Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Hexavalent Chromium (VI) Removal by Penicillium sp. IA-01

Written By

Ismael Acosta-Rodríguez, Damaris L. Arévalo-Rangel, Juan F. Cárdenas-González, María de Guadalupe Moctezuma-Zárate and Víctor M. Martínez-Juárez

Submitted: October 2nd, 2014 Reviewed: April 20th, 2015 Published: September 9th, 2015

DOI: 10.5772/60660

Chapter metrics overview

1,835 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The objective of this work was to study the removal of chromium (VI) in aqueous solution by the fungus Penicillium sp. IA-01, isolated from polluted air with industrial vapors. To obtain the fungal biomass, pre-inoculums were performed in thioglycolate broth from a strain isolated from vapours contaminated with Cr (VI). The fungus was incubated for four weeks at ambient temperature, filtered, and washed three times with trideionized water. In preparing cellullar fractions, it was necessary to break the fungal cells with glass beads using a homogenizer being careful to keep the samples in frosty cold ice. To obtain the fungal biomass, the fungus was filtered and stored in an oven at 80°C, allowing it to dry for 48 h. Removal of Cr (VI) in vitro was evaluated using different cellular fractions and dead fungal biomass. We determine the optimal characteristics for metal removal in the reaction mixture. Concluding that the ideal conditions for the removal of Cr (VI) in the cell extracts were 37°C and pH 7.0, also we observ that the highest enzyme activity was in the mixed membrane fraction. In dead fungal biomass, the ideal conditions for removal of metal are 60°C and pH 1.0.


  • Penicillium
  • Fugal biomass
  • Cellular fractions
  • Chromium (VI)
  • Biosorption
  • Removal

1. Introduction

Environmental pollution with heavy metals is caused by anthropogenic and natural actions. Discharges of wastewater from various industrial activities such as electroplating, mining, paint factory, plastics, coating metal cables, and automotive radiators, and certain industries producing energy, metal engineering industry and producers of welding materials contain high concentrations of metals. Several heavy metals are highly toxic and ingestion of these metals by drinking contaminated water or breathing polluted air can cause serious health problems in human beings. Several metals are considered toxic at certain levels of concentrations in wastewater, such as arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, copper, chromium, nickel, lead and mercury. Unlike the organic compounds, heavy metals cannot be biodegraded or destroyd, therefore they must be removed. There are several methods for removal of heavy metals: ion exchange, membrane separation, and separation and electrochemical adsorption on various adsorbents. [1].

Chromium (Cr) is one of the major environmental pollutants coming from industrial effluents and tannery. It is considered the major pollutant cataloged by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA:, since it is stable in aqueous solution and hence high in mobility in different environments. Chromium is a metal element in the periodic table. It is odorless and tasteless; is found in rocks, plants, soil, and volcanic dust, humans and animals; and exists in the environment most commonly as the trivalent [(chromium (III))], hexavalent [(chromium (VI))] and metallic [(chromium (0))]. Chromium (III) is generally contained in many vegetables, fruits, meats, grains and yeast. Industrial processes generally produce chromium (VI) and chromium (0). The main sources of chromium (VI) in drinking water are discharges from steel and pulp, and erosion of natural deposits of chromium (III). In many places, chromium compounds have been scattered to the environment through leaks, poor storage or improper disposal practices. The chromium compounds are very persistent in water and sediment [2].

Chromium is regarded as an environmental pollutant due to its wide use in various industrial activities, such as electrolytic plating, leather tanning, explosives manufacturing etc. The stable forms of chromium in the environment are trivalent (Cr (III)) and hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)). Further, Cr (VI) is highly soluble, making it mobile in soil and aquatic environments, with consequent toxicity ecosystems. Chromium in their different forms can be use in the production of steel alloys and other metals chromed, for dyes and pigments, and the preservation of leather and wood. It can also be find naturally in the soil. The primary forms of chromium found in nature are chromium (III) and chromium (VI) and these forms are converted to each other depending on environmental conditions [2]. Cr (VI) is consider the most toxic form of chromium, and is usually associated with oxygen as chromates (CrO4–2) and dichromates (Cr2O7–2) [3], which due to its high solubility are highly mobile in soil environments and water [4]. Moreover, Cr (III) is in the form of oxides, hydroxides or poorly soluble sulfates, by which it is much less mobile, and there joined organic matter in the soil and aquatic environments [5, 6]. Cr (VI) is a strong oxidizing agent, and in the presence of organic matter is reduced to Cr (III); this transformation is faster in acidic environments [3]. However, high levels of Cr (VI) may exceed the reducing capacity of the environment and thus can persist as a contaminant. It has been established now that various chromium compounds as oxides, chromates and dichromates, are environmental contaminants in water, soil, and industrial effluents, because this metal is widely used in various manufacturing, such as electrolytic plating, explosives manufacturing, leather tanning, metal alloy, dyes and pigments manufacturing, etc. [1, 5].

There are studies of many methods for removal of chromium ion present in water industrial waste, for example: ion exchange on resins, coagulation-flocculation, adsorption on activated carbon, reduction, chemical precipitation, sedimentation, etc., [7], which in most cases are expensive or inefficient, especially when the concentration of these ions is very low [8]. Therefore arise emerging technologies such as biosorption, the process of attracting various chemical species by biomass (live or dead), by physicochemical mechanisms as adsorption or ion exchange [9].

Fungal cells interact with chromium at different levels from the cell wall and, from the periplasm to the cytoplasm and cell organelles. These microorganisms require detecting and regulating intracellular levels of chromium through homeostasis systems that maintain a balance between the incorporation, expulsion, and arrest of metal [1]. It is common for native microorganisms of sites contaminated with chromate ion, show resistance because they have asset or liability mechanisms that allow them to remove from detoxification. In certain species these mechanisms are know in detail, some of which are of basic interest and biotechnological importance, the latter in the context of developing new technologies for the treatment of industrial effluents and for bioremediation of contaminated sites. These mechanisms generally include biotransformation of Cr (VI) reduced species (chemical reduction), which may be direct (enzymatic) or indirect (enzyme); incorporation and bioaccumulation; biosorption of Cr (III), and Cr (VI); and immobilization [1, 9]. Some filamentous fungi reduce Cr (VI) to Cr (III), by different mechanisms of Cr (VI) detoxification, like reducing power generated by carbon metabolism [10, 11, and 12]. Aspergillus nigervar. tubingensisEd8, has demonstrated the ability to both biotransform Cr (VI) and accumulate it in the biomass, by a reduction and a sorption processes, using electron microscopy techniques [13].

Aspergillus nigerstrains have been described as coping with chromium mainly via the biosorption of the metal into the cells, rather than via the use of reducing activity [14]. Extracellular reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) was observed during the growth of Candida utilisby mechanisms independent from the intensity of culture growth or initial chromium concentration [15], and they hypothesized that Cr (VI) reduction in C. utiliscould be partly dependent on pH changes of broth during the exponential phase or on exo-enzymatic activities during stationary phase. Also, the biosorption of this metal has has been investigated in different fungi and yeast: Cyberlindnera fabianii, Wickerhamomyces anomalusand Candida tropicalisin aqueous solutions at different pH conditions. Cr (VI), and pH range between 2 and 4 where the most effective for the three species [16]. Secondly, Candida maltosa, isolated from tanning liquors from a leather factory has the capacity to reduce Cr (VI) both in the presence of viable intact cells and in cell-free extracts [17]. This ability was related to NADH-dependent chromate reductase activity associated with soluble proteins and, to a lesser extent, with the membrane fraction [17]. Recently, the reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) through an enzymatic mechanism has been observed in Pichia. Both in intact cells and in cell-free extracts of P. jadiniiM9 and P. anomalaM10 strains, chromate was reduced, suggesting the presence of a chromate reductase activity possibly associated with the cytosolic or membrane proteins [18]. In the bacteria Pseudomonas putidaF1, challenged with Cr (VI) in minimal médium (instead of in the complex LB medium), an ATPase involved in DNA repair-like protein (Pput 2963) was overexpressed compared with untreated cultures, suggesting that DNA damage occurs [19], and a non-enzymatic mechanism of Cr (VI) reduction has been described for A. niger[20]. The purpose of this chapter is to elucidate the characteristics of removal of chromium (VI) by Penicilliumsp. IA-01cells.


