Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Protein Component of Sow Colostrum and Milk

Written By

P.K. Theil and W.L. Hurley

Submitted: October 12th, 2015 Reviewed: March 4th, 2016 Published: September 7th, 2016

DOI: 10.5772/62841

Chapter metrics overview

2,308 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The production of colostrum and milk by the sow are primary limiting factors affecting survival, growth and development of the piglets. The proteins of colostrum and milk provide not only a supply of amino acids to the neonate but also a wide range of bioactive factors. Proteins in sow mammary secretions include those associated with the milk fat membranes, caseins, mammary-derived whey proteins, immunoglobulins, hormones and growth factors, enzymes, and a wide range of other proteins. Concentrations of most milk-specific proteins typically are lower in colostrum than in milk, while concentrations of immunoglobulins and other bioactive proteins often are enriched in colostrum compared with mature milk. Dietary protein is utilized for milk protein production with approximately 50% efficiency. During both the colostrum period and at peak lactation as much as 700–800 g of protein is secreted daily by today’s highly prolific sows. Estimates of daily milk protein secretion during lactation suggest that sows are not able to consume sufficient dietary protein and energy to account for output of solids in milk and therefore must mobilize body protein and body fat to support their milk production. Milk protein content typically is not affected by dietary treatment, indicating that the sow mobilizes her body reserves to maintain milk production and milk protein production. These observations are of particular interest for today’s highly prolific sows, which may require more dietary protein than previous genotypes.

Keywords

  • Colostrum
  • milk
  • protein
  • sow
  • lactation

1. Introduction

The newborn piglet is completely reliant on the sow’s colostrum and milk for a nutrient supply as well as for a range of bioactive factors that impact its immunological and physiological development. Production of colostrum and milk by the sow are primary limiting factors affecting survival, growth and development of the piglets [16]. Milk production by sows is impacted by numerous factors, including litter size, piglet size, nursing frequency, stage of lactation, sow age, body condition and parity, maternal behavior, and nutrition [710].

General composition of sow colostrum and milk has been reviewed previously [1116]. Composition of mammary secretions after giving birth changes rapidly. For the sow, colostrum is considered as the secretions during the first 24 h after giving birth [17]. The period between 24 and 96 h after parturition is considered as transition milk [18, 19].

Recently, the lactation curve of sows was described [20], which showed that milk yield increases day by day in the first two weeks of lactation, depending on the number of suckling piglets. Indeed, genetic selection for large litters has increased the milk yield of sows and at peak lactation highly prolific sows (14 suckling piglets) produce on average 13–15 kg of milk daily. The milk protein production increases in a pattern similar to the lactation curve and peaks at 700–800 g of protein secreted daily.

The proteins of colostrum and milk provide not only a supply of amino acids to the neonate but also a wide range of bioactive factors. This chapter provides an overview of the proteins found in sow colostrum and milk, and a description on how the milk protein changes over time during the colostrum and lactation periods. In addition, estimates of milk protein production by the sow are discussed, and some of the factors that may impact milk protein production.

Advertisement

2. Proteins in milk fractions

The proteins of milk generally are characterized according to how they segregate during some fundamental methods of fractionating milk components. These methods originally were developed to fractionate bovine milk. One basic method of separating the fractions of milk is to separate the lower density lipid-containing cream fraction from the aqueous component, typically by centrifugation. The residual aqueous or defatted fraction then is referred to as the skim milk fraction. This type of fractionation has most often been used as a starting point for identifying milk proteins.

Milk is a partially stable emulsion of fat globules. In addition to the lipid component of the fat globules (primarily triacylglycerides), they also contain numerous proteins, which are associated with the milk fat globule membrane (MFGM). The MFGM proteins have been extensively studied in cow milk [2123]; however, they have received relatively less attention in sow milk. Seventeen proteins have been identified in association with sow MFGM, including xanthine dehydrogenase, lactadherin, butyrophilin, adipophilin, acyl-CoA synthetase, fatty acid-binding protein 3, and others [24].

The skim milk fraction will contain the major milk protein components, including the caseins and whey proteins. Caseins are a special set of proteins found only in milk and are the major proteins found in sow milk. The caseins in sow milk include αS1-casein (CSN1S1), αS2-casein (CSN1S2), β-casein (CSN2), and κ-casein (CSN3). The whey proteins are defined as all of the skim milk proteins excluding the caseins. The whey protein fraction encompasses a wide range of proteins with an extensive array of functions. The functionality of the various whey proteins includes direct involvement in the process of milk synthesis, provision of immune protection to the neonate, and hormones and growth factors that may impact neonatal development as well as enzymes and other proteins associated with cellular functions arising from epithelia, leukocytes, and other mammary tissue cells.

