Abstract
“Smartly” functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs) constitute an actively pursued research topic in the fields of nanomaterials and nanotechnology. The development of highly efficient and selective methodologies for dispersing CNTs in the liquid phase has not only made efficient separation and purification of CNTs possible, but also opened the doors to many fascinating material and biological applications. Very recently, the development of CNT hybrid systems with controlled stimuli-responsiveness has achieved significant breakthroughs. This chapter outlines the state of the art within this vibrant research area, and examples from the most recent literature are selected to demonstrate progress in the preparation of CNT composites, the physical properties of which can be readily switched by various external stimuli (e.g., pH, photoirradiation, solvent, temperature, etc.).
Keywords
- carbon nanotubes
- chemical functionalization
- stimuli-responsiveness
- reversibility
- nanomaterials
- supramolecular chemistry
1. Introduction
Since the first synthesis of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) by Ijima in 1991 [1], CNT-based materials have attracted tremendous interest from both academia and industry. Indeed, CNTs along with other nano-sized carbon materials (
CNTs are carbon allotropes in a tubular shape with nanoscale diameter (

Figure 1.
(A)–(C) Illustration of the formation of SWNTs with various chiral indices by rolling graphene sheets.
The synthesis of CNTs can be done in several ways, for example, arc discharge, laser ablation, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and others [9]. However, all the currently existing processes for CNT production generate mixtures of various CNTs, amorphous carbon, and/or residual metal species. For this reason, post-treatment of as-produced CNT products becomes a critically important and indispensable step toward the application of CNTs [10], since removal of the unwanted impurities can give rise to considerably improved performances for CNT-based electronic and optoelectronic devices, while the purity of CNTs plays a key role in reducing or averting undesired toxicity and side effects in biological and medicinal applications. Another significant technical challenge encountered in the application of CNTs is the extremely low solubility and hence very poor processability of pristine CNTs in common solvents. The very large hydrophobic π-surface of CNTs makes them prone to aggregation (forming bundles) through π-stacking and van der Waals interactions. Breaking the bundles into individual tubes is an energetically costly process that usually relies on chemical modifications to overcome the strong inter-tube attractions. There are two general approaches for preparation of functionalized CNTs (
The generally employed strategy for non-covalent functionalization of CNTs relies on the use of certain dispersing agents (
In short, the present knowledge and techniques for dispersed CNT systems and subsequent applications have been considerably expanded, thanks to the continued efforts of material chemists on the design and synthesis of novel molecular and macromolecular systems as functional dispersants or agents for CNT modifications. Indeed, the current design of CNT dispersants and development of related processing methods have already surpassed being merely a single-parameter issue of improving dispersity. Rather, the objectives of research have turned out to be more and more diversified and application-oriented. In the following sections, our discussions are firstly focused on a newly emerging topic—reversible dispersion and release of CNTs regulated by rationally designed stimuli-responsive molecular and supramolecular systems—which has attracted rapidly growing attention in recent years. In the second part, the recent progress in polymer-functionalized CNT composites that show controlled responsiveness to one or more environmental stimuli is described.
2. Dispersion and release of CNTs: a microscopic and supramolecular perspective view
Effective dispersion of CNTs requires sufficient energy input (
In the literature, a large array of molecular and macromolecular motifs has been reported to give satisfactory graphenophilic performance. In the category of small molecules, planar structurally rigid polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have been known to easily adsorb on the surface of CNTs through a combination of hydrophobic and π-π interactions [28, 29]. Examples of such PAHs include pyrene, naphthalene, and phenathrene, which carry the fused aromatic backbones, mapping out the segmental hexagonal arrangement on the sidewall of CNTs. It is worth noting that since the initial study by Dai and co-workers [30], pyrene has become a popularly employed anchoring group allowing facile assembly of CNT supermolecular constructs imparted with various optoelectronic properties [31–34] and biologic activities [35–38] By the same token, highly π-extended heterocyclic aromatic compounds, such as phorphyrins, [39], phthalocyanines [40], and tetrathiafulvalenes [41, 42], have been found to show strong non-covalent interactions with CNTs, rendering the resulting hybrid systems intriguing photophysical and optoelectronic properties. Besides the small molecule-based systems, π-conjugated polymers have been widely used in CNT dispersion as well [15]. In these conjugated polymers, arene groups are embedded in the repeat units, which collectively engender strong binding to CNTs via π-π stacking. Experimental observations and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations have demonstrated that the polymer backbones with a certain degree of flexibility would favor wrapping around the CNTs in different fashions [43, 44]. DNA or RNA molecules can interact with the CNT sidewall via π-π stacking. In particular, single-strand DNA (ssDNA) oligomers and polymers have been extensively explored as SWNT dispersants and the interactions were found to be sequence-dependent [45–51]. Such properties have enabled fascinating applications including precise sorting of SWNTs, DNA sequencing, and chemical sensing applications [52]. Indeed, for many CNT dispersants developed so far, aromatic functional groups (
With the wide range of CNT dispersants studied over the past decade, fundamental understanding of their non-covalent interactions with CNTs at the molecular and supramolecular levels has been continually developed by state-of-the-art spectroscopic and microscopic analyses as well as high-level theoretical simulations. Knowledge in this field is highly instructive to the design of more sophisticated CNT-dispersing methods that are transferrable to the application of CNT-related materials in science and technology. One topic receiving much attention in the recent research of CNTs is the reversible dispersion and release of CNTs under the control of external stimuli, such as irradiation, chemical reactions, and solvation effects. Basically, to generate stable CNT dispersion in the solution phase, the CNT surface needs to be functionalized or encapsulated with dispersants to a sufficient degree. This in turns makes the dissociation of CNTs from dispersants not an easy task; for instance, many polyaromatics and π-conjugated polymers are known to irreversibly adsorb onto the surface of CNTs, which makes it extremely difficult to remove them from CNTs by physical means (

