Open access peer-reviewed chapter

RNA Interference – A Powerful Functional Analysis Tool for Studying Tick Biology and its Control

Written By

Remil Linggatong Galay, Rika Umemiya-Shirafuji, Masami Mochizuki, Kozo Fujisaki and Tetsuya Tanaka

Submitted: May 4th, 2015Reviewed: September 21st, 2015Published: April 6th, 2016

DOI: 10.5772/61577

Chapter metrics overview

2,005 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Ticks (Acari: Ixodida) are blood-sucking arthropods globally recognized as vectors of numerous diseases. They are primarily responsible for the transmission of various pathogens, including viruses, rickettsiae, and blood parasites of animals. Ticks are second to mosquitoes in terms of disease transmission to humans. The continuous emergence of tick-borne diseases and acaricide resistance of ticks necessitates the development of new and more effective control agents and strategies; therefore, understanding of different aspects of tick biology and their interaction with pathogens is very crucial in developing effective control strategies. RNA interference (RNAi) has been widely used in the area of tick research as a versatile reverse genetic tool to elucidate the functions of various tick proteins. During the past decade, numerous studies on ticks utilized RNAi to evaluate potentially key tick proteins involved in blood feeding, reproduction, evasion of host immune response, interaction with pathogens, and pathogen transmission that may be targeted for tick and pathogen control. This chapter reviewed the application of RNAi in tick research over the past decade, focusing on the impact of this technique in the advancement of knowledge on tick and pathogen biology.

Keywords

  • Acari
  • ticks
  • Ixodidae
  • RNA interference
  • tick-borne diseases

1. Introduction

Ticks belong to the class of Arachnida together with spiders, scorpions, and mites. To date, there are about 900 species of ticks, majority of which are hard ticks belonging to the Ixodidae family, as well as about 200 species are soft ticks belonging to the Argasidae family, and a single species belonging to the Nuttalliellidae family [1]. Most of the ticks of medical and veterinary importance are hard ticks. Through their blood-feeding behavior, ticks can directly affect their host by causing anemia, irritation, and allergic reactions particularly in heavy infestation. The saliva of some tick species may also contain neurotoxic substances that may cause the condition termed “tick paralysis” [2]. Additionally, the transmission of pathogens including viruses, bacteria, and parasitic protozoa also occurs during blood feeding [1]. Ticks are considered second to mosquitoes in terms of their impact on public health, but they are the most important vectors of different pathogens in both domestic and wild animals [3]. Tick infestation and tick-borne diseases (TBDs) continue to have great economic impact on livestock production, particularly on cattle and small ruminants, in several continents [2]. The annual loss in cattle production worldwide due to ticks and TBDs has been estimated to be worth billions of USD [4].

The complete dependence of ticks to host blood for the completion of their life cycle and generation of offspring is the reason for their notoriety as vectors of several diseases. Depending on the species, a tick may utilize one to three hosts during their life cycle. Most of the pathogens they transmit can be carried on throughout their life cycle through transstadial (from one stage to the next) transmission and to the next generation through transovarial (from adults to eggs) transmission [5]. A single tick may carry multiple pathogens [6], thereby having the potential of infecting a host with a cocktail of pathogens. Most tick-borne infections are zoonotic in nature, and more of these are being recognized in recent years [1, 7]. Among the TBDs that are well-known in the veterinary and medical field are anaplasmosis, borreliosis, rickettsiosis, ehrlichiosis, babesiosis, theileriosis, and tick-borne encephalitis.

The significant impact of ticks and TBDs underscores the importance of tick control. For several decades, the application of chemical acaricides has been the primary tick control method, and acaricides were used extensively in livestock production. However, the continuous emergence of resistant tick strains makes most chemical acaricides ineffective [8]. Moreover, the increasing concerns for animal product and environmental contamination set limitations for this control method. To search for new and more effective means of controlling ticks and TBDs, researchers have actively expanded the understanding on tick biology.

RNA interference (RNAi) is a reverse genetic approach for manipulation of genes that commonly utilizes double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to induce post-transcriptional gene-specific silencing [9]. RNAi has been extensively employed in many studies on tick biology and pathogen interaction since the first report of RNAi application in the hard tick Amblyomma americanum[10]. In fact, it is evident that a number of laboratories in different countries working on tick research are routinely performing RNAi, as shown by an increasing number of recent publications utilizing this technique. Typically, functional studies using RNAi involve gene knockdown with subsequent infestation and evaluation of phenotypes, such as blood feeding and reproduction success (Figure 1). Indeed, RNAi has been particularly useful in searching for tick proteins that can be targeted for control of tick development and TBDs [11].

This chapter aims to show the extent of RNAi application in tick research, emphasizing the progress of advanced knowledge on tick biology and tick-pathogen interaction. We first discussed so far known RNAi mechanisms and the current RNAi inducing methods in ticks; then, briefly described the studies on tick physiology, immunity, and pathogen interaction that employed RNAi, highlighting the prospects of applications of RNAi in tick research.

Figure 1.

A typical RNAi experiment in the hard tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. The double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is introduced to adult ticks by microinjection. Unfed adult ticks, placed on a double adhesive tape attached on a glass slide (A), are injected with dsRNA using a pointed microcapillary glass attached to a microinjector (B) through the membrane of the fourth coxa under a stereomicroscope (C). Successful silencing, as shown by the absence of a band for the target gene, such asHlfer1, is confirmed around 4 d post-injection through RT-PCR after adjusting the cDNA level using an internal control, such as actin (D). Ticks were infested on a host and allowed to feed to repletion (E) and after dropping, parameters such as engorged body weight (F), survival, egg laying (G, H), and hatch were compared.

Advertisement

2. RNAi pathway in ticks

The mechanism of RNAi has been well studied in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegansand the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster[9, 12]. RNAi begins with the uptake of dsRNA by the cell, followed by its cleavage to produce small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Cleavage of dsRNA is accomplished by an RNAse III enzyme called Dicer. The siRNAs are then incorporated into RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which then drives the degradation or translational inhibition of the target mRNA that results to gene silencing. This silencing signal may spread among the cells and different tissues, leading to systemic gene silencing in the whole organism [13]. The mechanism of RNAi in ticks has not been fully elucidated, but the study of Kurscheid et al. [14] revealed that several components of RNAi machinery in other invertebrates are also present in the ticks, and they proposed a putative tick RNAi pathway. Here, we briefly describe the available knowledge on key components of RNAi machinery in ticks, in comparison of other invertebrates.

2.1. dsRNA uptake

There are two recognized dsRNA uptake mechanisms in invertebrates: a transmembrane channel-mediated uptake through systemic RNA interference defective (SID) transmembrane proteins described in C. elegans, and an endocytosis-mediated uptake described in most arthropods [15, 16]. Several SIDs identified in C. eleganshave been shown to be involved in the spread of RNAi [17]. SID-1, SID-3, and SID-5, which have wide tissue distribution, are involved in the systemic spread of RNAi [1820], whereas SID-2, localized mainly in the gut, is involved primarily in the intestinal uptake of ingested dsRNA [21]. The multi-domain SID-1 along the plasma membrane facilitates the traffic of dsRNA into and out of the cells. Homologs of SID-1 are present in some arthropods and vertebrates [18]. Both SID-3, a conserved tyrosine kinase, and SID-5 have intracytoplasmic localization, the latter being associated with late endosomes [19, 20]. SID-2 has luminal localization in the intestinal cells, and it was also found in the lower levels of excretory duct cells [21]. In addition to SIDs, endocytosis has also been also implicated as a dsRNA uptake mechanism in C. elegansthrough a protein containing an epsin N-terminal homology (ENTH) domain [22]. In D. melanogaster, dsRNA uptake in cells is facilitated mainly by scavenger receptor-mediated endocytosis [23]. Two scavenger receptors, Eater and Sr-CI, have been identified to be responsible for the majority of dsRNA uptake. These scavenger receptors are mainly expressed in the plasmatocytes and have a primary role in the phagocytosis of bacterial pathogens [24, 25].

SID homologues have not been identified in ticks. However, a homologue of ENTH, Epn-I, has been identified in the hard ticks Rhiphicephalus(Boophilus) microplusand Ixodesscapularis[14]. A class B scavenger receptor identified in Haemaphysalis longicornis(HlSRB) has been demonstrated to mediate systemic RNAi in this tick [26, 27]. Combined injection of dsRNA against HlSRBand other target genes, Vitellogenin-1 (HlVg-1) and Vitellogenin Receptor(HlVgR) effectively silenced these genes. However, silencing HlSRBprior to injection of dsRNA against HlVg-1and HlVgRinhibited the silencing of the latter two genes, suggesting that the uptake of the injected dsRNA is dependent on HlSRB in ticks. Similar to D. melanogasterscavenger receptors, HlSRB is also involved in the phagocytosis of bacteria [28], but it is expressed not only in the hemocytes but also in the other organs such as midguts, salivary glands, and ovary [26]. The presence of ENTH homologue and scavenger receptor indicates that the uptake of dsRNA in ticks is through endocytosis. Additionally, the presence of scavenger receptor in different tick tissues strongly implies its involvement in systemic RNAi, particularly after dsRNA injection. Introduction of dsRNA into the hemocoel of ticks directly exposes the different tick organs to dsRNA, and the scavenger receptor in these organs most likely mediates the entry of dsRNA into the cells.

2.2. dsRNA processing and RISC assembly

The recommended length of dsRNA to effectively induce silencing of the target gene in non-mammalian systems is more than 200 bp [15]. A study in R.(B.) microplusshowed, however, that short dsRNAs between 100 and 200 bp were also effective in inducing silencing of Ubiquitin-63Ehomologue, with minimal off-target effects, but short hairpin dsRNAs were not able to induce silencing effects [29]. After cellular uptake, dsRNAs are cleaved into 21–25 nt siRNAs by an RNAse III enzyme called Dicer. In contrast to C. elegansand mammals that have only one Dicer, D. melanogasterand mosquitoes have two Dicers [15]. Dicer-2 is the one involved in the generation of siRNA, whereas Dicer-1 acts on stem loop RNA precursors to generate micro RNA (miRNA). Both, however, are required for siRNA-induced gene silencing due to their distinct roles in siRISC assembly [30]. Only a single putative Dicer has been identified so far in the hard tick I. scapularis, which is more similar to mammalian Dicer-1 [14].

The RNAi inhibition of a target mRNA is accomplished by RISC formed by siRNAs and Argonaute (AGO) proteins. AGO proteins are highly conserved between species, encoded by multiple genes in most organisms. All AGO proteins are characterized by two domains: the PAZ domain and the PIWI domain [31]. Upon ATP activation, AGO mediates RISC recognition of mRNA target that are homologous to siRNAs, subsequently leading to the cleavage of the mRNA target [9]. In most insects, including D. melanogasterand mosquitoes, five AGO genes have been identified [15, 31]. In ticks, a homologue of AGO-1 has been identified in I. scapularisand R.(B.) microplus,and a homologue of AGO-2 has been identified in I. scapularis[14]. However, the functions of these tick AGOs remains to be confirmed.

