Open access peer-reviewed chapter

First– and Second–Line Drugs and Drug Resistance

Written By

Hum Nath Jnawali and Sungweon Ryoo

Submitted: May 29th, 2012 Reviewed: November 8th, 2012 Published: March 20th, 2013

DOI: 10.5772/54960

Chapter metrics overview

9,255 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which is transmitted through inhalation of aerosolized droplets. TB mainly attacks the lungs, but can also affect other parts of the body. TB is highly contagious during the active stage of the disease and can infect an individual through inhalation of as few as 10 Mycobacterium tuberculosis(MTB) bacteria. After inhalation, these bacteria are mainly captured by the alveolar macrophages, but they can evade the host immune system and remain in the dormant stage for a long period of time, at which point they can reactivate to a virulent form under immune-compromised conditions of the host. This is possible because M. tuberculosiscan persist in slow growing as well as in fast growing stages which makes treatment challenging. Almost all of the antibiotics that can be used to treat TB work when the bacteria are actively dividing. In the intensive phase of TB treatment, the antibiotics mainly kill rapidly growing bacteria, which causes rapid sputum conversion, and the eradication of clinical symptoms. However, in order to kill the persistent or slow growing strains of MTB, the continuation phase of the treatment is essential. TB can be treated effectively by using first line drugs (FLD) isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), ethambutol (EMB) and streptomycin (SM). However, this first line therapy often fails to cure TB for several reasons. Relapse and the spread of the disease contribute to the emergence of drug resistant bacteria. The emergence of multidrug resistant TB (MDR-TB), i.e. which is resistant to at least isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF), is of great concern, because it requires the use of second-line drugs that are difficult to procure and are much more toxic and expensive than FLDs [1]. Therefore, the detection and treatment of drug susceptible or single drug resistant TB is an important strategy for preventing the emergence of MDR-TB [2]. M. tuberculosisstrains with extensively drug resistant-TB (XDR-TB), that is resistant to either isoniazid or rifampicin (like MDR tuberculosis), any fluoroquinolone, and at least one of three second-line antituberculosis injectable drugs—i.e., capreomycin, kanamycin, and amikacin have also been reported [3].

First- and second-line drugs, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and mechanisms of drug resistance are presented in Table 1 [4]. Antituberculosis drugs are mainly divided into two parts.

  1. First-line antituberculosis drugs- Isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA) and streptomycin (SM).

  2. Second-line antituberculosis drugs- Sub divided into two

    1. Fluoroquinolones- Ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LEV), moxifloxacin (MOX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP).

    2. Injectable antituberculosis drugs- Kanamycin (KAN), amikacin (AMK) and capreomycin (CAP).

    3. Less-effective second-line antituberculosis drugs- Ethionamide (ETH)/Prothionamide (PTH), Cycloserine (CS)/Terizidone, P-aminosalicylic acid (PAS).

DrugMIC (mg/L)GeneRole of gene product
Isoniazid0.02–0.2 (7H9/7H10)katGcatalase/peroxidase
inhAenoyl reductase
ahpCalkyl hydroperoxide reductase
Rifampicin0.05–0.1 (7H9/7H10)rpoBβ-subunit of RNA polymerase
Pyrazinimide16–50 (LJ)pncAPZase
Streptomycin2–8 (7H9/7H10)rpsLS12 ribosomal protein
rrs16S rRNA
gidB7-methylguanosine methyltransferase
Ethambutol1–5 (7H9/7H10)embBarabinosyl transferase
Fluoroquinolones0.5–2.0 (7H9/7H10)gyrA/gyrBDNA gyrase
Kanamycin2–4 (7H9/7H10)rrs16S rRNA
eisaminoglycoside acetyltransferase
Amikacin2–4 (7H9/7H10)rrs16S rRNA
Capreomycin2-4 (7H9/7H10)rrs16S rRNA
tylArRNA methyltransferase
Ethionamide2.5–10 (7H11)inhAenoyl reductase
p-aminosalicylic acid0.5 (LJ)thyAthymidylate synthase A

Table 1.

First- and second-line drugs, MICs and mechanisms of drug resistance

Advertisement

2. First-line antituberculosis drugs

2.1. Isoniazid

Isoniazid (INH) is one of the most effective and specific antituberculosis drugs, which has been a key to treatment since its introduction in 1952 [5]. M. tuberculosisis highly susceptible to INH (MIC 0.02–0.2 μg/ml). INH is only active against growing tubercle bacilli, and is not active against non-replicating bacilli or under anaerobic conditions. INH enters the mycobacterial cell by passive diffusion [6]. The most significant adverse reactions associated with isoniazid administration are hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity.

Resistance to isoniazid is a complex process. Mutations in several genes, including katG, ahpC, and inhA, have all been associated with isoniazid resistance. INH is a prodrug that is activated by the mycobacterial enzyme KatG [7]. INH-resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosisoften lose catalase and peroxidase enzyme encoded by katG [8], especially in high-level resistant strains (MIC > 5 μg/ml) [9]. Low-level resistant strains (MIC < 1 μg/ml) often still possess catalase activity [9]. Although mutations in katGhave been shown to be responsible for INH resistance [10], it is not clear whether the regulation of katGexpression plays a role in INH resistance. The katGgene encodes a bifunctional catalase-peroxidase that converts INH to its active form [7]. Activated INH inhibits the synthesis of essential mycolic acids by inactivating the NADH-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase encoded by inhA[11].

A study by Hazbo´n et al. [12] analysed 240 alleles and found that mutations in katG, inhAand ahpCwere most strongly associated with isoniazid resistance. A decrease in or total loss of catalase/peroxidase activity as a result of katGmutations are the most common genetic alterations associated with isoniazid resistance [7]. Ser315Thr is the most widespread katGmutation in clinical isolates, but there are many mutations that result in inactivation of catalase-peroxidase, with MICs ranging from 0.2 to 256 mg/L.

Mutations in inhA or its promoter region are usually associated with low-level resistance (MICs = 0.2 −1 μg/ml) and are less frequent than katG mutations [10, 12]. INH-resistant M. tuberculosisharboring inhA mutations could have additional mutations in katG, conferring higher levels of INH resistance [13]. The most common inhAmutation occurs in its promoter region (-15CT) and it has been found more frequently associated with mono-resistant strains [14].