2. Materials and methods

2.1. Screening of the microorganism showing the resistant to Chromium (VI) and chromate resistance test

We isolate a chromate resistant mycelial fungus from polluted air near the Faculty of Chemical Science, UASLP (San Luis Potosí, México), and this was used for the screening. The chromate resistant filamentous fungus contained in the air was grown on the Petri dish containing modified Lee’s minimal medium (LMM) (with 0.25% KH2PO4, 0.20% MgSO4, 0.50% (NH4)2SO4, 0.50% NaCl, 0.25% glucose, and 2% agar) supplemented with 500 mg/L K2CrO4; the pH of the medium was adjusted and maintained at 5.3 with 100 mmol/L citrate-phosphate buffer. The plates were incubated at 28C for seven days. The strain was identified based on characteristic macroscopic and microscopic observation [21]. Fungal cultures grown in thioglycolate broth were used as primary inoculums. Chromate-resistant tests of the isolated strain, filamentous fungus Penicilliumsp IA-01, were perform on liquid LMM containing the appropriate nutritional requirements and different concentrations of Cr (VI) (as potassium chromate), and the dry weight was determined.

2.2. Biosorption tests by using dry cells

The fungal cells was grown at 28°C in an stirred and aerated liquid media containing thioglycolate broth at a concentration of 8g/L (p/v). After five days of incubation, the cells were recovered by centrifugation (3000 rpm/10 min), and washed twice in the same conditions with deionized wáter, and subsequently it was dry (80°C/24 h) in an oven. Solutions of Cr (VI) for analysis, were prepared by diluting 71.86mg/L of stock metal solution. The concentration range of chromium (VI) solutions was 50-1000mg/L. The pH of each solution was adjusted to the required value by adding 1M H2SO4 solution before mixing with the microorganism. The biosorption of the metal by fungal dry cells was determined at different concentrations (50–1,000mg/L) of 100 mL Cr (VI) solution, with 1g of fungal biomass, at 120 rpm, and the sample was filtered. The filtrate containing the residual concentration of Cr (VI) was determined spectrophotometrically. For the determination of rate of metal biosorption, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1,000mg/L of Cr (VI) solution was used. The supernatant was analyzed for residual Cr (VI) after the contact period at different times. For determination of the effects of pH and temperature, four solutions (pH 1, 2, 3, and 4) and temperatures (28, 40, 50, and 60℃) were respectively used.

Moreover, biosorption to the contaminated soil and water was examined. Four Erlenmeyer glass flasks containing 5g of fungal biomass and 20g of contaminated soil and 20 mL of water (297mg Cr (VI)/g soil or 155mg Cr(VI)/L water), of tannery (Celaya, Guanajuato, México), was completed to 100 mL with trideionized water, were incubated during seven days at 120 rpm, and filtered in Whatman filter paper No. 1, and the concentration of Cr (VI) of the filtrate analyzed with 1, 5 diphenylcarbazide [22].

2.3. Reduction of Cr (VI) by living cells

Reduction efficiency of Cr (VI) by living, resting, and permeabilized cells was examined. To examine the living cells, cultures in 100 mL of LMM were inoculated with 5 ×105 spores/mL (28C, and 48 h), the cells were centrifugated (2000 rpm, at 4C/10 min), and washed twice with sterile trideionized water and the pellet was resuspended in 3 mL of the same solution, and was transferred at a fresh LMM (100 mL with 50mg/L Cr (VI)). At different times, 1 mL aliquots were removed and centrifuged (5000 rpm/10 min), and we determine the concentration of Cr (VI) or total Cr in the supernatant.

Reduction efficiency of Cr (VI) was examined by the resting cells. 5 ×105 spores/mL of Penicilliumsp. was inoculated and incubated in 100 mL thioglycolate broth (pH 7.0) for five days, and was harvested (3000 ×g at 4C); cell pellets obtained were washed by centrifugation twice with 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and resuspended in the same buffer. The suspended cell pellets were added in 2-10mg/100 mL of Cr (VI) solution, mixed for 30 min, and incubated at 30C for 6 h. Heat-killed culture pellets (2 mL), which were treated at 100oC for 10 min were used as control. After the incubation, the tubes were centrifuged, and 100 µL aliquots were withdrawn from each sample to estimate the remaining Cr (VI).

Reduction efficiency of Cr (VI) was also examined by the permeable fungal cells. Culture of Penicilliumsp. IA-01 was grown for five days, harvested, and washed with potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) as described above. The suspended culture pellets were treated with 0.2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulphate, 0.2% Tween 80, (v/v), 0.2% Triton X-100 (v/v), and 0.2% toluene (v/v), by vortexing for 30 min to achieve cell permeabilization. Permeabilized cell suspensions (0.5 mL) were then added with 2–10mg/100 mL of Cr (VI) as final concentrations and incubated for 6 h at 30C.

2.4. Activity of chromate reductase

Cell-free extracts (CFE) of Penicilliumsp IA-01 were prepared by modifying the previously published protocols. The pellets were resuspended in 5% (v/v) of the original culture volume in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). These cell suspensions were placed to an ice bath and disrupted using an Ultrasonic Mini Bead Beater (Densply) with 15 cycles of 60 sec for each one. The sonicate thus obtained was then centrifuged at 3000 x g for 10 min at 4C. The pellet was resuspended in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and this is the CFE.

Enzymatic chromate reduction was estimated as described previously using a standard curve of Cr (VI) 0–30 mM. The assay was as follows: The reaction system (1.0 mL) was made up of varying Cr (VI) final concentrations (5–30 mM) in 700 µL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) added with 250 µL aliquots of CFE for chromate reduction and 50 µL of NADH. The system volume of 1.0 mL was kept constant for all experiments. Chromate reductase activity was measured at 37C at different pH values using several buffers (100 mM phosphate citrate, pH 5.0; 50 mM phosphate, pH 6.0–8.0, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8-9). The effect of temperature was studied by measuring chromate reductase activity at different incubation temperatures between 20 and 60C, at optimum pH. The CFE samples were also treated with several metal ions to a final concentration of 1mM at optimal pH and temperature; Na+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, Mg2+, Cd2+, and Fe3+ were tested by using 10 mM solutions of Na2SO4, CaCl2, CuCl2, HgCl2, MgCl2, CdCl2, and FeCl3. The electron donors tested were NADH, glucose, sodium acetate, formic acid, citrate, cystin, lactic acid, and ascorbic acid in a final concentration of 1mM, and the inhibitors were EDTA, KCN, NaN3, and β-mercaptoethanol at the same concentration. For chromate reductase activity, one unit was defined as enzyme that reduces 1mmol of Cr (VI)/min/37C, and the specific activity was defined as unit chromate reductase activity/min/mg protein in the CFE. Protein concentrations were determined by the Lowry method [23].

