Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Normal Aging and Dementia

Written By

Michał Prendecki, Jolanta Florczak-Wyspianska, Marta Kowalska, Margarita Lianeri, Wojciech Kozubski and Jolanta Dorszewska

Reviewed: 12 May 2016 Published: 28 September 2016

DOI: 10.5772/64203

From the Edited Volume

Update on Dementia

Edited by Davide Vito Moretti

Chapter metrics overview

2,121 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Normal aging begins after 60 years of age. According to Harman, the accumulation of free radicals, which results from weakening of repair and protective mechanisms, takes place in the aging brain. It is believed that especially in the population of the most elderly there is increased incidence of both dementia and depression. The causes of these central nervous system disorders in the aging human body are changes at the molecular level, such as changes in the biochemical parameters, the accumulation of mutations in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, and epigenetic changes. Biomarkers associated with aging of the brain include accumulated deposits of β-amyloid (Aβ), disturbed cholesterol homeostasis, altered neuroimaging parameters, and impaired glucose metabolism. Genetic factors are also responsible for normal aging, for example, SIRT1, AKT1, and CDKN1A, and among them the longevity genes, such as FOXO3A and CETP. Dementia as well as cognitive decline may be modified by poly-T variants of TOMM40 and APOE alleles via influencing the level of apolipoprotein E (apoE) in the brain and in the plasma as well as by its ability of Aβ clearance.


  • molecular factors
  • dementia
  • normal aging

1. Introduction

Currently, average life expectancy in the world is over 60 years. The world’s longest life expectancy is in Japan, at 82.2 years, and in Australia, at 80.6 years. In Europe, the longest-lived people are the French, at 80.6 years, the Swedes, at 80.6 years, the Italians, at 79.9 years, the Greeks, at 79.3 years, the Dutch, at 79.1 years, and the Germans, at 78.9 years. It is predicted that in Europe from 2005 to 2050, the number of people following into their 80th year of life will increase by 43 million [1].

In psychological studies on the elderly, three subperiods were stratified among people over 60 years old; these included young olds (65–75 years of age), old olds (75–85 years old), and eldest olds (over 85 years of age). Deterioration of cognitive functions was visible in the eldest olds age group, while asymptomatic structural changes in the brain, such as cortical atrophy, poli- and leukoaraiosis (deterioration of white matter, present in 8–90% of the elderly with no signs of dementia), or decreased glucose metabolism and deteriorated subcortical and cortical flow, could be detected by neuroimaging even among the young olds [2].

Progressive aging of the population is one of the factors determining the increasingly frequent occurrence of cognitive impairment and dementia syndromes. Dementia, due to its prevalence in the population (it occurs in approximately 10% of those 65 years of age and in approximately 30–40% of those 90 years of age), requires great concern and clinical care. It is estimated that by 2040, the number of elderly people with dementia in the world will exceed 80 million [3].

According to the classification of mental disorders in the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM – IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) [4], there is no isolated, separate diagnostic category for “dementia,” but the criteria for this diagnosis are contained in the various types of dementia, for example, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), vascular dementia (VD), or in other diseases. According to these criteria, a diagnosis of dementia is necessary to determine the presence of multiple cognitive deficits that cause significant disturbances in the functioning of social exclusion and mental illness (depression) and delirium.

Dementia is a progressive impairment of the functional status and significantly reduces the quality of life of older people in all its dimensions, since physical disability and the loss of sphincter control coexist along with dementia. The most common cause of dementia in the oldest patients is the degenerative process that is underway in the brain in the course of AD. In old age, an important process associated with the degeneration of neurons in AD is cerebral arteriosclerosis. Dementia, with dying neurons, is caused by both pathologies. A high percentage of the causes of dementia in the elderly may develop depression. In these patients, the following is observed especially often: loss of interest, sleep disturbances, psychomotor disturbances, and problems with concentration. In turn, the use of multiple drugs in dementia complicates the diagnosis of depression [4].

Depression is defined as an emotional distress syndrome (states of depressed mood, depression), which is often co-morbid with somatic diseases and/or with intensifying their symptoms. Depression is a common and serious problem among the elderly and increases mortality. Approximately 15% of people over the age of 65 have symptoms of depression, which impede daily functioning [2, 4].

It is believed that the functional and cognition changes observed in older persons are associated with disturbances at the molecular level in the aging body. Molecular changes in the aging process may relate to genomic instability as a result of accumulation of mutations, telomere attrition and epigenetic alterations, and alteration in the level of brain biomarkers [2].

To select significant studies for this review, the authors conducted multiple searches through public databases, including PubMed and Scopus, by using the following search strategy: (“normal aging” or “aging”) and (“dementia” or “cognitive decline”) and (“biomarker” or “SNP” or “genetic polymorphism” or “mutation”). The last search was performed in February 2016. A subsequent data mining through review articles and references facilitated finding additional eligible studies.


2. Brain biomarkers and cognitive function in normal aging

Central changes leading to impaired brain and cognition functions have been reported in normal brain aging, but data are inconclusive [5, 6]. A study [5] using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium contrast confirmed changes in the hippocampus associated with impairment of cognitive function in elderly people. Also, a study conducted on 564 cognitively normal individuals (average age was 78 years) using MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) PET indicated impairment of cognition and imaging biomarkers. The causes of these central changes in the brain of the aged subjects seem to have been increased β-amyloid (Aβ) levels [6]. In the senescent brain, accumulation of Aβ deposits is eminent, in the form of senile plaques as well as fibrillary tangles in the neurons. The lesions may develop in the human brain as late as in one’s 80s (frequently with no signs of dementia). The slower the accumulation of lesions is, the longer the time period required to develop dementia [7, 8]. Cerebral amyloidosis has been associated not only with Aβ deposition but also with higher pulse pressure in the presence of neurodegeneration, which may lead to more rapid progression of dementia [9]. However, more recent data indicate that Aβ deposition may in time exceed brain structural changes, such as grey matter volume, as measured by MRI, and neuronal hypometabolism assessed using PET with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) [10]. Moreover, the cognitive decline in elderly patients is associated with brain infarcts [11]. Also dietary factors, such as ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), were shown to be associated with normal brain function; the PUFA concentration remains in reverse correlation with brain atrophy in cognitively normal elders [10].


3. Molecular changes in normal aging and dementia

In the aging process, the epigenetic changes lead to expression alteration of genes associated with vital functions of cells, such as mitochondrial function, as well as protective and repair mechanisms, as shown in Table 1.

