of exons 2 and 3 is affected, as immature forms of Tau mRNA are transcribed in mature PC12 cells (phenotype differentiated into neuron). We observed that processes in these cells begin to retract. In spite the mechanism is still unknown, the effect produced in these cells indicate that immature Tau forms cease to stabilize microtubules in these cells processes [26] (Figure 4). The inclusion of exons 2 and 3 promotes the shift from immature Tau forms to their mature counterparts, stabilizing microtubules.

Figure 4.

Tau exons 1–9 (modified from [50]), the primers Ex1 and Ex5A, amplify from exons 1 to 5. The exons 2 and 3 are amplified by (Ex1/Ex5A), the exon 6 is amplified by (Ex5/Ex9, Ex6S/Ex6AS) and exon 8 by (Ex7/Ex9). (A) Untreated undifferentiated cells and (B) NGF-induced differentiated PC12 cells; and from PC12 cells exposed to Aβ(1–42) peptide in (C) undifferentiated cells and (D) NGF-induced differentiated cells. Differentiation inhibits fetal tau expression. Aβ exposure promotes exclusion of exons 2/3 in undifferentiated and differentiated cells, and exclusion of exon 6 in undifferentiated cells. Scheme taken from [26].

It has been demonstrated that immature Tau forms are similar to those found on PHF [27], suggesting that exclusion of exons 2 and 3 induced by amyloid peptide in AD may destabilize neurites, and thus, the cells would lose their polarity.

Currently, splicing regulation has been studied with microRNAs (miRNAs), which are regulators of genetic expression [28]. miRNAs are short RNA molecules that bind to transcripts in order to repress and regulate expression. A miRNA deregulation was found on hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex. It was ascertained that miR-132-3-p was the most affected in this disease. miR-132-3-p downregulation in neurons was inversely proportional to the occurrence of hyperphosphorylated Tau [29], and it is linked to the splicing of exon 10 [30].

The inclusion of exon 10 is inhibited by the constitutive factors ASF/SF2, SRp55, SRp75, and SWAP [31].

Exon 2 regulation has been determined by inclusion and exclusion of exons 2 and 3, and it has been determined that exon 3 never appears without exon 2 [32].

Advertisement

4. Amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene

Figure 5.

APP isoforms, showing the different APP proteins from alternative splicing of exons 7 and 8.

APP is one of the three members of a small gene family coding type I membrane proteins possessing an extracellular domain and a small cytoplasmic region. Only APP contains the sequence coding the Aβ domain. APP human gene is located at chromosome 21, which is involved in autosomal dominant inheritance in some families affected by early Alzheimer’s disease. This gene contains 18 exons, and it is more than 170 kb long [33]. More than 25 mutations have been identified to cause the familial type of AD. All of these mutations substitute amino acids near or within the Aβ domain [34]. Aβ is derived from APP by proteolytic cleavage due to an alternative splicing process (generating three isoforms composed by 695, 751, and 770 residues, respectively) [35], of exons 7, 8, and 15 (Figure 5). The APP form without the residues coded by exon 15 is called L-APP, and this isoform is found in most tissues [36]. The APP695 isoform is predominantly expressed in neurons, whereas APP751 is expressed in all tissues and it includes exon 7, codifying a domain similar to that of the Kunitz protease inhibitor [37].

In neurons, APP is found on terminal vesicles in axons and it can be transported in an anterograde or retrograde manner [38]. Other brain cells also express APP and release variable amounts of Aβ, including astrocytes and microglia.

APP may be subjected to protelytic cleavage during and after its transit through the secretory pathway. The first of them is carried out by the α-secretase enzyme resulting in the release of a large and soluble ectodomain fragment (α-APP) [39] in the extracellular space, while retaining a 83-residue C-terminal fragment (CTF) in the membrane. Alternatively, some APP molecules that were not cleaved by α-secretase may be processed by the activity of an enzyme named β-secretase, generating a β-APP ectodomain that retains one residue from the 99 CTF [6].