In M. tuberculosis, ahpCcodes for an alkyl hydroperoxidase reductase that is implicated in resistance to reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen intermediates. It was initially proposed that mutations in the promoter of ahpCcould be used as surrogate markers for the detection of isoniazid resistance [15]. However, several other studies have found that an increase in the expression of ahpCseems to be more a compensatory mutation for the loss of catalase/peroxidase activity rather than the basis for isoniazid resistance [4, 16].

2.2. Rifampicin

Rifampicin (RIF) was introduced in 1972 as an antituberculosis drug and has excellent sterilizing activity. Rifampicin acts by binding to the β-subunit of RNA polymerase (rpoB) [17], the enzyme responsible for transcription and expression of mycobacterial genes, resulting in inhibition of the bacterial transcription activity and thereby killing the organism. An important characteristic of rifampicin is that it is active against actively growing and slowly metabolizing (non-growing) bacilli [18]. RIF produces relatively few adverse reactions. It may cause gastrointestinal upset. Hepatotoxicity occurs less frequently than with isoniazid administration.

Rifampicin MICs ranging from 0.05 to 1 μg/ml on solid or liquid media, but the MIC is higher in egg media (MIC = 2.5–10 μg/ml). Strains with MICs < 1 μg/ml in liquid or agar medium or MICs < 40 μg/ml in Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium are considered RIF-susceptible. The great majority of M. tuberculosisclinical isolates resistant to rifampicin show mutations in the gene rpoBthat encodes the β-subunit of RNA polymerase. This results in conformational changes that determine a low affinity for the drug and consequently the development of resistance [19]. Mutations in a ‘hot-spot’ region of 81 bp of rpoBhave been found in about 96% of rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosisisolates. This region, spanning codons 507–533 (numbering according to the Escherichia coli rpoBsequence), is also known as the rifampicin resistance-determining region (RRDR) [17]. Mutations in codons 531, 526 and 516 (Ser531Leu, His526Tyr, and Asp516Val) are the most frequently reported mutations in most of the studies [20, 21]. Some studies have also reported mutations outside of the hot-spot region of rpoBin rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosisisolates [22].

2.3. Pyrazinamide

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important first-line antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug that is used in short-course chemotherapy and is one of the cornerstone drugs in the treatment of MDR-TB [23]. One key characteristic of pyrazinamide is its ability to inhibit semidormant bacilli residing in acidic environments [23]. Pyrazinamide is a structural analogue of nicotinamide and is a pro-drug that needs to be converted into its active form, pyrazinoic acid, by the enzyme pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase (PZase) [24]. PZA is only active against M. tuberculosisat acid pH (e.g., 5.5) [25]. Even at acid pH (5.5), PZA activity is quite poor, with MICs in the range of 6.25–50 μg/ml [26]. Hypersensitivity reactions and gastrointestinal upset may occur with PZA administration.

PZase is encoded in M. tuberculosisby the gene pncA[27]. Mutations in the pncAgene may cause a reduction in PZase activity which may be the major mechanism of PZA resistance in MTB [28, 29]. The mutations of the pncAgene in PZA-resistant MTB isolates has been well characterized, however the correlation varies between different geographical areas including missense mutations, one or more base insertions or deletions, and complete deletion [28-32]. Despite the highly diverse and scattered distribution of pncA mutations, there is some degree of clustering of mutations within different regions of the pncAgene such as at amino acid residues 3–17, 61–85 and 132–142 has been reported [33, 34]. The highly diverse mutation profile in the pncAgene observed in PZA-resistant strains is unique among drug-resistance genes in M. tuberculosis[28]. While the reason behind this diversity is still unclear, it is thought that this could be due to adaptive mutagenesis or due to deficiency in DNA mismatch repair mechanisms [23]. Most PZA-resistant M. tuberculosisstrains (72–97%) have mutations in pncA; [28, 29, 34, 35] however; some resistant strains do not have pncA mutations.

2.4. Ethambutol

Ethambutol (EMB) [dextro-2,2’-(ethylenediimino)di-1-butanol], which is an essential first-line drug in tuberculosis treatment, plays an important role in the chemotherapy of drug-resistant TB [36]. EMB is also an important antimycobacterial drug as it enhances the effect of other companion drugs including aminoglycosides, rifamycins and quinolones. The most common side effects observed with ethambutol are dizziness, blurred vision, color blindness, nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, loss of appetite, headache, rash, itching, breathlessness, swelling of the face, lips or eyes, numbness or tingling in the fingers or toes. Patients taking ethambutol should have their visual acuity and color vision checked at least monthly.

The MICs of EMB for M. tuberculosisare in the range of 0.5–2 μg/ml. EMB is a bacteriostatic agent that is active for growing bacilli and has no effect on non-replicating bacilli. EMB interferes with the biosynthesis of cell wall arabinogalactan [37]. It inhibits the polymerization of cell-wall arabinan of arabinogalactan and of lipoarabinomannan, and induces the accumulation of D-arabinofuranosyl-P-decaprenol, an intermediate in arabinan biosynthesis [38, 39].

Arabinosyl transferase, encoded by embB, an enzyme involved in the synthesis of arabinogalactan, has been proposed as the target of EMB in M. tuberculosis[40] and M. avium[41]. In M. tuberculosis, embBis organized into an operon with embCand embAin the order embCAB. embC, embBand embAshare over 65% amino acid identity with each other and are predicted to encode transmembrane proteins [40]. Mutations in the embCABoperon, in particular embB, and occasionally embC, are responsible for resistance to EMB [40]. Point mutations of the embABCgene commonly occurred in embBcodon 306 [40, 42, 43], and mutations in the embB306codon have been proposed as a marker for EMB resistance in diagnostic tests [44]. However, point mutations in the embB306locus occur in only 50 to 60% of all EMB-resistant clinical isolates [42, 45-47], and embB306mutations can also occur in EMB-susceptible clinical isolates [46, 47]. Five different mutations were uncovered in this codon (ATGGTG/CTG/ATA, ATC and ATT), resulting in three different amino acid shifts (MetVal, Leu, or Ile) [43]. Although the association between embB306mutation and ethambutol resistance or broad drug resistance has been observed in several groups’ studies with either clinical or laboratorial isolates [48, 49], the exact role of embB306mutations play in the development of ethambutol resistance and multidrug resistance in M. tuberculosisis not fully understood. About 35% of EMB-resistant strains (MIC <10 μg/ml) do not have embBmutations [39, 45], suggesting that there may be other mechanisms of EMB resistance. Further studies are necessary to identify the potential new mechanisms of EMB resistance.