Figure 2.
Schematic illustration of release of CNTs by changing the dispersants from being graphenophilic to graphenophobic.
3. Recent advances in reversible dispersion and release of CNTs with stimuli-responsive dispersants
3.1. By acid-base interactions
Acid-base interactions are probably the most straightforward ways to drastically alter the chemical and physical properties, for instance, changing from neutral to cationic/anionic, from organic solubility to water solubility. For this reason, this approach has become the actively pursued one in this field. Das and co-workers [56] recently developed a series of cholesterol-based amino acid carboxylates

Figure 3.
Cholesterol-based carboxylates amphiphiles
Based on a similar acid-base exchange concept, Huang and co-workers [58] recently synthesized a pH-responsive pillar[6]arene

Figure 4.
Reversible dispersion and release of MWNTs by pH-sensitive guest-host complexation between pillar[
In 2015, Bryce and Lambert [59] synthesized a total of 13 amphiphilic surfactants, the structures of which were made of a pyrene head (hydrophobic) and various hydrophilic tails ending with carboxylate groups. Similar to the design of numerous other CNT dispersants, the pyrene group here was employed to act as a strong graphenophile to irreversibly link the surfactant molecules to the surface of CNTs. The performances of these pyrene-based surfactants in terms of MWNT dispersion in aqueous media were assessed. In particular, the authors examined the pH responsiveness of two of the surfactants

Figure 5.
Pyrene-based surfactants
A novel dumbbell-shaped 2-ureido-6[1H]-pyrimidinone (UPy)-based fluorene derivative

Figure 6.
Selective dispersion and quantitative release of semiconducting SWNTs using a pH-sensitive H-bonded supramolecular polymer.
In addition to the above-mentioned rationally designed CNT dispersant systems, some other pH-sensitive molecules and biopolymers have also been reported to induce reversible dispersion/precipitation of CNTs in aqueous media. For example, Sun and co-workers [61] reported that 1-pyreneacetic acid after deprotonation under basic conditions could be non-covalently functionalized on nitric acid-treated as-produced SWNTs to form stable dispersion in water. Upon acidification, 1-pyreneacetic acid was quantitatively removed to yield purified SWNTs. The easy recovery and reuse of dispersants make this method potentially useful for large-scale CNT processing and production. Bhattacharya
Apart from typical protic acids, CO2 has been utilized as a form of acid to trigger reversible release of CNTs from corresponding CNT-dispersant assemblies in solution. In 2010, Zhang and co-workers [64] reported the use of

