2. Research of autoregulation of nodulation in soybean plants
Using a split root technique, it was shown that nodule formation of the latter infected root was systemically suppressed by a prior infected root . Host plants systemically suppress excess nodulation through communications between shoots and roots, by using unknown signals . It is postulated that when soybean root is infected with bradyrhizobia, infection signal is synthesized in root and is transported toward shoot. And then shoot-derived autoregulation signal is synthesized in shoot and is transported toward root. Differentiation of nodule at later infected root is suppressed by the shoot-derived autoregulation signal.
Several hypernodulation mutant lines of soybean were isolated using chemical mutagens such as ethyl-methane-sulfonate (EMS) or N-nitroso-methyl-urea (NMU) since the 1980s; nts lines (from cv. Bragg) , NOD lines (from cv. Williams)  and En6500 line (from cv. Enrei)  were obtained. The mutant lines can form profuse nodulation in the presence or absence of nitrate compared with their parents. These mutants are thought to lack a part of the autoregulation of nodulation. Reciprocal grafting experiments between the hypernodulation mutant and the wild type soybean showed that the hypernodulation phenotype depends on the shoot , especially mature leaves [7, 8]. Hypernodulation mutant supplied a large amount of photosynthate to the nodule than the roots . The specific nitrogen-fixation activity and the concentration of leghemoglobin in hypernoduation mutant lines are lower than in the parent line [10, 11, 12]. Therefore, it is reasonable that the number of nodules should be regulated to be optimum by the host plant.
Autoregulatory response is induced during after nodule meristem formation but before nodule emergence [13, 14], perhaps there are some suppressing points . The control has been proposed to operate 2-4 days after inoculation in soybean [15, 16]. About 7-8 days after inoculation, nodules initially appear on roots, only which has not suppressed their growth by shoot-derived autoregulation signal. These time course is a point in the study of autoregulation of nodulation.
3. Photosynthate allocation and regulation of nodulation
One of the idea, plants might suppress the translocation of photosynthate to underground part to control the excessive nodulation. It is shown that availability of photosynthate might be involved in the control of nodule number, with approach grafting , and light enhancement and CO2 enrichment study . From the split root experiment, the inoculation treatment of bradyrhizobia appeared to stimulate the allocation of photosynthate to the inoculated root [19, 20]. However, photosynthate requirement during nodule initiation was not known. In general, growth point has a strong localized sink activity of photosynthate, which is the energy source as well as structural resources. So we investigated whether a requirement of carbon source is increased or not in early stages of nodule formation. The early stage of nodule formation (a period of 2-8 days after inoculation in this study) is important, because autoregulation of nodulation is already activated in this period.
Current photosynthate allocation of soybean cv. Williams was conducted in relation to the nodule initiation . Whole shoots were exposed to 14CO2 for 120 min, and the distribution of radioactivity in each organ was determined. During the early stage of nodule formation (4, 6, 8 days after inoculation) the 14C distribution to the inoculated roots did not increase in comparison with uninoculated control roots. 14C respired by underground parts was also similar between the inoculated and control roots. Visualized Images of the distribution of 14C indicated that the shoot apex and root apex, which were growing point in above and underground parts, showed a high radioactivity, but the intense signals were not seen in the expected nodulating parts of roots. These results indicate that current photosynthate allocated to the inoculated roots did not increase in comparison with uninoculated roots, in the early stage of nodule formation.
After the emergence of nodules (10 and 12 days after inoculation), the inoculated roots gradually had priority of photosynthate allocation compared with the uninoculated control roots. At 12 days after inoculation, 14C distribution of inoculated root was statistically increased in comparison with the uninoculated control roots. Also, consumption of current photosynthate by the respiration of underground parts increased at day 12 after inoculation. The radioactivity per dry weight was higher in the nodules than that of the growing point of shoots (i.e. shoot apex). Thus, the underground part after emergence of the nodule is already a high consumer of energy (Figure 1).
