Open access

First– and Second–Line Drugs and Drug Resistance

Written By

Hum Nath Jnawali and Sungweon Ryoo

Submitted: 29 May 2012 Published: 20 March 2013

DOI: 10.5772/54960

From the Edited Volume

Tuberculosis - Current Issues in Diagnosis and Management

Edited by Bassam H. Mahboub and Mayank G. Vats

Chapter metrics overview

9,882 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which is transmitted through inhalation of aerosolized droplets. TB mainly attacks the lungs, but can also affect other parts of the body. TB is highly contagious during the active stage of the disease and can infect an individual through inhalation of as few as 10 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) bacteria. After inhalation, these bacteria are mainly captured by the alveolar macrophages, but they can evade the host immune system and remain in the dormant stage for a long period of time, at which point they can reactivate to a virulent form under immune-compromised conditions of the host. This is possible because M. tuberculosis can persist in slow growing as well as in fast growing stages which makes treatment challenging. Almost all of the antibiotics that can be used to treat TB work when the bacteria are actively dividing. In the intensive phase of TB treatment, the antibiotics mainly kill rapidly growing bacteria, which causes rapid sputum conversion, and the eradication of clinical symptoms. However, in order to kill the persistent or slow growing strains of MTB, the continuation phase of the treatment is essential. TB can be treated effectively by using first line drugs (FLD) isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), ethambutol (EMB) and streptomycin (SM). However, this first line therapy often fails to cure TB for several reasons. Relapse and the spread of the disease contribute to the emergence of drug resistant bacteria. The emergence of multidrug resistant TB (MDR-TB), i.e. which is resistant to at least isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF), is of great concern, because it requires the use of second-line drugs that are difficult to procure and are much more toxic and expensive than FLDs [1]. Therefore, the detection and treatment of drug susceptible or single drug resistant TB is an important strategy for preventing the emergence of MDR-TB [2]. M. tuberculosis strains with extensively drug resistant-TB (XDR-TB), that is resistant to either isoniazid or rifampicin (like MDR tuberculosis), any fluoroquinolone, and at least one of three second-line antituberculosis injectable drugs—i.e., capreomycin, kanamycin, and amikacin have also been reported [3].

First- and second-line drugs, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and mechanisms of drug resistance are presented in Table 1 [4]. Antituberculosis drugs are mainly divided into two parts.

  1. First-line antituberculosis drugs- Isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA) and streptomycin (SM).

  2. Second-line antituberculosis drugs- Sub divided into two

    1. Fluoroquinolones- Ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LEV), moxifloxacin (MOX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP).

    2. Injectable antituberculosis drugs- Kanamycin (KAN), amikacin (AMK) and capreomycin (CAP).

    3. Less-effective second-line antituberculosis drugs- Ethionamide (ETH)/Prothionamide (PTH), Cycloserine (CS)/Terizidone, P-aminosalicylic acid (PAS).

Drug MIC (mg/L) Gene Role of gene product
Isoniazid 0.02–0.2 (7H9/7H10) katG catalase/peroxidase
inhA enoyl reductase
ahpC alkyl hydroperoxide reductase
Rifampicin 0.05–0.1 (7H9/7H10) rpoB β-subunit of RNA polymerase
Pyrazinimide 16–50 (LJ) pncA PZase
Streptomycin 2–8 (7H9/7H10) rpsL S12 ribosomal protein
rrs 16S rRNA
gidB 7-methylguanosine methyltransferase
Ethambutol 1–5 (7H9/7H10) embB arabinosyl transferase
Fluoroquinolones 0.5–2.0 (7H9/7H10) gyrA/gyrB DNA gyrase
Kanamycin 2–4 (7H9/7H10) rrs 16S rRNA
eis aminoglycoside acetyltransferase
Amikacin 2–4 (7H9/7H10) rrs 16S rRNA
Capreomycin 2-4 (7H9/7H10) rrs 16S rRNA
tylA rRNA methyltransferase
Ethionamide 2.5–10 (7H11) inhA enoyl reductase
p-aminosalicylic acid 0.5 (LJ) thyA thymidylate synthase A

Table 1.

First- and second-line drugs, MICs and mechanisms of drug resistance


2. First-line antituberculosis drugs

2.1. Isoniazid

Isoniazid (INH) is one of the most effective and specific antituberculosis drugs, which has been a key to treatment since its introduction in 1952 [5]. M. tuberculosis is highly susceptible to INH (MIC 0.02–0.2 μg/ml). INH is only active against growing tubercle bacilli, and is not active against non-replicating bacilli or under anaerobic conditions. INH enters the mycobacterial cell by passive diffusion [6]. The most significant adverse reactions associated with isoniazid administration are hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity.

Resistance to isoniazid is a complex process. Mutations in several genes, including katG, ahpC, and inhA, have all been associated with isoniazid resistance. INH is a prodrug that is activated by the mycobacterial enzyme KatG [7]. INH-resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis often lose catalase and peroxidase enzyme encoded by katG [8], especially in high-level resistant strains (MIC > 5 μg/ml) [9]. Low-level resistant strains (MIC < 1 μg/ml) often still possess catalase activity [9]. Although mutations in katG have been shown to be responsible for INH resistance [10], it is not clear whether the regulation of katG expression plays a role in INH resistance. The katG gene encodes a bifunctional catalase-peroxidase that converts INH to its active form [7]. Activated INH inhibits the synthesis of essential mycolic acids by inactivating the NADH-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase encoded by inhA [11].

A study by Hazbo´n et al. [12] analysed 240 alleles and found that mutations in katG, inhA and ahpC were most strongly associated with isoniazid resistance. A decrease in or total loss of catalase/peroxidase activity as a result of katG mutations are the most common genetic alterations associated with isoniazid resistance [7]. Ser315Thr is the most widespread katG mutation in clinical isolates, but there are many mutations that result in inactivation of catalase-peroxidase, with MICs ranging from 0.2 to 256 mg/L.