Advertisement

3. Major sow milk proteins

The concentration of total casein as a proportion of total milk protein generally increases from a low of 9–32% at parturition to 30–45% at 24 h postpartum [25, 26] and accounts for 50–55% of total milk protein in mature milk [2528]. Total whey protein content of sow colostrum may be as high as 90% at parturition, followed by a decline to 70% by 24 postpartum [18, 26]. Total whey protein as a percentage of total protein is approximately 50% in mature milk [26].

The major whey proteins in sow milk include β-lactoglobulin (BLG), α-lactalbumin (LALBA), whey acidic protein (WAP), lactoferrin (also referred to as lactotransferrin; LTF), serum albumin (ALB), and immunoglobulins. BLGis a member of the lipocalin family, which transports small hydrophobic molecules; however, the specific function of this protein in milk or in the neonate is not understood. BLGhas significant sequence similarity with glycodelin [29], also known as progestin-associated endometrial protein (PAEP). Isolated bovine BLGhas also been shown to have antimicrobial activity against some mastitis causing bacteria [30]. Concentrations of BLG, the major whey protein in sow milk, are between approximately 8 and 15 g/L during the initial week postpartum [31, 32]. LALBAis a small molecular weight protein that is the regulatory subunit of the lactose synthase enzyme activity. LALBAbinds with β-1,4-galactosyltransferase in the Golgi apparatus of the mammary epithelial cell resulting in the synthesis of the disaccharide lactose from glucose and galactose. The synthesis of lactose, the primary osmole in sow milk, is responsible for drawing water into the Golgi apparatus and secretory vesicles during milk synthesis. Concentrations of LALBAare lower in colostrum (0.8–1.9 g/L) than in transition or mature milk (approximately 2–3 g/L) [31, 32], consistent with the observed lower concentrations of lactose in colostrum compared with mature sow milk. The function of the WAPin sow milk also is not understood. Concentrations of WAPin sow mammary secretions increase from 0.3 g/L at parturition to approximately 1 g/L at day 7 [31, 32]. Lactoferrin is an iron-binding protein with antimicrobial properties. Concentrations of lactoferrin in colostrum are relatively high (1.2 g/L) until day 3 postpartum and then decline to 0.3 g/L by one week postpartum [33]. Colostrum concentrations of albumin decline rapidly between parturition and 12 h postpartum (from 19 down to 8 g/L) and then gradually decline to 3.0 g/L or less [34].

Advertisement

4. Protective and bioactive proteins

Colostrum and milk contain an array of protective factors that can impact the neonate. The role of colostrum and milk immunoglobulins in the neonate has been extensively studied. The immunoglobulins are transported through the mammary epithelial cells by a receptor-mediated process, thought to involve the neonatal Fc-receptor (FcRn) in the case of IgG1 and IgG2, and the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) for IgA and IgM (see Ref. [35] for review).

Colostrum during or immediately after parturition contains the highest concentrations of each immunoglobulin, with average concentrations of total IgG, IgA, and IgM of approximately 65, 13, and 8 g/L, respectively [16]. These immunoglobulin concentrations remain elevated during the initial 6 h postpartum, decline by approximately 30–45% by 12 h, and continue declining through the next several days. Concentrations of IgG and IgM in mature milk are approximately 1 and 1.6 g/L, respectively. Interestingly, IgA is the major immunoglobulin in mature milk of the sow with a concentration of approximately 4 g/L [16]. The changes in proportion and total amount of immunoglobulins in sow mammary secretions are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Relative total amounts and proportions of immunoglobulins G, A, and M in sow mammary secretions during lactation. Circles for 6 h through ≥12 days represent the total immunoglobulin content in mammary secretions compared with the content at 0 h. Adapted from Ref. [16].

