Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Impact of Series FACTS Devices (GCSC, TCSC and TCSR) on Distance Protection Setting Zones in 400 kV Transmission Line

Written By

Mohamed Zellagui and Abdelaziz Chaghi

Submitted: February 21st, 2012 Reviewed: October 12th, 2012 Published: March 27th, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/54257

Chapter metrics overview

6,862 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The electricity supply industry is undergoing a profound transformation worldwide. Market forces, scarcer natural resources, and an ever-increasing demand for electricity are some of the drivers responsible for such unprecedented change. Against this background of rapid evolution, the expansion programs of many utilities are being thwarted by a variety of well-founded, environment, land-use, and regulatory pressures that prevent the licensing and building of new transmission lines and electricity generating plants.

The ability of the transmission system to transmit power becomes impaired by one or more of the following steady state and dynamic limitations:

  • Angular stability,

  • Voltage magnitude,

  • Thermal limits,

  • Transient stability,

  • Dynamic stability.

These limits define the maximum electrical power to be transmitted without causing damage to transmission lines and electrical equipment. In principle, limitations on power transfer can always be relieved by the addition of new transmission lines and generation facilities.

Alternatively, Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) controllers can enable the same objectives to be met with no major alterations to power system layout. FACTS are alternating current transmission systems incorporating power electronic-based and other static controllers to enhance controllability and increase power transfer capability. The FACTS concept is based on the substantial incorporation of power electronic devices and methods into the high-voltage side of the network, to make it electronically controllable.

FACTS controllers aim at increasing the control of power flows in the high-voltage side of the network during both steady state and transient conditions. Owing to many economical and technical benefits it promised, FACTS received the support of electrical equipment manufacturers, utilities, and research organizations around the world. This interest has led to significant technological developments of FACTS controllers (Sen, K.K.; Sen, M.L., 2009), (Zhang, X.P. et al., 2006). Several kinds of FACTS controllers have been commissioned in various parts of the world.

Popular are: load tap changers, phase-angle regulators, static VAR compensators, thyristors controlled series compensators, interphase power controllers, static compensators, and unified power flow controllers.

The main objectives of FACTS controllers are the following (Mathur, R.M.; Basati, R.S., 2002):

  • Regulation of power flows in prescribed transmission routes,

  • Secure loading of transmission lines nearer to their thermal limits,

  • Prevention of cascading outages by contributing to emergency control,

  • Damping of oscillations that can threaten security or limit the usable line capacity.

The most Utility engineers and consultants use relay models to select the relay types suited for a particular application, and to analyze the performance of relays that appear to either operate incorrectly or fail to operate on the occurrence of a fault. Instead of using actual prototypes, manufacturers use relay model designing to expedite and economize the process of developing new relays. Electric power utilities use computer-based relay models to confirm how the relay would perform during systems disturbances and normal operating conditions and to make the necessary corrective adjustment on the relay settings. The software models could be used for training young and inexperienced engineers and technicians. Researchers use relay model to investigate and improve protection design and algorithms. However, simulating numerical relays to choose appropriate settings for the steady state operation of over current relays and distance relays is presently the most familiar use of relay models (McLaren et al., 2001).

1.1. Problem statement

In the presence of series compensators the system FACTS devices i.e. GTO Controlled Series Capacitor (GCSC), Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC) and Thyristor Controlled Series Reactor (TCSR) connected in high voltage (HV) transmission line protected by distance relay, the total impedance and the measured impedance at the relaying point depend on the injected reactance by compensators. So there is a reel impact on the relay settings zones.

1.2. Objectives

This chapter presents a comparative study of the performance of MHO (admittance) distance relays for transmission line 400 kV in Eastern Algerian transmission networks compensated by three different series FACTS i.e. GCSC, TCSC and TCSR connected at midpoint of a single electrical transmission line. The facts are used for controlling transmission voltage in the range of ±40kV as well as reactive power injected between -50 MVar/+15 MVar on the power system. This chapter studies the effects of GCSC, TCSC and TCSR insertion on the total impedance of a transmission line protected by MHO (admittance) distance relay.

The modified setting zone protection in capacitive and inductive boost mode for three forward zones (Z1, Z2and Z3) and reverse zone (Z4) have been investigated in order to prevent circuit breaker nuisance tripping to improve the performances of distance relay protection. The simulation results are performed in MATLAB software.