Mutations in inhA or its promoter region are usually associated with low-level resistance (MICs = 0.2 −1 μg/ml) and are less frequent than katG mutations [10, 12]. INH-resistant M. tuberculosis harboring inhA mutations could have additional mutations in katG, conferring higher levels of INH resistance [13]. The most common inhA mutation occurs in its promoter region (-15CT) and it has been found more frequently associated with mono-resistant strains [14].

In M. tuberculosis, ahpC codes for an alkyl hydroperoxidase reductase that is implicated in resistance to reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen intermediates. It was initially proposed that mutations in the promoter of ahpC could be used as surrogate markers for the detection of isoniazid resistance [15]. However, several other studies have found that an increase in the expression of ahpC seems to be more a compensatory mutation for the loss of catalase/peroxidase activity rather than the basis for isoniazid resistance [4, 16].

2.2. Rifampicin

Rifampicin (RIF) was introduced in 1972 as an antituberculosis drug and has excellent sterilizing activity. Rifampicin acts by binding to the β-subunit of RNA polymerase (rpoB) [17], the enzyme responsible for transcription and expression of mycobacterial genes, resulting in inhibition of the bacterial transcription activity and thereby killing the organism. An important characteristic of rifampicin is that it is active against actively growing and slowly metabolizing (non-growing) bacilli [18]. RIF produces relatively few adverse reactions. It may cause gastrointestinal upset. Hepatotoxicity occurs less frequently than with isoniazid administration.

Rifampicin MICs ranging from 0.05 to 1 μg/ml on solid or liquid media, but the MIC is higher in egg media (MIC = 2.5–10 μg/ml). Strains with MICs < 1 μg/ml in liquid or agar medium or MICs < 40 μg/ml in Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium are considered RIF-susceptible. The great majority of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates resistant to rifampicin show mutations in the gene rpoB that encodes the β-subunit of RNA polymerase. This results in conformational changes that determine a low affinity for the drug and consequently the development of resistance [19]. Mutations in a ‘hot-spot’ region of 81 bp of rpoB have been found in about 96% of rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates. This region, spanning codons 507–533 (numbering according to the Escherichia coli rpoB sequence), is also known as the rifampicin resistance-determining region (RRDR) [17]. Mutations in codons 531, 526 and 516 (Ser531Leu, His526Tyr, and Asp516Val) are the most frequently reported mutations in most of the studies [20, 21]. Some studies have also reported mutations outside of the hot-spot region of rpoB in rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates [22].

2.3. Pyrazinamide

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important first-line antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug that is used in short-course chemotherapy and is one of the cornerstone drugs in the treatment of MDR-TB [23]. One key characteristic of pyrazinamide is its ability to inhibit semidormant bacilli residing in acidic environments [23]. Pyrazinamide is a structural analogue of nicotinamide and is a pro-drug that needs to be converted into its active form, pyrazinoic acid, by the enzyme pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase (PZase) [24]. PZA is only active against M. tuberculosis at acid pH (e.g., 5.5) [25]. Even at acid pH (5.5), PZA activity is quite poor, with MICs in the range of 6.25–50 μg/ml [26]. Hypersensitivity reactions and gastrointestinal upset may occur with PZA administration.

PZase is encoded in M. tuberculosis by the gene pncA [27]. Mutations in the pncA gene may cause a reduction in PZase activity which may be the major mechanism of PZA resistance in MTB [28, 29]. The mutations of the pncA gene in PZA-resistant MTB isolates has been well characterized, however the correlation varies between different geographical areas including missense mutations, one or more base insertions or deletions, and complete deletion [28-32]. Despite the highly diverse and scattered distribution of pncA mutations, there is some degree of clustering of mutations within different regions of the pncA gene such as at amino acid residues 3–17, 61–85 and 132–142 has been reported [33, 34]. The highly diverse mutation profile in the pncA gene observed in PZA-resistant strains is unique among drug-resistance genes in M. tuberculosis [28]. While the reason behind this diversity is still unclear, it is thought that this could be due to adaptive mutagenesis or due to deficiency in DNA mismatch repair mechanisms [23]. Most PZA-resistant M. tuberculosis strains (72–97%) have mutations in pncA; [28, 29, 34, 35] however; some resistant strains do not have pncA mutations.

2.4. Ethambutol

Ethambutol (EMB) [dextro-2,2’-(ethylenediimino)di-1-butanol], which is an essential first-line drug in tuberculosis treatment, plays an important role in the chemotherapy of drug-resistant TB [36]. EMB is also an important antimycobacterial drug as it enhances the effect of other companion drugs including aminoglycosides, rifamycins and quinolones. The most common side effects observed with ethambutol are dizziness, blurred vision, color blindness, nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, loss of appetite, headache, rash, itching, breathlessness, swelling of the face, lips or eyes, numbness or tingling in the fingers or toes. Patients taking ethambutol should have their visual acuity and color vision checked at least monthly.

The MICs of EMB for M. tuberculosis are in the range of 0.5–2 μg/ml. EMB is a bacteriostatic agent that is active for growing bacilli and has no effect on non-replicating bacilli. EMB interferes with the biosynthesis of cell wall arabinogalactan [37]. It inhibits the polymerization of cell-wall arabinan of arabinogalactan and of lipoarabinomannan, and induces the accumulation of D-arabinofuranosyl-P-decaprenol, an intermediate in arabinan biosynthesis [38, 39].

