Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Staphylococcal Food Poisoning and Novel Perspectives in Food Safety

Written By

Zhenbo Xu, Brian M. Peters, Bing Li, Lin Li and Mark E. Shirtliff

Submitted: May 4th, 2015 Reviewed: December 21st, 2015 Published: April 13th, 2016

DOI: 10.5772/62177

Chapter metrics overview

2,243 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Ingestion of food is the major way for human beings to obtain nutrient substances for basic living, and therefore, the quality and safety of food is a major concern. Foodborne illness includes any illness resulting from the consumption of contaminated food that contains pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or chemical or natural toxins. Consequently, food safety is considered to be a globally expanding issue and thus a leading topic in public health, no longer limited to foodborne illnesses but extended to nearly every safety issue regarding “farm to table” food approaches. Bacterial foodborne infections occur by ingestion of food contaminated with growth of pathogenic bacteria, toxin production, and continuous bacterial growth in intestines. In the past decade, a large number of cases or reports have been available on food containing unhealthy, harmful, or toxic substances (other than food poisoning outbreaks) worldwide. Foodborne microorganisms, primarily associated with pathogenic bacteria and toxic substances produced in food, have presented major challenges for food safety. As a global foodborne pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus is typically capable of causing a large number of infections, including food poisoning. Thus, this chapter aims to review several factors contributing to the rise of staphylococci as a growing concern for the food safety industry, including the growth of S. aureus, production and regulation of staphylococcal enterotoxins, the viable putative but nonculturable (VPNC) state, and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus caused by the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in both clinical and veterinary settings.


  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Enterotoxins
  • Food poisoning
  • Biofilm

1. Introduction

Foodborne illness, also known as foodborne infection, foodborne diseases, or food poisoning, is defined as any illness resulting from the consumption of contaminated food that contains pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or chemical or natural toxins (such as poisonous mushrooms) [1, 2]. Remaining as the leading concern in public health and food safety globally, the annual occurrence of foodborne illness has been reported to be 47.8 million foodborne cases (with 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths) in the United States, 750,000 cases (with 113,000 hospitalizations and 460 deaths) in France, and 5.4 million cases (with 18,000 hospitalizations and 120 deaths) in Australia [35]. Foodborne infections and diseases are caused by a large variety of pathogens that contaminate food and related products, accounting for the major source of all foodborne illnesses, with an estimate of 14 million illnesses, 60,000 hospitalizations, and 1,800 deaths per year [2]. Therefore, bacterial foodborne infections occur when ingested food is contaminated with pathogenic bacteria, toxins produced (even if the growth of host bacteria is terminated), and continuous bacterial growth in intestines (for setting up an infection that causes illness).

1.1. Staphylococci

As a group of Gram-positive, facultative aerobic, frequently unencapsulated, osmotolerant microorganisms, staphylococci are carried, mostly transiently, by approximately 50% of healthy adults on the skin and anterior nares and widespread in untreated water, raw milk, and sewage. Staphylococci are responsible for various tissue infections and a multitude of diseases [69]. Up to date, more than 30 distinct types of staphylococci strains have been verified to be infectious for humans, and the associated illnesses and diseases range from mild to severe, from no treatment required to even potentially fatal [6, 7, 10]. Most of these infections are caused by Staphylococcus aureus, which has been regarded as a leading human and zoonotic pathogen implicated in both clinical medicine and food safety and typically is capable of causing a large number of infections, including skin infections and sometimes pneumonia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, gastroenteritis, scalded skin syndrome, and toxic shock syndrome (TSS) [6]. Aside from this bacterium, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are regarded as a frequent cause of nosocomial infection and bacteremia, especially in patients with indwelling medical devices [12, 13]. CoNS have also become the most frequently isolated pathogens in intravascular catheter-related infections (CRI), accounting for an estimated 28% of all nosocomial bloodstream infections [14].

1.2. Staphylococcal Food Poisoning (SFP)

Staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP) is a noncontagious gastrointestinal illness caused by the ingestion of food contaminated with preformed staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), with low fatality and symptoms commonly including nausea, retching, vomiting, stomach cramps, exhaustion, and diarrhea [1, 15]. The onset of SFP symptoms commonly occurs between 0.5 and 6 h, and the illness typically lasts for 1 day (up to 3 days), with rapid recovery [1]. Serving as one of the most economically important foodborne diseases, SFP is currently a major issue for global public health programs worldwide [16, 17]. In the United States, Staphylococcushas been among the top 5 pathogens responsible for foodborne illnesses. From 1983 to 1997, the annual number of SFP cases had been estimated to be 185,000, with 1,750 hospitalizations and 2 deaths, totaling a cost of 1.5 billion dollars [1, 2]. Based on the recent surveillance in 2011, SFP was found to be account for 241,148 foodborne illnesses, 1,064 hospitalizations, and 6 deaths per year [1, 18]. In Europe, SFP ranks as the fourth most common causative agent of foodborne illness, with 926 SFP outbreaks reported in 15 European Union (EU) countries from 1993 to 1998 [2, 19]. In Japan, according to the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan, for a period of 20 years (1980–1999), a total of 2,525 outbreaks of SFP were reported, which involved 59,964 persons, resulting in 3 deaths [17]. In addition, an extensive SFP outbreak occurred in Japan in 2000, with a large number of patients (13,420 cases) ingested with dairy products contaminated with SEs [20]. In China, for a majority of regions, S. aureuswas recovered from more than 15% of food samples, and in occasional outbreak cases, the identification rate approached 90% [2, 8, 21]. However, due to the lack of comprehensive surveillance and investigation and the prevalence and occurrence of SFP that varied considerably among different regions and areas in China, this discrepancy may be explained by different local eating habits and food product usage. In addition, staphylococcal strain-dependent differences may also contribute to the variation.

Food commonly involved in staphylococcal intoxication include protein food (even salty) such as ham, raw or processed meat, puddings, pastries tuna, chicken, sandwich fillings, cream fillings, potato and meat salads, custards, raw bilk milk, milk products (especially unpasteurized milk), cheese products, and creamed potatoes [22, 23]. In China, raw meat, milk and dairy products, frozen products, and cooked food have been found as major food types contaminated by S. aureus, taking up 38%, 20%, 16%, and 14%, respectively [2, 8, 21]. In Europe, meat and related products have been the common food vehicles for SFP. In Japan, SFP frequently occurs in rice balls and Japanese-style desserts [24]. Food made by hand requiring no further cooking or handled frequently during preparation are major targets for Staphylococcuscontamination and at highest risk for the production of bacterial toxins, which eventually cause SFP. Although S. aureuscontamination can be readily avoided by heat treatment of food, its ability to grow in a wide range of temperatures (7–48.5°C), pH [4.2–9.3] and sodium chloride concentrations (up to 15% NaCl) facilitates the contamination and transmission of this organism to various types of food [16, 17, 25, 26].


2. Staphylococcal Enterotoxins (SEs)

Some S. aureusstrains are capable of producing SEs, and several CoNS species have also been reported to produce SEs, including Staphylococcus epidermisand Staphylococcus haemolyticus, among others [2729]. Classified into members of the pyrogenic toxin superantigen family [30], SEs are a series of extracellular single-chain proteins primarily produced in food or culture media and secreted by some Staphylococcusstrains, and the causative agent of SFP, which after ingestion may cause intoxication exhibited by vomiting (emetic action on the abdominal viscera) and diarrhea (epithelium of the intestinal tract and inhibition of water absorption in intestine), even collapse in severe cases [15]. In most SFP cases, a single enterotoxigenic staphylococcal strain isolated from the contaminated food is suspected to be the responsible strain [31]. However, from a number of SFP outbreaks with symptoms similar to gastrointestinal syndromes mediated by SEs, only nonenterotoxigenic staphylococci have been isolated, which may be explained by the outgrown enterotoxigenic staphylococci by the nonenterotoxigenic ones. Containing low α-helix and high β-pleated sheet content, SEs have similar and flexible structure, with a low molecular weight between 24,000 and 30,000 Da [32]. One of the characteristic features of SEs is their heat stability (withstanding heating to 121°C for 10 min), as SEs are commonly produced ranging from 10°C to 50°C, with the optimum at 30°C to 40°C [24, 26, 3335]. Consequently, when Staphylococcusstrains grow in food under appropriate conditions and produce SEs undetectable by taste or smell, SEs remain active even when bacteria itself have been eliminated by heating. As concluded, effective ways include the prevention of food contamination from staphylococci, staphylococci organisms from growing, and SEs from being produced under either heating or freezing. SEs are also highly hydrophilic, with pH ranges from 4.8 to 9.0 (optimum between 5.3 and 7.0) and water activity (aw) ranges from 0.87 to 0.99 (optimum at 0.90) [24, 36, 37]. Being well studied and documented, SEs are found to possess a number of biological properties, including superantigenicity (induction of T-cell mitogenicity and human interferon), emetic activity, and pyrogenicity [38]. In addition to gastrointestinal symptoms in SFP as aforementioned, SEs have also been implicated in other diseases such as atopic eczema [3941], rheumatoid arthritis [4143], and urticaria [41, 44]. With binding of functional SEs (not presursor) to both the α-helical regions of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules outside the peptide binding groove of the antigen-presenting cells (APC) and the variable region (Vβ) on the T-cell receptor (TCR), a bridge between T cells and APC is formed, leading to nonspecific activation and proliferation of a large number of T cells [41, 45, 46] resulting in robust inflammatory cytokine release.

As classified according to the distinct immunological entities, until recently, a total of 25 types of SEs (A–V and X, with 3 subtypes for C) have been identified. The finding of SEs has been in accordance with the development of identification methodologies. In early studies, animal testing experiments had been commonly used for the observation of SE activity, requiring monkey, feline, or cavy models [4749]. After feeding with contaminated food, animals exhibited abnormal behavior or gross morphology changes, and the SEs contained in food were determined by the number of vomiting events, the time until the first vomiting event, and behavioral changes [47]. These types of animal feeding experiments had been commonly used for the characterization of emetic activities of SEs, thus determining the roles for emetic activities of SEs during SFP. However, such methodologies were also significantly limited by low sensitivity and specificity, poor reproducibility, high expense and laboratory operation, diversity in animals, and incapability of quantification and accurate identification [47]. Therefore, the identification of individual single type of SEs was reported by the availability of serological assays. Based on the specific reaction between antigen and antibody, identification of SEs via specific antibody [50] was first reported in the 1930s. Ouchterlony double immunodiffusion, also known as agar gel immunodiffusion, had become applicable in 1948 [51], and the first serological study on distinct SEs was conducted in 1958 [52]. From 1960s to 1970s, a number of SEs with emetic activities were identified and reported by the employment of serological methodologies including Ouchterlony double immunodiffusion, radial immunodiffusion, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). With the development of molecular biotechnology such as PCR and even genome sequencing in the 1990s and 2000s, a large number of newly identified SEs (G–V and X) as well as variants (for instance, 17 distinct variants of sel-x) had been discovered on enterotoxin gene cluster (egc), staphylococcal pathogenicity islands (SaPIs), mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and even the bacterial genome (sel-pon genome of N315).

2.1. Classical SEs

Although investigation on the observation and detection of SEs from animal feeding experiments could be dated back from 1930s, the immunological characteristics were not clarified until a number of serological studies had been conducted in the 1950s and 1960s. These studies revealed 6 types (A, B, C1, C2, D, and E) of SEs that were characterized and further referred to as classic SEs (including C3 reported in 1984). Antigenicity of SEs was validated when the antisera prepared from rabbits infected with SEs was demonstrated to protect cats [52], and later from a further serological study, the origins of two heat-resistant types of SEs had been verified [52, 53]. These extracellular immunologically distinct SEs responsible for the clinical manifestation of SFP were first referred to as type F (food poisoning) and type E (mostly produced by strains of “enteritis” origin) and later designated as A and B for a better sequential numbering system, with only type A commonly associated with food poisoning (A-1963). Sharing a similar basic three-dimensional structure, the 5 serological groups of SEs (A–E) exhibit nucleotide sequence identity of 50% to 85%, with types A, D, and E categorized into one group (52–83% amino acid identity) and types B and Cs falling into a separate, more closely related group (62–64% amino acid identity) [53, 54]. As origins and sources, types B and C are important causes of nonmenstrual-associated TSS, and types A and D are common causes of SFP with types B and C to a lesser extent [49].

2.1.1. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin A (seaor SEA)

SEA was first identified in 1959 from S. aureusstrain FRI-196E [52, 55] and then named as type A [56], which has been considered to be the most commonly detected SE associated with food poisoning, with its minimal toxic dose for humans ranging from 20 to 100 ng [24]. Also, SEA has been verified to be responsible for a number of SFP outbreaks, including an extensive outbreak caused by ingestion of dairy products in Osaka, Japan, in 2000 [24, 56, 57]. After identification by serological methodology, the production of SEA in different media or condition had become a major concern. The maximal level of SEA production was found to occur during exponential phase. In semisolid BHI agar (pH 5.3], the production of SEA was acquired, and trace amounts of SEA and SEB were obtained with cellophane sac culture [58, 59]. As food samples were concerned, SEA production was detected in a number of meat samples (raw beef and pork, cooked beef and pork, and canned ham). Better growth of S. aureusand production of SEA were detected in cooked meat than raw meat despite no significant difference obtained, and such diversity may be explained by the bacterial competition between anaerobic and aerobic conditions (with the latter preferable for S. aureus) [50, 58, 59]. In milk, SEA production was also found to be associated with staphylococcal growth [60]. In fermented sausage, SEA production had been detected aerobically at pH 5.1 (with an inoculum of 4×107 cells/g sausage) but not anaerobically at pH 5.7 [61]. For cogrowth food microorganisms, inhibition was observed to be more common than stimulation, including inhibition of both staphylococcal growth and SE formation with no apparent effect on growth [62]. However, such influence of other microorganisms on Staphylococcuswas affected markedly by environmental conditions, and discrepancy on inhibition had been also noticed between plate test and meat slurries [58, 59]. Despite acquisition of appropriate staphylococcal growth in both pure culture and in the presence of other food microorganisms, production of SEA was only formed in pure culture [58, 59]. Although SEB was reported to be produced in much larger quantities and more diverse among strains than SEA, SEA had been implicated in a larger number of food poisoning cases [63]. Resembling a primary metabolite (with SEB as a secondary metabolite), SEA is secreted by the bacterium during the exponential phase of growth, with various of factors affecting its production, including salt concentration (NaCl, NaNO2, and NaNO3 showing no influence), surfactants (increase in SEA secretion), pH (optimal ranging from 6.5 to 7.0), and antimicrobial agents (inhibition by chloramphenicol or 2,4-dinitrophenol, with streptomycin or penicillin G exhibiting no influence), which may explain the higher frequency and incidence of SEA in food poisoning [6366]. In addition, temperature and inoculum size play important roles in SEA production. As temperature was concerned, SEA production was detected under a broad range of temperatures from 10°C to 50°C (in BHI broth) but not at low temperatures (such as 8°C or 10°C as reported) [24]. SEA was detected in the exponential phase from 15°C to 37°C, and its production increased with the elevation of temperature. Also, SEA was detected in the stationary or death phase at 10°C despite acquisition of the lowest SEA concentration at this temperature. Similar to SEE, SEA contains 2 MHC-II binding sites (Zn2+ dependent) and thus possesses strong superantigenicity for T-cell activation [67, 68]. Carried by a polymorphic family of lysogenic phages [69, 70], the gene encoding SEA has a length of 771 bp, and its translational product is SEA precursor of 257 amino acids. With 24-residue N-terminal hydrophobic leader sequence further processed, the mature form of SEA was composed of 233 amino acids [38, 53, 6874]. Unlike other classic SEs (seb, sec, and sed), expression of seahad been found to be independent of agrregulation [54, 75, 76].

2.1.2. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B (seband SEB)

Being the first identified (from S. aureusstrain FRI-243) and the most studied SE, SEB was initially named as type E and subsequently designated as type B. As the most potent SE and requiring much lower quantities for toxic effect than synthetic chemicals, SEB are capable of causing multiorgan system failure and death at low concentration. As an exotoxin secreted by S. aureus, production of SEB had been reported from diverse clonal complexes, including CC8 (the most common), CC20, and CC59 [32, 7779]. As a superantigen capable of cross-linking APCs and T cells to form a ternary complex between MHC-II and TCR at specific Vβ chain, SEB had been well studied as a causative agent for food poisoning, TSS, atopic dermatitis (common colonization of S. aureusand frequent occurrence of SEB-specific antibody from patients with AD), and respiratory diseases (asthma and nasal polyps) [32, 77, 80, 81]. As a well-characterized protein, SEB had been found to be extremely stable (retaining its activity even in acidic environment), water soluble, heat stable (among the most heat-stable proteins, with intact protein under 78°C to 80°C for 30 min), broadly pH tolerant [410], and resistant to proteolytic digestion (such as pepsin, trypsin, and papain) [47, 82, 83]. Nevertheless, SEB formation and production were influenced by a number of factors, including inhibition of SEB formation in BHI broth by medium filtrates (such as K2HPO4, KCl, CoCl2, NaF, acriflavine, phenethyl alcohol, streptomycin sulfate, chloramphenicol, spermine phosphate, spermidine phosphate, and Tween-80) [82], decrease of SEB production by either temperature depletion (without affecting staphylococcal growth) or curing salt concentration elevation (more rapid reduction of SEB production than staphylococcal growth) [84], catabolite repression [85], and minerals (double SEB production was obtained when magnesium and potassium are under appropriate concentration) [34, 86, 87]. Generally, maximal SEB production occurs in postexponential growth. From early studies in the 1950s and 1960s, SEB was considered to be irrelevant to food poisoning [50, 88]. Located in either chromosome (strain FRI-243, FRI-277, or S6) or plasmid (strain DU-4916), sebis 705 bp in length, and the mature SEB consists of 239 amino acid residues sharing nucleotide and amino acid sequence homology with sec1and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A [8991]. Regulated by the staphylococcal two-component system, accessory gene regulatory (agr), the region between 59 and 93 nucleotides upstream of the transcription ignition site was found to be essential for transcription and expression [9294]. sebhad been commonly found in toxin-mediated foodborne and clinical S. aureusstrains, and recently, seb(by PCR and Western blotting) was detected from 5% of 300 clinical Staphylococcusstrains [95].

