Open access

Application of Different Advanced Oxidation Processes for the Degradation of Organic Pollutants

Written By

Amilcar Machulek Jr., Silvio C. Oliveira, Marly E. Osugi, Valdir S. Ferreira, Frank H. Quina, Renato F. Dantas, Samuel L. Oliveira, Gleison A. Casagrande, Fauze J. Anaissi, Volnir O. Silva, Rodrigo P. Cavalcante, Fabio Gozzi, Dayana D. Ramos, Ana P.P. da Rosa, Ana P.F. Santos, Douclasse C. de Castro and Jéssica A. Nogueira

Submitted: 01 September 2012 Published: 30 January 2013

DOI: 10.5772/53188

From the Edited Volume

Organic Pollutants - Monitoring, Risk and Treatment

Edited by M. Nageeb Rashed

Chapter metrics overview

4,506 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Water is not only an economic, but also an increasingly important social commodity. Potable water is an essential resource for sustaining economic and social development in all sectors. A safe water supply and appropriate sanitation are the most essential components for a healthy and prosperous life. However, increases in human activities have led to exposure of the aqueous environment to chemical, microbial and biological pollutants as well as to micro-pollutants. Thus, liquid effluents containing toxic substances are generated by a variety of chemistry-related industrial processes, as well as by a number of common household or agricultural applications.

New, economically viable, more effective methods for pollution control and prevention are required for environmental protection and effluent discharge into the environment must have minimal impact on human health, natural resources and the biosphere.

Research in photochemical and photocatalytic technology is very promising for the development of viable alternatives for the treatment of polluted waters and effluents from various sources, including both industrial and domestic. Currently available chemical and photochemical technology permits the conversion of organic pollutants with a wide range of chemical structures into substances that are less toxic and/or more readily biodegradable by employing chemical oxidizing agents in the presence of an appropriate catalyst and/or ultraviolet light to oxidize or degrade the pollutant of interest. These technologies known as advanced oxidation processes (AOP) or advanced oxidation technologies (AOT), have been widely studied for the degradation of diverse types of industrial wastewaters. These processes are particularly interesting for the treatment of effluents containing highly toxic organic compounds, for which biological processes may not be applicable unless bacteria that are adapted to live in toxic media are available. The production of powerful oxidizing agents, such as the hydroxyl radical, is the main objective of most AOP. The hydroxyl radical reacts rapidly and relatively non-selectively with organic compounds by hydrogen abstraction, by addition to unsaturated bonds and aromatic rings, or by electron transfer. In the case of persistent organic pollutants (wastes), complete decontamination may require the sequential application of several different decontamination technologies such as a pretreatment with a photochemical AOP followed by a biological or electrochemical treatment.

This chapter discusses the influence of different AOP on the degradation and mineralization of several different classes of organic pollutants such as pesticides, pharmaceutical formulations and dyes. The use of the Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions as tools for the treatment of pesticides and antineoplastic agents is presented, as well as examples of the optimization of the important parameters involved in the process such as the source of iron ions (free or complexed), the irradiation source (including the possibility of using sunlight), and the concentrations of iron ions and hydrogen peroxide. The chapter also reports the use of TiO2 nanotubes obtained by electrochemical anodization, nanoparticles prepared by a molten salt technique, and Ag-doped TiO2 nanoparticles as heterogeneous photocatalysts, emphasizing their potential for use in environmental applications. These catalysts were characterized by a combination of techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, elemental analysis, and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy.


2. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOP)

AOP are specific chemical reactions characterized by the generation of chemical oxidizing agents capable of oxidizing or degrading the pollutant of interest. The efficiency of the AOP is generally maximized by the use of an appropriate catalyst and/or ultraviolet light [1-3].

In most AOP, the objective is to use systems that produce the hydroxyl radical (HO) or another species of similar reactivity such as sulfate radical anion (SO4•-). These radicals react with the majority of organic substances at rates often approaching the diffusion-controlled limit (unit reaction efficiency per encounter). Both of these species are thus highly reactive and only modestly selective in their capacity to degrade toxic organic compounds present in aqueous solution. The principal reaction pathways of HO with organic compounds include hydrogen abstraction from aliphatic carbon, addition to double bonds and aromatic rings, and electron transfer [4]. These reactions generate organic radicals as transient intermediates, which then undergo further reactions, eventually resulting in final products corresponding to the net oxidative degradation of the starting molecule [5].

The AOP are of two main types: homogeneous and heterogeneous processes, both of which can be conducted with or without the use of UV radiation. Thus, for example, the homogeneous process based on the reaction of Fe2+ with H2O2, known as the thermal-Fenton reaction process typically becomes more efficient for the mineralization of organic material present in the effluent when it is photocatalysed. This latter process (Fe2+/Fe3+, H2O2, UV-Vis) is commonly referred to as the photo-Fenton reaction. Among the heterogeneous AOP, processes using some form of the semiconductor TiO2 stand out because UV irradiation of TiO2 results in the generation of hydroxyl radicals, promoting the oxidation of organic species [1,6].

2.1. Advances in research on AOP

AOP and their applications have attracted the attention of both the scientific community and of corporations interested in their commercialization. This can be illustrated by means of searches, in August, 2012, of the Science Finder Scholar database (version 2012). This database covers the complete text of articles/papers indexed from over 15475 international journals and 126 databases with abstracts of documents in all areas, as well as several other important sources of academic information. The results of the searches were organized as histograms to show the evolution of the number of publications (articles or patents) related to the different kinds of AOP. Figure 1 shows the results of a search using the keywords "advanced oxidation processes”, which yielded approximately 840 publications and which nicely reflects the rapid growth in interest AOP, given the unique characteristics and the versatility of application of AOP.

Figure 1.

Number of publications per year indexed in the Science Finder Scholar database retrieved using the keywords "advanced oxidation processes".

2.2. Fenton reaction

The thermal Fenton reaction is chemically very efficient for the removal of organic pollutants. The overall reaction is a simple redox reaction in which Fe(II) is oxidized to Fe(III) and H2O2 is reduced to the hydroxide ion plus the hydroxyl radical.