Arabinosyl transferase, encoded by embB, an enzyme involved in the synthesis of arabinogalactan, has been proposed as the target of EMB in M. tuberculosis [40] and M. avium [41]. In M. tuberculosis, embB is organized into an operon with embC and embA in the order embCAB. embC, embB and embA share over 65% amino acid identity with each other and are predicted to encode transmembrane proteins [40]. Mutations in the embCAB operon, in particular embB, and occasionally embC, are responsible for resistance to EMB [40]. Point mutations of the embABC gene commonly occurred in embB codon 306 [40, 42, 43], and mutations in the embB306 codon have been proposed as a marker for EMB resistance in diagnostic tests [44]. However, point mutations in the embB306 locus occur in only 50 to 60% of all EMB-resistant clinical isolates [42, 45-47], and embB306 mutations can also occur in EMB-susceptible clinical isolates [46, 47]. Five different mutations were uncovered in this codon (ATGGTG/CTG/ATA, ATC and ATT), resulting in three different amino acid shifts (MetVal, Leu, or Ile) [43]. Although the association between embB306 mutation and ethambutol resistance or broad drug resistance has been observed in several groups’ studies with either clinical or laboratorial isolates [48, 49], the exact role of embB306 mutations play in the development of ethambutol resistance and multidrug resistance in M. tuberculosis is not fully understood. About 35% of EMB-resistant strains (MIC <10 μg/ml) do not have embB mutations [39, 45], suggesting that there may be other mechanisms of EMB resistance. Further studies are necessary to identify the potential new mechanisms of EMB resistance.

2.5. Streptomycin

Streptomycin (SM), an aminocyclitol glycoside antibiotic, was the first drug to be used in the treatment of TB, in 1948 [50]. SM kills actively growing tubercle bacilli with MICs of 2–4 μg/ml, but it is inactive against non-growing or intracellular bacilli [23]. The drug binds to the 16S rRNA, interferes with translation proofreading, and thereby inhibits protein synthesis [51, 52]. Ototoxicity and nephotoxicity are associated with SM administration. Vestibular dysfunction is more common than auditory damage. Renal toxicity occurs less frequently than with kanamycin or capreomycin. Hearing and renal function should be monitored in patients getting SM.

Mutations associated with streptomycin resistance have been identified in the genes encoding 16S rRNA (rrs) [53] and ribosomal protein S12 (rpsL) [54-57]. Ribosomal protein S12 stabilizes the highly conserved pseudoknot structure formed by 16S rRNA [58]. Amino acid substitutions in RpsL affect the higher-order structure of 16S rRNA [51] and confer streptomycin resistance. Alterations in the 16S rRNA structure disrupt interactions between 16S rRNA and streptomycin, a process that results in resistance [59]. Mutations in rpsL and rrs are the major mechanism of SM resistance [54, 56, 57], accounting for respectively about 50% and 20% of SM-resistant strains [54, 56, 57]. The most common mutation in rpsL is a substitution in codon 43 from lysine to arginine [54, 56, 57], causing high-level resistance to SM. Mutation in codon 88 is also common [54, 56, 57]. Mutations of the rrs gene occur in the loops of the 16S rRNA and are clustered in two regions around nucleotides 530 and 915 [39, 54, 56, 57]. However, about 20–30% of SM-resistant strains with a low level of resistance (MIC < 32 μg/ml) do not have mutations in rpsL or rrs [60], which indicates other mechanism(s) of resistance. A mutation in gidB, encoding a conserved 7-methylguanosine (m(7)G) methyltransferase specific for 16S rRNA, has been found to cause low-level SM resistance in 33% of resistant M. tuberculosis isolates [61]. A subsequent study showed that while Leu16Arg change is a polymorphism not involved in SM resistance, other mutations in gidB appear to be involved in low-level SM resistance [62]. In addition, some low-level SM resistance seems to be caused by increased efflux as efflux pump inhibitors caused increased sensitivity to SM, although the exact mechanism remains to be identified [62].


3. Second-line antituberculosis drugs

3.1. Fluoroquinolones

The fluoroquinolones (FQs) have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and so are widely used for the treatment of bacterial infections of the respiratory, gastrointestinal and urinary tracts, as well as sexually transmitted diseases and chronic osteomyelitis [63]. In contrast to many other antibiotics used to treat bacterial infections, the FQs have excellent in vitro and in vivo activity against M. tuberculosis [64, 65]. FQs include ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. So, FQs are currently in use as second-line drugs in the treatment of TB. Adverse effects are relatively infrequent (0.5–10% of patients) and include gastrointestinal intolerance, rashes, dizziness, and headache. Most studies of fluoroquinolone side effects have been based on relatively short-term administration for bacterial infections, but trials have now shown the relative safety and tolerability of fluoroquinolones administered for months during TB treatment in adults.

The cellular target of FQs in M. tuberculosis is DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase consisting of two A and two B subunits encoded by gyrA and gyrB genes, respectively [66]. Mutations in a small region of gyrA, called quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) and, less frequently, in gyrB are the primary mechanism of FQ resistance in M. tuberculosis [66, 67]. Analysis of QRDR alone by genotypic tests has been suggested as sufficient for rapid identification of vast majority of FQ-resistant M. tuberculosis strains as additional targeting of gyrB did not enhance the sensitivity significantly [67, 68].

Mutations within the QRDR of gyrA have been identified in clinical and laboratory-selected isolates of M. tuberculosis, largely clustered at codons 90, 91 and 94 [69-73], with Asp94 being relatively frequent [71, 74]. Codon 95 (Ser95Thr) contains a naturally occurring polymorphism that is not related to fluoroquinolone resistance, as it occurs in both fluoroquinolone-susceptible and fluoroquinolone-resistant strains [75]. A less common involvement is codon 88 [76]. For clinical isolates, gyrB mutations appear to be of much rarer occurrence [72, 73]. Generally, two mutations in gyrA or concomitant mutations in gyrA plus gyrB are required for the development of higher levels of resistance [69, 77].

3.2. Aminoglycosides (kanamycin, amikacin and capreomycin)

The aminoglycosides amikacin (AMK)/kanamycin (KAN) and the cyclic polypeptide capreomycin (CAP) are important injectable drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Although belonging to two different antibiotic families, all exert their activity at the level of protein translation. Renal toxicity occurs from these drugs. Regular monitoring of hearing and renal function is recommended.