Milk contains a wide array of antimicrobial and immunomodulatory proteins and peptides. Certainly the immunoglobulins, especially IgA, lactoferrin and lysozyme activity individually and synergistically probably provide for some of the antimicrobial function that has been found in sow milk [36]. Lysozyme activity has been identified in sow colostrum immediately after parturition [37] but not in mature milk [38]. Even some of the proteins associated with the milk fat globule may have bactericidal properties, such as the mucins [39, 40], lactadherin, butyrophilin, adipophilin, acyl-CoA synthetase, and fatty acid-binding protein 3 [24]. The specific role of these proteins in modulating the immune health of the sow’s mammary gland and the health of her litter deserve additional evaluation. Several cytokines have been identified in sow colostrum and milk, including IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and TGF-β [41]. Concentrations of these cytokines are greatest in colostrum and then decline as lactation progresses [41]. Butyrophilin has also been implicated as having an immunomodulatory function [42].

Milk contains many hormones and growth factors, which may have biological activity in the neonate [43, 44]. Prolactin in sow colostrum is at its highest concentration just prior to parturition and then declines rapidly during the first 24 h postpartum [45], followed by a slower decline through the remainder of lactation [46]. Similarly, concentrations of relaxin are greatest in colostrum and then decline over the first week of lactation [47]. This milk-borne relaxin has been associated with maternal programming of neonatal development in what is called the lactocrine hypothesis [48]. Specifically, relaxin absorbed into the circulatory system in the piglet prior to gut closure can affect the developing reproductive tract of the neonate. Leptin concentrations in the skim fraction of colostrum and milk decrease during the initial week of lactation before stabilizing for the remainder of lactation, while stage of lactation does not seem to impact leptin concentrations in whole milk [49]. Sow colostrum and milk also contain insulin, neurotensin, bombesin [50], triiodothyronine and thyroxine [51], insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I; [52]), epidermal growth factor-like peptide [53, 54], and prostaglandin-like activity [55].

Proteins in sow colostrum and milk include many enzyme activities, such as lipase and ribonuclease activity [38], trypsin inhibitor activity [56], ceruloplasmin [57], and enolase and glycogen phosphorylase [58]. A high molecular weight glycoprotein of unknown origin and function has been identified, which may be specific to sow milk [59].

Advertisement

5. Protein concentrations in sow mammary secretions

Sow colostrum, i.e. the mammary secretions during the first 24 h after onset of parturition, is rich in protein, especially colostrum from the earliest phase. The protein concentration drops from approximately 16 to 10% during the first 12 h after onset of parturition (Figure 2; [60]). Recent studies indicate that the protein content continues to decrease to reach a plateau at 6–7% protein at 36 h after parturition [61]. However, according to Ref. [60], the protein content remains rather stable in transient milk, i.e. in mammary secretions released from 24 h post parturition and the next couple of days (Figure 2). The low protein content of mammary secretions 24–36 h post parturition observed in Ref. [61] may indicate that late colostrum/transient milk produced by modern hyperprolific sows, with an average of 18 piglets born, may be compromised in terms of protein content. In Ref. [60], published in 1995, sows had an average of 9.7 piglets born.

Figure 2.

Examples of mammary secretion protein concentration change during the initial 12 h of the colostrum period and during the transition milk period. (A) Changes in colostrum protein concentration from parturition to 12 h can be described byy = 0.0757x3 – 1.3411x2 – 0.1717x + 163.25 (R2 = 0.99931). (B) Changes in protein concentration from 24 to 72 h can be described byy = −0.0151x2 + 1.5054x + 66.15 (R2 = 1). Adapted from Ref. [60].

Changes in the protein concentration of sow milk during lactation can be estimated using the mathematical model described in Ref. [20]. Milk protein concentrations decline from 7% at day 2 to reach a plateau at approximately 5%, which is then maintained through at least four weeks after parturition (Figure 3; [20]).

Figure 3.

Milk protein concentration during lactation. The profile was calculated using the mathematical model developed in Ref. [20] with the following input: Dietary protein (16%).

As lactation progresses, other milk constituents than the protein fraction also change. Indeed, the milk lactose concentration increases slightly from 5.2 to 5.5%, while the milk fat concentration decreases from 8.0 to 6.3% from day 2 to 28, respectively [20]. As a consequence, the energy content of milk decreases in a curvilinear manner throughout lactation (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Milk energy content during lactation. The profile was calculated using the mathematical model developed in Ref. [20] with the following input: Dietary protein (16%).

The protein-to-energy ratio of the milk declines during the first week of lactation; however, there is a gradual increase thereafter until weaning (Figure 5). The protein-to-energy ratio may be indicative of the nutritive quality of sow milk to support piglet growth [19]. However, the relative consistency of the protein-to-energy ratio of sow milk through lactation may indicate that milk intake of individual piglets is the major determinant of piglet growth rather than milk composition per se.