2.3. Amplification of RNAi signal

The ability to spread throughout the whole organism, inducing total systemic silencing of the target gene in spite of introducing only a relatively small amount of dsRNA, is an important aspect of RNAi observed in plants and invertebrates. This systemic RNAi-induced gene silencing in both plants and C. elegansinvolves RNA-directed RNA polymerase (RdRP) that amplifies the RNAi signal [9]. RdRP function in RNAi has not been found in arthropods, but a putative homologue of RdRP EGO-1 protein of C. eleganshas been identified in the hard tick I. scapularis, and a partial sequence was also identified from R.(B.) microplus[14].

Advertisement

3. Methods of introducing dsRNA in ticks

3.1. Injection

Direct injection is the most widely used technique for introducing dsRNA for in vivo gene silencing, not only in ticks but also in insects [11, 32]. Through this method, dsRNA is usually introduced directly into the hemocoel of ticks allowing the dsRNA to circulate within the hemolymph. In most reports, a high concentration of at least 1 µg dsRNA per tick has been shown to be effective in inducing gene silencing [33], but in some reports, lower concentration has been found to be similarly effective [3436]. Injection has been accomplished using a 33–36-gauge needle attached to a Hamilton syringe particularly in large tick species, such as Amblyomma americanum[37], Dermacentor variabilis, and D. marginatus[38], while microinjection using a microcapillary drawn to a fine point needle and inserted to a micromanipulator has been commonly employed in smaller tick species, including Ixodes[39], and Haemaphysalis[26] ticks. Different injection sites include the lower right quadrant of the ventral surface of the exoskeleton [40], the groove between the basis capituli and the scutum [37], the ventral torso of the idiosoma, away from the anal opening [39], and the coxal membrane in the fourth coxae [26, 41]. In some reports, dsRNA was injected through the spiracle [29, 42, 43] and anal pore; the latter inducing midgut-specific silencing of the target gene [44]. Injection of dsRNA has been commonly performed in unfed adult ticks, subsequently allowed to recover for at least 24 h before infestation or use in succeeding experiments. Exceptionally, dsRNA has been also injected in engorged R.(B.) microplus[42, 45-47], A. americanum, I. scapularis, and D. variabilisadults [43], which produced significant effects on the eggs and larvae, and microinjection has also been accomplished in I. scapularis[48-52] and engorged O. moubatanymphs [53].

3.2. Soaking

Soaking in dsRNA has been previously employed to study RNAi in the cell lines of D. melanogaster[23, 54]. In tick research, this method has been applied to induce in vitro RNAi not only in cell cultures [55-57], but also in some organs including whole salivary glands [36, 58-60] and midguts [61]. Soaking live Varroa destructor[62] and Dermanyssus gallinae[63] mites, as well as Aedes aegyptilarvae [64] in a solution of dsRNA has been already demonstrated in producing effective silencing of the target genes in these organisms. However, soaking whole ticks in a solution of dsRNA has not been commonly performed. Soaking Haemaphysalis longicornisnymphs in a solution of dsRNA for 24 h resulted to significant transcript reduction of the target gene, although the effect on the phenotype was not observed in all the nymphs [65]. In our laboratory, we have attempted to soak H. longicornislarvae, nymphs, and adults in a dsRNA solution overnight, which resulted to a significant decrease in the mRNA level of a targeted gene (Galay et al., unpublished results). Soaking offers a simpler and less invasive method of introducing dsRNA without injuring the ticks and is applicable to immature tick stages. Furthermore, it does not require injection equipment; therefore, it is less laborious.

3.3. Electroporation

Electroporation is a technique that employs electric impulses to promote DNA uptake of cells and has been primarily used with in vitro cell transfection [66]. In tick research, this technique has been first applied to facilitate the introduction of dsRNA in I. scapulariseggs and nymphs [67]. After electroporation, fluorescein-labeled dsRNA was visualized all over the nymph’s body and eggs, indicating the successful entry of dsRNA. In a more recent report, the wax coating of the eggs was first removed using heptane and hypochlorite prior to electroporation [68]. Using heptane alone did not significantly decrease the hatching rate. Thus, heptane may be more helpful in evaluating the effect of a particular dsRNA to egg hatching. This technique also offers a less invasive method of dsRNA introduction that can be applied to immature tick stages and eggs.

3.4. Feeding

Feeding dsRNA in insects has been achieved in different species using diets mixed with dsRNA, liposome-embedded or lipophilic siRNAs, and bacteria and transgenic plants that can synthesize dsRNA [32, 69]. Although in vitro feeding assays have been shown to be useful in studying different tick molecules and tick-pathogen interaction [70], its application in RNAi study in ticks has been limited. A study on the Lyme disease vector I. scapularisemployed capillary feeding of dsRNA to nymphs to suppress anticomplement gene isac[71]. In another study, adult R.(B.) microplusticks were capillary fed with ubiquitindsRNA mixed in whole blood or Bm86dsRNA mixed in bovine serum [72]. In both cases, ticks were pre-fed in an animal host before capillary feeding was performed. While this method may be advantageous over injection due to very minimal injury, drawbacks may arise from the uncertainty whether an individual tick will ingest the amount of dsRNA that will effectively induce silencing, and the possibility of variation in the amount of dsRNA ingested by the ticks within a treatment group. Furthermore, capillary feeding is difficult to perform and may not be applicable in ticks with short hypostome.

Advertisement

4. RNAi and study of tick physiology

4.1. Genes related to salivary functions

The saliva is an important arsenal of ticks containing hundreds of pharmacologically potent substances that facilitate attachment to their hosts and blood-sucking [73]. Different salivary proteins have redundant functions in counteracting the hemostatic [74], inflammatory, and immune mechanisms [75] of the host. Aside from its function in tick feeding, the salivary glands are also involved in osmoregulation and transmission of pathogens [76].

Many studies on characterization of salivary proteins in the recent years employed RNAi (Table 1). In fact, the first report on the application of RNAi in tick research described a tick inhibitor of inflammatory mediator, a salivary histamine-binding protein, wherein researchers induced in vitro RNAi by soaking salivary glands in dsRNA [10, 58]. Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptors (SNARE) complex proteins, which mediate exocytosis in secretory pathways of the salivary glands, have been characterized in Amblyommaticks. These include N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion (NSF) protein, Synaptosomal Associated Protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25) [77], Ykt6 [65], and vesicle transport through interaction with t-SNAREs (Vti) [78]. Silencing various genes such as Salp14, Salp9pac [39], Neuronal isoform munc18-1 (nSec1) [59], and synaptobrevin [36] affected the secretion of anticoagulant or the anticoagulant activity of salivary gland extracts, indicating that these genes are important in tick anti-hemostatic mechanism.

Longistatin [79] and acidic chitinases [80] have been found to be important in the formation of blood pool and tick cement cone, respectively. The attachment site of longistatin-silenced H. longicornisticks did not show pathological changes, such as hemorrhagic lesions corresponding to the blood pool, while the attachment site of ticks simultaneously silenced acidic chitinases exhibited blood leakage and these ticks can be easily removed. Various protease inhibitors that have roles in anti-hemostatic, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory mechanism have been also characterized using RNAi, including a cystatin, sialostatine L [81], a Kunitz type protease inhibitor, rhipilin [82], and serine protease inhibitors (serpin) [83, 84].

Other salivary proteins with immunomodulatory function, such as the anti-complement protein, isac [71], and two proteins that can inhibit neutrophil function, ISL 929 and 1373 [85], have also been knockdowned in I. scapularis. Silencing of isacin nymphs, induced by capillary feeding of dsRNA, not only reduced blood feeding, but also decreased the load of the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferiin the tick. Meanwhile, the saliva of ticks devoid of ISL 929 and 1373 had reduced ability in inhibiting host integrin. An osmoregulatory protein aquaporin, characterized in I. ricinusthrough RNAi, showed that suppression of this protein impaired the concentration of blood meal due to failure in removing water [86].

4.2. Genes related to digestion and midgut function

The midgut of ticks houses various kinds of enzymes that act on a large amount of ingested host blood, which contains great quantities of hemoglobin [151]. Functional studies on these enzymes and other midgut proteins using RNAi have expanded the understanding of tick digestive physiology (Table 1). Silencing hemoglobinolytic enzymes, such as leucine aminopeptidase [91, 92], longipain [95], and cathepsin L [96, 97] had negative impact on tick feeding. Moreover, the longipain of H. longicorniswas found to have a protective role in Babesiainfection through its babesiacidal activity [95]. Other proteins important in tick digestion that have been characterized using RNAi are thrombin inhibitors that prevent blood coagulation and serine proteinase, which induce erythrocyte degradation. Silencing of thrombin inhibitor hemalin from H. longicornis[93] and boophilin from R.(B.) microplus[47] prolonged the blood feeding period and decreased the oviposition of these ticks, respectively. Silencing serine protease reduced the weight of ticks after blood feeding due to impaired erythrocyte degradation [94].

4.3. Genes related to reproductive function

Ticks are known for their high fecundity, laying hundreds of eggs per batch in the case of soft ticks and up to thousands in the case of hard ticks. A series of physiological events takes place in female ticks during and after blood feeding that initiate ovarian maturation and subsequent oviposition. Vitellogenesis, the synthesis and oocyte deposition of the yolk protein precursor (vitellogenin), is a key process for ovarian development and oocyte maturation induced by blood meal in ticks [152]. Three genes encoding vitellogenin have been identified and characterized in H. longicornis[102].