AMK and KAN are aminoglycosides that have a high level of cross-resistance between them [78-80]. The cyclic polypeptide CAP is structurally unrelated to the aminoglycosides and thus is a potential candidate to replace AMK or KAN if resistance to either of them is suspected [81, 82]. It has been demonstrated that the risk of treatment failure and mortality increase when CAP resistance emerges among MDR-TB cases [83]. However, cross-resistance in M. tuberculosis between AMK/KAN and CAP has been observed in both clinical isolates and laboratory-generated mutants [79, 80, 84, 85].

AMK/KAN and CAP primarily affect protein synthesis in M. tuberculosis and resistance to these drugs is associated with changes in the 16S rRNA (rrs) [78, 80, 81, 85, 86]. The rrs mutation A1401G causes high-level AMK/KAN and low-level CAP resistance. C1402T is associated with CAP resistance and low-level KAN resistance. G1484T is linked to high-level AMK/KAN and CAP resistance [79, 80, 84, 86]. Low-level resistance to kanamycin has been correlated to mutations in the promoter region of the eis gene encoding aminoglycoside acetyltransferase, the enhanced intracellular survival protein, Eis [87].

Resistance to the cyclic peptide capreomycin has also been associated with mutations in tlyA [86]. The gene tlyA encodes a putative 2’-O-methyltransferase (TlyA) that has been suggested to methylate nucleotide C1402 in helix 44 of 16S rRNA and nucleotide C2158 in helix 69 of 23S rRNA in M. tuberculosis [81, 88]. Capreomycin binds to the 70S ribosome and inhibits mRNA–tRNA translocation [89]. It is believed that TlyA methylation enhances the antimicrobial activity of capreomycin [81] and that disruption of tlyA leads to capreomycin resistance because the unmethylated ribosome is insensitive to the drug [81, 86, 88]. The identified mechanism of capreomycin resistance on the basis of in vitro selected mutants has found that tlyA mutations were common [80, 86] whereas infrequent in clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis [79, 80].

3.3. Ethionamide/prothionamide

Ethionamide (ETH, 2-ethylisonicotinamide) is a derivative of isonicotinic acid and has been used as an antituberculosis agent since 1956. The MICs of ETH for M. tuberculosis are 0.5–2 μg/ml in liquid medium, 2.5–10 μg/ml in 7H11 agar, and 5–20 μg/ml in LJ medium. Ethionamide and the similar drug prothionamide (PTH, 2-ethyl-4-pyridinecarbothioamide) act as pro-drugs, like isoniazid. Which is activated by EtaA/EthA (a mono-oxygenase) [90, 91] and inhibits the same target as INH, the InhA of the mycolic acid synthesis pathway [92]. Once delivered into the bacterial cell, ethionamide undergoes several changes. Its sulfo group is oxidized by flavin monooxygenase, and the drug is then converted to 2-ethyl-4-aminopyridine. The intermediate products formed before 2-ethyl-4-aminopyridine seem to be toxic to mycobacteria, but their structures are unknown (may be highly unstable compounds). Mutants resistant to ethionamide are cross-resistant to prothionamide. ETH frequently causes gastrointestinal side effects, such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. It can cause hypothyroidism, particularly if it is used with para-aminosalicyclic acid.

3.4. p-Amino salicylic acid

p-Amino salicylic acid (PAS) was one of the first antibiotics to show anti-TB activity and was used to treat TB in combination with isoniazid and streptomycin [93]. Later, with the discovery of other more potent drugs including rifampicin, its use in first line regimens was discontinued. PAS is still useful as part of a treatment regimen for XDR TB although its benefit is limited and it is extremely toxic. Thymidylate synthase A, encoded by thyA, an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of thymine, has been proposed recently as the target of PAS in M. bovis BCG [94]. Most common mutation in thyA was Thr202Ala, though few susceptible isolates also showed the same mutation [95]. However, its mechanism of action was never clearly elucidated. The most common adverse reactions associated with PAS are gastrointestinal disturbances.

3.5. Cycloserine

Cycloserine (CS) is an antibiotic that is used to treat TB. The exact mechanism of action of cycloserine is unknown, but it is thought to prevent the tuberculosis bacteria from making substances called peptidoglycans, which are needed to form the bacterial cell wall. This results in the weakening of bacteria’s cell wall, which then kills the bacteria. Cycloserine possesses high gastric tolerance (compared with the other drugs) and lacks cross-resistance to other compounds. But it causes adverse psychiatric effects; [96, 97] which is its main drawback. So, psychiatric interrogation is necessary before prescribing cycloserine drug. Cycloserine is one of the cornerstones of treatment for MDR and XDR tuberculosis [96, 97, 98]. Terizidone (a combination of two molecules of cycloserine) might be less toxic [96, 97], although studies of this drug are scarce.


4. Conclusions

Despite all the advances made in the treatment and management, TB still remains as one of the main public health problems that have plagued mankind for millennia. The challenges posed by M. tuberculosis infection, through its interaction with the immune system and its mechanisms for evasion, require many more breakthroughs to make a significant impact on the worldwide tuberculosis problem. The introduction of MDR and XDR strains of M. tuberculosis poses several problems in mycobacterial genetics and phthisiotherapy. Among the response priorities, rapid detection of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance, use of appropriate regimens for treatment, and new drug development are of paramount importance. However, regarding the dynamics of TB transmission, and also in view of rational development of new anti-TB drugs, it is extremely important to extend our knowledge on the molecular basis of drug resistance and all its complexity. It is necessary to clarify the association between specific mutations and the development of MDR-TB or the association between drug resistance and fitness. This would allow better evaluation of the transmission dynamics of resistant strains and more accurate prediction of a future disease scenario. Adequate monitoring of drug resistance, especially MDR/XDR-TB in new patients and its transmission, molecular characterization of the drug-resistant strains, and analysis of patients’ immune status and genetic susceptibility are also needed to address the problem of the fitness, virulence and transmissibility of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains.