One of genetic hallmarks of aging is genomic instability which includes accumulation of genetic damage both in nuclear DNA (nDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). mtDNA is more susceptible to DNA damaging factors than nDNA due to its oxidative environment. Also DNA repair mechanisms are less efficient in mitochondria than in nucleus [23], although mitochondria have most of the DNA repair pathways existing in the nucleus [24]. The mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) theory of aging (mitochondrial free radical theory of aging [MFRTA]) proposed by Harman assumes that free radicals generated in normal metabolism cause mtDNA mutations and ageing is a result of oxidative damage accumulation. According to MFRTA, maximum life span can be decreased by mtDNA damage caused by oxidative stress [25]. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) may play signaling role in mitochondrial stress during ageing [26]. It is also suggested that mtDNA mutation accumulation and mitochondrial dysfunction during aging are a result of decreased activity of autophagy and mitophagy [27]. Moreover, a study performed on 18 three-generation families of women shows decline in mtDNA copy number, mitochondrial protein expression, and oxidative function with age [28]. Oxidative DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction lead to neuronal loss and may play a role in the development of dementia. The decreased level of antioxidants was observed among dementia individuals [29, 30]. It was suggested that high levels of ROS and decline in neuronal DNA damage response may be associated with neuronal dysfunction and cognitive impairment characterized by lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score [31]. Additionally, it is known that oxidative damage leads to frontal-executive dysfunction [32].

Gene/encoded product Locus Role in aging References
sirtulin 1
10q21.3 Age-related decreased level of SIRT1 is associated
with impaired oxidative stress response and changes in glucose metabolism. Indirectly may be involved in age-related diseases, for example, retinal degeneration, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases.
protein Kinase B
14q32.32  Decreased level of AKT1 with age alters
regulation of glucose metabolism, apoptosis,
cell proliferation and cell migration, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 (p21)
6p21.2 Possible promoter of aging due to pro-aging activity of p53.Oxidative stress increases expression of CDKN1A and overexpression of p21 may be involved in age-related diseases such as atherosclerosis, amyloidosis, AD, and arthritis. [14]
Cholesterol ester transfer protein
16q21 Responsible for cholesterol homeostasis in central nervous system. Decreased level of CETP
results in healthier aging, slower memory decline, less frequency of dementia, and lower AD risk.
Transcriptional factor FOXO3A
6q21 Involved in insulin metabolism and insulin/IGF1 signaling pathway.
Protection from oxidative stress and reduction of age-related diseases.
Insulin-like growth
factor 1
12q23.2 Decreased level of IGF-1 with age leads to cell senescence. [20]
Paraoxonase 1
7q21.3 Decreased level of PON1 with age impairs oxidative stress response and is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases due to LDL oxidation. [21]

Table 1.

The role of genes and their encoded products in aging.

Another mechanism involved in aging is epigenetic alterations. Epigenetics is defined as molecular traits that are “stably heritable phenotype resulting from changes in a chromosome without alterations in the DNA sequence.” The epigenetic pathways include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNA [33].

The analyses of CpGs methylation changes show that genome-wide global levels of DNA methylation decrease during aging. Despite this, many promoters of genes which are unmethylated in young gain methylation in old individuals [34, 35]. Other authors [36] suggest that DNA methylation changes may result in age-associated immune deficiency. It is possible that hypermethylation is caused by programmed changes, while hypomethylation may be the result of environmental and stochastic processes. Multiple studies have identified genes undergoing hyper- and hypomethylation with age. The first group includes genes involved in process such as cell adhesion, cell-cell signaling, ion transport, neuron differentiation, and other genes associated with development. The hypermethylated genes are regulated by a common group of transcription factors, whereas hypomethylated genes are involved in metabolic process, RNA splicing, regulation of ligase activity and protein ubiquitination, transmission of nerve impulse, and many others. The hypomethylation in neurons may cause age-related memory deficits [36, 37]. The abnormal profile of methylation may contribute to dementia. It is shown that mutation in DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), gene encoding an enzyme crucial for methylation, leads to a condition called hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy (HSAN1) with early onset of dementia and hearing loss [38]. Other authors suggest [39] that changes in methylation may be involved in age-related cognitive functions decline.

Histone modification includes acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, citrullination, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ribosylation, deimination, and proline isomerization, in which the first three are the most-studied topics. Modifications can change the chromatin structure by histone-histone or histone-DNA interactions. The chromatin packaging affects many processes such as transcription, repair, replication, and chromosome condensation. Acetylation is associated with activation of transcription, while the result of lysine methylation can be either activation or repression [40]. Chromatin packaging changes during aging [41]. It is shown that higher level of histone acetylation facilitates memory and learning processes; therefore, acetylation decrement may lead to cognitive impairments and is associated with aging [42]. Also histone methylation may affect the life span; loss of H3K9 trimethylation which results in reduction of heterochromatin is the hallmark of aging [43]. The acetylation of H4K16 is necessary for maintaining the structure of chromatin and when impaired, the process of double-strand break repair is less efficient [44]. Subsequently, histone tail proteolytic cleavage, especially H3, may be involved in aging, but the exact mechanism remains unclear [45]. Additionally, the decline in histone chaperon levels is observed during aging and may be the answer for defective DNA repair mechanisms [46].

Both age-related changes in DNA methylation and histone modification alter the experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in hippocampus by changing the chromatin structure. Thus, it may be involved in memory loss and learning difficulties. Epigenetic changes may be possible brain biomarkers of cognitive aging [47].


4. Genes associated with age-dependent dementia

Several genes are involved in age-dependent dementia. Most of them, such as ABCA7, APOE, APOC1, BIN1, CASS4, CELF1, CD33, CD2AP, CELF1, CLU, CR1, DSG2, EPHA1, FERMT2, HLA-DRB5/DBR1, IL1RAP, INPP5D, MEF2C, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, NME8, PCDH11X, PICALM, PLD3, PTK2B, TOMM40, TREM2, TRIP4, TRPC4AP, SLC24H4-RIN3, SORL1, and ZCWPW1, are associated with AD, which is the most prevalent cause of dementia in elders [48]. AD affects 24 million people worldwide and accounts for 60–80% of dementia cases [49]. APOE cluster (APOE, TOMM40) and CLU gene of the genes mentioned above, as well as Aβ cascade genes (APP, PSEN1, PSEN2), have also been mentioned as linked to memory decline in cognitively normal adults.