It was shown that an appreciable amount of photoassimilate is not required for nodule initiation before emergence in Williams. What about in hypernodulation mutant lines? The availability of photosynthate might be involved in autoregulation of nodulation. For example, if photosynthate allocation to nodulation in the early stages of nodule formation is markedly increased in NOD1-3, autoregulation of nodulation might be involved in the availability of photosynthate.
To demonstrate this idea, a current photosynthate allocation of hypernodulation mutant of soybean NOD1-3 (isolated from Williams) was examined at 8 days after inoculation using 14CO2 as shown above . The results showed that the 14C distribution in the roots on 8 days after inoculation did not increase when compared with uninoculated control plants in NOD1-3. In visualized images of radioactivity by an imaging plate, the nodules were observed as the strong signal spots in the underground organ. It was concluded that appreciable amount of photoassimilate is not required for the nodule initiation in NOD1-3 in 8 days after inoculation. It was also indicated that the growth of nodule in NOD1-3 is slightly early, compared with Williams; because nodule at early stage had already high sink activity in NOD1-3.
These results indicate that an appreciable amount of photoassimilate is not required for nodule initiation, irrespective of wild type and hypernodulation mutant. It is considered that photosynthate allocation to the nodulated root is not related to autoregulation of nodulation. However, it is unclear whether photosynthate allocation to root in the uninoculated NOD1-3 is similar with the uninoculated Williams or not. If photosynthate allocation to root in uninoculated NOD1-3 is higher than that in uninoculated Williams, cause of hypernodulating trait in NOD1-3 might be attributed to the photosyanthate allocation. So we compared 14C partitioning in the uninoculated plants between Williams and NOD1-3 (unpublished data). Results show that there was no difference between NOD1-3 and Williams in 14C distribution per plant parts (Figure 2). It is strongly suggested that control of nodule formation may be independent of allocation of photosynthetic product.
4. Role of autoregulation system
While it is known that substantial amounts of photosynthate are required for the nitrogen-fixing activity in mature nodules, real-time analysis of photosynthate allocation in hypernodulation has not been reported. Time course study was performed with the aim to clarify the real-time allocation of photosynthetic products in relation to excess nodulation in soybean plants . Allocation of photosynthates to underground part in soybean plants was analyzed using 11CO2 and positron-emitting tracer imaging system (PETIS). PETIS can monitor 2D-distribution of positron-emitting tracer like 11C, and a PETIS imaging provides an animation movies of radioactivity non-invasively. Soybean plants were inoculated with
Generally, hypernodulation mutant lines tend to show an inferior growth and seed yield compared with the parent. The peculiar supernodulating variety of soybean “Sakukei 4” showed the improved growth , so it was expected high yield. However, Sakukei 4 could not produce higher seed yield compared with the parental varieties Enrei or Tamahomare, because N use efficiency of Sakukei4 was low . One of the reason of low N efficiency might be nodule formation on distal region of root in Sakukei 4.
5. The growth of hypernodulation mutant
Hypernodulation mutants form profuse nodules compared with their wild type parents. Physiological characterization of hypernodulation mutants showed some features of plant growth in addition to the hypernodulation trait. Especially, less vigorous plant growth had been reported [3, 4, 5]. In general, it is because of strong requirement for carbon source of nodules. But it was unclear whether inferiority of growth occurs as a secondary effect of hypernodulation trait or directly due to gene defects by mutation. The details of the growth characteristics of hypernodulation mutant lines may be important to understand the systemic features of the autoregulation mechanism.