  1. 1. Espinal, M. A, Laszlo, A, Simonsen, L, Boulahbal, F, Kim, S. J, Reniero, A, Hoffner, S, Rieder, H. L, Binkin, N, Dye, C, Williams, R, & Raviglione, M. C. Global trends in resistance to antituberculosis drugs. The New England Journal of Medicine (2001). , 344(17), 1294-303.
  2. 2. Masjedi, M. R, Farnia, P, Sorooch, S, Pooramiri, M. V, Mansoori, S. D, Zarifi, A. Z, Velayati, A. A, & Hoffner, S. Extensively drug resistant tuberculosis: 2 years of surveillance in Iran. Clinical Infectious Diseases (2006). , 43(7), 840-7.
  3. 3. Eker, B, Ortmann, J, Migliori, G. B, Sotgiu, G, Muetterlein, R, Centis, R, Hoffmann, H, Kirsten, D, Schaberg, T, Ruesch-gerdes, S, & Lange, C. Multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, Germany. Emerging Infectious Diseases (2008). , 14(11), 1700-6.
  4. 4. Almeida Da Silva P. E, & Palomino J. C. Molecular basis and mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: classical and new drugs. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2011. , 66(7), 1417-30.
  5. 5. Bernstein, J, Lott, W. A, Steinberg, B. A, & Yale, H. L. Chemotherapy of experimental tuberculosis. V. Isonicotinic acid hydrazide (nydrazid) and related compounds. American Review of Tuberculosis (1952). , 65(4), 357-64.
  6. 6. Bardou, F, Raynaud, C, Ramos, C, Laneelle, M. A, & Laneelle, G. Mechanism of isoniazid uptake in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology 1998. , 144(Pt 9), 2539–44.
  7. 7. Zhang, Y, Heym, B, Allen, B, Young, D, & Cole, S. The catalase-peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature (1992). , 358(6387), 591-3.
  8. 8. Middlebrook, G. Isoniazid resistance and catalase activity of tubercle bacilli. American Review of Tuberculosis (1954). , 69(3), 471-2.
  9. 9. Winder, F. Mode of Action of the Antimycobacterial Agents and Associated Aspects of the Molecular Biology of Mycobacteria. In: Ratledge C, Stanford J, eds. The Biology of Mycobacteria. Vol I. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; (1982). , 354-438.
  10. 10. Zhang, Y, & Telenti, A. Genetics of Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In Molecular Genetics of Mycobacteria. Hatful, G.F., and Jacobs, W.R., Jr (eds). Washington, DC: ASM Press; (2000). , 235-254.
  11. 11. Banerjee, A, Dubnau, E, Quemard, A, Balasubramanian, V, Um, K. S, Wilson, T, Collins, D, & De Lisle, G. Jacobs WR Jr. inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science (1994). , 263(5144), 227-30.
  12. 12. Hazbón, M. H, Brimacombe, M, Bobadilla del Valle, M, Cavatore, M, Guerrero, M. I, Varma-Basil, M, Billman-Jacobe, H, Lavender, C, Fyfe, J, García-García, L, León, C. I, Bose, M, Chaves, F, Murray, M, Eisenach, K. D, Sifuentes-Osornio, J, Cave, M. D, Ponce de León, A, & Alland, D. Population genetics study of isoniazid resistance mutations and evolution of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2006). , 50(8), 2640-9.
  13. 13. Heym, B, Alzari, P M, Honore, N, & Cole, S. T. Missense mutations in the catalaseperoxidase gene, katG, are associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Molecular Microbiology (1995). , 15(2), 235-45.
  14. 14. Leung, E. T, Ho, P. L, Yuen, K. Y, Woo, W. L, Lam, T. H, Kao, R. Y, Seto, W. H, & Yam, W. C. Molecular characterization of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: identification of a novel mutation in inhA. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2006). , 50(3), 1075-8.
  15. 15. Rinder, H, Thomschke, A, Rüsch-gerdes, S, Bretzel, G, Feldmann, K, Rifai, M, & Löscher, T. Significance of ahpC promoter mutations for the prediction of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (1998). , 17(7), 508-11.
  16. 16. Sherman, D. R, Mdluli, K, Hickey, M. J, Arain, T. M, Morris, S. L, Barry, C. E 3rd, & Stover, C. K. Compensatory ahpC gene expression in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science (1996). , 272(5268), 1641-3.
  17. 17. Ramaswamy, S, & Musser, J. M. Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tubercle and Lung Disease (1998). , 79(1), 3-29.
  18. 18. Mitchison, D. A. Basic mechanisms of chemotherapy. Chest (1979). Suppl): , 771-81.
  19. 19. Telenti, A, Imboden, P, Marchesi, F, Schmidheini, T, & Bodmer, T. Direct, automated detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1993). , 37(10), 2054-8.
  20. 20. Somoskovi, A, Parsons, L. M, & Salfinger, M. The molecular basis of resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Respiratory Research (2001). , 2(3), 164-8.
  21. 21. Caws, M, Duy, P. M, Tho, D. Q, Lan, N. T, Hoa, D. V, & Farrar, J. Mutations prevalent among rifampin and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from a hospital in Vietnam. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2006). , 44(7), 2333-7.
  22. 22. Heep, M, Rieger, U, Beck, D, & Lehn, N. Mutations in the beginning of the rpoB gene can induce resistance to rifamycins in both Helicobacter pylori and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2000). , 44(4), 1075-7.
  23. 23. Mitchison, D. A. The action of antituberculosis drugs in short-course chemotherapy. Tubercle (1985). , 66(3), 219-25.
  24. 24. Konno, K, Feldmann, F. M, & Mcdermott, W. Pyrazinamide susceptibility and amidase activity of tubercle bacilli. The American Review of Respiratory Disease (1967). , 95(3), 461-9.
  25. 25. Mcdermott, W, & Tompsett, R. Activation of pyrazinamide and nicotinamide in acidic environment in vitro. American Review of Tuberculosis (1954). , 70(4), 748-54.
  26. 26. Zhang, Y, & Mitchison, D. The curious characteristics of pyrazinamide: a review. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (2003). , 7(1), 6-21.
  27. 27. Scorpio, A, & Zhang, Y. Mutations in pncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, cause resistance to the antituberculous drug pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus. Nature Medicine (1996). , 2(6), 662-7.