The main β-secretase in neurons is a transmembrane aspartyl protease named BACE1, predominantly located at the transgolgi network (TGN) and also in endosomes [40]. The cleavage mediated by BACE1 generates the N-terminal fragment of Aβ. The high level of neuronal BACE1 expression preferably targets APP to the amyloidogenic processing pathway in the brain [34]. Aβ is constitutively released from cells expressing APP in normal conditions. The cleavage generated by β-secretase is followed by a constitutive trim at the C-terminal of the Aβ region, and it is carried out by the activity of γ-secretase. Simultaneously, a peptide fragment designated as p3 is produced from the sequential activity of both α- and γ-secretases [6]. A substantial amount of α-APP is generated by γ-secretase that acts on the inserted APP in plasma membrane.

The Aβ40 and Aβ42 fragments are generated to a large extent during APP internalization and endosomal processing. Most of the Aβ generated within the cell is destined for secretion.

APP has autocrine and paracrine functions during growth regulation. It has been best characterized as trophic as it has been demonstrated that it stimulates neurite growth. This phenotype is compatible with its increased expression during neuron maturation [41, 42].

Advertisement

5. PSEN 1 and PSEN 2

Presenilins (PSEN) are an important part of the γ-secretase enzyme activity, and they are responsible for the proteolytic cleavage of APP. γ-secretase is a multimeric complex of PSEN1 or PSEN2, nicastrin, and APH1. All mutations in PSEN1 increase APP cleaving activity by γ-secretase, which generates the Aβ42 fragment. The PSEN1 gene is located in chromosome 14 and that of PSEN2 in chromosome 1, both of them are approximately 60% similar [43]. Regarding the gene’s structure, it has been demonstrated that the first 4 exons contain untranslated regions, and exons 1 and 2 possess alternative transcription sites. The function of these sites is still unclear. The first ATG is located in exon 4, and its 12 bp is used as an alternative splicing donor site. Exon 9 is subjected to alternative splicing in leukocytes but not in other tissues. Most of the expressed transcripts are polyadenylated after the TAG stop codon in exon 13 [44]. A PSEN 2 variant has been shown to lack exon 5, which has been detected on individuals with sporadic Alzheimer’s disease [45].

Several mutations on the PSEN genes are responsible for early familial Alzheimer’s disease. The loss of exons 3 and 4 of PSEN demonstrates that transcripts are efficiently translated as truncated proteins at their N-terminal; however, this does not affect their function as amyloid fragment generators [46].

A PSEN2 variant that does not possess exon 5 has been reported to increase the generation of the Aβ40 y 42 fragments [47].

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Currently, there is no cure for Alzheimer’s disease and the research conducted nowadays in order to fully understand this condition is relevant. Nevertheless, its underlying causes have not yet been determined.

The mechanism of the disease is not fully understood, and the conducted studies have shown that proteins such as Tau, APP, and both presenilins are highly important for developing the disease.

Through artificial intelligence studies, it has been demonstrated that more than 70 genes are associated to these proteins [48], rendering this disease extremely complex.

Alternative splicing is key in order to generate the appropriate proteins that do not affect neuron functioning; thus, the individual may carry a healthy life.

Advertisement

Final note

We seek the most current literature on the subject, and the database used was the PubMed for the development of this chapter.