Figure 7.
Reversible dispersion and aggregation of SWNTs using CO2-responsive polymers
3.3. By photoirradiation
Photoirradiation offers an effective way to trigger conformational and bonding changes in molecules, and therefore photo-responsive systems have found wide applications in molecular switches and photochromic devices [66]. In the field of CNT dispersion, photo-responsive dispersant systems have been explored, but not yet to a very large extent.
In 2008, Zhang and co-workers [67] developed poly(ethylene glycol)

Figure 8.
Dispersion and re-aggregation of SWNTs in water by a photo-reactive PEG-MG dispersant 10.
In a very recent report, Feng and co-workers [93] devised a photo-controlled method to achieve reversible dispersion and re-aggregation of SWNTs by means of photoswitchable guest-host chemistry. In their work, a pyrene-attached cyclodextrin

Figure 9.
Reversible dispersion and release of SWNTs in water using photo-regulated supramolecular guest-host complexation.
The easy synthesis and controllable photo-switchability of azobenzene have made it a popular building block in the design of photo-responsive CNT dispersants, but one important issue related to it warrants particular attention. It has been noted in some previous studies that when the azobenzene unit is tightly bound to the surface of CNT, the
3.3. By redox chemistry
There are many redox-active systems known to undergo facile reversible electron transfers under the controls of either chemical or electrochemical means, and often a reversible redox reaction is associated with a dramatic conformational change in the substrate. Such properties can be utilized to exert control over the dispersion and release of CNTs, if the dispersants are rationally designed to carry certain redox-active units. In 2008, Ikeda and co-workers [72] developed a Cu-based redox-active complex

Figure 10.
Cu complex
A class of highly electron-donating organic compounds, namely tetrathiafulvalene vinylogoues (TTFV), has been investigated by Zhao and co-workers as redox-responsive units to be integrated in redox-regulated “smart” molecular and polymer systems [73]. In general, a TTFV unit can undergo a simultaneous two-electron transfer to form a dication in the presence of a chemical oxidant (

Figure 11.
Conjugated polymers
3.4. By temperature control
The control over dispersion and release of CNTs can also be achieved using temperature-sensitive dispersants. For example, Wang and Chen in 2007 investigated the dispersion of SWNTs with temperature-responsive poly(
Most recently, a family of pyrene-based non-ionic surfactants was synthesized and studied by Bryce and Lambert [79]. Of these compounds, two surfactants

Figure 12.
Temperature-sensitive surfactants
3.5. By solvent control
Compared with the aforementioned types of stimuli-responsiveness, the tuning of solvent properties is a much easier way as it neither involves multiple steps of addition and separation of chemical species, nor requires significant energy inputs (

Figure 13.
Solvent-controlled wrapping and unwrapping of SWNTs with oligo(
In 2013, Mulla and Zhao [83] reported the synthesis and properties of a series of linear and

Figure 14.
Dithiafulvenyl-functionalized conjugated oligomer
Bonifazi and co-workers [85] in 2011 reported a strategy of solvent-controlled hydrogen bonding interactions to achieve reversible dispersion and release of MWNTs. In their work, H-bonding supramolecular polymers were respectively assembled by complementary H-bonding recognition between di(acetylamino)pyridine-terminated molecules (

Figure 15.
Molecular building blocks
4. CNT-polymer composites responsive to single or multiple external stimuli
Stimuli-responsive polymers show the intriguing behavior that their shapes, physical, electrical, and optical properties can be significantly changed in response to small variations of environmental conditions, such as pH, temperature, electrical field, ionic strength, solvent, and so on [86, 87]. As such, stimuli-responsive polymers have been widely used as active building blocks to develop advanced nanomaterials and molecular devices. Investigations on functionalization of CNTs, either covalently or non-convalently, with stimuli-responsive polymers have been actively carried out over the past decade. In 2008, Pan and Hong [88] contributed a review article outlining the progress in designing
In 2014, Luo
In 2012, Yuan and co-workers prepared a copolymer through free radical polymerization of