Figure 5.

Protein-to-energy ratio of sow milk during lactation. The profile was calculated using the mathematical model developed in Ref. [20] with the following input: Dietary protein (16%).

Advertisement

6. Daily protein yields in sow colostrum and milk

Recently, it was demonstrated that the yield of sow colostrum was approximately 50% higher than previously believed [4, 5, 17]. With the high protein content in colostrum secreted in the early phase (described above), the daily protein secretion through colostrum amounts to 700–800 g [61], which is similar to the daily secretion of protein in milk at peak lactation (see below; [20]). While recent studies have shed light on the amounts of nutrients being secreted through colostrum and when they are secreted [4, 61], it is still unknown when the colostral proteins are being synthesized [5]. The high concentration of protein in colostrum at parturition suggests that this synthesis occurs in late gestation, allowing for accumulation of the proteins in colostrum. Milk-specific proteins, such as the caseins, BLG, LALBA, and WAP, are synthesized by mammary epithelial cells, while most of the immunoglobulin and the serum albumin are synthesized elsewhere in the sow.

Figure 6.

Daily milk yield of sows with litter size (LS) of 10, 12, or 14 piglets. Note that the profile was calculated using the mathematical model developed in Ref. [20], assuming that sows with 10, 12, and 14 piglets on average produced litter gain (LG) of 2.5, 2.8, and 3.1 kg/d, respectively.

From a nutritional perspective, the timing of synthesis of the colostral proteins is important because fetal growth, mammary growth, and colostrum protein production compete for the dietary proteins supplied during late gestation. Factorial calculations of the daily protein requirement in late gestation suggest that dietary protein likely is scarcely supplied [62]. In a recent study, colostrum yield and colostrum protein content were studied across five different experiments to reveal potential limitations in colostrum synthesis [63]. In that study, it was found that the colostrum yield was positively correlated with litter size (including total born, live born, and 24 h litter size), and it is therefore logical to suggest that highly prolific sows may require more dietary protein than previous genotypes. However, no relationship between colostrum yield and colostrum protein concentration was found, indicating that colostrum protein production likely is not compromised, in spite of high colostrum production due to their large litters [63].

Daily milk production increases during the first two weeks of lactation and peaks around day 17 of lactation [20], although it seems to peak a few days later if the production level is lower. Milk yield is greatly affected by the number of suckling piglets [64] because each piglet takes ownership of a single mammary gland and stimulates mammary growth [65, 66] and maintains milk production within that gland [67]. Milk yield is around 13-15 kg/d at peak lactation in modern highly prolific sows (with 14 piglets; [20]), whereas sows with a more moderate litter of 10 suckling piglets and consequently less litter gain per day produce around 10 kg/d (Figure 6). Consequently, sows produce around or slightly above 1.0 kg of milk daily for each piglet at peak lactation. After peak lactation, the milk yield decreases; however, it remains nearly maximal if piglets are weaned after three to four weeks.

Figure 7.

Daily milk protein yields of sows with litter size (LS) of 10, 12, or 14 piglets. Note that the profile was calculated using the mathematical model developed in Ref. [20], assuming that sows with 10, 12, and 14 piglets on average produced litter gain (LG) of 2.5, 2.8, and 3.1 kg/d, respectively.

Daily milk protein production increases in a fashion similar to the lactation curves of sows (Figure 7). Thus, the daily milk protein yield also peaks around day 17 (slightly later for sows with a lower yield). For highly prolific sows, as much as 750 g of milk protein is secreted daily, whereas the daily milk protein yield is around 500 g when sows have 10 suckling piglets and have a moderate level of productivity (i.e. litter gain of 2.5 kg/d). In a recent study, it was found that milk protein concentration was negatively related to the milk yield of highly prolific sows for all four weeks of lactation [63]. The negative relationship suggests that the mammary capacity for milk protein synthesis has been reached or, alternatively, that the dietary protein supply is inadequate to support the milk production of high prolific sows. In favor of the latter explanation, it was demonstrated that dietary protein is utilized for milk protein production with approximately 50% efficiency [68]. At peak lactation, sows ingest around 1300–1400 g of dietary protein daily, but if high producing sows secrete 750 g of milk protein daily, they should ingest 1500 g/d of dietary protein (assuming 50% utilization efficiency). Most sows are not able to ingest enough feed to obtain a zero balance of protein nor a zero balance of energy, and consequently, sows typically mobilize body protein and body fat to support their milk production [19, 62, 68].