Target geneTick speciesRNAi EffectRefs
Salivary proteins
Histamine-binding protein (HBP)Amblyomma americanumAltered feeding pattern and longer feeding period; decreased histamine-binding activity in the salivary glands[10, 58]
Salp14/ Salp9pacIxodes scapularisImpaired feeding, decreased post-blood meal weight, decreased anticoagulant activity of salivary gland extract[39]
Neuronal isoform munc18-1 (nSec1)A. americanumDecreased post-blood meal weight and prolonged feeding time, decreased anticoagulant secretion of salivary gland[59]
SynaptobrevinA. americanumInhibited secretion of anticoagulant stimulated by PGE[36]
CystatinA. americanumDecreased post-blood meal weight, mortality during feeding, low feeding success rate[61]
Anticomplement protein (Isac)I. scapularisDecreased post-blood meal weight, decreased Borrelia burgdorferiinfection[71]
Sialostatin L (cystatin)I. scapularisFailure to feed on the host, decreased post-blood meal weight and failed oviposition[77]
AquaporinI. ricinusDecreased post-blood meal weight, decreased volume of ingested blood[78]
HlYkt6 (SNARE)Haemaphysalis longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight, high mortality, supressed salivary secretion and anticoagulant activity[65]
ISL 929 and 1373I. scapularisSupressed PMN inhibitory activity of saliva from knockdowned ticks[79]
Rhipilin (Kunitz type protease inhibitor)Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloidesProlonged attachment time, decreased post-blood meal weight[80]
LongistatinH. longicornisMortality after attachment, failure to engorge, poor blood pool formation[81]
Serine protease inhibitor (serpin)A. americanumNo effect on tick attachment, feeding and oviposition[82]
R. haemaphysaloidesDecreased attachment rate and engorgement weight[83]
ReprolysinRhipicephalus(Boophilus) microplusDecreased egg weight and egg conversion ratio[84]
N-ethylmaleimide sensitive fusion protein (NSF)A. maculatumInhibition of engorgement, failure of oviposition[85]
Synaptosomal Associated Protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25)A. maculatumDecreased post-blood meal weight, decreased egg weight, failure in hatching[85]
Vti (SNARE)A. americanum, A. maculatumDecreased post-blood meal weight and survival, failed oviposition[86]
Glutaminyl cyclase (QC)A. maculatum, I. scapularisDecreased post-blood meal weight, egg weight and hatch[87]
AV422A. americanumDecreased post-blood meal weight[88]
Acidic chitinase (Ach)A. americanumLeakage of blood from the mouthparts in late feeding phase, loose attachment in the host’s skin[89]
Digestive activity
LongepsinH. longicornisNo effects reported[90]
Leucine aminopeptidaseH. longicornisExtended pre-oviposition period, decreased egg weight and egg conversion ratio, morphological abnormalities in the oocytes[91, 92]
Hemalin (thrombin inhibitor)H. longicornisLonger blood feeding period, failure to engorge, decreased inhibitory activity of fibrinogen clot formation in the midgut[93]
Boophilin (thrombin inhibitor)R.(B.) microplusDecreased oviposition[47]
Serine proteinaseH. longicornisSuppressed erythrocyte degradation; decreased post-blood meal weight[94]
LongipainH. longicornisImpaired blood feeding, decreased post-blood meal weight, increased B. gibsoniinfection level and transovarial transmission[95]
Cathepsin LI. ricinusDecreased weight gain[96]
H. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight[97]
AstacinR.(B.) microplusDecreased egg weight and egg conversion ratio[84]
Tick reproduction
Follistatin-related protein (FRP)H. longicornisDecreased egg conversion ratio[98]
Vitellogenin receptor (VgR)Dermacentor variabilisFailure of Vg uptake by oocytes; failed oviposition[34]
H. longicornisSuppressed oocyte maturation and failed oviposition, failure of B. gibsonitransovarial transmission[99]
A. hebraeumSuppressed oocyte maturation, long pre-oviposition period,[100]
VoraxinA. americanumFailure to engorge and lay eggs in females fed with males injected with a combination of subolesin and voraxin dsRNA[101]
Vitellogenin (Vg)H. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight, abnormal oocytes, decreased egg conversion ratio[102]
GATA factorH. longicornisDisrupted egg development[103]
S6 kinaseH. longicornisDisrupted egg development[103]
Target of rapamycin (TOR)H. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight, mortality after engorgement, Failure of oocytes to mature and failure to lay eggs[104]
Structural and metabolic function
Glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferase (HlGFAT)H. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight and survival[105]
β-ActinI. scapularisDecreased post-blood meal weight and oviposition[106]
Na+-K+-ATPaseI. scapularisDecreased post-blood meal weight and oviposition[106]
Valosin-containing protein (HlVCP)H. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight[107]
Cyclophilins (Immunophilin)H. longicornisLower post-blood meal weight, low survival after blood feeding and failure to lay eggs after silencing cyclophilin A[108]
Ribosomal protein P0H. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight, low engorgement rate, and high mortality[109]
Protein disulphide isomerases (PDI)H. longicornisMortality after engorgement, leakage of blood from the midgut, little egg output[110]
Organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATP)A. americanumDecreased post-blood meal weight, oviposition and egg conversion ratio[37]
Ferritins (FER)I. ricinusDecreased post-blood meal weight, oviposition and hatch[111]
H. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight, survival, oviposition and hatch[112, 113]
Iron regulatory protein (IRP1)I. ricinusDecreased post-blood meal weight and hatching of eggs[111]
Elongation factor 1-αR. annulatus, R.(B.) microplusHigh post-blood meal mortality, decreased post-blood meal weight and failure of oviposition[45]
Lysine-ketoglutarate reductase/saccharopine dehydrogenase (LKR/SDH)H. longicornisLonger blood feeding period, decreased post-blood meal weight, longer pre-oviposition period, decreased oviposition and hatch after SDH silencing; higher volume of hemolymph after LKR silencing[114]
UbiquitinR.(B.) microplusShorter post-blood meal survival, decreased or absence of egg output, impaired embryogenesis[14, 29, 45, 72];
R. annulatusHigh mortality[45]
Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3)R.(B.) microplusDecreased oviposition and hatching[115]
CD147 receptorA. americanumInhibited feeding, low post-blood meal weight tender cuticle[116]
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related proteinsA. americanumDecreased post-blood meal weight[117]
Putative 5.8S, ITS2 and 28S rRNAA. americanumHigh mortality and very low post-blood meal weight[118]
Putative 2B7 60S ribosomal protein L13eA. americanumHigh mortality and very low post-blood meal weight[118]
Putative interphase cytoplasm foci protein 45A. americanumHigh mortality and very low post-blood meal weight[118]
Putative threonyl-tRNA synthetaseA. americanumHigh mortality and very low post-blood meal weight[118]
Putative 60S ribosomal protein L13aA. americanum100% mortality[118]
Putative mitochondrial 12S rRNAA. americanumHigh mortality and very low post-blood meal weight[118]
Chymotrypsin inhibitor (HlChI)H. longicornisMortality after attachment, retarded blood feeding and longer feeding period, decreased post-blood meal weight, decreased egg weight and egg conversion ratio[119]
Scavenger receptorH. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight, mortality after engorgement, decreased oviposition and hatch; inhibited bacterial phagocytosis of granulocytes[26, 28]
4E-BP (eIF4E-binding protein)H. longicornisDecreased lipid accumulation in the midgut and fat bodies after long starvation period[120]
Protein kinase B (AKT)H. longicornisInhibition of engorgement and growth of organs during blood feeding; decreased expression of longepsin, HlMIFand HlVgs[121]
R.(B.) microplusDecreased cell glycogen content and viability, and altered cell membrane permeability[57]
Spook (Spo)Ornithodoros moubataArrested development and molting[53]
Shade (Shd)O. moubataAbnormal ecdysis and delayed molting[53]
Cystatin (RHCyst)R. haemaphysaloidesDecreased attachment and hatching rate[122]
TropomyosinH. longicornisLonger feeding time, decreased engorgement rate and post-blood meal weight, high mortality after blood feeding, failed oviposition[123]
Protective antigens
Subolesin (4D8)I. scapularisDecreased post-blood meal weight, oviposition and survival; failure of embryogenesis; silencing in eggs and larvae when dsRNA injected to engorged females[43, 124]
A. americanumDecreased post-blood meal weight, oviposition and survival[43, 101, 124]
D. marginatusDecreased post-blood meal weight, oviposition and survival[124]
D. variabilisDecreased post-blood meal weight, oviposition and survival; decreased fertility; silencing in eggs and larvae when dsRNA injected to engorged females[43, 124]
R. sanguineusDecreased post-blood meal weight, oviposition and survival; more dramatic effect when simultaneously silenced with Rs86[124, 125]
R.(B.) microplusHigh mortality, decreased post-blood meal weight, oviposition and hatch in dsRNA-injected adults and progeny of dsRNA-injected adults[42, 45, 46]
R. annulatus,Decreased post-blood meal weight[45, 126]
O. erraticusDecreased egg output[127]
O. moubataDecreased egg output[127]
Midgut protein Rs86R. sanguineusDecreased post-blood meal weight and oviposition[125]
Midgut protein Hl86H. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight[128]
Midgut protein Bm86R.(B.) microplusDecreased number of engorging ticks, lower post-blood meal body weight and survival after feeding in B. bovis-infected host, decreased egg weight[129]
Midgut protein Ree86R. evertsi evertsiNo significant effect[130]
Midgut protein ReeATAQR. evertsi evertsiNo significant effect[130]
LongicinH. longicornisDecreased post-blood meal weight, increased B. gibsoniinfection in the midgut and ovary, and transmission in the eggs[131]
α2-macroglobulin proteinsI. ricinusDecreased phagocytic action of hemocytes[132, 133]
Macrophage migration inhibitory factorA. americanumNo effect on phenotypes[134]
Janus kinase ( JAK)–signaling transducer activator of transcription (STAT) pathwayI. scapularisIncreased A. phagocytophiluminfection level[135]
Dual oxidase (Duox)I. scapularisDecreased level of B. burgdorferi[136]
Peroxidase ISCW017368I. scapularisDecreased level of B. burgdorferi[136]
Glutathione S-transferaseR.(B.) microplusDecreased tick attachment and post-blood meal weight[45]
R.sanguineusIncreased susceptibility to permethrin[137]
Selenoprotein WR.(B.) microplusDecreased tick attachment and post-blood meal weight[45]
Selenoprotein KA. maculatumDecreased oviposition[138]
Selenoprotein MA. maculatumDecreased oviposition[138, 139]
Thioredoxin reductaseA. maculatumDecreased native microbial load in midguts and salivary glands[139]
Rmcystatin3 (cysteine protease inhibitor)R.(B.) microplusIncreased resistance to bacteria[140]
Pathogen acquisition/ transmission
SubolesinD. variabilisInhibited Anaplasma marginaleinfection in salivary glands[141, 142]
R.(B.) microplusDecreased A. marginaleinfection level in salivary glands and tick cells[143]
Salp15I. scapularisDecreased Borrelia burgdorferitransmission to the host[52]
Salp14I. scapularisNo effect on acquisition of A. phagocytophilumand B. burgdorferiin nymphs[49]
Salp16I. scapularisReduced A. phagocytophilumacquisition[48]
Salp25DI. scapularisDecreased acquisition of B. burgdorferiafter knockdown in salivary glands[44]
VarisinD. variabilisDecreased A. marginaleinfection level[144]
ImmunophilinR.(B.) microplusDecreased hatch, decreased larval survival, increased B. bovisinfection in larval progeny[41]
Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor (Spi)R.(B.) microplusInhibition of engorgement, decreased egg weight[41]
Glutathione S-transferaseD. variabilisInhibited A. marginaleinfection[142]
H+ transporting lysosomal vacuolar proton pump (vATPase)D. variabilisInhibited A. marginaleinfection in the midgut after acquisition feeding[142]
Selenoprotein MD. variabilisInhibited A. marginaleinfection and multiplication in salivary glands[142]
Putative von Willebrand factor (94Will)R.(B.) microplusDecreased A. marginaleinfection level in salivary glands[143]
Flagelliform silk protein (100Silk)R.(B.) microplusDecreased A. marginaleinfection level in salivary glands and tick cells[143]
Putative metallothionein (93 Meth)R.(B.) microplusIncreased A. marginaleinfection level in tick cells[143]
Tick salivary lectin pathway inhibitor (TSLPI)I. scapularisDecreased load of B. burgdorferiand transmission to host[145]
Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor (DvKPI)D. variabilisIncreased rickettsial infection in the midgut[146]
Kunitz-type protease inhibitor 5 (KTPI)R. annulatus, R.(B.) microplusDecreased post-blood meal weight[126]
Histamine release factorI. scapularisDecreased post-blood meal weight, decreased B. burgdorferitransmission[147]
TROSPAR. annulatus, R.(B.) microplusDecreased B. bigeminainfection level; Decreased post-blood meal weight in R. microplus[126]
Serum amyloid AR. annulatus, R.(B.) microplusDecreased B. bigeminainfection level[126]
RicinusinR. annulatus, R.(B.) microplusDecreased post-blood meal weight in R. annulatus[126]
CalreticulinR. annulatus, R.(B.) microplusDecreased B. bigeminainfection level in R. microplus; decreased post-blood meal weight in R. annulatus[126]
Chitin deacetylase-like protein (IsCDA)I. scapularisNo significant effect on B. burgdorferiacquisition or transmission[50]
Antifreeze glycoproteinI. scapularisDecreased survival and mobility of ticks in extremely cold temperature; decreased A. phagocytophiluminfection level[148]
x-linked
inhibitor of apoptosis protein (E3 ubiquitin ligase, XIAP)
I. scapularisIncreased A. phagocytophiluminfection[149]
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit IIIR.(B.) microplusFailure in transmission of A. marginale[150]

Table 1.