2.5. Determination of hexavalent, trivalent, and total amount of chromium

Hexavalent and trivalent chromium were quantified employing diphenylcarbazide [22] and chromazurol S [24], respectively, the total amount of Chromium was determined by electrothermal atomic absorption spectroscopy [22]. Tree dependent experiments were carried out and the mean value was shown


3. Results and discussion

3.1. Isolation and identification of a fungal strain tolerant to Cr (VI)

Microorganism was grown on the LMM agar plates containing 500 mg/L of K2CrO4, and the largest colony of fungi was isolated. Colonies isolated grew rapidly within three days. Colonies are usually fast growing, in shades of green, sometimes white, mostly consisting a dense conidiophores. Microscopically, chains of single-celled conidia (ameroconidia) are produced in basipetal succession from a specialized conidiogenous cell called phialide. In Penicillium,the phialides may be produced singly, in groups or from branched metulae, giving a brush-like appearance known as a penicillus (Figure 1) [25].

The cells of the isolated strain grew on LMM supplemented with 2 g/L of Cr (VI) about 50% of growth relative to control (85mg of dry weight without metal) was obtained (Figure 2) and, therefore probably is resistant to the metal. Different microorganisms that are Cr (VI) resistant have been isolated from different contaminated sites [1, 16, 26, and 27], and Chromate tolerance has been described in the mutants of stocked culture, and in native isolates of contaminated sites, as in this work; in several cases, both yeast and filamentous fungi showed that tolerance to Cr (VI) is due to transport of sulfate disturbance that leads to reduced incorporation of chromate [28] in other cases, phenotypes of hypersensitivity to Cr (VI) are produced as a result of alteration of the vacuolar ATPase and vacuolar structures [29] or by alteration of proteins that protect the oxidative effect of Cr (VI) as the alkyl hydroperoxide reductase [30] or Cu-Zn-superoxide dismutase and methionine sulfoxide peptide reductase [31]. However, the mechanism of tolerance in Penicilliumsp IA-01fungus are not investigated. Thus, we precisely examined the characteristics of the Penicilliumstrain to estimate the mechanism in the following experiments.

Figure 1.

Macroscopic and microscopic morphology of the fungusPenicilliumsp IA-01

Figure 2.

Growth in dry weight ofPenicilliumsp., IA-01with different concentrations of Cr (VI), 1 × 105 spores/mL, 28°C, seven days of incubation, 100 rpm.

3.2. Absorption of Cr (VI) by the dry cells of Penicilliumsp. IA-01

First, the ability of absorption was examined by using Penicillumsp. IA-01 cells to clarify the mechanism of Cr (VI) tolerance. Figure 3 shows the effect of the incubation time on Cr (VI) removal by Penicilliumsp biomass. The optimum time for Cr (VI) removal was 150 min at constant values of pH (1.0), biosorbent dosage (1g 100/mL), initial metal concentration (50mg/L) and temperature (28°C). Some studies [32], report an incubation time of 48 h at pH 1.0 by fruiting bodies of the jelly fungus Auricularia polytricha,24 h for C. fabianii, W. anomalusand C. tropicalis, at pH range between 2 and 4 for the three species [16], to pH of 2.0 to five days for Aspergillus niger[20], the latter with 10 g/L of biomass, and at the same pH of 2.0. Changes in the permeability of the fungal cell wall, of unknown origin, could partly explain the differences found in the incubation time, providing greater or lesser exposure of the functional groups of the cell wall of the biomass tested [33].

Figure 3.

Effect of incubation time on Cr (VI) removal byPenicilliumsp. 50mg/L Cr (VI), 100 rpm, 28°C, pH 1.0, and 1.0 g of fungal biomass.

With respect to the influence of initial pH on removal efficiency, it was found that the highest activity was evident at pH 1.0, at 150 min the metal is removed, while at pHs 2, 3, and 4, the authors did not observe significant differences (20% of removal), and at neutral or alkaline pH´s, there was no removal (Figure 4). A pH optimum has been reported of 1.0 to removal Cr (VI) by fruiting bodies of the jelly fungus A. polytricha[32] and for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeand the fungi Rhizopus arrhizusa pH range of 1.5-2.5, at 4 h [34], although most indicate a pH optimum range of 2.0 to 4.0 with the yeasts C. fabianii, W. anomalusand C. tropicalis,isolated from sediments in Morocco [16], both Mucor hiemalis[35] and R. arrhizus[36], at 24 h, Rhizopus nigricansin 8 h [37]. The Cr (VI) is found as HCrO4-, Cr2O72-, CrO42-, Cr4O132-, and Cr3O102 - [12]. A decrease in pH causes protonation of the surface of the adsorbent, which induces a strong attraction for the Cr (VI) ions from solution negatively charged, so that the biosorption increases with increasing acidity of the solution. However, as the pH increases, the concentration of OH- ions increases, causing changes in the surface of the adsorbent and preventing the biosorption negatively chargen of Cr (VI) ions, thereby decreasing the adsorption of metal to high pH values. It has been reported [11] that while Cr (VI) is obtain by eliminating indigenous strains of filamentous fungi, most of the cations may be reduced to Cr (III).

Figure 4.

Effect of pH on Cr (VI) removal byPenicilliumsp. 50mg/L Cr (VI), 100 rpm, 28°C, and 1g of fungal biomass.

Temperature is found to be a critical parameter in the bioadsorption of Cr (VI) (Figure 5). The highest removal was observed at 50oC and 60°C. At this point the total removal of the metal is carried out at 100%, at 40 min. These results are likely for Paecilomycessp [10] and A. niger[20] at 45oC and 24 h, but are different for R. arrhizus[36]. The increase in temperature increases the rate of removal of Cr (VI) and decreases the contact time required for complete removal of the metal, to increase the redox reaction rate [38].

Figure 5.

Effect of temperature on Cr (VI) removal byPenicilliumsp. IA-01. 50mg/L Cr (VI), 100 rpm, pH 1.0, and 1g of fungal biomass.

At different metal concentrations (200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000mg/L), biomass studied, shows the same results for removal, adsorbing 100% between 210 and 240 min while 1000mg/L of metal is removed 100% up to 90 min of incubation (Figure 6) with respect to other fungal biomasses, some reports argue that the amount of metal increases in direct proportion with the increase in concentration of the metal ion in solution [35, 37], and others author report lower removal efficiencies of metal, for example 25 and 250mg/L of chitin and chitosan [36], and 1mg/L for cellulose acetate [39]. This was due probably to the increase in the number of ions found competing for the available functions groups on the surface of biomass [38].

Figure 6.

Effect of initial metal concentration on chromium (VI) removal byPenicilliumsp. IA-01. 28oC. pH 1.0, 100 rpm, and 1g of fungal biomass.

The influence of the biomass on the removal capacity of Cr (VI) was depicted in Figure 7. If we increase the amount of biomass, we also increase the removal of Cr (VI) in the solution (although there is a 100% of remotion, with 3, 4, and 5g of biomass, 60 min), perhaps due to increased of biosorption sites of the same, because the amount of added biosorbent determines the number of binding sites available for metal biosorption [30]. Similar results have been reported for M. hiemalisand R. nigricans, although the latter has 10g of biomass [35, 37], but different from those reported for biomass wastes from the mandarin (gabassa), whit an optimal concentration of biomass of 100mg/L [40]. Consequently, we found out the following results: Penicilliumsp. IA-01 has the ability of absorption to Cr (VI) and the value of adsorption is as high as in the fruiting bodies of the jelly fungus A. polytricha[32], C. fabianii, W. anomalusand C. tropicalis[16], A. niger[20], M. hiemalisand R. nigricans[35, 37], and Paecilomycessp. [10]. The adsorption rate was affected by pH, temperature, initial concentration of Cr (VI) and dry cells. In the case of polluted soil and water, around 40% of Cr (VI) could not be removed. Therefore, absorption to the organic compounds contained in polluted soil and water may occurr. The results suggest that the reduction of Cr (VI) is necessary to the bioremediation of soil and air.