References

  1. 1. Brookmeyer, R., Johnson, E., Ziegler-Graham, K., & Arrighi, H. M. (2007). Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement, 3, 186–191. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381
  2. 2. Herrera-Rivero, M., Hernández-Aguilar, M. E., Manzo, J., & Aranda-Abreu, G. E. (2010). [Alzheimer’s disease: immunity and diagnosis]. Rev Neurol, 51(3), 153–164. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20645266
  3. 3. Ray, S., Britschgi, M., Herbert, C., Takeda-Uchimura, Y., Boxer, A., Blennow, K.,… Wyss-Coray, T. (2007). Classification and prediction of clinical Alzheimer’s diagnosis based on plasma signaling proteins. Nat Med, 13(11), 1359–1362. doi:10.1038/nm1653
  4. 4. Baquero, M., Peset, V., Burguera, J. A., Salazar-Cifre, A., Boscá-Blasco, M. E., del Olmo-Rodríguez, A. (2009). [Quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease]. Rev Neurol, 49(7), 337–342. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19774526
  5. 5. Swaminathan, A., & Jicha, G. A. (2014). Nutrition and prevention of Alzheimer’s dementia. Front Aging Neurosci, 6, 282. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00282
  6. 6. Selkoe, D. J. (2001). Alzheimer’s disease: genes, proteins, and therapy. Physiol Rev, 81(2), 741–766. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11274343
  7. 7. Dickson, D. W. (1997). The pathogenesis of senile plaques. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 56(4), 321–339. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9100663
  8. 8. Serrano-Pozo, A., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., & Hyman, B. T. (2011). Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 1, a006189. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006189
  9. 9. Jarrett, J. T., Berger, E. P., & Lansbury, P. T. (1993). The carboxy terminus of the beta amyloid protein is critical for the seeding of amyloid formation: implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochemistry, 32(18), 4693–4697. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=8490014
  10. 10. Revett, T. J., Baker, G. B., Jhamandas, J., & Kar, S. (2013). Glutamate system, amyloid ß peptides and tau protein: functional interrelationships and relevance to Alzheimer disease pathology. J Psychiatry Neurosci, 38(1), 6–23. doi:10.1503/jpn.110190
  11. 11. Selkoe, D. J., & Schenk, D. (2003). Alzheimer’s disease: molecular understanding predicts amyloid-based therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 43, 545–584. doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140248
  12. 12. Matlin, A. J., Clark, F., & Smith, C. W. (2005). Understanding alternative splicing: towards a cellular code. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 6(5), 386–398. doi:10.1038/nrm1645
  13. 13. Littauer, U. Z., Giveon, D., Thierauf, M., Ginzburg, I., & Ponstingl, H. (1986). Common and distinct tubulin binding sites for microtubule-associated proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 83(19), 7162–7166. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=3463956
  14. 14. Aranda-Abreu, G. E., Behar, L., Chung, S., Furneaux, H., & Ginzburg, I. (1999). Embryonic lethal abnormal vision-like RNA-binding proteins regulate neurite outgrowth and tau expression in PC12 cells. J Neurosci, 19(16), 6907–6917. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10436048
  15. 15. Aronov, S., Aranda, G., Behar, L., & Ginzburg, I. (2001). Axonal tau mRNA localization coincides with tau protein in living neuronal cells and depends on axonal targeting signal. J Neurosci, 21(17), 6577–6587. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11517247
  16. 16. Aronov, S., Aranda, G., Behar, L., & Ginzburg, I. (2002). Visualization of translated tau protein in the axons of neuronal P19 cells and characterization of tau RNP granules. J Cell Sci, 115(Pt 19), 3817–3827. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=12235292
  17. 17. Aranda-Abreu, G. E., Hernández, M. E., Soto, A., & Manzo, J. (2005). Possible Cis-acting signal that could be involved in the localization of different mRNAs in neuronal axons. Theor Biol Med Model, 2, 33. doi:10.1186/1742-4682-2-33
  18. 18. Andreadis, A. (2006). Misregulation of tau alternative splicing in neurodegeneration and dementia. Prog Mol Subcell Biol, 44, 89–107. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17076266