2.1.3. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin C (secand SEC)

According to the new numbering system agreed on the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) meeting in 1962, the first verification of SEC was then reported in 1965, with its toxicity and specificity also confirmed [96]. In this study, the enterotoxins from S. aureusstrains FRI-137 and FRI-361 were both discovered to react with a specific antibody; thus, strain FRI-137 (ATCC 19095) was selected as the prototype of SEC [96]. However, 2 years later, enterotoxins from strain FRI-137 and FRI-361 were purified as distinct enterotoxins [96, 98] and consequently labeled as SEC1 (strain FRI-137) and SEC2 (strain FRI-361). In 1984, the third enterotoxin C (SEC3) was discovered from a S. aureusstrain FRI-913 from prawn in England, which were serologically and chemically similar to SEC1 and SEC2 but identical by isoelectric focusing, radioimmunoassay (RIA), and N-terminal analysis [99, 100]. Despite cross-reactivity with same antibody, each of the 3 SEC had antibodies that reacted with minor determinants [99]. Located on chromosome (SaPIs), secis composed of 801 bp and encodes a precursor protein of 267 amino acids, with the mature toxin of 239 amino acids [101, 102]. Aside from 3 types of classic SECs, additional secvariants (such as sec-bovine from SaPIbov) possessing >95% deduced amino acid homology among them had been also reported [103107]. As SEC1, SEC2, and SEC3 are all emetic enterotoxins with equal toxicity to that of SEA and SEB in both oral administration and intravenously [96, 99], SEC have been responsible for numerous SFP outbreaks (mostly caused by milk) [108]. Maximal production of SEC occurs during postexponential growth. SEC-positive strains of S. aureusare commonly associated with bovine, ovine, and caprine dairy products [109]. Yet interestingly, SEC expression has been noted to be reduced in cheeses [110]. From a recent study, milk environment was found to dramatically change the expression profiles of enterotoxin genes despite no influence on staphylococcal growth. In particular, SEC production was substantially reduced in milk compared to the laboratory medium on the protein level, which may be explained by the down-regulation of the agrsystem [111].

2.1.4. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin D (sedand SED)

In 1967, SED was first reported from S. aureusstrain FRI-293 (which also produced SEC; thus, strain FRI-494 was selected as the prototype strain, also known as ATCC 23235) and its emetic activity in cats, and specific neutralization of biological activity by antisera had been verified [112]. The production of SED alone and in combination with SEA was considered to play a key role in food poisoning (ranking second in frequency after SEA) and recognized as one of the most commonly recovered enterotoxins in SFP outbreaks [112, 113]. Encoding a toxin of 228 amino acids, sedis located on a 27.6-kb penicillinase plasmid pIB485 [114]. SED was found to be partially activated by agrvia RNA III-mediated reduction of Rot (repressor of toxin) during postexponential growth phase, as independent formation from agrwas found under high concentration. As a consequence of agrregulation via quorum sensing, during growth in BHI broth, a modest postexponential induction ratio (<10-fold) was obtained as sedreached maximal production during transition from exponential to stationary phase of growth [113, 115]. With the existence of a consensus -10 sequence, a less conserved -35 sequence, and a TG dinucleotide motif, the presence of 52-bp sequence (from -34 to +18) and transcription from +1 to +18 were important for promoter function and agrregulation [116]. Aside from regulation by the agrsystem, NaCl stress was capable of decreasing sedexpression, although no significant effect was further verified. However, regulation under NaCl stress may be highly strain specific variable [117]. As food samples were concerned, in cheese manufacturing (with starter culture including 103 CFU/ml of milk), sedexpression was not induced even when inoculated at 106 CFU/ml (equal to 108 CFU/g of cheese), presenting a low level of expression and a prolonged pattern that was similar to SEA [113, 118]. In different ham products, when S. aureuswas inoculated for optimal growth in cultivation broth for 7 days, continuous sedexpression was observed throughout the entire incubation period for both boiled and smoked ham [115]. However, much less production of sed(9 times less) was detected in the latter. For Serrano ham, SED was only detected after 5 days of incubation (sedexpression still too low to determine), similar to which a second increase had been obtained for boiled and smoked ham after the same time span of incubation [115].

2.1.5. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin E (seeand SEE)

In 1971, SEE was reported from a food poisoning S. aureusstrain FRI-326, which produced distinct SEE having no immunoreactivity with specific antibodies to other SEs [119]. Its toxicity (in rhesus monkeys), specificity, and neutralization with specific antibody were also validated [119]. Located on the phage, seeis composed of 771 bp and encodes a precursor with a molecular weight of 29,358 Da, which was further processed to a mature extracellular form with a molecular weight of 26,425 Da [120]. Containing a single polypeptide chain, SEE consists of 259 amino acid residues (no free sulfhydryl groups found), with serine and threonine as the NH2- and COH-terminal amino acids, respectively [121]. Under extreme acidic (pH 2) and basic (pH 12) conditions as well as heating, the toxicity (emetic activity) and antigenicity (serological activity) were found to be destroyed, which is likely due to conformational change [121].

2.2. Staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxins

Before the 1990s, a total of 7 types of classic SEs (sea, seb, sec1, sec2, sec3, sed, and see) had been known as causative agents of SFP in humans due to emetic activity. However, starting from the discovery of sehin 1994 (aside from discovery of sefon 1981), a large variety of novel SE or SE-related toxins (as well as variants) had been reported (G–V and X) based on genetic homology with classical SEs. In 2004, the International Nomenclature Committee for Staphylococcal Superantigens has proposed that only staphylococcal superantigens inducing emesis after oral administration in a primate model should be designated as SEs, whereas other related toxins lacking either emetic properties in a primate model or verification of emetic activity should be otherwise designated as staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxin type X [122, 123].

2.2.1. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type F (sel-fand SEl-F)

In 1981, Bergdoll et al. had noticed an enterotoxin-like protein recovered from 93.8% [61/65] S. aureusstrains sampled from patients with TSS, representing the first evidence of sel-f[124]. With its purification and preparation of specific antibody, sel-fwas also recovered from 11.5% [3/26] of laboratory S. aureusstrains, compared with only 4.6% [4/87] from other sources, which suggested the association between SEl-F and TSS [124]. However, from an investigation on the spread of a TSS strain, a temporal association of antibodies to SEl-F with cessation of recurrences of TSS was found, indicating that its production may not either reach clinically significant levels during infection or is insufficient to cause TSS [125]. Generally, studies and reports on SEl-F have been rarely available.

2.2.2. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type G (sel-gand SEl-G)

In 1998, SEl-G and SEl-I (from S. aureusstrains FRI-572 and FRI-445, respectively) had been identified and characterized, including verification on emesis (eliciting emetic response in rhesus monkeys) and superantigenicity (proliferation of T cells) [126]. sel-gconsists of 777 nucleotides and encodes a precursor protein of 258 amino acids, which has typical bacterial signal sequences and is then cleaved to form mature toxin with 233 amino acids and with a molecular weight of 27,043 Da [127, 128]. SEl-G showed higher homology to SpeA, SEB, SEC, and SSA (38–42% amino acid identity) and exhibited similar epitopes with SEC1 [126].

2.2.3. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type H (sel-hand SEl-H)

In 1994, the first discovery of sel-hfrom S. aureusstrain D4508 was reported, with its nucleotide and amino acid sequences identified [129]. One year later, SEl-H was identified and purified from S. aureusstrain FRI-569, which elicited an emetic response in monkeys and was found to be antigenically distinct from other existent SEs [51]. SEl-H shares about 35% amino acid identity with SEA, SED, and SEE [130]. As a superantigen homologous to SEA subfamily, SEl-H displays unique MHC-II binding properties. As a potent T-cell mitogen, SEl-H was capable of activating large amounts of T cells by cross-linking APC and T cells via Vα domain (Vα10, TRAV27) of TCR (with no TCR Vβ-specific expansion) by direct interaction between SEl-H and TCR Vα domain [131, 132]. With emetic activity, sel-hwas commonly detected alone or together with sea[133] and responsible for a number of SFP outbreaks. In 1996, an outbreak was caused by cheese and S. aureusstrains isolated from cheese were found to produce SEl-H [133]. From the SFP outbreak caused by reconstituted milk in Japan, SEl-H was also detected along with SEA. In a survey on 146 S. aureusstrains isolated from humans, cows, and bovine in Japan, 7 and 4 strains were found to harbor sea+sel-h+ and sel-halone, respectively [57, 133]. In December 2003, a suspected SFP outbreak involving 8 persons (3 adults and 5 children) with symptoms of vomiting, stomach cramps, and diarrhea shortly after lunch was caused by contaminated mashed potato, and S. aureusstrains contained in raw bovine milk for preparation of mashed potato were found to produce sufficient SEl-H for food poisoning [134]. SEl-H production was influenced by a variety of factors, including aeration and pH conditions. Higher production level of SEl-H was acquired under aerobic incubation or pH controlled at 7.0, with decrease in SEl-H production under anaerobic condition or slight change of pH (such as 6.5 or 7.5) [135].

2.2.4. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type I (sel-iand SEl-I)

As aforementioned, SEl-I were identified together with SEl-G in 1998 [126]. Unlike SEl-G, SEl-I was more similar to SEA, SED, and SEE (26–28% amino acid identity). sel-iconsists of 729 nucleotides and encodes a precursor protein of 242 amino acids, which contains typical bacterial signal sequences and is further cleaved to form mature SEl-I of predicted 218 amino acids with a molecular weight of 24,928 Da [127, 128]. Although separated by DNA related to other SEs, linkage of sel-gand sel-iwas discovered, and this enterotoxin gene cluster was designated as egc, with sel-glocated 2002 bp downstream of sel-i[127]. In southern France, carriage of sel-g+sel-i+ and sec+sel-g+sel-i+ was detected from 41.9% and 24.5% of 155 S. aureusstrains isolated from various food samples [128]. In Taiwan, 14.5% [8/55] S. aureusstrains of human origin and 9.4% [13/139] strains isolated from frozen food, Chinese sausage, and meal boxes were found to harbor sel-g, sel-h, and/or sel-i, suggesting a minor role that such SEs play in SFP outbreaks [136]. However, a discrepancy between the presence of sel-gand sel-iand the production of enough quantities of SEG and SEI was also noticed [128]. In 2004, 10.1% [11/109] wild Staphylococcusspp. stains were found to contain SEs and egc, and the egcfrom strain AB-8802 present variants of sel-gand sel-i(sel-gvand sel-iv) [137].

2.2.5. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type J (sel-jand SEl-J)

In 1998, sel-jwas first found to be located on the plasmid pIB485 encoding sed, which was separated from sedby 895 bp of intergenic region containing a perfect inverted repeat (with each arm of the repeat having a length of 21 bp) [138]. Most of sel-jwas detected on sed-encoding plasmid, suggesting the coexistence of these 2 SEs and their relative contribution to the food poisoning symptomology [138]. With transcription in opposite directions, both sel-jand sedwere capable of expression in S. aureusstrains, with sedonly under the transcriptional control of agr[138]. Containing 269 amino acid residues, sequence of SEl-J showed substantial similarity to the SE family of sea, sed, and see.

2.2.6. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type K (sel-kand SEl-K)

Despite observation of the sel-kgene on SaPI1 (in 1998) and egcfrom S. aureusstrains A900322 (in 2001), the first designation of sel-kfrom S. aureusTSS isolates MN NJ was reported in 2001, with its identification on SaPI3 together with seb[139, 140]. Possessing biochemical and biological properties similar to classic SEs, including superantigenicity (Vβ-specific T-cell activation), pyrogenicity, emesis, and lethality in primates, SEl-K was secreted by clinical S. aureusstrains, with a molecular weight of 26,000 Da and a pI between 7.0 and 7.5 [48, 140]. An increase in the secretion of SEl-K was obtained when coexpressed with SEB (K-2014). However, regardless of the variation in SEl-K secretion amount in vitro, similar levels of SEl-K accumulation were found in vivo[141]. SEl-K was commonly detected in clinical isolates (more than half) and almost all USA300 strains. In addition, a genetic variation of sel-kwas discovered, with 6 variants found among 20 clinical isolates [141].

2.2.7. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type L (sel-land SEl-L)

First noticed on egcfrom S. aureusstrain A900322 [142], sel-lwas identified on pathogenicity island SaPIbov (15,891 bp) from a bovine mastitis S. aureusisolate RF122 (sel-l) in 2001, with a molecular weight of 26,000 Da and an isoelectric point of 8.5 [105]. Lacking emetic activity, SEl-L was found to exhibit a number of biological properties similar to other SEs, including superantigenicity, pyrogenicity, enhancement of endotoxin shock, and lethality in rabbits when administered via subcutaneous mini-osmotic pumps, but the protein lacked emetic activity [105].

2.2.8. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type M (sel-mand SEl-M)

In 2001, sel-mwas reported to be located on the egc(enterotoxigenic gene cluster) together with sel-g, sel-I, sel-k, and sel-l, and SEl-M was found to exhibit superantigenicity activity with specific Vβ pattern [142]. However, the emetic activity has not been elucidated yet. Most clinical S. aureusstrains harboring egcwere found to carry such SEs regardless of the diseases, suggesting the potential derivation of SEs and the putative cluster of SE genes from egc.

2.2.9. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type N (sel-nand SEl-N)

From the egcreported in 2001, sel-nwas also found to be located between sel-iand sel-g[142]. A study was conducted on the cloning and expression of sel-mand sel-nfrom S. aureusstrain FRI-1230, demonstrating that SEl-M and SEl-N were capable of stimulating T cells and inhibiting K562-ADM and B16 cells with an equivalent level to that of SEC2 [143]. Although superantigenicity had been verified, the emetic activity of SEl-N is still unclear [144].

2.2.10. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type O (sel-oand SEl-O)

In 2001, sel-owas identified from the egccluster, on which other 4 SEs and 2 pseudogenes were also located, including sel-i, sel-j, sel-m, sel-n, Ψent1, and Ψent2[142]. However, the biological and biochemical properties of sel-oremains unclear despite validation of its superantigenicity [144].

2.2.11. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type P (sel-pand SEl-P)

In 2001, sel-p(previously called sep) was first discovered from the genome of MRSA N315, and its biological properties were fully characterized in 2005 (with sel-pfrom S. aureusstrain Sagal isolated from an SE unidentified food poisoning outbreak in Japan), including superantigenicity (induction of a substantial proliferative response and production of cytokines) and emetic activity (at relatively high dose as 50–150 μg/animal) [123, 145]. According to this study, SEl-P was detected in 60% of the 30 sel-p-positive S. aureusisolates, and all 10 strains harboring seband sel-pproduced SEB but not SEl-P, suggesting that inactivation of the sel-plocus associates with a particular SE genetic constitution [123]. Most recently, colonization with sel-p-positive MRSA increased the risk of bacteremia, which indicated sel-pas a predictive virulence factor for invasive disease [146].

2.2.12. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type Q (sel-qand SEl-Q)

In 2002, a member of the new subfamily (group V), sel-q(from S. aureusstrain MN NJ) was identified and located directly 5 of sel-k, with a molecular weight of 26,000 Da and isoelectric point between 7.5 and 8.0 [147]. Despite a lack of emetic activity (incapability in neither lethality in rabbits nor emetic activity in monkeys), sel-qhad been found to possess superantigenicity, pyrogenicity, and ability to enhance endotoxin shock.

2.2.13. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type R (sel-rand SEl-R)

In 2003, sel-rwas recovered and identified from 4 S. aureusstrains (Fukuoka 5, Fukuoka 6, Fukuoka 7, and Fukuoka 8) isolated from patients with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea from a food poisoning outbreak occurred at a lunch-box shop in Fukuoka prefecture of Japan in September 1997 [148]. Located on 2 types of plasmid, pBI485 (and pBI485-like plasmids, encoding sedand sel-jas well) and pK0311 (pF5, pF6, and pF7), sel-rwas found to most closely related to sel-g[148]. Investigation on the biological properties of SEl-R revealed its superantigenicity (T-cell stimulation activity via MHC-II) and emetic activity (induction of a reaction in animals within 5 h at 100 μg/kg) [148150]. SEl-R production was also verified in seropositive S. aureusstrains [148, 149]. A survey was conducted on the SEl-R production from 24 sed-positive S. aureusisolates, and sel-rexpression was detectable from 22 isolates despite carriage of variant sedgene for seven strains lacking SED production [151].

2.2.14. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type S (sel-sand SEl-S)

Two novel SE-like genes, sel-sand sel-t, had been reported on the plasmid pF5, where sel-jand sel-rwere located. SEl-S (rSES) was characterized for biological properties, including superantigenicity (specific stimulation of human T cells via MHC-II APC) and emetic activity (induction of emetic reactions in monkeys) [150].

2.2.15. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type T (sel-tand SEl-T)

As aforementioned, a first identification of sel-twas reported on plasmid pF5 harbored by S. aureusstrain Fukuoka 5 from SFP. Similar to SEl-S, SEl-T was found to exhibit both superantigenicity and emetic activity (induction of a delayed reaction after 24 h or 5 days postadministration). Data from the emetic study on SEs involved in the SFP outbreak in Fukuoka in 1997 combined with emesis studies in house musk shrews (similar as in the monkeys) suggest that SEl-R and SEl-S were validated to be the causative toxins of vomiting [150].