  28. 28. Cheng, S. J, Thibert, L, Sanchez, T, Heifets, L, & Zhang, Y. pncA mutations as a major mechanism of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: spread of a mono-resistant strain in Quebec, Canada. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2000). , 44(3), 528-32.
  29. 29. Lemaitre, N, Sougakoff, W, Truffot-pernot, C, & Jarlier, V. Characterization of new mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and identification of conserved regions important for the catalytic activity of the pyrazinamidase PncA. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1999). , 43(7), 1761-3.
  30. 30. Ando, H, Mitarai, S, Kondo, Y, Suetake, T, Sekiguchi, J. I, Kato, S, Mori, T, & Kirikae, T. Pyrazinamide resistance in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Japan. Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2010). , 16(8), 1164-8.
  31. 31. Juréen, P, Werngren, J, Toro, J. C, & Hoffner, S. Pyrazinamide resistance and pncA gene mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2008). , 52(5), 1852-4.
  32. 32. Suzuki, Y, Suzuki, A, Tamaru, A, Katsukawa, C, & Oda, H. Rapid detection of pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a PCR-based in vitro system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2002). , 40(2), 501-7.
  33. 33. Park, S. K, Lee, J. Y, Chang, Lee, M. K, Son, H. C, Kim, C. M, Jang, H. J, Park, H. K, & Jeong, S. H. pncA mutations in clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Korea. BMC Infectious Diseases (2001). , 1, 4.
  34. 34. Scorpio, A, Lindholm-levy, P, Heifets, L, Gilman, R, Siddiqi, S, Cynamon, M, & Zhang, Y. Characterization of pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1997). , 41(3), 540-3.
  35. 35. Louw, G. E, Warren, R. M, Donald, P. R, Murray, M. B, Bosman, M, Van Helden, P. D, Young, D. B, & Victor, T. C. Frequency and implications of pyrazinamide resistance in managing previously treated tuberculosis patients. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (2006). , 10(7), 802-7.
  36. 36. American Thoracic Society, CDC, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Treatment of tuberculosis. MMWR Recommendations and Reports (2003)., 52(RR-11), 1–77.
  37. 37. Takayama, K, & Kilburn, J. Inhibition of synthesis of arabinogalactan by ethambutol in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1989). , 33(9), 1493-9.
  38. 38. Wolucka, B. A, Mcneil, M. R, De Hoffmann, E, Chojnacki, T, & Brennan, P. J. Recognition of the lipid intermediate for arabinogalactan/arabinomannan biosynthesis and its relation to the mode of action of ethambutol on mycobacteria. The Journal of Biological Chemistry (1994). , 269(37), 23328-35.
  39. 39. Zhang, Y, & Yew, W. W. Mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (2009). , 13(11), 1320-30.
  40. 40. Telenti, A, Philipp, W. J, Sreevatsan, S, Bernasconi, C, Stockbauer, K. E, Wieles, B, & Musser, J. M. Jacobs WR Jr. The emb operon, a unique gene cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis involved in resistance to ethambutol. Nature Medicine (1997). , 3(5), 567-70.
  41. 41. Belanger, A. E, Besra, G. S, Ford, M. E, Mikusová, K, Belisle, J. T, Brennan, P. J, & Inamine, J. M. The embAB genes of Mycobacterium avium encode an arabinosyl transferase involved in cell wall arabinan biosynthesis that is the target for the antimycobacterial drug ethambutol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1996). , 93(21), 11919-24.
  42. 42. Ramaswamy, S. V, Amin, A. G, Göksel, S, Stager, C. E, Dou, S. J, El Sahly, H, Moghazeh, S. L, Kreiswirth, B. N, & Musser, J. M. Molecular genetic analysis of nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ethambutol resistance in human isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2000). , 44(2), 326-36.
  43. 43. Sreevatsan, S, Stockbauer, K. E, Pan, X, Kreiswirth, B. N, & Moghazeh, S. L. Jacobs WR Jr, Telenti A, Musser JM. Ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: critical role of embB mutations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1997). , 41(8), 1677-81.
  44. 44. Sreevatsan, S, Stockbauer, K. E, Pan, X, Kreiswirth, B. N, Moghazeh, S. L, Jacobs, W. R Jr, Telenti, A, & Musser, J. M. Ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: critical role of embB mutations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1997). , 41(8), 1677–81.
  45. 45. Alcaide, F, Pfyffer, G. E, & Telenti, A. Role of embB in natural and acquired resistance to ethambutol in mycobacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1997). , 41(10), 2270-3.
  46. 46. Lee, A. S, Othman, S. N, Ho, Y. M, & Wong, S. Y. Novel mutations within the embB gene in ethambutol-susceptible clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2004). , 48(11), 4447-9.
  47. 47. Mokrousov, I, Otten, T, Vyshnevskiy, B, & Narvskaya, O. Detection of embB306 mutations in ethambutol-susceptible clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Northwestern Russia: implications for genotypic resistance testing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2002). , 40(10), 3810-3.
  48. 48. Safi, H, Fleischmann, R. D, Peterson, S. N, Jones, M. B, Jarrahi, B, & Alland, D. Allelic exchange and mutant selection demonstrate that common clinical embCAB gene mutations only modestly increase resistance to ethambutol in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2010). , 54(1), 103-8.
  49. 49. Perdigão, J, Macedo, R, Ribeiro, A, Brum, L, & Portugal, I. Genetic characterisation of the ethambutol resistance-determining region in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: prevalence and significance of embB306 mutations. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (2009). , 33(4), 334-8.
  50. 50. British Medical Research CouncilStreptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. A Medical Research Council Investigation. BMJ (1948). , 2, 769-82.