Figure 16.
Dispersion and precipitation of MWNTs in aqueous solution of a dual stimuli-responsive copolymer of NIPAM and EVImBr. Adopted from reference [
In 2016, Mandal and co-workers used RAFT polymerization to synthesize a type of cationic poly(ionic liquid)

Figure 17.
(A) Structure of P[VBTP][Cl]
Barner-Kowollik and co-workers recently synthesized cyclopentadienyl end-capped poly(

Figure 18.
Synthesis of thermo-responsive functionalized SWNTs
5. Conclusions and perspectives
The literature survey discussed above has demonstrated that stimuli-responsive molecular and macromolecular systems can be successfully applied to attain reversible dispersity of CNTs in solutions as well as sensitive changes in other physical properties. Each type of the external stimuli aforementioned exhibits certain advantages and offers promising opportunities for the preparation of “intelligent” nanohybrids with improved properties and enhanced performance than conventional CNT-based materials. On the other hand, significant challenges are still present, which require continued research efforts to address both the fundamental and practical aspects. For the systems based on chemical or photochemical stimuli, controllability and tenability of the reversibility of the chemical and supramolecular reactions involved are the key issues to investigate. Besides the currently used methods (
References
- 1.
Iijima S. Helical Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon. Nature. 1991;354(6348):56–8. - 2.
Zhang Q, Huang J-Q, Qian W-Z, Zhang Y-Y, Wei F. The Road for Nanomaterials Industry: A Review of Carbon Nanotube Production, Post-Treatment, and Bulk Applications for Composites and Energy Storage. Small. 2013;9(8):1237–65. - 3.
Park S, Vosguerichian M, Bao Z. A Review of Fabrication and Applications of Carbon Nanotube Film-based Flexible Electronics. Nanoscale. 2013;5(5):1727–52. - 4.
Sgobba V, Guldi DM. Carbon Nanotubes-Electronic/Electrochemical Properties and Application for Nanoelectronics and Photonics. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38(1):165–84. - 5.
Avouris P, Freitag M, Perebeinos V. Carbon-Nanotube Photonics and Optoelectronics. Nat Photon. 2008;2(6):341–50. - 6.
Liu X, Wang M, Zhang S, Pan B. Application Potential of Carbon Nanotubes in Water Treatment: A Review. J Environ Sci. 2013;25(7):1263–80. - 7.
Heister E, Brunner EW, Dieckmann GR, Jurewicz I, Dalton AB. Are Carbon Nanotubes a Natural Solution? Applications in Biology and Medicine. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2013;5(6):1870–91. - 8.
Prato M, Kostarelos K, Bianco A. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes in Drug Design and Discovery. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41(1):60–8. - 9.
Prasek J, Drbohlavova J, Chomoucka J, Hubalek J, Jasek O, Adam V, et al. Methods for Carbon Nanotubes Synthesis-Review. J Mater Chem. 2011;21(40):15872–84. - 10.
Karousis N, Tagmatarchis N, Tasis D. Current Progress on the Chemical Modification of Carbon Nanotubes. Chem Commun. 2010;110(9):5366–97. - 11.
Dyke CA, Tour JM. Covalent Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Materials Applications. J Phys Chem A. 2004;108(51):11151–9. - 12.
Di Crescenzo A, Ettorre V, Fontana A. Non-covalent and Reversible Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2014;5:1675–90. - 13.
Bilalis P, Katsigiannopoulos D, Avgeropoulos A, Sakellariou G. Non-covalent Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes with Polymers. RSC Adv. 2014;4(6):2911–34. - 14.
Zhao Y-L, Stoddart JF. Noncovalent Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42(8):1161–71. - 15.
Samanta SK, Fritsch M, Scherf U, Gomulya W, Bisri SZ, Loi MA. Conjugated Polymer-Assisted Dispersion of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes: The Power of Polymer Wrapping. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47(8):2446–56. - 16.
Kharissova OV, Kharisov BI, de Casas Ortiz EG. Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes in Water and Non-aqueous Solvents. RSC Adv. 2013;3(47):24812–52. - 17.