2.2.16. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type U (sel-uand SEl-U)

From sequencing of 24 S. aureusstrains harboring egc, sel-uwas identified on 4 of the tested strains [152]. SEl-U was found to result from sequence divergence in the Ψent1and Ψent2pseudogenes, as sel-uwas located between sel-ivand sel-nin egcof strain 382F (AY158703) with replacement of the Ψent1and Ψent2between sel-ivand sel-nin egcof strain Mu50 (AP003363) [144, 152]. A variant sel-u, designated as sel-u2, was recovered from an atypical egclocus and generated by a limited deletion in the pseudogenes Ψent1and Ψent2, which contained superantigenicity for activation of T-cell families Vβ-13.2 and Vβ-14 [144].

2.2.17. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type V (sel-vand SEl-V)

In a broad surveillance on egcfrom 666 clinical S. aureusisolates, 63% [421/666] strains were positive for egclocus [144]. The archetypal egcharboring 5 SEs and 2 pseudogenes was found in 409 strains, and a novel SE-like toxin, designated as sel-v, was discovered from an atypical egclocus from S. aureusstrain A900624 [144]. SEl-V was generated by recombination between sel-mand sel-i, and its superantigenicity for activation of T-cell families Vβ-6, Vβ-18 and Vβ-21 has also been validated.

2.2.18. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Like Toxin Type X (sel-xand SEl-X)

In 2011, sel-xwas discovered from the core genome of 95% of phylogenetically diverse S. aureusstrains with human and animal origins, including 17 distinct allelic variants (sel-x1 to sel-x14, sel-xov, sel-xbov1, and sel-xbov2). Acquisition of sel-xincludes the horizontal transfer by a S. aureusprogenitor, allelic diversification by point mutation, and assortative recombination, which explains the high genetic diversity of sel-x. With a unique predicted structure, SEl-X was well characterized by biological activities, including superantigenicity (activation of Vβ-specific T cells), pyrogenicity, and endotoxin enhancement. It is also noteworthy that SEl-X produced by strain USA300 (CA-MRSA) had been found to be responsible for the lethality in a rabbit model, which suggested a novel virulence determinant of CA-MRSA disease pathogenesis.

2.3. Pathogenicity Islands (PAIs) and S. aureusPIs (SaPIs)

2.3.1. PAIs

In 1986, before the first report of PAIs by Hacker et al. in Werner Goebel’s group of Germany in 1994, two large segments had been found to be capable of deletion and thus enable the host bacterial to produce hemolysin and loss of P. fimbriae [139, 153, 154]. Considered to be foreign DNA segments integrated into the bacterial genome, such segments existed within pathogenic isolates (cause of virulence) but not on highly genetically similar nonpathogenic strains [153]. As a subclass of genomic islands, PAIs are defined as a group of gene clusters encoding bacterial virulence on a large DNA segment (ranging from 20 to l00 kb) located on the bacterial chromosome [139, 154156]. PAIs are acquired by microorganisms via horizontal gene transfer via transduction, conjugation, and transformation. Acquisition of PAIs may rapidly and radically alter the genome of a bacterium, consequently strengthening or reducing its fitness within the host [154, 157]. Pathogens are capable of harboring one or more PAIs associated with one or more virulence genes. PAIs are capable of encoding genetic products, including secretory proteins (such as type III secretion system), cell surface proteins (such as erythrocytolysin, fimbriae, and heme binding factors), signal transduction systems, and regulation systems [139, 155157].

As distinct DNA regions are present in the genome of pathogenic bacteria and absent in nonpathogenic strains (despite same or close species), typical PAIs are composed of mobility genes (such as integrases) commonly located at the beginning of the island and close to the tRNA locus or the respective attachment site. A number of virulence genes (V1–V4) are frequently interspersed with other mobility elements including insertion sequence (IS) elements (Isc, complete insertion element) or remnants of IS elements (ISd, defective insertion element) [153, 155, 156]. Commonly flanked by direct repeats (DR) and IS elements, PAIs are often genetically unstable and comprise some potential mobile components, such as IS elements, integrase, transposase, and plasmid replication initiation sites. As DNA sequences ranging from 16 to 20 bp (with maximum of 130 bp) with sequence repetition, DR plays a critical role in insertion and deletion (as recognition sites), such as integration of bacteriophages. Although combination of IS elements may be capable of mediating transfer of large DNA fragments, insertion mediated by IS also leads to inactivation of genes as well [153, 154, 156]. Consequently, PAIs are capable of deletion with distinct frequencies and loss of virulence traits encoded by PAIs are reported to occur at higher frequency than that encoded by mutation. PAIs are commonly inserted in the backbone genome of the host strain, typically located to specific sites such as tRNA loci or adjacent to tRNA genes, or sites associated with plasmid and phage integration, due to highly conserved genes encoding tRNAs among various bacterial species [153, 154].

PAIs differ from host chromosomes in GC content and codon usage, which may account for the discovery of novel PAIs and maintenance of the divergent nucleotide composition from the horizontally acquired DNA. Based on significant differences with respect to bacterial virulence, GC content, and codon usage, a hypothesis was proposed that such characteristics may be bestowed from DNA segments on the plasmid and phage; thus, acquisition of PAIs and the emergence of new pathogenic organisms can be correlated [153, 156].

2.3.2. SaPIs

As mobile pathogenicity islands with length ranging from 14 to 17 kb and carriage of genes for superantigen toxins and other virulence factors, SaPIs have been responsible for the TSS and other superantigen-related diseases, especially SE-like toxins. Located in specific loci of the chromosome and induced by bacteriophages, SaPIs are capable of incorporating small infective phage-like particles via a program of excision-replication-packaging. Containing most of the staphylococcal toxins and virulence factors, SaPIs facilitate the horizontal acquisition of MGEs and, thus, play an important role in the evolution of Staphylococcus[139, 154, 155]. SaPI families

Aside from SCCmec(introduction in detail as below), a large number of toxin genes have been found in SaPIs, including SE-like toxins and TSST. Several types of SaPIs have been identified. SaPI1 was found to be inserted in an attCsite close to the tyrBgene and flanked by the region of tstgene, with a length of 15,233 bp [139]. The characteristic features of SaPI1 include mobility and instability, whereas SaPI2 was identified as a second locus. Transduction between SaPI1 and SaPI2 by via helper phage was demonstrated, and stable integration of these 2 SaPIs without phages had also been verified [139, 155, 156]. Inserted at the 3 end of the GMP synthase gene, SaPIbov was identified in a bovine isolate of S. aureusby PAI related to SaPI1, with a length of 15,891 bp and carriage of sec, sel-l, and tst. SaPI3 was identified to contain sel-kand sel-q[157]. SaPIs with similar structure between SaPI3 and SaPI1 had also been reported. νSa families

Up to date, 7 conservative PAI types had been discovered in S. aureus, namely, νSa1 (including SaPI1 and SaPI3), νSa2 (SaPIbov), νSa3, νSa4 (including SaPI2), νSaα, νSaβ, and νSaγ [139, 155157]. νSa1 to νSa4 were found to contain integrase genes as putative elements of genetic mobility. Derivation of intand attsites from phage genome was pointed out, as both were found in SaPIs. On the contrary, νSaα and νSaβ harbor transposase genes, which may be derived form transposons. Comprising SaPI1 and SaPI3, the νSa1 locus of CA-MRSA also carries a large number of genes encoding enterotoxins and TSST. Similarly, the loci of both νSa2 from CA-MRSA and SaPIbov were found to contain enterotoxins and TSST. Capable of high-frequency deletion and formation of an episomal circular DNA, νSa3 was identified in CA-MRSA MW2 and Mu50, and one type of νSa3 harbors novel allelic forms of secand sel-l. With a lower frequency of excision than that of νSa3, the νSa4 family contains several allelic forms of a genomic island, and type I νSa4 carries secand sel-l[157]. Despite the presence of both νSaα and νSaβ in all sequenced S. aureusgenomes, the size and number of ORFs in νSaα, as well as the size and gene composition of νSaβ, were found to be highly variable, with neither SaPIs spontaneously excised from the chromosome [145]. The composition of νSaα includes 11 allelic forms of setgenes (encoding exotoxins), lukDEgenes (encoding leukotoxins), and lipoprotein gene clusters. However, all varieties of νSaβ contain a gene cluster for serine proteins and superantigen genes absent in CA-MRSA but present in HA-MRSA strains. Adjacent to short DRs, the locus etdPAI contains exfoliative toxins etdand edin-B(encoding exfoliative toxins), IS element, and restriction/modification system [158]. Development and evolution of pathogenicity

The mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotic cells include transduction, conjugation, and transformation, among which phage transduction has been the primary transmission drivers of genes among different species and thus plays an important role in the formation of PAI [159]. The formation of PAIs may include 5 stages [160] as follows: (i) acquisition of virulence gene via horizontal gene transfer regulated by an operon and derived from “gene pool” of varied environment; (ii) integration of foreign genes (commonly derived from various complex genes of different donors) into the bacterial chromosome or plasmid via site-specific recombination or other mechanisms, following similar rules to complete integration and shaping obvious structure of genetic island; (iii) evolvement of MGEs into PAI via restructure, gene elimination, and acquisition of other genetic materials, during which the gene components associated with mobility may be inactivation or lost, such as origin of plasmid replication, self-transmissible plasmid tra and phage int; (iv) induced expression of foreign genes under temperate environment; and (v) acquisition or elimination of genetic information constantly via a serious of recombination, insertion or elimination, by which PAI may retrieve MGE and obtain the ability of excision and transfer the whole PAI from chromosome to another recipient bacterium.

Evolution of the bacterial genome may significantly influence its pathogenicity, mainly including point mutations, recombination, and horizontal gene transfer. Despite slow evolution due to relatively low frequency of point mutation, the horizontal gene transfer of large genetic segments (such as PAIs and SaPIs) undoubtedly speeds up the exchange of bacterial genes (as “quantum leap” in short time), leading to the consequent appearance and spread of various novel mutations or variants [161, 162].


3. Novel perspectives of Staphylococcusassociated with food safety

3.1. Antimicrobial resistance mediated by MGEs

Antibiotics, as compounds or substances that kill or inhibit the growth of microorganisms, have been regarded as one of the greatest contributions to medicine and humanity and used to treat a wide range of infectious diseases caused by bacteria for both animals and human beings [5, 165]. Abuse of existing antibiotics contributes to the spread of antibiotic resistance and poses a predicament for the treatment of several bacterial infections, including therapy for individuals with food poisoning. In China, as one of the currently worst areas for antibiotics abuse, the annual prescription of antibiotics, including both clinical and veterinary treatment, is approaching 140 grams per person and has been roughly estimated to be 10 times higher per capita than that in United Kingdom [6, 7, 163, 164]. From a retrospective study conducted on 1,739 Staphylococcusisolates from a hospital in Guangzhou, China, from 2001 to 2010, antimicrobial resistance of tested drugs (exclusively for teicoplanin and vancomycin) was commonly observed among the isolates examined, with high resistance rates for β-lactamases (94.0% and 73.7% for penicillin and oxacillin, respectively) and resistance percentages for cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline ranging from 83.9% to 19.4% [165]. As a consequence, antibiotic resistance in microorganisms still remains one of the core concerns in global public health, with methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) strains representing one important group, commonly considered as “super bugs” [7]. Since their first discovery in 1961, MRS (including MRSA and MRCNS) have become among the most prevalent pathogens causing nosocomial infections throughout the world [13, 16, 17, 19, 166]. With the first report of an MRSA-mediated gastrointestinal illness outbreak [174], MRS strains have been considered a major contributor to both health-care-associated and foodborne illnesses. MRS had been identified from contamination of various food samples, such as milk, pork, chicken, veal, beef, turkey, and lamb meat [168170] as well as in food production animals, such as cattle, chickens, pigs, and cows and are closely connected with the newly discovered MRSA designated as livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) [171173]. Carriage of MRS strains in a wide variety of food and food production livestock may not be limited to only food hazard but also poses a significant occupational risk for the industrial staff, such as handlers, asymptomatic carriers, and uncolonized individuals. MRS strains show resistance to nearly all β-lactam antibiotics and commonly multiple other drugs due to the mecAand other resistance genes carried by an MGE designated as staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec(SCCmec). Additionally, the role of integrons as a mobile genetic mechanism in horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance has also been well established [174177].

3.1.1. SCCmec

As one of the major foodborne infectious pathogens, S. aureus(in particular, MRSA) has been considered to be a potential “super bug,” posing a challenge to hospital infection control and a threat to global food safety. Due to the carriage of the mecAgene encoding a novel specific penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a), which exhibits a decreased binding affinity to antibiotics, MRSA presents resistance to virtually all β-lactam antibiotics [178]. Evolution from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus(MSSA) to MRSA occurred with the acquisition of a genomic island, the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec). Harboring mecA and a large number of functional and regulatory genes, SCCmecis an MGE present in Staphylococcusspecies. With accurate excision and integration mediated by site-specific recombinase genes ccrAand ccrB, SCCmecis capable of integration into the bacterial chromosome, leading to the rapid spread of antimicrobial resistance (to β-lactam or other antibiotics) among staphylococcal strains.

MRSA was found shortly after the common use of methicillin, which was first licensed to treat penicillin-resistant S. aureusinfections in Britain in 1959 [179], resulting in outbreaks of MRSA occurring worldwide. In the 1980s, an extraordinary large chromosomal DNA segment greater than 30 kb carrying mecwas found to contain no allelic equivalence in MSSA strains by direct chromosome analysis of MRSA strains; this region was designated as mecDNA [180183]. In 1987, the sequence of mecAgene cloned from a Japanese MRSA strain was determined [184, 185]. In consideration of the threat caused by this pathogen, the characteristics of MRSA were studied and SCCmecwas found to be an MGE in MRSA. Additionally, the types of SCCmecwere found to be genetically diverse. In 1999, the cloning and determination of the structure of the entire mecDNA sequence from a Japanese S. aureusstrain N315 (first isolated in 1982) was reported [186]. Based on the structure, it was reported that mecDNA was a novel genomic element designated as staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec(SCCmec) driven by two site-specific recombinase genes referred to as cassette chromosome recombinases A (ccrA) and cassette chromosome recombinases B (ccrB) [178]. This was the first time that SCCmecwas defined, and ccrAand ccrBwere proposed as a novel set of recombinases, defining a new family of staphylococcal genomic elements. After the discovery of SCCmec, various types of SCCmecwere continuously found by scientists around the world. In 2001, the identification of two additional types of SCCmecwas isolated in other countries of the world and designated as type II SCCmec(found in N315) [187]. The two additional types of SCCmecwere type I found in NCTC10442, which is the first MRSA isolate in England in 1961, and type III found in 85/2082 isolated in New Zealand in 1985. In 2002, a novel type of SCCmecdesignated as type IV was identified from CA-MRSA strains [188]. According to the foundation of type IV SCCmec, a new type of SCCmecdesignated as VI, which was originally mistaken as type IV SCCmec, was explored [189, 190]. In 2004, type V SCCmecwas found in the chromosome of a CA-MRSA strain (WIS [WBG8318]) isolated in Australia [191]. Since 2008, novel types of SCCmecwere found globally. Types VII and VIII SCCmecwere identified in MRSA strains JCSC6082 (a Swedish isolate) [192] and C10682 (a Canadian isolate) [193], respectively. Novel types of SCCmecdesignated as types IX and X were identified in MRSA strains JCSC6943 and JCSC6945, respectively [194]. The latest type of SCCmecto be classified was designated as type XI; it was discovered in the MRSA strain LGA251 genome with a divergent mecA homologue (mecALGA251) [195]. Structure and types

As a major member of the SCC family and a carrier for gene exchange in staphylococci strains, SCCmecis located near the replication origin of the Staphylococcuschromosome and inserted at attBsite located at the 3 end of a novel ORF with unclear function (orfX). Typical SCCmeccomprise 3 basic genetic elements: (i) Ccrcomplex, composed of two site-specific recombinase genes (ccrAand ccrB), and surrounding ORFs. Via site-specific recombination mediated by ccrAand ccrB, multiple antibiotic resistance and heavy metal resistance genes are capable of insertion into SCCmec. SCCmecis further integrated to the staphylococcal chromosome by accurate excision and integration, leading to adaption of the bacterial host to different environments and pressure of antibiotic selection. According to the different types of ccrAand ccrB, Ccrcomplex was classified into 8 allotypes: type 1 for ccrA1and ccrB1, type 2 for ccrA2and ccrB2, type 3 for ccrA3and ccrB3, type 4 for ccrA4and ccrB4, type 5 for ccrC1, type 6 for ccrA5and ccrB3, type 7 for ccrA1and ccrB6, and type 8 for ccrA1and ccrB3. (ii) Meccomplex harboring mecAand related regulatory genes. Based on the regulatory genes located upstream and downstream of mecAand the difference of insertion sequences, meccomplex was classified to five classes: class A carried the integrated mecI-mecR1-mecA-IS431structure, class B carried devoid the IS1272-∆mecR1-mecA-IS431structure that contains integration insertion sequence, class C carried the IS431-mecA-∆mecR1-IS431structure that contains two copies of insertion sequence IS431, class D carried the IS431-mecA-∆mecRstructure, and class E carried the blaZ-mecALGA251-mecR1LGA251-mecILGA251structure. Class C Meccomplex was divided into two different class designations: class C1 (two IS431s were arranged in the same direction) and class C2 (two IS431s were arranged in the opposite direction) by the inserted direction of IS431. (iii) A junkyard region (J region) is located between Ccrcomplex and Meccomplex. According to its location in SCCmec, J region was classified into J1 (also known as L-C region), J2 (also known as C-M region), and J3 (also known as M-R region) region, located at the upstream of ccrgene complex and downstream of Ccrcomplex and the upstream of Meccomplex and downstream of Meccomplex, respectively.