4.1. APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2

Aβ is formed in a process called an amyloid cascade which involves the amyloid precursor protein (APP), encoded by the APP gene located on chromosome 21. APP is a transmembrane protein with high expression in developing human neurons. In normal conditions, APP is truncated by proteolytic enzymes such as α- and β-secretases. However, in individuals developing AD, APP is processed by an alternative pathway involving γ-secretase. This leads to the production of the 40–42 amino-acid Aβ peptide. The active subunits of γ-secretase presenilin 1 and/or 2 are encoded by genes PSEN1 and PSEN2, respectively. So far, 230 clinically significant mutations have been described in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 genes; however, these mutations are very rare and account for around 0.5% of dementia cases. Moreover, most of these mutations are considered to be associated with a familial form of AD. On the other hand, asymptomatic carriers of the mutations in Aβ cascade genes demonstrate significant changes in cognitive functions, advancing with age [48].

4.2. TOMM40, translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane 40 homolog (TOM40)

TOMM40 is a gene encoding for translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane 40 homolog (TOM40). The gene is located on chromosome 19 in a cluster with APOE. Both genes remain in linkage disequilibrium and are associated with dementia [50]. Most reports concerning the role of TOMM40 in developing dementia have focused on a variable length poly-T sequence polymorphism (rs10524523) located in intron 6 [5153]. The number of deoxythymidine residues in the rs10524523 polymorphism comprise the so-called “alleles” of the poly-T repeat as “short” (abbreviated here as S), “long” (L), or “very long” (VL). These remain in strong linkage with the APOE variants, as the TOMM40 L allele is almost exclusively observed in the APOE E4 carriers, while TOMM40 S and/or the VL variants are associated with APOE E3 [5153]. The poly-T variation in TOMM40 was shown to be significantly associated with the age of onset of dementia [52]. Moreover, as shown in [51], the TOMM40 poly-T variant may facilitate the estimation of dementia progression in AD patients, independently from the status of other dementia loci. They also implied that the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) signals recorded in the APOE locus may indeed arise from TOMM40.

It has been suggested that Aβ may exert intracellular toxicity mediated by TOM40, for example, by affecting the function of cellular power plants—the mitochondria. According to [50], the mechanism underlying TOM40’s role in dementia involves its ability to uptake Aβ to the mitochondrion, as Aβ has been found to be co-localized with cristae proteins in the mitochondria. Subsequently, after absorption the intracellular Aβ would cause increased production of ROS, thus leading to DNA damage and premature neuronal death.

Several studies have shown that poly-T TOMM40 variation may influence cognitive performance in healthy elderly people. The authors of study [54] investigated a cohort of 1613 elderly volunteers whose cognitive decline was followed for a period of 14 years (range = 12–18 years). This study showed that the TOMM40 S variant repressed the activity of luciferase assay. Correspondingly, expression of the S variant was half of that in the VL variant. Moreover, they observed that the S variant significantly reduced vocabulary ability, diminished age-dependent vocabulary decline, in subjects as compared to the VL variant carriers. Other authors [55] conducted longitudinal modeling of a cognitive aging study on a cohort of 639 subjects with no signs of dementia, aged 21 to 97 years with a known TOMM40 and APOE status. The volunteers underwent neuropsychological testing every 2 years. This study [55] showed that the influence of TOMM40 variation on memory decline was particularly visible in subjects before 60 years of age (p = 0.009), however only in TOMM40 VL/VL carriers whose improvement after the test-retest was significantly less pronounced than in the S/S and S/VL carriers. Moreover, the authors performed a neuropsychological examination and testing using the human analog of the Morris water maze and brain MRI on 59 cognitively normal volunteers, stratified as S/S, S/VL, and VL/VL carriers. They found that the S/S group performed better on world-centered navigation (p ≤ 0.004) and world-centered delayed recall (p ≤ 0.014) but not on self-centered navigation tests. They also found that the TOMM40 variants significantly influenced the brain structure. The S/S group had a thicker right entorhinal cortex (p ≤ 0.043) than the S/VL and VL/VL groups, whereas significant thinning of the left entorhinal cortex and the left posterior cingulate cortex was present only in the VL/VL group (p = 0.043 and p = 0.024, respectively) as compared to the S/S group [55]. In another interesting study [56], the authors stratified 117 healthy adults (medium age: 55 years) with the APOE E3/E3 genotype according to the TOMM40 status into three groups, S/S, S/VL, and VL/VL, and performed memory tests and structural brain imaging. They found that the asymptomatic carriers of the TOMM40 VL/VL genotype performed worse on testing of episodic learning and had a smaller volume in the posterior cingulate as compared to the S/S and S/VL groups [56].

These studies suggest that the TOMM40 role is not limited to decreasing age at the onset of dementia but may also influence the brain structure and hasten memory decline in cognitively normal, healthy individuals.


5. Cholesterol, lipoproteins, and dementia

Of the many lipids, cholesterol is believed to play a major role in brain function and development, as the brain contains as much as 23% of the total cholesterol deposits [57]. One of the most pronounced groups of genes described as dementia risk factors are involved in the transport of cholesterol and may be accounted for as apolipoproteins [58]. A misbalanced lipid metabolism may be associated with memory loss [59]. According to another paper [60], patients with higher levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) had a decreased risk of developing dementia at the time of the study and in the future. For patients from the upper quartile (with a plasma HDL concentration higher than 55 mg/dL), the dementia hazard was decreased by 60%. Studies on the subjects were continued by several other teams; however, the obtained results seem to be rather inconsistent [6167].

Generally, the HDL level is believed to negatively correlate with the prevalence of dementia in elderly people; however, many studies have implied that HDL influence may be characteristic of the VD development [58, 68].

5.1. CLU, apolipoprotein J (apoJ)

Apolipoprotein J (apoJ, also known as clusterin), encoded by the CLU gene, has been shown to probably be associated with dementia. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) performed by authors [69] identified a genetic variation (rs11136000) which was a significant risk factor of dementia. The role of apoJ in the pathomechanism of AD is not fully understood. It has recently been shown that apoJ plasma levels positively correlate with the risk of dementia, as elevated apoJ levels have been reported in the plasma of AD patients as well as in their brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The study [70] showed that apoJ plasma, but not CSF, levels are elevated in AD patients and were a risk factor of dementia (HR 18.6). This biomarker was also shown to be significantly correlated with cognitive decline in AD patients and reversely correlated in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Moreover, increased plasma apoJ levels in MCI indicated an amplified risk of further cognitive decline. Furthermore, it was shown that genetic variation in the CLU region may amplify the influence of personality type on the performance of declarative memory in older, non-demented adults [71].

5.2. APOE, apolipoprotein E (apoE)

ApoE is encoded by the APOE gene, which is located on the long arm of chromosome 19. It comprises four exons. Two frequent polymorphisms were described on the last exon: rs7412 and rs429358. These variants encode for three common alleles of APOE: E2, E3, and E4, encoding for apoE ε2, ε3, and ε4, respectively.