Yang H, Bezugly V, Kunstmann J, Filoramo A, Cuniberti G. Diameter-Selective Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes via Polymers: A Competition between Adsorption and Bundling. ACS Nano. 2015;9(9):9012–9. - 18.
Hersam MC. Progress Towards Monodisperse Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3(7):387–94. - 19.
Sun D-m, Timmermans MY, Tian Y, Nasibulin AG, Kauppinen EI, Kishimoto S, et al. Flexible High-Performance Carbon Nanotube Integrated Circuits. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(3):156–61. - 20.
Yun D-J, Jeong YJ, Ra H, Kim J-M, An TK, Seol M, et al. Fabrication of High-Performance Composite Electrodes Composed of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Glycerol-doped Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):Polystyrene Sulfonate for Use in Organic Devices. J Mater Chem C. 2015;3(28):7325–35. - 21.
Wang F, Kozawa D, Miyauchi Y, Hiraoka K, Mouri S, Ohno Y, et al. Considerably Improved Photovoltaic Performance of Carbon Nanotube-based Solar Cells Using Metal Oxide Layers. Nat Commun. 2015;6. - 22.
Jung Y, Li X, Rajan NK, Taylor AD, Reed MA. Record High Efficiency Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Silicon p–n Junction Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2013;13(1):95–9. - 23.
Hata K, Futaba DN, Mizuno K, Namai T, Yumura M, Iijima S. Water-Assisted Highly Efficient Synthesis of Impurity-Free Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Science. 2004;306(5700):1362–4. - 24.
Bahr JL, Mickelson ET, Bronikowski MJ, Smalley RE, Tour JM. Dissolution of Small Diameter Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Organic Solvents? Chem Commun. 2001(2):193–4. - 25.
Zhou B, Lin Y, Li H, Huang W, Connell JW, Allard LF, et al. Absorptivity of Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Solution. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107(49):13588–92. - 26.
Landi BJ, Ruf HJ, Worman JJ, Raffaelle RP. Effects of Alkyl Amide Solvents on the Dispersion of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108(44):17089–95. - 27.
Krupke R, Hennrich F, Hampe O, Kappes MM. Near-Infrared Absorbance of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Dispersed in Dimethylformamide. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107(24):5667–9. - 28.
Kah M, Zhang X, Jonker MTO, Hofmann T. Measuring and Modeling Adsorption of PAHs to Carbon Nanotubes Over a Six Order of Magnitude Wide Concentration Range. Environ SciTechnol. 2011;45(14):6011–7. - 29.
Yang K, Xing B. Adsorption of Organic Compounds by Carbon Nanomaterials in Aqueous Phase: Polanyi Theory and Its Application. Chem Rev. 2010;110(10):5989–6008. - 30.
Chen RJ, Zhang Y, Wang D, Dai H. Noncovalent Sidewall Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Protein Immobilization. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123(16):3838–9. - 31.
Maligaspe E, Sandanayaka ASD, Hasobe T, Ito O, D’Souza F. Sensitive Efficiency of Photoinduced Electron Transfer to Band Gaps of Semiconductive Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Supramolecularly Attached Zinc Porphyrin Bearing Pyrene Glues. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(23):8158–64. - 32.
Perez EM, Illescas BM, Herranz MA, Martin N. Supramolecular Chemistry of π-Extended Analogues of TTF and Carbon Nanostructures. New J Chem. 2009;33(2):228–34. - 33.
Bottari G, de la Torre G, Torres T. Phthalocyanine–Nanocarbon Ensembles: From Discrete Molecular and Supramolecular Systems to Hybrid Nanomaterials. Acc Chem Res. 2015;48(4):900–10. - 34.
Bartelmess J, Frasconi M, Balakrishnan PB, Signorelli A, Echegoyen L, Pellegrino T, et al. Non-covalent Functionalization of Carbon Nano-Onions with Pyrene-BODIPY Dyads for Biological Imaging. RSC Adv. 2015;5(62):50253–8. - 35.
Hong G, Diao S, Antaris AL, Dai H. Carbon Nanomaterials for Biological Imaging and Nanomedicinal Therapy. Chem Rev. 2015;115(19):10816–906. - 36.