Up to date, SCCmecelements are classified into types I to XI based on the nature of Ccrand Meccomplex and are further classified into different subtypes in accordance with diverse J region. Types and subtypes of SCCmecare described in detail as follows: (i) Type I SCCmecwas first discovered and had a long history dating back to the 2000s. The characteristic MRSA strain carrying type I SCCmecwas identified, designated as NCTC10442, which was recovered in the United Kingdom in 1961, representing the first MRSA strain [187]. Type I SCCmec, carrying class B Meccomplex and type 1 Ccrcomplex, carried a plsregulator in J1 region. A subtype within type I SCCmecwas designated as IA, containing a plasmid pUB110 located in J3 region [202]. According to the nomenclature proposed in 2006 [271], type I SCCmecwas designated as 1B.1.1 and its subtype IA was designated as 1B.1.2. (ii) The characteristic MRSA strain carrying type II SCCmechad been identified and designated as N315, which was first isolated in 1982 and discovered in 1999 [178, 186, 196, 197]. Type II SCCmecharbored class A Meccomplex and type 2 Ccrcomplex. In J3 region, an integrated copy of staphylococcal plasmid pUB110 was found and a kdpregulator was found in J1 region. A number of subtypes were designated as IIA, IIB, IIC, IID, IIE, and IIb and a variant in type II SCCmecin consideration with the difference of J1 and J3 regions. According to the nomenclature reported in 2006 [196], type II SCCmecwas named 2A.1.1 and type IIb was designated as 2A.2. IIA, IIB, IIC, IID, and IIE were designated as 2A.3.1, 2A.3.2, 2A.3.3, 2A.3.4, and 2A.3.5, respectively. The variant of type II was designated as 2A.1.2. (iii) A Zelanian isolate designated as 85/2082 first isolated in 1985 was found carrying type III SCCmec, which was first discovered in 2001 together with type I SCCmec[196] and was known as the representative MRSA strain of type III SCCmecuntil now. Type III SCCmeccarries class A Meccomplex, type 3 Ccrcomplex, and an integrated copy of plasmid pT181 encoding tetracycline and mercury resistance in J3 region. Regarding the difference within the J3 region, there were several subtypes in type III SCCmecdesignated as IIIA and IIIB and two variants designated as IIIC and IIID. According to the 2006 nomenclature [196], type III SCCmecwas designated as 3A.1.1, IIIA was designated as 3A.1.2, and IIIB was designated as 3A.1.3. (iv) The two commonly characteristic MRSA strains carrying type IV SCCmec, which was first discovered in 2002, were designated as CA05 (JCSC1986) and 8/6-3p (JCSC1978) [188]. Type IV SCCmecwas found to have a unique combination of class B Meccomplex and type 2 Ccrcomplex, and transposon Tn4001 was found in J3 region of type IV SCCmec. Diversity in subtypes of type IV SCCmecwas obtained, including IVa, IVb, IVc, IVd, IVE, IVF, IVA, IVg, IVh, IVi, IVj, and IV1. Based on the 2006 nomenclature [196], IVa, IVb, IVc, and IVd were designated as 2B.1.1, 2B.2.1, 2B.3.1, and 2B.4, respectively. IVE was named 2B.3.3, IVF was designated as 2B.2.2, and IVA was designated as 2B.N.2. IVg, IVh, IVi, IVj, and IVk were designated as 2B.5.1, 2B.6.1, 2B.7.1, and 2B.8.1, and IV1 was designated as (v) The CA-MRSA strain WIS (JCSC3624) isolated in Australia was the characteristic MRSA strain carrying type V SCCmec[191], which carried class C2 Meccomplex and type 5 Ccrcomplex. No subtype had been found so far within the group of type V SCCmec. According to the nomenclature proposed in 2006 [196], type V SCCmecwas designated as 5C.1. (vi) In 2001, type VI SCCmecwas first identified from a pediatric MRSA clone named HDE288, which was first reported in 1992 [189, 190]. Type VI SCCmeccarries a class B Meccomplex and type 4 Ccrcomplex. Until now, no subtype of type VI SCCmechas been found, which was designated as 4B according to the 2006 nomenclature [196]. (vii) CA-MRSA strain designated as JCSC6082 (p5747/2002) was isolated in 2002 [198] and identified to carry a type VII SCCmecin 2008 [192]. Type VII SCCmeccarries a class C1 Meccomplex that was different from class C2 Meccomplex carried by type V SCCmecand type 5 Ccrcomplex. There was no subtype of type VII SCCmecreported. According to the nomenclature put forward in 2006 [196], type VII SCCmecwas designated as 5C1. (viii) Type VIII SCCmecwas first identified from a Canadian MRSA strain designated as C10682 isolated in 2003 [193]. It harbored a novel combination of class A Meccomplex and type 4 Ccrcomplex. No subtype of type VIII SCCmechas been found currently. According to the nomenclature proposed in 2006 [196], type VIII SCCmecwas designated as 4A. (ix) Type IX SCCmecwas first reported to be identified in a MRSA strain designated as JCSC6943 isolated from a Thailand participant [194]. It was found carrying class C2 Meccomplex and type 1 Ccrcomplex. No subtype of type IX SCCmecwas found so far. According to the nomenclature put forward in 2006 [196], type IX SCCmecwas designated as 1C2. (x) Together with type IX SCCmec, type X SCCmeccarried class C1 Meccomplex and novel type 7 Ccrcomplex was identified in a Canadian MRSA strain designated as JCSC6945 [194]. So far, no subtype of type X SCCmechas been found. According to the 2006 nomenclature [196], type X SCCmecwas designated as 7C1. (xi) Type XI SCCmecisolated from MRSA strain LGA254 in southwest England of 2007 was a novel type different from other SCCmecwith carriage of distinct class E Meccomplex and type 8 Ccrcomplex. No subtype was found in type XI SCCmec, and according to the 2006 nomenclature, it was designated as 8E [195, 196, 199].

A thorough understanding of the molecular epidemiology and evolution of MRSA may aid in the further identification, control, prevention, and therapy of Staphylococcus-mediated human diseases, necessitating SCCmectyping as an essential tool for discrimination of different types and subtypes. Currently, there are several SCCmectyping methods available for the global evolutionary study of MRSA, with multiplex PCR as the major and widely used methodology. Multiplex PCR was first developed in 1988 and put in use to distinguish different types and subtypes of SCCmecin 2002 [198, 200]. In various multiplex PCR strategies, specificity of primer design has been the major concern determining the application of SCCmectyping. The multiplex PCR assay described in 2006 [201] was applicable for unique and specific typing of types and subtypes I, II, III, IVa, IVb, IVc, IVd, and V, respectively. After years of validation, this multiplex PCR strategy had been demonstrated to be a rapid, simple, and feasible method for SCCmectyping and serves as a useful tool for further prevention and control of Staphylococcus-mediated infections by clinicians and epidemiologists. However, with emergence of novel SCCmec(11 types and various subtypes to date), inclusive and novel SCCmectyping methodologies are desperately required. Prevalence and occurrence

As different types and subtypes of SCCmechave been verified to influence the multidrug resistance and the antimicrobial MIC of β-lactam, a thorough understanding of the prevalence of SCCmecmay aid in the further identification, control, prevention, and therapy of Staphylococcus-mediated human diseases. Consequently, surveillance of SCCmechas been performed globally in past decades. As the first identified type, type I SCCmecwas nonpredominant in the 1970s, which was reported in a limited number of areas, including Brazil, Iran, Japan, Philippines, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States [202210]. Type II SCCmechad been commonly found in Japan, Korea (occasionally in China), and the United States [206, 207, 211215] and occasionally detected in Algeria, Brazil, China, Iran, Turkey, and Thailand [205, 216221]. Type III SCCmechas been most frequently found among HA-MRSA and remains the predominant type in many countries or areas including Asia (China, Hong Kong, Iran, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand), Europe (Poland, Portugal, and Turkey), and South America (Brazil) [205, 208214, 217, 220, 222231]. Types IV and V have been implicated as CA-MRSA-associated SCCmec. A large number of variants (subtypes) have been reported within type IV, which is also the predominant type in Algeria, Brazil, Denmark, Korea, New Zealand, Portugal, Philippines, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, and the United States [202204, 209, 219, 221, 231238]. Other types of SCCmecare rarely detected and reported [166]. According to our preliminary studies, from 2001 to 2006 in Guangzhou, analysis of the distribution of SCCmectype in 262 Staphylococcusstrains demonstrated that the classic nosocomial SCCmectype (I–III) dominated among the tested strains, and none of the tested strain carried type IV or V. For MRSA strains, 3 and 198 strains belonged to SCCmectypes II and III, respectively, with 8 strains untypeable. For MRCNS strains, 9, 24, and 12 strains were classified as SCCmectypes I, II, and III respectively, with 8 strains untypeable. From a retrospective study conducted on 1,739 Staphylococcusisolates from a local hospital in Guangzhou from 2001 to 2010, SCCmectyping was performed on 263 randomly selected MRSA strains. Type III SCCmecwas most frequently observed with an identification rate of 94.7% [249/263], with type II detected in 4 isolates (one individual isolate in 2001, 2002, 2005, and 2008, respectively) and 10 untypeable MRSA strains were recorded [165]. However, diversity in SCCmectypes had been obtained from SCCmecsurveillance of MRSA from another medical setting in Guangzhou from 2009 to 2012, as types I, II, III, IIIA, IV, V, and VI SCCmeccarriage were found to be 17.6%, 56.8%, 6.2%, 10.7%, 4.1%, and 2.1%, respectively.

3.1.2. Other resistance determinants in Staphylococcus

Aside from SCCmec, the role of integrons as a mobile genetic mechanism in the horizontal transfer of antimicrobial genes or determinants among microorganisms has been recently well characterized, established, and documented, which may contribute to the broad distribution and spread of antibiotic resistance and ultimate emergence and unleashing of “super bugs” [174177]. A complete and functional integron platform comprises three elements: (i) the integrase gene (intI) encoding an integrase, (ii) a proximal primary recombination site attI, and (iii) a promoter gene (Pc) functionally demonstrated for all integrons [240]. Several classes of integrons have been identified and distinguished by differences and divergence in the intIsequences, and integron classes 1 to 3 are so-called multiresistant integron (RIs) with a capability of acquiring identical gene cassettes [173]. Class 4 integron is considered to be a distinct type of integron and termed super integron (SI), which was found on the small chromosome of Vibrio choleraeand known to be an integral component of various γ-proteobacterial genomes [17, 241, 242]. As a direct result of the linkage to Tn402-like transposons and associated with Tn3 transposon family (Tn21 or Tn1696), the class 1 integron platform has been the most ubiquitous among microbes and remains the focus of numerous studies, with a large variety of clinical Gram-negative organisms and a few Gram-positive bacteria reported to harbor this integron class [243245]. The first observation of class 1 integron within Staphylococcusspp. was reported in 2004, with species including Staphylococcus lentus, Staphylococcus nepalensis, and Staphylococcus xylosus[246]. In Guangzhou, class 1 integrons were commonly found in MRSA strains (31.6%, 83/263) during 2001 to 2010, with decreasing identification rates observed [6, 7, 165, 166, 247]. From 2001 to 2004 in Guangzhou, the detection rate of class 1 integron for MRSA and MRCNS was 51.7% [46/89] and 56.6% [30/53], respectively [6, 13, 165, 247, 248]. From 2007 to 2010, class 1 integron was found in MRS isolates based on a series of studies of systematic integron investigation in hundreds of staphylococci strains from 2001 to 2006 [165, 247, 248]. Nevertheless, only 38.3% [46/120] of MRSA isolates carried class 1 integron. Undoubtedly, the commonly detected integron-based antimicrobial resistance mechanisms have contributed to the evolution of the resistance of MRSA and may further lead to dissemination of new waves of “super bugs.” Class 2 integron has an organization similar to that of class 1 but is associated with the Tn7 transposon family [174, 249]. Class 3 integron contains a comparable structure to that of class 2 integron and up to date has only been found in a limited number of microorganisms, including Pseudomonas, Alcaligenes, Serratia marcescens, and Klebsiella pneumoniae[249252]. Class 4 integron harbors hundreds of gene cassettes encoding adaptations that extend beyond antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity [253]. The remaining classes of integrons may also contain antibiotic resistance gene cassettes, but knowledge of their worldwide prevalence remains limited [240, 254]. As a genetic element existing in 9% of bacteria and representatives from a broad range of phyla and environments, integrons play a core role in antibiotic resistance among clinical organisms and contribute to the evolution and adaption of bacteria.

3.1.3. Mobility and evolution of MGEs in staphylococci

As a commonly found MGE with an antibiotic resistance gene (mecA) and site-specific recombinase genes (ccrAand ccrB), SCCmechas been classified into 11 types, various subtypes, and variants and plays a core role in antibiotic resistance, molecular epidemiology, and evolution of staphylococci. Through recognition of recombination sites (attB, attSCC, attI1, attC, secondary sites, etc.) and via this site-specific recombination event, MGEs are capable of capturing foreign genes. The mobility of MGEs is defined as being associated with mobile DNA elements (transposons or plasmids) and antibiotic resistance genes in addition to having a small array size and substantial heterogeneity in recombination sites [187, 229] From Southern hybridization analysis in preliminary studies, 58 staphylococci isolates were found to harbor one copy of class 1 integron on the chromosomal instead of plasmid DNA compared with their frequent location on plasmids for facilitation of conjugative-mediated transfer [13]. As natural capture systems and assembly platforms, MGEs in Staphylococcus(SCCmecor integrons system) allow bacteria to incorporate foreign genes and convert them to functional proteins by ensuring the correct expression. Despite affinity for self-transposition, integron systems are commonly associated with the transposons and conjugative plasmids serving as vehicles for the intra- and interspecies transmission of genetic material as well as gene cassettes capable of mobilizing to other integrons or to secondary sites in the bacterial genome [255]. This event has been regarded as a key mechanism in the dissemination and spread of resistance genes responsible for the swift spread of resistance genes and the rapid evolution of resistance to a wide range of unrelated antibiotics among diverse bacteria [251, 256]. Any ORF existing in the environmental “gene pool” is conceivably capable of being structured into the bacterial genome through the recombination platforms, and MGEs consequently have the potentially limitless capacity to exchange and stockpile functional genes, which enables rapid adaptation to selective pressure and may ultimately endow additional fitness and advantage to the bacterial host. In addition, a vast number of MGEs (such as conjugative plasmids, transposons, insertion sequences, and even entire chromosome) and the captured genes comprise the vast reservoirs of integrons and lead to the longstanding concept of a single massive “gene pool” that is available and temporally shared among bacteria [73]. The common observation of MGEs in microorganisms from the general environment and its enormous sequence diversity detected from such microbes, as well as various products unrelated to antibiotic resistance, strongly suggests that MGEs are ancient genomic structural elements and have played a general role in evolution and adaptation for a considerable period of time [43].

As a genomic island (G island) and MGE demarcated by a pair of DRs and inverted repeats, SCCmechas a set of site-specific recombinase genes (ccrAand ccrB) required for its movement and is inserted at the 3 end of orfXand located adjacent to the replication origin [220]. In the chromosome of staphylococci, SCCmecmay have evolved from a primordial mobile element SCC, into which the meccomplex was inserted. However, the function of the putative SCCmecmay not be limited as the conveyer of antimicrobial resistance (mediated by meccomplex) alone, and this MGE may serve as a vehicle for the exchange of useful genes for the better survival for staphylococci in various environments. In addition, SCCmecis a general genetic information exchange system of staphylococci with ccrAand ccrBinvolved in the recombination events (integration and excision), which plays a significant role in the evolution of Staphylococcus. MGEs serve as the reservoir for various genes and possess the function of interspecies genetic exchange. It is interesting to speculate whether multiple MGEs carried by staphylococci would speed up the rate of gene exchange or genome evolution, although these hypotheses require further investigation. From previous surveys, the influence of carriage of multiple MGEs on antimicrobial resistance had been investigated in MRSA. The presence of multiple MGEs was found to be strongly correlated with antimicrobial resistance, including erythromycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which further limits the therapeutic options for deep-seated Staphylococcusinfection and diseases. For treatment of complicated Staphylococcusinfections, gentamicin is commonly prescribed by many clinicians in combination with vancomycin due to enhanced efficacy based on synergistic antibacterial activity [257]. For penicillin-allergic patients, erythromycin has been frequently used. As the first choice for suspected CA-MRSA cutaneous infections, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has also been commonly used in combination with rifampin for MRSA in carriers despite the high recurrence (up to 50%) and frequent emergent resistance of this organism.

Up to date, the most known functional genes carried by MGES are found to encode resistance to the oldest groups of antibiotics (such as tetracycline, streptomycin, and spectinomycin) that have been discontinued in clinical settings for decades but still available in veterinary practice. Although the indiscriminate use of these older antibiotics is no longer occurring in the clinical setting, their use in veterinary medicine may contribute to a novel and significant concern in food safety. Abuse of antibiotics leads to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and poses a predicament for the future treatment of bacterial infection, with MGEs undoubtedly facilitating the rapid spread and dissemination of a vast number of resistance genes among microorganisms.

3.1.4. Livestock-Associated MRSA (LA-MRSA)

As a common pathogen for both clinical medicine and food safety, MRSA was first reported as hospital associated before the 1990s and thus designated as HA-MRSA. Since the 1990s, CA-MRSA strains have increasingly been reported among groups of patients with no apparent connection to hospitals. It is noteworthy that a large number of such CA-MRSA-infected patients or carriers were pediatric associated. Aside from HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA, LA-MRSA has been recently documented and is known to be more persistent in food products from swine and cattle [258], which is also responsible for pneumonia, endocarditis, and necrotizing fasciitis by LA-MRSA carriers [259]. Nowadays, LA-MRSA acts as an increasing risk for public health and a challenge to livestock farming and related food products. LA-MRSA was mostly found among animals (particularly pigs) and humans with frequent contact to livestock farming or livestock food products [260262]. After the first isolation of MRSA from livestock (cows with mastitis) [263], a extremely limited number of reports were focused on LA-MRSA. However, after an initial LA-MRSA case occurred in humans, described in 2005 [262], LA-MRSA have been the focus of numerous recent studies. In 2007, a transmission of MRSA (ST1, spa-type t127) between cows and humans was reported, verifying the transmission between animals and humans [264]. Afterwards, different types of LA-MRSA have been continuously discovered globally, and the prevalence and occurrence of LA-MRSA vary significantly in different areas. In Europe and America, the majority of LA-MRSA strains belong to sequence type (ST) 398, whereas ST9 is frequently discovered in Asia [265268]. Both livestock and humans are potential carriers of LA-MRSA, and individuals working in animal clinics and livestock production environments with direct contact or exposed to MRSA-positive animals or ingestion of the MRSA-positive livestock food products have an increased risk of becoming MRSA carriers [269, 270]. A high risk of animal to human transmission of ST398 was found to result from direct association between animal and/or human MRSA carriages in the farm setting [261, 269, 271273] despite much lower occurrence of transmission between humans by LA-MRSA and that of HA-MRSA [274276].