The objective of our study was to investigate the characteristics of the initial growth of the NOD mutant lines with the dry matter weight of each part and a whole plant. The experiment was designed within the period when the plants could grow without nitrogen supply. We investigated the phenotypes of not only inoculated plants but also uninoculated plants, and clarified whether phenotypes appeared by a secondary effect of a hypernodulation trait or not; secondary effect means the phenomenon which is caused by excess number of nodules, while a hypernodulation trait is primary effect of mutation gene. The point of this study is that soybean seeds of hypernodulation mutant lines, NOD1-3, NOD2-4, and NOD3-7, and of the Williams parent were carefully selected by uniform seed weight. If seeds were selected randomly, seeds of NOD1-3 and NOD3-7 tend to be smaller than that of Williams and NOD2-4. Difference of seed weight affects initial growth of plants.
First, characteristics of the initial growth of hypernodulation NOD mutant lines were compared with that of Williams with or without inoculation of
Next, characteristics of the initial growth of NOD mutant lines were compared with Williams at 17 or 18 days after sowing . The plants were grown with or without seed-inoculation of bradyrhizobia, and in the absence or presence of nitrate in the culture solution. When the plants were grown without inoculation, the total dry weight of all mutant lines was not different statistically from Williams, both in the absence and presence of nitrate. When they were grown with inoculation of bradyrhizobia, however, the total dry weight of each mutant line was significantly lower than that of Williams, both in the absence and presence of nitrate. These results indicated that less total dry matter accumulation of hypernodulation mutant lines than the wild type may be the secondary effect due to the large number of nodules, while the hypernodulation trait is a primary effect of the mutated gene. When the plants were grown with inoculation, the nodule number was decreased by the presence of nitrate in Williams, NOD1-3 and NOD2-4, but not in NOD3-7. NOD3-7 may be the most tolerant to nitrate inhibition of nodulation among NOD mutant lines. Growth of each leaf of NOD3-7 and NOD1-3 was different from the wild type and NOD2-4; the expanded leaf was smaller but the new leaf was larger compared with Williams under all conditions (Figure 5). This indicates that NOD3-7 and NOD1-3 might decrease the ability for leaf expansion and have a faster leaf emergence rate. In order to compare the growth rate of the leaves, study was conducted to measure leaf length of the plants daily between 6 and 18 days after sowing (unpublished data). Plants were grown in bradyrhizobium-free nutrient solution without N supply. Figure 6 shows the increase in the length of each leaf blades with time, of Williams and NOD mutant lines. In Williams, an expansion of new leaf started after growth of the previous leaf had been completed. The leaf growth pattern of NOD2-4 was similar with the Williams. In NOD3-7, expansion of new leaf was started earlier before the previous leaf finished expansion. The graph of NOD1-3 shows intermediate pattern between Williams and NOD3-7. The emergence rate of new leaf of NOD3-7 was fastest in all lines. In addition, leaf shape of NOD1-3 and of NOD3-7 was narrower compared with wild type; the leaf index (the ratio of the leaf length to the leaf width) of NOD1-3 and of NOD3-7 was increased than the wild type. It was indicated that NOD3-7 and NOD1-3 had a rapid emergence rate of leaves, while the final size of their expanded leaves was smaller than that of Williams and NOD2-4.
Figure 7 shows summary of initial growth of NOD mutant lines, compared with Williams. When they were inoculated, all NOD mutant lines form great number of nodules than does Williams. But the individual nodule size of NOD mutant line was smaller than that of Williams. In the leaf phenotype, individual leaf size of NOD1-3 and NOD3-7 was smaller than that of Williams. But they had faster rate of new-leaf emergence and their leaf number per plant had tendency to increase. In NOD1-3 and NOD3-7, leaf phenotype was similar with nodule phenotype. On the other hand, leaf phenotype of NOD2-4 was similar with Williams.
6. Leaf phenotype of hypernodulation mutant
We investigated the difference of fully expanded leaf size in cell level using light microscopy when the plants were not inoculated without N supply . Results showed that the cell number of NOD1-3 and NOD3-7 was significantly lower than that of Williams. Cell area of all lines was similar and there were not significant difference between each line. The cell area of NOD3-7 was a little higher than that of other lines, it maybe because of compensation effect of decreased cell number. Compensation effect is characterized by cell enragement triggered by the decrease in cellular proliferation of leaf . It was indicated that NOD1-3 and NOD3-7 produced small-size leaves due to the smaller number of leaf cells, compared to Williams parent. These phenotypes were not affected by the inoculation with bradyrhizobia or nitrate supply.