ApoE in physiological conditions is a major cholesterol carrier and one of the most vital proteins responsible for maintaining cholesterol homeostasis in the brain. ApoE is mostly synthesized by astrocytes and probably does not cross the blood-brain barrier [72].

A recent study [73] on transgenic rabbit Apoe knockouts (Apoe -/-) showed that apoE is essential for cholesterol homeostasis under stress conditions. Under normal conditions, the transgenic animals were able to maintain a stable, physiological level of plasma cholesterol. However, when the animals were transitioned to a diet with high cholesterol content, its level increased dramatically (1070 ± 61 mg/dL in apoE KO vs 169 ± 79 mg/dL in the wild type, p < 0.001). Another study [74] showed that increased content of fat and cholesterol in the diet increased apoE production, probably due to transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. This suggests that functional apoE is essential for cholesterol regulation in mammals and protects against diet-induced atherosclerosis. The various variants of APOE have a distinct influence on apoE function and effect. Studies on humans and in apoE transgenic mice suggest that lipidation of apoE depends strongly on the APOE genotype, and that apoE ε2 and ε3 are significantly more lipidated than apoE ε4. Interestingly, cholesterol and proper apoE lipidation are essential for apoE function in sustaining synapses [75].

A study [76] analyzing the association of plasma and CSF apoE concentrations showed that the CSF/serum ratios of apoE levels were associated with progression of dementia. Schmidt et al. observed that “the lower the ratio, the faster the deterioration,” as measured by the MMSE, instrumental activities of daily living (iADL), or Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Subsequently, another study [77] showed that plasma apoE may be a biomarker of dementia, as patients suffering from memory decline had lowered concentrations of plasma apoE.

The first reports indicating that APOE may be associated with dementia were published more than 20 years ago. Detailed studies of this gene were carried out mainly in AD; however, the literature data support APOE influence on memory in people with no symptoms of dementia. It is believed that APOE E3 is the most common allele in the population and does not modify the risk of memory decline. The APOE E4 variant was shown to be overrepresented in dementia patients, especially those with AD [78]. So far, APOE E4 remains the most significant risk factor of sporadic AD and accounts for 30% of cases [79]. APOE E2 was shown to be associated with reduced age-dependent cognitive decline. This observation occurred independently of age-related neuroinflammation and synaptic changes or the Aβ burden [80]. The described effect may be explained by a higher apoE level in APOE E2 carriers as well as by more efficient Aβ clearance [81]. Moreover, according to study [75], the effects of APOE E2 and E4 counteract, and in transgenic mice the introduction of the E2 allele decreased Aβ deposition, while the E4 allele increased the Aβ burden.

According to [82], the most significant APOE effect on the onset of dementia may be observed in patients over the age of 60 (p = 0.006). This was visible as an accelerated memory decline in APOE E4 carriers. However, other authors [83] reported that characteristic changes in MRI may be observed even in healthy infants carrying the APOE E4 allele. According to authors of [84], the APOE E4 allele is not only responsible for a decline in episodic memory with age in cognitively normal adults but may also induce impaired olfaction due to deterioration of medial temporal lobe. This is consistent with the neuroimaging data, suggesting that in non-demented APOE E4 carriers, mediotemporal atrophy occurs prior to clinical dementia onset.

It is also interesting that multiple studies have confirmed that the TOMM40/APOE locus is associated not only with the risk of dementia but also with longevity. The GWAS confirmed that the rs4420638 polymorphism on chromosome 19q13.32 was significantly related to living longer than >85 years (OR = 0.72, p = 3.40 × 10-36) [85]. Similarly, according to a recent study [86], with the use of more sophisticated integrative GWAS (iGWAS) method to couple data from 14 meta-analyses, the locus housing APOE and TOMM40 remained significantly associated with longevity, even when the false discovery rate (FDR) was set at 10%, which indicates that the APOE/TOMM40 locus holds the key for healthy senescence without a pathological memory decline.


6. APOE in a healthy Polish population under 60 years of age

Despite the many years of research, AD remains a disease that is difficult to predict and diagnose, with few blood-derived biomarkers possible for use in routine clinical setting. As was stated before, APOE remains the most significant genetic risk factor of AD. This creates a need for the development of a novel, quick, and reliable method of analyzing the APOE genotype and the apoE plasma concentration. The role of APOE in the development of dementia and its influence on longevity in elderly people has been studied by [53]. As per our knowledge, APOE studies on a younger population in Poland have been neglected and there are no literature data on association of the APOE genotype and the apoE plasma level in non-demented Polish adults.

6.1. Aim of the study

In this study, we tried to assess the influence of the APOE genotype and the effect of demographic factors on the apoE level in a subset of Polish non-demented volunteers less than 60 years of age.

6.2. Subjects

A total of 83 healthy adults (70 females, mean age: 51.9 ± 7.2; 13 males, mean age: 44.9 ± 11.7) under 60 years of age with no signs of dementia or other neurological disorders were enrolled in the study. All participants provided signed, written consent. The research project was approved by the Bioethical Committee at the Poznan University of Medical Sciences, decision no. 1031/13, dated May 5, 2013.

6.3. Materials

Each volunteer’s blood was collected on an anticoagulant—K3EDTA (Monovette™ vacuum system, Sarstedt, USA). A total of 3 ml of blood was immediately aliquoted, then frozen and stored at −80°C upon nucleic acid isolation. Subsequently, the remaining blood was centrifuged (1400 relative centrifugal force [RCF], 10 min) and the collected plasma was aliquoted and stored at −80°C.

6.4. Methodology

6.4.1. APOE genotyping

First, a subject’s DNA was extracted from frozen blood using gravity flow microcolumns (Genomic Micro AX Blood Gravity, A&A Biotechnology, Poland). The DNA concentration was measured by a microplate spectrophotometer (Take3, Epoch, BioTek, USA) and adjusted to 20 ng/μL with Milli-Q® water. Subsequently, genotyping was performed according to a modified mismatch primer method [87]. Briefly, three quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) specific to each APOE allele were performed with the use of four different primers (as shown in Table 2). The qPCR included two steps: primary pre-amplification (15 cycles) with annealing at 64°C followed by 30 cycles of secondary amplification with annealing at 62°C. The reactions were performed on a CFX Connect™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-rad, USA) in 10 μL volumes, with 250 nM primers and 50 ng of genomic DNA using 1× SsoFast™ EvaGreen® Supermix (Bio-rad, USA). The cycling conditions were: 30 s initial denaturation at 98°C followed by cycles of 98°C for 5 s and 64 and 62°C for 10 s. The reaction was considered positive once the products appeared before the 10th cycle of secondary qPCR. The method was validated by Sanger sequencing in an external laboratory.