As a clone of typical LA-MRSA, ST398-LA-MRSA has been responsible for serious infections and outbreaks worldwide [277, 278]. Containing various spa-types, ST398-LA-MRSA strains are mostly found to carry type IV or V SCCmec, which are nontypeable by standard PFGE using SmaIdigestion due to protection from digestion by the presence of a restriction/methylation system [271, 279, 280]. According to the virulent properties of ST398 strains, most animal-associated ST398-LA-MRSA strains lack the major virulence factors in staphylococci, such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), TSS toxin 1, and exfoliative toxins [281]. However, various resistance genes commonly present in staphylococci of human and animal origins are also recovered in ST398-LA-MRSA strains, including the β-lactamase gene cluster blaZ-blaI-blaR, the tetracycline resistance genes tetMand tetK, the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance genes ermA, ermB, and ermC, the lincosamide resistance gene lnuA, and arrays aacA-aphDor aadDfor resistance to gentamicin-tobramycin-kanamycin or kanamycin-neomycin, respectively [281285]. In addition, novel resistance genes were also discovered in ST398-LA-MRSA strains, such as dfrK(trimethoprim resistance), ABC transporter genes vgaCand vgaE(pleuromutilin-lincosamide-eptogramin A resistance), and apmA(apramycin resistance) [286].

Emergence, spread, and dissemination of ST398-LA-MRSA from animals, as well as its transmission between humans and animals, strongly suggest that the antimicrobial resistance caused by veterinary antibiotic abuse poses a hazard to both humans and animals regarding food safety challenges associated with animal origins.

3.2. Viable Putative but Nonculturable (VPNC)

In nature, bacteria exist in various states such as normal growth state, dead state, dormant state, and VPNC state, which was first reported in 1986 [287]. Differing significantly from the “starvation survival” state, VPNC state [previously known as viable but nonculturable (VBNC)] is a specific state under which bacteria remain alive but fail to form a colony on routine bacteriological media that normally support their growth. Consequently, routine bacteriological detection methodology fails to detect the VPNC bacteria. However, given the right conditions, bacteria in the VPNC state remain active and can “resuscitate” to the normal state. Hence, the VPNC food spoilage or pathogenic bacteria are considered to be a stealth source of contamination, posing a significant concern for traditional surveillance and control methodologies of foodborne pathogens.

3.2.1. Induction and resuscitation

Entering into the VPNC state is considered to be a survival mechanism for nonsporulation bacteria under a number of harsh environmental conditions, which is described in detail as follows: [1] Nutrient starvation [288]. Without essential nutrients, bacterial growth and metabolism may be terminated and thus enter the death-like status. Nutrient starvation, such as the absence of carbon source or nitrogen source, which is an extreme condition for the growth of bacteria, can induce the VPNC state. [2] Extreme temperature [289]. The appropriate temperature for typical bacterial growth ranges from 20°C to 37°C, and termination of growth usually occurs under extremely high or low temperature. The temperature of 4°C or -20°C, at which bacteria stop growth and metabolism, is frequently used for induction of VPNC state. The combination of nutrient starvation and low temperature has also been widely applied as an induction condition. [3] pH value [290]. Most microorganisms grow in neutral and slightly acidic or alkaline pH conditions. Strong acidity or alkalinity may lead to bacterial death-like states, which has been occasionally used to induce the VPNC state. [4] Salinity [291]. As an extreme condition for bacterial growth, high salinity has been found to enable the entering of VPNC state. [5] Osmotic stress [291]. Extremely high osmotic stress was reported to be applied for VPNC state induction. [6] Oxygen availability [292, 293]. In an aerobic environment, anaerobic bacteria would enter into the VPNC state and the absence of oxygen would induce the VPNC state of aerobic bacteria and vice versa. [7] Existence of heavy metals [294, 295]. [8] Common food preservatives (cryopreservation, vacuum preservation, etc.). Currently, numerous bacteria are reported to have the ability to enter into VPNC state, such as Salmonellaspp. [287, 296, 297], Enterococcusspp. [298300], Vibriospp. [301309], Campylobacterspp. [310], Pseudomonasspp. [307, 311313], Shigellaspp. [314, 315], Lactobacillusspp. [316, 318], Escherichia coli[313, 316], and Staphylococcusspp. [318324]. Furthermore, it has been well established and documented that bacteria in VPNC state can resuscitate and regain culturability when provided with appropriate conditions [308, 325, 326]. A variety of processes, including elevation of temperature gradually or directly [308], heat shock treating [325], adding nutrients [326], and adding organic matter (Tween-20, Tween-80, catalase, sodium pyruvate, etc.) were found to be applicable for resuscitation from the VPNC to normal state. The resuscitated bacteria are comparatively similar to their exponential-phase bacterial counterparts.

Currently, only 2 species of Staphylococcus, S. aureus, and S. epidermidis, were capable of entry into VPNC state [318324]. In 2009, formation of VPNC S. aureusby radiation was reported for the first time, representing the first evidence of Staphylococcuscells entering the VPNC state [318]. One year later, induction of VPNC state by starvation of the Staphylococcuscells at low temperature (4°C) was also obtained [319]. Resuscitation of S. aureusstrain under VPNC state was induced by temperature upshift (from 4°C to 22°C) or rich medium supplemented with sodium pyruvate [319, 320]. The prevention of resuscitation was observed by deficiencies in catalase or superoxide dismutase, indicating the relation of VPNC formation of S. aureusto oxidative stress [319, 320], constituting the initial studies on the mechanism of the formation and resuscitation of S. aureusin VPNC state. In addition, S. aureuscells in biofilm were found to enter into a VPNC state under antibiotic pressure (vancomycin or quinupristin/dalfopristin) [320, 321], suggesting that central venous catheter (CVC) or medical implant-associated biofilms may be potential reservoirs for S. aureusand S. epidermidisin the VPNC state [323]. Thus, both biofilm formation and VPNC induction may augment clinical challenges associated with antibacterial treatment options. S. epidermidisbiofilms were reported to enter into the VPNC state when grown in excess glucose presumably due to accumulation of acidic compounds as the degradation products of glucose metabolism. This process was counteracted by high extracellular levels of calcium and magnesium added to the culture medium allowing modulation of the proportions of VPNC bacteria within S. epidermidisbiofilms [324]. Although the induction and resuscitation of Staphylococcuscells in VPNC state has been verified, relatively little is known with respect to inducing and resuscitating condition, necessitating further investigation into this fascinating bacterial survival strategy.

3.2.2. Characteristics and mechanisms

Remaining metabolically or physiologically active, bacteria in VPNC state maintain cell integrity but exhibit dwarfing, which contribute to protect against a wide variety of stressors. The maintenance of metabolic activity and continuous gene expression under VPNC state [327, 328] indicates that potentially ingested bacteria may still be capable of causing foodborne illnesses. Such microorganisms also possess the capacity to regain culturability in vivo[329], exhibiting high ATP level, membrane potential [298], and retained plasmids, presenting higher autolytic capability than exponentially growing cells. The outer membrane protein profile also alters with entry into VPNC state [330]. Due to the diversity of VPNC bacteria, various characteristics among different species of microorganisms are being discovered worldwide. Regarding the mechanism of the VPNC state, the up- or down-regulation of genes and proteins associated with VPNC status compared to the exponential phase and the resuscitated status is considered to be potential factors for entering and exiting of VPNC state. However, it is currently unclear as to which genes are essential for these processes.

As for the pathogenicity of Staphylococcuscells under VPNC state, the viable cell numbers and gene expression had been found to remain constant in VPNC state by examination of epifluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) [320, 321]. This finding implied that S. aureuscells are likely still pathogenic in VPNC state and thus pose a significant concern on its threat to food safety.

3.2.3. Detection and identification

VPNC pathogenic bacteria are considered to be a threat to public health and food safety due to incapability of detection by the “gold standard” methodology for identification of food-associated microorganisms. Hence, the development, evaluation, validation, and further application of rapid and accurate detection methodology for VPNC bacteria are considered to be the leading concerns for the surveillance of bacterial cells in VPNC state as well as further understanding of the mechanisms on their survival and persistence in the extreme environment. The conventional detection method for VPNC bacteria was the combination of acridine orange direct count (AODC) (for total bacterial cell number counting), bright-field microscopy with nalidixic acid (for metabolically active cell number counting), and plate counting (for determination of culturability). The occurrence of entry of bacterial cells into VPNC state was validated and confirmed when colony counts were totally depleted on culture plates (with no observed colonies), which was designated as nonculturable, whereas the total bacterial and metabolically active cells still remained countable. Despite the limited application of nalidixic acid on Gram-negative microorganisms, the novel LIVE/DEAD Bacterial Viability Kit with requirement on differential fluorescence was employed for the detection of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [331]. In consideration of the carcinogenesis and expense of fluorescence substances, the development of molecular assays, such as random amplified polymorphism DNA and RT-PCR [328], was recently applied to identify bacterial cells in the VPNC state. As Staphylococcusspecies were concerned, an immunosensing system using impedance spectroscopy measurements was recently developed and applied for rapid verification and quantification of S. aureuscells in the VPNC state [322], with high sensitivity and specificity obtained.

In conclusion, foodborne pathogens, especially S. aureusstrains, which contain various virulence genes, are capable of forming VPNC state and resuscitating into active and pathogenic state under specific conditions, posing a significant threat to food safety. The “farm to table” process includes food ingredients, processing, transportation, and storage, which involves a large variety of conditions. A number of such conditions (such as low temperature during refrigeration) may be sufficient for entry into the VPNC state, complicating the use of routine diagnostics by resulting in high “false-negative” rates of pathogen detection. However, once resuscitation occurs under proper conditions, foodborne pathogens remain active and virulent, which thus are highly likely to cause food poisoning outbreaks.


4. Concluding remarks

Ingestion of food is the major (although, not only) way for human beings to obtain nutrient substances for basic living; therefore, the quality and safety of food have recently become a major concern. Considered to be an expanding global problem and leading topic in public health, food safety is no longer limited to foodborne illnesses but has been extended to all safety issues associated with “farm to table” food approaches. In the past decade, a large number of worldwide cases or reports have been available regarding food containing unhealthy, harmful, or toxic substances (other than food poisoning outbreaks). Foodborne microorganisms, previously limited to pathogenic bacteria and toxic substances produced in food, have played a critical role in food safety. However, now due to diversity in the genus and species of microbes, variety of mechanisms on the regulation of growth and survival, and complexity of ecosystem involving polymicrobial interaction and environmental factors, a number of novel microbial issues associated with food safety have been recently acknowledged. Microorganisms may very well be capable of surviving the journey from farm to table via various evasion mechanisms at various food processing stages, including source (antimicrobial resistance caused by the use of drugs in veterinary medicine or livestock feed), processing (formation of biofilm and further survival of bacterial elimination), storage (formation of VPNC state and “false-negative” detection), and even after cooking (production of heat-stable toxins that remain active despite elimination of host bacteria). The contributions of aforementioned and novel evasion mechanisms with respect to food safety undoubtedly require further investigation in vitro and in vivo for improved diagnostic and decontamination procedures.