Fe2++ H2O2  Fe3++HO+ OHE1

The ferric ion produced in Equation 1 can in principle be reduced back to ferrous ion by a second molecule of hydrogen peroxide:

Fe3++ H2O2  Fe2++HO2 +H+ E2

However, this thermal reduction (Equation 2) is much slower than the initial step (Equation 1) and the addition of relatively large, essentially stoichiometric amounts of Fe(II) may be required in order to degrade the pollutant of interest [7]. Another important limitation of the Fenton reaction is the formation of recalcitrant intermediates that can inhibit complete mineralization. Despite these potential limitations, the conventional Fenton reaction has been widely used for the treatment of effluents [6, 8-11].

Figure 2.

Number of publications per year indexed in the Science Finder Scholar database retrieved using the keyword "Fenton".

For the degradation of organic molecules, the optimum pH for the Fenton reaction is typically in the range of pH 3-4 and the optimum mass ratio of catalyst (as iron) to hydrogen peroxide is 1:5 respectively [12]. One way of accelerating the Fenton reaction is via the addition of catalysts, in general from certain classes of organic molecules such as benzoquinones or dihydroxybenzene (DHB) derivatives [13,14]. It is also possible to accelerate the Fenton reaction via irradiation with ultraviolet light, a process generally known as the photo-assisted Fenton or photo-Fenton reaction, which is discussed in the following section.

Regarding the Fenton reaction, a search of Science Finder Scholar (2012) with the keyword “Fenton” without any refinements retrieved 14821 publications from 1986 to 2012. As shown in Figure 2, there is a clear upward trend in the publications, with 902 publications related to this topic being reported in just the first half of 2012.

2.3. Photo-fenton reaction

One of the most efficient AOP is the photo-Fenton reaction (Fe2+/Fe3+, H2O2, UV light), which successfully oxidizes a wide range of organic and inorganic compounds. The irradiation of Fenton reaction systems with UV/Vis light (250-400 nm) strongly accelerates the rate of degradation. This behavior is due principally to the photochemical reduction of Fe(III) back to Fe(II), for which the overall process can be written as:

Fe3+ + H2O+ hv Fe2+ +HO+H+E3

Studies of the pH dependence of the photo-Fenton reaction have shown that the optimum pH range is ca. pH 3. Studies of the photochemistry of Fe(OH)2+, which is the predominant species in solution at this pH and that is formed by deprotonation of hexaaquairon(III), have shown that Fe(OH)2+ undergoes a relatively efficient photoreaction upon excitation with UV light to produce Fe(II) and the hydroxyl radical. Therefore, irradiation of Fenton reaction systems not only regenerates Fe(II), the crucial catalytic species in the Fenton reaction, but also produces an additional hydroxyl radical, the species responsible for provoking the degradation of organic material. As a consequence of these two effects, the photo-Fenton process is faster than the conventional thermal Fenton process.

The efficiency of the photo-Fenton process can be further enhanced by using certain organic acids to complex Fe(III). Thus, for example, oxalic acid forms species such as [Fe(C2O4)]+, which absorbs light as far out as 570 nm, i.e., well into the visible region of the spectrum. This species makes the photo-Fenton reaction more efficient because it absorbs a much broader range of wavelengths of light and because, upon irradiation, it efficiently decomposes (quantum yield of the order of unity) to Fe(II) and CO2:

2[Fe(C2 04)]+ + hv  2Fe2++ 2CO2 + C2O42   E4

The use of photo-Fenton reaction has considerable advantages in practical applications. It generally produces oxidation products of low toxic, requires only small quantities of iron salt (which can be either Fe3+ or Fe2+) and offers the possibility of using solar radiation as the source of light in the reaction process sunlight constitutes an inexpensive, environmentally friendly, renewable source of ultraviolet photons for use in photochemical processes.

The disadvantages of the photo-Fenton process include the low pH values required and the need for removal of the iron catalyst after the reaction has terminated. If necessary, however, the residual Fe(III) can usually be precipitated as iron hydroxide by increasing the pH. Any residual hydrogen peroxide that is not consumed in the process will spontaneously decompose into water and molecular oxygen, being thus a "clean” reagent itself. These features make homogeneous photo-Fenton based AOPs the leading candidate for cost-efficient, environmental friendly treatment of industrial effluents on a small to moderate scale [6, 15-17]. Currently much research activity is focused on attempts to develop new catalysts that function at neutral pH that do not require acidification of the effluent in order to react and that also do not require removal of the catalyst at the end of the reaction.

A search of Science Finder Scholar (2012) with the keyword “photo-Fenton” (Figure 3) showed a modest increase during the 1990s followed by a much more robust upward trend since ca. 2000.

Figure 3.

Number of publications per year indexed in the Science Finder Scholar database retrieved using the keyword "photo-Fenton".

2.4. Ozone

Ozone is a powerful oxidizing agent with a high reduction potential (2.07V) that can react with many organic substrates [18,19]. Using ozone, the oxidation of the organic matrix can occur via either direct or indirect routes [20,21]. In the direct oxidation route, ozone molecules can react directly with other organic or inorganic molecules via electrophilic addition. The electrophilic attack of ozone occurs on atoms with a negative charge (N, P, O, or nucleophilic carbons) or on carbon-carbon, carbon-nitrogen and nitrogen-nitrogen pi-bonds [22,23]. Indirectly, ozone can react via radical pathways (mainly involving HO•) initiated by the decomposition of ozone.

A process that employs ozone is only characterized as an AOP when the ozone decomposes to generate hydroxyl radicals (Equation 5), a reaction that is catalyzed by hydroxide ions (OH-) in alkaline medium or by transition metal cations [18,24,25].