Milk production and milk protein production are highly prioritized by lactating sows [19]. If the dietary supply of protein or energy is insufficient, the sow mobilizes amino acids from muscle tissues or fat from adipose tissues, respectively. Mobilization of muscle tissues can be substantial and result in sow weight loss that in extreme cases may amount to 75–80 kg during three weeks of lactation [69]. However, in a pioneer experiment [70] where lactating sows were provided an insufficient nutrient supply, a linear decrease in weight loss was reported in sows in response to feed intake that was gradually increased from 1.5 to 4.8 kg/d (over six different feeding levels). In each case, the nitrogen balance of the sows was negative but was clearly responsive to feed intake. Interestingly, the milk protein content was not affected by dietary treatment, and the piglet growth rate, which may be seen as an indicator for the milk yield, was not compromised until the fourth week of lactation. These findings are consistent with the sow’s physiology during lactation being set to maintain milk production and milk protein production as a high priority, and she compensates for insufficient nutrient intake by increasing the body mobilization. The reduced piglet weight gain in the fourth week of lactation observed in Ref. [70] could be interpreted as a result of the depletion of readily available body pools of amino acids after three weeks of insufficient nutrient supply.

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

Colostrum is much richer in protein than in mature sow milk. The protein component changes dramatically during the colostrum period, where the decline in contents of bioactive proteins, including immunoglobulins, hormones, and growth factors, is pronounced. The concentrations of milk-specific proteins, such as the caseins and the major mammary-derived whey proteins, increase during the early lactation period. The amount of protein secreted in colostrum and milk is extremely high. During both the colostrum period and at peak lactation as much as 700–800 g of protein is secreted daily. Currently, it is not known which factors are most limiting the sow milk production or the sow milk protein production. Without doubt, daily feed intake and dietary content of essential amino acids are important factors. However, sow live weight, body pools of amino acids in muscle tissues, and amino acid mobilization capacity may be equally important to sustain this demanding daily production of milk and milk protein. Current research suggests that today’s highly prolific sows may require more dietary protein than previous genotypes.