2.5. Streptomycin

Streptomycin (SM), an aminocyclitol glycoside antibiotic, was the first drug to be used in the treatment of TB, in 1948 [50]. SM kills actively growing tubercle bacilli with MICs of 2–4 μg/ml, but it is inactive against non-growing or intracellular bacilli [23]. The drug binds to the 16S rRNA, interferes with translation proofreading, and thereby inhibits protein synthesis [51, 52]. Ototoxicity and nephotoxicity are associated with SM administration. Vestibular dysfunction is more common than auditory damage. Renal toxicity occurs less frequently than with kanamycin or capreomycin. Hearing and renal function should be monitored in patients getting SM.

Mutations associated with streptomycin resistance have been identified in the genes encoding 16S rRNA (rrs) [53] and ribosomal protein S12 (rpsL) [54-57]. Ribosomal protein S12 stabilizes the highly conserved pseudoknot structure formed by 16S rRNA [58]. Amino acid substitutions in RpsL affect the higher-order structure of 16S rRNA [51] and confer streptomycin resistance. Alterations in the 16S rRNA structure disrupt interactions between 16S rRNA and streptomycin, a process that results in resistance [59]. Mutations in rpsL and rrsare the major mechanism of SM resistance [54, 56, 57], accounting for respectively about 50% and 20% of SM-resistant strains [54, 56, 57]. The most common mutation in rpsL is a substitution in codon 43 from lysine to arginine [54, 56, 57], causing high-level resistance to SM. Mutation in codon 88 is also common [54, 56, 57]. Mutations of the rrsgene occur in the loops of the 16S rRNA and are clustered in two regions around nucleotides 530 and 915 [39, 54, 56, 57]. However, about 20–30% of SM-resistant strains with a low level of resistance (MIC < 32 μg/ml) do not have mutations in rpsL or rrs[60], which indicates other mechanism(s) of resistance. A mutation in gidB, encoding a conserved 7-methylguanosine (m(7)G) methyltransferase specific for 16S rRNA, has been found to cause low-level SM resistance in 33% of resistant M. tuberculosisisolates [61]. A subsequent study showed that while Leu16Arg change is a polymorphism not involved in SM resistance, other mutations in gidB appear to be involved in low-level SM resistance [62]. In addition, some low-level SM resistance seems to be caused by increased efflux as efflux pump inhibitors caused increased sensitivity to SM, although the exact mechanism remains to be identified [62].

Advertisement

3. Second-line antituberculosis drugs

3.1. Fluoroquinolones

The fluoroquinolones (FQs) have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and so are widely used for the treatment of bacterial infections of the respiratory, gastrointestinal and urinary tracts, as well as sexually transmitted diseases and chronic osteomyelitis [63]. In contrast to many other antibiotics used to treat bacterial infections, the FQs have excellent in vitro and in vivo activity against M. tuberculosis[64, 65]. FQs include ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. So, FQs are currently in use as second-line drugs in the treatment of TB. Adverse effects are relatively infrequent (0.5–10% of patients) and include gastrointestinal intolerance, rashes, dizziness, and headache. Most studies of fluoroquinolone side effects have been based on relatively short-term administration for bacterial infections, but trials have now shown the relative safety and tolerability of fluoroquinolones administered for months during TB treatment in adults.

The cellular target of FQs in M. tuberculosisis DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase consisting of two A and two B subunits encoded by gyrAand gyrBgenes, respectively [66]. Mutations in a small region of gyrA, called quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) and, less frequently, in gyrBare the primary mechanism of FQ resistance in M. tuberculosis[66, 67]. Analysis of QRDR alone by genotypic tests has been suggested as sufficient for rapid identification of vast majority of FQ-resistant M. tuberculosisstrains as additional targeting of gyrBdid not enhance the sensitivity significantly [67, 68].

Mutations within the QRDR of gyrA have been identified in clinical and laboratory-selected isolates of M. tuberculosis, largely clustered at codons 90, 91 and 94 [69-73], with Asp94 being relatively frequent [71, 74]. Codon 95 (Ser95Thr) contains a naturally occurring polymorphism that is not related to fluoroquinolone resistance, as it occurs in both fluoroquinolone-susceptible and fluoroquinolone-resistant strains [75]. A less common involvement is codon 88 [76]. For clinical isolates, gyrB mutations appear to be of much rarer occurrence [72, 73]. Generally, two mutations in gyrA or concomitant mutations in gyrA plus gyrB are required for the development of higher levels of resistance [69, 77].

3.2. Aminoglycosides (kanamycin, amikacin and capreomycin)

The aminoglycosides amikacin (AMK)/kanamycin (KAN) and the cyclic polypeptide capreomycin (CAP) are important injectable drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Although belonging to two different antibiotic families, all exert their activity at the level of protein translation. Renal toxicity occurs from these drugs. Regular monitoring of hearing and renal function is recommended.

AMK and KAN are aminoglycosides that have a high level of cross-resistance between them [78-80]. The cyclic polypeptide CAP is structurally unrelated to the aminoglycosides and thus is a potential candidate to replace AMK or KAN if resistance to either of them is suspected [81, 82]. It has been demonstrated that the risk of treatment failure and mortality increase when CAP resistance emerges among MDR-TB cases [83]. However, cross-resistance in M. tuberculosisbetween AMK/KAN and CAP has been observed in both clinical isolates and laboratory-generated mutants [79, 80, 84, 85].