2O3+ 2H2O  2HO+O2 +2HO2E5

The efficiency of ozone in degrading organic compounds is improved when combined with H2O2, UV radiation or ultrasound. The initial step in the UV photolysis of ozone is dissociation to molecular oxygen and an oxygen atom (Equation 6), which then reacts with water to produce H2O2 (Equation 7):

O3+ hv O2+ OE6
H2O+ O H2O2E7

In a second photochemical step (Equation 8), H2O2 photodissociates into the active species, two hydroxyl radicals:

H2O2+ hv 2HOE8

The O3/UV process has been employed commercially to treat ground water contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons, but cannot compete economically with the H2O2/UV process. A major problem with the use of ozone for water treatment is bromine formation in waters containing bromide ion. Strategies such as addition of H2O2 (O3/H2O2) can reduce bromine formation and assure the suitability of ozone for treating drinking and wastewater [26].

A search of the Science Finder Scholar database retrieved using only the keyword "ozone" retrieved, as expected, an enormous number of publications, nearly 130,000. Refinement with the additional keyword "degradation" reduced this to 3057 publications, which is a significant number when compared with other AOPs, especially in recent years (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Number of publications per year indexed in the Science Finder Scholar database retrieved using the keywords "ozone" and “degradation”.

2.5. Heterogeneous AOP

Another important class of AOP is based on the use of solid semiconductors as heterogeneous catalysts for the mineralization of organic compounds. In this type of photocatalysis, an electron in the valence band of the semiconductor (CdS, TiO2, ZnO, WO3, etc.) is promoted into the conduction band upon excitation. The electron in the conduction band typically reacts with O2, while the hole in the valence band can react with an adsorbed pollutant or oxidize water to produce a surface-bound HO radical [2].

According to Alfano and coworkers [27], the anatase form of titanium dioxide (TiO2) is the material most indicated for use in photocatalytic water treatment, considering aspects such as toxicity, resistance to photocorrosion, availability, catalytic efficiency and cost. Using TiO2 as the semiconductor, the photocatalysis is based on the activation of anatase by light [28]. The band gap or energy difference between the valence and conduction bands of anatase is 3.2 eV. Thus, UV light of wavelength shorter than 390 nm is capable of exciting an electron (e-) from the valence to the conduction band.

TiO2+ hv  e+ h+E9

An important feature of TiO2 photocatalysis is the very high oxidation potential of the holes left in the valence band (3.1 eV at pH 0), making it possible for photoexcited TiO2 to oxidize most organic molecules.

The electron (e-) and hole (h+) pair produced by absorption of UV light can migrate to the surface of the anatase particle, where they react with adsorbed oxygen, water, hydroxide ion or organic species via electron transfer reactions. Both water and hydroxide ion can act as electron donors to the holes (h+) of the catalyst [27,29], generating hydroxyl radicals, as shown by Equations 10 and 11.

h++ H2O  HO+ H+E10
h++ HO  HOE11

When dissolved molecular oxygen is present or is deliberately added to the medium, it can act as an acceptor of the electron in the conduction band, generating the superoxide radical (Equation 12) and triggering a series of reactions that can lead to the formation of hydroxyl radicals [30,31].

Alternatively, one can increase the oxidative efficiency of TiO2 photocatalysis by adding H2O2. The electrons in the conduction band then reduce the added H2O2 to HO and HO- [32], according to Equation 13.

O2+ e  O2E12
H2O2+ e  HO+ OHE13

The use of TiO2 also makes it possible to degrade organic molecules that are resistant to oxidation, since they can potentially be reduced by the electrons in the conduction band.

TiO2 photocatalysis has a number of important advantages in relation to other AOP and, in some aspects, even some biological treatments. In particular, unlike other AOP, the TiO2/UV system can be employed to treat pollutants in the gas phase, as well as in solution. In addition, TiO2 has a relatively low cost, is essentially insoluble in water and biologically and chemically inert. Moreover, it can be used to treat effluents containing a wide range of concentrations of pollutants, in particular very low concentrations. Solar radiation can be used to activate the catalyst; and the excellent mineralization efficiency is observed for organochlorine compounds, chlorophenols, nitrogen-containing pesticides, aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins, carboxylic acids, etc. The principle limitations of TiO2 photocatalysis in practical applications are the low quantum efficiency of the process and the limited depth of penetration of the incident radiation into suspensions of TiO2, due to the strong scattering of light by the opaque white catalyst particles. Incrustation of the reactor walls with catalyst can also reduce the amount of incident light. Batch reactors also require additional unit operations in order to physically separate the catalyst from the solution at the end of the irradiation for recycling. Although substantial progress has been made in developing larger-scale reactors for carrying out heterogeneous photochemical reactions, much work remains to be done before TiO2 photocatalysis becomes a generally applicable technique.

Figure 5 shows the evolution of publications related to heterogeneous photocatalysis by TiO2, reflecting the potential for application of this technology on an industrial scale.

Figure 5.

Number of publications per year indexed in the Science Finder Scholar database retrieved using the keywords "photocatalysis" and “TiO2 semiconductor”.


3. Applications

In this section, several applications of homogeneous and heterogeneous AOP are discussed, focusing on the degradation and mineralization of organic pollutants such as pesticides, pharmaceutical formulations and dyes.

3.1. Homogeneous AOP applied to degradation of the herbicide chlorimurom-ethyl and the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone

The use of the thermal Fenton and the photo-Fenton reactions for the treatment of the pesticide chlorimurom-ethyl (CE) and the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone (MTX) is described here, along with the optimization of the parameters involved in these processes, including the sources of iron (free or complexed) and irradiation (lamp or possibility of using sunlight) and the concentrations of iron and hydrogen peroxide, etc. Ozone and ozone combined with UV and H2O2 were also used as alternative treatments of these pesticides.

3.1.1. Degradation of Chlorimurom-Ethyl (CE)

The thermal Fenton, photo-Fenton and ozonation processes were applied for the degradation of a commercial preparation of chlorimurom-ethyl (CE, Figure 6), a compound belonging to the class of sulfonylurea herbicides. This herbicide, widely used in the cultivation of soybeans, may persist in the environment and has residual phytotoxicity [33].

Figure 6.

Molecular structure of Chlorimurom-ethyl (CE).