References

  1. 1. Boyd RD, Kensinger RS. Metabolic precursors for milk synthesis. In: Verstegen MWA, Moughan PJ, Schrama JW, editors. The Lactating Sow. Wageningen: Wageningen Press, 1998. p. 71–95.
  2. 2. Le Dividich J, Rooke JA, Herpin P. Nutrition and immunological importance of colostrum for the new-born pig. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2005;143:469–485. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859605005642
  3. 3. Quesnel H, Farmer C, Devillers N. Colostrum intake: Influence on piglet performance and factors of variation. Livestock Science. 2012;146:105–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.03.010
  4. 4. Theil PK, Flummer C, Hurley WL, Kristensen NB, Labouriau RL, Sørensen MT. Mechanistic model to predict colostrum intake based on deuterium oxide dilution technique data and impact of gestation and pre-farrowing diets on piglet intake and sow yield of colostrum. Journal of Animal Science. 2014;92:5507–5519. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-7841
  5. 5. Theil PK, Lauridsen C, Quesnel H. Neonatal piglet survival: impact of sow nutrition around parturition on fetal glycogen deposition and production and composition of colostrum and transient milk. Animal. 2014;8:1021–1030. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114000950
  6. 6. Quesnel H, Farmer C, Theil PK. Colostrum and milk production. In: Farmer C, editor. The Gestating and Lactating Sow. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2015. p. 173–192. DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_8
  7. 7. Fraser D. Behavioural perspectives on piglet survival. In: Cole DJA, Foxcroft GR, Weir BJ, editors. Control of Pig Reproduction III. Essex, U.K.: Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Ltd., 1990. p. 355–370.
  8. 8. Brooks PH, Burke J. Behaviour of sows and piglets during lactation. In: Verstegen MWA, Moughan PJ, Scharma JW, editors. The Lactating Sow. Wageningen: Wageningen Press, 1998. p. 301–338.
  9. 9. King RH. Factors that influence milk production in well-fed sows. Journal of Animal Science. 2000;78(Suppl. 3):19–25.
  10. 10. Hurley WL. Mammary gland growth in the lactating sow. Livestock Production Science. 2001;70:149–157. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00208-1
  11. 11. Oftedal OT. Milk composition, milk yield and energy output at peak lactation: a comparative review. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London. 1984;51:33–85.
  12. 12. Hartmann PE, Holmes MA. Sow Lactation. In: Barnett JL, Hennessy DP, editors. Manipulating Piglet Production II. Proc. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia, 1989. p. 72–97.
  13. 13. Oftedal OT, Iversen SJ. Comparative analysis of nonhuman milks. A. Phylogenetic variation in the gross composition of milks. In: Jensen RG, editor. Handbook of Milk Composition. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc., 1995. p. 749–789.
  14. 14. Darragh AJ, Moughan PJ. The composition of colostrum and milk. In: Verstegen MWA, Moughan PJ, Schrama JW, editors. The Lactating Sow. Wageningen: Wageningen Press, 1998. p. 3–21.
  15. 15. Park YW. Milks of other domesticated mammals (Pigs, Yaks, Reindeer, etc). In: Fuquay JW, Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, editors. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, Volume 3. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2011. p. 530–537.
  16. 16. Hurley WL. Composition of sow colostrum and milk. In: Farmer C, editor. The Gestating and Lactating Sow. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2015. p. 193–229. DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_9
  17. 17. Devillers N, van Milgen J, Prunier A, Le Dividich J. Estimation of colostrum intake in the neonatal pig. Animal Science. 2004;78:305–313.
  18. 18. Klobasa F, Werhahn E, Butler JE. Composition of sow milk during lactation. Journal of Animal Science. 1987;64:1458–1466.
  19. 19. Theil PK, Nielsen MO, Sørensen MT, Lauridsen C. Lactation, milk and suckling. In: Bach Knudsen KE, Kjeldsen NJ, Poulsen HD, Jensen BB, editors. Nutritional Physiology of Pigs. Chapter 17, 2012. Available at: http://vsp.lf.dk/Viden/Laerebog_fysiologi/Chapter%2017.aspx
  20. 20. Hansen AV, Strathe AB, Kebreab E, France J, Theil PK. Predicting milk yield and composition in lactating sows – A Bayesian approach. Journal of Animal Science. 2012;90:2285–2298. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4788
  21. 21. Heid HW, Keenan TW. Intracellular origin and secretion of milk fat globules. European Journal of Cell Biology. 2004;84:245–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2004.12.002
  22. 22. Fong BY, Norris CS, MacGibbon AKH. Protein and lipid composition of bovine milk-fat-globule membrane. International Dairy Journal. 2007;17:275–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.05.004
  23. 23. Cavaletto M, Giuffrida MG, Conti A. Milk fat globule membrane components – a proteomic approach. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;606:129–141. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74087-4_4
  24. 24. Novakovic P, Huang YY, Lockerbie B, Shahriar F, Kelly J, Gordon JR, Midleton DM, Loewen ME, Kidney BA, Simko E. Identification ofEscherichia coliF4ac-binding proteins in porcine milk fat globule membrane. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 2015;79:120–128.