Genes functionally characterized through RNAi in different tick species.

Silencing these genes through RNAi greatly reduced the reproductive capacity of female ticks, which showed immature and light-colored oocytes. The uptake of vitellogenin in the oocytes is facilitated by vitellogenin receptor, which has been characterized in D. variabilis[34], H.longicornis[99], and A. hebraeum[100]. Aside from the negative impact in oviposition consistently induced by RNAi in all these studies, silencing of H. longicornisvitellogenin receptor also reportedly inhibited the transovarial transmission of Babesia gibsoni. Three factors involved in the initiation of vitellogenesis, the GATA factor, S6 kinase [103], and target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway [104], have been also characterized in H. longicornisticks using RNAi. The significance of other proteins to reproduction, such as a tick homologue of the human follistatin-related protein [98] and the engorgement protein voraxin [101] from the male gonad, has been also demonstrated using RNAi.

4.4. Genes related to structural and metabolic functions

Various gene encoding proteins important in cellular structure and metabolism have been characterized using RNAi. Due to their wide distribution and systemic function, knockdown of these proteins caused detrimental effects on different tick physiological functions and some even proved to be lethal (Table 1). Among these proteins is the multifunctional ubiquitin, which has been first targeted based on a homologous gene of D. melanogasterin a study investigating the components of tick RNAi pathway [14]. Ubiquitin knockdown in R.(B.) microplusshortened the post-blood meal survival of ticks and impaired egg viability and hatch. In separate studies, ubiquitin has also been the subject in examining off-target effects of RNAi [29] and the feasibility of dsRNA feeding in R.(B.) microplus[72]. RNAi-mediated silencing of ribosomal proteins in A. americanum[118], and ubiquitin, elongation factor-1 alpha and several other proteins in R.(B.) microplusand R. annulatus[45] has been employed to screen potential antigens for tick control.

In the hard tick H. longicornis, individual knockdown of glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferase [105], cyclophilin A [108], the ribosomal protein P0 [109], protein disulphide isomerases [110], and tropomyosin [123] resulted to decreased survival of ticks after engorgement. Two proteins with apparent roles in withstanding long starvation period, lysine-ketoglutarate reductase/saccharopine dehydrogenase (LKR/SDH) [114] and 4E-BP [120], have also been characterized in H. longicornis. LKR/SDH mRNA expression is higher in starved ticks than in unfed ticks and knockdown of LKR resulted to high volume of hemolymph after blood feeding, suggesting its role in osmoregulation. Meanwhile, 4E-BP knockdown led to decreased lipid storage in the midguts and fat bodies of ticks during longer starvation period. An interesting report on the application of RNAi in studying tick neurobiology targetedβ-actin and Na+-K+-ATPase of I. scapularisusing fluorescently labeled dsRNAs to monitor the uptake in tick synganglia [106].

The significance of proteins involved in iron metabolism to tick feeding and reproduction has been also demonstrated using RNAi in two hard tick species, I. ricinus[111] and H. longicornis[112]. Silencing two types of the iron storage protein ferritin greatly reduced the ticks’ capacity to engorge and produce eggs, also affecting post-blood meal survival due to occurrence of iron-mediated oxidative stress [113]. An iron regulatory protein responsible for translation of iron binding proteins was characterized in I. scapularis, with its knockdown greatly reducing egg hatchability [111]. Two enzymes, spook and shade, were characterized in the soft tick O. moubataand were shown to be important in ecdysteroidogenesis through RNAi [53]. Silencing spook protein in nymphs caused arrested development and molting, whereas silencing shade delayed molting and led to abnormal ecdysis.

Advertisement

5. RNAi studies on tick protective antigens and immunity

The immune system of ticks has a vital role of protecting them from harmful substances in the blood, including components of their host’s immune system, and from various pathogens that they acquire in their blood feeding activity. Tick protective antigens, therefore, gain wide interest due to their potential as target for tick control. The highly conserved tick protective antigen subolesin, previously known as 4D8, was first identified from I. scapularisthrough cDNA expression library immunization (ELI) [153], after which, it has been also identified in other hard tick species, and using RNAi, was found to be important in the success of blood feeding and reproduction [124]. An ortholog of subolesin has also been characterized in two soft tick species and RNAi demonstrated that subolesin is also important in the reproduction of soft ticks [127]. The function of subolesin is unclear, but a report showed that subolesin knockdown affected the expression of several genes involved in multiple cellular pathways, suggesting a role in gene expression by interacting with regulatory proteins [154]. Aside from being reported as a promising anti-tick vaccine antigen candidate in many studies, it has been also proposed that subolesin may be targeted in ticks that subsequently will be released for sterile acarine technique (SAT) [38].

The membrane-bound glycoprotein Bm86 expressed mainly in the midgut of R.(B.) microplus[155] is the first, and until recently, the only tick antigen that is commercially available as an anti-tick vaccine in some countries. The exact function of Bm86, however, remains unclear yet. RNAi has been employed to knockdown Bm86and its homologues in other tick species, including R. sanguineus, H. longicornis, and R. evertsi evertsi, which in most cases affected the blood feeding and reproduction of adult ticks, except in R. evertsi evertsiwherein knockdown of two homologues did not yield significant effects [130]. A study in R.(B.) microplusalso showed that knockdown of Bm86decreased the blood feeding capacity and survival of ticks after feeding on a B. bovis-infected host, suggesting that Bm86 may have a critical role in the fitness of ticks after feeding from an acutely B. bovis-infected host [129].

The function of some components of immunity, such as α2-macroglobulin proteins [132, 133], antimicrobial peptides [131], Janus kinase (JAK)-signaling transducer activator of transcription (STAT) pathway [135], dityrosine network [136], and cysteine protease inhibitor in the hemocytes [140] have been analyzed using RNAi. The α2-macroglobulin proteins of I. ricinus, related to vertebrate complement system, were shown to be involved in the phagocytic activity of hemocytes against Gram-negative bacteria [132, 133]. In contrast, a cysteine protease Rmcystatin3 identified in R.(B.) micropluswas implicated as a negative modulator of tick immune response after its silencing greatly reduced the number of bacterial load in the ticks [140]. The role of a defensin from H. longicornis, longicin, in ticks' immune defense against Babesiaparasites was demonstrated through RNAi, as exhibited by a higher load of B. gibsoniin the midgut and ovary of longicin-silenced ticks after infestation in an infected host [131]. Meanwhile, JAK-STAT pathway was shown to be important in Anaplasma phagocytophiluminfection in ticks after its knockdown increased the infection in the salivary glands of nymphs that fed on infected mice [135]. A dual oxidase and a peroxidase, ISCW017368, which together forms a dityrosine network, were separately silenced in I. scapularis, both resulting to reduced Borrelia burgdorferipersistence in ticks [136].

The obligatory blood feeding lifestyle of ticks exposes them to high levels of pro-oxidants that may trigger oxidative stress. Antioxidant enzymes function to protect them from the harmful effects of oxidative stress. Furthermore, these antioxidant enzymes provide detoxification mechanisms to counteract toxins that they encounter in the environment, such as chemical acaricides. RNAi has been very useful in evaluating the function of these antioxidants. Silencing a selenoprotein in R.(B.) microplusreduced the engorged body weight and egg output [45]. In contrast, a study on A. maculatumshowed that silencing two selenoproteins did not alter blood feeding, although the egg output was reduced. Interestingly, the total antioxidant capacities of the saliva from knockdowned ticks were higher, indicating that other antioxidant enzymes may have compensated for the absence of selenoproteins [138]. In another study, silencing thioredoxin reductase, another selenoprotein, in A. maculatumdid not have a negative impact on blood feeding and reproduction. Likewise, variations in transcriptional expression of some antioxidant enzymes were also observed, suggesting compensatory mechanism in the absence of thioredoxin reductase [139]. However, the more interesting finding in that study was the decreased microbiota population following thioredoxin reductase knockdown, possibly because of disturbed redox homeostasis balance. Meanwhile, silencing a glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene affected the attachment of ticks and reduced the post-blood meal bodyweight of R.(B.) microplus[45]. It also made R. sanguineusticks more susceptible to permethrin, although no significant effects on tick attachment, feeding and reproductive capacity were observed [137].

Advertisement

6. Understanding tick-pathogen interaction through RNAi

RNAi has undoubtedly paved a way to better understand the different aspects of ticks' association with various pathogens. Numerous tick proteins with different functions have been found to be involved in the acquisition, establishment, and transmission of pathogens. Several proteins have been studied through RNAi to determine their importance in the development cycle of different pathogens. The knockdown of subolesin [142, 156], GST, vATPase, and selenoprotein M [142] in D. variabilis, and putative von Willebrand factor, flagelliform silk protein and subolesin in R.(B.) microplus[143] decreased the infection level of A. marginalein these hard ticks, implying that these proteins are significant in the establishment of infection of this rickettsia.

RNAi also demonstrated that the Lyme disease agent B. burgdorferican utilize several proteins of I. scapularisto facilitate its transmission to the host. These include salivary proteins such as tick histamine release factor [147], Salp15 [52], and the lectin complement pathway inhibitor (TSLPI) [145]; the latter two provide protection for B. burgdorferiagainst components of the host immune system. Salivary proteins Salp14 [49], Salp16 [48], and Salp25D [44] have been examined for their function in acquiring A. phagocytophilumor B. burgdorferithrough RNAi. Knockdown of Salp14 did not affect the acquisition of either rickettsiae, whereas the knockdown of Salp16 and Salp25D decreased the infection level of A. phagocytophilumand B. burgdorferiin the tick, respectively.