Experiments were performed in a photochemical reactor (1.0 L) equipped with a high pressure mercury lamp (125 W) coupled to a reservoir (2.0 L) via a recirculation pump. The photo-Fenton degradation was influenced by the initial concentrations of H2O2 and Fe2+. Experiments were performed with different H2O2 concentrations, ranging from 17 to 103 mmol L-1, maintaining the Fe2+ concentration constant at 0.33 mmol L-1. Subsequently, the H2O2 concentration was fixed at 68.4 mmol L-1, the value that gave the best mineralization, and the Fe2+ concentrations were varied from 0.20 to 1.0 mmol L-1. The extent of mineralization of the organic material, expressed as the percentage of removal of the total organic carbon (TOC), ranged from 84% to 95%. Since the quantity of Fe2+ had only a small effect on CE removal, a concentration of Fe2+ of 0.20 mmol L-1 was used in subsequent experiments. In all cases, the extent of mineralization was higher than the percentage of degradation of CE (82-87%) determined by HPLC. This particularity reflects the fact that a commercial formulation of CE was employed in the experiments. Thus, a solution of this formulation in water that contained 30 mg L-1 of CE contained 65 mg L-1 of total organic carbon. Therefore, it can be concluded that the other organic compounds present in the composition react somewhat better with HO than CE.

The effect of UV radiation on this optimized reaction system was used to compare the efficiencies of the thermal Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions for the mineralization of CE (Figure 7) with each other and with those of several other homogeneous AOP. Under direct photolysis there was no significant mineralization. Less than 20% TOC removal was obtained at the end of the thermal Fenton treatment. However, a considerable increase in mineralization was observed when the Fenton system was irradiated with UV light. Monitoring CE removal rather than TOC showed that both the thermal Fenton reaction and the photo-Fenton reactions caused extensive degradation of the target compound. Therefore, in the photo-Fenton process, UV radiation makes a significant contribution to both mineralization and CE removal.

Normative Instruction nº 2, published on January 3, 2008, by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA) [34], regulates the practice in Brazil for treatment of pesticide residues in effluents generated by agricultural aviation companies. The Ministry recommends ozonation for a minimum of six hours using a system with a minimum capacity for producing one gram of ozone per hour for each charge of four hundred and fifty liters of pesticide residue derived from washing and cleaning of aircraft equipment [34]. To verify the efficiency of this system for the mineralization of CE-contaminated water, the samples were treated with ozone alone and with ozone in combination with UV light and H2O2. Although oxidation of CE was very fast with all the ozonation methods studied, the use of ozone alone proved to be of limited utility with regard to the mineralization of the organic content of CE-contaminated waters. The combination of O3/UV/H2O2 did, however, achieve a high extent of mineralization (80%), indicating that the mineralization of the organic content is mediated by the HO radical.

When compared to the other systems studied, the photo-Fenton system showed the best results, with mineralization exceeding 85%, making it the preferred technique for the treatment of wastewater containing this pesticide.

Figure 7.

Comparison of the efficiencies of mineralization of a commercial formulation of CE in aqueous solution by the different AOP. [CE]0 = 0.060 mmol L–1; [TOC]0 = 65 mg L-1; when present, [Fe2+]=0.2 mmol L-1, [H2O2] = 68.4 mmol L-1 and [O3]= 25 mg mL-1.

3.1.2. Degradation of Mitoxantrone (MTX)

Antineoplastic agents (drugs employed in cancer chemotherapy) are pollutants due their mutagenic, carcinogenic, and genotoxic potential, even at trace levels [35]. The AOP selected for degradation of the antineoplastic drug mitoxantrone (MTX), Figure 8 [36], were the photo-Fenton (with Fe2+, Fe3+, and potassium ferrioxalate - K3(FeOx) - as iron sources), solar photo-Fenton, Fenton and UV/H2O2 reactions. The MTX degradation experiments were carried out using an annular glass photochemical reactor (working volume, 1 L) and a quartz tube for introduction of the radiation source (a 125 W mercury vapor lamp).

Figure 8.

Molecular structure of Mitoxantrone.

Degradation of MTX by the photo-Fenton process was investigated with several different concentrations of Fe(II) (0.54, 0.27, and 0.13 mmol L–1) and H2O2 (4.0, 9.4, and 18.8 mmol L–1). The results showed a low removal of TOC, with a mineralization of only 14-35%. One explanation for this low efficiency is that MTX has nitrogen and oxygen atoms that might serve as complexation sites for iron(III), making it unavailable for participation in the Fenton reaction. The possibility of complexation between MTX and iron(III) was investigated by spectrophotometric measurements. Indeed, addition of Fe(NO3)3 to solutions of MTX caused significant spectral changes, including a shift and a decrease in the absorbance of the long-wavelength absorption band (608-658 nm) of the drug. Spectrophotometric titrations suggested that the complex has a 2:1 Fe3+:MTX stoichiometric ratio with a complexation constant (K) of 1.47 × 104 M–2, indicative of a high affinity of MTX for Fe3+.

In order to minimize the effects of the complexation of Fe(III) by MTX, the use of more stable, but photoactive iron complexes as the source of iron in the degradation process was examined. One such complex is potassium ferrioxalate K3(FeOx). This complex is often employed because of its high quantum efficiency of photodecomposition and strong absorption in the UV-visible region (up to 500 nm), compatible with the use of solar irradiation in a K3(FeOx) - mediated photo-Fenton process [37].

Figure 9 compares the efficiencies of several different AOP for the degradation of MTX. The photo-Fenton process employing K3(FeOx) and the UV/H2O2 process were the most efficient for mineralizing MTX, with 82% and 90% total organic carbon removal, respectively. Total degradation of MTX was observed in the thermal Fenton process, but only 65% degradation of MTX occurred under UV irradiation alone; However, TOC data show that there was no appreciable mineralization of MTX under direct photolysis and in the thermal Fenton reaction, even after long treatment periods, whereas the photo-Fenton reaction using solar irradiation led to a TOC removal of 59%.