  1. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food Safety [Internet]. 2015. Available from: [Accessed 2015-08-31]
  2. 2. Xu Z, Li L, Chu J. Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays on rapid detection of various types of staphylococci strains. Food Res Int. 2012;47:166–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.042
  3. 3. Scallan E, Griffin PM, Angulo FJ. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—unspecified agents. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:16–22. DOI: 10.3201/eid1701.091101p2
  4. 4. Summary of Report of the French Sanitary Agencies [Internet]. 2003. Available from:
  5. 5. Martyn DK, Ian M, Gill VH. Food borne illness in Australia: the OzFoodNet experience. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:392–400. DOI: 10.1086/589861
  6. 6. Xu Z, Li L, Shi L. Class 1 integron in staphylococci. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:5261–5279. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-0676-7
  7. 7. Xu Z, Li L, Shirtliff ME. Resistance class 1 integron in clinical methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrains in southern China, 2001–2006. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:714–718. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03379.x
  8. 8. Xu Z, Liu X, Li L, Li B. Development ofStaphylococcus aureusenterotoxin in food borne bacteria. Mod Food Sci. 2013;29:2317–2324
  9. 9. Xu Z, Li L, Zhao X. Development and application of a novel multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for rapid detection of various types of staphylococci strains. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2011;5:1869–1873
  10. 10. You R, Gui Z, Xu Z. Methicillin-resistanceStaphylococcus aureusdetection by an improved rapid PCR assay. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2012;6:7131–7133
  11. 11. Zhao X, Li Y, Wang L. Development and application of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method on rapid detectionEscherichia coliO157 strains from food samples. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:2183–2188. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-009-9700-6
  12. 12. Ben-Ami R, Navon-Venezia S, Schwartz D. Infection of a ventriculoatrial shunt with phenotypically variableStaphylococcus epidermidismasquerading as polymicrobial bacteremia due to various coagulase-negative staphylococci and Kocuria varians. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2444–2447. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2444-2447.2003
  13. 13. Xu Z, Shi L, Alam MJ. Integron-bearing methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in South China, 2001–2004. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278:223–230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00994.x
  14. 14. Nouwen JL, van Belkum A, de Marie S. Clonal expansion ofStaphylococcus epidermidisstrains causing Hickman catheter-related infections in a hemato-oncologic department. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2696–2702
  15. 15. Sospedra I, Soler C, Manes J. Analysis of staphylococcal enterotoxin A in milk by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;400:1525–1531. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-4906-6
  16. 16. Alarcon B, Vicedo B, Aznar R. PCR-based procedures for detection and quantification ofStaphylococcus aureusand their application in food. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;100:352–364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02768.x
  17. 17. Shimizu A, Fujita M, Igarashi H. Characterization ofStaphylococcus aureuscoagulase type VII isolates from staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks (1980–1995) in Tokyo, Japan, by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3746–3749
  18. 18. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:7–15. DOI: 10.3201/eid1701.P11101
  19. 19. Smyth DS, Kennedy J, Twohig J.Staphylococcus aureusisolates from Irish domestic refrigerators possess novel enterotoxin and enterotoxin-like genes and are clonal in nature. J Food Protect. 2006;69:508–515
  20. 20. Asao T, Kumeda Y, Kawai T. An extensive outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning due to low-fat milk in Japan: estimation of enterotoxin A in the incriminated milk and powdered skim milk. Epidemiol Infect. 2003;130:33–40. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268802007951
  21. 21. Deng Y, Liu C, Li B. Review of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusand its detection in food safety. Mod Food Sci. 2015;31:259–266
  22. 22. Bad Bug Book (second edition)—Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms and Natural Toxins Handbook [Internet]. 2012. Available from:
  23. 23. U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service, Basics for Handling Food Safely [Internet]. 2011. Available from:
  24. 24. Tsutsuura S, Shimamura Y, Murata M. Temperature dependence of the production of staphylococcal enterotoxin A byStaphylococcus aureus. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77:30–37. DOI: 10.1271/bbb.120391
  25. 25. Bergdoll MS. Enterotoxins. In: Adlam C, Easmon CFS, editors. Staphylococci and staphylococcal infections. London: Academic Press; 1983. pp. 559–598.
  26. 26. Schmitt M, Schuler-Schmid U, Schmidt-Lorenz W. Temperature limits of growth, TNase and enterotoxin production ofStaphylococcus aureusstrains isolated from foods. Int J Food Microbiol. 1990;11:1–19. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1605(90)90036-5
  27. 27. Bautista L, Gaya P, Medina M. A quantitative study of enterotoxin production by sheep milk staphylococci. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988;54:566–569
  28. 28. Becker K, Keller B, von Eiff C. Enterotoxigenic potential ofStaphylococcus intermedius. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5551–5557. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5551-5557.2001
  29. 29. Jay JM. Microbiological food safety. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1992;31:177–190. DOI: 10.1080/10408399209527567
  30. 30. Pimenta-Martins MG, Furtado RF, Heneine LG. Development of an amperometric immunosensor for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin type A in cheese. J Microbiol Methods. 2012;91:138–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.05.016
  31. 31. Noleto AL, Bergdoll MS. Staphylococcal enterotoxin production in the presence of non-enterotoxigenic staphylococci. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980;39:1167–1171
  32. 32. Fries BC, Varshney AK. Bacterial toxins—staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Microbiol Spectr. 2013;1. DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.AID-0002-2012
  33. 33. Pexara A, Burriel A, Govaris A.Staphylococcus aureusand staphylococcal enterotoxins in foodborne diseases. J Hellenic Vet Med Soc. 2010;61:316–322
  34. 34. McLean RA, Lilly HD, Alford JA. Effects of meat-curing salts and temperature on production of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. J Bacteriol. 1968;95:1207–1211
  35. 35. Vandenbosch LL, Fung DY, Widomski M. Optimum temperature for enterotoxin production byStaphylococcus aureusS-6 and 137 in liquid medium. Appl Microbiol. 1973;25:498–500
  36. 36. Smith JL, Buchanan RL, Palumbo SA. Effect of food environment on staphylococcal enterotoxin synthesis: a review. J Food Protect 1983;46:545–555
  37. 37. Notermans S, Heuvelman CJ. Combined effect of water activity, pH and suboptimal temperature on growth and enterotoxin production ofStaphylococcus aureus. J Food Sci. 1983;48:1832–1835. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb05096.x
  38. 38. Betley MJ, Mekalanos JJ. Nucleotide sequence of the type A staphylococcal enterotoxin gene. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:34–41
  39. 39. Bunikowski R, Mielke M, Skarabis H. Prevalence and role of serum IgE antibodies to theStaphylococcus aureus-derived superantigens SEA and SEB in children with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:119–124. DOI: 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70535-X
  40. 40. Herz U, Bunikowski R, Mielke M. Contribution of bacterial superantigens to atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1999;118:240–241. DOI: 10.1159/000024085
  41. 41. Rasooly R, Do PM.In vitrocell-based assay for activity analysis of staphylococcal enterotoxin A in food. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2009;56:172–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00561.x
  42. 42. Bunning VK, Lindsay JA, Archer DL. Chronic health effects of microbial foodborne disease. World Health Stat Q. 1997;50:51–56
  43. 43. Howell MD, Diveley JP, Lundeen KA. Limited T-cell receptor beta-chain heterogeneity among interleukin 2 receptor-positive synovial T cells suggests a role for superantigen in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:10921–10925. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10921
  44. 44. Ye YM, Hur GY, Park HJ. Association of specific IgE to staphylococcal superantigens with the phenotype of chronic urticaria. J Kor Med Sci. 2008;23:845–851. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.5.845
  45. 45. Hu DL, Omoe K, Sashinami H. Immunization with a nontoxic mutant of staphylococcal enterotoxin A, SEAD227A, protects against enterotoxin-induced emesis in house musk shrews. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:302–310. DOI: 10.1086/596065
  46. 46. Jozefczyk Z, Robbins RN, Spitz JM. Antibodies to staphylococcal enterotoxin in laboratory personnel. J Clin Microbiol. 1980;11:438–439
  47. 47. Crawley GJ, Black JN, Gray I. Clinical chemistry of staphylococcal enterotoxin poisoning in monkeys. Appl Microbiol. 1966;14:445–450
  48. 48. Omoe K, Hu DL, Ono HK. Emetic potentials of newly identified staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxins. Infect Immun. 2013;81:3627–3631. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00550-13
  49. 49. Hu DL, Nakane A. Mechanisms of staphylococcal enterotoxin-induced emesis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;722:95–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.08.050
  50. 50. Casman EP, Bennett RW. Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin in food. Appl Microbiol. 1965;13:181–189
  51. 51. Su YC, Wong AC. Identification and purification of a new staphylococcal enterotoxin, H. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:1438–1443
  52. 52. Casman EP. Serologic studies of staphylococcal enterotoxin. Public Health Rep. 1958;73:599–609. DOI: 10.2307/4590200
  53. 53. Borst DW, Betley MJ. Promoter analysis of the staphylococcal enterotoxin A gene. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:1883–1888
  54. 54. Borst DW, Betley MJ. Phage-associated differences in staphylococcal enterotoxin A gene (sea) expression correlate with sea allele class. Infect Immun. 1994;62:113–118
  55. 55. Casman EP. Further serological studies of staphylococcal enterotoxin. J Bacteriol. 1960;79:849–856
  56. 56. Casman EP, Bergdoll MS, Robinson J. Designation of staphylococcal enterotoxins. J Bacteriol. 1963;85:715–716
  57. 57. Tetsuya I, Naoto T, Keiji Y. Mass outbreak of food poisoning disease caused by small amounts of staphylococcal enterotoxins A and H. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71:2793–2795. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2793-2795.2005
  58. 58. Casman EP, Bennett RW. Culture medium for the production of staphylococcal enterotoxin A. J Bacteriol. 1963;86:18–23
  59. 59. Casman EP, Mccoy DW, Brandly PJ. Staphylococcal growth and enterotoxin production in meat. Appl Microbiol. 1963;11:498–500
  60. 60. Silverman SJ, Knott AR, Howard M. Rapid, sensitive assay for staphylococcal enterotoxin and a comparison of serological methods. Appl Microbiol. 1968;16:1019–1023
  61. 61. Barber LE, Deibel RH. Effect of pH and oxygen tension on staphylococcal growth and enterotoxin formation in fermented sausage. Appl Microbiol. 1972;24:891–898
  62. 62. McCoy DW. Influence of food microorganisms on staphylococcal growth and enterotoxin production in meat. Appl Microbiol. 1966;14:372–377
  63. 63. Markus ZH, Silverman GJ. Factors affecting the secretion of staphylococcal enterotoxin A. Appl Microbiol. 1970;20:492–496
  64. 64. Reiser R, Conaway D, Bergdoll MS. Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin in foods. Appl Microbiol. 1974;27:83–85
  65. 65. Niskanen A, Lindroth S. Comparison of different purification procedure for extraction of staphylococcal enterotoxin A from foods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976;32:455–464
  66. 66. Warren JR. Comparative kinetic stabilities of staphylococcal enterotoxin types A, B, and C1. J Biol Chem. 1977;252:6831–6834
  67. 67. Cavallin A, Arozenius H, Kristensson K. The spectral and thermodynamic properties of staphylococcal enterotoxin A, E, and variants suggest that structural modifications are important to control their function. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:1665–1672. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.3.1665
  68. 68. Noleto AL, Malburg JL, Bergdoll MS. Production of staphylococcal enterotoxin in mixed cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:2271–2274
  69. 69. Betley MJ, Lofdahl S, Kreiswirth BN. Staphylococcal enterotoxin A gene is associated with a variable genetic element. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:5179–5183. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.16.5179
  70. 70. Betley MJ, Mekalanos JJ. Staphylococcal enterotoxin A is encoded by phage. Science. 1985;229:185–187. DOI: 10.1126/science.3160112
  71. 71. Maina EK, Hu DL, Tsuji T. Staphylococcal enterotoxin A has potent superantigenic and emetic activities but not diarrheagenic activity. Int J Med Microbiol. 2012;302:88–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.01.003
  72. 72. Shafer WM, Iandolo JJ. Staphylococcal enterotoxin A: a chromosomal gene product. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978;36:389–391
  73. 73. Christianson KK, Tweten RK, Iandolo JJ. Transport and processing of staphylococcal enterotoxin A. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985;50:696–697
  74. 74. Huang IY, Hughes JL, Bergdoll MS. Complete amino acid sequence of staphylococcal enterotoxin A. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:7006–7013
  75. 75. Akhtar M, Park CE, Rayman K. Effect of urea treatment on recovery of staphylococcal enterotoxin A from heat-processed foods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:3274–3276
  76. 76. Yamashita K, Kanazawa Y, Ueno M. Significance of the detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin A gene in low fat milk which caused a serious outbreak of food poisoning. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2003;44:186–190. DOI: 10.3358/shokueishi.44.186
  77. 77. Krakauer T, Stiles BG. The staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) family: SEB and siblings. Virulence. 2013;4:759–773. DOI: 10.4161/viru.23905
  78. 78. Kashiwada T, Kikuchi K, Abe S. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B toxic shock syndrome induced by community-acquired methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(CA-MRSA). Intern Med. 2012;51:3085–3088. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7295
  79. 79. Wang CC, Lo WT, Hsu CF. Enterotoxin B is the predominant toxin involved in staphylococcal scarlet fever in Taiwan. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1498–1502. DOI: 10.1086/392501
  80. 80. Li J, Yang J, Lu YW. Possible role of staphylococcal enterotoxin B in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Viral Immunol. DOI: 10.1089/vim.2015.0017
  81. 81. Yang M, Kostov Y, Bruck HA. Gold nanoparticle-based enhanced chemiluminescence immunosensor for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) in food. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;133:265–271. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.05.029
  82. 82. Friedman ME. Inhibition of staphylococcal enterotoxin B formation in broth cultures. J Bacteriol. 1966;92:277–278
  83. 83. Jamlang EM, Bartlett ML, Snyder HE. Effect of pH, protein concentration, and ionic strength on heat inactivation of staphylococcal enterotoxin B 1. Appl Microbiol. 1971;22:1034–1040
  84. 84. Keller GM, Hanson RS, Bergdoll MS. Effect of minerals on staphylococcal enterotoxin B production. Infect Immun. 1978;20:158–160
  85. 85. Morse SA, Mah RA, Dobrogosz WJ. Regulation of staphylococcal enterotoxin B1. J Bacteriol. 1969;98:4–9
  86. 86. Schumacher-Perdreau F, Akatova A, Pulverer G. Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B and toxic shock syndrome toxin: PCR versus conventional methods. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1995;282:367–371. DOI: 10.1016/S0934-8840(11)80706-1
  87. 87. De Boer ML, Chow AW. Toxic shock syndrome toxin 1-producingStaphylococcus aureusisolates contain the staphylococcal enterotoxin B genetic element but do not express staphylococcal enterotoxin B. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:818–827. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/170.4.818
  88. 88. Tweten RK, Iandolo JJ. Transport and processing of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. J Bacteriol. 1983;153:297–303
  89. 89. Huang IY, Bergdoll MS. The primary structure of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. 3. The cyanogen bromide peptides of reduced and aminoethylated enterotoxin B, and the complete amino acid sequence. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:3518–3525
  90. 90. Shafer WM, Iandolo JJ. Chromosomal locus for staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Infect Immun. 1978;20:273–278
  91. 91. Shafer WM, Iandolo JJ. Genetics of staphylococcal enterotoxin B in methicillin-resistant isolates ofStaphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1979;25:902–911
  92. 92. Ranelli DM, Jones CL, Johns MB. Molecular cloning of staphylococcal enterotoxin B gene inEscherichia coliandStaphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:5850–5854. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.17.5850
  93. 93. Johns MJ, Khan SA. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B gene is associated with a discrete genetic element. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:4033–4039
  94. 94. Mahmood R, Khan SA. Role of upstream sequences in the expression of the staphylococcal enterotoxin B gene. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:4652–4656
  95. 95. Ataee RA, Karami A, Izadi M. Molecular screening of staphylococcal enterotoxin B gene in clinical isolates. Cell J. 2011;13:187–192
  96. 96. Bergdoll MS, Borja CR, Avena RM. Identification of a new enterotoxin as enterotoxin C. J Bacteriol. 1965;90:1481–1485
  97. 97. Borja CR, Bergdoll MS. Purification and partial characterization of enterotoxin C produced byStaphylococcus aureusstrain 137. Biochemistry. 1967;6:1467–1473
  98. 98. Avena RM, Bergdoll MS. Purification and some physicochemical properties of enterotoxin C,Staphylococcus aureusstrain 361. Biochemistry. 1967;6:1474–1480. DOI: 10.1021/bi00857a033
  99. 99. Reiser RF, Robbins RN, Noleto AL. Identification, purification, and some physicochemical properties of staphylococcal enterotoxin C3. Infect Immun. 1984;45:625–630
  100. 100. Bohach GA, Schlievert PM. Expression of staphylococcal enterotoxin C1 inEscherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1987;55:428–432
  101. 101. Hovde CJ, Hackett SP, Bohach GA. Nucleotide sequence of the staphylococcal enterotoxin C3 gene: sequence comparison of all three type C staphylococcal enterotoxins. Mol Gen Genet. 1990;220:329–333. DOI: 10.1007/BF00260504
  102. 102. Schmidt JJ, Spero L. The complete amino acid sequence of staphylococcal enterotoxin C1. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:6300–6306
  103. 103. Marr JC, Lyon JD, Roberson JR. Characterization of novel type C staphylococcal enterotoxins: biological and evolutionary implications. Infect Immun. 1993;61:4254–4262
  104. 104. Spero L, Morlock BA. Biological activities of the peptides of staphylococcal enterotoxin C formed by limited tryptic hydrolysis. J Biol Chem. 1978;253:8787–8791
  105. 105. Orwin PM, Fitzgerald JR, Leung DY. Characterization ofStaphylococcus aureusenterotoxin L. Infect Immun. 2003;71:2916–2919. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2916-2919.2003
  106. 106. Bohach GA, Handley JP, Schlievert PM. Biological and immunological properties of the carboxyl terminus of staphylococcal enterotoxin C1. Infect Immun. 1989;57:23–28
  107. 107. Mantynen V, Niemela S, Kaijalainen S. MPN-PCR-quantification method for staphylococcal enterotoxin c1 gene from fresh cheese. Int J Food Microbiol. 1997;36:135–143
  108. 108. Valihrach L, Alibayov B, Demnerova K. Production of staphylococcal enterotoxin C in milk. Int Dairy J. 2013;30:103–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.01.003
  109. 109. Wilson IG, Cooper JE, Gilmour A. Detection of enterotoxigenicStaphylococcus aureusin dried skimmed milk: use of the polymerase chain reaction for amplification and detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes entB and entC1 and the thermonuclease gene nuc. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:1793–1798
  110. 110. Cretenet M, Nouaille S, Thouin J.Staphylococcus aureusvirulence and metabolism are dramatically affected byLactococcus lactisin cheese matrix. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2011;3:340–351. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00230.x
  111. 111. Valihrach L, Alibayov B, Zdenkova K. Expression and production of staphylococcal enterotoxin C is substantially reduced in milk. Food Microbiol. 2014;44:54–59. DOI: 10.1016/
  112. 112. Casman EP, Bennett RW, Dorsey AE. Identification of a fourth staphylococcal enterotoxin, enterotoxin D. J Bacteriol. 1967;94:1875–1882
  113. 113. Duquenne M, Fleurot I, Aigle M. Tool for quantification of staphylococcal enterotoxin gene expression in cheese. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:1367–1374. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01736-09
  114. 114. Bayles KW, Iandolo JJ. Genetic and molecular analyses of the gene encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin D. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:4799–4806
  115. 115. Marta D, Wallin-Carlquist N, Schelin J. Extended staphylococcal enterotoxin D expression in ham products. Food Microbiol. 2011;28:617–620. DOI: 10.1016/
  116. 116. Zhang S, Stewart GC. Characterization of the promoter elements for the staphylococcal enterotoxin D gene. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:2321–2325. DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.8.2321-2325.2000
  117. 117. Sihto HM, Tasara T, Stephan R. Temporal expression of the staphylococcal enterotoxin D gene under NaCl stress conditions. FEMS Microbiol Lett. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnv024
  118. 118. Pereira JL, Salzberg SP, Bergdoll MS. Production of staphylococcal enterotoxin D in foods by low-enterotoxin-producing staphylococci. Int J Food Microbiol. 1991;14:19–25. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1605(91)90033-L
  119. 119. Bergdoll MS, Borja CR, Robbins RN. Identification of enterotoxin E. Infect Immun. 1971;4:593-595
  120. 120. Couch JL, Soltis MT, Betley MJ. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the type E staphylococcal enterotoxin gene. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:2954–2960
  121. 121. Borja CR, Fanning E, Huang IY. Purification and some physicochemical properties of staphylococcal enterotoxin E. J Biol Chem. 1972;247:2456–2463
  122. 122. Lina G, Bohach GA, Nair SP. Standard nomenclature for the superantigens expressed byStaphylococcus. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:2334–2336. DOI: 10.1086/420852
  123. 123. Omoe K, Imanishi K, Hu DL. Characterization of novel staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxin type P. Infect Immun. 2005;73:5540–5546. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.9.5540-5546.2005
  124. 124. Bergdoll MS, Crass BA, Reiser RF. A new staphylococcal enterotoxin, enterotoxin F, associated with toxic-shock-syndromeStaphylococcus aureusisolates. Lancet. 1981;1:1017–1021. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(81)92186-3
  125. 125. Arnow PM, Chou T, Weil D. Spread of a toxic-shock syndrome-associated strain ofStaphylococcus aureusand measurement of antibodies to staphylococcal enterotoxin F. J Infect Dis. 1984;149:103–107. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/149.1.103
  126. 126. Munson SH, Tremaine MT, Betley MJ. Identification and characterization of staphylococcal enterotoxin types G and I fromStaphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1998;66:3337–3348
  127. 127. Jarraud S, Cozon G, Vandenesch F. Involvement of enterotoxins G and I in staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome and staphylococcal scarlet fever. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2446–2449
  128. 128. Omoe K, Ishikawa M, Shimoda Y. Detection of seg, seh, and sei genes inStaphylococcus aureusisolates and determination of the enterotoxin productivities ofS. aureusisolates Harboring seg, seh, or sei genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:857–862. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.857-862.2002
  129. 129. Ren K, Bannan JD, Pancholi V. Characterization and biological properties of a new staphylococcal exotoxin. J Exp Med. 1994;180:1675–1683. DOI: 10.1084/jem.180.5.1675
  130. 130. Jorgensen HJ, Mathisen T, Lovseth A. An outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning caused by enterotoxin H in mashed potato made with raw milk. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;252:267–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.005