An interesting study on I. scapularisshowed that A. phagocytophilumpromotes cold tolerance through an antifreeze glycoprotein [148]. In the absence of this antifreeze glycoprotein, the survival rate of ticks after exposure to extremely cold temperature and the infection level of A. phagocytophilumfollowing exposure was reduced. Tick defensins, varisin from D. variabilis[144], and ricinusin from Rhipicephalusticks [126] have been silenced to examine their functions in pathogen establishment; the former reduced A. marginaleinfection level, while the latter did not have an effect on B. bigeminainfection.

Several reports also demonstrated the interaction of Babesiaparasites and tick proteins through RNAi. Knockdown of the immunophilin gene in R.(B.) microplushad negative impact on the reproductive performance of the tick and also increased the infection rate of B. bovisin larval progeny [41], while knockdown of TROSPA, serum amyloid A, and calreticulin reduced the infection level of B. bigeminain Rhipicephalusticks [126]. Silencing a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor from D. variabilisincreased the rickettsial infection in the midgut [146], whereas in R.(B.) microplus, silencing a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor, Spi, tended to increase the infection rate of B. bovisin larval progeny [41], but silencing of another Kunitz-type protease inhibitor 5 (KTPI) did not have any effect on Babesiainfection [126].

Advertisement

7. Future directions in tick research and application in tick control

Indeed, great progress in understanding tick biology has been already accomplished in the past. However, many aspects of tick physiology and host-tick-pathogen interaction need to be unraveled yet. Moreover, several optimizations can still be done to improve RNAi in tick research. While being the most widely used method of introducing dsRNA, the injection method (particularly microinjection) that requires elaborate equipment may not be accessible to all laboratories. Moreover, injection is mostly applicable to adult and sometimes nymphal stages, and may be injurious to the ticks, especially when performed by an inexperienced researcher. The soaking method is simpler, less invasive, and less laborious. Electroporation has been recently shown to be effective in introducing dsRNA in eggs [66] and may be useful in studying the function of genes that are involved in embryogenesis and physiology of immature tick stages.

RNAi may also prove to be a promising tick control method and not just a research tool. In pest insect management, the possibility of using RNAi as a novel tool of pest control is already being explored by feeding liposome-coated dsRNA or dsRNA expressed in transgenic plants or bacteria [32]. RNAi targeting several genes have been accomplished by feeding plants expressing dsRNA in several species of economically important crop pests [16]. Feeding dsRNA to ticks is still an underdeveloped approach, which has been yet accomplished only by artificial feeding. Coating dsRNAs with liposomes or nanocarriers may increase dsRNA stability that may make it feasible for administration to the host. Genes that are highly conserved across different tick species, and are of importance in tick survival are good candidate targets. These include proteins with structural and metabolic functions, such as ubiquitin, tropomyosin, and ferritin. However, the specificity of dsRNA to the tick gene should be highly considered. Additional consideration would be the establishment of a minimum effective dose, since the synthesis of dsRNA is costly.

Additionally, RNAi has been proposed as an alternative method for the sterile insect technique in blood-sucking mosquitoes that will produce sterile males by feeding dsRNA in mosquito larvae [64]. Quite similarly, the application of RNAi for tick control was also proposed in a single report on D. variabilis, wherein the highly conserved subolesin was targeted leading to reproductive incapacity [38]. In conclusion, the authors suggested that RNAi may be used to massively produce sterile ticks (SAT) that may be released in the field. Releasing subolesin-silenced ticks may also aid in the control of A. marginale, since it has been reported that subolesin knockdown reduced the infection level of this pathogen [141143]. Introducing dsRNA to eggs through electroporation described above may be a more convenient way of producing knockdowned ticks.

Advertisement

8. Summary

In this chapter, we have reviewed the application of RNAi in tick research and described the significant contribution of RNAi in advancing our knowledge on tick biology and tick-pathogen interaction. RNAi has revolutionized the advancement of our understanding of various aspects of tick blood feeding and digestion, reproduction, metabolism, and immunity. As a functional analysis tool, RNAi has become very handy in elucidating the functions of different proteins from more than 10 hard tick species and a few soft tick species. It has been particularly helpful in screening potential target antigens for anti-tick and tick-borne pathogen vaccine development [157]. Several methods of introducing dsRNA in ticks have been employed but injection has remained to be the most widely used technique. The number of published research on ticks that involves the application of RNAi has been continuously increasing through the years, and it is expected to continue doing so. A great majority of the published reports focused on hard ticks, but due to some physiological differences, more research using RNAi on soft ticks should be conducted. Finally, with numerous potential target genes already identified, the application of RNAi as a tick control method should be investigated in the future, starting with optimization of dsRNA delivery method for practical use.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Numbers 22580335, 25292173, and 26660229. We also thank our colleague, Melbourne R. Talactac, at the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, for his assistance in writing this chapter.