Although the UV/H2O2 process is usually slower than the photo-Fenton process, due to the complexation of MTX with Fe(III) in the latter, the UV/H2O2 process proved to be more efficient in this case. To corroborate this, the amount of photogenerated Fe(II) was quantified during the irradiation of ferric ions [Fe(NO3)3] and ferrioxalate in the presence of MTX. In the presence of MTX, the photoreduction of Fe(III) generated only 75 μmol L-1 of Fe(II), while irradiation of ferrioxalate generated 285 μmol L-1 of Fe(II) under the same experimental conditions. This conclusively shows that MTX inhibits the photochemical step of the photo-Fenton reaction, making the overall process substantially less efficient.

Figure 9.

Comparison of the mineralization of aqueous MTX solutions (0.077 mmol L–1) by different AOP (0.54 mmol L–1 iron source and 18.8 mmol L–1 H2O2, when present).

Cytotoxicity evaluation of the solution during treatment by an AOP is a very important since the intermediates and by-products formed during the oxidation of the organic material can be more toxic than the initial target compound. Cytotoxicity tests were performed using NIH/3T3 mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. The concentration (IC50) for inhibition of growth by MTX was 3.29 µg mL–1, demonstrating its toxicity to NIH/3T3 cells. In contrast, 100% growth of NIH/3T3 cells was observed in similar tests on aliquots of solutions of MTX that had been degraded by the H2O2/UV and photo-Fenton (UV/H2O2/ K3(FeOx)) processes, indicating an absence of toxic effects. Thus, these two AOP, which degraded MTX completely and exhibited the best mineralizations of the drug, generated no toxic by-products, confirming the potential of both of these processes for the removal of MTX from aqueous solution.

3.2. Preparation of TiO2 semiconductors and their application in the heterogeneous photocatalysis of methyl viologen, methylene blue and xylidine

TiO2 is an important, widely studied photocatalytic material [38]. Several samples of TiO2 are commercially available, but Evonik (Degussa) P-25 (70% anatase and 30% rutile) is the most popular and, in most cases, gives the best results. However, different methods such as sol-gel process [39-41], electrochemical anodization [42], and molten-salt synthesis [43] can be used to prepare TiO2 in the form of powders, nanoparticles, thin film, nanotubes, etc. This section considers heterogeneous photocatalysis employing TiO2 in the forms of nanotubes obtained by electrochemical anodization, of nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel or molten salt techniques, and of Ag-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. These catalysts were characterized by a series of techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, elemental analysis, energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, etc. and were applied for the degradation of a herbicide and a dye.

TiO2 prepared by the sol-gel process (acid hydrolysis of titanium(IV) isopropoxide) was used for the photocatalytic degradation of the herbicide methyl viologen (MV2+, Figure 10), which is widely employed in over 130 countries on crops of rice, coffee, sugar cane, beans, and soybeans, among others [44], despite a high power of intoxication. The performance under irradiation of nanoparticles of TiO2 prepared by the sol-gel technique (TiO2 SG) was compared to TiO2 SG doped with Ag (0.5%-4.0%), and to undoped and doped TiO2 P25. The materials were characterized by thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffraction, surface area, infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy. X-Ray diffraction analysis showed that TiO2 synthesized by the sol-gel method is similar to TiO2 P25 with both anatase and rutile peaks, but with a lower crystallinity and an increase in the surface area compared to P25. The surface area of TiO2 SG, determined experimentally by BET, was 71.21 m2 g-1, 1.5 times larger than TiO2 P25 (46.18 m2 g-1). The doping with Ag influenced the values of the band gap energy (Egap), determined by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Higher percentages of Ag resulted in a decrease the Egap value, shifting the light absorption to the visible region. Additionally, energy dispersive spectroscopic analysis confirmed the presence of Ag in the doped materials. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis (Figure 11) indicated that silver changed the oxide morphology, depending on the amount. In materials with 0.5% (Figure 11 A) and 1.0% of Ag (Figure 11B), the agglomerates were larger, while in samples with 2.0% (Figure 11C) and 4.0% (Figure 11D) the particles were smaller and more well-defined. This indicates that the presence of larger quantities of silver in the sol-gel oxide modified the material surface, making it more uniform.

Figure 10.

Molecular structure of Methyl Viologen.

Figure 11.

Scanning electron micrographs of: (A) TiO2 SG 0.5% Ag; (B) TiO2 SG 1.0% Ag; (C) TiO2 SG 2.0% Ag; (D) TiO2 SG 4.0% Ag.

Laser flash photolysis is a technique for producing and investigating excited states and transient reaction intermediates and the kinetics of photochemical reactions. The photocatalytic reduction of MV by TiO2 or by Ag-doped TiO2 (2%) in the presence and absence of sodium formate was investigated via the formation of MV•+ at different initial concentrations of MV2+ (0.05, 0.07, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 mmol L-1), monitoring the transient absorption of MV•+ at 605 nm [45]. As reported by Tachikawa et al. [45], the transient absorption decays by first order kinetics. The bimolecular electron transfer rate constants in the absence and presence of sodium formate, listed in Table 1, were obtained from linear plots of the observed first-order rate constants versus the concentrations of MV2+. In the presence of sodium formate there is an increase in electron transfer constant for all photocatalysts analyzed; according Tachikawa et al [45], this occurs because the initial oxidation of organic additives, such as sodium formate, generates the CO2- radical, which has strong reducing power and can easily reduce other substrates. There is an increase in the electron transfer rate constants in the presence of sodium formate and in the presence of silver, demonstrating the improved efficiency of the oxidation/reduction in the presence of the metal.

Absence of NaHCO2 Presence of NaHCO2
TiO2 P25 5.4 x 109 M-1s-1 6.0 x 109 M-1s-1
TiO2 P25 2.0% Ag 6.5 x 109 M-1s-1 8.0 x 109 M-1s-1
TiO2 SG 3.2 x 109 M-1s-1 3.6 x 109 M-1s-1
TiO2 SG 2.0% Ag 4.5 x 109 M-1s-1 6.6 x 109 M-1s-1

Table 1.

Electron transfer rate constants for MV2+ in the presence of the different TiO2 photocatalysts.