To investigate the relationship between nodule and leaf phenotypes, the leaf growth of seed-inoculation plants (active-autoregulation) was compared with the uninoculated plants (basal-autoregulation) in Williams . Results showed that the leaf area of inoculated plants was significantly larger than that of uninoculated plants. The cell number of primary leaves of active-autoregulation plants was significantly higher than that of basal-autoregulation plants. So we concluded that the recognition of infection signal in the shoot might stimulate the cell proliferation of leaf blade. The autoregulation of nodulation system might be active at the basal level when plants are grown without inoculation. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in root nodules requires a large amount of photosynthates. To activate cell proliferation of leaves along with the autoregulation mechanism by infection of bradyrhizobia would be reasonable.
In order to prevent a decrease in growth due to excess nodulation, especially of distal region of root, the control mechanism plays an important role. In the autoregulation of nodulation, yet-unknown signal molecules are used in the communication between shoot and root. Our study showed that control of nodule formation may be independent of allocation of photosynthetic product [21, 22]. Recently, it was indicated that the shoot-derived autoregulation signal is a downregulator of nodulation and is produced by the wild type, rather than activator produced by the mutants . They also indicated that both bradyrhizobia inoculation and visible nodule formation are not essential for shoot-derived autoregulation signal synthesis . Our study showed that the autoregulation of nodulation might be related to the control system of leaf-cell proliferation. Universal regulation system of plant growth might closely link to the autoregulation of nodulation. So it might be reasonable that plant hormones regulate nodule development . For example, salicylic acid , abscisic acid , methyl jasmonic acid  and polyamine  are proposed to be involved in autoregulation of nodulation in leguminous plants. The autoregulation of nodulation might be regulated through interplay of several signaling compounds. The non-symbiotic phenotype of the mutants might be helpful to isolate signal molecules of autoregulation of nodulation.
Kosslak R.M. and Bohlool B.B. Suppression of nodule development of one side of a split-root system of soybeans caused by prior inoculation of the other side. Plant Physiology 1984; 75: 125-130
Caetano-anolles G. and Gresshoff P.M. Plant genetic control of nodulation. Annual Review of Microbiology 1991; 45: 345-382
Carroll B.J., McNeil D.L. and Gresshoff P.M. Isolation and properties of soybean [ Glycine max(L.) Merr.] mutants that nodulate in the presence of high nitrate concentrations. Proceedings of National Academy of Science 1985; 82: 4162-4166
Gremaud M.F. and Harper J.E. Selection and initial characterization of partially nitrate tolerant nodulation mutants of soybean. Plant Physiology 1989; 89: 169-173
Akao S. and Kouchi H. A supernodulating mutant isolated from soybean cultivar Enrei. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1992; 38: 183-187
Delves A.C., Mathews A., Day D.A., Carter A.S., Carroll B.J. and Gresshoff P.M. Regulation of the soybean- Rhyzobiumnodule symbiosis by shoot and root factors. Plant Physiology 1986; 82: 588-590
Francisco P.B. Jr. and Harper J.E. Translocatable leaf signal autoregulates soybean nodulation. Plant Science 1995; 107: 167-176
Sato T., Yashima H., Harper J.E., Akao S. and Ohyama T. Nodule formation and N2 fixation traits of the rooted-single leaf isolated from hypernodulating mutants and the wild type. Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1997; 68: 444-447 (in Japanese)