AMK/KAN and CAP primarily affect protein synthesis in M. tuberculosisand resistance to these drugs is associated with changes in the 16S rRNA (rrs) [78, 80, 81, 85, 86]. The rrsmutation A1401G causes high-level AMK/KAN and low-level CAP resistance. C1402T is associated with CAP resistance and low-level KAN resistance. G1484T is linked to high-level AMK/KAN and CAP resistance [79, 80, 84, 86]. Low-level resistance to kanamycin has been correlated to mutations in the promoter region of the eisgene encoding aminoglycoside acetyltransferase, the enhanced intracellular survival protein, Eis [87].

Resistance to the cyclic peptide capreomycin has also been associated with mutations in tlyA[86]. The gene tlyAencodes a putative 2’-O-methyltransferase (TlyA) that has been suggested to methylate nucleotide C1402 in helix 44 of 16S rRNA and nucleotide C2158 in helix 69 of 23S rRNA in M. tuberculosis[81, 88]. Capreomycin binds to the 70S ribosome and inhibits mRNA–tRNA translocation [89]. It is believed that TlyA methylation enhances the antimicrobial activity of capreomycin [81] and that disruption of tlyAleads to capreomycin resistance because the unmethylated ribosome is insensitive to the drug [81, 86, 88]. The identified mechanism of capreomycin resistance on the basis of in vitro selected mutants has found that tlyAmutations were common [80, 86] whereas infrequent in clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis[79, 80].

3.3. Ethionamide/prothionamide

Ethionamide (ETH, 2-ethylisonicotinamide) is a derivative of isonicotinic acid and has been used as an antituberculosis agent since 1956. The MICs of ETH for M. tuberculosisare 0.5–2 μg/ml in liquid medium, 2.5–10 μg/ml in 7H11 agar, and 5–20 μg/ml in LJ medium. Ethionamide and the similar drug prothionamide (PTH, 2-ethyl-4-pyridinecarbothioamide) act as pro-drugs, like isoniazid. Which is activated by EtaA/EthA (a mono-oxygenase) [90, 91] and inhibits the same target as INH, the InhA of the mycolic acid synthesis pathway [92]. Once delivered into the bacterial cell, ethionamide undergoes several changes. Its sulfo group is oxidized by flavin monooxygenase, and the drug is then converted to 2-ethyl-4-aminopyridine. The intermediate products formed before 2-ethyl-4-aminopyridine seem to be toxic to mycobacteria, but their structures are unknown (may be highly unstable compounds). Mutants resistant to ethionamide are cross-resistant to prothionamide. ETH frequently causes gastrointestinal side effects, such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. It can cause hypothyroidism, particularly if it is used with para-aminosalicyclic acid.

3.4. p-Amino salicylic acid

p-Amino salicylic acid (PAS) was one of the first antibiotics to show anti-TB activity and was used to treat TB in combination with isoniazid and streptomycin [93]. Later, with the discovery of other more potent drugs including rifampicin, its use in first line regimens was discontinued. PAS is still useful as part of a treatment regimen for XDR TB although its benefit is limited and it is extremely toxic. Thymidylate synthase A, encoded by thyA, an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of thymine, has been proposed recently as the target of PAS in M. bovisBCG [94]. Most common mutation in thyAwas Thr202Ala, though few susceptible isolates also showed the same mutation [95]. However, its mechanism of action was never clearly elucidated. The most common adverse reactions associated with PAS are gastrointestinal disturbances.

3.5. Cycloserine

Cycloserine (CS) is an antibiotic that is used to treat TB. The exact mechanism of action of cycloserine is unknown, but it is thought to prevent the tuberculosis bacteria from making substances called peptidoglycans, which are needed to form the bacterial cell wall. This results in the weakening of bacteria’s cell wall, which then kills the bacteria. Cycloserine possesses high gastric tolerance (compared with the other drugs) and lacks cross-resistance to other compounds. But it causes adverse psychiatric effects; [96, 97] which is its main drawback. So, psychiatric interrogation is necessary before prescribing cycloserine drug. Cycloserine is one of the cornerstones of treatment for MDR and XDR tuberculosis [96, 97, 98]. Terizidone (a combination of two molecules of cycloserine) might be less toxic [96, 97], although studies of this drug are scarce.

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

Despite all the advances made in the treatment and management, TB still remains as one of the main public health problems that have plagued mankind for millennia. The challenges posed by M. tuberculosisinfection, through its interaction with the immune system and its mechanisms for evasion, require many more breakthroughs to make a significant impact on the worldwide tuberculosis problem. The introduction of MDR and XDR strains of M. tuberculosisposes several problems in mycobacterial genetics and phthisiotherapy. Among the response priorities, rapid detection of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance, use of appropriate regimens for treatment, and new drug development are of paramount importance. However, regarding the dynamics of TB transmission, and also in view of rational development of new anti-TB drugs, it is extremely important to extend our knowledge on the molecular basis of drug resistance and all its complexity. It is necessary to clarify the association between specific mutations and the development of MDR-TB or the association between drug resistance and fitness. This would allow better evaluation of the transmission dynamics of resistant strains and more accurate prediction of a future disease scenario. Adequate monitoring of drug resistance, especially MDR/XDR-TB in new patients and its transmission, molecular characterization of the drug-resistant strains, and analysis of patients’ immune status and genetic susceptibility are also needed to address the problem of the fitness, virulence and transmissibility of drug-resistant M. tuberculosisstrains.