To test the photocatalytic activity of the oxides, MV2+ photodegradation experiments were performed. The amount of herbicide solution treated was 500 mL and herbicide concentration was determined by spectrophotometric analysis at 250 nm. Titanium dioxide synthesized by the sol-gel method (Figure 12B) had a lower rate of degradation than TiO2 P25 (Figure 12A). This difference can be attributed to several factors, including the preparation method, crystal structure, surface area, size distribution and porosity. Although the sol-gel oxide had a higher surface area, it contained non-uniform particles of different sizes and therefore had a lower porosity than TiO2 P25. The oxides synthesized with 2.0% silver showed improved photocatalytic activity for degradation of MV. However, in the presence of oxide doped with 4.0% silver, there was an inhibition of the photocatalytic process, probably due to the excessive amount of silver, which occupied most of the active sites of the catalyst.

Figure 12.

Results of MV2+ (0.2 mmol L-1) degradation by heterogeneous photocatalysis (0.5 g of photocatalyst) with (A) TiO2 P25 and (B) TiO2 SG.

An alternative method for preparing TiO2 is via molten-salt synthesis. This approach employs an eutectic mixture of salts, for example NaCl/KCl or NaNO3/KNO3 in the desired proportion, together with other reagents (oxalates or metals oxides). Molten-salt synthesis [43] was used to prepare TiO2 using TiOSO4.xH2O.xH2SO4 as the Ti precursor with a melt phase of either NaNO3 or KNO3. The synthesis reaction occurs according to Equation 14.

TiOSO4+ 2ANO3  TiO2[A]+ A2SO4+ 2NO2+12  O2E14

where the symbol [A] indicates the alkali metal cation used in the molten salt ([Na] or [K]).

The oxides synthesized in this manner were characterized by X-ray diffraction and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The X-ray diffraction diffractograms (Figure 13) show only the presence of the anatase phase for both oxides synthesized by the molten-salt method. The Egap values for TiO2[K] (3.13 eV) and TiO2[Na] (3.15 eV) were similar to that of P25 (3.13 eV), as expected.

Figure 13.

X-ray diffractograms of TiO2 synthesized by the molten salt method: (A) in NaNO3 and (B) in KNO3.

The morphologies of the oxides, observed by SEM (Figure 14), exhibited different forms of agglomeration, presumably due to an influence of the alkaline metal nitrate molten salt used in the synthesis.

Figure 14.

Scanning electron micrographs of (A) TiO2[K]; (B) TiO2[Na].

In order to evaluate the photocatalytic activities of the synthesized oxides, they were used for the photodegradation of the dye methylene blue (MB, Figure 15). Although MB is not considered to be a very toxic dye, it can cause harmful effects on living beings. After inhalation, symptoms such as difficulty in breathing, vomiting, diarrhea and nausea may occur in humans [46]. The degradation of MB was carried out in aqueous solution in a 400 mL reactor with an 80 W mercury vapor lamp as the irradiation source. The concentration of MB was determined from its absorption at 654 nm.

Figure 15.

Molecular structure of Methylene Blue.

Figure 16 compares the degradation of MB using the two catalysts synthesized by the molten-salt method. TiO2[K] produced a net degradation efficiency of 99%. In constrast, TiO2[Na] degraded only 61% of MB. The lower rate of degradation of MB by TiO2[Na] and the lower overall efficiency may be related to the differences in aggregation observed in the SEM images of the two oxides (Figure 14). On the basis of these results, TiO2[K] obtained by the molten salt method would appear to be a promising alternative material for the catalytic photodegradation of organic dyes like MB.

Figure 16.

Degradation of MB (0.40 mmol L-1) by heterogeneous photocatalysis using TiO2 (0.5g L-1) synthesized by the molten salt method.

TiO2 nanotubes has been subject of several recent studies due to their unique electronic transport properties and their mechanical strength, large surface area and well-defined geometry, which improve their performance in many applications compared to other forms of titanium dioxide. Several studies have reported that highly ordered and uniform TiO2 nanotubes can be easily obtained using anodization in titanium fluoride [42,47]. The formation of TiO2 nanotubes by electrochemical anodization is based on a competition between the anodic oxide formation and its dissolution as a soluble complex fluoride.

Ti/TiO2 electrodes (4 x 2.8 cm) were prepared by anodization of Ti foil using an applied voltage of 20 V in 0.15 mol L-1 NH4F in glycerol (10% H2O). Self-assembly of nanotubular TiO2 arrays can be seen on films of Ti obtained under these anodization conditions (Figure 17). The average internal diameter of the nanotubes was 66 nm.

Figure 17.

Scanning electron micrographs of TiO2 nanotubes prepared on a Ti film in 0.15 mol L-1 NH4F in glycerol (10% H2O) at a potential of 20 V. (A) TiO2 nanotubes, (B) diameters of the nanotubes.

The photoeletrocatalytic activity of the Ti/TiO2 electrodes was evaluated by linear voltammetric scans in the potential range of -0.4 to 0.7 V under UV irradiation. The photoanodic current flow arises from the photooxidation of adsorbed water molecules or hydroxyl groups on the titania surface (Figure 18).

Figure 18.

Linear-sweep photovoltammograms for TiO2 nanotubes on a Ti film in 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 (curve A) under UV illumination and in the dark (curve B). Scan rate: 5 mV s-1.

Initial studies of photoelectrocatalytic oxidation employing these electrodes was carried out using 2,4 xylidine (Figure 19) as the model pollutant. In 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 supporting electrolyte applying a potential of 0.6 V, a TOC removal of 62% was obtained.

Figure 19.

Molecular structure of 2,4-Xylidine.


4. Conclusion

Although there has been a considerable increase in research activity related to advanced oxidation processes (AOP) since 2000, a number of significant challenges must still be overcome to make AOP generally applicable for the treatment of polluted waters and effluents. AOP involving both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis have shown good results for degradation of pollutants leading to efficient mineralization. The use of TiO2 nanoparticles and nanotubes as the photocatalyst have been shown to be viable alternatives for the photodegradation of methylene blue (MB) and for the photoelectrocatalytic oxidation of xylidine. These studies underline the importance of synthesizing new molecules and testing the catalytic efficiencies of novel materials. In addition, new experimental conditions and new AOP technologies need to be developed for the efficient, cost-effective oxidative mineralization of organic materials in polluted waters.