  25. 25. Brent BE, Miller ER, Ullrey DE, Kemp KE. Postpartum changes in nitrogenous constituents of sow milk. Journal of Animal Science. 1973;36:73–78.
  26. 26. Csapo J, Martin TG, Csapo-Kiss ZS, Hazas Z. Protein, fats, vitamin and mineral concentrations in porcine colostrum and milk from parturition to 60 days. International Dairy Journal. 1996;6:881–902. DOI: 10.1016/0958-6946(95)00072-0
  27. 27. Mahan DC, Becker DE, Harmon BG, Jensen AH. Effect of protein levels andopaque-2corn on sow milk composition. Journal of Animal Science. 1971;32:482–496.
  28. 28. Richert BT, Goodband RD, Tokach MD, Nelssen JL. Increasing valine, isoleucine, and total branched-chain amino acids for lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science. 1997;75:2117–2128. DOI: 10.1997.7582117x
  29. 29. Schiefner A, Rodewald F, Neumaier I, Skerra A. The dimeric crystal structure of the human fertility lipocalin glycodelin reveals a protein scaffold for the presentation of complex glycans. Biochemistry Journal. 2015;466:95–104. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20141003
  30. 30. Chaneton L, Perez Saez JM, Bussman LE. Antimicrobial activity of bovine β-lactoglobulin against mastitis-causing bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science. 2011;94:138–145. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3319
  31. 31. Jackson JR. Effect of gestation length and supplemental dietary fat on colostrum and milk composition in swine [thesis]. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1990.
  32. 32. Hurley WL, Bryson JM. Enhancing sow productivity through an understanding of mammary gland biology and lactation physiology. Pig News and Information. 1999;20:125N–130N.
  33. 33. Elliot JL, Senft B, Erhardt G, Fraser D. Isolation of lactoferrin and its concentration in sows’ colostrum and milk during a 21-day lactation. Journal of Animal Science. 1984;59:1080–1084.
  34. 34. Klobasa F, Butler JE. Absolute and relative concentrations of immunoglobulins G, M, and A, and albumin in lacteal secretion of sows of different lactation numbers. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1987;48:176–182. DOI: 10.1038/icb.1974.6
  35. 35. Hurley WL, Theil PK. Immunoglobulins in mammary secretions. In: McSweeney PLH, Fox PF, editors. Advanced Dairy Chemistry: Volume 1A: Proteins: Basic Aspects. 4th ed. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, 2013. p. 275–294. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4714-6_9
  36. 36. Nagy LK, Mackenzie T, Bharucha Z. In vitro studies on the antimicrobial effects of colostrum and milk from vaccinated and unvaccinated pigs onEscherichia coli. Research in Veterinary Science. 1976;21:132–140.
  37. 37. Krakowski L, Krzyzanowski J, Wrona Z, Kostro K, Siwicki AK. The influence of nonspecific immunostimulation of pregnant sows on the immunological value of colostrum. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2002;87:89–95. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2427(02)00004-1
  38. 38. Chandan RC, Parry RMJr, Shahani KM. Lysozyme, lipase, and ribonuclease in milk of various species. Journal of Dairy Science. 1968;51:606–607.
  39. 39. Patton S. MUC1 and MUC-X, epithelial mucins of breast and milk. In: Newberg DS, editor. Bioactive Components of Human Milk. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001. p. 35–45. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1371-1_4
  40. 40. Schroten H. Chemistry of milk mucins and their anti-microbial action. Advances in Nutritional Research. 2001;10:231–245. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0661-4
  41. 41. Nguyen TV, Yuan L, Azevedo SP, Jeong K-I, Gonzalez A-M, Saif LJ. Transfer of maternal cytokines to suckling piglets: In vivo and in vitro models with implications for immunomodulation of neonatal immunity. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2007;117:236–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.02.013
  42. 42. Arnett HA, Viney JL. Immune modulation by butyrophillins. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2014;14:559–569. DOI: 10.1038/nri3715
  43. 43. Pakkanen R, Aalto J. Growth factors and antimicrobial factors in bovine colostrum. International Dairy Journal. 1997;7:285–297. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-6946(97)00022-8
  44. 44. Baumrucker CR, Magliaro-Macrina AL. Hormones in milk. In: Fuquay JW, Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, editors. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2011. p. 765–771. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00228-4
  45. 45. Devillers N, Farmer C, Mounier A-M, Le Dividich J, Prunier A. Hormones, IgG and lactose changes around parturition in plasma, and colostrum or saliva of multiparous sows. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 2004;44:381–396. DOI: 10.1051/rnd:2004043
  46. 46. Mulloy AL, Malven PV. Relationships between concentrations of porcine prolactin in blood serum and milk of lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science. 1979;48:76–81.
  47. 47. Yan W, Wile AA, Bathgate AD, Frankshun A-L, Lasano S, Crean BD, Steinetz BG, Bagnell CA, Bartol FF. Expression of LGR7 and LGR8 by neonatal porcine uterine tissues and transmission of milk-borne relaxin into the neonatal circulation by suckling. Endocrinology. 2006;147:4303–4310. DOI: 10.1210/en.2006-0397