  51. 51. British Medical Research Council. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. A Medical Research Council Investigation. BMJ (1948). , 2, 769-82.
  52. 52. Gale, E. F, Cundliffe, E, Reynolds, P. E, Richmond, M. H, & Waring, M. J. The molecular basis of antibiotic action. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. (1981).
  53. 53. Douglass, J, & Steyn, L. M. A ribosomal gene mutation in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. The Journal of Infectious Diseases (1993). , 167(6), 1505-6.
  54. 54. Finken, M, Kirschner, P, Meier, A, Wrede, A, & Böttger, E. C. Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Molecular Microbiology (1993). , 9(6), 1239-46.
  55. 55. Funatsu, G, & Wittman, H. G. Ribosomal proteins. XXXIII. Location of amino-acid replacements in protein S12 isolated from Escherichia coli mutants resistant to streptomycin. Journal of Molecular Microbiology (1972). , 68(3), 547-50.
  56. 56. Honore, N, & Cole, S. T. Streptomycin resistance in mycobacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1994). , 38(2), 238-22.
  57. 57. Nair, J, Rouse, D. A, Bai, G. H, & Morris, S. L. The rpsL gene and streptomycin resistance in single and multiple drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Molecular Microbiology (1993). , 10(3), 521-7.
  58. 58. Noller, H. F. Structure of ribosomal RNA. Annual Review of Biochemistry (1984). , 53, 119-62.
  59. 59. De Stasio, E. A, Moazed, D, Noller, H. F, & Dahlberg, A. E. Mutations in 16S ribosomal RNA disrupt antibiotic-RNA interactions. The EMBO Journal (1989). , 8(4), 1213-6.
  60. 60. Cooksey, R. C, Morlock, G. P, Mcqueen, A, Glickman, S. E, & Crawford, J. T. Characterization of streptomycin resistance mechanisms among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients in New York City. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1996). , 40(5), 1186-8.
  61. 61. Okamoto, S, Tamaru, A, Nakajima, C, Nishimura, K, Tanaka, Y, Tokuyama, S, Suzuki, Y, & Ochi, K. Loss of a conserved 7-methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low-level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Molecular Microbiology (2007). , 63(4), 1096-106.
  62. 62. Spies, F. S. da Silva PE, Ribeiro MO, Rossetti ML, Zaha A. Identification of mutations related to streptomycin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and possible involvement of efflux mechanism. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2008). , 52(8), 2947-9.
  63. 63. Spies, F. S, da Silva, P. E, Ribeiro, M. O, Rossetti, M. L, & Zaha, A. Identification of mutations related to streptomycin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and possible involvement of efflux mechanism. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2008). , 52(8), 2947-9.
  64. 64. Bartlett, J. G, Dowell, S. F, Mandell, L. A, File Jr, T. M, Musher, D. M, & Fine, M. J. Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases (2000). , 31(2), 347-82.
  65. 65. Wang, J. Y, Hsueh, P. R, Jan, I. S, Lee, L. N, Liaw, Y. S, Yang, P. C, & Luh, K. T. Empirical treatment with a fluoroquinolone delays the treatment for tuberculosis and is associated with a poor prognosis in endemic areas. Thorax (2006). , 61(10), 903-8.
  66. 66. Ginsburg, A. S, Grosset, J. H, & Bishai, W. R. Fluoroquinolones, tuberculosis, and resistance. The Lancet of Infectious Diseases (2003). , 3(7), 432-42.
  67. 67. Chang, K. C, & Yew, W. W. Chan RCY. Rapid assays for fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2010). , 65(8), 1551-61.
  68. 68. Hillemann, D, Rusch-gerdes, S, & Richter, E. Feasibility of the GenoType MTBDRsl assay for fluoroquinolone, amikacin-capreomycin and ethambutol resistance testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2009). , 47(6), 1767-72.
  69. 69. Takiff, H. E, Salazar, L, Guerrero, C, Philipp, W, Huang, W. M, Kreiswirth, B, & Cole, S. T. Jacobs WR Jr, Telenti A. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1994). , 38(4), 773-80.
  70. 70. Alangaden, G. J, Manavathu, E. K, Vakulenko, S. B, Zvonok, N. M, & Lerner, S. A. Characterization of fluoroquinolone-resistant mutant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis selected in the laboratory and isolated from patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1995). , 39(8), 1700-3.
  71. 71. Cheng, A. F, Yew, W. W, Chan, E. W, Chin, M. L, Hui, M. M, & Chan, R. C. Multiplex PCR amplimer conformation analysis for rapid detection of gyrA mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2004). , 48(2), 596-601.
  72. 72. Pitaksajjakul, P, Wongwit, W, Punprasit, W, Eampokalap, B, Peacock, S, & Ramasoota, P. Mutations in the gyrA and gyrB genes of fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis from TB patients in Thailand. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health (2005). Suppl 4): 228-37.
  73. 73. Lee, A. S, Tang, L. L, Lim, I. H, & Wong, S. Y. Characterization of pyrazinamide and ofloxacin resistance among drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Singapore. International Journal of Infectious Diseases (2002). , 6(1), 48-51.
  74. 74. Sun, Z, Zhang, J, Zhang, X, Wang, S, Zhang, Y, & Li, C. Comparison of gyrA gene mutations between laboratory-selected ofloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical isolates. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (2008). , 31(2), 115-21.
  75. 75. Musser, J. M. Antimicrobial agent resistance in mycobacteria: molecular genetic insights. Clinical Microbiology Reviews (1995). , 8(4), 496-514.
  76. 76. Matrat, S, Veziris, N, Mayer, C, Jarlier, V, Truffot-pernot, C, Camuset, J, Bouvet, E, Cambau, E, & Aubry, A. Functional analysis of DNA gyrase mutant enzymes carrying mutations at position 88 in the A subunit found in clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to fluoroquinolones. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2006). , 50(12), 4170-3.