Figure 7.

Effect of biomass concentration on chromium (VI) removal byPenicilliumsp. IA-01. 50mg/L Cr (VI). 28oC, and pH 1.0, 100 rpm.

3.3. Removal of Cr (VI) in industrial wastes with fungal biomass

For the removal of the metal from industrial wastes, we incubate the fungal biomass (5g) with non-sterile oil and contaminated water (297mg Cr (VI)/g, and 155mg Cr (VI)/L), suspended in trideionized water. It was observ that after seven days of incubation with the biomass, the Cr (VI) concentration from soil and water samples decreased to 63.24% and 43%, respectively (Figure 8), without significant change in total chromium (not shown). In the absence of the biomass, the metal concentration of the soil samples decreased slightly (18%, not shown), maybe caused by indigenous microflora and (or) reducing components present in the soil [10, 11, and 18]. The capacity of Penicilliumsp., biomass to remove the metal are lower to those reported for other biomasses, like Litchi chinensis,[41] tamarind shell [42], Mammea americana[43], and C. reticulata[44], and equal or better than that of C. maltoseRR1 [17]. The Penicilliumbiomass was more efficient for the chromium removal under acidic conditions. Some studies were carried out at neutral pH [45]. A. nigermycelium removal 8.9mg/g dry weight at seven days of incubation (500ppm of Cr (VI)). Otherwise, Paecilomycessp. biomass was incubate with non-sterilized contaminated soil containing 50mg Cr (VI)/g, suspended in LMM, pH 4.0, and it was observed that after eight days of incubation with the biomass, the Cr (VI) concentration of soil sample decreased fully [46]. We found out the following results: Penicilliumsp, IA-01, has the ability to absorb Cr (VI) and the value of adsorption is as high as the fruiting bodies of the jelly fungus A. polytricha[32]; C. fabianii, W. anomalusand C. tropicalis[16]; A. niger[20], M. hiemalisand R. nigricans[35, 37] and Paecilomycessp. [10]. The adsorption rate was affected by pH, temperature, initial concentration of Cr (VI) and dry cells. In the case of the polluted soil and water, around 40% of Cr (VI) could not be removed. Therefore, absorption to the organic compounds contained in polluted soil and water may occurr. The results suggest that the reduction of Cr (VI) is necessary to the bioremediation of soil and air.

Figure 8.

Removal of Cr (VI) in industrial wastes incubated with 5g of fungal biomass. 100 rpm, 28°C, 20g and 100 mL of contaminated soil and water, respectively (297mg Cr (VI)/g soil and 155mg Cr (VI)/L).

3.4. Removal of Cr (VI) by living cells of Penicillumsp. IA-01

Next, the reduction of Cr (VI) by Penicilliumsp. IA-0 were examined by using living cells. The fungal cells, which were cultured in 100 mL LMM containing 50mg/L Cr (VI), under various pH, inoculated amount, Cr (VI) concentration and carbon sources. The amount of Cr (VI) was determined and the percentage of decreased amount to total amount was calculated. The effect of different pHs (4.0, 5.3, and 6.2), show a pH optimum of 5.5 (77% at four days, 28oC, and 100 rpm), while at pH of 4.0 and 6.2 were of 43% and 65%, respectively (Figure 9). About, Coreño-Alonso et. al. [13], reported a 95% of removal at pH of 5.3 and 24 h with A. nigervar tubingensisstrain Ed8, and also, at pH 5.0 for Cr (VI) removal with A. nigerMTCC 2594 [14] and at pH 3.0–5.0 for Pb+2, Cd+2 and Cr+3 with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae[47]. In contrast to our observations, the máximum adsorption capacities by both living yeasts were found at pH 4.0 for C. fabianiiHE650139 and W. anomalusHE648168, and 3.0 for C. tropicalisHE650140, with a percentage of removal of 100%, by all living microorganisms [16], also, a maximum uptake of Cr (VI) at pH 7.0 with Aspergillus foetidus[48]. On the other hand, using a Citrobacterstrain, it has been reported that an enhanced uptake of different heavy metals, is increased if pH is from 2.0 to 7.0 and also a decrease in the removal at higher pH values [49]. Al-Asheh and Duvnjak [50] also reported most removal increasing pH in the range 4.0–7.0 on Cr (III) uptake using Aspergilluscarbonarius. At low values of pH, the low efficiency of removal of the metal, may be due to the competition between hydrogen (H+) and metal ions [36], and at higher pH values (7.0), the efficient metal removal may be due to the ionization of functional groups and the increase in the negative charge density on the cell surface. At alkaline pH values (8.0 or higher), a reduction in the solubility of metals may contribute to lower uptake rates [1].

Figure 9.

Effect of pH on chromium (VI) removal by biomass ofPenicilliumsp IA-01 50mg/L Cr (VI), 100 rpm, 28°C

In Figure 10, the effect of the biomass concentration (72, 141, and 169 mg of dry weight) on Cr (VI) removal, with percentages of removal of 35%, 49%, and 60%, respectively, is shown. Similarly, most of the reports in the literature observe at higher biomass dose resulting in an increase in the percentage removal [3, 7, 8, 13, 16, 47, and 52]. With higher biomass dose, there are more binding sites for complex of Cr (VI) (e.g., HCrO4- and Cr2O72 ions) [3, 28].

Figure 10.

The effect of cell concentration on the removal of Cr (VI). 50mg/L Cr (VI), 100 rpm, 28°C, and pH 5.3

Figure 11, shows the effect of Cr (VI) concentration (50 to 200mg/L) on the removal of the same. If we increase the concentration of the metal, the removal of metal decreases (60%, 50%, 28%, and 11%, respectively. This is probably because, if we increase initial metal concentration, we increase the number of ions competing for the available functions group on the surface of biomass. Our observations are like most of the reports in the literature [3, 7, 8, 37, 47, 48, 53].

Figure 11.

The effect of the concentration of Cr (VI) in the solution on the removal. 100 rpm, 28°C, pH 5.3

With different carbon sources, like fermentable: glucose, sucrose, and citrate, and oxidable (glycerol). With glucose, sucrose, and citrate, the decrease in Cr (VI) levels occurred at a different rate, at six days of incubation (52%, 47%, and 27%, respectively), and the other carbon sugars were less effective (glycerol 7% of removal). With another inexpensive commercial carbon sources like unrefined sugar and brown sugar, the decrease in Cr (VI) levels occurred at a similar rate (96% and 100%, respectively) (Figures 12(a), (b)). If we incubate the fungal biomass without a carbon source, there are no changes in the initial Cr (VI) concentration during the experiment (data not shown), suggesting that a carbon source is required to decrease Cr (VI) concentration in the growth medium. Our results are similar to some reports: how in chromate-resistant strains of filamentous fungi indigenous to contaminated wastes, with A. foetidus, A. nigerand A. parasiticus[11, 48, and 54] with glucose like carbon source, and other carbon sources like sucrose and citrate by a Paecilomycessp fungal strain isolated from environment. [10], but are different from the observations of Srivasta and Thakur [55] with Aspergillussp and Acinetobactersp, who observed that the main carbon source is the sodium acetate. Consequently, we found out the following results in this section: As shown in Figure 4, the difference between dry cells and living cells were clear. Penicilliumsp. IA-01 cells could remove Cr (VI) at pH 4.0-6.2, although combining by absorption did not occurr (Figure 4). The result suggests that Penicilliumsp. cells can absorb and/or reduce Cr (VI) as well as adsorption. Additionally, as shown in Figure 12, the removal of Cr (VI) by adding glucose was higher than that of water (without glucose), and some carbon sources such as brown sugar and piloncillo enhanced the removal. There results suggest that the carbon sources induce the absorption rate of Cr (VI) or increase the amount of chromate reductase activity.