Reaction Starter Sequence Annealing
melting point

Table 2.

Starters used for genotyping of APOE.

6.4.2. ApoE quantification

Determination of the plasma apoE concentration was performed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. The analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Human apoE ELISA Kit, Mabtech, Sweden) using 10,000× diluted plasma samples. Absorbance was measured by an EPOCH microplate reader (BioTek, USA). The concentrations were calculated from a four-parametric standard curve (R = 0.998) by Gen5 ver. 2.01 software (provided with the reader).

6.5. Results

Our study on Polish subjects showed that the observed genotype frequencies of APOE are in line with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p = 0.9365). The dominating allele was APOE E3 (83.7%) and the least common allele was APOE E2 (3.0%), as is shown in Figure 1. Interestingly, we did not observe any APOE E2/E2 homozygotes, as is shown in Table 3.

Our results indicate that the apoE plasma concentration depends on the APOE genotype (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], p = 0.021). Generally, in APOE E3/E3 carriers we recorded the highest mean concentrations of apoE, while in the APOE E4/E4 homozygotes we recorded the lowest mean concentrations. In females with the APOE E2/E3 allele, the concentration of apoE was slightly lower than in the E3 homozygotes. Interestingly, in a single case of an E2/E4 carrier we observed an increased level of plasma apoE. Subsequently, the plasma apoE concentration in APOE E3/E3 carriers was higher in males than in females. Conversely, in APOE E3/E4 carriers the recorded apoE concentration was higher in females. Hence, the decrease in apoE due to the APOE E4 genotype was more pronounced in males than in females (41% vs 16%), as shown in Table 3. Overall, the apoE concentration was insignificantly higher in males than in females (2.54 vs 2.24 mg/dL; p = 0.194, Student’s t-test). The observed positive trend of increasing apoE in older individuals did not reach statistical significance (r = 0.201, p = 0.0687; Pearson correlation coefficient). However, after stratification according to gender, we observed significant correlation of the apoE plasma level and age in females (r = 0.348, p = 0.00128; Pearson correlation coefficient). The concentrations of apoE stratified according to APOE status, gender, and age are shown in Table 4 and Figure 2, respectively.

Figure 1.

Frequencies of APOE alleles in Polish, cognitively normal volunteers under 60 years of age.

Genotypes APOE E2/E2 APOE E2/E3 APOE E3/E3 APOE E3/E4 APOE E4/E4 APOE E2/E4
Observed frequencies 0
Expected frequencies 0.08

Table 3.

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium calculations of APOE variants in Polish, cognitively normal volunteers less than 60 years of age.

Note: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium calculations, p = 0.9365, n = 83.

Female 1.98 ± 0.67 2.91 2.35 ± 0.78 2.02 ± 0.52 0.69
Male 2.91 ± 0.63 1.72 ± 0.22
Combined 1.98 ± 0.67 2.91 2.43 ± 0.79 1.95 ± 0.49 0.69

Table 4.

Mean plasma apoE concentration (mg/dL) in Polish, cognitively normal volunteers under 60 years of age stratified according to gender and APOE genotype.

Note: Mean concentration ± SD (mg/dL) or (single result).

Figure 2.

Mean apoE plasma concentration (mg/dL) in Polish, cognitively normal volunteers under 60 years of age stratified according to gender and age.

6.6. Discussion

As was stated before, the APOE E4 allele is associated with increased risk of developing dementia.

According to our results, the APOE E3 genotype was the most prevalent genotype in the studied group, while the E2 genotype was the least common. Similar results were reported in the Polish population [53].

Our study shows that APOE E4 variant is associated with a decreased concentration of plasma apoE in cognitively normal Polish volunteers less than 60 years of age. Our results are supported by the results of other authors [77], who analyzed plasma apoE concentrations and APOE status in a cohort of 75,708 participants in the Copenhagen General Population Study and the Copenhagen City Heart Study. The authors also showed that apoE is dependent on the APOE genotype, as they found substantial differences in plasma apoE concentrations between carriers of distinct APOE genotypes. However, contrary to our results, in their study the highest level of apoE was observed in APOE E2 homozygotes and decreased in E4 carriers in a dose-dependent manner: E2/E2 > E2E3 > E2/E4 > E3/E3 > E3/E4 > E4/E4. The plasma concentration of apoE in E4/E4 homozygotes was up to 65% lower as compared to APOE E2/E2 carriers. This partial incompatibility with our results may be explained by the utilization of various methods: the authors used the nephelometry and turbidimetry methods, whereas we used the well-established ELISA method. In another study [88], the authors showed that apoE concentrations in plasma apoE increased with age in a healthy population. We observed a similar trend; however, it was significant only in the female group.

The plasma concentration of apoE may be a valuable dementia biomarker because it is easily available and, according to literature data, decreased apoE may be a risk factor for developing dementia. The above-mentioned Australian follow-up cohort study, comprising mostly Caucasian subjects, showed that the reduced apoE plasma level may be a predictor of a transition from MCI to AD. Moreover, the plasma apoE concentration correlates positively with cognitive function, and patients with a lower apoE level tend to perform worse in neuropsychological tests assessing spatial memory and language abilities [89].

Hence, the assessment of the plasma apoE concentration and the APOE status may give valuable information to physicians trying to predict the rate of cognitive decline in the course of dementive disease as well as in normally ageing adults and elderly persons.


7. Summary

Figure 3.

The genetic and biochemical factors associated with normal aging and dementia; β-amyloid—Aβ.

The appearance of dementia in old age is influenced by both biochemical and genetic factors leading to structural disorders in the brain of elderly persons. The level of Aβ is mentioned among the other biochemical factors associated with dementia. The deposition of Aβ in the brain is controlled by APOE and by genes associated with the amyloid cascade (APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2). Subsequently, Aβ toxicity is modified by the TOMM40. In the elderly, also abnormal cholesterol, glucose levels, and the weakening of protective and repair mechanisms leading to the generation of ROS (mediated, e.g. by PON1) may cause a reduction in cognitive functions. However, the role of genes associated with longevity (e.g. FOXO3A, CETP) and normal aging (e.g. SIRT1, AKT1, CDKN1A) is not clearly defined in the occurrence of diseases typical for this age group, as shown in Figure 3.

Finding a way to control the genetic factors and their protein products may contribute to the prevention of diseases of old age, including depression and dementia, and to improve the quality of life of elderly people.



This study was supported by the Poznan University of Medical Sciences grant no. 502-14-01111677-10342.