Sudibya HG, Ma J, Dong X, Ng S, Li L-J, Liu X-W, et al. Interfacing Glycosylated Carbon-Nanotube-Network Devices with Living Cells to Detect Dynamic Secretion of Biomolecules. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48(15):2723–6. - 37.
Li C, Mezzenga R. Functionalization of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Their pH-Responsive Hydrogels with Amyloid Fibrils. Langmuir. 2012;28(27):10142–6. - 38.
Ogoshi T, Takashima Y, Yamaguchi H, Harada A. Chemically-Responsive Sol−Gel Transition of Supramolecular Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNTs) Hydrogel Made by Hybrids of SWNTs and Cyclodextrins. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(16):4878–9. - 39.
Zhong Q, Diev VV, Roberts ST, Antunez PD, Brutchey RL, Bradforth SE, et al. Fused Porphyrin–Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Hybrids: Efficient Formation and Photophysical Characterization. ACS Nano. 2013;7(4):3466–75. - 40.
Wang Y, Hu N, Zhou Z, Xu D, Wang Z, Yang Z, et al. Single-walled Carbon Nanotube/Cobalt Phthalocyanine Derivative Hybrid Material: Preparation, Characterization and Its Gas Sensing Properties. J Mater Chem. 2011;21(11):3779–87. - 41.
Romero-Nieto C, García R, Herranz MÁ, Ehli C, Ruppert M, Hirsch A, et al. Tetrathiafulvalene-Based Nanotweezers—Noncovalent Binding of Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Media with Charge Transfer Implications. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(22):9183–92. - 42.
Ehli C, Guldi DM, Angeles Herranz M, Martin N, Campidelli S, Prato M. Pyrene-Tetrathiafulvalene Supramolecular Assembly with Different Types of Carbon Nanotubes. J Mater Chem. 2008;18(13):1498–503. - 43.
Didenko VV, Moore VC, Baskin DS, Smalley RE. Visualization of Individual Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Fluorescent Polymer Wrapping. Nano Lett. 2005;5(8):1563–7. - 44.
Von Bargen CD, MacDermaid CM, Lee O-S, Deria P, Therien MJ, Saven JG. Origins of the Helical Wrapping of Phenyleneethynylene Polymers about Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117(42):12953–65. - 45.
Xiao Z, Wang X, Xu X, Zhang H, Li Y, Wang Y. Base- and Structure-Dependent DNA Dinucleotide–Carbon Nanotube Interactions: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Thermodynamic Analysis. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115(44):21546–58. - 46.
Gao H, Kong Y. Simulation of DNA-Nanotube Interactions. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2004;34(1):123–50. - 47.
Kato Y, Inoue A, Niidome Y, Nakashima N. Thermodynamics on Soluble Carbon Nanotubes: How Do DNA Molecules Replace Surfactants on Carbon Nanotubes? Sci Rep. 2012;2:733. - 48.
Landry MP, Vuković L, Kruss S, Bisker G, Landry AM, Islam S, et al. Comparative Dynamics and Sequence Dependence of DNA and RNA Binding to Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119(18):10048–58. - 49.
Manohar S, Tang T, Jagota A. Structure of Homopolymer DNA−CNT Hybrids†. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111(48):17835–45. - 50.
Karachevtsev MV, Karachevtsev VA. Peculiarities of Homooligonucleotides Wrapping Around Carbon Nanotubes: Molecular Dynamics Modeling. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115(29):9271–9. - 51.
Johnson RR, Johnson ATC, Klein ML. Probing the Structure of DNA−Carbon Nanotube Hybrids with Molecular Dynamics. Nano Lett. 2008;8(1):69–75. - 52.
Zhang S, Wang X, Li T, Liu L, Wu H-C, Luo M, et al. Sensitive Detection of a Modified Base in Single-Stranded DNA by a Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube. Langmuir. 2015;31(36):10094–9. - 53.
Sohrabi B, Poorgholami-Bejarpasi N, Nayeri N. Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes Using Mixed Surfactants: Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118(11):3094–103. - 54.
Uddin NM, Capaldi FM, Farouk B. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Carbon Nanotube Dispersions in Water: Effects of Nanotube Length, Diameter, Chirality and Surfactant Structures. Comput Mater Sci. 2012;53(1):133–44. - 55.