  19. 19. Himmler, A., Drechsel, D., Kirschner, M. W., & Martin, D. W. (1989). Tau consists of a set of proteins with repeated C-terminal microtubule-binding domains and variable N-terminal domains. Mol Cell Biol, 9(4), 1381–1388. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=2498649
  20. 20. Neve, R. L., Harris, P., Kosik, K. S., Kurnit, D. M., & Donlon, T. A. (1986). Identification of cDNA clones for the human microtubule-associated protein tau and chromosomal localization of the genes for tau and microtubule-associated protein 2. Brain Res, 387(3), 271–280. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=3103857
  21. 21. Heicklen-Klein, A., & Ginzburg, I. (2000). Tau promoter confers neuronal specificity and binds Sp1 and AP-2. J Neurochem, 75(4), 1408–1418. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10987820
  22. 22. Buée, L., Bussière, T., Buée-Scherrer, V., Delacourte, A., & Hof, P. R. (2000). Tau protein isoforms, phosphorylation and role in neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Res Rev, 33(1), 95–130. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10967355
  23. 23. Adams, S. J., DeTure, M. A., McBride, M., Dickson, D. W., & Petrucelli, L. (2010). Three repeat isoforms of tau inhibit assembly of four repeat tau filaments. PLoS One, 5, e10810. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010810
  24. 24. Schellenberg, G. D., D’Souza, I., & Poorkaj, P. (2000). The genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 2, 158–164. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11122949
  25. 25. Qian, W., & Liu, F. (2014). Regulation of alternative splicing of tau exon 10. Neurosci Bull, 30(2), 367–377. doi:10.1007/s12264-013-1411-2
  26. 26. Lagunes, T., Herrera-Rivero, M., Hernández-Aguilar, M. E., & Aranda-Abreu, G. E. (2014). Abeta(1–42) induces abnormal alternative splicing of tau exons 2/3 in NGF-induced PC12 cells. An Acad Bras Cienc, 86(4), 1927–1934. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201420130333
  27. 27. Smith, C. J., Anderton, B. H., Davis, D. R., & Gallo, J. M. (1995). Tau isoform expression and phosphorylation state during differentiation of cultured neuronal cells. FEBS Lett, 375(3), 243–248. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=7498509
  28. 28. Roth, W., Hecker, D., & Fava, E. (2016). Systems biology approaches to the study of biological networks underlying Alzheimer’s disease: role of miRNAs. Methods Mol Biol, 1303, 349–377. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2627-5_21
  29. 29. Lau, P., Bossers, K., Janky, R., Salta, E., Frigerio, C. S., Barbash, S., …De Strooper, B. (2013). Alteration of the microRNA network during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO Mol Med, 5(10), 1613–1634. doi:10.1002/emmm.201201974
  30. 30. Smith, P. Y., Delay, C., Girard, J., Papon, M. A., Planel, E., Sergeant, N., …Hébert, S. S. (2011). MicroRNA-132 loss is associated with tau exon 10 inclusion in progressive supranuclear palsy. Hum Mol Genet, 20, 4016–4024. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr330
  31. 31. Wang, J., Gao, Q. S., Wang, Y., Lafyatis, R., Stamm, S., & Andreadis, A. (2004). Tau exon 10, whose missplicing causes frontotemporal dementia, is regulated by an intricate interplay of cis elements and trans factors. J Neurochem, 88(5), 1078–1090. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15009664
  32. 32. Li, K., Arikan, M. C., & Andreadis, A. (2003). Modulation of the membrane-binding domain of tau protein: splicing regulation of exon 2. Mol Brain Res, 116(1–2), 94–105. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=12941465
  33. 33. Yoshikai, S., Sasaki, H., Doh-ura, K., Furuya, H., & Sakaki, Y. (1990). Genomic organization of the human amyloid beta-protein precursor gene. Gene, 87(2), 257–263. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=2110105
  34. 34. Thinakaran, G., & Koo, E. H. (2008). Amyloid precursor protein trafficking, processing, and function. J Biol Chem, 283(44), 29615–29619. doi:10.1074/jbc.R800019200
  35. 35. Tanaka, S., Nakamura, S., Ueda, K., Kameyama, M., Shiojiri, S., Takahashi, Y., …Ito, H. (1988). Three types of amyloid protein precursor mRNA in human brain: their differential expression in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 157(2), 472–479. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=3144271