  1. 1. Robertson R. Weight loss in elderly. (in) Rosenthal T, Naughton R, Williams M. Geriatria, Czelej, Lublin 2009:131–145.(Article in Polish)
  2. 2. Dorszewska J. Cell biology of normal brain aging: Synaptic plasticity – Cell death. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013; 25:25–34. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-013-0004-2
  3. 3. Holle R, Grässel E, Ruckdäschel S, Wunder S, Mehlig H, Marx P, Pirk O, Butzlaff M, Kunz S, Lauterberg J. Dementia care initiative in primary practice: Study protocol of a cluster randomized trial on dementia management in a general practice setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009; 6:9, 91. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-91
  4. 4. Jóźwiak A. Dementia in the elderly. Geriatria 2008; 2:237–246.(Article in Polish)
  5. 5. Montagne A, Pa J, Zlokovic BV. Vascular plasticity and cognition during normal aging and dementia. JAMA Neurol. 2015; 72:495–496. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol
  6. 6. Petersen RC, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Rocca WA, Roberts RO, Mielke MM, Lowe VJ, Knopman DS, Pankratz VS, Machulda MM, Geda YE, Jack CR Jr. Association of elevated amyloid levels with cognition and biomarkers in cognitively normal people from the community. JAMA Neurol. 2016; 73:85–92. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3098
  7. 7. Dickstein DL, Kabaso D, Rocher AB, Luebke JI, Wearne SL, Hof PR. Changes in the structural complexity of the aged brain. Aging Cell. 2007; 6:275–284.
  8. 8. Bishop NA, Lu T, Yankner BA. Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline. Nature. 2010; 464:529–535. DOI: 10.1038/nature08983
  9. 9. Nation DA, Edmonds EC, Bangen KJ, Delano-Wood L, Scanlon BK, Han SD, Edland SD, Salmon DP, Galasko DR, Bondi MW, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Investigators. Pulse pressure in relation to tau-mediated neurodegeneration, cerebral amyloidosis, and progression to dementia in very old adults. JAMA Neurol. 2015; 72:546–553. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4477
  10. 10. Berti V, Murray J, Davies M, Spector N, Tsui WH, Li Y, et al. Nutrient patterns and brain biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease in cognitively normal individuals. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015; 19:413–423. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-014-0534-0
  11. 11. Torralva T, Sposato LA, Riccio PM, Gleichgerrcht E, Roca M, Toledo JB, Trojanowski JQ, Kukull WA, Manes F, Hachinski V. Role of brain infarcts in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: Clinicopathological characterization in the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center database. Neurobiol. Aging. 2015; 36:2861–2868. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.06.026
  12. 12. Kida Y, Goligorsky MS. Sirtuins, Cell Senescence, and Vascular Aging. Can J Cardiol, 2016; 32:634–641.DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.11.022
  13. 13. Morris BJ, Willcox DC, Donlon TA, Willcox BJ. FOXO3: A major gene for human longevity – a mini-review. Gerontology. 2015; 61:515–525. DOI: 10.1159/000375235
  14. 14. Vijg J, Hasty P. Aging and p53: Getting it straight. A commentary on a recent paper by Gentry and Venkatachalam. Aging Cell. 2005; 4:331–338.
  15. 15. Gravina S, Lescai F, Hurteau G, Brock GJ, Saramaki A, Salvioli S, Franceschi C, Roninson IB. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the p21 (CDKN1A) gene and correlations with longevity in the Italian population. Aging (Albany, NY). 2009; 1:470–480.
  16. 16. Gudnason V, Kakko S, Nicaud V, Savolainen MJ, Kesäniemi YA, Tahvanainen E, Humphries S. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene effect on CETP activity and plasma high-density lipoprotein in European populations. The EARS Group. Eur J Clin Invest. 1999; 29:116–128.
  17. 17. Sanders AE, Wang C, Katz M, Derby CA, Barzilai N, Ozelius L, Lipton RB. Association of a functional polymorphism in the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) gene with memory decline and incidence of dementia. JAMA. 2010; 303:150–158. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1988
  18. 18. Brooks-Wilson AR. Genetics of healthy aging and longevity. Hum Genet. 2013; 132:1323–1338. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-013-1342-z
  19. 19. Forte G, Grossi V, Celestini V, Lucisano G, Scardapane M, Varvara D, Patruno M, Bagnulo R, Loconte D, Giunti L, Petracca A, Giglio S, Genuardi M, Pellegrini F, Resta N, Simone C. Characterization of the rs2802292 SNP identifies FOXO3A as a modifier locus predicting cancer risk in patients with PJS and PHTS hamartomatous polyposis syndromes. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:661. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-661
  20. 20. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013; 153:1194–1217. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
  21. 21. Kilic U, Gok O, Erenberk U, Dundaroz MR, Torun E, Kucukardali Y, Elibol-Can B, Uysal O, Dundar T. A remarkable age-related increase in SIRT1 protein expression against oxidative stress in elderly: SIRT1 gene variants and longevity in human. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0117954. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117954
  22. 22. Lescai F, Marchegiani F, Franceschi C. PON1 is a longevity gene: Results of a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2009; 8:277–284. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2009.04.001
  23. 23. Blasiak J, Glowacki S, Kauppinen A, Kaarniranta K. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA damage and repair in age-related macular degeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14:2996–3010. DOI: 10.3390/ijms14022996
  24. 24. Alexeyev M, Shokolenko I, Wilson G, LeDoux S. The maintenance of mitochondrial DNA integrity – critical analysis and update. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013; 5:a012641. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012641
  25. 25. Harman D. A theory based on free radical and radical chemistry. J Gerontol. 1956; 11:298–300.
  26. 26. Sanz A, Stefanatos RK. The mitochondrial free radical theory of aging: A critical view. Curr Aging Sci. 2008; 1:10–21.
  27. 27. Gaziev AI, Abdullaev S, Podlutsky A. Mitochondrial function and mitochondrial DNA maintenance with advancing age. Biogerontology. 2014; 15:417–438. DOI: 10.1007/s10522-014-9515-2
  28. 28. Hebert SL, Marquet-de Rougé P, Lanza IR, McCrady-Spitzer SK, Levine JA, Middha S, Carter RE, Klaus KA, Therneau TM, Highsmith EW, Nair KS. Mitochondrial aging and physical decline: Insights from three generations of women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 70:1409–1417. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glv086
  29. 29. Gackowski D, Rozalski R, Siomek A, Dziaman T, Nicpon K, Klimarczyk M, Araszkiewicz A, Olinski R. Oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage is characteristic for mixed Alzheimer disease/vascular dementia. J Neurol Sci. 2008; 266:57–62.
  30. 30. Hatanaka H, Hanyu H, Fukasawa R, Sato T, Shimizu S, Sakurai H. Peripheral oxidative stress markers in diabetes-related dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015. DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12645.