  48. 48. Bagnell CA, Steinetz BG, Bartol FF. Milk-borne relaxin and the lactocrine hypothesis for maternal programming of neonatal tissues. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 2009;1160:152–157. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03834.x
  49. 49. Estienne MJ, Harper AF, Barb CR, Azain MJ. Concentrations of leptin in serum and milk collected from lactating sows differing in body condition. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 2000;19:275–280. DOI: 10.1016/S0739-7240(00)00082-5
  50. 50. Westrom BR, Ekman R, Svendsen L, Svendsen J, Karlsson BW. Levels of immunoreactive insulin, neurotensin, and bombesin in porcine colostrum and milk. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 1987;6:460–465. DOI: 10.1097/00005176-198705000-00025
  51. 51. Mostyn A, Sebert S, Litten JC, Perkins KS, Laws J, Symonds ME, Clarke L. Influence of porcine genotype on the abundance of thyroid hormones and leptin in sow milk and its impact on growth, metabolism and expression of key adipose tissue genes in offspring. Journal of Endocrinology. 2006;190:631–639. DOI: 10.1677/joe.1.06731
  52. 52. Monaco MH, Gronlund DE, Bleck GT, Hurley WL, Wheeler MB, Donovan SM. Mammary specific transgenic over-expression of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) increases pig milk IGF-I and IGF binding proteins, with no effect on milk composition or yield. Transgenic Research. 2005;14:761–773. DOI: 10.1007/s11248-005-7219-8
  53. 53. Jaeger LA, Lamar CH, Bottoms GD, Cline TR. Growth-stimulating substances in porcine milk. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1987;48:1531–1533.
  54. 54. Tan TJ, Schober DA, Simmen FA. Fibroblast mitogens in swine milk include an epidermal growth factor-related peptide. Regulatory Peptides. 1990;27:61–74. DOI: 10.1016/0167-0115(90)90205-B
  55. 55. Maffeo G, Damasio M, Balabio R, Jochle W. Detection of prostaglandin-like substances in sow’s milk. Zuchthygiene. 1987;22:209–214. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.1988.tb00808.x
  56. 56. Jensen PT. Tryspin inhibitor in sow colostrum and its function. Annales De Recherches Veterinaires. 1978;9:225–228.
  57. 57. Cerveza PJ, Mehrbod F, Cotton SJ, Lomeli N, Linder MC, Fonda EG, Wickler SJ. Milk ceruloplasmin and its expression by mammary gland and liver in pigs. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2000;373:451–461. DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1572
  58. 58. Danielsen M, Pedersen LJ, Bendixen E. An in vivo characterization of colostrum protein uptake in porcine gut during early lactation. Journal of Proteomics. 2011;74:101–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.08.011
  59. 59. Qin Y, Qi N, Tang Y, He J, Li X, Gu F, Zou S. Isolation and identification of a high molecular weight protein in sow milk. Animal. 2015;9:847–854. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114003280
  60. 60. Jackson JR, Hurley WL, Easter RA, Jensen AH, Odle J. Effects of induced or delayed parturition and supplemental dietary fat on colostrum and milk composition in sows. Journal of Animal Science. 1995;73:1906–1913.
  61. 61. Krogh U, Bruun TS, Amdi C, Flummer C, Poulsen J, Theil PK. Colostrum production in sows fed different sources of fiber and fat during late gestation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2015;95:211–223. DOI: 10.4141/CJAS-2014-060
  62. 62. Theil PK. Transition feeding of sows. In: Farmer C, editor. The Gestating and Lactating Sow. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2015. p. 147–172. DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_7
  63. 63. Vadmand CN, Krogh U, Hansen CF, Theil PK. 2015. Impact of sow and litter characteristics on colostrum yield, time for onset of lactation, and milk yield of sows. Journal of Animal Science. 2015;93:2488–2500. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8659
  64. 64. Auldist DE, Morrish L, Eason P, King RH. The influence of litter size on milk production of sows. Animal Science. 1998;67:333–337. DOI: 10.1017/S1357729800010109
  65. 65. Kim SW, Hurley WL, Han IK, Easter RA. Growth of nursing pigs related to the characteristics of nursed mammary glands. Journal of Animal Science. 2000;78:1313–1318.
  66. 66. Nielsen OL, Pedersen AR, Sørensen MT. Relationships between piglet growth rate and mammary gland size of the sow. Livestock Production Science. 2001;67:273–279. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00197-4
  67. 67. Theil PK, Sejrsen K, Hurley WL, Labouriau R, Thomsen B, Sørensen MT. Role of suckling in regulating cell turnover and onset and maintenance of lactation in individual mammary glands of sows. Journal of Animal Science. 2006;84:1691–1698. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-518
  68. 68. Theil PK, Jørgensen H, Jakobsen K. Energy and protein metabolism in lactating sows fed two levels of dietary fat. Livestock Production Science. 2004;89:265–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.01.001
  69. 69. Kim SW, Hurley WL, Wu G, Ji F. Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. Journal of Animal Science. 2009;87(E. Suppl):E123–E132. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1452
  70. 70. King RH, Dunkin AC. The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 3. The response to graded increases in food intake during lactation. Animal Production. 1986;42:119–126.

Written By

P.K. Theil and W.L. Hurley

Submitted: October 12th, 2015 Reviewed: March 4th, 2016 Published: September 7th, 2016