References

  1. 1. Espinal, M. A, Laszlo, A, Simonsen, L, Boulahbal, F, Kim, S. J, Reniero, A, Hoffner, S, Rieder, H. L, Binkin, N, Dye, C, Williams, R, & Raviglione, M. C. Global trends in resistance to antituberculosis drugs. The New England Journal of Medicine (2001). , 344(17), 1294-303.
  2. 2. Masjedi, M. R, Farnia, P, Sorooch, S, Pooramiri, M. V, Mansoori, S. D, Zarifi, A. Z, Velayati, A. A, & Hoffner, S. Extensively drug resistant tuberculosis: 2 years of surveillance in Iran. Clinical Infectious Diseases (2006). , 43(7), 840-7.
  3. 3. Eker, B, Ortmann, J, Migliori, G. B, Sotgiu, G, Muetterlein, R, Centis, R, Hoffmann, H, Kirsten, D, Schaberg, T, Ruesch-gerdes, S, & Lange, C. Multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, Germany. Emerging Infectious Diseases (2008). , 14(11), 1700-6.
  4. 4. Almeida Da Silva P. E, & Palomino J. C. Molecular basis and mechanisms of drug resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: classical and new drugs. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2011. , 66(7), 1417-30.
  5. 5. Bernstein, J, Lott, W. A, Steinberg, B. A, & Yale, H. L. Chemotherapy of experimental tuberculosis. V. Isonicotinic acid hydrazide (nydrazid) and related compounds. American Review of Tuberculosis (1952). , 65(4), 357-64.
  6. 6. Bardou, F, Raynaud, C, Ramos, C, Laneelle, M. A, & Laneelle, G. Mechanism of isoniazid uptake inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology 1998. , 144(Pt 9), 2539–44.
  7. 7. Zhang, Y, Heym, B, Allen, B, Young, D, & Cole, S. The catalase-peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature (1992). , 358(6387), 591-3.
  8. 8. Middlebrook, G. Isoniazid resistance and catalase activity of tubercle bacilli. American Review of Tuberculosis (1954). , 69(3), 471-2.
  9. 9. Winder, F. Mode of Action of the Antimycobacterial Agents and Associated Aspects of the Molecular Biology of Mycobacteria. In: Ratledge C, Stanford J, eds. The Biology of Mycobacteria. Vol I. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; (1982). , 354-438.
  10. 10. Zhang, Y, & Telenti, A. Genetics of Drug Resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis. In Molecular Genetics of Mycobacteria. Hatful, G.F., and Jacobs, W.R., Jr (eds). Washington, DC: ASM Press; (2000). , 235-254.
  11. 11. Banerjee, A, Dubnau, E, Quemard, A, Balasubramanian, V, Um, K. S, Wilson, T, Collins, D, & De Lisle, G. Jacobs WR Jr.inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Science (1994). , 263(5144), 227-30.
  12. 12. Hazbón, M. H, Brimacombe, M, Bobadilla del Valle, M, Cavatore, M, Guerrero, M. I, Varma-Basil, M, Billman-Jacobe, H, Lavender, C, Fyfe, J, García-García, L, León, C. I, Bose, M, Chaves, F, Murray, M, Eisenach, K. D, Sifuentes-Osornio, J, Cave, M. D, Ponce de León, A, & Alland, D. Population genetics study of isoniazid resistance mutations and evolution of multidrug-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2006). , 50(8), 2640-9.
  13. 13. Heym, B, Alzari, P M, Honore, N, & Cole, S. T. Missense mutations in the catalaseperoxidase gene,katG, are associated with isoniazid resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Molecular Microbiology (1995). , 15(2), 235-45.
  14. 14. Leung, E. T, Ho, P. L, Yuen, K. Y, Woo, W. L, Lam, T. H, Kao, R. Y, Seto, W. H, & Yam, W. C. Molecular characterization of isoniazid resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: identification of a novel mutation ininhA. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2006). , 50(3), 1075-8.
  15. 15. Rinder, H, Thomschke, A, Rüsch-gerdes, S, Bretzel, G, Feldmann, K, Rifai, M, & Löscher, T. Significance ofahpCpromoter mutations for the prediction of isoniazid resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (1998). , 17(7), 508-11.
  16. 16. Sherman, D. R, Mdluli, K, Hickey, M. J, Arain, T. M, Morris, S. L, Barry, C. E 3rd, & Stover, C. K. CompensatoryahpCgene expression in isoniazid-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosis. Science (1996). , 272(5268), 1641-3.
  17. 17. Ramaswamy, S, & Musser, J. M. Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tubercle and Lung Disease (1998). , 79(1), 3-29.
  18. 18. Mitchison, D. A. Basic mechanisms of chemotherapy. Chest (1979). Suppl): , 771-81.
  19. 19. Telenti, A, Imboden, P, Marchesi, F, Schmidheini, T, & Bodmer, T. Direct, automated detection of rifampin-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisby polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1993). , 37(10), 2054-8.
  20. 20. Somoskovi, A, Parsons, L. M, & Salfinger, M. The molecular basis of resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Respiratory Research (2001). , 2(3), 164-8.
  21. 21. Caws, M, Duy, P. M, Tho, D. Q, Lan, N. T, Hoa, D. V, & Farrar, J. Mutations prevalent among rifampin and isoniazid-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates from a hospital in Vietnam. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2006). , 44(7), 2333-7.
  22. 22. Heep, M, Rieger, U, Beck, D, & Lehn, N. Mutations in the beginning of therpoBgene can induce resistance to rifamycins in both Helicobacter pylori andMycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2000). , 44(4), 1075-7.
  23. 23. Mitchison, D. A. The action of antituberculosis drugs in short-course chemotherapy. Tubercle (1985). , 66(3), 219-25.
  24. 24. Konno, K, Feldmann, F. M, & Mcdermott, W. Pyrazinamide susceptibility and amidase activity of tubercle bacilli. The American Review of Respiratory Disease (1967). , 95(3), 461-9.
  25. 25. Mcdermott, W, & Tompsett, R. Activation of pyrazinamide and nicotinamide in acidic environment in vitro. American Review of Tuberculosis (1954). , 70(4), 748-54.
  26. 26. Zhang, Y, & Mitchison, D. The curious characteristics of pyrazinamide: a review. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (2003). , 7(1), 6-21.
  27. 27. Scorpio, A, & Zhang, Y. Mutations inpncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, cause resistance to the antituberculous drug pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus. Nature Medicine (1996). , 2(6), 662-7.