Advertisement

2. Apparent reactance injected by series FACTS devices

In general, FACTS compensator can be divided into three categories (Acha, E. al., 2004): Series compensator, Shunt compensator, and combined series-series compensator. In this chapter, we study the series FACTS devices.

2.1. GCSC

The compensator GCSC mounted on figure 1.a is the first that appears in the family of series compensators. It consists of a capacitance (C) connected in series with the transmission line and controlled by a valve-type GTO thyristors mounted in anti-parallel and controlled by an angle of extinction (γ) varied between 0° and 180°. If the GTOs are kept turned-on all the time, the capacitor Cis bypassed and it does not realize any compensation effect. On the other hand, if the positive-GTO (GTO1) and the negative-GTO (GTO2) turn off once per cycle, at a given angle γcounted from the zero-crossing of the line current, the main capacitor Ccharges and discharges with alternate polarity (Zhang, X.P. et al., 2006), (De Jesus F. D. et al., 2007).

Figure 1.

Transmission line in presence of GCSC

Hence, a voltage VCappears in series with the transmission line, which has a controllable fundamental component that is orthogonal (lagging) to the line current.

The compensator GCSC injects in the transmission line a variable capacitive reactance (XGCSC). From figure 1.b the expression of XGCSC is directly related to the controlled GTO angle (γ) which is varied between 0° and 180° as expressed by following equation (De Souza, L. F. W. et al., 2008), (Ray, S. et al., 2008) :

XGCSC(γ)=XCmax[12πγ1πsin(2π)]E1

Where,

XCmax=1C.ωE2

2.2. TCSC

The compensator TCSC mounted on Figure 2.a is a type of series FACTS compensators. It consists of a capacitance (C) connected in parallel with an inductance (L) controlled by a valve mounted in anti-parallel conventional thyristors (T1and T2) and controlled by an angle of extinction (α) varied between 90° and 180°.

Figure 2.

Transmission line in presence of TCSC

From figure 2.b, the compensator TCSC injected in the transmission line a variable capacitive reactance (XTCSC). The expression of XTCSCis directly related to the controlled thyristors, angle (α) which is varied between 90° and 180° and expressed by following equation (Acha, E. al., 2004), (Sen, K.K.; Sen, M.L., 2009):

XTCSC(α)=XC//XL(α)=XC.XL(α)XC+XL(α)E3
XL(α)=XLmax[ππ2αsin(2α)]E4

Where,

XLmax=L.ωE5

And,

XC=1j.C.ωE6

From the equations (4), (5) and (6), the equation (3) becomes:

XTCSC(α)=XC.XL.max[ππ2αsin(2α)]XC+XL.max[ππ2αsin(2α)]E7

2.3.TCSR

The compensator TCSR is an inductive reactance compensator at which its inductive reactance is continually adjusted through the firing delay angle (α) of the thyristors as shown in figure 3.a. It consists of a series reactor shunted by a thyristors controlled reactor (TCR).

If the firing delay angle is 180°, the TCSR operates as an uncontrolled reactor (L1). When the angle decreases below 180°, the inductive reactance of TCSR decreases and at 90° it is given by the parallel connection of the reactors (L1//L2).

Figure 3.

Transmission line in presence of TCSR.

From figure 3.b, the compensator TCSR injected in the transmission line a variable capacitive reactance (XTCSR). The expression of XTCSR is directly related to the controlled thyristors angle (α) expressed by the following equation (Acha, E. al., 2004), (Zhang, X.P. et al., 2006) :

XTCSR(α)=XL2//XL1(α)=XL2.XL1(α)XL2+XL1(α)=XL2.XL1max[ππ2αsin(2α)]XL2+XL1max[ππ2αsin(2α)]E8

Where,

XL1max=L1.ωE9

And,

XL2=j.L2.ωE10
Advertisement

3. Power system protection

Fault current is the expression given to the current that flow in the circuit when load is shorted i.e. flow in a path other than the load. This current is usually very high and may exceed ten times the rated current of a piece of plant. Faults on power system are inevitable due to external or internal causes, lightning may struck the overhead lines causes insulation damage. Internal overvoltage due to switching or other power system phenomenon may also cause an over voltage which leads to deterioration of the insulation and faults. Power networks are usually protected by means of two main components, relays that sense the abnormal current or voltage and a circuit breaker that put a piece of plant out of tension.