Figure 12.

Influence of carbon source on the capability ofPenicilliumsp., IA-01 to decrease Cr (VI) levels in the growth medium. 100 rpm, 28°C, pH 5.3

3.5. Adsorption and reduction by resting and permeable cells

We also estimated the ratio of absorption and/or reduction to adsorption, as we found that the fungi Penicilliumsp. IA-01, has these abilities as well as adsorption from the results in Section in 3.3. The resting cells and permeabilized cells were used for the examination, and heat-killed cells were used to examine the amount of adsorption. The removal was calculated as value of Cr (VI) in resting cells to the value from total value minus the value of Cr (VI) in heat-killed cells (0% of removal). First, the removal of the metal by resting cells was examined. The cell pellets of Penicilliumsp, which were cultured in 100 mL thioglycolate broth, were incubated in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) for 6h at 30℃. The resting cells of the fungus were expedient in reducing 0–10mg/100 mL Cr (VI) concentrations in 8 h as shown in Figure 13. The fungus removal was between 53% and 70% (2–10 mg/100/mL) of the metal, and these results resemble those reported by A. nigerand A. parasiticus[54], Fusariumsolani[56], Paecilomyces lilacinus[57], and the bacteria Pseudomonassp. [58] and Paecilomycessp. [46]. Structural properties of the biosorbent including the cellular support and other several factors are known to affect the biosorption rate [59].

Figure 13.

Resting cell assays for Cr (VI) reduction byPenicilliumsp. IA-01 performed at initial concentrations of 0–10mg/100 mL of Cr (VI), pH 7.0, and 37°C in 8 h

The cell permeabilization increased the Cr (VI) reduction by the resting cells, as the permeabilized cells with Triton X-100 which could reduce 57%, toluene 52%, SDS 47.4%, and Tween 80 40.4% (Figure 14) of 30 mM Cr (VI) within 6 h, suggesting an efficient intracellular mechanism of chromate reduction. The Cr (VI) reductase activity in CFE of cells grown in the absence of Cr (VI) was 94.07 μmoles/min/mg protein.These results indicate that the Cr (VI) reductase was associated with the CFE. Fungal, yeast, and bacteria chromate reductases have been localized either in CFE of A. nigerand A. parasiticus[54], Pichia jadiniiM9, Pichia anómalaM10 [60], Pichiasp. [61], and Bacillussp. [62], cytosolic fraction of C.maltosa[17], Pichiasp. [62], and Pannonibacterphragmitetus[63] of membrane fraction of Pseudomonassp. G1DM21 [58], Bacillus megaterium[64], and Enterobactercloacae[65]. The results by resting and permeable cells suggest as follows: As shown in Figure 13, 70-80% of Cr (VI) could be removed by resting cells, and the result suggests that absorption of Cr (VI) occurrs without energy of carbon sources or ATP. Additionally, as shown in Figure 14, the ratios of the removal of Cr (VI) in case of the pretreatment by Triton X-100, toluene and SDS of glucose were 2-2.5 times higher. Therefore, the transport through cell membrane is the rate-limiting steps.

Figure 14.

Permeabilized cell assays for Cr (VI) reduction byPenicilliumsp. IA-01 performed at initial concentrations of 28mM of Cr (VI), pH 7.0, and 37C

3.6. Chromate reductase activity

The result of permeable cells (Figure 14) suggests that Penicilliumsp. IA-01 has the enzymatic ability of reduction to Cr (VI). Thus, we investigated the reduction of Cr (VI) by Penicilliumsp. IA-01. The activity of chromate reductase is examined in the cell-free extract. The function of the chromate reductase of Penicilliumsp., was characterized in different in vitroconditions. In determining the optimal pH for the chromate reductase activity, we used the following buffers at different pH ranges: potassium phosphate, citrate phosphate, and Tris-HCl; and we found the máximum enzymatic activity to be at an optimum pH of 7.0, with potassium phosphate buffer, as depicted in Figure 15, and these results resemble those reported by the fungi A. nigerand A. parasiticus[54], the yeast P. jadiniM9 [60], and cell-free extract of Arthrobactersp. SUK 1201 [66]. Other authors reported stability between 7.0 and 7.4 for the bacteria Pseudomonassp. G1DM21 [58], 6.5 and 7.5 for E. coliCFE [67], and in the range of 5.0 to 8.0 for Bacillussp. [68].

Figure 15.

Effect of pH on Cr (VI) reductase activity in cell-free-extracts ofPenicilliumsp. IA-01 determined in different buffers (pH 6.5–9.0) with an initial concentration of 5.6mM Cr (VI), at 37C

The optimal temperature for the Cr (VI) reductase activity was 37°C, but the reductase activity was altered significantly at 20°C (39% of inhibition); but when the assays were performed at 50°C the reductase activity showed 14.2% of inhibition (Figure 16). For P. jadiniiM9, incubation at 55°C produced a reduction in activity of 55% [60]. In P. anómalaM10, when incubated at 8°C, a decrease in activity of 25% was observed, and at 50°C the activity was at 50%. [69]. For A. nigerand A. parasiticus[54], Pseudomonassp. G1DM21 [58], E. coli[66], and Bacillussp. CFEs [67], the thermal stability was of 30°C [66, 67], and for the activity in cell-free extract of Arthrobactersp. SUK 1201, it was 32°C [66]. On the contrary, Pseudomonas putidaCFE probed to be more resistant, keeping its stability up to 50°C [69].

Figure 16.

Effect of temperature on Cr (VI) reductase activity in cell-free extracts ofPenicilliumsp. IA-01 with initial concentrations of 28mM Cr (VI) at pH 7.0

The effect of different metal cations on the chromate reductase activity of Penicilliumsp. was determined in Figure 17. All the metal ions tested inhibit the Cr (VI) reductase activity of the CFE of 12% with Cu2+ and 40.2% with Na+, and these results are different than those reported for the yeast P. jadiniiM9 chromate reductase because only Cu2+ and Na+ produced an augmentation in the activity of 63 and 30%, respectively [60]; in Arthrobactersp. SUK 1201, Cu2+ also increases the activity [66], and all other ions tested had an inhibitory effect but in different levels. A decrease of 56.5% was observed with Hg2+, while addition of Mg2+, Fe3+, Ca2+, and Cd2+ resulted in a decrease of activity between 40% and 51%. In P. anomalaM10 chromate reductase, only Cu2+ produced a rise in activity of 31% [69]. Inhibition by Hg2+ was higher in P. anomalaand Pseudomonassp., than in Penicilliumsp., with a decrease in activity of 85% and 90%, respectively [58, 60]. Inhibition by Ca2+ and Mg2+ was approximately 50%, while Fe3+ reduced the activity to 32%. These results agree with those reported for Arthrobacter crystallopoietes[44] and Bacillussp. [67]. On the other hand, inhibition by Hg2+ can be related to its affinity to –SH ligands, then suspecting the presence of this chemical group in the active site of the enzyme related to chromate reductase activity [70].