  131. 131. Nilsson H, Bjork P, Dohlsten M. Staphylococcal enterotoxin H displays unique MHC class II-binding properties. J Immunol. 1999;163:6686–6693
  132. 132. Petersson K, Pettersson H, Skartved NJ. Staphylococcal enterotoxin H induces V alpha-specific expansion of T cells. J Immunol. 2003;170:4148–4154
  133. 133. Rosec JP, Gigaud O. Staphylococcal enterotoxin genes of classical and new types detected by PCR in France. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;77:61–70. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00044-2
  134. 134. Pereira ML, Do CLS, Santos EJD. Enterotoxin H in staphylococcal food poisoning. J Food Protect. 1996;3:448–561
  135. 135. Su YC, Wong AC. Production of staphylococcal enterotoxin H under controlled pH and aeration. Int J Food Microbiol. 1998;39:87–91. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1605(97)00118-9
  136. 136. Chen TR, Chiou CS, Tsen HY. Use of novel PCR primers specific to the genes of staphylococcal enterotoxin G, H, I for the survey ofStaphylococcus aureusstrains isolated from food-poisoning cases and food samples in Taiwan. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;92:189–197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.10.002
  137. 137. Blaiotta G, Ercolini D, Pennacchia C. PCR detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes inStaphylococcusspp. strains isolated from meat and dairy products. Evidence for new variants of seG and seI in S. aureus AB-8802. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97:719–730. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02349.x
  138. 138. Zhang S, Iandolo JJ, Stewart GC. The enterotoxin D plasmid ofStaphylococcus aureusencodes a second enterotoxin determinant (sej). FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998;168:227–233
  139. 139. Lindsay JA, Ruzin A, Ross HF. The gene for toxic shock toxin is carried by a family of mobile pathogenicity islands inStaphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 1998;29:527–543. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00947.x
  140. 140. Orwin PM, Leung DY, Donahue HL. Biochemical and biological properties of staphylococcal enterotoxin K. Infect Immun. 2001;69:360–366. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.360-366.2001
  141. 141. Aguilar JL, Varshney AK, Wang X. Detection and measurement of staphylococcal enterotoxin-like K (SEl-K) secretion byStaphylococcus aureusclinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:2536–2543. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00387-14
  142. 142. Jarraud S, Peyrat MA, Lim A. egc, a highly prevalent operon of enterotoxin gene, forms a putative nursery of superantigens inStaphylococcus aureus. J Immunol. 2001;166:669–677. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.1.669
  143. 143. Pan YQ, Ding D, Li DX. Expression and bioactivity analysis of staphylococcal enterotoxin M and N. Protein Expr Purif. 2007;56:286–292. DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2007.08.005
  144. 144. Thomas DY, Jarraud S, Lemercier B. Staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxins U2 and V, two new staphylococcal superantigens arising from recombination within the enterotoxin gene cluster. Infect Immun. 2006;74:4724–4734. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00132-06
  145. 145. Kuroda M, Ohta T, Uchiyama I. Whole genome sequencing of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2001;357:1225–1240. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04403-2
  146. 146. Calderwood MS, Desjardins CA, Sakoulas G. Staphylococcal enterotoxin P predicts bacteremia in hospitalized patients colonized with methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:571–577. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit501
  147. 147. Orwin PM, Leung DY, Tripp TJ. Characterization of a novel staphylococcal enterotoxin-like superantigen, a member of the group V subfamily of pyrogenic toxins. Biochemistry. 2002;41:14033–14040. DOI: 10.1021/bi025977q
  148. 148. Omoe K, Hu DL, Takahashi-Omoe H. Identification and characterization of a new staphylococcal enterotoxin-related putative toxin encoded by two kinds of plasmids. Infect Immun. 2003;71:6088–6094. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.10.6088-6094.2003
  149. 149. Omoe K, Imanishi K, Hu DL. Biological properties of staphylococcal enterotoxin-like toxin type R. Infect Immun. 2004;72:3664–3667. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3664-3667.2004
  150. 150. Ono HK, Omoe K, Imanishi K. Identification and characterization of two novel staphylococcal enterotoxins, types S and T. Infect Immun. 2008;76:4999–5005. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00045-08
  151. 151. Lis E, Podkowik M, Schubert J. Production of staphylococcal enterotoxin R byStaphylococcus aureusstrains. Foodborne Pathogens Dis. 2012;9:762–766. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1185
  152. 152. Letertre C, Perelle S, Dilasser F. Identification of a new putative enterotoxin SEU encoded by the egc cluster ofStaphylococcus aureus. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95:38–43. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01957.x
  153. 153. Schmidt H, Hensel M. Pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004,17:14–56. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.14-56.2004
  154. 154. Ubeda C, Barry P, Penades JR. A pathogenicity island replicon inStaphylococcus aureusreplicates as an unstable plasmid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14182–14188. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705994104
  155. 155. Ruzin A, Lindsay J, Novick RP. Molecular genetics of SaPI1—a mobile pathogenicity island inStaphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 2001;41:365–377. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02488.x
  156. 156. Yarwood JM, McCormick JK, Paustian ML. Characterization and expression analysis ofStaphylococcus aureuspathogenicity island 3. Implications for the evolution of staphylococcal pathogenicity islands. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:13138–13147. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111661200
  157. 157. Baba T, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet. 2002;359:1819–1827. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08713-5
  158. 158. Yamaguchi T, Nishifuji K, Sasaki M. Identification of theStaphylococcus aureusetd pathogenicity island which encodes a novel exfoliative toxin, ETD, and EDIN-B. Infect Immun. 2002;70:5835–5845. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5835-5845.2002
  159. 159. Boyd EF, Brussow H. Common themes among bacteriophage-encoded virulence factors and diversity among the bacteriophages involved. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:521–529. DOI: 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02459-9
  160. 160. Hacker J, Carniel E. Ecological fitness, genomic islands and bacterial pathogenicity. A Darwinian view of the evolution of microbes. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:376–381. DOI: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve097
  161. 161. Groisman EA, Ochman H. Pathogenicity islands: bacterial evolution in quantum leaps. Cell. 1996;87:791–794. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81985-6
  162. 162. Hentschel U, Hacker J. Pathogenicity islands: the tip of the iceberg. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:545–548. DOI: 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01410-1
  163. 163. Hussein AI, Ahmed AM, Sato M. Characterization of integrons and antimicrobial resistance genes in clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from Palestinian hospitals. Microbiol Immunol. 2009;53:595–602. DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2009.00168.x
  164. 164. Zhong N, Gui Z, Xu L. Solvent-free enzymatic synthesis of 1,3-diacylglycerols by direct esterification of glycerol with saturated fatty acids. Lipids Health Dis. 2013;12:65. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-65
  165. 165. Deng Y, Liu J, Peters BM. Antimicrobial resistance investigation onStaphylococcusstrains in a local hospital in Guangzhou, China, 2001–2010. Microb Drug Resist. 2015;21:102–104. DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2014.0117
  166. 166. Xu Z, Li L, Alam MJ. First confirmation of integron-bearing methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Curr Microbiol. 2008;57:264–268. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-008-9187-8
  167. 167. Jones TF, Kellum ME, Porter SS. An outbreak of community-acquired foodborne illness caused by methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:82–84. DOI: 10.3201/eid0801.010174
  168. 168. Andreoletti O, Budka H, Buncic S. Foodborne antimicrobial resistance as a biological hazard. EFSA J. 2008;765:2–87.
  169. 169. de Boer E, Zwartkruis-Nahuis JT, Wit B. Prevalence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;134:52–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.007
  170. 170. Kwon NH, Park KT, Moon JS. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) characterization and molecular analysis for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusand novel SCCmec subtype IVg isolated from bovine milk in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:624–632. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki306
  171. 171. Khanna T, Friendship R, Dewey C. Methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureuscolonization in pigs and pig farmers. Vet Microbiol. 2008;128:298–303. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.10.006
  172. 172. Lee JH. Occurrence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrains from cattle and chicken, and analyses of their mecA, mecR1 and mecI genes. Vet Microbiol. 2006;114:155–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.10.024
  173. 173. Vanderhaeghen W, Cerpentier T, Adriaensen C. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) ST398 associated with clinical and subclinical mastitis in Belgian cows. Vet Microbiol. 2010;144:166–171. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.044
  174. 174. Hall RM, Stokes HW. Integrons: novel DNA elements which capture genes by site-specific recombination. Genetica. 1993;90:115–132. DOI: 10.1007/BF01435034
  175. 175. Hall RM, Brown HJ, Brookes DE. Integrons found in different locations have identical 5 ends but variable 3 ends. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:6286–6294.
  176. 176. Hall RM, Collis CM. Mobile gene cassettes and integrons: capture and spread of genes by site-specific recombination. Mol Microbiol. 1995;15:593–600. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02368.x
  177. 177. Stokes HW, Hall RM. A novel family of potentially mobile DNA elements encoding site-specific gene-integration functions: integrons. Mol Microbiol. 1989;3:1669–1683. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00153.x
  178. 178. Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance inStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1549–1555. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1549-1555.2000
  179. 179. Graham D. Intellectual property rights and the life science industries: past, present and future. World Sci. 2009;63:0013–0117
  180. 180. Beck WD, Berger-Bachi B, Kayser FH. Additional DNA in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusand molecular cloning of mec-specific DNA. J Bacteriol. 1986;165:373–378
  181. 181. Chikramane SG, Matthews PR, Noble WC. Tn554 inserts in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusfrom Australia and England: comparison with an American methicillin-resistant group. J Gen Microbiol. 1991;137:1303–1311. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-137-6-1303
  182. 182. Dubin DT, Matthews PR, Chikramane SG. Physical mapping of the mec region of an American methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1661–1665. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.35.8.1661
  183. 183. Skinner S, Inglis B, Matthews PR. Mercury and tetracycline resistance genes and flanking repeats associated with methicillin resistance on the chromosome ofStaphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 1988;2:289–292. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1988.tb00030.x
  184. 184. Matsuhashi M, Song MD, Ishino F. Molecular cloning of the gene of a penicillin-binding protein supposed to cause high resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics inStaphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1986;167:975–980
  185. 185. Song MD, Wachi M, Doi M. Evolution of an inducible penicillin-target protein in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusby gene fusion. FEBS Lett. 1987;221:167–171. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80373-3
  186. 186. Ito T, Katayama Y, Hiramatsu K. Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusN315. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1449–1458
  187. 187. Ito T, Katayama Y, Asada K. Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1323–1336. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1323-1336.2001
  188. 188. Ma XX, Ito T, Tiensasitorn C. Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec identified in community-acquired methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1147–1152. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1147-1152.2002
  189. 189. Oliveira DC, Milheirico C, de Lencastre H. Redefining a structural variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, SCCmec type VI. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3457–3459. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00629-06
  190. 190. Oliveira DC, Tomasz A, de Lencastre H. The evolution of pandemic clones of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus: identification of two ancestral genetic backgrounds and the associated mec elements. Microb Drug Resist. 2001;7:349–361. DOI: 10.1089/10766290152773365
  191. 191. Ito T, Ma XX, Takeuchi F. Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2637–2651. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2637-2651.2004
  192. 192. Berglund C, Ito T, Ikeda M. Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in a methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrain isolated in Sweden. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3512–3516. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00087-08
  193. 193. Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S. Novel staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type, tentatively designated type VIII, harboring class A mec and type 4 ccr gene complexes in a Canadian epidemic strain of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:531–540. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01118-08
  194. 194. Li S, Skov RL, Han X. Novel types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements identified in clonal complex 398 methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3046–3050. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01475-10
  195. 195. Garcia-Alvarez L, Holden MT, Lindsay H. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureuswith a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:595–603. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8
  196. 196. Chongtrakool P, Ito T, Ma XX. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrains isolated in 11 Asian countries: a proposal for a new nomenclature for SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:1001–1012. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.50.3.1001-1012.2006
  197. 197. Savolainen K, Korhonen TK, and Kuusela P. PLS, a large surface protein encoded by mec DNA of methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus, prevents bacterial adhesionin vitro. Ninth International Symposium on Staphylococci and Staphylococcal Infections Kolding, Denmark; 2000.
  198. 198. Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2155–2161. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2155-2161.2002
  199. 199. Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. Genetic organization of the chromosome region surrounding mecA in clinical staphylococcal strains: role of IS431-mediated mecI deletion in expression of resistance in mecA-carrying, low-level methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus haemolyticus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1955–1963. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.7.1955-1963.2001
  200. 200. Garcia-Alvarez L. Assessment of the role of cattle movements and other risk contacts on the spread ofStaphylococcus aureusstrain types between UK dairy farms [thesis]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; 2009.
  201. 201. Kim JS, Song W, Kim HS. Association between the methicillin resistance of clinical isolates ofStaphylococcus aureus, their staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) subtype classification, and their toxin gene profiles. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;56:289–295. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.05.003
  202. 202. Cabrera EC, Ramirez-Argamosa DT, Rodriguez RDM. Prevalence of community-acquired methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusfrom inmates of the Manila City Jail, characterization for SCCmec type and occurrence of Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene. Philipp Sci Lett. 2010;3:4-12.
  203. 203. Laplana LM, Cepero MA, Ruiz J. Molecular typing ofStaphylococcus aureusclinical isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type determination and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:505–513. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.06.020
  204. 204. Stranden AM, Frei R, Adler H. Emergence of SCCmec type IV as the most common type of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin a university hospital. Infection. 2009;37:44–48. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-008-7430-7
  205. 205. Namvar AE, Afshar M, Asghari B. Characterisation of SCCmec elements in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusisolated from burn patients. Burns. 2014;40:708–712. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.09.010
  206. 206. Barada K, Hanaki H, Yamaguchi Y. Trends of beta-lactam antibiotic susceptibility in blood-borne methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and their linkage to the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type. J Infect Chemother. 2007;13:213–218. DOI: 10.1007/s10156-007-0523-x
  207. 207. Hu DL, Maina EK, Omoe K. Superantigenic toxin genes coexist with specific staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec genes in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011;225:161–169. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.225.161
  208. 208. Reiter KC, Machado AB, Freitas AL. High prevalence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureuswith SCCmec type III in cystic fibrosis patients in southern, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2010;43:377–381
  209. 209. Lima DF, Brazao NB, Folescu TW. Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) gene carriage amongStaphylococcus aureusstrains with SCCmec types I, III, IV, and V recovered from cystic fibrosis pediatric patients in Brazil. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;78:59–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.10.004
  210. 210. Gomez E, Chiang T, Hogan PA. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusSCCmec type and its association with clinical presentation, severity, and length of stay among patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Adv Infect Dis. 2014;4:111–115.
  211. 211. Krzyszton-Russjan J, Empel J, Leski T. Clonal structure of the methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) population in Poland: revision and update. Microb Drug Resist. 2005;11:127–136. DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2005.11.127
  212. 212. Moon SY, Lee HJ, Lee MS. Molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusblood isolates: clonal spread of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVA between the community and the hospital. Microb Drug Resist. 2010;16:217–222. DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2010.0010
  213. 213. Kim J, Jeong JH, Cha HY. Detection of diverse SCCmec variants in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusand comparison of SCCmec typing method. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:1128–1130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01806.x
  214. 214. Ho CM, Ho MW, Lee CY. Clonal spreading of methicillin-resistant SCCmecStaphylococcus aureuswith specific spa and dru types in central Taiwan. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:499–504. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1338-3
  215. 215. Heltshe SL, Saiman L, Popowitch EB. Outcomes and treatment of chronic methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusdiffers by staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (sccmec) type in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014
  216. 216. Noto MJ, Archer GL. A subset ofStaphylococcus aureusstrains harboring staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV is deficient in CcrAB-mediated SCCmec excision. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:2782–2788. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00032-06
  217. 217. Lulitanond A, Chanawong A, Sribenjalux P. Preliminary report of SCCmec-types and antimicrobial susceptibilities of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusisolates from a university hospital in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010;41:920–927.
  218. 218. Chu H, Zhao L, Zhang Z. Antibiotic resistance and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusfrom lower respiratory tract: multi-resistance and high prevalence of SCCmec III type. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;67:795–801. DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9542-7
  219. 219. Matos PD, Schuenck RP, Cavalcante FS. Accuracy of phenotypic methicillin susceptibility methods in the detection ofStaphylococcus aureusisolates carrying different SCCmec types. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010;105:931–934. DOI: 10.1590/S0074-02762010000700017
  220. 220. Teodoro CR, Mattos CS, Cavalcante FS. Characterization of MLS(b) resistance amongStaphylococcus aureusandStaphylococcus epidermidisisolates carrying different SCCmec types. Microbiol Immunol. 2012;56:647–650. DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00481.x
  221. 221. Djoudi F, Bonura C, Benallaoua S. Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive sequence type 80 methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureuscarrying a staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVc is dominant in neonates and children in an Algiers hospital. N Microbiol. 2013;36:49–55
  222. 222. Szczepanik A, Koziol-Montewka M, Al-Doori Z. Spread of a single multiresistant methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusclone carrying a variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type III isolated in a university hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26:29–35. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-006-0237-5
  223. 223. Japoni A, Jamalidoust M, Farshad S. Characterization of SCCmec types and antibacterial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin southern Iran. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011;64:28–33
  224. 224. Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Gilbert G. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) isolates in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist. 2008;14:217–220. DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2008.0822
  225. 225. Kilic A, Guclu AU, Senses Z. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) characterization and Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene occurrence for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin Turkey, from 2003 to 2006. Antoine Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008;94:607–614. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-008-9278-3
  226. 226. Ahmad N, Ruzan IN, Abd GM. Characteristics of community- and hospital-acquired methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrains carrying SCCmec type IV isolated in Malaysia. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58:1213–1218. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.011353-0
  227. 227. Peng Q, Hou B, Zhou S. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) isolates in a teaching hospital, Shantou, China. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2010;4:844–848.
  228. 228. Chen Y, Liu Z, Duo L. Characterization ofStaphylococcus aureusfrom distinct geographic locations in China: an increasing prevalence of spa-t030 and SCCmec type III. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96255. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096255
  229. 229. Pan SC, Wang JT, Lauderdale TL. Epidemiology and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusisolates in Taiwan: a multicenter study. J Formosan Med Assoc. 2014;113:409–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.05.012
  230. 230. Neela V, Ghasemzadeh MH, van Belkum A. First report on methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusof Spa type T037, sequence type 239, SCCmec type III/IIIA in Malaysia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:115–117. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-009-0813-6