Abbreviations list

AOP Advanced Oxidation Processes
AOT Advanced Oxidation Technologies
HO Hydroxyl Radical
SO4 •- Sulfate Radical Anion
DHB Dihydroxybenzene
CE Chlorimurom-Ethyl
MTX Mitoxantrone
K3(FeOx) Potassium Ferrioxalate
SEM Scanning Electron Microscopic
MV2+ Methyl Viologen
MB Methylene Blue



The authors acknowledge the Brazilian funding agencies CAPES, CNPq and FUNDECT for financial and fellowship support. F.H.Q. is associated with NAP-PhotoTech, the USP Research Consortium for Photochemical Technology, and INCT-Catalysis. A.M.Jr. is associated with NAP-PhotoTech and INCT-EMA.


  1. 1. LegriniOOliverosEBraunA. MPhotochemical Processes for Water Treatment. Chemical Reviews 1993932671698
  2. 2. Sonntag C vonAdvanced Oxidation Processes: Mechanistic Aspects. Water Science & Technology 200858510151021
  3. 3. MatilainenASillanpääMRemoval of Natural Organic Matter from Drinking Water by Advanced Oxidation Processes. Chemosphere 2010804351365
  4. 4. BauerRFallmannHThe Photo-Fenton Oxidation- a Cheap and Efficient Wastewater Treatment Method. Research on Chemical Intermediates 1997234341354
  5. 5. Machulek Jr AQuina F.H., Gozzi F., Silva V.O., Friedrich L.C., Moraes J.E.F. Fundamental Mechanistic Studies of the Photo-Fenton Reaction for the Degradation of Organic Pollutants. In: Puzyn T., Mostrag-Szlichtyng A. (ed) Organic Pollutants Ten Years After the Stockholm Convention- Environmental and Analytical Update. Rijeka: InTech; 2012271292
  6. 6. PignatelloJ. JOliverosEMackayEAdvanced Oxidation Processes for Organic Contaminant Destruction Based on the Fenton Reaction and Related Chemistry [published erratum appears in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2007;37 273-275] Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2006361186
  7. 7. BossmannS. HOliverosEGobSSiegwartSDahlenE. PPayawan Jr L, Straub M, Worner M, Braun AM. New Evidence against Hydroxyl Radicals as Reactive Intermediates in the Thermal and Photochemically Enhanced Fenton Reactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 19981022855425550
  8. 8. BenitezF. JBeltran-herediaJAceroJ. LRubioF. JChemical Decomposition of 246Triclorophenol by Ozone, Fenton’s Reagent, and UV Radiation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1999
  9. 9. FriedrichL. CMendesM. ASilvaV. OZantaCMachulek Jr A, Quina FH. Mechanistic Implications of Zinc(II) Ions on the Degradation of Phenol by the Fenton Reaction. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 201223713721377
  10. 10. Pontes RFFMoraes JE, Machulek Jr A, Pinto JM. A Mechanistic Kinetic Model for Phenol Degradation by the Fenton Process. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010
  11. 11. Zanta CLPSFriedrich LC, Machulek Jr A, Higa KM, Quina FH. Surfactant Degradation by a Catechol-Driven Fenton Reaction. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010
  12. 12. BigdaR. JConsider Fenton’s Chemistry for Wastewater Treatment. Chemical Engineering Progress 199591126266
  13. 13. HamiltonG. AFriedmanJ. PCampbellP. MThe Hydroxylation of Anisole by Hydrogen Peroxide in the Presence of Catalytic Amounts of Ferric Ion and Catechol. Scope, Requirements and Kinetic Studies. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1966882252665268
  14. 14. HamiltonG. AHanifin Jr JW, Friedman JP. The Hydroxylation of Anisole by Hydrogen Peroxide in the Presence of Catalytic Amounts of Ferric Ion and Catechol. Product studies, Mechanism, and Relation to Some Enzymic Reactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1966882252695272
  15. 15. LunaA. JMachulek Jr A, Chiavone-Filho O, Moraes JEF, Nascimento CAO. Photo-Fenton Oxidation of Phenol and Organochlorides (24DCP and 2,4-D) in Aqueous Alkaline Medium with High Chloride Concentration. Journal of Environmental Management 2012C) 10-17.
  16. 16. Machulek Jr AMoraes JEF, Okano LT, Silvério CA, Quina FH. Photolysis of Ferric Ion in the Presence of Sulfate or Chloride Ions: Implications for the Photo-Fenton Process. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 200987985991
  17. 17. Machulek Jr AMoraes JE, Vautier-Giongo C, Silverio CA, Friedrich LC, Nascimento CAO, Gonzales MC, Quina FH. Abatement of the Inhibitory Effect of Chloride Anions in the Photo-Fenton Process. Environmental Science & Technology 2007
  18. 18. AugugliaroVLitterMPalmisanoLSoriaJThe Combination of Heterogeneous Photocatalysis with Chemical and Physical Operations: A Tool for Improving the Photoprocess Performance. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews 200674127144
  19. 19. Machulek Jr AGogritcchiani E, Moraes JE, Quina FH, Oliveros E, Braun AM. Kinetic and Mechanistic Investigation of the Ozonolysis of 2,4-Xylidine (2,4-dimethyl-aniline) in Acid Aqueous Solution. Separation and Purification Technology 2009672141148
  20. 20. ZhaoLMaJSunZLiuZYangYExperimental Study on Oxidative Decomposition of Nitrobenzene in Aqueous Solution by Honeycomb Ceramic-Catalyzed Ozonation. Frontiers Environmental Science & Engineering in China 2008214450
  21. 21. KunsAPeralta-zamoraPMoraesS. GDuranNNovas Tendências no Tratamento de Efluentes Têxteis. Química Nova 20022517882
  22. 22. LinS. HYehK. LLooking to Treat Wastewater? Try Ozone. Chemical Engineering 19931005112116
  23. 23. EsplugasSCurso técnico, 810de novembro, 1995LRR-Universidad de Concepcion-Chile, Concepción, Chile.