  36. 36. Hartmann, T., Bergsdorf, C., Sandbrink, R., Tienari, P. J., Multhaup, G., Ida, N., …Beyreuther, K. (1996). Alzheimer’s disease betaA4 protein release and amyloid precursor protein sorting are regulated by alternative splicing. J Biol Chem, 271(22), 13208–13214. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=8662794
  37. 37. Sandbrink, R., Masters, C. L., & Beyreuther, K. (1996). APP gene family. Alternative splicing generates functionally related isoforms. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 777, 281–287. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=8624099
  38. 38. Yamazaki, T., Selkoe, D. J., & Koo, E. H. (1995). Trafficking of cell surface beta-amyloid precursor protein: retrograde and transcytotic transport in cultured neurons. J Cell Biol, 129(2), 431–442. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=7721945
  39. 39. Sisodia, S. S. (1992). Beta-amyloid precursor protein cleavage by a membrane-bound protease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89(13), 6075–6079. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=1631093
  40. 40. Vassar, R. (2004). BACE1: the beta-secretase enzyme in Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Neurosci, 23(1–2), 105–114. doi:10.1385/JMN:23:1–2:105
  41. 41. Hung, A. Y., Koo, E. H., Haass, C., & Selkoe, D. J. (1992). Increased expression of beta-amyloid precursor protein during neuronal differentiation is not accompanied by secretory cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89(20), 9439–9443. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=1409654
  42. 42. Muresan, V., Varvel, N. H., Lamb, B. T., & Muresan, Z. (2009). The cleavage products of amyloid-beta precursor protein are sorted to distinct carrier vesicles that are independently transported within neurites. J Neurosci, 29(11), 3565–3578. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2558-08.2009
  43. 43. Barber, R. C. (2012). The genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientifica (Cairo), 2012, 246210. doi:10.6064/2012/246210
  44. 44. Rogaev, E. I., Sherrington, R., Wu, C., Levesque, G., Liang, Y., Rogaeva, E. A., …St George-Hyslop, P. (1997). Analysis of the 5’ sequence, genomic structure, and alternative splicing of the presenilin-1 gene (PSEN1) associated with early onset Alzheimer disease. Genomics, 40(3), 415–424. doi:10.1006/geno.1996.4523
  45. 45. Sato, N., Hori, O., Yamaguchi, A., Lambert, J. C., Chartier-Harlin, M. C., Robinson, P. A., …Takagi, T. (1999). A novel presenilin-2 splice variant in human Alzheimer’s disease brain tissue. J Neurochem, 72(6), 2498–2505. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10349860
  46. 46. Grünberg, J., Walter, J., Eckman, C., Capell, A., Schindzielorz, A., Younkin, S., …Haass, C. (1998). Truncated presenilin 2 derived from differentially spliced mRNA does not affect the ratio of amyloid beta-peptide 1-42/1-40. Neuroreport, 9(14), 3293–3299. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9831466
  47. 47. Sato, N., Imaizumi, K., Manabe, T., Taniguchi, M., Hitomi, J., Katayama, T., …Tohyama, M. (2001). Increased production of beta-amyloid and vulnerability to endoplasmic reticulum stress by an aberrant spliced form of presenilin 2. J Biol Chem, 276(3), 2108–2114. doi:10.1074/jbc.M006886200
  48. 48. Mestizo Gutiérrez, S. L., Herrera Rivero, M., Cruz Ramírez, N., Hernández, E., & Aranda-Abreu, G. E. (2014). Decision trees for the analysis of genes involved in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. J Theor Biol, 357, 21–25. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.05.002
  49. 49. Aranda-Abreu, G. E., Hernández, M. E., Fausto Rojas Durán, A., Mestizo Gutierrez, S. L., & Denes, J. M. (2016). Tau alternative splicing in Alzheimer’s disease. In: E. Massey (Ed.), Alternative Splicing and Disease. NOVA Science Publisher. https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=56697&osCsid=b172d9ebb2bfdf1ed18a4f1ef5ac71b6.
  50. 50. Vanier, M. T., Neuville, P., Michalik, L., & Launay, J. F. (1998). Expression of specific tau exons in normal and tumoral pancreatic acinar cells. J Cell Sci, 111(Pt 10), 1419–1432. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9570759

Written By

Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Sonia Lilia Mestizo Gutiérrez, María Elena Hernández Aguilar and Fausto Rojas Durán

Reviewed: June 6th, 2016 Published: September 28th, 2016