Figure 17.

Effect of different metal cations on Cr (VI) reductase activity in cell-free extracts ofPenicilliumsp. IA-01 at pH 7.0 and 37°C

The reductase activity increased on supplementation in the reaction mixtures with electron donors. All the electron donors analyzed increased the activity, and the most efficient were ascorbic acid, NADH, glucose, and citrate by 4.4, 4.0, 2.9, and 2.87 times, respectively (Figure 18), and these results are like those reported for the yeasts P. jadiniiM9 and P. anomalachromate reductase with NADH [60] and Pseudomonassp. with citrate, acetate, glucose, and formate [58]. In previous reports of Bacillussp., glucose has been reported to act as an electron donor and has been demonstrated to increase Cr (VI) reduction [72, 73], and also formate-dependent Cr (VI) reductases have been reported in Shewanella putrefaciensMR-1 [74]. Our work supports other studies reporting NADH or NADPH-dependent enzymatic reduction of Cr (VI) under aerobic conditions [58, 60, 67, 69, and 70]. Ramirez-Díaz et al. [75], report the oxidation of NADH donates an electron to the chromate reductase enzyme, and then the electron is transferred to Cr (VI) reducing it to the intermediate form Cr (V) which finally accepts two electrons from other organic substances to produce Cr (III).

Figure 18.

Effect of different electron donors on Cr (VI) reductase activity in cell-free extracts ofPenicilliumsp. IA-01 at pH 7.0 and 37°C

Respiratory inhibitors like azide (1mM), EDTA (1mM), and cyanide (1mM) caused inhibitions of 48%, 47%, and 32%, respectively (Figure 19), in the Cr (VI) reductase activity; these results agree with those obtained in previous studies [66], and it has been observed that cyanide and azide partially inhibited purified chromate reductase of E. coliATCC 33456 19 [67] and aerobic chromate reduction by Bacillus subtilis[71] and inhibited more than 50% of membrane-associated chromate reductase activity of S. putrefaciensMR-1 [74], while no inhibition was observed in CFE of Bacillussp. ES29 [70]. Respiratory inhibitors act on de novo protein synthesis or affect the respiratory chain intermediates responsible for Cr (VI) reduction, wherein Cr (VI) serves as a terminal electron acceptor [69]. As shown in Figures 15 and 16, the optimal pH and temperature of chromate reductase in Penicilliumsp. IA-01 were pH 7 and 37℃, and the results were supported by the results of living cells. Therefore, the reduction is mainly occurred to remove Cr (VI) and to show resistance to high concentration of Cr (VI). Whereas, addition of electron donors caused the decrease of the activity, and therefore, these compounds may be inhibitor of the enzyme.

Figure 19.

Effect of different inhibitors on Cr (VI) reductase activity in cell-free extracts ofPenicilliumsp. IA-01 at pH 7.0 and 37°C


4. Conclusion

We isolated a Penicilliumsp. IA-01 strain, which grow about 50% relative to control (85 mg of dry weight without metal) in LMM, probably is resistant to the metal, and also removes efficiently 1g/100 mL of Cr (VI) after 90 min of incubation, and removes 63.2% and 43% from soil and water samples contaminated, respectively. This strain showed an efficient capacity of reduction (91%) of 50mg/L Cr (VI) in the growth medium after seven days of incubation, at 28°C, pH 5.3, 100 rpm and with an inoculum of 169mg of dry weight. The Cr (VI) reduction potential of the resting cells was increased by cell permeabilization. The optimum temperature and pH of chromate reductase activity of the CFE, were found to be 37°C and 7.0, respectively, and activity was enhanced in the presence of 0.1mM NADH and other electron donors. 1mMol of metal ions like Cu2+, Na+, Hg2+, Mg2+, Fe3+, Ca2+, and Cd2+ and respiratory inhibitors resulted in a decrease of the activity. Finally, these results suggest the potential applicability of Penicilliumsp for the remediation of Cr (VI) from polluted soils and waters.