Tummala NR, Morrow BH, Resasco DE, Striolo A. Stabilization of Aqueous Carbon Nanotube Dispersions Using Surfactants: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations. ACS Nano. 2010;4(12):7193–204. - 56.
Dutta S, Kar T, Brahmachari S, Das PK. pH-responsive Reversible Dispersion of Biocompatible SWNT/Graphene-Amphiphile Hybrids. J Mater Chem. 2012;22(14):6623–31. - 57.
Ghosh M, Brahmachari S, Das PK. pH-Responsive Single Walled Carbon Nanotube Dispersion for Target Specific Release of Doxorubicin to Cancer Cells. Macromol Biosci. 2014;14(12):1795–806. - 58.
Yu G, Xue M, Zhang Z, Li J, Han C, Huang F. A Water-Soluble Pillar[6]arene: Synthesis, Host–Guest Chemistry, and Its Application in Dispersion of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in Water. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(32):13248–51. - 59.
Welsh DJ, O'Driscoll LJ, Bailey SWD, Visontai D, Howes K, Frampton H, et al. Key Role of the Linker in Pyrene-Linker-Carboxylate Surfactants for the Efficient Aqueous Dispersion of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. RSC Adv. 2015;5(115):95360–8. - 60.
Pochorovski I, Wang H, Feldblyum JI, Zhang X, Antaris AL, Bao Z. H-Bonded Supramolecular Polymer for the Selective Dispersion and Subsequent Release of Large-Diameter Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(13):4328–31. - 61.
Lu F, Wang X, Meziani MJ, Cao L, Tian L, Bloodgood MA, et al. Effective Purification of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Reversible Noncovalent Functionalization. Langmuir. 2010;26(10):7561–4. - 62.
Maji B, Samanta SK, Bhattacharya S. Role of pH Controlled DNA Secondary Structures in the Reversible Dispersion/Precipitation and Separation of Metallic and Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nanoscale. 2014;6(7):3721–30. - 63.
Wang D, Chen L. Temperature and pH-Responsive Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Dispersions. Nano Lett. 2007;7(6):1480–4. - 64.
Ding Y, Chen S, Xu H, Wang Z, Zhang X, Ngo TH, et al. Reversible Dispersion of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Based on a CO2-Responsive Dispersant. Langmuir. 2010;26(22):16667–71. - 65.
Guo Z, Feng Y, He S, Qu M, Chen H, Liu H, et al. CO2-Responsive “Smart” Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Adv Mater. 2013;25(4):584–90. - 66.
Natali M, Giordani S. Molecular Switches as Photocontrollable “Smart” Receptors. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(10):4010–29. - 67.
Chen S, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Zhang X, Dai L, Smet M. Light-Controlled Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Dispersions in Aqueous Solution. Langmuir. 2008;24(17):9233–6. - 68.
Lemasson F, Tittmann J, Hennrich F, Sturzl N, Malik S, Kappes MM, et al. Debundling, Selection and Release of SWNTs Using Fluorene-based Photocleavable Polymers. Chem Commun. 2011;47(26):7428–30. - 69.
Imin P, Imit M, Adronov A. Supramolecular Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNTs) with a Photoisomerizable Conjugated Polymer. Macromolecules. 2012;45(12):5045–50. - 70.
Maggini L, Marangoni T, Georges B, Malicka JM, Yoosaf K, Minoia A, et al. Azobenzene-based Supramolecular Polymers for Processing MWCNTs. Nanoscale. 2013;5(2):634–45. - 71.
Umeyama T, Kawabata K, Tezuka N, Matano Y, Miyato Y, Matsushige K, et al. Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes by Photo- and Thermal-responsive Polymers Containing Azobenzene Unit in the Backbone. Chem Commun. 2010;46(32):5969–71. - 72.
Nobusawa K, Ikeda A, Kikuchi J-i, Kawano S-i, Fujita N, Shinkai S. Reversible Solubilization and Precipitation of Carbon Nanotubes through Oxidation–Reduction Reactions of a Solubilizing Agent. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47(24):4577–80. - 73.
Zhao Y, Chen G, Mulla K, Mahmud I, Liang S, Dongare P, et al. Tetrathiafulvalene Vinylogues as Versatile Building Blocks for New Organic Materials. Pure Appl Chem. 2012;84(4):1005–25. - 74.