References

  1. 1.Dantas-Torres F, Chomel B, Otranto D. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: A One Health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28:437-46. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2012.07.003.
  2. 2.Jonjegan F, Uilenberg G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology 2004;129:S3-S14.
  3. 3.de la Fuente J. The fossil record and the origin of ticks (Acari: Parasitiformes: Ixodida). Exp Appl Acarol. 2003;29:437-46.
  4. 4.Estrada-Peña A, Salman M. Current limitations in the control and spread of ticks that affect livestock: A review. Agriculture. 2013;3:221-35. doi:10.3390/agriculture3020221.
  5. 5.Estrada-Peña A, de la Fuente J. The ecology of ticks and epidemiology of tick-borne viral diseases. Antiviral Res. 2014;108:104-28. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.05.016.
  6. 6.Kim E, Bauer C, Grevelding CG, Quack T. Improved PCR/nested PCR approaches with increased sensitivity and specificity for the detection of pathogens in hard ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4:409-16. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.04.004.
  7. 7.Baneth G. Tick-borne infections of animals and humans: A common ground. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:591-6. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.03.011.
  8. 8.Guerrero FD, Lovis L, Martins JR. Acaricide resistance mechanisms inRhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplus. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2012;21:1-6. doi:10.1590/S1984-29612012000100002.
  9. 9.Hannon GJ. RNA interference. Nature. 2002;418:244-51. doi:10.1038/418244a.
  10. 10.Aljamali MN, Sauer JR, Essenberg RC. RNA interference: Applicability in tick research. Exp App Acarol. 2002;28:89-96.
  11. 11.de la Fuente J, Kocan KM, Almazan C, Blouin EF. RNA interference for the study and genetic manipulation of ticks. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:427-33. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2007.07.002.
  12. 12.Mello CC, Conte Jr. D. Revealing the world of RNA interference. Nature. 2004;431:338-42. doi:10.1038/nature02872.
  13. 13.Whangbo JS, Hunter CP. Environmental RNA interference. Trends Genetics. 2008;24:297-305. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2008.03.007.
  14. 14.Kurscheid S, Lew-Tabor AE, Valle MR, Bruyeres AG, Doogan VJ, Munderloh UG, et al. Evidence of a tick RNAi pathway by comparative genomics and reverse genetics screen of targets with known loss-of-function phenotypes inDrosophila. BMC Mol Biol. 2009;10:26. doi:10.1186/1471-2199-10-26.
  15. 15.Barnard AC, Nijhof AM, Fick W, Stutzer C, Maritz-Olivier C. RNAi in arthropods: Insight into machinery and applications for understanding the pathogen-vector interface. Genes. 2012;3:704-41. doi:10.3390/genes3040702.
  16. 16.Aronstein K, Oppert B, Lorenzen MD. RNAi in agriculturally-important arthropods. In: Grabowski P, editor. RNA Processing: InTech; 2011. p. 157-80. doi:10.5772/19768.
  17. 17.Rocheleau CE. RNA interference: Systemic RNAi SIDes with endosomes. Curr Biol. 2012;22:R873-R5. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.039.
  18. 18.Hunter CP, Winston WM, Molodowitch C, Feinberg EH, Shih J, Sutherlin M, et al. Systemic RNAi inCaenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2006;71:95-100. doi:10.1101/sqb.2006.71.060.
  19. 19.Jose AM, Smith JJ, Hunter CP. Export of RNA silencing fromC. eleganstissues does not require the RNA channel SID-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:2283-8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809760106.
  20. 20.Hinas A, Wright AJ, Hunter CP. SID-5 is an endosome-associated protein required for efficient systemic RNAi inC. elegans. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1938-43. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.020.
  21. 21.Winston WM, Sutherlin M, Wright AJ, Feinberg EH, Hunter CP.Caenorhbaditis elegansSID-2 is required for environmental RNA interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:10565-70. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611282104.
  22. 22.Tijsterman M, May RC, Simmer F, Okihara KL, Plasterk RHA. Genes required for systemic RNA interference inCaenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2004;14:111-6. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.029.
  23. 23.Ulvila J, Parikka M, Kleino A, Sormunen R, Ezekowitz RA, Kocks C, et al. Double-stranded RNA is internalized by scavenger receptor-mediated endocytosis inDrosophilaS2 cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:14370-5. doi:10.1074/jbc.M513868200.
  24. 24.Ramet M, Pearson A, Manfruelli P, Li X, Koziel H, Gobel V, et al.Drosophilascavenger receptor CI is a pattern recognition receptor for bacteria. Immunity. 2001;15:1027-38. doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00249-7.
  25. 25.Kocks C, Cho JH, Nehme N, Ulvila J, Pearson A, Meister M, et al. Eater, a transmembrane protein mediating phagocytosis of bacterial pathogens in Drosophila. Cell. 2005;123:335-46. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.034.
  26. 26.Aung KM, Boldbaatar D, Liao M, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Nakao S, Matsuoka T, et al. Identification and characterization of class B scavenger receptor CD36 from the hard tick,Haemaphysalis longicornis. Parasitol Res. 2011;108:272-85. doi:10.1007/s00436-010-2053-1.
  27. 27.Aung KM, Boldbaatar D, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Liao M, Xuan X, Suzuki H, et al. Scavenger receptor mediates systemic RNA interference in ticks. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28407. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028407.
  28. 28.Aung KM, Boldbaatar D, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Liao M, Tsuji N, Xuan X, et al. HlSRB, a Class B Scavenger Receptor, is Key to the Granulocyte-Mediated Microbial Phagocytosis in Ticks. PloS ONE. 2012;7:e33504. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033504.
  29. 29.Lew-Tabor AE, Kurscheid S, Barrero R, Gondro C, Moolhuijzen PM, Valle MR, et al. Gene expression evidence for off-target effects caused by RNA interference-mediated gene silencing ofUbiquitin-63Ein the cattle tickRhipicephalus microplus. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41:1001-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.05.003.
  30. 30.Lee YS, Nakahara K, Pham JW, Kim K, He Z, Sontheimer EJ, et al. Distinct roles forDrosophilaDicer-1 and Dicer-2 in the siRNA/miRNA silencing pathways. Cell. 2004;117:69-81. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00261-2.
  31. 31.Hock J, Meister G. The Argonaute protein family. Genome Biology. 2008;9:210. doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-210.
  32. 32.Xue X, Mao Y, Tao X, Huang Y, Chen X. New approaches to agricultural insect pest control based on RNA interference. In: Zayed A, Kent CF, editors. Advances in insect physiology. 42: Elsevier; 2012. p. 73-117. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-387680-5.00003-3.
  33. 33.Karim S, Adamson SW. RNA interference in ticks: A functional genomics took for the study of physiology. In: Zayed A, Kent CF, editors. Advances in insect physiology. 42: Elsevier; 2012. p. 120-54. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-387680-5.00004-5.
  34. 34.Mitchell III RD, Ross E, Osgood C, Sonenshine DE, Donohue KV, Khalil SM, et al. Molecular characterization, tissue-specific expression and RNAi knockdown of the first vitellogenin receptor from a tick. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;37:375-88. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.01.005.
  35. 35.Decrem Y, Beaufays J, Blasioli V, Lahaye K, Brossard M, Vanhamme L, et al. A family of putative metalloproteases in the salivary glands of the tickIxodes ricinus. FEBS J. 2008;275:1485-99. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06308.x.
  36. 36.Karim S, Ramakrishnan VG, Tucker JS, Essenberg RC, Sauer JR.Amblyomma americanumsalivary glands: Double-stranded RNA-mediated gene silencing of synaptobrevin homologue and inhibition of PGE2 stimulated protein secretion. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;34:407-13. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.01.005.
  37. 37.Mulenga A, Khumthong R, Chalaire KC, Strey O, Teel P. Molecular and biological characterization of theAmblyomma americanumorganic anion transporter polypeptide. J Exp Biol. 2008;211:3401-8. doi:10.1242/jeb.022376.
  38. 38.de la Fuente J, Almazan C, Naranjo V, Blouin EF, Meyer JM, Kocan KM. Autocidal control of ticks by silencing of a single gene by RNA interference. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2006;344:332-28. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.109.
  39. 39.Narasimhan S, Montgometry RR, DePonte K, Tschudi C, Marcantonio N, Anderson JF, et al. Disruption ofIxodes scapularisanticoagulation by using RNA interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:1141-6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307669100.
  40. 40.Kocan KM, Blouin EF, de la Fuente J. RNA interference in ticks. J Vis Exp. 2011;20:2472. doi:10.3791/2474.
  41. 41.Bastos RG, Ueti MW, Guerrero FD, Knowles DP, Scoles GA. Silencing of a putative immunophilin gene in the cattle tickRhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplusincreases the infection rate ofBabesia bovisin larval progeny. Parasit Vectors. 2009;2:57. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-2-57.
  42. 42.Nijhof AM, Taoufik A, de la Fuente J, Kocan KM, de Vries E, Jonjegan F. Gene silencing of the tick protective antigens,Bm86,Bm91andsubolesinin the one-host tickBoophilus microplusby RNA interference. Int J Parasitol. 2007;2007:653-62. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.11.005.
  43. 43.Kocan KM, Manzano-Roman R, de la Fuente J. Transovarial silencing of the subolesin gene in three-host ixodid tick species after injection of replete females with subolesin dsRNA. Parasitol Res. 2007;100:1411-5. doi:10.1007/s00436-007-0483-1.
  44. 44.Narasimhan S, Sukumaran B, Bozdogan U, Thomas V, Liang X, DePonte K, et al. A tick antioxidant facilitates the lyme disease agent's successful migration from the mammalian host to the arthropod vector. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2:7-18. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2007.06.001.
  45. 45.Almazan C, Lagunes R, Villar M, Canales M, Rosario-Cruz R, Jonjegan F, et al. Identification and characterization ofRhipicephalus(Boophilus)micropluscandidate protective antigens for the control of cattle tick infestations. Parasitol Res. 2010;106:471-9. doi:10.1007/s00436-009-1689-1.
  46. 46.Merino O, Almazan C, Canales M, Villar M, Moreno-Cid JA, Estrada-Pena A, et al. Control ofRhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplusinfestations by the combination of subolesin vaccination and tick autocidal control after subolesin gene knockdown in ticks fed on cattle. Vaccine. 2011;29:2248-54. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.050.
  47. 47.Soares TS, Watanabe RMO, Tanaka-Azevedo AM, Torquato RJS, Lu S, Figueiredo AC, et al. Expression and functional characterization of boophilin, a thrombin inhibitor fromRhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplusmidgut. Vet Parasitol. 2012;187:521-8. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.01.027.
  48. 48.Sukumaran B, Narasimhan S, Anderson JF, DePonte K, Marcantonio N, Krishnan MN, et al. AnIxodes scapularisprotein required for survival ofAnaplasma phagocytophilumin tick salivary glands. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1507-17. doi:10.1084/jem.20060208.
  49. 49.Pedra JOF, Narasimhan S, DePonte K, Marcantonio N, Kantor FS, Fikrig E. Disruption of the salivary protein 14 inIxodes scapularisnymphts and impact on pathogen acquisition. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:677-82.
  50. 50.Kariu T, Smith A, Yang X, Pal U. A chitin deacetylase-like protein is a predominant constituent of tick perotrophic membrane that influences the persistence of Lyme disease pathogens within the vector. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78376. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078376.
  51. 51.Pal U, Li X, Wang T, Montgometry RR, Ramamoothi N, Desilva AM, et al. TROSPA, anIxodes scapularisreceptorBorrelia burgdorferi. Cell. 2004;119:457-68. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.027.
  52. 52.Ramamoorthi N, Narasimhan S, Pal U, Bao F, Yang XF, Fish D, et al. The Lyme disease agent exploits a tick protein to infect the mammalian host. Nature. 2005;436:573-7. doi:10.1038/nature03812.
  53. 53.Ogihara MH, Hikiba J, Suzuki Y, Taylor D, Kataoka H. Ovarian ecdysteroidogenesis in both immature and mature stages of an Acari,Ornithodoros moubata. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0124953. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124953.
  54. 54.Clemens JC, Worby CA, Simonson-Leff N, Muda M, Maehama T, Hemmings BA, et al. Use of double-stranded RNA interference inDrosophilacell lines to dissect signal transduction pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:6499-503. doi:10.1073/pnas.110149597.
  55. 55.Blouin EF, Manzano-Roman R, De la Fuente J, Kocan KM. Defining the role of subolesin in tick cell culture by use of RNA interference. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1149:41-4. doi:10.1196/annals.1428.058.
  56. 56.Barry G, Alberdi P, Schnettler E, Weisheit S, Kohl A, Fazakerley JK, et al. Gene silencing in tick cell lines using small interfering or long double-stranded RNA. Exp App Acarol. 2013;59:319-38. doi:10.1007/s10493-012-9598-x.
  57. 57.de Abreu LA, Calixto C, Waltero CF, Noce BPD, Githaka NW, Seixas A, et al. The conserved role of the AKT/GSK3 axis in cell survival and glycogen metabolism inRhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplusembryo tick cell line BME26. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830:2574-82. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.12.016.