Power system protection is the art and science of the application of devices that monitor the power line currents and voltages (relays) and generate signals to deenergize faulted sections of the power network by circuit breakers. Goal is to minimize damage to equipment that would be caused by system faults, if residues, and maintain the delivery of electrical energy to the consumers (Horowitz, S.H.; Phadke A.G. 2008), (Blackburn, J.L.; Domin, T.J. 2006).

Many types of protective relays are used to protect power system equipments. They are classified according to their operating principles; over current relay senses the extra (more than set) current considered dangerous to a given equipment, differential relays compare in and out currents of a protected equipment, while impedance relays measure the impedance of the protected piece of plant.

3.1. Principal characteristics of protection system

For system protection to be effective, the following characteristics must be met (Blackburn J.L.; Domin. T.J., 2006), (Zellagui. M, Chaghi. A., 2012):

  • Reliability : assurance that the protection will perform correctly in presence of faults on electrical transmission and distribution line,

  • Selectivity : maximum continuity of service with minimum system disconnection,

  • Speed of operation : minimum fault duration and consequent equipment damage and system instability,

  • Simplicity : minimum protective equipment and associated circuitry to achieve the protection objectives,

  • Economics: maximum protection at minimal total cost.

3.2. Principles of relay application

The power system is divided into protection zones defined by the equipment and the available circuit breakers. Six categories of protection zones are possible in each power system:

  • Generators and generator-transformer units,

  • Transformers,

  • Bus bars,

  • Lines (transmission and distribution),

  • Utilization equipment (motors, static loads, or other),

  • Capacitor or reactor banks (when separately protected).

3.1. Protection zones

Most of these zones are illustrated in figure 4. Although the fundamentals of protection are quite similar, each of these six categories has protective relays, specifically designed for primary protection, that are based on the characteristics of the equipment being protected. The protect ion of each zone normally include s relays that can provide backup for the relays protecting the adjacent equipment (Zellagui.M; Chaghi.A. 2012.a ). The protection in each zone should overlap that in the adjacent zone; otherwise, a primary protection void would occur between the protection zones. This overlap is accomplished by the location of the CTs the key sources of power system information for the relays.

Figure 4.

Protection zone on power system

Advertisement

4. Setting zones for MHO distance relays

4.1. Principal

Distance protection is so called because it is based on an electrical measure of distance along a transmission line to a fault. The distance along the transmission line is directly proportional to the series electrical impedance of the transmission line.

Impedance is defined as the ratio of voltage to current. Therefore, distance protection measures distance to a fault by means of a measured voltage to measured current ratio computation (Zigler, G., 2008), (Zellagui, M.; Chaghi, A., 2012.b). The philosophy of setting relay at Sonelgaz Group is three forward zones and one reverse zone to protect EHV transmission line between busbar Aand Bwith total impedance ZABas shown in figure 5.

Figure 5.

Principal operation of distance relay

4.2. Setting zones

4.2.1. First zone

In practice it is normal to adjust the first zone relays (Z1) at A to protect only up to 80% of the protective line AB. This is a high speed unit and is used for the primary protection of the protected line. Its operation is instantaneous (Dechphung, S.; Saengsuwan, T., 2008).

This unit is not set to protect the entire line to avoid undesired tripping due to over reach. Over reach may occur due to transients during the fault condition.

4.2.2. Second zone

It is set to cover about 20% of the second line (BC). The main object of the second zone unit is to provide protection to the end zone of the first section which is beyond the reach of the first unit. The setting of the second unit is so adjusted that it operates the relay even for arcing faults at the end of the line. To achieve this, the unit must take care beyond the end of the line. In other words its setting must take care of under reach caused by arc resistance (Dechphung, S; Saengsuwan, T., 2008), (Zellagui, M.; Chaghi, A., 2012.b).

Under reach is also caused by intermediate current sources, errors in CT, and VT and measurement performed by the relay. To take into account the under reaching tendency caused by these factors, the normal practice is to set the second zone reach up to 20% of the shortest adjoining line section. The protective zone of the second unit is known as the second zone of protection. The second zone unit operates after a certain time delay. Its operating time is 0,3 sec.

4.2.3. Third zone

It is provided for back-up protection of the adjoining line. Its reach should extend beyond the end of the adjoining line under the maximum under reach, which may be caused by arcs, intermediate current sources and errors in CT, VT and measuring unit (Zellagui. M.; Chaghi. A., 2012.b). The protective zone of the third stage is known as the third zone of protection.