  24. 24. Pera-titusMGarcia-molinaVBañosM. AGimenezJEsplugasSDegradation of Chlorophenols by Means of Advanced Oxidation Processes: a General Review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2004474219256
  25. 25. StraehelinSHoignéJDecomposition of Ozone in Water in the Presence of Organic Solutes Acting as Promoters and Inhibitors of Radical Chain Reactions. Environmental Science & Technology 1985191212091212
  26. 26. WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality [electronic resource]: incorporating 1st and 2nd addendaRecommendations. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization; 2008
  27. 27. AlfanoO. MCabreraM ICassanoA. EPhotocatalytic Reactions Involving Hydroxyl Radical Attack. Journal of Catalysis 19971722370379
  28. 28. HerrmannJMGuillardCPichatP. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: an Emerging Technology for Water Treatment. Catalysis Today 1993
  29. 29. MineroCPelizzettiEMalatoSBlancoJLarge Solar Plant Photocatalytic Water Decontamination: Effect of Operational Parameters. Solar Energy 1996565421428
  30. 30. QuinaF. HNascimentoC. A. OTeixeiraA. C. S. CGuardaniRLopez-gejoJDegradacion Fotoquimica de Compuestos Organicos de Origen Industrial. In: Nudelman. N. (ed) Quimica Sustentable. Santa Fe, Argentina: Universidad Nacional del Litoral; 2004205220
  31. 31. Valente JPSAraujo AB, Bozano DF, Padilha PM, Florentino AO. Síntese e Caracterização Textural do Catalisador CeO2/TiO2 Obtido via Sol-Gel: Fotocatálise do Composto Modelo Hidrogenoftalato de Potássio. Eclética Química 2005304712
  32. 32. BockelmannDWeichgrebeDGoslichRBahnemannDConcentrating versus Non-Concentrating Reactors for Solar Water Detoxication. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 1995
  33. 33. CorminboeufCCarnalFWeberJChovelonJ-MChermetteHPhotodegradation of Sulfonylurea Molecules: Analytical and Theoretical DFT Studies. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2003107471003210038
  34. 34. BrazilMinistério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento-MAPA. Instrução Normativa nº 2 de 3 de Janeiro de 2008”. Diário Oficial da União de 8 de Janeiro de 2008.;nº 5. Seção 1 592008
  35. 35. TurciRSottaniCSchierlRMinoiaCValidation Protocol and Analytical Quality in Biological Monitoring of Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs. Toxicology Letters 2006
  36. 36. CavalcanteR. PSandimL. RBogoDBarbosa AMJ, Osugi ME, Blanco M, Oliveira SC, Matos MFC, Machulek Jr A, Ferreira VS. Application of Fenton, Photo-Fenton, Solar Photo-Fenton, and UV/H2O2 to Degradation of the Antineoplastic Agent Mitoxantrone and Toxicological Evaluation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, in press (DOIs11356-012-1110-y).
  37. 37. Safarzadeh-amiriABoltonJ. RCaterS. RFerrioxalate-Mediated Photodegradaation of Organic Pollutants in Contaminated Water. Water Research 1997314787798
  38. 38. ChenXMaoS. STitanium Dioxide Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, Modifications, and Applications. Chemical Reviews 2007107728912959
  39. 39. OsugiM. EUmbuzeiroG. AAndersonM. AZanoni MVB. Degradation of Metallophtalocyanine Dye by Combined Processes of Electrochemistry and Photoelectrochemistry. Electrochimica Acta 2005
  40. 40. OsugiM. EUmbuzeiroG. ACastro FJV, Zanoni MVB. Photoelectrocatalytic Oxidation of Remazol Turquoise Blue and Toxicological Assessment of its Oxidation Products. Journal of Hazardous Materials 20061372871877
  41. 41. OsugiM. ERajeshwarKFerraz ERA, Oliveira DP, Araújo ÂR, Zanoni MVB. Comparison of Oxidation Efficiency of Disperse Dyes by Chemical and Photoelectrocatalytic Chlorination and Removal of Mutagenic Activity. Electrochimica Acta 200920095472086
  42. 42. OsugiM. EZanoni MVB, Chenthamarakshan CR, Tacconi NR, Woldemariam GA, Mandal SS, Rajeshwar K. Toxicity Assessment and Degradation of Disperse Azo Dyes by Photoelectrocatalytic Oxidation on Ti/TiO2 Nanotubular Array Electrodes. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies 2008113425434
  43. 43. DoctersTChovelonJ. MHermannJ. MDeloumeJ. PSyntheses of TiO2 Photocatalysts by the Molten Salts Method: Application to the Photocatalytic Degradation of Prosulfuron (R). Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2004504219226
  44. 44. EislerREisler’s Encyclopedia of Environmentally Hazardous Priority Chemicals. Elsevier; 2007
  45. 45. TachikawaTTojoSFujitsukaMMajimaTDirect Observation of the One-Electron Reduction of Metil Viologen Mediated by the CO2 Radical Anion during TiO2 Photocatalytic Reactions. Langmuir 2004202294419444
  46. 46. MohabansiN. PPatilV. BYenkieNA Comparative Study on Photodegradation of Methylene Blue Dye Effluent by Advanced Oxidation Process by Using TiO2/ZnO Photocatalyst. Rasāyan Journal of Chemistry 201144814819
  47. 47. Grimes CA, Mor GK. TiO2 Nanotube Arrays: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Springer; 2009.

Written By

Amilcar Machulek Jr., Silvio C. Oliveira, Marly E. Osugi, Valdir S. Ferreira, Frank H. Quina, Renato F. Dantas, Samuel L. Oliveira, Gleison A. Casagrande, Fauze J. Anaissi, Volnir O. Silva, Rodrigo P. Cavalcante, Fabio Gozzi, Dayana D. Ramos, Ana P.P. da Rosa, Ana P.F. Santos, Douclasse C. de Castro and Jéssica A. Nogueira

Submitted: 01 September 2012 Published: 30 January 2013