  1. 1. Ahemad, M. Bacterial mechanisms for Cr(VI) resistance and reduction: an overview and recent advances. Folia Microbiologica 2014; 59, 321–332.
  2. 2. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
  3. 3. Seng, H. and Wang, Y.T. Biological reduction of chromium byE. coli. Journal of Environmental Engineering 1994; 120(4), 560-572.
  4. 4. Marsh, T.L. and McInerney, M.J. Relationship of hydrogen bioavailability to chromate reduction in aquifer sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2001; 67, 1517-1521.
  5. 5. Nriagu, J.O. and Nieboer, E. Chromium in the natural and human environments. Wiley-Interscience, New York; 1988.
  6. 6. Lofroth, G. and Ames, B.N. Mutagenicity of inorganic compounds inSalmonella typhimurium: Arsenic, chromium and selenium. Mutation Research 1978; 53(2), 65-66.
  7. 7. Park, D., Yung, Y.S. and Park, J.M. Reduction of hexavalent chromium with the brown seaweedEckloniaBiomass. Environmental Science Technology 2004; 38(18), 4860-4864.
  8. 8. Sahin, Y. and Öztürk, A. Biosorption of chromium (VI) ions from aqueous solution by the bacteriumBacillus thuriengensis. Process Biochemistry 2004; 40 (5), 1895-1901.
  9. 9. Volesky, B. and Holan. Z.R. Biosorption of heavy metals. Biotechnology Progress 1995; 11, 235-250.
  10. 10. Cárdenas-González, J.F. and Acosta-Rodríguez, I. Hexavalent chromium removal by aPaecilomyces sp. fungal strain isolated from environment. Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications 2010, Volume 2010,1-6. ISSN 15653633.
  11. 11. Acevedo-Aguilar, F.J., Espino-Saldaña, A.E., Leon-Rodriguez, I.L, Rivera-Cano, M.E., Villa-Rodriguez, M., Wrobel, K., Wrobel, K., Lappe, P., Ulloa, M. and Gutierrez-Corona, J.F. Hexavalent chromium removal in vitro and from industrial wastes, using chromate-resistant strains of filamentous fungi indigenous to contaminated wastes. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 2006; 52, 809–815.
  12. 12. Morales-Barrera, L. and Cristiani-Urbina, E. Hexavalent chromium removal by aTrichoderma inhamatumfungal strain isolated from tannery effluent. Water Air Soil Pollution 2008; 187, 327–336.
  13. 13. Coreño-Alonso. A., Solé, A., Diestra, E., Esteve, I., Gutiérrez-Corona, J.F., Reyna-López, G.E., Fernández, F.J. and Tomasini, A. Mechanisms of interaction of chromium withAspergillus nigervartubingensisstrain Ed8. Bioresource Technology 2014; 158, 188–192.
  14. 14. Sandana-Mala, J.G., Unni Nair, B. and Puvanakrishnan, R. Bioaccumulation and biosorption of chromium byAspergillus nigerMTCC 2594. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 2006; 52, 179–186.
  15. 15. Muter, O., Patmalnieks, A. and Rapoport, A. Interrelations of the yeastCandida utilisand Cr(VI): metal reduction and its distribution in the cell and medium. Process Biochem 2001; 36, 963–970.
  16. 16. Bahafid, W., Joutey, N.T., Sayel, N., Iraqui-Housaaini, M. and El Ghachtouli, N. Chromium adsorption by three yeast strains isolated from sediments in Morocco. Geomicrobiology Journal 2013; 30, 422–429.
  17. 17. Ramírez-Ramírez, R., Calvo-Méndez, C., Ávila-Rodríguez, M., Lappe, P., Ulloa, M., Vázquez-Juárez, R. and Gutiérrez-Corona, J.F. Cr (VI) reduction in a chromate-resistant strain ofCandida maltosaisolated from the leather industry. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2004; 85(1), 63-68.
  18. 18. Martorell, M.M., Fernandez, P.M., Farina, J.I. and Figueroa, L.I.C. Cr(VI) reduction by cell-free extracts ofPichia jadiniiandPichia anomalaisolated from textile-dye Factory effluents. International Journal of Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 2012; 71, 80–85.
  19. 19. Thompson, D.K., Chourey, K., Wickham, G. S., Thieman, S.B., Verberkmoes, N.C., Zhang, B., McCarthy, A.T., Rudisill, M.A., Shah, M. and Hettich, R.L. Proteomics reveals a core molecular response ofPseudomonas putidaF1 to acute chromate challenge. BMC Genomics 2010; 11, 311.
  20. 20. Park, D., Yun, Y.S., Jo, J.H. and Park, J.M. Mechanism of hexavalent chromium removal by dead fungal biomass ofAspergillus niger. Water Research 2005; 39, 533–540.
  21. 21. López-Martínez, R., Méndez-Tovar, L.J., Hernández-Hernández, F. y Castañon-Olivares, L.R. Hongos contaminantes comunes en el Laboratorio. En Micología Médica. Procedimientos para el diagnóstico de Laboratorio, 2ª. Ed. Trillas. pp 137-148. México; 2004.
  22. 22. Greenberg, A.E., Clesceri, L.S. and Eaton, A.D. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18ª. ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. 3, 58-3.60; 1992.
  23. 23. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 1951; 193(1), 265–275.
  24. 24. Pantaler, R.P. and Pulyaeva, I.V. A spectrophotometric study of complexation between chromium and chromazurol S. Journal of Analytical Chemistry (Moscow) 1985; 40, 1634-1639.
  25. 25. Kirk, M.P., Cannon, F.P., David, C.J. and Stalpers, A.J. Dictionary of the Fungi, CABI, Wallingford, UK; 2001.
  26. 26. Ksheminska, H., Jaglarz, A., Fedorovych, D., Babyak, L., Yanovych, D., Kaszycki, P. and Koloczek, H. Bioremediation of chromium by the yeastPichia guilliermondii: toxicity and accumulation of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) and the influence of riboflavin on Cr tolerance. Microbiological Research 2003; 158, 59–67.
  27. 27. Thatoi, H., Das, D., Mishra, J., Prasad Rath, B. and Das, N. Bacterial chromate reductase, a potential enzyme for bioremediation of hexavalent chromium: A review. Journal of Environmental Management 2014; 146, 383-399.
  28. 28. Cervantes, C., Campos García, J., Devars, S., Gutiérrez Corona, F., Loza Tavera, H., Torres Guzmán, J.C., Moreno Sánchez, R. Interactions of chromium with micro-organisms and plants. FEMS Microbiological Review 2001; 25(3), 335-347.
  29. 29. Gharieb, M.M. and Gadd, G.M. Evidence for the involvement of vacuolar activity in metal(loid) tolerance: vacuolar-lacking and defective mutants ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaedisplay higher sensitivity to chromate, tellurite and selenite. BioMetals 1998; 11(2), 101-106.
  30. 30. Nguyen-Nhu, N. T. and Knoops, B. Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase 1 protectsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeagainst metal ion toxicity and glutathione depletion. Toxicology Letter 2002; 135(3), 219-228.
  31. 31. Sumner, E.R., Shanmuganathan, A., Sideri, T.C., Willetts, S.A., Houghton, E.J. and Avery, S. Oxidative protein damage causes chromium toxicity in yeast. Microbiology 2005; 151(6), 1939-1948.
  32. 32. Zheng, S., Huang, H., Zhang, R. and Cao, L. Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by fruiting bodies of the jelly fungus (Auricularia polytricha). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2014; 98, 8729–8736.
  33. 33. Kratochvil, D. and Volesky, Advances in the biosorption of heavy metals. Reviews TIBTECH 1998; 16, 291-300.
  34. 34. Nourbakhsh, M., Sag, Y., Ozer, D., Aksu, Z., Kutsal, T.A. and Caglar, A. A comparative study of various biosorbents for removal of Chromium (VI) ions from industrial wastewaters. Process Biochemistry 1994; 29, 1-5.
  35. 35. Tewari, N., Vasudevan, P. and Guha, B. Study on biosorption of Cr (VI) byMucor hiemalis. Biochemical and Engineering Journal 2005; 23(3), 185-192.
  36. 36. Sag, Y. and Aktay, Y. Kinetic studies on sorption of Cr(VI) and Cu(II) ions by chitin, chitosan andRhizopus arrhizus. Biochemical and Engineering Journal 2002; 12, 143-153.
  37. 37. Bai, R.S. and Abraham, T.E. Biosorption of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution byRhizopusnigricans. Bioresource Technology 2001; 79(1), 73-81.
  38. 38. Agarwal, G.S., Kumar, H. and Chaudari, S. Biosorption of aqueous chromium (VI) byTamarindus indicaseeds. Bioresource Technology 2006; 97(7), 949- 956.
  39. 39. Arthanareeswaran, G., Thanikaivelan, P., Jaya, N., Mohan, D. and Raajenthiren, M. Removal of chromium from aqueous solution using cellulose acetate and sulfonated poly (Ether Ketone) blend ultrafiltration membranes. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2002; 12(2), 143-153.