  28. 28. Cheng, S. J, Thibert, L, Sanchez, T, Heifets, L, & Zhang, Y.pncAmutations as a major mechanism of pyrazinamide resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: spread of a mono-resistant strain in Quebec, Canada. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2000). , 44(3), 528-32.
  29. 29. Lemaitre, N, Sougakoff, W, Truffot-pernot, C, & Jarlier, V. Characterization of new mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant strains ofMycobacterium tuberculosisand identification of conserved regions important for the catalytic activity of the pyrazinamidase PncA. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1999). , 43(7), 1761-3.
  30. 30. Ando, H, Mitarai, S, Kondo, Y, Suetake, T, Sekiguchi, J. I, Kato, S, Mori, T, & Kirikae, T. Pyrazinamide resistance in multidrug-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates in Japan. Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2010). , 16(8), 1164-8.
  31. 31. Juréen, P, Werngren, J, Toro, J. C, & Hoffner, S. Pyrazinamide resistance andpncAgene mutations inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2008). , 52(5), 1852-4.
  32. 32. Suzuki, Y, Suzuki, A, Tamaru, A, Katsukawa, C, & Oda, H. Rapid detection of pyrazinamide-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisby a PCR-based in vitro system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2002). , 40(2), 501-7.
  33. 33. Park, S. K, Lee, J. Y, Chang, Lee, M. K, Son, H. C, Kim, C. M, Jang, H. J, Park, H. K, & Jeong, S. H.pncAmutations in clinicalMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates from Korea. BMC Infectious Diseases (2001). , 1, 4.
  34. 34. Scorpio, A, Lindholm-levy, P, Heifets, L, Gilman, R, Siddiqi, S, Cynamon, M, & Zhang, Y. Characterization ofpncAmutations in pyrazinamide-resistantMycobacteriumtuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1997). , 41(3), 540-3.
  35. 35. Louw, G. E, Warren, R. M, Donald, P. R, Murray, M. B, Bosman, M, Van Helden, P. D, Young, D. B, & Victor, T. C. Frequency and implications of pyrazinamide resistance in managing previously treated tuberculosis patients. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (2006). , 10(7), 802-7.
  36. 36. American Thoracic Society, CDC, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Treatment of tuberculosis. MMWR Recommendations and Reports (2003)., 52(RR-11), 1–77.
  37. 37. Takayama, K, & Kilburn, J. Inhibition of synthesis of arabinogalactan by ethambutol inMycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1989). , 33(9), 1493-9.
  38. 38. Wolucka, B. A, Mcneil, M. R, De Hoffmann, E, Chojnacki, T, & Brennan, P. J. Recognition of the lipid intermediate for arabinogalactan/arabinomannan biosynthesis and its relation to the mode of action of ethambutol on mycobacteria. The Journal of Biological Chemistry (1994). , 269(37), 23328-35.
  39. 39. Zhang, Y, & Yew, W. W. Mechanisms of drug resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis.The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (2009). , 13(11), 1320-30.
  40. 40. Telenti, A, Philipp, W. J, Sreevatsan, S, Bernasconi, C, Stockbauer, K. E, Wieles, B, & Musser, J. M. Jacobs WR Jr. Theemboperon, a unique gene cluster ofMycobacteriumtuberculosisinvolved in resistance to ethambutol. Nature Medicine (1997). , 3(5), 567-70.
  41. 41. Belanger, A. E, Besra, G. S, Ford, M. E, Mikusová, K, Belisle, J. T, Brennan, P. J, & Inamine, J. M. TheembABgenes ofMycobacterium aviumencode an arabinosyl transferase involved in cell wall arabinan biosynthesis that is the target for the antimycobacterial drug ethambutol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1996). , 93(21), 11919-24.
  42. 42. Ramaswamy, S. V, Amin, A. G, Göksel, S, Stager, C. E, Dou, S. J, El Sahly, H, Moghazeh, S. L, Kreiswirth, B. N, & Musser, J. M. Molecular genetic analysis of nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ethambutol resistance in human isolates ofMycobacteriumtuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2000). , 44(2), 326-36.
  43. 43. Sreevatsan, S, Stockbauer, K. E, Pan, X, Kreiswirth, B. N, & Moghazeh, S. L. Jacobs WR Jr, Telenti A, Musser JM. Ethambutol resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: critical role ofembBmutations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1997). , 41(8), 1677-81.
  44. 44. Sreevatsan, S, Stockbauer, K. E, Pan, X, Kreiswirth, B. N, Moghazeh, S. L, Jacobs, W. R Jr, Telenti, A, & Musser, J. M. Ethambutol resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: critical role ofembBmutations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1997). , 41(8), 1677–81.
  45. 45. Alcaide, F, Pfyffer, G. E, & Telenti, A. Role ofembBin natural and acquired resistance to ethambutol in mycobacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1997). , 41(10), 2270-3.
  46. 46. Lee, A. S, Othman, S. N, Ho, Y. M, & Wong, S. Y. Novel mutations within theembBgene in ethambutol-susceptible clinical isolates ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2004). , 48(11), 4447-9.
  47. 47. Mokrousov, I, Otten, T, Vyshnevskiy, B, & Narvskaya, O. Detection ofembB306mutations in ethambutol-susceptible clinical isolates ofMycobacterium tuberculosisfrom Northwestern Russia: implications for genotypic resistance testing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2002). , 40(10), 3810-3.
  48. 48. Safi, H, Fleischmann, R. D, Peterson, S. N, Jones, M. B, Jarrahi, B, & Alland, D. Allelic exchange and mutant selection demonstrate that common clinicalembCABgene mutations only modestly increase resistance to ethambutol inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2010). , 54(1), 103-8.
  49. 49. Perdigão, J, Macedo, R, Ribeiro, A, Brum, L, & Portugal, I. Genetic characterisation of the ethambutol resistance-determining region inMycobacterium tuberculosis: prevalence and significance ofembB306mutations. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (2009). , 33(4), 334-8.
  50. 50. British Medical Research CouncilStreptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. A Medical Research Council Investigation. BMJ (1948). , 2, 769-82.