Liang S, Chen G, Zhao Y. Conformationally Switchable TTFV-Phenylacetylene Polymers: Synthesis, Properties, and Supramolecular Interactions with Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J Mater Chem C. 2013;1(35):5477–90. - 75.
Liang S, Chen G, Peddle J, Zhao Y. Reversible Dispersion and Releasing of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by a Stimuli-responsive TTFV-Phenylacetylene Polymer. Chem Commun. 2012;48(25):3100–2. - 76.
Adeel SM, Li Q, Nafady A, Zhao C, Siriwardana AI, Bond AM, et al. A Systematic Study of the Variation of Tetrathiafulvalene (TTF), TTF+ and TTF2+ Reaction Pathways with Water in the Presence and Absence of Light. RSC Adv. 2014;4(91):49789–95. - 77.
Liang S, Zhao Y, Adronov A. Selective and Reversible Noncovalent Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by a pH-Responsive Vinylogous Tetrathiafulvalene–Fluorene Copolymer. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(3):970–7. - 78.
Etika KC, Jochum FD, Theato P, Grunlan JC. Temperature Controlled Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes in Water with Pyrene-Functionalized Poly(N-cyclopropylacrylamide). J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(38):13598–9. - 79.
O'Driscoll LJ, Welsh DJ, Bailey SWD, Visontai D, Frampton H, Bryce MR, et al. Reversible Thermal Switching of Aqueous Dispersibility of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. Chem-Eur J. 2015;21(10):3891–4. - 80.
Hill DJ, Mio MJ, Prince RB, Hughes TS, Moore JS. A Field Guide to Foldamers. Chem Rev. 2001;101(12):3893–4012. - 81.
Guichard G, Huc I. Synthetic Foldamers. Chem Commun. 2011;47(21):5933–41. - 82.
Zhang Z, Che Y, Smaldone RA, Xu M, Bunes BR, Moore JS, et al. Reversible Dispersion and Release of Carbon Nanotubes Using Foldable Oligomers. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(40):14113–7. - 83.
Mulla K, Zhao Y. When Dithiafulvenyl Functionalized π-Conjugated Oligomers Meet Fullerenes and Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J Mater Chem C. 2013;1(33):5116–27. - 84.
Mulla K, Liang S, Shaik H, Younes EA, Adronov A, Zhao Y. Dithiafulvenyl-grafted Phenylene Ethynylene Polymers as Selective and Reversible Dispersants for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Chem Commun. 2015;51(1):149–52. - 85.
Llanes-Pallas A, Yoosaf K, Traboulsi H, Mohanraj J, Seldrum T, Dumont J, et al. Modular Engineering of H-Bonded Supramolecular Polymers for Reversible Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(39):15412–24. - 86.
Schattling P, Jochum FD, Theato P. Multi-Stimuli Responsive Polymers – The All-in-One Talents. Polym Chem. 2014;5(1):25–36. - 87.
Stuart MAC, Huck WTS, Genzer J, Muller M, Ober C, Stamm M, et al. Emerging Applications of Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Materials. Nat Mater. 2010;9(2):101–13. - 88.
Hong CY, Pang CY. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes Responsive to Environmental Stimuli. J Mater Chem. 2008;18(16):1831–6. - 89.
Luo H, Li Z, Yi G, Zu X, Wang H, Huang H, et al. Multi-Stimuli Responsive Carbon Nanotube–Shape Memory Polymeric Composites. Mater Lett. 2014;137:385–8. - 90.
Soll S, Antonietti M, Yuan J. Double Stimuli-Responsive Copolymer Stabilizers for Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Macro Lett. 2012;1(1):84–7. - 91.
Biswas Y, Maji T, Dule M, Mandal TK. Tunable Doubly Responsive UCST-Type Phosphonium Poly(ionic liquid): A Thermosensitive Dispersant for Carbon Nanotubes. Polym Chem. 2016;7(4):867–77. - 92.
Zydziak N, Hubner C, Bruns M, Vogt AP, Barner-Kowollik C. Modular Ambient Temperature Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes with Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Strands. Polym Chem. 2013;4(5):1525–37. - 93.
Guo Z, Feng Y, Zhu D, He S, Liu H, Shi X, et al. Light-Switchable Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Based on Host–Guest Chemistry. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23(40):5010–8.