  40. 40. Zubair, A., Bhatti, H.N., M. Hanif, M.A. and Shafqat, F. Kinetic and equilibrium modeling for Cr(III) and Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solutions byCitrus reticulatewaste biomass. Water Air Soil Pollution 2008; 191(1-4), 305-318.
  41. 41. Acosta-Rodríguez, I., Martínez-Pérez, R., Cárdenas-González, J.F., Moctezuma-Zárate, M.G. and Martínez-Juárez, V.M. Hexavalent chromium removal byLitchi chinensissonn peel. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2012; 8(1) 7-13.
  42. 42. Acosta, I., López, V., Coronado, E., Cárdenas, J.F. and Martínez, V.M. Remoción de Cromo (VI) por la biomasa de la cascara de Tamarindo, (Tamarindus indica). Revista de Biotecnología y Bioingeniería 2010; 14, 11-23.
  43. 43. Acosta, I., Sandoval, P., Bautista, D., Hernández, N., Cárdenas, J.F. and Martínez, V.M. 2012. Bioadsorción de Cromo (VI) por la cáscara de Mamey (Mammea americanaL.). Avances en Ciencias e Ingeniería 2012; 3(2), 1-9.
  44. 44. Acosta-Rodríguez, I., Coronado-Quintero, E., Cárdenas-González, J.F., Tovar-Oviedo, J. and Martínez-Juárez, V.M. Hexavalent chromium removalCitrus reticulatashell. Journal of Natural Sciences 2013; 1(1); 29-39.
  45. 45. Fukuda, T., Ishino, Y., Ogawa, A., Tsutsumi, K. and Morita, H. Cr(VI) Reduction from contaminated soils byAspergillussp. N2 andPenicilliumsp. N3 isolated from chromium deposits. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 2008; 54(5), 295-303.
  46. 46. Cárdenas-González, J.F. and Acosta-Rodríguez, I. Hexavalent chromium removal by aPaecilomycessp. fungal. In: Shaukat, S.S. Ed., Progress in Biomass and Bioenergy Production, pp. 133-150; 2011.
  47. 47. Rodríguez, M.E., Miranda, R.C., Olivas, R. and Sosa, C.A. Efectos de las condiciones de operación sobre la biosorción de Pb++, Cd++ and Cr+++, en solución porSaccharomyces cerevisiaeresidual. Informacion Tecnologica 19(6), 47–55, 2008.
  48. 48. Prasenjit, B. and Sumathi, S. Uptake of chromium byAspergillus foetidus. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 2005; 7(2), 88–92.
  49. 49. Puranik, P.R. and Paknikar, K.M. Biosorption of lead, cadmium, and zinc byCitrobacterstrain MCM B-181: characterization studies. Biotechnology Progress 199; 15(2), 228–237.
  50. 50. Al-Asheh, S. and Duvnjak, Z. Adsorption of copper and chromium byAspergillus carbonarius. Biotechnology Progress 1995; 11(6), 638–642.
  51. 51. Gadd, G.M. Accumulation of metals by microorganisms and algae. In Biotechnology: A Comprehensive Treatise, Rhem, H.J. and Reed, G. Eds., vol. 6B, pp. 401–433, VCH, Weinheim, Germany; 1981.
  52. 52. Liu, T., Li, H., Li, Z., Xiao, X., Chen, L. and Deng, L. Removal of hexavalent chromium by fungal biomass ofMucor racemosus: influencing factors and removal mechanism. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2007; 23(12), 1685–1693.
  53. 53. Beszedits, S. Chromium removal from industrial wastewaters. In: Chromium in the Natural and Human Environments, Nriagu, J.O. and Nieboer, E. Eds., pp. 232–263, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1988.
  54. 54. Shugaba, A., Buba, F., Kolo, B.G., Nok, A.J., Ameh, D.A. and Lori, J.A. Uptake and reduction of hexavalent chromium byAspergillus nigerandAspergillus parasiticus. Journal of Petroleum and Environmental Biotechnology 2012; 3(3). 8 pages.
  55. 55. Srivastava, S. and Thakur, I.S. Evaluation of biosorption potency ofAcinetobactersp., for removal of hexavalent chromium from tannery effluen 2007; 18(5), 637–646.
  56. 56. Sen, M. and Ghosh Dastidar, M. Biosorption of Cr (VI) by resting cells ofFusarium solani. Iran Journal of Environmental Health Science Technology 2011; 8(2), 153–158.
  57. 57. Sharma; S. and Adholeya, A. Detoxification and accumulation of chromium from tannery effluent and spent chrome effluent byPaecilomyces lilacinusfungi. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 2011; 65(2), 309–317.
  58. 58. Desai, C., Jain, K. and Madamwar, D. Hexavalent chromate reductase activity in cytosolic fractions ofPseudomonassp. G1DM21 isolated from Cr(VI) contaminated industrial landfill. Process Biochemistry 2008; 43(7), 713–721.
  59. 59. Bayramo, G., Bektas, S. and Arica, M.Y. Biosorption of heavy metal ions on immobilized white-rot fungusTrametesversicolor. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2003; 101(3), 285–300.
  60. 60. Martorell, M.M., Fernández, P.M., Farina, I. and Figueroa, L.I. Cr(VI) reduction by cell-free extracts ofPichia jadiniandPichia anomalaisolated from textile-dye factory effluents. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 2012; 71, 80– 85.
  61. 61. Fernández, P.M., Martorell, M., Farina, J.I. and Figueroa, L.I. Removal efficiency of Cr6+ by indigenousPichiasp isolated from textile factory effluent. The Scientific World Journal. 2012. Vol. 2012, Article ID 708213, 6 pages.
  62. 62. Campos, J., Martinez-Pacheco, M. and Cervantes, C. Hexavalent-chromium reduction by a chromate-resistantBacillussp., strain. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1995; 68 (3), 203–208.
  63. 63. Xu, L., Luo, M., Jiang, C., Wei, X., Kong, P., Lang, X., Zhao, J., Yang, L. and Liu, H.In vitroreduction of hexavalent chromium by cytoplasmic fractions ofPannonibacterphragmitetusLSSE-09 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2012; 166(4), 933–941.
  64. 64. Cheung, K.H., Lai, H.Y. and Gu, J.D. Membrane-associated hexavalent chromium reductase ofBacillusmegaterium TKW3 with induced expression. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2006; 16(6), 855–862.
  65. 65. Wang, P.C., Mori, T., Toda, K. and Ohtake, H. Membrane associated chromate reductase activity fromEnterobacter cloacae. Journal of Bacteriology 1980; 172(3), 1670–1672.
  66. 66. Dey, S. and Paul, A.K. Evaluation ofin vitroreduction of hexavalent chromium by cell-free extract ofArthrobactersp. SUK 1201. British Microbiology Research Journal 2013; 3(3), 325-338.
  67. 67. Bae, W.C., Lee, H.K., Choe, Y.C., Jahng, D. J., Lee, S. H., Kim, S. J., Lee, J. H. and Jeong, B. C. Purification and characterization of NADPH-dependent Cr(VI) reductase fromEscherichia coliATCC 33456. Journal of Microbiology 2005; 43(1), 21–27.
  68. 68. Elangovan, R., Abhipsa, S., Rohit, B., Ligy, P. and Chandraraj, K. Reduction of Cr(VI) by aBacillussp. Biotechnology Letters 2006; 28(4), 247–252.
  69. 69. Park, C.H., Keyhan, M., Wielinga, B., Fendorf, S. and Martin, A. Purification to homogeneity and characterization of a novelPseudomonas putidachromate reductase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000; 66(5), 1788–1795.
  70. 70. Camargo, F.A.O., Bento, F.M., Okeke, B.C. and Frankenberger, W.T. Hexavalent chromium reduction by an actinomycete,Arthrobacter crystallopoietesES 32. Biological Trace Element Research 2004; 97(2), 183–194.
  71. 71. Garbisu, C., Alkorta, I., Llama, M.J. and Serra, J.L. Aerobic chromate reduction byBacillussubtilis. Biodegradation 1998; 982), 133–141.
  72. 72. Liu, Y.G., Xu, W.H., Zeng, G.M., Li, X. and Gao, H. Cr(VI) reduction byBacillussp., isolated from chromium landfill. Process Biochemistry 2006; 41(9), 1981–1986.
  73. 73. Pal, A., Dutta, S. and Paul, A.K. Reduction of hexavalent chromium by cell free extract ofBacillus sphaericusAND 303 isolated from serpentine soil. Current Microbiology 2005; 51(5), 327–330.
  74. 74. Myers, C.R., Carstens, B.P., Antholine, W.E. and Myers. J.M. Chromium (VI) reductase activity is associated with the cytoplasmic membrane of anaerobically grownShewanellaputrefaciensMR-1. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2000; 88(1), 98–106.
  75. 75. Ramirez-Díaz, M.I., Díaz-Pérez, C.D., Vargas, E., Riveros-Rosas, H., Campos-García, J. and Cervantes, C. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to chromium compounds. Biometals 2008; 21, 321–332.

Written By

Ismael Acosta-Rodríguez, Damaris L. Arévalo-Rangel, Juan F. Cárdenas-González, María de Guadalupe Moctezuma-Zárate and Víctor M. Martínez-Juárez

Submitted: October 2nd, 2014 Reviewed: April 20th, 2015 Published: September 9th, 2015