  231. 231. Park C, Lee DG, Kim SW. Predominance of community-associated methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrains carrying staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec type IVA in South Korea. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:4021–4026. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01147-07
  232. 232. Berglund C, Sjoberg L, Soderquist B. Predominance of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV among methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) in a Swedish county and presence of unknown SCCmec types with Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:447–456. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01150.x
  233. 233. de A TP, Pacheco RL, Costa SF. Prevalence of SCCmec type IV in nosocomial bloodstream isolates of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3435–3437. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3435-3437.2005
  234. 234. Conceicao T, Tavares A, Miragaia M. Prevalence and clonality of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) in the Atlantic Azores islands: predominance of SCCmec types IV, V and VI. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:543–550. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-010-0892-4
  235. 235. Bartels MD, Boye K, Rohde SM. A common variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa in isolates from Copenhagen, Denmark, is not detected by the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusassay. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1524–1527. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02153-08
  236. 236. Valsesia G, Rossi M, Bertschy S. Emergence of SCCmec type IV and SCCmec type V methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureuscontaining the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes in a large academic teaching hospital in central Switzerland: external invaders or persisting circulators? J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:720–727. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01890-09
  237. 237. Ammons DR, Puttagunta R, Granados JC. An exploratory study of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusand SCCmec elements obtained from a community setting along the Texas border with Mexico. Curr Microbiol. 2010;60:321–326. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-009-9544-2
  238. 238. Williamson DA, Roberts SA, Ritchie SR. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin New Zealand: rapid emergence of sequence type 5 (ST5)-SCCmec-IV as the dominant community-associated MRSA clone. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62020. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062020
  239. 239. Sobhy N, Aly F, Abd EKO. Community-acquired methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusfrom skin and soft tissue infections (in a sample of Egyptian population): analysis of mec gene and staphylococcal cassette chromosome. Braz J Infect Dis. 2012;16:426–431. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2012.08.004
  240. 240. O’Halloran F, Lucey B, Cryan B. Molecular characterization of class 1 integrons from Irish thermophilicCampylobacterspp. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53:952–957. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh193
  241. 241. Mazel D, Dychinco B, Webb VA. A distinctive class of integron in theVibrio choleraegenome. Science. 1998;280:605–608. DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5363.605
  242. 242. Rowe-Magnus DA, Guerout AM, Ploncard P. The evolutionary history of chromosomal super-integrons provides an ancestry for multiresistant integrons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:652–657. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.652
  243. 243. Xu Z, Li L, Shirtliff ME. First report of class 2 integron in clinical Enterococcus faecalis and class 1 integron inEnterococcus faeciumin South China. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;68:315–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.05.014
  244. 244. Labbate M, Case RJ, Stokes HW. The integron/gene cassette system: an active player in bacterial adaptation. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;532:103–125. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-853-9_6
  245. 245. Barlow RS, Pemberton JM, Desmarchelier PM. Isolation and characterization of integron-containing bacteria without antibiotic selection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:838–842. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.838-842.2004
  246. 246. Nandi S, Maurer JJ, Hofacre C. Gram-positive bacteria are a major reservoir of class 1 antibiotic resistance integrons in poultry litter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:7118–7122. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0306466101
  247. 247. Xu Z, Shi L, Zhang C. Nosocomial infection caused by class 1 integron-carryingStaphylococcus aureusin a hospital in South China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:980–984. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01782.x
  248. 248. Xu Z, Li L, Shirtliff ME. Resistance class 1 integron in clinical methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusstrains in southern China, 2001–2006. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:714–718. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03379.x
  249. 249. Senda K, Arakawa Y, Ichiyama S. PCR detection of metallo-beta-lactamase gene (blaIMP) in Gram-negative rods resistant to broad-spectrum beta-lactams. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2909–2913
  250. 250. Nemergut DR, Robeson MS, Kysela RF. Insights and inferences about integron evolution from genomic data. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:261. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-261
  251. 251. Correia M, Boavida F, Grosso F. Molecular characterization of a new class 3 integron inKlebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:2838–2843. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2838-2843.2003
  252. 252. Arakawa Y, Murakami M, Suzuki K. A novel integron-like element carrying the metallo-beta-lactamase gene blaIMP. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1612–1615. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.39.7.1612
  253. 253. Rowe-Magnus DA, Guerout AM, Mazel D. Super-integrons. Res Microbiol. 1999;150:641–651. DOI: 10.1016/S0923-2508(99)00127-8
  254. 254. Nield BS, Holmes AJ, Gillings MR. Recovery of new integron classes from environmental DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;195:59–65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10498.x
  255. 255. Rowe-Magnus DA, Mazel D. Integrons: natural tools for bacterial genome evolution. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001;4:565–569. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00252-6
  256. 256. Mazel D. Integrons: agents of bacterial evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:608–620. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1462
  257. 257. Mulazimoglu L, Drenning SD, Muder RR. Vancomycin-gentamicin synergism revisited: effect of gentamicin susceptibility of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1534–1535.
  258. 258. Stefani S, Chung DR, Lindsay JA. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA): global epidemiology and harmonisation of typing methods. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39:273–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.030
  259. 259. Graveland H, Duim B, van Duijkeren E. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin animals and humans. Int J Med Microbiol. 2011;301:630–634. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.09.004
  260. 260. Frana TS, Beahm AR, Hanson BM. Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusfrom pork farms and visiting veterinary students. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53738. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053738
  261. 261. Smith TC, Male MJ, Harper AL. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) strain ST398 is present in Midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4258. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004258
  262. 262. Voss A, Loeffen F, Bakker J. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1965–1966. DOI: 10.3201/eid1112.050428
  263. 263. Devriese LA, Hommez J. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin dairy herds. Res Vet Sci. 1975;19:23–27
  264. 264. Juhasz-Kaszanyitzky E, Janosi S, Somogyi P. MRSA transmission between cows and humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:630–632. DOI: 10.3201/eid1304.060833
  265. 265. Cui S, Li J, Hu C. Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusfrom swine and workers in China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64:680–683. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp275
  266. 266. de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJ, Spalburg EC. High prevalence of methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureusin pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2007;122:366–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.027
  267. 267. Neela V, Zafrul AM, Mariana NS. Prevalence of ST9 methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusamong pigs and pig handlers in Malaysia. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:4138–4140. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01363-09
  268. 268. Sergio DM, Koh TH, Hsu LY. Investigation of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin pigs used for research. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56:1107–1109. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47283-0
  269. 269. Lewis HC, Molbak K, Reese C. Pigs as source of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusCC398 infections in humans, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1383–1389. DOI: 10.3201/eid1409.071576
  270. 270. Morgan M. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusand animals: zoonosis or humanosis? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;62:1181–1187. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn405
  271. 271. Smith TC, Pearson N. The emergence ofStaphylococcus aureusST398. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:327–339. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0072
  272. 272. van den Broek IV, van Cleef BA, Haenen A. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin people living and working in pig farms. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137:700–708. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268808001507
  273. 273. Graveland H, Wagenaar JA, Heesterbeek H. Methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureusST398 in veal calf farming: human MRSA carriage related with animal antimicrobial usage and farm hygiene. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10990. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010990
  274. 274. Wassenberg MW, Bootsma MC, Troelstra A. Transmissibility of livestock-associated methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(ST398) in Dutch hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:316–319. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03260.x
  275. 275. Bootsma MC, Wassenberg MW, Trapman P. The nosocomial transmission rate of animal-associated ST398 methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J R Soc Interf. 2011;8:578–584. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0349
  276. 276. Graveland H, Wagenaar JA, Bergs K. Persistence of livestock associated MRSA CC398 in humans is dependent on intensity of animal contact. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16830. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016830
  277. 277. Cuny C, Friedrich A, Kozytska S. Emergence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) in different animal species. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300:109–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.11.002
  278. 278. Kluytmans JA. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin food products: cause for concern or case for complacency? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:11–15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03110.x
  279. 279. Bens CC, Voss A, Klaassen CH. Presence of a novel DNA methylation enzyme in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusisolates associated with pig farming leads to uninterpretable results in standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1875–1876. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1875-1876.2006
  280. 280. Vanderhaeghen W, Hermans K, Haesebrouck F. MethicillinresistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) in food production animals. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138:606–625
  281. 281. Monecke S, Coombs G, Shore AC. A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17936. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017936
  282. 282. Fessler A, Scott C, Kadlec K. Characterization of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusST398 from cases of bovine mastitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:619–625. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq021
  283. 283. Fessler A, Kadlec K, Hassel M. Characterization of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusisolates from food and food products of poultry origin in Germany. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:7151–7157
  284. 284. Kadlec K, Ehricht R, Monecke S. Diversity of antimicrobial resistance pheno- and genotypes of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusST398 from diseased swine. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64:1156–1164. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp350
  285. 285. Argudin MA, Fetsch A, Tenhagen BA. High heterogeneity within methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusST398 isolates, defined by Cfr9I macrorestriction-pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles and spa and SCCmec types. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:652–658. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01721-09
  286. 286. Kadlec K, Fessler A. Novel and uncommon antimicrobial resistance genes in livestock-associated methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:745–755
  287. 287. Roszak DB, Grimes DJ, Colwell RR. Viable but non-culturable forms of Salmonella enteritidis in aquatic systems. Can J Microbiol. 1984;30:334–338.
  288. 288. Cook KL, Bolster CH. Survival ofCampylobacter jejuniandEscherichia coliin groundwater during prolonged starvation at low temperatures. Appl Microbiol. 2007;103:573–583
  289. 289. Besnard V, Federighi M, Declerq E. Environmental and physico-chemical factors induce VBNC state inListeria monocytogenes. Vet Res. 2002;33:359–370
  290. 290. Cunningham E, O’Byrne C, Oliver JD. Effect of weak acids onListeria monocytogenessurvival: evidence for a viable but nonculturable state in response to low pH. Food Control. 2009;20:1141–1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.03.005
  291. 291. Asakura H, Kawamoto K, Haishima Y. Differential expression of the outer membrane protein W (OmpW) stress response in enterohemorrhagicEscherichia coliO157:H7 corresponds to the viable but non-culturable state. Res Microbiol. 2008;159:709–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.08.005
  292. 292. Kana BD, Gordhan BG, Downing KJ. The resuscitation-promoting factors ofMycobacterium tuberculosisare required for virulence and resuscitation from dormancy but are collectively dispensable for growthin vitro. Mol Microbiol. 2008;67:672–684. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06078.x
  293. 293. Mascher F, Hase C, Moenne-Loccoz Y. The viable-but-nonculturable state induced by abiotic stress in the biocontrol agentPseudomonas fluorescensCHA0 does not promote strain persistence in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1662–1667. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.4.1662-1667.2000
  294. 294. Ghezzi JI, Steck TR. Induction of the viable but nonculturable condition inXanthomonas campestrispv.campestrisin liquid microcosms and sterile soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1999;30:203–208.
  295. 295. Del CR, Russi P, Mara P.Xanthomonas axonopodispv.citrienters the VBNC state after copper treatment and retains its virulence. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;298:143–148. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01709.x
  296. 296. Reissbrodt R, Rienaecker I, Romanova JM. Resuscitation ofSalmonella entericaserovartyphimuriumand enterohemorrhagicEscherichia colifrom the viable but nonculturable state by heat-stable enterobacterial autoinducer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:4788–4794. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.10.4788-4794.2002
  297. 297. Cho JC, Kim SJ. Green fluorescent protein-based direct viable count to verify a viable but non-culturable state ofSalmonella typhiin environmental samples. J Microbiol Methods. 1999;36:227–235. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7012(99)00038-X
  298. 298. Signoretto C, Lleo MM, Tafi MC. Cell wall chemical composition of Enterococcus faecalis in the viable but nonculturable state. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1953–1959. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.1953-1959.2000
  299. 299. Lleo MM, Bonato B, Tafi MC. Resuscitation rate in different enterococcal species in the viable but non-culturable state. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91:1095–1102. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01476.x
  300. 300. Wery N, Pourcher AM, Stan V. Survival ofListeria monocytogenesandEnterococcus faeciumin sludge evaluated by real-time PCR and culture methods. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;43:131–136. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01946.x
  301. 301. Du M, Chen J, Zhang X. Characterization and resuscitation of viable but nonculturableVibrio alginolyticusVIB283. Arch Microbiol. 2007;188:283–288. DOI: 10.1007/s00203-007-0246-5
  302. 302. Eguchi M, Fujiwara E, Miyamoto N. Survival ofVibrio anguillarumin freshwater environments: adaptation or debilitation? J Infect Chemother. 2000;6:126–129. DOI: 10.1007/s101560000027
  303. 303. McDougald D, Rice SA, Weichart D. Nonculturability: adaptation or debilitation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1998;25:1–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1998.tb00455.x
  304. 304. Senoh M, Ghosh-Banerjee J, Ramamurthy T. Conversion of viable but nonculturableVibrio choleraeto the culturable state by co-culture with eukaryotic cells. Microbiol Immunol. 2010;54:502–507
  305. 305. Ramaiah N, Ravel J, Straube WL. Entry ofVibrio harveyiandVibrio fischeriinto the viable but nonculturable state. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93:108–116. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01666.x
  306. 306. Jiang X, Chai TJ. Survival ofVibrio parahaemolyticusat low temperature under starvation conditions and subsequent resuscitation of viable, nonculturable cells. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:1300-1305
  307. 307. Oliver JD. Recent findings on the viable but nonculturable state in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010;34:415–425. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00200.x
  308. 308. Vattakaven T, Bond P, Bradley G. Differential effects of temperature and starvation on induction of the viable-but-nonculturable state in the coral pathogensVibrio shiloiandVibrio tasmaniensis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:6508–6513. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00798-06
  309. 309. Whitesides MD, Oliver JD. Resuscitation ofVibrio vulnificusfrom the viable but nonculturable state. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1002–1005
  310. 310. Churruca E, Girbau C, Martinez I. Detection ofCampylobacter jejuniandCampylobacter coliin chicken meat samples by real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification with molecular beacons. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;117:85–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.007
  311. 311. Khan NH, Ahsan M, Taylor WD. Culturability and survival of marine, freshwater and clinicalPseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbes Environ. 2010;25:266–274. DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME09178
  312. 312. Lowder M, Unge A, Maraha N. Effect of starvation and the viable-but-nonculturable state on green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence in GFP-taggedPseudomonas fluorescensA506. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:3160–3165. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3160-3165.2000
  313. 313. Lowder M, Oliver JD. The use of modified GFP as a reporter for metabolic activity inPseudomonas putida. Microb Ecol. 2001;41:310–313. DOI: 10.1007/s002480000094
  314. 314. Rahman I, Shahamat M, Chowdhury MA. Potential virulence of viable but nonculturableShigella dysenteriaetype 1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:115–120
  315. 315. Nicolo MS, Gioffre A, Carnazza S. Viable but nonculturable state of foodborne pathogens in grapefruit juice: a study of laboratory. Foodborne Pathogens Dis. 2011;8:11–17. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0491
  316. 316. Nybom SM, Collado MC, Surono IS. Effect of glucose in removal of microcystin-LR by viable commercial probiotic strains and strains isolated from Dadih fermented milk. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:3714–3720. DOI: 10.1021/jf071835x
  317. 317. Suzuki K, Iijima K, Asano S. Induction of viable but nonculturable state in beer spoilage lactic acid bacteria. J Inst Brew. 2006;112:295–301. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2006.tb00734.x
  318. 318. Caillet S, Ursachi L, Shareck F. Effect of gamma radiation and oregano essential oil on murein and ATP concentration ofStaphylococcus aureus. J Food Sci. 2009;74:M499–M508. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01368.x
  319. 319. Masmoudi S, Denis M, Maalej S. Inactivation of the gene katA or sodA affects the transient entry into the viable but non-culturable response ofStaphylococcus aureusin natural seawater at low temperature. Mar Pollut Bull. 2010;60:2209–2214. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.08.017
  320. 320. Pasquaroli S, Zandri G, Vignaroli C. Antibiotic pressure can induce the viable but non-culturable state inStaphylococcus aureusgrowing in biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:1812–1817. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt086
  321. 321. Pasquaroli S, Citterio B, Cesare AD. Role of daptomycin in the induction and persistence of the viable but non-culturable state ofStaphylococcus aureusbiofilms. Pathogens. 2014;3:759–768. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens3030759
  322. 322. Bekir K, Barhoumi H, Braiek M. Electrochemical impedance immunosensor for rapid detection of stressed pathogenicStaphylococcus aureusbacteria. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4761-7
  323. 323. Zandri G, Pasquaroli S, Vignaroli C. Detection of viable but non-culturable staphylococci in biofilms from central venous catheters negative on standard microbiological assays. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:E259–E261. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03893.x
  324. 324. Cerca F, Andrade F, Franca A.Staphylococcus epidermidisbiofilms with higher proportions of dormant bacteria induce a lower activation of murine macrophages. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:1717–1724. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.031922-0
  325. 325. Gupte AR, De Rezende CL, Joseph SW. Induction and resuscitation of viable but nonculturableSalmonella entericaserovartyphimuriumDT104. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:6669–6675. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6669-6675.2003
  326. 326. Aagot N, Nybroe O, Nielsen P. An alteredPseudomonasdiversity is recovered from soil by using nutrient-poorPseudomonas-selective soil extract media. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5233–5239. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.11.5233-5239.2001
  327. 327. Oliver JD. The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J Microbiol. 2005;43:93–100
  328. 328. Maalej S, Denis M, Dukan S. Temperature and growth phase effects onAeromonas hydrophilasurvival in natural seawater microcosms: role of protein synthesis and nucleic acid content on viable but temporarily nonculturable response. Microbiology. 2004;150:181–187
  329. 329. Anuchin AM, Mulyukin AL, Suzina NE. Dormant forms ofMycobacterium smegmatiswith distinct morphology. Microbiology. 2009;155:1071–1079. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.023028-0
  330. 330. Muela A, Seco C, Camafeita E. Changes in Escherichia coli outer membrane subproteome under environmental conditions inducing the viable but nonculturable state. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;64:28–36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00453.x
  331. 331. Bunthof CJ, Bloemen K, Breeuwer P. Flow cytometric assessment of viability of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:2326–2335. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2326-2335.2001

Written By

Zhenbo Xu, Brian M. Peters, Bing Li, Lin Li and Mark E. Shirtliff

Submitted: May 4th, 2015 Reviewed: December 21st, 2015 Published: April 13th, 2016