The characteristic curve on MHO (admittance) relay for setting zones is shown in figure 6.

Figure 6.

Characteristic curveX(R) for setting zones for distance protection.

Figure 7 represents the tripping time T1, T2and T3correspond to these three zones of operation for circuit breaker installed at busbar Aand MHO distance relay (RA).

The fourth setting zones for protected transmission line (forward and reverse) without series FACTS are given by (Zellagui, M.; Chaghi, A. 2012.c), (Gérin-Lajoie, L. 2009):

Z1=R1+jX1=80%ZAB=0,8.(RAB+jXAB)E11
Z2=R2+jX2=RAB+jXAB+0,2.(RBC+jXBC)E12
Z3=R3+jX3=RAB+jXAB+0,4.(RBC+jXBC)E13
Z4=R4+jX4=60%ZAB=0,6.(RAB+jXAB)E14

The total impedance of transmission line AB measured by MHO distance relay is:

ZAB=KZ.ZL,KZ=KVTKCTE15

Where, ZAB is real total impedance of line AB, and KVT and KCT is ratio of voltage to current respectively.

The presence of series FACTS systems in a reactor (XFACTS) has a direct influence on the total impedance of the protected line (ZAB), especially on the reactance XAB and no influence on the resistance RAB.

Figure 7.

Selectivity of distance relay

4.3. Measured impedance by relay in presence fault

Distance relaying belongs to the principle of ratio comparison. The ratio is between voltage and current, which in turn produces impedance. The impedance is proportional to the distance in transmission lines, hence the distance relaying designation for the principle.

This principle is primarily used for protection of high voltage transmission lines. In this case the over current principle cannot easily cope with the change in the direction of the current flow, which is common in the transmission but no so common in radial distribution lines. Computing the impedance in the three-phase system is a bit involved in each type of the fault produces a different impedance expression. Because of these differences the settings of the distance relay are needed to be selected to distinguish between the ground and phase faults.

In addition fault resistance may create problem for distance measurement because of the fault resistance may be difficult for predict. It is particularly challenging for distance relays to measure correct fault impedance when the current in feed from the other end of the line create an unknown voltage drop on the fault resistance (Kazemi, A. et al., 2009), (Kulkami, P.A. et al., 2010).

This may contribute to erroneous computation of the impedance, called apparent impedance ‘seen’ by the relay located at the end of the line and using the current and voltage measurement just from the end. Once the impedance is computed, it is compared to the settings that define the operating characteristics of the relay. Based on the comparison, a decision is made if a fault has occurred, if so in what zone.

The principle behind the standard distance protection function is based on measured apparent impedance (Zseen) at the transmission line terminals. The apparent impedance is computed from fundamental power frequency components of measured instantaneous voltage and current signals (Liu, Q.; Wang, Z., 2008), (Khederzadeh, M.; Sidhu, T. S., 2006), (Jamali, S.; Shateri, H. 2011), the apparent impedance is given by :

Zseen=(VseenIseen).KZE16
Advertisement

5. Case study and simulation results

The power system studied in this paper is the 400 kV, 50 Hz eastern Algerian electrical transmission networks at group SONELGAZ (Algerian Company of Electricity and Gas) which is shows in figure 8 (Sonelgaz Group/GRTE, 2011). The MHO distance relay is located in the bus bar at Ramdane Djamel substation in Skikda to protect transmission line between busbar Aand busbar Bat Oued El Athmania substation in Mila, the bus bar Cat Salah Bay substation in Sétif.

The figure below represents a 400 kV transmission line in the presence of a series FACTS type GCSC, TCSC and TCSR installed in the midpoint of the transmission line protected by a MHO distance relay between busbar A and B.

5.1. Characteristic curve of installed series FACTS devices

Figure 9 shows the characteristic curves of the different compensators used GCSC, TCSC and TCSR installed on transmission line in this case study.

5.2. Impact on the impedance of a protected transmission line.

The impact of the angle variation γand injected reactance XGCSCby compensator GCSC on reactance and resistance of the total impedance for transmission line (XABand RAB) and on the parameters of measured impedance by MHO distance relay (XRelayand RRelay) in the inductive and capacitive mode is summarized in table 1.

Figure 8.

Electrical networks 400 kV study in Algeria

Figure 9.