  31. 31. Simpson JE, Ince PG, Matthews FE, Shaw PJ, Heath PR, Brayne C, Garwood C, Higginbottom A, Wharton SB; MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group. A neuronal DNA damage response is detected at the earliest stages of Alzheimer’s neuropathology and correlates with cognitive impairment in the Medical Research Council’s Cognitive Function and Ageing Study ageing brain cohort. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015; 41:483–496. DOI: 10.1111/nan.12202
  32. 32. Newton DF, Naiberg MR, Goldstein BI. Oxidative stress and cognition amongst adults without dementia or stroke: Implications for mechanistic and therapeutic research in psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 227(2–3):127–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.03.038
  33. 33. Berger SL, Kouzarides T, Shiekhattar R, Shilatifard A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 2009; 23:781–783. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1787609
  34. 34. Jones MJ, Goodman SJ, Kobor MS. DNA methylation and healthy human aging. Aging Cell. 2015; 14:924–932. DOI: 10.1111/acel.12349
  35. 35. Zampieri M, Ciccarone F, Calabrese R, Franceschi C, Bürkle A, Caiafa P. Reconfiguration of DNA methylation in aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 2015; 151:60–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2015.02.002
  36. 36. Marttila S, Kananen L, Häyrynen S, Jylhävä J, Nevalainen T, Hervonen A, Jylhä M, Nykter M, Hurme M. Ageing-associated changes in the human DNA methylome: Genomic locations and effects on gene expression. BMC Genomic. 2015; 16:179. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1381-z
  37. 37. Sun D, Yi SV. Impacts of chromatin states and long-range genomic segments on aging and DNA methylation. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0128517.
  38. 38. Klein CJ, Botuyan MV, Wu Y, Ward CJ, Nicholson GA, Hammans S, Hojo K, Yamanishi H, Karpf AR, Wallace DC, Simon M, Lander C, Boardman LA, Cunningham JM, Smith GE, Litchy WJ, Boes B, Atkinson EJ, Middha S, B Dyck PJ, Parisi JE, Mer G, Smith DI, Dyck PJ. Mutations in DNMT1 cause hereditary sensory neuropathy with dementia and hearing loss. Nat Genet. 2011; 43:595–600. DOI: 10.1038/ng.830
  39. 39. Xu X. DNA methylation and cognitive aging. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:13922–13932.
  40. 40. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007; 128(4):693–705.
  41. 41. Di Bernardo G, Cipollaro M, Galderisi U. Chromatin modification and senescence. Curr Pharm Des. 2012; 18:1686–1693.
  42. 42. Gräff J, Tsai LH. Histone acetylation: Molecular mnemonics on the chromatin. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14:97–111. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3427
  43. 43. Scaffidi P, Misteli T. Lamin A‐dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science. 2006; 312:1059–1063.
  44. 44. Krishnan V, Liu B, Zhou Z. ‘Relax and Repair’ to restrain aging. Aging (Albany, NY). 2011; 3:943–954.
  45. 45. Zhou P, Wu E, Alam HB, Li Y. Histone cleavage as a mechanism for epigenetic regulation: Current insights and perspectives. Curr Mol Med. 2014; 14:1164–1172.
  46. 46. Das C, Tyler JK. Histone exchange and histone modifications during transcription and aging. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013; 1819:332–342.
  47. 47. Spiegel AM, Sewal AS, Rapp PR. Epigenetic contributions to cognitive aging: Disentangling mindspan and lifespan. Learn Mem. 2014; 21:569–574. DOI: 10.1101/lm.033506.113
  48. 48. Dorszewska J, Prendecki M, Oczkowska A, Dezor M, Kozubski W. Molecular basis of familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2016; 13:1–12. e-pub
  49. 49. Fargo K. Alzheimer’s Association Report: 2014 Alzheimers disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2014; 10:e47–e92.
  50. 50. Hansson Petersen CA, Alikhani N, Behbahani H, Wiehager B, Pavlov PF, Alafuzoff I, et al. The amyloid beta-peptide is imported into mitochondria via the TOM import machinery and localized to mitochondrial cristae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105:13145–13150. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806192105
  51. 51. Roses AD, Lutz MW, Amrine-Madsen H, Saunders AM, Crenshaw DG, Sundseth SS, et al. A TOMM40 variable-length polymorphism predicts the age of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010; 10(5):375–384. DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2009.69
  52. 52. Lutz MW, Crenshaw DG, Saunders AM, Roses AD. Genetic variation at a single locus and age of onset for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2010; 6:125–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.01.011
  53. 53. Maruszak A, Pepłońska B, Safranow K, Chodakowska-Żebrowska M, Barcikowska M, Zekanowski C. TOMM40 rs10524523 polymorphism’s role in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease and in longevity. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012; 28:309–322. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110743
  54. 54. Payton A, Sindrewicz P, Pessoa V, Platt H, Horan M, Ollier W, et al. A TOMM40 poly-T variant modulates gene expression and is associated with vocabulary ability and decline in nonpathologic aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2015; 39:217.e1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.11.017
  55. 55. Laczó J, Andel R, Vyhnalek M, Matoska V, Kaplan V, Nedelska Z, et al. The effect of TOMM40 on spatial navigation in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2015; 36:2024–2033. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.03.004
  56. 56. Johnson SC, La Rue A, Hermann BP, Xu G, Koscik RL, Jonaitis EM, et al. The effect of TOMM40 poly-T length on gray matter volume and cognition in middle-aged persons with APOE ε3/ε3 genotype. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2011; 7:456–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.11.012
  57. 57. Dietschy JM. Central nervous system: Cholesterol turnover, brain development and neurodegeneration. Biol Chem. 2009; 390:287–293. DOI: 10.1515/BC.2009.035
  58. 58. Koch M, Jensen MK. HDL-cholesterol and apolipoproteins in relation to dementia. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2016; 27:76–87. DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000257
  59. 59. Ettcheto M, Petrov D, Pedrós I, de Lemos L, Pallàs M, Alegret M, et al. Hypercholesterolemia and neurodegeneration. Comparison of hippocampal phenotypes in LDLr knockout and APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. Exp Gerontol. 2015; 65:69–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.03.010
  60. 60. Reitz C, Tang M-X, Schupf N, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Luchsinger JA. Association of higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in elderly individuals and lower risk of late-onset Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2010; 67:1491–1497. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.297
  61. 61. Ancelin M-L, Ripoche E, Dupuy A-M, Barberger-Gateau P, Auriacombe S, Rouaud O, et al. Sex differences in the associations between lipid levels and incident dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013; 34:519–528. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-121228