  51. 51. British Medical Research Council. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. A Medical Research Council Investigation. BMJ (1948). , 2, 769-82.
  52. 52. Gale, E. F, Cundliffe, E, Reynolds, P. E, Richmond, M. H, & Waring, M. J. The molecular basis of antibiotic action. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. (1981).
  53. 53. Douglass, J, & Steyn, L. M. A ribosomal gene mutation in streptomycin-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates. The Journal of Infectious Diseases (1993). , 167(6), 1505-6.
  54. 54. Finken, M, Kirschner, P, Meier, A, Wrede, A, & Böttger, E. C. Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Molecular Microbiology (1993). , 9(6), 1239-46.
  55. 55. Funatsu, G, & Wittman, H. G. Ribosomal proteins. XXXIII. Location of amino-acid replacements in protein S12 isolated fromEscherichia colimutants resistant to streptomycin. Journal of Molecular Microbiology (1972). , 68(3), 547-50.
  56. 56. Honore, N, & Cole, S. T. Streptomycin resistance in mycobacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1994). , 38(2), 238-22.
  57. 57. Nair, J, Rouse, D. A, Bai, G. H, & Morris, S. L. TherpsLgene and streptomycin resistance in single and multiple drug-resistant strains ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. Molecular Microbiology (1993). , 10(3), 521-7.
  58. 58. Noller, H. F. Structure of ribosomal RNA. Annual Review of Biochemistry (1984). , 53, 119-62.
  59. 59. De Stasio, E. A, Moazed, D, Noller, H. F, & Dahlberg, A. E. Mutations in 16S ribosomal RNA disrupt antibiotic-RNA interactions. The EMBO Journal (1989). , 8(4), 1213-6.
  60. 60. Cooksey, R. C, Morlock, G. P, Mcqueen, A, Glickman, S. E, & Crawford, J. T. Characterization of streptomycin resistance mechanisms amongMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates from patients in New York City. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1996). , 40(5), 1186-8.
  61. 61. Okamoto, S, Tamaru, A, Nakajima, C, Nishimura, K, Tanaka, Y, Tokuyama, S, Suzuki, Y, & Ochi, K. Loss of a conserved 7-methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low-level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Molecular Microbiology (2007). , 63(4), 1096-106.
  62. 62. Spies, F. S. da Silva PE, Ribeiro MO, Rossetti ML, Zaha A. Identification of mutations related to streptomycin resistance in clinical isolates ofMycobacterium tuberculosisand possible involvement of efflux mechanism. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2008). , 52(8), 2947-9.
  63. 63. Spies, F. S, da Silva, P. E, Ribeiro, M. O, Rossetti, M. L, & Zaha, A. Identification of mutations related to streptomycin resistance in clinical isolates ofMycobacteriumtuberculosisand possible involvement of efflux mechanism. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2008). , 52(8), 2947-9.
  64. 64. Bartlett, J. G, Dowell, S. F, Mandell, L. A, File Jr, T. M, Musher, D. M, & Fine, M. J. Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases (2000). , 31(2), 347-82.
  65. 65. Wang, J. Y, Hsueh, P. R, Jan, I. S, Lee, L. N, Liaw, Y. S, Yang, P. C, & Luh, K. T. Empirical treatment with a fluoroquinolone delays the treatment for tuberculosis and is associated with a poor prognosis in endemic areas. Thorax (2006). , 61(10), 903-8.
  66. 66. Ginsburg, A. S, Grosset, J. H, & Bishai, W. R. Fluoroquinolones, tuberculosis, and resistance. The Lancet of Infectious Diseases (2003). , 3(7), 432-42.
  67. 67. Chang, K. C, & Yew, W. W. Chan RCY. Rapid assays for fluoroquinolone resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2010). , 65(8), 1551-61.
  68. 68. Hillemann, D, Rusch-gerdes, S, & Richter, E. Feasibility of the GenoType MTBDRsl assay for fluoroquinolone, amikacin-capreomycin and ethambutol resistance testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosisstrains and clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2009). , 47(6), 1767-72.
  69. 69. Takiff, H. E, Salazar, L, Guerrero, C, Philipp, W, Huang, W. M, Kreiswirth, B, & Cole, S. T. Jacobs WR Jr, Telenti A. Cloning and nucleotide sequence ofMycobacterium tuberculosis gyrAandgyrBgenes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1994). , 38(4), 773-80.
  70. 70. Alangaden, G. J, Manavathu, E. K, Vakulenko, S. B, Zvonok, N. M, & Lerner, S. A. Characterization of fluoroquinolone-resistant mutant strains ofMycobacterium tuberculosisselected in the laboratory and isolated from patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1995). , 39(8), 1700-3.
  71. 71. Cheng, A. F, Yew, W. W, Chan, E. W, Chin, M. L, Hui, M. M, & Chan, R. C. Multiplex PCR amplimer conformation analysis for rapid detection ofgyrAmutations in fluoroquinolone-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisclinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2004). , 48(2), 596-601.
  72. 72. Pitaksajjakul, P, Wongwit, W, Punprasit, W, Eampokalap, B, Peacock, S, & Ramasoota, P. Mutations in thegyrAandgyrBgenes of fluoroquinolone-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisfrom TB patients in Thailand. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health (2005). Suppl 4): 228-37.
  73. 73. Lee, A. S, Tang, L. L, Lim, I. H, & Wong, S. Y. Characterization of pyrazinamide and ofloxacin resistance among drug resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates from Singapore. International Journal of Infectious Diseases (2002). , 6(1), 48-51.
  74. 74. Sun, Z, Zhang, J, Zhang, X, Wang, S, Zhang, Y, & Li, C. Comparison ofgyrAgene mutations between laboratory-selected ofloxacin-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisstrains and clinical isolates. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (2008). , 31(2), 115-21.
  75. 75. Musser, J. M. Antimicrobial agent resistance in mycobacteria: molecular genetic insights. Clinical Microbiology Reviews (1995). , 8(4), 496-514.
  76. 76. Matrat, S, Veziris, N, Mayer, C, Jarlier, V, Truffot-pernot, C, Camuset, J, Bouvet, E, Cambau, E, & Aubry, A. Functional analysis of DNA gyrase mutant enzymes carrying mutations at position 88 in the A subunit found in clinical strains ofMycobacterium tuberculosisresistant to fluoroquinolones. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2006). , 50(12), 4170-3.