Characteristic curve for series FACTS devices installed

ModeInductiveCapacitive
γ (°)0204080100120140180
XGCSC (Ω)32,00018,34157,74660,0718-0,0718-1,8454-7,7466-32,000
XAB (Ω)143,44129,78119,19111,51111,37109,59103,6979,440
RAB (Ω)11,52611,52611,52611,52611,52611,52611,52611,526
XRelay (Ω)7,17206,48915,95935,57565,56845,47975,18473,9720
RRelay (Ω)0,57630,57630,57630,57630,57630,57630,57630,5763

The impact of the angle variation αand XTCSCinjected reactance by compensator TCSC on reactance and resistance of the total impedance for transmission line (XABand RAB) and on the parameters of measured impedance by MHO distance relay (XRelayand RRelay) in the inductive and capacitive mode is summarized in table 2.

ModeInductiveCapacitive
α (°)909192100140180
XTCSC (Ω)3,159.1063,385.1066,7825.106-4828,0-440.684-106.670
XAB (Ω)3,158 1063,384.1066,7826.106-48177,0-329,244,7697
RAB (Ω)11,52611,52611,52611,52611,52611,526
XRelay (Ω)1,579.1051,692.1053,3913.105-2408,9-16.46220.2385
RRelay (Ω)0,57630,57630,57630,57630,57630,5763

The impact of the angle variation αand injected reactance XTCSRby compensator TCSR on reactance and resistance of the total impedance for transmission line (XABand RAB) and on the parameters of measured impedance by MHO distance relay (XRelayand RRelay)in the inductive and capacitive mode is summarized in table 3.

ModeInductive
α (°)90100110120130140160180
XTCSR (Ω)32,00032,02132,17032,56333,30834,50638,64545,714
XAB (Ω)143,44143,46143,61144,00144,75145,95150,09157,15
RAB (Ω)11,52611,52611,52611,52611,52611,52611,52611,526
XRelay (Ω)7,17207,17317,18057.20027,23747,29737,50437,8577
RRelay (Ω)0,57630,57630,57630,57630,57630,57630,57630,5763

5.3. Impact on setting zones

5.3.1. Impact of GCSC Insertion

Figures 10 and 11 show the impact of the variation extinction angle γand reactance XGCSCon the value of setting zones reactance and setting zones resistance respectively in presence of GCSC on transmission line.

Figure 10.

Impact of insertion GCSC on reactance of setting zones

Figure 11.

Impact of insertion GCSC on resistance of setting zones

5.3.2. Impact of TCSC Insertion

Figures 12 and 13 is show the impact of the variation extinction angle of αand reactance XTCSCon the value of setting zones reactance and setting zones resistance respectively in presence of a TCSC on transmission line.

Figure 12.

Impact of insertion TCSC on reactance of setting zones

Figure 13.

Impact of insertion TCSC on resistance of setting zones

5.3.3. Impact of TCSR Insertion

Figures 14 and 15 is show the impact of the variation extinction angle αand reactance XTCSRon the value of setting zones reactance and setting zones resistance respectively in presence of TCSC on transmission line.

Figure 14.

Impact of insertion TCSR on reactance of setting zones

Figure 15.

Impact of insertion TCSR on resistance of setting zones

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

The results are presented in relation to a typical 400 kV transmission system employing GCSC, TCSC and TCSR series FACTS devices. The effects of the extinction angle γfor controlled GTO installed on GCSC as well as extinction angle αfor controlled thyristors on TCSC and TCSR are investigated. These devices are connected at the midpoint of a transmission line protected by distance relay. However as demonstrated these angles injected variable reactance (XGCSC, XTCSC or XTCSR) in the protected line which lead to direct impact on the total impedance of the protected line and setting zones.

Therefore settings zones of the total system protection must be adjusted in order to avoid unwanted circuit breaker tripping in the presence of series FACTS compensator.