  58. 58.Aljamali MN, Bior AD, Sauer JR, Essenberg RC. RNA interference in ticks: A study using histamine binding protein dsRNA in the female tickAmblyomma americanum. Insect Mol Biol. 2003;12:299-305. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00416.x.
  59. 59.Karim S, Ramakrishnan VG, Tucker JS, Essenberg RC, Sauer JR.Amblyomma americanumsalivary gland homolog of nSec1 is essential for saliva protein secretion. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2004;324:1256-63. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.189.
  60. 60.Ramakrishnan VG, Aljamali MN, Sauer JR, Essenberg RC. Application of RNA interference in tick salivary gland research. J Biomol Tech. 2005;16:297-305.
  61. 61.Karim S, Miller NJ, Valenzuela J, Sauer JR, Mather TN. RNAi-mediated gene silencing to assess the role of synaptobrevin and cystatin in tick blood feeding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;334:1336-42. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.036.
  62. 62.Campbell EM, Budge GE, Bowman AS. Gene-knockdown in the honey bee miteVarroa destructorby a non-invasive approach: Studies on a glutathione S-transferase. Parasit Vectors. 2012;3:73. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-73.
  63. 63.Kamau LM, Wright HW, Nisbet AJ, Bowman AS. Development of an RNA-interference procedure for gene knockdown in the poultry red mite,Dermanyssus gallinae: Studies on histamine releasing factor and Cathepsin-D. Afr J Biothechnol. 2013;12:1350-6. doi:10.5897/AJB12.2693.
  64. 64.Whyard S, Erdelyan CNG, Partridge AL, Singh AD, Beebe NW, Capina R. Silencing the buzz: A new approach to population suppression of mosquitoes by feeding larvae double-stranded RNAs. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:96. doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0716-6.
  65. 65.Gong H, Umemiya R, Zhou J, Liao M, Zhang H, Jia H, et al. Blocking the secretion of saliva by silencing theHlYkt6gene in the tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;39:372-81. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.03.002.
  66. 66.Neumann E, Schaeffer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J. 1982;1:841-5.
  67. 67.Karim S, Troiano E, Mather TN. Functional genomics tool: Gene silencing inIxodes scapulariseggs and nymphs by electroporated dsRNA. BMC Biotech. 2010;10:1. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-10-1.
  68. 68.Ruiz N, de Abreu LA, Parizi LF, Kim TK, Mulenga A, Braz GRC, et al. Non-invasive delivery of dsRNA into de-waxed tick eggs by electroporation. PLoS ONE. 2015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130008.
  69. 69.Yu N, Christiaens O, Liu J, Niu J, Cappelle K, Caccia S, et al. Delivery of dsRNA for RNAi in insects: An overview and future directions. Insect Sci. 2013;20:4-14. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01534.x.
  70. 70.Krober T, Guerin PM.In vitrofeeding assays for hard ticks. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:445-9. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2007.07.010.
  71. 71.Soares CAG, Lima CMR, Dolan MC, Piesman J, Beard CB, Zeidner NS. Capillary feeding of specific dsRNA induces silencing of theisacgene in nymphalIxodes scapularisticks. Insect Mol Biol. 2005;14:443-52. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2583.2005.00575.x.
  72. 72.Lew-Tabor AE, Bruyeres AG, Zhang B, Valle MR.Rhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplustick in vitro feeding methods for functional (dsRNA) and vaccine candidate (antibody) screening. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:500-10. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.03.005.
  73. 73.Francischetti I, Sa-Nunes A, Mans B, Santos I, Ribeiro J. The role of saliva in tick feeding. Front Biosci. 2010;14:2051-88.
  74. 74.Chmelar J, Calvo E, Pedra J, Francischetti I, Kotsyfakis M. Tick salivary secretion as a source of antihemostatics. J Proteomics. 2012;75:3842-54. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.026.
  75. 75.Kazimirova M, Stibraniova I. Tick salivary compounds: Their role in modulation of host defences and pathogen transmission. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:43. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2013.00043.
  76. 76.Kaufman WR. Ticks: Physiological aspects with implications for pathogen transmission. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2010;1:11-22. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2009.12.001.
  77. 77.Browning R, Karim S. RNA interference mediated depletion of NSF and SNAP-25 results in the inhibition of blood feeding of the Gulf-Coast tick,Amblyomma maculatum. Insect Mol Biol. 2013;22:245-57. doi:10.1111/imb.12017.
  78. 78.Villareal AM, Adamson SW, Browning RE, Budachetri K, Sajid MS, Karim S. Molecular characterization and functional significance of the Vti family of SNARE proteins in tick salivary glands. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;2013:483-93. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.03.003.
  79. 79.Anisuzzaman, Islam MK, Alim MA, Miyoshi T, Hatta T, Yamaji K, et al. Longistatin, a plasminogen activator, is key to the availability of bloodmeals for ixodid ticks. PloS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001312. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001312.
  80. 80.Kim TK, Curran J, Mulenga A. Dual silencing of long and shortAmblyomma americanumacidic chitinase forms weakens the tick cement cone stability. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:3493-503. doi:10.1242/jeb.107979.
  81. 81.Kotsyfakis M, Karim S, Andersen JF, Mather TN, Ribeiro JMC. Selective cysteine protease inhibition contributes to blood-feeding success of the tickIxodes scapularis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:29256-63. doi:10.1074/jbc.M703143200.
  82. 82.Gao X, Shi L, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Zhou J. Characterization of the anticoagulant protein Rhipilin-1 from theRhipicephalus haemaphysaloidestick. J Insect Physiol. 2011;57:339-43. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.12.001.
  83. 83.Chalaire KC, Kim TK, Garcia-Rodriguez H, Mulenga A.Amblyomma americanum(L.) (Acari: Ixodidae) tick salivary gland serine protease inhibitor (serpin) 6 is secreted into tick saliva during feeding. J Exp Biol. 2011;214:665-73. doi:10.1242/jeb.052076.
  84. 84.Yu Y, Y.J. C, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Zhou J. Isolation and characterization of two novel serpins from theRhipicephalus haemaphysaloides. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4:297-303. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.02.001.
  85. 85.Guo X, Booth CJ, Paley MA, Wang X, DePonte K, Fikrig E, et al. Inhibition of neutrophil function by two tick salivary proteins. Infect Immun. 2009;77:2320-9. doi:10.1128/IAI.01507-08.
  86. 86.Campbell EM, Burdin M, Hoppler S, Bowman AS. Role of an aquaporin in the sheep tickIxodes ricinus: Assessment as a potential control target. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:15-23. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.06.010.
  87. 87.Barnard AC, Nijhof AM, Gaspar ARM, Neitz AWH, Jonjegan F, Maritz-Olivier C. Expression profiling, gene silencing and transcriptional networking of metzincin metalloproteases in the cattle,Rhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplus. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186:403-14. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.026.
  88. 88.Adamson SW, Browning RE, Chao CC, Bateman Jr. RC, Ching WM, Karim S. Molecular characterization of tick salivary gland glutaminyl cyclase. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;43:781-93. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.05.011.
  89. 89.Mulenga A, Kim TK, Ibelli AMG. Deorphanization and target validation of cross-tick species conserved novelAmblyomma americanumtick saliva protein. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43:439-51. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.12.012.
  90. 90.Boldbaatar D, Sikasunge CS, Battsetseg B, Xuan X, Fujisaki K. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of an aspartic protease from the hard tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;36:25-36. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.10.003.
  91. 91.Hatta T, Umemiya R, Liao M, Gong H, Harnnoi T, Tanaka M, et al. RNA interference of cytosolic leucine aminopeptidase reduces fecundity in the hard tick,Haemaphysalis longicornis. Parasitol Res. 2007;100:847-54. doi:10.1007/s00436-006-0336-3.
  92. 92.Hatta T, Tsuji N, Miyoshi T, Islam MK, Alim MA, Yamaji K, et al. Leucine aminopeptidase, HlLAP, from the ixodid tickHaemaphysalis longicornis, plays vital roles in the development of oocytes. Parasitol Int. 2010;59:286-9. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2010.03.001.
  93. 93.Liao M, Zhou J, Gong H, Boldbaatar D, Shirafuji R, Battur B, et al. Hemalin, a thrombin inhibitor isolated from a midgut cDNA library from the hard tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. J Insect Physiol. 2009;55:165-74. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.11.004.
  94. 94.Miyoshi T, Tsuji N, Islam MK, Alim MA, Hatta T, Huang X, et al. A set of serine protease paralogs are required for blood-digestion in the ixodid tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. Parasitol Int. 2008;57:499-505. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2008.08.003.
  95. 95.Tsuji N, Miyoshi T, Battsetseg B, Matsuo T, Xuan X, Fujisaki K. A Cysteine Protease Is Critical forBabesiaspp. Transmission inHaemaphysalisTicks. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4(5):e1000062.
  96. 96.Franta Z, Sojka D, Frantova H, Dvorak J, Horn M, Srba J, et al.IrCL1—the haemoglobinolytic cathepsin L of the hard tick,Ixodes ricinus. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41:1253-62. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.06.006.
  97. 97.Yamaji K, Miyoshi T, Hatta T, Matsubayashi M, Alim MA, Anisuzzaman, et al. HlCPL-A, a cathepsin L-like cysteine protease from the ixodid tickHaemaphysalis longicornis, modulated midgut proteolytic enzymes and their inhibitors during blood meal digestion. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;16:206-11. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2013.01.018.
  98. 98.Zhou J, Liao M, Hatta T, Tanaka M, Xuan X, Fujisaki K. Identification of a follistatin-related protein from the tickHaemaphysalis longicornisand its effect on tick oviposition. Gene. 2006;372:191-8. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2005.12.020.
  99. 99.Boldbaatar D, Battsetseg B, Matsuo T, Hatta T, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Xuan X, et al. Tick vitellogenin receptor reveals critical role in oocyte development and transovarial transmission ofBabesiaparasite. Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;86:331-44.
  100. 100.Smith AD, Kaufman WR. Molecular characterization of the vitellogenin receptor from the tick,Amblyomma hebraeum(Acari: Ixodidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;43:1133-41. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.10.002.
  101. 101.Smith A, Guo X, de la Fuente J, Naranjo V, Kocan KM, Kaufman WR. The impact of RNA interference of the subolesin and voraxin genes in the maleAmblyomma hebraeum(Acari: Ixodidae) on female engorgement and oviposition. Exp App Acarol. 2009;47:71-86. doi:10.1007/s10493-008-9195-1.
  102. 102.Boldbaatar D, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Liao M, Tanaka T, Xuan X, Fujisaki K. Multiple vitellogenins from theHaemaphysalis longicornistick are crucial for ovarian development. J Insect Physiol. 2010;56:1587-98. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.05.019.
  103. 103.Boldbaatar D, Battur B, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Liao M, Tanaka T, Fujisaki K. GATA transcription, translation and regulation inHaemaphysalis longicornistick: Analysis of the cDNA and an essential role for vitellogenesis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;40:49-57. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.12.009.
  104. 104.Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Boldbaatar D, Liao M, Battur B, Rahman MS, Kuboki T, et al. Target of rapamycin (TOR) controls vitellogenesis via activation of the S6 kinase in the fat body of the tick,Haemaphysalis longicornis. Int J Parasitol. 2012;42:991-8. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.08.002.
  105. 105.Huang X, Tsuji N, Miyoshi T, Motobu M, Islam MK, Alim MA, et al. Characterization of glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferase from the ixodid tick,Haemaphysalis longicornis, and its critical role in host blood feeding. Int J Parasitol. 2007;37:383-92. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.11.012.
  106. 106.Karim S, Kenny B, Troiano E, Mather TN. RNAi-mediated gene silencing in tick synganglia: A proof of concept study. BMC Biotech. 2008;8:30. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-8-30.
  107. 107.Boldbaatar D, Battsetseg B, Hatta T, Miyoshi T, Tsuji N, Xuan X, et al. Valosin-containing protein from the hard tickHaemaphysalis longicornis: Effects of dsRNA-mediated HlVCP gene silencing. Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;85:384-94.
  108. 108.Boldbaatar D, R.M. K, Battur B, Umemiya R, Liao M, Tanaka T, et al. Identification of two forms of cyclophilin from the hard tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. Process Biochemistry. 2008;43:615-25.
  109. 109.Gong H, Liao M, Zhou J, Hatta T, Huang P, Zhang G, et al. Gene silencing of ribosomal protein P0 is lethal to the tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. Vet Parasitol. 2008;151:268-78. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.11.015.
  110. 110.Liao M, Boldbaatar D, Gong H, Huang P, Umemiya R, Harnnoi T, et al. Functional analysis of protein disulfide isomerases in blood feeding, viability and oocyte development inHaemaphysalis longicornisticks. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;38:285-95. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.11.006.