Fujikake H., Yashima H., Sato T., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K. and Ohyama T. Rapid and reversible nitrate inhibition of nodule growth and N2 fixation activity in soybean ( Glycine max(L.) Merr.). Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2002; 48: 211-217
Nishiwaki T., Sato T., Yashima H., Ikarashi T., Ohyama T., Harper J.E., Akao S. and Kouchi H. Changes in concentration of leghemoglobin components in hypernodulation mutants of soybean. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1997; 43: 1091-1096
Sato T., Yashima H., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K., Akao S., Harper J.E. and Ohyama T. Determination of leghemoglobin components and xylem sap composition by capillary electrophoresis in hypernodulation soybean mutants cultivated in the field. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1998; 44: 635-6445
Sato T., Yashima H., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K., Akao S. and Ohyama T. Possible involvement of photosynthetic supply in changes of nodule characteristics of hypernodulating soybeans. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1999; 45: 187-196
Calvert H.E., Pence M.K., Piece M., Malik N.S.A. and Bauer W.D. Anatomical analysis of the development and distribution of Rhizobiuminfections in soybean roots. Canadian Journal of Botany 1984; 62: 2375-2384
Caetano-anolles G. and Gresshoff P.M. Early induction of feedback regulatory responses governing nodulation in soybean. Plant Science 1990; 71: 69-81
Garahty N., Caetano-Anolles G., Joshi P.A. and Gresshoff P.M. Anatomical analysis of nodule development in soybean reveals an additional autoregulatory control point. Plant Science 1992; 58: 1-7
Bano A. and Harper J.E. Plant growth regulators and phloem exudates modulate root nodulation of soybean. Functional Plant Biology 2002; 29: 1299-1307
Francisco P.B. Jr and Harper J.E. Tranlocatable leaf signal autoregulates soybean nodulation. Plant Science 1995; 107:167-176
Bacanamwo M. and Harper J.E. Response of a hypernodulating soybean mutant to increased photosyathate supply. Plant Science1997; 124: 119-129
Singleton P.W. and Kessel C.V. Effect of localized nitrogen availability to soybean half-root systems on photosynthate partitioning to roots and nodules. Plant Physiology 1987; 83: 552-556
Olsson J.E., Nakao P., Bohlool B.B. and Gresshoff P.M. Lack of systemic suppression of nodulation in split root system of supernodulating soybean ( Glycine max[L.] Merr.) mutants. Plant Physiology 1989; 90: 1347-1352
Ito S., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K. and Ohyama T. Allocation of photosynthetic products in soybean during the early stages of nodule formation. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2006; 52: 438-443
Ito S., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K. and Ohyama T. Allocation of photosynthetic products in hypernodulation mutant of soybean NOD1-3 in the early stage of nodule formation. Bulletin of Faculty of Agriculture Niigata University 2006; 59: 33-38
Ito S., Suzui N., Kawachi N., Ishii S., Ishioka N.S. and Fujimaki S. Real time analysis of translocation of photosynthate to nodules in soybean plants using 11CO2 with a positron-emitting tracer imaging system (PETIS). Radioisotopes 2010; 59: 145-154 (in Japanese)
Takahashi, M., Arihara, J., Nakayama, N., Kokubun, M., Shimada, S., Takahashi, K. and Hajika, M. Breeding of supernodulating soybean cultivar "Sakukei 4". Bulletin of National Institute of Crop Science 2003; 4: 17-28 (in Japanese)
Nakamura T., Nakayama N., Yamamoto R., Shimamura S., Kim Y., Hiraga S., Ohyama T., Komatsu S. and Shimada S. Nitrogen utilization in the supernodulating soybean variety “Sakukei 4” and its parental varieties, “Enrei” and “Tamahomare.” Plant Production Science 2010; 13: 123-131