References

  1. 1. AchaEFuerte-esquivelC. RAmbriz-pérezHAngeles-camachoC2004FACTS Modelling and Simulation in Power Networks,John Wiley & Sons Ltd Publication,978-0-47085-271-2London, England.
  2. 2. BlackburnJ. LDominT. J2006Protective Relaying: Principles and Applications,rd Edition, Published by CRC Press,978-1-57444-716-3USA.
  3. 3. De JesusF. DDe SouzaL. F. WWantanabeEAlvesJ. E. R2007SSR and Power Oscillation Damping using Gate-Controlled Series Capacitors (GCSC)IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery,22N°3, (Mars 2007),18061812
  4. 4. De SouzaL. F. WWantanabeE. HAlvesJ. E. R2008Thyristor and Gate-Controlled Series Capacitors: A Comparison of Component Ratings, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery,232May 2008),899906
  5. 5. DechphungSSaengsuwanT2008Adaptive Characteristic of MHO Distance Relay for Compensation of the Phase to Phase Fault Resistance, IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET’ 2008), Singapore, Thailand,2427November 2008.
  6. 6. Gérin-lajoieL2009A MHO Distance Relay Device in EMTP Works, Electric Power Systems Research, 79(3), March 2009,484449
  7. 7. HorowitzS. HPhadkeA. G2008Power System Relayingrd Edition, Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd,978-0-47005-712-4England, UK.
  8. 8. JamaliSShateriH2011Impedance based Fault Location Method for Single Phase to Earth Faults in Transmission Systemsth IET International Conference on Developments in Power System Protection (DPSP), United Kingdom, 29 March- 1 April, 2010.
  9. 9. KazemiAJamaliSShateriH2009Measured Impedance by Distance Relay with Positive Sequence Voltage Memory in Presence of TCSC, IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition (PSCE’ 09), Seattle, USA,1518March 2009.
  10. 10. KhederzadehMSidhuT. S2006Impact of TCSC on the Protection of Transmission LinesIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery211January 2006),8087
  11. 11. KulkamiP. AHolmukheR. MDeshpandeK. DChaudhariP. S2010Impact of TCSC on Protection of Transmission Line, International Conference on Energy Optimization and Control (ICEOC’ 10), Maharashtra, India,2830December 2010.
  12. 12. LiuQWangZ2008Research on the Influence of TCSC to EHV Transmission Line Protection, International Conference on Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technology (DRPT’ 08), Nanjing, China,69April 2008.
  13. 13. MathurR. MBasatiR. S2002Thyristor-Based FACTS Controllers for Electrical Transmission SystemsPublished by Wiley and IEEE Press Series in Power Engineering,978-0-47120-643-9New Jersey, USA.
  14. 14. MclarenP. GMustaphiKBenmouyalGChanoSGirgisAHenvilleCKezunovicMKojovicLMarttilaRMeisingerMMichelGSachdevM. SSkendzicVSidhuT. STziouvarasD2001Software Models for Relays, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery,1612April 2001),238245
  15. 15. RaySVenayagamoorthyG. KWatanabeE. H2008A Computational Approach to Optimal Damping Controller Design for a GCSCIEEE Transaction on Power Delivery,233July 2008),16731681
  16. 16. SenK. KSenM. L2009Introduction to FACTS Controllers: Theory, Modeling and Applications",Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and IEEE Press,978-0-47047-875-2New Jersey, USA.
  17. 17. Sonelgaz Group/GRTE2011Topologies of Electrical Networks High Voltage 400 kV, Technical rapport published by Algerian Company of Electrical Transmission Network, 30 December 2011, Sétif, Algeria.
  18. 18. ZellaguiMChaghiA2012a). Distance Protection for Electrical Transmission Line: Equipments, Settings Zones and Tele-Protection, published by LAP Lambert Academic Publishing,0000-9783Saarbrücken- Germany.
  19. 19. ZellaguiMChaghiA2012.bMeasured Impedance by MHO Distance Protection for Phase to Earth Fault in Presence GCSC, ACTA Technica Corviniensis : Bulletin of Engineering, Tome 5, Fascicule 3, (July-September 2012),8186
  20. 20. ZellaguiMChaghiA2012.cA Comparative Study of FSC and GCSC Impact on MHO Distance Relay Setting in 400 kV Algeria Transmission Line, Journal ACTA Electrotehnica,532July 2012),134143
  21. 21. ZhangX. PRehtanzCPalB2006Flexible AC Transmission Systems : Modelling and ControlSpringer Publishers,978-3-64206-786-0Heidelberg, Germany.
  22. 22. ZiglerG2008Numerical Distance Protection : Principles and Applicationsrd Edition, Publics Corporate Publishing, Wiley-VCH,978-3-89578-318-0Berlin, Germany.

Written By

Mohamed Zellagui and Abdelaziz Chaghi

Submitted: February 21st, 2012 Reviewed: October 12th, 2012 Published: March 27th, 2013