  111. 111.Hajdusek O, Sojka D, Kopacek P, Buresova V, Franta Z, Sauman I, et al. Knockdown of proteins involved in iron metabolism limits tick reproduction and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:1033-8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807961106.
  112. 112.Galay RL, Aung KM, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Maeda H, Matsuo T, Kawaguchi H, et al. Multiple ferritins are vital to successful blood feeding and reproduction of the hard tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. J Exp Biol. 2013;216:1905-15. doi:10.1242/jeb.081240.
  113. 113.Galay RL, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Bacolod ET, Maeda H, Kusakisako K, Koyama J, et al. Two kinds of ferritin protect ixodid ticks from iron overload and consequent oxidative stress. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e90661. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090661.
  114. 114.Battur B, Boldbaatar D, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Liao M, Battsetseg B, Taylor D, et al. LKR/SDH plays important roles throughout the tick life cycle including a long starvation period. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7136. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007136.
  115. 115.Fabres A, De Andrade CP, Guizzo M, Sorgine MH, Paiva-Silva GO, Masuda A, et al. Effect of GSK-3 activity, enzymatic inhibition and gene silencing y RNAi on tick oviposition and egg hatching. Parasitology. 2010;137:1537-46. doi:10.1017/S0031182010000284.
  116. 116.Mulenga A, Khumthong R. Disrupting theAmblyomma americanum(L.) CD147 receptor homolog prevents ticks from feeding to repletion and blocks spontaneous detachment of ticks from their host. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;40:524-42. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.04.012.
  117. 117.Mulenga A, Khumthong R. Silencing of threeAmblyomma americanum(L.) insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related proteins prevents ticks from feeding to repletion. J Exp Biol. 2010;213:1153-61. doi:10.1242/jeb.035204.
  118. 118.de la Fuente J, Manzano-Roman R, Naranjo V, Kocan KM, Zivkovic Z, Blouin EF, et al. Identification of protective antigens by RNA interference for control of the lone star tick,Amblyomma americanum. Vaccine. 2010;28:1786-95. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.007.
  119. 119.Alim MA, Islam MK, Anisuzzaman, Miyoshi T, Hatta T, Yamaji K, et al. A hemocyte-derived Kunitz-BPTI-type chymotrypsin inhibitor, HlChl, from the ixodid tickHaemaphysalis longicornis, plays regulatory functions in tick blood-feeding processes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;42:925-34. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.09.005.
  120. 120.Kume A, Boldbaatar D, Takazawa Y, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Tanaka T, Fujisaki K. RNAi of the translation inhibition gene4E-BPidentified from the hard tick,Haemaphysalis longicornis, affects lipid storage during the off-host starvation period of ticks. Parasitol Res. 2012;111:889-96. doi:10.1007/s00436-012-2915-9.
  121. 121.Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Tanaka T, Boldbaatar D, Tanaka T, Fujisaki K. Akt is an essential player in regulating cell/organ growth at the adult stage in the hard tickHaemaphysalis longicornis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;42:164-73. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.12.001.
  122. 122.Wang Y, Zhou Y, Gong H, Cao J, Zhang H, Li X, et al. Functional characterization of a cystatin from the tickRhipicephalus haemaphysaloides. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:140. doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0725-5.
  123. 123.Tian M, Tian Z, Luo J, Xie J, Yin H, Zeng Q, et al. Idenfification of the tropomyosin (Hl-Tm)Haemaphysalis longicornis. Vet Parasitol. 2015;207:318-23. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.007.
  124. 124.de la Fuente J, Almazan C, Blas-Machado U, Naranjo V, Mangold AJ, Blouin EF, et al. The tick protective antigen, 4D8, is a conserved protein involved in modulation of tick blood ingestion and reproduction. Vaccine. 2006;24:4082-95. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.046.
  125. 125.de la Fuente J, Almazan C, Naranjo V, Blouin EF, Kocan KM. Synergistic effect of silencing the expression of tick protective antigens 4D8 and Rs86 inRhipicephalus sanguineusby RNA interference. Parasitol Res. 2006;99:108-13. doi:10.1007/s00436-006-0132-0.
  126. 126.Antunes S, Galindo RC, Almazan C, Rudenko N, Golovchenko M, Grubhoffer L, et al. Functional genomics studies ofRhipicephalus(Boophilus)annulatusticks in response to infection with the cattle protozoan parasite,Babesia bigemina. Int J Parasitol. 2012;42:187-95. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.12.003.
  127. 127.Manzano-Roman R, Diaz-Martin V, Oleaga A, Siles-Lucas M, Perez-Sanchez R. Subolesin/akirin orthologs fromOrnithodorosspp. soft ticks: Cloning, RNAi gene silencing and protective effect of the recombinant proteins. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185:248-59. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.032.
  128. 128.Liao M, Zhou J, Hatta T, Umemiya R, Miyoshi T, Tsuji N, et al. Molecular characterization ofRhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplusBm86homologue fromHaemaphysalis longicornisticks. Vet Parasitol. 2007;146:148-57. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.01.015.
  129. 129.Bastos RG, Ueti MW, Knowles DP, Scoles GA. TheRhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplus Bm86gene plays a critical role in the fitness of ticks fed on cattle during acuteBabesia bovisinfection. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:111. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-111.
  130. 130.Nijhof AM, Balk JA, Postigo M, Rhebergen AM, Taoufik A, Jonjegan F. Bm86 homologues and novel ATAQ proteins with multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains from hard and soft ticks. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:1587-97. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.06.003.
  131. 131.Tsuji N, Battsetseg B, Boldbaatar D, Miyoshi T, Xuan X, Oliver Jr. JH, et al. Babesial vector tick defensin againstBabesiasp. parasites. Infect Immun. 2007;75:3633-40. doi:10.1128/IAI.00256-07.
  132. 132.Buresova V, Hajdusek O, Franta Z, Loosova G, Grunclova L, Levashina EA, et al. Functional genomics of tick thioester-containing proteins reveal the ancient origin of the complement system. J Innate Immun. 2011;3:623-30. doi:10.1159/000328851.
  133. 133.Buresova V, Hajdusek O, Franta Z, Sojka D, Kopacek P. IrAM-An alpha2-macroglobulin from the hard tickIxodes ricinus: Characterization and function in phagocytosis of a potential pathogenChryseobacterium indologenes. Dev Comp Immunol. 2009;33:489-98. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2008.09.011.
  134. 134.Bowen CJ, Jaworski DC, Wasala NB, Coons LB. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression and protein localization inAmblyomma americanum(Ixodidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 2010;50:343-52. doi:10.1007/s10493-009-9324-5.
  135. 135.Liu L, Dai J, Zhao YO, Narasimhan S, Yang Y, Zhang L, et al.Ixodes scapularisJAK-STAT pathway regulates tick antimicrobial peptides, thereby controlling the agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:1233-41. doi:10.1093/infdis/jis484.
  136. 136.Yang X, Smith AA, Williams MS, Pal U. A dityrosine network mediated by dual oxidase and peroxidase influences the persistence of Lyme disease pathogens within the vector. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:12813-22. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.538272.
  137. 137.Duscher GG, Galindo RC, Tichy A, Hummel K, Kocan KM, de la Fuente J. Glutathione S-transferase affects permethrin detoxification in the brown dog tick,Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:225-33. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.11.006.
  138. 138.Adamson S, Browning R, Singh P, Nobles S, Villareal A, Karim S. Transcriptional activation of antioxidants may compensate for selenoprotein deficiencies inAmblyomma maculatum(Acari: Ixodidae) injected withselK-orselM-dsRNA. Insect Mol Biol. 2014;23:497-510. doi:10.1111/imb.12098.
  139. 139.Budachetri K, Karim S. An insight into the functional role of thioredoxin reductase, a selenoprotein, in maintaining normal native microbiota in the Gulf Coast tick (Amblyomma maculatum). Insect Mol Biol. 2015. doi:10.1111/imb.12184.
  140. 140.Liu S, Soares TS, Vaz Jr. Id, Lovato DV, Aparecida ST. Rmcystatin3, a cysteine protease inhibitor fromRhipicephalus microplushemocytes involved in immune response. Biochimie. 2014;106:17-23. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2014.07.012.
  141. 141.de la Fuente J, Ayoubi P, Blouin EF, Almazan C, Naranjo V, Kocan KM. Anaplasmosis: Focusing on host-vector-pathogen interactions for vaccine development. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1078:416-23. doi:10.1196/annals.1374.081.
  142. 142.Kocan KM, Zivkovic Z, Blouin EF, Naranjo V, Almazan C, Mitra R, et al. Silencing of genes involved inAnaplasma marginale-tick interactions affects the pathogen developmental cycle inDermacentor variabilis. BMC Dev Biol. 2009;9:42. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-9-42.
  143. 143.Zivkovic Z, Esteves E, Almazan C, Daffre S, Nijhof AM, Kocan KM, et al. DIfferential expression of genes in salivary glands of maleRhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplusin response to infection withAnaplasma marginale. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:186. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-186.
  144. 144.Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Manzano-Roman R, Naranjo V, Hynes WL, Sonenshine DE. Silencing expression of the defensin, varisin, in maleDermacentor variabilisby RNA interference results in reducedAnaplasma marginaleinfections. Exp App Acarol. 2008;46:17-28. doi:10.1007/s10493-008-9159-5.
  145. 145.Schuijt TJ, Coumou J, Narasimhan S, Dai J, DePonte K, Wouters D, et al. A tick mannose-binding lectin inhibitor interferes with the vertebrate complement cascade to enhance transmission of the lyme disease agent. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10:136-46. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2011.06.010.
  146. 146.Ceraul SM, Chung A, Sears KT, Popov VL, Beier-Sexton M, Rahman MS, et al. A kunitz protease inhibitor fromDermacentor variabilis, a vector for spotted fever group Rickettsiae, limitsRickettsia montanensisinfection. Infect Immun. 2011;79:321-9. doi:10.1128/IAI.00362-10.
  147. 147.Dai J, Narasimhan S, Zhang L, Liu L, Wang P, Fikrig E. Tick histamine release factor is critical forIxodes scapularisengorgement and transmission of the Lyme diseases agent. PloS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001205. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001205.
  148. 148.Neelakanta G, Sultana H, Fish D, Anderson JF, Fikrig E.Anaplasma phagocytophiluminducesIxodees scapularisticks to express an antifreeze glycoprotein gene that enhances their survival in the cold. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3179-90. doi:10.1172/JCI42868.
  149. 149.Severo MS, Choy A, Stephen sKD, Sakhon OS, Chen G, Chung DD, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase XIAP restrictsAnaplasma phagocytophilumcolonization ofIxodes scapularistick. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:1830-40. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit380.
  150. 150.Bifano TD, Ueti MW, Esteves E, Reif KE, Braz GRC, Scoles GA, et al. Knockdown of theRhipicephalus micropluscytochrome c oxidase subunit III gene is associated with a failure ofAnaplasma marginaletransmission. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98614. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098614.
  151. 151.Sojka D, Franta Z, Horn M, Caffrey C, Mares M, Kopacek P. New insights into the machinery of blood digestion by ticks. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:276-85. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2013.04.002.
  152. 152.Friesen KJ, Kaufman WR. Quantification of vitellogenesis and its control by 20-hydroxyecdysone in the ixodid tick,Amblyomma hebraeum. J Insect Physiol. 2002;48:773-82. doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00107-5.
  153. 153.Almazan C, Kocan KM, Bergman DK, Garcia-Garcia JC, Blouin EF, de la Fuente J. Identification of protective antigens for the control ofIxodes scapularisinfestations using cDNA expression library immunization. Vaccine. 2003;21:1492-501. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00683-7.
  154. 154.de la Fuente J, Maritz-Olivier C, Naranjo V, Ayoubi P, Nijhof AM, Almazan C, et al. Evidence of the role of tick subolesin in gene expression. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:372. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-372.
  155. 155.Willadsen P, Riding GA, McKenna RV, Kemp DH, Tellam RL, Nielsen JN, et al. Immunologic control of a parasitic arthropod. Identification of a protective antigen fromBoophilus microplus. J Immunol. 1989;143:1346-51.
  156. 156.de la Fuente J, Blouin EF, Manzano-Roman R, Naranjo V, Almazan C, de la Lastra JMP, et al. Functional genomic studies of tick cells in response to infection with the cattle pathogen, Anaplasma marginale. Genomics. 2007;90:712-22. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.08.009.
  157. 157.de la Fuente J, Merino O. Vaccinomics, the new road to tick vaccines. Vaccine. 2013;31:5923-9. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.049.

Written By

Remil Linggatong Galay, Rika Umemiya-Shirafuji, Masami Mochizuki, Kozo Fujisaki and Tetsuya Tanaka

Submitted: May 4th, 2015Reviewed: September 21st, 2015Published: April 6th, 2016