  77. 77. Kocagöz, T, Hackbarth, C. J, Unsal, I, Rosenberg, E. Y, Nikaido, H, & Chambers, H. F. Gyrase mutations in laboratory selected, fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants ofMycobacterium tuberculosisH37Ra. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1996). , 40(8), 1768-74.
  78. 78. Alangaden, G. J, Kreiswirth, B. N, Aouad, A, Khetarpal, M, Igno, F. R, Moghazeh, S. L, Manavathu, E. K, & Lerner, S. A. Mechanisms of resistance to amikacin and kanamycin inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1998). , 42(5), 1295-7.
  79. 79. Jugheli, L, Bzekalava, N, De Rijk, P, Fissette, K, Portaels, F, & Rigouts, L. High level of cross-resistance between kanamycin, amikacin, and capreomycin amongMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates from Georgia and a close relation with mutations in therrsgene. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2009). , 53(12), 5064-8.
  80. 80. Maus, C. E, Plikaytis, B. B, & Shinnick, T. M. Molecular analysis of cross-resistance to capreomycin, kanamycin, amikacin, and viomycin inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2005). , 49(8), 3192-7.
  81. 81. Johansen, S. K, Maus, C. E, Plikaytis, B. B, & Douthwaite, S. Capreomycin binds across the ribosome subunit interface using tlyA-encoded 2’-O-methylations in 16S and 23S rRNAs. Molecular Cell (2006). , 23(2), 173-82.
  82. 82. World Health Organization (WHO)Policy Guidance on Drug-Susceptibility Testing (DST) of Second-Line Antituberculosis Drugs. Report (WHO/HTM/TB/2008.392):1-20. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. (2008).
  83. 83. Migliori, G. B, Lange, C, Centis, R, Sotgiu, G, Mütterlein, R, Hoffmann, H, Kliiman, K, De Iaco, G, Lauria, F. N, Richardson, M. D, & Spanevello, A. Cirillo DM; TBNET Study Group. Resistance to second-line injectables and treatment outcomes in multi drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis cases. The European Respiratory Journal (2008). , 31(6), 1155-9.
  84. 84. Engström, A, Perskvist, N, Werngren, J, Hoffner, S. E, & Juréen, P. Comparison of clinical isolates and in vitro selected mutants reveals thattlyAis not a sensitive genetic marker for capreomycin resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2011). , 66(6), 1247-54.
  85. 85. Via, L. E, Cho, S. N, Hwang, S, Bang, H, Park, S. K, Kang, H. S, Jeon, D, Min, S. Y, Oh, T, Kim, Y, Kim, Y. M, Rajan, V, Wong, S. Y, Shamputa, I. C, Carroll, M, Goldfeder, L, Lee, S. A, Holland, S. M, Eum, S, Lee, H, & Barry, C. E. rd. Polymorphisms associated with resistance and cross-resistance to aminoglycosides and capreomycin inMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates from South Korean patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2010). , 48(2), 402-11.
  86. 86. Via, L. E, Cho, S. N, Hwang, S, Bang, H, Park, S. K, Kang, H. S, Jeon, D, Min, S. Y, Oh, T, Kim, Y, Kim, Y. M, Rajan, V, Wong, S. Y, Shamputa, I. C, Carroll, M, Goldfeder, L, Lee, S. A, Holland, S. M, Eum, S, Lee, H, & Barry, C. E. 3rd. Polymorphisms associated with resistance and cross-resistance to aminoglycosides and capreomycin inMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates from South Korean patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2010). , 48(2), 402-11.
  87. 87. Zaunbrecher, M. A. Sikes RD Jr, Metchock B, Shinnick TM, Posey JE. Over-expression of the chromosomally encoded aminoglycoside acetyltransferaseeisconfers kanamycin resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2009). , 106(47), 20004-9.
  88. 88. Zaunbrecher, M. A, Sikes, R. D Jr, Metchock, B, Shinnick, T. M, & Posey, J. E. Over-expression of the chromosomally encoded aminoglycoside acetyltransferaseeisconfers kanamycin resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2009). , 106(47), 20004-9.
  89. 89. Stanley, R. E, Blaha, G, Grodzicki, R. L, Strickler, M. D, & Steitz, T. A. The structures of the anti-tuberculosis antibiotics viomycin and capreomycin bound to the 70S ribosome. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology (2010). , 17(3), 289-93.
  90. 90. Debarber, A. E, Mdluli, K, Bosman, M, Bekker, L. G, & Barry, C. E. rd. Ethionamide activation and sensitivity in multidrug-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2000). , 97(17), 9677-82.
  91. 91. DeBarber, A. E, Mdluli, K, Bosman, M, Bekker, L. G, & Barry, C. E 3rd. Ethionamide activation and sensitivity in multidrug-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2000). , 97(17), 9677-82.
  92. 92. Banerjee, A, Dubnau, E, Quemard, A, Balasubramanian, V, Um, K. S, Wilson, T, Collins, D, & De Lisle, G. Jacobs WR Jr.inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide inMycobacterium tuberculosis. Science (1994). , 263(5144), 227-30.
  93. 93. Zhang, Y, Heym, B, Allen, B, Young, D, & Cole, S. The catalase/peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature (1992). , 358(6387), 591-3.
  94. 94. Rengarajan, J, Sassetti, C. M, Naroditskaya, V, Sloutsky, A, Bloom, B. R, & Rubin, E. J. The folate pathway is a target for resistance to the drugpara-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) in mycobacteria. Molecular Microbiology (2004)., 53(1), 275–82.
  95. 95. Leung, K. L, Yip, C. W, Yeung, Y. L, Wong, K. L, Chan, W. Y, Chan, M. Y, & Kam, K. M. Usefulness of resistant gene markers for predicting treatment outcome on second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. Journal of Applied Microbiology (2010)., 109(6), 2087–94.
  96. 96. WHO. Guidelines of the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/9241546956_eng.pdf (accessed July 30, 2010).
  97. 97. WHO. Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241547581_eng.pdf (accessed July 30, 2010).
  98. 98. Caminero, J. A. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: evidence and controversies. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2006., 10(8), 829–37.

Written By

Hum Nath Jnawali and Sungweon Ryoo

Submitted: May 29th, 2012 Reviewed: November 8th, 2012 Published: March 20th, 2013