  62. 62. Mielke MM, Bandaru VVR, Haughey NJ, Xia J, Fried LP, Yasar S, et al. Serum ceramides increase the risk of Alzheimer disease: The Women’s Health and Aging Study II. Neurology. 2012; 79:633–641. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318264e380
  63. 63. Gupta VB, Laws SM, Villemagne VL, Ames D, Bush AI, Ellis KA, et al. Plasma apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease risk: The AIBL study of aging. Neurology. 2011; 76:1091–1098. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318211c352
  64. 64. Ghebranious N, Mukesh B, Giampietro PF, Glurich I, Mickel SF, Waring SC, et al. A pilot study of gene/gene and gene/environment interactions in Alzheimer disease. Clin Med Res. 2011; 9:17–25. DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2010.894
  65. 65. Dias IHK, Polidori MC, Li L, Weber D, Stahl W, Nelles G, et al. Plasma levels of HDL and carotenoids are lower in dementia patients with vascular comorbidities. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014; 40:399–408. DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2010.894
  66. 66. Czapski GA, Maruszak A, Styczyńska M, Żekanowski C, Safranow K, Strosznajder JB. Association between plasma biomarkers, CDK5 polymorphism and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2012; 72:397–411.
  67. 67. Warren MW, Hynan LS, Weiner MF. Lipids and adipokines as risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012; 29:151–157. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2012-111385
  68. 68. Tai LM, Thomas R, Marottoli FM, Koster KP, Kanekiyo T, Morris AWJ, et al. The role of APOE in cerebrovascular dysfunction. Acta Neuropathol. 2016; 131:709–723
  69. 69. Lambert J-C, Heath S, Even G, Campion D, Sleegers K, Hiltunen M, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2009; 41:1094–1099. DOI: 10.1038/ng.439.
  70. 70. Jongbloed W, van Dijk KD, Mulder SD, van de Berg WDJ, Blankenstein MA, van der Flier W, et al. Clusterin levels in plasma predict cognitive decline and progression to Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015; 46:1103–1110. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150036
  71. 71. Sapkota S, Wiebe SA, Small BJ, Dixon RA. Apolipoprotein E and Clusterin can magnify effects of personality vulnerability on declarative memory performance in non-demented older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016; 31:502–509. DOI: 10.1002/gps.4355
  72. 72. Liu C-C, Liu C-C, Kanekiyo T, Xu H, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: Risk, mechanisms and therapy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013; 9:106–118. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.263
  73. 73. Niimi M, Yang D, Kitajima S, Ning B, Wang C, Li S, et al. ApoE knockout rabbits: A novel model for the study of human hyperlipidemia. Atherosclerosis. 2016; 245:187–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.12.002
  74. 74. Srivastava RA. Regulation of the apolipoprotein E by dietary lipids occurs by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996; 155:153–162.
  75. 75. Hu J, Liu C-C, Chen X-F, Zhang Y-W, Xu H, Bu G. Opposing effects of viral mediated brain expression of apolipoprotein E2 (apoE2) and apoE4 on apoE lipidation and Aβ metabolism in apoE4-targeted replacement mice. Mol Neurodegener. 2015; 10:6. DOI: 10.1186/s13024-015-0001-3
  76. 76. Schmidt C, Gerlach N, Schmitz M, Thom T, Kramer K, Friede T, et al. Baseline CSF/serum-ratio of apolipoprotein e and rate of differential decline in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015; 48:189–196. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150286
  77. 77. Rasmussen KL, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG, Frikke-Schmidt R. Plasma levels of apolipoprotein E and risk of dementia in the general population. Ann Neurol. 2015; 77:301–311. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24326. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24326
  78. 78. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science. 1993; 261:921–923.
  79. 79. Seshadri S, Fitzpatrick AL, Ikram MA, DeStefano AL, Gudnason V, Boada M, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease. JAMA. 2010; 303:1832–1840. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.574
  80. 80. Shinohara M, Kanekiyo T, Yang L, Linthicum D, Shinohara M, Fu Y, et al. APOE2 eases cognitive decline during aging: clinical and preclinical evaluations. Ann Neurol. 2016; 79:758–774. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24628
  81. 81. Arold S, Sullivan P, Bilousova T, Teng E, Miller CA, Poon WW, et al. Apolipoprotein E level and cholesterol are associated with reduced synaptic amyloid beta in Alzheimer’s disease and apoE TR mouse cortex. Acta Neuropathol. 2012; 123:39–52. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-011-0892-1
  82. 82. Caselli RJ, Dueck AC, Huentelman MJ, Lutz MW, Saunders AM, Reiman EM, et al. Longitudinal modeling of cognitive aging and the TOMM40 effect. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2012; 8:490–495. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.11.006
  83. 83. Dean DC, Jerskey BA, Chen K, Protas H, Thiyyagura P, Roontiva A, et al. Brain differences in infants at differential genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer disease: A cross-sectional imaging study. JAMA Neurol. 2014; 71:11–22. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4544
  84. 84. Olofsson JK, Josefsson M, Ekström I, Wilson D, Nyberg L, Nordin S, et al. Long-term episodic memory decline is associated with olfactory deficits only in carriers of ApoE-є4. Neuropsychologia. 2016; 85:1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.004
  85. 85. Deelen J, Beekman M, Uh HW, Broer L, Ayers KL, Tan Q, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of human longevity identifies a novel locus conferring survival beyond 90 years of age. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23:4420–4432. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu139
  86. 86. Fortney K, Dobriban E, Garagnani P, Pirazzini C, Monti D, Mari D, et al. Genome-wide scan informed by age-related disease identifies loci for exceptional human longevity. Li H, editor. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11:e1005728. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005728
  87. 87. Calero O, Hortigüela R, Bullido MJ, Calero M. Apolipoprotein E genotyping method by real time PCR, a fast and cost-effective alternative to the TaqMan and FRET assays. J Neurosci Methods. 2009; 183:238–240. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.06.033
  88. 88. Rasmussen KL, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG, Frikke-Schmidt R. Plasma levels of apolipoprotein E and risk of ischemic heart disease in the general population. Atherosclerosis. 2016; 246:63–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.12.038
  89. 89. Gupta VB, Wilson AC, Burnham S, Hone E, Pedrini S, Laws SM, et al. Follow-up plasma apolipoprotein E levels in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing (AIBL) cohort. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015; 7:16. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-015-0105-6

Written By

Michał Prendecki, Jolanta Florczak-Wyspianska, Marta Kowalska, Margarita Lianeri, Wojciech Kozubski and Jolanta Dorszewska

Reviewed: 12 May 2016 Published: 28 September 2016