Nishimura R., Hayashi M., Wu G.J., Kouchi H., Imaizumi-Anraku H., Murakami Y., Kawasaki S., Akao S., Ohmori M., Nagasawa M., Harada K. and Kawaguchi M. HAR1 mediates systemic regulation of symbiotic organ development. Nature 2002; 420: 426-429
Searle I.R., Men A.E., Laniya T.S., Buzas D.M., Iturbe-Ormaetxe I., Carroll B.J. and Gresshoff P.M. Long-distance signaling in nodulation directed by a CLAVATA1-like receptor kinase. Science 2003; 299: 109-112
Vuong T.D., Nickell C.D. and Harper J.E. Genetic and allelism analyses of hypernodulation soybean mutants from two genetic backgrounds. Crop Science 1996; 36: 1153-1158
Vuong T.D. and Harper J.E. Inheritance and allelism analysis of hypernodulating genes in the NOD3-7 and NOD2-4 soybean mutants. Crop Science 2000; 40: 700-703
Reid D.E., Ferguson B.J, and Gresshoff P.M. Inoculation- and nitrate-induced CLE peptides of soybean control NARK-dependent nodule formation. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2011; 24: 606-618
Ohyama T., Nicholas J.C. and Harper J.E. Assimilation of 15N2 and 15NO3- by partially nitrate-tolerant nodulation mutants of soybean. Journal of Experimental Botany 1993; 44: 1739-1747
Sato. T., Onoma N., Fujikake H., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K. and Ohyama T. Changes in four leghemoglobin components in nodules of hypernodulating soybean (Glycine max [L] Merr.) mutant and its parent in the early nodule developmental stage. Plant Soil 2001; 237: 129-135
Day D.A., Lambers H., Bateman J., Carroll B.J. and Gresshoff P.M. Growth comparisons of a supernodulating soybean (Glycine max) mutant and its wild-type parent. Physiologia Plantarum 1986; 68: 375-382
Ito S., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K. and Ohyama T. Comparison of initial growth of hypernodulation soybean mutants, NOD1-3, NOD2-4 and NOD3-7, and their parent cv. Williams. Bulletin of Faculty of Agriculture Niigata University 2006; 59: 39-43
Ito S., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K. and Ohyama T. Characteristics of initial growth of hypernodulation soybean mutants, NOD1-3, NOD2-4 and NOD3-7, affected by inoculation of bradyrhizobia and nitrate supply. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2007; 53: 66-71
Ito S., Kato T., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K. and Ohyama T. The autoregulation of nodulation mechanism is related to leaf development. Plant and Cell Physiology 2008; 49: 121-125
Tsukaya H. Controlling size in multicellular organs: focus on the leaf. PLOS Biology. 2008; 6: 1373-1376
Tanabata S., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K., Kawaguchi M. and Ohyama T. Leaf growth of Lotus japonicushypernodulation mutant har1-4. Bulletin of Faculty of Agriculture Niigata University 2013; 66(2): (in press)
Yamaya H. and Arima Y. Evidence that a shoot-derived substance is involved in regulation of the super-nodulation trait in soybean. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2010; 56: 115-122
Ferguson B.J. and Mathesius U. Signaling interactions during nodule development. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 2003; 22: 47-72
Sato T., Fujikake H., Ohtake N., Sueyoshi K., Takahashi T., Sato A. and Ohyama T. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid supply on nodule formation hypernodulating mutant and wild type of soybean. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2002; 48: 413-420
Suzuki A., Akune M., Kogiso M., Imagama Y., Osuki K., Uchiumi T., Higashi S., Han S.M.,Yshida S., Asami T. and Abe M. Control of nodule number by the phytohormone abscisic acid in the roots of two leguminous species. Plant and Cell Physiology 2004; 45: 914-922
Nakagawa T. and Kawaguchi M. Shoot-applied MeJA suppresses root nodulation in Lotus japonicus. Plant and Cell Physiology 2006; 47: 176-180
Terakado-Tonooka J. and Fujihara S. Involvement of polyamines in the root nodule regulation of soybeans (Glycine max). Plant Root 2008; 2: 46-53