  77. 77. Kocagöz, T, Hackbarth, C. J, Unsal, I, Rosenberg, E. Y, Nikaido, H, & Chambers, H. F. Gyrase mutations in laboratory selected, fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1996). , 40(8), 1768-74.
  78. 78. Alangaden, G. J, Kreiswirth, B. N, Aouad, A, Khetarpal, M, Igno, F. R, Moghazeh, S. L, Manavathu, E. K, & Lerner, S. A. Mechanisms of resistance to amikacin and kanamycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1998). , 42(5), 1295-7.
  79. 79. Jugheli, L, Bzekalava, N, De Rijk, P, Fissette, K, Portaels, F, & Rigouts, L. High level of cross-resistance between kanamycin, amikacin, and capreomycin among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Georgia and a close relation with mutations in the rrs gene. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2009). , 53(12), 5064-8.
  80. 80. Maus, C. E, Plikaytis, B. B, & Shinnick, T. M. Molecular analysis of cross-resistance to capreomycin, kanamycin, amikacin, and viomycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2005). , 49(8), 3192-7.
  81. 81. Johansen, S. K, Maus, C. E, Plikaytis, B. B, & Douthwaite, S. Capreomycin binds across the ribosome subunit interface using tlyA-encoded 2’-O-methylations in 16S and 23S rRNAs. Molecular Cell (2006). , 23(2), 173-82.
  82. 82. World Health Organization (WHO)Policy Guidance on Drug-Susceptibility Testing (DST) of Second-Line Antituberculosis Drugs. Report (WHO/HTM/TB/2008.392):1-20. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. (2008).
  83. 83. Migliori, G. B, Lange, C, Centis, R, Sotgiu, G, Mütterlein, R, Hoffmann, H, Kliiman, K, De Iaco, G, Lauria, F. N, Richardson, M. D, & Spanevello, A. Cirillo DM; TBNET Study Group. Resistance to second-line injectables and treatment outcomes in multi drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis cases. The European Respiratory Journal (2008). , 31(6), 1155-9.
  84. 84. Engström, A, Perskvist, N, Werngren, J, Hoffner, S. E, & Juréen, P. Comparison of clinical isolates and in vitro selected mutants reveals that tlyA is not a sensitive genetic marker for capreomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2011). , 66(6), 1247-54.
  85. 85. Via, L. E, Cho, S. N, Hwang, S, Bang, H, Park, S. K, Kang, H. S, Jeon, D, Min, S. Y, Oh, T, Kim, Y, Kim, Y. M, Rajan, V, Wong, S. Y, Shamputa, I. C, Carroll, M, Goldfeder, L, Lee, S. A, Holland, S. M, Eum, S, Lee, H, & Barry, C. E. rd. Polymorphisms associated with resistance and cross-resistance to aminoglycosides and capreomycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from South Korean patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2010). , 48(2), 402-11.
  86. 86. Via, L. E, Cho, S. N, Hwang, S, Bang, H, Park, S. K, Kang, H. S, Jeon, D, Min, S. Y, Oh, T, Kim, Y, Kim, Y. M, Rajan, V, Wong, S. Y, Shamputa, I. C, Carroll, M, Goldfeder, L, Lee, S. A, Holland, S. M, Eum, S, Lee, H, & Barry, C. E. 3rd. Polymorphisms associated with resistance and cross-resistance to aminoglycosides and capreomycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from South Korean patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2010). , 48(2), 402-11.
  87. 87. Zaunbrecher, M. A. Sikes RD Jr, Metchock B, Shinnick TM, Posey JE. Over-expression of the chromosomally encoded aminoglycoside acetyltransferase eis confers kanamycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2009). , 106(47), 20004-9.
  88. 88. Zaunbrecher, M. A, Sikes, R. D Jr, Metchock, B, Shinnick, T. M, & Posey, J. E. Over-expression of the chromosomally encoded aminoglycoside acetyltransferase eis confers kanamycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2009). , 106(47), 20004-9.
  89. 89. Stanley, R. E, Blaha, G, Grodzicki, R. L, Strickler, M. D, & Steitz, T. A. The structures of the anti-tuberculosis antibiotics viomycin and capreomycin bound to the 70S ribosome. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology (2010). , 17(3), 289-93.
  90. 90. Debarber, A. E, Mdluli, K, Bosman, M, Bekker, L. G, & Barry, C. E. rd. Ethionamide activation and sensitivity in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2000). , 97(17), 9677-82.
  91. 91. DeBarber, A. E, Mdluli, K, Bosman, M, Bekker, L. G, & Barry, C. E 3rd. Ethionamide activation and sensitivity in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2000). , 97(17), 9677-82.
  92. 92. Banerjee, A, Dubnau, E, Quemard, A, Balasubramanian, V, Um, K. S, Wilson, T, Collins, D, & De Lisle, G. Jacobs WR Jr. inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science (1994). , 263(5144), 227-30.
  93. 93. Zhang, Y, Heym, B, Allen, B, Young, D, & Cole, S. The catalase/peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature (1992). , 358(6387), 591-3.
  94. 94. Rengarajan, J, Sassetti, C. M, Naroditskaya, V, Sloutsky, A, Bloom, B. R, & Rubin, E. J. The folate pathway is a target for resistance to the drug para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) in mycobacteria. Molecular Microbiology (2004)., 53(1), 275–82.
  95. 95. Leung, K. L, Yip, C. W, Yeung, Y. L, Wong, K. L, Chan, W. Y, Chan, M. Y, & Kam, K. M. Usefulness of resistant gene markers for predicting treatment outcome on second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. Journal of Applied Microbiology (2010)., 109(6), 2087–94.
  96. 96. WHO. Guidelines of the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. (accessed July 30, 2010).
  97. 97. WHO. Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. (accessed July 30, 2010).
  98. 98. Caminero, J. A. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: evidence and controversies. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2006., 10(8), 829–37.

Written By

Hum Nath Jnawali and Sungweon Ryoo

Submitted: 29 May 2012 Published: 20 March 2013